the Old Testament from the apostles at their first conversion but suddenly they could not be translated into every language and till they were translated they could not be read in the congregation unto edifying The books of the New Testament could not be delivered untill they were written but they were not written all at once and when they were all written being sent to severall churches it must be some time before they could be gathered together and translated And if nothing be allowable in the church but what was found in the primitive churches planted by the apostles by record of scripture I fear the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue must be cast out of the congregations I go not about to equalize stinted Liturgies with set translations of the holy scriptures but I would intreat such as oppose a stinted Liturgie by these reasons to consider whether they do not put weapons into the adversaries hands to fight against the scriptures Again set forms of catechismes publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others used with liberty to adde or alter as occasion requireth are no more commanded of God then set forms of prayer nor no more in use in the apostolick churches Christ our Saviour the Prophets or Apostles have no more appointed the one then the other if all parts of holy and spirituall worship may be performed without a stinted Liturgie they may be performed also without a stinted or set catechisme and if a set form of prayer must be disallowed a set form of catechisme publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others must be condemned also But the antiquity excellency and necessity of catechizing is known to them who are exercised in the building and governing of the house of God the use and profit of a set form therein is both manifest by reason and confirmed by experience at home and abroad in publick and private to them who have laboured to lay the foundation of Christian religion and train up the people committed to their charge in sound wisdome and understanding And in these things we swerve not from our pattern because we teach and professe the same doctrine and worship God with the same worship and substantiall means of worship that the primitive churches and Christians did There is the same reason of reading the Apocrypha books of Maccabees and those that follow them in the congregation and of reading a stinted form of Liturgie and the same reasons that silence the Apocrypha will silence stinted prayers as well and as much When we prove the lawfulnesse of a stinted form of prayer by the stinted forms of psalmes and blessing mentioned in scripture it is thought answer sufficient to say There is great difference betwixt blessings or psalmes and prayer and yet here it is enough to match things unlike together and to say of them without all proof There is the same reason of both But if it have any sinews it will silence the singing of psalmes sermons professions of faith and conceived prayer no lesse then stinted especially the use of notes to help memory and forms of catechisme by whomsoever and howsoever used For there is the same reason of reading and uttering by heart in the congregation And if nothing but the canonicall scriptures must be read in the congregation nothing must be uttered by heart or strength of memory but the scriptures alone But sermons professions of faith conceived prayer are not canonicall scripture The reason is one and whatsoever can be answered truly in the one will put the other to flight If it be said That it is the prerogative of the scripture to be the rule of faith and manners and therefore nothing is to be read in the congregation as the ground undoubted and immediate of faith and manners but the scripture alone this openeth way for stinted prayer as well as for sermons or conceived prayer The substantiall means of worship both publick and private are determined of God It is unlawfull to set up an image for worship either publick or private The scripture must be acknowledged the sole rule of faith and manners both in publick and private It is unlawfull to devise sacramentall signes in private as well as in the congregation And if it be unlawfull to reade any other book in the congregation because the reading of the scripture is the onely approved medium cultûs by the same reason all forms of catechismes and singing of psalmes and reading or use of stinted praiers in the family are unlawfull And if the one be an image in the congregation the others are so in the family When the Lord had devised and appointed a perfume saith the authour of the Letter all men are forbidden to make a composition like that perfume Exod. 30. 35 37. So if it could be proved that Christ had made a form for the churches and believers alwayes when they pray then the offering up of any other prayers made by others or of our own devising would seem to be as unlawfull as the offering of strange incense Exod. 30. 9. Where it is implyed that seeing God hath determined no certain form therefore forms devised by men are not necessary but lawfull In the same manner they may be answered from their own grounds That seeing God hath sanctified and set apart the canonicall scriptures given by immediate Divine inspiration to be the sole and perfect rule of faith and manners therefore the scripture alone must be read and acknowledged as the sole ground of heavenly instruction But seeing he hath determined no certain form of prayer or sermons professions of faith or thanksgiving therefore either none at all must be made or forms devised by men are lawfull to be heard in the congregation yet not as immediate and undoubted grounds of faith for that is proper to the scripture but as instructions and exhortations builded upon or petitions framed according to the scripture as present occasion doth require In sermons who doth not put a difference betwixt the text whereupon the discourse instructions exhortations rebukes comforts be grounded deduced the exhortations rebukes comforts which are propounded in method phrase of speech devised by men The first is ought to be canonicall scripture the other not so But it would argue great ignorance if not perversenesse if a man should cavill in this manner against the preaching of the word That the scriptures alone are to be read in the congregation therefore the minister of the Gospel must simply reade the scripture but never give the meaning nor make application In the Primitive church sundry councels have forbidden the reading of any books as parts of Divine worship but canonicall scripture onely of the Old and New Testament but no councel ever condemned the use of a stinted Liturgie Those churches which forbad the reading of any books which be without the canon did
cannot be performed Particular duties affirmative against a generall negative commandment must have expresse warrant by way of prerogative and derogation from the generall commandment wherein we must not go one jot beyond signed commission Thus Abraham was commanded to offer up his son Isaac which otherwise had been against the sixth commandment Thus the sacraments are commanded to the church which for the church to devise of her self is against the second commandment and therefore it is unlawfull to institute other sacraments then God hath appointed or adde sacramentall signes to them which the Lord hath instituted But to affirm the same of devised words in prayer preaching administration of the sacraments and reading of the scriptures sc that they were instituted of God by particular warrant and by speciall prerogative and derogation would be exceeding strange Signes religious then are of two sorts 1. Vocall if they may be called signes metaphysicall under which I comprehend naturall gestures as they are expressions of the inward affection and these are not simply forbidden or commanded in the second commandment nor do simply pertein to the second commandment but to the precept rather which requireth the inward affection it self 2. Reall and such as in common nature use and end be one with the positive ordinances of God and these are the images forbidden in the second precept And seeing for the affirmative part positive worship as it is to be approved mainteined and exercised purely according to the institution is the object of that commandment it seemeth that prayer as it is directed unto God onely in the mediation of Jesus whether inward or outward conceived in heart or declared by word or gesture cannot be referred as a branch of positive worship to the second commandment When men pray to idols or saints departed inwardly or outwardly they sinne against the first commandment If with carnall imaginations before an image they break the second if lightly vainly irreverently with the lips alone they sinne against the third But the method words or phrase of speech as such is neither condemned in the second commandment nor doth belong unto it Mens inventions in Gods worship are forbidden in the second commandment But stinted prayer is the invention of man never instituted nor approved of Christ in his Testament Must this go for currant without limitation proof or explication That all inventions of men in Gods worship are forbidden in the second commandment What then shall we say to all devised words and phrases used in Gods service What to all set forms of catechismes studied sermons interpretations of the scriptures the contents of chapters the titles of sundry books of scripture What to the divisions of thē into sections chapters and verses the interlineary glosses divers readings marginall references the reading of one part this week another the next What of the building and ordering of synagogues for the sanctification of the sabbaths the fashion of gathering for the repair of the temple in Joash his time the swearing to the covenant under Asia the ordination of holy feasts and fasts upon occasion What of the forms and gestures used in oathes of conceived prayer it self of set forms of worship studied before and kept in memory as some distinguish in the same form and with like truth we may argue against them mens inventions in the worship of God are forbidden by the second commandment But set forms of catechismes studied sermons interpretations of the scripture c. are mens inventions The conclusion that followeth from these premisses is evidently false therefore some one of them if not both is false also For of truth nothing but truth can follow And what they can answer to the premisses of this latter argument the same will be sufficient to overthrow the other Catechizing is Gods ordinance but this or that form of catechisme in respect of method and phrase of speech is the collection and composition of man Reading the scripture is allowed of God but the division of the law into fiftie three or fiftie foure greater sections and the subdivision of these into lesser sections the partitions of severall books into chapters and the division of them into verses the appointing of this or that portion of the law the prophets and the evangelists to be read ordinarily upon this or that day is the invention or devise of man Preaching is commanded of God so is the interpretation of the scripture but the phrase and method of sermons is of men The matter of scripture is the immediate truth of God but the words and phrases which are as vessels to convey this truth unto us I speak of translations not of the originall text are humane and not of God by immediate inspiration God commandeth us to call upon his name both in publick and private but the words wherein we expresse our desires are our own both in conceived and stinted prayer These are humane in respect of the word and form Divine in respect of the matter And here it must be observed that positive worship or means for these two in this sense are all one opposed to humane inventions is that which must be warranted by particular institution and not by the light of reason according to the generall rules of scripture As for example the sacraments are positive worship or means of worship and they have particular expresse institution but the form or manner of administration as it respecteth decency order and edification is not positive worship or means thereof in the sense before mentioned and therein it sufficeth if all things be done according to the generall rules of scripture the light of reason directing in particulars what is decent and to edification So then devised worship is unlawfull but it is lawfull to worship God in a form of words devised for the form is not worship but the prayer tendred in that form Mens inventions in Gods worship that be of the same nature and use with true worship or means of worship ordained of God be unlawfull but method order phrase of speech devised by man was never judged an invention unlawfull Book-prayer in an image or similitude of spirituall prayer which indeed it is not and the book as idoles supplyeth the place of the world and spirit The accusation is grievous but if we crave a reason thereof we shall find them as farre to seek as forward to accuse Is it onely a similitude of prayer because it hath onely the externall form of prayer but wanteth the soul and life thereof They might easily answer themselves As it is penned or printed it hath onely the externall form and so it is not properly a prayer but as it is rehearsed with understanding affiance of heart and fervency it hath the true and whole nature of prayer And by what reason can a book-prayer be called an image of true prayer which will not agree to prayer first conceived and then uttered For
if it be uttered with the lips without the intention of the heart it is a bare similitude and if the other be read or uttered after an holy manner with that affection which God requireth in prayer it is true and acceptable prayer Words without the heart are but empty sounds whether read or pronounced out of the memory or ex tempore and if the voice be joyned with the heart it is pleasant melody though our petitions be read out of a book But the book then saith he supplieth the room of the word and spirit Nothing lesse For the word of God directeth us what to ask even when we reade our prayers upon a book so long as we crave with understanding things agreeable to the will of God And the spirit doth enable and stirre us up to desire that which is according to Gods will and our necessity We may utter requests with our lips in conceived prayer without the aid and assistance of the holy Ghost and so we may in a penned prayer but offer up the sighs and grones of the heart we cannot without his grace It is no more lawfull to use any strange manner of prayer then it was to use strange fire or strange incense in time of the law Psal 141. 2. Apoc. 8. 3 4. But a stinted form of prayer is a strange manner of prayer The proposition we grant if rightly understood otherwise symbolicall and analogicall arguments if the proposition be not rightly taken are very dangerous But a stinted form of prayer is no strange manner of worship because in it all things required to the nature of true prayer may be observed In the word of God we have direction given to whom for what with what heart and affection to what end a man ought to pray but in what method or frame of speech he is to be a petitioner we find nothing prescribed in particular neither do we judge any thing necessary more then this That order decency and edification be observed That which hath the common nature definition use and end of worship but wanteth Divine authority and institution to make it approved and true worship that is strange in the worship of God But the method and phrase of speech hath not the common nature definition use or end of worship or prayer belonging unto it As conceived prayer so a set form of prayer is for substance and nature agreeable to the rules of direction delivered in the word of truth though for method and words both the humane Let our brethren set down out of the word of God what is necessarily and essentially required to the nature and being of true prayer shew if they be able that some one or other condition or requisite cannot be observed in a prescript or stinted form If this cannot be done as I think it never hath nor can be how dare they esteem or style it a strange worship They tell us God hath not ordained that manner of worship But this phrase the manner of worship is used two wayes first as it noteth the substantiall means of worship ordained of God by speciall institution secondly as it is put for the outward order or form how this worship or means of worship is performed A third signification might be added as when we say the third commandment teacheth in what manner the name and ordinances of God are to be used Now if it be taken in the first or third signification the outward frame of words order and method is neither means nor manner of worship either in preaching prayer or administration of the sacraments If in the second the word of God doth not prescribe any particular form stinted or not stinted as necessary but doth warrant both as allowable For where nothing is in particular commanded touching the externall form of words and order in which our petitions should be presented to the Lord there we are left at liberty And to put religion in reading or uttering words in a stinted or conceived form where God hath laid no bond upon the conscience what is it lesse then superstition If the phrase of speech be modus or medium cultûs as it is referred to the second commandment then it is instituted commanded and determined of God in particular then that and none other is lawfull and necessary for so it is in all parts of his positive worship Those sacramentall signes which God hath designed in the covenant are necessary and those onely lawfull and if method and phrase of speech be medium cultûs in the same sense the like must be said of that also In substance a prayer read and conceived is all one and the one is no more a strange manner of worship then the other And here let it be observed that all these objections are made against all use of stinted or read prayers publick or private voluntary or imposed sound and pertinent as well as corrupt and cannot be restrained to a form imposed upon the minister of the congregation to be used continually and that corrupt and faulty The matter if supposed to be alike from God as being truth and according to sound doctrine the manner in that we call conceived prayer is the same which nature teacheth and scripture approveth and is the onely way in which the prayers of all holy men recorded in scripture since Christ have been carried as the Papists themselves grant But for the manner or way of book-prayer we have not so much as example in scripture for it The strength of this reason let us view in the like M r Smith would prove the originals not to be given as helps before the eye in worship Because upon the day of Pentecost and many yeares after the churches of the new Testament did use no books in time of spirituall worship but prayed prophesied and sung psalmes merely out of their hearts Acts 2. 4 42. 10. 44 48. 19. 6. 1. Cor. 14. 15 17 26 37. Because no example can be shewed of any man ordinary or extraordinary that at or after the day of Pentecost used a book in praying prophesying and singing of Psalmes if yea let it be done and we yield And against the use of translations for the hearers thus he argueth The Prophets and Apostles wrote books but did never divide their books into chapters and verses Seeing therefore that chapters and verses were of mans invention hence it followeth before chapter and verse came in the hearers could not turn to search their books in time of hearing The Apostles in quoting testimonies of the prophets do not quote chapter and verse but onely say It is written The scripture saith The holy Ghost saith thereby teaching us that there is no use of chapter and verse for searching in time of hearing Never was there mention made of any hearer that ever had his book to search in time of hearing The reasons be the same and yet I perswade my self they
that dislike a stinted form of prayer will not allow of the conclusion which M r Smith would inferre As for the reason it self whatsoever can be truly spoken of the excellency profit and use of conceived prayer we freely and willingly admit but betwixt it and stinted prayer there is no such disagreement that if the one be praised the other must needs be cast out of doores if the one be allowed the other must needs be a breach of the second commandment Nature teacheth that from the abundance of the heart the mouth should speak and in the use of a stinted form repeated by memory or read upon a book the mouth speaketh from the abundance of the heart else in the stinted use of psalms prayers or prayses the saints of God recorded in scripture spake not from the heart If no example of any holy man since Christ be recorded in scripture who hath tendered his prayers to God in a stinted form of words or read them out of a book is this any thing against that practice Is not the approved practice of the church of the Jews grounded upon reasons common to them and us and of perpetuall equity sufficient to justifie an act or order though no example can be brought for it out of the new testament I have not heard nor read of such an exception in a matter of this nature in any writer old or new Popish or Protestant and consider I pray what dangerous consequences would follow thereupon I will not presse them because upon second thoughts I make no question it will appear farre amisse If in that particular of stinted prayer we find not example will it not suffice if from grounds of scripture we can prove it lawfull and that all things required in prayer may be observed in a stinted form If in that particular there be none examples will it not suffice that analogicall examples of things of the same nature and kind may be produced And then it will not be hard to find examples since Christ for the use of stinted prayer as we shall shew hereafter But what if none example could be produced of that or the like practice The scripture doth not descend to give particular commandment or example for every thing perteining to order or manner of administration of Divine things It is sufficient that there be generall rules found for that purpose according to which particulars must be directed Nay which is more sundry things are not onely lawfull but necessary for which you can bring no example out of the word of God neither before nor since Christ I will spare to mention particulars because I would not teach profane men to wrangle God may have as much honour or more in our publick assemblies if a stinted form were not used And this is a certain truth That whatsoever the worship and service of God may spare without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of Saints is superfluous and so but a vain invention If all this be granted it will not follow that a stinted form is against the second commandment of the same common nature with an image For in publick administration of Gods service in the outward order method and phrase many things are laid aside by the most and might be spared by all men which are against no commandment And the like may be said of sundry observations The custome of godfathers and godmothers in baptisme of calling an assembly by the sound of a bell of buriall in church-yards might be spared and yet not against the second commandment When there be many wayes or means whereby a thing may be atteined it is not an idle invention ordinarily to choose the one or other as seemeth expedient M r Robinson disputeth thus against our stinted form of prayer It cannot be an ordinance of Christ because the church may perfectly and entirely worship God without it with all the parts of holy and spirituall worship as did the apostolick churches for many yeares before such Liturgie was devised or imposed I should think both these reasons carry the same sense sc That that may be spared without which the church may perfectly and entirely worship God with all parts of holy and spirituall worship And if that be the meaning then I deny that to be a superfluous or vain invention which might be spared without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of Saints For set forms of blessing catechismes administration of the sacraments be not superfluous and vain inventions and yet all parts of Gods spirituall worship may perfectly and entirely be performed without them The use of a set translation of holy scripture to be read in the congregation by such or such portions or sections is no vain invention the distribution of it into chapters and verses the quotation of chapter and verse the marginall references are no superfluous devises and yet the church may perform all parts of Gods worship entirely and perfectly without these as did the apostolick churches The prescribing of a set form of psalmes to be sung by all the people jointly together is no superfluous devise and yet it may be spared without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of the people as it was in the apostolick churches for many years Of which more in the next chapter Set forms of confessions of churches set forms of professions of faith to be used in the publick worship of God be not vain inventions and yet you may say of them as you do of stinted forms of prayer They may be spared There is no example for them in scripture since Christ The word consubstantiall is not necessary as without which the doctrine of that truth of the Divinity of our Saviour Christ cannot be mainteined for that were to accuse the holy pen-men of scripture yet was it not an idle or superfluous invention In some reformed churches before preaching-time the church assembled hath the scriptures read in such order that the whole canon thereof is oftentimes in one yeare run through In others there is no such order of simple reading but besides their set sermons two chapters are paraphrastically expounded with the principall points thereof taken and applyed unto their auditours Neither of these simply necessary nor yet superfluous inventions To kneel in prayer yea to prescribe that men shall ordinarily kneel in publick prayer if with conveniency they may is not an idle invention and yet men may pray sitting standing falling upon the face Men may meet together to worship God at fit time in convenient place observe due order method moderation in length according to the abilities and necessities of the people without rules and prescriptions for that purpose and yet rules prescriptions and precedents are not idle inventions And though it be possible to worship God aright and further the edification of his Saints as much without as with a set form yet a set form of prayer devised
particular sinnes against the law of God the state of man by nature and the condition of the Saints and of the church as also to think upon the works of Gods providence and how he is pleased to deal with his people in all places 2. The better to stirre up confidence and affection and to furnish himself with words and matter it is not unlawfull nor unprofitable to reade the prayers of the godly registred in holy scripture or published in other godly books to observe the matter of their prayer their ferventnesse in praying and the arguments wherewith they pressed their suits and contended for audience 3. After a man hath collected matter for prayer by meditation and reading he may studie to digest it into due order and method and to expresse his requests in fit and decent speech and the same so conceived he may utter as a prayer according as occasion shall offer it self The reason may be thus contracted If the Spirit of God doth work by means and stir up good desires but giveth not abilitie to expresse our desires in fitting significant words 〈◊〉 it is lawfull for us to use all godly means to stirr up the graces of God in us and premediate how we may utter our requests in such form and manner as may best serve for our quickning and the edification of others And if the use of a premeditated form of words in prayer do not stint the Spirit in a sinfull manner a set form of prayer cannot be condemned as injurious to the Spirit The Spirit of God is the onely sufficient help which God giveth us to help our infirmities in the time of prayer Rom. 8. 26. Gal. 4. 6. Zech. 12. 10. We confesse most willingly that prayer is not a work of nature wit or learning but of the Spirit of grace True desire or abilitie to pray is not bred in us by nature nor procured and gotten by our study and industry but proceedeth onely from the holy Ghost as the authour and efficient and this is proved by the places quoted But ability to pray standeth in the lifting up of the soul unto God not in the ample expression of our desires according to the various occasions in fit words and pressing them with forcible arguments Prayer is the immediate work of the Spirit But no text of scripture doth in such sense make the holy Ghost the authour of prayer or helper of our infirmities as that it should be unlawfull to make use of outward means to furnish the soul with matter stirre up the graces of God in the heart and blow the coals of the spirit For then we must not reade the scriptures nor other godly books we may not meditate or conferre the better to fit us for prayer Peradventure it will be said the Spirit of God is our onely helper in the time of prayer so that at other times we may use helps to stirre up the graces of the Spirit but not in the time of prayer And if this distinction be found in scripture or by sound reason may be deduced out of scripture we must hearken unto it but if it be of our selves whiles we pleade against the devises of men we maintein devises The Spirit of grace is at all times the sole mover and enabler of us to pray and the use of lawfull helps and such as suite with the nature of prayer are at no time unlawfull As it is fit to meditate and reade before we pray so in prayer it is lawfull to kneel lift up the eyes and hands use the help of the voyce and the benefit of a Christian friend to stirre up affection Therefore for the lawfulnesse of book-prayer we may dispute thus If it be lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer the better to stirre up affection then book-prayer is not to be condemned for this that the Spirit of God is the onely or sufficient help that God giveth to help our infirmities in the time of prayer But it is lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer The Spirit alone either immediately or by means sanctified and ordained by himself maketh requests for us yea it is by the immediate teachings and suggestions of the Spirit that all our requests must be put up no other helps are mentioned or can be collected in the present action of prayer I will not stand to enquire how these things can agree together what is meant by the immediate teachings of the Spirit or how the Spirit maketh requests either immediately or by means The Spirit alone and that immediately is the authour of prayer but by means he ministreth varietie of matter order and words But what are we to understand by means sanctified and ordained by himself If means ordained by speciall institution it is too strait and hard to conceive what they be If means allowed by God as those whereby we may furnish our selves with words and matter for prayer as reading godly books conference meditation on the works of God c. a stinted form of prayer is a means sanctified And here I desire it may be noted in what sense a form of prayer is called a means or furtherance not as a means or form of worship properly so called but as in fit words and phrases it presenteth to our minds or memories what we ought to beg agreeable to the word of God as the frame of words and matter kept in memory may be called and is reputed a stinted form A stinted form of prayer quencheth the Spirit It is a quenching of the Spirit to reade another mans prayer upon a book That quencheth the Spirit which is as water to cool or allay or exstinguish the heat of that holy fire which cannot be imputed to a set form of prayer either by authoritie of scripture or sound reason Reading godly books is an exercise profitable to stirre up the graces of Gods Spirit in us were it not a wonder if reading a godly prayer should produce the contrary effect As in the ministery of the word the corruption of mans heart and the hainousnesse of sinne may more lively and fully be discovered for his humiliation then he is able of himself to set it forth so in prayer penned by a goldy andwell experienced Christian the case of a distressed soul may more pithily and amply be deciphred and anatomized then he of himself is able to lay it open And in such case to deny this lawfull help is to take away a crutch from the lame and bread from the hungry In the very act of prayer it is lawfull to use outward helps whereby we may be enabled to pray better and shall it not be lawfull for a burdened soul perplexed with doubtings overwhelmed with bitter anguish to use the help of a book that he might the better unfold and lay open his misery into the bosome of his loving Father The ample and particular laying open of our necessities doth ease the
heart and move affections and when this may be done better by the help of a book in prayer then of our selves how can the use thereof be accused as the quenching of the Spirit It is the Spirit indeed that doth help us in our infirmities but we must use means to stirre up the graces of the Spirit in us He quencheth not the Spirit who laboureth to blow the coals of grace and useth all helps afforded in most ample and particular manner to unburden his heart before the Lord. He doth not substitute his Christian friends in the place of the word and Spirit who not able to lift up his own soul by reason of griâ—vous straitnesse and pressure of heart doth crave his help and assistance in prayer And may not a godly book supply the lack of Christian companion When we are dull and out of order we may joyn with others in prayer for our relief and quickning why then should it be intolerable to make this benefit of a godly book A set form of prayer may be committed to memory and uttered from it doth that also quench the Spirit It is not safe they say for a minister to limit himself alwayes to one form of prayer though devised by himself But if it be a quenching of the Spirit an humane invention forbidden in the second commandment if it cannot be made by the Spirit if it be not that true and spirituall worship which God requireth it is not lawfull ordinarily nor once for minister or private christian in publick or private in case of distresse or otherwise for the objection is generall That all stinted forms of prayer do quench the Spirit and these mitigations of safe alwayes and for a minister are a plain concession there is no force in the reason These stinted forms do quench the Spirit of prayer in that they deprive the church and minister of that libertie of the Spirit of prayer which God would have them use stinting the minister yea all the ministers of the kingdome to the same measure of the Spirit not onely one with another but all of them with him that is dead and rotten Nothing is here objected against our stinted form which may not with like truth be alledged against the reading of a prescribed and set translation the use of the Lords prayer a set form of blessing singing of psalms and baptizing in these precise words I baptize thee c. For in these things it may be said The minister yea all the ministers in the kingdome are stinted to the same measure of the Spirit c. And if in those particulars that form of reasoning be of no weight in this it is but an empty sound A stinted form depriveth not the minister or church of that libertie of the Spirit which God would have them use seeing they may use that notwithstanding as the severall occasions of the church or people shall require If all ministers throughout the Christian world should put up the same holy and just petitions to God in the same phrase of speech as in the words of the Lords prayer they should neither stint the Spirit to one measure nor deprive the church of the liberty of the Spirit seeing the measure of the Spirit standeth not in words and forms but in fervent sighs and groans and they have time and libertie to pray besides as God shall enable them and the present occasions of the assembly require And if it must needs be that in a stinted form the Spirit is stinted to one measure then all stinting of the Spirit is not quenching of the Spirit For the minister doth not quench the Spirit if he stint it in respect of time and occasions Suppose sundry private Christians in the assembly do excell their pastour in the gift of prayer the wife excell the husband the child or servant excell the master or governour is the Spirit quenched in them when it is stinted for the time to their measure in prayer Suppose divers Christians meeting upon occasion the weakest in gifts be put to pray for the rest is the Spirit in them quenched because it is stinted to his measure The question is not of prayer devised by a mans self or of limiting the Spirit in the people but of prayer devised by others and imposed and of limiting the Spirit of the minister the first is lawfull the second sinfull The question is of a publick stinted form of prayer or Liturgie Whether it quench the Spirit in the minister or the people and Whether it quench the Spirit because it stinteth it Whether the form be devised by others or by a mans self imposed or voluntarily taken up that is nothing to the matter in hand but Whether it quench the Spirit because for the time it is limited to that form of words And if we look into the matter it self the Spirit of God may be quenched in a mans self no lesse by the rude customary use of a form devised by a mans self then by a form imposed by others and it may be as prejudiciall to the comfort of Gods people And if we consult the scripture where shall we find this distinction of limiting the Spirit by prayer devised by a mans self or devised of others of stinting the Spirit in respect of time occasion form of prayer uttered out of memory or read upon a book But the distinction it self hath been confuted already together with the assertion That a stinted prayer doth quench the Spirit It cannot properly be said saith one that the Spirit is limited by his own ordinance but when the Spirit of the minister is straitned by forms prescribed to him by men without Gods ordinance and appointment then the Spirit is limited and stinted indeed But this is a bare repetition of what was said before without proof or reason and besides a strange description of limiting the Spirit is nothing but a proof of one thing by the same And here I desire two things may be noted First though many reasons in shew be brought against the use of stinted prayer yet when the matter cometh to the upshot they are barely one and that nakedly affirmed Stinted prayer is unlawfull because in reading book â—prayer he doth not exercise his own but another mans gifts Is this reason good No for in reading scripture out of a translation he exerciseth another mans gifts But stinted prayer is the devise of man A child of twelve or thirteen yeares old may reade a stinted prayer as well as the minister The same may be said of reading the Scriptures But stinted prayer is the devise of man It is unlawfull to stint the Spirit Yet this is done in praying with others But stinted prayer is the devise of man So that all hangeth upon this string for the confirmation whereof nothing is alledged Secondly they take that for granted evermore which should be proved or prove the same by the same as Stinted prayer doth
which assembled every day the word was preached every day And in the congregations which assembled every Lords day after the reading of the lessons psalmes and evangelists the word was preached constantly before they were dismissed The time specially appointed or taken for the sermon was the morning after the reading of the prophets and psalmes and evangelists In the afternoon as assemblies so sermons were frequent and two or more sermons were made in one and the same congregation sometimes by one sometimes by divers ministers After the sermon ended followed the prayers of the congregation as the testimonies before alledged plentifully confirm Clemen Constit lib. 2. cap. 57. After the exhortation of the Presbyter and the Bishop all pray unto God Justin Apol. 2. ad Anton. Then we rise all and pray together sc after the exhortation ended Origen Hom. 3. in Isa Idcirco surgentes oremus Deum Hom. 36. in Luc. Surgamus precemúrque Deum Chrysost Hom. 50. ad cap. 14. Matth. But now it is time to conclude our speech with prayer orate igitur universi nobiscum In all which we see the wisdome of the church so moderated the length of the Liturgie that each ordinance of God had its proper season that reading and prayer did not thrust out preaching nor preaching eat up prayer that the weak were not tired and burdened nor the sluggish fostered in their securitie And if a Liturgie be onely burdensome for length it is not altogether to be cast off For the thing it self is thereby justified as good and allowable that which burdeneth being taken away And it is much better to wrestle against bodily tirednesse with spirituall fervour then deprive themselves of the comfort and profit which is to be had in the ordinances of God The worship of God by that stinted form whereof our question is is the devise of Antichrist it being never prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles and recorded in scripture But as the mystery wrought to a greater height in declining times of the church it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed strictly enjoyned and every where used in the papacy as serving to maintein superstition and a dumbe idole-reading ministery and to nourish people in ignorance of the nature and right use of prayer The Masse-book is in Latine this Liturgie-book is in English the Masse-book hath all the prayers this Liturgie hath and some more other differences I know not between them Therefore king Edward the sixth in his letter to the Devonshire-men to convince them that their Liturgie was our service telleth them that it was no other but the old and the self-same words in English which were in Latine save a few things taken out which were so fond that it was a shame to heare them in English And king James in a speech of his in Scotland said that their English Liturgie was an ill-said Masse Pope Pius the fourth sending Vincentio Parpatia Abbat of S. Saviour to Qu. Elisabeth offered to confirm the English Liturgie by his authoritie if she would yield to him in some other things Indeed this Liturgie pleased them so well that for the first eleven years of Qu. Elizabeth Papists came to the English churches and service as the Lord Cook sheweth And when the Popes intelligencers had seen service solemnly sung and said in Canterbury and London with all their pomp and procession they wondred that their master would be so unadvised as to interdict a Prince or State whose service and ceremonies so symbolized with his own The whole form then of the church-service a few grosse things taken out is borrowed from the Papists culled and picked out of that popish dung-hill the Portuis and vile masse-Masse-book But that form of prayer by which God is worshipped after the manner that idolaters worship their Gods swerveth from a rule of prayer prescribed in scripture Deut. 12. 3 4. 30. 31 32. And this is made the first of the exceptions against the common-prayer-book which were briefly added to in the Abbridgement That it appointed a Liturgie which in the whole matter and form thereof is too like unto the Masse-book The main challenge in this objection which I have set down more at large because it is much insisted upon against our communion-book is That it was taken out of the masse-book But in the manner of propounding there be divers great mistakes to say no more It is a great fault that they put no difference betwixt the substance of worship and the externall form or order of celebration The substance of worship in that stinted form of prayer is That we call upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ according to his will Is this the devise of Antichrist because the form of words was taken out of the masse-book Suppose a minister of the Gospel should borrow some expressions or phrases of speech from heathen authours is his sermon forthwith the invention or devise of an heathen It is as far wide that they say Not onely the form of it taken from the church of Antichrist but surely the matter also For the matter of our Liturgie is the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue the calling upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ and not upon angels or saints departed for the living and not for the dead the right administration of the sacraments for substance and singing of psalmes are these the devises of Antichrist Is the administration of the Lords supper in both kinds in remembrance of Christs death and passion who by one oblation of himself once offered hath made a full perfect and sufficient oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world is this taken from the church of Antichrist These imputations are not so grosse as their reasons weak upon which they are built If our stinted Liturgy be the devise of Antichrist because it is not prescribed by the apostles or recorded in scripture then every stinted Liturgie must fall under the same censure for none other is prescribed in scripture or recorded by the apostles And so either every stinted Liturgie is part of that mystery of iniquitie which began to work in the apostles dayes or our Liturgy is not Antichristian because it was not prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles If it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed then the first beginning of it was no more from Antichrist then was the beginning of other Liturgies Antichrist sitteth in the Temple of God and antichristianisme is a filthy and lothsome leprosie which by degrees did infect the pure worship of God If therefore our Liturgie was sowred in after-times with that old leaven it might be pure and free in its first originall Is it for matter taken from the church of Antichrist
because it was culled and picked out of the popish dunghill the popish and vile masse-book full of all abominations Who knoweth not that many pretious truths may be culled and picked out of the masse-book Good gold may have some drosse and amongst an heap of drosse it is possible to find some good gold A true mans goods may be found in a thieves den or cave and the goods of the church in the possession of Antichrist Antichrist hath either by violence broken in upon or by secret insinuation before his cunning was spied gotten the rich treasures of the church into his hand which the right heirs may lawfully require and take back again not as borrowed from him but as due to them I scarce know how a man should more honour Antichrist or wrong the true church of God then to grant that all the good things that Antichrist doth usurp do of right belong unto him and are borrowed from him For they are the rich legacies which Christ hath bequeathed unto his church to whom properly they pertein The matter then of our stinted form may be from God and proper to the church though picked and culled out of the Masse-book If therefore our stinted Liturgie be Antichristian it is so either in respect of the matter or of the form Not of the matter for that which properly belonged to Antichrist the soul and grosse errours are purged out Not of the form for order and phrase of speech is not properly Antichristian of which more hereafter The Papists cannot sincerely approve our publick service but they must condemn and detest their own their prayers in an unknown tongue their praying to saints departed much more to feigned saints their receiving in one kind their unbloudy sacrifice their reall presence their satisfaction for veniall sinnes and temporall punishment of mortall sinnes their blotting out of the second commandment or at least confounding it with the first with others the like And if for the first eleven yeares of Qu. Elisabeth the Papists came to our churches and service what can we think but that the hand of the Lord was with us at that time for good when without division we sought him and he was pleased so to honour us that our adversaries should at least feignedly submit themselves The Lord grant all estates and conditions wisely to consider the true cause why they are fallen from our assemblies since that time and hardned in their perversenesse every day more and more But to come to the thing it self objected to wit That our book of common prayer is wholly taken out of the masse-Masse-book we are here to note that the Masse in former times did signifie the worship of God which consisted in publick prayers thanksgivings confession of faith singing of psalmes reading and interpretation of the holy scriptures and receiving the sacrament of the Lords supper and so the ancient Masse and Liturgie were the same But now the Romane Masse is put for the unbloudy sacrifice of the body of Christ which the priest doth offer up for the quick and dead And in this sense the word is to be taken when they say our service-book is taken out of the Masse-book But it should rather be said that the Masse was in time added to our communion-book and by the purging out of the Masse it is restored to its former puritie Popery is as a scab or leprosie that cleaveth to the church and the Masse an abomination annexed to the Liturgie Before ever the Masse was heard of in the world or began to be hatched there were stinted Liturgies in the church for substance much-what the same with ours and these at first more pure after stained with more corruption as the times grew worse and worse The Eastern churches as it should seem had their stinted Liturgies first and the Western borrowed many things from them but as the times declined they brought in more and more drosse into the church untill the canon of the Masse was completely framed The ancient Liturgies attributed to James Basil Chrysostom c. are counterfeit as our Divines have largely proved and the Papists cannot deny But divers things conteined in those Liturgies were in use in the primitive church without question In the primitive times they had their appointed lessons out of the Law and the Prophets and the Psalmes and the Evangelists their stinted prayers and forms of celebration with some variety but in substance all one in a manner This is evident if we compare the genuine writings of the Fathers with those counterfeit Liturgies before mentioned whereof some particular instances are given in the chapter following The stinted forms at first were more brief afterwards they were enlarged and as often it falleth out by enlargement corrupted and defiled Corruption by this means as a disease cleaving to the Liturgie it is necessary it should be corrected and thereby recovered to its first integrity or foundnesse Thus Cardinal Quignonius by the commandment of Clement the seventh so changed the Romane Breviarie that for a great part it was more like the English book of prayers than the Romane Breviarie And the English Liturgie gathered according to the module of the Ancients the purest of them is not a collection out of the Masse-book but a refining of that Liturgie which heretofore had been stained with the Masse And if those things were unjustly added to the Liturgie they might be and were justly cast out If it was wholly taken out of the Masse-book I should desire further to know how the Masse-book came to have those things in which are found in the book of Common prayers sound and holy for matter and directly contrary to Antichristianisme If these things were in the book before then all things therein were not of Antichrist but he had usurped them and it is lawfull for the true man to lay claim to his goods whereever he find them If they were not in the Masse-book then all things are not taken out of it but somethings restored out of purer Antiquity which the man of sinne had wickedly expunged The ministers of Lincoln never judged the use of the Book unlawfull never thought it lawfull to separate from the prayers of the congregation never refused to use the book though in some things they desired to be excused The churches of God have been evermore taught to prize and esteem these main and fundamentall truths and ordinances of worship at an higher rate then that some petty dislike of this or that in the externall form when the matter is sound and good should cause Separation The conclusion in brief is That our service-Service-book is not a translation of the Masse but a restitution of the ancient Liturgie wherein sundry prayers are inserted used by the Fathers agreeable to the scriptures Causelesse separation from the externall communion with any true church of Christ is the sinne of schisme But to separate from the prayers of the
congregation simply because a stinted form is used is causelesse separation from the externall communion of the church Weigh all the reasons brought to prove it lawfull and they will be found too light If we look to our guide and captain Christ doth not goe before us therein Dare any man affirm that they be not met together in the name of Christ or that he is not present in the midst of them that joyn together in a stinted Liturgie Is there any duty publick or private which God requireth of people holding communion together in ordinances of worship which may not be performed of each to other when a stinted form of prayer is used without Separation But by that unwarrantable course of voluntary separation they make an unlawfull rent in the church deprive themselves of the comfort of Gods ordinances weaken the faith of many cause divisions among brethren and advantage the adversaries of true religion CHAP. IX It is lawfull for a Christian to be present at that service which is read out of a book in some things faultie both for form and matter ONe reason alledged to prove the lawfulnesse and necessity of Separation from our publick service in particular is this That the prayer-book in question is corrupt in many things which is thus amplified The matter of some petitions is such as we cannot say Amen to it in faith as in the collect on the XII sunday after Trinitie it is prayed that God would forgive us those things whereof our consciences are afraid and give unto us that our prayers dare not presume to ask c. To omit divers others the very â—itting of Collects to certain dayes for holy fasts and feasts not sanctified by God savour of superstition as speciall prayers for Lent serving to countenance the keeping of it as a religious fast c. the manner of praying vain repetitions as the often repeating of the Lords prayer and GLORY TO THE FATHER and LORD HAVE MERCY UPON US c. disorderly responsories the clerk taking part of the prayer out of the ministers mouth c. Moreover the book perverteth the right use of the scriptures dismembreth and misapplieth them for making of gospels epistles lessons and collects appointed for feasts of mens devising and derived from the Papists and it reteineth a corrupt translation of the psalmes and bringeth into the church Apocrypha writings and the errours conteined in them To them that look at all humane Liturgies as images forbidden by the second commandment this objection is of small force because the thing it self and not the corruption cleaving to the Liturgie is disallowed But lest this accusation should breed scruple in the minds of some not altogether disaffected to stinted forms of prayer or Liturgies I will examine not the qualitie of the exceptions whether justly or unjustly taken but the weight of the reason if the particulars should be granted For this objection it self doth free the Liturgie from grosse errours either fundamentall or such as border thereupon respecting faith or practice in the prayers themselves or that which concerneth the administration of the sacraments For the corruptions objected are Misapplication of some text si of scripture Frequent repetitions of the same things Disordered responsories and Breaking petitions asunder c. and these not dispersed throughout the whole book but in some passages onely which concern not the main grounds and chief heads of Christian religion but are such faults or slips as may peaceably be tolerated amongst brethren Therefore not to insist upon any particulars mentioned I lay down this proposition That a Christian may lawfully and with good conscience be present at such service and prayers which are read out of a book though somethings therein are or may be supposed to be faultie for form or matter in things not fundamentall nor bordering thereupon not pernicious or noxious but such as may be tolerated amongst brethren these not dispersed through the whole body of the book but in some passages onely It is one thing to allow corruption another to be present at the service of God where something is done corruptly For the Lord chargeth us to keep our selves free from all pollution but alloweth not to separate from abuses unlesse he be pleased to go before and as he goeth before us It is one thing to approve of abuses in a Liturgie another to tolerate what we cannot reform For a Liturgie should be framed so not that things may be construed well but that they cannot be construed amisse But many things may be suffered which are not so well ordained when it is not in our power to redresse them The Lord needeth not mans lie neither doth he allow us to do evil that good may come thereof and therefore I must not subscribe to an errour against conscience though never so innocent nor professe approbation of that which in conscience I cannot allow though never so small to the intent I might enjoy externall communion with the church of God in the ordinances of worship But I must tolerate many things for the maintenance of peace and unitie and the preservation of Gods worship For if there be not mutuall toleration and forbearance but each man will rigidly stand upon his own opinion and presse others to be of his mind and follow his practice in all things and every tittle of necessitie all things must fall into confusion and the church be rent almost into as many pieces as there be men The proposition is proved first Because they that alledge the foresaid faults or corruptions against communicating with us in our publick Liturgie or stinted prayers do themselves put small strength or none at all in this reason For suppose a chapter be somewhat unfitly divided and break off in the midst of the matter or now and then separate verses which should go together or a verse be ill distinguished or the preacher misalledge a text of scripture or something be found amisse in his prayer when he exerciseth his own gifts must I of necessitie separate from that ordinance of God or reject the good for that which is amisse Hereunto this answer is returned When the minister exerciseth his own gift Gods ordinance is observed wherewith I may communicate in praying as well as preaching notwithstanding his infirmities in either which are but personall and in such cases the rule warranteth men to trie all things and to hold that which is good 1. Thess 5. 21. But when the Liturgie is read an ordinance which is not of God but of man is introduced into Gods worship contrary to the second commandment and therefore I must reject it and have no communion with it Is not this in plain terms to grant that the corruptions alledged can be no cause of Separation but this onely Because it is the devise of man The corruptions alledged are not the cause because they may be found in translations the distinction of chapters and verses the preaching
maketh our joyning with the assembly sinfull to us whereas if the evils were unexpected the danger would not be alike And thus it was with them who congregated to heare the scribes and Pharisees It is not for them that earnestly oppose all humane inventions to ward off a blow by humane devises When God commandeth my presence at his ordinance why should the corruption foreknown in the manner of administration without my consent or approbation any more defile then that which falleth out unexpected Or if it should nothing can be alledged more impertinently For the corruptions of the Pharisees in perverting the law were ordinary and common well known to all men and so reproved by our Saviour as a thing notorious And the like may be said of the disorders in the churches of Corinth and Rome for if the knowledge thereof came to the Apostle absent and at that time in prison by the information of the brethren of necessitie it must be known to the members of the churches The faithfull therefore when they joyned in the ordinances of worship with these assemblies neither did nor could pretend ignorance of these things There is a broad difference to be put betwixt the sinne committed by persons with whom I communicate and the corruption put upon the ordinance in which I communicate If the sinne of him with whom I communicate be manifest and known the ordinance of God is corrupted by it one way or other And if I be defiled with all known corruption whatsoever it is not materiall to the point in hand how those corruptions differ in their specificall nature The question is Whether all presence at the ordinances of God in some respect corruptly or disorderly administred contract guilt in him that is onely present in obedience to Gods commandment and hath no calling from God to testifie peculiar or speciall dislike It may be of some use here to shew what corruptions be fundamentall and what not what pernicious to be tolerated and what not when a man hath a calling to testifie against abuses and when not But to speak of the specificall difference betwixt abuses of the same kind or degree is quite wide of the mark This will easily be yielded because communion in the ordinances of worship is as well denied when wicked men are admitted to the sacrament as when it is administred in a devised or stinted Liturgie as it is called It was never questioned by right-believing Christians but the faithfull by Gods approbation might hold communion with the churches in the ordinances of worship for some ages after the death of the apostles The church continued a virgin all the dayes of the apostles as Hegesippus noteth But immediately after their death innumerable evils crept in began to spring amain neverthelesse the faithfull might did and ought to hold communion together in the proper and substantiall means of worship That many things were amisse in the churches is not denied and that the faithfull through ignorance did offend in many things but in this that they held communion notwithstanding such abuses amongst them they are blamelesse For a time the faithfull did lie hid in Babylon by Gods approbation untill the exhortation was given from heaven to come out of her and touch no unclean thing Not that they might touch any unclean thing at any time that is either in practice or consent and liking stain themselves with the corruptions of the world But that they might lie hid in the midst of much confusion and neither like nor consent unto the evils which they did bewail but could not reform That exhortation from heaven Come out of her my people come out of her c. some interpret of a locall departing out of the citie of Rome as Lot went out of Sodom and that interpretation the text seemeth to favour because the very outward destruction of the place is in that chapter menaced and therefore the removing out of the very place in avoydance of the mischief coming upon it forewarned But most commonly it is applied to a spirituall coming out of Babylon in separating from the societie and communion of that church wherein they could lie hid no longer without defilement And hence some conclude that this departure was to be made at a certain definite time when God was pleased to go before the faithfull and furnish them for this end and purpose But untill the time of freedome was proclaimed the faithfull did and might so lie hid in Babylon as not to be partakers of her sinnes For there is a certain order of the Revelation fitted to the order of times And as there is a time to speak and a time to keep silence but no time to lie so there is a time for the church to figh and lie hid but no time to dissemble or defile her self And as the Israelites offended not when they removed not out of Egypt before Moses was sent thither of God so neither did the faithfull transgresse in that they departed not out of Babylonish captivitie before they were called of God the time of liberty was proclaimed and God shewed them whither to flie To live in captivitie untill freedome be published is a misery not a sinne In that condition care must be to keep pure and undefiled but not to run away without leave or licence from God Whatsoever is to be thought of this application of the text herein all orthodox interpreters consent and agree that after the church was stained with manifold abuses the faithfull did and ought to hold communion with her in the means of worship But if simple presence be approbation of every thing that is judged to be done amisse in the worship of God a Christian could at no time that can be named in no age since the death of the apostles hold communion with the church of God in the ordinances and means of grace For it is as lawfull to be present at the worship prayers or administration which is read out of a book in some things faulty as to be present at that service where the scriptures are read out of a translation in many things faulty and corrupt in which many things are added diminished altered and changed But in the primitive churches the faithfull must be present if at all at the worship of God when the scriptures were read out of a faulty translation For to say nothing of the corruptions of the Seventy Interpreters which as Bellarmine confesseth had gathered many stains and blots in three hundred yeares of necessity the translations which were derived from it of which sort were most in the primitive church can be no lesse corrupt For no man before Hierome ever translated the books of the Old Testament out of the originall into Latine but out of the Seventy And the same may well be thought of most vulgar translations where the Greek or Latine were not in
the due esteem of the great mercy the Lord hath shewed unto his church No particular member of a church may voluntarily break off externall communion with the church or refuse to communicate in the publick service and worship of God unlesse the Lord Jesus go before him therein and be his warrant that is unlesse Christ hath withdrawn the presence of his grace or the party cannot be present without the guilt of hypocrisie or approbation of somewhat that is evil For the members of the visible church must hold fellowship in faith and love not onely one with another but with all other visible churches and all others intirely professing the faith of Christ so farre as they hold communion with Jesus Christ And therefore no member can lawfully break off externall communion with the true church of Christ but in that onely wherein and so farre as it hath broken off fellowship with Christ For where Christ is there is his church and where two or three are met together in his name there is he in the midst among them He is that Prince that is in the midst of his people who goeth in when they go in And when Christ calleth his free voluntaries to assemble in prayer or to partake at his table and promiseth to be present with them to heare their prayers and refresh their souls with grace it is not lawfull for a Christian to withdraw himself But in a congregation where a stinted form is used and that in some respects faulty here or there Christ may be and is present in the midst among them Christians are called to come and may be present without guilt of hypocrisie or approbation of the least evil To leave communion when we be obliged by God to continue in it is no lesse then schisme according to the nature of it Obliged by God we are to hold communion with the true churches of Christ in his true worship and service so farre as it may be without sin and wickednesse on our parts So that though there be some errours or ignorances in the publick administration yet if our belief of some errour or approbation of disorder be not required to that communion it is not lawfull to depart from the society of that church which professeth the saving truth of Christ intirely for substance rightly mainteineth the dispensation of the sacraments soundly calleth upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ and plentifully enjoyeth the means of grace When corruption and externall communion be so involved that it is simply impossible to leave the corruptions unlesse we leave the externall communion of the church a necessity of separation from that externall communion then lyeth upon us But though errours or corruptions of some kind be not onely tolerated but established mainteined and pressed yet if we can hold communion without approbation of the said errours or corruptions Separation in that case is unjust rash and unadvised because the Lord therein doth not go before us The sin of Separation if unjust is so great and heinous the ill consequences and mischiefs so many and fearfull that all Christians should be well advised neither to lay stumbling-blocks before the feet of others which might occasion their turning aside nor to seek or catch occasions of departure but rather to wait and tarry till they be assured that the Lord goeth before them For the first when the Anabaptists in Helvetia opposed humane inventions as unlawfull they were by publick authority and with common consent abolished And that of Irenaeus is well known Variety of ceremonies commend the unitie of faith For the other part the faithfull have ever tolerated weaknesses and infirmities in each other and abuses in the church so long as the foundation was held and they agreed in the main In the primitive church not onely some persons but whole congregations have doubted of many books of scripture and yet lost not their dignity of true churches of Christ How long did the faithfull wait and bear before they departed or rather were driven by excommunication sword and sire out of Babylon This hath been the judgement of the godly learned in all ages of the church They that for trifling and small causes saith Irenaeus divide the body of Christ c. these can make no reformation of such importance as to countervail the danger of a division When good men tolerate bad men saith Augustine which can do them no spirituall hurt to the intent they may not be separated from those who are spiritually good then there is no necessity to divide unity And in another place These two things reteined will keep such men pure and uncorrupted that is neither doing ill nor approving it Although faith be one funiculus colligantiae yet variety of opinions without pertinacy standeth with unity but nothing is so contrary to the church as schisme and departure This matter I will shut up with the saying of Zaga Bishop of Aethiope and embassador of Prester John It is a miserable thing that Christian strangers should be so sharply reproved as enemies as I have been here and other things which concern not the faith But it should be farre more convenient to support all Christians be they Grcaeians be they Armenians be they Aethiopians be they of any one of the seven Christian churches with charity and love of Christ and to permit them to live and converse amongst other Christian brethren without any injurie because that we are all infants of one baptisme and do hold truly the true faith The conclusion is That the externall communion of the church in publick worship is not to be forsaken for some faults neither fundamentall nor noxious which may be espied in her Liturgie Though the bearing and forbearing not onely of small but even of great sinnes also must be for a time yet it must be but for a time and that is whilest reformation be orderly sought and procured Lev. 19. 17. But what time hath wrought in the church of England all men see growing dayly by the just judgement of God from evil to worse and being never aforetime so impatient either of reformation or other good as at this day Moreover a man must so bear an evil as he be no way accessory unto it by forbearing any means appointed by Christ for the amending of it Errours or faults be of two sorts Some grosse notorious manifest such as a man cannot but see to be amisse unlesse he will shut his eyes against the light and must amend or there can be no hope of salvation Others of quotidian incursion frailty and infirmity ignorance or mere weaknesse such as godly men are not convinced of or if they see them at some times to be amisse yet in ordinary course they be overtaken with them from which the most holy be not altogether free In these latter though Christians must labour the help cure and support of each
first receive a stinted form of prayer and the councels themselves take order touching the reading of the scripture and the singing of psalmes and other things which pertein to a stinted Liturgie So that those Fathers churches had not learned that the same reasons which silence the Apocrypha in the congregation will silence all stinted forms of Liturgie as well and as much As it were a ridiculous thing for a child when he would ask of his father bread c. to reade it to him out of a paper so it is for the children of God especially for the ministers of the Gospel in their publick ministrations to reade unto God their requests for their own and the churches wants out of a service-book wherein they are stinted to words and syllables It is a common saying Similitudes agree not in all things and a rule as generall That to argue from a bare similitude is the loosest kind of reasoning which may be applyed to cover or countenance any errour or abuse whatsoever Therefore this objection might well have been passed over as it is omitted by the most that have written of this subject that I have seen but that colours and shadows do often take more with some then that which is substantiall If a man would set himself to plead for superstitious abuses and idolatrous practices errours and unwritten traditions is it not an easie matter by some similitude to cast a fair glosse upon them And it is a strange thing that such as with so much earnestnesse set themselves against all humane inventions and devises in Gods worship should by their form of reasoning open the floud-gates wide for all superstitious idolatrous antichristian devises and impieties as this reason doth I need not instance every man that knoweth what is principally alledged in defense of any popish vain unprofitable superstitious or idolatrous practice or custome or will take pains to look must needs see this to be so But to look upon the objection it self If a child being to ask many particulars of his father for himself and others should write them in a paper for the help of memory or some other reason and having committed them to memory as they are registred in his paper should in that form of words digested and written down present his requests before his father without addition or alteration what morall evil or incivility should be committed in this case why should this be esteemed a thing ridiculous And if similitudes do please so well may we not say with more reason and upon better ground That as a learned oratour being to make an oration in an honourable presence about divers matters of weight and importance will not onely study and digest but penne his speech and deliver it word for word as it is contrived and penned so the minister of the Lord of hosts in his publick ministration is not onely to consider what requests he is to make to God in his own and the peoples behalf but to digest them into fit method and to penne or write them down and to utter them in the congregation as he hath contrived them Let the indifferent judge whether of these two be the most reasonable Book-prayer is generally laid aside in the families of best Christians And in all reformed churches generally the use of a book by every able and godly minister is left off and at home it is accounted and complained of as a burden by the better sort of them that use it Many things are disused and that by the best Christians which are not unlawfull Where there be many wayes to the wood ordinarily men may make choice of one or two not disallowing the other It is lawfull for Christians when they pray in their families dayly to reade the ten commandments the profession of faith c. which is generally laid aside without sinne Many things also may be decent in the congregation which are not so expedient and requisite in the family And in one congregation a thing may be lawfull and of use which is disused in another without sin where yet it would not be unprofitable The deacons in Chrysostomes and Basils time used to call upon the people with these words Oremus Attendamus Let us pray Let us give eare The deacon at the holy mysteries stood up and thus spake unto the people Oremus pariter omnes The manner was that before every lesson or chapter the minister should say unto the people Let us attend If this custome be disused either in the congregation or Christian families at this day it doth not argue the thing it self to be indecent or unprofitable And if by Book-prayers all stinted forms whether read or repeated by help of memory be understood they are not so generally rejected in the families of the best Christians nor in the ministery of the most able and godly ministers as the objection importeth Let us heare the testimony of a godly learned and well experienced minister now at rest with the Lord When as saith he the question is made by many of the lawfulnesse or at least of the expediency of praying by the help of a book or of using a prescript and set form of prayer it is to be considered that there be divers degrees and measures of gifts both naturall as wit memory utterance as also of grace as knowledge faith zeal given to divers men besides that some have been more trained and exercised in this holy duty then others Now they that are better gifted either by nature or else by grace and custome may use the more liberty Which difference I have observed not onely in divers private Christians but also in some most reverend faithfull and worthy ministers some using both in their publick ministery and in their private families a stinted prayer and set form of words with little alteration at all except some extraordinary occasion have happend and yet both sorts so furnished with pietie and learning as I could hardly preferre one before the other And a little after For the publick congregation for the most part it is expedient to keep a constant form both of matter and also of words and yet without servile tying of our selves to words and syllables If the judgement of reformed churches abroad or of the godly faithfull learned and reverend at home be of any weight they are so farre from complaining of a stinted form as burdensome that in many cases they judge it expedient A set form of prayer and administration of the sacraments not onely devised by the minister himself but agreed upon by the churches is approved by generall consent Is there any reformed church established which hath not their book of common prayer The ministers at home to whom the use of common prayer hath been thought most burdensome have from time to time professed their liking and approbation of a stinted Liturgy That they like well enough of