his returne Gen. 35.9 4. She feareth to be deprived of them both in one day not because as the Hebrewes thinke as they were borne together they died together but lest that if Esau killed Iacob she knew Gods justice would overtake the other Mercer 3. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. We must be cloathed with Christs righteousnesse Vers. 15. SHe cloathed Iacob c. Like as Iacob being apparelled with faire perfumed garments was accepted of his father so we cannot be pleasing unto God unlesse we be cloathed with the righteousnesse of Christ as the Apostle saith Not having mine owne righteousnesse but that which is through the faith of Christ Calvin in vers 27. 2. Doct. The Patriarks by temporall blessings were stirred up to seeke for spirituall Vers. 28. GOd give thee of the dew of heaven c. The Fathers rested not in these temporall blessings but thereby as by certaine degrees were to ascend higher and be brought to the meditation of heavenly things Mercer As the Apostle sheweth If they had beene mindfull of that Countrey from whence they came out they had leasure to have returned but now they desire a better that is an heavenly Heb. 11.16 3. Doct. Election not of works but of grace Vers. 30. THen came Esau from hunting If Esau and Iacobs works be compared here together we shall see that Esau doth nothing but praise-worthy he obeyeth his fathers minde taketh great paines to hunt for flesh he carefully maketh it ready but contrariwise Iacob dissembleth hee offereth Kids flesh for venison maketh himselfe Esau deceiveth his father and this difference is set forth to this end to shew that election standeth not by works but is of grace Calvin As Saint Paul saith That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works by him that calleth Rom. 9.11 4. Doct. The efficacie of the blessing dependeth not upon the minister but the word of God Vers. 33. I Have blessed him therefore he shall be blessed Though Isaack ignorantly had pronounced the blessing upon Iacob yet it remained effectuall and of force so they which blesse and pronounce remission of sinnes in the name of God though they be weake men and compassed with infirmities yet their sentence shall stand being agreeable to the will of God the force thereof dependeth not upon their ministery but upon the word of God Whatsoever ye binde in earth shall be bound in heaven c. Matth. 18.18 Calvin 5. Doct. The Iewes supplications why not heard Vers. 38. HE lift up his voice and wept Esau because he sought a blessing apart to himselfe and scorned to associate himselfe to Iacob to whom the promise was made could not prevaile with his teares so the Jewes notwithstanding their prayers fastings howlings lamentations powred forth unto God are not heard because they refuse the true Messiah and seeke a way by themselves to goe unto heaven Luther 6. Doct. The meanes which serve under Gods providence must not be neglected Vers. 43. ARise and flie to Haran c. Rebecca though she was fully assured that Iacob should have the blessing and inheritance yet she is carefull to use the means and not immediately to depend upon Gods providence whereby we are taught that as we are not to relie upon the meanes which the Lord setteth before us for our deliverance and for the perfitting of his good pleasure toward us yet we must not neglect them our Saviour promised to be with his Disciples to the end of the world yet hee wisheth them if they be persecuted in one City to flie to another Matth. 10.23 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Saint Peter reproved for his dissimulation Vers. 19. I Am Esau thy first borne c. Pererius well collecteth that it is not necessary to exempt Iacob here from a veniall sinne seeing that Saint Peter who was not inferiour in grace and knowledge is noted for his dissimulation and thereof reproved by Saint Paul in 27. Gen. Numer 46. contrary to the opinion of Hierome who would excuse Peter from all fault and thinketh that all that discourse was but a set match betweene them to this opinion the Rhemists seeme to incline Galath 2. Sect. 9. but it is confuted by Augustine Epist. 19. who discusseth this point at large with Hierome saith he Qua fronte in altero reprehendit quod ipse commisit With what face could Saint Paul have reprehended that in another which he did himselfe if so this had beene a set match betweene them Epist. 11. 2. Confut. Against the authority of the booke of Tobie PErerius would excuse this dissimulation of Iacob saying I am Esau c. by that of the Angell who to Tobie inquiring of his tribe and kindred answered I am Azarias of Ananias the great Tobie 5.12 for as this speech was figurative that the Angell was not the sonne of Ananias so called but of the grace of God which is signified by that word and so Iacob meaneth that he was not Esau in person but in respect of his prerogative Contra. Thus he hath shaped a defence of one lie by another for the Angell saith he was of Ananias and of thy brethren he meaneth then that Ananias which was of kindred to Tobie And this is one reason which impaireth the credit of this Booke because the Angell is brought in lying which is not the use of the holy Angels in the Canonicall Scripture 3. Confut. Sacraments depend not upon the intention of the minister Vers. 23. WHerefore he blessed him c. The blessing which Isaack pronounceth loseth not his force by his ignorance or wrong intention who purposed to blessed Esau and not Iacob but upon the promise and word of God whereby is confuted that point of popish doctrine that the sacraments depend upon the intention of the minister as though it were in mans power to frustrate the institution of God Calvin The Apostle saith Shall their unbeleefe make the faith of God without effect Rom 3.3 neither shall the unbeleeving or not rightly intending minister frustrate the force of the Sacrament 4. Confut. Against the errour of the Chiliastes Vers. 28. GOd give thee of the dew of heaven and the fatnesse of the earth Upon this place with the like Tertullian foundeth his errour which is called of the Chiliastes that Christ should reigne with the Saints a thousand yeares here upon the earth Vtriusque indulgentia exempla sunt siquidem justum est Deo ellic exultare famulos ubi sunt ipsius nomine afflicti c. here saith Tertullian in Isaacks blessing upon Iacob both are promised the joyes of heaven and of earth and it is just with God that his servants should there rejoyce where they were for his name afflicted Lib. 3. cont Marcion Contra. Isaack here prophesieth not of the state of the Church after this life but in this world unlesse they will say that in the next life we shall have wheat and wine which are here mentioned neither doth it follow
as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
of that language in the Scripture Vers. 47. LAban called it Iegar-sahadutha c. 1. Laban though he came of Thare the father of Abraham in whose family the Hebrew tongue was preserved yet dwelling among the Syrians he learned both their language and manners and therefore calleth this place by a Syrian name but Iacob by an Hebrew who most used himselfe to that tongue and so did his wives that gave their children not Syrian but Hebrew names Calvin 2. These Syrian words are only found in Genesis and the rest of the books of Moses and beside one whole verse Ierem. 10. and certaine chapters in Ezra and Daniel after the Syrian dialect which is an honour as the Hebrewes note wherewith the Syrian language is dignified in that it is inserted into the holy Scriptures and therefore is not to be neglected Mercer 3. Whereas vers 48. it is said Laban called it Galeed whereas Iacob gave it that name not Laban Moses reporteth the sense of the name in the Hebrew tongue which Laban gave QUEST XX. Of the mountaine of Gilead Vers. 47. IAcob called it Galeed 1. This name Galeed or with some smal change of points called Gilead is before mentioned vers 25. under that name not as yet given unto that place but now imposed by this occasion which is interpreted an heape of witnesse so called of the heape of stones which was made as a witnesse of the league betweene Iacob and Laban 2. There was one Gilead the sonne of Machir of Manasses of whom came the Gileadites Numb 26.29 but he gave not the first name to this mountaine 3. This mountaine Gilead is the greatest of all beyond Jordan it is in length 50. miles and as it is continued and runneth along it receiveth divers names from Arnon to the City Cedar it is called Galaad then to Bozra it is named Seir afterward Hermon and so reaching to Damascus it is joyned to Libanus and therefore as Hierome saith Lebanon is called the head or beginning of Galeed Ier. 22.6 Perer. QUEST XXI Of the name Mispah and of divers places so called Vers. 49. HE called it Mispah 1. The Latine translator doth wholly omit this word the Septuagint maketh it a name appellative not proper calling it a vision which Augustine referreth to that vision wherein by the way God appeared to Laban But this Mispah was another proper name given unto the same place of the word tsaphah to behold whereof the reason is given in this verse The Lord looke betweene me and thee 2. Of this Mispah which signifieth a looking or watch-tower the whole countrey is called the land of Mispah under the hill Hermon Iosu. 11.3 There were three other places of that name a City in Juda Iosu. 15.38 another belonging to Benjamin Iosu. 18.26 a third in the land of Moab 1 Sam. 22.3 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Wives and husbands to be preferred before parents Vers. 17. WHatsoever God hath said unto thee doe it Iacobs wives are willing to leave and forsake their fathers house and to goe with their husband for so the Scripture saith Therefore shall a man leave father and mother and cleave to his wife Gen. 2.24 2. Doct. Office of carefull Pastors Vers. 38. THe rams of thy flocke have I not eaten c. Iacob is an example of a vigilant and carefull Pastor hee watched day and night to keepe his flocke but hee made no spoile or havocke of them Such ought good pastors to bee not to feed themselves but the flocke as S. Peter saith 1 Pet. 5.2 3. Doct. Polygamy unlawfull Vers. 50. IF thou shalt take wives beside my daughters Laban himselfe though upon a covetous mind hee thrust many wives upon Iacob yet by the light of naturall reason condemneth the multiplying of wives Thou shalt not vex my daughters the taking then of other wives is a vexation of them this maketh against their obstinate blindnesse that would maintaine polygamy if they would appeale to Laban he would be a Judge against them Calvin But our Saviour Christ the Judge of us all hath given us a rule They two shall be one flesh Matth. 9.2 two then not many can be made one flesh 4. Doct. Of the blind and superstitious devotion of â—dolaters Vers. 47. THou hast searched all my stuffe Such is the blind rage of idolaters as here we see in Laban he leaveth no corners unsought he giveth no credit to Iacobs protestation nor yet sheweth any reverent affection to his daughters but tosseth and tumbleth all their stuffe and all this was to find out his house-gods such blind devotion was in Micah that howled and cried after the children of Dan because they had carried away his images Iud. 18. Such foolish superstition reigneth at this day among the Romanists that doe more cruelly punish the least wrong done to their dumbe idols than which are offered to their brethren the living images of God 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against the worshipping of idols for remembrance Vers. 30. THou hast stollen my gods Laban was not so blockish to thinke that those idols were indeed his gods or that his gods could be stollen away for hee afterward speaketh of the God of Abraham and the God of Nachor vers 53. but he calleth them his gods because hee made them in the remembrance of God or hee looked towards them when he prayed to God Vatab. Calvin This taketh away that vaine pretence of superstitious Romanists who would excuse their idolatry because they doe not worship the idols themselves but them whose images and representations they are for Laban here did no more Calvin 2. Confut. Images and idols where they are adored all one FUrther let it be noted that the word teraphim images is translated by the Septuagint and Latine interpreter idols yet Onkelos readeth tsalmanaia images of tselem which signifieth an image whence is inferred that an image and idoll is all one contrary to the conceit of the Papists that doe distinguish betweene the name of images and idols which indeed being turned to a religious or rather irreligious use are all one 3. Confut. Disparity of religion maketh not a nullity of marriage BEside in that Rachel stole here fathers gods it is evident that Laban was an idolater yet Iacob refused not to marry his daughters and this marriage was firme and sure whereupon Cajetanus noteth Hic quoque prudens lector habes quod disparitas cultus non est ex naturali jure impediens conjugium Here thou hast discreet reader that the disparity of religion is no impediment by the law of nature to marriage And he collecteth well yet Catharinus another of that side calleth it impium dogma an impious opinion lib. 5. annot in Cajetan But Cajetanus opinion may be justified both by example in Scripture as Moses married Sephora Samson Dalila David Maacha which were of idolatrous parents as also by S. Pauls doctrine who would have the beleeving partie not to put away his unbeleeving wife
they are done So then Moses hands became steadie afterwards being supported and so the constancie of the gesture of the bodie did rebound upon the affection of the soule which in like manner continued constant and fervent 6. Rupertus mysticall application is not here to be rejected Moses manus graves erant Moses hands were heavie because the law could bring nothing to perfection QUEST XVII Of the supporting and bearing up of Moses hands Vers. 12. ANd they tooke a stone and put it under him c. 1. Moses was both wayes wearied both in standing so long and in holding up his hands all that while therefore they provide both wayes for his infirmitie and weaknesse they put under a stone for him to sit upon and of each side held up his hands Tostat. 2. As they supported and bare up his hands so no doubt they joyned with him in their earnest prayers and desires unto God Quum manus ejus attollerent mentes etiam habebant ad Deum erectas As they lift up his hands so also they had their minds erected unto God Calvin 3. His hands are said to be steadie to the going downe of the sunne not that then they began to be faint but then the battell being ended and the victorie obtained there was no need for him any longer to hold up his hands 4. Divers allegories are made of this place as that Moses hands that is the precepts of the law are heavie but that by Aaron who signifieth Christ and Hur that is the holy Ghost they are made easie and light Ferus Some by Moses and Hur understand the two Testaments upon the which our prayer must relie Some againe thus allegorize Aarrn they say signifieth montanus hillie and Hur fire so two things support our prayer high and heavenly meditation and fervent charitie Lyran. But Chur signifieth white V◠light or fire and beside the false etymologie these allegories are too curious and somewhat farre fetcht 5. But Rupertus mysticall application may be received who by this stone understandeth the grace of the Gospell In quasederet Moses id est lex adimpleretur whereon Moses sate that is the law was fulfilled And this morall accommodation also is very fit that by Aaron and Hur all godly Ministers may learne Quomodo se mutuò animare debeant incitare ad preces How they ought to animate and stirre up one another unto prayer Marbach QUEST XVIII What this Amalek was and of whom descended Vers. 13. IOshua discomfited Amalek and his people 1. Strabo hath this opinion that this Amalek the father of the Amalekites should bee descended of Ismael Lyranus and Tostatus would convince him of errour herein because the young man which came running to David and confessed that hee had killed Saul said he was an Amalekite and yet he is generally held to have beene the sonne of Doeg that was an Edomite But this were to prove a thing more certaine by that which is uncertaine for it is evident and certaine out of the Scripture that Amalek the sonne of Eliphaz came of Esau Gen. 36. and whether that young man were the sonne of Doeg is uncertaine 2. Where it is said Amalek and his people Tostatus doth much busie himselfe to shew that this could not be Amalek the sonne of Eliphaz for then he must have beene above 260. yeare old for the time of the sojourning of Israel in Egypt was 215. yeare and when Iacob descended thither he was an 130. yeare old about whose 80. yeare Amalek might be borne and so he resolveth that this was not that Amalek but another of that name descended of that race Tostat. quast 7. in Exod. But all this labour might have beene well spared for by Amalek not any one person but the whole nation of the Amalekites is understood as Israel is usually in Scripture taken for the Israelites and his people were those which ayded and assisted them Vatab. As Iosephus sheweth how the King of Amalek sent unto other nations and that they combined themselves together against Israel 3. Thus we see how this victorie was atchieved First and principally by God the Author and cause thereof then the meanes were of two sorts partly spirituall by the earnest prayer of Moses partly externall by Ioshuas sword Simler And here began the prophecie to take place concerning Iacob and Esau The elder shall serve the younger Borrh. QUEST XIX What booke this was wherein Moses is commanded to write this storie Vers. 14. WRite this for a remembrance in the booke 1. Tostatus thinketh that this was some speciall booke beside this present storie and namely that which is called the booke of Iashar or the Righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10. and that many things were written in that booke by way of prophecie which booke was written by Moses but is now lost because when that Heretikes had corrupted this booke the ancient Church neglected it and had no care of it lest in receiving the Verities in that booke they should together have received their Falsities and Heresies Tostat. quast 7. in Exod. Contra. 1. That this booke of Iashar was written by Moses it is not like seeing mention is made thereof in Davids time 2 Sam. 1.18 for if all those stories had beene prophetically set downe in that booke aforehand what needed those severall historicall books of Scripture to have beene written afterward 2. Neither had that beene a good reason to reject that booke because it had beene corrupted for so some bookes of canonicall Scripture also should have beene laid aside which some Heretikes corrupt fingers have beene medling with 3. This booke of Iashar therefore was none other than a Chronicle of the acts and gestes of the people of God which booke is now lost as divers other historicall books Iun. 4. Tostatus addeth further that this booke of Iashar was the same booke which is called the booke of the battels of the Lord Numb 21.14 which was not that booke of Numbers for there is a confirmation of those things then presently done by a former book which prophetically described those warres But it is no good argument thus to reason the booke of the battels of the Lord is not the booke of Numbers therefore it is that other booke of Iashar some thinke it was the booke of Judges Genevens Some a booke now missing the Scriptures now extant being sufficient Osiander The best answer is that the word sepher signifieth as well a rehearsall as a booke as it is taken Matth. 1.1 The booke of the generation of Iesus Christ. The meaning then is that when the battels of the Lord are rehearsed these also shall be spoken of which by Gods providence the Amorites made against Moab preparing an inheritance for the children of Israel who were forbidden to deale directly against Moab Iun. Numb 21. annot 8. 5. Wherefore the booke wherein Moses did make a memoriall of this thing was no other than this present historie of Exodus and
Hexapla in Genesin Exodum THAT IS A sixfold commentary upon the two first Bookes of Moses being GENESIS and EXODVS WHEREIN THESE TRANSLATIONS are compared together 1. The Chalde 2. The Septuagint 3. The vulgar Latine 4. Pagnine 5. Montanus 6. Iunius 7. Vatablus 8. The great English Bible 9. The Geneva edition And 10. The Hebrew originall Together with a sixfold Vse of every Chapter shewing 1. The Method or Argument 2. The divers readings 3. The explanation of difficult questions and doubtfull places 4. The places of doctrine 5. Places of confutation 6. Morall observations In which worke about three thousand Theologicall questions are discussed above forty Authors old and new abridged and together comprised whatsoever worthy of note either Mercerus out of the Rabbines Pererius out of the Fathers or Marlorat out of the new Writers have in their learned Commentaries collected Now the fourth time imprinted with the Authors corrections before his death By ANDREW WILLET Minister of the Gospell of Iesus Christ. IOHN 5.46 47. Moses wrote of mee but if you beleeve not his writings how shall yee beleeve my words LONDON ¶ Printed by Iohn Haviland and are sold by Iames Boler at the signe of the Marigold in Pauls Church-yard 1633. Hexapla in Genesin THAT IS A SIXFOLD COMMENTARIE UPON GENESIS Wherein six severall Translations that is the Septuagint and the Chalde two Latine of Hierome and Tremelius two English the Great Bible and the Geneva Edition are compared where they differ with the Originall Hebrew and Pagnine and Montanus interlinearie interpretation TOGETHER WITH A SIXFOLD USE of every Chapter shewing 1. The Method or Argument 2. the divers readings 3. the explanation of difficult questions and doubtfull places 4. the places of doctrine 5. places of confutation 6. Morall observations WHEREIN ABOVE A THOVSAND THEOLOGICALL questions are discussed and is comprised together whatsoever worthy of note either Mercerus out of the Rabbines Pererius out of the Fathers Marlorat out of the new Writers have in their learned Commentaries collected Divided into two Tomes and published to the glory of God and the furtherance of all those that desire to read the Scripture with profit Now the third time revised corrected and with divers additions enlarged By ANDREW WILLET Minister of the Gospell of Iesus Christ. IOHN 5.46 47. Moses wrote of me but if you beleeve not his writings how shall ye beleeve my words AMBROS EPIST. 41. Deambulabat Deus in Paradiso c. nunc deambulat in Paradiso Deus quando Scripturas lego Paradisus Genesis in quo virtutes pullulant Patriarcharum Paradisus Deuteronomium in quo germinant legis praecepta God sometime walked in Paradise c. and now God walketh in Paradise when I read the Scriptures Genesis is a Paradise wherein the vertues of the Patriakes doe branch forth Deuteronomie is a Paradise wherein the precepts of the Law doe sprout forth LONDON ¶ Printed by the Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE HIGH AND MIGHTIE RIGHT VERTVOVS AND MOST CHRISTIAN PRINCE King IAMES our dread Soveraigne by the grace of God King of Great Britaine of France and Ireland Defender of the Christian faith MOST gracious Soveraigne as under the shadow of your Highnesse great and mighty tree I meane your Princely and peaceable government the goodly beasts of the field honourable and great persons doe solace themselves so the fowles of heaven and the little birds doe sit and sing in the branches thereof and there build their neasts and lay their young and I among the rest have brought forth my implumed and unfeathered birds those imperfect workes which heretofore I have dedicated to your excellent Majestie and now this which wanteth but the wings of your Highnesse favour to flie abroad To your pious and sacred Majestie therefore I here present this absolute Tractate upon Genesis such as hath not beene yet in respect of the order matter and manner set forth vpon this booke wherein whatsoever questions of weight are discussed and other necessarie matters added as the short preface following sheweth This my third work to your highnesse I here in all humility exhibite and offer as an unfained pledge of our hearty joy for the joyfull entrance of this third yeare of your Majesties happy reigne This divine booke of Genesis as Ambrose advised Augustine to read the Prophesie of Isaias Augustine sendeth Volusianus to the Apostles writings I would commend in the first place as it is in order first to be read of all the Scriptures wherein are declared and set forth the beginning of the world and the progresse thereof the punishment of the wicked and rewards of the righteous so many examples and enticements to vertue such judgements and dehortations from sin and the same so lively and effectuall â—s if they were now presently done before our eyes as Augustine saith of this historie of Genesis I know not how but as often as it is read the hearer is so affected as though the thing were even now effected This worthy history containeth the space of 2368. yeares above halfe the age of the world from the first to the second Adam It insisteth principally in setting forth the life and acts of six honourable Fathers as starres among the rest Adam Noah Abraham Isaack Iacob Ioseph from all these your Majestie may receive somewhat with Adam who in Enos time when religion decayed taught his sonnes apart from the wicked to call upon the name of God your princely care must bee that you and your people as separated from the superstition of the world should worship the Lord more purely with Noah God hath raised you up to bring rest and comfort to his Church as another Abram the Lord hath made you an high Father as Isaack to procure joy and laughter to the Church as Iacob a supplanter of Popish superstition as Ioseph to adde what is wanting in the Church or Common-wealth Much bound unto God is this Church and Common-wealth for your Highnesse peaceable and religious government that whereas we for our sins had deserved with Israel neither to have King nor Church as the Prophet Hoshea saith We have no King because we feared not the Lord and againe in the same place the thorne and thistle shall grow upon their Altars yet the Lord in mercy hath blessed us with both We praise God for your princely vertues your worthy clemencie equity bountie piety which doe shine in your Majestie as the pretious stones in the King of Tyrus garment your gracious clemencie is as a cordiall unto this land which having remitted some great offences must needs passe by smaller trespasses If David pardoned Shemeis rayling he could not but forgive Mephiboseths negligence Your princely peace made abroad doth give us hope of a peaceable state at home as Davids favour toward Abner a reconciled enemie was a signe of grace to Barzillai an ancient friend what would we have
and the Angels upon this day Christ rose the holy Ghost was given and Manna descended from heaven first on this day serm detempor 251. Wherefore I cannot wholly condescend to Mercerus judgement who saith politiae causa retinuerunt Apostols diem dominicum Sabbato subrogatum that the Apostles for policy sake have retained the Lords day in stead of the Sabbath in 2 Gen. vers 3. A policy I grant in the use of the Lords day but that is neither the only nor chiefe reason of the institution thereof There are three causes of the observation of the Lords day a religious and holy use for the Lord to this end did consecrate this day by his owne example and commandement to bee spent in holy exercises the Civill or politicall use of the Lords day is for the rest of our selves our servants and catteâ—ls the ceremoniall or symbolicall end was to shadow forth our spirituall rest in Christ in this last respect I confesse the ceremony of the Sabbath in part to be abolished for it is a symbole still of our everlasting rest in heaven Heb. 4.9 But in the other two respects the law of the Lords day is perpetuall for that as Philo saith it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 festum populare a popular or generall festivall to be observed of all people for ever I doe wonder then this doctrine of the Sabbath and day of rest now called the Lords day having such evident demonstration out of the scriptures and being confirmed by the constant and continuall practice of the Church in all ages that any professing the Gospell specially being exercised in the study of the scriptures should gainsay and impugne these positions following as erronious 1. That the commandement of sanctifying the Sabbath is naturall morall and perpetuall for if it be not so then all the commandements contained in the decalogue are not morall so should we have nine only and not ten commandements and then Christ should come to destroy the Law not to fulfill it contrary to our Saviours owne words Matth. 5.17 2. That all other things in the law were so changed that they were cleane taken away as the priesthood the sacrifices and the sacraments this day namely the Sabbath was so changed that it yet remaineth for it is evident by the Apostles practice Acts 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Apocal. 1.10 that the day of rest called the Sabbath was changed from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke and so was observed and kept holy under the name of the Lords day 3. That it is not lawfull for us to use the seventh day to any other end but to the holy and sanctified end for which God in the beginning created it for this were presumption to alter Gods appointment and the will and ordinance of the Creator must stand in the use of the creature otherwise the Apostle had not reasoned well for the use of meats from the end of the creation which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving 4. As the Sabbath came in with the first man so must it not goe out but with the last for if the keeping of a day of rest holy unto the Lord bee a part of the morall law as it cannot bee denyed then must it continue as long as the Lord hath his Church on earth and the morall Sabbath must stand till the everlasting Sabbath succeed in place thereof 5. That we are restrained upon the Sabbath from work both hand and foot as the Jewes were though not in such strict particular manner as they were for whom it was not lawful to kindle a fire upon the Sabbath Exod. 35.2 yet in generall wee are forbidden all kind of worke upon the Lords day as they were which may hinder the service of God saving such workes as either charity commandeth or necessity compelleth for it is a part of the morall precept in it thou shalt doe no manner of worke 6. That the Lord would have every Sabbath to be sanctâ—fied by the Minister and the people and that in the Church he ought to preach the word and they to heare it every Sabbath day but not each of these under paine of condemnation as the place is misconstrued is confirmed by the practice of our blessed Saviour Luke 4.16 and of S. Paul Act. 13.14 and 20.7 And hereunto are the Canons of our Church agreeable which require that every Minister preach every Lords day and likewise catechise the youth 7. That the Lord hath commanded so precise a rest unto all sorts of men that it may not by any fraud deceit or circumvention whatsoever be broken under the paine of his everlasting displeasure who doubteth of this but that every breach of any part of the morall law especially by deceit and circumvention deserveth in it selfe Gods curse and everlasting dâ—spleasure as the Apostle saith the wages of sinne is death and the Law saith Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law to doe them as the Apostle citeth this text This doctrine of the Sabbath first grounded upon the authority of scripture hath accordingly beene ratified by the constant and perpetuall practice of the Church Origen saith In nostro Dominico die semper pluit Dominus Manna de coelo in our Lords day the Lord alwayes raineth Manna from heaven Hierome Dominicus dâ—es orationi tantum lectionibus vacat upon the Lords dayes they onely give themselves to prayer and reading Ambrose tota diâ— sit vobis oratio vellectio c. nulle actus seculi actus divinitatis impedâ—ant c. Let us all the day be conversant in prayer or reading let no secular acts hinder divine acts let no table play carry away the mind Augustine quomâ—do Maria mater Domini c. As Mary the mother of our Lord is the chiefe among women so among other 〈◊〉 this is the mother of the rest the whole grace of the Sabbath and the ancient festiâ—ity of the people of the Iewes is changed into the solemnity of this day Concil Tullen cap. 19. Oportet eos qui praesunt Ecclesiis c it behoveth those which are set over the Churches upon all dayes but especially upon the Lords dayes to teach the people c. Matisconens 2. cap. 1. Exhibeamus Deo liberam servitutem c. Let us exhibite unto God our free service not because the Lord requireth this of us to celebrate the Lords day by corporall abstinence but he looketh for obedience whereby we treading downe all terrene rites might be raised up to heaven But these allegations are here superfluous seeing there is a learned Treatise of the Sabbath already published of this argument which containeth a most sound doctrine of the Sabbath as is laid downe in the former positions which shall be able to abide the triall of the word of God and stand warranted thereby when other humane fantasies shall
exercise his strength as Augustine againe saith Administrat omâ—ia qua creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios motus exercere sinat God doth so governe all things which he created that yet hee suffereth them to exercise their owne motions 3. God might justly suffer this to be done because hee did know how to turne Adams fall unto good Deuâ— permisit hominem tentari quâ—m sciebut esse casurum quid simul videbat eo casu sâ—â—â—ti posse ad misericordiam c. God suffered man to be tempted whom he knew should fall because he saw how to use his fall to declare his mercy and justice while he justly punished some out of the same damned masse and delivered others in mercy Doct. VI. Adam not damned WHereas v. 15. a promise is made concerning Christ that the seede of the woman should breake the serpents head from hence we infer that our first patents though they sinned yet were by faith in the Messiah to come restored and not utterly condemned which was the heresie of the Tatiaâ—es August de haeres c. 23. In the booke of wisdome we read that wisdome preserved the first father of the world and brought him out of his offence c. 10.1 which is agreeable to the Canonicall scripture because Adam is called the sonne of God Luke 3.38 he was not then the child of death and hell everlastingly to perish Doct. VII Wherein Adam transgressed NOw because carnall men doe extenuate Adams sinne that he was cast out of Paradise for eating an apple I will briefly shew the greatnes of our first parents transgression wherein many sins concurred 1. There was in them both incredulitie in not beleeving Gods words to be true 2. Vnthankfulnesse in not being contented with their estate 3. Pride in desiring to be like unto God 4. Wantonnes in sinning without any necessitie having all the trees in the garden beside to eare of 5. There was the sinne of gluttonie in pampering the desire of the belâ—â—e 6. Disobedience in transgressing the commandement 7. Curiositie in coveting to know the operation of the fruit in bringing them to knowledge 8. Presumption in that they presumed of Gods mercie that they should not die though they did eate 9. Then followed the concupiscence and rebellion of the flesh in being ashamed of their nakednesse 10. They excused their sinne 11. They are guiltie of homicide in bringing death not only upon themselves but all their posteritie 12. Beside Eva seduced her husband 13. Adam sinned in his inordinate affection to his wife in listning to her 14. The easines of the commandemeÌ„t maketh the transgression more heinous as Augustine well noteth answering to this question why God forbad them to eate of that tree Si bona est quare non tango si mala est quare in Paradise ideo in Paradiso est quia bona est sed nolâ— tangâ—â— quiâ— obedienteÌ„ te volâ— if it be good why doe I not touch it if it be evill why is it in Paradise therefore it is in paradise because it is good but I will not have thee touch it because I would have thee obedient God could not then make better triall of mans obedience than in forbidding that which was good Places of confutation Confut I. Infidelity not pride the first sinne of our parent 1. THe opinion of the Popish writers is that pride was the first sinne that Eva was tempted unto because Satan saith unto them yee shall bee as gods but it is rather evident that their first sinne was infidelitie first Satan telleth them ye shall not die at all and so perswadeth them not to give credit to the word of God for if they had verely beleeved that to come to passe which was threatned they would never have given any credit to Satan Confut. II. Our parents lost not their faith 2. BEllarmine also holdeth that our first parents in their transgression lost their faith because by the seducement of Satan they beleeved not what God said unto them ye shall not die Ans. 1. It followeth not if in this one act of faith they failed that therefore totally their faith was extinguished he that shal be seduced in one article or point of faith is he presently stripped of all faith 2. It was no formall infidelitie as though wittingly they rejected Gods word but they were materially deceived onely and their sudden violent affection over-shadowed their knowledge judgement 3. So Peter denied Christ through feare and frailtie yet in his judgement he could not so at once cast off all opinion of Christ hâ—s faith was shaken and winnowed but it failed not as our Saviour testifieth of him that he had praied for him that his faith faile not Luke 23.22 and so was the case in our first parents Confut. III. Not Marie but Christ brake the serpents head 3. vers 15. THe vulgar latine translation readeth shee shall breake thy head c. which the Popish writers understand of the virgin Mary as Pererius doubteth not to give this marginal note B. virgo contrivit caput serpentis the blessed Virgin did break the head of the serpent and Bellarmine also justifieth this translation whereas in the original it is his ipsum it in the neuter gender which must be referred to seed the Septuagint and the Chalde read he in the masculine understanding it of Christ for none else but Christ broke the serpents head Confut. IIII. The tree of life could not actually give life but was a symbole of it 4. vers 22. LEst he take of the tree of life and live for ever Bellarmine would proove from hence that this tree by eating the fruit therof might bring true immortalitie Ans. 1. As the Lord saith by way of derision man is become as one of vs to know good and evill So in the same sense is this other part of the sentence uttered that as a man simply thought to get knowledge by eating of the one so he might imagine to obtaine life by the other 2. For if Adam might have lived by eating of this tree now after he had sinned how would that other saying have taken effect in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 These speeches had beene contrarie the one to the other 3. It was therefore the tree of life as the other was of the knowledge of good and evill that is significative non effective not in operation â—ut in signification it was a signe or symbole of life received from God and by Gods gift should have beene â—reserved if a man had not sinned and therefore man beeing deprived of life lost also the signe thereof Places of Exhortation and practice 1. WE have here set forth unto us from v. 1. to v. 7. the degrees of tentation 1. the suggestion of Satan 2. delectation the woman saw the tree was pleasant c. 3. Consent shee tooke of the fruit 4. The effecting of the thing desired shee did eate
one people with them which they could not doe with those which were uncircumcised QUEST IV. Whether Simeon and Levi their cruell act may be in part or in whole excused Vers. 25. ANd the third day when they were sore two of Iacobs sonnes Simeon and Levi. 1. Some Hebrewes excuse Simeon and Levi their fact because Hemor and Sichem first went about to breake the covenant thinking to spoile them of that they had for thus they say Shall not their flocks and substance be ours vers 23. Contra. 1. But it appeareth not that Hemor and Sichem went about any such thing they thus speake either to perswade the people who most respect their profit Mercer or they meane that by trading or having entercourse with them they should in a manner possesse their goods Perer. 2. But if it were so onely Hemor and Sichem had beene guilty of the violating of this league there was no cause to punish the whole Citie 3. And although they had reason to revenge themselves yet such a cruell massacre cannot be justified 2. Ramban excuseth this fact thinking that by the decrees of Noah if the Magistrates punished not adultery others might but who seeth not what confusion and disorder this doctrine would bring in â— that every private man should take upon him to bee a punisher of sinne The Apostle saith that the power or magistrate beareth not the sword for nought Rom. 13.4 It is peculiar then to him to exercise the sword 3. Philo allegorizeth this story by Dinah which signifieth judgement understanding the soule by Sichem the sonne of Hemor which is interpreted an Asse the brutish affections from the which Simeon and Levi the sonnes of prudence deliver the soule Lib. de migration Abrah But these allegories being devised onely and not warranted by Scripture cannot give any defence to such rage and violence 4. Some doe but in part excuse Simeon and Levi which may be considered on Gods behalfe and so the punishment was just or on the behalfe of the Sichemites who also for consenting unto that grievous sinne were justly also punished but on the behalfe of Simeon and Levi because they did it craftily this judgement was unjust sic Carthusian in libr. Iudith But this allegation maketh nothing for the justifying of Simeon and Levi their enterprise for God knoweth how to turne mens wicked acts to his glory neither did these furious men aime at any such end but sought to satisfie their revengefull minde 5. Some goe yet further that this act was not unjust quoad rem in respect of the thing because the Sichemites had grievously sinned but quoad modum they did it fraudulently Cajetan others say primum motum that the first motion to commit this slaughter was of God but they in the execution did modum excedere exceed measure Thom. Anglic. Cont. But Iacob condemneth not onely the execution but the very first device and counsell Into their secret let not my soule come Gen. 49.6 therefore the very first thought and device was evill and therefore not of God 6. Some proceed yet further and altogether defend both their fact and the manner thereof calling their craft and dissimulation a prudent caution their reasons are these 1. Because all the Sichemites were consenting unto that wickednesse and therefore they deserved punishment Cont. 1. It cannot bee gathered that all the Sichemites were consenting to the sinne of Sichem their fault was because of a carnall minde for their owne profit they received circumcision 2. And though the whole City had herein offended yet Simeon and Levi had no such calling or commission to put them to the sword 2. The place is objected Iudith 9.2 where the Lord is said to have given unto Simeon a sword to take vengeance upon the strangers that opened the wombe of the virgin and vers 4. Which were moved with thy zeale Contra. Though Simeon and Levi were ministers of Gods justice upon the Sichemites for their sinne yet they did it not without sinne and therefore against this booke which is no Scripture where their zeale is commended I oppose the sentence and censure of Iacob who saith That they did it in their selfe-will therefore not by the motion of Gods spirit and Cursed be their wrath Gen. 49.7 but if they had done it in zeale they were rather to be blessed 3. They further reason thus that if Simeon and Levi had committed such an unlawfull act Iacob would have more sharply reproved them Contra. Iacob partly considered the justice of God upon the Sichemites for the outrage committed against Dinah partly hee was moved with her complaint and moane for the losse of her virginity partly he gave place for the time to the rage of his sonnes that were in their fury and this was the cause of so easie a reprehension Mercer 4. But we reade of no restitution which Iacob caused to be made of the goods of the Sichemites taken away which Iacob would have done if the act had beene unlawfull for he saith He got it from the Amorite that is the fields and possessions of the Sichemites by his sword and bow Gen. 48.12 Contra. 1. It is not unlike but that many of the persons as the women and children taken captive were returned for they could not all remaine in Iacobs house and together with them much of the goods 2. The rest together with the ground though first unjustly had it pleased God should remaine unto Iacob as a recompence for the injurie done to his daughter as the Hebrewes tooke of the Egyptians jewels of silver and of gold without any restitution thereof in respect of their long and hard service yet neither this fact of theirs nor the other of Iacobs is here to be imitated Mercer 3. Iacob is said to get it with his sword not as though he joyned with his sonnes in the action or after consented unto it but because he by force and armes was ready to defend the possession of that ground from the invasion of the Canaanites whom God did strike with a feare they attempted nothing against Iacob or his sonnes Gen. 35.5 Mercer 5. Wherefore the best solution of this question is that although Simeon and Levi were ministers of Gods justice secretly working yet both the act and the manner thereof in respect of the instruments and executioners was unlawfull 1. Because they attempted this thing without the counsell or knowledge of Iacob whom this wrong most concerned in the ravishing of his daughter for Iacob saith Into their secret my soule enter not Gen. 49.7 2. They dissembled propounding a condition as though they would enter into a league with them and yet meant it not 3. They make religion a cloake of their cruelty and abuse circumcision to that end the ordinance of God yet Ioseph somewhat to hide the nakednesse of the fathers of that Nation in his narration omitteth to make mention of this craft 4. They put the whole Citie to the sword even those
be warned that they offend not in the like as this correction imposed upon Simeon and Levi was for the admonition of their brethren and posterity 3. That men feeling the justice of God in their due corrections may flee unto Gods mercy and the promises of God in Christ as Adam when he received the sentence of death for his transgression had also the promise of the Messiah given him Mercer 2. Confut. Against popish 〈…〉 SEeing then that corrections remaining after the forgivenesse of sin are to make ourselves and others more cautelous this is no ground for the Popish purgatory paines which are not visible and so serve not for the example of others neither are they availeable unto godly repentance for the which there is no place after this life Mercer 3. Confut. Peter not the chiefest of the Apostles because first 〈◊〉 Vers. 3. RVben mine eldest sonne This is to be observed that the twelve Patriarks are not rehearsed in the same order here as before Gen. 30. and Genes 27. and afterward Numb 1. 〈◊〉 33. yet 〈◊〉 these places Ruben is named first but not alwayes sometime Iudah is named before him as Numb â— 2 As then this were but a simple argument for the preheminence of Ruben before his brethren because he is in most places named first being the eldest so as simply doe the Papists conclude for Peters supremacie before the other Apostles because he is commonly named firsts which was rather because of his Eldership than any priority before the rest neither is he alwayes named in the first place for Galat. â—9 〈◊〉 is named before him 4. Confut. The bookes of Iudith and Tobie not canonicall Vers. 5. SImeon and Levi brethren in evill Hence it may appeare that the booke of Iudith is not Canonicall because there this fact of Simeon is commended cap. 9.2 which here Iacob condemneth and accurseth It satisfieth not to say with Dyonis Carthusian that the fact of Simeon and Levi in respect of the Sichemites was just but unjust in respect of them who brake their faith and covenant for Iudith commendeth their zeale which were moved with thy zeale v. 4. Neither is Lyranus and Pererius answer sufficient 1. For Iudith in that place commendeth also the manner of the fact and saith that God did put the sword of vengeance into their hand vers 2. and Iacob here curseth their very affection and zeale wherewith they were first moved Cursed be their wrath for it was cruell and further whereas Iudith doth set it downe as a reward of their zeale Thou gavest their Princes to the slaughter Iacob even therein doth accurse For in their wrath they slew a man It is evident then that the booke of Iudith was not written by the spirit of God because it commendeth that which is here condemned Seeing also Iacob remembreth Sampson in Dan Mordecai and Esther in Benjamin Barak in Nepthali it is like that Tobie also under Nepthali and Iudith in Simeon should not have beene forgotten if their stories were of like truth 5. Confut. The Pope succeedeth not Christ in this Kingdome Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart from Iudah Pererius applieth this to the kingdome of Christ that is his Church which shall endure for ever and so shall the Pope Christs vicar saith he who succeedeth Christ as the sonne doth the father in his authority and dignity in Gen. 49. numer 58. Conâ—â—a True it is that of Christs dominion there shall be none end and that he will alwayes have a Church upon the earth But the Pope which is the Antichrist is no successor to Christ but an usurper of his kingdome he is Christs son as the Jewes boasted they were Abrahams sonnes but Christ telleth them plainly They were of their father the Devill if ye were Abrahams children saith our Saviour ye would doâ— the workes of Abraham Iohn 8.39.44 So the Pope is his sonne whose doctrine he followeth but to forbid to marry and to teach to abstaine from meats as the Pope doth are the doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4.1 2. 6. Confut. Antichrist shall not come of Dan. Vers. 17. DAn shall be a serpent by the way c Divers of the ancient Writers upon this place did ground their opinion that Antichrist should come of Dan and therefore they say that tribe is omitted Apocal. 7. and this Pererius holdeth a probable opinion and worthy of credit Conâ—r 1. By this meanes that which Iacob pronounceth as a blessing upon Dan they turne to a curse and whereas Iacob speaketh of one that should be a deliverer of his people which some doe fitly apply to Sampson they would have him point out an enemy and adversary to the Church of God 2. The tribe of Dan was dispersed a thousand yeeres before Antichrist appeared in the world 3. Dan is omitted in the Apocalypse because of the idolatry which began in that tribe wherein Antichrist doth imitate him though hee come not of his stocke so likewise is Simeon omitted in Moses benediction Deuter. 33. yet they will not â—nferre that Antichrist should come of that tribe as Simeon is omitted by Moses for his evill example so Dan is by Iohn for his idolatry 7. Confut. Against Limbus 〈◊〉 Vers. 25. WHo shall blesse thee with the blessings of the deepâ—◠〈◊〉 lieth beneath Pererius maketh Ioseph here a type of Christ whom the Patriarks blessed and praised in the lake or Limbus in the deepe beneath whom he delivered from thence numer 1â—5 Contra. 1. These are but weake arguments of such weighty matters that are taken from types and figures â— Iacob speaketh here of temporall blessings of the wholesome aire pleasant dewes fruitfull ground and nourishing springs in the deepe below they are therefore unproperly applied to spirituall 3. Neither shall he ever be able to prove that the Patriarkes were shut up in the deepe below seeing that the rich man in hell looked up and lift up his eyes to Lazarus being in Abrahams bosome Luk. 16. it was then a place above not in the deepe beneath 8. Confut. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 33. WAs gathered to his people 1. Burgensis will have this people to be the fathers in Limbus to whom Iacob went so also Lyranus Contra. 1. Henoch was of this people to whom the Patriarks went after death but hee was not in Limbus hee was taken up to heaven and walked with God 2. Abraham went to his fathers in peace Gen. 15.15 that is with joy and comfort but what comfort is there in Limbus a lake and dungeon of darkenesse 3. Wherefore to be gathered to his people is not to be joyned to the Angels as gloss interlinear for Abraham is said to goe also to his fathers but the Angels were not his fathers neither is this phrase all one as to say he slept with his fathers or went the way of all flesh or changed his life as Perer. Mercer for Ismael is said also to goe to his people Genes â—5
I say with the Apostle Am I become your enemie because I speake the truth Hierom saith Scio me offensurum quà m pluâ—imes qui dum mihi irasâ—untur suam indicant conscientiam I know I shall offend many who while they be angrie with me doe bewray their conscience If they speake against him that defendeth the truth they shew themselves therein enemies to the truth if they cannot indure error to be discovered they declare themselves to be in error In this case therefore they which are offended doe discover their owne conscience to bee corrupted But if the reprehenders of this worke be such as blame other mens diligence because they themselves are idle and finde fault with that which they cannot mend and such as like nothing but their owne I answer with the Apostle He that praiseth himselfe is not allowed but he whom the Lord praiseth Now howsoever other are affected toward me and my poore labours this minde I will beare toward the sharpest Censurers and their writings that as the Apostle said of certaine contentious Preachers in his time That so Christ be preached whether under pretence or sincerely hee would therein joy So I say of such writers whether they write of emulation and vaine glorie or of sincere affection so the truth be maintained I doe rejoyce therein and give God thanks for their labours As Hierom writeth of his friends letters Si amas scribe obsecranti si irasceris iratus licèt scribe magnum hoc desiderii solamen habebo si amici literas vel indignantis accipiam Ad Nitiam If thou lovest me write at my request if thou art angrie yet write it is some comfort unto me that I may receive the letters yea of an angrie friend But some doe thinke that it is in vaine for men to write in this age which so smally considereth of their paines and that it is labour lost which findeth not recompence in the world As though peace were the reward of the pen and the grace of God depended upon the grace and favour of men the gifts of God as they are not bought with money so neither should they be sold for money Hee that serveth the world let him looke for his reward in the world he that serveth Christ shall finde him a plentifull rewarder He that said to his Apostles Great is your reward in heaven hath a reward in store for those which labour in his name They which expect either praise or profit in this world having their desire doe receive their reward as our Saviour said of the Pharisies that did all of vaine ostentation They have their reward As for the praise of men as Hierom saith of the Preacher Docente te in Ecclesia non clamor populi sed gemitus suscitetur lachrymae auditorum laudes tuae sint ad Nepotian When thou teachest in the Church seeke not to raise the crying but the sighing of the people let the teares of the hearers be thy praise As the Preacher must not respect the praise of men so neither the writer And concerning other reward of gaine or preferment to be expected Ambrose hath this excellent speech Propositam pia mens mercedem non appetit sed pro mercede habet boni facti conscientiam justi operis effectum angustae mentes invitentur promisso erigantur speratis mercedibus lib. 1. de Abraham cap. 8. A godly minde coveteth no propounded reward but counteth the conscience of well doing and the good effect of the well done worke a reward let unwilling minds bee enticed by promises and stirred up with hope of rewards Now it remaineth that I briefely shew the argument order and matter of this Commentarie wherein I have chiefely propounded unto my selfe omitting the ordinarie and usuall collections the discussing and solution of such questions as seemed more obscure and difficult according to that saying of Augustine Verbi Dei altitudo exercet studium non denegat intellectum The depth of the word of God doth exercise meditation and studie it denieth not understanding And he fitly resembleth the holy writers the Prophets and Apostles to the Angels whom Jacob saw ascending and descending Ascendentes sunt quando perfectis perfecta praedicant descendentes quando parvulis imperitis simplicia insinuant They ascend when they preach perfect things to the perfect they descend when they insinuate plaine things to the simple I have followed the same method in this Commentarie upon Exodus which I did before observe upon Genesis they that know the one may also judge of the other This historie of Exodus consisting of two parts the redemption of the Lords people and the constitution of them being redeemed by wholesome lawes and ordinances I have accordingly divided into two parts or tomes the first whereof handleth the peoples deliverance and preservation unto the 19. Chapter The second treateth of their constitution and setling of their estate by wholesome lawes both Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall which part likewise is distributed into two books the first containing the promulgation of the foresaid lawes to Chapter 30. the other the execution thereof thence to the end of the booke Thus have I proceeded in the old Testament hitherto â—ot being yet resolved with my selfe whether to take the books of the Hebrew Scriptures in order which a mans life time would scarce suffice in this manner to goe thorow or to make choice of the more difficult books indifferently out of the old and new Testament In the handling whereof wee shall see the different gifts of Interpreters as Hierome well noteth Multi super Evangelia bene disserunt sed in explanatione Apostoli impares sui sunt alii cum in instrumento novo optimè senserint in Psalmis veteri Testamento muti sunt Dialog 1. advers Pelagian Divers doe treat well upon the Gospels but in explaining the Apostle are unlike themselves others being of sound judgement in the new Testament are no bodie in the old But yet to begin with the old maketh a good way to understand the new for the law is a schoolemaster as the Apostle saith to bring us unto Christ. And as Ambrose elegantly resembleth it Lex velut inferioris molae saxum tarda pigra otiosa The law as the nether milstone is heavie slow and of small riddance But yet as the upper milstone though of greater agilitie and quicker dispatch yet cannot grinde without the nether but both together make good meale so the truth and faith of Christ as fine flower is betweene the old and new Testament minsed and divided forth unto us But this further I must advertise the discreet Reader of not to take offence that I have made use in this Commentarie both of Protestant and Popish writers old and new upon this booke as I have here set them downe in the margen not rejecting the judgement of any that witnesse for the truth For as the Apostle alleageth the Heathen Poets so farre
Such things as went before as The occasion which was their grievous oppression in Egypt chap. 1. The preparation of the instruments of their deliverance of Moses chap. 2 3 4. and Aaron chap. 4. with their message to Pharaoh chap. 5 6. The meanes procuring their deliverance those ten severall plagues which were sent upon Egypt described from chap. 7. to chap. 12. 2. Their deliverance it selfe consisting of their Departure out of Egypt with the manner thereof and institution of the Passeover chap. 12. and their going forward in their journey c. 13. Their passing thorow the red sea with the destruction of the Egyptians chap. 14. Their thanksgiving chap. 15. â— In the constitution of the Church is set forth 1. The provision of things necessarie for them as 1. Their foode chap. 16. and water for their thirst chap. 17. 2. Defence from their enemies as the Amalekites chap. 17. 3. A politike order set for government c. 18. 2. The prescription and promulgation of lawes Morall chap. 20. with the preparation thereunto chap. 19. Judiciall belonging to the policie of the Common-wealth chap. 21. to 24. Ceremoniall touching The sacred things of the Tabernacle chap. 25.27.30 The Tabernacle it selfe c. 26.27 The Ministers of the holy things the Priests and Levites Their institution with their holie garments chap. 28. Consecration ch 29. The workmen and instruments chap. 30. 3. The execution and practice of their people partly in Their disobedience to the Morall law in their apostasie and idolatrie chap. 32. with their reconciliation chap. 33.34 Their obedience concerning the ceremonials Of the people in bringing stuffe to make the Tabernacle and other holy things chap. 35.36 Of the workmen in making all things according to the patterne chap. 36. to 39. Moses in approving the worke chap. 39. and disposing it chap. 40. 3. Certaine generall questions out of the whole booke explaned QUEST I. Concerning the inscription of the booke THis booke is called in Hebrew of the first words velle shemoth that is and these are the names of the Greekes it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exodus of the miraculous going of the Israelites out of Egypt Simler The inscription of the bookes of Scripture is of three sorts for it is taken either from the persons that wrote them as the bookes of Esay Ierem. c. or whereof they be written either in generall as the bookes of Ioshuah and of the Judges or in part as the bookes of Samuel or else from the things entreated of as the booke of Leviticus Numbers c. or of the first words of the booke as Genesis is called of the Hebrewes beresheth in the beginning Leviticus veâ—â—kra and he called c. which are the first words of the text and so also is this booke named as is said before Iun. and the reason of it may be this because where the writer of any booke of Scripture left it without name they of elder time for reverence and religion sake did forbeare to give it any title Simler QVEST. II. Of the computation of yeeres comprehended in the storie of Exodus COncerning the continuance of time and number of yeeres which are comprehended in this booke they are found to be 142. as may bee thus gathered From the death of Ioseph to the birth of Moses are yeeres 60. from the birth of Moses unto the departure of Israel out of Egypt are yeeres 80. chap. 7.7 from the departure of Israel thence unto the Tabernacle erected was one yeere chap. 40.17 Iun. These two latter numbers are certainly gathered out of the Scripture only the first may be doubted of which is thus also warranted all the time of the peregrination of Abraham and his seed in Egypt and Canaan maketh 430. yeeres Exod. 22.40 this time beginneth when Abraham was called out of his countrie and 30. yeeres was run at the birth of Isaack who at 60. begat Iacob Gen. 25.26 who at an 130. went downe into Egypt unto Ioseph Gen. 47.9 who being then 39. yeeres old and dying at an 110. Gen. 50.26 lived after that yeeres 71. then put hereunto 80. yeeres of Moses age all maketh joyning the summes of 30.60.130.71.80 together yeeres 371 there remaineth then the summe of 59. yeeres or 60. to make up the whole summe of 430. yeeres QUEST III. Whether Moses were the writer of this booke NOw that Moses was the pen-man and writer of this booke the spirit of God being the author and inspirer thereof it is diversly evident 1. for Moses testifieth of himselfe that he wrote all the words of the Lord Exod. 24.4 which are contained in this booke 2. The Scripture so divideth the bookes of the old Testament that they were written either by Moses or some other of the Prophets Luk. 16.31 3. Our Saviour alleaging a certaine place out of this booke doth call it the booke of Moses Mark 12. 26. Have you not read in the booke of Moses so also Luk. 20.37 And that the dead shall rise againe even Moses shewed it beside the bush when he said c. QUEST IV. Whether Moses Iudiciall lawes do now necessarily bind the Civill Magistrate BUt whereas in this booke divers both morall ceremoniall and Judiciall lawes are prescribed whereof the two first there is no question but that the one doth bind us still and the other is abrogated only concerning the Judicials of Moses it is controverted whether Christian Magistrates are bound to observe them which Judicials being of three sorts either such which are annexed to the Morall law as the punishment of adulterie and murther and disobedience to parents with death and such like or such as were appendant to the Ceremoniall law as the punishment of those that touched any dead thing or that came neere a woman in her monethly course and such like or such as belonged to the peculiar policie and state of that Common-wealth as concerning the yeere of Jubile the raising up of seed to the brother departed in marying his wife and such like of the two latter there is no doubt made but that the one is abrogated together with the ceremonies whereon they attended the other as proper to that government are now determined only the third kinde of Judicials remaineth about the which great question is made how farre Christian governours are obliged to the same For the discussing of which question 1. I neither am of their opinion which thinke that the Judiciall law is left to the libertie of the Christian Magistrate to adde to it and take from it and to alter it as shall â—e thought fit for the time and manner of the countrey for this were 1. to be wiser than God to leave altogether those directions and rules of justice which he hath set downe and the Apostle saith the foolishnesse of God is wiser than men 1. Cor. 1.25 that which seemeth to be meanest of the Divine orders is farre beyond the wisest humane inventions 2. And there is but one Law-giver that
commendation of himselfe But no such supposition iâ— here necessarie for Moses here ascribeth nothing to himselfe but onely sheweth how â—hey were set apart of God for this great worke neither is all kind of boasting unlawfull namely such as is referred to the glory of God as Saint Paul did say of himselfe that he laboured more than all the Apostles 2. As Aaron iâ— in the former verse set before Moses as having the preeminence of nature because he was eldest so here Moses is set before Aaron as having the preeminence of grace who was first called and from whose mouth Aaron was to receive direction and by whose hand Aaron was consecrated to the Priesthood Pellican QUEST XVI In what sense Moses saith he was of uncircumcised lips Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips and how should Pharaoh heare me c. 1. Whereas the Septuagint read of a small voyce Augustine moveth this doubt that Moses should be said to have so small a voice as though Pharaoh onely had not beene able to heare them quâ—st 7. in Exod. But this doubt ariseth upon ignorance of the originall for the true reading is I am of uncircumcised lips 2. As circumcision properly signifieth the cutting off that which is superfluous in the bodie and so consequently of any superfluitie in any power or facultie so uncircumcision signifieth the remaining of that superfluous part either in any part or power of the bodie or of the soule so because Moses stammered in his speech and so doubled many superfluous syllables in that sense he saith his lips that is his words uttered by his lips were uncircumcised Iun. But that which is uncircumcised is also taken for that which is polluted and defiled as S. Stephen saith Act. 7. that the Iewes were of uncircumcised hearts and eares Perer. But this is diligently to be marked that God notwithstanding Moses so oft complaineth of this naturall defect and imperfection yet would not take it from him but giveth him the supplie of his brother Aarons eloquence that Moses should not be sufficient of himselfe Perer. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Knowledge still increased the neerer they approched to the time of the Messias Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Lord did more fully reveale himselfe to Moses than to Abraham David saw more than Moses of Christ as it is extant in the Psalmes and evident by the particular prophesies of the Messiah Daniel saw more than David describing the very time of the Messiahs comming The Apostles saw more than the Prophets which desired to see those things which they saw and did not see them Matth. 13. Thus we see that still in processe of time knowledge increased and more still was added unto it and the neerer they came unto the time of the Messiah the greater was the light Gregor homil 16. super Ezechiel 2. Doct. God performeth his promises for his owne mercy and truths sake Vers. 4. AS I made my covenant with them The onely cause that moveth the Lord to be gratious to his people is the remembrance of his covenant which proceeded from his love there was nothing in this unthankfull people to procure the love of God toward them So the Apostle saith Herâ—iâ— iâ— love not that we loved God but that he loved us 1 Ioh. 4.10 Piscat 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. Of certaine Hereticks that take exception to the authoritie of the booke of the Canticles Vers. 3. I Appeared unto c. by the name of almightie God Certaine Heretikes because God was knowne to Abraham by his name Shaddai to Moses by his name Iehovah and there is no booke in Scripture beside the Canticles wherein some of these names of God are not found have impiously taken exception upon this reason against this booke Contra. True it is that in the Canticles which are indited to set forth the sweet spirituall love betweene Christ and his Church the fearefull and terrible names of God are omitted in stead of omnipotent the Church calleth Christ her Spouse peaceable and lovely for Lord her Spouse her beloved for Iehovah that ineffable name she compareth him to a bundle of Myrrhe and to an Ointment powred out so Christ also giveth unto the Church amiable termes as Sister Spouse the Dove and such like and this is the cause why those fearefull names are omitted in that bookes Perer. And for the same cause Christ in the Gospell setteth not forth God under the names of Adâ—nai Shaddai Iehovah as in the Law but under the name of God and our Father because the Gospell bringeth peace and comfort not feare and terror sic Zeigler 2. Conf. Of the Iewes that attribute great force to the letters of the name Iehovah BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Jewes ascribe much unto this name affirming that by the vertue thereof miracles may be wrought and that Christ did thereby effect his great works they attribute unto this name power to cast out deuils to adjure spirits to heale diseases and hereupon Magicians in their devilish invocations abuse the names of God Elohim Adonai Iehovah Contra 1. Words have no vertue or propertie beside the signification If by words pronounced any thing bee effected it proceedeth of faith not of the sound of the words if any words of themselves wrought any thing most like the words of prayer yet not the words but the prayer of faith saveth Iam. 5.15 If it be answered that the uttering of the name of Iehovah to such purposes is with faith I replie that it cannot be because faith is grounded upon the word but they have no warrant out of the word that the syllables of the name Iehovah have any such force 2. Indeed in the name of Iehovah that is by faith in his name many great works have beene done but not by vertue of the letters and syllables As the seven sonnes of Sceva a Jew by the bare name of Iesus could doe nothing Acts 19.14 but by faith in his name were miracles wrought Act. 3.16 3. Christ wrought miracles not by words and syllables but because he was Iehovah the Lord of life and power himselfe he by his owne power brought forth these wonderfull works 4. Iosephus writeth that Alexander meeting Iaddâ—a the high Priest in his priestly garments having the name of Iehovah in his forehead did fall downe at his feet and worshipped But this was not done by vertue of those letters but by the power of God for being secretly asked of Parmenio why hee whom all men adored fell downe at the high Priests feet answered Non hunc se adorare sed Deo cujus pontifex esset honorem illum habuisse That he worshipped not him but yeelded that honour to God whose Priest he was 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. The greater light of the Gospell requireth greater faith Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne This then was a just rebuke unto the Israelites that
necessary that Pharaoh should not hearken unto Moses because the Lord had foretold so much who cannot be deceived But Pharaoh was not forced or compelled thereunto there is then an absolute or violent necessity which forceth and compelleth there is a conditionall and hypotheticall necessity when a thing is said to be necessary another thing presupposed so Pharaohs disobedience and obstinacy was the second way necessary upon the presupposall of Gods prescience but the first way it was not necessary the first necessity is coactive but the second is voluntary the other neither justifieth a man if he doe well being forced noâ— condemneth him if hee doe evill but the second hath place in both both the righteous have praise whose obedience in respect of Gods ordinance is necessary and infallible and the wicked are justly condemned who sinne willingly though Gods prescience considered in some sort also necessarily Borrh. 5. Places of controversie and confutation 1. Confut. Against those that impugne the deity of Christ. Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God Hence certaine Heretikes as Nestorius that did separate the humanity of Christ from his divine nature would confirme their heresie that the man Christ was God no otherwise than Moses is called God as Eliphandus a Bishop of Spaine who held that the man Christ was onely the Sonne of God by adoption Contra. 1. The name of God in Scripture is given unto men as Psal. 80. I said ye are Gods but that title is given them in respect of their office but it agreeth unto Christ by nature for here the Lord is said to have appointed Moses God not to have begotten him as Hilarie well noteth neither is he simply called God as Christ is but with an addition Pharaohs God 2. Not onely the name of Elohim God is given unto Christ but Iehovah which is a name not communicable unto any creature but peculiar unto God and if Christ were no otherwise God than Moses was it were Idolatry to worship him Simler 3. Hilarie also sheweth that Christ is said to be five wayes very God which agree unto none but him 1. in name he is simply called God as Iohn 1. The word was God and 1. Epist. Ioh. 5.20 speaking of Jesus Christ he saith the same is very God 2. By his nativity and generation and so he is called the Sonne of God 3. By nature hee is one with God I and the father are one 4. In power all power is given me in heaven and in earth Matth. 20. 5. By his owne profession he professed himselfe to be the Sonne of God and therefore the Jewes went about to kill him because he said that God was his Father Iohn 5.18 Hilar. lib. 7. de trinitat 2. Confut. Against transubstantiation Vers. 13. AArons rod devoured their rods The Papists would establish their transubstantiation by this place for as Aarons rod being turned into a serpent is still called a rod not because it was so now but for that it had beene so so the bread in the Eucharist after it is converted into the body of Christ is called bread still because it was so before Contra. 1. If they could shew Scripture to warrant the conversion of the bread into Christs body as here is an evident text for the turning of the rod into a serpent they should say somewhat but untill they can doe that their error can have no colour from hence 2. Beside Aarons rod is so called not only because it had beene a rod before but it was to returne to be a rod againe but they will not have the body of Christ returne againe to be bread Simler In the questions before handled the 27. and 28. concerning the power of Satan in counterfeiting the spirits of the dead one question of purpose there handled by Pererius touching the apparition of Samuel raised by the Pythonisse 1. Sam. 28. I of purpose there omitted reserving it for this place of confutation 3. Confut. That Samuel himselfe appeared not to Saul but the Devill in his likenesse 1. THe most of that side are of opinion that it was the very soule of Samuel not raised up by the witches enchantments but God interposing himselfe did prevent her superstitious invocations and sent Samuel to declare his judgements to Saul sic Thostatus Cajetanus Pererius and their reasons are these First because the Scripture saith it was Samuel 2. Hee saith as the Lord spake by my hand vers 17. which was true of Samuel not of the Devill in the likenesse of Samuel 3. Hee foretelleth what should happen unto Saul the next day which the Devill could not doe 4. In Ecclesiasticus it is written that Samuel after his sleepe told of the Kings death chap 46.20 Ferer Contr. 1. The Scripture speaketh according as the thing appeared not as it was as Pharaoh in his dreame is said to have seene kine come out of the river Gen. 4.1 2. which were but representations of kine 2. As the Devill tooke upon him Samuels person so he also counterfeiteth his speech it was not true out of the Devils mouth no more was it true Samuel such counterfeit speech became a counterfeit Samuel 3. The Devill might either by certaine conjectures perceiving in what distresse Saul was and that God had forsaken him gesse what the successe of the battell should be or rather God herein might force him to speake the truth as did the false Prophet Balaam Borrh. 4. The authority of the booke of Ecclesiasticus doth not presse us and Augustine doubteth also thereof affirming that it was not in Canone Hebraeorum The Hebrewes received it not into the Canon of Scripture lib. de cura pro mortuis chap. 18. 5. Neither is there the like reason of Gods preventing the witches enchantments and Balaams divinations for that God did to his further glorie to shew his power in making the false Prophet to be an instrument of the trueth but this had beene contrary to Gods owne law who forbiddeth that any should aske counsell of the dead Deut. 18. Borrh. 2. Some doe goe further and thinke that the Devill might have power also to bring up Samuels body as Satan transported Christs body to the top of the pinacle Contra. 1. There is not the like reason betweene the transporting of the bodies of the living and of the dead which are asleepe and at rest 2. Satan had no power over Christs body but hee yeelded himselfe to Satans temptation that hee might overcome him in his owne weapon and this was permitted unto Satan to doe for the glorie of God the comfort of his members the confusion and victory over Satan but if Satan should be suffered to take up the bodies of the Saints neither God should receive honour by it nor the Church profit and beside Satan thereby would strengthen his Kingdome of darkenesse Borrh. 3. Wherefore the sounder judgement is that it was not the spirit of Samuel but of Satan that appeared to Saul who can transforme himselfe into an Angel
the principall and chiefe moneth as Vatablus but the first in order from whence all the rest should be numbred 2. Divers nations have had a divers custome in the accompt of their yeeres the Egyptians in their Hieroglyphikes counted every moneth a yeere the Arabians three moneths as from the spring to the Autumne from thence to midwinter The Acarnanians counted six moneths to a yeere as from the spring to the Autumne the Romanes and the Hebrewes reckoned twelve moneths and so is the yeere to bee taken here 3. It was the first moneth for matters ecclesiasticall and belonging to religion But the civill yeere began in the seventh moneth Levit. 25.9 As the Egyptians began their ecclesiasticall yeere from Midsummer and their civill from the Autumne Iun. From thence also they began their Jubile and the account of the seventh yeere of rest which if it had begun in the spring they should have wanted two yeeres fruits for the seventh yeere of rest and Jubile should begin before they had reaped the fruits sowne in the sixt yeere and in the seventh it was not lawfull for them either to sow or reape 4. As it was the first moneth of the yeere so was iâ— the chiefe and most famous in respect of the deliverance of the Israelites and in this moneth they went over Jordane and came into the land of Canaan the 10. day of the first moneth Iosh. 4.19 Perer. And now all things began to flourish and revive in the spring so that the earth did also as it were seeme to rejoyce for the liberty of the people of God Ferus From hence the Israelites for the remembrance of so glorious a deliverance had great cause to begin the computation of their yeere as Christians now doe from the nativity of our Lord for a commemoration of their spirituall deliverance Perer. QUEST IV. Of the name of this first moneth called of the Hebrewes Abib of the Chaldes Nisan THe name of this first moneth is not here expressed but chap. 13.4 it is called the moneth Abib so called because in that moneth corne began to be ripe 1. But here I cannot subscribe unto the opinion of Pererius therein following Paulus Burgensis that the Hebrewes had no names for their moneths before the captivity of Babylon but by their number as the first second third and after the captivity they borrowed the names of the moneths of the Medes and Persians and chiefly of the Chaldeans as it is to be found in the bookes of Nehemia Esther and the prophesie of Zacharie and the bookes of the Macchabees 2. But this appeareth to be otherwise for in divers places of Scripture wee finde the names of some of the moneths after the calling of the Hebrewes before the captivity of Babylon as the second moneth Zif 1 King 6.1 and the 7. moneth Ethanim 1. King 8.2 Pererius saith that these were not the proper names of these moneths but onely appellatives signifying the properties of those moneths as the first was called Zif of the opening because the flowers began then to open and shew the other signified strong because in that moneth fruits were gathered whereby mans heart was comforted and made strong Vatab. Or because they were of strong constitution which resisted and overcame the diseases incident to that season of the yeere about the fall of the leafe Cajetane Contra. 1. This is no good argument these names have some speciall signification therefore they were not the proper names of the moneths Abib signifieth an eare of corne Levit. 2.14 Was it not therefore a name of the first moneth which was so called because the corne then eared and began to be ripe So Bul was the name of the eight moneth 1. King 6.38 so called of the inundation of waters which fall in that moneth 2. It is very probable that those Chalde names of the moneths as Adar Cisleu Elul were not taken up of the Hebrewes till after the captivity as the first is mentioned Nehâ—m 6.19 the second Zachar. 7.1 the third 1. Maâ—chah 14.27 But the Hebrew names were in use before as appeareth by these already given in instance 3. Now the proper names of the moneths as they were used after the Captivity were these the first Nisan answering to our March the second Tiar answering to Aprill the third Sivan which is our May the fourth Tamuz our June the fifth Ab which we call July then Elul agreeable to August the seventh Tisri sorting to our September the eight Marchesâ—â—an with us October the ninth Cisleu our November the tenth Tebeth the same with December the eleventh Sebath named with us January the twelfth Adar which is correspondent to our February Ex Pererio QUEST V. When the first moneth of the Hebrewes tooke beginning NOw to know when to beginne the first moneth of the yeere 1. Some give this rule that whereas the Hebrewes alwayes count their moneths from the new Moone as Psalm 81.3 Blow up the trumpet in the new Moone they will have that to be the first moneth whose full Moone is neerest to the equinoctiall But this rule sometime faileth for it may fall out that two full Moones are equally distant from the equinoctiall and then it would be uncertaine which Moone to take 2. Some say that was the first moneth with the Hebrewes whose new Moone was neerest to the equinoctiall whether it were before or after Ferus But this rule doth not hold neither for it may bee that one new Moone falleth out as upon the 7. day of March another upon the fifth of Aprill and so further off from the equinoctiall that is when the night and day is of equall length and yet this shall rather be the first Moone than the other 3. Therefore this is a more certaine observation that the first moneth should be that whose fourteenth day falleth out either upon the Equinoctiall or presently after it and so the new Moone of the first moneth will fall out neither before the eight day of March nor after the fifth day of Aprill 4. Now hence it is evident that the first moneth of the Hebrewes is never all within March it may sometime be all without March though not all without Aprill as when the Hebrewes every third yeere put in a moneth to make the yeere to agree with the course of the Sunne so that they had two Adars as it might be two Februaries together then the latter Adar being mensis intercalaris the moneth put betweene concurring with March the first moneth began with April but for the most part their first moneth tooke part of March and part of April QUEST VI. Why the Lambe was commanded to be prepared foure dayes before Vers. 3. IN the tenth of this moneth let every man take unto him a lambe c. They were commanded to set apart the paschall lambe foure dayes afore for these causes 1. Lest that if they had deferred it till the instant of their departure they might by reason of other businesse
patronizing their labours is not the meanest flower in your garland nor the smallest pearle among your jewels nor of the least grace among your vertues But as Plutarke saith The Moone never sheweth fairer than when it is at the full so your beneficence and favour toward such sheweth your fulnesse which with all other honourable parts I wish may still increase with you as the Moone and never decrease as the Sunne Now in one word I will touch the occasion of my writing As before I handled in my Commentary upon Genesis the holy histories of Abraham Izhak Iakob Ioseph So observing the same method I have entred into the history of Moses life and acts I have chiefly handled the obscurer questions which fall out in this booke of Exodus not to bee inferiour in mine opinion either in depth of knowledge or weight and pithinesse of argument or variety of delight to any in all the Scripture Neither have I omitted the plainer observations of most speciall note fit for edifying for as Augustine well saith In omni copia scripturarum sanctarum pascimur apertis exercemur obscuris illie fames pellitur hic fastidium In the great plenty of the sacred Scriptures wee are nourished with the plaine places and exercised with the obscure that ariveth away hunger and this satiety Of Moses therefore the Writer of the Law I thought good to write to a Moses in our times a most honourable Professor and Iudge of the Law Three things in Moses are worthy of all eminent persons to be imitated his beginning without ambition his proceeding without corruption his ending with glory For the first Moses presumptuously aspired not to that high calling to be the deliverer and Iudge of the Lords people but by all meanes would have declined it And as the Apostle noteth of Aaron that no man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that was called of God as Aaron So was it true of Moses and therefore as Hierome saith Indignum se judicans ministerio Dei major effectus est While hee counted himselfe unworthy of the service of God he became greater Secondly in the execution of his office Moses was most faithfull as the Scripture giveth testimony of him that he was faithfull in all his house Heb. 3.2 Hee delivered the oppressed delayed not the right of the poore received no gifts corrupted not judgement sought not himselfe The people waited upon Moses but from morning to even Exodus 18.14 which Iethro his father in law thought to bee too much that the people should stay so long for judgement and therefore adviseth him to take a more speedy course for expedition It was admirable that Moses having six hundred thousand people to attend upon him for their causes held them no longer than from morning to even Herein your Honour with other of your honourable place shall doe well as your Honour hath well shewed heretofore your care that way to imitate Moses in abridging the tediousnesse and length of suits and in taking care that poore suters bee not wearied with long attendance But this is more to bee wondred at that Moses having two sonnes Gershon and Eleazar sought not their advancement nor to make them great seeing he consecrated Aaron and his sonnes for the Priesthood and ordained Ioshua his minister and servant to succeede him in the government making no mention at all nor commending his sonnes unto God for either place Wherein hee well declared that hee affected not the greatnesse of his owne house but studied wholly for the welfare of the people of God And herein Ioshuah followed his masters steps who divided the land of Canaan among the tribes and left nothing for himselfe but that the people last of all cast him out a part and that but a meane one in the barren mountaines as Hierome noteth writing of that Christian Matron Paula how shee visited the sepulchre of Ioshuah Satisque mirata est quod distributer possessionem sibi montana aspera delegasset And marvelled very much that the divider of the possessions chose the hilly and craggie places for himselfe and he addeth further Imo Iosua nihil sibi reliquit sed portio ab Israelitis illi concessa Ioshua left nothing for himselfe but a portion was given him by the Israelites as is evident Iosh. 19.49 Whence it cannot be inferred that it is unlawfull for Governors to provide for their kindred and posterity for Ioseph being in authority nourished his father and brethren but hereby it appeareth that the chiefest care of Magistrates who are Fathers of the Common-wealth should be for the publike weale more than for their private wealth As the Apostle saith I seeke not yours but you for the children ought not to lay up for the fathers but the fathers for the children And Bernard saith well Praees nunquid ut de subditis crescas nequaquam sed ut ipsi de te Thou art set over others not that thou shouldest increase by them but that they be increased by thee As Moses was faithfull and sincere in his office so his end was glorious who ever had a more honourable end than Moses whom the Lord is said to have buried whereof Ambrose thus writeth Quis in terrenis ejus potuit deprehendere reliquias quem secum esse Dei filius in Evangelio demonstravit Who could thinke to finde his reliques that is his body in the earth whom the Sonne of God shewed in the Gospell to bee with him Such an honourable end God will send to all Christian Magistrates that walke in Moses steppes whose excellent vertues of humility sincerity piety while your Honour setteth before your eyes Moses reward of immortall glory shall assuredly follow through the abundant mercies of God and the infinite merits of Iesus Christ our blessed Saviour to whom bee praise for ever Your Honours ready to be commanded in the Lord ANDREW WILLET THE SECOND PART OF THIS BOOKE OF EXODVS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND SETling of both the Ecclesiasticall and civill State of Israel by most just and godly Lawes THe first part of this booke concerneth the deliverance and redemption of the people both from the cruell bondage of the Egyptians and from other dangers which befell them in the desart Now followeth the other generall part of the constitution and setling of their State by wholesome and good Lawes both morall judiciall and ceremoniall to chap. 30. with the execution and practice of the people to the end of the booke CHAP. XIX 1. The Method and Argument THis Chapter containeth a description of the preparation of the people to receive the Lawes afterward given them which preparation is both generall to vers 9. then particular to the end of the Chapter In the generall preparation first the circumstances are set downe both of time place and persons when they removed from whence and whither and who the whole host of Israel vers 1 2. Secondly the generall
and terror love and feare for a Fountaine cannot make both salt water and sweet Iam. 3.12 But the law is the minister of death of feare and terror Ergo not of life and peace and so consequently not of the faith of the Gospell which bringeth all these 3. The same thing doth not both make the wound and give a plaister to heale it The law doth shew us our sinne faith by grace in Christ healeth it the law reviveth sinne Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.8 but we are dead to sinne and alive to God in Iesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6.11 The same cannot make us both to die unto sinne and revive sinne the law doth the one therefore not the other So Augustine saith Ad hoc data est lex ut vulnera ostenderet peccatorum qua gratiae benedictione sanaret Therefore was the law given that it should shew the wounds of our sinnes which it should heale by the benediction of grace August de poenitent medic 4. The Preachers publishers and givers of the law and Gospell are divers The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Ioh. 1.17 But if justifying faith were commanded in the law then grace also should come by the ministrie of Moses that gave the law This is Bernards reason who further inferreth thus Venit prâ—inde gratia plenus veritate Dominus noster c. Therefore Christ our Lord came full of grace and truth that what could not bee done by the law might bee fulfilled by grace Serm. parâ— 28. 5. The qualities and conditions of the law and the Gospell are divers the law promiseth life to him that worketh Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse of the law That the man which doth these things shall live thereby Rom. 10.5 But the Gospell requireth not the condition of working but beleeving to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 If then faith were commanded in the law to beleeve should also be a worke of the law then the Apostles conclusion were in vaine I conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the law But if faith be excluded out of the works of the law then it is not commanded or contained in the law for then it should be a worke of the law 2. Further the invocation of Angels and Saints which is commonly practised and stifly maintained in the Church of Rome is another apparent transgression of this first commandement because they give a speciall part of the divine worship which consisteth in prayer and invocation unto the creature First we will see and examine the arguments produced by the Romanists in defence of this superstition and then by other reasons out of the Scriptures convince and confute them The Romanists Arguments answered brought in defence of the invocation of Saints 1. THe Saints doe pray for us therefore we may and ought to pray them The antecedent or first part that the Saints doe pray for us they would prove by these places of Scripture Exod. 32.13 Moses thus saith in his prayer Remember Abraham Izhak and Iakob thy servants c. Ierem. 15.1 Though Moses and Samuel stood before me yet could not my affection be toward this people Baruch 3.4 O Lord God almightie heare now the prayer of the dead Israelites 2 Macchab. 14.15 And Onias spake and said This is a lover of the brethren who prayeth much for the peoplâ— to wit Ieremias the Prophet of the Lord. Answ. 1. As for the testimonies cited out of Baruch and the booke of Macchabees they prove nothing because they are no books of Canonicall Scripture 2. The other testimonies are impertinently alleaged for in the first Moses maketh no mention of the prayers which Abraham Izhak and Iakob should make for the people but of the covenant which the Lord made with them In the other of an hypotheticall and conditionall proposition they make a categoricall and absolute affirmation The text is If Moses and Samuel stood they inferre that Moses and Samuel did stand Simler But it may better be answered that if these were alive among the people to stand before the Lord for them in prayer c. as see the like Ezech. 14.14 Though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were among them they should deliver but their owne soules by their righteousnesse 3. The Saints doe pray unto God by their generall wishes and desires as wishing that the Kingdome of God were accomplished as Revel 6.10 The soules under the Altar crie with a loud voyce saying How long Lord c. doest thou not judge and avenge our bloud But our particular necessities they are ignorant of and so doe noâ— make particular requests for us therefore the argument followeth not they pray by their generall desires for the Church Ergo they pray for us in particular 4. Seeing that the Romanists doe hold that the Patriarks and Fathers of the old Testament were in Limbo which they make a member or part of hell they doe contradict themselves in making them mediatours and intercessours in heaven 2. Argum. The Angels they say know our affaires and pray for us As Zachar. 1.12 The Angell of Iehovah answered and said O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou bee unmercifull to Ierusalem c. Therefore it is lawfull to pray to the Angels Answ. 1. That the Angels doe report our affaires unto God and so may make relation of our prayers and words also as of our other gests and acts unto God as the Lords messengers and ministers we will not denie but that they make any particular requests for men the Scripture no where speaketh and we are not bound to beleeve the relation of our prayers unto God is one thing and mediation and intercession is another 2. That Angell of Iehovah which prayed for Jerusalem was the Lord Christ who maketh intercession for his Church unto whom the rest of the Angels returne their message vers 11. who is also called Iehovah vers 20. 3. Neither doth it follow if it could bee proved out of Scripture that the Angels prayed foâ— us that we are to pray to them because they are not alwayes present to heare us and we are forbidden in Scripture to worship them Revel 22.9 and therefore to pray unto them which is a part of divine worship 3. Argum. The Saints that are living doe one pray for another much more the Saints being dead because their charitie is more perfect and seeing there is a communion of Saints as of the living so also of the dead which communion being not in faith and hope whereof there is no more use with them that are at rest it remaineth it is in charitie As therefore we may request the living to pray for us so we may pray the dead also to entreate for us Answer 1. The argument followeth not for the Saints alive doe one know anothers necessitie so do not the
and necessary or just cause doe so require c. otherwise the Law doth forbid all unlawfull swearing as well as the Gospell 3. And the reason why they ought not to sweare by strange gods is ne frequenti juramento iâ—â—â—cantur ad cultâ—â—◠〈◊〉 c. lest that by often swearing they be induced to worship them Glos. interliâ—â—â—â— 4. And as an Hebrew then and so a Christian now was not himselfe so neither were they to compell a Gentile to sweare by them yet as Augustine determineth it is lawfull for a Christian recipere ab eo juramentum in Deo suo c. to receive an oath of a Gentile by his god to confirme some covenant or contract se Gentilis obtularis se facturum if the Gentile doe of himselfe offer it Lyran Tostat. QUEST XXV Whether a Christian may compell a Iew to sweare by his Thorah which containeth the five bookes of Moses VPon this occasion how farre a Christian may compell another of a contrary religion to sweare as a Jew or Turke Tostatus bringeth in divers questions which it shall not be amisse here briefly to touch as first whereas it is an usuall thing with the Jewes at this day to sweare upon their Thorah which is nothing else but a volume containing the five bookes of Moses yet bound up in silke and laid up very curiously in their Synagogue whereout they use to read the lectures of the Law the question is whether it be lawfull for a Christian Judge to urge a Jew to take his oath upon his Thorah for upon the Gospels he will rather dye than take an oath For the resolution of this doubt divers things are to be weighed and considered 1. That there is great difference betweene the Idols and 〈◊〉 gods of the Heathen and the Jewes Thorah for this 〈◊〉 a part of Gods word and containeth nothing but the truth and it is all one as if the Jew did lay his hand upon the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses as any Christian may take his oath upon the Gospels or any other part of Gods word 2. And like as a Christian laying his hand upon the Gospels doth not 〈◊〉 by the bookâ— for 〈◊〉 were unlawfull in giving the honour due to the Creator unto a creature but hath relation unto God whose verity and truth is contained in that booke So a Jew swearing upon his Thorah yet sweareth by God the Author of the Law and in so doing sinneth not 3. Yet it may so fall out that a Jew may sinne in swearing upon his Thorah as having an opinion that all the contents of that booke as namely the ceremonials are yet in force which are abolished in Christ and yet the Judge may not sinne in requiring the Jew to sweare upon his Thorah for he doth not consider of those things quae sunt in voluntate agentis sed de ipso actis which are in the minde and intent of the doer but of the act it selfe therefore the act of it selfe being lawfull a Jew may be required to doe it Sic Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXVI Whether a Iew may be urged to sweare in the name of Christ. BUt as the Jew may be urged to sweare upon his Thorah which they hold to be a booke of truth as Christians doe yet the case is not alike if a Christian should compell a Jew to sweare in the name of Christ for although Christ be in deed and in truth very God yet the Jewes hold him to be worse than any Idoll and therefore the Jew in taking such an oath should doe against his conscience and consequently commit a great sinne or if a Jew should require a Christian to sweare by the name of Christ whom he holdeth to be no God nor yet a good man therein the Jew should also sinne against his conscience for it skilleth not a thing to be so or so indeed dum aliter concipiatur as long as a man otherwise conceiveth and is perswaded in his minde Tostat. qu. 15. QUEST XXVII Whether a Saracene may be urged to sweare upon the Gospels or in the name of Christ. NOw although a Jew cannot be compelled without sinne to sweare in the name of Christ whom he holdeth worse than an Idoll or upon the Gospels which they thinke containe nothing but fables yet the reason standeth otherwise for a Saracene or Turke he may be required to sweare in the name of Christ or upon the Gospels And the reason is because the Saracens have a good opinion of Christ and beleeve that he was sent of God and that he was a great Prophet and a good man and for the most part they doe assent unto the Gospels and beleeve that Christ spake the truth And therefore they in taking such an oath doe not against their conscience and therein sinne not Now if it be objected that the Saracens differ more from the Christians than the Jewes and therefore can no more lawfully take an oath in the name of Christ than the Jewes the answer is that although the Jewes consent with the Christians touching the canonicall bookes of the old Testament as the Saracens doe not yet as touching Christ they doe totally dissent from the Christians and so doe not the Saracens Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXVIII Whether a Christian may sweare upon the Iewes Thora BUt it hath beene before shewed that a Jew may be without sinne urged to sweare upon his Thora which is nothing but the Pentateuch containing the five bookes of Moses another question is moved whether a Christian may safely take his oath upon the Jewes Thora And that it is not lawfull so to doe it may be thus objected 1. It is a sinne Iudaizare to Iudaize to doe as the Jewes doe as to be circumcised to observe the Jewish Sabbath and such like But to sweare upon the Thora is to Iudaize that is to doe as the Jewes doe Ergo c. Answ. 1. To Iudaize is not simply to doe that which the Jewes doe but that which they alone doe and none other as to beleeve that which they only beleeve as that the ceremonies of the Law are still in force or to doe that which they only doe as to be circumcised and to abstaine from certaine kinde of meats as Saint Paul chargeth Saint Peter that he compelled the Gentiles Iudaizare to Iudaize concerning their meats for he did eat with the Gentiles before the Jewes came and afterward he withdrew himselfe from them otherwise to beleeve as the Jewes and others also beleeve and to doe likewise as to hold the world to have beene created the Israelites to have beene delivered and all other things in the Scriptures to be true as they are there set downe this is not to Iudaize 2. So because the Thora which is the Pentateuch is not only received of the Jewes but of the beleeving Gentiles and the truth of the Law we subscribe unto as well as the Jewes therefore simply to take an oath upon their Thora
is not to play the Jew but a Christian may as lawfully doe it as to sweare upon the Gospels or any other part of the divine Scriptures 2. Dare favorem errori Iudaeorum c. To give way or shew favour unto the errour of Jewes is sinne but a Christian swearing upon the Thora should give way unto the Jewish errour Ergo. Answ. To sweare upon the Thora where any scandall or offence may grow unto the weake or any occasion of hardning to the Jew it is unlawfull yet this sheweth not but that where no such danger is simply so to take an oath is not unlawfull 3. To make this a lawfull act then for a Christian to take an oath upon the Jewes Thora these things must be considered 1. If he sweare upon it not as upon any other booke of the same contents that is comprehending the five bookes of Moses but as it is a monument of the Jewes bound up in silke and laid up in their Synagogue so is it not lawfull because to be addicted to such superstitious observations is sinne 2. Though there be no difference betweene their Thorah which is written in Hebrew and our Pentateuch in Latine or English in respect of the substance but one indifferently may lay his hand upon the one or the other for there is no difference of languages before God yet if a man make difference in his owne opinion thinking the one not as lawfull as the other herein he should offend doing against his owne conscience 3. Or if an Hebrew should require a Christian to sweaâ—e upon his Thorah rather than upon the Gospels it were not lawfull for hereby we should confirme him in his errour 4. Or if one Christian should require another to sweaâ—e rather upon the Jewish Thorah than upon the Gospels it were not safe so â—o doe because such an one giveth occasion of suspition that he doth not firmely and stedfastly beleeve the contents of the Gospell 5. But if a Christian of himselfe without any such motion made by another doe willingly take his oath upon the Thorah either of necessity because there is no other booke of Scripture present or because he maketh no difference betweene one booke of Scripture and another he may doe it lawfully so it be done without offence unto others Sic Tostat. quaest 16. QUEST XXIX That it is not lawfull for a Christian to sweare upon the Turkes Alcaron or Mahomets thigh nor for a Turke himselfe BUt though a Christian may sweare upon the Jewes Thora the former considerations being observed yet is it altogether unlawfull for him to sweare either upon Mahomets thigh which is kept as an holy relique among the Saracens and Turkes or upon their Alcaron 1. The first is evident because this being a morall precept to sweare by the name of God only and not by the name of any strange gods bindeth all beleeving people for ever now to sweare by Mahomets thigh is to sweare by a strange god and therefore it is unlawfull as well for the Jew as the Christian to take such an oath seeing they are both bound to keepe the morall precepts and Commandements Tostat quaest 19. 2. The other also is unlawfull as it may thus be shewed for an oath is made three wayes either 〈◊〉 God alone without any other externall signe or symboll which is a lawfull and sufficient oath or by the creature alone which is an unlawfull oath for so the glory which is onely due unto God should be given unto the creature or by God and some creature together with reference unto God as when in taking an oath the hand is laid upon a booke But such a creature is used as an externall symboll in an oath as in quo nihil est mendacii wherein there is no lye and it must immediat è nos ducere in cognitionem Dei bring us immediatly to the knowledge of God therefore we lay not our hand upon a stone because it hath no instruction in it as a booke hath But the Gospell hath both these properties there is no falsehood or untruth in it and it doth bring us immediatly and directly to the knowledge of God The Turkes Alcaron hath neither for both it containeth many falsehoods fables and untruths and it can never bring us to the knowledge of the true God having many errours in it So then a Christian taking his oath upon the Alcaron thereby should confesse all to be true which is there contained and so blaspheme God and beside give great offence unto Christians and so secondly his brethren therefore it were better for a Christian to chuse rather to dye than to take such a blasphemous oath Tostat. qu. 20. The like judgement is to be given of the Jewes Talmud which containeth many fables and blasphemies against Christ. And for the same reasons before alleaged even a Turke or Saracen sinneth in taking an oath upon Mahomets thigh though he directly make it not God because he useth such an unholy superstitious and abominable thing in taking of a sacred oath likewise he offendeth in swearing upon his Alcaron which containeth abominable lies and the same most pernicious even concerning the end of all our happinesse in blessednesse in the next world which their Alcaron placeth and maketh to consist in the carnall pleasures of eating and drinking and the use of women Tostat. quaest 21 22. QUEST XXX Why three feasts are only named wherein they had more Vers. 14. THree times thou shalt keepe a feast unto mee in the yeere 1. They had divers other festivall dayes beside these three which are here named the Pasch called the feast of unleavened bread Pentecost named the feast of first fruits and the feast of Tabernacles called here the feast of gathering fruits in the end of the yeere which said three feasts are not named because they were more strictly observed than the rest for the Sabbath was more straitly kept wherein it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor consequently to doe any worke about preparing of their meat neither in the feast of reconliation was it lawfull to doe any worke at all Levit. 23.28 whereas in other feasts only servile workes are forbidden and in the feast of the Passeover such workes as were about their meat and drinke were permitted Exod. 12.16 But therefore are these three feasts named because in them onely the people were bound to come up before the Lord. 2. And these three were speciall feasts above the rest for these causes 1. Because in them onely the people were required to appeare before the Lord. 2. Speciall oblations were offered in these feasts In the Passeover was offered a sheafe of the first fruits Levit. 23.10 in the feast of Pentecost they presented the first fruits of their wheat harvest faire flower baken with leaven Levit. 23.17 And in the feast of Tabernacles they were commanded to make them boothes of boughes ibid vers 40. 3. Those feasts excelled the other in respect of the
of life wherein those things are written which lead and direct us unto life eternall as that may be called a booke of warfare wherein the precepts of the act military are contained So the Scriptures are called the booke of life wherein the truth is contained Eccles. 24.26 3. The booke of God is that divine power wherein every mans doings shall bee brought to his remembrance as it is said Dan. 7.10 Iudgement was set and the bookes opened 4. There is also a booke of the righteous which conteineth the acts of the Saints for the memory of times to come In this place he thinketh the booke of God here may be taken either the first or second way Burgens addit 8. But Moses here speaketh of a booke only written by God but those bookes of the Scriptures and of the righteous were written by men 8. Tostatus maketh three bookes one a great booke wherein are all things registred in the world and all men foreseene good or bad which booke hee saith is divided into two other bookes the one which only containeth the names of those which are ordained unto life which is called liber praedestinationis the booke of predestination the other wherein they only are written whom the Lord foreseeth shall come to everlasting destruction and this is called liber praescientia the booke of Gods prescience And in this place Moses by Gods booke understandeth the booke of predestination Tostat. qu. 41. But as Tostatus resolveth well that the booke of life and of Gods predestination is here understood so yet that assertion of his that there is a booke of prescience wherein their names are written which shall be damned hath no warrant in Scripture for although it be most true that as the number is certaine with God of those which shall be saved so the Lord knoweth who are left unto destruction yet the Scripture only giveth the name of a booke unto the first and they which are rejected are not said to bee written in any booke but only not to be written in the booke of life Psal. 69.28 Apocal. 27.8 9. Therefore thus better are the Lords bookes distinguished 1. There are two generall and common bookes as they may be so called the one is the booke of Gods prescience and providence wherein the Lord seeth and directeth all things which hee himselfe doth in the world of this booke speaketh the Prophet David Psal. 139.26 In thy booke were all things written Simler 2. The second generall booke is the booke of remembrance before the Lord wherein all the acts of men good and evill are as registred before the Lord as Malach. 3.16 it is said A booke of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord so Apocal. 20.12 other bookes beside the booke of life were opened the booke of every ones conscience Borrh. 3. Then the third booke is the particular summe of all the elect appointed to salvation and this is the booke of life which Moses meaneth here Simler QUEST LXXIX How the Lord is said to have a booke TAke me out of the booke c. 1. This is a metaphoricall speech sicut nos ea literis consignamus as we use to signe with letters those things the memory whereof we would have kept so God is said to have a booke not that he needeth any booke of remembrance but because all things are present before him as if they were written in a booke Simler Iunius 2. So also Thomas Liber vitaein Deo dicitur metaphorice The booke of life is said to be with God by a metaphor according to the use and custome of men for they which are chosen to any speciall place or service conscribuntur in libro are written in a booke as souldiers and Counsellers as among the Romans the Senators were called patres conscripti the fathers whose names were written or registred 3. So also Burgens Sicut liber militiae vocatur in quo scribuntur electi ad militiam As the muster booke or of warfare is so called wherein their names are written which are chosen for warre so the Lord is said to have a booke of life wherein all they are comprehended which are ordained to salvation Burgens addit 8. QUEST LXXX Whether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life TAke me out of the booke of life 1. Some thinke that the elect indeed may be raced out of the booke of life for they which are elected Si secure vivunt absque penitentia à numer◠electorum Dei excluduntur If they live securely without repentance are excluded out of the ranke and number of the elect Marbach To the same purpose also Osiander Deletur rursus de libro vitae c. He is blotted againe out of the booke of life which by his sinnes loseth the celestiall inheritance 2. Contra. But this is an unsound opinion 1. For thus either they must make God ignorant of things to come that he certainly forseeth not the end of the elect and reprobate and so is deceived in his decree in ordaining some to be saved which shall not be saved or else they must be driven to confesse that Gods decree is mutable that hee changeth his sentence in excluding those upon their sinnes which were before elected But neither of those are to be admitted for neither is God subject to change Iames 1.17 neither can his prescience or foreknowledge be deceived as the Apostle saith The foundation of God remaineth sure c. the Lord knoweth who are his 2 Tim. 2.19 But this were no sure foundation if they which God in the decree of his election knew to be his should afterward fall out not to be his 2. Indeed they which live and dye without repentance cannot be elected But it is impossible that they which are elected should finally fall away or be void of repentance but as God hath decreed the end of such to be everlasting salvation so he hath also ordained the way and meanes which they should walke in as the Apostle saith Ephes. 1.4 As he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world that wee should be holy and without blame before him in love Therefore Tostatus with other of that side are herein more sound than the moderne Lutherans Qui intus scripti sunt in libro vitae secundum firmam Dei praedestinationem impossibile est deleri c. It is impossible for those to be blotted out which are written in the booke of life according to Gods firme and certaine predestination Tostat. qu. 43. So also Lyranus Impossibilis est deletio c. It is impossible to be blotted out if we take it simplie to be written in the booke of life So also Burgens QUEST LXXXI Of the two wayes whereby we are said to be written in the booke of life BUt one may be said two wayes to bee written in the booke of life 1. Lyranus hath this distinction one way they are said simply to be written In
quantum praedestinati sunt in noticia Divina as they are ordained to salvation in the knowledge and prescience of God and they that are thus written can never bee blotted out another way they are scripti secundum quid written after a sort not according to the divine prescience or predestination Sed secundum dispositionem in eis actu existentem secundum praesentem justitiam But according to their disposition which is in act in them and according to their present justice and thus are they said to be blotted out not in respect of Gods knowledge as though any thing can fall out against his prescience but in respect of their change from grace into sinne 2. Thomas also to the same purpose some are said to bee blotted out Non secundum rei veritatem sed secundum hominum opinionem Not according to the truth of the thing but in the opinion of men for it is usuall in Scripture ut aliquid dicatur fieri quando innotescit that a thing should be said to be done when it appeareth So some are said to be written in the booke of life quia homines ibi opinantur scriptos propter presentem justitiam because men thinke they are there written in respect of their present justice Then some are there written ex pradestinatione by predestination which can never bee blotted out Some ex gratia in respect of their present grace which they may fall from and so be blotted out And againe in another place he expresseth the same thing in other termes Some are predestinate of God Insâ— ut simpliciter habituri vitam aeternam Simply to have life eternall in themselves and these are so written in the booke of life as they can never be blotted out And some are so written Vt habeant vitam aeternam non in se sed in sua causa To have life eternall not in themselves but in respect of their cause and present state of Justice which when they fall from they are said to be blotted out 3. So before them both Augustine We must not so take it brethren Quod quenquam Deus scribat in librâ— vitae deleat illum That God writeth any in the booke of life and blotteth him out for if a mortall man said that I have written I have written shall we thinke that God writeth and blotteth out Praescius est Deus praedestinavit omnes ante constitutionem mundi regnaturos cum filio God foreseeth all things and he did predestinate all before the making of the world that should reigne with his sonne c. Therefore this is said Secundum spem ipsorum qui ibi se scriptos putabant That some are written which are said to be blotted out in their owne opinion because they thought they were there written so that where it is said let them be blotted out of the booke of life the meaning is ut ipsos constet non illos ibi esse that it may appeare unto them that they are not there To this purpose Augustine as he is alleaged both by Simlerus and Borrhaius 4. Tostatus followeth the same distinction that some are written in the booke of life secundum firmam praedestinationem according to Gods sure predestination some only secundum praesentem justitiam in respect of their present justice these may bee blotted out and not the other but he addeth further that so likewise in the booke of Gods prescience wherein onely they are written whose end is damnation some are written there secundum firmam Dei praescientiam according to Gods firme prescience others secundum praesentem injustitiam according to their present injustice These may be blotted out and not the other And this writing of them in one booke according to their present justice in the other according to their present injustice he calleth the writing foris without the booke the other writing according to Gods predestination and prescience he saith is intus within the booke Then out of these positions he inferreth certaine conclusions 1. That it is possible for one to be written in both these bookes the booke of life and the booke of death together in the one according to Gods predestination or prescience in the other according to their present justice or injustice As he which is predestinate unto life may according to his present state of injustice be written in the booke of death foris without as Paul while he was yet a persecutor and one may be in Gods prescience written in the booke of death and yet according to his present state of grace he may be written in the booke of life as Iudas while yet he continued in Christs obedience and preached the Gospell 2. Yet it is possible for one to be written twice in the same booke both in regard of Gods prescience and his owne state and condition as Moses was thus written in the booke of life and Iudas when he betrayed Christ in the booke of death 3. They which are written in the booke of life according to predestination may be blotted out thence according to their present state and condition as David when he sinned and so in the other booke likewise as Saul while he was yet a vertuous King he was written in the booke of rejection in Gods prescience but blotted out in regard of his present justice 4. But he that is written in the booke of life according unto predestination cannot be written in the booke of death according to Gods prescience and so on the other side because one and the same cannot be foreseene of God both to salvation and condemnation 5. And they which are written according to their present justice in the booke of life cannot at the same time be written in the booke of death according to their present injustice because one cannot at the same time be counted righteous and wicked before God Tostat. qu. 43. But these exceptions may worthily be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. Because he maketh a booke of death and speaketh of putting in and blotting out of that booke whereas the Scripture acknowledgeth only a booke of life not any of death for not to be written in the booke of life though they bee not written in any other blacke booke is sufficient unto everlasting perdition 2. He calleth the booke of death the booke of Gods prescience only as though God were not a Judge also in condemning the vessels of wrath into hell and ordaining them justly thereunto as he is in the electing the vessels of honour to salvation 3. It is an errour that God writeth any in either of those bookes on the backside in respect of their present state or condition of justice or injustice for Gods writing there is unchangeable they are there said to be written in regard of their present state secundum spem ipsorum in their owne hope as Augustine or secundum opinionem hominâ—m according to the opinion of men that thinke them to be there written as Thomas before
9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed and appointed for warre 2. That also may be called the booke