Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	canon_n	church_n	read_v	2,503	5	6.6327	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46964	Remarks upon Dr. Sherlock's book, intituled, The case of the allegiance due to soveraign princes, stated and resolved, &c.	Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703.	1690 (1690)	Wing J842; ESTC R220008	13,889	15

which he now seeks protection and which he acknowledges now at last being convinc'd thereof by the Events of Providence to have the Authority of God though introduced by the Devil But how does it follow that this Doctrine of his must therefore be received as the Doctrine of the Church of England because he finds it in Bishop Overal 's Book Do the Canons of a Convocation neither assented to by Act of Parliament nor so much as by the King 's Letters-Patents make or authoritatively declare the Doctrine of the Church of England Is the Convocation the Representative Body of the Church of England I know they tell us so in the Canons of 1603. But I never found that any but some few of the Clergy believed them Has what he calls the Church a power to determine matters of Civil Right Are we to go to School to Clergy-men to learn the Terms and Measures of our Duty and Allegiance to Magistrates which all Mankind but a few of that profession in our own Nation acknowledge to depend upon Human Laws and the several Constitutions of Government and which the body of our Clergy are so ignorant of that they are a dark Labyrinth to them When the blind lead the blind both shall fall into the ditch And yet his Argument Page 9 10 drawn from the pretended Canons of that Convocation are as good Authority as can be urged to the Members of the Church of England for if a Convocation cannot declare the Judgement of the Church of England he knows not where we shall learn it So that the Members of the Church of England are to be guided in matters relating to their Temporal Rights by an Assembly of their Clergy Though even our Popish Ancestors protested from time to time against the Authority of the See of Rome in Temporalibus But I can tell him whence and whence only he may learn the Doctrine and Judgment of the Church of England authoritatively viz. in the Articles and the Liturgy which have the publick Sanction of the Legislative Authority not in his Spurious Canons of 1610 nor in those of 1640 nor yet in the Homilies though appointed by Act of Parliment to be read in Churches for so is the Apocrypha and yet we do not submit to those Books as Authoritative All other writings are but the Opinions of private Men The rest of that Section consists of some Stories of Jehu Ahab and Jezebel The Moabites and Aramites Ehud and Eglon the Kings of Egypt and Babylon the Four Monarchs Alexander Darius Jaddus and Caesar All which are no more to us than if he had told us a tale of Tom Thumb or Guy of Warwick But it is no new thing for the Clergy to top Foreign Laws and Governments upon us One of their Canons in 1603. is Quicunque in posterum assirmabit Potestatem Regiam non habere eandem Authoritatem in Causis Ecclesiasticis quam Pii Principes apud Judeos Christiani Imperatores in Primitiva Ecclesiâ obtinuerunt c. Excommunicetur ipso facto c. Our King's Jurisdiction in matters Ecclesiastical is setled and bounded by Laws of this Realm and those Laws we look upon as the measure of their Authority But Clergy men make nothing of Human Laws at least not of the Laws of England But send us to the Jews and to the Romans to enquire what Authority their Princes had and very boldly determine under the penalty of Excommunication That Our Kings have eandem potestatem And yet they neither know what power our Laws allow to our Kings nor what their Laws allow'd to theirs He grants that Kings set up by God have God's Authority and that all Kings who are in the actual possession of the Government are set up by God And therefore having God's Authority Allegiance is due to them So that he resolves the Duty of Allegiance into the Authority committed by God to the Prince the committing of which Authority appears by the Events of Providence For Providence is God's Government of the World by an invisible Influence and Power the Ends of which he serves by overruling mens wicked Designs to accomplish his own Counsels and decrees and either disappoints what they intended or gives success to them when he can serve the Ends of his Providence by their wickedness But how shall Subjects judge when God serves the ends of his Providence by man's wickedness and consequently when their obedience becomes due to a new Prince why obedience is due to God's authority when we can reasonably conclude that God has made him King p. 16. That is when the providence of God has settled him in the Throne But there are different degrees of settlement which require different degrees of submission The Doctor has gone hand in hand with providence ever since the Revolution p. 17. The generality of the Nation submitted to the present King and Queen and placed them on the Throne and put the whole power of the Kingdom into their hands though it may be the Doctor could not think them settled by Provedence whilest the late King had such a formidable power as made the Event p. 17. doubtful yet because he thought fit to continue in the Kingdom he could live quietly and peaceably pay taxes give them the title of King and Queen and pray for them as such because we are bound to pray for all that are in authority and that their Majesties had because they had power to do a great deal of good or a great deal of hurt Here power to do good or harm is authority And Thieves and Robbers have that But it may be the King and Queen had Gods authority all this while before the Doctor thought fit to own it by swearing Allegiance to them because he did not know they had it till the power of the dipossessed Prince was broken and no visible prospect of his recovering his Throne again So that men of the Doctor 's opinion must watch till God has play'd his game out before they can be ascertain'd what his will and pleasure is in these matters of obedience and swearing Allegiance to Princes For the will of God when known is the rule of Conscience But the will of God in these cases is no otherwise to be known but by the Events of Providence So that men of such Principles as this Gentleman represents to us for Church of England Principles must stay till the Storm be over and then they 'l tell us 't is fair weather I cannot sufficiently express my indignation against men that can have the confidence to represent the Church of England which is the body of the People of England and who have a right to their Properties and Religion as far as these words Right to Properties and Religion can be extended as a sort of men who must not stir their finger in opposition to a Prince that invades this Right all at once upon a supposition that the Prince is invested with God's