mouths of most men concerning those passages there expressed Paulus Fagius who seems to give the rightest account of it differs not much from this of Junius only reads it in the futuretense and supposes it to intend a future relation his words are Ideo dicetur est enim verbum Hebraicum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 futuri temporis in commemoratione bellorum hoc est cum bella Deicommemorabuntur recensebuntur a posteris quae bella pro Israel in mari rubro gesscrit quae ad hos torrentes quasi dicat hi auo locitanquam memorabiles ab omni posteritate repetentur in quibus Deus pro Israel dimicavit ubi prodigia Coeleslia ostâ—nsa sunt that is In the relation that shall be hereafter of the Wars of the Lord there shall be a famous mention amongst all posterity of what God did for Israel in those two places wheresoever the Wars of the Lord are spoke of what God did in those two places shall have an eminent mention The Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sepher signifies properly any rehearsal or enarration recensionem aut enarrationem quamcunâ— recensionem scriptam but per accidens If we understand it not to relate to any Book but only to a relation Verbal as it seems most probably to do because Moses speaks only of a rehearsal in generals but not directly of a written rehearsal it reaches not this matter and if it do I see no good reason can be given why by that Book of the Wars of the Lord should not be meant either some succeeding Book part of the Bible or else that very Book of Numbers it self But Secondly which way soever this Text be taken it can never be reasonably urged to prove there were Letters or Books before Moses because 't is said to be a Book relating a Story of things done in Moses his own Time for those Wars called the Wars of the Lord commenced but at the peoples coming out of â—gypt under his conduct And therefore 't was impossible there should be a written story of them before Moses himself was extant To the last Objection I Answer 'T is true that the Egyptians were a Learned people probably the most learned the world then had The continued clearness of their Skye and the constant overslows of Nile naturally tending to render them learned in those two Noble Sciences of Astrology and Geometry yet there is not the least ground to believe they had any use of Alphabetical Letters before Moses his time or any other way to express or communicate their learning but what was Symbolical and Hycroglyphycal nor is there the least Record any where extant to evince the contrary Aristotle sayes The ancient way of the Egyptians writing was per Hiâ—roglyphycas literas saxis incisas and he adds Conceptus aâ—imalium scrâ—bunt uti occulata side legimus in lapidibus per figuras idem in omnibus Scientijs Artibusque sacientes quos locabant in Templis tanquam Paginas perlegendas talesque illis pro libris extant Tacitus tells us Primi per siguras Animaâ—ium Egypti sensus mentis efsingebant antiqâ—â—ssima Monumenta memoriae humanae impressa saxis cernuntur Diodorus Sicalus long before in the fourth part of his History has given us a large account of this Symbolical way of writing amongst the Egyptians and Ethiopians which was reduced to these three heads Imitativa Tropica Enigmatica nor do we hear a word of any other writing amongst them till Moses his time who in all probability first discovered to them that way of transferring their minds one to another by Alphabetical Letters And this Artapanus a most ancient Historian tells us who speaking of Moses sayes Vt quasi Deas ab Egyptijs coleretur propter Literarum inventionem Mercurium appellatum That he was reverenced by the Egyptians as a God and for his first inventing of Letters called Mercury The Antiquity of the Bible in point of fact being thus cleared 't is in the second place to be considered what Testimony to the Divinity of the Bible does in truth result from thence And herein we shall find the one very remarkbly leading us to the other First in the general 't is a thing not to be denied that a reverence to Antiquity seems to have been universal All men in all Ages seem to have risen up and payed respect to the Hoary Head of Antiquity and that upon these two grounds First What is most Ancient has undergone the greatest Trial Every man is ready to venerate what has endured the Test of many Generations and lasted through most Ages because nothing corrects mistakes like Experience not distinguishes falshood and truth like Time Time we say and truly say is Index as well as Edax rerum Secondly Every mans Reason tells him all Secundary truth must needs lie nearest to the Eternal truth and so be of greatest Antiquity Error of every kind is of a later Edition then truth an Apostacy from it and a Corruption of some prime Principles Though Error and falshood may be very Ancient yet Truth is still the Elder Brother and has this still to say to all its opposers Non fuit sic ab initio And therefore the farther we wade into Antiquity the nearer still we come to Truth In Religion most especially that Maxim prevails antiquitate nihil verius veritate nihil antiquius In the present case the Antiquity of the Bible carries in it a very signal proof of its Divinity That which is the most ancient Religion is like to be the Truest greatest antiquity in Religion is an eminent mark of greatest Truth and that upon these two very forcable considerations First 't is reasonable to believe that there has been an intercourse between God and Man since the beginning and a Supernatural inter course since mans first defection that Gods Revelations were as early as mans necessities That there was no time wherein man stood in need of Supernatural Instruction and help but that God affords it to him If the supposal of Revelation in the general be reasonable as I have proved at large it is the other will follow and we shall find good ground to believe that there has been a Revelation from God since there was first Reason for it and such a constitution as Supernatural Religion in order to mans happiness and recovery that bears an equal Date with his first apostacy to think otherwise were to deny what the notion of Gods goodness very openly affirms to us And this being so no Religion can be True that is not clothed with great antiquity And that Religion that is most ancient and can derive it self from the beginning must needs be most True The Bible therefore giving us Historically an account of Gods first intercourse with man and of the constant continuation of it in all Ages and being it self the first account that ever was given of Religion in such a Written way upon all accounts the most Ancient the world
And indeed well might he tell them so for the Prophets Hosea and Isaiah were contemporary with the first Olympiad which began as Scaliger proves aut of Eusebius and others but in the Reign of King Ahaz whose Son Hezekiah lived at the same time with Numa in Rome and Eâ—dras himself and the latest Writers of the Old Testament wrote before Socrates Philosophized in Athens who taught not there till some time after the Captivity This Antiquity of Moses and his Writings and their precedency to all other written Religion or Learning is in fact so evident that 't is not capable of any tollerable denial And as Scaliger sayes in his discourse upon Eusebius the proof of it resulting so plainly from the universal Testimony of Heathen Authors themselves nihil superesse Paganis videtâ—r nisi aut ut ingeâ—ua confessio ab tis exprimcretur aut silentium pertinacâ—ae sinem faceret And he adds quod certe faeliciter câ—ssit ut hac in parte Porphrius manus daret 'T is not made out from any nice disputes between Chronologers comes not within any near compasses of time but from a general concurrence of all Histories and is so far beyond the â—each of all contradiction that the worst Enemies to our Religion have agreed it and given in their Testimony to it Of this Eusebius in the tenth book of his Praep. Evan. Chap. 3. takes special notice and tells us that Porphrie one of the most raging malicious Enemie that ever the Christians met with had in his fourth book which he writ against them given this Testimony to Moses and his Antiquity That he had written the History of the Jews truly which thing he had perceived by conferring it with Sanchoniathon the Berutian who rehearseth the very same Circumstances and Names and Places that Moses does the which he had learned out of the Registers of one Hierumbalus a Priest of the God of Levi and out of the Chronicles of the Cities and out of Holy Books dedicated to Temples and this Sanchoniathon sayes he was after Moses about the time of Semiramis By which it evidently appears he had such an Opinion of the Antiquity of Moses that he makes him to be much earlier in the World then we affirm him to be But 't is agreed on all hands he lived and writ in a time long before any other Authors of books or any other written Learning was known And this clear Evidence we have so clear that in such a case a clearer cannot be expected of the Antiquity of Moses in point of fact and the Preeminence of his Writings above all others in that respect gives us very probable ground to believe that he himself was the first introducer of Letters as well as the first Writer of Books whatever other Nations have fabulously boasted to the contrary and notwithstanding Plinies absurd supposition that Letters were Eternal because he imagined the World to have been so for 't is not reasonable to think if the World had enjoyed the use of Letters before but that there would have been some Monuments of it before his time remaining at the least to the next after Ages of which we should have had some credible account from them And therefore Diodorus Siculus gives this as the Reason why there were no more Antient Histories and that the Actions of Kings were not Recorded of old because the World wanted Letters Impossibile est sayes he primas Literas aeque ac primos Reges vetuslas extitisse And Josephus gives the very same Reason why we have no more Antient History then we have because the world antiently wanted the use of Letters but especially we cannot suppose but that those Revelations God made before of himself and his mind to some parts of the World would have been safely preserved in Writing and left upon Record to posterity long before Moses writ nor can we well imagine that those Holy men to whom at any time God pleased to reveal himself should not use their utmost diligence in the best way to secure and communicate so inestimable a Treasure of this we hear not the least upon any tollerable ground of credit nor of any other Writings before Moses but upon reports that appear grosly fictitious and fabulous 'T is a thing greatly probable that till Moses his time the World knew nothing of Letters for we neither find any Laws of God or of Men written before and 't is likewise most probable that we owe them not nor their use to Humane invention but to Divine Revelation and 't is likely Plato had learned so much from the Jews when he said in his Cratilus that the Original of Letters was from the Gods 'T is a thing offers its self very fairly to our belief that God himself when he gave the Ten Commandements written by his own singer to Moses introduced the first Alphabet and that Letters themselves and those Divine precepts are of an equal Date I insist not on this as capable of any certain and positive proof nor if it were is it to be urged as a convincing Evidence of the truth of the Bible But yet 't is a Circumstance of very considerable weight and has very good probabilities for its belief and that we shall find if we consult but what Chrysostome Theophilact and other of the Christian Writers have said in the justification of it Cyrill of Alexandria in his seventh Book against Julian insists much upon it Vives upon the thirty ninth Chapter of St. Austins 18 Book de Civ Dei sayes that 't is the most common opinion both of Jews and Christians that Moses first gave Letters to the Hebrew Language which doubtless has the Priority of all others and that Eupolemus Artapanus and many other profane Authors affirm it and that both the Egyptians and also the Phaenicians from whom the Graecians first learnt the use of Letters had their Letters from Him and that Moâ—es was that Mercury to whom the Egyptians ascribe the first invention of them The Objections that are usually made against this seem but of very little weight First we are told of certain Tractates of Enoch that were written before the Flood Secondly of two Pillars of the Sons of Seth with observations Astronomical engraven upon them which they set up to continue their Learning and that it might remain beyond the Flood which Adam had foretold them of The one of which remained in the Countrey of Syria till the time of Josephus as he himself sayes Thirdly that Moses in the 21 of Numbers makes mention of the Book of the Wars of the Lord as a Book extant before that time And fourthly that Moses himself is said to be Learned in all the Learning of the Egyptians which learning probably was written For the first That there were Books of Enochs Writing before the Flood which were preserved in the Ark for so they must be seems to be a story wholly fabulous we find not one word of them amongst
we have now contained in our Bables all that was written by a Divine Inspiration and intended as a Rule to the Church and no more That is How can we now be safely assured about the Canon of the Scripture and be able upon good grounds to say what is Canonical and what is not 'T is too apparent a Truth that nothing by the power of its own worth and excellency has ever been able to scape contempt and reproach from the unruly wills and debauched minds of corrupt and unreasonable men The Bible has met with its share in this kind Some upon Fanatical Pretences have despised and rejected the Whole Others have mangled and severed it as themselves thought good receiving some part only as Divine and rejecting the rest as they pleased Of this Iraeneus Tertullian Epiphanius St. Austin and many of the Christian Writers have given us a large account The Manichees rejected the whole body of the Old Testament as coming from an Evil God The Ptolemaites as Epiphamus tells us rejected all the Books of Moses The Gnosticks with some other Hereticks rejected the whole Book of Psalms Cerdon and after him Marcion rejected all the Gospels but that of St. Luke the Acts of the Apostles and divers other parts of the New Testament as we find by Tertullian The Valentimans rejected all the Gospels but that of St. John as we see in Irenaeus Others rejected all that St. John wrote The Ebionites received no Gospel but that of St. Matthen and rejected in gross all the Epistles of St. Paul In a word There is not one Part of the Bible from the first to the last that has scap'd the reprobation of some bad Men. But all such attempts were soon blown away expired in the Birth bore about them their own shame and reproach made no considerable battery upon the Truth in any Age Nor did they reach further than the vitiated Minds and corrupt Breasts of such Profligate Hereticks as were the first Authors of them In answering to this Question How we come to be well assured about the Canon of the Bible and that those Books now received by the Church of England and other Protestant Churches as such are all Canonical and no other Two things only will occur that are of any seeming moment In the due consideration of which all will be said that is needful about this Matter First How we come to reject out of our Canon those Books commonly called Apocryphal which were written at least all but one of them during the times of the Old Testament And secondly Upon what grounds we now receive some particular parts of the New Testament which have sometimes layen under question If we mistake in the first we have less in our Bibles than we ought If in the latter we have much more than we should About the first concerning the several parts of the Old Testament there is amongst Christians themselves a present Disagreement But concerning the other the whole Christian World is at this day of the same opinion For the First That there is good Reason to reject those Books commonly called the Apocrypha that they were not written by any Divine Inspiration nor sent us from GOD as any part of those Supream Laws by which he intended to rule and judge the World and so ought not to be reckoned within the Canon will be made very evident to any reasonable Judge upon these Considerations following First After the time of Esdras and the erection of the second Temple 't is universally agreed by all the most Antient Jews and Christians that the Jews had no Prophet amongst them Nor did GOD raise up any Man with an Extraordinary Spirit from the time of Malachi who is agreed to be the last Prophet till John the Baptist Which was for the space of four hundred and odde years Now 't is sufficiently evident that these Apocryphal Books were all written after the time of Malachi and so can be of no extraordinary Mission And if any of them had been written before and had been extant in Ezra's time which they were not it had been an unanswerable Reason for their Rejection now Because they were not received then For 't is well known that none of these Books now in question were by Him incorporated with the rest of the Bible nor were within the Canon at that time setled That the Jews had no Prophets by whom all parts of the Old-Testament were written For the Church is built upon the Foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And the whole of the Old-Testament is called Prophecy nor any Men of an Extraordinary Spirit amongst them after the Captivity both Jews and Christians generally agree Josephus is express in it in his first Book against Appion he tells us that from the time of Artaxerxes though certain Books had been written yet they deserved not the same Credit and Belief that the Sacred Scriptures did because there was no succession of Prophers amongst them Saint Austine in the 45th Chapter of his 18th Book De Civitate Dei sheweth at large that the Jews had no Prophecy after Ezra's time And the same Eusebius affirmeth in his Demonstrationes Evangelicae Post Zachartam Malachiam non fuâ—sse amplius apud Judaeos Prophetam Et a reditu ex Captivitate ad tempora Servatoris nullum babucrint Judaei sacrum Volumen The Jews had no Prophets after Zachary and Malachi nor any Sacred Writings after the Captivity till our Saviour's time And some of these very Books tell us as much themselves For in the first Book of the Maccabees Chap. 9. 't is there said That there was then great Tribulation in Israel such as had not been since the dayes that there had been no Prophet in Israel relating to Ezra's time And indeed it appears very plain from the Scripture it self that there were no Divine Writings published between the Prophecy of Malachi and the writing of the Gospels For the Evangelists take things up just where he left them and begin the Gospel from the end of Malachi's Prophecy For he ending his Prophecy at John the Baptist under the Type and Title of Elias and the Evangelists beginning the Gospel with Him for St. Mark expresly declares the ending of that Prophecy to be the beginning of the Gospel There is a visible combination from thence from that period of Prophesie of the Old and New Testament together Secondly All the Writers of the Old Testament were Prophets to the House of Israel and to the Church of the Jews and their Writings and Prophesies were directed chiefly to them And so they were all writ except some Passages in Daniel and Ezra that were written in the Chaldee Dialect to which the Jews had in their Captivity been much accustomed in their own Native Language the Language of Canaan which was the Hebrew But these Books were confessedly most of them first written in Greek and could be of no use at all to the Jews at Jerusalem and
can now be urged in proof of the Bible that will come under any sensible demonstration The proposal of this Book to the World to be received as a Law Divine is not so made as by Mathematical Evidence or gross visible absurdities in its denial to introduce it self irresistably at the first sight But this book is so proposed to our belief as that all men by a serious and impartial consideration of the matter of it and a due enquity into all the Circumstances attending it may have ground sufficient to acquiesce in it as Divine and judge it to be such as it self claims to be And that the Bible should be upon such terms and no other proposed to the belief of the World seems highly reasonable when we consider that God intends this book as the great SHIBBOLETH by which he will try the World that from the believing or not believing of it shall arise the great discrimination between Virtuous and Good Men and such who free from the prevailing influence of corrupt and sensual Interests pursue the Genuine dictates of right Reason and improve those notions of Divinity they are born with and others who either choose to be Sottishly Ignorant or else wilfully to oppose what God had made in it self most suitable and corresponding to the Reason and Conscience of every unprejudiced Man The truth is our Assent or not to the Bible is made a matter of Reward and Punishment And therefore 't is so proposed to our belief that there may be a sufficient ground for both The way to this Discourse in hand being thus far cleared I shall now prosecute the design of it in this method First I will indeavour to render it a thing reasonable to be believed that there should be some supernatural Law revealed from God and given to mankind in order to their present and future happiness as the great Guide and Rule of all their actions towards God and towards each other And that 't is not a reasonable supposal that the world in the posture we find it should be left singly to the conduct of Nature Secondly That 't is most rationally credible upon all such grounds by which a judgment in this case ought to be established That this Book we call the Bible is this Revealed Law superadded to our natural Light and contains in it self that compleat Systeme of Divine Truth by which God will Informe Rule and Judge the World And this I shall endeavour a proof of from the matter of this Book it self and from such external concomitants of it as highly concur to create a belief of its Divine Authority And lastly propose all such considerable Doubts Queries and Difficulties as the minds of men are usually busied withall about this Matter And attempt their Satisfaction therein To make the first thing proposed evident that 't is Reasonable to believe in the general that God should give us some further direction then what our Natural Light will afford us That he should promulge some Supernatural Law to the world Let these several things following be duely considered First What wretched and dismal Ignorance has the world been in yea the wisest and best parts of it and in what disagreement with it self about all parts of Religion where this supernatural Law hath been either not known or not received How sadly hath that inbred principle of Religion wherewith all men are born been seduced and mislead where there has been nothing supernatural to guide and direct it The natural notion of a Deity has corrupted into all folly and vanity and men have formed Religions not only hateful to God but at last nauseous to themselves Devotion men still had to somewhat above them but they knew not well how to express it The Wisest saw reason enough to scorn their own Religion but knew not how to compose a better Some went farr in the Negative in saying what ought not to be that then was amongst themselves but none ever attained to a certain directory of what should be When we view over the utmost products of all humane abilities and the greatest discoveries at any time made by natural light we shall find the world without Revelation to have been greatly defective in these three things First in their Divinity in their conceptions of the Deity and their Worship of him Secondly In the account they gave to themselves of the worlds first Production and of the Origine of things Thirdly In their Morality and in their Ethical Institutes of humane life and the converse of mankind together First In their Divinity Varro ranks all the Heathen Theology under three heads Their Fabulous and Historical Theologie Their Natural and Mystical Theology Their Civil and Political Theology which he also calls Mythical Physical and Civil The first came from their Poets and contains such a Rapsody of Nonsense and Folly as the like to it hath not upon any occasion nor upon any subject been collected since the world began That one God was born from a Mans Head another from a Mans Thigh a third from some drops of Blood That some Gods were Thieves others Adulterers others Servants to Men with multitudes of such absurd and ridiculous fictions The Second sort came from their Wise men and from their Philosophers They dispute what the Gods are Where they are And whence they are And amongst them we find an endless diversity and most stupendious folly some making the gods to consist of Fire some of Numbers others of Atoms and by their Mystical Divinity interpreting Jupiter to Fire Juno to Earth Pluto to Air Nestis to Water and others of their Gods to the several parts of the World with many other so gross and notorious absurdities that Justin Martyr tells the Graecians that the Divinity of their Philosophers Multo sit quam Poctarum Theologia atque de Diis doctrina ridiculosior is much more absurd then that of their Poet. The third sort relates it self to the Laws and Customes of particular Cities and Countreys by which they ordered their Priests what Gods they should worship at what Times and Seasons and upon what occasions what Sacrifices and Services and all things relating to the exercise of their Religion both upon the Stages in their Theatres and also in their Temples For in the one they represented their Gods and had Plaies acted in honour to them as a part of Religion and in the other they Worshipped them In all which we find them shedding the blood one of another and offering most inhumane sacrifices and a numberless multitude not only of childish and foolish but profane and impious obscene and lascivious rites and ceremonies If we look back as farr as any Heathen Records will carry us and view over the Barbarous Nations of the world for so the Graecians were pleased to call all but themselves according to that of Varro Barbarae sunt omnes nationes praeter Graecos the Phaenicians the Caldaeans the Egyptians and such others as we have
perfect Attributes the terms of our pardon must come from God 'T is not in man to find out how God shall forgive him or to to Chalk out the Tracks of Divine Justice and Mercy toward himself nor will his guilt be removed nor his thoughts be at rest till he know Gods mind about it Nothing can assure us of Reconciliation with God but what is from Heaven appointed as the means of it No natural knowledg can give us any certain direction about it nor is it reasonable to believe it should If Humane Nature had no absolute security in it self of its first state how can we expect it should restore it self when once degenerated What did not remain perfect when it was so is much more unlikely to recover again out of Imperfection to be so Every man may know he is degenerated from what he ought to be and so may reasonably collect from what he once was but no man can reason himself into a ceâ—taâ—n way of Recovery The whole world have subscribed to their own Apostacy but could never agree upon any certain remedy How miserably have Mankind tired themselves and to how little purpose in finding out what would appease Divine Anger and compensate for their disobedience No man ever yet worsâ— ipped any God but he made some Offering to him in hopes that might indemnisie him and be taken in Lieu of his own punishment Men have at a Venture offered up all parts of the world in Sacrifice have tried all experiments victimis lavacris and by all other means their best guesses could suggest to them to obliterate their own Guilt and to procure D vâ—â—e favour but never were upon any suâ—er gâ—ound then their own vain fancies for acceptance Agaâ—hias tells us in his second Book of the Peâ—sian war that the Persians were wont to solemnize a great Holy-day once a year which they called The death of Vices in which as an eminent piece of Devotion they slew multitudes of Serpents all other sorts of wild Beasts and thereby thought they should Execute all their Corruptions safely bury their sins The Philosophers abounded with remedies foâ— this Epidemical Disease Some thought to cure the evil of the world in a Moral way some in a way Mathematical and some by Religious Ceremonies But alas The right way of doing it has lain hid from Ages and Generations till God himself made it known and revealed it from Heaven VVhat a trifle is the Blood of a Sheep or an Oxe to satisfie for an Offence against an Infinite Justice At how easie and cheap a rate might men Sin and God be satisfied And what a publick tolleration of evil were it if the Blood of Bulls and Goats might take away sin and the lives of unreasonable Creatures Commute for the sins of Men The consideration of all these things does directly Steer us upward and point us to a dependance upon Revelation to give us a clear distinct and satisfying Knowledge of God of our selves and of this whole World How man came to Rebel and Sin first to enter By what ways and means Indemnity may be obtained And upon what terms we may be again reconciled to God and accepted This precious discourse the design of which is to render it a reasonable supposal that there should be in the general some Divine Revelation some Laws Supernatural promulged to the world and that Mankind should not be wholly left to the conduct of Nature can be no way ungrateful to those who are already possessed with a due esteem of the Scriptures and do assent to their verity because 't is to re-inforce one of the greatâ—st supports to all Scripture-belief Nor will it seem impertinent to those who are any way ingenious in their doubts and enquiries about this matter because 't is naturally necessarily the first step that is to be taken in order to their satisfaction But may be very well offensive to such who shall design to themselves a disbelief of the Scriptures and make it their Province to weaken their Authority and render all proofs brought for them insufficient because it goes far towards an evident and apparent determination of the whole cause against them Does indeed petere jugulum of their chiefest pretences and virtuâ—lly breaks the very Back-bone of all Antiscriptural opposition for if there be such a thing as a Revelation mâ—de to the World as that which the goodness of God and the wants of men seem necessarily to call for If God have given to Mankind a Law supernatural Where is this Divine Law to be found 'T is but reasonable to suppose it somewhere or other upon Record This Book we call the Bible must needs be it and will certainly carry it against all Pretenders the natural dictates o right Reason being Judge What Book or Writing is there extant under Heaven that can with any tollerable colour counter plead the Bible upon this account A man must be horribly Hood-winkt in his inteâ—lectuals that does not evidently see 't is impar coâ—gressus between the Bible and all other Pretenders From what paâ—ts of the world will you fetch such a Supernatural Lâ—w by which we may suppose God to Govern Mankind one either fit for him to Give or for us to Receive according to that Natural Knowledge we have of him and of our selves and that Rational Judgment to which all Supernatural pretences ought to be subjected Where wâ—ll you find a Systeme of Divinity that makes known to us in a way suitable to our natural conceptions of him the most of God and of his Nature we are able to comprehend delivers us from all the intanglements of Humane Nature by ways and Methods so pâ—opoâ—tioned thereunto and discoveâ—s to us ceâ—taâ—n tracks to the highest happiness here and hereafter we are capable to enjoy Shall we go to the Laws of Lycurgus and Solon because they pretended to Revelation Can any man be so stupid Those Laws were chiefly Municipal and made no pretence to what we enquire after Shall we imagine the Books of the Sybills because they were thought to be filled with many Divine secrets contained such Revelation The greatest part if not the whole of them is long since perished out of the world which is proof sufficient they were none of those standing Laws by which God designed to Rule and Judge Mankind Some excellent Greek Verses there are indeed extant at this day which go under their Names but they are upon good grounds by the most learned supposed to be none of theirs And iâ— they were the Christian Religion and the Truths contained in the Bible are so clearly described and the Pagan Religion so directly and strongly confuted therein that the Scriptures can scarce have a greater Testimony given to their Divinity Shall we go to the inspired Entâ—usiasticâ—l Poâ—ts for this Revelation What a ridiculous foppery would that seem to one that has once conversed with the Bible And what a wild extravagant Religion should we
erect from the Theology of Hesiod The Hymnes of Orpheus The Poems of Homer The Odes of Pindar Or from Virgil or Ovid Shall we look back to the Heathen Oracles for this Revelation To those of Delphos Dodona Jupiter Hammon and the rest Who can be so marvelously vain Besides the consideration of that general uncertainty and sometimes falshood that visibly attended their responses the Records of those Oracles the Books wherein their Responses and Divinations were contained are long since perished and lost Shall we goe as far as Numa Pompilius and his Goddess for the old Roman Theology That s impossible to be retrived The Religion of Numa is long since vanished out of the World and the Books wherein it was contained were openly Burnt And upon this occasion were they burnt long after the death of Numa in the Consulship of Cornelius and Bebius there were found in Rome two Coffins in the one whereof was the Body of Numa and in the other fourteen Books of Numa's seven of them in Latine containing the Laws and Ceremonies of their Religion and the other seven in Greek concerning the Study of Wisdom and in these latter was much contained not only destructive to the Gods and the Religion of other Countreys but also to his own and to the Roman Profession of which the Senate well considerdering resolved it as best that the whole fourteen books should be openly burnt together Which was accordingly done Of which we have an account at large in Valerius Maximus and Varro Or shall we at last come to that Arabian Prophet to Mahomet to set up his Collection of Precepts his Alchoran which he tells you a hundred times over God was the Author of and that all Mankind could not have writ a syllable of it to confront the Bible 'T were to the full as wife a project to light a Rush-candle and resolve to out-face the Sun as to encounter the Bible with such Mean and Ridiculous Stuff What an absurd Foppish Flam is that Alchoran Evidently a Cheat in every Page of it A confused Medley of wicked contemptible trash heaped up together by a Triumvirate of Arrians Jews and Pagans all known Impostors in the Ages wherein they lived and so transferr'd by the History of their own times to all future Generations God has made every Reasonable Mind not some way or other Debauched or Pre-ingaged a Touchstone sufficient to discover such counterfeit Metal Some part of it seems rather like the Ravings of men Distracted then any product of Common Reason It tells us that Men were first created of Shadow That the Earth was made in two dayes and that God fastened it to the Mountains by Anchors and Cables That Mahomet cut the Moon into two pieces and Cemented it close together again with a multitude of Such Raving and Distracted Fantasmes In many things 't is evidently self-contradictious and what is said in one place is directly overthrown in another Mahomet himself sometimes plainly Confessing He knows not whether He or His be in a way of Salvation for which very saying I wonder the people did not stone him The whole of it a Rapsody of most prodigious Absurdities A câ—nlused Inconsistent Composure Principles of Heathenisme Judaisme and Christianity all Generally Corrupted and so wildly patcht up together that Mahomet might very well declare what he did That he thought No body would ever be able to underst and his Law Whatever we sind in it that carries the least Resemblance of Truth is apparently stollen out of the Old and New Testamâ—nt though for the most part visibly Falsified and inverted It tells us that Jesus was sâ—cretly conveyed inâ—o Heaven and that somewhat in his likeness which was not himself was nailed to the Cross That He was not really Crucified but that the Jews were Abused and Deluded It tells us also that in the 14th of St. John's Gospel where mention is made of Sending the Comforter that there was much sard of Mahomet which the Christians have since Razâ—d out Which is to father a ridiculous and impossible falshood upon them for that Gospel was Extant long before Mahomet was born or thought of for he was not born till the year of Christ 571 and published most parts of the world over not onely in the Greek Copies of it but in divers Translations in the Syriacke Arabick Ethiopick and Latin tongues and was far enough from the possibility of any universal Alteration that could be made by the Christians in Mahomets time That which the Alchoran tells us in general of the Bible and the Christian Religion directly overthrows it self and Mahomet thereby has utterly subverted his whole Fabrick For he says that Moses and Christ were both sent from God and that the Old and New Testament are Divine Books that God imparted the Law to Moses the Psalms to David and the Gospel to Christ But pretends that as the Gospel succeeded the Law so the Alchoran does the Gospel Now if the first be true I am sure the latter is false unless God can contradict himself which is impossible For both Moses and Christ have delivered very many Doctrines directly Contrary to His. The Bible and the Alchoran are sufficiently Inconsistent And therefore wherever the Old and New Testament are acknowledged to be Books Divine and from God the Alchoran ought reasonably to be Rejected as a Vile and wicked Delusion If it be asked as usually it is How that Religion came to spread so far and the Disciples thereof to be so Numerous if it be so Vile and also so absurd a Couzenage as indeed it is Such a Question will be easily answered if these Three things be considered First The Mahometan Religion ows its original to the Sword more then to all its pretences besides 'T was Mahomets being a General that made him pass for a Prophet Nor was his Alchoran at first received in any Nation where his Sword did not make way for it 'T is a Religion that was at first Introduced and has been since Propagated and Vpheld purely by Force Not Discoursed into men but Imposed upon them Mahomet himself often declares that God did not send him to convert the World by Miracles but by the Sword and by Instruments of War And indeed There is not a Chapter in his Alchoran where he does not preach Fire and Sword Warrs and Massacres for the advancement of his Law Secondly Where-ever that Religion is introduced all Inquirie into it is absolutely forbid and men are Made without the least Tasting or Chewing to Swallow the whole Body of Mahomets Divinity at Once And by this means Ignorance is grown so natural an Appurtenant to that Religion that wherever 't is setled it does not only silence all Discourse of Divinity but totally ruines all Learning and brings men into perfect Enmity with all Liberal Sciences 'T is an easy thing to spread the Basest Metal as well as the purest if we can prevent its Trial. Falshood and Truth are upon Even termes
cannot be admitted as such are all 〈◊〉 them found peculiarly appurtenant to the â—iblâ— and cannot belong to any other Books or Writings or to any other Pretences to Revelation whatsoever Having thus established these two general points First that 't is a thing in it self reasonable and fit to believe that there should be some Revelation made from God to the world some Supernatural Laws promulged as the great Rule of mens lives here and Gods Judgment hereafter And that these Laws should be somewhere or other extant upon Record that Mankind might be fully assured and ascertained about them and that they might be visible to all that there should be some such Book as the Bible pretends to be and that 't is greatly unreasonable to believe the contrary And Secondly that in the Judgment of right Reason there are many general qualifications that must necessarily be appurtenant to such a Revelation wheresoever 't is extant and by which 't is but reasonable that Mankind should make a Judgment of every pretence to it and that all those qualifications are found punctually and peculiarly belonging to the Bible and cannot be applied to any other extant pretences to Revelation whatsoever I shall now proceed to the second thing proposed which was a more distinct and particular proof and endeavour to make it appear that this Book is indeed sent us from Heaven and is in truth that Revelation we have good cause to expect from above and that we have all those Reasons concurring to make us acquiesce in it as such from whence a Judgment in such a case ought finally to result That there is so much Evidence to be given in to prove its Divinity as no man ought to desire nor can reasonably expect more in a matter of such a Nature And so much that where mens corrupt Interests and prejudices are not Predominant will appear sufficient to every impartial enquiry And this shall be prosecuted in this Method I will these several ways consider this Book First In the time of its conveyance to the World Secondly In the way and manner of its conveyance Thirdly In the success and effects of it since its conveyance And lastly In it self in the matter of it as we now find it And from each of these considerations will a signal Testimony be given in to its Divinity and when we have taken a view of the whole we shall find that the Book both in the Matter of it and in all the Circumstances that have at any time attended it does eminently relate it self to God as its Author and cannot be reasonably judged the product of any Humane contrivement whatsoever For the first When we reslâ—ct upon the â—â—me of this Books conveyance we shall find two things of very great weight offering themselves to our consideration First the Antiquity of those things it relates to us and informs us of And Secondly the Antiquity of this 〈◊〉 iâ—â—â—lâ— since composed and delivered to us with such a relation The Contents of this Book â—â—ch aâ— far as the first foundations of the Earth and the Heavens and give us an account of Gods Revelations to Man since his first mâ—â—â— and Original and of an Orall and â—erâ—all intâ—â—â—â—â—â—se between God and the World for two thousand four hundred and old years before it was any where extant upon Râ—â—â—â—d or any part of it written Which no other Bâ—â—â— since the World began so much as makes 〈◊〉 â—â—â—â—â—â—ce to If we consider the Revelation Histoâ—â—cally contained in this Book 't is what was 〈◊〉 the beginning and of the same 〈…〉 the World it self If we consider the Edition of it in this Book and the time 〈◊〉 this Books aâ—â—ual Publication with all the aâ—â—â—tional Revelations contained in it we shall find this Book to be the first born in its kind to pâ—ecede all other Writings whatsoever and in truth to be extant while Thales Mileâ—â—us Hamer Hâ—rmes and the most primative writers the world had were unborn and unthought of Moses wrote of the God of Abraham long before any of the Heathen Gods had a written mention made of them God pleasing so to order it that although the Revelations he made to the World were not written from the beginning yet they were written long before any other Writings were extant And his own Laws were first recorded and all other Writings are of a subsequent Date to this Holy Book First I will evidence this in point of fact and shew that it is so that to this Book is indeed due the right of Primogeniture and that all other Books are of a much after-edition And becondly examine what reasonably results from thence toward that proof of the Bible we are about To all which this must be premised that when we speak of the Bible as thus Ancient we intend actually no more of it then the Writings of Moses the whole Contents of the Bible being above four thousand years in a gradual publication and the Bible it self above a thousand and six hundred years in writing for so long it was from the time that Moses writ to St. John the revealer nor need we intend more to justifie the Antiquity of the whole because 't is all there virtually contained all the rest is superstructed upon that as its â—oâ—ndation and every several part of the Bible after Moses till the Top-stone was laid appears evidently to be writ in direct pursuance of what Moses at first delivered and so much St. Paul affirmed before Foelix that he taught nothing but what was long before extant in Moses and the Prophets For the first That the Books of Moses are in fact the most Ancient I find both Jews and Christians have been greatly concerned to make it manifest as judging it a point that did greatly credit their profession and highly justifie that Religion they adhered to Josephus and others of the Jewish writers have much insisted upon it and amongst the Christian Writers Justin Marter Tertullian Clemens Alexandrinus Eusebius Cyrill of Alexandria in his Books against Julian St. Austin and others But most especially Justin Martyr and Eusebius Justin Martyr in his Parenaetick to the Graecians because they used with great Arrogance to boast of the Antiquity of their own Learning and Religion and upon that account to look with great contempt upon others proves against them out of Pagan Authors and those chiefly their own beyond all reasonable denial that the Books of Moses were of much greater Antiquity then the most Ancient Writers they could make a pretence to And that the Christian Religion being the natural issue of those Writings founded upon them and derived from them was no new or upstart invention but indeed the first and most Antient written and unwritten Truth the World was possessed of and the same thing is afterwards more largely and distinctly proved and made good by Eusebius in his Evangelical Preparation Who thus concludes Quare omnibus Diis ac Heroibus Graecorum multo Vetustior
Moses invenitur And indeed the most Ancient of the Graecian Gods as appears by their own Histories were not of a much Earlyer date then the Warrs and ruines of Troy which Moses preceded some hundreds of years Josephus says in his first Book against Appion That the Graecians had no Elder write then Homer who lived as Pliny says two hundred and fifty years after the Trojan Warr which War was about four hundred and seven years before the Olympiads began according to Solinus two hundred and seventy years as Herodotus thinks three hundred But 't is clear from his own Poems that he lived some very considerable time after at least one hundred years by the Lowest calculation Moses was so long before him and so much his Predecessor that 't is granted by all that make mention of him That he lived some hundreds of years at least four hundred and odd before the Battle of Troy before the beginning of the Olympiads not less then eight hundred and forty years Till which time the Graecian History is generally Confused and Impâ—râ—â—â—â— nâ—r had they any certainty in Stâ—ry till thâ—n which Varro positively affirms and Eusâ—bâ—â—â— also proves out of the Annals of Africaâ—us who tells us Usâ—iad Oâ—â—mpiadas niâ—il exploratum in Histori Graecorum mâ—â—tur sed omnia consusis conscripta temporiâ—us sunt Post Olympâ—ad â—s vâ—ro quoniam quadrâ—â—unto dilâ—gentissime oâ—nia notahantuâ— Nulla penitus confusio temporum su And indeed till that time there is little certainty in any Story but that o the Bible He lived bâ—fore the building oâ— Rome about eight hundred sixty and five years for Rome was founded in the beginning of the Seventh Olimpiad which was twenty five years after their first beginning But suppose Homer was not the first Graecian Writer as Euschius and others think and perhaps truly enough that they had others before him 'T is certain and agreed to by all They had no Letters amongst them till Cadmus nor any Written-â—earning for some considâ—â—able time after him And â—tis well known that Cadmus was Later then Moses Those that carry him highest make him but contemporary with Josuah and he is as some think more truely to be reckoned of the same time with Othâ—icl mentioned in the book of Judges And yet we find the Ancientest learning the world possessed of besides the Bible is written in the Greek toâ—â—â—e So Justin Martyr observes speaking of this matter says â—e Si quis vel Pâ—etarâ—â— veterum vel Legislaterum vel â—isioâ—â—orâ—m vel Plilosopherum meminissâ— velit comperiet tamen illâ—s Libros sues â—râ—cerum composâ—â—sse literis Both Justin Martyr who lived within a hundred and thirty of Christ and â—uschiâ—s aâ—our two hundred aâ—ter him have evidently proved from the best and most acknowledged Calculations and from the mention that is made of Moses by Prophâ—â—e Writers such as Sanconiathon the Phaenician Antiquaâ—â—â— Berâ—sus Caldeus Ptolomens and Manâ—tho Egiptian Chronologers and amongst the Creacâ—aâ—s Artapanus Polemon Eupolemus and from Tregus Pompâ—ius epitomized by Justin and others that Moses was the first Legislator and lived long before any Authors of Books were extant And this is also very particularly affirmed by Dioderus Siculus the best and most eminent Historian the Gracians â—â—d who says himself he spent thirty years in Travel to search out the Antiquities of all Countries and to inable himself to write a General Story for he tells us in his History that â—e had learnt from the Egyptian priests that Moses was the First Legislator and Preceded all others in that kind We are told by many Ancient Authors that he lived with and to them St. Austin agrees in his 18th Book De civit Dei and by others That he Preceded Cecrops the founder of Athens after whom all those Ancient and memorable things fell out in Greece as Deucalions flood Phaetons sire the birth of Ericthonius the ripe of Proserpina the misteries of Ceres the â—â—titution of the Eliâ—â—â—â—â—â— sacrifices Triptolemus his art of Tilling the Ground the carrying away of Europa the birth of Apollo the building of Thebes by Cadmus after whom also where Bacchus Minos Perseus Esculapius Hercules and others whom we find mentioned in the Graecian Authors as most Ancient Nor had the Graecians any higher terms to express Antiquity by then Cecropian and Ogygian which they used to call all such things as they thought most Ancient from Cecrops and Ogyges in whose times they supposed Men like Mushroms sprung naturally out of the Earth about Athens But the certainest account that seems to be given of the direct Time in which Moses lived is this That he was Contemporary with Inachus the first King of the Archieâ—es In this Chronologers seem most generally to agree as Scaliger shews in his most learned Animadversions upon Eusebius his Chronologie Justin Martyr Tertullian Tatianus Clemens Alexandrinus Athenagoras Theophilus and many others of the Christian Writers affirm it and from many Heathen Authors we have direct Evidence for it Polemon in his first Book Rerum Graecanicarum is express in it and Apion both in his Commentary that he writ against the Jews and also in other of his Writings speaks of the Jews coming out of Egypt Regnante apud Archivos Inacho quibus sayes he prefuit Moses And Ptolomens Mendiâ—us an Egyptian that wrote the Chronicle of Egypt sayes that Moses governed the Jews and lead them out of Egypt quando Inachus Argis regnabat And 't is sufficiently known to all that are any way verst in Antiquity that Inachus and also Cecrops lived some hundreds of years before the Trojan War and long enough before any Books or the most Ancient Written Learning the world had was extant Tertullian in the 19 Chapter of his Apology tells the Romans they also as well as the Graecians glorified much in Antiquities sayes he Our Religion far out does all you can produce of that kind for the Books of one of our Prophets only viz. Moses wherein it seems God hath inclosed as in a Treasury all the Religion of the Jews and consequently all the Christian Religion preceding for many Ages together reach beyond the Ancientest you have even all your publick Monuments the Antiquity of your Originals the establishment of your Estate the birth of most part of the people the foundation of many great Cities all that most advanced by you in all Ages of History and memory of times the invention of Characters which are Interpreters of Sciences and the Guardians of all excellent things I think I may say more even your Gods Temples Oracles and Sacrifices Have you heard mention made of that great Prophet Moses He was contemporary with Inachus he preceded Danaus three hundred fourscore and thirteen years the Ancientest of all that have a name in your Histories He lived some hundreds of years before the ruine of Troy Every of the other Prophets succeeded Moses and yet the last of them all is of the same Age as your first Wise men Law-givers and Historians were
the Jews in the time of our Saviour and the Apostles nor before and 't is certain if there had been any Books then extant in truth written by him they would have been in great esteem and veneration in the Jewish Church though they had not been within their Canon which we are sure they were not and Philo or Josephus most diligent searchers of their Antiquities would have made some eminent mention of them in whose Works we find altum silentium about any such Books and therefore 't is not to be supposed they believed there were any such real Books then extant But 't is most probable that after the Apostle Jude had in his Epistle quoted a Prophecie of Enoch which Prophecie without doubt he came to the knowledge of either purely by Revelation which I rather believe or else by a Tradition the truth of which was ascertained to him by Revelation by which means came others also of the Sacred Writers in after-times to be ascertained of what they writ about divers things that relate to the History of Moses that were not to be found in his Books for in the Psalms we find mention of some things done in Moses his time that are not recorded in his Books St. Paul in the 9 to the Hebrews sayes that when Moses had spoken every precept according to the Law he took the blood of Calves and Goats with Water and Scarlet Wool and Hyssop and sprinkled bâ—th the Book and all the People saying this is the Blood of the Testament c. In which the Apostle has added several things that are not inserted by Moses in the selation of this passage in the 24 of Exodus So Stephens Speech set down in the 7 of the Acts tells us that Moses in killing the Egyptian supposed that his brethren would have understood how that God by his Hand would deliver them but they understood not By which we have a Reason given for Moses killing the Egyptian that he himself has no where set down and by which we come to understand that before Moses went into the Land of Midian God revealed to him that he was to be the deliverer of that people which Moses himself has not any where told us I say 't is probable that some Hereticks in the Church most likely the Gnosticks who much cryed up those Spurious Writings to promote their own corrupt Opinions and Interests took occasion from thence to frame certain counterfeit Books just as some others did under the names of Jaâ—nes and Jambres after St. Pauls mention of them as written by Enoch before the Flood which Books have sufficiently betrayed themselves for those that were published under his name were stuft as St. Austin sayes with such absurd and fabulous Stories of Angels and such ridiculous relations of Gyants whose Fathers were Angels and no men that they are to be justly rejected as pâ—lpably counterfeit and fictitious Of the same mind is Jerom Chrysostom and Epiphanius and when Celsus alledged some absurd Stories out of those writings in reproch to the Christians Origen in his fifth Book answers him by shewing what a mean esteem the Jews as well as the Christians then had of them For the second those Pillars of the Sons of Seth 't is beyond all compass of credit that any such Pillars should be set up with an intention to outlast the Deluge or that they should so do or that any Engravings upon them should be visible some thousands of years after especially upon one of Brick for Josephus tells us there were two at first erected one of Brick and another of Stone and that of Stone they made on purpose to last if the other should decay how he came to such an exact account of their minds the Reader may guess and yet he sayes 't was that of Brick that then remained upon which he does not absolutely say there was any thing written in Letters but that the Sons of Seth Engraved upon them such things as they had invented which might be by many other representations and other ways then by Letters for I doubt not but that a Symbolical representation of mens thoughts one to another was extream early in the World though they wanted Alphabetical Letters Nor does Josephus say that He saw it it himself or give any punctual account what it was that was engraven upon it or any certain Place where the Pillar was to be seen but only in general that it was then in the Countrey of Syria where he left men of leisure to enquire after it The truth is there are so very many improbable and unlikely if not impossible Circumstances do attend this vain Story that 't is plain Josephus though in the general a Historian of deserved credit took it upon bare report from others some late Authors think and perhâ—ps not amiss from the fabulous relation of Manetho who sayes he took his History from some Pillars set up before the Flood and was marvailously abused in that Countenance he seems to give to it nor ought it to seem strange that he should be so for we sind many of the best Historians have taken up things upon trust and fallen thereby into very great mistakes Suetonius and Tacitus are both eminent Historians amongst the Romans yet both guilty of strange mistakes Tacitus tells us in his History That the Jews worshipped an Asses Head with the highest veneration then which nothing could be more untruly and upon less ground affirmed and Suetonius so mistook that he thought Christ lived in the time of Claudius for he sayes In the time of Claudius Judaeos impulsore Chresto assidue tumultuantes civitate expulit That Claudius expelled the Jews out of Rome who were continually making uproars being stirred up thereunto by Christ Then which there could not be an absurder mistake nor a greater falshood well uttered For the third The mention that Moses makes in the 21 of Numbers and the 14 of the book of the wars of the Lord as a Book then extant his words are wherefore it is said in the Book of the Wars of the Lord what he didin the red Sea and in the brooks of Arnon First divers probable senses are given of the place that render it no Objection in this case The Geneva Translation not much differing from some others renders it thus Wherefore it shall be spoken in the book of the Battles of the Lord c. If so then 't is Prophetical and may relate to Joshuah who is said to sight the Battles of the Lord and to the Relations in the books of Joshuah or Judges that were to be after Junius reads the words thus Idcirco dici solet in recensione bellorum Jehovae c. Wherefore it is wont to be said in the rehearsal of the Wars of the Lord c. And so understands it not of any particular book but that amongst the Wars that God disposed for the good of the Israelites there was in those times a famous mention in the
has and in its own Antiquity answering that antiquity we may justly expect to accompany Gods First Revelations the Bible I say upon this account has a singular evidence given in to its Credibility and its antiquity does strongly affirm its Divine Authority Secondly The Antiquity of the Bible does point us to its Divinity because 't is not reasonable to believe that the First Writen account the world had of Religion should be a Cheat that the First eminent Record of Religion should be a Lye and not only a Lye but the Worst of Lies and the most Pernicious and Destructive falshood for so it must needs be to impose a Law upon the world in Gods name without his Authority that ever was published amongst mankind 'T is not in the judgment of right Reason consisting with the Wisdom and Goodness of God to suffer the world to be Originally Cheated in point of Religion to suffer a publick open Counterfeit of his Name and Authority to the highest degree First to possess the world and take the Precedence of all truth to permit the Devil to publish a Systeme of Lies and erect a Monument of Falshood Before there was any written Record of Truth We must needs suppose Gods care of Men and the concern's of his own honour to engage him to the contrary and that God should First establish his own Truth to which mankind might still have a recourse and by which as a Standard all Delusions and False Pretensions might be Tried 'T were as one says well very absurd to think God should permit the Devil to set up a Chappel before he had built a Church If the Bible were originally composed by Impostors and be not a Divine Book 't will then undeniably follow that the most Primitive and Ancient account we have of Religion is connterfeit And that in the Earliest notices we have of God of the worlds Original Mans fall and the way of his Recovery for we have none so early as what the Bible gives us of any of these and of some of them no other the world is Deceived and Abused and that God suffer'd the Devil in the first place and before any thing was publiquely extant from him to contradict it in his name and with pretence of his Authority to abuse and deceive Mankind with a false and delusive account of all those things they are most concern'd to know and upon the right Knowledge of which their present and future happyness does unavoidably depend This very one consideration will prevail much upon every impartial judgment Who can believe the first Religion should be the worst when True Religion must needs be as old as the World And the Earliest notions of God the falsest when we must needs think it reasonable that God should reveal himself to the World from the beginning Or that the first book we sind writ should contain the Highest imposture in point of Religion and more dishonour God and abuse the World then any or all the Books written since 'T is a thing beyond all compass of credit That God should suffer false informations to be given in his own Name of himself and his own Revelations from the first beginning of the World for about 4043 years for about so long a time it was from that first intercourse between God and Man the Scripture gives us Historically an account of till the last Revelation of St. John And that this account should begin with the first book that the world had and be gradually carried on into such a complete Systeme as now we see it is in a Written way by several hands in several Ages for a thousand and six hundred years together for about so long a time it was from Moses his first Writing to St. Johns Closing the Bible Nor is it supposable that the vilest falshood for such is the Bible if it be not from God a Religion whereby if it be false God would be more dishonoured and men more deluded then by any that ever was yet extant should have this to say in its justisication That 't is of all others the most Ancient and has been longest lasting amongst Mankind The consideration therefore of this Book in the Time of its conveyance the Antiquity of it in respect of the matter it contains and the Antiquity of it self as a Book written long before all others and of so early a Date in the World does with great Evidence point us to its Divine Original and very strongly tends to perswade us that God himself was the Author of it Secondly The way and manner of this Books conveyance to us The Method of Gods thus Recording his pleasure has been such that we shall find we have all those reasonable inducements and in some respects more to credit it upon which we receive any Humane Authors and acquiesce in them as true And all such farther Evidence as we can well expect to insure us of the truth of a Book that pretends to come from God and be Divint And this will appear to be so if we consider first the Instruments God imploied in the writing of it and such humane Circumstances as attended their doing it And Secondly The Divine witness God himself has in the most eminent way given to this Book in its conveyance to ascertain us of the truth of it and of the sincerity of those that wrote it First If we consider the Pen-men of this Book those Amanuenses God made use of for the writing of it and such Circumstances as attended their doing it How unlikely a thing is it that they either did or could abuse the world in this matter if we reflect upon these several things First the unblemished Credit and Reputation of these Writers Secondly the several Qualifications and Qualities of them Thirdly their Interests as moral and reasonable men Fourthly their Number and that great distance of Time in which many of them wrote one from another For the first Nothing we know does more credit Ancient Authors then the good Report of those Ages wherein they lived transferred to posterity Not one of those Holy Pen-men God imploied in writing the Bible was that ever we find upon any good grounds tainted in Reputation or convicted of any sort of Impostor in their own or future ages but were men of acknowledged Integrity and Sanctity in those times wherein they lived and very many of them gave the highest Testimony to their integrity in becoming Martyrs in justification of what themselves writ For the Second the various Qualities and Conditions of these Writers seems much to secure us against so vile a design as this book must needs be composed with if it be not from God Some of them were Kings and men of the greatest quality before they writ and not very likely to be guilty of so much baseness and meanness to carry on such a work and also men of deepest Learning and Knowledge Others of them many of the Prophets and most of the
Apostles were men Illiterate and of Parts and Education so mean that they seem no way capable to write so profoundly to lay so deep a Contrivement of mischief or by the single strength of their own abilities to bid so fair to delude the World 'T were strange to Imagine men of such distant qualities and different abilities should all agree in the same Imposture and so Harmonize as we find they do in the promotion of it Thirdly If we consider the Interest of these Writers as they were Reasonable Men for so we must needs suppose them and to act upon the same inducements that Mankind do in all other things No man could reap any advantage by counterfeiting this Book nor could the Composers thereof design any Earthly or Heavenly Good to themselves as a Recompence for such an undertaking not Heavenly for 't were the highest Offence against God and meriting the highest Punishment Nor Earthly and that upon these two Grounds First because the tendency of the Book throughout is to mortifie mens Earthly ambitions and appetites and to propose a happiness of another Nature as mens great Interest and relating to another World and no man of common discretion that designed to greaten himself here would choose to become the Author of such a Doctrine in order to it because every step he advanced that way would visibly betray an Apostacy from his own Principles and render him an open Impostor meriting the scorn and contempt of all Mankind Secondly The most of those that God imploied in that work actually exposed themselves by the doing of it to all the Persecutions Hazards and Contempts imaginable And some of them as amongst the Prophets Isaiah Jeremiah Amos and Ezekiel and all the Apostles according to what our Saviour foretold them as History assures us save only the Apostle John with the loss of their own Lives published their Doctrine 'T is a thing greatly ridiculous to imagine so many men in so many Ages should agree to cheat the World to no other end but their own certain ruine both in this world and the next What end could many of the Prophets have in those unwelcome Messages they brought to those Ages wherein they lived and for which they knew beforehand they should meet with so much ill usage No man can be so sottish to think Jeremiah designed to himself any Interest in this world when he prophecied himself into the Dungeon and at last into his Grave Or that the Apostles designed greatness or happiness here when they knowingly exposed themselves to all the rage that was then upon Earth and endured the shock of all that fury which either Jews or Gentiles or the whole World together could execute upon them He that reads the Story of St. Paul must needs suppose him to act beyond the bounds of all folly and madness and not like a man either capable of instructing or abusing Mankind if he intended any thing in this world as his End The Motives of those Holy Writers in what they did cannot with any Colour of Reason be judged to be other then pure obedience to God love to truth and preferring a Reward hereafter above their own lives and all enjoyments here How highly did they preach up obedience and submission to Magistrates when all the Rulers upon Earth were their most bitter Enemies And that Doctrine could have no other effect but to bring their own Heads to the Block The Authors of the Heathen superstitions were of a very different Genius And as one sayes well of them Cute Authores superstitionis inter Gentes omnes sibi suis semper conciliarunt Dignitatem Nor is there any part of the Bible written by any of them with any the least shew of intention to greaten or advance themselves thereby But on the contrary many of the most eminent of them have themselves Recorded their own great fatlings and imperfections as well secret as open They all appear to be themselves under a subjection to the Doctrine they taught which plainly declares they were inspired from above and no way Masters of it as a Creature of their own Throughout the whole Book there is a visible Antipathy to all self-seeking flattery or compliance God alone is exalted and all mens persons Actions and reputations are openly Postponed to his honour and put in subjection to those Holy and excellent truths there delivered Moses of all the rest seems the gâ—etâ—st gainer in this world because 't was necessary at that time God should raise up a leader to his people yet 't is plain he had no design for himself for he pronounceth a grievous curse and a sore Judgment upon his own Tribe the Tribe of Levi rejects his own posterity leaves them to the condition of common Levites sets up Joshuah to succeed him and places the Kingly superiority over that people in another Tribe from his own the Tribe of Judah and himself while he lived attained to no more but to spend his days with great trouble amongst a murmuring mutinous people in a wearisome Wilderness Fouruthly The Number of those Writers and the great distances of Time may of them lived in from the other does as probably secure us against any Humane contrivement in the composure of this Book as we can reasonably expect The world affords not an instance that ever so many Men that lived in so many several and distinct Ages so exactly agreed about any one thing much less to cheat and abuse the World and carry it on in such a continued written way Never any such thing was done in any kind nor is it supposable upon the grounds of common Reason that ever any such thing should be 'T were strange it should be done in a matter of highest concernment wherein Gods Honour mans welfare are to the utmost engaged that such a number of Impostors should be at several distant times for fifteen or sixteen hundred years together in contriving and composing such a Book as the Bible is to delude and deceive the World and that in all that time there should be no palpable discovery made of them nor they themselves should so trip in the doing it as visibly to shame their own undertaking and betray those corrupt and rotten principles upon which they proceeded As 't is highly improbable that such a number of men living at such distances of time should all agree in the same design and the same way of promoting it and agree they must for 't were absurd to imagine it could happen so to be by chance because most parts of the Bible have been still written with a reference to things future and no man that writ any one part could at that time know that others in future Ages would justifie what he said and take up the design in a right nick of time just where he left it and so still carry it on and yet this must still so come to pass if the Bible were written by any Humane contrivement
sorts of Christians under the Gospel St. Jerom calls it a Book full of Idle dreams The Papists themselves though they have admitted many other Books that we reckon Apochryphal into their Canon yet have still rejected this and Bellarmine himself in his Book de Script Eccles speaks with great contempt of this whole Book And calls the Author of it whoever he were a writer of Romances Secondly There are many very good and sufficient Reasons to induce us to believe the contrary First There is no where in any part of the Bible the least mention not by Esdras himself though he gives us a large and particular account of what he himself did of any such thing And 't is not conceiveable but so eminent a thing as God inspiring one man to write over again so great a part of the Bible which so many had been inspired to write before would have been some where or other Recorded nor is it credible but that so great a Judgment upon the Jews as the total loss of their Law would have been distinctly mentioned when the Holy Ghost is so very particular in giving us an account of all the lossâ—s the Jews underweâ—â— at that time of all the ruines made by the Babylonians at Jerusalem and of all the spoils they carryed into Babylon from thence Secondly 'T is not to be doubted but that there were multitudes of Copies in the hands of the Religious Jews especially the Priests of whom there were many hundreds who had a constant use of it And that the People also dâ—d generally possess themselves of it after that eminent danger it had undergone and the Recovery of â—â—â—n the Eighteenth year of Jâ—siah And 't is not to be supposed that all the Copiâ—s could be destroyed Those that probably were in the hands of Jeremiah Gedalich and many others who stayed behind and accepted their liberty to continue still in Judea and those in the hands of Daniel Ezekiel and those that were carryed away with them in the first Captivity to Babylon long before the City and Temple were burnt and all those which were probably kept by many of those that were carried into Babylon after especially if we consider that we no where find that the Babylonians made it any part of their business in particular to destroy and extirpate their Law And when Antiochus did afterward with all his might indeavour it by Reason of the many Copies that were extant in good mens hands he was no way able to effect it Thirdly It appears the Jews had the Scriptures with them during the time of their Captivity in Babylon both from Daniels Prophecie who Prophesied there and also from other Historical Evidence First From his Prophecie for we find him in the 9 Chapter of his Prophecie quoting several times particularly the Writings of Moses And in the beginning of that Chapter he sayes He understood by Books the number of years whereof the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah the Prophet that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolation of Jerusalem And those Books could be no other but the Prophecie of Jeremiah it self with other parts of the Scripture and the Records of the Kings of Babylon wherein were to be found the times that the Jews were brought thither which Daniel compared together and so found out the End of Jâ—remies seventy years and of the Captivity the difficulty in the doing of which arose from hence that there had been four distinct Captivities and four several Kings of Judah carryed into Babylon at four several times first Manasses then Jehojakim and with him amongst others Daniel himself Thirdly Jeconias and with him Ezekiel and Mordecai and lastly Zedekias when the City and Temple were destroyed And 't was not a thing very easie to know from which of these Captivities to reckon the seventy â—aâ—s Ezekiel seems to begin it eleven years before the City was destroyed when Jeâ—â—onias was carryed away thither for he sayes In the five and twentieth year of our being in Captivity in the bâ—ginning of the year in the tenth day of the month in the fourteenth year after that the City was smitten And the Prophet Jeremie in comforting those that were carryed away with Jecenias used these words Thus saith the Lord after seventy years be accomplished in Babel I will visit you and cause you to return to this place by which he seems to begin the seventy years from thence but in other places is very express that the seventy years were to be accounted from the destruction of the City and Temple And so it appears the Captivity mentioned by Ezekiel was not that by which the seventy â—ears were to be reckoned Nor was the Prophecie uttered by Jeremie to comfort those that were captivated with Jeconias to commence when uttered nor till the destruction of the City and the last Captivity of Zedekiah All which Daniel considered and by comparing these Prophecies together found the exact time from whence the seventy years were to be accounted Secondly From Historical Evidence for Josephus sayes the Reason why Cyrus set on foot the rebuilding of the Temple and restoring of the Jews to their Countrey was his reading the Prophecie of Isaiah which was written â—10 years before his time wherein the Prophet foretells in Gods name that Cyrus should be raised up for that very purpose upon reading of which during the Captivity he save Cyrus was ravished with admiration of God and surprized with an ardent zeal to bring about what was so long before written And t is highly probâ—ble that God made use of the sight of that Prophecie to engage Cyrus to what he did for otherwise 't was a thing in it self most absurdly impolitick and against all ordinary Rules of discretion to restore such a people and rebuild such a place that had been so famous and so terrible to all the Nations round about Especially when as Josephus sayes there went out of Babilon at their return of those two Tribes of Judah and Benjamin there captivated Four Milions six hundred twenty and eight thousand Persons that were above twelve years old besids four thousand and seventy Levites and of their Wives and Children together forty thousand seven hundred forty and two besides also some hundreds of the Tribe of Levi that were Porters Singers and other sacred Servitors Fourthly 'T is not Imaginable that Zerubbabel Joshuah Haggai and so many others of them would have so laboured as they did to return out of Babylon toâ—e-build their Temple and restore their Ancient Worship if the Law of God the great Rule and Foundatioâ— of it had been wholly lâ—st and extinguished Nay it appears evidently in the Book of â—zra that those Jews that firstâ—etâ—â—â—ed into Judaea before Esdras came out of Babylon brought the Law out of Babylon with them for in the sixth of Esdras 't is there said They set the Prâ—ests in their divisions and the Levites in their coâ—ses and setled the Worship oâ—the Temple
according to the Law of Moses which we cannot conceive after seventy years they could so exactly have done or would ever have attempted to have done it had not they had the Law with them while Esdras himself was yâ—tâ—n Babylon and when Esdras did come to Jerusalem we find in the 8th of Nehemiah the people were so far from wanting the Law or staying for any such Restoration or Re-penning of it by him as is pretended that they desired him only to read the Law openly to them which he immediately did as a thing they were then possessed of and which was notorious amongst them Fifthly 'T is no way probable that Esdras should so Re-pen the Bible because we find his own writings full of Caldee words as also the Prophecie of Daniel but all that part of the Bible written before the Captivity is in pure Hebrew and 't is no way conceiveable but that if he had Re-penn'd the whole he would have written it in the same way he wrote his own Books and according to the Idiome that was then in use amongst the Jews either wholly in Caldee or else with some mixture of Caldee and Hebrew together The whole of this Story does evidently appear to be a Romantick fable taken out of a Book sâ—ust with many vain and ridiculous follies and is contradicted by another Apecryphal Book of much better credit 〈◊〉 wee 'l depend upon such Evidence for in the second Book of the Maccabees we are there told that the Tabernacle and the Ark in the sides of which the Law we know was placed were sâ—cured by the Prophet Jeremie and hid in a Cave at Mount Nebo when Jerusalem and the Temple were burnt And if any such thing were though the Law be not particularly mentioned yet being always kept in the Ark â—â—s not to be doubted but Jeremie preserved it with the Ark and had an especial reference to the securing of it in what he then did This we affirm as a truth to which both Jews and Christians have assented that at the return of the people out of Babylon the care of Esdras about the Bible and that great Synagogue that was then according to Moses his first institution assembled in which were present Haggai Zacharie Malachy Nehemias and Zerubbabel was very eminent and great and to this day we derive singular advantages from it For first with great diligence they made an exact seperation between such Writings as were of Divine Inspiration dictated by the Holy Ghost and were to be a standing Rule to the Church in all Ages and all other Writings whatsoever whether written by true Prophets or false for even true Prophets and such as were most eminent might and without doubt many of them did write diverse things without any immediate assistance or direction from God and consequently which were nor of Divine Authority they collected all the sacred parts of the Old Testament together which during the Captivity lay dispersed in private hands no publick use being made of them Incorporated the whole into one intire Volumn an admirable work in the order we now have it which before was not possible to be for several Psalms several of the Prophecies and some other Books were written after the coming of the people into Babylon and it does no where appear that those parts written before were conjoyned in one intire Volumn more of them then the five Books of Moses the Original Copy whereof Moses himself delivered in a publick assembly to the Levites to be layed up in the sides of the Ark the peculiar Archive God had by his special command appointed for it the whole of the Old Testament so united they ranked under three Classes and divided into three parts which division was continued amongst the Jews till the times of our Saviour who in the 24th of St. Luke refers to it when he sayes All things ought to be fulfilled which are written in the Law of Moses the Prophets and the Psalms Secondly Their care in securing the Original Text of the Scripture was eminently great and most highly is it to be applauded in adding points to the Hebrew Letters to preserve the Knowledge of the Tongue and facilitate the reading and Learning of it dividing the sacred Writings into Verses with many other things of that kind most probably first begun by them of which the Jewish Writers give us a large account The whole of their indeavours this way and of those amongst the Jews that succeeded them therein was called the Massora which God wonderfully blessed to preserve the purity of the Hebrew Text and to deliver the Old Testament safely and intirely over to us What a useful and most laborious enterprize this Massora was we may know by the description Buxtorffe gives of it in the second Chapter of his most excellent Commentarius Massorethicus Massora sayes he est Doctrina critica a priscis Hebraeorum sapientibus circa Textum Hebraeum Sacrae Scripturae ingeniosâ— inventa quâ— Versas Voces Literae ejus nâ—meratae omnisque ipsarum variet as notata suis locis cum singulorum versuum recitatione indicata est ut sic constans genuina ejus lectio conservetur ab omni mutatione aut corruptio e aeternum preservetur valide premuniatur The Massora is a critical Learning about the Hebrew Text of the Sacred Scripture ingeniosly invented by the Ancient wise men amongst the Jews in which the Verses words and Letters are all numbred and all their variations particularly noted and set down in their proper places with a recital of the particular Verses that so the constant and genuine reading of the Scripture may be preserved and for ever secured against all change or corruption And that Ezra and this great Synagogue were most probably the first Authors and Contrivers of the Massâ—ra however augmented by others in after Ages and not some learned Jews at Tiberias that long lived after ouâ— Saviour as some have supposed Buxtorffe in the Eleventh Chap. of the samebook hath largely and learnedly proved from the best and most Ancient Writers amongst the Jews and thus concludes upon the whole Haec communis est Hebraeorum sententia Massoram a viris Synagogae magnae prosectam esse This is the common opinion amongst the Jews that the Massora came from the men of the great Synagogue Thirdly That Ezra and that great Synagogue to render the sacred Text more intelligible and make the truth of some Historical Relations more evident did make some small additions and some verbal alterations in some places is greatly probable and it might easily be done but no Re-penning the Bible nor the least violation offered to the sacred Record nor to the credit of its Authority nor can the least Objection though many have indeavoured it be raised from hence to that purpose when so many Persons of an infallible Spirit were present in that Assembly and who were without doubt Divinely directed about what they did in that matter In
a Word that famous and venerable Senate in which the last of the Prophets were present all parts of the Old Testament being compleated and the whole Prophecy that God vouchsafed till the coming of the Messiah delivered applied themselves to the punctual Collection of the several parts together and securing the Original text against any corruption or alteration exactly setled the Canon of the Old Testament which the Jews kept punctually to till the times of our Saviour who fully approved the Scriptures as he then found the Jews in possession of them Secondly That any parts of the Bible or any Books dictated by the Holy Ghost are wholly Lost we utterly deny The affirmation of it is neither consisting with the notion of Divine providence in General nor can any particular proof be brought to make it good Those who insist upon this as Bellarmine and some of the Papists do thereby to gain an advantage to the Church when 't is put in ballance with the Bible And others with design by proving the Loss of any Part to invalidate the Authority of the Whole instance in the three thousand parables or proverbs of Solomon and a thousand and five songs spoken of 1 King 4.32 The Books of Nathan the Prophet and Gad the Seer mentioned in the second of Chronicles The Prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite and the visions of Iddo or Addo the Seer spoken of in the 2 Chron. 9. and some others And under the New Testament an Epistle of St. Paul written as they suppose to the Laodicaeans mentioned Colos 4.16 Although very many of these Writings mentioned in the Old Testament seem to refer to other parts of Scripture contained in the Bible In particular 't is probable that Nathan and Gad wrote some parts of the Books of Samâ—â— and the Kings so much at least as concern's the Actions of David of which they were exactly knowing if they wrote not the whole Second Book of Samuel and the first of the Kings which some upon probable grounds supposes yet Admit all these were other writings then are now contained in any part of the Bible it will no way follow they were ever any part of Canonical Scripture When the Scripture mention's Books written by these or any other Men and relates historically to the matter oâ— them as St Paul sometimes quoted Heathâ— Authors Will that Infer They are parts of the Bible By no means Nay the very Writers of the Bible themselves such as David Solâ—mon and others of the Prophets might and without all doubt some of them did Write many things in an ordinary way that were True without any Divine or Infallible direction and which were never incorporated with the Bible and so says St. Austin in his 18th Book De civ Dei says be Those Prophet whom it pleased the Holy Spirit to inspire wrote some things as Men And those works we have 〈◊〉 in our Canon nor had the Jews in theirs and other things as from the mouth of God and these works are really Distinct Some being held their own as Men and some the Lords as speaking by them And therefore He that will prove from hence that any parts of the Bible are Lost must first be well assured that These are no parts of the Scriptures we are now possessed of and Secondly that admitting they are not That they were written by an Infallible Spirit and ence within the Canon Of which Latter we are well assâ—red the least proof cannot be made For the Jews were most faithful Preservers of those Oracles of God committed unto their change Nor were they ever so much as once blamed by Christ or the Apostles for any Miscarriage that way As for an Epistle supposed to be written by St. Paul under the New Testament to the Laodicaeons which is since Lost The supposition is frivolous and groundless For the words in the Greck are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And that from Laodicaea Which cannot be understood of an Epistle written by St. Paul to Laodicae but of one written from Laodicaea either to the Colossians themselves which they then had by them or else to St. Paul which he sent them and required them to read it as containing something expedient for them to know The mistaken opinion from this place of an Epistle from St. Paul to the Laodicâ—ans hath most probably arisen from the ill rendition in the Vulgar Latin where the words are rendered illa quae est Laodicentium But without any ground from the Original Catherinus confesseth that according to the opinion of Chrisostome and Oecumenius Non hic nominari Epistolam a Paulo scriptam ad Laodicenses sed ex co loco scriptam That here 's no mention of any Epistle written by St. Paul to the Laodicaeans but of some Epistle written from Laodicaea That there was anciently a Counterfeit Epistle that pretended to be written by St. Paul to the Laodicaeans which is since lost is most true But in those times wherein 't was extant it was universally Rejected as Spurious and known so to be St. Jerome speaks of it but says Abomnibus exploditur The second Councel of Nice in their sixth Canon say thus of it Inter Epistolas Pauli Apostoli quaedam fertur ad Laodicenses quam Patres nostri tanquam Alienam reprobaverunt Tertullian against Marcion and Theophilact both reject it with great contempt and say 't is Apostolico nomine planâ— indigna And Bellarmine himself though he had formerly affirmed there was such an Epistle which was certainly Lost Yet in the first Chapter of his Book which he calls his Recognition or After-view of his works Retracts it says he was mistaken and that there never was any such thing as such an Epistle written by St. Paul So that all the Insinuations of this kind that any parts of the Bible any Books written by a Divine inspiration have been at any time Lost out of the world appear to be very weakly and ill Grounded And in truth the foot steps of Divine providence have been eminently visible in Securing those Holy writings upon this threefold account From Destruction Addition and Alteration First No accidents of Time nor Designs of its worst Enemies have Totally obliterated the Whole or any Part. Secondly Though many have attempted to piece in and add to it false and counterfeit Fragments and some whole Gospels yet in defiance to all those Essays the Scriptures have remained intire and stood like a Rock Impenetrable No Spurious Writings have been able to incorporate with this holy Book Such who have gone about to forge Scripture have but made the Lustre of the Bible more Eminent and more evidently shewed us the difference of Gods reâ—ealing from Heaven and Mens counterfeiting upon Earth Mens writing by the strength of humane abilities and mens writing as they were moved thereunto by the Holy Ghost Thirdly From Alteration No man has been suffer'd notwithstanding all the attempts of Hereticks to that purpose to pollute or corrupt it All
Truths are visibly concenter'd in it Here is indeed a perfect Rendesvouz of all such Truths as were any where scattered and the World imperfectly has had and all such as they were in need to have All such natural Truths both of a Moral and Divine Nature as the Reason of the World does acknowledge and a full discovery of all such supernatural Truths as the minds of men naturally pursue and are inquisitive after Whatever is written in mans heart or upon the Works that God has made is here after an excellent manner Transscribed Justified and Improved And many defects of natural Knowledge supernaturally supplyed by a most suitable Revelation So that if we'lâ— judge of this Book either by what we certainly do know or by what we need and desire to know and expect should be revealed to us concerning God our selves and this whole World We shall find great reason to derive this Book from Above and subscribe to it as Divine For the First Never any Book contained such a System of natural Truth since the World began nor ever so far interpreted to us what truly is so And of this every mans own Reason becomes a proper and competent Judge Secondly Never any Book has told us so much nor gone so far to fix the restless minds of men about all such supernatural things as they are most inquisitive after 'T is here we have a certain account of God's Nature and the manner of his Existence how and when he created the World With what Designs and to what Ends he disposes and governs it Whence all our disorder first came How 't is to be cured Sin removed and Man reconciled to God! 'T is here we are certainly assured of the Resurrection of our Bodies the Immortality of our Souls and the condition of our future being for ever 'T is here we know all we can know and all we need to know both of this World and the next From no other but God himself could such a Beam of Light have broke forth so to enlighten the World Nor will it seem any way tolerable to an unprejudiced Judgment to father such a Book upon the highest principle of Falshood and derive it from the worst design that ever the World was defiled with Secondly I shall endeavour to shew that this Book so far as it relates to matters of Fact wherein an Etxernal justification is necessary is so far witnessed unto that there can be no room left for any reasonable doubt to be made about it First That there was such a man as Moses and such a People as the Jews in Egypt in those times which the Scripture mentions That Moses was their Leader and that he led them out of Egypt wrote their Story and gave Laws to them we have attested to us by the most Ancient Records of the Egyptians the Phenicians the Caldeans and the Grecians By Sanchomathon the famous Phenician Antiquary Berosus a Caldean Ptolomeus and Manetho Writers of the Egyptian-Chronicles The latter of whom Manetho speaks very particularly both of the Jews coming into Egypt and their departure thence And amongst the Grecian Writers by Artapanus Polemo Eupolemus Diodorus Siculus with many others as is at large proved by Josephus in his first Book against Appoin And one of these Artapanus is so large in his Relation of the Story of Moses that he sets down much of the business of his whole life and many of his Miracles his contesting with the Magicians before the King of Egypt his carrying the Jewâ— thorow the Red Sea and the drowning of the Egyptians who pursued them his dwelling with the Jews after in the Wilderness Who were there says he fed with a certain Snow that God rained from Heaven And at last describes particularly the very Person of Moses and sets down his Stature his Countenance and his Complexion Many of the same things are Recorded by Eupolemus Demetrius and others Numemus a Pythogorean-Philosopher whom we find quoted in Origens's fourth Book against Celsus tells us he had read the Life of Moses in many good Histories And relates many particulars of him as his being taken out of the Water his being bred up in the Court that he wrought many Miracles and that certain Magicians called Jannes and Jambres attempted to do the like No one Story amongst the Heathen of any Nation has been so witnessed unto by Writers Forraign to that Nation as the History of the Jews has been who from their greatest enemies have received a sufficient Testimony in point of Fact to the truth of Moses and what he wrote And indeed considering how great and eminent a Common-wealth was at first first established by the Writings of Moses and what a notorious and visible conâ—mâ—â—nce and succession there was of it ' Tiâ— Morally impossible that the business of Moses and his Writing in those times in matter of Fact should be fictitious and false Of so much of the History written by Moses as relates to things transacted before the Flood we cannot expect to find any exact and punctual account in a Traditional way Because of the great disadvantage of Oral Tradition especially by the confusion of Babel And yet 't is very evident that some considerable Remainders of the Ancient Story of the first World about the Creation the long lives of men in those first times and divers other things were preserved amongst the several Nations after the dispersion at Babel And we find many things relating thereto in Hermes Orpheus Homer Hesiond and the most Primitive Writers Of which Vossius Bochartus and many others have given a very satisfying account Concerning the Flood that there was such a Deluge nothing has been more universally credited And because the Tradition of it was That it befel in the prime time of the World and men were generally ignorant of the right account of times Therefore they applyed it still to that time they thought most ancient So the Thebans to the times of Ogyges and the Thessalians to the time of Deucalion which Floods of Ogyges and Deucalion were not two other distinct Floods as some have supposed but the same Flood of Noah applyed to those times and called by those Names which they thought of greatest Antiquity One sayes well What Nation has not believed it Even amongst the remotest Indians we find the Tradition of it has remained And what Author has not spoken of it Amongst the Egyptians Phenicians Grecians and Romans nothing more common And well may we suppose it should be so For Those who attempted the rearing of that Structure at Babel had probably a particular respect in what they did to the Flood that was past resolving to prevent the danger of another which sprang from their own Infidelity For God by his Promise to Noah had secured them against all fears of that kind and therefore had sufficient occasion wheresoever they came to preserve and continue the memory of it Berosus one of the most antient Writers after
Moses I mean the true antient Berosus and not the latter Counterfeit of him sets down the Story of it in the very same way that Moses does Begins his History Ante Aquarum cladem Famosam quâ universus perut orbis And sayes There was only eight Persons saved Cyril in his first Book against Julian shews that Alexander Polybistor and Abidene under the feigned names of Saturn and Xyfuthrus have writ for the most part the same Story that Moses has done of the Flood and of the Ark and the Place of its Resting And in very many other antient Authors have we particular Narratives of it And 't is evident that many Poetical Fictions and Fabulous Stories that we find amongst the Antient Heathen-Writers had their derivations from thence So that to doubt about the Fact of what Moses has written in this particular were extreamly unreasonable For 't were to deny what is eminently witnessed unto by several Historians of several Countreys and to withstand the Stream of an Universal Tradition The Story of Building the Babylontan Tower is particularly set down by the same Alexander Polyhistor and Abidene as we find them quoted at large by Eusebius They tell us That Men would needs in despite of the Godds build up a Tower to the Sun in the place where Babylon now is And when they had built it very high the Godds overthrew it And that at that time began the diversity of Languages And 't is obvious to the commonest understanding That all that Fiction of the Poets about the Gyants warring against Heaven is but a corruption of this Story The Burning of Sodom is mentioned by many of the best credited Authors by Diodorus Saculus Strabo Tacitus Pliny and Solinus And 't were easie to produce the like Testimonies to the most eminent Passages that Moses has set down That the People of Israel conquered the Land of Canaan dispossest the Inhabitants and setled themselves in Palestine is a thing so notorious from the Effects that 't is capable of no denyal And we have a large account of many particulars of it in Procopius Eupolemus and other Authors who wrote of Joshua Samuel Saul David in whom according to the Prediction of Moses the Government of that People came into the Tribe of Judah and others mentioned in the Sacred Story That there was such a King as Solomon that built a Temple at Jerusalem Josephus in his first Book against Appion proves from the antient Chronicles of the Tyrians which sayes he they have kept with great diligence And therein mention is made of Solomons League with the King of Tyre and of his building the Temple at Jerusalem and the exact time of it A hundred forty three years and eight months before the building of Carthage The same account we have in Eupolemus Alexander Polyhistor Haecateus Dius a Phenician and many others who have written so largely about that Temple that as some have observed There was not a Vessel nor any Tool or Instrument in it which they have not particularly mentioned which exactness we find not in any Heathen Story in the Descriptions of any Temples of their own The Captivity of the Jews in Babylon Cyrus his obtaining the Persian Empire and his Conquest of Babylon is all punctually set down by prophane Writers Alexander Polyhistor writes an exact Story of Jeremiah's Prophesie and of the Captivity And Diocles and Berosus both give an account of the Jews deliverance by Cyrus and that they were Captives in Babylon 70 years And Alexander Polyhistor and Haecateus both write of Cyrus his re-building the Temple of Jerusalem Daniels Predictions about the four Monarchies and other things have been visibly fulfilled beyond all denyal Porphiry so raged heretofore at that Prophetical Instance of the Truth of the Bible that he seeks by all means to evade it spends his whole twelfth Book which he wrote against the Christians to that purpose and finds no other way at last to do it but by an absurd pretence That those Prophesies about the four Monarchies were written long after Daniels death by some other in the times of Antiochas Which is sufficiently confuted Not only by the credible relation we have in History that Daniels Prophesie was shewed by Iaddus the High-Priest of the Jews to Alexander who lived many years before Antiochus when he was marching toward Jerusalem with an intention to destroy it who finding himself so particularly in that Prophesie prophesied of spared the City thereupon But because the 70 Interpreteâ—â— who tranâ—tated the Old Testament for Ptolomy about a hundred years before Antiochus tranâ—â—â—ated the Book of Daniel which was then extant and part of the Bible After the Captivity t is clear from all Story that the Jews that returned out of Babylon continued under a National establishment though not under a succession of Kingly Government from the Posterity of David for God had declared by Jeremiah that none of the Seed of Jeconaih should any more sit upon the Throne of David had Sovereign Jurisdiction among them which the ten Tribes had wholly lost and long before were totally deprived of Nay were still govern'd by some of themselves till the Romans imposed Herod and Idumaean upon them in whose time our Saviour was born So that the Scepter did not depart from Judah nor a Law-giver from between his feet till Shiloe came For the Matters of Fact relating to the New Testament 'T is not possible for any reasonable Man to dis-believe there was such a Man in Fact as our Saviour and such Men as the Apostles that lived in those times that erected the Christian Religion because of the succession of it in multitudes of Professors ever since and the written Account we have of it Not only from Christians themselves but from Jews and Heathens in those times Tacitus and Suetonius both make mention of Christ Tacitus in the 15th Book of his Annals speaking of Nero's cruelty to the Christians sayes The Author of them was one Christ who in the Reign of Tiberius was punished with death by Pontius Pilate Procurator of Judea Josephus speaks of him Pliny Suetonius and others write of the Christians extant in those times of their Principles their manner of Living and of their Sufferings Suetonius sayes in the Life of Nero Christianos genus hominum maleficae superstitionis suppliciis affixit That he pumshed the Christians a sort of men of a magical superstition Many Historical Passages in the Gospels are attested to us by Heathen and Jewish-Writters though 't is most certain the Roman Historians of that Age knew not much of the Affairs of Palestine as appears by what they have writ concerning the Jews especially Tacitus who appears very grosly ignorant both about them and their Religion The Star that appeared at our Saviours Birth is mentioned by Pliny lib. 2. chap. 5. And by the Philosopher Chalcidius largely in his Comment upon Platoes Timaeas Herodi killing the Children in Bethlehem by Macrobius The Eclipse of
Of the first peopling of America from whence it was first peopled or at what time little account can be expected nor can any Objection be reasonably made from thence in this Matter because of the perfect silence in all Antient Story of any such place and because of our total ignorance of it till of late but there is ground sufficient to believe that 't is of a much later Plantation than the other three parts of the World For there are not Records found amongst the People of that Countrey that exceed a thousand years and as most tell us from thence Not above eight hundred The exact and punctual account of this whole Matter we have from Josephus and Eusebâ—us heretofore and from many learned men since But especially from the most excellent Bochart who has herein far exceeded them all and whose most successful endeavours this way have not onely most evidently cleared the Truth of Sacred History in this particular but indeed the Whole of what Moses has wrote is very greatly justified thereby Secondly Those Prophetical Predictions of our Saviour in the New Testament concerning the miseries of the Jews their being led Captive into all Nations the Besieging of Jerusalem and such a Ruine of the Temple as that one stone should not be left upon another with many other Prophesies relating to that business have had such an eminent and notorious fulfilling in the times of Vespatian Trajan Adrian and since as greatly justifies the whole of the Gospel and much assures us of the truth of all that our Saviour has spoken What we find in Tacitus Hegysippus and other Heathen Writers but especially the Story of Josephus their own Historian has written of that which happened to the Jeus their City and Temple about forty years after the sufferings of Christ is so exactly corresponding to what he himself foretold and is set down in the 24th of St. Matthew that no instance can be given that any future events were ever so plainly and fully foretold and so punctually fulfilled in any Age Nor can any impartial man consider that strange Agreement there is in every Particular between what then happened and what our Saviour foretold so many years before without being greatly affected with it And how fully competent Josephus was to write that Story may be judged by what he himself sayes in his first Book against Appion I my self sayes he have composed a most true Story of those Wars and of every particular thing there done As well I might having been present in all those Affairs For I was Captain of the Galilaeanâ— amongst our Nation so long as any resistance could be made against the Romans And then it fell out that I was taken by the Romans And being Prisoner unto Titus and Vespatian they caused me to be an eye-witness of all things that pass't First In Bonds and Fetters And afterwards freed from them I was brought from Alexandria with Titus when he went to the Siege of Jerusalem So that nothing could then pass whereof I had not notice For beholding the Roman Army I committed all things to writing with all possible diligence My self did onely manage all Matters disclosed unto the Romans by such as yeelded themselves for that I only did perfectly understand them Lastly Being at Rome and having now leasure all businesses being past I used the help of some for the Greek Tongue And so I published a History of all that had happened in the aforesaid War Which History of mine is so true that I fear not to call Vespatian and Titus Emperors in those Wars to witness for them I first gave a Copy of that Book to them after to many noble Romans present in those Wars I sold also many of them to our own Nation to such as understood the Greek Language Amongst whom were Julius Archelaus Herod the Honest and the most worthy King Agrippa who do all testifie that my History containeth nothing but truth who would not have been silent if any thing either out of Ignorance or Flattery I had changed or omitted in any particular The City of Jerusalem and the Temple being about forty years after our Saviours time by Vespation and Titus totally ruined and demolished The Jews after that three times indeavoured to rebuild their Temple The first time was under the Emperor Adrian in the year after Christ 136. Which attempt had no other effect but the slaughter of fifty thousand of them with many other sad Desolations which we find set down at large by that noble Historian Dion Cassius Their second attempt was under Constantine which he soon quashed but not without great Expressions of his Displeasure against them cutting off their Ears and branding their Bodies and making most of them Slaves and Vagabonds Their last attempt to rebuild it was in the dayes of Julian when they were so far from being any way hindered that they were highly encouraged by Julian himself with Money and all Materials on purpose as Sozomon tells us to vilify the Christian Religion and confront our Saviours Prediction The Story of it we have from one that we are sure could have no design to befriend the Christians Ammianus Marcellinus a Heathen-Historian and a Souldier at that time in Julians Army He tells us with what immoderate Expences and indefatigable Industry the Jews by the help of Julian set about it intending to make it more famous than ever And that to expedite the Work Julian appointed one Alyppius a Person of great quality in his Army to oversee it and assist in it And at last concludes his whole Relation with these words Cum itaque rei idem fortiter instaret Alyppius juvaretque Provinciae Rector Metuendi globi flammarum prope fundamenta crebis assultibus erumpentes fecere locum exustis aliquoties operantibus inaccessum hocque modo elemento destinatius repellente cessavit incaeptum Am. Marcel lib. 23. When therefore this Alyppius set eagerly on the work being assisted by the Governour of that Province dreadful Balls of Fire bursting forth with often assaults near the Foundation made the place the Workmen being several times devoured with the flames inaccessible And after this manner the Element resisting as with some kind of destiny the design was given over This was that final stroke from Heaven that put a period to all endeavours of rebuilding that place and to all future attempts of restoring again the Jewish Church-state and Polity And how great an Evidence is it to the truth of the Gospel and the Whole of what our Saviour has spoken to sind all these Predictions against his great Opposers and Crucifiers so strangely and so exactly and in so visible and notorious a manner fulfilled And in truth that general prophetick Spirit we find throughout the Bible those manifold plain and direct Predictions 't is every where fill'd with of things future and to come tells us much of its Divinity and greatly assures us It could not be an effect
the greatest ruine to mankind deluding them with false informations about their chiefest concerns should be able to produce in their justification the most eminent Miracles and all the greatst Evidences that rationally can be expected to ascertain the World in the publication of the highest supernatural Truths In a word who can beleive a Book so circumstanced as we find the Bible to be should be composed by the worst Instruments and with the worst of designs No such thing can ever be credited while we suppose there is a God ruling above and men live in the exercise of Reason below 'T were most absurd to suppose that any Book falsely pretending to Gods Name and Authority designing his dishonour and mans destruction should be capable of such a proof as has been brought in defence of the Bible And yet so must the Tables be turn'd the whole proof must so be inverted of all that hath been said a contrary application must of necessity be made if this Book comes not from God and be not in truth what it self openly claims to be The Divine Authority of this Book we call the Bible being thus upon the forementioned grounds established I come in the last place to a Consideration of such Doubts and Objections as are usually made about it All the Material Difficulties that can be proposed will be reduceable to these four Questions I. First How could men come to be assured in those times wherein the several parts of the Bible were first writen that they were written by an Infallible Spirit and upon sure grounds distinguish them from all other Writings II. Secondly How come we certainly to know the true Compass and Extent of Holy Writ How can we know that we have now contained in our Bibles all that was writen by a Divine Inspiration and intended as a standing Rule to the Church and no more That is How can we be now safely assured about the Canon of the Scripture And be able upon good grounds to say What is Canonical and what is Not III. Thirdly How can we that have not the Originals of the Scripture not the Autographa's of those that wrote it but onely the Copies of them and most but the Translations of those Copies rest assured we have God's Mind as it was first delivered IV. Fourthly How can we believe this Book say some to be from God when we find contained in it divers Contradictions several strange and incredible Stories and other things greatly lyable to exception In answering the first Question This ought to be previously considered That there were Advantages peculiar to the belief of those who first received the Bible or any parts of it and lived in those Times wherein it was first delivered that we have not And we have likewise some Advantages and those very considerable to our belief which they had not They conversed with the Pen-Men themselves the Names of many of whom are to us wholly unknown the Holy Ghost not judging it necessary to record them foreseeing the Scriptures would descend to us upon other sufficient Evidence They were able to judge of their personal Integrity and the account they gave of their Divine Commission were Eye-witnesses of the Miracles saw the Original Writings And in the Apostles times many knew some of their Hands These we have not but we see the progress and success of this Book which they saw not We see this Book translated into all Languages whole Nations converted by it The Gospel spread all the World over and the fulfilling of many Predictions since which they could not then be Witnesses of With many other great Effects of it We see the Whole conjoyn'd and the excellent Harmony of it and the relation each part has to compleat the Design of the Whole Are in divers respects upon different terms of judging now upon the Whole from what men were in judging at first upon any particular parts But to come to a direct Answer to this Question There could be but two wayes to ascertain men in their reception of any part of the Bible when it first became publick First By some outward visible Justification of the Persons imployed in that Service to assure us that they were sent and commissionated from God Or secondly From the Matter and the Nature of such Writings themselves And herein a due consideration of those Times and Seasons in which the several parts of the Bible were written and the then present state of things and the order of writing it will much inform us Moses who layed the first and great Foundation of the whole Fabrick in the five Books that he wrote He had a justification Personal beyond all question His Commission and Authority to do what he did was sufficiently evident to all that conversed with him There was all that could be expected to assure those that then lived that God had imployed him For God admitted him openly to a personal converse with himself We read in the nineteenth of Exodus that the Lord said unto Moses Loe I come to thee in a thick Cloud that the People may bear when I speak with thee and believe thee for ever c. He impowered him upon many occasions to work the greatest Miracles that since the World had a being had ever been wrought and openly to shame and out-doe all his Opposers and all Pretenders that way And whensoever there was a doubt made about this Divine Authority or any contest with him upon that account as in the case of Korah and at other times God plainly and openly from Heaven in the sight of all the People decided the Matter to assure them and all Generations to come that Moses was no Impostor but acted by a Divine Commission in what he then did And indeed It being the first time that God revealed himself to the World in a written way and published those Laws which were to be a Standard to all that succeeded and the great Corner-stone of all that Revelation that he would at any time after make to Man-kind 't was but necessary it should be fixed and established upon certain and unquestionable grounds So that such who lived in Moses his time could have no good reason at all to doubt in the least of his sincerity for all was done that could be done to put that matter out of question And God visibly shewed himself as we find in the four and twentieth of Exodus and his own glory amongst them For 't is said They saw the Lord God of Israel and there was under his feet as it were a paved work of a Saphire-stone and as it were the Body of Heaven in its clearness Nor could there be any doubt raised Whether the Laws and Precepts of Moses were rightly recorded and as he intended they should For before his Death he himself by God's special command in a publick Assembly delivered over his Five Books to the Levites to be layed up in the sides of the Ark. After Moses his time
till our Saviours coming and the writing of the New Testament when there was again a Flood-gate of Divine Power let open in Mighty and Miraculous Operations all the parts of the Old Testament that were at any time written and they were not all Written till the time of Ezra after whom and the erection of the second Temple God made no further Addition all the other parts I say of the Old Testament were principally to be judged of by what Moses at first established Working of Miracles after his time was not to be the great and onely Rule of Prophesie and Revelation God had declared and commanded the contrary Nor indeed has the Holy Ghost thought fit to record to us whatever might be done in that kind that any one Pen-Man of the Old Testament wrought any Miracles after Moses his time 'T is a truth that there was among the Jews a Succession of the Office of Prophets after Moses and certain Schools of them which first began and were continued in the Cities of the Levites who dwelt dispersed amongst all the other Tribes And of many that were probably trayn'd up in those Schools we read in Scripture as of God and Nathan and other Seers and Prophets That some of them wrote no part of the Bible nor that we read of were any way extraordinarily imploy'd but most likely were so stiled because they had their education there were bred up and devoted to that Office and Employment That God did often make use of those that were of that Prophetical Society in extraordinary Matters I doubt not But in dictating the Bible God was pleased arbitrarily to chuse out what Instruments of conveyance he pleased and confin'd not himself to any one sort of Men nor to any Prophetical Office to give us any assurance from thence in this case For he sometimes chose men out of the Court as he did Isaiah the Kings Nephew And sometimes from the Herd as he did Amoz the Shepherd who sayes himself He was neither a Prophet nor the Son of a Prophet And God in an extraordinary way by the Word and the Prophesie that he gave such to utter created them Prophets And the greatest evidence of such mens Prophetical Authority arose if no Miracles were wrought by them from the Word they uttered And if any were of which we cannot be certain the Holy Ghost being silent about it from a conjunction of both A Miracle wrought in confirmation of any Doctrine correspending to what God by Moses had at first established was the greatest assurance that the Judaical Church after Moses was capable of No false Prophet in those dayes ever arrived so far That is They never had the concurrence of a Personal and a Doctrinal Justification together If any such wrought a Miracle to gain them a personal credit yet their Doctrine was still faulty And being to lead men from God and to subvert those Laws of his by Moses so solemnly setled That was an intimation sufficient from God's own direction to discover and shame them But supposing the several Pen-Men of the Old Testament after Moses wrought no Miracles at all and that God made most of them Prophets by that very Employment which 't is certain he did and that they were not previously in any such Office so that nothing of that kind could give men any assurance Yet by these three wayes men might be then much secured in that case in the first Edition of every distinct part of the Old Testament First From the known personal Sanctity and Integrity of the Writers themselves God never made use of any ill men or such as could come under any reasonable suspition of Imposture to write any part of the Bible nor of any but such whom men in that Age wherein they lived had very good reason to credit This being a certain and revealed Truth that in writing all the parts of the Bible 't was Holy Men still that Spoke and Wrote Now there could not be a more superlative imposture and wickedness than to ascend the Throne of God to speak in his Name and pretend his Authority without his Order No Man not wholly forsaken of all fear of God and respect to men could be supposed to make such an attempt Nor could any Man of known Piety and Honesty be reasonably suspected of it Secondly and chiefly From the conformity of what was then writen to the Laws and Precepts of Moses setled upon such unquestionable evidence for whatever was superstructed upon that Foundation came under the same Justification So that if any Writings were published in God's Name that appeared to be as all the other parts of the Old Testament did but a further discovery and promise of the Messiah a renewal of those Threatnings and Promises in Moses to that People and a further promotion of those Holy Laws and that Religion and Worship by him established there was no absolute necessity of Miracles in such cases If any man will suppose there might be in those times Books piously written and grounded upon the Doctrine of Moses that came not from any Divine Inspiration in judging of which Men might be possibly deceived and mistaken I answer Either such Books pretended to a Divine Mission from God or they did not If they did not no man could be indangered by them If they did They must either be written by true Prophets or False No true Prophets would do it And 't is not reasonable to think any false prophets should because they could serve no Design by it Nor could the Devil or any ill Instruments any way promote their own Interests by perswading men to serve the true God in the right way Nor do we find that in Fact any such thing ever was Thirdly There appeared in most if not all the parts of a Bible a peculiar Majesty a savour of Divine Authority in a more than ordinary way A great and eminent difference as the Prophet Jeremiah sayes between the Chaff and the Wheat Nor is it fit to suppose but that whâ—â— came by an immediate Inspiration from God should carry some Impressions of his Wisdom Power and be some way differenced from the common Writings of weak and fallible men Besides from many other Circumstances attending the first Edition of the several parts of the Bible relating to the Matter written and the Authors that wrote might God give a further evidence to their Divine Authority of which we are now wholly ignorant And it would be perhaps somewhat of curiosity and of little use to enquire after And some of them are recorded to us in the Scripture it self As particularly the foretelling of future Events that accordingly came to pass Two wayes God himself had previously appointed by Moses for the discovery of all false pretentions to Revelation First If any Pretenders that way came to seduce men from the true God and that Divine Worship of his then established God commands They should be rejected And secondly If
in Palestine nor understood by any but the dispersed Hellenists And so were no way likely to be sent from the Holy Ghost to that Church who never owned any Scripture for Canonical but what was in Hebrew a Language peculiar to them And the Bibles they constantly used till our Saviours time in their Synagogues were all in Hebrew Thirdly There is in most of these Books some eminent discovery of their own Humane Extraction As in the second of Macc. 2.24 The Author of that Book whoever he were tells us that he had borrowed what he wrote out of Jason of Cyrene and contracted five Books of his into one Volumn And so what he there wrote he is so far from fathering it on the Holy Ghost or any Dictates of his that he plainly confesseth 't was none of his own but the bare Epitomy of another mans Writings and desires to be excused if he had not done it well And 't is most notoriously evident to every common Reader that many of these Books contain such ridiculous Stories and gross Absurdities that without high impiety and great contradiction to all those Natural Notions we have of God they cannot be imputed to the Holy Ghost as their Author Fourthly These Books were never received by the Church of the Jews into their Canon nor are to this day And so during the times of the Old Testament were never received by any Church for there was then no other which is most absurd to conceive of any parts of God's Written and Supream Laws As also that the Jews to whom in a most peculiar way the Oracles of God were committed and who had the custody of all God's Sacred Records and were as St. Austin calls them God's the Churches great Library-Keepers should so notoriously err as to reject for not to receive into their Canon is to reject so great a part of the Bible 'T is somewhat strange that those of the Roman Church with whom chiefly we contest in this Matter and who annex to the Church an infallible Judgement should imagine the Church of the Jews to fall into so great and gross a mistake in so fundamental a matter That the Jewish Church never heretofore received these Apocryphal Books into their Canon nor do to this day is a thing that with the least colour of Reason cannot be denyed That they do not to this day is known all the World over wheresoever the Jews are And their Bibles are to be seen That the Ancient Church of the Jews before the times of our Saviour had no other Books within their Canon than those we now have is evident from the testimony of Josephus in his first Book against Appion who there tâ—lls us what Books the Jews reckoned Canonical and sayes They are onely twenty two in number according to the number of Letters in their Alphabet and reckons those very Books we now receive as onely Canonical Other Books he sayes there were written after the Captivity but they were never numbred with the Sacred Records Origen St. Jerome and many other of the Christian Writers have largely proved the same Those of the Roman Church who have turn'd every Stone to ease themselves from the dint of this Argument have found no other countenance that ever these Books received from the Jews to make us suppose they received them into their Canon but that in some places some few of the Hellenist Jews that lived remote from Palestine had annexed some of these Books to their Septuagint Bibles But such Hellenists themselves had any esteem of them as Canonical Writings Nor can it any more be proved from thence that they had than it can That we in England receive them into our Canon because they are bound up with some of our Bibles And never were any of these Books annexed to the Hobrew-Bibles used at Jerusalem and in Palestine nor were any of them ever read or admitted into their Synagogues there In truth This matter in point of Fact is so notorious and evident that Bellarmine himself makes an ingenuous confession of it and sayes plainly Hos omnes Libros speaking of these Apocryphal Books ad unum rejici ab Hebraeis That every one of these Books were rected by the Church of the Jews Contr. 1. lib. 1. ch 10. And confirms the same out of St. Jerome And if so we have then not only the judgment of the Judaical Church in this case which is singly sufficient For 't were a ridiculous contradiction to make any Books part of the Old Testament now which were not so received then But we have also a more infallible determination For our Saviour and the Apostles fully and constantly approved the Old Testament as the Jews were then possessed of it 'T were absurd to suppose that our Saviour should with so much exactness reduce all to the Rule of the Scripture and yet tacitly approve and silently pass over so great a mistake about the Rule it self Our Saviour directs the Jews to search the Scriptures as they then had them as being perfect and compleat Appeals to their own Bibles upon all occasions in his own defence Expounded Moses the Psalms and the Prophets as those to whom he spake were acquainted with them and as they were then extant Nay he himself read and preached in their Synagogues out of the Scriptures as he there found them and as they were there publickly used And no man can soberly imagine that our Saviour would go about to instruct the People out of any false and imperfect Rule The Apostles likewise upon all occasions made use of the Old Testament as they found the Jews possessed of it Nor have we the least intimation that the Jews were either mistaken in the number of those Books they received or that the least alteration had been made in those Books since the times wherein they were first written And 't is as evident that the Old Tement as the Jews then had it and as our Saviour and the Apostles approved it descended down to the Christian Church and was constantly so received The Primitive Writers agree universally in it Cyprian Epiphanius Athanasius Nazianzen all bear witness to it Cyril Bishop of Jerusalem after he has reckoned up to his Catechumini the 22 Books of the Old Testament we now receive adds Hos lege viginti duos Cum Apocryphis nil habe negotii Catechis 4. Read these two and twenty Books But meddle not with the Apocrypha Origen quoted for it at large by Eusebius in his History reckons up the very same twenty two Books for the Canonical parts of the Old Testament And so does St. Jerome and expresly reckons the other Apocryphal The same we find in Russinus who sayes The Apocryphal Books they never antiently called Libros Canonicos but Ecclesiasticos And the first Council we read of that entred into a consideration of this Matter which was that of Laodicea about the year 364. in their 59 Canon declare the Canonical Books of the
Old Testament to be the very same and no other then those we now receive Nor were these Apocryphal Books ever otherwise reckoned either in the Jewish or Christian Church than as humane and fallible Writings till the late Assembly at Trent were pleased to declare them otherwise These things must needs seem sufficient to any reasonable man to clear up that doubt on the one hand Whether we have not less in our Bibles than we indeed ought to have Because that besides what the Roman Church hath of late done to Canonize these Apochryphal Writings no other addition to the Bible has been at any time attempted that merits the least consideration I proceed to the doubt on the other hand And that is How we may be reasonably secured that our Bibles contains in them no more then they should That is upon what ground we receive some Books in the New Testament The Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of St. James the second Epistle of St. Peter the Epistle of Jude the 2 and 3 Epistles of John and the Apocalyps Of all which there has formerly been some doubt made In the solution of which I shall endeavour these two things First To shew what were most probably the first and original grounds of such Doubts And secondly To shew that those doubts then ought to be of no prevalency with us now And that there is at this time no good reason to make the least doubt of any part of the New Testament as we are now in possession of it All the Doubts that have arisen about any parts of the New Testament were most probably these two wayes occasioned First 'T is obvious that the New Testament was writ in several parts at several times and not all composed together The Whole became not publick but by many steps and degrees Had several former and latter Editions That is some parts that were first writ were copyed out by those that had the Originals and con-joyn'd and so dispers'd And other parts still added as they were written and became publick Now 't is easie to conceive that some parts that were after added to such Bibles as first came out might be at first questioned and doubted of by such who had the former Editions and were not fully informed about the after Addition of other parts And so it has fallen out in the publication of most Systemes of Humane Laws that have come out gradually and by parts and not in a full and intire Body at once Secondly 'T is very probable that many Christians that lived in those first Times by reason of their distance from those places where some parts of the New Testament first became publick might be for a considerable time it may be till after the deaths of their Authors without any notice of them And upon that account some doubts about such parts might arise because they â—ad come to their knowledge no sooner especially if any such parts seemed to â—avour or countenance any particular Sect or Opinion as the Epistle to the Hebrews did that of the Novations and the Apoâ—alyps that of the Chiliasts And this is most likely to be the true reason why some of the Epistles and we know 't was about the Epistles that the doubts chiefly were were at any time questioned especially such as were more remotely and uncertainly directed to the scattered Jews as that of St. James that to the Hebrews and that of St. Peter which were no way likely to be so soon or so commonly known to the generality of Christians Nor could they be so easie to come by as those Epistles sent to Rome Corinth and Ephesus and those great and publick Cities from whence the fame of them would soon spread and Copies were upon much easier terms to be had because 't was certainly known where the Originals were Secondly There is no good Reason from any Question that was made heretofore to raise any Doubts now about any Parts of the New-Testament And that for these three Reasons First Because these Books in question were most generally received at first and doubted of only by some and those such who had least information about them And this is very evident Because we find them frequently quoted as Canonical Scripture by many of the most ancient Christian-Writers in those Ages next the Apostles Tertullian except the second Epistle of St. Peter hath in his Works quoted as Canonical Scripture every Book of the New-Testament we now receive And St. Ierome speaking in his Epistle ad Dardanâ—m of the Epistle to the Hebâ—ews and some other of those Books about which we now discourse sayes We receive them not from the Custom of this Time but from the Authority of the most Primitive Writers Secondly They contain nothing in them but what does plainly harmonize with the rest of the Bible and is generally witnessed unto by other Books about which no question hath been at any time made And of this there can be no doubt unless it be concerning the Revelation which yet contains a most Admirable though Mysterious Agreement with the Books of Moses the Prophecies of Ezekiel and Daniel and divers other parts of the Bible And to this Book besides that the suitableness of Events thereunto and the notorious fulfilling of many Prophetical passages in it has put its Divine Authority out of all question we have as great a Testimony from Antiquity as can in such a case well be expected Justin Martyr who lived very near the Apostle John himself in his Dialogue with Tryphon cites it as the Writing of St. Iohn and without the least question ascribes it to him Irenaeus who lived some small time after Justin and was the Scholar of Polycarp who was the Scholar of St. Iohn sayes positively 'T was written by St. Iohn the Apostle And that he was well assured thereof from some most probably Polycarp that had seen the Apostle Iohn himself and personally conversed with him Lib. 4. cap. 37. and Lib. 5. And â—ertullian in his 4th Book against Marcion sayes Though Marcion did reject the Apocalyps as none of St. John 's yet sayes he the succession of Bishops tracod to the beginning will establish Him as the certain and undoubted Author of it Thirdly God has in a providential way determined this matter For those that at first questioned those Books when the heat of primitive Persecutions were somewhat abated the Church had free intercourse and communication together and came to be better informed received them All doubts about them are now vanished Luthur and some with him in Germany who were the last that revived any doubts of that kind upon second and more deliberate thoughts recanted their Error All Christians are now at an Agreement about them the Supreamest Establishment that can be of Canonical-Authority even the Roman Church themselves receive the Apocalyps into their Canon although many passages in it seem very particularly directed against them Indeed the heavenly lustre of these Books is