risen vp without Gods authoritie by men how where and when since the pure times of the blessed Apostles and founders of Christes church and religion yea and that in most of the particulers Wherin my purpose is not to enter so farre as might be spoken for I cannot make in so short a roome an exact treatise but onely as briefely as I can conueniently so far to shew the christian reader as he may sufficiently see and perceiue that poperie hath his originall from men and not from God that it came vp since and vnder the Christian religion like vnto the Iuie that commeth vp after the oke and taketh holde thereon and by little and little so ouerspreadeth it and couereth it from the sight of men that wee can scarse see or discerne the oke Histories differ in setting downe 〈◊〉 times And here I am to aduertise the reader that historie writers and reporters of antiquitie differ much in these causes about the times so as the cronologie writers finde themselues encombred howe to set downe the certaintie in manie things yet notwithstanding though the authors disagree about the certaine time yet the matter is made vndoubted when they all agree that it is found out to come in after the Apostles times Wherein I make choise to take our testimony from hartie and vnfained papists that the truth of this cause may the more appeare when themselues cannot but yeeld vnto vs sufficient warrant and proofe of their new borne superstition Two deuises to hide the newnes of poperie They haue two great helpes to maintaine the antiquitie of their follie First the authorising of counterfait writinges such as are the decretall Epistles of Clemens Anacletus and others of the primatiue Church which not onely disagreeing in stile and matter from the times they pretende but also telling of those thinges and persons which were many yeres after doo very much argue that when the papists are faine to runne vnder the shadowe of such muddie and vnsetled Wales of forged authoritie their foundation is not so deepe in their owne conscience as they would beare the worlde in hand Their second helpe is that they proine pare and loppe and engraft the writings of auncient fathers and others teaching them by a newe deuise called Index Expurgatorius hatched in the late Counsell of Trent Anno 1571. to speake as they thinke best for there sea of sinne and to holde their peace where they like not of their sayinges If they may thus authorise false witnesses to speake for their purpose as they list and gagge the toonges of the true witnesses they can speake no further but as they giue them leaue then may euerie simple man see in them that an euill conscience findinge themselues to haue no antiquitie of trueth doth cause them to inuent shiftes to colour and cloake their wicked forgeries and newe deuises by which they haue manie yeeres abused Gods people But GGD bee thanked who bringeth the hidden and secreate thinges of the wicked vnto light he hath confounded their wisedom that all this doth not hide their filthie and earthlie generation For the prophesie of Saint Paul concerning such peruerse and cursed speakers which haue a shewe of godlinesse but haue denied the power thereof is now in the eyes and knowledge of all men come to passe For he a 2. Tim. 3.9 saith They shall preuaile no longer for their madnesse shal be euident to all men 3. And this verily is brought to passe by the righteous iudgements of God causing their owne tongs to take them and making the counsell of the wicked to bee foolishnesse Marke therefore and consider how they confound the glorie of their inuentions ad deuises Martinus Peresius Aiala a Bishop and a verie zealous papist seeming to haue taken great paines in reading of antiquities writeth a b Printed at Paris 1549. booke of traditions dedicated to Phillip king of Spain where hee c In his preface nisi attramento mortuo in sacris codicibus expressū calleth the inspired scriptures of the worde of God Dead incke in the holy bookes and affirmeth that if we should follow onely the holy scriptures which he calleth a pestiferous opinion Christian religion and ecclesiasticall pollicie should vtterly be destroied auouching beside the canonical scriptures another kind of doctrine called Tradition the head seed plot as he saith of almost all controuersies betweene vs and if herein wee agreede all discord now in religion would quickly cease And in this booke he maketh d 3. pars assertio 6. fol. 6. Diuina authoritas magisterium apostolicum Episcop maxime Romanorum a Deo concessa authoritas three fountains of traditions First they call diuine authority that is such as Christ in their deuise instituted deliuered which were not laid vp in the scriptures the second fountaine they call the Apostolicall mastership where they haue traditions some in the canons Apostolicall some in holy mens writings the last fountaine is the mastership authoritie of the Bishops most of all of the Roman Bishops which they also cal the e pars 2. assert 5. fol. 44. mastership of the church Wherein is a power as they say to iudge and determine what is canonicall scripture and to make diuers lawes and ecclesiasticall discipline And this last giueth power to all the rest for here as they say wee know which is the true worde of God heere the authoritie of decretalles is made firme and this being a gift and priuiledge that cannot erre is of that autenticall authoritie if we beleeue them that no man must once reason against it Out of these fountaines they drawe their traditions of the rites of Baptisme of confirmation auricular confession and penitentiall satisfaction the tradition of order and his rites the fearefull sacrifice of the alter transubstantiation praier for the dead communion vnder one kind purgatorie extreame vnction worship and intercession of Saints worship of relickes images exorcismes Lent fastes single life vowes of chastitie and such like In handling of which traditions he b Postulat 3. fol. aut quia legi Dei repugnant proximae sunt occasiones peccandi c. giueth vs a rule to discerne humane traditions from diuine saying Traditions which are not good are either contrarie to the law of God and are verie neere occasions to sin or derogate to the glorie of Christ or they are friuolous burdensome and of no profit If it be lawfull for vs to follow these three rules we shal easily proue popery to be no good tradition but a meere humane inuention of their owne For the first rule I hauing before shewed that all their popish religion is contrary to the religion which God taught Abraham Moses and the Prophets taught the Iewes and Christ and his Apostles taught all nations and contrarie to the doctrine which Paule taught the auncient Romanes and which Peter taught the Iewes it must needes follow that these traditions being
clay If we reade the warres sedition tumults bonefires massacres rebellions treasons murders and all manner of hurly burly betweene Pope and pope Cardinall and Cardinall betweene pope and Cardinals Emperors kinges and people betweene citie and citie subiect against their Lords and one nation against another From the first arising of Hildebrands fire which he brought from hell vntill our time which haue beene raised procured maintayned and continued by that wicked generation wee may well say of them as the prophete Esay speaketh of the wicked b Cap. 57.20 The wicked are like the raging sea that cannot rest whose waters cast vp mire and dirt But he that would reade Clemangis Sigebert Aeneas Siluius Sigonius Mathie Parrisius and other such writers which liued in those times shall find a great many more monsters new borne in the church of Rome then in this shorte treatise I am able to set downe yet for the further helpe of the reader I will leade him a worde or twaine from these storie writers to the Counsels If happely wee may finde some of this new broode of poperie by them The c Canon 6. Anno 330. The primacie of Bishops Nice councel summoned by Constantin the great consisting of 318. Bishops out of all the parts of the world ordained according to the custome of the church in those daies that the Patriarch of Alexandria and of Antioch shold haue the like authority in their Bishoprickes as the Bishops of Rome in his This was as Gratian saith the first generall counsell Therefore when the pope is gotten to an higher presumption he is in this respect of a new religion About this time the counsell of Ancyra d Canon 14. eating of flesh condemned those ministers that did account flesh vncleane and abominable And the counsell of e Canon 2. Gangrena a little after calleth them Anathema acursed which condemne a man for eating flesh in faith But this late counsell of Trent and Synagogue of Rome doe commaund abstinence from flesh vpon rewarde or vengeance of God and their practise of seueritie in punishing such for heretickes as eat flesh in daies by them deuised and canonized we well know and remember The same councell of Gangrena f Canon 4. 9 10. single life doth accurse whomsoeuer that put difference between a maried prieste or any other touching the seruice in the ministerie and also such as for virginitie sake iudge mariage abhominable But all men know that the Romish Harlot is of a new learning putting more holinesse in single life and vowes of chastity especially in their priests then in honest and honorable wedlock A counsel at Antioch somwhat after a Canon 2. the sole communion ordained such to bee cast out of the Church which entred the Church and heard the scriptures and did not tarrie to receiue the communion with the rest of the people And the like you may finde to be the order of the church in ancient time b Anno 480. Canon 18. in the counsell of Agatha a citie of Fraunce But now our new sinagogue hath deuised a priuate masse that the priest should blesse the people with the cup make them to worship his idoll and he himselfe eate all alone A councell at Laodicea c An. 368. Canon 16. 59. iudged that the gospels and other scriptures were to bee read on the Sabbaoth daies and that of the vnlearned there ought not to be said in the Church Canonicall scriptures only to be read in the church psalmes made and vulgar which as I iudge were balads neither to reade books which are out of the canon but onely the canonicall bookes of the old and new testament and there they reckon vp the bookes which we hold for canonicall But wee know that the Romish Apostasie hath afterward brought in legends and other Apocrypha writings to iustle out the holy scriptures of God keeping them secret in an vnknowen tongue The 4. counsell of Carthage saith Mulieres baptizare c. Let not women presume to baptize Women bapt But we know by what deuise the sea of Rome haue brought in women to baptise In the sixt counsell of Carthage Anno 430. Appeales to Rome wherein was S. Augustine Bishop of Yppo and Legate of the prouince of Numidia it was tried and found out that it was not as Bonifacius Bishop of Rome would haue vsurped lawful by the councell of Nice to appeale to Rome out of other Bishops prouinces Epist Concil Africk ad lestinum but that they saw most wiselie and iustly that all busines was to bee ended where it was begun neither should the grace of the holie spirit be wanting to any prouince whereby equitie might be wisely seene of Christs priests and constantly holden And after that the Mileintane counsell a Canon 22. forbad all people to appeale ouer the sea out of their prouince but only to the counsel of Africk the primates of their prouinces and who so did otherwise shold not be receiued to the cōmunion in al Africk But we know that since that time the pride of that wicked whore of Rome hath vsurped iurisdiction ouer al lāds that by any means they cold bring vnder their feet receiue appeals from whom soeuer insomuch that we b Polydor hist Ang. li. 20 Rich. 2. read of a Synode in England An. 1391. which because many were vexed for causes which could not be knowen at Rome ordained that the authority of the pope of Rome should stretch no farther then to the Ocean sea that who so appealed to Rome beside excōmunication shold be punished with losse of all their goods perpetual imprisonment In the same counsel of Mileintane Anno 420. c Canon 5.6.7 It was decreed against Pelagius that without the grace of Christ we can do nothing and that euerie man should know he hath sin in him Free will and iurisdiction by workes as saith Saint Iohn Epist 1. cap. 1. and that in many things wee sin all and that we must confesse with the Psalme enter not into iudgement with thy seruant for in thy sight shal no mā liuing be iustified which thing is opened by an d Epist 72. Epistle of Aurelius B. of Carthage vnto the Bishops of the prouince of Bizanzena and Arzignitanta where hauing shewed the error of Pelagius he declareth the faith of the Catholikes to be thus Sixtly to confesse the grace of God and his helpe to be giuen vnto all singuler acts and the same not according to our merits that it may be true grace that is freely giuē by his mercie who said I wil haue mercie on whom I will haue mercie c. And ninthlie to confesse when wee fight against tentations and vnlawfull concupiscences although we haue there euen our owne will yet not by that but by the mercie of God we haue our saluation because otherwise it shall not be true which the Apostle saith
statutes and iudgements Here you see that the prophets hauing the same spirite of truth to leade them and their pen which Moses had in his writings auouch the perfection of Gods word in Moses bookes so farre as they would be vnderstood to doe or speake nothing that should not agree vnto that worde so written and whosoeuer did otherwise had not the light in him Now because Moses and the prophets agreed in their writinges in declaring and making manifest the same truth and word of God which he would haue to be the knowen canon and rule of religion Our Sauiour Christ reiecteth all c Math. 15.3 new deuises writing traditions and customes of men sendeth vs to the d Luk. 16.29 cap. 24.44 law and the prophets bidding vs to e Ioh. 5.39 search the scriptures Which also to bee a most certaine rule Saint Peter saith We haue a most sure worde of the prophets And Saint Paul a 2. Tim. 3.16 The whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach vs that the man of God may be absolute being made perfect vnto all good workes What can be a more perfect rule or touchstone then that which is most sure inspired of God profitable euery way in righteousnes by which a man may be absolute perfect vnto all good workes And hereof it commeth that the writinges of the new testament are not a new Canon or additament of rule in religion but onely a more plaine reuelation fulfilling of that which was before taught by Moses and the prophetes and therefore you shal find that Christ and the Apostles euery where do approue their doctrine by the testimonies of the scriptures of the olde testament Wherefore Paul acknowledgeth that b Rom. 16.26 God commanded the preaching of the gospell to bee by the scriptures of the prophets and Peter c Act. 3.22.24 appealeth to Moses and to all the prophets from Samuel and thenceforth that they foretold of those daies that is of the time of the gospell and the things which should bee manifested therein And therefore Paul protested that he d Cap. 26.22 witnessed both to small and great no other things then those which the prophets and Moses did say should come Wherefore the whole scriptures of the olde and new testament is one and the same rule of religion Although peraduēture as is before declared there may be some difference in ceremony and maner of gouernment yet is the first euen in those thinges a witnesse of the last and the last a true and faithfull expounder and fulfiller of the first Hereof it is that Mathew and the other Euangelists do confirme all the doctrine and doings of Christ by seuerall scriptures Yea those thinges which in forme order differ are yet proued that so they ought to be by Moses and the prophetes as the ministerie of a Math. 3.3 Iohn Baptist b Act. 2.16 and of the Apostles c Heb. 7.1.12 the priesthood of Christ and his changing of the lawe d 1. Cor. 9.9.13 prouiding for the ministerie though not by tithes and many such like But as for the most substantiall parts of the doctrine of faith and saluation I hope it shal appeare to the godly Christian by reading this Chapter throughout that there is but one canon and rule of truth Therefore to conclude let the reader obserue that this writing of Gods word is done by the spirit of God to this vse and ende that we might bee sure to know and how to trie and finde out what is the worde of God by examining all things wee heare by the Canon of the scripture As did e Act. 17.11 the noble men of Berea Wherefore Saint f Cap. 1.3.4 Luke affirmeth that the ende of this writing was that wee might acknowledge the certaintie of those thinges whereof wee haue beene instructed And Saint Paule saith that for the Church g Philip. 3.1 it was a sure thing and this sure thing is expounded by the Euangelist who sayth h Ioh. 20.21 These thinges are written that yee might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the sonne of God and that in beleeuing yee might haue life through his name Therefore as Moyses which first wrote shewed the absolutenesse of this Canon of Gods worde written by i Deut. 4.2 forbidding all adding to and taking from So the last booke of this Canon sealeth vp all the writinges of God with the like admonition saying e Reuelat. 22.18 I protest to euerie one that heareth the wordes of the prophesie of this booke If any man shall adde vnto these thinges God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke Now in both partes of this Article agreeing to all these testimonies of holy scripture is the iudgement and profession of the Church of England For we say b Artic. 20. of the authoritie of the church It is not lawfull for the Church to ordaine any thing that is contrarie to Gods worde written c Articl 6. the doctrine of holy scripture Holy scripture containeth all things necessarie to saluation so that whatsoeuer is not read therein nor may be proued thereby is not to be required of any man that it should be beleeued as an article of the faith or bee thought requisite and necessarie to saluation c. d Apolog. cap. 9. diuis 1. We receiue and embrace all the Canonicall scriptures both of the old and new testament c. they bee the verie sure and infallible rule whereby may be tried Whether the Church do swarue or erre and whereunto all ecclesiasticall doctrine ought to bee called to account and that against these scriptures neyther law nor ordinance nor any custome ought to be heard c. In all which wee doe acknowledge this most absolute canon of Gods word agreeing with Abraham Moses the Prophets Christ and his Apostles The tenth Article of the people who follow the right religion that is the Church of God 10 There is but one Church of God and the same is catholike and spread ouer all the world holding onely the true faith of Christ and it is made visible and knowne by the profession of the same faith which is in the preaching of the pure word of God and right administration of his holy sacraments IN this Article is a double description of Christes Church first in regard of the nature and second in regard of the visible markes The nature is in three things vnitie and vniuersalitie and faith The markes are declared by their profession which is preaching and administring the word sacraments By vnitie wee vnderstand that God hath not diuers Churches of diuers sectes in diuers places or times but howsoeuer times and places may haue some externall and temporal differences yet in all times and places the people whom God alloweth and accepteth to bee his church are but one misticall bodie wherof Christ is the head and as
of an other subiect And accidents are and haue a being without their true substance proper and naturall subiect A bodie which is a thing circūscriptible and by the diuine law of Gods creation prouidence is alway and can be but in one place at one time is here made and set in diuers places yet still one the same and that at one time in heauen and earth at Constantinople at Ierusalem at Rome at Carthage euery where But how cā they shift here the making of God to assume these formes as they call thē into the vnity of his person that so God man the formes of bread wine make not one Christ for by their doctrine these formes haue no being but in Christ Christ is vnder thē I quake to write it yet say they we must beleeue this chāge for nothing is vnpossible to God They must not so blinde our eies for it is vnpossible to God to haue already done that which he neuer did nor neuer will doe such is this transubstantiation of theirs It is impossible for God to deny himself such is this transubstātiation it is impossible for God to lie such is this transubstātiation Againe how can this be a sacrament when the outward signes be gone and a remembrance of him that is present but rather that himself is the signe of himself a remembrance of himself present neither yet is this so for we cannot see him feele nor vnderstand how he is present that he might be a signe or a remēbrance of himselfe but a third thing is present the accidents or forms of bread wine this is a new learning to teach Christ and his Apostles to goe to schoole nay this is the monster of all mōsters Teach we the Indians that this is the God of the christians may they not think rather the sunne or moone more likely to be God to haue a more expresse maiestie of a God may not the diuel laugh in himself that he hath so far passing measure bewitched the wise and graue learned mē to beleeue that which a child may easily perceiue to be meere folly Infinit is the blood that hath bin shed to maintaine this fansie and who would not willingly spend all the blood in his heart rather thē to yeeld to such blasphemie But the diuel is not herewithal content but that he might lead thē euery way as slaues in triumph against God and his Christ he maketh thē to worship these formes and host as they call it and carrie it about in procession that all men might adore it as God And this a Concil trident Ses 6. Septemb. 17. 1562. Cap. 1. ses 3. canon 5. they build vpon these words of Christ Doe this in remembrance of mee for by them as they say the Priest hath power to make a sacrifice propitiatorie and then being turned into God they say it is meet and fit that hee should be worshipped whom God bringing into the world commaunded the Angels to adore But herein first they gainesay the Scripture which teacheth the end of all sacrifices by the Priesthood of Christ as is by many arguments proued from the sixt till the eleuenth Chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrewes Secondlie when they cause it to be worshipped and yet God instituted it to be taken and eaten onelie what doe they but peruert the ordinance of God and they say wee must worship the sacrament or els Christ in the sacrament If they say the sacrament then they cannot say Christ because he is not the sacrament but the sacrament is a signe of him or els the sacrament is no sacrament I so they say in the sacrament thē they say no thing because that by their doctrine there is no such thing but only the formes of bread and wine for the bread and wine is turned into Christs body and blood as they say and so there is nothing left to be the sacrament Yet if it were so as they say what man can appoint a new forme of worship to be performed vnto God without his expresse commandement or authoritie Math. 15. Looke in the Masse booke ordinarium Missae For Christ saith that all such worship as is by the precept of men is in vaine And lastly consider how this can agree when they offer the sacrifice they desire God to accept that sacrifice againe when they shew it the people they cause them to worship it a strange and new kind of God that must be prayed for and praied to But howsoeuer it is a manifest thing that the popish sacrament and sacrifice is not the same which Christ instituted and therefore not of the exercises of the true Catholike religion For if Saint Paul when there was among the Corinthians but a little abuse in the mixture of eating 1. Cor. 11.20 in the congregation at the time of the celebration of the Lords supper whereupon there was discontentment betweene rich and poore if I say hereupon hee called them to the plaine and simple institution saying I haue receiued of the Lord that which I haue deliuered vnto you c. And therein addeth nothing to that which is written in Mathew Marke and Luke what doth he inferre but that it should be obserued without all additions and therfore vpon this ground forbiddeth their eating in the church What would he haue done if he had seene such swelling boiles filthy bunches standing vp so abhominablie as these Romish additaments which altogether take away the verie forme of Christes institution This sheweth how little these men haue of the gospell of Christ the teachers whereof are enioyned to teach the church to doe b Mat. 28.19 1. Tim. 6.4 whatsoeuer he commaunded And to keepe this commandement without spot and vnrebukeable vntill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ And therefore wee are not bound to c 1. Cor. 11.1 follow them any otherwise but as they follow Christ In the thirteenth Article the sea of Rome is directly contradictory to the christian religion For they say a Concil Trident de sacris ling. peregrin cap. 8. Et si missa contineat populi fidelis eruditionem c. Although the masse containe great instruction of the faithfull people yet it seemed not conuenient to the fathers that it should be celebrated euerie where in the vulgar tongue And their masse booke which containeth prayers celebration of sacraments reading of holy scriptures c. is set forth to bee vsed in the latine tongue But saith b Manip curat cap. 10. de rit quo deb miss celebra one of that side Sciendum quod missa tribus linguis c. It is to be vnderstoode that the masse is celebrated in three languages that is to say Hebrew Greeke and Latine For Alleluya Amen Osanna Sabaoth are taken of the Hebrew Kyrie eleeson Christe eleeson are taken of the Greeke all the rest are Latin The masse is said in these three manners because
as they confesse not found in holy scriptures cannot bee good if the first part of their rule be true Secondly if it be of the nature of the scripture as we haue proued to containe all things necessarie to saluation and some of these as their dreadfull sacrifice of the masse rites in baptisme confirmation purgatorie prayers for the dead c. are by popish doctrine necessarie to saluation and yet are not to be found in holy scriptures then it followeth that they are contrarie to the law of God when they stand vp to shew themselues auaileable to saluation because they falsely accuse the scripture not to containe all thinges necssarie to saluation yea they accuse the scripture of a lie when it saith c 2. Tim. 3.15.16.17 They are able to make thee wise vnto saluation and that the man of God may bee perfect and absolute vnto euerie good worke But what can bee more contrarie to the law of God then to make his inspired word written to tell a lie Here then by their owne rule fall downe their traditions forged vpon Christ and his Apostles and presumed by their Church and if the scripture bee true there can and ought to bee no such thing and therefore of necessitie by their owne doctrine these are but deuises of men traditions not good Now for the second part of this first braunch of their rule where they say that the naughtie traditions are verie neere occasions of sinne These traditions breake that rule also For beside that they are all sinne in that God neuer commaunded them and come vnder that checke d Math. 15.2 In vaine they worship mee teaching for doctrines mans precepts they can neuer denie by any good reason but that by these traditions they giue occasions of sinne many waies As in Baptisme men cannot discerne the true worke of Baptisme for the multitude of ceremonies vnto which are giuen the verie power and operation of Baptisme by the sacrifice of the masse relickes images and praying to Saintes they are ledde vnto sinne being directly against that commandement which saith a Math. 4.10 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue And their vowes of chastitie and single life giue occasion of all filthinesse buggery and murder and sodomitrie But if in these traditions there be a direct and particular contradiction to holy scripture then where is their foundation as for example the holy scripture saith b Heb. 18. There remayneth no more sacrifice for sinne they say the sacrifice of the masse is for the quicke and the dead the holy scripture saith it is c 1. Tim. 4.1 a doctrine of deuils to forbidde meates and mariage These traditions make priesthoode vowes and holding the childe at Baptisme to hinder marrige and that Lent and ember daies must not see any flesh and that for conscience sake The scripture saith thou d Precep 2. Exod. 20. shalt make no image nor worshippe them and they say thou mayest and oughtest to worship them And there are a great many more as is before apparant to bee seene whereof I thought good to giue the reader a taste that hee might the better remember what hath beene before written For the second part of the rule to knowe a naughtie tradition to be of men and not of God they say it is naught if it bee derogatorie to the glorie of Christ I pray you looke vpon all and euerie of these traditions and you shall find that they are set forth for merite and remission of sinnes for satisfaction and iustification All which as is before proued are the glorie of Christ because there is e Act. 4.12 no other name giuen vnder heauen whereby a man may bee saued These being newe names challenging that which belongeth to him cause men to giue his glorie vnto others And therefore by this rule seeing they derogate from the glorie of Christ they are no good traditions but meere inuentions of men not sufferable in the Church of God Lastly they are friuolous and burdenous c. which is the third part of their rule to know traditions to be of man do but looke vpon the number If f Gratians decrees one booke can shew vs 3090. decrees whereof most of them be of these traditions and that there be besides these in decretall and extrauagants I cannot tell how many thousand more then how can they auoid the name of burden And as for their profite if wee may iudge by holy scriptures which teacheth that g Heb. 1.3 Christ by himselfe purgeth our sins What profit can there be in any or all of these except we may say that Christ hath not purged our sinnes But their owne conscience telleth them there is no need of them As for example when they can h Manipul curat cap. 8. de annex bapt say of all the rites of tradition in Baptisme that they are not of the essence of Baptisme because that without them Baptisme may bee well giuen in case of necessitie which hauing as great a warrant as any of the rest wee may verily conclude that they are all but friuolous and superfluous ouerspreading outslippes of mens deuises What shall we then determine of this goodly popish trash but that they cannot be ancient autentical after Gods word seeing they cannot agree to their owne rules whereby they would proue them to be of God Therefore that is most blasphemous that they call the worde of God as it is in the holy bookes dead incke in comparison of their tradition vnlesse it be warranted by tradition and vnderstood in the sence of the mastership of their church Wee are then come thus farre that poperie is a tradition not written with dead incke in Gods holy bookes but some other kinde of doctrine which by their owne rules cannot bee found worthy the name of a good tradition and therefore a meere deuise of mans foolishnesse that is to say verie fables much displeasing and abhominable in the holy eyes of almightie God 4 Now let vs looke into the particulers Heere come the a Antididagma printed at Louan 1544. reuerend Canons of Colen who in the generall ioyning with this great clearke Peresius in many things crie with him Traditum est or traditum tenemus that is it is a tradition or wee hold it a tradition And this they doe where they are to shewe their originall and in deede it is an easie matter to maintayne any foolish or wicked thing by such a deuise yet are these learned men of Colon content to tell vs one or two originalles First b Pag. 70. they say It is true that Christ gaue the Sacrament to his Apostles vnder both kindes of breade and wine and that the church obserued that order a long time after therefore they teach vs that to keep the cup from the common people is but new learning So also they c Pag. 143. say their holy daies reckning by name 22.
and that vnawares a thing that Christian men suspected not the diuell had vnder hande a more cunning and sure way to ouerthrow the faith namelie he draue men into the wildernesse and solitarie places which partlie happened by persecution and partlie by a blinde deuotion and so sowed the seeds of munkerie in the Church of Christ which as farre as I can d Polydor virgil de inuent rerum lib. 7. cap. 1. cap. 3. Histor Ecclesiast tripertit lib. 1. cap. 11. About Anno 300. read first e began in the deserts of Aegyt These men gaue them selues to holie meditation and religious contemplation of Gods workes and leauing the perfect booke of God written in the holy scriptures they read in an other booke like the heathen as nature and reason which is blinde in Gods causes did lead them and made a newe Philosophie hauing this principle Veram beatitudinem in cultura dei legum eius obseruatione that is True happinesse to consist in the seruice of God and keeping his commandements which while men perceiued not howe it beat vpon the foundation they began to cast their eies vpon themselues and by little and little because by nature we are prone to thinke too wel of our selues and as men fond of their owne children we admire our deuises christians fel in loue with this new trade of life the pearcing reflex of the glittering beams of their great and rare holines and new religious deuotion daseled the eies of all sorts of men Insomuch as very excellent men and great clearkes Basilius magnus Hierom and Augustine diuers other leaned toward this new religion and began to make rules for the same And so the diuel comming as an angel of light made his first entrance and their priuelie stale in this iustifying by workes vn espied For these and other godly fathers in plaine and euident places of scripture being by their conscience constrained they frankly acknowledge the truth of Christ Iesus and auow it against heretikes yet oftentimes their eies looking backwarde like the peacocke vpon their owne goodly rules and obseruations doe with the left hand robbe Christ of that which they so thankfully ascribe vnto him with the right Yet this meriting by workes was not so bolde and brauely attired in the first six hundred yeres to assume and take such open authority and hie glory in the church as it was afterwarde when peace and wealth made men by wantonnes to seeke many deuises Some as the climing popes set vp decrees and decretals and made themselues men of renown some by the knowledge of lawes and canons stroue for the lawrell crowne of glory some by schoole learning made themselues admirable who drawing in Aristle and Philosophie to make grounds in diuinitie taught the reasonable way of righteousnes by workes and the congruitie and condignitie of freewil some as fryers and cloysters by rules and orders made new religions and waies of saluation here commeth vp purgatorie pardons pilgrimage praiers for the dead and a thousand new things of rare holines meritorious deuotion By all these did the diuel make vnto him selfe many mightie legions of resolute warriers to face wearie out Christ that he might leaue the church that he by his eldest sonne Antechrist might raigne and rule alone and so he easily thrust out faith onely for righteousnes and the true way of saluation And brought in infinit traditions vnwritten verities obseruations customes mysteries deuotions and reuelations If you would read Guillerimus Durandi rationale diuinorum with Guido manipulus curatorum Bonauentura de profectu religiosorum Hieremias Buchius of the conformities of S. Frauncis with Christ with such like and ioine there vnto the counsell of Trent with their masse and all the bookes appendents in seruice to their Ladie and Saints and heape vnto them the thousands of commandements of the church in decrees decretals and canons brought in by popes scholemen canonists ciuilians it would make a mans hart to bleed to think how little regard is had of Christ and of his righteousnes wisedome sanctification redemption name glorie And that the christian reader may the better perceiue these things let him marke but this one thing which is yet fresh in memorie When Luther stoode vp for the gospell and tooke into his hand the spiritual sword of Gods word and stroke and hewed at one of the last growing sproutes of this new way of righteousnes namely pardons and indulgencies and finding great resistance by the warriers before named hee began to arme himselfe with the armor of God and by little and little both learning and teaching the article of iustification by faith onely in Christ by and by all this braue baggage and counterfeit galantnes and earthlie glorie of righteous by mens doeings like a thicke mystie cloud couering the aire did vanish away in the conscience of many thousands by the bright shining power of the true sunne of righteousnes Iesus Christ in and by faith alone And of this we haue had almost one hundred yeres experience that as a 1. Sam. 5. Dagon of the Philistims could not stand before the arke of God So all the whoorish deuises of Romish Babilon could not stande before the doctrine of faith onely in Iesus Christ the Lord be praised 3. of the Sacraments Now looke we on the third point of the sacraments and seales of the couenant of mercie and let vs here whether the auncient fathers of the primatiue church were not protestants First Tertullian offereth him selfe a verie b He liued about Anno 230. auncient father hee telleth vs c Contra Martiō lib. 4. onely of two sacraments and of the Lordes supper d lib. 1. hee saith Non reprobauit panem quo ipsum corpus suum representat he refuseth not bread whereby he representeth his bodie Loe Tertullian an auncient protestant in the matter of the sacraments Cyprian likewise sheweth him selfe a protestant e De caena domini saying Mansio nostra in ipso c. our abiding in him is eating and drinking and as it were a certaine incorporation c. and a little after That which meat is to the flesh this faith is vnto the soule that which is meat to the bodie that is the woord to the spirit and in his conclusion hee addeth As oft as wee doo these thinges wee doo not wheat our teeth to byte but with a sincere faith wee breake the holie bread and deuide it while wee distinguish and seperate that which is deuine and that which is humaine c. Origen steppeth in betweene them both and protesteth with vs f vpon leuit homil 7. saying There is also in the newe Testament a letter which killeth him who marketh not those thinges which are spoken spiritually For if thou according to the letter followe this same which is said vnlesse you eate my fleshe and drinke my bloud this letter killeth Saint Augustine followeth after and sheweth him selfe
fallen into an Apostasie And the reason he giueth confirmeth it directly that it should vndoubtedly fall out and so come to passe for hee afterward affirmeth that it commeth of the righteous iudgement of God vpon the reprobate saying God shall sende them stronge delusion that they should beleeue lies that all they might bee damned Vers 12.12 which beleeued not the truth but had pleasure in vnrighteousnesse which thing if it be wel seen into vprightly waied it will cōuince the church of Rome to be of the false religion and antechristian church and their brauerie of profession their antiquitie vniuersalitie and visible succession to be the sitting of the man of sinne in the temple of God that is the plague and running soare of the Church the damnation of many soules and that now within these few yeares the gospel teaching the true Christian religion hath reuealed their Apostasie and that so openly clearly as euerie man may see it if he doe not wilfully blind his owne eyes 3 Now if they say that the Church cannot erre and thereupon build their antiquitie vniuersalitie succession c. Namely that they must needes bee the true Church being so actiuely and vniuersally visible in their continued succession because it belongeth to the Church vnder the gospell as they say to bee as the Moone that neuer is ecclipsed nor couered vnder a cloud but alwaies appeareth glorious and beautifull vnto the world then doe they euidently declare and proue themselues to bee the false sinagogue of Sathan and their religion to bee his delusions and lies Because the worde of God doth so manifestly say there shall bee an Apostasie and falling away in religion and that the enemie of Christ should raigne in the place of Gods temple And least happily wee should bee deceiued in thus iudging euen in this one point of their religion that they hold that the church cannot erre they cōuince themselues to be Antechrist many wayes especially in that they make the authoritie of the Church aboue the scriptures that they might be iudges of it and not of them What do they herein more truely then professe to all the worlde that there sitteth amongst them the aduersarie that exalteth himselfe against all that is called God for what is there in the whole world by which God is knowen or can bee knowen truely and rightly to bee God and by which God is exalted and all his honour truth and word magnified and his will wisedome and goodnesse glorified and worshipped but onely the inspired writinges of the blessed booke of God If they hauing no truth on their side to maintayne themselues to bee the Church of God they will foist in with a brasen face contrarie to euident scripture this vntruth that the church cannot erre and thereupon vsurpe authoritie ouer this booke of God and after it to haue no authoritie but such as they allow and to haue no other meaning or sence but such as they giue and so God and his holy law must looke for no other name credite and dignitie but as it pleaseth them being men to giue And so againe God and his word should not bee builders and describers of the Church but the Church builders and describers of God and his word doth it not then necessarily follow that they are verie Antechrist and the seate of Apostasie Moreouer if Christ say this Apostasie should bee so great that if it were possible a Math. 24.24 the verie elect should bee deceyued Are not they verie Antechrist to make the Church alwaies visible and not able to erre And let the godly Christian reader consider what vse there is of these rules precepts b Math. 7. 1. Ioh. 4.1.2 2. Ioh. vers 9. Beware of false prophets beleeue not euerie spirit c. hereby shall you know the spirit of God that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God whosoeuer transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God c. Againe there is prophesied of a woman whose name is Reuelat. 17. 18. A misterie great Babilon the mother of whordoms abominations of the earth which is a great citie which raigneth ouer the kings of the earth and all nations drinke of the wine of the wrath of her fornication And God saith to vs Go out of her my people c. If the true vse of these scriptures teach vs two things first that we must trie and iudge the false prophets the spirits and whosoeuer may cal themselues the Church by the doctrine of Christ expressed in the scriptures and that vnder the time of the gospell a citie by false doctrine should poyson all nations and we ought to go out of that citie how can any man iudge the Citie of Rome which calleth her selfe the mother of all Churches and vsurpeth ouer all nations seeing that it hath forsaken the truth and yet claimeth vniuersalitie perpetual succession visible refuseth to be tried by the holy oracles of God these rules and Canons of holy scriptures how I say can any man iudge otherwise but that it is the verie seat of Antechrist And in this that it would bee maintained by saying it cannot erre it erreth most apparantly And therefore that onely is the true Church and house of God whether visible or inuisible a Heb. 3.6 Math. 18.20 which holdeth fast the true faith where two or three are gathered together in Christes name and not that which pretendeth visible succession and saith it cannot erre 4 Howbeit in all this time it was not as the church of Rome would beare vs in hand that our religion which is that auncient religion of Abraham had such an ecclipse that it cannot bee traced in these 1600. yeares after Christ for as before the comming of Christ it lay hidde in comparison of the vniuersalitie of the whole world in the house and posteritie of Abraham and sometime more then other appearing and shining forth when God made his glorious truth to cast the beames of light far and wide at such times as he made his saintes glorious by deliuerance as out of Egipt and Babilon And in subduing the Cananites in prospering Dauid Solomon Iehoshaphat Ezekiah and Ioshiah So in this time of Christianitie among the Gentils there hath beene as it were an ebbing and flowing and as I may say a morning and an euening For the gospell beginning with small degrees and like a grayne of mustard seede was persecuted by the vniuersall world at the first And yet preuailed mightely through all those bitter and intollerable persecutions of the first three hundred yeares in so much as in the first Christian Emperours dayes namely Constantine the great when hee summoned the first generall Councell of Nice for the cause of Arrius there came 318. Bishops and these were from all partes of the worlde West as farre as Spaine and North in a manner at the verie North Pole So that all the worlde stoode amased
lib. 4. Orthod fid cap. 7. Who is there which can make the image of God who is inuisible without body circumscription without figure therefore it is extreme madnesse to counterfeit fashion the deuine power Guillermus Durandi helpeth vs a little further vntill An. 480. b De rational diuin lib. 1. de pictur affirming that the councell of Agatha forbad pictures to bee made in the church and that that should bee painted in the wales which is worshipped adored Now this c 16. Durandi d De rit eccles lib. 1. cap. 4. sect 1. Durantus with old father Gratian e De consecrat distinct 3. cap. perlatum do patiently abide and beare that these images had little entertainment into the churches of Christians vntill An. 600. But then they are bold to bring forth Gregorie liuing about that time that they might shew the first originall decree of their error Namely that about this time there were images crept into the church to bee lay mens bookes but not to be adored For this Gregorie f Lib. 7. epist 109. reproueth one Serenus Bishop of Massilia for breaking images in the church whē he saw them worshipped but yet he commendeth him that hee would not haue the people to worship them wishing to teach the people not to sinne by worshipping them and yet to learne the storie in the wales which they could not reade in bookes So that it can not be found that vnto this time of 600. yeares images got any further honour but to stand or to be painted in the church as bookes to teach the rude people and then they began about that time to forget the scriptures of God which saith g Hier. 10.15 Aback 2. 19. They are vanitie and the worke thereof errors there is no profite in them but they are teachers of lies But this Romish and hethenish idolatrous worship which is now among the papistes had so many enemies of godly Christians that from time to time it suffered the repulse till about the yeare 785. And then in the second counsel of Nice it was hatched hardened made bolde to come abroad into open light and to beard to face downe the pure adoration and seruice of God with this prety h By these two verses Nam Deus est quod imago docet sed non Deus ipsa Hanc videas sed mente colas quod cernis in ipsa deuise and colour to hide their idolatrie that they honor not the image it selfe but in it they worship him whom the image doth represent A thing so manifestly condemned by the auncient Christians that this is the greatest and the strongest antiquity which the papists haue for the grounding and first full birth of their idolatrie as thou shalt verie well perceiue if thou reade the aforesaid authors of this matter and the Antididagma of the reuerende canons of Colen and B. Boner vpon the 10. commandements and the counsell of Trent or any other that declare faithfully the true storie of antiquitie Therefore let the Christian reader iudge if this bee not of a newe and late generation and whether such daintie cloakes of humane folly will shrowde them well and safely agaynst the powring showers of the fierie wrath of God which i Esai 45.23 hath once sworne by himselfe saying Euerie knee shall bow vnto mee and euerie tongue shall sweare by mee And againe hee saith k Cap. 42.8 I am the Lorde this is my name and my glorie will I not giue vnto an other 2. Faith onely iustifieth neither my praise vnto grauen images The second foundation is of the condition on our part of the couenant with God wherein because the gospell requireth no other condition but onely faith in Iesus Christ therfore the catholike religion holdeth this principle Faith in Iesus Christ onely without workes doth iustifie Which to be the ancient catholike beliefe of Christians Eusebius Pamphilus a very learned diuine of the primitiue age doth testifie he liued about Anno 325. who writing the storie of the primitiue Church sheweth that this was the faith of the Christians from the Apostles vnto that age For speaking of the heresie of the Hebionites whose beginning was in the verie first age of Christianitie he calleth them poore alluding to their name in the knowledge of the glorie of Christ Histor eccles lib. 3. cap. 27. and he telleth that they were reputed erronious in this that they held that the obseruation of the law was to be kept and that faith onely in Christ was not sufficient to saluation Which is confirmed by Irenaeus who b Aduers heres lib. 1. ca. 26 saith that Ebion refused Paul calling him an Apostata from the law Now if it were not the common and vniuersall faith of the Church that faith onely iustifieth how could Ebion all that 300. yeares bee accounted an hereticke for holding the contrarie But this will more appeare if we heare the auncient fathers and elder protestants both before and after Eusebius time to speake and vtter their profession Cyprian c Anno 255. before Eusebius d Epist 3. Caecilio saith thus Si Abraham Deo credidit c. If Abraham beleeued God it was imputed to him for righteousnes truely whoseouer beleeueth God and liueth by faith is found righteous Origin e Anno. 235. a little before him speaketh thus vpon the words of S. Paul Rom. 3. vers 27.28 f In epist ad Rom. cap. 3. lib. 3. He saith the iustification of faith onely to suffice So that whosoeuer beleeueth onely is iustified although hee fulfill no part of workes And to proue this he bringeth the example of the thiefe on the crosse namely That no whit of good workes is declared to bee done by him in the gospell but for his faith onely Iesus said vnto him this day shalt thou be with me in paradise Hilarius g 345. liued much about that time or not long after Eusebius and h Cap. sine Canon 8. hee saith vpon Mathew Fide sola iustificat He iustifieth onely by faith Basilius Magnus as it were i Anno 370. presently after him saith The k de humilitate Apostle saith let him that glorieth glory in the Lord where he said that Christ is made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption that as it is written let him that glorieth glorie in the Lord for that is perfect euerie way glorying in the Lord when a man is not extolled for his owne righteousnesse but acknowledgeth himselfe indeed void of true righteousnesse and to bee iustified by onely faith in Christ Ambrose was not long l 380. after when he m Epist 71. wrote to one Irenaeus saying Let no man glorie in his works because no man is iustified by his doings but he that is iust hath it giuen him because that after the washing he is iustified therfore it is faith