Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	call_v	new_a	scripture_n	1,786	5	5.4943	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A77209	An answer to M. Cawdry's two books of the Sabbath, lately come forth Wherein the author doth two things: 1. He vindicates himselfe from Mr Cawdrie's unfriendly abuse of him, in fathering upon him three texts of scripture, and three arguments deduced from them, to prove the perpetuity of the antient Sabbath, ... Wherein the author hath 1. Answered and confuted all that Mr. Cawdry hath wrote to corrupt the sense and meaning of the Commandement. 2. He hath restored the antient, genuine, and proper sense of the Commandement: and confirmed it by sundry undeniable arguments. By Theophilus Brabourne.	Brabourne, Theophilus, b. 1590.	1654 (1654)	Wing B4088; ESTC R229562	39,309	117

time for Ecclesiasticall H●storians antiently used the name Sabbath day for Saturday the Latines do so to this day and in England as in the case of a Writ we do the same as I have shew● before wherefore since there never was nor is known in the Churches any weekly day named Sabbath day but one namely Saturday therefore the fourth Commandement must be expounded of this one day Saturday the seventh and last day of the weeke and not of a Sabbath day indefinitely as uncertaine which day it is thus you have seene this Argument proved But it will be said Is not our Lords day commonly called Sabbath day in all Pulpits and in all Books I answer yea it is so called by such as love to miscall things and to nick-name daies so they may call if they please every Fast day every Thanksgiving day every Christmas day But sure I am this is but a novelty of yesterdaies standing and as the name is novell so is the observation of the Lords day as or for a Sabbath novell also as by and by you shall see For 1. The Lords day was never called Sabbath day in any Scripture of the New Testament let them shew us a Text for it if they can 2. These Authors before mentioned St Augustine Peter Martyr Calvin Zanchie Vrsinus Paraeus Chemnitius Melanchion with many others all these wrote of the Lords day that it is but an indifferent thing and of the same authority with Good Friday the Passion day Christmas day and o her holy daies of the Church and therefore these men could not think in their times the Lords day was a Sabbath or call the Lords day Sabbath day as we do in reference to the fourth Commandement 3. In the fifth yeare of Edward the sixth an Act was made for the keeping of Holy daies as Sunday St Matthews day St Marks day and the other holy daies In which Act both the King the Lords spirituall the Bishops the Lords Temporall and the House of Commons expressely confessed that they knew no Scripture for Sunday or the other Holy daies and therefore they could not call Sunday or St Matthews day Sabbath daies and therefore this nicknaming of daies as to call the Sunday and Lords day Sabbath day and to keepe it as a Sabbath is but a novelty and sprang up but since Edward the sixth his daies 4. I am sixty foure yeares of Age and so cannot remember much above fifty yeares yet I do remember such works commonly done on the Lords day as I am sure are no Sabbath days works For in the City of Norwich about fifty yeares ago the City Waits or Musitians were wont for divers weekes in the yeare to play upon the Market Crosse on the latter pa●t of the Lords day thousands of people there assembled to heare them At the new elected Majors gate they played at Wasters or Cudgels on the latter part of the Lords day with hundreds of people looking on And the Sealing Office was open and Weavers carrying and recarrying their S●uffs to be sealed The Merchants bought their S●uff on the Lords day and packed them in great packs the same day and the Carts loaded the Stuffs the same day at night and went towards London by foure a clock the next morning these things were done with the knowledge of all the Magistrates and without contradiction of the most godly Ministers I have been credibly informed that about ten yeares before my time a religious Grocer in the City did open his shop ordinarily on the Lords day and Mr Moore the most religious Minister then in the City hath come into the Shop seeing them buying and selling Grocery wares and did never rebuke them for it or say why do you so And another antient and religious man a Shooemaker told me this day that in his younger time Shooemakers sold shooes on the Lords day ordinarily wherefore the observation of the Lords day as a Sabbath day is but a novel●y and they that thus kept it could not thinke it was a Sabbath day or call it a Sabbath day so far of my fifth Argument Argument the sixth If the fourth Commandement was expounded by Moses and the Prophets for Saturday the seventh and last day of the weeke and not for Sunday the first day of the weeke or any one day of the seven then the fourth Commandement is now to be expounded for Saturday the seventh and last day of the we●ke and not for Sunday the first day of the weeke or for any one day of the seven But the fourth Commandement was expounded by Moses and the Prophets for Saturday the seventh and last day of the weeke and not for Sunday ●he first day of the weeke or for one da● of seven Therefore the fourth Commandement ought in our times to be expounded for Saturday the seventh and last day of the weeke not for Sunday the first day of the weeke or for any one day of the seven As for the fi●st proposition it stands firme by this reason Looke what was once the true sense and meaning of Gods Laws the same is the sense and meaning of it for ever after for the sense and meaning of Scripture do not vary and change with the change of time● as if Scripture had one exposition and meaning to day and another to morrow we can find no better rule for the expounding of any Text of Scripture in the Old Testament than to expound it as Moses and the Prophets did antiently If therefore the fourth Commandement was antiently expounded for Saturday it must be so expounded still and in our times Take a ceremoniall Law as that of Circumcision or the Passeover and if you will expound and open the sense of it now you must render the same sense of it now which Moses and the Prophets gave of it antiently or else your exposition is false I do not say a ceremoniall Law binds now as it did antiently but yet I say the exposition of it is the same now which it was antiently as if you fall upon exposition of the time and day of Circumcision or the Passover you must expound it now of the eighth day not of the seventh or ninth day and of the foureteenth day of the month not of the foureteenth day of the yeare and so you must deale with every of the ten morall Commandements or else you deale falsely with them As for the second Preposition it is cleare that Moses and the Prophets did expound the fourth Commandement to their people the Jews for Saturday the seventh and last day of the weeke not for Sunday the first day of the weeke or for any one day of the seven because the Church of the Jews who were taught and instructed by Moses and the Prophets kept the Saturday and not the Sunday by the fourth Commandement yea this Mr Cawdry confesseth saying The seventh and last day of the weeke was appointed to the old world that is to the Jews so far of

to sanctifie it the first day of the weeke is the Lords day in it thou shalt do no worke for the Lord Christ re●●ed or rose from the dead on the first day of the weeke and therefore the Lord Christ blessed the Lords day and sanctified it If now Mr Brabourne should preach on this Commandement or write a book for the true Exposition of it and instruct the people of the Land saying 1. By the Lords day you are to understand a Lords day but not the Lords day for every day of the weeke is the Lord Christs day in some sense 2. By the first day of the weeke you may understand some one day of the weeke or other 3. We may imitate Christs resting or rising from death on the first day of the weeke if we Christians rest upon some one or other day of the weeke as on Saturday the last day of the weeke 4. The Lords day was appointed to the Grecians in the first Age of the Church but Saturday the seventh day to us Christians 5. The Lords day and first day of the weeke are not the substance of Christs Commandement but Saturday the last of the weeke 6 The Lords day and first day of the weeke are indirectly commanded by Christ but Saturday the seventh day of the weeke are directly commanded Should I thus expound this Commandement of Christ oh how would the Patrons of the Lords day rage stampe and storme at me Saying how shamefully doth this Brabourne corrupt Christ his Law for the Lords day How abominably doth he abuse Gods people by his false Expositions Never did Jesuite so abuse and corrupt any Texts of Scripture as this man hath abused our Lord Christ his Commandement the Devils themselves did never so abuse the Scriptures it is pitty the man is suffered to live any longer hanging is too good for him burne him like an Heretick I cannot expresse the one halfe of their zeale in this kind and I confesse all this were worthily spoken against me if I had so done but now I pray compare my supposed Exposition of Christs supposed Commandement with Mr Cawdrie's reall Exposition of Gods reall fourth Commandement in the sixe particulars mentioned and behold how paralell and alike they are one to the other point by point now if my Exposition be abominably absurd what then is theirs and if Jesuits yea and the Devill never did the like what may too many of our most zealous Ministers thinke of themselves who do the same d●yly and are the most forward and stirring in this kind of exposition so far of the Absurdities and now I come to my Conclusion The Conclusion HAving vindicated God's fourth Commandement from Mr Cawdrie's false Expositions of it now it will be expected that I should proceed in answer to other passages of his Books and in particular to confute his answers made unto divers of my twenty foure Arguments for the antient Sabbath and to answer or confute his Texts alleaged by him in maintenance of the Lords-day-Sabbath as it is called now adaies touching these two I shall give this account First concerning the antient Sabbath if I should maintaine my twenty foure Arguments Mr Cawdry or some of his friends for him might complaine to the State and procure my book to be answered by fire as Jewish for so was Mr Ockfords book of like kind but I am resolved that no provocations shall force me to proceed so far againe having vindicated the fourth Commandement from this false exposition of one day in seven I have confuted the most of his Answers given by him to many of my 24 Arguments so as it is needlesse for me to proceed any further Now as touching Mr Cawdrie's Texts alledged by him to prove the Lords day to be kept for a Sabbath if I should answer them as nothing is more facile and easie to be done I might so also run the hazzard of having my books burnt with fire but I will not offend the State so far I shall therefore satisfie my selfe with this that I have many yeares since discharged my conscience by writing of two severall books wherein I have made answers plentifully to every one of their Texts of Scripture and given not one but many answers unto every one of their Texts of Scripture the which answers were never yet confuted by any man and yet it is about twenty sixe yeares since I wrote my first book and about twenty two yeares since I wrote my second booke nor hath Mr Cawdry now confuted those answers albeit he hath made a great flourish with three great books saying he will confute all gainsayers but it is very false for he hath not confuted Mr Brabourne I observe that albeit M. Cawdry is larger upon the Sabbath than any man yet hath he nothing new or more for matter than others have wrote many yeares agone new books but old matter more words but no more matter the Practice of Piety in a few leaves is as large for matter as M. Cawdries three large books of twelve shillings price now since Mr Cawdry hath brought no new Texts of Scripture to light or new Arguments for the Lords day wherefore should I blot paper and spend inke to answer that in him which I have fully answered long since to others who have wrote the same things before him Whilest I was in writing of my first booke of the Sabbath and in answering the Texts of Scripture alledged for the Lords day me thought they were such simple and silly things for that purpose as my thoughts often checked me for vouchsafing an answer to them fearing understanding Divines would secretly thinke that Brabourne was some Ignoramus or some vainglorious man labouring to gaine credit by fighting with a shaddow and confuting what no judicious Schollar would ●aintaine I remember that divers times I tooke off my Pen to pause whether I should go on or not and doubtlesse I had then broke off but that I saw so many of our most zealous Ministers so far from being ashamed of it as they with a deale of not zeale maintained it but I may say of them as once Saint Paul said of those superstitious Jews They have the zeale of God but not according to knowledge Rom. 10.2 And as Christ said to the Scribes and Pharisees Woe be unto you blind guides for misleading the devout people of the Land Mat. 23. and so I end FINIS

Lords day ●abbath so called but never so proved I shall not here alleadge any Scriptures against it nor confute any of Mr Cawdry's replies made by him to my answers which I made to their severall Texts of Scripture alleadged for the Lords day nor shall I need for Mr Cawdry hath rather replied to the answers of the Bishop of Ely to Dr Heyline and to Mr Primrose than to my answers and yet he hath carried it on so cunningly as his Reader cannot but thinke he hath confuted Mr Brabourne also and this must go among the Vulgar for an Answer to my Books this is one peece of Mr Cawdry's Sophistry he cannot be content to abuse me with fathering upon me falsely three Texts of Scripture but also he must make the world beleeve that he hath answered my books against the Lords-day Sabbath whereas he hath done no such thing he hath indeed mentioned my name often but never replied to my Answers and if he hath mentioned any of them instead of a Confutation he hath sleightly passed by and instead thereof he hath falne upon the Bishop Dr Heyline or Mr. Primrose It is usuall with most that write for the Lords day to have a fling at Mr B●abou ne in one Page they among many things carpe at some one and twenty or thirty Pages after they carpe at another and perhaps fifty or sixty Pages after they carpe at a third and so much for confutation of M. Brabourne thus have some done in their bookes from New-England and many in their books in Old England but none of them all dare undertake to confute all my Answers to their Texts for I have given not only one Answer but many Answers to every one of their Texts So Mr Cawdry perhaps may stumble upon some one of my many Answers but to go Text by Text and confute all my Answers answer by answer as is meete and reasonable I have not yet seene it nor do I beleeve that ever I shall see it his wit in passing these things by in silence so sleightly is to me an Argument that he is at a non-plus and therefore is faine to make a colour of an Answer and to bluster among the people with the wind of three great books so thinks Theoph. Brabourne Mr Brabourne's vindication of himselfe from the unfriendly abuse of Mr Cawdry fathering upon him no less than three Texts of Scripture and three Arguments deduced from them to prove the morality or perpetuity of the antient s●venth-day-Saturday-Sabbath the which things M. Brabourne doth in no case own The words of Mr Cawdry SEE Mr Cawdries book on the Sabbath his third part in p. 429 430. thus writing Of all that have wrote of this subject to wit the Sabbath day Mr. Brabourne is the largest and hath the greatest shew of Scripture and Reason for his opinion and therefore in confuting him we shall easily confute all the rest He hath produced five Texts of Scripture for hims●lfe we consider their strength in order Objection the first out of Gen. 2.3 The first is taken from Gen. 2.3 whence thus he argueth An Ordinance given in the state of innocency not peculiar to that state is perpetuall But by divine institution the seventh day was appointed to be the time of rest in Innocency and not appropriated to that state Ergo. To this Text and to this Argument deduced from it I answer At my first reading them my heart rose against them saying in my selfe surely Mr Cawdry hath done me wrong then I tooke my first booke of the Sabbath printed 1628. and sought among my twelve Arguments there for proofe of the perpetuity of the ancient seventh-day-Sabbath but there I could not find these things then I sought in my second book of the Sabbath printed 1632. among my twenty foure Arguments for the antient Sabbath and there I could not find these things Lastly because I would make a through and full search I spent some houres to turne over both my books page by page but neither so could I find these things wherefore I disclaime this first Text and Argument as none of mine Mr Cawdry in charging this and two other Texts upon me doth not say in which of my two books the Reader might find them nor in which of my twelve or twenty foure Arguments these things may be found nor in what page they may be found so the Reader is left to seek a needle in a bottle of hay there are 238. pages in my former booke and 632. pages in my latter booke so it is not easie for any man to find a thing without direction but it is too common with some Writers in a weake cause wittily I might say wickedly to omit the quotation of the booke and page and then to foist in what they please of their owne the easilier to deceive the Reader to abuse the Author and the better to gaine credit to their weake cause by begetting a sleighty opinion of their Adversary The second Text. Mr Cawdry in the place fore cited and page 430. thus writeth Objection the second The second place of Scripture is that of Exod. 31.16 where the Sabbath is call'd An everlasting Covenant and therefore it is still in force To this Text and the Argument deduced from it I answer as before that I have sought for these things in my first booke and in my twelve Arguments and in my second booke and in my twenty foure Arguments there for the seventh-day Sabbath for where else should I seeke but among my Arguments for this Text and Argument But there I finde them not yea I have cursorily sought page by page in both my books but yet I cannot find them wherefore I disclaime them as none of mine I yet remember that before I printed my first book I had thoughts of this Text Exod 31.16 where the Sabbath is called an Everlasting Covenant but I then fore-saw that I could not from these words frame a sound Argument to prove the perpetuity of the ancient Sabbath because Circumcision is called an Everlasting Covenant also wherefore I laid it aside and will Mr Cawdry now father this weake Argument upon me What can his end of it be but to render me the cause I have in hand ridiculous and contemptible To deceive his Reader And to winne vaine applause to himselfe and his cause The third Text. Mr Cawdry in the place first cited and in page 430. thus writeth Objection the third from Isa 66.23 The third Text is Isa 66.23 where the Prophet speaking of the renewed state of the Church by Christ saith from month to month and Sabbath to Sabbath all flesh should come to worship the Lord. To this Text he answereth that the continuance and perpetuity of the S●bbath can no more be concluded hence than of the New Moons which are mentioned with the Sabbath yet by himselfe granted to be abolished I have sought among my twelve Arguments in one of my books and my twenty foure Arguments

An Answer To M. Cawdry's two Books of the Sabbath Lately come forth Wherein the Author doth two things 1. He vindicates himselfe from Mr Cawdrie's unfriendly abuse of him in fathering upon him three Texts of Scripture and three Arguments deduced from them to prove the perpetuity of the antient Sabbath which the Author doth in no case own 2. He vindicates the fourth Commandement from M. Cawdry's false Exposition of it Wherein the Author hath 1. Answered and confuted all that Mr Cawdry hath wrote to corrupt the sense and meaning of the Commandement 2. He hath restored the antient genuine and proper sense of the Commandement and confirmed it by sundry undeniable Arguments By Theophilus Brabourne Mat. 5 18 19. Vntill heaven and earth passe away one jot or one tittle shall in no wise passe from the Law Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least Commandements and shall teach men so he shall be least in the kingdome of heaven London Printed for William Franklin and are to be sold at Norwich 16●4 To the Reader SAint Jude exhorts us that we should earnestly contend for the truth which was once delivered unto the Saints And the Prophet Jeremiah complaines of men in his time who bent their tongues like Bows for lies but they were not valiant or couragious for the Truth Jer. 9.3 If ever St Jude's Exhortation was needfull in the Church it is now needfull when the truth or true doctrine of the Sabbath once delivered to the Saints is so shamefully corrupted and abused If ever there was a time when the Prophet Jeremiah's complaint was verified now is the time Do not men now yea Ministers and of all ministers those accounted the most forward hot and zealous do not these bend their tongues like bows for lies And doth not Mr Cawdry appeare in the front by his three books of about twelve shillings price though to little purpose Whether these expositions of the fourth Commandement be truths or falsities I leave my Reader to judge after he hath read this little Booke They say first So be it we give God a day for his Sabbath it matters not what day be it Saturday or Sunday As if God had never made choi●e of his day They might as well say So be it we have a man to dispense the Sacraments it matters not what man be he Minister or Lay-man Secondly They say God did not command in his fourth Commandement the Sabbath day as of a certaine day definitely but a Sabbath day as of some uncertaine day indefinitely as if God delivered his Commandements in ambiguous terms and doubtfull words as if no man could know by the Commandement what day God meant his people should keep for his Sabbath day Thirdly They say by the ordinall word seventh in the fourth Commandement we need not understand Saturday the seventh and last day of the week but any one day of the s●ven as Sunday the first day of the weeke as if when God commanded the last day of the week we may understand him of the first day of the weeke Fourthly whereas God rested at the Creation on Saturday the seventh day for our imitation they say we may imitate Gods example if we rest on Sunday the first day as if we imitated Gods example by crossing of it for he rested at the end of the weeke and we rest at the beginning of the weeke Fifthly They say the fourth Commandement enjoyned the Jews to keep Saturday the same fourth Commandement enjoynes Christians to keepe Sunday as if one and the same Commandement should enjoyns contrary things as the Saturday which they call Judaisme and the Sunday or Lords day which they call their Christian Sabbath and so it shall enjoyne both Judaisme and Christia●isme and so the fourth Commandement shall have one sense and meaning yesterday and another this day for thousands of yeares till Christ it shall have one expositition as for Saturday and for ever after Christ it shall have another exposition as for Sunday Now to make up the number of seven abominations Mr Cawdry will adde two more as these ensuing Sixthly The Sabbath day and seventh day mentioned in the fourth Commandement are not the substance of the fourth Commandement but one day in seven is the substance as if the words expressed in the Commandement should be no substance and yet one day in s●ven which words are not expressed should be the substance of it Seventhly The Sabbath day and seventh day mentioned in the fourth Commandement are indirectly commanded but one day of seven of which there are no such words in the Commandement and yet these are directly commanded as he saith Was there ever any of God's ten Commandements thus shattered by Jesuites and thus wrung and wrested from the genuine and true sense intended by God and yet these are the expositions given by the godly Ministers Now may I not justly take up the Prophet Jeremiah's complaint of these so zealous Ministers saying They bend their tongues like Bows to publish false Expositions of Gods fourth Commandement The Lord threatned old Eli the Priest saying They that despise me shall be despised 1 Sam. 2.30 And have not these Ministers despised God by corrupting the sense of one of his ten Commandements And hath not God of late despised them Never did God poure greater contempt upon Clergy men than in our daies wherein they are ashamed to weare black Coats and turne into colours These things premised now I shall give my Reader an account how far I have answered Mr Cawdry's Books He hath wrote three books of the Sabbath the first part about seven yeares agone the other two parts now lately I do not undertake to answer all that he hath wrote for many things he hath wrote not against me but in confutation of the Bishop of Eli Doctor White 's Book which was an Answer unto my second Booke of the Sabbath and particularly against what I wrote in it in maintenance of the antient Sabbath but granting what I wrote against the Lords day Sabbath And divers things he hath wrote against Dr Heyline and against Master Primrose Now I leave these things unto their proper Authors I meddle with no more than with what he hath wrote against me as touching the antient Sabbath and the Lords-day Sabbath as touching these two I give this account 1. As touching the antient Sabbath I do not endeavour punctually to confute any of his Answers made to divers of my twenty foure Arguments left my books should be cmmitted to the fire and I should offend the State yet I have much ado to bridle my selfe so as to be silent in this quarrell I only endeavour to vindicate my selfe from Mr Cawdry's unfriendly abuse of me by fathering upon me the things I never wrote and to vindicate God's fourth Commandement from his false Expositions of it and my hope is that the State will permit a man to do so much for God and for himselfe 2. As for the