Selected quad for the lemma: book_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A27340
|
The belief of praying for the dead
|
Belhaven, John Hamilton, Baron, 1656-1708.
|
1688
(1688)
|
Wing B1787; ESTC R16794
|
35,862
|
72
|
rarely spoken of in ancient Times because less common 'T was compil'd sometime before our Saviours comming with the addition of those Books which were Written after the Collection of the First Canon Lib. 2. Cont. Appion Joseph the Jew assures us of such an addition made where he cites the Text of Ecclesiastick as part of their Scripture which Book is not found in the Collection of the First Canon of the Jews and was written near Two Hundred Years after it This suppos'd I am of the Discoursers mind that the Books of Maccabees were not by the Jews acknowledg'd as part of the First Collection of Canonical Scripture they were written near Three Hundred Years after the First Collection made by Esdras But can the Discourser prove to me that these Books were not by the Jews receiv'd as part of the Second Collection of Canonical Scripture If the Discourser notwithstanding this reasonable Distinction remains unsatisfied and still scruples their Authenticness and continues to say that the Jews did not receive them as Canonical I le humour him in this and grant him what he asks But are we Jews If the Jews did not the Church of Christ receiv'd them as Canonical Scripture S. Jerome 't is true says In Praef. Salom that the Church did not look upon them as part of that Canonical Scripture which was contain'd in the First Canon of the Jews and which was universally receiv'd from the beginning by all Christians So did S. Gregory the Great Lib. Moral 19. c. 13. Neither of them deny the Maccabees to be part of that entire Canon of Scripture which the Church of Christ appprov'd of and read in their dayes In this entire Canon of Scripture Canon 47. Sunt autem Canonicae Scripturae Maccabaeorum Libri duo the Third Council of Carthage which all well-meaning Christians alwayes look'd upon as Orthodox number'd the Maccabees So did Innocent the First Head of the Universal Church of Christ upon Earth in his Letter to Exuperius Bishop of Tholouse S. Austin in express Words says That the Jews do not receive the Books of Maccabees as Canonical S. Aug. l. 18. de Civit. Dei. c. 37. Maccabaeorum Libros non Judaei sed Ecclesia pro Canonicis habet but the Church does And in the Second Age the Valentinian Hereticks asserted That the Bible no where patroniz'd it to be lawful to venture their Lives for GOD ALMIGHTY's sake And Origen instanc'd that Famous Example of the Mother and seven Sons who died upon this Account out of the Second of Maccabees as part of Holy Scripture and confuted them Reasons without exception that if the Jews did not Christians number'd these Books with the rest of Canonical Scripture In S. Matthew We read an other Confirmation of this Truth where Christ himself says Chap. 12. v. 32. That the Sin against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven neither in this World nor in that to come I cannot chuse here but take Notice how wittily the Discourser Reasons upon the World to come He will have the World to come to be in this present World and not to be till this World end Thus he delivers himself They Catholicks suppose That the World to come Page 19. must signify the time between every mans Death and the General Resurrection The World to come cannot be till this World end i. e. till the time be That Purgatory shall be no more which now is in this Present World. I expected the acuteness of so sharp a Wit could have distinguished between Life and Death this World and the next especially when Scripture had done it before him We therefore following the distinction which Scripture gives understand by this World this present Life which all Mankind more or less enjoys and by that to come the State of Man after Death a middle State where some Sin is to be expiated 'T is certain that by this passage neither in this World nor in that to come is meant that the Sin against the Holy Ghost in which Man dies is never to be forgiven For if it were ever to be forgiven certainly it would be pardon'd in this World or that to come for no other place can be assign'd where Pardon is to be expected S. M. c. 3. v. 29. And thus S. Mark interprets the Phrase He hath not Forgiveness for ever and shall be guilty of an eternal Sin. From hence Roman Catholicks infer That there are some Sins not eternal to be pardon'd in the next World and if to be pardon'd without dispute in a middle state of Souls for whose delivery Prayers are offer'd by the Faithful living Our Reason is because Scripture assigns this World and that to come as the only two places where Sin may be pardon'd saying That the Sin against the Holy Ghost shall in neither of them or never be pardon'd Let those sayes S. Bernard who deny Purgatory ask of him S. Bern. super Cantica Serm. 66. Quaerant ergò ab eo qui dixit quoddam peccatum esse quod neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro remitteretur Cur hoc dixerit si nulla manet in futuro remissio purgatione peccatis who said there is some Sin which shall neither be forgiven in this World nor in that to come Why did he say this if there remain in the World to come no forgiveness or purgation of Sin S. Isidore of Spain is more express Lib. 1. de off Eccles. c. 18. Nam cum Dominus dicit qui peccaverit in Spiritum sanctum non remitteretur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro demonstrat quibusdam illic dimittenda peccata quodam purgatorio igne purganda For when our Lord says whosoever shall sin against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven him neither in this World nor in that to come he demonstrates that Sin is forgiven to some there and expiated in a certain Purgatory Fire And to the same Words of CHRIST S. Austin gives the like Interpretation S. Aug. Civit. Dei l. 2. c. 24. De Defunctis quibusdam vel ipsius Ecclesiae vel quorundam piorum exauditur Oratio neque enim de quibusdam veraciter diceretur quod non eis remittatur neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro nisi essent quibus etsi non in isto tamen remittetur in futuro For some Souls departed the Prayers of the Church or pious Persons are heard for otherwise it would not be truly said of some that it should not be forgiven them neither in this World nor in that to come unless there were some to whom if not in this it shall be forgiven in the World to come And I am of opinion if the Discourser will but seriously consider our Saviours own Words that he will acknowledge some Sins to be pardon'd in this Life and some after Death I shall instance only one Example somewhat of the like nature to convince him If
the like Sin made a Collection among them of a considerable summ of Money and sent it to Jerusalem to offer Sacrifice for the Sin well and religiously thinking of the Resurrection Edit Sixti 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For unless he hop'd that they that were fallen should rise again it would seem superfluous and vain to pray for the Dead After considering that there is an excellent Reward laid up for those that die piously which was a Holy and Godly Thought he therefore made an Expiation for the Dead that they might be Absolv'd from their Sin. This is so plain and easy that I cannot imagin how any one except he wilfully will mistake should understand it otherwise than in the Roman Catholick Affirmation The Sin questionless that they committed whom GOD permitted to be cut off by the Enemy was mortal The Law forbad to covet Deut. 7. Josh 7. or take any thing appertaining to Idols They were commanded to destroy it and therefore because this People had taken the Donaries of Idols they were slain says the Text. Judas and his Company hop'd that their fellow-Souldiers repented before they died of their grievous Sin. There was sufficient Ground for this They fought in defence of their Country and their Religion For these they bravely Ventur'd their Lives As therefore the Justice of GOD punished their Crime by permitting them to be kill'd might not their surviving Associates hope the Divine Goodness would recompence the venturing of their Lives for GOD's Honour and Glory by Repentance before Death surpriz'd them His Mercy exceeds all other of the Divine Attributes At least this makes the case dubious And in ambiguous things a favourable Interpretation is approv'd of For who knows the sense of the Lord or who was His Counsellor If this be not satisfactory what follows will convince you for it is certain That Judas order'd Prayers to be offer'd for the slain because he hop'd they repented of their Sin Considering says the Text That there is an excellent Reward laid up for those that die godlily he therefore made an expiation for the Dead Is not a godly Death a mark of Repentance These Prayers order'd by Judas were offer'd as an Atonement for the Sin of the deceased That this was his design is apparent No body can dispute the being of a Sacrifice among the Jews which was offer'd for Sin. The Law of Moses in Numbers and Deuteronomy frequently makes mention of such a one And all the Tribes forthwith after the Battle agreeing in a general Collection of a summ of Money to be sent upon this Account to Jerusalem demonstrate that this Sin-Offering was extended to and allow'd of for the Dead Two Motives excited Judas hereunto First the Resurrection to Life For unless he hop'd that they that were fallen should rise again it would seem superfluous and vain to pray for the Dead And Secondly the Pardon of Sin after considering continues the Text That there is an excellent Reward laid up for those that die godlily he therefore made an Expiation for the Dead that they might be absolv'd from their Sin. By Sin for which Prayers were offered is meant the remainder of mortal Sin the Guilt which infers an Obligation to some temporal Penalty this is evident Judas hop'd that the Slain died godlily or repented but he could not be of this perswasion unless he likewise believ'd that the Fault of their notorious Crime was pardon'd For Repentance carries along with it Forgiveness Whensoever you shall invoke my Name saith the LORD I will hear you Now besides the Guilt of eternal Damnation which follows the Fault of grievous Offences as the shadow does the body both standing or perishing together there can nothing remain to which the Title of Sin may be given but the Guilt which infers an Obligation to temporal Punishment 'T is then this Guilt which is here call'd Sin for which Judas after the hope of Pardon and Repentance of the Fault as the Text affirms Considering That there is an excellent Reward laid up for those that die godlily who repent of their Sins and are pardon'd therefore made an Expiation for the Dead that they might be absolv'd from their Sin. This is further confirm'd in these other Words of the Text And turning to Prayers they beg'd of God That the Sin Committed might be perfectly blotted out The Sin then was before blotted out the Fault pardon'd but not perfectly blotted out the Guilt which deserv'd some temporal Penalty remain'd to be expiated For had they deem'd it had been before perfectly blotted out they would not have beg'd of God a perfect Forgiveness This had been already Granted There was then some Penalty that remain'd of which they beg'd forgiveness But the Pain of Sin is ordinarily speaking only compleatly satisfied with pain Nor can any one hope to be perfectly pardon'd of Sin according to the rate of God's ordinary Providence without entire satisfaction which if not paid now must hereafter be compensated This is exactly what Mr. de Meaux Writes of the Roman Catholick Belief in this point in his excellent Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church Exposit pag 17. Sect. 8. which all Christendom approves of Those who depart this Life says this Venerable Prelate in Grace and Charity but nevertheless indebted to the Divine Justice some Pains which it reserv'd are to suffer them in the other Life This is what Oblig'd all the Primitive Christians to offer up Prayers Alms-deeds and Sacrifices for the Faithful who departed in Peace and Communion of the Church with a certain Faith that they might be assisted by these means This is what the Council of Trent proposes to us to believe touching Souls departed in Purgatory Sess 25. de Purg. without determining in what their Pains consist or many other such like things concerning which this Holy Council demands great Moderation blaming those who divulge what is uncertain or suspected And to finish This passage of Holy Scripture out of the Second Book of Maccabees is so strong and convictive in behalf of praying for the Dead that our Adversaries can have nothing at all to say for themselves but with a strange Boldness to deny these Books to be part of the Bible Yet the old Editions of Scripture in English which were printed near the Beginning of the Pretended Reformation give them without distinction their proper place in the Bible What private Revelation the Reformers have had since to displace them and cast them out they never told us The Discourser indeed gives us this Reason for it that they were never receiv'd by the Jews as Canonical That we may well understand the Meaning of this Objection it will not be amiss to speak here of Two Canons of a Bible which the Jews used The First Canon of the Bible was composed by Esdras This is generally allow'd of The Second Collection was more ample and encreas'd by the superaddition of many Books to the former This was more