of the Old and New Testament The Church of England receiveth the Canon of Scripture according to the antient Church exactly as the Church of England doth Secondly that he saith that is secundum majorum traditionem ex patrum monumentis That it is according to the tradition of the Church and out of the writings of the Fathers Whereby we see the Church of England follows antiquity in reception of the books of holy Scripture more truly than the Church of Rome doth But this obiter and the way Again Bullinger citeth the judgment of Bibliander Bibliander de opt genere interpretandi Hebraica whose words are Ecclesiasticos libros etiam Hagiographa nominant sancta scripta Quae etsi non habent idoneam authoritatem roborandi ea quae in contentionem veniunt ut Canonici Scriptores non tamen rejiciuntur ut Apocrypha qualis fuit prophetia Eldad Medad c. Ecclesiastici autem lâ—bri etiam in Scholam auditoria fidelis populi admâ—ssi sunt tam venerandi multis ut Judith etiam in ordinem canonicae Scripturae à quibusdam reponatur Which having the same sense I forbear to English Onely he saith that the Book of Judith was by some accounted Scripture I suppose he meaneth Origen which I think may as little claim that priviledge as any other Lastly Bullinger goes over every book of them and shews the benefit that the Church may reap by the reading of them And saith We may better learn the form of Houshold-government out of Tobit and Judith and the Ethicks or rules of good living out of Ecclesiasticus and the book of Wisdom than out of Plato Aristotle and Xenophon And the way of a religious Soldier out the Maccabees And of the first book of them he saith Ac tanti omnino hic liber est ut boni illo non possent citra jacturam carere That it is verily of such worth that a good man cannot without loss be without it Which is consonant unto that of King James speaking of the same book Conf. Hamp Court pag. 61. viz. Who shewed the use of the Maccabees to be very good to make up the story of the persecution of the Jews c. And of the History of Bel and the Dragon Bullinger saith Viderint autem qui eam historiam pro fabula damnant quibus nitantur Authoribus Ego video Historiam refertissimam esse multiplici fructu eruditione Let them look to it saith he what Authors they rest upon who condemn it for a fable I observe it to be a History full fraught with fruitful instructions And he names what In a word his whole discourse on these books is worth reading And it is to be noted that this was with the allowance of the rest of the Ministers of Tigur where this book was printed Necessit Reform pag. 20. Basilic Doron But the authority of King James is by some Brethren objected against the Apocrypha viz. As for the Apocrypha books I omit them because I am no Papist and indeed some of them are not like the ditement of the Spirit of God Answ Thus say they the King But it seems time and reading had further ripened the Kings judgment in that point For afterward when he upon great occasion solemnly delivered his judgment Confer Hamp Court second day confer p. 61. è Cathedrâ in reference to the satisfaction of his whole Kingdom this was the result His Majesty in the end said He would take an even order between both Affirming that he would not wish all Canonical books to be read in the Church unless there were one to interpret nor any Apocrypha at all wherein there was * He explains himself presently in allowing the book of Maccabees wherein he acknowledgeth some errors any error But for the other which were clear and correspondent to the Scripture he would have them read for else said he why were they printed and therein shewed the use of the book of Maccabees very good to make up the story of the Persecutions of the Jews but not to teach a man to sacrifice for the dead or to kill himself Thus far the King whâ—ch if the Brethren knew they did not well to cover and if they knew it not and were not vers'd in the most authentical books and writings of this nature as that Conference is a special one they were not fit to deal in such an Argument So also in the same place of the same Conference pag. 61 62. the King opened and defended a passage in Ecclesiasticus one of the Apocryphal books objected against as unsound and closes all with this salt quippe to the opposers What trow ye makes these men so angry with Ecclesiasticus by my saul I think he was a Bishop c. You see with what judgment the Brethren have quoted the King against the Apocrypha and yet as a crowing argument they insist upon it Again Object 2 Hierom. Ep. ad Laetam Tom. 1. St. Hieron is also produced as a witness against these books viz. That he should advise a Lady say they caveat omnia Apocrypha that she should take heed of all the Apocrypha Answ There are several causes of mistaking and mis-representing of an Author as 1 That men rest on Quotations Causes of misunderstanding and mis-representing of an Author and read them not themselves 2 That they understand not the language and Idiom of the writer 3 That they weigh not his scope and drift 4 That they ponder not the context 5 That they compare not one place with another 6 That they consider not the circumstances time place c. 7 That they consult not others that may illustrate him Then for misrepresenting him 1 That they make no bones of it 2 That they conceit they shall not be seen by every eye 3 And that when they be they have a brow to bear it so what they say may serve the turn at present It so fares here For if the Brethren read the place they quote in Jerom it is sure they understood not what he meant by Apocrypha Erasmus therefore on the place shall teach them Inscribuntur Petro Paulo nonnulla ipsi Christo Erasm in Hierom â—p ad Laetam num 79. veluti epistola Jesu ad Abygarum regem They are saith he ascribed to Peter to Paul and some to Christ himself as the Epistle of Jesus unto Agborus Where you see that Jerome did not mean by the Apocrypha onely the Books joyned with the Old Testament but those also yea those especially that were affixed to the New Again They did not weigh Jerom's scope for it was onely to instruct a young Girl in reading in that place not to shew what the Church might do or did Fourthly They did not compare this passage with others where he expresseth himself ex professo As where he speaks of the Books which bear Solomons name but are not his used to be read
men The Br. object Tyranny to Q. Eliz. and the Parl. which is not to be imagined To this first in general If this Reason be admitted it doth not only overthrow all constitutions that concern Religion whether made by Church or State whensoever any turbulent spirit shall fancy them not to be according to the Word And to all States and Churches But it condemns also all the Reformed Churches yea all the Churches and Christian States that are or ever have been I think in the world And particularly majorem in modum and in a special manner the Church of Geneva Ch. of Geneva requires conformity by Oath Revel 13.11 and Calvins Discipline where they are obliged thereunto by oath But to the dilemma in particular neither of the two Horns of this Lamb that speaks like a Dragon have any strength Have they forgotten or never learned that boyes are taught in the very rudiments of Logick and reasoning Kek. Log l. 3. c. 12. can 7. Quod per bonam consequentiam ex testimonio aliquo divino elicitur id EANDEM cum eo vim habet That what by good consequence is drawn from Scripture hath the same force that Scripture hath Did not our Saviour and all the Apostles prove their Doctrine so unto those that received nothing from them but what they proved Do not the Brethren think their Sermons and this their Book ought to be obeyed absolutely and in all the points they have excepted And indeed a good consequence is nothing but a natural effect Consequences And an effect is of the same nature with its cause yea as one saith nothing else but the cause in act or at least the cause is in the effect R. Hook l. 5. so is Scripture in the true consequénces of it And yet subscription to such conclusions do not argue the Authors to be infallible but only to be eyes unto the weaker-sighted to see the light by Tert. Advers Haeret. Omnia quidem dicta Domini omnibus posita sunt quae per aures judaeorum ad nos pervenerunt Gods Word is propounded unto all but it comes to us by the ears and so by the eyes of others And because men are called to subscribe and not children who should have their eyes their subscription only acknowledgeth that the Church and State have taken a true sample from the original leaving this still as the standard as prior tempore ordine naturâ dignitate Such are all the true determinations of Judges in reference to the Law as Deut. 17. They shall expound the Law to thee And the disobedient there was punished with death for contempt of the sentence of the Church and State and yet their determinations were not of equal authority but of equal force with the Law it self So here Secondly To the other horn of this Lamb or dilemma That else the statute did intend to tyrannize over the conscience which they say is not to be imagined Oportuit esse memorem Answ Did not the Brethren in the very lines immediately going before acknowledge yea urge it as an argument out of Sir Edw. Coke who saith He heard Wray Chief Justice of the K. Bench Pasch 23 Eliz. quoting Dier 23 Eliz. 377. lib. 6. fol. 69. Greens case Smiths case report that where one Smith subscribed to the 39 Articles of Religion with this addition so far forth as the same were agreeable to the Word of God that it was resolved by him and all the Judges of England that this subscription was not according to the Statute of Eliz 13. Because the Statute required an absolute subscription and this subscription made it conditional And that this Act was made for avoiding diversity of opinions c. And by this additâ—on the party might by his own private opinion take some of them to be against the Word of God and by this means diversity of opinions should not be avoided which was the scope of the Statute and the very Act it self made touching subscription hereby by of none effect Thus far their own quotation So then it is evident by the words themselves quoted just before and by the sentence of all the Judges of England that the Statute requireth absolute subscription which if it do they say it did intend to tyrannize over the consciences of men So then Q. Eliz. and that Parl. with all the Kings and Parliaments since that have confirmed that Act were Tyrants It concerns the present Parl. to vindicate their predecessors in this point also To what they add concerning mens subscribing when they are young Subscription of young men and before their judgments be mature It is answered first Those admitted to the Ministry though they may be as Timothy was but young in age yet they are not to be Novices in knowledge And Subscription is a good bond upon them Use of subscription both for the peoples good and their own to preserve them from novelties and apostacy But so that no man is engaged against the Word of God I hope then they will not urge the obligation of the Covenant upon those who have not had time or solidity throughly to ponder and weigh all the Articles thereof in the ballance of the Sanctuary and in the scale of the Law as they phrase it To the last of this head The liberty given to tender consciences Liberty to tender consciences is to be in things of lesser not of fundamentall consequence and in the Articles of the Faith for then how should the Magistrate be custos utriusque tabulae How should the Prince perform his trust of the souls as well as the bodies estates and names of his people How should there be one God one Faith one Baptisme in a particular Church and we all with one mouth glorifie God This is also against the practice of all Churches we have no such custome 1 Cor. 11. nor the Churches of God Thus much in reply to their three general first object against the Articles 1. Their doubtfulnesse 2. Their erroniousness and 3. The exacting of subscription to them I come now to the fourth viz. Their defectiveness and imperfection Defectiveness of the Artic. Where the first Exception is that Art 6. it is said that In the name of the holy Scripture we understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority there was never any doubt in the Church The Brethren oppose that some Books and passages of the New Testament have been doubted of as the Epistle of James the second Epistle of Peter The Article they say is defective in not enumerating all the Books of the New Testament as it had done those of the Old and of the Apocrypha comprehending them only under this expression All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received These words of the Article being the former contains no matter of doctrine namely those of which there was never any doubt in the
to the judgment of these Brethren that the Q. and these Parl. then were in matter of the greatest moment the establishing of the Doctrine and Worship Articles and Liturgy of Almighty God and means of the salvation of men either so ignorant that they understood not what was requisite to the full establishment of their own Acts or so negligent that they minded it not as they should And seeing all the Kings and Parliaments since have swallowed their error As also all the Judges of the Land who do not only sit in Parliam to give advice but also have judged in their several Circuits the violations of those Books And because the present and future Parliaments may be subject to the like miscarriages may it be prevented in a better way then by the Parliam restoring to the Clergy the liberty of being elected Burgesses lost as I take it but in Henry the 8 th his time and so the Brethren may obtain places in the House of Commons and the Parliament enjoy the benefit of their guidance 2. To their instances particular in their printed sheet of alterations in the first printed book of Queen Elizabeth from that of Edward 6. viz. certain Saints days in the Kalender 1 Saints days but in black letters instead of others that were named in that of Edw. 6. Secondly certain Lessons of the Apocrypha appointed to be read instead of some out of the Canonical Scripture which were before appointed in the book of Edw. 6. For answer to both these first in general we have heard above to which I refer the reader Next in particular to that of the Saints days it doth not seem to hazzard the bringing in of new Holy-days both because as the brethren acknowledge they are set down in black letters those to be kept Holy-days in red but especially because the number of Holy-days is stinted they are set down by name in the Liturgy and a prohibition of any other to be kept so that as long as the book remains as now it is there can be no peril of that It may be the change of names was because the days now put in might be days of payment of mony or days of Law or perhaps unworthy persons names put out and better put in their room as Mr. Fox did in that Kalender of his Martyrology But this whatsoever it be makes no alteration in the Service or in the reading Yea but the alteration of the Chapters does 2. Apocryphal chapters To that therefore I say that this alteration was done either casu and by chance or consilio and of purpose And then either by privat hands or by publick authority by the Queen or Commissioners from her according to the clause in this Act authorising her for explanations In all which respects I refer unto the general answer afore-going But more particularly They might be altered upon some such suggestions as was made afterward by the Brethrens Ancestors modestly at the Conference of Hampton-Court of which afterwards To the Second 2. Book of Common-prayer aâ— it now stands established The book of Common-prayer as it now stands as established which the Brethren oppose as differing from that of Queen Elizabeth in alterations detractions and additions For answer first in general We must reflect on what hath been said above viz. That such alterations as have been made by Royal authority by commission under the great Seal being made but for explanations fake and containing nothing contrary to any thing in the book contained doth not derogate from the authority and establishment of the book but such alterations are confirmed such power being yielded to the Kings of this Nation by the Laws K. James Proclamation for uniformity of Com. prayer And for that purpose gave forth Our Commission undes Our Great Seal of England to the Arch-bishop of Canterbury and others according to the form which the LAWS of this Realm in like case prescribed to be used to make the said EXPLANATION c. saith the King upon occasion of the alterations made at the Instance of the Brethrens predecessors at the Conference at Hampton-Court But to come unto particulars first to the Alterations 1. Alterations in the Liturgy That of Holy-days hath beâ—n replyed unto as also that of Apocryphal Chapters To which I add R. Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 20. That it cannot be reasonably thought that we do thereby offer disgrace unto the word of God For in such choice we do not think but that fitness of speech may be more respected than worthiness of matter But this alteration whatsoever it were was made as by the authority of the King By whose means the Apocryphal chapters were altered so it seems by the occasion of Dr. Reynolds anotations For the King said That Dr. Reynolds should note those chapters in the Apocrypha books where those offensive places were and bring them But why do the Brethren appear now so zealous for the reading of the Scripture Conf. Hamp Court p. 63. Matth. 15. which they had almost laid aside in the publick worship for their own traditions i. e. for what they thought better to deliver unto the people 3. As for the alterations made for explanations sake K. James explanation of the present Liturgy by the King at the suit of the Non-conformists at that Conference now made violations of the Statute and essential alterations of the book they were not in any part of the substance of the book it self not in any prayer Not any alteration in the matter of the Liturgy or Exhortation and so in no one point either of Doctrine or Worship let the Reader note against the calumnies insinuated by these Brethren but onely in some two or three words in the old Translation of the Gospels And in a few Rubricks Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 19. which are directions for the service The words altered in the Gospels wherein the steps of the Latine-service-book have been somewhat too nearly followed they are these 1. ' And Jesus said to them Conf. Hamp Court p. 86. to be put twice into the Dominical Gospels instead of Jesus said to his Disciples Though at the Conference it was answered That for ought that could appear by the places Ibid. pag. 63. he might speak as well to his Disciples as to the Pharisees The alterations in the Rubricks are Ibid. pag. 86. 1. Before the general Absolution is put or Remission of sins which before was onely Absolution 2. In private Baptism the lawful Minister present before it was then they minister it 3. In the same Rubrick they procure not their children to be baptised before it was they baptize not children 4. In that before Confirmation Examination with Confirmation of children it was appointed but I do not find it was done So that as the alterations of the words of the old Translation were but two so these in the Rubricks are but three And none of
Apostle St. Paul implyeth that faith only which works by love to be effectual to obtain forgiveness of sins Jam. 2. And St. James proves as well concerning love as faith that if it have not Alms-giving it is uneffectual as those words If a brother or a sister be naked or destitute of daily food and one say Go be warmed be filled and give him not that which is needful for the body what doth it profit that is what proof of love is here 1 Tim. 6.19 And Paul exhorts rich men by good works to lay up for themselves a good foundation that they may lay hold on eternal life Explained There is a foundation of right whereby we have title to eternal life and that is faith if it be a living one Foundation of salvation double The right of it such also And there is a foundation of assurance and that is by good works Again There is an original right and that 's by faith in the general promise the Covenant of Grace And there is a collateral right and that is by good works whereunto particular promises are made Homil. of Amlsd p. 161. But as our Authour saith I know some men will not be contented with this answer and no marvel for such men can no answer content or suffice I have done with their Exception against the matter Alms-deeds and the efficacy of them I come now to their objection against the proof or the title of it rather Chap. 4.10 Ecclus. 3.30 That the Book of Tobith being cited for proof it is said that the Holy Ghost did teach in sundry places of Scripture and this Book named whence they infer 1. That the Book of Tobith is here taken for holy Scripture 2. That it was indited by the Holy Ghost But for answer When things seem double to the eye that are single it is an argument that either their opticks or their understanding is defective In all other mens eyes for a Book to be holy Scripture and to be indited by the holy Ghost is all one and vice versâ But if they spake that they did not think if their hearts were worse then their head we may here retort upon them their own reproach upon the Hom. excellent sense Secondly I answer with the Learned Whitaker De Sacr. Script Q. 1. cap. 11. Non est idem esse canonicam Scripturam computari in numerum sacrarum Scripturarum It is not the same thing to be Canonical Scripture Apocrypha how Script and to be counted in the number of holy Scripture Computantur enim in numero Scripturarum quae cum sacris Scripturis leguntur ad aedificationem plebis etsi non ad dogmatum confirmationem They are counted saith he in the number of the Books of Scripture which are read with Scripture for the edification of the Church although not for the confirmation of Articles of Faith The Articles therefore having excluded these Books from holy Scripture Artic. 6. as themselves note and every ones Bible having it in the Apocrypha that expression might be born in a popular Sermon though not in a determination in the Schools But Secondly The Homily saith the Holy Ghost saies it and that implies 't is very Scripture As if Apocrypha how from the holy Ghost as he called it Scripture in a large sense so he might not ascribe it to the Holy Ghost in a like sense also yet not as any truth especially in matters of Religion may be so ascribed but because it is so consonant unto those very expressions which the Holy Ghost hath in the undoubted Scripture touching the same matter as we saw above out of the Sermons of our Saviour and writings of the Apostles But Thirdly because I love plainness What if I grant that the Homily being penned very early and in the morning as it were of the Reformation and before the Articles had determined the number of Canonical Books at least in the Synod 1562. or were confirmed by Parl. And whilest it was still in the peoples minds being so formerly taught that those Books Were Scripture what if to avoid offence in a popular Sermon the Homily spake according to the then received opinion as the holy Evangelists and Apostles oftentimes follow the Greek Translation differing from the Hebrew because it was generally received and the errors not such as overthrew the faith Object so here But why was it not amended since Why is it suffered to Answ 1 stand still Forsooth for the same reasons perhaps in part that those of the Church of Rome our brethren of the Nation and others affected that way may see we do not reject wholly those Books out of the number of holy Scriptures in some sense and as inditements of the holy Ghost in such things as they have agreeable to Answ 2 Scripture And it may be these and such like expressions were left as are the Psalms and Epistles and Gospels after the old Translation not only for the cause now named but also to be as a picture of the face of the Church in its infancy here that the growth of it since in knowledge and distinct understanding of things might the better appear Though it must be avowed that if any man Galat. 1. yea or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Doctrine than what is already and then was established in the Articles Homilies and Liturgies let Answ 3 him be accursed Lastly It is very probable that the things not being of any dangerous consequences as they stood Ipsae quippe mutatio consuetudinis etiā quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat Aug. Januar. Ep. 118. c. 5. and the changing of them might be not only very difficult for some things must have been much altered and detruncated but also give occasion of calumny to the adversary and of scandal to the weak it was thought better to let them stand lest it should be said the Doctrine or Worship was altered and not the same as at the Reformation Art 37. The last place they except against is Art 37. where the Queen being named and we enjoyned to read the Articles as they are we may not they say turn the word Queen unto King which Exception because it foameth out their own shame Jud. v. 13. as the Apostle speaketh representing them to be men of a captious and quarrelsome spirit shall receive no other answer But be the Articles true or false 3. Tyranny in the Act requiring subscription to the Articles Pag. 5. they urge the repealing of the Act requiring absolute subscription unto them upon another ground viz. Because say they if we may not subscribe without an addition so far forth as the same Articles are agreeable to Gods Word it must needs be granted that the Composers of them are admitted to be infallible and their Articles of equal authority with the Canonical Scriptures or else that the Statute intended to tyrannize over the consciences of
and for some of our selves likewise if whilst we had such principles we had been silenc'd and asleep also To the last vâ—z That conscientious men are 3. Conscientientious men troubled for their unconformity unto these things molested and troubled I answer And well they may both for their own good and others whom by their example or perswasion they might mislead For if God may justly plague his people for neglecting his good and wholsome Law Act for the uniformity of Common-prayer in these cases provided as the Queen and Parliament imply he will It is as good service done to men by penalties to compel them to their duty in theâ—e particulars as to scourge a child to keep him from the fire St. Austin being once of the mind that Schismaticks and Hereticks should not be punished on better advice acquaintance with the Scripture and by experience Epist 48. and 50. was brought to be of another mind and wrote two large and elaborate Epistles to defend the lawfulness of the use of Laws to that purpose SECT III. Humane Inventions THe third general Exception is against the things we treat of that they are inventions humane and from man onely Answ several of them First The light of natural understanding wit and reason is from God he it is which thereby doth illuminate every man entring into the world Rich. Hook Eccles pol. lib. 3. sect 9. If there proceed from us any thing afterward corrupt and naught the mother therof is our own darkness neither doth it proceed from any such cause whereof God is the Author He is the Author of all that we think or do by vertue of that light which himself hath given And therefore the Laws which the very Heathens did gather to direct their actions by so far forth as they proceeded from the light of nature God himself doth acknowledge to have proceeded even from himself and that he was the writer of them in the table of their hearts In the second place How much more then is he the Author of those Laws which have been made by his Saints c. saith that praise worthy Author When the Disciples would have had our Saviour to put the man to silence who cast out devils in his name Mar. 9.38 and followed him not with them our Saviour rebuking of them gives us this useful Maxim in religious matters viz. That he that is not against us is on our part Things not opposing of the Scripture and intended for and tending to the furtherance of Religion they are not humane notions but the inventions of men directed by Scripture in the general touching such things viz. 1 Cor. 14. That all things be done to decency and edification and guided by the Spirit of God in such particulars Observance whereof rather then opposition thereto would represent a Christs Disciple The Feast of Dedication of the Temple was no injunction from the Lord 1 Maccab. 4.59 Joh. 10.22 But so useful an invention of man that our Lord himself observed it Remarkable also to this purpose is the profession of the Learned Zanchy touching things of this nature viz. Zanch. Observ in confess suam cap. 25. Aph. 10 11. ab initio Credo ea quae â piis patribus in nomine domini Congregatis communi omnium consensu citra ullam sacrarum literarum contradictionem definita recepta fuerunt ea etium quanquam haud ejusdem cum sacris literis authoritatis A SPIRITV SANCTO ESSE Those things saith he which have been concluded and received by the holy Fathers gathered together in the name of God Canons of the Church of what authority agreed on by common consent and without any contradiction to the Scripture although they are not of the same authority with the holy Scriptures yet I believe even those things to be from the HOLY GHOST Thus he Joh. 14. cap. 15. cap. 16. And it is not in vain that Christ hath promised his Spirit to his people to guide them into all truth SECT IV. Of the Apocrypha TO the fourth that many things in the premises are but Apocryphal and so not Scriptural nor obliging Now Touching the Apocrypha and its injunction to be read in some parts in the Church although all the Scripture be not read First which Books in case my self did think as some others do safer and better to be left publickly unread R. Hook Eccles pol. l. 5. sect 20. nevertheless as in other things of like nature even so in this my private judgment I should be loth to oppose against the force of their reverend authority who rather considering the divine excellency of some things in all and of all things in certain of those Apocrypha which we publickly read have thought it better to let them stand as a list or marginal border unto the Old Testament And though with divine yet as humane compositions to grant at the least unto certain of them publick audience in the Church of God And if in them there happen any speech that soundeth towards error should the mixture of a little dross constrain the Church to deprive her self of so much gold rather than learn how by art and judgment to make separation To this effect very fitly from the counsel that St. Jerom giveth unto Laeta of taking heed how she read the Apocrypha as also by the help of other learned mens judgment we may take direction And let me add that without such directions Confer Hamp Court pag. 61. King James said well he would not have all the Canonical Scripture read But because some there are who seem better to relish forreign judgments than those of their own Church Expositio de sacr libr. dignitate praefix ante Biblia Tigurin sive Leon Judae I shall recite first Bullingers opinion of those Books and the publick reading of them one of the Professors of the Church of Tigur his words are Ego verò arbitror salvo aliorum judicio istos libros Apocryphos rectissimè Hagiographa dici posse nimirum a sanctis viris de rebus Scriptos sacris quos quanquam non fint in Canone Hebraeo Ecclesia tamen quia sancta tradunt Canonicis non contradicunt recipit ac in sanctorum coetibus legit I do think saith he saving other mens judgments that these Apocryphal Books may very justly be called holy writings as being written by holy men touching holy things which though they are not in the Hebrew Canon yet because they treat of religious matters and do not contradict the holy Scriptures the Church doth receive them and reads them in the Assemblies of the Saints Then he produceth the judgment and relation of Cyprian Cyprian expos symb or Russinus for the work is ascribed to both in his Exposition of the Creed to the same purpose Where it is by the way to be noted out of the Text of Cyprian or Ruffinus first that he reckons the Books
in the Church as Ecclesiasticus and the Wisdom of Solomon he addeth Sicut ergo Judith Tobiae Machabeorum libros legit quidem Ecclesia sed eos inter Canonicas Scripturas non recipit sic haec duo volumina legat ad aedificationem plebis non ad authoritatem Ecclesiasticorum dogmatum confirmandam Hierom's testimony of the publick reading of the Apocrypha As therefore saith he the Church reads the books of Judith one of those the Brethren expresly except against and of Tobit and the Maccabees yet not counting them among the Canonical Scriptures so let it read these two Books Ecclesiasticus and the Wisdom of Solomon for the edification of the people though not for the establishing the Authority of the Doctrines of the Church Where there are three things to be noted First that these Books are Apocrypha Secondly That they were read in the Church Lastly That they may be so done Fifthly They suppress the whole sentence out of which they quote that particle whence it would have appear'd that he did not forbid her absolutely the reading of them but that she should do it warily and with judgment His words are Caveat omnia Apocrypha Et si quando ea non ad dogmatum veritatem sed ad signorum reverentiam legere voâ—uerit sciat non eorum esse quorum titulis praenotantur multaque his admixta vitiosa grandis esse prudentiae aurum in luto quaerere Let her take heed of all the Apocrypha but what he meant by them we heard above but if at any time she will read them not for the confirming of the faith of doctrine but for the reverence unto the things intended in those writings let her know that they are not the works of those whose name they bear and that many corrupt things are mixed with them and that it is for the riper wisdom to seek gold out of the clay Thus he Even as Paul adviseth the Thessalonians to prove all things 1 Thess 5. Matth. 23.3 chap. 16.6 and hold fast that which is good So our Saviour commands his Disciples to hear the Scribes and Pharisees but yet to take heed of their leaven So Jerom allows her to read them but with discretion without which 2 Pet. 3. even the Scripture proveth a snare to the weak Now notwithstanding all this I am of the judgment of St. Hierom of Ruffinus or Cyprian above quoted and of the Church of England touching the nature and use of the Apocrypha yet may I not perhaps oppose the evidence of those * Hieron in prolog's variis Whitak de S. Script Q. 1. Reynold de lib. Apocryph Junius in Apocryph Chamier de Canone Aliique learned men who have endeavoured to prove some of them fictions yet such as were intended and are useful for * Consicta sunt enim sed in hoc consicta ut sacrum aliquid significent Erasm in epist Hieron ad Laetam n. 78. edification In which regard my self not long since heard a great man of the Separation SAY but he could not SEAL it by any evidence though urged that the Common-prayer was Popish but Romances were useful though fictitious because they express vertue and vice to the heighth If so why then may not the Apocrypha pass for Religious Romances wherein the like is performed Of one of which St. Jerom. Hieron prefat in Judith Tom 3. Accipite Judith viduam castitatis exemplum triumphali laude perpetuis eam praeconiis declarate Hanc enim non solum foeminis sed viris imitabilem dedit qui castitatis ejus remunerator virtutem talem ei tribuit ut invictum omnibus hominibus vinceret insuperabilem superaret Receive ye Judith saith he the widow an example of chastity and with triumphant praise publish her with perpetual commendations for he who was the rewarder of her chastity hath propounded her to be imitated not onely by women but by men also Who gave her also such grace that she overcame him that was unconquerable and prevailed over him whom no man could vanquish So that you see if those writings be useful in the Church as that noble person said that express vertue and vice to the life and that in the opinion of St. Jerom no weakling some of these books do so even in that respect they should not be rejected wholly And if the fore-quoted Authors please not the next I presume will and they are the Abomination of the Brethrens soul the Bishops but yet in this point and that 's strange will speak ad salivam and to their palate Viz. in the Admonition prefixed unto the second Tome of Homilies done no doubt by the same Authors that the Homilies were Presat in Tom. 2. Homil. and published by the same authority In that admonition unto Ministers Ecclesiastical and it is a grave and godly one are these words And where it may so chance some one or other here 's room you see chapter of the Old Testament to fall in order to be read upon the Sundays or Holy-days which were BETTER to be changed with some other of the New Testament of MORE edification it shall be well done to spend your time to consider well of such chapters before-hand whereby your prudence and your diligence shall appear so that your people may have cause to glorifie God for you and be the readier to embrace your labours to your better commendation to the discharge of your consciences and their own To explain that they meant all that was to be read except the New Testament by the word Old Testament were needless Now you see that the Liturgy the Kalender the Rubrick doth not so tie the Minister to syllables in every thing but hath left something to his discretion and piety and particularly in this the reading of the Old Testament and if you distinguish ne dum of the Apocrypha So much for the fourth head of the Exceptions namely that respecting the Apocrypha SECT V. Of Popery and the Mass-book To the fifth viz. That the things mentioned do savour of Rome that they are Popish superstitious and taken out of the Mass-book Answ If we should here reply That both the matter and form the substance and ceremonies of the Doctrine Worship and Government of the Church of England is much more antient than Popery in the main of it Yet there are those that have a starting-hole for this and a note beyond Ela Reas necess Reform p. 63. Instance viz. That albeit some of the Rites and Ceremonies now in use may be mentioned in sundry of the Fathers within the first six hundred years after Christ yet such mentioning of them is no evidence that they are not Popish forasmuch as Popery was in the egg and the mystery of iniquity began to work though under other disguises and under other names even in the time of St. Paul himself 2 Thess 2.7 Answ 1 Tim. 4.1 But if Popery be
them in the very Text of the Liturgy it self 2. Detractions from the Liturgy The second variation of the present book from that of Queen Elizabeth are detractions or takings away But God wot they are scarce a number but two and the present Book innocent of them being both made in that of Queen Elizabeth The one is a Rubrick mark nothing of the substance and Text but a Rubrick onely after the Communion containing an explication in what sense kneeling is enjoyned at the Communion Kneeling at the Communion explain'd And the Brethren say 't is an excellent and solid one and so it is but will they then now kneel First negatively it saith That the kneeling is not to the Bread and Wine Reas for Reform Ed. 2. pag. 3. of the inserted sheet for they remain Bread and Wine still Secondly Nor to any real and essential Presence there being of Christs natural flesh and blood for they are in heaven and not here But secondly and positively this gesture of kneeling is for signification of the thankful acknowledgment of the benefits of Christ given unto the worthy Receiver and to avoid prophaneness Now I suppose this Rubrick might be omitted in the Liturgy as being rather a Canon than a Rubrick These serving chiefly for direction how the worship is to be performed Not so properly for explication though some of the Rubricks also do explain But none of them the chief Ceremonies as the Surpliss or the Cross in Baptism and therefore the exposition of these being omitted the other might be thought fit also to be left out which would else have occasioned the addition of the explication of them also and of others to the occasioning of disputes rather than devotion it being not so needful to explain there the Orthodox doctrine in this point being laid down in the Articles and in the Homilies Artic. 28. Homil. of the receiving the Sacrament Can. 30. Can. 18. The explanation of Rites being thought fit for the Canons as in ours the explication of the Cross in Baptism and of bowing at the Name of Jesus But secondly this appears that this Rubrick doth seem not to be appointed by Parliament For if you observe the first Edition of the Common-prayer-book of 5 6 Edw. 6. which is done in very good paper and print the next being in worse as is usual in second Editions of books you shall see room enough vacant in the left page to have received that Rubrick but that is left bare and the Rubrick is printed in a leaf by it self and pasted on Observed as we were viewing by my worthy friend M. Tho. Smith keeper of the publick Library at Cambr. which is further cleared by the Errata in the first edition the second having none In that first edition the Rubrick is printed after all the Rubricks in the other it is in order at n. 3. in another between n and o. which shews that it came after the book was printed off and so not in that passed by the Act. Now then not being established by the Act as it seems the Parliament of 1 Eliz. knew they might omit it and yet not be guilty of detractions from the Book A prayer omitted The next omission is a prayer to be used in times of dearth and famine But seeng it contâ—ins no other matter for doctrine but what is in the prayer yet standing for that occasion 2 King 7. The former draws an argument to prevail with God from the miracle wrought by Elisha in the famine of Samaria And the latter yet standing from the general course of Gods providence and from his goodness which surely are more immediate grounds of faith It is not at all material especially seeing the omission might be from the Press and not from the Prelates Now these two are the onely detractions of the book from that of King Edward but neither of them chargeable upon the present but on the Book of Queen Elizabeth which this follows It appears from the premises that we have all the Liturgy that was established Text Substance and Circumstance as in Queen Elizabeth's time and that Book of hers all that the other had except these immaterial omissions of one Rubrick not establish'd and of one Prayer another more pertinent still remaining two for the same thing in this case and place being not thought so necessary Though all now in the Liturgy be not by that act established which leads me to the last head of Exceptions against the present Book viz. the additions 3. Additions to the Liturgy The Additions For answer in the general I refer unto what was said above Secondly in particular These additions are not annexed as part of the Book that the Act established But either as explanations of it which as we heard above the King hath power to do As are the Questions and Answers added to the Catechism Conf. Hamp Court p. 43. at the suit of the Non-conformists at the Conference at Hampton-Court Or they are certain necessary Prayers for the Kings relations which must be variable according to times and the state of the Royal Family and so not to be established necessarily by Parliament but put into this Common-prayer-book because of daily use with it yet not made parts of it and therefore not altering what was established by the Act. No more then the printing of the Kings Proclamation for uniformity before it is part of the Book or then divers godly prayers at the end devised by some good men But to come to the particulars 1. Prayers The Prayers and the Questions in the Catechism both which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful though with some particular exceptions against a question or two The Prayers added to the Book of King Edward are one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful and necessary They acknowledge also pag. 28. pag. 30. that in the Catechism somewhat of that kind to be useful and necessary though not that model To collect then and conclude It appears that we have the Book now as established in Queen Elizabeths time without alteration 1 Except some odd days set down under other names 2 Also perhaps some few Chapters altered in the Kalender 3 Two words chang'd in the old Translation 4 And three or four Rubricks or directions explained And all these except the first names of days at the request of the Non-conformists the Brethrens Predecessors in these exceptions And no detraction of any Rubrick or Prayer or Exhortation or line or word in the text of the Book or otherwise but of a Rubrick about kneeling that seems not to be established by Parliament and of one Prayer against famine not of any consequence with the addition of some useful prayers and some Questions and Answers necessary for the enlarging and explication of the Catechism but not as part of the Book
instructed So that they do justly incur that of Solomon Prov. 18.13 He that answers a matter before he understands it it is a shame and reproach unto him as shall immediately appear Inserted sheet p. 4. They say That sundry prayers are added Inserted sheet p. 4. not confirmed by Parl. which because an indefinite expression might make the common Reader think of many Pag. 28. n. 6. whereas themselves afterward mention the number and the prayers viz. one for the Queen or King one for the Bishops and one for Q. Anne and the Royal Progeny Next That these Additions have emboldened some to make alterations at their pleasure Ibid. The Br. calumny of the Liturgy Another indefinite and boundless expression leading the Reader into an uncertainty what to rest on as established Whereas they have not instanced in one line or word in the body and text of the Liturgy it self the Prayers and Exhortations that is altered from what was by Parliament established They proceed for instance say they the Prayer for the Queen and Royal Family before the year 1627. began thus Almighty God which hast promised to be a Father of thine Elect and of their seed But now thus Almighty God the fountain of all goodness Which change say they was a great presumption of which no reason can be discovered unless this That the word Elect distasted the favourers of Popish Arminianism Now first again oportet esse memorem Did they not say with this breath but now that these were added besides the Act and might they not then be chang'd without presumption by the same Authority that enjoyn'd them Again this discovers their unsufficiency for this undertaking Lord Cant. speech in Star-chamber at the censure of Dr. Bastwick p. 27 28. not having read the most known and publick books of these Arguments As in particular that wherein this is fully opened who did it and upon what occasion and this delivdred at the famous Censure of Dr. Bastwick Mr. Burton and Mr. Prynne where it is shewn That the King did acknowledge that the Alteration was made by his special direction as having then no children to pray for After this follows for fault in the matter of the Liturgy a quarrel with the old translation of the Psalms Inserted sheet p. 4 5 6 7. Epistles and Gospels Against these they alledge in general That being there is a new authoâ—ised and yet how authorised if the Kings Proclamation do not oblige wiâ—hout particular Act of Parliament as they imply pag. 62. Quaer 4. Insert sheet pag. 5. 7. Translation the standing of those parts of Scripture after the old causes scandal they say and makes sport for Papâ—sts and Atheists to find how much our translations publickly used do enterferre and jar The variety of Translations useful Euseb H. l. 6. c. c. 15 16. Hieron de Script n. 64. and how corrupt some of them be But surely the Church of God hath been always of another mind And Origen much commended for his edition of the Hexapla or the Bible in six several editions whereof five were in the same language viz. the Greek and some of them done by Hereticks St. Austin also writing his Directory for Students in Divinity de doctrinâ Christianâ speaking of the variety of the Latine Translations out of the Greek saith Aug. de doctr Christ l. 2. c. c. 11 12. Ut enim cuique primis fidei temporibus in manus venit codex Graecus aliquantulum facultatis sibi utriusque linguae habere videbatur ausus est interpretari Quae quidem res plus adjuvit intelligentiam quam impedivit si modò legentes non sint negligentes Nam nonnullas obscuriores sententias plurium codicum saepe manifestavit inspectio sicut illud c. In the young times of the Church if there chanced to fall into any mans hand a Greek copy of the Bible and he conceited he had some little skill in both the Tongues Greek and Latine he took the boldness to translate which thing notwithstanding doth more help than hinder understanding if so be that the Reader be not idle for many obscure places are cleared by comparing of several translations as that of Isaiah c. In which testimony we have two things first the benefit the Church may reap by variety of translations Secondly that in this variety there is even profit to be reaped by the worst Usher Epist ad L. Capel de Textus Hebr. variantib Lect. pag. 7.9 10. Precipue verò p. 17. As the Greek translation of the LXX it self as now we have it is not onely the worst that is but ever will be said the learned Primate of Ireland and implies as much in print And yet of this did our Saviour and the Apostles make often use without any scruple And if the Papists were enemies absolutely to varietie of Translations why with so great charge did the King of Spain publish that splendid Edition of the Bible in so many languages Phillip the 2d What the agreement is betwixt their books of publick service and the vulgar Bible is not material seeing the common people have not allowance for the reading of the Scripture But in particular there may be instances given wherein if the literal sense of the Original is not better rendred by the old Translation even by that of ours excepted against yet is it made more plain and easie Again as some persons keep the measure of their childrens growth what if some weakness of translation be left that the Church may perceive its proceeding and going forward Thirdly that of St. Jerom Neque enim nova sic cudimus Hieron prefat in proverb ad Heliodor Tom. 3. ut vetera destruamus We so take up new things that we must not wholly abolish the old may be of use here For accustomed things though not the best are not always safe to be removed Ipsa quippe mutatio consuetudinis etiam quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat The alteration of custom though it help by its usefulness Aug. Junuario ep 118. cap. 5. idem Hieron Epist 10. yet it disturbs by its novelty as we saw above As also the same Father in the like case wrote unto St. Jerom Movit quiddam longè aliter abs te positum apud Jonam prophetam quà m erat omnium sensibus ibi memoriaeque inveteratum tot aetatum successionibus decantatum Factus est tantus in plebe c. Something saith he that thou hast translated far otherwise in Jona the Prophet than was fixed in the minds and memories of the auditory and by the course of so many ages now grown as it were a common song did move till it came to a tumult among the people c. Where they say That three verses are added in the 14 Psalm not in the Greek of 72. but onely in the Popish vulgar Bibles Insert sheet pag. 5. Object Answ this is one of
their usual mistakes For first they are in the Roman and Paris Edition of the Greek and in many antient Eastern Psalters as is noted in those Bibles As also are they in that Edition so magnifi'd by Austin which he followed in his Exposition of the Psalms Aug. in Ps 13. But howsoever they are Scripture and are found altogether in Rom. 3. as themselves acknowledge I might add that they are also in that follow'd by Jerom Hieron in Ps 13. if that Commentary upon the Psalmes be his which Bellarmine saith is obscura quaestio a difficult Problem When they add Insert sheet pag. 6. Object Answ that the Translation of the Epistles and Gospels is as antient as 25 Hen. 8. and taken out of the Mass-book This is added to make this Translation odious but sure they will grant that the Epistles and Gospels in the Mass-book were first taken out of the Scripture it self But of the Mass-book in general we have spoken above and shewen that every thing in it ought not to be rejected Hook eccles pol. 5. § 19. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 45 46. Lastly for the particular places they name some of them have been objected and answered long since And the difference not overthrowing either faith or manners there being also a correct translation for constant use appointed and these but onely in the Epistles and Gospels which are to be used not so frequently these faults moreover not being many nor of any great consequence are venial That of Hezekiah his destroying the brazen Serpent might have here been omitted having been so fully replyed unto and the disproportion shewn by a learned Pen so long ago And afterward briefly by a learned King Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 65. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 73. Of which Books and Answers the Brethren take not the least notice whether out of ignorance or want of ingenuity may be left in medio without danger of the Law I hope Necess Reform pag. 18. 1. The Kalender Next after the man that bore the Armour comes the Champion himself after the inserted sheet the solemn treatise where the first title is of the Kalender And the main quarrel against it for appointing so much of the Apocrypha to be read In the Answer to the fourth general Exception of which above To the particulars if any thing sound toward error or be indeed dross should that deprive the Church of the gold contained in the rest Do we not read of the Midwifes lying of Abrahams twice of Rachels stealing her fathers Idols and many other in Scripture which ought not therefore to be rejected Again if it were requisite to spend time in the particulars there might not want perhaps a probable defence Tob. 3. of what either the daughter of Raguel or Raphael the Angel or Asmodeus the evil Spirit or Judith are there said to have done or spoken Jacob said He obtained the portion of Sichem with his sword and with his bowe much after that sense that Judith there speaks according unto Calvins Exposition Jus victoriae ad se transfert quasi divinitus sibi concessum quia in ejus gratiam homicidis Deut peperceret Calv. in Genes 48.22 Simeon and Levi might have a laudable zeal as Judith speaks and God might use it in his secret counsel and did so to purchase a place for Jacob And Jacob own the Land as his conquest though he detest the action The like may be said touching Judith's prayer as no doubt Jahel had hers before she cut of Sisera's head Judg. 4. whom also she slew by the deceit of her lips as well as Judith did Holofernes Genes 30. Did not Rachel and Leah with great Religion bless God for the children that they had made their husband Jacob beget upon their Handmaids Times and persons must be noted And every thing in Scripture is not to be imitated Else we might say as the Brethren Are not these gallant chapters to be read in the Churches The examples then in Scripture must be interpreted by rule and may not also the Apocrypha The next Regiment assaulted by the Brethren are the Redcoats the Rubricks so called 2. The Rubricks because antiently written in red Letters and are directions how to officiate and read the common-prayer-Common-prayer-book the first whereof is cloathed not with a coat of Male but of a Priest at which they fire They say Priest is the old style and title in the Mass-book This Mass-book is the Gorgons head wherewith they terrifie all assailants But was the Mass book ever in English True indeed Fox Act. Mon. in Edw. 6. King Edward the sixth for the appeasing of a rebellion told the Rebels so but that was not as it was the Mass-book but as it was a Prayer-book as little as might be at that time different Besides that prayer-book is not the same with ours now for it hath been reformed more than once since The Mass then never having been in English the word Priest could not be taken thence Yea but it answers to Sacerdos in the Mass-book which signifies Priest Priest That 's the Brethrens translation to avoid Presbyter out of the Mass-book whose evident derivative Priest is with very little alteration If this please not may one more antient and more cheerful be admitted viz. Walter Mapes Arch-deac of Oxf. in King Johns time M. Sâ—r. Sacerdos enim est cùm sacra dederit Tunc verò Presbyter cùm ter praebiberit i. e. When sacred things he gives he is a Priest A Presbyter when thrice before the rest He takes his Cup and so begins the Feast Thirdly Is it equipollent the word Priest to a sacrifice surely not in the etymology for it signifies onely an administration of holy things nor in the use unless we shall say that in the Primitive Church they owned a proper and real sacrifice These Bâ—ethren with the finger point us to take notice That they have seriously consulted Antiquity pag. 47. did they never in all their reading meet amongst a multitude of the like with such a passage as this Cùm haec tanta ac talia multa alia exempla praecedant Cypr. lib. 1. ep 3. quibus Sacerdotalis authoritas potestas divina dignatione formatur quales putas esse eos qui Sacerdotum hostes contra ecclesiam catholicam rebelles nec praemonentis domini comminatione nec futuri judicii ultione terrentur c. Whereas these such so great and so many examples have gone before us of the admonitions and executions of the judgments of God against the despisers of the Priesthood whereby the authority and power of Priesthood is by Gods special providence established what kind of men wouldst thou take them to be who being enemies to Priests and rebels against the Catholick Church are neither terrified with the Lords forewarning nor with the punishment of the judgment to come And what more usual than that title
fell in with Novatus in the former by seeming to deny forgiveness whensoever a man repents from the bottom of his heart so in the latter with Pelagius in concluding Austin Tom. 7. part 2. from a suposition if we do that therefore we may do it Though indeed he went rather upon the command than supposition Object Secondly where they say it occasions men to delay their repentance Have they not read Answ Rom. 2. That the goodness of God and especially that held out in the promise of forgiveness does lead unto repentance Artic. Relig. 17. Is not despair of mercy truly concluded to be a most dangerous downfall whereby the devill doth thrust men either into desperation or into wrethchlesness of most unclean living no lesse perilous than desperation But God may in mercy let these Brethren one day feel in their own consciences the pretious use of this sentence What time soever c. And indeed there is age enough in some of them before and sin enough I fear to make them need it In Psal 31. In te Domine speravi Savanarola to be sure that learned and constant Martyr having acknowledged in the person of sadness and despair objecting to him when he was very near his end Te scientiâ scripturarum ornavit sermonem praedicationis in ore tuo posuit quasi unum de magnis viris in medio populi te constituit That God had endued him with the knowledge of the Scriptures and put the word of preaching also into his mouth and made him as one of the great men of his time as * En Monachus solers rerum scrutator acutus Martyrio ornatus Savanarola pius Chr. Pflug ad Icon. Savanar Ante compend s Philosoph excellentiss he was indeed yet was glad to make use of this sentence even in the words of the Common-prayer though not out of it to refresh his conscience in the sore conflict under the sense of sin wherein he was Annon audivisti Dominum dicentem in quacunque die ingemuerit peccator omnium iniquitatum ejus non recordabor ampliùs Hast thou not heard the Lord saying In what day soever a sinner repenteth I will remember none of his sins any more But these perhaps are but the prefaces may not so much latent evil be within as that their true quarrel with this Scripture should be the same that theirs was in the Gospel with the good-man of the house Matth. 20. for making those that came in at the eleventh hour and had wrought but one equal to them that had undergone the burden and heat of the day And take it ill that a poor sinner at the last repenting from the bottom of his heart should be as the Thief crucified was with Christ in Paradise as well as they who conceive they have done God so so much good service This for the first General the reply to the Brethren SECT IV. A Vindication of the compilers of the Liturgy A Word now of vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy and first in general Script Angl. Censur Liturg. cap. 1. and it shall be in the words of Bucer censuring the whole order of the Service till the Communion In descriptione communionis quotidianarum praecum nihil video in libro esse descriptum quod non sit ex divinis literis desumptum si non ad verbum ut Psalmi Lectiones tamen sensu ut sunt collectae Modus quoque harum lectionum ac precum tempora sunt admodum congruenter cum verbo Dei observatione priscarum Ecclesiarum constituta Religione igitur summa retinenda erit vindicanda haec ceremonia In the description saith he of the Communion he meaneth here communion in prayer for of the Lords Supper he speaketh next and in the description of the daily prayers in the Common-prayer-book I see nothing set down but what is taken out of the holy Scriptures if not verbatim as the Psalms and Lessons yet in sense and meaning as are the Collects And the manner or measure and order of these Lessons and Prayers and the times are very convenient and appointed according to the Word of God and the practise of the most antient Churches Therefore this Service is to be retained and defended in a most religious manner Note How weak were Bucers eyes that could not see that beam which our Brethren stumble upon at the very threshold nay he could see nothing in all that part of the Service amiss even as it was then But in particular touching this sentence The wisdom and piety of the Composers did appear therein forasmuch as they prudently considered that there is nothing more necessary than the publishing of the Gospel The wisdom of the Composers of the Liturgy as being the power of God to salvation And that this is nothing else but the offer of mercy to the penitent through faith in Jesus Christ They considered that there is nothing draws to repentance more effectually than the goodness of God and hope of pardon Therefore being to propound the form of Confession and of Repentance they propose this and other sentences to excite them thereunto And because they would have the people to retain in their minds these special places of Scripture for that purpose and the words of Ezekiel being somewhat long they contracted the substance of them into this sentence Except 2 The second Exception in the body of the Book is against that clause in the general Confession No health in us There is no health in us May we not reply There is no Except 3 soundness in them Let the one help the other A third is TE DEUM Benedicite i. e. We praise thee O God All thy works praise thee Answ the TE DEUM and BENEDICITE which are said to be Apocryphals and interrupt the reading of the Scripture So do also the Prayers and Exhortations in the Liturgy If there must be no interruption of reading of the Scripture it must be all reading and no Liturgy That falshood that they would fix upon the Preface of the Book which they say would bear us in hand Scripture that it is provided against that the continual reading of Scripture shall not be interrupted lies in the falseness of their conception for the Preface takes the word Scripture in the sense that sometimes the Fathers do in a larger one namely and as was in use in the time when the Liturgy was compiled as comprehending those antient Religious writings which when properly distinguished from those that are Canonical as they are by the Articles which are the rule to measure particular expressions by that are found in the Offices of the Church then when they are so distinguished they are called Apocryphals but largely often Scripture and holy Scripture As Austin saith the books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are called Solomons de quadam similitudine Retract l. 2. c. 4. for some
likeness-sake So are these also called Scripture and holy Scripture yea and sometimes Canonical some of them De doctr Christ lib. 2. cap. 8. by St. Austin But so that aliter Hieronymus accipit vocabulum hoc Canonicus aliter eam vocem Augustinus Innocentius Patres Carthaginuenses interpretanter Otherwise doth Jerom take the word Canonical and otherwise Austin Innocent and the Fathers at the Councel of Carthage saith our Whitaker Contr. 1. Q. 1. c. 4. And so I say otherwise do the Articles of our Church take the word Canonical and otherwise sometimes the prayer-Prayer-book and the Homilies But of this more largely above In the answer to the fourth general Exception Secondly These are brought in here not as an interrupting of the reading any more than the singing of a Psalm which though not express Scripture might be sung betwixt the Lessons or reading an Exhortation or Prayer for they are brought in by way of Hymn onely and are sung also in some Churches But in particular they except first against Te Deum Te Deum We praise thee O God c. that it is a piece taken out of the Mass-book and in Popish Churches usually sung Thence brought in by Bishops into Protestant Churches but no where enjoyned or warranted by any Law in force That it shews the Bishops are not able to give thanks themselves for extraordinary mercies That it is a superstitious formal dress c. Answ To the antiquity of Te Deum beyond the Mass-book its reference unto St. Ambrose might be testimony But it s being used there or taken thence doth no more derogate from the matter of it than it doth from the Psalmes Epistles and Gospels or then it doth from the Doctrine of Free-mercy against Merits which is yet there and in the very office of the Mass as we saw above In answer to the fifth general exception It is recorded as a reputation to the old Romans that they disdained not nec ab hoste doceri To learn even of an enemy for we In what is good all friends and fellows be That the Bishops brought it in does not argue want of ability to give thanks themselves but their want of self-conceit and singularity They prudently and modestly choosing to receive and close with what is good and of general reception That they might declare their communion with all Christians in what they might and fulfilling the Apostles prayer Rom. 15. With one mind and one mouth glorifie God with the rest of his Church That it is no where enjoyned and warranted by any Law in force Not established is more than they have charged the Book hitherto with Answ having not nor indeed being not able to do it alledged any one thing added to the body of the Liturgy established by Law pag. 28. n. 6. but an Appendix as themselves reckon of three prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny 2. Act uniform com pr. Besides it is also untrue for themselves acknowledge as it is in the Act for the Uniformity of Common-prayer that the Books of 5 6 Edw. 6. shall be established without alteration except one sentence in the Letany and the addition of two in the Lords Supper c. Now it is evident that TE DEUM is in King Edwards Books and in the Book of Queen Elizabeth established by Parliament as we now receive it with all the Kings Parliaments and Judges since and comprehended by Bucer in that Elogy of his before named viz. That all generally till the Communion was agreeable to Gods Word and the use of the primitive Church Which form of Communion then hath been since reformed in part as he directed So that Te Deum is as well established by Law as any other part of the Book This gross reeling of the Brethren doth not it argue now they were etcaetera To the last which touches the matter of it viz. That it is a superstitious formal dress Seeing this is a high charge not on it but on the Common-prayer-book also yea and on the Church of England it should have in particular been shewed by the Brethren wherein it is so for dolosus versatur in universalibus This is the fruit perhaps of their Law-studies they have learned the course of Chancery to charge heavy crimes and prove nothing But shall I open this mystery of iniquity to be suspected in the breasts of these Brethren they seem to be Socinians and enemies to the Godhead of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the Doctrine of the Trinity both which are there splendidly acknowledged and professed in the Hymn of Te Deum Mr. Cartwright as it seems before Dr Reynolds and the rest at Hampton-Court were ashamed to except against it though they spared not where they thought exception might with any modesty be taken But as I said here is not onely a profession of the doctrine of the Trinity and a kind of repetition of the common Creed by way of Hymn The special use of the hymn TE DEUM but a particular application of prayer unto our Lord Jesus Christ which is done in no other part of the Book so expresly except the Letany Communion This is the superstition it may be feared that the Brethren aim at for other there is none We may now understand them when they call it and other parts of the Book Popish superstitious and Antichristian namely in his sense who writing against the doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of the Lord Jesus entituled his book Antithesis doctrinae Christi Antichristi de uno vero Deo An opposition of the doctrine of Christ and of Antichrist concerning the one true God To which the learned Zanchy making answer shews that for strengthning our faith in the doctrine of the Godhead of Christ Zanch. epistol dedic ad Sturm ante Resp suam ad Arrianum Tom. 8. p. 6. Ad hanc fidem in cordibus nostris servandam fovendam augendam quà m necessaria est crebra ad Christum in coelo residentem pro nobis interpellantem mentis elevatio EJUSQUE ac patris invocatio à verâ porrò seriâ contemplatione personae Christi ab assiâ—ua beneficiorum ejus commemoratione denique ab ardenti nominis ejus invocatione quibus fovetur fidos nostra separari non potest studium perpetuum resipiscentiae c. sunt autem haec meditatio invocatio resipiscentia tria praecipua verae fidei effecta c. For the nourishing this our faith saith he in the Godhead of Christ namely in our hearts and for the encreasing and preserving of it Prayer to Christ necessary for the strengthning of faith in him how necessary is the often lifting up our minds to Christ sitting in heaven and interceding for us and as necessary is prayer to him and to the Father Now from the true and serious consideration of the
person of Christ and from the continual commemoration of his benefits and from the fervent calling upon his name whereby our faith is nourished there can not be separated an endeavour of perpetual repentance Three chief effects of faith Now these meditation prayers to him and repentance are the three chief effects of faith c. Let the Brethren then cease to quarrel Te Deum as Popish for this doctrine hath been preserved pure in the Popish Church as we saw above out of Zanchy or else confess their own Antichristianism In the answer to the fifth general Exception that is their Arianism and Socinianism Touching their exception in particular against Benedicite or O all ye works of the Lord Benedicite or O all ye works c. bless ye the Lord. It is first to be noted as appears in the Books of King Edw. 6. that this was appointed for Lent onely in the place of Answ 1 Te Deum We praise thee O God but since left indifferent Answ 2 Secondly for the matter of it it contains no other doctrine nor for the order any other method than what is in the 104 and 148 Psalms with something Answ 3 out of the 118 Psalm being a convenient compages of them What the Title is in the Apocrypha needs not to be mention'd here speaking of the Common-prayer-book Answ 4 in which it hath no title As for the reproaches here cast upon it and the holy Martyrs the compilers of the Liturgy who put it in of bungling and Mass-book and belying the Canonical Text because it is said to be the song of the three childr in the furnace Dan. 3. mentioned by Daniel which yet may be well understood to be so as Austin we heard above understood the Book of Wisd and Ecclesiasticus to be called Solomons ob quandam similitudineÌ„ because of a kind of likeness so Ans It is no way probable but that those 3. children did praiâ—e â—od in the midst of the fire which they saw he restrained from hurting of them and might justly take occasion to magnifie God for his Works in the Creatures in giving them such vertues and yet restraining them at his pleasure and so if it were not indeed yet ob quandam similitudinem for some likeness sake it may not be unsitly called so But howsoever who shall compare it will find that it doth in all things follow the pattern of the Psalms above mentioned and so of the Scripture and though Apocryphal yet is a fit form of thanksgiving But as I said the Bunglings and Mass-book and lying we leave them to the father of lies and to those his children that by imitating that Parent in calumny and falshood do merit to be his heirs But yet God in his mercy give them repentance and pardon and according to their Baptism the form whereof they do little less thâ—n blaspheme ' make them the members of Christ the children of God and inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven SECT IV. The Responds of the People THe fourth exception is against the Responds and Answers of the People to the Minister appointed in the Prayer-Book excepting Amen The Brethren say Fourth Excâ—ption The Respondâ— P. 27 28 n 4. They have no warrant from the Word and are Will-worship nor can be done in Faith That they interrupt the reading contrary to the Preface are taken out of the Mass-Book onely that there are above one hundred of them To which are added the Peoples answering the Confession of sins Creed and every other Verse of the Psalms But they omit the Principal the matter and the use of which anon First for the number Though they may be so many in the whole Number yet are they not all in one service but so divided that they are neither burdensome nor confused To the interrupting of the reading and the Mass-book hath been answered If all were reading where were the Liturgy Nowhere else That they are said to be no where else If they speak of the substance of them argues their want of reading in Antiquity which they would seem to have seriously consulted and of the practice of some in later times Are there not in the ancient Liturgies mentioned by themselves many Responds and Answers of the People Whether those Liturgies be theirs whose names they bear is not the question but ancient they are and the question is whether they had any such answerings of the People which every one by inspection may see they had We will cite but two Witnesses the one Ancient the other Modern The first shall be the Liturgy of Chrysostome How often is repeated besides the Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord have mercy upon us and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To thee O Lord we commend them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord vouchsafe pardon And sometimes longer Responds than any of ours are and the very same in sense as at the Communion The Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let us give thanks unto the Lord Liturg. Chrysost Tom. 6. Then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is meet and right to worship the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost the Trinity of the same and undivided substance And a little after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People for so Chorus is taken also both in the Poets and as we shall see straightway in Neoterick Liturgies Holy holy holy Lord of Sabbath Heaven and Earth are full of thy Glory Hosanna in the highest Blessed be he that cometh in the Name of the Lord Hosanna in the highest And afterward the Priest and the Deacon having uttered their sentences 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People We praise thee we bless thee we give thanks unto thee O Lord and we supplicate unto thee O our God Which are the words much of them of one of the Peoples Responds at the Communion in our Liturgy Lib. Hermaâ—i Archiep. Colon. Reformation The next for I omit other things shall be that notable Liturgy called the Book of the Reformation of Colon compiled by * Vid. Sleidan com lib. 15. Ad Ann. 1543. Against it the Popish party wrote the Antididagma Bucer one of our own Reformers and Melancthon and Pistorius all thorough-Protestants and men of eminency as all know in the Church The Book is so remarkable that it hath ben translated into English the Latine Copy I follow and it is a most usefull piece for all those Ministers that would seriò and in good earnest feed the Flock of God over which the holy Ghost hath made them Overseers In this Common Prayer Book besides the Symphony in Doctrine in some things carped at by the Brethren in our Liturgy of which anon there are several Responds and Answers of the People Not here to insist upon the Answers of the Sureties in Baptism in the name of the child As creditis credimus Answers of the witnesses in Baptism