concupiscence which by evil customs rises up into a thick bole of vitious inclinations while we study not to impair but rather to augment and nourish it However I must give you leav to number this among my silly principles to the end you may talk more copiously of the disputes and wars and broils that are and have been in several parts of Christendom and fall again into your much affected and often iterated rhetorical strain So the Pagans judged the Primitive Christians c. Seventh is There is no remedy of our evils but by a returnal to the Roman Sea This and the principle foregoing had not you warily cloven a hair had been all one and both are equally mine But sir that may remedy our difference in faith which neither can nor will prevent varieties in philosophy or other worldly judgements nor considering the infinite diversity of mens humours is there any one thing equally prevalent with all men and at all times to the like good effect and if it do certainly help one evil it is not therfor a remedy for all But it seems you have yet a little more mirth and choller to vent and therfor I must permit you to adde this principle for mine that you may smilingly consider how the Romans should cure our evils that cannot prevent disorders differences and sins amongst themselvs The eight follows That Scriptur on sundry accounts is insufficient to settle us in the truth And in this you flourish and triumph most copiously for fifteen pages together as the champion of the word of God But sir you speak not one word to the purpos or against me at all if I had delivered any such principle Gods word is both the sufficient and only necessary means both of our conversion and settlement as well in truth as vertue But sir the thing you heed not and unto which I onely speak is this If the scripture be in two hands for example of the Protestant Church in England and of the Puritan who with that scriptur rose up and rebelled against her can the scriptur alone of it sels decide the busines how shall it do it has it ever don it or can that written word now solitary and in private hands so settle any in a way that neither himself nor present adherents nor future generations shall question it or with as much probability dissent from it either totally or in part as himself first set it This sir is the case unto which you do neither here nor in all your whole book speak one word And what you speak otherwis of the scripturs excellency I allow it for good What is not against me is with me Ninth The Pope is a good man and seeks nothing but our good This also I no where aver For I never saw him nor have any such acquaintance with him as to know whether he be a good man or no though in charity I do not use to iudg hardly of any body Much less could I say that he whom I know to have a general solicitude for all Churches seeks nothing but our good Sir if I had pondred my words in Fiat lux no better than you heed yours in your Animadversions upon it they might even go together both of them to lap pepper and spices or som other yet more vile emploiment Tenth that the devotion of Catholiks far transcends that of Protestants But sir I never made in Fiat lux any comparison between their devotions nor can I say how much the one is or how little the other But you are the maddest Commentatour I have ever seen you first make the Text and then Animadversions upon it Here at length you conclude your chapter and would say you your book also if you had none to deal with but ingenious and judicious readers It seems what follows is for readers neither judicious nor ingenious And becaus I knew you took me for one of those I went on in my view Indeed had I not undertaken to give you an account of your whole book I could have been well content to stop here with ingenious and judicious readers and look no further Doubtles in this affair good wits will jump You would write no more had you none but judicious readers and these will read no more becaus they are judicious But I poor ass must jogge on 3 ch from page 110 to 119. Your third chapter concerns my preface which in part you allow and partly dislike And I am equally content with both 4. or 5 ch from page 119 to 148. Your fourth chapter by mistake of press is named Fift and so I must here call it It begins my book and takes up five of my paragraffs at once You have loitered long about the gate like a trifling idlesbee and mean now it seems when you com to my own words to go nimbly over them as of lesser concernment then your own forestalled conceits which you have hitherto made sport with You first set up a maypole and then danced about it and now at length half tired and almost out of breath you come home to me My first paragraff about Diversity of feuds you do not much except against But I see you do not affect the schoolmen haply for the same reason the French love not Talbot having been used in their infancy to be frighted with that name However you think I have good reason to make honourable mention of them becaus they were say you the hammerers and forgers of Popery Alas sir I see that anger spoils your memory for in the twelfth and thirteenth chapter of that very book of your Animadversions you make Popery to be hammered and forged not a few hundreds of years before any schoolmen were extant You check me also for saying that reformation of religion is pretended by emulous Plebeians as though say you Hezekiah Josiah and other good Kings and Princes also of our own were emulous plebeians But sir when I say in Fiat lux p. 20. what glory the emulous plebeian sees given to higher spirits c. I only speak of the times of vulgar insurrection against autority as all men see except your self who will not My second paragraff of the Ground of quarrels you like well and explicate it with a text to help me out I could not haply tell how to cite James the fourth chapter the first and second vers of that chapter without your help However it is kindnes though it be but cours as sir Thomas Moor told his maid when she kist him as he was going to execution and so I take it My third paragraff about nullity of title would you think every period of it confute my self But that saying of S. Paul An à vobis verbum Dei processit an ad vos solos pervenit which I make use of to stop the mouth of all vitilitigatours in religion was cited by me you think in an unhappy hour becaus say you ther is is not any one single text of scriptur more
fals nay and that I know it is fals and that I cannot produce one authentick testimony no not one of any such thing But this is but your ordinary confidence 21 ch from page 402 to 416. I must not mervail that my following paragraff called Dirge is so wantonly plaid upon in your one and twentieth chapter You think of no body after they are dead nor does it at all concern you whether they be in hell or heaven or som third place or not at all But Sir were not all the ancient monuments of the foundations of our churches colledges and chappels in England now destroyed you would finde your self with that wretched opinion of yours absolutely incapable to enter upon any benefice cure or employment in this land But the times are changed and you have nothing now to do but to eat drink and preach for to morrow you shall dye 22 ch from page 416 to 435 In your two and twentieth chapter which is of the Pope you do but only repeat my words and not understand and deny and laugh 23 ch from page 435 to Finis Your last chapter is upon my paragraff of Popery wherein I set down eleven other parcels of catholik profession all of them innocent unblamable and sacred You onely bite at the first of them and having it seems enough filled your self with that your wearied bones go to rest With Mas comedido the title of my last paragraff you meddle not at all It is doubtless to you who understand not the English word Messach another Gnostick Paldabaoth But I would you had Mas comedido by heart You cannot but mervail that I have taken so little notice all this while of your onely one strong and potent Argument you stout Achilles that meets me in every paragraff and period and beats me back into the walls of Troy Wberever I am whatsoever I say your 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is upon me All the discours of my whole one and thirty paragraffs is by it fell'd to the ground miserably bruised and battered with that one and the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But I hope you will have me excused I have not leisur I am not willing I want ability to answer it or give you any corresponding satisfaction The like to our Authour for flourishing empty words and cunning sleights of subtilty hath been seldom c. Here our Authour falls into a great misadventure c. Here our Authour discovers not only his gross ignorance but somthing more c Our Authour beleeves not a word of all this nor can c. We finde our Authour never to fail so palpably and grosly as when c. Our Authour speaks notoriously fals nor hath he c. Our Authours history philosophy and reason all alike c. Our Authour speaks boldly though he know it is not so but. c. Our Authour if I could com to speak to him would not own any of this c. Never any such cunning dissembling hypocrite as our Authour c. It is no mervail our Authour should still fail both in philosophy antiquity c. who hath not c. In these and such like arguments which occur almost as oft as the pages of your book you rout Our Authour utterly I am in all this not able to say bough to a goose Although I be not conscious of any either fraud in my breast or fault in my book or lye in either yet in all such talk you must and will and shall have both the first and last word too Another argument of yours exprest in twenty places of your Animadversions by which you would dissipate at once great part of Fiat lux into the air does as finely cant as this does coursly defy The religion say you that is now profest in England is that and only that which was first in ancient times received here c. This you speak and the more confidently do you speak it the less significant you know your words be and yet sounding well enough for your design What do you mean I pray you Sir by that religion that is now profest in England Why do you not specify it Speak it in down-right language Is it Popery that has been peaceably profest in the land for almost a thousand years and did all the good things we now finde in it as yet profest by som No this you will deny Is it prelate-protestancy that for threescore years opprest popery here This if you had said you had praised that too much which your self approves not Is it Presbytery that warred the last twenty years and utterly destroyed the foresaid Protestancy In saying this you had to your own danger disabled the English Protestant Church now to the great heart-burning of the Presbyterians establisht again by law Is it Independency that for six or seven years curbed the Presbyterian here in Tectour Olivers time and had almost past an Act for the abolishing of the three P.P.P. Papish Protestant and Presbyterian Is it Quakery that is now far enough spread and openly profest by many and judges the Papist stark naught the Protestant half rotten the Presbyterian quarter addle and other Independents imperfect Is it som general abstracted religion that is common to them all Then Popery as well as any other may be justly stiled the religion here first received For that common notion in whatever you shall say it consists so it be positive as it ought to be will be found first and principally in the Papists faith But this you have not thought good your self to expres that you may seem to expres somthing that may be thought good to your self and ill to me But you must deal candidly with me I am an old ox that hath fixed his foot firmly and am not to be out-braved either with your canting words or passionate execrations I had told you Sir of all your tricks from page to page in particular if nothing had been required at my hands to write but only my own reply but being if I should do so obliged to set down your talk too I think it not worth either my charge or labour to reflect upon you such your voluminous impertinencies And I have I assure you taken notice of all in your book that may seem to have any appearance of reason in it though really ther be none at all against me and is not either manifestly untrue or absolutely improper This is all And now good Sir I could wish you had given me the first letter of your name that I might have known how to salute you I have been told of late that the Authour of the Animadversions upon Fiat lux is one Doctour O N a Protestant against Popery which you found down a Presbyterian against Protestancy which you threw down an Independent against Presbyterianry which you kept down But whether you be Doctour O N or to turn your inside outwards you be N O doctour since I cannot be assured it shall be all one to me
knows not what or beleev not what himself speaks It was the proper badg of those times when after the alarm sounded in the Pulpit that our people therupon went forth in troops to battle neither did the peasant understand nor the man in black beleev although the sound rung generally in their ears that it was the sword of the Lord and of Gideon which they brandisht against the loyal band their foes Fourthly your pert assertion so often occurring in your Book that ther is neither reason truth nor honesty in my words is but the overflowing of that former intemperat zeal and the more frequent it occurs the less approbation it will find Fiftly your sharp and frequent menaces that if I write or speak again I shall hear more finde more feel more more to my smart more then I imagin more then I would rellishes too much of that insulting humour our poor bleeding Land then groaned under the many years of our anarchical confusion Sixtly the absence of your name in the frontispiece of your book which I have never before observed in all my life of any Protestant writer that hath ever in my time set forth a book here in England against Popery givs no small suspicion that the Authour of our Animadversions is no such Protestant as he would be thought to be Lastly that I may omit other special reasons your other general trick of charging me then most of all with fraud ignorance and wickednes when in your own heart you find me most clear from any such blemish thereby to put a vail upon your own caus which would otherways be disparaged makes me smell a fox a notorious one sic notus Vlysses This has been too often acted here in England to be soon forgotten The better the cause the lowder still was the cry against those who stood for it that the blustering nois of calumnies might drown all report of their innocence And by all this I cannot Sir but suspect that if the description of Popery your Animadversions gives us be right you are a Papist your self a great one and no true Protestant But as it is so let it be Thus much I only tell you that you may see I am neither neglective of your book nor idle but have perused and read it over And although what for the threats of your Animadversions and what for the reasons of my own Fiat Lux I may not enter into controversies yet I hope I may let you know that I have seen your work And that you may the better credit me I will give you a short account of it first in general then in particular All the whole design of Fiat Lux you do utterly mistake throughout all your book of Animadversions so that you conceiv that to be a Controversy which is none that to be absolutely asserted which is but hypothetically discoursed that to be only for one side which is indifferently for all although I speak most for them that are most spoken against and am in very deed absolutely against all speaking quarrelling disputing about Religion If you will but have patience to hear my purpose and design which to all men not interested and blinded with a prejudice is clear enough relucent in the whole context of Fiat Lux what I say will easily appear to your self Fiat Lux sayes one thing and supposes it another thing he desires and aims at that he dislikes this commends We are at this day at variance about Religion this Fiat Lux supposes but it were better to have peace this he aims at and desires And both these things are intermingled up and down in my Book according to that small faculty that God hath given me though not according to the usual method of Books now adayes Here Sir in few words you have the whole summe of Fiat Lux. And I hope you will grant that that to be the scope of my book which I made it for That we are now at varience is most clear and certain by me supposed and not to be denied And that it were better to have peace is as absolutely expedient as the other is evidently true These then being things both of them which no man can resist either by denying the one or disliking the other I thought them better intermingled than set apart and with more reason to be supposed then industriously proved Yet to superinduce a disposition unto peace my only work was to demonstrate an uselesnes an endlesnes an unprofitablenes of quarrels which I laboured quite through my book beginning it with an intimation of our quarrels which S. Paul calls the fruits and works of the flesh and ending it with a commendation of charity which is the great fruit and blessing of Gods holy Spirit Now the easier to perswade my Countreymen to a belief both of the one and the other first is insinuated in Fiat Lux both the ill grounds and worst effects of feuds then is the plea of parties specified their probabilities acknowledged and lastly an impossibility of ever bringing our debates to a conclusion either by light or spirit reason or scriptur texts so long as we stand separated from any superiour judicative power unto which all parties will submit is I think with a strong probability if not demonstrative evidence concluded And therfor is it thought by Fiat Lux to be more rational and Christian like to leav these endles groundles and ruinous contentions and resign our selvs to humility and peace This is the design and whole summ of my book And although I speak up and down here for Papists ther for Protestants elswhere for Presbyterians or Independents commonly out of the very discourses they make for themselvs yet do I not defend either their wayes or their arguments Nor do I teach any doctrin at all or hold there any opinion but only giv to understand in that one little book what is largely discoursed in a hundred That all parties do make out to themselves such a probability which as it stands joyned with the actours resolution and separated from any superiour visible power to which they will submit can never be subdued And hath not long experience proved this as true as any thing els What is ther in Fiat Lux that can be denied Is it not evident that we are now at variance and too long indeed have been Is it not also clear that peace charity and neighbourhood is better than variance dissention and wars do not parties strongly plead for themselvs so far perswaded each one that he is in the right that he will not yield that truth is with any but himself Is not all this evident I am sure it is and all England will witnes it And if any one should be able to evince that any reasonings made in Fiat Lux either for Papists Protestants or others be not certain or perhaps not probable yet he does nothing except he be able to prove likewise that they are not probable to Fiat Lux
or to those that use them whether Protestants or Papists which he can no more do than he can pull a star out of the firmament I say Sir again and mark I pray you what I say If you should chance to evince that the reasons brought by Fiat Lux either for the doctrin or practises of Papists or others be either not probable or untrue yet is your labour all in vain except you be able to demonstrate likewise that they are not probable to Fiat Lux or to Papists and others who use those reasons which you can no more do then any thing that is absolutely impossible By this time Sir you may discern how hard it is to deal with Fiat Lux and impossible to confute him sith he speaks nothing but what is as clearly true and evident as what we see at mid-day Nor do I in this any way exalt the ability of the Authour whom you are pleased so much and frequently to disable A Tomfool may say that which all the wise men in the world cannot gain-say as he did who said the Sun was above half an hour high at noon It was Fiat Lux his fortune rather then chois to utter words which will no sooner be read than acknowledged And it was your misfortune Sir to employ your greater talents in refuding evident truths perhaps for no other reason but becaus they issued from the pen of a man who is not so great a friend to faction as you could wish And although you proceed very harsh and furiously yet am I verily perswaded you now discern though too late for your credit that you had all this while according to our English proverb good Mr. Doctor a wrong sow by the ear Thus far in general Now briefly to give you som account in particular You spend four Chapters and a hundred and eighteen pages which is the fourth part of your Book before you com to the first line and paragraff of mine The applaus and honour of this world c And it is not unwittily done For being to be led as you heavily complain out of your ordinary road of controversies by the wilde chase of Fiat Lux it behoved you to draw som general common places of your own for your self to walk in and exercise your rhetorick and anger before you pursue a bird that flies not you say in any usual tract Preface from page 1 to page 19 Your preface wherein you speak of my subtilty and your own pretence affords me nothing but the beginning of your mistake which will run quite through your book 1 Chap. from page 19. to 29. Your first Chapter beats me about the pate for saying that I conceal my method with a terrible syllogistical dilemma He that useth no method say you cannot conceal it and if he hath concealed it he hath used one But I must pass by store of such doughty stuff being only fit for the young Oxford Schollar who being com home to take air would prove before his father and mother that two eggs were three Then going on you deny that Protestants ever opposed the merit of good works which at first I wondered at seeing the sound of it has rung so often in mine own ears and so many hundred books written in this last age so apparently witnes it in all places till I found afterwards in my thorow perusal of your book that you neither heed what you say or how much you deny At last giving a distinction of the intrinsick acceptability of our works the easlier to silence me you say as I say 2 Chap. from page 29. to 110. Your second chapter collects out of Fiat Lux as you say ten general conclusions spread all over like veins and arteries in the body of that my book And this you do that you may make your self a campus Martius to sport in without confinement to my method But you name not any page of my book where those principles may all or any of them be found and you do wisely for in the sens those words do either naturally make out or in which you understand them of all the whole ten I can hardly own any one The first of my principles must be this That we received the Gospel first from Rome We that is we English first received it thence But against this you reply That we received it not first from Rome but by Joseph of Arimathea from Palestin as Fiat Lux himself acknowledges Sir if Fiat Lux say both these things he cannot mean in your contradictory fals sens but in his own true one We that is we Englishmen the now actual inhabitants of this Land and progeny of the Saxons received first our Gospel and Christendom from Rome though the Brittans that inhabited this Land before differing as much from us as Antipodes had some of them been Christened long before us And yet the Christendom that prevailed and lasted among the Brittans even they also as well as we had it from Rome too mark this likewise But you reply Though persons from Rome did first plant Christianity among the Saxons was it the Popes Religion they taught did the Pope first finde it out or did they Baptise in the name of the Pope Good Sir it was the Popes Religion not invented but profest by him and from him derived unto us by his missioners You adde Did not the Gospel come to Rome as well as to us for it was not first preached there Sir properly speaking it came not so to Rome as it came to us For one of the twelve fountains nay two of the thirteen and those the largest and greatest was transferred to Rome which they watered with their blood we had never any such standing fountain of our Christian Religion here but only a stream derived to us from thence My second assertion must be From whom we first received our Religion with them we must still abide This principle as it is never delivered by Fiat Lux though you put it upon me so is it in the latitude it carries and wherin you understand it absolutely fals never thought of by me and indeed impossible for how can we abide with them in any truth who may perhaps not abide in it themselvs Great part of Flanders was first converted by Englishmen and yet are they not obliged either by Fiat Lux or any lux whatsoever to accompany the English in our now present wayes My third is The Roman Religion is still the same This indeed though I do no where formally express it yet I suppose it becaus I know it hath been demonstratively proved a hundred times over You deny it has been proved why do you not then disprove it becaus you decline say you all common places very good so do I let us com then to proper ones You fall then upon my Queries in the end of my book The Roman was once a true flourishing Church and if she ever fell she must fall either by apostacy heresy or
were not then about any sacrifice but only preaching Gods word or som such thing to the people in the name and behalf of God But Sir is this to be in earnest or to jest The sacred text sayes they were sacrificing to our Lord liturgying and ministring to him You say they were not sacrificing to God but only preaching to the people And now the question is whether you or I more rightly understand that apostolical book For my sence and meaning I have all antiquity as well as the plain words of sacred text you have neither 16 ch from page 304 to 313. Your sixteenth chapter upon my paragraff of the Virgin Mary which is you say the most disingenuous of all my book is spent in an invective against calumnies which brings you upon your often iterated common place of Pagans reproaches to Christians And whatever my paragraff may be this your chapter seems to me as ingenious as the very best of your book and absolutely frivolous And must you inveigh against calumnies whose whole book is nothing els it is a bundle of slanders and a meer quiver of sharp arrows of desolation 17 ch from page 313 to 325. Your seventeenth chapter upon my paragraff of Images or Figures nibbles at more of my discours made in that one paragraff then you have taken notice of in ten of my others And therfor I mean to com up close to you A man say you may indeed have such thoughts of devotion as Fiat lux speaks of upon the sight of images which he sees hanging in Churches if he be a man distraught of his wits not if he be himself and sober So then mad men it seems can tell what figures represent sober and wise men cannot Again The violation of an image say you redounds to the prototype if it be rightly and duly represented not els And when then is Christ crucified for example rightly and duly represented Are you one of those can tell what figures represent or not The hanging up of traitors in effigie is don say you only to make a declaration of the fact and not to cast a dishonour upon the person So you say Becaus you know it don long after the fact has rung all the whole kingdom over and don not in places of concours but ignominy not in the Exchange but Tiburn not with any characters declaring the fact but with a halter about his neck to denote the death and ignominy inflicted as far as is possible upon him You go on Where the Psalmist complains of Gods enemies breaking down his sculptures he means not therby any images or figures but only wainscot or carved ceiling Surely the Prophet wanted a word then to express himself or translatours to express the Prophet If we must guess at his meaning without heeding his words one might think it as probable that the hous of God was ordained with sculptures of Cherubims and other angels to represent his true hous that is above as with the circles quadrats triangls rhombos and rhomboides of wainscot The eye say you again may not have her species as well as the ear becaus God has commanded the one and not the other This Sir you only say Fiat lux makes it appear that God commands and commends both and the nature of man requires both nor can you give any reason why I may not look upon him who was crucified as well as hear of him You adde Nor is the sole end of preaching as Fiat lux would have it only to move the mind of the hearers unto corresponding affections Why do not you say then what els it is for you deny my words but declare your self no other end but what I have in those short words exprest You may haply conceal in your heart some other end of your preaching which you are loath to speak as to procure applaus to vent your rhetorick to get good benefices to show your fine cloth and silks your pure neat white starched bands and cuffs button'd handkerchiefs and ladies gloves to inflame factions get wives or the like but I could not think of all things at once nor needed I to express any more than that one end of preaching which is connatural apostolical and legal You go on God indeed commanded the Cherubims to be set upon the ark but those cherubims were images of nothing of what should they be images Nor were they set up to be adored Besides God who commanded them to be set up did no more gain-say his own prohibition of images to be made than he contradicted his own rule which forbids to steal when he commanded his people to spoil the Egyptians But Sir since the real Cherubims are not made of our beaten gold those set up by Moses must be only figures And of what els should they be figures but of those real ones Nor is it either to my purpos or yours that they are set up to be adored For images in catholick Churches are not set up for any such purpos nor do I any where say it No man alive has any such thought no tradition no councel hath delivered it no practis infers it Christian Philosophers or Schooolmen have indeed raised a philosophical question Whether any respect may be terminated upon the Figur purely as it is such an absolute entity in it self besides that relative one that falls only upon the prototype But what they question or what they talk or what they resolve does no more belong becaus they say it unto catholik faith then if they had been asleep and said nothing All catholik councels and practis declares such sacred figurs to be expedient assistants to our thoughts in our divine meditation and prayers and that is all that I know of it And the relative respect that is given to any figur as it is such a figur whether in a glass or in any more fixed postur to supply the defects of a mirrour that it terminates naturally upon the sampler or prototype is evident to right reason and philosophy And it cannot be otherwise That which you speak of the Israelites spoiling the Egyptians by Gods command hath som species of an argument in it But Sir we must know you as well as I that God who forbids men to steal did not then command to steal as you say he did when he bad his people spoil the Egyptians under the species of a loan Many things legitimate that their act of spoil and clear it from any notion of theft or robbery or stealing First they might have of themselvs a right to those few goods in satisfaction of the long oppression they had unjustly undergon and it may be that in that their great hast their own allowance was not then paid them But secondly becaus it is a thing of danger that any servant should be allowed to right himself by putting his hand to his masters goods though his case of wrong be never so clear therfor did the command of God intervene to
sojourneying in Paris when he understood of a grecian byshops arrival there did with some other english gentlemen in his company give him a visit and afterwards with the same or like company went frequently to see him The articles of our English Church were translated into greek and shown him Many questions were asked him about the service of the grecian Church praying for the dead invocation of Saints real presence confession c. Dr. Cousins can tell himself what answer he received from that venerable grave prelate Cyrillus arch-bishop of Trapesond for that was his name and title In brief he owned not those articles as any way consonant to the faith of the Greeks who beleeved and had ever practised the contrary He also told them distinctly and openly that Mass or Liturgy was and had ever been the great work of their Christianity all over the greek Church that confession of sins to a priest praying for the dead invocation of saints and such like points wherein we in England differ from papists wer all great parts of their religion and their constant practis Finally he let them know that all the Liturgies both those of S. Basil S. Chrysostom S. Gregory Nazianzen were ever kept in the learned greek differing from the vulgar language And withal showed his own greek book of Liturgy which he used himself at the altar Dr. Cousins did himself see him officiate with his lay brother a monk of S. Basil belonging to S. Catherins monastery in mount Sina ministring to him at the altar and found both by his words and practis that in all those and other essential parts and observances of Christianity the Greeks agreed perfectly with the Roman Church This testimony Sir of a venerable arch-byshop to such a worthy person as Dr. Cousins might I should think suffice to justify my words and make you beleev with me that Christian Liturgies have ever been used as Fiat lux speaks in a learned language distinct from the vulgar But we need not go far from home for a testimony When was the Bible or Service-book seen here in England for a thousand years space in any other language but Latin before Edward the sixt dayes except haply the Psalter which the Saxons and almost all people have ever had in their own tongue being a chief part of Christians devotion or in Brittish or Welch before the byshop of S. Asaph his translation You mightily insult over me in your 336 page for saying that the bible was kept by the Hebrews in an ark or tabernacle not touched by the people but brought out at times to the priest that he might instruct the people out of it Here say you the authour of Fiat lux betrayes his gross ignorance and somthing more for the ark was placed in sanctum sanctorum and not entered but by the priest only once a year wheras the people were weekly instructed But Sir do I speak there of any sanctum sanctorum or of any ark in that place was ther or could ther be no more arks but one If you had been only in these latter dayes in any synagogue or convention of Jews you might have seen even now how the bible is kept still with them in an ark or tabernacle in imitation of their forefathers when they have now no sanctum sanctorum amongst them You may also discern how according to their custom they cringe and prostrate at the bringing out of the Bible which is the only solemn adoration left amongst them and that there be more arks than that in sanctum sanctorum If I had called it a box or chest or cuphoard you had let it pass But I used that word as more sacred 19 ch from page 365 to 386. I discerned in your ninteenth chapter which is upon my paragraff of Communion in one kind a somwhat more then ordinary swelling choller which moved me to look over that my paragraff afresh And I found my fault ther is in it so much of Christian reason and sobriety that if I had since the time I first wrote it swerved from my former judgment of the probability I conceived to be in that Roman practis of communicating in one kind I had there met with enough to convert my self And therfor wondered no more that you should load me so heavily with your wonted imputations of fraud ignorance blasphemy and the like I ever perceiv you to be then most of all passionate when you meet with most convincing reasons When the exorcist is most innocent his patient they say then frets and foams and curses most 20 ch from page 386 to 402. Ther is in your twentieth chapter which prosecutes my paragraff of Saints or Hero's one word of yours that requires my notice I say in that my paragraff that the pagans derided the ancient Christians for three of their usages First for eating their own God Secondly for kneeling to their priests genitals Thirdly for worshipping an asses head This last you except against and impute my story to my own simplicity and ignorance if not to somthing wors for that imputation say you was not laid upon Christians at all but only upon Jews as may be seen in Josephus But Sir you may know that in odiosis the primitive Christians were ever numbred among the Jews and what evil report lay upon these was charged also upon them though sometimes upon another ground And although Josephus may excuse the Jews and not the Christians yet a long while after his time if not even then also that slander was generally all over the pagan world charged upon Christians also as may be read in Tertullian and other ancient writers yea and very probably by the very Jews themselvs who bitterly hated them cast off from themselvs upon the poor Christians on another account which I specified in Fiat lux And through the whole Roman empire did the sound of this scandal ring up and down for som ages together Insomuch that Tertullian himself conceited that as the Christian religion was derived from the Jews so likewise that the imputation of the asses head first put upon the Jews might from them be derived upon Christian religion And the same Tertullian in his Apologetick addes these words The calumnies saith he invented to cry down our religion grew to such excess of impiety that not long ago in this very city a pictur of our God was shown by a certain infamous person with the ears of an asse and a hoof on one of his feet clothed with a gown and a book in his hand with this inscription This is Onochoetes the God of Christians And he addes that the Christians in the city as they were much offended with the impiety so did they not a little wonder at the strange uncouth name the villain had put upon their lord and master Onochoetes forsooth he must be called Onochoetes And are not you Sir a strange man to tell me p. 393. that what I speak of this business is notoriously
All that I undertook at this time is to let you know who ever you be that I have read over your Animadversions upon my Fiat lux And I thank you for your book for it confirms my Fiat lux and all the whole design of it I think irrefragably It shows to the eye and really verrifies by your own example what Fiat lux did but speak in words namely that controversies of religion are endles for want of some one thing to fix upon which may not be depraved that they are fraught with uncharitable animosities which darken the understanding and deprave good manners that they are mutable as mens fansies be which can never be fixedly stated sith every man hath a spirit hath a method hath an opinion of his own and sayes and denyes with endles diversity that they are guileful and delusory sometimes fals on both sides ever on one and yet still made out with subtil words so plausible to the eye and ear that men employed in the multitude of affairs and troubles of this world can never be able to disintangle those knots of pro and con then especially at a loss when they consider that such as mannage those disputes are all of them interested persons fiftly that they are mad and irrational while all parties pretend one and the same rule of holy scriptur and yet will admit of no exteriour visible judg in their visible exteriour contests lastly that they are mischievous and fatal to all places where they rise as they have been of late to this our distressed kingdom of England where disputes and controversies about religion raised to a height by the inferiour scribes against their prelates drew after them pikes and guns to make them good for twenty years together with much desolation and ruin which times I think I may not unjustly call the Vicars Wars For the inferiour Priests and Levites envying the dignities glory and revenues of their prelates when they could not otherwise get them into their own hands by their lamentable tones in Eloimi raised up the people of the land to further their design This trick of theirs they learned from wolves For these when they spy a waifaring man whom they would devour and yet by a narrow search perceiv him to be too strong for them starting aside upon som hillock there set upon their tails they howl for help And if any will not beleev Fiat lux that such be the fruits of disputes and controversies and such their nature and genius let them beleev the Authour of Animadversions who as he sayes what he pleases and denies what he lists so to his frequent reproaches villifications and slanders he adjoyns his own menaces of terrour to make my words good and justify Fiat lux You frequently threaten me that if I write again I shalt hear more far more than you have said in your Animadversions but I promis you Sir if you write again you shall never hear more from me For now the flies begin to com into my chamber which may haply expect I should heed their flight and hearken to their buzz and I must not leav those greater employments to look upon your Animadversions or any your other books This Epistolae my only daughter coms as you see to chide you Sir for abusing her innocent Brother But she does it so sparingly and with so many blushes as though the blame wer hers though yours be the misdemeanour And I hope she may so far work upon your good natur if you have any left that laying your hand upon your heart you may now sorrowing say Quid feci I have wronged the innocent And for that end I wish you all grace and peace and I wish it you with all my heart who am natural father both of that innocent boy Fiat lux and of this Epistola his sister and if you will but reckon me so your very true friend JVC. Given this V. of the Ides of April in the year of our Lord MDCLXIII FINIS The places of my Paragraffs in this Epistle DIversity of feuds page 31 Ground of quarrels page 32 Nullity of title ibid. Heats and resolutions page 33 Motives of moderation ibid. Obscurity of God ibid. Darknes of nature page 44 Mystery of providence page 44 Help page 44 Reason page 47 Light and Spirit page 48 Plea of parties page 49 Scriptur page 70 History of religion page 72 Discovery page 77 Messach page 80 Virgin Mary page 83 Images or Figurs page 84 Tongues or latin service page 93 Table or Communion page 101 Saints or Hero's page 102 Dirge page 104 Pope page 104 Popery ibid. Mas comedido ibid.