Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n call_v great_a king_n 3,363 5 3.4821 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B08273 Their Majesties colony of Connecticut in New-England vindicated from the abuses of a pamphlet, licensed and printed at New-York 1694. Intituled, Some seasonable considerations for the good people of Connecticut / by an answer thereunto. Allyn, John, d. 1696.; Pitkin, William, 1635-1694. 1694 (1694) Wing A1038; ESTC W34067 31,143 48

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of our Acting from the time in which we are Addressing Their Majesties and with his usual Severity Ans If we should for once gratifie his humor and say we mist it therein yet what is he better than Esops Doctor to the Dead man the case was sent away to England and that before he wrote and he is too late to help it Pam. In Page 36 he grows Jocous and t is all that he is pleasant in in the whole Book and but sour there too he Masquerades tells us that our Great Champion our Goliah leaves us in the Lurch the Stone is Sunk in his forhead c. And shall we yet harden our selves c. Ans He uses a great Liberty we know none that have so Lurched us though the Stone of a Slander that one took a great Bribe at York has been cast at one of us but it s most like to be found in another forehead Pam. In Page 37 he propounds the Event to Consideration and this he Predicts will be 1. That Friends will be ashamed of us Enemies will Insult Ans We think his Friends if he have any wise ones will be ashamed of him for his Trifling and abusive use of Sacred and Serious things and that his and our Enemies will insult upon us with this weapon he hath so unadvisedly or maliciously put into their hands Pam. His Second Prognostick is That the King and Councel expects better things of us Ans He is all along too bold to give the Kings sence it has been said of a Chancelour in some cases that he that knew the Chancelours mind knew the Kings mind but we have no assurance that this mans Perception is so deep Pam. His Third Presage is that That we Prejudice Their Majesties Interests frustrate Their Intentions defeat Their Counsels c. Ans 1. As we justly dislike his fore Staling Their Majesties Judgment so we do but a little fear it though that be evidently designed by his Book and he may move in his own Orb and not Soar with his Icarian Wings so near the Sun alass little thing why thus Cheek by Jole with the Soveraign power will he perform the thing through thee we know a divine Sentence is in the Lips of the King and that our Judgement cometh forth from the Lord. 2. Let it be remembred that we do take care of our duty in respect of the War and are out great charge as hath been said We will pass over his fond Conceits in Page 39 of the French Concluding that they have Connecticut to Friend at least in a posture of Neutrality and that of the Maquaes being put to go to the French as Instances only of one that wants to Sleep and that of the Commission as what we had before with this Intimation that Connecticut hath also the Kings Broad Seal for their Corporation Militia Pam. In Page 40 he falls afresh to rating at us Do we not know That to Levy War against the King is High Treason c. That an Actual Rebellion or Insurrection is a levying War against the King That a gathering Forces for the Removal of Councellors Altering of Laws c. is levying of War against the King That the holding a Fort or Castle by force of Arms against the King and His Power is a levying War against the King c. Ans 1. We must refer to what hath be said chiefly for answer to these things to avoid vain and tedious Repetitions but as these things are applyed unto us we may say as Nehemiah to Sanbalat Chap. 6. v. 8. There are no such things as though sayest but thou feignest them out of thine own heart 2. Hath not Connecticut an uncondemned right to somewhat of a Militia Why may we not in the reverss charge as hard those that interupt us especially considering that the General Government is under Their Majesties yet in the Corporations hand to which particular Officers though by Patent one would think should stand in some Subordination But it may be said that we mistake him he doth not charge us with Treason levying War against the King he layes it only as a ground to argue from as he doth Pam. What Construction then do we think it will have If we shall be found to Rise in Arms against the Kings Lieutenant Publishing His Commission and Commanding Obedience unto it and by Force and Arms to with-hold the Militia and all Forces by Sea and Land and all Forts and places of strength in a whole Colony or Province from the King against His plain Commission Published under the great Seal Ans 1. The if that all this is propounded with makes it like a wet Eale hard to take any hold on or how to use it but he intends not to beat Air but to strike us in these things and because here he seems to clench most of his Coblery we say 2. If he argue from the former of Treason c. to this of our holding which he will call with-holding the Militia that the latter is as great as bad as the former or worse then we did not mistake him and indeed his sence Suites best his Scope in the whole Book But 3. If he argue from the greater to the lesser there is no great force in it for though it be Fellony to kill a Man yet it is not so to kill a Fly though a man may not Rob yet he may stand a Tryal in Law for what he hath held quietly a long time on a good tenure ere he Surrender and if finally he should be Ejected yet a Tryal is due to him ere a delivery is due from him 4. All a long the Pamphlet beggs and not proves the main question for he still runs away with this that our Charter now gives us no use of any Militia at all and on that Supposition he builds in a manner all his discourse but this we differ from him in and take it our right to have Their Majesties and the Laws descission in 5. What if after all this his Scuffle to bring our heads within his halter the Charter and his Excellencies Commission should be found to refer to divers Militia's the one to a Corporation Militia as formed by the General Court to our necessity and without which we are undone and the other to the Kings Militia according to the 13 and 14 of Charles II. Or which is almost the same that they should refer to the same Militia in divers respects Namely the one to what of our Militia falls not within the verges of that Act forementioned and the other to what of it that Act will on tryal be found to Comprehend will not this reconcile the Charter and Commission Or what if the Law or Their Majesties Grace will firm our former and present Station in these things these things are not only possible but hopeful and he might have staid his hand and not have run out upon us as Traitors as worse than Turks as dispisers of