God's Providence in their Minds p. 133 3 To foretell the times of the Messias p. 136 Why his Coming revealed so often and so particularly p. 137 By what Steps and Degrees God revel'd this Mystery p. 141 Some Prophecies more directly pointing to the Messias than others p. 145 Concerning the Literal and Mystical sense of Prophecies how reasonable to allow this Double Sense p. 146 An Instance of both these Senses in that Famous Prophecy Is 7.10 c. which is at large Exlain'd p. 149 The same proved by other Instances p. 151 There are Evident Marks whereby to discover a Mystical Sense wherever 't is involv'd under a Literal One p. 152 The reasons why Prophecies are written in such a Style as contains a Mystical Sense under a Literal One p. 155 Two Rules laid down as the Foundation of Mystical Interpretations p. 161 A Recapitulation of what has been said in this Chapter p. 163 CHAP. IV. Wherein some Difficulties are Resolv'd relating to the Prophets themselves or their Writings p. 167 Two Difficulties proposed the First concerning the Obscurity of Prophecies the Second concerning the Marks whereby to distinguish True Prophets from False Ibid The First Answer'd by proving these two things 1 That the Prophecies were not so much design'd to gratify Men's Curiosity in discovering to them what should come to pass hereafter as to Convince them when the things foretold were come to pass that 't was the Lord's doing p. 170 Dan. 12.4 and Revelat. 22.10 Explain'd p. 171 2 Assertion The fulfilling of Prophecies if deliver'd plainly inconsistent with the Freedom of Humane Actions p. 174 Three Rules laid down for the Clearing of Second Difficulty 1 Rule A Prophets endeavouring to Seduce Men to Idolatry a certain Sign of a False Prophet p. 183 2 Rule The Prophets usually when they first entred upon their Office gave such a Sign of their Mission that a little time would discover whether they were sent from God or not the fulfilling of which Sign establisht their Authority for the Future p. 185 3 Rule Three Criteria made use of to judge of a Prophet if he gave no Sign viz. Purity of Doctrine Holiness of Life and Agreement with other Prophets p. 188 CHAP. V. Concerning the Inspiration of the Canonical Books of the Old Testament in General and of the Historical and Poetical Books in Particular p. 139 Mr. N.'s Objections Proposed p. 194 Concerning the time when the Canon of the Old Testament was Compiled Several Reasons assign'd why it must have been Compiled in Ezra's time or not long after p. 195 To suppose it Compiled so Early adds great weight to it's Authority p. 199 The Canon doth not consist of all the Fragments of the Ancient Jewish Books which were Extant when that was made as Mr. N. supposes p. 201 Our Saviour approved the Canon of the Old Testament as it stood and was received by the Jews in his time p. 205 So did the Apostles 2. Tim. 3.16 Vindicated from the Gloss which Grotius and Mr. N. put upon it p. 209 The Jewish Division of the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Chetubim does not favor Mr. N. p. 214 That Division proved not to be Ancient p. 216 Grotius's Authority in this Controversy consider'd p. 211 Concerning the Authority of the Historical Writings of the Old Testament 'T is probable they were Composed by Prophets p. 220 A passage in Josephus to that purpose clear'd from the Exceptions of Monsieur Huetius p. 223 The Book of Esther Vindicated from Mr. N.'s Objections p. 226 A Vindication of the Book of Job Why writ with so much Elegancy p. 228 An account of those passages in it which savour of Impatience p. 230 What Opinion Job maintain'd in the Dispute betwixt him and his Friends p. 233 In what sense this Book is Inspir'd p. 236 What excellent Uses may be made of this Book p. 239 The Divine Authority of the Book of Psalms proved p. 240 They made up the greatest part of the Publick Service first of the Jewish and afterward of the Christian Church in the Primitive times p. 242 An Answer to the Grand Objection taken from the Imprecations which are to be found in several of the Psalms consisting of Three Particulars viz. 1 Several of those Expressions do not really import so much as they seem to do p. 246 2 Most of them are rather Predictions than Imprecations p. 247 3 'T is lawful in several Cases to Pray against our Enemies This proved in four Instances p. 250 A Caution against Misunderstanding some Expressions in the Psalms p. 260 The Divine Authority of the Book of Proverbs asserted p. 261 M. N. guilty of a manifest Error p. 262 The Proverbs being Moral Instructions no Argument that they are not Inspir'd p. 264 In what respect this Book exeeeds the Moral Writings of the Heathen Philosophers p. 267 Mr. N's Objections against some particular Passages in this Book Answer'd p. 269 Concerning the Collection of Proverbs ascribed to Agur and an Answer to Mr. N's Objections against them p. 271 The Design of Ecclesiastes and of the Canticles explained and Vindicated from Mr. N's Objections p. 279 The CONCLUSION p. 281 ERRATA THat which most disturbs the sense is pag. 48. lin 20. where in stead of do not reach this Case by the Laws of Christ read the Laws of Christ do not reach this Case P. 26. in the Mar. for p. 11. 12. r. p. 17. p. 50. in the Mar. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 121. l. 26. for ther'e 's r. there 's p. 123. l. 26. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 145. Marg. for v. Cels r. c. Cels p. 160. l. 20. del likewise p. 212. Mar. put a comma after citatur p. 250. l. 18. for ef r of p. 259. l. 20. for of notorious r. of his notorious p. 262 l. 23. for sebject r. subject CHAPTER I. General Considerations concerning the Inspiration of the Writings of the New Testament I Do not dislike our Author's a French Edit p. 222. English p. 13 Division of the Scripture-Writings into Prophecies Histories and Doctrines and I do so far agree with him as to grant that all the Holy Books have not an equal degree of Inspiration but have more or less of it according as the matters they contain are more or less Adequate to the Writers Understanding and Capacities For I cannot but think that God made use of their Natural Talents as far as they could be subservient to his designs the Reasons of which Opinion I shall have occasion hereafter to mention But yet notwithstanding my agreement with him thus far I must desire leave not to follow his Method because I think 't will contribute much to the Clearness and Strength of the following Discourse if I treat of the Inspiration of the New-Testament-Writings in General in the first place For in this Method we begin with what is most Known and Certain
g Ezek. 13.18 that they may sleep on securely in their Sins The True Prophets accuse the False Ones of several Vices in their Conversation and Manner of Living of making h Jer. 6.13 Ezek. 13.19 Mich. 3.5 11. This was one of the Arguments made use of to prove Montanus his followers False Prophets because they took Mony for Prophesying beside that they were guilty of Theft and other Crimes v. Euseb H. E. l. 5. c. 18. a gain of their Profession and speaking smooth things for advantage i Is 30.10 of Adultery k Jer. 23 14.-29.23 and Riot l Is 28.7 Mic. 2.11 of being Fearless and Unconcern'd at God's Judgements and not indeavouring by Prayers or other eminent Acts of Piety to avert them m Ezek. 13.5 Jer. 27.18 And as to the other Mark of True Prophets viz. their Agreement with other Prophets we find Jeremy Appealing to it in the Contest between him and Hananiah who Prophesied n Jer. 28 3 4. of the return of Jechoniah's Captivity contrary to what Jeremy had foretold Upon which Jeremy tells him o Ib. ver 8 9. The Prophets that were before me and before thee of old prophesied of War and Evil and Pestilence the Prophet that prophesieth of Peace when the word of the Prophet shall come to pass then shall the Prophet be known that the Lord hath sent him Where Jeremy argues against the Truth of Hananiah's Prophecy and proves that what himself had prophesied was much more Credible of the two because many other Prophets agreed with him in prophesying evil against the Jews and several other Countries whereas he being single in his Prophecy concerning Peace nothing but the Punctual Answering of the Event could give him the Authority of a Prophet and people must Suspend their judgments till Time shouuld discover whether he were in the Right or no. Which place seems likewise to imply that Hananiah had never before given a Sign to attest his Mission and therefore his Credit would justly be questionable till men could see whether his Sign came to pass or not From what has been said we may conclude it probable that where a Prophet gave no Sign whereby men might make Tryal of the Reality of his Pretensions they made a judgment of it by considering his Education whether he had been brought up in the Schools of the Prophets which were the Seminaries of Inspir'd persons by examining his Manner of Life his Doctrine and his Agreement with other Prophets and the more any of these was liable to Exceptions the more need was there that he should give a Sign to attest his Mission So for Example 't was more requisite that Amos should give a Sign who was no Prophet by Education or Prophets Son but a Herdman p Amos 8.14 by Profession than any of those Prophets who were of the Priestly Order or brought up among the Sons of the Prophets CHAP. V. Concerning the Inspiration of the Canonical Books of the Old Testament in General and of the Historical and Poetical Books in Particular THe Two Preceding Chapters concerning Prophecy being a Digression with respect to the Book which I undertook to Answer tho not with Respect to the General Design of this Treatise which is to Vindicate the Authority of the Scriptures I return to Mr. N's Memorial as 't is Communicated by the Author of the Letters and shall Examine in this Chapter the Exceptions which he makes against the Authority of the Old Testament Writings Which are of two sorts General and Particular The General Exceptions are levell'd against the Authority of the Old Testament Canon which this Author supposes a Fr. p. 279. En. p 106. to consist of all the Ancient Writings whether Perfect or Imperfect whether Inspir'd or not which were remaining among the Jews at the time when this Collection was made The Particular Exceptions relate to Particular Books which he supposes not to be Inspir'd either because the matter of them is such as Men may know and faithfully relate without Inspiration such as are the Historical Books b Fr. p. 233. En. p. 31. or else because they contain something in them which is Vnworthy of God being its Author which Exception he advances against several Passages in the Psalms and the Proverbs and against the Intire Books of Job Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon c Fr. p. 271 c Eng. p. 93 c. In Answer to these Twofold Exceptions I shall I. Say something concerning the Authority and Inspiration of the old-Old-Testament Canon in General II. I shall make a Reply to his Objections against the Particular Books which are part of this Canon 1. As to the First it must be confess'd that we cannot give an Exact Account by whose Authority the Canon of the Old Testament was setled for we have no Writings extant that give us a History of that Affair But 't is very probable the Collection of the Canonical Books was made in Ezra's time or not long after 1. Because the Scripture-History ends about that time I know nothing of later date in it than the mention of Jaddus by Nehemiah d Neh. 12.10 22. who was Contemporary with Ezra which Jaddus was High Priest at the Beginning of Alexander the Great 's Reign And whatever others may have objected to the contrary the mentioning of this Jaddus is very reconcileable with the time when Nehemiah writ as a Great Prelate has lately made out with Incomparable Learning and Clearness e Letter to Dr. Sherlock about a passage in Josephus c. 2. Because Malachi the Prophet that lived much about the same time seems to Seal up the Vision and Prophecy among the Jews by referring them to the Law of Moses as their standing Instructor till the Gospel should be revealed and pointing out to Elias the Forerunner of the Messiah as the next great Prophet that was to be reveal'd f Mal. 4.4 5. And indeed his Prophecy looks as if it were design'd to Connect the Old and New Testament together by putting a period to the Old Testament Revelation and directing men to the New for further Instruction This Argument will appear more probable if we consider 3ly That under the Maccabees the Jews look'd upon the Gift of Prophecy as wholly ceased and were of Opinion it had been so for a considerable time g See 1 Macc. 4 46.-9.27.-14.41 The same Opinion is confirm'd not long after by the Author of Ecclesiasticus h Ecclus. 36.14 15 16. 4. If we suppose the LXX Interpreters Translated all the Old Testament which is an Opinion that Learned men i Walton Prolegom 9. in Bibl. Polygl n. 11. Vales. in Eus H.E. l. 5. c. 8. have brought good Reasons for then 't is plain the Canon must have been settled before the time when that Version was made which was done under Ptolomee Philadelphus and as 't is very probable at the Beginning of his Reign k
Vales. ibid. 5. However that be yet 't is certain that when the Book of Ecclesiasticus was writ the Canon of the Old Testament was settled for he makes mention of the Twelve Prophets altogether l Ecclus. 49.10 which is an Argument that the Smaller Prophets were then Collected and Compil'd into one Book which Book was afterward call'd the Book of the Prophets m See Act. 7.42 Justin M. c. Tryph. p. 45.50.57 Ed. Steph. Cyprian Epist 59. Ed. Oxon. Nay further the Author of the Prologue to that Book speaks of the Law Prophets and other Books of Scripture as then Translated into Greek which is an Undeniable Argument that the Canon was then Completed And tho we suppose that Prologue to be made by the Grandchild of the principal Author Jesus the son of Syrach which Younger Syracides lived in the time of Euergetes II. commonly called Ptolomee Physcon yet it appears by the Beginning of that Prologue that his Grandfather studied the same Holy Books which he afterwards says were turn'd into Greek And this Elder Siracides speaks of Simon the son of Onias the High Priest as one whom he very well remembred n c. 50. 1 c. now that Simon was High Priest in the Beginning of Philopator's Reign o See 3 Macc. 2.1 com with c. 1.1 who was next in Succession but one to Philadelphus So that the Canon of Scripture will appear to be as old as Philadelphus's time because 't is evident from hence that 't was Translated all into Greek in a little time after tho we should not suppose the whole work performed by the LXX Lastly to these Considerations we may add the Concurring Testimony of all the Ancient Writers both Jewish and Christian who agree in supposing the Canon of the Old Testament to have been Compil'd in or about Ezra's time and who probably had the Authority of some Ancient Writers for what they say which now are lost And if these Considerations taken all together have any Force in them to prove the Canon of the Old Testament to have been settled in Ezra's time or in the next Age I say if it were settled so early this very thing will add great Weight to its Authority For 1. 't is agreed on all hands that Ezra who calls himself a Ready Scribe in the Law of Moses p Ezr 7.6 Revis'd the Holy Writings Retriev'd them from the Corruptions which the Scarcity of Copies and the Disuse of the Hebrew Language during the Captity had brought into them supplied and completed many of them and put them into Order and Method And when a man of so great Authority as Ezra was had done all this so lately it cannot be imagin'd but that the Compilers of the Canon must have had a particular Regard to his Judgment and admitted no Books into their Collection but what were allow'd of by Ezra or if they were of Later date than his time the Writing of them must have been within the Memory of these Compilers so that they were proper Judges whether a Book deserv'd to be esteem'd Sacred or not So that from hence 't will follow that the Authority of the main Body of the Canon bottoms upon the Judgment and Authority of Ezra whom if we should grant to have been no Prophet yet we canot think but in a matter of such Moment as the Revising and putting in order the Holy Writings he would not only use the best Skill he had himself but likewise consult with Haggai Zechary or Malachi the last of which must needs have been alive in his time and possibly the other Two also and do nothing without their Advice For we find that at the first Return from the Captivity in a matter of much less moment viz. where some that pretended to the Priesthood could not prove their Pedigree the Governour would determine nothing but left the matter undecided till a Priest should arise who had Vrim and Thummim q Ezr. 2.62 63. And if any such Priest did arise afterward as if we believe Josephus there did for he tell us that that Oracle ceas'd but 200. years before his time r Antiq. Jud. l. 3. c. 9. p. 90. C. Ed. Gen. 't is very probable that the Judgment of the Canonical Books was left to him to determine which were such as the Learned Mr. Dodwell has made appear in the Appendix Å¿ Sect. 9. to his Lectures now in the Press 2. This Early date of the Canon of the Old Testament quite destroys that Fancy of our Authors x Fr. p. 279. Eng p. 106. that the Jews put together all the Fragments that remain'd of their Ancient Books so that the Canon of Scripture was their whole Library For in the First place 't is plain that the Chronicles are Extracts out of larger Records which they often Refer to and yet these Books were Compil'd after the Captivity as appears by several passages y 1 Chr. 3.17 〈…〉 c. in them and 't is not likely that the Originals which escaped the Destruction of Records occasion'd by the Ruine of the Commonwealth and the Captivity which ensu'd should be lost in so little a time as was between the Compiling the Chronicles and making the Canon Especially since Josephus z L. 1. c. App. p. 136. D. tells us that the Genealogies of the High-Priests and their Succession for above Two Thousand years past were preserved in the Publick Records and remain'd to his own time Again several Books which never were in the Canon were Extant when the New Testament was writ and are Cited there as Writings of Credit and Antiquity such as are the Prophecy of Enoch and the Assumption of Moses both referr'd to by St. Jude a Jude 〈◊〉 and 14. as also several other Ancient Books from whence both Christ and his Apostles take many Passages concerning Historical Matters which are not Extant in the Canonical Writers b â—ee Matth. 23 3â— Luk. 4.25 Jam. 5.17 Act. 7.22 52. Heb. 11 37.-12.21 2 Tim. 3.8 V. Orig. Epist and African And 't was from such Ancient Writings probably that Josephus took some Stories which he relates of Moses c Antiq. l. 2. c. 5. and of other Persons Besides we find Apocryphals quoted by Barnabas in every Page of his Epistle almost by Clemens Alexandrinus and other Ancient Writers in several places many of which 't is likely were Written Originally in Hebrew since by the Matters they Treat of we may reasonably judge them to be as old as the Collection of the Canon and were certainly lookt upon as Books of great Antiquity or else they would not have been Cited by these Authors under the Venerable name of Scripture From all which it appears that the Compilers of the Canon did not take in Promiscuously whatever Hebrew Writings they could find but used all possible diligence to distinguish Sacred Writings and such as were design'd by God for the Use of the Church from those
whether those words of this Paraphrase As is a great part of the Old Testament be not added meerly to serve the present Turn without the least Intimation of such a Restriction from the Text it self and whether the Coherence of these two Verses be not plainly this Continue in the Study of the Old Testament because all the Books which that consists of are Divinely Inspir'd But I supposes he grounds this Interpretation of his upon that Reading of the Text for which Grotius f In locum contr Rivetum vouches the Syriack and Vulgar Translations Omms Scriptura Divinitùs Inspirata utilis est But if we should admit of this Reading still the Sense will come all to one and the Words as they lie then tho they do not in Express terms assert that all the Old Testament Writings are Divinely Inspir'd yet they Imply it and take it for granted For if we read the Greek thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will be an Explicative Epithet to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 just as if we add the Epithet Rationalis to Homo in such a Proposition as this Homo Rationalis creatus est ad colendum Deum In which Proposition tho it be not expresly asserted that Homo is Rationalis yet so much is Implied and if it were not true 't would make the whole Proposition false as Monsieur Nicol has observed in his Ars Cogitandi g Pars 2. c. 5. And just so in the Proposition we speak of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies the Scriptures of the Old Testament in which sense the word is always taken in the New Testament and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is added for a fuller Explication of that term I know Grotius h Votum pro Pace prout citatur Fr. p. 270. Fn. p. 193. will needs have the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taken here in its General Sense and signify simply a Book or Writing But I can't forbear saying that this gloss is Unworthy of Grotius and 't is a sign of a Bad Cause when so Great a Man is fain to betake himself to such Pitiful Sophistry as is to be seen in the fore-cited Place For he can't produce one Instance in all the New Testament where the word is used in that Sense and if he could yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 added to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sufficiently Restrains the General sense of it and makes one Complex Term which must signify the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Verse before both which Expressions signify the Old Testament because 't is a Collection of Inspir'd Writings and consequently the Phrase it self asserts so much by way of Implication or else it would be an Improper Expression I think it appears from what has been said what was the Judgement of Christ and his Apostles concerning the Canon of the Old Testament and since 't is certain that they approved the Canon of the Old Testament as it was received by the Jewish Church of their own time I can't guess what evidence of Reason can be sufficient to perswade a Christian to Oppose such an Authority And therefore I can't be of our Author's mind when he tell us i Eng. p. 188. Fr. p. 267. He knows not why we may not doubt of the Books of the Old Testament as well as of some of the New the Authority of several of the Latter having been question'd But there is a visible Difference between the Authorities that confirm the Old Testament Canon and those which give Testimony to the New To the Former Christ and his Apostles bear Witness whereas the Credit of the Latter depends upon the Consent and Testimony of much the Greater part of the Church in the Ages succeeding that of the Apostles which tho it be sufficient for any Wise and Unprejudic'd Man to ground his assent upon yet it hath not that Sacredness and Infallibility in it which the other hath For those Ages made use only of Humane Means for settling the New Testament Canon which was sufficient for that purpose considering the Nearness of those times to the Writing of the Books to which they give Testimony Nor does the name of Chetubim which the Jews give to those Writings of the Old Testament which Mr. N. calls in question at all justify his Opinion He fancies k Fr. p. 276. En. p. 102. they were call'd Chetubim i. e. Simply Writings as he Interprets it to signify that they were like other Humane Writings and had nothing at all of Inspiration in them But the Jewish Writers say not one Syllable to confirm this Opinion that I can find On the contrary by their placing Daniel among the Chetubim it appears that they look upon the Writers of that Class to have been Inspir'd for the Jews all agree that Daniel had really the Gift of Prophecy tho they fancy it to be in a lower Degree Further Maimonides saith expresly l More Nevoch p. 2. c. 45. that they are called Chetubim quia scripta sunt per Spiritum Sanctum And tho he reckons that Impulse which he calls Spiritus Sanctus inferiour to the Degree of Inspiration which Isaiah and the other Prophets properly so call'd had yet 't is plain that he looks upon it as a proper kind of Inspiration for the instances he gives of it are by his own Confession real Inspirations m See Mr. Smiths Discourse of Prophecy c. 7. So that I do not see how Maimonides take his Explication altogether gives any Advantage to this Opinion tho Grotius n Votum pro pace prout citatur Fr. p. 231. Eng. p. 141. quote him for it The Jews do indeed acknowledge a Difference between the Inspiration of the Hagiographa and the Prophetical Writings but this doth not prove them to be no part of the Scripture for I think there is no body that considers the manner of the Spirit 's Operation upon the Minds of Inspir'd Persons but will readily acknowledge that there 's no need of the same Degree of Inspiration to write a History or a Book of Morality as is requisite to make a Prophet But concerning the different Degrees of Inspiration I have discours'd already in several places of this Treatise and shall have Occasion to speak of it hereafter But if the Jewish Division of the Old Testament favour'd Mr. N's Opinion never so much I do not see any Force at all in the Argument taken from thence for that Division is not of so early a Date as to be able to vye with the much Ancienter Opinion concerning the Inspiration of the whole Jewish Canon St. Jerom is the first that I find takes notice of this Division o Prolog Galeat Praef. in Daniel the placing the Prophet Daniel among the Chetubim in this Division besides that there is no shadow of Reason for it except it be that the Jews bear him a Spight for Prophecying so plainly of our Saviour discovers that
't is of no long standing since 't is contrary to the Sense of the Ancient Jews For Josephus often calls Daniel a Prophet p Antiq. l. 10. c. 12. nay one of the greatest q Ib. p. 353. G. Ed. Genev Prophets And agreeably to the Received Opinion our Saviour gives him the same Title r Matth. 24.15 But further the same Josephus Å¿ L. 1. c. App. p. 1036. G. makes use of another Division of the Old Testament Writings viz. into the Books of Moses the Prophetical under which he comprehends the Historical because they were writ by Prophets as he with very good Reason supposes and the Poetical Books as they are commonly call'd or those which contain Hymns to God and Precepts of good Life Which Division agrees much better with that mention'd by our Saviour t Luke 24.44 viz. into the Books of Moses the Prophets and the Psalms than the other which the Jews have since that time Invented Thus far I have shew'd that Mr. N. by rejecting some of the Receiv'd Books of the Jewish Canon rejects the Authority of the whole Jewish and Christian Church nay and of Christ and his Apostles too What Reasons he has for this we shall see by and by but at present let us examine what Authority he has to oppose to such a Powerful one as all these join'd together amount to And I can find no body that stands by him in this Opinion but Grotius and him he calls in to his Assistance at every Turn But tho I have a great value for Grotius's Judgment yet I think if it be laid in the Balance to counterpoise that of Christ and his Apostles 't will be found too Light That Great man's Extraordinary Learning and Merits and particularly his having so well deserv'd of several Parts of Scripture and given such Light into their true Sense and Design makes me willing to pass over his Failures and not be severe upon his Memory for those False Glosses and some of them deserve a Harder Name which he has made upon other Books of it Only I can't but observe that this Opinion of his concerning the Old Testament Canon is very Inconsistent with the Main Design of his Votum pro Pace and those other Treatises where he has asserted it For the Great Design of those Projects for Peace is to magnify Antiquity Tradition and the Authority of the Church and to shew that Catholick Unity is never to be restor'd but by submitting all Controversies to the Decision of these three as so many Arbitrators or Umpires between the different Parties And yet at the same time when he Pleads for the Authority of the Church of Antiquity and Tradition he Rejects those Books which have all the Authority that the Universal Church Uninterrupted Tradition and the Consent of all the Ancients both Jews and Christians can give them II. I come now in the Second Place to consider the Exceptions which our Author makes against Particular Books of the Old Testament and the Books he Excepts against are either Historical or those they commonly call Poetical As to the Historical Writings I agree with him thus far that the Sacred Historians were not usually Inspir'd with the things themselves which they relate nor with the Words by which they Express the things But I think I have prov'd in the First Chapter u P. 37. of this Treatise that a Book may be written by God's Direction and yet not without the Use of Humane means And as there is no Reason to think that God Inspir'd the Evangelists with the Knowledge of those Passages of our Saviour's Life which they themselves were Eye-witnesses of or might easily learn from those that were so so 't is every whit as groundless to suppose that God Reveal'd those Particulars to the Writers of the Old Testament History which they could come to the Knowledge of by Consulting the Records and Ancient Monuments in which these Matters were related But notwithstanding this 't will appear that these Books were writ by God's Direction and Design'd by him for the Use of the Church if we consider what Mr. N. himself grants x Fr. p. 231. En. p. 28. That they were not writ meerly to satisfy our Curiosity but to be a standing proof of a Providence to after Ages to shew us the Care that God always takes of Good People and the Punishments he inflicts upon the Wicked to give us Examples of Piety and Vertue and lastly to inform us of several Matters of Fact which tend very much to confirm our Faith as containing many Types and Predictions of our Saviour To which we may add that setting aside the Squabbles between F. Simon and his Adversaries about the Scribes and Keepers of the Publick Registers of the Jews 't is highly probable that the Prophets usually writ the Histories of their Kings and those Books which are so often quoted under the name of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah and Israel and were Annals from whence the Substance of the Books of Kings and Chronicles are taken For we find a Considerable part of the History of Hezekiah Incorporated into Isaiah's Prophecy a Is c. 36 37 38 39. which is a Strong Presumption that the whole History of that King's Reign was Recorded by the same Hand And indeed so much is expresly asserted 2 Chron. 32.32 So the Acts of David were Recorded by Samuel the Seer by Nathan the Prophet and by Gad the Seer b 1 Chr. 29.29 The Acts of Solomon were written in the Book of Nathan the Prophet in the Prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite and in the Visions of Iddo the Seer c 2 Chr. 9.29 The History of Rehoboam's Reign was written by Shemaiah the Prophet and by Iddo the Seer in his Genealogies d 2 Chr. 12.15 the last of these Recorded likewise the Acts of Abijah Rehoboam's Son e Chap. 13.22 Jehu the Son of Hanani who was a Prophet f 1 King 16.1 2 Chron. 19.2 writ the History of Jehoshaphat g 2 Chr. 20.34 The Acts of Vzziah were Recorded by the Prophet Isaiah h Ch. 26.22 and those of Manasses among the sayings of the Seers i Ch. 33.19 To the same purpose I think we may most probably Interpret those words of Josephus k Joseph c. Appion l. 1. p. 1036. Ed. Genev. which have been so often quoted of late upon this Subject where he tells us that the Histories of the Jewish Nation were writ only by Prophets and therefore they look upon none of them as Authentick which were writ after Artaxerxe's time because there was no Clear and Vndoubted Succession of Prophets in the following Ages Nor is Huetius's Objection l Demon. Evangel p. 161. against this Passage of Josephus of any Weight who affirms that Josephus Contradicts what he had said but just before viz. That the Chief Priests as well as the Prophets had the Care of Writing the Publick
Histories committed to them But that Learned Man seems not to have attended to the whole Scope and Design of Josephus in that place For that Historian does not say that the Writing of the Publick Histories was committed to the Chief Priests as well as the Prophets but that the Care of the Publick Records was committed to them * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And if we take an Intire view of that Section we shall find that Josephus speaks not only of the manner how the Histories of Former times were written but likewise how they were Preserved after they are writ The Care of writing them was committed to the Prophets as the other Passage assures us not Excluding those Priests who had the Gift of Prophecy the Preserving them he here tells us was particularly the Business of the Priests who likewise exactly Preserved the Genealogies of their Nation and renewed them when the Copies were Impair'd and in danger to be all lost by Wars and other Accidents and therefore were lookt upon as the Keepers of the Publick Records Whence is it that the same Author usually calls the Holy Writings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 m Antiq. p. 73. G. p. 140. A. p. 176. G. The Books laid up in the Temple under the Custody of the Priests Which was agreeable to the Customs of the Neighbouring Countries for so Philo Byblius n Ap. Euseb Praep. Evang. l. 1 says of Sanchuniathon that he Collected the Phenician Antiquities 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 out of the Records laid up in their Temples But to return to our Subject From those many Instances I have given which shew 't was a Custom among the Jews for the Prophets to be their Historians we may conclude that the Historical Books of the Old Testament were writ by Men who had the Gift of Prophecy and Inspiration and tho we suppose them to be but Abridgements of the larger Commentaries of the Prophets yet they are really of as much Authority as those very Annals would be which were writ by the Prophets themselves if they were extant For if an Epitome be faithfully made and I suppose Mr. N. does not question the Fidelity of the Sacred Historians whatever is contained in it hath the same Authority and Credibility with the Original Writing So that if we lay all these things together the Character of the Compilers of these Historical Books the Matter and Design of them the Authority of the Jewish Canon and above all that of Christ and his Apostles these are sufficient Inducements to believe these Books to be Written by God's Direction for the Benefit of the Church And this I think is enough to give Divine Authority to an Historical Book tho neither the Matter nor Words of it be indited by Inspiration As for the History of Esther Mr. N. has taken much pains o Fr. p. 164 c. Eng. p. 249. and shewed a great deal of Skill in the Rules of Dramatick Poesy and all to prove that this Book looks like a Fiction and a piece of Tragi-Comedy He indeed tells us that he affirms nothing in this matter and does not intend to make himself a Party in the Dispute But a man would hardly take so much pains to make anothers Opinion look probable if he did not think it so himself But whatever his own Sentiments be to shew himself Impartial and that he is resolv'd not to conceal any thing that may be said on the other side he Critically remarks p Eng. p. 169. Fr. p. 252. that one Condition necessary to be observ'd in Dramatick Writings is wanting viz. Vnity of Time and Place which must needs seem a considerable Objection to so nice a Judge But besides this there 's another Objection which I confess has more Weight with me and seems quite to turn the Scales and make his Remarks appear meer Fancy and Fiction viz. that the Feast of Purim was really observed by the Jews in memory of the Deliverance recorded in this Book And 't will be a hard matter to make me believe that a whole Nation should keep an Anniversary Feast as 't is certain they did q 2 Macâ— 15.36 without some real Ground for it And if this was not the true Occasion of it as he seems to insinuate r Eng. p 170. Fr. p. 253. I desire either he would prove the Feast to be as very a Fiction as he supposes the History is or else inform us how the whole Nation of the Jews came to be so far impos'd upon as to observe it for till he does one of these two things I shall still be of opinion that the one was a Real Feast and the other a True History But tho this Play does not succeed he is resolved not to give over but try his Skill upon another Subject and turn the Book of Job into a Tragi-Comedy Å¿ Fr. p. â—â—4 Eng. p. 99. And I confess this Book is made according to the Rules of Poetry and with all the Beauties of it too as an Ordinary Reader may easily discover under all the Disadvantages of a Translation And therefore methinks our Author who understands the Rules and Decorums of Poetry so well should not be offended with those Pathetic Strains that are in the third Chapter and some other places of that Book for tho we should grant that they would not become a grave Philosophical Discourse yet I believe he might have found several Speeches in the Old Tragedies written with as much Vehemence and Warmth And yet the severest Philosophers commended those Writings and look'd upon them as containing very useful Instructions of Life And I see no Reason why God might not in this as well as other things suffer the Holy Writers to comply so far with their own Genius and the Humour which then prevail'd among the grave Sages of the World as to deliver Great and Weighty Truths in Poetical numbers and Expressions both to recommend them to the more Curious and Nice Readers and to convince the Wise men of the World who are apt to despise the Plainness of the Scriptures that there are to be found as Elevated Thoughts and as Noble Expressions in the Holy Writings as any Greece or Rome can boast of and therefore when they use a plain popular Style 't is not out of Necessity but Choice and because they rather aim at the Instruction of the ignorant than to gain Applause from the Learned t V. Orig. c. Cels p. 275 371 372. Ed. Cant. But still men perhaps will be ready to say that these Expressions may do well in a Profane Poem but are not so proper for a Sacred one and do not become the mouth of a Person eminent for Piety and Patience In answer to which I would desire the Objectors in the first place to consider that the Substance of the 3d Chapter of this Book which so much offends Mr. N. u Fr. p. 275. Eng. p. 100 when 't is taken in
Reason to believe that either Job or his Friends spoke every thing which they say by Inspiration As to the Latter the Case is plain for God himself says that they had not spoken of him the thing that is right l Job 42.8 And even Job himself tho he maintain'd the Right side in the Controversy yet now and then is guilty of too vehement Expostulations m c. 7.11 c. 10.2 with God Almighty he stands too much upon his own Justification n c. 9 17.-10.7.-16.17.-13.23 See c. 33.9 10 11 -34.5 6. and Vindication of his Innocency and takes upon him to Censure the Methods of Providence too freely o c. 9.22 23 -19.7.-23.13 for which Faults we find afterwards he earnestly begs God's Pardon and p c. 42.3 c. Repents of them in Dust and Ashes I willingly acknowledge what the Jews themselves allow q See Bp. Patrick's Appendix to his Paraphrase tho they are very Jealous of giving this Honour to any that are not of their own Nation that Job and his Friends were Prophets among the Gentiles And indeed there 's reason to grant this for we find Eliphaz himself professes that he had a Night-vision r Job 4.13 which was not altogether Å¿ See c. 33.15 16. unusual in those days But Job had the Gift of Prophecy in a more Eminent manner as appears not only from that Famous Passage of his t Job 19.25 26 27 I know that my Redeemer lives c. which St. Jerom u In locum justly calls a Prophecy of the Resurrection but also because God spake x Job 31.8 to him by a Voice from Heaven and 't is probable he saw a Shekinah y c. 42.5 or Visible Appearance of the Divine Glory But allowing all this I see no proof that the Discourses set down in this Book ought to be lookt upon as spoken by the Spirit of Prophecy and therefore the Inspiration of the Book it self seems to me to consist in this viz. As 't is an Historical account of Job's Behaviour before and under his Afflictions and of his happy Issue out of them all together with his reflections and the discourses he had with his Friends upon that Occasion written by God's Direction for the Use of his Church to be an Example of Patience under Sufferings and a Vindication of God's Providence in permitting the Righteous to be Afflicted And since by Reason of the Antiquity of the Book the Author is not certainly known and Consequently we cannot Argue that 't is Inspired from the Character of its Author the Evidence for its being Inspired or Written by God's Direction for the Use of the Church must be Resolved into the Authority of the Jewish Canon as that is confirmed to us by Christ and his Apostles and this Book particularly Recommended by St. James z James 5.11 to the Use of Christians especially since the Design of it does exactly Answer the Character which St. Paul a Rom. 15.4 gives of the Old Testament Writings in General viz. That they were written for our Instruction that we thro Patience and Comfort of the Scriptures might have Hope And thus much I think may suffice in Answer to Mr. N's Objections against the Book of Job I shall only add that besides the Powerful Comforts this Book affords to the Afflicted and the submission it teaches us to yield to God's Will and to Adore the Unsearchableness of his Judgements which are the principal and obvious Designs of this Book 't is likewise of excellent Use upon another account viz. as it gives us a True Idea of Natural Religion b See c. 31. when it was in its Prime and as it was practis'd in those early Ages before the Tradition of the Creation was lost or the World quite overrun with Idolatry I proceed in the next place to consider what our Author alledges against the Book of Psalms His Opinion concerning these in general is b Fr. p. 230. Eng. p. 27. That there was no need of Inspiration but only of Piety and Zeal for the composing them and he further says That any Devout man may easily now-a-days praise God in that manner But all the Pious men that ever were in the Christian Church have been of another mind and never look'd upon their own Composures as Equal to the Psalms whereas if the Authors of the Psalms were assisted only with an Ordinary Degree of Piety and Devotion I can not see why the members of the Christian Church should not think themselves as well qualified to make Hymns to God as any of the Jewish that were no more than Pious and Devout men But saith Mr. N. c Ubi sup Fr. p. 277. Eng. p. 104. David never saith Thus saith the Lord as the Prophets who speak by God's Authority use to do Now tho it be false that David never uses this Expression for in several places he uses those very Words or such as are Equivalent d 1 Sam. 23.2 Psal 2.7.110.1 yet if 't were true I do not see what Service 't would do Mr. N. unless he can prove that Praising God by Inspiration is the same as Delivering a Message from him and Instructing the people in his Name which is the only proper occasion to usher in what is said with Thus saith the Lord e see Mr. Smith of Prophecy c. 7. Sure Mr. N. thinks that because we grant Prophecy to be the Highest Degree of Inspiration therefore there can be really no other sort But I am much mistaken if St. Paul was not of another mind when he said with Relation to the Diversity of Spiritual Gifts Are all Apostles are all Prophets f 1 Cor. 12.29 And If the foot shall say because I am not the hand I am not of the body is it therefore not of the body g Ib. v. 15. And we may easily apply the Apostles Reasoning to our present Case on this manner If Mr. N. shall say Because Composing of Psalms and Hymns is not Prophecying nor bringing a Message from God 't is not Inspiration is it therefore not Inspiration On the contrary 't is plain that the Holy Writers look'd upon Praising God by Spiritual Songs when 't was perform'd by Gifted Persons as a Real and Distinct sort of Inspiration and therefore call'd it Prophesying h 1 Sam. 10.5 1 Chr. 25.1 1 Cor. 11.5 Exod. 15.20 See Mr. Smith of Prophecy ch 7. and 8 And Dr. Hammond up on St. Luke 1.67 as that word is taken in a large Sense for Inspiration in General And methinks without Descanting so Nicely upon the several Degrees of Divine Inspiration and Weighing God's Gifts in a Balance to try it they can be found Wanting as our Author does this might be sufficient to convince Men that God Design'd the Book of Psalms for the Perpetual Use of the Church viz. That the Psalms have been one of the most considerable parts of
and Magistrates to the meanest of their Subjects And 't is meer Cavilling in this Author to say d Ubi supr That the Directions about Good Husbandry and House-keeping Country People know without Inspiration as if it were below the Wisdom of an Inspired Teacher to admonish the meanest of their Duty as certainly 't is every Man's to be Diligent in his Calling and incourage them to attend upon it e See Tit. 3.14 where the Apostle gives the same sort of Advice or as if People had not need to be put in mind of their Duty altho they knew it before As little weight is there in what he saith f Ubi sup concerning the Caution which this Book so often gives Men against Suretiship or being bound for others as if it amounted to a total forbidding Men the Exercise of this sort of Charity I grant him this may be in some Cases a very good Act of Charity but if we consider it as 't is generally practis'd and Proverbial Sayings are to be understood only to hold true in Most cases we shall find such ill Effects of it that 't is not only Wise but Religious Advice to warn men against it Experience tells us that men are often bound for more than they are able to pay which is the very Case Solomon speaks of g Prov. 22.26 27. in some of those places Mr. N. refers to and so injure the Creditor as well as undo themselves and intail Misery upon their Families which a man is bound in Justice as well as Charity to provide for in the first place And Suretiship when it brings men to Beggary at the same time exposes them to those dangerous Temptations to sin which always accompany extreme Want Upon these accounts Suretiship is oftner the occasion of a great deal of Injustice and other Wickedness than the Exercise of Charity And since these are the usual Consequences of it 't is very good Advice to warn men against it and as proper for this Book as any whatsoever since the Rules of it as I observ'd just now are design'd only for Wise Observations grounded upon Experience which are generally True but are not to be taken so strictly and rigorously as if they never fail'd in any one Instance h v. Grot. in Matth. 12.30 As to what Mr. N. objects i Ubi supra against the Collection of Proverbs ascribed to Agur k Prov. 30. if I should grant him that they have nothing of Inspiration in them I do not see how it prejudices the Authority of Solomon's Proverbs at all For Solomon's Character will go a great way to Intitle his Proverbs to Inspiration whereas these are the Sayings of an Unknown Author who does not pretend to have been bred up in the Schools of the Prophets l See Bp. Patrick's Paraph. upon Pro. 30.3 which were look'd upon as the Nurseries of Inspir'd Writers I know some Learned Men fancy both this and the 31st Chapter to be Sayings of Solomon as well as the foregoing but as they bring no Proof for what they say so 't is altogether unaccountable why Solomon should disgiuse himself under two such different Names neither of which have the least Affinity with his own Now supposing the two last Chapters of the Proverbs to have been writ by Uncertain Authors and added to Solomon's by some Private hand and afterward to have been continued by those that Copied the Holy Writings as we see Additions have been made to Daniel and Esther in the Greek Bibles and as 't is probable the Hellenists join'd these and the other Apocryphal Writings with the Canonical as early as our Saviour's time upon this Hypothesis Mr. N.'s Objections against this part of the Proverbs fall short of the Mark and do not prejudice the Authority of Solomon's Proverbs at all And this Supposition I think has nothing of Absurdity in it nor can any Consequences be drawn from hence to weaken the Authority of the Jewish Canon For if we should suppose these two Chapters to be Apocryphal it will neither follow that we cannot tell what is Canonical and what not nor that there may have been Additions made to Books which are all of a piece and go all under one and the same Author's name We can conclude nothing from hence but this that wherever we find a Writing bearing the name of an Unknown Author added to a Book whose Author is known without any necessary Dependance upon or Connexion with the Book that goes before or that comes after in such a Case only 't will follow from this Hypothesis that we have no Reason to think both those Writings to be of an Equal Authority And since this is the only Instance that can be given in all the Old Testament of a small Writing made an Appendix to a greater meerly because of the Affinity of the Subject whatever Hypothesis we admit concerning these Two Chapters it can be no Prejudice to any other part of the Old Testament Canon because there 's no Instance can be given of a like nature But whatever I have said upon this Point I propose only by way of Supposition and meerly out of a Design to shew that whatever Objections Mr. N. thinks he can make against these Additions to the Proverbs they do not at all diminish the Authority of Solomon's Writings For indeed the Authority of the Jewish Canon weighs so much with me and the Jews seem to have been so scrupulous of admitting any Writing into their Canon without due Examining whether it deserv'd to be receiv'd into it or not that I must confess I cannot easily bring my self to think there are any Apocryphals among the Hebrew Writings of the Old Testament As for the Greek Writings and Translations we know that the Hellenists were much more Easie and Remiss as to this matter and allowed great Liberty to Transcribers and Commentators to make such Additions to the Text which in their Opinion did tend to Illustrate it But the Jews being Scrupulous of Adding to or Diminishing from the Text even to Superstition I think it Unjust to conclude that any part of their Canon is of doubtful Authority from one single Instance which some may fancy looks suspicious And therefore taking this Prophecy or Collection a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Agur's to have the same External Authority with the rest of the Jewish Canon I cannot see that the Internal Matter of it affords any Reason to the Contrary For there are many wise Observations and a great deal of good Advice contain'd in it and his Prayer to God for a Competency b Prov 3. ◠8 9. is a very Excellent one and is so much the more to be valued because all the Heathen Philosophers were puzzl'd how to advise others about the matter of their Prayers c See Platon Alcibiad 2. Juvenal Sat. 10. what Blessings 't was proper to ask of God and the Vulgar put up very Absurd and
Writer that I know as our Author himself observes e Ubi sup so that as he truly adds A man must fetch all out of his own Stock that intends to Answer him However if this Discourse do not prove satisfactory I hope 't will be the occasion of Engaging some Abler Pen in this Cause and if that be the only Good it does it will not be altogether Vnserviceable In the last place I must desire of those who think I have not carried the Inspiration of the Scriptures so high as I ought not to be Angry with me or uncharitably Censure me as if I design'd to Betray the Cause which I pretend to maintain but if they are not satisfied with my Performance to Vndertake the Argument themselves and do Justice to so Good a Causa I assure them I shall heartily wish them Success in their Vndertaking and shall be glad if my Arguments appear weak because theirs are stronger for I can do nothing against the Truth but for the Truth The Contents CHAP I. General Considerations concerning the Inspiration of the writings of the New-Testament THe Method of the whole Treatise proposed Pag. 1 The Proof of the Inspiration of the New-Testament Writings contain'd in Six Propositions p. 3 I. Proposition God design'd to provide a means for Preserving the Doctrine of Christianity to the End of the World p. 5 II. Prop. The best means of preserving Christianity in an Ordinary way was by conveying the Doctrine of it to after Ages by Writing p. 6 III. Prop. 'T is reasonable to think that God would deliver the Christian Doctrine in Writing because he used the same means formerly for the Instruction of the Jewish Church p. 10 The Reasons which enduced St. Matthew and St. Mark to write their Gospels as they are related by the Ancient Church-Writers p. 12 IV. Prop. God has actually made use of no other way for the Conveying the Doctrine of Christianity but the Writings of the New Testament p. 13 V. Prop. The Apostles themselves design'd their Writings for the Perpetual Use of the Church and lookt upon them to be of equal Authority with the Divine Writings of the Old Testament p. 15 The Reasons which moved St. Luke and St. John to write their Gospels p. 16 The Apostolical Epistles were design'd for General Use tho many of them writ upon Particular Occasions p. 17 Reflections upon the Style and way of writing used by St. Paul p. 18 Concerning the General Epistles p. 21 VI. Prop. The Age immediately following that of the Apostles lookt upon their Writings as the Standing Rule of Christian Faith p. 22 Reflections upon a Passage in Mr. Hobs's Leviathan concerning the Date of the New Testament Canon p. 26 An Answer to Mr. N.'s Objection That some Books are received into the New Testament Canon whose Authors are not known p. 28 Four Corollaries or Inferences drawn from the whole 1 Inference That the Holy Ghost Assisted the Apostles as fully when they Writ as when they Preach'd p. 29 2 Inference The Holy Ghost in several Cases Dictated to the Apostles the Words and Style they should Use and in all Cases preserved them from using such Expressions as would naturally lead men into Error p. 31 What Cautions are to be observed in Interpreting the Style of the Apostles and arguing from the Terms they use p. 35 3 Inference Since the Writing of the New Testament is owing to God's Providence and Care of his Church the Composing the several parts of it does not exclude the Use of Natural Means no more than other Acts of Providence do p. 37 4 Inference 'T is no Argument against a Book 's being design'd by God for the Perpetual Use of the Church that 't was at first Written upon a particular Exigency and with respect to the Circumstances which were peculiar to that time p. 40 CHAP. II. A More Particular Enquiry into the Nature of the Apostolical Gifts and Inspiration p. 42 The General Heads treated of in this Chapter p. 44 In what Cases the Apostles deliver'd their Judgements as Men and did not speak by Inspiration Three Instances of this Nature propos'd p. 45 1 Cor. 7.12 at large Explain'd p. 46 To grant that the Apostles spoke some things without Inspiration does not prejudice their Authority as to others p. 53 In all other Cases beside those before Excepted the Apostles Preach'd and Writ by the particular Direction and Assistance of the Spirit p. 55 The Scripture Notion of an Apostle p. 57 1 Cor. 2.10 c. and 1 Thes 4.8 considered p. 58 The Assistance which the Spirit gave the Apostles did not consist only in bringing to their remembrance what Christ had said to them p. 62 This proved 1. From those Discourses of our Saviour's concerning the Kingdom of Heaven where he represents it as a Temporal State in Complyance with the prejudices of his Disciples p. 63 2 From his Parables concerning the Future State of the Gospel p. 65 3 From the Gift which the Apostles had of Explaining the Types and Prophecies of the Old Testament p. 68 The Apostles had an Extraordinary Assistance when they were summon'd to appear before Magistrates upon the account of their Religion p. 73 S. Matt. 10.20 Vindicated from the Gloss of Mr. N. p. 74 Several Instances given of his and other Modern Writers Arts to Evade the true force of Scripture Expressions Ibid. Mr. N.'s Unsincerity in passing by the plain Instances which are in Scripture of the Boldness and Courage of the Apostles p. 78 St. Paul's Behaviour before the Council Acts 23. Clear'd from Mr. N.'s Aspersions p. 80 St. Stephen's Behaviour Acts 7. Vindicated p. 84 Mr. N.'s Objections against the Inspiration of the Apostles particularly Answer'd 1 Objection That the Apostles Disputed and Conferr'd with each other Answer'd p. 88 2 Objection That St. Peter after the Descent of the Holy Ghost had need of a Vision to instruct him Answer'd p 95 3 Objection That St. Paul and St. Barnabas were forc'd to go to Jerusalem to have that Controversy decided Whether the Gentile Converts were bound to observe the Law Answer'd p. 97 4 Objection St. Peter's Dissimulation at Antioch Answer'd p. 104 5 Objection That the Spirit of Prophecy mention'd in the New Testament was only a Disposition of Mind which made men fit to Instruct Answer'd p. 104 1 Tim. 4.13 14. Clear'd p. 106 Why St. Paul gave Directions to the Prophets and Inspir'd Persons at Corinth p. 110 A brief Answer to some Lesser Cavils p. 112 CHAP. III. Concerning the Inspiration of the Prophets p. 115 The Personal Qualifications of the Prophets consider'd both as to their Intellectual Accomplishments p. 116 and their Moral Ones p. 121 The Original design of God's sending Prophets to the Jews was to hinder them from having recourse to Heathen Oracles and Divinations p. 126 The Prophetical Office design'd for Greater Purposes p. 129 1 To admonish the People of their Duty p. 130 2 To keep up a sense of
Gospels shews that they were writ for the General Vse of the Church to Record the Doctrine and Miracles of our Saviour the Author and Finisher of our Faith whom all are to hear and obey And tho it were some particular Emergency that might induce the Evangelists to set about this Work which yet is to be look'd upon as a Providential Motion yet the Gospels themselves not only answer that particular End which was the first Occasion of their being writ but are of General Use and fitted to all Ages and times We have already mention'd the Occasion of St. Matthew and St. Mark 's writing their Gospels St. Luke gives an l Luk. 1.1 Account of his Undertaking himself the substance of which is That since many had written an History of our Savior's Life and Actions who wanted some Advantages of knowing the Particulars which he had he himself being exactly inform'd by those who were Eye-witnesses and Parties concern'd set about a more accurate account of these Matters to the end that every Christian who will be at the pains to read it might know the Certainty of those things wherein he has been instructed It seems from hence that committing things to Writing was in St. Lukes judgment the most certain means of Conveying the Knowledge of them to others As for St. John 't is plain by comparing his Gospel with the other Three that he had seen the Rest and approved them a V. Eus H. E. l. 3. c. 24 and therefore supplied what he thought fit which the former Evangelists had omitted that so all of them together might be a Complete Account of all that Jesus did and taught And he 〈◊〉 himself tells us that his Design in writing his Gospel was b Joh. 20.31 That men might believe that Jesus is Christ and that believing they might have life thro' his Name To proceed to the Epistles of the Apostles it must be confess'd that many of St. Paul's were written upon the particular Exigencies of the Churches to which they are directed and were occasion'd by some Disputes that were proper to those times which may be thought an Argument that they were not design'd for the General Use of the Church But yet if we consider that the Fundamental Doctrines of Christianity are admirably illustrated by them and many of the more Mysterious parts of the Gospel-Dispensation more fully treated of in them than by Christ himself because there were many things which the Apostles were not able to bear c Joh. 16.12 while he was with them and therefore they were referred to the Teaching of the Holy Ghost for fuller Instruction in such matters I say if we lay these things together we must acknowledge it necessary to add the Apostolical Epistles to the Gospels in order to the making up a Complete Rule of Christian Faith or else we shall be much to seek for an Authentick Explication of several Important Points of Christianity But of this I shall discourse more largely in the next Chapter To return to S. Paul's Epistles I cannot but observe how the Wisdom of God has made St. Paul's Style and way of Writing to be admirably serviceable to the Edification of the Church which yet if we examine it by the Rules of Criticism is far from being Regular and Exact But his free use of Digressions and those long ones too sometimes opens him a way into a larger Subject and of more General Use and does not suffer him to confine himself to that one particular Point which 't was his main Design to treat of And when we find him take occasion from every hint to explain the Mysteries of the Gospel to set forth the Excellency of it and to perswade men to live up to the Height of its Precepts this is not only a sign that his holy Soul was full of this noble Subject but is likewise an argument that the Holy Spirit Influenc'd his Pen and made him enlarge himself upon those Points which were of Universal Concern and would be for the Perpetual Benefit of the Church in all succeeding Ages A signal Instance of this you may see in that large Digression in the second Epistle to the Corinthians which reaches from the 13. verse of the Second Chapter to the 5. verse of the Seventh Where he discourses of some of the Fundamentals of Christianity with such a true Spirit of Piety and with such a powerful Force of Natural Eloquence that if we may prefer one part of that Inspir'd Teacher's Writings before another we might call this one of the most Elevated Discourses in all St. Paul's Epistles And as both the Matter of his Epistles and the Manner how they are writ discover to us that they were design'd for the Perpetual Use of Christians so we shall find St. Peter to have been of the same mind whose words justify all that I have said For he places St. Paul's Epistles in an equal Rank with those holy Writings which were on all hands agreed upon to be the Word of God Thus much his words import II. Pet. 3.15 16. where speaking of St. Paul's Epistles that there were some things in them hard to be understood which ignorant and unstable men wrested and applied to ill purposes to establish corrupt Doctrines he adds As they do also the OTHER SCRIPTURES to their own destruction which Expression of other Scriptures plainly implies that St. Peter look'd upon St. Paul's Epistles as part of the Canon of Scripture and rank'd them among those Divine Writings which were design'd for our Edification and Instruction in Righteousness and which 't was dangerous to pervert to a contrary Purpose And if St. Paul's Epistles which were writ upon the Exigencies and with Regard to the State of Particular Churches were yet still design'd to be of general Use the same may be said with much greater reason concerning the Epistles of the rest of the Apostles with aim only at this General Design to confirm those in the Faith to whom they were directed to exhort and testifie that this is the true Grace of God wherein they stood d 1 Pet 5.12 and to keep up the Remembrance of the Apostles Doctrine after their decease e 2 Pet. 1.15 as St. Peter speaks concerning the Intent of his two Epistles And we find St. John addresses himself to all Christians without Restriction and even to all Ranks and Degrees of them whom he divides into Children Young men and Fathers f 1 Joh. 2.12 13. Thus much I think sufficient to prove that the Apostles themselves design'd their Writings for the Perpetual Use of the Church and look'd upon them as of Equal Authority with the Inspir'd Books of the Old Testament I proceed to the VI. and last Proposition viz. The Age immediately following that of the Apostles look'd upon their Writings as the Standing Rule of Faith to the Christian Church Certainly next to the Apostles themselves the Age immediately following was best able to know what the
Fr. p. 280 285. that laying too great stress upon Words has bin the occasion of most of the Disputes among Christians I readily grant it has but then the fault has bin that Men have either Interpreted Scripture-Expressions by notions of Philosophy which the Holy Writers never heard of or else they have not inquir'd into the Sentiments of those times in which these Books were writ but have judged of their sense by the Schemes and applied them to the Disputes of Modern Ages as if they were writ only with a regard to the Controversies that should arise in After-Times without any respect to the Sentiments and Exigencies of the Age wherein they were written But if we have a regard only to the Genius of the Language which the Holy Writers used and judge of their Sentiments by the State of the Church in their time and by such Ancient Authors as were most likely to be acquainted with the Notions which were then generally received I don't think laying stress upon the Phrases of the Scriptures can lead us into such gross errors as Mr. N. imagines k Eng. p. 146. Fr p. 234. And without supposing this we can scarce deduce any Inferences from Scripture Texts and yet this is practis'd by the Apostles themselves who sometimes argue from Words and those too taken in their nicest signification A remarkable example of which is that Inference of S. Paul's l Gal. 3.16 To Abraham and to his seed were the Promises made he saith not And to seeds as of many but as of one And to thy seed which is Christ 3. Since God in his Providence took care that these Books should be Writ for the use of his Church and therefore gave Providential occasions for their being Written it follows that they are Compos'd in such a manner as not to exclude the use of the Natural Reason and Meditation of the Writers who Compos'd them Works of Providence are not suppos'd to exclude Humane means and we believe many things to be brought to pass by the determinate Counsel and Power of God tho they are not purely Miraculous and and meerly God's own Act and Deed but are brought to pass by second Causes as his Instruments And why then can't he give Men a Rule of Faith and Manners except the Writing be with the immediate Finger of God as the Two Tables were 'T is certain that the ordinary Operations of the Spirit do only excite and assist our natural Faculties not supersede or render them useless And even the extraordinary ones do very often influence Men's minds after the same manner as appears by S. Paul's advice to Timothy m 1 Tim. 4.14 Give attendance to Reading to Exhortation to Doctrine neglect not the gift which is in thee which was given thee by prophecy And to the same purpose he speaks in the second Epistle n 2 Tim. 1.6 And therefore tho we suppose the Authors of the Scriptures to have been Inspir'd and to have had the extraordinary Assistances of God's Spirit yet this will not exclude the use of their Natural Talents but that the Writers made use of them as far as they could be serviceable to their purpose and God supplied their defects From hence appears the weakness of that Argument which is urged by our Author and by some others against the Inspiration of the Poetical Books o Fr. p. 230. En. p. 27. of the Old Testament because they seem to be the effects of Study and Meditation and against that of the Historical Books of the Scripture p Grot. votum pro pace p. 672. Refutat Apologet. p. 722. because the things contain'd in them are either of the Writers own Knowledge or else taken from Ancient Memoirs or the Relation of others To the same purpose 't is urged against the Divine Authority of S. Paul's Epistles by Spinoza q Theol. Polit. c. 11 that they are full of Argumentation which he thinks must be the effect of S. Paul's own reason As if a Man that had a perfect Systeme of the Christian Religion infused into his mind by Revelation as we suppose S. Paul to have had did not apprehend it after a Rational manner and see the whole Series and Chain of its Principles by the help of which he could infer one thing from another But is it not a pleasant Argument against the Inspiration of a Book that it is writ in a Rational and Argumentative way which must either suppose that 't is below God Almighty to give a reason for his Institutions or else that 't was not proper for the Apostles to shew their Disciples that the Doctrines they taught them were such as might be Rationally deduc'd from certain Principles and to confute their Adversaries the same way who would not submit to their bare Authority nor believe a thing to be true meerly because they said so 4. It follows from what has bin said that 't is no Argument against a Book 's being design'd by God for the perpetual use of the Church that 't was at first writ upon some particular Exigency and with relation to the peculiar Circumstances of the persons to whom 't is directed For some of those Books of the Old Testament which were certainly design'd for the publick benefit of the Church as 't is granted by all that acknowledge any such thing as Inspiration and I don 't at present concern my self with any others I say some of the Undoubtedly Inspir'd Writings were occasion'd by the particular Exigences of those times in which their Authors lived I mean the Books of the Prophets who were all sent by God to testify against the sins which were committed in their own times And if God so order'd it that these Prophecies should be of perpetual use to the Church why may not the other Occasional Writings of the Scripture if I may so term them have been compos'd with the same Design I have already shewed r P. 19. that the manner of St. Paul's Writing does excellently answer this Intent From hence it appears that the Argument used by some Popish Writers why the New Testament cannot be a perfect Rule of the Christian Faith because several parts of it were writ only with Relation to particular Exigencies of some one Church holds as well against the Old Testament being a Rule to the Jews because a great part of of it viz. the Prophecies were occasion'd by the particular Circumstances of those Times in which the Prophets lived CHAP. II. A more particular Inquiry into the nature of the Apostolical Gifts and Inspiration HAving said thus much in general concerning the Divine Authority and Inspiration of the Apostolical Writings I proceed to examine more distinly the Assertions which the Author of the Letters hath laid down concerning the Inspiration of the Apostles and of their Writings and in order to that shall consider particularly both as to their Nature and Extent some of the most remarkable Gifts with which the
which were not so The Reasons which Confute this Opinion of our Author concerning the Collection of the Canon of the Old Testament I thought fit to represent all together when I was upon this Subject tho I am sensible that 't is only the first of these Considerations which can be inferr'd as a Corollary from what has been said concerning the Early Date of the Old Testament Canon What I have hitherto said concerning the Authority and Antiquity of the Old Testament Canon I cannot call Absolutely Certain or Demonstrative but I may safely say thus much that it carries in it a greater Degree of Probability than any thing the Adversaries of the Canon have advanc'd to the Contrary So that tho we should grant what our Author says d Fr. p. 276. Eng. p. 102. That there is no proof at all that Esdras and the Great Sanhedrim of that time among whom were Haggai Zachary and Malachi Compil'd the Canon yet still 't is probable 't was made by those that were so near their time that they knew what their Sentiments were in this Matter and made this Collection accordingly But if this Proof be not thought Satisfactory I should think any Christian ought to acquiesce in the Judgement of our Saviour and 't is plain he lookt upon the Jewish Canon which was Undoubtedly the same in his time which is now received in the Protestant Churches I say he lookt upon it as a Collection of Holy Writings design'd by God for the Instruction of his Church and the Rule the Jews were to have recourse to when they would inform themselves what was the Will of God He bids them e Jâ—h 5.39 Search the Scriptures without distinguishing as our Author does f Fr. p. 277 279 285. Eng p. 10â— 106 116. the Truly Inspir'd Books from those which are not so for in them saith he ye think and so far ye are in the right that ye have Eternal Life 'T is strange our Saviour should not correct this Mistake of theirs if some of the Books they had such a great Veneration for favour'd such Dangerous Doctrines as our Author thinks the Book of Ecclesiastes does g Fr. p. 272. Eng. p. 96. and contain'd Expressions very like Blasphemies as he is pleas'd to speak concerning the Book of Job h Fr. p. 275. Eng. p. 101. For if this were true 't was certainly very dangerous for Men to Search or be too much Conversant in these Books especially since they came Recommended under the Character of a Divine Inspiration 'T is strange our Saviour i Luk. 24.44 should prove the Passion and Resurrection of the Messias not only out of Moses and the Prophets but also out of the Psalms by which our Author k Fr. p. 277. Eng. p. 123. understands those Writings which the Jews call Chetubim if these Books be of so little Authority as he would perswade us they are Mr. N. would fain Evade the Force of this Argument taken from our Saviours Authority by telling us l Fr. p. 278. Eng. p. 104 105. that Christ never design'd to Criticize upon the Sacred Books or to Correct those Errors of the Jews which were of small Importance But since our Saviour Criticiz'd so far upon the Sacred Books as to Confute the false Glosses m Matt. 5. c. 23. which the Scribes and Pharisees had made upon them and to Reject the Traditions n c. 15.1 which they had Equall'd to the Word of God and in some Cases Prefer'd before it it seems as necessary for him to have distinguisht between the True Scriptures and those Books which were Undeservedly esteem'd such Especially if these Latter advance Doctrines that do not well agree with the Former as our Author o Fr. p. 272 c. Eng p. 95 c. indeavours to prove concerning several places of the Proverbs Ecclesiastes and Job for then the Admitting the Authority of such Writings is of as Ill Consequence as the Receiving the Traditions of the Pharisees could be Nay with his leave I think it an Error of more dangerous Consequence to Equal a Book that is not Inspir'd when it contains False Doctrine with one that is truly Divine than to Equal such Traditions as the Pharisees held with an Inspir'd Writing Because a Tradition will probably in time be forgotten and so lose all its Authority which we see has been the Fate of most of the Pharisaical Traditions whereas a Book that has once been generally Reputed of Divine Authority 't is likely will maintain that Character for ever For its very Character will make Men careful to preserve it and the Older it grows the Stronger will the Plea of Prescription be for its Divine Original and Consequently the More will be Impos'd upon by it as we see hath Actually happen'd in the Case we are now speaking of if our Author's Opinion be true For the whole Christian and Jewish Church hath time out of mind lookt upon the Books contain'd in the Jewish Canon to be Inspir'd and have upon all Occasions appeal'd to their Authority as such From whence it appears that our Saviours taking notice of this Error if it had been one would have been much more beneficial to after Ages than his Confuting an Unwritten Tradition could be But further we find the Apostles Judgment does evidently concur with our Saviours in this matter St. Paul says a Rom. 3.2 that the Jews were intrusted b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with the Oracles of God but surely he would have told us that they were not True to their Trust if he had thought they had mix'd Prophane Books with the Sacred ones But that Text of the same Apostle c 2 Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is given by Inspiration of God is so clear a Proof of the Apostles Judgment in this matter that 't will admit of no Evasion For the Apostle tells Timothy in the foregoing Verse that from a child he had known the Scriptures by which he must mean the Body of Writings which the Jews look'd upon as such for in that Religion he had been Educated by the Care of his mother who was a Jewess d Act. 16.1 Then it follows in this verse All Scripture is given by Inspiration of God where the Apostle certainly understands the word Scripture in the same sense which he took it in the Verse before viz. for that Collection of Writings which the Jews received as the Word of God But pray let us hear our Authors Paraphrase e Eng. p. 192. Fr. p. 270. upon these two Verses It is as if he had said to Timothy that he ought to keep close as he had done hitherto to the Study of the Old Testament which would instruct him sufficiently in the way of Salvation by joyning thereunto Faith in Christ Jesus because all Scripture Inspired AS IS A GREAT PART OF THE OLD TESTAMENT Is profitable for Instruction I think I may appeal to any Indifferent Man
12.5 6. Jam. 4.6 1 Pet. 5.5 and other places plainly alluded q 2 Cor. 8.21 1 Pet. 4.18 to by them I say one would be apt to conclude that all these Considerations added to the Intrinsecal Worth of the Book it self might be a sufficient Inducement to look upon it as a Book compos'd by God's Appointment for the Benefit of the Church But before I proceed any further upon this Sebject I cannot but reflect by the way upon a Passage of our Author which the observing that this Book is quoted by the Apostles puts me in mind of and that is this He tells us r Fr. p. 278. Eng. p. 105 That the Apostles never cite the works of Solomon or the Book of Job What he says touching the former I have just now shewed to be manifestly False and there is as little truth in the later part of his words for the Book of Job is as formally quoted by St. Paul Å¿ 1 Cor. 3.19 as any Book of the Old Testament The Wisdom of the world is Foolishness with God FOR IT IS WRITTEN He taketh the Wise in their own Craftiness Which Citation as 't is certainly taken out of Job t c. 5. 13. so it shews withal a great Deference given by the Apostle to the Authority of the Book from whence 't is taken I thought fit just to observe this Mistake of Mr. N.'s tho it be of no great consequence on purpose to take down the Confidence of this Gentleman a little and shew him that he is not so exactly vers'd in the Scripture as a man that undertakes to Criticize upon it with so much Capriciousness and so little Reverence and Regard to its Authority ought to be But to return to the Matter in hand The Sum of the General Charge which our Author has advanc'd against the Divine Authority of the Book of Proverbs is a Fr. p. 271. En. p. 94. That they are Moral Sentences which a Good Man may pronounce without Inspiration As if no Book could be writ by God's Direction but where the matter is such as exceeds the reach of Humane Invention and cannot be the Product of our Rational Faculties And then by the same Reason no work must be ascribed to God but what exceeds the Power of Natural Agents and so God must be accounted the Author of nothing that happens in the World but what is purely Miraculous Now this Argument if it prove any thing at all it proves not only that this Book is not written by Divine Inspiration but farther that no Book of Moral Instructions can be For Morality is nothing but the Law of Right Reason instructing us how to govern our Actions and I suppose the Law of Reason contains nothing in it above Reason and Consequently nothing which is above the Capacity of a Wise and Good Man to think or speak from all which it will follow by our Authors Principles that whatever Book contains nothing in it but what is deducible from the Principles of meer Reason must be purely Humane and can have nothing Divine or of the Hand of God in it But is not Mr. N. sensible that the Corruption of Humane Nature the Degeneracy of the World the Uncertainty of Humane Reasoning and especially the Imperfect Knowledge we have of the Nature of God and our own Souls have so far Obscur'd a great many branches of this Law of Nature or Reason that there was need of a more than Ordinary Illumination to recover some Truths which were in a manner lost to the World and to set them in a True Light so as to Convince others of their Certainty and Excellency Sure our Author will grant that the Unity of the Godhead is a Truth that is Adequate to Humane Reason nay a Truth so Evident that one would wonder that Men of Searching Heads could miss of it and yet we find there were very few among the Heathens that had their Reason so throughly purg'd from the prejudices which Education and the Establisht Religion of the World had infected it with as to assent to this Truth And I think this is a sufficient Proof that Men may stand in need of a Teacher Divinely Inlightned to Discover such Truths to them as may indeed be deduced from the Principles of Reason when 't is in its true perfection but yet are such as few Men's Reason hath arrived to because of the Degeneracy and corruption to which 't is obnoxious And many such Truths are to be found in this Book which tho they are so reasonable that Men can't but assent to them assoon as they hear them yet 't is in vain to search for them in the Writings of the Best and Acutest Philosophers For Instance we may challenge them to shew such a Wise Instruction in any of their Books as Solomon lays down for the foundation of Morality b Prov. 1.7 The fear of the Lord is the beginning of Wisdom or this c Prov. 3.5 6 Trust in the Lord with all thy Heart and lean not to thy own Vnderstanding In all thy ways acknowledge him And indeed thro the whole Book the Duties of Morality are inforc'd upon Men from Religious Considerations and by Arguments taken from the Duty we owe to God and the Rewards and Punishments we must expect from him according as we behave our selves Which makes this Book differ very much from the Moral Writings of the Philosophers where we shall find little or nothing said concerning our Duty to God his Authority over us our Dependance upon him and the Submission we owe to him the Methods of Providence and the Rewards or Punishments of another Life all which are often insisted upon in this Book For this is a visible Defect in the Writings of the Philosophers that as they never inforce our Duty by Arguments which are taken from the Principles of Religion so their disswasives from Vice are taken from these Topicks viz. That 't is below the Dignity of Humane Nature and a Contradiction to Reason rather than from this Consideration That 't is displeasing to God a Breach of his Law and an Act of Disobedience which he will Punish I Confess some Philosophers that lived since the Appearance of Christianity especially the Emperor Antoninus have very Excellent Sayings concerning God's Providence and the Submission we owe to him But I am apt to think that as the Light of the Gospel Diffus'd it self over the World it in some measure Inlightned the minds even of those who Refus'd to imbrace it as the Sun gives Light before it reaches our Hemisphere My meaning is that the very Account which Inquisitive Men received of the Principles of Christianity helped to Clear up their minds and gave them more distinct Apprehensions of the Principles of Natural Religon than they had before But to return Beside the Precepts I have already mention'd there are many Excellent Advices given in the Proverbs to all sorts and Degrees of Men from Princes
and from thence proceed to explain what is more Doubtful and Obscure And if the Divine Authority of the Writings of the New Testament be once proved that of the Old must follow as a necessary Consequence because the former gives Testimony to the latter and most of the Arguments which prove the one may be easily applied to the other Mr. N. allowes the Histories of the N. Testament to be exact and true Relations of the matter of Fact but supposes that there 's no need of Inspiration to Write a true History b Fr. p. 231 c. Engl. p. 28. c. He grants likewise that the Apostolical Epistles contain nothing but what is conformable to the Doctrine of Christ but yet that the Apostles had no need of an extraordinary Inspiration for Writing their Epistles c Fr. p. 282 283. Eng. p. 112 113. But all this while he takes no notice that these Writings were design'd by God for the Perpetual Use and Instruction of the Church and to be a Rule of Christian Faith to all Ages Which one thing if it be made out will prove their Divine Original and sufficiently distinguish them from all other Writings purely Humane where Providence cannot be supposed to have had such an extraordinary Hand in the Composure since it neither can be pretended that the Authors were the Immediate Instruments of God in publishing his Will nor that their Works were design'd for so general a Use as the Instruction of the Universal Church I shall therefore in the first place give a definition of an Inspir'd Writing and then prove that the Writings of the New Testament are truly such An Inspired Writing I take to be a Book that is writ by the Incitation Direction and Assistance of God and design'd by him for the Perpetual use of the Church The Proof of the Inspiration of the New-Testament-Writings I shall comprise in these following Propositions I. God design'd to provide a means for the preserving the Doctrine of Christ to the end of the World II. This could not be done so well in any Ordinary way or Humane means as by committing this Doctrine to Writing III. 'T is more reasonable to suppose that God would make use of this way than any other because he made use of the same means before for the Instruction of the Jewish Church IV. He has actually made use of no other way for the conveying down the Christian Doctrine that can be assign'd V. The Apostles themselves design'd their Writings for the Perpetual use of the Church and lookt upon them of equal Authority in the Christian Church as the Writings of the Old Testament were in the Jewish VI. The Age immediately after the Apostles lookt upon the Writings of the New Testament as the standing Rule of Faith to the Christian Church I think the making out these Propositions some of which need very little proof will fully prove the Divine Authority of the Books contain'd in the Canon of the New Testament and when they are made out such Consequences may be drawn from them as will silence most of the Cavils and Objections which the Author of these Letters and some others have raised against the Inspiration of the Scripture I. The first Proposition to be proved is this God design'd to provide a means for the preserving the Doctrine of Christ to the end of the World This Proposition I think any Christian will take for granted and my design at present is not to dispute with Infidels but to lay down those Principles upon which the Divine Authority of the Scriptures is built the truth of Christianity being presupposed because the Author I am to deal with professes the Belief of Christianity and yet has raised Objections against a great many of those Writings which Christians have all along lookt upon to be of Divine Authority I say therefore that no Christian can doubt of the truth of this Proposition for every Christian believes the Gospel to be the last and most perfect Revelation of the Will of God which he intends to afford to the World he believes that Christ will be with his Church to the end of the World Mat. 28.20 16.18 and that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it i. e. it shall never be so far weakned as that the Profession of Christianity should cease or the Church be perfectly deprived of the Knowledge of saving Truth Nothing further being needful for the illustrating this Proposition I proceed to the II. Proposition God could not preserve the Knowledge of Christianity in an Ordinary way or by any Humane means so well as by conveying the Doctrine of it to after Ages by Writing I do not pretend to prescribe to God Almighty what method he shall use to discover his Will to the World or confine him to any one way of doing it but thus much I think I may safely say that a standing Rule of Faith committed to Writing is liable to less inconveniencies and difficulties than any other way of conveying down Divine Truth Whereas all other ways that can be assign'd of transmitting Divine Revelation are incumbred with so many difficulties that without a constant series of Miracles they can never attain their end And therefore we can't reasonably suppose that God will make choice of any such methods to Reveal his Will by For this is to be laid down for a certain truth that God never works more Miracles than needs must nor ever suspends or overbears the force of natural Agents without evident necessity but allways uses second Causes and Humane means as far as they will go And therefore that method which offers least violence to Nature is more likely to be made choice of by God Some Men indeed are apt to think that the Hand of God can't shew it self without a constant series of Miracles but they that consider things more exactly rather judge that a continued succession of Miracles would really be a reproach to God's Ordinary Providence for often to interrupt the course of Nature must needs be a reflection upon the Wisdom that first contrived it We can imagine but two ways of God's Communicating his Will to several successive Ages without the help of Writing either Oral Tradition or making a Particular Revelation to every single Person or at least to all those whose business 't is to teach and instruct others in their Duty Now both these ways are liable to such difficulties and do suppose so many immediate interpositions of God's Power to prevent those errors which must of necessity attend them considering the present state of Humane Nature as are not suitable to the methods which God uses in Governing the World I shall not pursue this matter any further nor give a particular account of the inconveniencies to which both these Methods are obnoxious and to correct which a constant Interposition of Miracles will be necessary The Absurdity of the former has bin abundantly demonstrated by the e Dr. Tillotson's
Apostles thought of their own Writings and what Authority they challeng'd as due to them Irenaeus one of the Greatest men of the Church in that Age sufficiently shews the Sense of the Christians of his own time concerning the Authority of these Writings The Hereticks against whom he writes pretended that their Opinions came originally from the Apostles and that whatever the Apostles might say to the contrary in their Writings yet they taught those very things by word of mouth which these Hereticks since maintain'd In answer to this Irenaeus does not only confute their Pretences by shewing that there was Clear and Undoubted Tradition for the Catholick Faith which in those early Times could easily be trac'd up to the very Apostles g Iren. l. 3. c. 3. but likewise proves that 't is in vain to set up Oral Tradition in Opposition to the Writings of the Apostles h Ibid. l. 3. c. 1. because the very same Gospel which they at first preach'd they afterwards by the Will of God committed to Writing to be the Foundation and Pillar of our Faith In pursuance of which Testimony we may further observe that the very Arts which those Hereticks used either to Undermine or Evade the Authority of the Apostolical Writings plainly shew their Authority was look'd upon as Sacred and Decisive in the Christian Church The Writers of the same Age do fully bear witness to the Canon of the New Testament The Learned Mr. Dodwell has observ'd i Dissert in Irenaeum l. n. 40 41. that St. Paul's Epistles were generally known and received in the Church soonest of any of the New Testament Writings and accordingly besides the Testimony which St. Peter gives them which we have already mention'd we we may observe that Ignatius the earliest Writer of the second Age is very industrious in imitating St. Paul's Style and using his Expressions as if he had a mind his Readers should take notice that he had studied his Epistles The Authority indeed of the Epistle to the Hebrews hath been call'd in question because the Author 's not having set his Name to it has given occasion to doubt whether it were S. Paul's or not But as this Epistle must be of Apostolical Authority being older than Clemens Romanus who plainly alludes to it in two places of his Epistle to the Corinthians k N. 17 36. so the style the way of Arguing and the Genius of the work discover it to be S. Paul's but S. Peter puts an end to the dispute for the saying which he quotes in his second Epistle as S. Paul's is certainly taken out of the Epistle to the Hebrews l 2 Pet. 3.15 compar'd with Hebr. 10.37 The first Epistle of S. Peter is quoted by S. Polycarp who writ just after Ignatius's death About the same time certain Pious Men Travell'd from place to place on purpose to communicate the Writings of the Gospels as Eusebius informs us m 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 H. E. l. 3. c. 37. which he to be sure understood of the Four Gospels now extant which only were reckon'd Authentick in his time And 't is plain they were esteem'd so in the Middle of the Second Age because Justin Martyr quotes them generally whenever he has occasion to mention any thing belonging to the History of our Saviour But in Irenaeus's time their Authority was settled beyond all dispute for he says positively n Iren. l. 3. c. 11. that there are Four Gospels neither more nor less And indeed the Authenticalness of Four Gospels seems to be owing to St. John himself who made them into one Complete Code as I observed before o p. 11. 12. The same Iraeneus gives a large Testimony to the Revelations and often quotes the first Epistle of S. John p ap Euseb H. E. l. 3. c. 18. l. 5. c. 8. I thought it not improper to give this brief Account of the Testimonies which are given by the earliest Christian Writers to the most considerable Books of the New Testament to shew how good a Foundation there is for the Authority of the New-Testament Canon and how little ground there is for Mr. Hobb's Insinuation to the contrary who tell us q Leviathan part 3. c. 33. that the Writings of the Apostles were not received nor acknowledged as such by the Church till the Council of Laodicca which was held in the Year 364. recommended them to Christians As if all Christians did not agree in acknowledging such particular Books for the Writings of the Apostles till they were Recommended to them as he speaks and Enumerated by a Council Which has as little truth in it as what he says just afterward that at the time of this Council all the Copies of the New Testament were in the hands of Ecclesiasticks which if it be not a downright and wilful falsity in him is such a piece of ignorance as a grosser cannot be found in all the Kingdom of Darkness which he has described I find Men generally agree in believing Mr. Hobbs to be the Author of the Leviathan and several other ill Books and I fear too many have a great deference for their Authority tho the Parliament which according to him hath a juster right to declare what Books or Doctrines are to be received than a Council hath not yet given us a Catalogue of his Writings or Recommended them to the World neither of which could be true if this Argument of his be good But to return I don't pretend to have Collected all that can be alledged to prove the Antiquity of the New-Testament-Canon nor will I go farther upon a Subject that is already undertaken by that Learned Person who will shortly Publish an Elaborate Collection of all the Various Readings of the New Testament from whom the World may expect full satisfaction as to this matter However I can't but just take notice that 't is no prejudice to the Divine Authority of the N. Testament as our Author intimates a Fr. p. 266. Eng. p. 85. that some Books are received into it whose Authors are not certainly known and therefore as he argues of whose Inspiration we can't be certain He instances in the Epistle to the Hebrews But there is sufficient proof that S. Paul was the Author of that Epistle as I have shewed already And as to the whole New-Testament Canon 't was certainly the design of those that Compiled it only to gather together the Writings of the Apostles or of such as writ by their direction as the Ancients tell us S. Mark did by S. Peter's b Clem. Alex. ap Eus H.E. l. 2. c. 15. S. Luke by S. Paul's c Iren ap eund l. 5. c. 8. Grot. in Luc. 21.34 1 Cor. 11.23 24 25. comparâ—d with Luk. 22.19 20. So that the only reason why some Books were doubted of was because it did not clearly appear whether they were Writ by Apostles or not and assoon as that point was cleared
their Authority was immediately Establisht And so much for the proving the Sixth Proposition And I think supposing these Six Propositions proved this Conclusion will plainly follow from what has been said that the Books of the new-New-Testament were Written by God's Direction and design'd by Him for the Perpetual use and Instruction of the Church and are the only Fixt Rule which he has appointed for this purpose I shall draw some Conclusions from these Premises which will tend to illustrate and explain the Divine Inspiration of the Holy Writings 1. It follows from hence that the Holy Ghost assisted the Apostles as fully when they Writ as when they Preached How far this assistance extended and wherein it consisted I shall examine particularly in the next Chapter at present I intend only to shew that we may presume there is as great a degree of Inspiration to be found in their Writings as was in their Preaching For since the reason why this Assistance accompanied them in their Preaching was the benefit of the Church that they might Guide it into all Truth without any danger of mixing error with it the same reason holds much stronger for their Writings which do not serve for the Instruction of One Age only as their Preaching did but of Many And therefore tho we should suppose that they use Arguments ad Hominem sometimes and proceed upon such Principles as were generally admitted in the Age they lived without nicely examining whether they were true or not yet this only shews that they thought fit to explain Divine Truths in such a manner as was most suitable to the Capacity of the persons they were immediately to Instruct And as we must grant that tho the New Testament was design'd for the use of future Ages yet the Phrase and Style and Argumentation used in it is wholly accommodated to the Sentiments and Usage of that Age in which 't was writ so S. Paul himself does plainly imply that he does not always use the Best Arguments but sometimes such as are best fitted to the Capacities and Notions of those he Writes to For thus we find him express himself by way of excuse for the Argument he makes use of d Rom. 6.19 I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh which is as much as if he had said I could bring a better argument to prove what I say but this which I make use of is more suitable to your Capacities and may perhaps more effectually convince you than a better 2. It follows secondly that since the Books of the New Testament and the same reason holds as to any other Writings of the same rank and use were design'd to be a standing rule of Faith to Christians the Holy Ghost tho he did not generally Dictate the words which the holy Writers used yet directed them to express their minds in such a manner that those who have a regard to the Dialect and way of speaking in which they write might rightly understand them or at least the Holy Spirit prevented their giving just occasion for Men's errors and mistakes in matters of Consequence by their Phrases and Expressions And such a degree of assistance is absolutely necessary to make these Books a standing Rule of Faith For tho we suppose the Holy Writers used a Popular style and consequently made use of such Hyperboles and Metaphors and other Improprieties of Speech which common practise allows of in all Languages especially where they occasionally speak of Philosophical matters and things not immediately relating to Religion yet unless we suppose them to speak properly in those Terms of Art which are of fundamental use in the explaining the Doctrines of Christianity and upon the sense of which whole Controversies turn and as they are differently taken they alter the very face of the Christian Religion I say except we suppose the Apostles to speak properly i. e. agreeably to their own Simplicity and Plainness of Speech and in such a manner as was most likely to be understood by those they writ to when they treat of matters of great Importance and such as are justly to be reckon'd Fundamental Doctrines the New Testament will not answer the ends of a Rule of Faith For a Book is of no use to explain or decide any Controversy if we can have no sixt rule whereby to judge of its style so as to be in some measure certain what is its true sense And 't is very strange if a Book writ by persons who had an extraordinary assistance from God and which was design'd for Universal use should not be worded with that care which Humane Industry uses in matters of Importance And therefore we have reason to rely upon the assistance of the Holy Spirit even with relation to the Phrase and Letter of the Scripture and to believe that he has so far directed the holy Pen-men that their Phrases and Expressions should not lead Men into error in matters of Consequence but may be rightly understood by those that acquaint themselves with the Dialect in which they writ and consult the Ages nearest the Apostles who must needs be next to their own style the best Judges of their sense If indeed the Socinian Doctrines concerning the Nature and Satisfaction of Christ were true it must be confessed there would be little reason to believe that the Holy Ghost had a hand in wording the Scriptures nay then the Scriptures will appear to be written in such a style as if the Writers design'd to lead Men into error And the Socinians themselves when they make Reason the sole Judge of Sripture and tell us they will not believe any thing contrary to Reason tho it were never so plainly asserted in Scripture do in effect confess that the expressions of Scripture taken in their natural and most obvious sense do not at all favour their Opinions e Socin de Christ Servat l. 3. c. 6. And therefore 't is no wonder to find these Gentlemen warn their Readers so often not to make Inferences from the Phrases of Scripture as if they were used strictly and properly that they so often tell us of the Improprieties and Metaphors which the Eastern Writers and those who imitate them abound with that the Apostles play with Words as Socinus with Reverence speaks f Amavit Paulus in Execrationis verbo esse argutus Socm de Chr Serâ— l. 2. c. 1 and take them sometimes in one sense and sometimes in another Our Author follows them in this as well as in some other things g v Fr. p 234. Eng p. 146. and often cautions h Eng. p 107 111. Fr. p. 280 281. En. p. 11â— Fr. p. 285. Eng. p. 145 146. Fr. p. 233 234. us not to subtilize about the expressions nor stick too close to the Letter of the Scripture since the style of Scripture is so far from being exact that 't is very careless and tells us i Eng. p. 107 116.
permittebat ipse praestaret Quonium disciplinae interest injuriam vindicari metu enim Ultionis omnis iniquitas refraenatur that God will plead our Cause and tho we may not Right our selves yet we may q 2 Chron. 24.22 desire him to Interpose and put a stop to the Successes of Wicked men who grow outragious and intolerable by Impunity and we ought to commit our Cause to him and rest satisfied with this Consideration That God will in his due time judge us according to our Righteousness r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Secundi Presbyteri jam morituri verba ap Athanas Epist ad Solitar p. 660. And that passage which the Apostle in the place above-mention'd quotes out of the Proverbs as a proof of what he says does imply as much ſ Prov. 25.21 22. If thine Enemy hunger feed him if he thirst give him drink for in so doing thou shalt heap Coals of Fire upon his head i. e. If thy Kindness does not reclaim him and make him thy Friend but he still persist in his Enmity God himself will avenge thy quarrel and punish him so much the more severely This is the sense of that place as appears by comparing the Expression of Coals of Fire with the sense of it in other places of Scripture where it always signifies God's Vengeance t See Ps 18.8 13 -120.4.-140.11 'T is the voice of Nature that Sin ought to be punish'd and they who do evil should suffer evil Nay 't is the Voice of God himself whom our Saviour proposes to us as the Pattern of Love and Kindness which we ought to imitate u Matth 5.45 and yet the Scripture often represents him as taking Pleasure and Satisfaction in the Destruction of Incorrigible Sinners and rejoycing at their Calamities x Deut. 28.63 Pro. 1.26 Is 1.24 Ezek 5.13 In Imitation of which Example the Righteous are said to Rejoyce when they see God's Vengeance upon Sinners and wash their Feet in the Blood of the Vngodly as it were trampling upon their Carcases in a Triumphant manner and to glorifie God upon such occasions saying Verily there is a Reward for the Righteous doubtless there is a God that judgeth in the Earth y Ps 58.10 11. In like manner when the Enemies of God's people have fill'd up the measure of their Iniquities and sinn'd beyond a possibility of obtaining Pardon the Prophets denounce God's Judgments against them in a triumphant Style and at the same time exhort all his Servants to rejoyce and praise God for making his Justice manifest So we find the Prophet Isaiah breaking forth into Joy upon such an occasion z Is 25.1 2. O Lord thou art my God I will exalt thee I will praise thy Name For thou hast made of a City a Heap c. And to the same purpose he speaks a little after a Is 26.5 6 11. So Jeremy when he foretells the Destruction of Babylon says b Jer. 51.48 The Heavens and Earth and all that is therein shall sing for joy and exhorts God's people particularly to declare in Zion the works of the Lord their God c Ver. 10. And when Mystical Babylon falls in the Revelations the Apostles and Prophets are exhorted to Rejoyce over her d Rev. 18.20 and the heavenly Host are represented as giving Solemn Thanks and Praise to God for Executing his Judgments upon her e Rev. 19.1 c. See c. 11.16 17 18 -15 2 3 4 -16.5 And although in such general Judgments Children which are Innocent usually suffer as well as the Guilty yet since God has a Right to take away their Lives when and in what manner he thinks fit without the Imputation of Injustice or Cruelty and the involving Great and Small Old and Young in the same common Destruction adds much to the Dreadfulness and Severity of the Judgment and consequently makes it more Exemplary upon this account 't is lawful to wish with the Psalmist f Ps 109. 9 c. 137.9 that God's Judgments may come upon the Children of Notorious and Implacable Enemies and this not out of a principle of Hatred and Revenge but only out of a Desire to see his Judgments made more manifest hereby to the World And as for the Psalmists pronouncing the Executioners of this Decree of God's Blessed g Ps 137.9 at which Mr. N. is so much offended h Fr. p. 229. Eng. p. 25. there are many Expressions like this in the Prophets where they incourage and commend and promise a Reward to those men who are to be Executioners of God's Judgments i Jer. 25 9.-27.6 7 8.-43.10.-50.14 21 26 29. Ezek. 29.19 and pronounce a Curse k Jer. 48.10 upon those who will not joyn in bringing his Will and Purposes to pass And where the Prophets exhort and incourage men to fulfill God's Judgments the Design of such Expressions is only to set forth in a Pathetical and Vehement manner how desirous the Holy Writers are that such a Work should be accomplish'd that will so much tend to the Illustrating God's Glory I think there is no sort of Imprecations used in the Psalms but something which has been offer'd in these Three Considerations will reach to and will be a sufficient Defence and Justification of Only I will add one brief Remark for the sake of those who do not converse with the Originals or the Ancient Versions of the Bible and that is this That the word l 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is sometimes Translated Hell in the Psalms and in several other places of the Old Testament signifies only the Grave and ought to have been always Translated so to prevent the Misunderstanding of these places So that when the Psalmist says m Psal 55.15 Let Death come hastily upon them and let them go down quick into Hell the Expression sounds harsh to a Vulgar ear and taking it in the most obvious sense of the words can hardly be defended but it really means no more but this Let them suddenly go down into the Grave before they have time to accomplish their Wicked Designs the later words being the same sense with the former only differently express'd Next in order to the Psalms are the Proverbs and therefore I shall in the next place consider the Objections which our Author advances against them One would think that the Character which the Sacred History n 1 Kin. 3.12 and all ages have given to Solomon of being indowed by God with an Extraordinary Degree of Wisdom above all other men together with what he says of himself that he imploy'd this Talent to the Instruction of the people and gather'd together many Proverbs o Eccles 12.9 to that end and besides all this the Authority of the Jewish Canon especially when 't is confirm'd by a Greater than Solomon our Saviour CHRIST and several Passages of this very Book directly quoted by his Apostles p Rom. 12.20 Hebr.