naturall water For in another place it is called fier as in S. Luke He shall baptize Lue. 3. v. 1â— you in spirit and fier and yet it is not vnderstood of true fire Therefore how can it appeare that in the former place true water is to be vnderstood or how will the Lutherans proue it against the Caluinists Not by any other meanes then by the practise order and tradition of the Church Another Christ in his last supper did not only institute the blessed Sacrament but also he adioyned the washing of feete and in the institution of the blessed Sacrament he sayd Eate and drinke but in the washing of eete and you ought one to wash the feete of another Here the Aduersaries say that in the first words there is a precept but not in the last And so the faythfull by Gods commaundment are obliged to receaue the blessed Sacrament in both kindes but not so to the washing of feete Now I aske how they are certaine of this or by what pretence do they thinke themselues bound to the receauing of both kyndes and yet free from the washing of feet Certainly they cannot pretend the words of Scripture For they seeme rather to shew the contrary For these words Eate and drinke seeme to signify no more of themselues then if a hous-keeper should say to his guests eate and drinke and be merry And if the hous-keeper should say so it would not be thought that be meant thereby to bynd them by a precept Therefore seing Christ spake in the same manner how is it certaine that he intended by that manner of speaking to oblige all the faythfull to the receauing of both kinds But these wordes You ought to wash the feete of one another seeme to signify a precept no lesse then if the maister should say to the seruant Thou must couer the table How therefore know they that by these words they are not obliged to wash the feete of one another seing the words themselues do shew plainly an obligation Only by the practise and Tradition of the Church For the Church neuer hath vsed this washing as necessary which notwithstanding she would haue done if shee had thought that she had beene obliged to it and that by Christs commaundment I omit many like examples which are easy to be found And out of these I conclude thus The Scripture may be considered two waies 1. According to the bare and outward letter 2. According to the inward sense which is intended of the holy Ghost But neyther of these two waies can it be iudge of Controuersies Not the former way as we haue proued in the first part of this second argument Neither as it is taken in the second way because the sense of the Scripture often tymes is so obscure and doubtfull that there is need of some other iudge who may define this to be the true meaning which is intended of the holy Ghost and not any other contrary And this is sufficient about the second Argument drawne from the Scripture THE III. ARGVMENT Which is drawne out of the Controuersies them selues THIS argument thus I propound There are many Controuersyes about fayth and Religion of the which in the Scripture there is no mention made at all or at least not so much as is sufficient so that the Scripture may giue sentence of them therefore in deciding of them some other iudge is to be sought Such Controuersyes be these The first whether the Bookes of Toby Iudith VVisedome Ecclesiasticus the Machabees be Canonicall land diuine The Lutherans and the Caluinists say no. But the Catholikes say the contrary Now who must be iudge to decide this contention The Scripture cannot be Neither the Lutherans nor the Caluinists which is well to be noted do appeale to the Scripture but to the Canon and tradition of the Iewes They say therefore that those Bookes cannot be found in the Canon of the Iewes which is extant in S. Hierome and therefore they are not to be accouÌ„ted Canonicall and Diuine Hence they confesse that in this case there ought to be some other iudge besides the Scripture And who is that The tradition of the Iewes say they But is not this strang to see our Aduersaries make more reckoning of Iewes then of Christians For although they be desirous to be accounted Christians they are deadly enemyes to the traditions of Christ and his Apostles and yet notwithstanding make great accompt of the Iewes traditions Wherefore say they not rather with S. Augustine Not August l. â—8 de ciuit Dei c. 36. the Iewes but the Church holdeth the Bookes of the Machabees for Canonicall or with Isidorus The Iewes do not receaue the bookes of Toby Iudith and the Machabees but the Church doth number them among the Canonicall Scriptures Ifidor in l. Proâ—m de lib. vet noâ— Test And in the same place The Booke of VVisedome and Ecclesiasticus are knowne to haue the like authority that other Canonicall Bookes haue The second is how many Sacraments there be of the new Law Our aduersaries say but two Baptisme and the Lords supper The Catholiks beleeue seauen But what sayth the Scripture Nothing as concerning any certaine number and therefore it cannot be the Iudge in this Controuersy From whence therefore receaue the Catholikes the number of seauen if not out of Scripture From the tradition and consent of the Church From whence the aduersaryes the nuÌ„ber of 2. Let them looke from whence Truly they haue it not from the Scripture but if they thinke they haue let them performe these three things First let them shew out of Scripture that the name of a Sacrament is attributed to Baptisme and to the Eucharist and not as well to Confirmation Order Pennance Matrimony and Extreme Vnction Secondly out of Scripture let them define a Sacrament Thirdly let them shew that the definition agreeth fitly with Baptisme and the Eucharist and not as well to the rest If they can do this they do something but that they neither wil nor euer can do this I am most certaine For first where will they find in Scripture that the name of a SacrameÌ„t is attributed to Baptisme and the Eucharist Truly in no place But I will find where it is applyed to Matrimony For so writeth the Apostle For this cause shall man leaue his Father and Mother Eph. 5. 31. shall cleaue to his wife and they shall be two in one flesh This is a great Sacrament But I speak in Christ in the Church As though he had sayd That a man shall leaue his parents and cleaue to his wife This is a great Sacrament because it is a signe of the vnioÌ„ of Christ with his Church that is the mariage of Christ and his Church Secondly where will they find Luth. in l. de captiu Bab â— vlt Melan. in ep Conf. August art 13. Mel. in locis ommunâ—â—us tit dâ— numero Sacramentorum in the Scripture the definition of
the which I will manifestly proue that the scripture only is not sufficient to be the Iudge of all Controuersies The First shal be taken from the office of a Iudge which cà not be giuen to the Scripture The second from the Scripture it selfe in the which two things are to be considered the bare letter and the meaning therof The bare letter doth kill as the Apostle sayth the meaning or sense is obscure and hard to be vnderstood and therefore it necdeth some other Iudge or interpreter The third shal be drawne from the controuersies themselues which are in question for there are some controuersies which cannot be decided by scripture seing there is no mention at all made of them in the scripiture The fourth shal be taken out from the vse and practise of the old testament in the which not the scripture but the high Priest is acknowledged to be Iudge The fift out of the like vse and practise of the new testament The sixt is gathered out of the Analogy or proportion of the Ciuill Iudge concerning the questions and controuersies which fall out in the ciuill gouerment or Common Wealth For the written law is not the Iudge of such controuersies but the Prince or some peculiar Iudge appointed by him or his Counsell Moreouer I will examine the testimonies of the Scripture brought in against vs in the beginning By the examining of the which I will infer three things First that some of them do rather make for the Catholikes then for the Protestants and especially that of the which most of all they bragge and boast Search the scriptures Secondly that others of them belong nothing to the matter of which we speake And lastly that the Protestants who only seeke to obtaine the victory out of the scripture are altogether ignorant of the sense or meaning of it But now I will begin with our owne arguments The Scripture alone is not the Iudge of Controuersies concerning matters of Fayth and Religion I. ARGVMENT Drawne from the Office of a Iudge THE first argumēt which is drawn from the office of the Iudge thus I propound He that is the Iudge betwixt two at variance ought in such manner to pronounce the sentence that both of them may plainly perceiue what the sentence of the Iudge is so that the one may see it is for him and the other that it is against him otherwise the aduersaries will neuer leaue of their contentions but both will still continue defending their cause But the Scripture cannot do this therefore the Scripture cannot be the Iudge of al controuersies The Maiot is cleare The Minor I proue Because the Lutherans and the Caluinists for these many yeares haue iarred and warred concerning all these articles 1. The Baptisme of Children 2. The reall presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist 3. Predestination 4. The person of Christ 5. Exorcismes 6. The number Canon of books of the Scripture And yet notwithstanding the scripture which they would haue to be Iudge could not hitherto nor can decide or put an end to these controuersies Hitherto it hath neuer beene heard that euer sentence was so pronounced by the scripture that eyther the Lutherās or the Caluinists haue confessed that it was pronounced either against the one or the other of them And this is plaine For as yet they both go forward most bitterly striuing contending Which doubtlesse they would neuer do if they did perceiue that the sentence were plainly giuen in their controuersies for then either the parties condemned would cease from contending any longer and submit themselues to the sentence or els they would appeale to some other Iudge pretending themselues to be vniustly condemned But neither of these do neyther Now therefore that the force of this argument may more plainly appeare two things are to be considered The one is that the Lutherans and Caluinists do openly confesse that they acknowledg no other Iudg then scripture only Which they affirme to be plaine mainfest euident and sufficient by it selfe to decide all controuersies whatsoeuer in matters of faith and religion that no falsity or errour can be found in it The other is that although they haue this Iudge yet notwithstanding they obtaine nothing by it but that their contentions still grow greater greater and they themselues become more hatefull to each other Out of which it followes that eyther the scripture hath not hither to pronounced clearly euidently and sufficiently that sentence or if it haue that eyther the Lutherans or the Caluinists are very stubborne and obstinate who will not yield to so manifest and so euident a sentence of which two let them make their choyce II. ARGVMENT Drawne out of the Scripture it selfe IN the Scripture two things are alwaies to be considered to wit the bare letter and the sense euen as in a man the soule and the body Of these two the holy Apostle as some interpret doth speake when he saith the letter killeth but the spirit quickneth as though 21 Cor. 3. 6. he had said if thou follow the true meaning and sense of the Scripture which is like the quickning soule and spirit it will helpe thee to saluation But if thou neglect the true and lawfull sense thereof and sticke only to the plaine bare and outward letter and striue to make that the meaning and sense which the bare letter only seemeth to import without doubt very often thou wilt fall into errour This interpretation S. Augustine doth approue Oftentymes sayth he O my dearely beloued Aug ser 7 de temp brethren I haue admonished your Charity that in the Lessons which these daies are read in the Church we ought not to attend only to that which we are taught by the bare letter but that we must seeke faithfully remouing away the veile of the letter a true quickning spirit for the Apostle saith that the letter killeth but the spirit quickneth For the vnhappy Iewes and the more vnhappy Heretikes whilst they regard the meere sound of the letter as a body without the soule so they remaine dead without the quickning spirit The like he hath in his third booke of Christian doctrine in the 5. Chapter This presupposed two things are to be proued The one is that the scripture if we respect the bare letter cannot possibly be the Iudge of controuersies The other is that albeit we marke also the sense and meaning of it yet neither so it can be the Iudge The former part is certaine for that which leadeth men into errour and heresie cannot be the infallible Iudge of all controuersies but the scripture if we respect the bare letter thereof leadeth men into errour and heresy therefore it cannot be the infallible Iudge of controuersies The Maior is plaine of it selfe because we seeke an infallible Iudge to the end we may not erre therfore that which leadeth vs into errour is not an infallible Iudge The Minor is euident out of the Apostle because the scripture
lib. post collation cap. 7. Church is that the sonne who is not partaker of the sinne of his Father shall not carry the iniquity of his Father But if he be partaker of it he shall of necessity carry it But now it is certaine that all Adams posterity were partakers of his sinne according to that of S. Paul in whom all sinned But in what manner Rom. 5. 12 all sinned in Adam is to be taught in another place yet here in the meane tyme I say that all sinned in Adam because God conditioned with him as with the first origen common roore head of his whole posterity that if the commandement which God had giuen him to wit that he should not taste of the fruit forbidden both he and his posterity should remaine in Paradise but if not then both he and all his posterity being guilty transgressours of Gods law should be cast out of paradise which afterwards so fell out There were also some ancient Heretikes who altogether denied the resurrection of our flesh because they found it written It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Which place Ioan 6. 63 they vnderstanding only according to the outward letter not searching any Refert Tertull. in lib deresur car c. 37. further into the inward sense and meaning thereof argued in this manner To what purpose should the flesh rise at all sith it profiteth nothing And out of the selfe same place the Caluinists conclude against another verity To what purpose say they should Christ impart to vs his flesh in the Eucharist if the flesh profit nothing But truly they both are deceaued by looking only into the bare letter which killeth Otherwise one might conclude in like manner if the flesh doth profit nothing Vide Maldonatum in cap. 6. Ioan. at all to what end did Christ take flesh to redeeme man To what end was the word made flesh To what end did he suffer in it vpon the Crosse Certainly he did not all this to no purpose That the Scripture according to the sense and meaning thereof cannot be Iudge BVT this being sufficient about the former part where it is manifest both by the authority of the Apostles and also by diuers sundry examples that the Scripture if we respect only the bare and outward letter thereof cannot be the infallible Iudge in matters of Controuersy because that the bare letter killeth and bredeth great errours and heresies But now let vs proceed to the latter part of this our argument wherein I wil declare that if we regard the very sense and meaning of the Scripture the same can be noe competent Iudge of all Controuersies in matters of fayth and Religion The which I proue in this manner The Scriptures according vnto the true sense thereof often tymes is obscure and very hard to be vnderstood oftentymes about discerning the true sense and meaning of it great Controuersies do arise But euery Controuersy doth require some iudge to determine the same it is therefore necessary that some Iudge be appoynted who certainly may determine which is the true sense of the Scripture which cannot be the Scripture it selfe for of the sense and meaning thereof there is Controuersy and therefore it is necessary that some other be assigned besides the Scripture In this discourse are certain principles grounded which are to be explicated and proued in particuler one after another The first is That the Scripture often tymes according vnto the sense is obscure hard to be vnderstood THIS S. Peter doth testify in his later Canonicall Epistle where speaking of the Epistles of S. Paul he 1. Pet. 3. 16. Luc. 24. 27. vseth these wordes In the which sayth he there are some things hard to be vnderstood Also it may be confirmed diuers waies First by the example of the disciples going vnto Emaus who vnderstanding not the Scriptures were taught by Christ Secondly by the Eunuch in the 8. Chapter of the Acts 13. verse who being asked of S. Philip whether he vnderstood the Prophet Isay which he was then reading answered in this maÌ„ner How can I sayd he vnlesse some man shew Act. 8. 31. me Thirdly by the example of the Apostles who vnderstood not many Mat. 13. 36. things which Christ had taught them For his Disciples coming to him sayd Mat 16. 11. expound vs the Parable of the Cockle seede Againe why do you not vnderstaÌ„d that I sayd not Luc. 18. 34. of bread to you and they vnderstood none of these things and this word was hid from them they vnderstood not the things thâ—t were sayd Fourthly by the common consent of all the interpreters For if the Scripture were easy what neede were there of so many interpreters so many commentaries so many questions and controuersies Fiftly by many particuler places and bookes of Scripture I proue it hard For who doth not perceaue Ezechiels prophesy about the visioÌ„ of the foure beasts to be most obscure Moreouer it plainly appeareth Daniels prophesy of the 70. weekes and of the abhomination of desolation to be most hard sith that in the searching into it and in the explaining of it it hath hitherto euen yet doth put many to their wits end as concerning the which Christ himselfe sayd he that readeth let him vnderstand Mat. 24. 15. Furthermore euen in the whole Apocalips of S. Iohn many obscure places and full of secret mysteries may be found And S. Hierom also affirmeth in a certaine epistle of his to Paulinus that in it there are as many Sacraments or secret mysteries as wordes But that in the other bookes of Scripture also many obscure and difficult places are to be found is wel known to such as read them to omit others let them speake who in tymes past notwithstanding their daily reading of Scripture with great diligence coÌ„fessed themselues to haue beene very ignorant in many passages thereof in which to be instructed and resolued they had recourse to S. Augustine S. Hierome and other most learned Fathers of the Church Whereof the Epistles of the auncient Fathers themselues do giue ample testimony out of the which I will put downe some We reade then that Pope Damasus asked counsell of S. Hierome about these Questions 1. What signified this whosoeuer shall Gen. 4. 15. Epist 124. 125. inter Epist Hiero. Ibidem kill Cain shal be punished seauen fould 2. If all things which God had made were very good to what end did he commaund Noë to take into the Arke as well those beasts which were vncleane as those which were cleane sith that nothing can be good which is vncleane 3. Wherefore did Abraham receaue Circumcision for a signe or seale of his fayth And wherefore did Isaac though Ibid. a iust man and deare to God deceaued by errour blesse not whom he would but whom he would not 4. What was the interpretation of Isay Epist 142. the Prophets
you their iudgments 13. Answere not a foole according Pro. 26. 4. Ibid. Sap. 1. 13. to his folly least thou be made like to him contrary to that Answere a foole according to his folly least he esteeme himselfe to be wise 14. God hath not made death contrary Eccles 11. 14. to that Good things and euill life and death pouerty and honesty are of God Sap. 11. 25. 15. Thou louest all things that are hatest nothing of those which thou hast made contrary to that Iacob I loued Rom. 9. 13. Eccl. 10. 15. 1. Tim. 6. but Esau I hated 16. The beginning of all sinne is prvde contrary to that the roote of all euill is couetousnesse 17. Do good to the humble giue Eccl. 12. 6. Luc. 6. 30. not to the impious prohibite to giue him bread contrary to that giue to euery one that asketh thee 18. They that eate me shall yet Eccl. 24. 28. Ioan. 4. 13. hunger and they that drinke me shall yet thirst contrary to that he who shall drinke of the water which I will giue him shall not thirst for euer 19. As yet fourty dayes and Niniue Ioan. 3 4. Ioan. 4. 11. shal be subuerted contrary to that shall not I spare Niniue the great Citty 20. Gratis you haue receiued Gratis Mat. 10. 8. Luc. 10. 7. giue you contrary to that the workman is worthy of his wages 21. Take nothing in the way neyther skrip shooes nor rod contrary to Math. 10. 10. Marc. 6. 8. that and he hath commaunded them that they should take nothing in the way but a rod only 22. After 6. daies Iesus tooke Peter Mat. 17. 1. Luc. 9. 28. Iames and Iohn contrary to that It came to passe after these words almost eight dayes and he tooke Peter c. 23. But if thy brother shall offend Mat. 18. 15. against thee go and rebuke him betweene thee and him alone contrary to 1. Tim 5. 20. that Them that sinne rebuke before all that the rest also may haue feare 24. None is good but one God Mar. â—0 19. Luc. 6. 45. contrary to that The goodman of the good treasure of his hart bringeth forth good 25. Go preach the Ghospell to euery Mar. 16. 15. Math. 10. 5. creature contrary to that Into the way of the Gentiles do not go and into citties of the Samaritans enter yee not But go to the sheepe that are perished of the house of Israell 26. You are they that haue remained Luc. 22. 28. Math. 26. 31. with me in my temptations contrary to that you shall all suffer scandall in me 27. If I giue testimony of my selfe Ioan. 5. 31. my testimony is not true contrary to Ioan. 8. 14. this Although I giue testimony of my selfe my testimony is true 28. I do not receaue testimony of Ioan. 5. 34. Ioan. 15. 27. man contrary to this And you shall giue testimony of me 29. He that eateth my flesh and Ioan. 6. 55. Ibidem v. 63. drinketh my bloud hath life euerlasting contrary to that It is the spirit that quickneththe flesh profitteth nothing 30. All things whatsoeuer I haue Ioan. 15. 15. Ioan. 16. 1â— heard of my Father I haue notified vnto you contrary to this I haue yet many things to tell you 31. Mary Magdalen came earely to Ioan. 20. 1. Mar. 16. 2. the monument when it was yet darke contrary to that she came to the monument the sunne being now risen 32. Circumcision indeed profiteth Rom. 2. 25. if thou obserue the Law contrary to that Behould I Paul tell you that if you be circumcised Galat. 5. 2. Christ will profit you nothing 33. VVe account a man to be iustified by Rom. 3. 28. Iames 2. 20. 24. Rom. â— v. 19. Act. 7. v. 51. Rom. 11. v. 34â— 1. Cor. 2. v. 16. 1. Cor. 13. v. 3. faith without works Contrary to that of S. Iames Fayth if it haue not workes is dead in it selfe And againe you see that man is iustified by workes and not by fayth alone 34. For who resisteth his will contrary to that you alwaies haue resisted the holy Ghost as also your Fathers 35. VVho hath knowne the mind of our Lord contrary to that But we haue the sense of Christ. 36. If I shall distribute all my goods to be meate for the poore and haue not charity it doth Luc. 11. v. 41. profit me nothing contrary to that giue almes and all things are cleane to you 37. And as in Adam all dy so also in Christ 1. Cor. 13. v. 32. Ioan. 5. v. 21. Galat. 1. v. 10. 1 Cor. 10. v. 33. all shal be made aliue contrary to that The Sonne quickneth whom he will 38. Do I seeke to please men If I yet did please men I should not be the seruant of Christ contrary to that be without offence euen as I in all things do please all men 39. Beare ye one anothers burden Galat. 6. 2. Ibid. v. 5. contrary to this Euery one shall beare his owne burden 40. God inhabiteth light not accessible contrary to that Come to him 1. Tim. 6. 16. Psal 33. 6. 1. Iohn 1. 8. 1. Ioan. 3. 9. and you may be illuminated 41. If we shall say that we haue no sinne we seduce our selues contrary to that Euery one that is borne of God commiteth not sinne These and such like apparent contradictions which are found in many places of the Scripture oftentimes do trouble the reader and cause excessiue paines and labour euen to the most learned of all The auncient Fathers do giue testimony of this who spent much tyme in the according of these and such like contradictions as S. Augustine for example wrote certaine bookes of the agreement amongst the Euangelists and diuers others also who tooke great paines in interpreting the Scripture whose labours if we had not beene partaker of we should haue yet beene ignorant and blind in many matters of great importance And thus far about the third cause of obscurity in Scripture The fourth ariseth vpon this that often tymes the words of Scripture make a doubtfull sense by reason of the want of some distinction For sometymes where a distinction is needfull there is none at all Which most commonly happeneth in these cases 1. When it maketh mention of God 2. When of Christ 3. When it insinuateth the coming of Christ 4. When it speaketh of the Church For there belongeth vnto God eyther Vnity of essence or Trinity of persons To Christ eyther the humane nature or diuine Moreouer Christs comming is twofould the one in his natâ—uity the other in the day of IudgmeÌ„t Also the Church is eyther militant vpon earth or triumphant in heauen Therefore when the Scripture maketh mention eyther of God or of Christ or of the Church it is doubtfull and obscure in what sense there they are to be taken as if it speake of God whether it
a Sacrament Luther indeed doth thus define it A Sacrament is a promise annexed to an externall signe Melancthon thus A Sacrament is a rite which hath the commandment of God to which is adioyned a promise of grace that is to say of free reconciliation or remission of sinnes as he explicateth himselfe Caluin in this manner A Sacrament is an outward signe by the which Calu. l. 4. Instit cap. 14. §. â— our Lord doth seale to our consciences the promise of his good will to vnderprop the weaknes of our fayth But verily none of all these definitions are in the Scripture Nay one of them doth not agree with another For Luther in his definition sayth that the promise is of the essence of a Sacrament Melancthon houldeth that it is annexed to the Sacrament But Caluin insinuateth in his that the promise is not annexed to the Sacrament but rather that the Sacrament is annexed and added to the promise and not that the promise is of the effect of Gods good will towards vs. Therefore according to Melancthon thus the promise were to be expressed if any shall receaue the sacrameÌ„t of Baptisme or of the Eucharist Him I promise the remission of his sinnes But according to Caluin in this maÌ„ner God hath promised to you remission of sins and life euerlasting and this promise he declares and seales by the Sacraments Thirdly whatsoeuer is to be thought of these definitions which our Aduersaryes haue newly inuented how will they shew out of the Scripture that they agree to Baptisme and the Eucharist I for my part see not But let vs try One definition is this A Sacrament is a rite which hath a Commandment of God to which is annexed a promise of remission of sins Let our aduersaryes proue out of scripture that this definition is agreeable to the Eucharist Let them proue I say this out of Scripture that the Eucharist hath a promise of remission of sinns annexed vnto it Or that which is all one That God in the Scripture doth promise vs remission of our sinns if we receaue this Sacrament They can neuer proue it For this Sacrament is not ordayned of God to remit a man his sinnes or to make of a wicked man or a sinner a iust holy man but rather it is instituted to the end that it may nourish confirme and increase that iustice grace and sanctity which was in him before he receaued this Sacrament Nay rather it is so farre off from remitting of sinnes as it is pernicious to a sinner if he come to it knowing himselfe guilty of deadly sinne Hence it is of the Apostle to the Corinthians But let a man proue himselfe and so let him eat of that bread and drinke of that chalice for he that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth drinketh iudgment to himselfe And Christ in his last supper would not giue the Eucharist to his Apostles before he had washed their feet to the end that he might giue vs to vnderstand that none vnles they be washed pure and free from all mortall sinne are to be admitted to the holy table of our Lord. And the reason is plaine out of the nature of this Sacrament For what is the Eucharist but a kind of spirituall meate and drinke by the which our soule is refreshed and made strong For my flesh sayth Christ is truly meate and my bloud is truly drinke And therefore as corporall meate and drinke doth not profit the body vnles it be aliue euen so neither the Eucharist doth helpe the soule vnles it be voyd of sin which is the death of the soule The third Controuersy is whether exorcismes and other ceremonyes vsed in the Catholike Church may be admitted in Baptisme That Lutherans admit them the Caluinists reiect theÌ„ Yet neither of them both can confirme their opinion out Scripture Not the Lutherans because the Scripture in no place maketh mention that such ceremonyes ought to be vsed but only we receaue them from the tradition of the Church Of the which thus S. Augustine writeth By the most ancient tradition of the Church sayth he children are exercised Aug l. 2. de nupt concup cap. 29. and breathed vpon that they may be translated to the kingdome of Christ from the power of darknes Not the Caluinists without it be in this manner No ceremonyes are to be vsed in the Church but those of the which there is expresse command in the Scripture But there is no command of the ceremonyes which the Catholikes vse in Baptisme Therfore such Ceremonyes are not to be vsed But the Mâ—ior is both false and contrary to the Caluinists themselues For the Caluinists do vse many ceremonies in Baptisme of the which there is no command in the whole Suripture such are these 1. That the infant must be baptized before al the people and that it should be on a Sunday or some other day when the people is wont to come togeather 2. That they who bring the infant to be baptized should be asked whether they will promise to instruct the child in fayth and manners after he shall grow to perfect age 3. That a name should be imposed vpon the infant who is baptized 4. That the forme of Baptisme should be pronounced in their country language 5. That the Creed our Lords prayer others also should be recyted Which ceremonyes Caluin prescribeth in a litle booke treating of the forme of ministring the Sacraments But where I pray you is commanded in Scripture Baptisme ought to be ministred Certainly in no place Hence therfore followeth that either they must reiect all those their ceremonyes or els graunt that all those which we vse are not therefore to be condemned because they are not expresly commanded in Scripture The fourth Controuersy Whether those who are baptized of heretikes are to be baptized againe S. Crprian in tymes past who was Bishop of Carthage did affirme it with some others But S. Augustine did deny it and followed that doctrine which was more true the which he did defend by no other meanes then by the Apostolicall tradition practise of the Church For so he writes against the Donatists VVhich custome sayth he to wit that baptisme may not be iterated I beleeue to haue proceeded Aug. l. 2. cont Donat c. 7. out of the Apostolicall tradition And againe That custome which was opposed against Cyprian is to be beleeued to haue receiued it beginning from the Apostolicall tradition to the which Cyprian did not yeald because it seemed to him vtterly destitute of any authority from the Scripture There are many other such like controuersies which cannot be decided out of Scripture alone but they must of necessity haue some other Iudge which heer I will briefly poynt to 1. Whether Baptisme may be giuen by one dipping 2. Whether Christians may worship Sunday in place of the Sabboath 3. Whether our Lady remained a Virgin after her Childbirth 4. Whether S. Peter the Apostle was Bishop
waies Some of them thus All scripture is profitable to teach and to argue Therefore traditions are superfluous which is much like vnto this All meat is profitable to nourish Luc. 11. 41. Dan. 4. 24. Therefore drinke is needlesse or els thus All alsmedeedes are profitable to Saluation therefore prayer is needlesse and the Sacraments are needlesse Alas who will not pitty such follies Or thus All scripture is profitable that is sufficient therefore traditions are needlesse But what an exposition is this Is it the same to be profitable and to be sufficient if it be so one may also interpret that place of S. Paul in the 1. Tim. 4. 8. same place Piety is profitable to all things that is Piety is sufficient for all things therefore all other things are needlesse And likewise that Take 2. Tim. 4. â—1 Marke and bring him with thee for he is profitable to me for the ministery that is sufficient Therefore Timothy Titus and Onesimus and all the rest were needlesse But who doth not now euidently perceaue that if this licence of interpreting the Scripture were once permitted how easy it were to corrupt it all But that the matter may appeare more plainly the text of the Apostles is well to be considered For the Apostle in the cited Chapter doth exhort Timothy the Bishop that he should instruct his subiects in fayth and good workes and that he should reprehend his aduersaries who being corrupted in mynd and reprobate concerning fayth 1. Tim. 3. 16. did resist the truth And that he might shew that he was able to performe it he addeth But thou continue in those things which Ibid. paulo post thou hast learned and are commtted to thee knowing of whome thou hast learned And because from thine infancy thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures which can instruct thee to Saluation by the fayth that is in Christ Iesus For all Scripture inspired of God is profitable to teach c. Where by the holy Scripturs which he sayth Timothy to haue knowne he meaneth the Scripture of the old Testament For at that tyme when Timothy was a Child the Scripture of the new Testament was not extant Therefore the Apostle in that text thus doth argue All Scripture inspired of God is profitable to teach subiects reprehend aduersaries But the Scripture of the old Testament which thou hast knowne from thy infancy is inspired of God Therefore it is profitable to teach thy subiects and to reprehend thy aduersaries And when thou art well instructed with the knowledg of that Scripture thou wilt obtaine great aide thereby to performe that which I haue tould thee And from the same head one may conclud in this manner All Scripture inspired of God is profitable to teach and argue And whosoeuer is instructed with the knowledg of this Scripture shall obtaine great aide thereby to performe them both Now out of both these arguments it followeth that these three propositions are true according to the Apostle 1. All Scripture inspired of God is profitable to teach and argue 2. That the Scripture of the old Testament is profitable to teach and to argue 3. That the Scripture of the new testament is profitable to teach and to argue As therefore it doth not follow the Scripture of the old Testament is profitable therefore the Scripture of the new Testament is needlesse superfluous Nor the contrary The Scripture of the New Testament is profitable therefore the Scripture of the old Testament is superfluous So also it doth not follow that tradition is superfluous because the old and the new Testament are profitable THE VIII TESTIMONY FOR I testify to euery one hearing the words â—po 22. 18. of the Prophecy of this booke If any man shall add to these things God shall add vpon him the plagues written in this booke And if any man shall diminish of the word of the booke of this Prophecy God shall take away his part out of the booke of life Heereby our aduersaries conclude in this manner If any man shall add to the words of this Apocalypticall Prophecy he shal be punished of God But the Catholikes add traditions Therefore the Catholikes shal be punished of God They may also conclude in this manner If any man shall add to the words of this Apocalipticall prophecy he shal be punished of God But the Caluinists add Ghospells Epistles of the Apostles the institutions of Caluin the Cathechisme of Hidelberge Athanasius Creed and also the first foure generall Councells Therefore the Caluinists shal be punished of God Or in this manner If any man shall diminish of the words of this Apocalipticall prophecy he shal be taken out of the booke of life But the Lutherans do not only diminish of the words of this Apocalipticall prophesy but also bring it into question whether it be true or no and not acknowledging it to be diuine and Canonicall tell vs in plaine termes that it is counterfait Apocalipticall Therefore they shal be taken out of the booke of life But now to the purpose S. Iohn forbiddeth nothing els but onely that the words of the Apocryphall prophecy be not corrupted of any Which he insinuateth to be done two wayes first by addition as if one should add any thing to the Apocalipticall prophecy to be as a part of it which is not Secondly by diminishing as if one should take something from it although it did not belong to it which certainly doth The Catholikes do neither But with an example I will declare it better S. Iohn foretelleth that in a certaine tyme two Prophets shall come clothed with sackcloath who shall prophesy a thousand two hundred sixty dayes and shall haue power to shut heauen that it raine not in the dayes of their prophesy and to turne the water into bloud c. To which prophecy the catholikes ad nothing at all which doth not belong vnto it nor take any thing away which is added therto but leaue it whole as it was prophesied of S. Iohn But our aduersaries do the contrary especially those who say that Luther and Caluin were the two Prophets For these who say this must of necessity diminish of the words of this prophecy seing that it is certaine that Luther and Caluin were not cloathed in sackcloathes nor had any power of shutting heauen nor also had those properties which follow The Conclusion of all that is contained in this Booke TWo things I haue hitherto endeauoured to performe The one is to shew that the Scriptures cannot be the iudge of Controuersies but the Church And this I haue declared six wayes First by the office of the iudge which is not fitting for the Scripture because the Scripture caÌ„not pronounce sentence in that manner betweene two at variance so that the one party may see it is for him and the other perceaue it is against him Secondly out of the scripture it selfe in the which two things are to be considered the
which may be declared with two similitudes the one is taken from the proportion of a mans body For if you should aske whether all the members which are in a mans body haue vitall and sensible spiritts in them by the which life in them is preserued I answeare that indeed all haue but with a certaine kynd of dependance from the head and the hart for these spirits are deriued from the head and the hart as from a double origen spring or fountaine into the other members From whence it comes that if those pores and passages be stopped intercepted through the which that distribution of spirits is made it followeth also that the other members are destitute of their spirits and cannot exercise their office at all but if they be patent and open all is well Euen so in the Church all the faythfull who are as members of the Church haue the assistance and direction of the holy Ghost but which a certaine kynd of dependance of the Pope who is as the head of the Church and from the Councells which are as the hart of the Church As long therefore as they remaine vnited to the doctrine of the Pope CouÌ„cells they are pertakers of the assistâ—nce and gouernement of the holy Ghost cannot erre in fayth But if they once depart by obstinacy and stubbornesse then they begin to shut vp all their passages that the diuine assistance and direction caÌ„not be distributed vnto them And so they begin to swarue from the truth and become subiect to errour which happened to Arius Nestorius Macedonius Pelagius and six hundred others And truly least the same happen vnto vs let vs heare the Counsell of the Apostle who in euery place doth exhort vs to the agreement and vnity of doctrine As when he writeth thus to the Romains And I desire you brethren saith he Rom. 16. 17. to marke them that make dissentions scandalls contrary to the doctrine which you haue learned and auoyd them And to the Corinthians I beseech you brethren by the name of our Lord 1. Cor. 1. 10. Iesus Christ that you all say one thing and that there be no schisme among you And to the Ephesians Becarefull to vse the spirit of truth in the bond of peace One body and one spirit as Eph. 4. 3. you are called in one hope of your Saluation One Lord one fayth one Baptisme And likewise to the Hebrewes VVith variances strang Heb. 13. 9. doctrines be not led away Another similitude may be borrowed from a flock of sheepe which very well doth represent the Church For as a whole flock being gathered together in one fould or one place hath the continuall assistance of their sheepheard who doth defend them all with his hooke his dogge from the cruelty of wolues eueâ— so the whole Church of the faythfull being collected in one fayth and in one spirit hath the perpetuall assistaÌ„ce of that diuine sheepheard Ioan. 10. 14. Matth. 28. 20. who sayd I am the good Pastour and I know my sheepe And againe Behould I am with you all dayes euen to the consuÌ„matioÌ„ of the world Also euen as the sheep as long as they remayne togeather with the flock and their Pastour they are safe from the biting of wolues euen so all Christians as long as they remaine vnited with the Church that is agreeing with the doctrine of the Church they are safe and secure from all dangers of errour and infidelity And finally as sheepe which stray from the flock are destitute of the protection of their Pastour and so subiect to be deuoured of the rauening wolues euen so Christians who disagree from the common sense and doctrine of the Church are quite destitute of the assistaÌ„ce of the holy Ghost and so in danger to fall certainly into pestiferous damnable errours From the which Christ free vs all FINIS THE CONTENTS OF THIS BOOKE OF the Iudge of Controuersies the Preface Pag. 1. The Scripture alone is not the Iudge of Controuersies concerning matters of Faith and Religion I. ARGVMENT Drawne from the Office of a Iudge Pag. 6. II. ARGVMENT Drawne out of the Scripture it selfe Pag. 9. That the Scripture according to the sense and meaning thereof cannot be Iudge Pag. 19. That the Scripture often tymes according vnto the sense is obscure and hard to be vnderstood Pag. 20. What are the causes why the Scripture is obscure Pag. 33. Wherefore is it Gods will that the Scripture should be obscure Pag. 58. It followes necessarily out of the obscurity of the Scripture that many Controuersies arise amongst Christians Pag. 64. The Scripture cannot be the Iudge of these and the like Controuersies Pag. 71. THE III. ARGVMENT Which is drawne out of the CoÌ„trouersies themselues Pag. 81. THE IIII. ARGVMENT Which is taken out of the vse and practise of the old Testament where not the Scripture but the Bishop was acknowledged for the Iudge Pag. 91. THE V. ARGVMENT Drawne from the custome vse and practise of the new TestameÌ„t Pag. 106. THE VI. ARGVMENT Drawne from the Analogy and proportion of the Ciuill Iudge concerning matters belonging to the common Wealth Pag. 118. The Testimonies of Scripture brought against vs heere are examined THE I. TESTIMONY Pag. 125. THE II. TESTIMONY Pag. 134. THE III. TESTIMONY Pag. 136. THE IIII. TESTIMONY Pag. 145. THE V. TESTIMONY Pag. 149. THE VI. TESTIMONY Pag. 151. THE VII TESTIMONY Pag. 153. THE VIII TESTIMONY Pag. 157. The Conclusion of all that is contained in this Booke Pag. 160. An ObiectioÌ„ of the vulgar people against all that hath beene hitherto sayd Pag. 162. FINIS