the same thing Thus then I argue upon the whole The Apostles when they cited the Oracles of the Old Testament comprehended them all under the Name of Scripture as if they would have said the Scripture of God Now I find that immediately after the Apostles the Saints also quoted the Writings of the Apostles under the Name of Scripture they have paid the same Honour to the Writings of the Apostles as the Apostles did to the Old Testament Have I not reason then to conclude from thence that it was the judgment of the Saints of the Primitive Church that the Writings of the Apostles were no less the Scripture of God than the Prophetick Writings wherein are recorded the Oracles of God CHAP. III. The second Proof drawn from hence that the Ancients have equall'd the Writings of the Apostles to the Oracles of the Old Testament IF what M. N. has asserted touching the writings of the Prophets were examined according to the Belief which the Primitive Church had of them it would be soon acknowledg'd that this New System is not to be maintained by dint of Argument The Proofs of which are every where to be found For the Primitive Writers of the Christian Religion being obliged to fetch from the Prophetic writings their Arguments to convince the Jews or to confirm the Christians who acknowledged their Authority this was the reason that they had frequent occasion to speak of the Inspiration of those Sacred Writings So that we plainly see that they are hardly ever cited by the Ancients without some Elogie drawn from the Sanctity of their Original Sometimes 't is the VVord of God sometimes 't is the Holy Scripture sometimes the Oracles of the Holy Ghost and sometimes the Scripture divinely inspired VVhen the Primitive Christians quoted any passage of the Old Testament it was as they phrased it the Mouth of the Lord that spoke But I do not speak this to divert me from alledging some Proofs Clemens Romanus who as 't is well known was contemporary with the Apostles speaking of the Prophets says That the Ministers of the Grace of God instigated by the Holy Spirit spoke of Repentance A little after that-reciting a Maxim drawn from the Old Testament he assures us that 't was no more than what the Holy Spirit recommended to us Quod vaticinantes non alio quam verbo divino afflati agantur vos quoque ipsos dicturos reor Dial. cum Triph. Jud. p. 8. Justin Martyr speaks of the Inspiration of the Prophets as of a Truth common to the Jews and Christians Descendens in eos spiritus Sanctus Religionem veram discere volentes per illos docendos esse statuit Id. ad Graec. Cohort p. 32. And in another place he says that the Holy Spirit descended upon the Prophets to the end they might teach all those that desired to be instructed in the true Religion * Caeterum Dei homines pleni spiriu Sancto à Deo inspirati institutique Prophetae ordinati sunt proinde fuere à Deo docti Theophil ad Autol. lib. 2. p. 87. Theophilus of Antiochia asserts that the Prophets were men filled with the Holy Spirit and inspir'd by God Clemens of Alexandria is full of Passages wherein he affirms the same thing I shall cite no more than one which is to be found at the beginning of his Protreptic Ipse est Dominus loquens in Isaia ipse in Elia ipse in ore Prophetarum All the Primitive Authors honour the Prophets and their VVritings as being inspir'd by God Origen alone would furnish me with several passages of which to be convinc'd â—here needs no more than only to read his â—hilocatia But to what purpose will some Body say â—o I quote all these Proofs The dispute is â—bout the New Testament not the Old one 〈◊〉 will not say that I had any desire of maâ—ing it my Business to let the World know â—he Character of M. N. by shewing that in â—he judgement of the Ancients he does an â—nfinite injury to the prophetic Writings by â—he liberty of writing which he assumes to â—imself That was never my Design for 〈◊〉 confine my self exactly to my Subject My â—im is still to make out that the writings of â—he New Testament are inspir'd by the Holy Ghost And is not the confirming the high Opinion which the Ancients had of the Prophets and their Writings a keeping close to â—hat Design If at the same time I shew that â—he Ancients have equal'd the Apostles and â—heir writings to the Prophets and their Prophesies without proceeding any farther that cannot be call'd a Deviation For to be convinc'd that it is a Truth Iren. adver heret lib. 3. c. 11. Because first the Apostles secondly the Prophets but all from one and the fame God Commentaria Apostolorum scripta Prophetarum sequuntur p. 98. Just Martyr Quia utrumque Testamenti Ministri uno eodemque spiritu inspirati locuti sunt Theophii ad Autol. l. 30 p. 125. Deus Aeâ—ernus Vnigenitus verbum incarnatum predicatum a Prophetis omnibus Apostolis ab ipso spiritu Iren. adv Eereticos l. 3. c. 21. Vnus eâ—â—m idem spiritus Dei quae in prophetis praeconavit c. Ipse in Apostolis Annunciavit ib. c 35. there needs no more than to read the Passages which I have quoted in the Margin the number of which I might have easily augmented more especially would I have cited the Fathers who lived after the Council of Nice CHAP. IV. The third Proof drawn from the Distinction which the Ancients made between the Canonical and Apocryphal Books THis Distinction takes place in respect of both Testaments There are join'd to the Canonical Books of the Old Testament several Pieces purely Human as the Books of Tobit Judith Baruc Macabee's c. which are call'd by the name of Apocrypha A word of which the true Original is very uncertain But whether it signifie conceal'd or obscure or whether it have any other sense certain it is that those Books which are added to the Scripture though they are not of divine Authority are call'd Apocrypha If the Books which are added to the Old Testament are not admitted to be Canonical 't is not because they are defective in their matter There are some of them whose Doctrine is sound and their Instructions pure so that there has been no scruple made to read them publickly in the Church I dare presume to say there is such a Portion of Apocryphal Books which is more Instructive and more edifying than such a portion of books we call Canonical Wherefore then are they rejected as Apocryphal I know very well that several Marks of human Frailty are to be discover'd in them but the chief Ground of their being rejected is because they are Books which the Holy Ghost has not inspir'd the Finger of God appears not in them the good things which are there to be found flow not immediately from the
Spring Moreover we have reason to examin and suspect them because they are not recommended to us by Persons actuated by the infallible Spirit of God This Reason is express'd by the Ancients in other terms for they say that the Apocryphal Books added to the Old Testament want Canonical Authority because they were written by persons who were no Prophets and who lived after Malachi the last of the Prophets Wherein they followed Josephus who has deriv'd from thence the grand Character of the difference which we ought to make between the Canonical Books and the Apocryphal The words of the Author are so remarkable as not to be omitted Answer to Appion l. 1. c. 2. There can be nothing more certain than the Writings authoriz'd among us because they cannot be subject to any Contradiction in regard that there is nothing approv'd but what the Prophets wrote some Ages ago according to the purity of Truth by the Inspiration and Agitation of the Spirit of God They have also written all that pass'd from the time of Artaxerxes to our Time But by reason there has not been as formerly a successive Series of the Prophets there is not the same Credit given to the Books which I have mention'd The Books written after the Prophet Malachi have been constantly rejected in regard he was the last Writer whom the Holy Ghost inspir'd under the Old Testament Euseb l. 8. De monst Evangel Quod ab illo tempore servatoris nullum extet Sacrum Voâ—umen VVhat I have said in respect of the Old Testament takes place in relation to the New Several Books of Piety were compos'd in the Primitive Church the Authors were Persons of Worth and the Books were so useful that the Reading of them was not only recommended to private Persons but they made no scruple to read them in publick For example the Epistle of Saint Clement had the same Honour VVherefore was it that those Books were not put into the number of Canonical that is to say of those Books that are the constant Rule of our Faith and Manners It was not always because they were in some things erroneous but by reason they were not inspir'd by the Holy Ghost that was sufficient to hinder them from being received for Canonical The Question that was put when there was a Dispute about any Book of which they doubted was to know whether or no it were written by a Person inspired Thence it came to pass that in the History of Eusebius we find that Dionysius Bishop of Alexandria pronouncing his Sentence upon the Apocalyps said that he acknowledged it to be the work of some Holy Man inspir'd by the Spirit of God 'T is known also that Origen speaking of the Book written by Hermas Reor enim sancti cujusdam divino spiritu afflati viri id opus esse Euseb h. e. l. 7. c. 21. Quae Scriptura valde mihi utilis videtur Et ut puto divinitus inspirata Origen l. 10. reptam Epist ad Rom. c. 16. Com. 14. said That he believ'd it to be a Writing divinely inspir'd a certain proof that they believ'd those Books which the Church has admitted as Canonical were inspir'd by the Holy Ghost CHAP. V. The Fourth Proof drawn from the honour which the Ancients paid to the Sacred Books of the New Testament WE may draw a very strong Argument to prove that the Primitive Church believ'd that the Sacred Books of the New Testament were inspired from the Honour and Reverence which they paid them I shall begin with that Holy awe which kept the Ancients from attempting any alterations in the Sacred Writings Addenti aut dâ—trahenti poena non modica Iren. adv Heres l 5. c. 30. It was a piece of rashness and Sacriledge to adulterate them either by adding or diminishing They were laden with Anathemas who were so bold as to lay their mending Hands upon those Sacred VVritings We find in the Ecclesiastical History that the Heretics who denied the Divinity of our Lord had the confidence to falsifie the Scripture to accommodate the Text to their Opinions Upon which an Author of the Primitive Ages says that it was not likely that the Heretics were ignorant how criminal an Enterprize of that nature was For says he Quantae porro audaciae sit ejusmodi facinus ne ipsos quidem ignorare credibile est aut enim sacras scripturas à spiritu sancto dictatas esse non credunt ac proinde infideles sunt aut semet ipso spiritu sancto sapientiores esse existimant ac proinde quid aliud sunt quam Demoniaci Euseb h. e. l. 5. c. ult either they believe not that the Sacred Scriptures were dictated by the Holy Ghost and so are Infidels or they imagine themselves to be wiser than the Holy Ghost and then what are they other then Demoniacs They had an inviolable Veneration for the Sacred Scripture Tatianus for having only presumed to put the Epistles of St. Paul into more elegant Language incurred the Censure which may be seen in the Historian last cited Euseb l. 4.29 If the Church were so jealous of the words of the Scripture we may easily judge of the Indignation of the Christians when they saw that any body durst presume to violate the Text it self either by addition or diminution 'T is clear that the Christians would never have been so sensible of injury done to the Scripture if they had not believed it to be the work of the Holy Spirit Some small fragment of Piety affixed to human Works would never have been a crime of Sacriledge For example I see not what great harm it could be to sow to S. Paul's Epistle to Philemon some little Discourse upon that Indulgence which is due from Christian Masters to their Servants were it true that the Epistle to Philemon is a Peice wherein the Holy Spirit had no Share 'T is true there may be something said in dislike of such an Act in regard that Sincerity requires that other Mens Works should be let alone in their natural Dress Nevertheless the Miscarriage deserves not to be treated with the Penalties of Sacrilege there is no reason to make such a noise about it as the Primitive Christians did upon the Alterations that were made in the Writings of the New Testament Nothing more clearly shews the Opinion which the Ancients had of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books than the Honor which they paid 'em in looking upon 'em as Sovereign Decrees in Matters of Religion For which Reason it was that in several Councils they were plac'd upon a Throne as they would have seated Jesus Christ himself had he come visibly to preside in those Holy Assemblies There was the same Honor paid to his Word as they would have done to his Person Which clearly shews with what an Eye of Veneration they look'd upon the Sacred Writings of the New Testament This Honor also no less visibly appears in the use which
ADVERTISEMENT OF Two Books lately Printed for Thomas Bennet TWelve Sermons Preached upon several Occasions by R. South D. D. Never before Printed The Second Volume The Lives of all the Princes of Orange from William the Great Founder of the Commonwealth of the United Provinces Written in French by the Baron Maurier in 1682 whose Father was Twenty Years Ambassador ar the Hague And Published at Paris by Order of the French King To which is added the Life of His Present Majesty King William the Third By Mr. Thomas Brown Together with each Prince's Head before his Life Done from Original Draughts by Mr. Robert White THE INSPIRATION OF THE New Testament Asserted and Explain'd IN ANSWER TO SOME MODERN WRITERS By C. G. LAMOTHE DIVINE LONDON Printed for Tho. Bennet at the Half-Moon in S. Paul's Church-Yard 1694. THE CONTENTS CHAP. I. THE State and Importance of the Question and Division of the Book CHAP. II. The first Proof of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament drawn from the mannâ—r after which the Ancients speak of it CHAP. III. The second Proof drawn from hence that the Ancients have equall'd the Writings of the Apostles to the Oracles of the Old Testament CHAP. IV. The third Proof drawn from the Distinction which the Ancients made between the Canonical and Apocryphal Books CHAP. V. The Fourth Proof drawn from the Honour which the Ancients paid to the Sacred Books of the New Testament CHAP. VI. The Fifth Proof drawn from hence that the Ancients positively asserted the Books of the New Testament to be inspir'd CHAP. VII Wherein the Objections that may be brought against the Testimony of Antiquity are answered CHAP. VIII Wherein we begin to prove by the Books of the New Testament that they are inspir'd and particularly by the Intention which God had in giving them to the World CHAP. IX Wherein the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament is demonstrated by the manner of their Composition CHAP. X. Wherein the Inspiration of the Books of the New Testament is made out from the Nature of the Covenant of which they are the Writings CHAP. XI Wherein the Inspiration of the Books of the New Testament is made out by the Prerogatives of the Apostles CHAP. XII Wherein the Inspiration of the Books of the New Testament is made out by the Promise which Christ Jesus madâ— of his Spirit to the Authors of it CHAP. XIII Wherein the Inspiration of the New Testament is made out by the fulfilling of the Promise of Jesus Christ CHAP. XIV Wherein are produc'd several Passages of Scripture which shew that the Sacred Writers of the New Testament have declared that they were Inspir'd in their Writings CHAP. XV. Wherein is drawn from the Gift of Discerning of Spirits granted to the Primitive Christians a Proof very much in Favour of the Sacred Books which the Apostles have left us The Second Part. CHAP. I. Wherein is shewn that 't is not the Common Belief that the Sacred Books of the New Testament were dictated word for word by the immediate Suggestion of the Holy Ghost CHAP. II. Wherein is explained the Nature of the Inspiration of the New Testament in respect of Revelatious CHAP. III. Wherein is Explain'd the Nature of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament in reference to things which the Apostles had heard and seen CHAP. IV. Wherein is Explain'd the Nature of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament in reference to the Progress which the Apostles might be able to make in reasoning upon the Truths suggested by the Holy Ghost and upon those which they had learn'd by the way of Sense CHAP. V. Wherein are set down Four Consequences that arise from the Manner of Explaining the Manner of the Inspiration of the New Testament CHAP. VI. Wherein is Consider'd the Nature of the Infallibility which springs from the Infallibility of the Holy Ghost and in particular touching the Manner how the Apostles obeyed it CHAP. VII Wherein is considered the Nature of the Infallibility which arises from the Direction of the Holy Ghost with reference to the Things wherein the Apostles were directed and whether they were in particular deceived in their Opinion of the near Approach of the End of the World CHAP. VIII Wherein is Examined What Influence the Direction of the Holy Ghost had over those Things that were only Concomitants of the Doctrine CHAP. IX Wherein it appears what ought to be the Extent of the signification of the words which the Sacred Writers have made use of in the Writings of the New Testament CHAP. X. Wherein some Objections are answered which have no Relation to the Apostelick Writings CHAP. XI Wherein some Objections are Answered which are directly made against the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament THE PREFACE THEY who have a Reverence for the Holy Scripture will never be offended to see the number of the Champions of it encrease 'T is known that in the Primitive Ages when Religion was continually attacqu'd the Church was never disgusted at the Apologies which the Christians so frequently set forth All those that knew how to write made it a part of their Duty to uphold Christianity And there is no question but that this was one of the most Potent means that Providence made use of to advance the Triumphs of the Religion of Jesus Christ We are in an Age wherein the Scripture is dishonoured sometimes after one manner sometimes after another So that I cannot believe when Libertinism exerts it self so boldly that Christians will grow weary of seeing the Number of Apologists increase who take upon them to defend that Scripture which made them Christians We dare not presume to say that all who have shaken the Authority of Scripture were profest Libertines in regard that some Persons of worth have upheld Propositions which being carry'd a little too far do great mischief to that Book for which in other respects they declare that they have an esteem even to Veneration 'T is not possible to dive into the secret intentions of Authors so as to know whether it be out of Impudence or through a hankering after Libertinism that they suffer these bold and dangerous stroaks to escape their Pens The Libertine counterfeits himself sometimes to be Orthodox and a lover of Truth and he proposes his doubts with a seeming Ingenuity and vigorously asserts the Truth for fear of being suspected Sometimes also a faithful disciple of the Truth expresses himself in a feeble and trembling manner and by his doubts and scruples gives an advantage to his Enemies God alone knows the bottom of the Heart and it is our Duty to leave it to him to decide the intentions of Authors and to endeavour to defend the Truth against all manner of Onsets on what side soever they are made There appear'd within these few Years a certain Treatise which attacqu'd the inspiration of the Sacred Scripture I shall not
go about to inform my self of the real Design which the Author had in composing a Work so injurious to Scripture but I thought it necessary to prevent the evil Consequences of such a dangerous Book Monsieur Witsius of Holland and Mr. Lowth a Divine of Oxford Father Simon and Father Le Vassour have set forth Answers to it which I have read But in regard it was their only Design to trace their Adversary step by step and not to handle this matter throughly there is therefore still room left for a new management of it The English Divine indeed in my Opinion has gone somewhat farther than the rest but I shall take the liberty to say that he might have built the Inspiration of the Holy Writings upon better foundations that he has not so sufficiently explained the nature of it as he might have done and that he has ventur'd to advance some things which in my judgment need a great deal of softning I hope he will be pleas'd to pardon me the Expression without which I could not be able to justifie my Design of writing after him In his Preface he acknowledges that the matter is nice and new and after he has besought the Readers not to censure him as if he intended to betray the cause which he defends he invites them to uphold it themselves According to this Invitation I shall make some steps in order to it If my Example should excite some other more Learned Pen to write upon the same Subject the Publick will be oblig'd to me for it I shall be well satisfied with my weak endeavours provided they may give occasion to the publishing any Treatise that shall maintain the Inspiration of the Holy Writings as effectually as the truth of them hath been asserted It will be found that I have tied my self to consider only the Writings of the New Testament there was no medling with the Books of the Old Testament without cutting out too much work for my self in a time when the Public receives not well any but small Treatises especially in matter of Divinity Therefore that I might accommodate my self to the Palate of the Age I was enforc'd to shorten my Subject After I had taken this Resolution it was no difficult thing for me to chuse which of the two Parts of Scripture it behov'd me to handle So that I determind in favour of the New Testament as being that Part upon which there has least been said We have several Books in defence of the Inspiration of the Prophets and their Writings because they have been so often attacqu'd But the Writers of the New Testament having peaceably enjoy'd the Honour pay'd them by the uninterrupted belief of their Inspiration Authors have not made it so much their Business to examine the nature of it or if any Libertine has attempted to contest it with them they have altogether relied upon the belief which the Church has had of it from time to time Besides this I may say that by maintaining the New Testament I defend the Old The Apostles have given such honourable Testimonials of the Writings of the Prophets that no Man can better maintain their honour than by demonstrating that Men inspir'd by the Holy Ghost have given Testimony to them But the chief Reason which made me chuse to defend the Writings of the New Testament is this because it is properly the Book that makes us Christians It is our Duty indeed to read the Writings of the Prophets there are to be seen those Oracles the Accomplishment of which is of glorious Consequence to the Gospel there we are inform'd of a great number of Actions wherein God appears magnificent in his Works and thence may be drawn Instructions effectual for the Sanctification of the Heart all these things were written for our Instruction but still a Christian must chiefly repair to the Writings to the New Covenant there it is that he ought to be most intent and stedfast from thence it is that he is chiefly oblig'd to receive his Faith and his Instructions in order to put himself into a state of Salvation The New Testament is that Book which God deliver'd as a Legacy to Mankind in these later times 'T is our Duty to cherish as much as in us lies the Respect which is due to that Sacred Book and to prevent it from being reckoned in the Catalogue of Common Writings for fear the Religion which it teaches us should be look'd upon as a Piece of Human Invention THE HOLY SCRIPTURES Inspir'd c. CHAP. I. The State and Importance of the Question and Division of the Work IT being my design to treat of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament I cannot forbear exactly to set down the state of the Question Which being done it will be found that all my Arguments aim at the same Mark and that I have made it my business not to amuse my Reader with any unprofitable Digression In the first place then the Reader is to be admonish'd that the Dispute is not here which are Canonical Books and which Apocryphal We suppose that those with whom we Contend agree that there is no contradiction to be made against the Canonical Authority of the New Testament according as we enjoy it at this day but that those Sacred Books were actually written or dictated by the Authors whose Names are affixed to ' em 'T is agreed that these Holy Men both saw and heard the matters of Fact which they relate and which they have written with extraordinary Fidelity and Sincerity Which being granted the Work begun is already in so great a forwardness that there is no need at all of entring into the discussion of several Difficulties which concern the Question relating to the Apocryphal Books By this means also we are freed from the trouble of proving that the Sacred Books were written by Men who were Witnesses of all the matters of Fact which are contain'd in the History of Jesus Christ or who themselves wrought great Miracles by which it appear'd that their Mission was Celestial In a word we are agreed upon the truth of these Books so that nothing remains farther to be known but whither they are inspir'd The Verity and the Inspiration make two different Questions of which the first is decided the Sacred Books of the New Testament are stedfastly and undeniably true at least so far as concerns Essential Things The main dispute is whether they are inspir'd or no So that there are some who let 'em alone with the Honour of being true but ravish from them that of Inspiration 'T is against these Innovators that I undertake the defence of the New Testament of which I maintain'd alike and equally assert both the Inspiration and the Truth even to the meanest Circumstances I could wish with all my heart that I might be able to handle this Question without chusing any certain Adversary My aim was to examine this important Matter without having any
the Jews look'd upon to be all Scripture In the Main the observation of Grotius does my argument no harm though it were well grounded for the design of that Author is only to deprive the Historical Books of the Old Testament of the Honour of Inspiration He acknowledges in another place that Moses Isaiah Jeremiah Ezekiel David and Daniel were divinely Inspired So that according to Grotius the Jewish Church had Books wherein the Holy Ghost spake Had they need of the Spirit of God they found it in the writings of the Prophets and this Light has constantly endur'd in all Ages of the Jewish Church even in the later times as corrupt as they were Ought we not to have a Light at least equal to it under an Oeconomy wherein it is agreed that God has manifested himself with more advantage than under the Law We have no longer any Apostles there are no longer any men inspir'd if we have not writings which repair that loss by means of that Infallibility with which the Holy Ghost would have invested them To whom is it not apparent that our condition is worse than that of the ancient Jews The Day shin'd out to them but it is Night with us All the advantage is on the side of the Carnal posterity of Abraham even of that which is rejected The Jews had formerly and still have Books wherein they find the infallible Voice of God But if we believe M. N. we must rely upon the Credit of Histories which some persons of sincerity have written for the Doctrine of our Saviour and to the arguments which only sound Reason and Judgement dictated to Authors without Logic or Education I cannot believe that this Hypothesis will ever be relished by those who are never so little acquainted with the Prerogatives of the Christian Church CHAP. XI Wherein the Inspiration of the Books of the New Testament is made out by the Prerogatives of the Apostles THE best way which we have to know certainly whether the Christian Church has not as great a share of divine Illumination as the Jewish Church is to see what sort of Persons the Authors of the New Testament were The Jewish Church had Prophets and we have Apostles our Books except two or three which were made under the inspection of the Apostles were written by the order and with the approbation of the Apostles There needs no more than to see whether our Apostles were not equal in worth to the Prophets of the Old Testament In the Epistle to the Ephesians I find them equalled together C. 2. v. 20. in the work of Salvation being built upon the Foundation of the Apostles and Prophets In this place to speak of Equality would be an injury to the Apostles in regard that here they are named before the Prophets Nor is it without good Ground that I make this observation since St. Pauls Custom is to put the Apostles at the head of the Ministers of the Christian Church She had also Prophets and Prophets inspir'd like those of the Old Testament Would you know which are the most Excellent the Apostles or the Prophets There needs no more than to see what rank they hold in the Catalogue which St. Paul gives of the Ministers of Grace 1 Cor. 12.28 First Apostles secondarily Prophets then Teachers Besides that this is a Place where the Apostle is bound to mark out to every one his Station Chance had no share in Ranging them under that Order So that we find that St. Paul observes the same Order in the sequel of his Argugument Are all Apostles 1 Cor. 13.29 are all Prophets are all Teachers In his Epistle to the Ephesians the Evangelists are set before the Teachers but he is constant in the precedency which he gives the Apostles before the Prophets He has appointed some for Apostles and others for Prophets Nevertheless notwithstanding his humility he gives the first Place to his own Dignity when he acted in his Apostleship he gave way to no Man If we may believe him the Apostles of the Christian Church were more excellent than the Prophets Nor do we too highly exalt the Apostleship by adding that it included in it self all the advantages affixed to the inferiour Degrees The Apostles were Prophets and Teachers they had the Gift of working Miracles which the Holy Ghost divided among them Had they all the Gift of Healing Did they all speak divers Languages Did they all Interpret No but the Apostles did all this the Grace of the Apostleship included all other Graces We ought not slightly to pass by the words of Saint Paul when designing to set forth that subordination which Grace had established in the Primitive Church by the variety of Gifts he declares that to every one is given the manifestation of the Holy Ghost so far as is expedient Though St. Paul had not said it 't is a Truth which common Sence would have given us to understand For do we not find that it is incumbent upon the wisdom of God to order the Means according to the Purpose which he proposes to himself Let us then say that the Apostles had a measure of the Holy Ghost proportionable to the designs of the Apostleship They had at least as much of the Spirit of Truth as the Prophets had received We say at least for in regard the Apostolic Writings were to be serviceable toward the edification of the Church at all times and in all places 't is clear that those Writings wanted a more especial assistance than those other of which the primitive use was only for a particular Nation and for a very limited time But 't is sufficient for me to extend the force of my Argument so far that the Prerogative ought at least to be equal If then the writings of the Prophets were inspir'd as I have prov'd certainly the writings of the Apostles who were the more excellent ought à fortiore to be inspired 'T is not any thing of personal Excellence which is the Business in dispute for the Prophets and Apostles are not to be here considered but with reference to the Use that they were made for The Prophets were not Prophets for themselves 1 Pet. 1.12 unto whom it was revealed that not unto themselves but unto us they did minister the Things c. The Apostles were not Apostles for themselves but it was for our sakes that they administer'd They are our Masters we are grounded upon their Writings Let us compare the Prophets and the Apostles we shall find that as it is certain that the Apostles were much more excellent than the Prophets 't was requisite they should have a more advantageous share of the Holy Ghost They stood in need of a lively and durable Light which was not to be extinguish'd by time but to enlighten all Ages I do not believe this argument is to be eluded with the least Tittle of Solidity Some will say that we ought to look upon the Writings of
from Heaven I have already touch'd upon this Argument The other is that the Epistles of S. Paul are reckon'd in the Number of the inspir'd Scriptures which the ignorant and unstable wrest as they do the other Scriptures Assuredly by those other Scriptures S. Peter means the inspir'd Scriptures of which Jesus Christ says in another place You go astray not knowing the Scriptures and which the New Testament usually cites as the Work of the Holy Ghost The Business in Hand is about the Scriptures which the unlearned wrest to their own destruction which can be meant of no other than of the Holy Scripture S. Peter does not complain of the Unlearned for wresting the Scriptures but for wresting the other Scriptures VVhence it is evident that the Epistles of S. Paul are reckon'd in the Number of the inspir'd Scriptures Can any thing be more positively express'd upon the Inspiration of the VVorks that make up the New Testament CHAP. XV. Wherein is drawn from the Gift of Discerning of Spirits granted to the Primitive Christians a Proof very much in Favour of the Sacred Books which the Apostles have left us MEN dispute about the Marks whereby they might formerly know the true Prophets Commonly it is affirm'd that Miracles or the Accomplishment of the Prophecy was the true Proof of a real Prophet But it may be said that this is not always certain for it would be a difficult thing to prove that all the Prophets verified their Mission by Miracles or by accomplish'd Prophecies This was not altogether so necessary but when there was something of great Importance that was the Subject of the Prophecy For to what purpose was it to make a great Noise and a stir when there was nothing more in the Business than to reduce Sinners into the right Path that had been traced by a Law supported by so many Miracles God never overturns the Laws of Nature unless there be some necessary occasion I should have rather said that the Miracles of a true Prophet become serviceable to him that wrought none at all wherein I thus explain my self When a Prophet had justified his Mission by some Miracles he was acknowledg'd for a Man of God After which his Testimony was as good as a Miracle to other Prophets while he acknowledg'd that those new Prophets were sent by the same Master This Attestation remov'd all Occasion of Doubts When we find that certain Books of the Old Testament want these authentick Proofs of their Divinity which other Books have that are look'd upon in the first Order of Canonical we are confirm'd by understanding that those Books about which some Men would raise Disputes and Doubts pass'd through the Hands of the last Prophets truly inspir'd I say the same thing of persons a Prophet whose Mission was not honor'd by Miracles was acknowledg'd upon the Inspiration of another Prophet whose Attestation had been prov'd I apply this Argument to my Subject They who had no good Opinion of the Works of S. Mark and S. Luke because they were not Apostles ought to alter their Sentiment when they consider that the Evangelists had the Approbation of the Apostles How shall we prove that the Apostles were worthy to be credited We have their Miracles but we have also other Proof from the Conduct which God observ'd in providing credible Testimonies among the Primitive Christians to justifie the Apostles 'T is known that among them there were several to whom God had granted the Talent of discerning Spirits 1 Cor. 12.7 8 10. S. Paul is positive in it But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom to another the word of knowledge by the same spirit To another the working of miracles to another prophecy to another discerning of Spirits This is no bare natural Discerning since it is reckon'd in the number of miraculous Gifts The Spirit of God taught several Christians how to understand Persons and Doctrines truly inspir'd Several make no scruple to refer to this what S. Paul says of the Spiritual Man 1 Cor. 2.15 But he that is spiritual judges all things This is to be understood of the things of God 14.29 Let the Prophets speak two or three and let the other judge Thus you see the discerning of Spirits establish'd Verse 22. of the same Chapter 't is said The Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets which is usually explain'd by saying that the Prophets of the New Covenant were Masters of themselves to observe silence till they had an opportunity to speak But nothing hinders but that it may be meant of that same Dependance which some of the Prophets had upon others when the one examin'd the other In which Sence the Prophets were subject to the Prophets The same Chapter furnishes me with an undeniable Proof to uphold my Argument Vers 37. If any Man think himself to be a Prophet or spiritual says S. Paul let him acknowledge that the things which I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. If any one thinks himself to be a Prophet or spiritual that is according to the Phrase of Scripture If any be a Prophet or spiritual let him acknowledge c. Spiritual persons then might discern if what S. Paul wrote came from the Lord. The Epistles of that Sacred Author pass'd for such a Proof which might well be call'd the Judgment of God since it was God who inspir'd Spiritual Men. This Consideration may serve for the Understanding of several Places of S. Paul he exposes his Writings to the Judgment of Spiritual Men Men judicious and discerning establish'd by Grace to corroborate the Authority of the Apostles By that means it was plainly discern'd that there was nothing spurious in their Writings and that they contain'd neither Arguments nor Matters of Fact which were not exactly according to the Weights of the Sanctuary Spinosa and M. N. here propose some Scruples but my Answer will be more intelligible when I have considered the Nature of the Inspiration of the Sacred Books of the New Testament Which is that which I am going to undertake in the Second Part of this Treatise The End of the First Part. The Second Part. CHAP. I. Wherein it is shewn that 't is not the Common Belief that the Sacred Books of the New Testament were dictated word for word by the immediate Suggestion of the Holy Ghost WHEN we go about to disabuse the Publick of an Euror 't is necessary that it should be notoriously manifest that it is publickly received in which case the notoriousness of it supplies the Proof or at least if the thing be not so evidently known 't is requisite we should give our selves the trouble to prove it For if it so falls out that Men undertake to undeceive the Publick when it is not deceived 't will be a sufficient reason to complain of the injury and to upbraid a
were left to their own Judgment and that there is no necessity of admitting the Assistance of the Holy Ghost into the Composition of their Writings On the other side I pretend to make it out in the Series of this Discourse that without that assistance the Scripture is of little use Now as the Argument upon which I insist in this Chapter is drawn from a serious Inspection into the Sacred Books I assert that if they be well considered it will appear that their Composition is not purely human I shall not prove this Proposition by heaping together the noble Passages that are to be found from time to time in the Writings of the Apostles I only ask who these new Authors were that spake so worthily of the Religion which they preach We find among 'em Galileans that is to say home-bred ignorant People born in a Country where there was nothing of Politeness we find 'em to be Fishermen that is to say People by their Profession rude and unpolish'd By them let us judge of the rest since 't is agreed that if any one of the Apostles were inspir'd in Writing the Question is decided Where was it then that these Authors learn'd to write well Let us grant that their Writings are not so fine as the Books which the World esteems The Authors of those Books had the Help both of Study and Art which is all human But where was it that the Sacred Authors learn'd their Manner of Writing We find that the Question is not whether the Writings of the Apostles are more eloquent than those which the World admires Suppose an Equality as to that matter that 's nothing to my purpose the Business is to know where the Apostles learn'd their Manner of writing those things which they deliver Upon the Day of the Pentecost they spoke new Languages that other Men spoke But the Miracle was this that the Apostles spake Languages which they had never learn'd before Some will say tho to little purpose where was the Miracle seeing that others spoke as well as they 'T is true indeed the Apostles write as other Men but here is the Difference not to be contested that the Apostles had never learn'd to write and I think this may pass for a good proof of the Inspiration of the New Testament CHAP. X. Wherein the Inspiration of the Books of the New Testament is made out from the Nature of the Covenant of which they are the Writings IT appears by inspecting into these Books that they belong to a Covenant which God has manifested with much more Advantage than the Old Testament The Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews says that Jesus Christ was the Mediator of a better Covenant This Covenant is better in divers Respects It is not to be contested but that it is better in respect of Light and Certainty I understand from the Writings of the New Testament that the Old one presented nothing but Types and Shadows S. John opposes Truth to the Law in point of Evidence The Law says he John 1.17 was given by Moses but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ S. Paul insists upon the same Opposition in his Second Epistle to the Corinthians But if the Gospel be hid says he 2 Cor. 4.3 6. it is hid to those that perish And he gives this Reason for it For God says he who commanded the Light to shine out of darkness hath shin'd in our Hearts to give the Light of the Knowledge of the Glory of God in the Face of Jesus Christ These Expressions are very clear and make out as evidently as it is possible the Inspiration of S. Paul It is necessary to bear it in remembrance but I insist at present only upon the Advantage of the New Covenant which is to be more full of Light and Clearness than the former This being granted I consider the Degrees of Light that enlighten'd the Old Covenant I find that the Prophets who were inspir'd by the Holy Ghost instructed the Ages they liv'd in but they also transmitted that Inspiration to the succeeding Ages by their Writings which were consulted with as much Religion as they would have consulted their Authors had they been alive Those Sacred Monuments were read as they would have hearken'd to the Prophets themselves The Mouth of God spake still in their Writings The Nation of the Jews was of this Opinion except as it is commonly thought a Handful of Sadducees who the better to defend their Errors entrench'd themselves in the Pentateuch However this does not hinder Josephus from saying in general Answer to Apâ—â—â— c. 2. Moreover there can be nothing more certain than the Writings authoriz'd among us in regard they are not liable to any Contrariety in regard there is nothing approv'd but what the Prophets wrote several Ages since according to the Purity of Truth by the Inspiration and by the Impulse of the Spirit of God Neither do we trouble our selves with infinite Numbers of Books that contradict one another as having no more than Twenty two c. And a little after We have so profound a Respect for these Books that never any Body was so hardy as to undertake either to add or diminish or alter the least Tittle We look upon 'em as Divine we call 'em so we profess to observe 'em inviolably and joyfully to lay down our Lives if there be occasion in defence of ' em Nothing can more clearly express the high Opinion which the Jewish Church had of the Sacred Books that compose the Old Testament And Josephus is more to be believ'd upon this Subject than a modern Author who tell us that the Prophets had no other Assistance of the Holy Ghost than a pious Disposition which made 'em write like persons of Sincerity but without any Prerogative of Infallibility But this was not Josephus's Opinion this was not the Belief of the Jewish Church this was not the Judgment of S. Peter who declares that Holy Men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Nor is there any father doubt to be made of it after the Decision of St. Paul The whole Scripture is divinely inspir'd and profitable for Instruction I shall not make any stop at the nice Cavil of Grotius who would make S. Paul to say The whole Scripture which is divinely inspired is profitable c. The Answer of Theophilact is sufficient They are to know says he that the Apostle said thou hast been bred up from thy Infancy in the Holy Scriptures He says All Scripture what Scripture does he mean The same of which he said that it was Sacred It was in truth in all the parts of Scripture that Timothy had been instructed from his Infancy St. Paul therefore exhorting him to persevere in the things which he had learn'd would not have argu'd rightly if when he urg'd it as a motive for his perseverance that all Scripture was inspir'd he had not spoke of the whole Book which
prove the fulfilling of the Promise as I have said already but they deserve a Chapter by themselves CHAP. XIV Wherein are produc'd several Passages of Scripture which shew that the Sacred Writers of the New Testament have declared that they were inspir'd in their Writings 'T IS now time to pass to particular Proofs which are to be found scatter'd here and there in the Writings of the New Testament The Enemies of their Inspiration set a high Value upon the Objection which they fetch from hence that the Apostles never begin their Discourses as the Prophets do by saying The Mouth of the Lord hath spoken it and are so daring as to assert that the Sacred Writers of the New Testament never thought nor desired it should be thought that there Writings were inspir'd I must confess that the Apostles do not say in express Words The Mouth of the Lord hath thus spoken For in regard that the Prophets did not enjoy the Benefit of Inspiration but by Intervals there was some kind of necessity that those Holy Men should declare what things those were which they had learn'd by Revelation It was not the same thing with the Apostles in regard they were assur'd that the Holy Ghost assisted 'em always according to the Promise of Jesus Christ in Matters of Religion More especially it ought to be observed that it is not true that the Prophets always began their Prophetick Writings with these Words The Mouth of the Lord hath spoken Let 'em read the Five Books of Moses and they shall find several Proofs of what I affirm That Legislator without any more ado begins with these Words In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth Nor is the Book of Exodus signaliz'd with any other better Character of Inspiration Nevertheless 't is known that those Two Books are no less inspir'd than the Prophesies that command Attention with these Words at the Beginning The Mouth of the Lord has spoken Let 'em not therefore have a worse Opinion of the Writings of the New Testament under pretence that these Words are not there In the Old Testament that which was merely Historical was not introduc'd with this Preface The Mouth of the Lord has spoke This is usually reserv'd for parts that are purely Prophetick wherein the Spirit of God had a singular Concern Now I affirm that the New Testament in those parts that contain some Prophecies marks out their Original as distinctly as if the Apostles had said The Spirit of the Lord has spoke it As for the Historical Parts and such as undertake Argument 't is not to be thought strange if we do not there meet with the same Character That is common to both Testaments they never expresly attribute to God any more than his Oracles But that is no Obstruction but that what those Holy Men either wrote or thought under the Guidance of the Holy Ghost may not be in some measure inspir'd I shall discourse of that more distinctly in the Series of this Treatise I have said enough to shew that the Old Testament has no advantage over the New in respect of Inspiration and that they are in the wrong who deny this Truth under pretence that the Prophets say sometimes The Mouth of the Lord hath spoken but the Apostles never make use of that Expression As to what they add that the Apostles never pretended to Inspiration and that they have not mention'd any thing of it in their Writings it is easie to be discern'd that nothing stands upon a weaker Foundation than this Objection In short the Apostles let us know that they had receiv'd from Heaven what we call Prophetick Parts sometimes it was in Vision sometimes by the Suggestions of the Spirit As to other Parts besides that I have already observ'd that the Works which compose the New Testament are written by Authors which the Holy Ghost had invested with Endowments necessary to make that Book the Foundation of Truth I could wish that something of Attention might be given to some express Passages of the New Testament S. Paul assures the Corinthians that he had the Mind of Christ 1 Cor. 2.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in another place after he had given his Judgment upon several Scruples that arose in point of Marriage he says that he speaks by permission not by command Chap. 7. and that he gives his Judgment as one that has obtain'd Mercy of the Lord to be faithful Is not this of as great Force as if he had said all these Instructions which I have given you were inspir'd into me by the Holy Ghost The Thing speaks it self S. Paul affirms that what he wrote to the Corinthians touching Marriage was the Work of the Holy Ghost For these Words Now I believe that I have the Spirit of God either signifie nothing where they are placed or else they signifie that what the holy S. Paul had wrote was by the Guidance of the Holy Spirit 'T is the general Intention of this Apostle that he should be look'd upon as a person in whom the Spirit of God resided to render him capable to instruct others The good thing that was committed unto thee 1 Tim. 1.14 2 Cor. 13.3 1 Thess 4.6 says he by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us since ye seek a Proof of Christ speaking in me He therefore that despiseth despiseth not man but God who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit If any man thinketh himself to be a Prophet or Spiritual let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the Commandments of the Lord. All which Passages clearly shew what Opinion it was that S. Paul desired Men should have of his Writings S. Peter is no less positive This Second Epistle beloved I now write unto you That ye may be mindful of the Words which were spoken before by the Holy Prophets 2 Pet. 3.1 and of the Commandment of us the Apostles of the Lord and Saviour S. Peter in these Words designs two Things which are proper for our Subject 1. He parallels that Epistle with the Writings of the Prophets 2. He puts a great Value upon that Epistle because it was written by an Apostle of Jesus Christ Will any Man say that a person who thus expresses himself did believe that the Writings of the Apostles were not inspir'd In the same Chapter S. Peter gives an Authentick Testimony in favour of the Epistles of S. Paul Even as our beloved Brother Paul also according to the Wisdom given unto him 2 Pet. 3.15 16. has also written unto you as also in all his Epistles speaking in them of these Things in which are some things hard to be understood which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest as they do also the other Scriptures These Words furnish us with two convincing Arguments in favour of the Inspiration of the Epistles of S. Paul 1. They were written according to the Wisdom which S. Paul had receiv'd