of whom his Life Doctrine and Miracles his Death Buriall Resurrection and Ascension his sitting at Gods right hand and what benefit we reape by him are liuely depainted and written The Apostles Sermons were taken out of the Scriptures Act. 2. 16 25 35. and 7. 2 51. and 8. 35. and 10. 34 35 43. and 13. 16 23 27 33 36 40. by which Scriptures they confirmed what they did teach and thereby confounded the aduersaries Acts 17. 2. and 18. 28. the decrees of the Councell at Ierusalem made by the Apostles and whole Church were grounded vpon Scripture Act 15. 15 19 Saint Pauls faith and seruice to God was the written Word in the Law and in the Prophets Act. 24. 14. And those Euangelicall doctrines found in his Epistles which are so full of comfort to a true beleeuer though our aduersaries spurne at them he found written in the old Testament There could hee finde the Kingdome of Christ Act. 28 23. There hee found written that the workes of the Law before God iustifie not Rom 4. 2 6. and 3 20. That election is of meere grace without respect to will or worke of man Rom. 9 11 16. That man is blessed by imputation through faith without workes of the Law and freely iustified by grace through faith Rom. 3. 21. for all these he gathereth out of the old Testament as in the quoted places may be seene Saint Peter taught out of the Scriptures remission of sinnes through faith in Christs name Act. 10. 43. Yea the Saluation of our soules and the grace which should come by Iesus Christ 1. Pet. 1. 9. 10 11. Therefore he commendeth to the whole Church in his second Epist 2. Pet. 1. 19 20 21. the holy Scriptures to which they doe well to attend as to a candle saith he shining in a darke place This he calleth a Propheticall Word most sure Now that this might not be taken for an vnwritten Word first he telleth them in vers 20. what he meaneth hereby euen the Prophecie of Scripture a Word written and then giueth a reason why hee calleth it a most sure Word for that saith he it was not by any priuate interpretation nor brought by mans wil but it was that which holy men taught inspired with the holy Ghost Psal 20 21. All Scripture therefore being inspired of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. is this most sure Word which is to bee attended vnto And if it be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Word surer then any other then euery other word must be ruled by it No other word then can equall it for two superlatiues of the same thing there cannot bee much lesse a word to ouer-top it This is the rule then and not any traditionall word which is but a meere popish fiction and subtill deuice to deceiue by VI. Their owne Bible telleth vs by way of commendations that the Church of Berea did hold the Scriptures to be the rule to examine doctrine by Act. 17. 11. which heard the Word deliuered by preaching and receiued it but no otherwise then they found it written in the Scriptures by which they did trie it daily searching the Scriptures if those things were so Where note 1. That the Bereans held not themselues tyed to the Priests lips 2. That they heard that which was taught them with relation to the written Word 3. That they held the Scriptures to be the triall of the truth of their Teachers doctrine 4. That they hauing heard did bring that which they had heard to the touchstone of holy Writ for their greater confirmation in the truth which things are written for their praise for our instruction also in imitation For if the holy Scriptures of the old Testament were then the rule to trie the Apostles preaching is not both the Old and New the rule to try mens teaching now VII And lastly Our Aduersaries grant vs that the Word of God is that one only and infallible rule of Faith which is vndoubtable true for what can be the rule to vs of Gods seruice but Gods will And how can wee know what is his will but by his Word Therefore this Word now being no where to be found but in holy Scriptures as is proued by their own Bible they must needs yeeld that the Scriptures are then the one onely infallible rule of our faith which if they will yet obstinately deny they must deny antiquity which they so vainely boast of Contraried by Antiquity Their owne Clement telleth vs lib. 1. Recog That from the diuine Scriptures the firme and sound rule of Faith must be taken Tertul. contra Hermog calleth the Scriptures the Rule of Faith Saint Basil lib. 1. Contr. Eunom calleth the Scriptures the Canon of that which is right and the rule of Truth Saint Ierome lib. 1. cap. 1. in Mat. The holy Scriptures are the Limits of the Church out of the which we may not goe Chrysostome Hom. 3. in 2. Cor. calleth them a most exquisite Rule and an exact Square and Balance to trie all things Saint Augustine lib. de bono viduit cap. 1. The holy Scripture hath fixed the Rule of our Doctrine that wee may not presume to bee more wise then we ought Greg. Nyssen in orat de eis qui adiêrunt Hieros calleth the Scriptures a right and inflexible Rule Gregory the great Hom. 4. in Ezechiel compareth the Scriptures to a measuring Reed which meteth out both the actiue and contemplatiue life of man By which testimonies of the Fathers wee may see how they contrary our Aduersaries tenent for in plaine termes the Fathers call the Scriptures a Rule right exquisite and inflexible and the onely Rule the Limits of the Church But our new Romane Masters sticke not to slighten and vilifie the same by calling the Booke of God a piece of a rule a Lesbian crooked rule a leaden rule a nose of waxe and we must be Heretikes for not partaking in such blasphemies We may therefore conclude with the words of Isiodorus Pelusiota lib. 1. Epist 369. who saith We ought to refuse whatsoeuer is taught vnlesse it be contayned in the volume of the Bible and with that of Cyril Hier. in 4. Catech. Concerning saith he the Diuine and holy mysteries of our Faith not any the least thing must be tendered without warrant of diuine Scripture Gainesayed by their owne men Gerson de commun sub vtraque specie The Scripture is the Rule of our faith And the same man saith Li. de examin doct part 2. cons We must take heede whether the doctrine bee agreeable to holy Scripture as well in it selfe as in the manner of deliuery Petrus de Aliaco the Cardinall calleth the Scriptures the Sacred Canon Clemangis loc 3. cap. 29. affirmeth the Scripture to be the infallible Rule of Truth yea the measure and Iudge of all Truth Durand Episcopus praefat in lib. sent The holy Scripture saith he setteth out the measure of Faith wee may not write or speake any thing which may differ from the same Picus Mirand in Apologia was bold to say that there was no infallible truth without the Bible Our faith saith Aquinas doth stay vpon the Canonicall In sum part 1. q. 1. Art 8. 10. books and the Church doth not decree but of things not necessary to Saluation Ferus on Mat. 13. saith that the holy Scriptures are
the sole Rule of verity and whatsoeuer differs or contradicteth the same it is error and Cockle with whatsoeuer shew it commeth forth Franciscus à Victoria de Sacra pa. 120. saith I doe not thinke it sure and certaine although all Writers agree thereto because it is not to be found in the holy Scriptures Villa Vincentius teacheth that the doctrine of the Bookes Li. 2. de form Conci ca. 2. of the Prophets and Apostles is alone the Rule and foundation of Truth Their Canon Law tels vs that the diuine Scriptures containe Dist 37. 6. Relat the whole and firme Rule of faith Andradius lib. 3. Defens Trid. Con. in initio Their opinion dislikes me not who say that therefore the Scriptures are called Canonicall because they containe the most ample Canon that is the Rule and Square of Piety Faith and Religion Bellarmine lets fall this truth that the sacred Scripture is De Verbo Dei lib. 1. ca. 2. the most certaine and most sure Rule of Faith If so in the Superlatiue degree then nothing there is to ouerrule or equall it and therefore we may more safely cleaue to it onely as the most sure and the most certaine Rule For nothing saith the same man a little before in the same place is more knowne nothing more certaine then the holy Scriptures which are contained in the Propheticall and Apostolike writings Besides these testimonies so cleare as no Protestant can speake better in this point I adde their owne practice against themselues For whatsoeuer they conceit to be a Rule whether a Traditionall word or their Popes Definitiue sentence they are constrained to runne vnto the Scriptures for the ground of their assertions and to procure credit to their supposed rule The Gagger hath obiected no Scriptures to disproue the Scriptures to be the onely Rule of Faith II. Proposition That the Scriptures are imperfect and insufficient to instruct vs in all things necessary to saluation Confuted by their owne Bible THeir Bible proueth the vndeniable fulnesse perfection and sufficiency of the Scriptures by setting downe the true ends thereof both for the whole and parts which being so appointed of God cannot bee frustrated nor insufficiency found in any meanes which he ordayneth for they doe perfectly conduce to their ends except any dare imagine impiously and will say that either the Scriptures are not sufficient for the ends whereto they are appointed of God which none but Atheists will affirme or that the ends are not inough to make the Scriptures perfectly sufficient to instrtct vs in all things necessary to Saluation But if the Scriptures be granted to be sufficient for their ends whereto they be appointed as needs must and the ends therein set downe be proued sufficient in all matters necessary to saluation it will necessarily follow that the Scriptures are sufficient The ends why the Scriptures were written proued sufficient to direct vs in all matters necessary to saluation The Scriptures were and are written for our learning Rom. 15 4. to teach to argue to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. 16. that we might haue faith and life in the Sonne of God Ioh. 20. 31. and hope also by the patience and consolation of the Scriptures Rom. 15 4. which can instruct to saluation 2. Tim. 3. 15. that the man of God may be perfect instructed to euery good worke If it can instruct and make perfect to euery good worke then euery good worke may be learned out of the Scriptures and that which can make a man to euery good worke perfect is in it selfe a perfect instruction thereto And what instruction is farther required then to good workes and to euery good worke where instruction is for euery such thing there is no defect This were proofe enough for the sufficiencie of the Scriptures but yet more Moses as their owne Bible sheweth wrote that the people might learne that they might feare the Lord their God all their dayes and keepe and fulfill all the words of the Law Deut. 31. 9 12 13. and his words and ceremonies that were commanded in the Law Deut. 17. 19. Dauid and others wrote the Psalmes to teach the feare of God Psal 33. 11. for instruction for the iust for comfort in aduersitie for praising and thanksgiuing in prosperitie with many other ends which their owne Bible plentifully sets out in their contents before euery Psalme according to their Doway translation Salomon wrote his Prouerbs to know wisedome and discipline to vnderstand the words of prudence and to receiue instruction of doctrine iustice and equitie that subtilty that is as they expound it profound and solid wit may be giuen to little ones knowledge and vnderstanding to yong men Prou. 1. 2 3 4. The Prophets wrote to discouer mens sinnes to threaten iudgements to call them to repentance to comfort the humbled to foretell things to come either of some particulars or of the state of the whole Church either then or afterwards as the Prophesies do witnesse The Euangelist S. Luke wrote that we might know the veritie Luk. 1. 3 4. of all those things which Iesus began to do and teach vntill the day that he was assumpted Act. 1. 1 2. S. Paul wrote to the Romanes to put them in remembrance what he had taught Rom. 15. 15. to the Corinthians to admonish them 1. Cor. 4. 14. not to keepe company with such as professed Christ and liued lewdly 1. Cor. 5. 9 11. to instruct them how to carrie themselues to an excommunicate penitent 2. Cor. 2. 3 9. To the Ephesians he wrote that by reading they might vnderstand his wisedome in the mysterie of Christ Ephe. 3. 3 4. to Timothy how he ought to conuerse in the house of God 1. Tim. 3. 15. To these may be added the end and scope of all the rest of his Epistles S. Peter wrote to admonish alwayes the Saints 2. Pet. 1. 12. to stirre them vp by admonition ver 13. and after his decease to keepe a memoriall of the things taught ver 15. that they might be mindfull of those words which he before had told them from the holy Prophets and the Apostles of the precepts of our Lord and Sauiour 2. Pet. 3. 2. and to testifie that this was the true grace of God wherein they stood 1. Pet. 5. 12. S. Iohn he wrote that we might not sinne but if any did to let vs know that we haue Iesus Christ our Aduocate and propitiation for our sinnes 1. Ioh. 2. 1 2. that we also might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God Ioh. 20. 31. and that we might know that
knowledge that I marueiled at them but the spirituall man iudgeth all things Espencaeus in 2. Tim. 3. pa. 116. testifieth that the Iewes did vse to instruct their children from fiue yeeres old A custome continued till this day So that saith he many Christians may bee ashamed of their negligence which is not onely my complaint saith he but also of the ancient Fathers marueiling that that custome should bee iudged now dangerous and pestiferous which the Ancient so often commended for profitable and wholesome Lorinus on Acts 17. 2. speaking of the Act of the noble Bereans saith That it was no more then Christ commanded when he said Search the Scriptures that is saith he as Chrysostome and Euthymius expound it not onely to reade it but also exactly and diligently to discusse it But I neede not speake more of this for among vs we see many of them take libertie to reade not onely their owne Translations but ours too Their practice then here with vs is against their doctrine and their practice else-where for in other places their doctrine is against reading of Scriptures translated and they also doe not suffer them to be read See plentifull testimonies cited by Doct. White in his Orthodox Faith pag. 47. 48. So they disallow and allow some of one mind some of another here with vs differing from themselues in Papisticall Countries for all is as the Iuggler playes fast or loose for their grand Masters aduantage Obiected Scriptures answered Deut. 10. 5. The two Tables were written by God and put by Moses into the Arke Answ What then Therefore the Scriptures are not to bee common and freely read of all If the putting of the Tables into the Arke might force such a conclusion the Scriptures might not onely bee kept from the people but from the Clergie too for those put into the Arke were neither for Priest nor people to reade But I answere more particularly 1. That these were not all the Scriptures of God although all that God himself did immediately write with his owne finger 2. These commandements in the Tables were also written out by Moses in Exod. 20. and in Deut. 5. which Bookes after were also copied out and so were in the hands of the Priests Princes and people 3. The putting them into the Arke was not that thence man should learne not to meddle with holy Scriptures which none euer dreamed of but these Romists For God commanded to teach them to his people Deut. 6. 1. and they were to instruct their children therein Deut. 6. 7. but they were put into the Arke for other ends 1. To keepe them safe there as a testimony against Israel 2. To learne to keepe them in their heart as they were kept in the Arke 3 Because the Arke was a type of Christ in whom this Law of commandements was written and in whom the Lords people should be accounted obseruers of the same Deut. 31. 9 26. There was but one copie of the Law and it was committed to the Priests of the Leuites to keepe and was hid for a long time till it was found in Iosias dayes 2. King 22. 8. Therefore the Scriptures were not common to all Answ It s true that there was but one originall that was kept but other copies were commanded to bee written out Deut. 17. 18. and the same to be read diligently vers 19. Ioshua had a copie of it Iosh 8. 34. Esdras had so Neh. 8. 2. In Iehosaphats See the Dowaies on Neh. 8. 2. for Copies time a copie was carried vp and downe 2. Chron. 17. 9. Daniel had bookes Dan. 9. 2. Christ telleth vs in the Parable Luk. 15. 29. that they had Moses and the Prophets The Law and Prophets were read in their Synagogues from old time Act. 13. 15. and 15. 21. How also could the Bereans search the Scriptures if they had not had them Act. 17. 11. And S. Paul saith that to the Iewes were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 2. The booke of the Law was written to be read and heard of the people Deut. 31. 11 12. So were also the Prophets writings Ier. 36. 6 10 14 15. and free for any to reade them that could get copies of them as wee may see in the Eunuch Act. 8. 28. By all which it is cleare that the Scriptures were common for all Nehem. 8. Here they would gather that the Scriptures were read in Hebrew and yet the people vnderstood not the language so by certaine words in the Euangelists not Hebrew which were then spoken of the people as Golgotha Mat. 27. 33. Talitha cumi Mark 5. 41. Acheldama in Act. 1. 19. Answ That the Scriptures of the old Testament were in the Hebrew tongue is true but that the people vnderstood not that tongue is as false as the other true for it s said as their own Bible hath it Neh. 8. 3. that Esdras read plainely in the presence of the men and women and of those that vnderstood and the eares of all the people were attent to the Booke vers 8. and they vnderstood when it was read And though they were 70. yeeres in Captiuitie yet had they not lost the knowledge of the Hebrew tongue for many thousands and not a few of note and place which went into captiuitie liued to returne againe Esdras 2. 1 2 3 42 65. and 3. 12. And shall we thinke that these had lost their natiue tongue After their returne they had some strange words mixed with the Hebrew but yet they generally spake the Iewes language Neh. 13. 24. and the Prophets Haggai Zacharie and Malachi wrote in the Hebrew and the people hundreds of yeres after vnderstood the Hebrew tongue when it was spoken Act. 21. 40. and 22. 2. and could reade it written Ioh. 19. 20. yea it was so common that Christ spake Hebrew and in no other Language to Paul from Heauen Act. 26. 14. And as for the words of Christ on the Crosse Matth. 27. 46. which some hearing said He calleth for Eliah if they were spoken of the Iewes they did it in mockage If of the Romane souldiers they being strangers and not vnderstanding him it maketh nothing to the purpose or point in question Ioh. 7. 49. The people which knoweth not the Law are cursed Hence they would gather that the Iewes vnderstood not the Hebrew language in which the Law was written Answ 1. The Pharises arrogated knowledge to themselues and contemned the people for want of knowledge to wit of the sense and meaning of the Law but not of the letters words and language wherein it was written 2. Neither is it true that the people knew not the Law because these enemies of Christ said so no more then that they were cursed because they so said of them in hatred against them for following Christ VI. Proposition That the common libertie for all to reade the Scriptures doth breed heresies Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT teacheth that the ignorance of the Scripture
and 8. 20. Â To call vpon the Name of the Lord Gen 4. 26. 21. 23. So in Psal 50. 16. Ioel 1. 14. To eate no blood Genes 9. 4. So in Leuit. 17. 14. Deut. 12 16. To powre out drinke offerings and to offer burnt offerings Gen. 35. 14. and 28. 18. So in Numb 6. 15 17. and 29. 11 16 21. To haue daily burnt offerings Iob 1. 5. So in Numb 28. 3 6. To acknowledge a high Priest Gen. 14. 18. So in Leuit. 8. 6. and 21. 10. To pay tithes Gen. 28. 22. and 14. 20. So in Leuit. 27. 30. To preach and prophecie Iude vers 14. 1. Pet. 3. 19 20. 2. Pet. 2. 5. and to teach the people So in Deut. 33 10. Leuit. 10. 11. Ier. 1. 17. Ezech. 3. 4. Malach. 2. 7. To enquire of God Genes 25. 22. So in 2. King 13. 11. and 22. 13. To make vowes vnto God Genes 28. 20. So in Numb 30. 2 3. Deut 12. 25. To keepe feasts vnto God Exod. 5. 1. So in Leuit. 23. 4. To know the Couenant of God with them Genes 15. 18 17. 2. 8. 21 22 9. 11. So in Deut. 5. 2. To know the promised seed Gen. 3. 15. and 22. 18. and the Messiah Ioh. 8. 56. Gal. 3. 16. Luk. 1. 55. So in Deut. 18. 15 18. Isai 11. 1. and 6. 10. Ioh. 12. 41. To haue faith in comming to God and offering sacrifice Heb. 11. 4. So in 2. Chron. 20. 20. To be iustified and accounted righteous by faith Gen. 15. 6. Rom. 4. 3. So in Hab. 2. 4. To receiue the Sacraments as first Circumcision Gen. 17. 10. then the Passeouer Exodus 12. So afterwards in Iosh 5. 2. Deut. 16. 1. To be vpright-hearted and to walke with God Gen. 15. 22. and 6. 9. and 17. 2. to feare God and to eschew euill Iob 1. 1. So in Deut. 18. 13. Iosh 24. 14. 2. Kin. 20. 3. Eccles 12. 13. To know the commandements of God and to teach others the same Gen. 18. 19. So in Exod. 20. Deut. 5. and 4. 9. and 6. 7. and 11. 19. Lastly Abraham had a charge from God Commandements Statutes and Lawes which he kept Gen. 26. 5. So the Israelites had a charge from God Commandements Statutes and Lawes as Moses and Prophets Psalmes euery where teach Thus we see that what was first by tradition was afterward particularly written and so the vnwritten Word was the same with the written First also before the Word was written with pen and ink the whole moral law written in the hart was to be obserued as may be shewed in the books of Genesis Exod. and Iob as well as the ceremoniall Law and the Sacraments Sacrifices and other parts of Gods worship before mentioned all which afterward were written in books Therefore the traditionall Word before the Law written helps nothing for a traditional Word now seeing God would haue that same written afterwards whereby of a traditionall Word it became the written Word of God Secondly in the time of Moses God spake to him and hee to the people but it is said that Moses wrote all the words of the Lord Exod. 24. 4. Deut. 31. 9 19 24. The Prophets also spake first by word of mouth which were for the most part interpretations and more speciall applications of the Word already written by Moses which also were after written as the bookes extant doe witnesse Thirdly In the time of Christ and his Apostles they taught by word of mouth the Word of God but their Word was not then an vnwritten Word For first Christ taught out of the Scriptures of Moses of the Prophets Psalmes as his interpreting Luk. 24. of them citing them and confuting the aduersaries by them doe shew he therefore taught the written Word And what he himself either did or farther spake in all necessary things touching his life and doctrine they are now written by the Euangelists Luk. 1. 1 5. Act. 1. 1. So in like manner the Apostles before they wrote taught not an vnwritten Word but the Word and Gospell Acts 8. 25. and this same written in the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 1. 1 2. and 16. 26. Act. 26. 22. and 28. 23. According as Saint Ierome saith Whatsoeuer the Apostles preached In Mat. 13. in the Gospell they preached it by the words of the Law and the Prophets For if they had preached any thing not in the Scriptures it had been in vaine for the Bereans to haue searched the Scriptures daily to see whether those things which they had heard of them were so or no Acts 17. 11. It is cleare therefore that they taught a written Word and what they receiued from Christ and taught for the effect and vse thereof they also afterward did write as may bee gathered from these insuing places of Scripture In Rom. 15. 15. the Apostle wrote putting them in mind to wit of that which had been taught them by word of mouth In 1. Cor. 11. 23. he telleth them that he deliuered by word of mouth that which he had receiued of the Lord then hee writeth downe in the same verse and the rest following that which he had receiued In 1. Cor. 15. 1. he telleth them that now by writing he declared vnto them the Gospell which hee had preached and which they had receiued so that he wrote that which before he had taught them In 2. Cor. 1. 13. he saith that hee wrote none other things vnto them then that which they did reade or did acknowledge In Phil. 3. 1. he wrote the same things to wit which hee had preached it not being to him grieuous and to them safe In 2. Thes 2. 5. he saith Remember yee not that when I was with you I told you these things to wit which hee then in that Epistle wrote he wrote then what by mouth hee had taught And howsoeuer in the verse 15. of this Chapter he mentioneth Traditions yet those were such as were then by him written there the word traditions is equally and alike referred to word and epistle as if he had said If that I deliuered by word bee forgotten yet haue you now my Epistle to keepe them in your mind and therefore in vers 5. he saith Remember yee not hauing written downe in vers 3. and 4 what he before had told them and so in vers 6. proceeding to set downe the traditions before deliuered vnto vers 13. Then writeth hee to them to stand fast and keepe the traditions taught by word before or by his epistle now as being all one and the same deliuered now both by word and writing In 2. Thes 3. 6. he there also makes mention of tradition but what of a tradition vnwritten Yes before it was written but now Paul wrote it as you may reade in vers 10. where hee telleth vs particularly what it was In 2. Pet. 1. 12. Saint Peter endeuours to put them alwaies in remembrance that they might after his decease keepe in
the Author de dupl mart ca. 42. There is no sicknesse of the soule for which the Scripture doth not afford a present remedy Athanas li. contr Gentes The Scriptures inspired of God are sufficient for all discussing and manifesting of the Truth August Tract 49. in Iohan. They are choise things which haue been written and thought sufficient for the saluation of beleeuers Chrysost hom 41. in Mat. or whosoeuer was that ancient Author Whatsoeuer is required to saluation is all accomplished in the Scripture neither is there any thing wanting there that is needfull for mans saluation Cyril lib. 12. in Iohan. in ca. 20. 31. Such things as the Apostle saw sufficient for our Faith and manners are written Hilar. li. 2. de Trinit speaking of Gods Booke What is there concerning mans saluation that is not contained therein What doth it want or what is there obscure in it All things are there full and perfect as being of him that is full and perfect Vincentius Lyrin yeeldeth the Canon of the Scriptures to be perfect and in it selfe aboundantly sufficient for all matters Thus we see how the Ancients ran vpon the perfection of the Scriptures and doe not vilifie them putting vpon them imperfectnesse and insufficiency as our Aduersaries very wickedly doe to get way hereby to their owne inuentions Gainesaid by the learned on their owne side Antoninus Archbishop of Florence God hath spoken but In sum part 3. tit 18. cap. 3. once and that in the holy Scriptures so fully to all doubts and cases and to all good workes that he needeth speake no more Scotus in 1. Sent. q. 2. The holy Scripture is all true necessarie and sufficient for him that walketh here below to bring him to saluation in all that concerneth beleeuing hoping and doing Gerson in serm in die Circum Dom. consul 1. The sacred Scripture is sufficient Caictan in Deut. 4. 2. willeth vs to gather from it that the Law of God is perfect Yea on 2. Tim. 3. saith he It s proper to the holy Scripture to teach the ignorant that he may bee perfect in all things Lyra on Ioh 20. 3. acknowledgeth the sufficiency of the Scriptures in respect of Christs excellencie in worke and doctrine Trithemius the Abbat li. 8. quaest ad Maximil Caesar q. 4. It is necessary that we hold the Scriptures perfect in all things and we must beleeue that they be true right entire sound diuinely-inspired and aboundantly sufficient to confirme the Christian Faith Villa-Vincentius de rat stud Theol. li. 1. ca. 3. The Scriptures and they alone are able to teach vs to saluation And he groundeth his assertion on 2. Tim. 3. 16 17. In which words saith hee the Apostle comprehendeth all things that are necessary to saluation Canus loc theol li. 7. ca. 3. The Canon of the Scripture is perfect and most sufficient of it selfe to euery end Espencaeus on 2. Tim. 3. 15 16. If any thing be needfull to bee knowne or done the Scriptures teach they can instruct a man to saluation and make him sufficiently learned Roffensis Art 37. aduers Luthera pa. 411. The holy Scripture is a store-house of all truths which are needful to be knowne of Christians Bellarm. de Verbo Dei li. 4. ca. 11. All things are written of the Apostles which are necessarie for all and which they openly did preach commonly to all Wee here then see that the Scriptures containe and that sufficiently all the things which be necessary for mans saluation by the many witnesses among the Papists themselues See Doctor * Reply to Fishers answer White pa. 42. producing Anselmus Scotus Gerson Bonauentura Occham Waldensis Gabriel Aquinas Lyra and Durand Here may be brought in against the sufficiency and perfection An Obiection answered of them their common obiection which is that many bookes are lost Let it be so what then This proueth not the insufficiency of these Scriptures for first I haue prooued that they are sufficient to wit these which we haue for of these now wee dispute Secondly the ancient Fathers speeches before are of these and their sufficiency not regarding the Books lost Thirdly of these also doe their owne men speake in their before-cited testimonies though they know well enough this triuiall obiection III. Proposition That the Scriptures be obscure and hard to be vnderstood euen in things necessary THis question is to be vnderstood of all things necessarily to be beleeued and done in the way of saluation For wee doe not say that all and euery thing and all and euery word sentence speech and prophecie in Scripture is plaine and easie to be vnderstood but all the places speaking of matters of faith and good life necessary to saluation are plaine and easie to bee vnderstood and yet not of all men neither but of all such as in humilitie with prayer diligently and constantly reade and heare them hauing a godly purpose and a true indeuour to liue after them for such shall vnderstand these things Prou. 2. 1 5. vers 24 9. Ioh. 7. 17. The question being thus conceiued to say that the Scriptures are to such darke and hard to be vnderstood in such necessarie points of saluation is vntrue Confuted by their owne Bible Psal 18. 18. The testimony of our Lord is faithfull giuing After our Bible Psal 19. wisedome to little ones Vers 9. The precept of our Lord is lightsome illuminating the eyes Psal 118. 105. Thy Word is a lampe to my feete and a light to Psal 119. my paths Vers 130. The declaration of thy words doth illuminate and giues vnderstanding to little ones Prou. 6. 23. The commandement is a lampe and the Law a light 2. Pet. 1. 19. We haue a Propheticall Word most sure which you doe well attending vnto as to a candle shining in a darke place By all these places it is euident that the Scriptures being a light a lampe candle shining lightsome illuminating the eyes and giuing vnderstanding to little ones must be plaine easie and not obscure and dark For if it were how can it be called light how can it be said to enlighten our eyes and be a lampe to our feete And what need haue we to attend to it for direction and guideance in a darke place if it were not a shining light vnto such as attend vnto it Contraried by ancient Fathers Clem. Alex. protrept pa. 25. It is a common light shining to all men there is no obscuritie in it Epiphanius Haeres 69. All things in the Scripture be manifest to them which repaire to them with a religious heart Saint August in Psal 8. God hath bowed downe the Scriptures euen to the capacitie of babes and sucklings And in Epist ad Volus The Scripture like a familiar friend speaketh those plaine things which it conteineth without glosing to the heart of the learned and vnlearned de doct Chr. li. 2. ca. 9. In these things which are set downe plainely in the Scriptures are to bee found
prepared and he shall find them cleare and easie to be vnderstood in all necessarie points of faith as experience giueth witnesse and euerie true Christian can testifie Lastly if the Scriptures bee obscure then much more the writings of men and if Scriptures bee hard to be vnderstood then much more mens writings For man when he hath written is not at hand to instruct his Reader but is either absent far off or perhaps dead so that hee cannot enforme the Reader of his mind but God is euer the liuing God and both can and doth enforme by his holy Spirit such as in reading his bookes doe reade deuoutly and beg of God humbly his gracious direction Mans knowledge is but in part he cannot certainely foresee all his Readers what they shall be how they will vnderstand him but Gods knowledge is as himselfe infinite and he foreknoweth all that shall reade his booke and thereafter frameth his Word as is best for their profit To conclude therefore let our Aduersaries impute to the Scriptures what they will let them if they will be still so wickedly blasphemous call them a dumb Iudge inkie diuinitie a leaden rule what else the very same and more also may be spoken of mens writings vpon the forenamed reasons what way soeuer they doe weaken the credit of the Scriptures by the very same doe they much more take away credit from mens writings And therefore let them lay all writings aside Popes decrees and Decretals Canons of Councels the writings of Fathers of Schoolemen of Doctors of Priests and Iesuites and other pettie Writers Pamphlets whatsoeuer if the Scriptures be neglected Act. 8. 30. Philip said Vnderstandest thou what thou readest And he said How can I except some man should guide me Answ 1. Here is a Lay-man well exercised and had his liberty without dispensation for money to reade the Scriptures vers 28. which was neuer denyed to any of the Iewish or Christian Church till the times of this Romish Antichrist 2. This place is spoken of a Proselyte a Noucie in Religion one that dwelt not amongst Gods people to heare the Law and Prophets daily read and expounded as they were in Iudea Act. 15. 21. and 13. 15. Will it follow therefore that what was obscure to him was and is yet obscure to others liuing in the bosome of the Church It will perhaps follow among Papists who haue Scriptures read in an vnknowne tongue and are prohibited to haue them translated and freely to be read of all but not else-where 3. This is but one place and that Propheticall too What will they hence conclude One place that Propheticall was not vnderstood of one man a young beginner and that at the first Ergo all the holy Scriptures are obscure to all the people and that for euer In Romish Diuinity a goodly conclusion 4. He vnderstood it after by Philips guiding and beleeued in Christ vers 36. 37. We acknowledge the people to need a guide but let them reade freely as the Eunuch here and where they doubt let them aske their Teachers or let Teachers like Philip goe to them and direct them in reading but take not Bibles from them and burne both them and it as furious Firebrands haue done without all example of any good men from the worlds beginning Luk. 24. 25 27. O Fooles and slow of heart c. Beginning at Moses and all the Prophets he expounded vnto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himselfe Answ 1. Christ reproueth not simply their ignorance of Scripture but rather their slownesse of heart to beleeue and apply all that the Prophets had spoken 2. Expounding argueth not obscuritie in the Scriptures but want of vnderstanding in the men and yet not that altogether but in some degree or measure 3. The things were not euery thing in the Scripture but that which concerned Christ himselfe touching his suffering and rising againe to glory which being then vnperformed and future were the more obscure euen to the Disciples themselues before their illumination Christs words therefore are proper to those persons and to that time till he had better informed them and not to be applyed to this time when all those things are plainely taught vs by the publication of the Gospell and doctrine of those Apostles and Disciples who therefore receiued miraculous illuminatiō by the spirit that they might preach and write clearely to vs euen to all people of those things Reuel 5. 4. And he to wit Iohn wept much because no man was in Heauen or in Earth found worthy to open the booke and to reade the booke neither to looke thereon Ans 1. This may bee meant metaphorically of some other booke of Gods Counsels and Decrees and if of the Bible yet not of the whole Bible but of the booke of the Reuelation except the Papists will haue Iohn at this time one that neuer had been worthy to open or to reade or to looke into Gods Word What none neither in Heauen nor earth Neuer a Prophet Neuer an Apostle to haue hitherto opened the Bible How then was Moses and the Prophets read vnto the people before Iohn was in Pathmos 2. This speakes not of the obscuritie of the booke but of the vnworthinesse of any saue Iesus Christ to vnloose the seales and to open it vers 9. 3. This is but of one booke and that before it was vnsealed and opened will it therefore follow that all the rest of the books are hard to be vnderstood being all open and none prohibited by God to reade them 2. Pet. 1. 20. No prophecie of Scripture is made by priuate interpretation Ans 1. Who wil deny this or which of vs holdeth the contrary 2. Here is nothing for the Scriptures obscurity but rather this proueth their plainenes for it speakes of their interpretation accounting holy mens speaking in the Scriptures as they were moued by the holy Ghost to be an interpretation and that not a priuate but a publike interpretation not made of their owne wil or of mans wil but of the will of God as his Spirit led them Mat. 13. 11 36. To you is giuen to know the mysteries c. Expound to vs the Parable c. Answ 1. This place may bee brought as well against the Word vnwritten as written for Christ wrote not but spake the Parable which they desired to haue expounded what will become then of their vnwritten word if that be obscure too Hee that alleaged this against the plainenesse of the written Word much forgot himselfe and his vnwritten word 2. Vnderstanding this of the written Word nothing can be more against themselues for here it is said that it is the gift giuen to the Church to vnderstand the Mysteries of the kingdom of God 3. They desired Christ to expound the parable What then Ergo the Scripture is obscure A grosse conclusion for it was Christs not written but as then his vnwritten Word and a Parable which they vnderstood not
as in the place of Deuteronomie is before answered V. Proposition That the Scriptures are not to be allowed to be read of the people nor heard by them in a knowne tongue Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT teacheth that the Scriptures were written to all sorts the bookes of Moses to all Israel Deut. 31. 91 9 22 30 32. So the Prophets Psalmes and Historicall bookes and all these were commended to the Churches keeping Rom. 3. 2. Act. 7. 38. We see in the new Testament some bookes written to noble Personages Luk 1. Act 1. to Ladies 2. Ioh. ver 1. to Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1. 1. to Pastors ouer Congregations Reuel 1. 11. and 2. 3. to old men 1. Ioh. 2. 14. to yong men 1. Ioh. 2. 13 14. yea generally to all the Saints Rom 1. 7. 1. Cor. 1 2. As the generall Epistles of Iames Peter Iohn and Iude do witnesse 2. It teacheth that they were written for the benefit and guiding of all sorts for kings Deut. 17 18 19. Iosh 1. 8. for Elders and Magistrates of the people Deut. 31. 9. and for others to make vse of Pro. 1. 4. 3. It teacheth that the reading searching and attending to them was commended to all sorts without any exception Deut. 30. 10. Iosh 23. 6. Ioh. 5 39 2. Pet. 1. 19. Eph. 6. 17. Reuel 1. 3. 4. It teacheth that they were commanded to be read vnto all sorts Deut. 31. 11 12. Ier. 36. 6 10. Col. 4. 16. 1. Thess 5. 27. and so were read to them Exod. 24. 7. Iosh 6. 34 35. Neh. 8. 2 3. and 2. Chron. 34. 30. Act. 13. 15. and 15. 21. 5. It sheweth vs that they were read of all sorts and neuer reproued for any euill in them as of Iosias 2. Chron. 34. 30. of the noble Eunuch Act. 8. 32. of the noble Bereans Act. 17. 11. of godly women as Lois and Eunice trayning vp Timothy from his child-hood therein 2. Tim. 1. 5. with 3. 15. It is cleare therefore by their owne Bible that all and euery one might reade Scriptures that could and would reade them and that without hinderance The Papists are farre from Moses spirit who wished from his heart that all the Lords people could prophesie Num. 11. 29. But they that do euill hate therefore the light and will not permit people to come vnto it lest thereby their deeds be reproued Ioh. 3. 20. Contraried by Antiquitie S. Augustine l. 3. c. 1. de doct Christ A man that feareth God doth diligently enquire after his will in the Scriptures And in Serm. 55. it is not sufficient that ye heare the Diuine Scriptures in the Church but also in your houses either reade them your selues or else desire some other to reade them and giue you diligent eare thereto The Nicene Synod saith Corn. Agrippa lib. de van Scient decreed that no Christian should be without the Bible in his house Chrysost exhorteth men to get the Bible the most wholesome remedie for the soule if not all yet some part to take the holy bookes into their hands before and after meate at home and not in the Church onely Yea he telleth his hearers that to think Gods Word needlesse cōmeth of the deuill the it was as an infecting Pestilence for the people to thinke that it appertained to men of the Church to reade them and not to others whereas he telleth them that it was much more necessarie for them then for the other See for these his speeches at large Hom. 10. on Gen. 29. Hom. 1. on Ioh. Hom. 13. on Mat. Hom. 2. on 2. Thess Hom. 3. S. Ierome on Col. 3. 16. We see heare saith he that lay people should not haue onely knowledge of the Scriptures sufficiently but aboundantly that so one might be able to teach another many of his writings were written to women as to Paula Epist 8. 9. 10. 12. 14. Eustochium Saluina Demetria Furia Celantia and others commending them for their reading and studie of Scriptures Epist ad Laetam yea he instructed one Laeta how she should bring vp her daughter in holy Scriptures to learne the Psalter thē Prouerbs then Ecclesiastes then Iob and so to go to the Gospels after these the Prophets Moses and Historicall bookes He herein was then no Papist S. Basil regul contract q. 95. It is necessarie and consonant to reason that euerie man learne that which is needfull out of the Scriptures whose Nurse one Macrina taught himselfe the Scriptures from a child Bas Epist 74. Theophylact on Eph. 6. Say not saith he that it belongeth Lib. 5 de curand Graec. affect onely to Religious men to reade the Scriptures for it is the dutie of euery Christian and most of all of such as deale in worldly affaires because they being as it were shaken with a tempest haue greater need of spirituall succour And Theodoret writeth of his times that Coblers Smiths Websters and all kind of Artificers all the women not onely such as could reade but See also Euseb lib. 1 cap. 6. de demonstrat Euangel Semsters Maidseruants and waiting-women Citizens Husbandmen Ditchers Neatheards Woodsetters vnderstood the points of faith and could discourse of them What can be more cleare then this that in former ages from the beginning euery one had libertie to reade the Scriptures for their helpe Socrat. lib. 4 cap 33. were they translated into vulgar tongues into all languages For the truth of this see Aug. de doct Chri. lib. 2. cap. 5. Theodoret in his forenamed Booke Beda Hist. lib. 1. cap. 1. Chrysost Hom. 1. in Iohan. Yea do we not know how Lay men for their diuine Knowledge were chosen to be Teachers in the Church Nectarius a Iudge made Bishop of Constantinople Ambrose a deputie Bishop of Millan with other moe Gainesaid by some of themselues The Rhemists though they hold the false Tenent yet in their Preface before their translation cannot denie the Scriptures to haue bene in the vulgar Languages of diuers Nations as in the Armenian the Sclauonian Gothick Italian French English tongue yea in the Languages of almost all the principall Prouinces of the Latine Church of later times The meere Politicke caution and limitation of the Trent Conuenticle was not deuised in former ages that the Scriptures should not be read indifferently of all men but of such as haue licence Licence to reade holy Scripture was not thought of in the Primitiue Church nor many hundred yeeres after The very translation of the Scriptures aforetimes shew that the godly Translators minded to put Gods Bible into all mens hands without any Popes licence Acosta li. 2. de Chron. Reu. ca. 2. pa. 65. is enforced to confesse that our gracious God hath maruerlously prouided in holy Writ that the most rude reading in humilitie may profit thereby and in chap. 5. speaking by experience I haue seene saith he some men vtterly vnlearned and scarce knowing Latine who haue gathered out of Scripture such profound
are of those things which God hath giuen vnto vs therefore by the Spirit of God can wee know them to be of God And indeed all Scripture being inspired of Gods Spirit who can better informe our knowledge of them then the blessed Inditer and Author of them 2. By the Scriptures themselues which beare witnesse of themselues that they are iustified in themselues Psal 18. 10. that Psal 19. they are all inspired of God 2. Tim. 3. 16. that they are holy Scriptures Rom. 1. 6. the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. who were guided by the holy Ghost 2. Pet. 1. 20. as also were the Apostles Mat. 10. 20. Mark 13. 11. And Paul telleth vs that he wrote the Commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. III. As their Bible telleth vs that by the Spirit and by the Scriptures themselues we know the Scriptures to be of God so also the same Bible teacheth vs 1. That the testimonie of the Spirit is truth 1. Ioh. 5. 6. and is no lye 1. Ioh. 2. 27. which Spirit of Christ all the Children of God haue Gal. 4. 6. and all that are Christs else they are none of his Rom. 8. 9. 2. That the testimony of the Scriptures are of more credit then the testimony of men for the witnesse of God is greater then men 1. Ioh. 5. 9. And Christ preferred the testimony of the Scriptures before mans testimony yea though a Prophet for he saith he receiued not testimony of man speaking of Iohn Bapt. Ioh. 5. 33 34. and yet he referred himself to the testimony of the Scriptures testifying of him vers 39. Yea he saith that his owne words would not be beleeued if the Scriptures be not belieued ver 47. So that the Scriptures testimony of themselues being the Word of God so the testimony of God are sufficient witnes to take them for the Scriptures of God which whoso refuseth or questioneth the testimony of no men no not of Christ if he were here on earth would be beleeued to make vs to receiue them for Gods Word This their owne Bible doth teach vs. IV. Their Bible doth not onely shew how the Scriptures giue witnesse of themselues thus in generall termes but more particularly informeth vs that the Scriptures doe proue the particular bookes of holy Writ to bee the Word of God Moses witnesseth of his owne writings that he wrote by commandement Deut. 31. 9 19. and what he deliuered was that which was commanded him Exod. 34. 34. All the Prophets witnesse their Prophecies to be of God Esay 1 2. Ier. 1. 2. Ezech. 1. 3. Dan. 10. 1. Hos 1. 1. Ioel 1. 1. Amos 1. 3. Obadiah 1. 1. Ionah 1. 1. Mich. 1. 1. Nah. 1. 1. Hab. 1. 1. Zeph. 1. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Zach. 1. 1. Mal. 1. 1. Iesus Christ gaue approbation to the authoritie of Moses the Prophets and the Psalmes Luk. 24. 26 24. And so the Apostles Act. 26. 22. Rom. 16. 23. not onely in expounding but also by alleaging one where or other some thing out of euery booke as out of Genesis Mat. 23. 35. Act. 7. 3. and 3. 25. Ioh. 4. 5. out of Exodus Mat. 5. 38. and 22. 32. Act. 13. 17 18. Leuiticus Rom. 10. 5. Mat. 5. 38. Numbers Ioh. 3. 14. and 6. 31. Deuteronomy Mat. 4. 4 7. and 5. 31. or 7. 37. Ioshua Act. 7. Heb. 11. 31. Iam. 2. Iudges Act. 13. 20. Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Mat. 1. 2 3 12. Samuel Kings and Chronicles Mat. 1. 2 3 6 7. and 12. 3 42. and 23. 35. Luk. 4. 25 26 27. Act. 13. 21 22. Rom. 11. 3. Heb. 11. 32. Iob Iam. 5. 11. Psalmes the whole book Act. 1. 16 20. and parts thereof Mat. 13. 35. and 21. 16 42. Prouerbs Rom. 12. 26. Iam. 4. 6. Heb. 12. 6. Esay Mat. 21. 5 13. Ioh. 12. 38. Ieremy Mat. 27. 9. Ezechiel 2. Cor. 6. 18. Reuel 4. 7. and 20. 8. Daniel Mat. 24. 15. So might I goe thorow all the small Prophets but that whole booke of the Prophets is approoued Act. 7. 42. And all the Scriptures of the old Testament are called by Saint Paul the words of God Rom. 3. 2. and are confirmed in particular as the rest as Hosea Mat. 9. 13. and 12. 7. Ro. 9. 25 26. Ioel Act. 2. 16. Ionas Mat. 12. 40. Amos Act. 7. 43. Micha Mat. 2. 6. Zacharie Mat. 27. 9. Habacuk Rom. 1. 17. Gal. 3. 11. Nahum Rom. 10. 15. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Malachy Mat. 17. 11 12. Thus the old Testament beareth witnesse to it selfe and the New also to the Old so doth the Old to the New foreshewing what in the New is reuealed besides the record it beareth of it selfe For Iohn telleth vs that his writings are the truth of God Ioh. 19. 35. Reuel 1. 1. Saint Paul that his are the commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. Saint Peter confirmeth the authoritie of all Pauls Epistles 2. Pet. 3. 16. And thus must we thinke of all the Apostles writings as the diuine truth of God because they were all led by the same Spirit Ioh. 15. 26. into all truth Ioh. 16. 13. which called the words of Christ to their remembrance Ioh. 14. 26. which Spirit Christ gaue them and they had receiued Ioh. 17. 8. Neither is it to be doubted but as their words in their Ministerie were the words of God Mat. 10. 20. Mark 13. 11. so were their words written of God also seeing they wrote what they taught as these places shew Luk. 1. 1 3 4. Act. 1. 1. 1. Cor. 15. 1. 2. Cor. 1. 13. Phil. 3. 1. 2. Thes 2. 5. and as before is prooued at large V. Their owne Bible telleth vs that the Word is a lampe and a light Psal 118. 105. 2. Pet. 1. 19. This is spoken of the written 〈◊〉 11 9. Word Now a lampe and a light need no man to point to them that hath eyes to see if the same be before them but they shew themselues to such clearely enough euen so doth the light of Gods Word in Scripture shew it selfe Gods workes shew themselues to be his workes out of themselues Act. 14. 16. He lest not himselfe without testimony Rom. 1. 20. Psal 18. 1. His Psal 19. workes shew him and shew themselues to be his and shall not Gods Word shew it selfe to be Gods Word Is there to a godly man a lesse print of the Deitie in his Word to discerne it then in a very naturall man to discerne his workes Moreouer shall the writings of men discouer their Authors of what profession and learning they be and shall not Gods Word be able to shew it selfe to bee of God For let one man write like an Artist another as a Philosopher the third as a Moralist the fourth as a Statist the fifth as a Diuine No man that is an Artist a Philosopher a Moralist a Statist or Diuine but hee can discerne of all these writings distinctly though hee haue not some to tell him what they bee So let
a man endued with Gods Spirit and spirituall vnderstanding come to the holy Scriptures he will discerne them to be of God and of his Spirits inditing though none beare witnesse to them and tell him so much For the spirituall man iudgeth all things 1. Cor. 2. 15. and if he can iudge he also can discerne of thē Weigh also that those which bee good Bankers know money at the first sight whose image and superscription it beareth The worke of an Apelles is easily discerned from that which is an ordinarie Painters And wee know that men well read are so quick-sighted as that they can discerne learned mens writings from the counterfeites of them How much more then may the writings of God so infinitely surmounting all others in all manner of grace dexteritie and maiestie of themselues be seuered and sundred from all other writings and be knowne to be of the Lords owne inditing Lastly as in generall the Scriptures shew themselues to bee Gods Word and also more particularly that the seuerall books thereof are his Word So these very bookes which wee at this day acknowledge and haue in account for Gods Word and so beleeue them to be doe witnesse for themselues that they are indeed the very Word of God though the Church should bee silent in her dutie so to professe and teach them to be And this is cleare 1. From the Penmen who according to the wisdome giuen to them as Peter speaketh 2. Pet. 3. 15. haue written the truth of God Ioh. 19 35. and the commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. Now who were the Penmen of these bookes we know 1. By the titles of them 2. By the inscriptions as that to the Rom. chap. 1. 1. to the Corinth chap. 1. 1. 2. Cor. 1. 1. to the Gal. chap. 1. 1. and so of the rest of the Epistles of Saint Paul Likewise that of Saint Iames Peter and Iude and the Reuel 1. 1 4. are knowne by their inscriptions 3. By the subscription in some as 1. Cor. chap. 16. 21. The salutation of me Paul with mine owne hand 4. By apparant testimonie within them telling vs who wrote them Iohn saith he wrote the Gospell ascribed to him Ioh. 21. 24. So Saint Paul his Epistles 2. Cor. 10. 1. 1. Corinth 15 9. 1. Tim. 1. 13. That to the Hebrewes in many places discouers it selfe to be Saint Pauls So the Gospell to be Saint Lukes and the Acts too for hee that wrote the one wrote the other also Acts 7. 7. 2. From the puritie the veritie the integritie the godly plainenesse and simplicitie and yet powerfull maiestie thereof euincing all gaine-sayers and manifesting these very bookes to be the Word of God What true and euident properties soeuer can be shewed to be the properties of Gods Word to know it by the very same these bookes challenge to themselues to approue themselues to bee Gods Word to the conscience of euery true Christian See Scotus his ten arguments 1. Sent. prol Art 1. Also Gregor de Valent. tom 3. p. 329. Let our aduersaries speake herein 3. From the witnesse of Gods Spirit making the reading studying meditation preaching and hearing of the things contained in these bookes very powerfull vpon mens consciences working conuersion to God and so perswading to beleeue them to bee of God as hereupon they doe yeeld obedience thereto feare to offend against the commandements therein beleeue with comfort the promises yea and so fully to giue themselues to the guiding thereof as they thinke in them to find eternall life and are so perswaded as that they can forsake all yea if need were also to suffer death vpon the faith of these sauing truths therein contained as holy Martyrs haue done very chearefully and constantly through the Spirits assistance bearing witnesse to them and by which they and wee know them to be the things giuen vs of God 1. Cor. 2. 12. This worketh faith and maketh vs beleeue them and therefore is called the Spirit of Faith 2. Cor. 4 13. This teacheth vs Ioh. 6. 45. and is truth 1. Ioh. 5. 6. and euer accompanieth the Word Esay 59. 21. to make it the power of God to saluation Rom. 1. and the sauour of life vnto life to them that are saued 2. Cor. 2. The Church is to testifie of them to interpret them out of themselues to keepe them and to defend them but she cannot either make them to be Gods word if they were not so already for she cannot make a word to be mans if man neuer spoke it neither can she make Gods word to be his word vnto vs vpon her owne credit if it selfe bare not witnesse of it selfe and the Spirit did not confirme the same and not worke this faith in vs. If her authoritie could worke this beliefe then were she to blame for not bringing all to the faith of them To worke diuine faith in our hearts is of God and not of men Contraried by Antiquitie Saluianus lib. 3. de prouidentia saith All that men say need reasons and witnesses but Gods Word is witnesse to it selfe for whatsoeuer the incorrupt Truth speaketh must needs be an incorrupt witnesse to it selfe Ambrose lib. 5. Epist 31. Whom may I beleeue in the things of God better then God himselfe Hilarie lib. 1. de Triniate God is a witnesse for himselfe and he is not to be knowne but by himself Now God and his Word is one and therefore saith Nilus it is all one to accuse God as Decausis dissent Eccl. pag. 2. to challenge the Scriptures Origen lib. 4. cap. 2. de Princip Whosoeuer with all diligence and reuerence as is meete shall consider the words of the Prophets it is certaine that in the reading and diligent view thereof hauing his mind and vnderstanding knocked at by a diuine inspiration he shall know that the words which he readeth were not vttered by man but are the words of God and of himselfe shall perceiue that these bookes were written not by humane Art not by the word of mortall man but by a Maiestie Diuine Gainesaid by some of their owne Gregorie de Valentia Comment in Thom. cap. 3. pag. 31. The Reuelation of the Scripture is beleeued not vpon the credit of another Reuelation but for it selfe Canisius citeth cap. de praecept Eccl. Num. 16. We beleeue adhere and giue the greatest authoritie to the Scripture for the testimonies sake of the holy Ghost speaking in them Bellarmine de Verbo Dei lib. ca. 2. Nothing is more knowne nothing more certaine then the Scripture that it were the greatest madnesse in the world not to beleeue them If he saith truth as he doth then is it madnesse not to beleeue the Scripture bearing witnesse of it selfe that it is all of it selfe inspired of God What farther Testimonie neede wee A Papist now of late in His guide of Faith saith thus We beleeue the Scriptures S. N. Guide of faith chap. 7. num 3. for the diuine Authoritie which is the
formall obiect of Faith and of infinit force and abilitie to perswade immediately by it selfe without the helpe of any formall inducement whatsoeuer Stapleton saith That all the former writings of the Bible may Defens Eccl. Autho. lib. 1. cap 9. Tripl incoat Aduers Wâ—itak in admonit be assured to vs by the latter the old Testament by the new and the inward Testimonie of the Spirit is so effectual for the beleeuing of any point of faith that by it alone any part may be beleeued though the Church hold her peace and neuer be heard Note this saying well you Papists that perswade your selues that the Scripture is not Scripture to you but because the Church tels you so They haue no Scripture for defence of this their Position to S. N. Guide of Faith chap. 7. num 2. and 3. obiect against vs. Atheisticall obiections some haue made as if they would vphold the Turkish Alcoran vnworthy any Christian and no more worthy any answer then the blasphemie of Rabshekah 2. King 18 36. against which King Hezekias commandement was Answer him not a word Esa 36. 21. VIII Proposition That traditions which they call the vnwritten word are the Rule of Faith Confuted by their owne Bible I. IT hath beene proued before that the word deliuered by mouth both before and vnder the Law and after till the new Testament was written in all substantiall and necessarie points of faith is now either expresly set downe or by a necessarie conclusion comprehended in the Scriptures II. That therefore the Scriptures are the onely Rule of Faith which before also is fully proued III. Their owne Bible in many places diuers wayes doth condemne traditions 1. In calling them traditions of men Col. 2. 8. of Fathers 1. Pet. 1. 18. your traditions that is the traditions of Scribes and Pharises Mat. 15. 1 3. commandements and doctrine of men Mat. 15. 9. Rudiments of the world Col. 2. 8 20. not calling them the tradition doctrines and commandements of God or his Word or the word of his Prophets any where 2. In declaring to vs that the worship which is after such traditions is a vaine worship Mat. 15. 9. and but a shew of wisedome in superstition Col. 2. 23. and that the conuersation also which is after Fathers tradition is but vaine 1. Pet. 1. 18. So as we see traditions may not be either a Rule of worship or of conuersation of life 3. In setting downe the euils which haue come to the Church and true Religion of God by such traditions Their Bible telleth vs that for traditions the Commandements of God were left transgressed made frustrate and his Word defeated Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9 13. It was tradition by which the Scribes and Pharises had diminished the integritie of the Law taken from it added to it and corrupted the meaning thereof which Christ freed it from Mat. 5. 18 20 22 23 28 29 34 35. It was a pretended Apostolicall word which first greatly troubled the Church of Antioch and was the cause of gathering the Councell at Ierusalem to confute and condemne the same Act. 15. 1 2 5 6 23 24. The decrees thereof were written the Epistle sent abroad vers 30. 31. and so they had a written Word to strengthen them against that traditionall corrupt and counterfeit Word Lastly it was a pretended Apostolicall word which troubled the Thessalonians 2. Thess 2. 2. which by his Epistle and so by the written Word was confuted If I should adde out of Storie to this out of Scripture what euils haue hereby happened to the Church in and among Hereticks who vsed traditions to defend their Heresies in and Irenaeus l. 5. c. 66. l. c. 13. â—ert de praescript Epiphan de Haeres l. 1. c. 23. 24 38. among the Fathers misse-led and misleading others by false traditions whereby some of them became Chiliasts and now in and among the Papists who vnder the colour of traditions fill the world full of their inuentions superstitions and Idolatries I should be ouer-long and so proue tedious But let the desirous Reader peruse D. Whitakers De traditionibus 4. In teaching vs that the Apostle giueth the Church warning not to be deceiued by word by Philosophie by vaine fallacie according to mens traditions 2. Thess 2. 1 2 3. Col. 2. 8. Contraried by Antiquitie Iustine in Triphonem If we will be safe in all things we must flie to the Scriptures we must beleeue God onely and rest only vpon his institutions and not on mens traditions Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 13. saith of the Apostles that what they preached by mouth they left vs in writing to bee the pillar and ground-worke of our Faith Tertul. de praescrip It were a folly to thinke that the Apostles knew all things but reuealed the same to few deliuering some things openly to all reseruing some other things to be spoken in secret to some What can more plainely be deliuered contradictorie to Papists and to taxe them of folly and falshood in this point Theoph. Alexand. in 2. Paschali It is a diuelish spirit to thinke any thing diuine besides the Authoritie of the holy Scriptures Basil in serm de fide It is a manifest defection from the faith to bring in any thing that is not written When he vttered this did he dreame of a traditionall word Ierome in Hag. cap. 1. All traditions pretended to be Apostolike if they haue not their authoritie from the Scriptures are cut off by the Sword of God Nazianzen in Epimedio Athanasij calleth this vnwritten word An inuocation and opposite to written Pietie See further Tertul. Origen Hippolytus Athanasius Ambrose Basil Greg. Nissene Ierome Augustine Cyril of Alexan. S. Antonie and Theodoret cited by Bishop Vsher in his last booke in the Controuersie of traditions Gainesaid by some of themselues This is to be seene in the words of Gregory Gerson Petrus See question the first before de Aliaco Clemangis Durandus Picus-Mirandula Aquinas Ferus and other auouching the whole Scriptures to bee the Rule of faith Also of Antoninus Scotus Gerson Trithemius Villa-Vincentius Caictan Lyra and other who maintaine that the the Scriptures be perfect and sufficient euery way their words See question the second before are cyted before and so doe gainesay this traditionall word Obiections out of the Scriptures answered 2. Thes 2. 15. Stand fast and hold the traditions which ye haue beene taught whether by word or by our Epistle Answ This place though in shew at the first sight may seeme to helpe them yet considering well what they in the Question vnderstand by traditions it helpes them nothing at all 1. Traditions here are such as all the Thessalonians receiued and which the Apostles had taught to them all but traditions which the Papists maintain are certaine secret traditions deliuered not to all but to some sorts of men for the better guiding of the Church Therefore these traditions here are not those these being common to all
2. This was in respect of a future lapse in Peter which Christ foresaw more then in any of the Apostles as the euent declared 3. This is meant of Peters owne particular inward grace of faith which was terribly shaken when he denied and forswore his Master and not of his teaching in the execution of his ministerie For why should Christ pray more for Peters teaching then for the rest whom Christ sent out as well as him to teach all Nations Mat. 16. 18. This text is spoken vnto Peter of the Churches preseruation against the gates of hell but speaketh nothing of Peters not erring much lesse of the Popes of whom Christ in this place neuer dreamed And its cleare by Scripture that the gates of hell preuailed against Peter after Christ had vttered these words vnto him though not totally and finally to destruction yet in a great measure to transgression and fearefull falling Mat. 23. 2. This is very largely answered before and there is it fully proued that these Scribes and Pharises erred grosly in many things Ioh. 21. 15 16 17. This text speakes of Peters dutie that as he loued Christ he should feed his lambes but speakes not a word of his not erring who after this was found ignorant in some things of the nature of Christs Kingdome Act. 1. 6. of going to the Gentiles and eating things forbidden by the Law abrogated by Christ Act. 10. 12 14. and he also erred at Antioch Gal. 2. But if this did cleare Peter what maketh it for the Pope who shewes no loue to Christ in feeding his lambes If he neuer teach then he may be sure neuer to erre in that kind Exod. 28. 30. First what this Vrim and Thummim was can no man tell Secondly though Aaron had it yet he foully erred in the golden Calfe in making it in building an Altar before it and proclaiming a feast thereupon to the Lord Exod. 32. 4 5 And did not Vrijah erre in the dayes of wicked Ahaz 2. King 16. 11 16 So the high Priest in Christs time Therefore this place alledged to proue that the high Priest could not erre is much abused Thirdly what is this to the Pope who is neither Gods high Priest for such is there now none but Iesus Christ onely neither hath this Vrim Thummim which Aaron had XV. Proposition That Councels may not erre being confirmed by the Pope Confuted by their owne Bible The Councell at Ierusalem gathered vnder the high Priest against Christ Mat. 26. against the Apostles Act. 4. 5 6. against Steuen Act. 6. 12. and 7. 1. against Paul Act. 22. 30. erred The Assembly gathered vnder Aaron who consented to them and made the golden Calfe erred Exod. 32. 1 2 3 4 5. The great congregation gathered vnder Dauid and the high Priest then erred in not seeking the Lord after a right manner 1. Chro. 13. in putting the Arke in a new Cart vers 7. and Chap. 15. 13 14 15. The Assembly of the Priests Prophets and people gathered against Ieremie erred Ier. 26. 8 9 11. And yet this Church had large promises as before is declared and the high Priests better assurances then the Pope For the high Priest was first nominated by God himself after confirmed by a miracle Num. 17. 8. he had vpon his brest the Vrim and Thummim and warrant in expresse tearmes to hold him for the Lords high Priest No such assurances hath the Pope And therefore if the Councels thus erred vnder the high Priests so may they vnder the Pope Contraried by Antiquitie 1. It s cleare that generall Councels haue erred as that of Arimine of 600. Bishops in defence of Arius yea Bellarmine Lib. 1. de Concil cap. 6. 7. nameth generall Councels reiected as the generall Councell at Antioch Anno 345. the generall Councell at Millaine of aboue 300. Bishops Anno 354. the second Ephesine Anno 449. and many other 2. Councels haue contradicted one another the first Nicene condemned worshipping of Images and the second Nicene allowed it Chalcedon condemned Eutyches the Ephesin confirmed his heresie In contradictions must needs be error 3. S. Augustine lib. 2. de bapt Contra Donat. cap. 3. saith that former generall Councels may be corrected by the later when that is knowne which before was hid He therefore beleeued that Councels might erre 4. Euen Councels confirmed by the Pope may erre and haue erred The Councell of Neocaesaria confirmed by Pope Leo 4. condemned second marriage contrary to 1. Cor. 7. The second Nicene approueth worshipping of Images contrary to Exod. 10. If any desire more instances let them reade our learned Whitacres de Concilijs 5. Councels approued by Popes haue contradicted one another The Councels of Constance and Basil determined that the Councell was aboue the Pope that the Pope might erre Pope Martin the first chosen by the Councell of Constance was of the same iudgement but the Councels of Ferraria and Florence determined the contrary that the Pope was aboue the Councell and Eugenius the 4. which gathered the Councels was of the same iudgement with them And therefore the one side must needs erre and so Councels approued by Popes may erre And what doubt can be made of this when this their virtual Church is proued before not onely to be subiect to error but also to haue erred And can his approuing of Councels preserue them from error who cannot preserue himselfe from it Gainesaid by some of themselues The Councell of Florence and Ferraria held that a Councell might erre and so thought Pope Eugenius the fourth Their learned men haue held that Councels may erre Generall Councels may erre saith Waldensis Cusanus also Concord In doctrina sid lib. 2. cap. 19. Loc. Theol. lib. 5. cap. 5. Dialog part 1. lib. 6. cap. 25. 26. Catho lib. 2. cap. 3. yea saith Canus and prescribe some lawes to the whole Church that are not right profitable and iust Occham holdeth that they may erre though the Pope confirme them For as is afore proued the Pope and Councels haue erred Pighius saith of the Councell of Constance that it decreed In Hierarch against the order of nature against manifest Scripture against the Authoritie of all Antiquitie and against the Catholicke faith of their Church Bellarmine saith that the great Councel of Chalcedon erred in In Praef. de P. Rom. equalizing the Bishop of Constantinople to the Bishop of Rome Our Aduersaries take libertie to themselues to allow or disallow Councels in what or as farre as they please as Councels make any way for them so farre they approue them as they make in any thing against them so farre they reiect them For this reade Bishop Morton his Catho Apologie par 2. lib. 4. ca. 3. p. 334 335. also D. White his last Booke pag. 153. Scriptures obiected answered Mat. 18. 20. Where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them Answ I. Here is not meant either a
other concerning the Popes not erring and his Authority ouer Councels Not in authorizing the Latine Translation For Pope Sixtus 5. set out his Edition with his fullest power as not to bee amended yet comes Clement 8. with his corrected Edition in many hundred places afterwards Not in Decrees for Formosus his Decrees were disannulled by Stephanus and this Popes by another Not in affection as is euident by the so many and so long continued Schismes Onuphrius reckons vp aboue thirtie notorious schismes Not in life for though bad inough all of them after they became Popes especially from the time of Boniface yet some were Necromancers some Mortherers some Atheisticall contempers of the Gospell some bloudy Warriers how many of them filthy Fornicators and Adulterers it is not to be told III. Not betweene Pope and Councels for these haue deposed Popes As the Councell of Constance did Iohn the 22 that of Basil Eugenius the 4. that of Pisa Gregory 12 and Bennet the 13. IV. Not betweene Pope and his Cardinals For of them he hath put out the eyes of some and caused other to be thrattled and some of them haue opposed him in their Writings V. Not betweene the Pope and the learned in that Church such were beside many others Marsilius of Padua Dante 's Aleigerius Occham the Doctors of Paris the state and Diuines of Venice of late dayes in an opposition did not regard the Popes iudgement VI. Not betweene the parts of the Popes Lawes for the See Rainolds against Hart. pag. â— 33. Decrees and Decretals are often at odds VII Not betweene Councell and Councell for Constance and Basil were against Ferrara and Florence VIII Not betweene the Canonists and Glossaries for they iarre and are at difference one with another IX Not betweene the Schoolemen for among them are particular Sect-Masters whose Schollers are called after their names Thomists Scotists Albertists Occhamists opposing one another X. Not betweene the Friers for the Dominicans and Franciscans spent whole ages in Controuersies one holding one thing and another another opinion about the Conception of the Virgin Mary which bred other differences also XI Not betweene the Priests and the Iesuites let herein beare witnesse The Iesuits Catechisme The sparing Discourse and other bookes with all virulencie written one against another in the English tongue XII Not betweene the Learned of what sort soeuer for in their writings they crosse one another in many points of their Religion and namely in all those which maintaine the truth with vs against others of that Romish Faction as in many particulars is already before and afterwards shall be further shewed And farther for this let the Reader reade Pappus concerning the discord among Papists Doctor Hall Deane of Worcester his Booke called the Peace of Rome and Doctor White his Way pa. 154. 155. to 161. XIII Not betweene the Inquisitors for they differ in their iudgement about the purging of Bookes some allowing for orthodoxe that which other will not let passe for sound as may be seene in the Indices expurgatorij of Spaine Antwerpe and Rome varying one from another See for this Doctor Iames his Mysterie of the Indices expurgatorij pag. 15. XIV Not betweene the People for euen among them be differing opinions As Master Moulin in his Buckler of Faith sheweth from his owne experience pag. 279. and as wee may finde among Papists with vs when they are conferred withall apart one from another Gainsaid by their owne men From the Papists themselues may the discord of the Romish Church be noted from their owne Historians from such as haue written the Popes liues and from such as in their writings doe acknowledge the differences among them as Bellarmine himselfe doth confesse very many and so Nauarre For which reade Doctor Hals forenamed booke intituled The Peace of Rome in hundreds of differences Many Scriptures are alledged to proue that vnitie ought to be in the Church which we acknowledge and pray for But yet they proue not their Churches vnitie XVIII Proposition That Saint Peter was Prince of the Apostles and had a primacie of Power and Authoritie aboue all the other Apostles Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT telleth vs how Iesus Christ reproued the contention which arose about their vaine conceit of Superioritie one aboue another This hee plainely condemned and as plainely told them that there should bee no such Superioritie among them as they did dreame of and therefore hee exhorted them to humilitie yea in such a sort as that hee keepeth him downe as the inferiour Minister and Seruant of the rest that would be greatest among them Mat. 20. 24 25 26 27. Mar. 10. 42 43 44. Luke 22. 24 25 26. 2. By their Bible wee are giuen to vnderstand that all the Apostles are euery way made equall in the like chusing and manner of calling Math. 4. 18. 21. In the like Commission giuen to all at once Mat. 28. 19 20. 10. 5. Mar. 16. the like power Mat. 10. 1. the same authoritie Ioh. 20. 21 23. the same benediction Luk. 24. 50 51. In breathing on them with one and the same breath his holy Spirit Ioh. 20. 22. In making them all Apostles in office the same and in title Luk. 6. 13. For the Apostles were the chiefest of all appointed in the Church Eph. 4. 11. 1. Cor. 12. 28. All therefore being Apostles they were equall for a higher dignity amongst them there was not They were all called foundations Reuel 21. 14. They were all installed into their Apostleship by one and the same meanes Act. 2 1 2 3 4. They were all ordained to one and the same end to bee with him to goe and preach Mar. 3. 14 15. 16. 15. to be witnesses of him to the vtmost parts of the Earth Act. 1. 8. and all of them at the length to sit and iudge the twelue Tribes of Israel Mat. 19. 28. The Lord made no difference among them If any had been it may seeme to haue been in Iohn 1. For he with his brother was Christs neerest kinsman 2. He was called the Disciple whom Christ loued 3. Hee and his Brother were called Boanerges Mar. 3. 17. sonnes of thunder 4. He was euer one with Christ as in his transfiguration Math. 17. 1. and in other places Mat. 26. 37. Mar. 5. 37. 5. Hee was the onely Disciple after whom Peter made enquirie what he should doe and of whom a saying went abroad that he should not dye 6. He was the onely Disciple that went boldly in with Christ and when he was in the High Priests house hee brought in Peter 7. He was the onely Disciple that stood by Christ when he was vpon the Crosse 8. He was the onely Apostle to whom Christ committed his Mother to take care of her 9. Hee was the onely Apostle which Christ would haue to call his Mother Mother and she to hold him as her sonne 10. He with Matthew was the onely Apostle that did write a Gospell
signe being called by the thing signified as we see in other Sacraments which must teach vs to expound this as also the rest of the words this Chalice is the new Testament 1. Cor. 11. 25. this is my bloud of the New Testament Math. 26. 28. this is the Chalice the New Testament Luk. 22. 20. and Drinke the Chalice saith S. Paul which they yeeld to be figuratiuely spoken and therefore so must the other Thirdly the name of bread both before the mentioning of the words of Consecration by Saint Paul in 1. Cor. 11. 23. and after is still kept verse 26 27 28. 1. Cor. 10. 16 17. not because only shew of Bread was so to the eye but for that it remained bread indeed and is yet so to feeling and taste as well as to sight Fourthly their Bible telleth vs that heauen truely hath receiued Christ vntill the times of the restitution of all things Acts 3. 21. Till then hee commeth not bodily out of heauen except the bread be heauen it selfe into which at his Ascension he was receiued Fiftly their Bible telleth vs that when Christ commeth hee shall come from heauen visibly so come againe as the Apostles saw him goe vp Act. 1. 11. But they saw him in his body visibly ascend so shall he in body come againe and not in a conceited inuisibilitie into the Sacrament bodily Sixtly their owne Bible teacheth that a body cannot be in two places at one instant of time Mat. 28. 26. He is not here said the Angell and giueth the reason For he is risen Because hee was in another place being risen and gone out of the Sepulchre See Augustine in Ioh. tract 31. shewing that Christ is not in two places at one time the Angell plainely and truely denied him therefore to be there Now wee beleeue him to bee euer bodily in heauen Therefore by an heauenly Angels reason wee may truely say that bodily he is not here in the Sacrament no more then he was in the Sepulchre because he was risen Seuenthly their Bible teacheth that wheresoeuer Christs bodie was at any time hee was discernable by sense and therefore he willeth his Disciples to vse their sense to discerne him Luk. 24. 39. So did Thomas Ioh. 20. 28. But in the Sacrament is no sensiblenesse at all of his bodily presence Eighthly their Bible doth teach that whensoeuer God turned one substance into another or tooke one away and put another in stead thereof that the same was discernable by sense Moses Staffe was visibly a Serpent Dust in Egypt was Lice seene and felt and so the Water was Bloud sensibly and the Water good Wine in Ioh. 2. 9. 10. to the taste But in this change at the Sacrament is no such sensible perception and therefore is there no such thing for God in his miracles deludeth no mans sense Contraried by Antiquity Tertul. aduers Marcionem This is my bodie that is This is a figure of my body Ambros desacra lib. 4. saith that it is a figure of the body and bloud of Christ And speaking of the signes he saith that they remaine the same that they were August in Psal 3. saith that in this Feast the Lord commanded and deliuered the figure of his bodie and bloud to his Disciples And the same Father contra Adamantium cap. 12. saith that wheÌ„ the Lord said This is my body he gaue the signe of his body See more in his Booke de Doct. Chri. lib. 3. cap. 16. calling it a figure and contr Maximinum lib. 3. cap. 22. he calleth the things visible Signes Chrysost ad Caesarium Monachum saith that though the bread hath the name of the Lords body yet the nature of bread remaineth still Theodoret. in Dialo immuta Hee changed the names and gaue his bodie that name which belonged to the signe and to the signe that name which belonged to his body not by changing their nature but by adding grace to nature And in Dial inconfusus hee saith that the mysticall signes after consecration doe not depart from their nature but they abide still in their former substance figure and forme and may be seene and touched as before Cyril in Ios lib. 4. cap. 14. saith that Christ gaue to his faithfull Disciples pieces of bread See farther in Bishop Vsher his last Booke of the controuerse of the Reall presence citing Iustine Martyr Ireneus Tertullian Origen Cyprian Theophilus of Antioch the Author of the harmony of the Gospels Eusebius Acacius Macarius Austin Chrysostome Theodores Ephraemius the Councell of Constantinople Bishops of France in a Synode at Carisiacum Rabanus Also D. White his last Booke pag. 401. citing many and pag. 435. answering the Aduersaries places out of the Fathers Gainsaid by themselues Golasins a Pope de duabus nat Chri. saith that the nature of the Bread and Wine ceaseth not but remaine stil in the propertie of their nature and contra Eutycheten The elements are the image and similitude of the body and bloud of Christ Their Glosse de cons Dist 2. The heauenly Sacrament is called the body of Christ but vnproperly It is impossible that the bread should be the body of Christ Pet. Lombard sent 4. dist 11. si autem c. saith that some iudged and some wrote that the very substance of bread and Wine remained still and of the manner of conuersion he saith he is not able to define Petrus de Aliaco the Cardinall 4. q. 6. Art 2. saith that the opinion which holdeth the substance of bread not to remaine doth not euidently follow of the Scriptures nor in his seeming of the Churches determination Caietan 3. par q. 75. Art 1. pag. 153. saith that in the Gospel there is nothing that compelleth vs to vnderstand them properly See more in Bishop Vsher his last booke of this point Ratrannus Scotus Alfrick Abbot of Malmesbury The Scriptures obiected answered Luk. 22. 15. With desire I haue desired to eate the Passeouer with you before I suffer Answ 1. This Text is vnderstood of the Iewish Passeouer and not of the Lords Supper for the Supper was not called the Pasche or Passeouer Also the whole Text sheweth it to bee â—â— verse 7 8 11 13 15. Secondly euen in this Text is a Sacramentall phrase for here the eating of the Lambe is called the Passeouer which was an act done long before of which this Feast was onely a remembrance and not the thing it selfe Thirdly this Passeouer did Christ certainly eate of with his Disciples but the Bread Wine in the Supper which he instituted for this new sacrament of the new Testament the Apostles ate and dranke of but not a word of Christs eating thereof but onely of the other Iewish Sacrament of which in the Verses next following hee also speakes saying that he would no more drinke of the Vine verse 18. as before he said that he would not eate of the Passeouer verse 16. Ioh. 6. 51. I am the liuing Bread c. Answ This speaketh not
fit this Shrift is for bawdry If any desire more reade Bishop Vshers last booke wherein is cited Gratian Iohannes Semeca Michael of Bononia Iohannes de Selua Also let him look into Doctor Whites way of the true Church of the Papists differing opinions about this pag. 440. 441. in quarto digress 55. Num. 8. and D. Whites last booke p. 190 191. Ans to Fisher 192. citing Iohn Medina Gratian and Caietan Iansenius Vasques Mich. Palacius Gloss on Gratian Gerson Panormitan Maldonat and others Scriptures obiected answered Math. 18. 18. Whatsoeuer ye shall binde on earth c. Answ 1. Here is not a word of confession in this place of Scripture but rather of accusation by another For in the words foregoing the notice giuen to the Church is from the partie not offending but offended If thy brother trespasse against thee c. tell it to the Church But all Auricular confession is supposed voluntary whereby a man accuseth himselfe and in priuate not publike as here Ioh. 20. 23. Whose sinnes ye remit c. Answ 1. Here is no mention of confession of sinnes to them Secondly the authoritie giuen here to the Apostles was exercised in the publike Ministerie preaching of the Word though they heard no priuate confession as the Papists dreame of Therefore the Apostle Saint Paul calleth the preaching of the Word the ministerie of Reconciliation 2. Cor. 5. 18. Thirdly Christ saith there As my Father sent mee so I send you Now he was not sent to heare priuate confessions and thereupon to giue them absolutions but by preaching to binde vp the broken hearted to proclaime libertie to the captiues and the opening of the prison to them that are bound Esai 61. 1. Luk. 4. 18. Neither did he binde any to priuate confession nor sate to heare the same Therefore such as he sendeth are not tyed to doe otherwise neither hath heere Popish shrift any ground Fourthly Caietan on this place saith that the Sacrament of penance hath here no commandement Act. 19. 18. And many that beleeued came and confessed c. Answ Here is mention indeed of confession but this proueth not imposed priuate confession secretly in the Priests eare For first this is of a confession voluntary not enforced Secondly of many that did it but not of all Thirdly publike and not in S. Pauls eare For as they shewed their workes and brought their bookes and burnt them before all men verse 19 So was this confession open for the Text maketh no difference of these actions Fourthly Here it is said they confessed but no particular enumeration of sinnes with circumstances Fiftly Caietan a Cardinall in his Commentarie hereof holdeth that this place is not meant of Auricular confession Iam. 5. 16. Confesse your faults one to another Answ This is nothing for the Popish confession For first it is as generall as prayer one for another But Prayer is a dutie common to all Secondly he saith not the prayer of the Priest but of a righteous man And I hope that others beside Priests are righteous men Thirdly here is not a word of absolution but a promise to the prayer of faith not to the Priests words to saue the sicke and to haue his sinnes pardoned verse 15. Fourthly confession commanded heere is not confined to a Priest but may extend to any other This Saint Iames speakes to all to whom he wrote his Epistle And this place is to be vnderstood one of these three wayes First either of Priests and people and then are the Priests bound to confesse as well to the people as the people to them For it s said Confesse one to another that is mutually or reciprocally Secondly or heere is vnderstood onely of Priests among themselues and then is there nothing to the people Thirdly or onely of the people among themselues and then is this nothing to the Priest to take authoritie hence to bind the people to confesse to him Fourthly confession here is not of secret sinnes in heart against God or sinnes hidden from men but of trespasses or offences one against another as the word in the Originall sheweth and is so taken in Marke 11. 25 26. Vpon which grieuances mutuall confession or acknowledgement of wrongs is here enioyned as a fit meanes of brotherly reconciliation and preseruation of peace among themselues To which they must adde prayer one for another that their mutuall confession reciprocally for reconciliation may bee blessed vnto them Of which practice happy are they which make conscience and blessed should we be if to this euery man would submit himselfe A harder taske then to whisper his sinnes in a Priests eare secretly Lastly the Rhemists say vpon this text that it is not certaine that S. Iames speaketh here of Sacramentall confession Wherevpon others in alledging Scriptures for Auricular confession leaue out this place as not to the purpose Mat. 3. 5 6. Then went out to him Ierusalem and all Iudea and all the Region round about Iordane and were baptized in Iordane confessing their sinnes Answ This sorteth not with Popish Auricular Confession and that for these three reasons First this was publike not in a corner of the Temple or of a Synagogue but in the place where he baptized them in Iordan before all the people Secondly this was at their first conuersion receiuing Baptisme and not yeerely at set times Thirdly it s not certaine what sinnes or how many whether in generall or particular they confessed Fourthly it was impossible for Iohn to heare euery mans priuate confession with enumeration of circumstances seeing all Iudea and all the Region about Iordane and Ierusalem went out to him meaning very many and multitudes of people Leuit. 13. 2. 14. 2. The Leper shall bee brought vnto the Priest c. Answ 1. Here is no mention of confession of sinnes but of one brought to the Priest to take a view of the Plague of Leprosie vpon the body verse 9 10. All the argument therefore that can hence be drawne is onely typicall not conuicting Secondly the partie was not to come and confesse himselfe a Leper to the Priest but the Priest was to iudge him so and to pronounce him a Leper chap. 13. 3 11 44. Then should the Leper cry and confesse not to the Priest but to the people that hee was vncleane verse 45. Thirdly this iudgement of the Leprosie by a plaine Law here belonged to the Priest But where can they shew a Law onely for their Priests to heare priuate confession after their Popish manner Fourthly the Priest looking vpon the partie was not in priuate betweene them two but before other for hee was brought vnto the Priest by others to bee viewed Fiftly the Priest did not alwayes professe the partie cleane vpon shewing his malady as the Popish Priest doth euer the Confitent vpon shewing his sins by confession but the Leuiticall Priest put the partie apart from all others a time for a tryall Leuit. 13. 4 5. and after
20. Because saith hee wee are redeemed by the grace of the Creator wee haue this heauenly gift bestowed vpon vs that when we leaue our fleshly habitation incontinently we are carried to our heauenly rewards Can any thing bee spoken more cleerely against going into Purgatorie See Bishop Vsher his last Booke in the controuersie touching Purgatorie and also D. White his last booke pag. 567. citing many Papists touching the inualiditie of the Popes power ouer soules in Purgatorie Scriptures obiected answered 1. Cor. 3. 15. If any mans worke shall bee burnt hee shall suffer losse but himselfe shall be saued yet so as by fire Answ 1. Albeit the foolish Gagger doth say that this is an expresse Scripture to proue Purgatorie yet Bellarmine saith Lib. 1. de Purg. cap. 5. that this is one of the most difficult places of the whole Scripture Therefore it will not easily satisfie a doubtfull minde in this controuerted point Secondly this place is interpreted in the seuerall words very See Morneus on the Masse all their opinions cited Lib. 3. cap. 6. p. 257 261. diuersly by the Ancients and so variously as Bellarmine is forced by reason of the incongruities thereof to leaue and forsake them all and to run his owne course as wide as any of the rest and differing from his fellowes Thomas Alcuinus Hugo Cardinalis and other Thirdly Erasmus in his Commentarie saith that this place affordeth not any thing for Purgatorie or veniall sinnes This his opinion is not suffered to see light but is blotted out See Index Expurgatorius which is made the true Purgatorie for Erasmus and others that dare to doubt of the false Purgatorie Fourthly the words are all Allegoricall Now Symbolicall places proue not Articles of Faith And therein it is absurd to take any of the words properly in continued metaphors and wholly Allegoricall Fiftly this text speaketh of burning of a mans worke but not of burning a soule But in Purgatorie they say the soule is burning and not his worke workes goe not into Purgatorie but here workes both good and bad are tryed by this fire Sixtly this speaketh of the worke of Teachers building vpon the foundation either Gold Siluer or precious Stones or Wood Hay and Stubble By the former must bee vnderstood either sound Doctrine or sound-hearted Beleeuers wonne to Christ by their teaching and then by the latter must be meant errours and vnsound Doctrine or hollow-hearted Christians which in time of fierie tryall fall away Take then either way this is nothing for veniall sinnes or bringing soules to a purgation Accordingly in the thirteenth verse the fire is a reuealing and trying fire to manifest the difference of mens workes in the execution of their Ministerie What is this to the purging and tormenting fire as a satisfactorie punishment for sinne Purgatorie fire is a materiall fire say they but a materiall fire cannot try Doctrines truth from falshood sound from vnwholesome teaching Seuenthly the word fire in verse 15. cannot be taken for materiall fire or Purgatorie fire First because the continued metaphors in the whole context admits not of such a proper and literall interpretation Secondly the word of similitude is against it For it is not said by fire but as by fire so it is not meant fire properly but by some likenesse a metaphoricall fire not a materiall fire Thirdly Estius one of their owne learned men saith That the word fire three times mentioned in verse 13 and 15 is the same in euery place and calleth the interpretation absurd which puts a difference in them Which being true the former fire in verse 13. not being meant of Purgatorie by Bellarmines grant this latter cannot but absurdly be so interpreted And so in conclusion no Purgatorie fire at all This fire is spirituall such a fire as can try Doctrines and can reueale them and can saue the builder though it consume his worke which fire is Gods Word Ier. 23. 29. and 20. 9. and Gods holy Spirit Mar. 9. 49. Mat. 3. 11. This word by the operation of this Spirit vpon the conscience of an erroneous builder when by the light of truth hee seeth his worke vaine and naught worketh as fire in him to make him confesse his errour and to labour to teach the truth and thus is he saued as by fire the word being in him as fire as it was in Ieremie especially in time of trouble and day of tryall for his Doctrine Ioh. 11. 22. But I know that euen now whatsoeuer thou wilt aske of God God will giue it thee Cardinall Allen saith the Gagger hath hence learnedly concluded that Martha had beene taught and beleeued that the dead might be holpen by the pietie of the liuing Answ 1. How learnedly the Cardinal could conclude hence Purgatorie or the Gagger to helpe him I leaue to learned men to iudge and withal whether they haue not exposed themselues to folly who hence would collect such a thing Secondly touching the Iewish Church and her Doctrine how Purgatorie was vnknowne to her and the Church of Israel vnder the Law let the Reader peruse Mornay of the Masse his third booke and sixt Chapter Thirdly the speech is to Christ and of her full assurance of the efficacie of his prayer vnto God euen to raise vp Lazarus from the dead as appeareth by the scope of her speech What is this to helpe soules in Purgatorie Act. 2. 24. Whom God hath raised vp loosing the sorrowes of Hell This cleerely makes for Purgatorie saith the wise Gagger for here he and the Rhemists wil haue Christ loose others from their paines Answ 1. This speakes of Christs rising from the dead by the power of God Secondly of Gods raising him vp and loosing him from the sorrowes of Hell and not of Christs freeing others from torment Thirdly here is no mention of Purgatorie but of Hell And is Hell and Purgatorie now one place I feare mee they will finde it so that hee which goeth to Purgatorie goeth to Hell Fourthly the word Hell is here taken properly or figuratiuely If properly for hell it selfe the place of the damned then it is nothing for their Purgatorie for from hell is no redemption Luk. 16. 26. If figuratiuely then it speakes not of any reall Purgatorie place and so neither way serues their turne Fiftly if they will haue the place to bee for Purgatorie then is there no cause now to feare it for therein is now no more paines For it is not said that hee loosed the soules out of it but the sorrowes thereof and tooke them away What maketh this for Purgatorie Sixtly the word in the most current originals is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though the old vulgar reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the first signifieth not Hell but Death so it is thus to be read loosing the sorrowes of death as we truely translate 1. Cor. 15. 29. Otherwise what shall they doe that are baptized for the dead An euident proofe saith the Gagger
cont Pelag. cap. 25. God doth not onely helpe vs to be able to worke but worketh in vs to will and to worke and in cap. 17. he saith that God without vs doth worke in vs to will and in Epist. 107. It is God who by his secret calling worketh the minde of man to giue consent Prosper de vocat Gent. cap. 6. The turning of the heart vnto God is of God alledging the place of Ieremie 24. 7. Fulgent ad Monimum lib. 1. Both our good will and also our good workes are of God And againe this Father saith We in no wise suffer nay according to wholesome Doctrine we forbid whether in our faith or in our workes to challenge to our selues any thing as our owne S. Bernard de gra lib. arb The creating of vs to freedome of will is wrought without vs. The Arausicane Councill 2. cap. 4. determineth that if any doe maintaine that God expecteth our will that wee may be purged from sinne and doth not confesse that by the infusion and operation of the holy Ghost it is also wrought in vs to be willing to bee purged hee resists the Apostles Doctrine who saith that it is of God that worketh in vs both the will and the deed Bishop Vsher lately handling this point citeth Austin and Fulgentius Prosper Ierome and others to whose learned Tract I referre the Reader Gainesaid by their owne men Bayus de vit imp cap. 8. Free-will without Gods helpe is of power to doe nothing but sinne The Master of the Sentences lib. 2. D. 25. saith that Free-will before Grace repaire it is pressed and ouercome with concupiscence and hath weakenesse in euill but no grace in good and therefore may sinne and cannot but sinne euen damnably Cornelius Mus Concion tom 1. pag. 252. Our strength is not sufficient to bring vs backe from death wee cannot be conuerted and saued by our owne power The exciting grace which disposeth thee to thy conuersion God workes in thee without thee God so weth it in vs without vs. Alphonsus aduers haeres lib. 7. verbo gratia Our will when by Gods helpe it hath begunne to doe any good it cannot without the same speciall helpe prosecute the good begun nor perseuere in it Greg. Ariminensis 2. D. 26. pag. 95. without this speciall aide it can doe nothing Sec Bishop Vsher in his last booke citing Gelasius with a Synod of 70. Bishops at Rome the French Bishops in the second Councill at Orange Bradwardin the Archbishop of Canterbury Scriptures obiected answered 1. Cor. 7. 37. Hath power ouer his owne will c. Answ 1. This is nothing to the question in hand which is of free-will and power thereof in the first act of a sinners conuersion Secondly we grant that in such a case as this to wit to marry his Virgin or not to marry her man hath free-will that is power and right Ioh. 1. 11 12. Hee came in to his owne but his owne receiued him not but as many as receiued him c. Answ 1. In the former part is mans inabilitie to entertaine Christ they receiued him not they would not We grant mans free will to euill till God change it Secondly in the latter part it is said Many receiued him But it is not said By the power of their owne will Wee acknowledge that by Gods preuenting grace men may receiue Christ which here is to be vnderstood for they that receiued him did it by faith and are said to beleeue in him but the Apostle saith Faith is the gift of God Ephes 2. 8. and not in mans power Thirdly the very next verse following in this Chapter verse 13. cuts the nerues of the power of free-will in our new-birth For saith the text We are borne of God not of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man Deut. 30. 19. I haue set before thee life and death blessing and cursing therefore choose life Answ This and all other exhortations and commandements as Ios 24. 14 15. Deut. 10. 12. and 11. 16 18. Ephes 4. 22. Phil. 2. 12. and in many other places in Moses Psalmes Prophets and in the New Testament doe not conclude in man any naturall power of his owne will to chuse or refuse to obey or not to obey of his owne free will as our Aduersaries doe imagine no more then they can conclude the lame man in Act. 2. 2. so borne to bee able to rise and walke because Peter said to him Rise vp and walke verse 6. First because in none of the exhortations dehortations and commandements there is any mention of the power by which man comes to be able to performe that which hee is exhorted vnto Therefore the power is to bee gathered out of other Scriptures which is the power of Gods grace and not the power of mans freewill as all the Scriptures before alledged doe fully proue Secondly for that all those places doe no more but shew what duties man oweth to God but not what hee can doe of himselfe A Creditor demanding paiment of his Debter and exhorting him to pay doth not therefore imply necessarily that he is able to pay for he may perhaps for all that be altogether vnable to pay as wee may reade Matth. 18. 25. So these places shew what we owe and what God requireth but not that therefore we are able to pay what hee commandeth for all the Scriptures afore alledged deny it Thirdly all these commandements and exhortations are spoken to those in the Church which consists of a mixed company both of vnregenerate which are either abiects or elect of God till they be called as also of regenerate persons Now to the first sort God thus speakes shewing them what they could haue done for God commandeth nothing that hath beene is and shall bee euer impossible to man and what yet they ought to doe vpon perill of damnation but not what either they now can doe or shall hereafter be euer able to doe of themselues being dead in sinne and void of grace and God not bound to giue it them To the second sort the elect not yet borne a new by the Spirit God thus speakes to shew not onely what they could haue done once what now they ought to doe but also what by Gods preuenting grace they may bee able and shall doe For God vseth such meanes to conuert them vnto him at that time the day of their visitation being come inwardly by his Spirit and worketh their will to that which hee outwardly by word commandeth and exhorteth vnto Act. 2. 38 41. As Peters exhortation to the lame man by which God conueighed strength and power into the man to make him able to walke Act. 3. 6 7. This appeareth liuely in Ezek. 37. 7 10. To the third sort the already Regenerate who haue by Gods preuenting grace free will God thus speaketh as to them that can doe what he commandeth and exhorteth vnto He vseth threats to keepe them in
hauing thus fallen how can they alledge him to proue perfect obedience For perfection is not in one point or in all for a time but in the same for euer Thus we see that there is no perfection of obedience in any to keepe the Law Therefore is there no workes of supererrogation for they that boast of these must bee in all perfection obedient to the Law first and then doe more then God commandeth either expresly or deriuatiuely For reasons against this point see Moulins his Buckler of faith pag. 173. 70. Sect. and Doctor White his last Booke pag. 521. Sect. 2. to pag. 534. Scriptures obiected for workes of supererrogation answered Matth. 19. 21. If thou wilt be perfect goe and sell all that thou hast and giue to the poore c. Answ 1. Christ here teacheth not that a man may in this life attaine to perfection to doe all that God commands and more too For first he had taught the contrary Luk. 17. 10. Secondly in Mark 10. 21. Christ leaueth out the word perfection and telleth him plainly that he lacked one thing Thirdly Saint Paul for all his excellencies and his manifold sufferings for Christ 2. Cor. 6. 4 10. yet hee did not attaine to perfection Phil. 3. 12. But here Christ speaketh to the vainely conceited yong man who as Austin in Epist 89. saith answered more arrogantly then truely and as Basil saith gaue false testimonie of himselfe when he said he had kept all these to wit all the Ad Hilarium lib. 4. de linquendis facultatibus commandements from his youth vp saying What lack I yet as if he had lacked nothing when he was apparantly couetous Mar. 10. 22. To suppresse this excesse of pride and to discouer his folly Christ thus speakes to him and not to set out a new Doctrine and way to perfection not contained in the Law Secondly these words are not a bare counsell as some conceit because it is said if thou wilt For this kinde of speaking notes not the thing spoken of to bee euer in a mans libertie and pleasure to doe or not to doe for so then should we not be tyed to Gods commandements for thus hee speakes in vrging to the obedience of them in verse 17. of this Chapter and Deut. 28. 1 15. it is said If thou wilt or if thou wilt not So in Esa 1. 19. These words imply not the libertie of choise but rather the desire of the minde to attaine to some thing yet lacking as by comparing Matthew here with Mark chap. 10. 21. it may appeare Thirdly the words giue vnto the poore are plainely a commandement This is a duty commanded and the Law requireth the works of Charitie and Almes to be giuen to the poore This is no counsell left to mans free choise to doe or not to doe as these places shew 1. Tim. 6. 17 18 19. Heb. 13. 16. to striue to perfection is commanded also Matth. 5. 48. Heb. 6. 1. 2. Cor. 7. 1. increasing more and more 1. Thes 1. 10. and 4. 1 10. 1. Pet. 2. 2. 2. Pet. 3. 18. Act. 20. 32. So it is not in our libertie to stand at a stay but we are tyed and bound to grow in grace in knowledge in faith and in good workes Thirdly Goe and sell all that thou hast This also is a commandement for it hath the forme of a commandement Goe and sell And though it be not an ordinary commandement to binde all yet was it a commandement to this young man for the present to try him and to discouer him as Gods commandement to Abraham to sacrifice his sonne Gen. 22. Seeing therefore that these words containe in them Commandements and not a bare counsell this place is nothing for arrogantly conceited works of supererrogation Fourthly if it were granted to bee a counsell yet being Gods counsell it is not best to our libertie to doe or not to doe for God who is great and wonderfull in counsell Esai 28. 29. Ierem. 32. 19. his counsell bindeth and to neglect and despise it is sinne and deserues punishment Psal 106. 13. and 107. 11. Prou. 1. 25. Luk. 7. 30. And therefore vpon Gods counsels they can build no workes of supererrogation 1. Cor. 7. 25. Now concerning Virgins I haue no cōmandement of the Lord yet I giue my iudgement c. He that giueth her in marriage doth wel but he that giueth her not in marriage doth better ver 38. Answ 1. Here is not the word Counsell though they for aduantage so translate it For the word in Greeke which is for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 counsell is not here vsed but another which signifieth a sound and graue sentence and iudgement more then counsell and aduice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the Corinthians had written about the matter verse 1. and the Apostle giueth his iudgement what is most conuenient and fitting for the present time verse 26. Secondly this his iudgement hee giueth by the aide and assistance of Gods Spirit verse 40. and therefore were the Corinthians highly to reuerence his iudgement yea and to submit vnto it as being giuen from an Apostle hauing Gods Spirit and one that had obtained mercy of the Lord to bee faithfull verse 25. and had the wisedome of God to iudge what was best to bee done Thirdly by saying he had no commandement from the Lord his meaning is hee had no expresse precept in particular but not that he had no commandement at all For he taught nothing which he had not from the Lord at least included in generall precepts from which by the direction of Gods Spirit hee deduced particulars considering and applying them to the circumstances of times places and persons This the Apostle doth here for Christ cōmanded his to be without worldly carefulnesse Mat. 6. 25 31 34. and to mind heauenly things chiefly ver 33. Now the Apostle at this time grounded his iudgement vpon these precepts and considering the present distresse and troubles of the Church applyed the same to the question of marrying or not marrying as is most cleare in verses 32 33 34 35. So then here is no counsell or bare aduice but his iudgement vpon the question grounded first on Christs commandements and then deliuered faithfully by the guidance of Gods Spirit This place therefore is nothing for workes of supererrogation or for counsels tending as they dreame to perfection Matth. 19. 12. There be Eunuches which haue made themselues Funuches for the Kingdome of Heauen Hee that is able to receiue i◠let him receiue it Answ There are here two things First a commendation of some Secondly a commandement vpon some Out of neither of these can they build their workes of supererrogation Not out of the first First they are to proue that these Eunuches were perfect fulfillers of the Morall Law Secondly that they did this which they did vpon counsell and not of dutie Both which they are to proue before they proue vpon this their commendations their
called 1. Tim. 6. 20. for these be vaine and deceitfull None of these are sufficient to leade vs but we are to be ruled by the written Word The Errors of our time The Romanists maintaine these insuing Propositions I. Proposition That the holy Scriptures are not in all matters necessarie to saluation the onely rule of our faith and life Confuted by their owne English Bible THeir Bible teacheth that there is a Rule Rom. 12. 6. Gal. 6. 16. This Rule one and the same Phil. 3. 16. Now that this Rule is the holy Scriptures which is the written Word of God it is cleare by the same Bible I. It maketh the Word written to bee the rule and guide in matters of controuersie Deut 17 11. In this place the Priests and Iudges are bound to proceed according to the Law But that Law was written in a booke called The booke of the Law of the Lord which the Priests and Leuites had with them in Iehosophats dayes to teach the people 2. Chron. 17. 9. Bellarmine lib. de Verbo Dei cap 2. saith on this place Holy Moses teacheth here that controuersies arising among Gods people are to bee iudged according to the Law II. Their Bible teacheth that God vrgeth To the Law and to the testimony which is written as aforesaid and condemneth them that speake not according to this Word Esay 8. 20. III. By it we are taught that the Church is straightly charged to keepe to the written Word as in Iosh 23. 6. Onely take courage and be carefull that you keepe all things which be written in the volume of the Law of Moses and decline not from them neither to the right hand nor to the left Iosh 1 8. Let not the volume of this Law depart from thy mouth but thou shalt meditate in it dayes and nights that thou mayst keepe and doe all things that bee written in it Is not this testimony cleare What can be spoken more plainely These places vrge to keepe to the written Word and withal not to decline from it S. Paul hauing spoken against diuision schisme and syding with teachers in the Church of Corinth some of them holding of one some of another to remedy this euill he warnes them not to be puffed vp one against another aboue that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. To these places may be added Deut. 30. 10. The Lord promised great blessings vnto Israel with this annexed condition saying If thou heare the voyce of thy Lord thy God and keepe his precepts where their obedience is commanded and his voyce made the rule thereof Now lest they should doubt where to find this his voyce and these his precepts Moses addeth these words which are written in this Law which Law he wrote and commanded the same to bee read before all Israel for this end to learne to feare the Lord and to fulfill all his words in that Law Deut. 31. 9 12. yea a curse is denounced against such as keepe not to the Written Word Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 1. 10. and a plague is threatned for not obseruing the same Deut. 28. 58. Hence is it that we shall find the prayses of holy men very often in Scripture That they did according as it was written 2. Chron. 35. 12. they couenanted that they would doethe things that were written 2. Chron. 34. 31. See out of their owne Bible more for this 2. Chr. 23. 18. 1. Esdr 3. 2. 4. and 6. 18. 2. Esdr 8. 14 15. and 10. 34 36. 4 King 23. 21. 3. King 2. 3. 2. King 1. 18. And not to doe as was written was a sinne for which they were to humble themselues and beg pardon of God 2. Chron. 30. 6 18. 1. By their owne Bible we learne that Iesus Christ the chiefe Shepheard and Bishop of our soules did nothing regard traditions he neuer named them but with dislike but aduanced very highly the dignitie of the Scriptures as the only and alone rule and meanes of our instruction in all things necessary to eternall life for thus their Bible telleth vs 1. That hee tooke for the ground of his teaching Scripture Luk. 4. 17. but wee reade not any where that hee taught vpon tradition 2. That he interpreted the Scriptures and out of them taught the things concerning himselfe Luk. 24. 27. not for traditions nor any thing out of them 3. That he opened the vnderstanding of his Disciples that they might vnderstand the Scriptures Luk. 24. 25. Hee neuer did so concerning traditions 4. That he often cited the Scriptures Mark 7. 6 10. Matth. 9. 13. and 12 3. and 13. 14. and in many other places but neuer traditions 5. That he exhorteth to the searching of the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39. but neuer to the searching of traditions 6. That hee cleared the Scriptures from abuse and corrupt expositions Mat. 5. 21 22 27 28 33. 24. 25 36 37 38 39. c. but neuer traditions 7. That he vsed the Scriptures in disputing with Satan Mat. 4. and in confuting his aduersaries Mat. 22. 31. and 19. 4. Luk. 10 26. neuer traditions 8. That he defended his owne doctrine and his manner of teaching by the Scriptures Mat. 13. 10 15. and also the act of his Disciples in plucking eares of corne Mat. 12. 3 4 5. but neuer by traditions 9. That hee tooke care alwayes in euery thing to fulfill the Scriptures Ioh. 12. 14 15 16. Mat. 4. 14. Luk. 24. 44 46. yea so farre as to suffer death to make good the truth of them Matth. 26. 54. Luk. 22. 37. but no such regard had he to traditions 10. That he did oppose Scriptures against traditions Mat. 15. 4. but neuer traditions against Scriptures or for interpretation of Scripture in matter of faith 11. That he preferred the witnesse of Scripture before the witnesse of men Ioh. 5. 34 39 41. yea the power of them for instruction before the voyce of any that should be raised from the dead Luk. 16. 27. neuer so traditions 12. That he put the triall of himselfe to Scriptures so true and sure a Iudge he tooke them to be Ioh. 5. 39. not to traditions IV. Lastly he taught how his owne words could take no place if the written Word were not regarded Ioh. 5. 47. What traditionall word is there then of any mortall man or of all the mortall men in the world which may receiue so much as equall authoritie how much lesse then supreme authoritie ouer the Scriptures V. Their owne Bible teacheth that the Apostles taught not an vnwritten but a written Word for the Gospell was that which they preached but that was written Rom. 1. 1 2. and was made manifest by the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. Our Sauiour taught his Disciples out of Moses Prophets See Treneus lib. 4. cap. 66 in fine and a little booke intituled The Messiab already come for the particulars and Psalmes Luk. 24. 27. in which bookes his Names his Natures his Offices his Birth where and when and