Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	call_v	new_a	testament_n	4,597	5	8.1545	4	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A04417	Christ on his throne. Or, Christs church-government briefly laid downe and how it ought to bee set up in all Christian congregations. Resolved in sundry cases of conscience.	Burton, Henry, 1578-1648, attributed name.	1640 (1640)	STC 14541; ESTC S107732	25,100	92

we ought not to regard it Fourthly the very next age after the Apostles produced many grosse errours and superstitions as Eusebius tells us and as the Apostles premonished Act. 20. 29. yea they complained of it in their own times while they yet lived For the mysterie of Iniquity saith Paul doth already worke c. which mysterie was that of Prelacy as appeares clearely from that Text where the Man of sin who exalts himself over the Church is set forth as the head and top of that mysterie namely of the Hierarchy which is and hath been the Lâ—rna or source of all iniquity And Jerome who lived in the fourth Century said That Prelation over the rest of the Ministers was a thing of humane presumption and not of Divine Ordination and though it was first devised for a remedy against schisme yet it proved in time the greatest schisme that ever was namely the schisme of Antichrist and all his crew of Prelates from Christ the Hierarchy being a meer enmity against Christs kingdome betweene which two there is as great a Chasma or gulfe as between Paradise and Hell CASE III. But seeing Episcopacy is of very great and reverend antiquity as they say is it not best to reduce the present Prelacy to the antient condition of Bishops in the Primitive Church NO unlesse they can proove these Bishops to bee such as Gods Word alloweth Wee reverence that antiquity which is joyned with verity But antiquitie without verity is oldnesse of error as said old Tertullian When one asked Christ If it were lawfull for a man to put away his wife for every cause Christ gave no indulgence at all but reduced that antient abuse among the Iewes to the primitive institution of God in Paradise Secondly The matter in hand is of higher moment than to be regulated by any humane ordinance or reduced to any antiquity other than the Scripture it selfe For the thing here in question concernes no lesse than the honour of Christs Kingdome and his royall prerogative in the government of his kingdome as we shall further see Thirdly that which is originally vicious cannot by tract of time bee made good Custome we see hath not made Prelates better but worse and worse in all ages An evil egge brings forth an evill Bird And Christ saith An evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit And Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit shall bee hewen downe and cast into the fire And Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted shall be plucked up by the roots And Either make the tree good and the fruit good or make the tree evill and the fruit evill If therefore the tree of Prelacie be originally and in its owne nature evill as having no foundation in Scripture as being none of Gods planting it ought to be so far from being a patterne for its antiquity as it ought utterly to be rooted up as being a novelty and not antiquity for that only is truly currant which is antiently true CASE IV. But if the Prelacy be plucked up and quite taken away what government shall be left for the Church of God FOr resolution whereof wee are to consider these necessary things First That that Government alone be set forth which Christ himselfe hath left us in his Word For who but the King and Law-giver of his Church and kingdome of Grace should give Lawes and appoint how it shall be governed Secondly we are not to think that Christ who was the Law-giver of the Old Testament was not also the Law-giver of the New and hath left us sufficient direction therin for the government of his people both for faith and manners Now in the Old Testament all must bee done according to the Pattterne shewed to Moses in the Mount even to the least pin in the Tabernacle So also for the Temple and the forme thereof David received all in writing by the Spirit of God 1 Chr. 28. 12. 19. No place is left nor power given to men to invent any thing or impose the least ceremony in the worship of God So in the New Testament is layd downe a perfect platforme of wholsome words which is profitable for doctrine for reproofe for correction for instruction in righteousnesse that the Man of God may be perfect throughly furnished unto every good worke CASE V. But we see great difference in mens opinions concerning that forme of Government which Christ hath left in his Word What then shall we do in this case or what is that forme of Governement which we shall pitch upon FOr answere hereunto first however all such governement as is contrary unto and expresly condemned in the Word of God such as the Hierarchy is ought in no case to be admitted or maintained Secondly as wee cannnot doubt but that Christ hath left an exact prescript forme of governement in his Word for the Church of the New Testament so we ought diligently in the use of all good meanes to enquire after that good old way and to finde as much of it as wee can and to follow what we know Thirdly if after all our search there be not a full agreement in all godly mens judgements in some things which seem somwhat more difficult or doubtfull we must not therefore either reject so much as is cleare or yet breake Communion and fellowship with those Churches which differ from us in judgement or practise so long as they maintaine not any government which cannot be warranted by the Word of God holding that rule of the Apostle Let us saith he as many as be perfect be thus minded God shall reveale even this unto you Neverthelesse whereto we have already attained let us walke by the same rule let us mind the same thing CASE VI How can the Church be without prelates in these respects especially 1. For ordaining of Ministers 2. For inflicting of Censures 3. For calling of Synods 4. For determining of doubts arising in matters of Faith 5. In appointing of Ceremonies 6. For Orders sake 7. For Confirmation of children 8. For dedication of Churches 9 For the forme of Doctrine FOr answer hereunto First in generall there is no need at all of any such Officers in the Church as are not of any divine Institution as Prelats are not as aforesaid yea such officers in stead of any profitable usefulnesse are most unprofitable and pernicious as the Lord saith to false Prophets I have not sent them therfore they shall not profit this people at all Secondly and particularly First Prelates are no way requisite or necessary for ordaining of Ministers First because they ordaine rather a new order of Priests than true Ministers for which cause the Booke of Ordination calls them Priests whereas true Ministers are never called in the new Testament priests Secondly They ordaine no true Ministers of the Gospell if wee may beleeve their practise but rather a sort of dumbe Priests for when they have ordained a

full Minister as they call it having put the Bible into his hand saying Take thou authority to preach the Word of God yet for all this hee may not must not preach at all till he have obtained the Prelates License which he must purchase for a good fee Again they make such Priests as are dumb dogs and cannot barke being meere Ignoramuses and Sir John-Lacke-Latines abusing those words Receive thou the holy Ghost And Take thou authority to preach the Word of God And lastly They make no true Ministers of Christ seeing they bind all with the Oath of Canonicall obedience to be subject to their lawlesse laws in the execution of their Ministry Secondly There is no use nor need of Prelates for inflicting of Censures Their power practise of Excommunication is altogether unlawfull a meere usurpation and contrary to Gods Ordinance and that in many respects First because the Prelate is not the Pastor of that Congregation whose member is cut off by Excommunication Because the Prelate doth it alone hee or his Surrogate and this perhaps either a Lay-man or a dumb priest without any consent of the people Thirdly he excommunicates a man for every triviall cause that without due summons rashly and for his fee absolves him without any repentance or reformation without satisfaction to the people offended Whereas excoÌ„munication is the highest censure is to be done by the Minister congregation joyntly after much means used to reclaim the offeÌ„dor for grievous scandals not to be restored without hearty repeÌ„tance in a sad serious solemn maner Lastly if Prelats for the causes here alledged be of no use for the high censure of excommunication how much lesse need is there of theÌ„ for inflicting corporall or criminall punishment upon reputed Delinquents as deprivation of liberty by imprisonmeÌ„t of the ministry by deprivation degradation suspeÌ„sion deprivation of means and livelihood by imposing of intolerable fines and restraining men from the exercise of their particular Calling to the undoing of them and theirs Thirdly for calling of Synods cannot this bee without a Prelate may not this be by a Law dormant giving liberty when occasion shall be to have a Synod for the better ordering whereof a Moderator for the time being is by votes elected Fourthly For determining of doubts arising in matters of Faith what need is there for Prelats Are they fit or competent Iudges in such things Yea are they not herein egregious usurpers presumptuous and arrogant men Yea Antichrists in sitting thus in the Temple of God over mens consciences as Lords over mens faith Is not this a meere evacuating of the authoritie and sufficiencie of the Scripture which is the sole judge and rule of Faith Yet this Prelates presume to doe and challenge as their proper right so as in the twentieth Article which is of the Authority of the Church these words have beene of later dayes foisted in namely that the Church hath authority in Controversies of faith Fiftly Neither in appointing of Ceremonies are Prelates needfull Yea for prelates or Church or any humane power to ordaine and impose Ceremonies to binde the consciences in the worship of God this is expressely condemned and forbidden both by Christ himselfe and by the Prophets and by the Apostles Man may not impose the least Ceremony in Gods worship if hee doe he therein denies Christ Col. 2. 19. he holds not the Head And yet the aforesaid Article boldly affirmes saying The Church hath power to decree Rites and Ceremonies So as this Article whether meaning by Church the Prelates as they meane it or any other humane power ought to be to Christians no article of Faith or binding any mans Conscience Sixtly For orders sake for what order-sake are Prelates necessary or any way requisit what order they keep all men know what order can there be in a Babylonish goverment as the prelatical altogether is 7. For confirmation of children This also is a Babylonish SacrameÌ„t as if it did confer some grace ex opere operato or some vertue dropping out of the Bishops Lawn sleeve Indeed this confirmation is a pretty knack to win credit to the Prelacy froÌ„ the blinde Vulgar which to everie wel taught Christian is both superstitious and ridiculous 8 For dedication of Churches this is a most notorious Romish Popish superstition is rather a meer prophanation than any dedication except it be to superstition idolatry as they at Rome do use their Temples they would make the world beleeve that by their many superstitious ceremonies in crossings censings adorations the like which they use in their dedication there goes forth a vertue by which holynes is infused into the wals pews especially into their sacred chancel Ninthly for the form of Liturgy if we goe no farther than our Service booke which is an extract out of Romes Latine service Missall or Masse-booke as it is confessed in the Booke of Martyrs the Romane Latine being turned into English if there were no more in it than this that it is the forme of Romes Worship and so as King Iames once called it an ill sayd Masse it might a little startle such Christians as hold that Christianity to be the purest which hath least conformitie with Antichrist and his superstitioÌ„s For if wee be commanded to come out of Rome to have no communion with her idolatrous service let it then be well considered whether Christians may with a good conscience be present at the English Liturgy which is for the maine the Masse turned into English For although it be objected that it is purged from the Popish drosse yet if it should be brought to the Touchstone or tried in the Text let the wisest then judge how free from Popish drosse it is when therein they shall finde Romish superstitious Ceremonies maintained and prest upon mens consciences as the Surplice Crosse in Baptisme kneeling at the Sacrament standing at the Creed attended with their severall significations as if man had a power to set up any significant Ceremonies in Gods worship when as wee finde all kinde of signes and ceremonies in Gods service under the Old Testament though ordained by God himselfe to be utterly abolished by Christ and forbidden to Christians under the New Testament and much more all such as are of humane invention all which are of that nature as the Apostle cals them the Yoke of Bondage to such as are intangled therein exhorting all Christians to stand fast in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made us free And Col. 2. he plainly shewes all such ordinances to be an evacuation of Christs death and so an apostacie from Christ And no Christian I hope will plead for the use of humane ordinances in Gods worship when Christ hath abrogated all ceremonies of divine institution and hath left no footstep for any one Ceremonie in the New Testament and flatly condemns all commandements of men

Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Text snippets containing the quad