Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	call_v	scripture_n	word_n	6,256	5	4.4782	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B09695	Railings and slanders detected: or The folly and heresies of the Quakers further exposed. Being an answer to an invective libel written by G. Whitehead, impertinently called, Antichrist in flesh unmasked, &c. which some of the Quakers call an answer to a book truly stiled Antichrist in Spirit unmasked: or, Quakerism a great delusion. In this brief discourse you have the slanderous out-cries of G. Whitehead, against Edward Paye, Henry Loader, and William Alcot, examined, detected, and confuted.	Paye, Edw. (Edward)	1692 (1692)	Wing P884; ESTC R181559	21,006	57

Men so to do would make void the Covenant of Life and Peace And see what my Antagonist saith Dip. Plu. p. 13. and then judge if the Scriptures be no Rule yea if it be Idolatry to call the Bible a means as G. W. expresly saith who also affirmeth that Faith grounded on the Scriptures is but an empty implicit Faith and bespeaks such Persons void of the knowledge of God and Christ and Salvation and to be yet in their Sins and that such Men walk by their own Fancies and Imaginations Christ Ascerded p. 11. Now if the Scriptures be a dead carnal Letter Ink and Paper saith Pernel in Sheild of Truth If they are the Precepts and Traditions of Men saith Nailor in his Love to the lost And as Helbro●… the Quaker said to James Nobs and his Wife If they are no better than an old Aim Hick's D. p. 29. If it be dangerous for the Ignorant to read them If to say an Ass hath as much Authority essentially in himself to teach and rebuke as the Scriptures If to account it blasphemy and diabolical to call the Scriptures the Word of God be not to contemn and vilifie them I am yet to seek what is I shall refer the Reader to our Book Antichrist in Spirit unmask'd where the rest of the Quakers Articles of Faith published in their late Pamphlet are particularly examined Now let the Quakers renounce and explode those Writings and Sayings of their Authors that stand upon Record that so directly contradict their new Faith professed by them and as was said we shall be glad of so great and happy a Reformation among them hoping some means hath been bless'd to work this happy change upon them In p. 24 25. G. Whitehead saith we have wronged his Words in Citation and Construction about the holy Scriptures and Person of Christ and likewise grosly abused wronged and mischarged G. Fo● J. Pernel G. Keith foully perverting and misconstruing their Words And he saith we have also abused vilified defamed and wronged W. Smith H. Smith J. Nailor E. Burroughs J. Penington S. Crisp W. P. and others Men of better Fame and Repute than our selves and more righteous and innocent than their Defamers Answer That forasmuch as G. Whitehead cannot or at least hath not shewed us wherein we have wronged them as to Matter of Fact we shall take these to be some of G. W's empty and swelling words of Vanity and look upon it as a presumptuous Blast blown without Proof or Demonstration and so it needs no further Answer at present Again I shall take no notice at all of the confused Profession of Faith that G. Whitehead makes in 27 28 29 30. Pages of his Libel but do think it had been much more to the present purpose had he instead thereof laboured to reconcile their Writings with their late published Faith The Conclusion Wherein I shall take a little Notice of G. Whitehead's Postscript G. W. cites Antichrist in Spirit c. p. 46. Where I referr the Reader to Saul's Errand to Damascus p. 6 7. Where G. Fox takes the Name of the eternal Judge of quick and dead to himself c. G. Whitehead saith this is notoriously false in Fact being saith he in the very same Book Saul's Errand recorded amongst those Matters falsly charged on G. F. by his Adversaries the Priests and others in the County of Lancaster in their Petition p. 1 2 3 4 5 6. of Saul's Errand where G. F. opposeth and answereth their Objections To all which I answer In the beginning of the Book Saul's Errand there is that part of the Lancaster Petition inserted p. 4 5 6 7. In which Petition G. F. is charged with taking to himself the Name of the eternal Judge of quick and dead c. The Lancaster Petitioners were several Men of Credit and Repute Now though G. W. says the charge was false and G. Fox denies it in that their Book c. What then Have not I more reason to believe the Affirmative of so many than G. Fox's Negative I know 't is a Faculty incident to you to deny Matters of Fact charged upon you be they ever so apparently true And who can think that a number of Men should agree together in charging G. Fox with a Falshood Though G. Fox denies their charge in his Book may not we answer it in your own Phrase p. 8 of your Pamphlet The Authority of the Quakers Books are utterly denied by us so that we have grounds to believe the Petitioners say true Why may not G. F. take the Name of Judge of quick and dead to himself as well as to approve of those blasphemous Titles given him by Jos Coal in his Letter from Berbadoes cited in Antichrist in Spirit p. 43 44 45 Dear G. Fox who art the Father of many Nations whose Light hath reached through us thy Children even to the Isles afar of to the begetting of many again to a lively hope for which Generations to come shall call thee G. F blessed whose Being and Habitation is in the Power of the Highest in which thou G. F. rulest and governest in Righteousness and thy G. Fox's Kingdom is established in Peace and the Increase thereof is without end 21 day of the 12 month 1658. Now if G. Fox could digest and approve of all these Titles due only to Christ himself in the Opinion of all Christians Why may he not use the like Modesty in taking the name of Judge of quick and dead to himself The other Titles were approved and ordered to be recorded Why may not G. Fox take this Name to himself as well as to say in one of your Meetings Friends although I have not told it you I do now declare it I have power to bind and loose whom I please Now if G. W. hath the confidence to deny these things a further Test of them and others may be more fully given G. Whitehead's next causeless Out-cry is that I say the Quakers say that Christ hath no body but his Church quoting Saul's Errand p. 9. Which saith G. W. is notoriously false again for said he it was the Priest's Objection against L. F. that he professed that Christ had never any body but his Church Saul's Errand p. 2. Which saith G. W. was also false and there recorded amongst their other false Charges objected To which I answer First I do not charge the Quakers with saying that Christ never had any Body but his Church They own he had a bodily Garment But the Petitioners aforesaid charged the Quakers with saying that Christ hath no Body but his Church Now instead of G. Fox's owning Christ to have a Body besides his Church or distinct from his Church He replies That Christ's Church is his Body which I say is but a shuffle and not denying but implicitly granting the Matter of Fact And why may not G. F. deny Christ to have a Personal Body besides or distinct from his Church as well as G. Whitehead

Railings and Slanders detected Or the Folly and Heresies of the QUAKERS Further Exposed Being an Answer to an Invective Libel Written by G. Whitehead impertinently called Antichrist in Flesh unmasked c. Which some of the QUAKERS call An Answer to a Book truly Stiled Antichrist in Spirit unmasked OR Quakerism a great Delusion In this Brief Discourse you have the Slanderous Out-cries of G. Whitehead against Edward Paye Henry Loader and William Alcot Examined Detected and Confuted He Seedeth of Ash●s 〈◊〉 deceived heart hath turned him aside that he cannot deliver his Soul nor say Is there not a Lye in my right hand Esai 44. 20. Wh●●st that Hereticks speak like the Faithful they not only mean otherwise than they say but clean contrary and by their Tenets full of Blasphemies they destroy the Souls of those who with their fair words suck in the Poyson of their foul Opinions Irenaeus in his Third Book against Heresies London Printed in the Year 1692. Railings and Slanders Detected or the Folly and Heresies of the Quakers further Exposed c. IT is well known to all that are but a little acquainted with the Faculties and Writings of the Quakers that their usual methods are to cry out against all that oppose or detect their corrupt notions as such that abuse and defame an Innocent and Religious People But amongst the many causeless out-cries they have proclaimed in the World I have not seen one for its magnitude that hath out-done a small parcel of slanderous confused Railleries that lately was Midwiv'd into the World and Fathered by George Whitehead which if there be a Wise Man amongst them it appears strange that it had not been stifled in the Birth rather than such an ill shapen Cub should have gone forth into the World to declare it self Legitimate and publish it self the true Off-spring of a Quaker But we must take it as it is and in the Title Page G. W. saith our Book is a desaming confused Book Answer I suppose a great part of it must needs be confused being taken out of your own confused Writings the reconciling of which to themselves is as easie as bringing together the South and North Poles 2. He calls it a defaming Book Answer It defames no Mans Person nor indeed your Principles any further than your Tongues and Pens did it first of all for it Treats of your professed notions which if false are deservedly exposed nothing being a more destructive evil in our day than for falshood to be carried on in the World with Fame and Applause But to come to your Book it self Could you suppose that any thing was contained in it to the purpose I cannot imagine what you could think of it If you had said any thing towards reconciling your former Writings with your late professed Faith you had done something to the purpose do you think that any whose Eyes are in their Heads will not easily see that your defects in Truth aud Reason are supplied with Slanders and Railings You tell us p. 5 6 7 8. We have shewed our envy and bitterness yea we appear Envious against your present Liberty as Men of Envious Turbulent Persecuting Spirits c. Why what 's the matter why our Book defames the Quakers as a People of a Religious Society c. who have solemly and sincerely declared to the Government That they own and believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament and desire to live in the Faith Knowledge and Practice of them and that they believe in the Three Divine Witnesses bearing Record in Heaven the Father Word and Holy Spirit and the Divinity and Humanity of Christ and Justification by Christ's Works Righteousness and Merits and not by their own This and much more in their professed Faith whereunto I referr the Reader Now we have gone and published to the World wherein the Writings of their chief Guides do directly oppose and contradict this Confession of Faith from which G. Whitehead concludes That by this we would make void one Condition of their present Liberty p. 6. As People not fit to be tolerated now have their Liberty of Conscience p. 7. And saith G. W. No doubt had these angry Anabaptists power we should not enjoy our Liberties the very Nature and Tendency of these their bitter lying Invectives being to bring Persecution upon us as a People not to be given any credit unto in our Solemn Profession before Authority To all which I Answer First We did not know till our Book was Published that you had professed this as your Faith before the Parliament And secondly we must the more admire your Presumptuous confidence herein that you should so affront the Government except you had at the same time renounced your former Writings that so evidently contradict it And whereas you falsly charge us with persecuting Spirits and Envy it is well known that our principles are and ever were that none ought to be persecuted for their Religious Principles or Notions no not the Papists themselves so long as they live peaceably in subjection to Authority and the Civil Government yet had they come and set up a Mass-House at Deptford and that they might the more effectually prevail upon the Ignorant and easilier proselyte them to their Idolatry and Superstitions should have published a Profession of Faith directly contrary to their known Principles and the Writings of their Chief Guides We should in like manner have looked upon our selves obliged both in Honour to God and Love to our Neighbours to have detected their Deceits And we freely allow any to examine our published Faith and if they can find such plain contradictions as aforesaid we will be content to bear the discredit and not retaliate them with Railings and Slanders nor account them envious Persecutors for it And now I would appeal to the Light in G. Whitehead whether he believes that we envy their Liberty and would Persecute them had we Power if he so believes he is miserably deluded in that matter and if he doth not so believe how willfully doth he sin against the Light in casting these Slanderous Aspersions upon us What are we envious Persecutors Hypocrites and possessed with an unclean Spirit and lying Devil p. 5 8 17. Fie George are these Thunderbolts fit to be shot at your Antagonists on all occasions I own that you have some cause to be displeased at our putting you upon a work you cannot possibly do namely to reconcile your late Faith with your former Writings But then you might have called us unreasonable Men or compared us to Pharaoh's Task-masters for its a work we put you upon that is harder than to make Brick without Straw And indeed G. Whitehead appears to have no mind to touch it with one of his fingers it is so knotty and difficult a piece of work No it passeth the skill of the ablest Orator with all his Rhetorick or George Whitehead with all his pretended skill in Logick to do it

Dip. Pl. p. 13. Burrough's Works p. 150. It is not our wonted course to say that Christ hath no Body but his Church But we say the Church is his Body Observe they do not usually say so but it appears they believe so See ibid p. 151. 152. To say Christ hath two Bodies one out of the sight of the Saints There is so much Wickedness and Ignorance in the Broachers of such a Particular that it needs no Answer c. See G. Whitehead's Verdict and I shall leave this to the Reader 's Judgment his Apology p. 33. Them that accuse us for saying Christ hath but one Body should produce Scripture that saith he hath two And where doth the Scripture say that Christ's glorified Body in Heaven is of humane Nature Now the Quakers own Christ's Church to be his Body then that is the one Body G. W. intends And it is monstrous to say he hath two So that then I do not wrong the Quakers in saying that they own Christ to have no Body but his Church Now all Christians own Christ's Church to be his Mystical Body and they also believe him to have a personal glorious Body distinct from his Church saith he Ep. c. p. 59. refers to Pernel's Sheild of Truth p. 12. Where I. P. calls Water-Baptism a formal Imitation and Invention of Men c. G. Whitehead saith James Pernel speaks not this of Water-Baptism without distinction Answer However he saith so and then the Charge is owned to be true To this agrees Smith's Primer p. 39. Thy Baptism Bread and Wine rose from the Pope's Invention And James Nailor's Salutation to the Seed of God p. 33 34. calls Water-Baptism a carnal thing Now let the judicious Reader judge how far I have been concerned in wronging the Quakers c. To conclude we will give an Answer to G. Whitehead's impertinent Questions though I think they are not worth taking notice of His Questions are 4 but his Reasons for asking them vanish in answering the first viz. Was E. P. deputed and approved by your Congregation or any select Assembly of Elders or Ministers of the Baptized People or Churches to write or publish his said Book against the People called Quakers Or did he do it on his own Authority or Head with your Approbation only Answer Your pretended Faith being published and dispersed plentifully here it did more directly affect this People of the baptized Way and therefore E. P. did write and publish the said Book by the approbation of the Majority of this Congregation And so he did not do it on his own Head Neither did we see it needful to desire the approbation of others herein though several have approved of it since And it is most ridiculously impertinent for you so often to speak of defaming you as a People except you could shew a Dispensation to be universal Dictators and a License to disperse your confused and pernicious Stuff without Controul Moreover Edw. Paye hath this to say that although he doth not pretend to Perfection as some of the Quakers have done that is a living without Sin Yet when G. W. becomes Master of an Inquisition Edw. Paye will give sufficient Testimonies both of his Life and Doctrine to the confutation of his Defamers And the mean time he challenges any to charge and prove against him any thing unbecoming a Man and a Christian respecting either Life or Principles humane Frailties excepted And although G. W. infinuates most arrogantly that he had need to be a Man of singular Piety and eminent Parts that is sit to discourse with a Quaker in this Controversie yet E. P. believes that a Man of as mean Qualifications as himself can do it And let this serve for an Answer to your impertinent Questions And now G. W. I conclude with a Word to thee and do hereby declare that I never had the least prejudice against or Controversie with any Quaker about civil things though I have been intimate with several of them both at Bristol when I lived there and elsewhere but from your Principles Liberanos Domine I hope shall ever be my Litany And I hope all that are or would be Christians will join with me and say Amen And now I have done except I am foolishly provoked which if I am you may it is like have a Quarterly Packet to keep your Fame in remembrance This is all from thy Friend Edward Paye FINIS ERRATA PAge 3. line 20. for ●●w read ●●r p. 24. 1. 7. dele And. 1. 26. for Mat● read Mat● p. 29. 1. 28. for 〈◊〉 read George