Selected quad for the lemma: book_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A26161
|
An apology, or, Defence of the divine art of natural astrologie being an answer to a sermon preached in Cambridge, July 25, 1652. ... / written by the learned and ingenious mathematician, Mr. George Atwell ... ; and now published by a friend ... vvhose preface is hereunto annexed.
|
Atwell, George.
|
1660
(1660)
|
Wing A4162; ESTC R12316
|
23,708
|
69
|
it yet he is but a man and subject to errour as well as others and one that divers good Divines will beg leave to dessent from in some of his tenents As first the unlawfulnesse of Cock-fightings and Dog-fightings Secondly that it is unlawful to buy an Almanack because if that saith grain will âe dear it makes men trust in it and âlistruft God I can not deny but if âny shall doe so as to put any absoâute confidence in an Almanack or âigure they greatly sin because there âs in them a possibility of errour for âeveral occasions before alledged so âs there not in Gods word yet there may be a kind of trust I doubt not ân some measure or perswasion at âeast of the truth of the Almanack or Figure by how much the more experience I have had of the truth of the âike or the same mans making before For suppose I owe 20 l. to be paid upon bond the first day of April to such a one as I am sure will âtand upon the forefeiter but I have â trusty Tenant that never failes me âut payes me 40 l. Rent the 25 or 26 of March at furthest will not any one rather trust to such a Tenant though there be a possibility of failâng as by thieves fire c rather then âo borrow it elsewhere or sell commodities to lesse Neither can I think but according to Josephs example it is lawful in a plentiful time with the one to lay up against a time of scarcity The other of Mr. Perkins quoted by the said Rowland is concerning a rule used by some Astrologers concerning the time when the effects of an Eclipse begins which is this Observe at the middle of the Eclipse how far the Luminary eclipsed is distant from its rising and how long it continueth above the Horizon then reduce them into minutes and say by the golden Rule If the whole continuance of the Luminarie eclipsed give 365 dayes what shall its time from the rising give The time hereby found say some is the time of the beginning of the effects But Mr. Perkins there reckons many several Eclipses whose effects of his own knowledge began presently after the Eclipses Where note that we need no stronger witness to prove that Eclipses have their effects and that these effects are found by Astrology deny it they that can and for my part I am of his mind for the time of the beginning of the effects and so is Origanus and so is Mr. Wings Ephemeris Yet let me answer one objection more which is this Though in erecting of Figures you doe not work by the Devil yet they that come to you doe beleeve you doe I aske must I give over my calling of a Surveyor or Ingineeâ because some great Professors thinking because I could tell distances without measuring them that I wrought by the Devil and thereon moved me to either leave it or my profession of the Gospel for I was a scandal to it Or must our Saviour Christ give over casting out Devils because some thought he wrought by Beelzebub yet I would have none so bold to tell the effects of Eclipses or great conjunctions before they fall least they misse of the time when they will fall as Lilly did for as Kâpler saith it is hard âo hit Near the beginning of this letter I spake a word or two in commendation of Sr. Christopher Heydens Book and that I would fain see that answered It hath been mine hap very lately to see a Book coming under the name of one Vicars B. D. as if he were a Bachelor of Divinity But if that can be called an answer certainly it is so strange an answer that it gives me as little satisfaction as Rowlandâ book that promised in the beginning of it to answer Sr. Christopher in the end of it but he would first answer an other which by that time he had done answering him Mr. Finis called him away that he could never attend to answer him since Just so dealeâ Mr. Vicars he promiseth in his Title Page great matters but truly so far as I read which was more then â quartern I may well say Parturiunt mârtes nasââtur ridiculuâ inus Much is promised but nothing performed I read till I was weary stilâ expecting some arguments thaâ should either disproove the lawfulnesse of Astrology in general or aââeast something that Sir Christopherâad defended But I found my expeâtation failed me for all that time âo far was spent against Conjurers Witches Charmers Inchanters and âuch as observe the flying of birds are âuch as look into the River as if Sir Chrâsâopher had mainteined these âhings Iâ you did it not to make the world believe so truly you have âaken a great deale of paines but nihil âd thumbum you may as well tax Mââes as Sir Christopher for these things Again you say you have known âome were such dunses in the Univerâities that being fit for no learning hey then set upon Astrology that hey may have the Devils help in it âhough you speak never so mystically âet I have a sound witness even your âwn conscience that you would make âen believe Sr. Christopher to be such â one Iâ he be not such a one why do âou speak it if he be such a one speak âlain English a man may more easily âeâend himself from a masty dog that flies at his face then from a little Whirpet that bites one by the heeles Truly Sir this is but backbiting at the best far unbeseeming the profession of a Divine neither is it the breach of the least Commandement though it were yet if you teach men so you are unfit for the kingdome oâ God Besides this whether he be more in wealth or poor in gifts the Wise man tels you he that despisetâ the poor reprocheth him that made him He could have made him wise and you foolish But what is this to the matter this is onely against the man Besides this How common a thing is it throughout your Book to call him My Gentleman My Gentleman Hath king James mâde him a Knight and will you degrade him and make him but a Gentleman Sir I am sure if I should call you so Would you not take it as irânically spoken and is this to fulfill the Royal Law of Liberty to doe as you would be done to Quod tibi fierâ non vis âlteri ne feceris But whether this will beare an action in the Court of Honour I leave to others to judg Non nostram inter vos tantâs componere late 's am sure it will beare an action in he high Court of Heaven But sure ãâã his shews that learned king king Iames that great enemy to Astroloâie whom you so boast of saw more â him then Astrology though you âee it not otherwise he would never have made him a Knight for that he was so great an enemy to pretenders âe did it after he had wrote his Book gainst Mr.