Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n canon_n church_n old_a 1,899 5 5.6844 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A19589 The sermon preached at the Crosse, Feb. xiiii. 1607. By W. Crashawe, Batchelour of Diuinitie, and preacher at the temple; iustified by the authour, both against Papist, and Brownist, to be the truth: wherein, this point is principally intended; that the religion of Rome, as now it stands established, is still as bad as euer it was Crashaw, William, 1572-1626. 1609 (1609) STC 6028; ESTC S118191 115,004 191

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to come to a Councell or Disputation c. and tho he binde and confirme that safe conduct with any bonde whatsoeuer and tho the party would not haue come but vpon the assurance of the safe conduct Yet hoc non obstante this not withstanding he may be taken and proceeded against and burned as an hereticke without any preiudice to the Catholick faith c. If this be good diuinity that Oaths Couenants to hereticks are of no force binde not the makers then it is in vaine for men to haue any dealing one with another for if oathes be once of no force in any one thing they will in time be weakened in all things Thus this Romish Councell that should haue amended hath contrariewise decreed two conclusions of monstrous impietie and such as for ought I could euer see were neuer till then decreed nor receiued no not in the Romish Church it selfe But is this reformed since No saith a great Spanish Bishop more then a hundred yeares after this Councell it is so farre from being altered that contrariwise by the authority of this decree it is now a rule in our Church that faith made to an hereticke by a priuate man is not to be kept no nor if it be made by a Magistrate as saith he is proued by the practice of the Councel of Constance Mark how they are healed afore it was true in publique persons nor it is true in priuate men also afore it might be broken without any fault but nowe it may not be kept See how Babylon is cured But the Councell of Trent is of later times hath not it done much good and reformed much ill Nay on the other side it hath decreed and made two Canons to the high disgrace of holy Scriptures and much derogating from the soueraign authoritie therof which till then were neuer decreed not in the darkest times of poperie when her ignorance and superstition was without all controll As namely first * Concil Trident sess 4. That the Apocriphall Bookes of Tobiah Iudith and the rest shall be held and receiued of as authenticall and Canonicall authority as any parts of holy Scripture whose authoritie was euer sacred This wrong was neuer offered to the holy Scriptures before neither was there euer any popish generall Councell so presumptuous afore this of Trent that euer durst add more books to the sacred Canon then we receiued from Christ and the Church of the olde Testament Some bold Papists say that the Florentine Councel before Trent did make them Canonicall which if it had it had bin little materiall seeing it was but a smal time before Trent scarce 100. yeares but the truth is it did not and therefore Bellarmine and Coccius are more carefull of their credit and will not affirme it * Bellar. tom 1 lib. de verbo Dei So that its cleer there neuer was generall Councell that made them Canonicall before Trent Coccius in the sauro cathol tom 1. nor any prouinciall but one * Concil C●●thag 3. and they are not able to bring one Father that held them so within 400. yeares after Christ nor very many after till of late and contrariwise wee are able to proue that all the Fathers for 400. yeares did reiecte them and many after yea the greater part of all learned Papists themselues till the Councell of Trent And thus wee see how Romish Babylon is stil the elder the worse But this is not all a Romish Councell will neuer meete for one euill Therefore secondly they decree * Concil Trident sess 4. That in all Disputations Sermons Lectures and to all other purposes that Latine translation called the vulgar shal be held the authentical text and that no man presume vnder any pretext to refuse it Heere is a strange decree that the streame shall be of more vertue then the Fountaine a translation of more authoritie then the Originall The former ages neuer heard of this indignitie but whensoeuer doubt was made or difference found recourse was forthwith had to the Originalls for the determining of the matter Many learned Papists are ashamed of this if they durst vtter it Bellarmine and Coccius do bewray it by their slight handling of the matter for they would gladly prooue if they could that Hierome was the author of that translation but as for the magnifying of it whosoeuer was the translator aboue the Originalls they are wiser then to venture their credits vpon so false a matter and therefore doe wholly leaue it vpon the credit of that conuenticle that concluded it Neither do I wrong to call it a Conuenticle for tho I should grant the whole to be a Councel yet the number that past this bil was so small that I may safely call it a Conuenticle For as an ill motion may pass in Parliament betimes in a morning before all the house be set so was this bill carried at Trent For whereas the Councel in his fulness consisted of about 300. that had voice of decision they took the aduantage at the beginning of the Councell and carried these two bils when ther were scarce 60. in the house wherof how many went against them is vncertain for the Pope durst not for one of his Crownes haue put these 2. bils especially the latter to the full house for how would they haue entertained it then when as they had liberty of speech against it who since their tongues were tyed the bil passed yet haue dared some of them who were of the Councel themselues euen to resist the decree Arius Montanus Sixtus Senensis Oleaster c. and haue taken so contrarie a course themselues in expounding the Scripture that howsoeuer they were tolerated for their learning whilest they liued yet being dead their books are either purged that is altered or els reproued So that its apparant to all that will vnderstand that this decree was so far from being established in any former ages that it is euen misliked of many of the better sort of themselues now that it is made And thus I hope we haue cleered it that these two Councells called in the corrupt and declining times of the Popish Church in shewe to haue reformed it haue beene so farre from that that contrariwise they haue concluded diuerse enormous impieties that were not before Then is not the Romish Babylon well cured The second Proposition Poperie is still as ill as euer it was I hasten to the second Proposition which is that the deformities that were before both in Doctrine and practice both in head and members and many whereof were complayned on by some of themselues doe yet remaine without redresse or reformation For the demonstration of this Proposition I might inlarge my selfe into many particulars but I will insist but vpon fewe and those I shal produce shall not be trifles nor triuiall but of great moment euen touching the maine and morall duties which a Christian man oweth to his God and which
that business a type of Baptisme a 1. Pet. 3. 20. 21 and b Gal. 4 24. c Paul of Sarah and Agar saith by them another thing is meant and no lesse saith S. Iohn of Babylon as we shall see hereafter Touching the olde and literall Babylon all these points haue bene long agoe verified vpon her since the Prophet vttred them The Church of the old Testament would haue cured her But she 2 could not be healed therfore she 3 for sooke her God 4 hath destroyed her And touching the mysticall Babylon the kingdome of Sathan and Anti-christ partly they are and partly shall bee made good vppon her The Church of the new Testament 1 would haue healed her But 2 shee is found incurable therefore when Christendome 3 forsakes her God 4 will destroy her The two first are already performed the third is a-doing and the fourth is sure to be fulfilled in Gods good time Of all these in their order Of the olde and literall BABYLON Touching the olde and literall Babylon the first point is the Churches loue and care of her good in these words The first Point Wee would haue cured Babylon COncerning which point all the rest we will not pursue the particular historicall matters considering that the history of Babylons carying Israel captiue of their vsage in their captiuity of their forsaking Babylon returning home againe lastly of Gods iust vengeance and destruction of Babylon are so notoriously knowen Therefore we will passe by the story and stand rather vpon matter of doctrine First therfore let vs obserue this generall doctrine namely that a good man loues his very enemies and not desireth onely but euen seeketh their good this did the Church of Israel to their enemies persecutors For these Babylonians had done the greatest hurt to the Church and kingdome of Israel that euer one nation did to another for first they inuaded their land vniustly then they besieged tooke Ierusalem the ●ea●e of the kingdome tooke and slew their kings ouerthrew their Kingdom ruinated their state burnt their Temple defaced their Religion killed whom they would caried captiue whom they would and so left their land a heape of desolation a Read for this purpose the last chapt of this prophecy together with the ends of the books o● kings Chronicles And yet worse then all this being their Captiues at Babylon there they mockt them in their misery and scoft at their Religion Come say they you that are these singers and haue had your Kings to be singers b 2. Sam. 23. 1. Dauid c. you that are these great Psalme-men and haue had your Kings such base fooles as some of them to bee Prophets some Preachers c Salomon Ec. 1. 1. 2. ●2 some song-makers d Dauid Salomon Hezekia c. Come make vs mery with one of your Psalmes let vs haue part of your Hebrewe musicke Sing vs one of your songes of Syon e Psal. 137. 3. Psalme 137. The least of these wrongs is heauie to be borne but all put together and especially for a Christian after all these miseries to be mockt for his religion and to see his God dishonored oh how bitter is it to the spirit of a man Yet after all this what do Gods people not only pardon it and put it vp but further doe both wish and seeke their good We would haue healed Babell Thus to doe is a marke of Gods childe and a signe of a true Church For to doe euill for euill and good for good is no more then nature euen the publicans saith Christ doe so much a Mat. 5. 46. to recompence euill for good is worse then nature it is malice peruerse corruption and therefore saith Salomon Hee that doeth so euill shall neuer depart from his house b Prou. 17. 13. But to doe good against euill that is aboue nature it is grace and a good euidence of Gods spirit thus doing saith Christ you are the children of your heauenly father c Mat. 5. 44. 45 Hereupon for the vse of this doctrine we may see a comfortable euidence that our Church is the true Church of God seeing that wee pray daily for the Church of Rome which curseth vs and it is very obseruable that whereas the Pope with all solemnity excommunicates curseth vs all to hell on the euening before good-Fryday d See the Popes bull set downe at large i● the first impression we for recompence the next day morning in euery Church chappel of this kingdom many places more pray for the cōuersion saluation of him all his sect e See one of the prayers appointed by publike authoritie in the common prayer booke for good-Fryday and so by Gods prouidence it falleth out that our publike prayer for thē is the same or the next day when they haue publikely cursed vs and this is the facte of our whole Church in the publike liturgy appointed of old and stil confirmed by authority Therfore if Christs argument be good that priuate men blessing their cursers are the children of God then sure this is not ill the Church that blesseth her cursers is the Church of God Let them therfore still go on in cursing if they needs wil but let thē take heed least as they loue cursing so it come vnto thē as they cloth themselues with cursing like a garment so it come into their bowels like water like oyle into their bones a Psal. 109. 17. 18. we contrariwise let vs not be weary of well doing let vs follow that blessed Peter whom they pretend to follow but doe not vnlesse it be in denying Christ whose blessed counsell is Render not euill for their euil nor curse for their curse but contrariwise blesse knowing that we are therunto called that we should be heires of blessing b 1. Pet 3. 9. thus doing we haue Peters owne testimony against thē that we are a Church of blessing a blessed Church and the Father of blessings blesse it more and more and all that seeke the peace of it Amen Thus we see generally they wished her well But what is the particular good they wished her namely her healing and conuersion We would haue healed her● here many things might be pressed I will but point at them 1. That it is the property of a holy man to wish aboue al● things the spirituall good of them with whō he liues the wicked man seekes the spirituall hurt of men the naturall man the carnall good but the holy man their spiritual eternal good Worldly matters haue their time place in his thoughts but that that takes vp possesseth his desires is the spirituall good of them he loues namely their conuersion their repentance their saluation these things be worthy their prayers pains Herein Gods children are like to God their Father who wishing good to his peo-people crieth out Oh that
much bragge of seeing so easilie they may deliuer so many thousand soules out of purgatorie in one yeare Certainely if these be true as they be written then granting that there is a purgatory it might soone be emptied But if it bee false fabulous and friuolous and hath no other end but to mock poore people and to suck out their siluer then what a Religion is that which maintaines such dealings especially seeing this is not the deede of any priuate men but of the Popes themselues nor a few but euen all since Boniface the eight Thus we haue searched deep into a foule and filthy wound Now what remaines but to see if it bee healed yet or no. 20 The tenth wound not healed but groweth more desperate and deadly to this day But alas Babylon will not be healed for as they feared not to put these tricks vpon the people 100. and 200. yeares agoe in the times of superstition so haue they presumed euen still in these daies of light to do the like And as the whoore is shamelesse in her sinne so is this whore of Babylon in her impiety for she hath not at all amended this enormity nor in any sort reformed it but rather lets it grow from bad to worse For euidence whereof let any man read Onuphrius Pauvinius z Vide Oauphrium Pauuinium de praecipuis vrbis Romae sanctioribus b●silicis quas septem Ecclesias vulgo vocant Colon. 1584. passim who not past 24. yeares ago hath written with publike authority a booke to this very purpose of the seuen principal Churches of Rome and of the indulgences belonging to them wherin al that is deliuered before is auerred much more added some part whereof I would put downe saue for that it may be reserued to a further purpose and fitter opportunity And for better euidence that as yet she hath not so shee purposeth neuer to heale vp this wound within these two yeares they haue allowed published with authoritie the pilgrimage or voyages of Seigneur Villamont a Les voyages du S●●de Villamont diuisez en●trois livies derniere edition reueuce augmē●ee c. A. Ar●as 1605. vide inter alia ibrum 1 cap. 12. c. one of the Gentlemen of the French Kings Chamber wherein the poore deceiued Gentleman out of his superstitious deuotion hauing visited all those Churches and made himselfe as he saith blessed by being partaker of all the indulgences thereto belonging hauing ascended those holie staires to euerie steppe whereof belong a thousand yeeres of pardon after all returning home at last much poorer but nothing wiser then hee went he wrote a book of his voyage and pilgrimage to Ierusalem and taking Rome in his way he describes at large the Indulgences granted of old and at this day in force to the Churches in Rome Which book being written in French whosoeuer list to reade will soon confesse that in this wound the Romish Babylon is not yet healed The eleuenth Wounde ANd heerunto I will adde another wound because it is so neer to this in popish consang●inity 21 The eleuēth wound Granting of Indulgences thousands of yeares and deliuerance of Soules out of purgatory to Beades Medals Crosses Pictures such like toyes being blessed hallowed by the Popes holy hands The wiser sort of Popes the rest of the craftier polititians in that hierarchie perceiuing that all the Nations of the earth many of them being so far distant could not come to their market of Indulgences being kept in Rome therfore lest they should lose their traffick into those parts they deuised a way that seeing a greate part of the world could not come to Rome Rome should send to them To which end out of his bounty and spirituall liberality for the incredible good of mens soules the Pope ordained that certaine Crucifixes and Medalls and Agnus dei b The principall of all these toyes i● the Agnus dei which euery one may not make but onely the Pope not he alwaies but onely at E●●●●nor at euery Easter but the first next his entrance and euery seauenth Easter after nor of any matte● ●●●in any manner but precisely of such simples with such ceremonies as are prescribed for that purpose which together with the prayers or rather coniurations then to be vsed are to be seene in the booke called Caeremoniale pōtif lib. 1. And hee that hath not that booke let him looke in the Commentaries of Peter Mathew vppon the Constitutions of Gregorie the 13. Constit the 1. and holy Beades and other such ●ewels should bee first consecrated and hallowed by the hands of his Holinesse and haue all the holinesse powred vpon them that hee can spare and further should haue annexed vnto them all those mighty Indulgences or the like that are graunted vnto the Churches stations at Rome and by this meanes they could sell an Agnus dei that is a little peece of white wax● or a Crucifixe of a little metall it may be brasse or copper such as the Iesuites of late sent into England by thousands at once as good inough to serue the English Catholickes or a little medal or a little beade or bugle or other matter of no more value these toyes and trinkets I say they can sell by this meanes and euery daie doe vtter at a higher rate then the Ieweller can his pearles or his diamonds Thus did not only the former Popes gull the people of elder ages in those times of ignorance making them beleeue that these toyes so hallowed and blessed by them were of such vertue as Christs bloud it selfe could be of no more as one of them sending an Agnus dei to an Emperour shamed not to write to him that This Agnus dei breakes off sinnes euen as the bloud of Christ But euen in these times of light and knowledge these owles dare still flie abrdade and euen of late nay euery yeere the Pope shameth not to sette his trumperies to sale annexing vnto thē such large and liberall Indulgences as Christs owne bloud can haue no more 22 The eleuenth wound not healed I could insist vpon late and notorious examples practised euen at home and vpon our owne Nation but I spare them at this time because the proofs thereof tho neuer so certaine to vs are not so authenticall to thē as bee these two examples I shal now produce one of them touching Poland the other France For Poland Not many yeares agoe 22 The eleuenth wound not healed Pope Clement the eight granted as followeth as is to bee seene in printed coppies d Vide libiū inscriptum E●uangel●um ●omanum edit anno 1600. Indulgences graunted by the Holinesse of our most Holy Father Pope Clement the eight At The Instance of the most Illustrious and most reuerend Lord Cardinall Radziuillius Bishop of Cracowe and Legate in Polande Vnto Certaine Holy Beades Crosses Medals and Images 1. Whosoeuer hauing one of these holie beades
found them so full of ridiculous absurdities impieties and vntruths that he affirmed him to be a man g Ludouicus Vi●●es lib. 2. de Caus. corrupt art de Lūbardica historia of a brazen face and a leaden heart that wrote them Now al these three sorts of bookes are in shew reformed of late but the truth is there is neuer a material vvound healed but rather a number made worse 1. For their Liturgy and seruice either publike or priuate it is cōtained in their books called Missalia Breuiaria Officia Manualia Portiforia and such other all these haue beene reuiewed and as they say corrected since the Councell of Trent h Vide Bullas Pontif. praefixas Missal Breuiareditionis 70. post But let them be examined and compared together I dare say that for one euil taken out there is another put in and tenne stand vnremooued and that both in diuers pictures as also for points of doctrine they are as ill as the former i Compare for this end the Missals breuiaries Manuals Primeri printed before the Councel of Trēt with those printed since at the least 2. Their Ceremonies of state or as they say of deuotion are contained in the bookes called Pontificale Romanum and Ceremoniale Romanum k Adde heereunto also their Processionale Rationale and Sacerdotale Romanum wherin what apish to yes there be what absurdities what superstitions sometimes ridiculous sometimes impious is incredible to them that see it not insomuch as some Papists l Vide Epistolam Alberti Castellani ad Leonem 10. praefiram Pōt●f● vlt edit Vene● yea the later Popes m Vide Bullas praed Clem. 8. haue not spared to confesse that they need great reformation and therefore vndertooke that worke thēselues But if a man did see how they haue amended them they would out of this one if there were no more euidences conclude that Rome is that Babylon that will neuer bee healed for looke into the Pontificale and the Ceremoniale which were reformed and are indeed much altered by the authoritie of Clement the eightth and printed at Rome within these few yeeres and you shall finde some small deformities taken away but many greate enormities suffered to stand some put in that were not that there before n Compare for this end the Pōtificale and Ceremoniale new and old which I will not stand at this time to particularise 40 The 19. wound not healed for al these are as bad still as afore both because the particulars are so manie and also for that seeing the bookes beeing so rare are not for each mans reading it may hap heereafter that the exact comparison of them together the old with the new may be a work of it self not vnworthy of some mens labours 3. * These were read in the Churches when the Scriptures were kept out Their stories or tales are comprised in the bookes called Speculum exemplorum Vitae Sanctorū Legēda Festiualia c. These also are lately reformed as they pretend But how If any would know what is done herein take but one exāple The Iesuites in the Low countries pretending these Legends or stories needed much reformation tooke the matter vpon themselues because it was of greate waight and consequence and appointed it to some of their societie to be reformed and now of la●e they haue published it at Doway some two or three yeeres agoe would make vs beleeue that it is amended in innumerable places o Vide librū intitulatum Magnum speculum exemplorum ab innumeris mēdis c. vindicatum per quendam Patrem è societate Iesu per eundem locupletatū Duaci anno 1605. But if any man haue lost any time in turning ouer their Legends and perusing the prodigious stories there laid downe let him venture euen a little more and compare this new reformed Speculum exemplorum with the former and if hee finde as impious and ridiculous Legends as improbable and as impossible tales in that as in the other thē let him make report what good reformers the Iesuites bee and how well the Romish Church is healed in this wound p To this end compare the old Speculum exēplorum or the Legend with the new Magnum speculū exemplorum set out by the lesuites this last yeere The conclusion is that the Missals and Breuiaries though vndertaken by Trent the Pontificall Ceremoniale though vndertaken by the Pope the Legend and Speculum though vndertaken by the Iesuites and all in shew reformed yet stand all at this day as foule and deformed and though some things bee taken out yet all laid together as bad or worse then they were afore These straits of time hinder me from inlarging my selfe any further therfore to conclude and wrap vp all in one generalll exception The twentieth wound THe last point wherewith I will charge the Romish Church and religion is not so fitly to bee called a wound as a leprosie or a generall consumption but all to one end for as it is no difference vpon the matter whether a man bee deepe and desperately wounded or haue a leprosie over all the body or a generall consumption for both are deadly and both incureable so is it in this case wherein the exception I take against them is that their Church State declined long agoe into that general corruption vniuersall pollution in all estates 41 The 20. wound A generall corruption of manners in all estates That the prophanenesse licentiousnesse and sinfulnesse of all sorts of people in that Church both head members is like a spirtuall leprosie without or a generall consumption within threatning ruine to the whole body This point is worthy to bee enlarged but I must deferre it and referre the Reader to the records of antiquity I meane such as be their owne men but hauing some remorse of conscience feare of God did confesse freely and bitterly deplore the miserie that the sinfulnesse of the popish Church and religion would bring vpon all the world Let them read that haue them these bookes named in the margent q Vide Gersonis opera passim Reuelationes Brigittae● Vincentij Ferrariens prognostic Petrū de Aliaco de reformatione eccl Nicolai de Clemangiis opera in Bibliotheca Patrum editionis primae and those that haue them not it may bee shortly they may haue some helpe therein and then you will graunt with mee that former and better times confessed that which I now laie to their charge I will insist particularly but vpon two the one of so greate antiquitie Poem●ta Walteri Mapes Maillardi Menotti Sermones Holcot in Sapient lect 82. passim Onus Ecclesiae passim the other of so greate authority as both are beyond exception Some 400 years ago liued a Monk learned for those times called as Posseuine confesseth r Vide Posseu in Appar sae In apped priori ad tom 1. lit B.
Gods the other a Chancery a Court of Mercy that is Maries these bee their verie wordes and further that if any man feele himselfe agrieued in Gods Court of Iustice let him appeale to the Court of mercie of his Mother Oh strange diuinity Can Gods iudgements be vniust or his proceedings erroneous and vnequall If they bee not then why do they talke of appealing to a higher Court For why doe Writs of error lie from one Court to another but that it is presupposed that they may erre and why is there a Chauncery but that the rigour and extremitie of the Lawe maie bee mitigated But if the Scripture saie true in the text Righteous art thou O Lord and iust in thy iudgements a Psal. 119 137 Then this is blasphemie of a high nature that there needes a Chancerie to rectifie his proceedings and mitigate his iudgements But as for this doctrine that the Chauncerie or Court of mercie is not Gods but his Mothers and that therefore Gods iudgements are to be mitigated by another and therefore that she and her Court are in this respect aboue God and his Court These blasphemies are so execrable and odious to Christian eares that I hope ther is not a papist in this kingdome that professeth to know and serue God but his heart hates them and all that hold them Against all this what can bee obiected but this that he being a priuate man spake wrot out of his priuate iudgement but this is not the generall doctrine of their teachers not their Church I answere If none in the world taught this but this one Frier yet how many soeuer knowing it do approue commend or defend it or if they do not reproue condemne it it is iustly to bee called their doctrine and by the lawe both of God man it is their sin as well as his For by the lawe of Accessaries he that anie waie approues or knowing it and hauing a calling to it reproues not a sinne makes himselfe guilty of the sinne but the Romish Church that is the Pope knoweth this hainous blasphemie and sayth that he hath authority to condemne all such therefore hauing not done so but contrariwise approuing it is guiltie of it Shewe me then that Pope Bishop or Inquisitour that hath condemned this blasphemie or this book for it I produce a Pope that allowed it namely Alexander the sixt who suffered it to passe vnder his name to the view and reading of the world let them bring one Pope since that hath condemned it or shewe one writer not reproued by them that euer reproued it or not condemned by them that euer condemned this blasphemie if they doe not this then it is apparant that in this wound Babylon is not yet healed But for better euidence that she lies rotting in this her filthinesse and incurable in this wound 6 The third wound not healed Posseuine the Iesuite their great and allowed Censor of al Authors giues his publike censure of this booke to bee Sermons of the excellency of the Queene of heauen and full of learning and godlinesse And this his censure no man that knoweth the present state of their religion can deny but that it is the censure of their Church and ought so to bee reputed for that worke of Posseuines was attempted continued and finished and printed and reprinted with as publick generall allowance as any thing can be And yet for better euidence that she is not healed nor reformed at all let it be obserued tha● this book is of so much estimation amongst them that it hath diuers times beene reprinted since Bernardine the Author set it out as namely in my knowledge once at Brixia in Italie almost twenty yeares agoe in three volumes corrected and amended as they pretende But that this impious doctrine is not amended I will make it euident for of late euen this present yeare this booke and all his other works were again printed at Colein in Germany in three volumes which when I perceiued out of the last Catalogue I could not rest till I had obtained this new impression from Coleine hoping that now at last they had for shame righted this cause of God and razed out that hainous blasphemie but hauing perused it I see to my griefe that they will not be healed for there the very same words and doctrine stand vnreprooued vncontrolled vnaltered nay not so much as hauing a Marginal note to explaine them but they are let to passe as good holy and Catholicke Romish doctrine And that this is true I here pawne my credit to this honorable assemblie and will be ready to iustifie it to anie desirous to be informed in the particulars by shewing the books themselues both new and old Which being so I hope no man wil denie but that it is apparant she is not healed And yet for the better satisfaction of all men that as she is not yet so shee purposeth neuer more to bee healed nor to reform any thing and that this is not the priuate opinion of that or any other one doctor I desire al that loue the truth to take knowledge that of late within these seuen yeeres an Italian doctor a Iesuite and an approoued writer writing a story of the miracles of our Lady of Loretto teacheth euen the same doctrine and makes no bones to bluster out almost the very same words which for better assurance I will put down The Virgin Mary both wil and can is both willing able to deliuer such as be compassed about with dangers on all sides and to heape vpon them all good blessings for Almighty God as farre as it is lawfull hath made his Mother fellow and partaker of his divine power and Maiesty c. See heere the new and refined diuinity of the Iesuites what is this but the same with that afore for if she be made partaker and fellow with God in his diuine power and Maiesty it is no maruell that God hath committed his mercy to her and if from these words we looke into the body of the booke we shall find hee ascribes such works and miracles to her as can belong to none but to him or her that is a fellow with God or rather God himselfe And as for this clause as far as it is lawfull is a strange word to be spoken of God for what can be vnlawful to God that is good whose will is the holiest law If therefore it be good to make a creature fellow with him in his deity it must needes bee lawfull and so the clause is idle If it be not good but impious and contrary to the nature of God then to think it any way lawfull or possible to be done is no losse then to think it any way lawful for God to lie or sin or denie himselfe so that take it any way this limitation of the Iesuite both grossely a●useth the Reader and containeth horrible impiety against God So far is it from
beleeued because they are allowed and authorised by the Pope being so by him authorised they are of as much authority as if the Pope himself had beene the Author of them Therefore it is of credite and implyeth necessity of beeing beleeued or it bindeth as strongly as if it had been pronounced or vttered by the Pope because wee make all those things as good as our owne vpon which we bestow or impart our authority The high holy God that is the Author of the holie Scriptures be mercifull vnto vs in hauing any thing to doe with this vnchristian blasphemie and graunt that wee may not any way communicate with their sins no● haue fellowship with this wicked worke of darkenesse The Impiety and Atheisme that lyeth in it is such as if it had but crept into some secret pamphlet I would neuer haue brought it into light but being that it is registred in the Glosse vppon their lawe a booke of so great authoritie and so common in the hands of all the learned I cannot but discharge my dutie to the trueth tho it may giue vantage to the Atheist and Libertine For what can such men think when they heare him that pretends to bee Christs Vicar and Peters successor teache that Salomons wordes are not of as good authority as his bee when as Christ himselfe did approue and iustifie himselfe and all his wordes and deedes and doctrines by the olde Testament and that the words of God in the olde Testament do therefore binde and are therefore to bee beleeued because the Pope pleaseth to insert and canonize them in his lawe that being by him so canonized they bee therefore as good as if the Pope himselfe had spoken them What I saie can they iudge but that the Pope is one of their profession a plain Atheist that holds the Scripture all religion as farre as pleaseth his humour and serueth his turnes And if any of his faction hold this too hard a censure I would intreate him to answere mee but this question grounded vpon these words of his Whether is God the Author of the olde Testament or no 2. Pet. 1. 20. 21 If they say no Saint Peter answereth that Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men spake as they were inspired of the holie Ghost If he be then the Prouerbs of Salomon being a Canonicall Booke of the Olde Testament is Gods Booke and the wordes of the Text are Gods words and not Salomons This beeing so let vs then take the wordes as they are in their true and full meaning and see what a peece of Popish diuinitie heere is Obserue that the words of the Text are not the words of the Pope A strāge peece of popish doctrine that gods word if it bee authorized by the Pope is thē of as good credit as if the Pope himselfe had spoken it therefore if the Pope please not to Canonize it then it is not● So that either Gods word must b●e beholden to the Pope for the authority of it or else it hath none but of God but because these words of God are heer canonized by the Pope therfore they are of credit worthy to be beleeued as well as if they had ben spoken by the Pope himselfe Loe heere the Pope in his owne colours this is Diuinity fit to be hatched at Rome and to be coyned in his mint● Let the words be examined and see what can follow of them but that either the Pope holdes not the Prouerbs to bee Gods booke but SALOMONS which is horrible Atheism or else if he hold them Gods that the words of God beare no credit nor haue authority to binde mens conscience till the Pope do canonize them and that Gods word in a booke knowne receiued and graunted to bee Canonicall is not of as good authority in that booke as being translated into the Popes Canon lawe If he refuse both these then let him refuse his owne lawe and burne his glosse vpon his decretalls● as containing Atheisme and Heresie in a high degree 12 The sixt wound not healed But to goe forward Is this wound healed Surely if they haue left it out or reformed it in any later impression so it be with open confession and detestation of the fault it is wel But sure I am it is in the impression I haue and in al other which I could borrow And further I do not know any Pope or popish writer that hath with authority and allowance condēned or reproued this Atheisme if they know any they may doe well to produce them Meane time I am also sure of this that in stead of healing it they haue suffered their Doctors Writers continually since to speake and write almost as ill if not worse In Queene Maries time an English Papist wrote thus c Proctor in his booke called the waie home to Christ printed at ●ōdon in 8. Religion is occasioned by Scripture but perfected and authorized by the Church See we are more beholden to the Church then to the Scripture for our Religion About the same time Cardinall Poole out of his Pope-holy deuotion is said to haue affirmed that The written word of God is but a seede of Turcisme d Scriptura scripta est semen turcicum And certaine Popish Doctors in Germanie beeing pressed in a disputation with the euidence of Scripture boldly answered We are not tyed to the Scriptures those goose quils do not tie vs e No● pen●is illis ●n●eri ●is minime su●●●● alligati I will not affirme both these two vpon mine owne credit but they haue beene charged with them both manie yeeres agoe and neuer yet disprooued them But that that followeth I speake vpon knowledge A little after a great English Papist pretending to summon a parliament for poperie in his booke so called tells a story of one whome hee hearde vpon reading the Booke of Ecclesiastes earnestly say that The Booke of Ecclesiastes is a naughty booke f Heskins a Doctor of di●●●●ty in his parliament of Christ lib. 1. cap. 2. printed at Antwerpe 1●66● in folio He voweth to God and cals him to witnesse that this hee heard him himselfe but what was hee that spake it a protestant no a papist and no mad fellow nor ignorant foole nor profane scoffer but sayth Heskins hee was a man of worship of grauity of wisedome of godly life and competent learning able to vnderstand and likewise exercised in the Scriptures and this is all the censure he giues of him that spake these wordes Hee addeth further a litle after in the same Chap. that a popish Gentlewoman hearing a text out of a booke that papists holde to be Scripture which shee misliked and being tolde by him for he heard her speak the words that the booke was Scripture shee answered that if the Scripture had such I will not say what shee saide words in it She would no more beleeue the Scripture for it