Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	call_v	church_n	time_n	2,817	5	3.2368	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A41591	An amicable accommodation of the difference between the representer and the answerer in return to his last reply against the papist protesting against Protestant popery.	Gother, John, d. 1704.	1686 (1686)	Wing G1325A; ESTC R201691	19,896	44

them or no They profess'd a hatred to Image-worship in the beginning for the more plausibly turning the Papists out of doors when they pursu'd them with the Commination in their old Common-Prayer-Books of Cursed be all Worshippers of Images but afterwards succeeding to the Errors of the Papists as well as to their Revenues they no longer dar'd to curse the Worshippers of Images knowing the Curse would light upon their own Heads but instead of that reform'd their Prayers and have it now Cursed are ye Idolaters 4. They worship Saints and Angels For see Beloved besides the building Churches to the Honour of their Names and setting up their Pictures in them which are as great external Acts of Worship and Religion as can be they likewise set Days apart to honour them as God has his Day set apart they command their Vigils to be kept and have Prayers in their Honour not questioning but that they can Pray for as many as they know upon Earth Nay they likewise pray for and depend upon their Assistance Help and Protection but especially of the Angels as you may see in their Common-Prayer Books where on the Day of Michael they beg to be defended by the Angels as if God who is Almighty were not able to defend them that they should thus seek shelter under the Angels Wings Is not this to leave God and his Christ and to make Gods of Creatures Oh! such abomination as this is not to be endured 't is intolerable Beloved For these Churches in their honour Days in their honour Images in their honour and Prayers in their honour is paying to them Divine Honours 't is worshipping them as Gods For mark ye now all Civil Honour is terminated on the visible things of this World and we have no intercourse with the invisible Inhabitants of the other World but what is Religious now if all Worship of invisible Beings is Divine and Religious Worship what abominable Idolatry are our blind Brethren faln into who by this Religious Worship make as many Gods as there are Angels and Saints in Heaven 5. They practice Idolatry again in receiving the Sacrament for though they allow this to be only Bread and Wine yet they pay it Religious Worship and honour it as God by falling down to it on their Knees They may say they do not this to the Bread and Wine But what must we not believe our Senses in so plain a Case Do we not see them do it with our Eyes And let them pretend what they please their Practice is the best explication of their Belief 6. They use a Book of Prayers which is nothing but a ship of the Mass 'T was call'd a mass-Mass-Book when it came first to light and tho' it has since reform'd its Name for the better imposing upon poor Souls yet the Nature of it is still the same The Epistles and Gospels and Collects and Litanies and Hymns are nothing but Terms of Babylon And pray now what are the Vigils Ember-days Rogation-days Ashwednesday Epiphany Sexagesima Quinquagesima Septuagesima is not all this the Language of the Beast Yea Beloved from the abundance of the Heart the Mouth speaketh as their Language is such is their very Heart and Soul they delight in an unknown Tongue and one may as well understand the Mass as this Language of the Common-Prayer Book Then look in the Calendar of the Common-Prayer and there you 'l find the Mass-Saints stand in their Order March shews you Gregory the Pope and Benedict the Monk April has George that kill'd the Dragon the follow Dunstan that catch'd the Devil by the Nose and stickl'd for the Celebacy of the Clergy and Augustin that brought Popery into this Nation and thus their Saints are listed as in the Mass-Book and as the Demy-Gods were in the Calendar of the Heathens Then if you listen to them in this their Devotion you will not think them to be an Assembly of Christians but rather a Confusion of Misbelievers of all sorts of Infidels met in a Club There you 'l hear them with the Persians crying out to the Sun with the Aegyptians to the Whale to all the Fishes and Beasts with the Chaldeans to the Fire with the Syrians to the Birds and with the Papists too to Ananias Azarias and Misael Dead Men Men that cannot hear them and this in all their Churches as if these their Saints were like God himself present in all Places And this Devotion is call'd the Canticle of Benedicite taken out of the Apocrypha which with them you may see passes for very good Scripture So that the whole Common-Prayer Book if not worse is nothing but the mass-Mass-Book in English And all the difference is that the Missal is of an Ancient standing us'd even in Basil and Chrysostom's time But our Common-Prayer Book never knew light till 't was devis'd under Edward VI. And how many Alterations has it had in this time Some made by King Edward himself some by Queen Elizabeth and several others since Nay have we not seen Prayers added to this Book in Thanksgiving for the Discovery of and Deliverance from a Plot which now every considering Man has reason to believe to have been no more than a Chimera and the Invention of Bad Men 7. They make Gods of Men attributing to them a Power of Forgiving Sins the incommunicable Attribute of the Almighty and this is plain in their Liturgy in which their Priests are order'd to give Absolution to Sinners 8. They encourage a Death-bed Repentance permitting their Members to live as extravagantly as they please all the time of their Health and not a word of Confess and Repent but when Death is waiting for them at their Beds-Head They have a Power to give Absolution they say and their never enjoyning it but in the last Agony is Argument enough to conclude there 's no obligation of Repenting amongst them till Death looks 'em in the Face 9. They know not what their Belief is touching this Power of Absolution Some of their Divines affirm That the Sentence by which Absolution is given to the Penitent is an Absolute and Definitive Sentence judicially absolving him from the Guilt of his Offences Others of their Doctors say That the Form of Absolution is Declarative rather than Absolute and think it a rashness to pronounce a Definitive Sentence in Gods Name And thus tho' their Faith be all pretended to be according to the Word of God yet 't is wonderful hard to know what it is and whilst they thus disagree amongst themselves how can any embrace their Creed who know not what they believe themselves 10. They dispense with Vows and dissolve the Obligation of such as are made even to God himself Thus you see when any Priest Jesuit or Fryar comes over to their Church tho' they have solemnly vow'd their Virginity to God and promised to the Almighty never to Marry yet they are no sooner made a Member of this Reform'd Congregation

one thing and now of late 't is become another and if right then I wonder how it can be right now Thus you see their Church alter and change according to the Complexion of the Times And not only in these things but in a thousand others nay in the very Articles of their Belief The Apostles Creed had never more than Twelve Articles and the assenting to these were enough to make a Christian but to make a Church of England Christian at first 't was requir'd to Subscribe to Forty two Articles and then a little after something was bated and 't was enough to subscribe to Thirty nine and in these there was so much chopping and changing both in Words Expressions and Sentences that even the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition never had more before it came to perfection These are the Marks my Dearest ones of that Congregation to which you are so earnestly invited to joyn but let those joyn with her that can those that can find a way to dispense with all their Sense and Reason and admit of Prophanation and Superstition and Idolatry for the Word of God But for us We have the Scripture and our Reason for our Guides and we need no better and we have no surer way of avoiding the Teeth of the Dragon than to keep out of the reach of his Tail If a Zealous Brother I say should in this manner paint out the Church of England to his Flock and endeavour to imprint in their Minds an Idea thus Foul and Monstrous of her teaching and maintaining abominable Superstitions and Idolatries I would fain know of the Answerer Whether this would be Representing or Misrepresenting the Church of England whether 't would be a shewing her as she is or as she is not I know according to his Principles the Charges being not false as to matter of Fact and none being urg'd without some Reason this Character ought not to be Entitled The Church of England Misrepresented And yet methinks I cannot fancy 't will be thought like her But however it be I am resolv'd to compound and not quarrel upon this score If he will not have this to be Misrepresenting in its strict and proper sense I am ready to allow that the word Misrepresented as it stands in the Title of my Book is not to be taken in its strict and proper sense as it signifies Calumniating by Perjury only and Lies such as was the Story of the Pilgrims Screw'd Guns and Black Bills for the hanging of the Jesuits and that of Stifling Sir Edm. Godfrey with a Pillow in the upper Court of Somerset-House and Strangling him in the lower Court before the Stables with a twisted Handkerchief and laying it on the Papists But in a less rigorous Signification as it implies the Representing a thing otherwise than it is and putting on false Colours whether by Wry Interpretations False Inferences Malicious Applications Weak Reasonings or any such like Topick For by whatsoever Method the thing is made to appear otherwise than it is 't is all the Misrepresenting I desire and equally fit for my purpose And now I have so far comply'd with the Answerer I hope the Talk of Misrepresenting as he says will be over And yet if he has a mind to prove once more in other ten Sheets That Misrepresenting is not to be taken in its strict and proper sense let him do it 't is only Twelve-pence apiece more for the Curious The Judicious will think it only worth a Smile if so much But I am yet in Arrears and must not part thus For it seems the Answerer has a Complaint against me and 't is this pag 3. That in my last Reply instead of defending my own Misrepresentations which I so unjustly father'd upon them I have pick'd up new Misrepresentations for him to Answer And really I was much to blame to look out for new Misrepresentations when he had little to say against the former except that they were not to be call'd Misresentations in a strict sense But where did I father 'em upon any body I laid them at no bodys door and if some appear'd so solicitous in clearing themselves that they were suspected to be Fathers they may thank themselves I pointed at none 'T is true for the shewing they were none of my own Childish Conceits I at length produc'd some eminent Protestants describing Popery with the same ill Features and worse than I had drawn it in my Character of a Papist Misrepresented and first the Archbishop of York And here the Quarrel is because I left out the Authorities mention'd by that Prelate And now the Answerer has inserted those Authorities what do they make to his purpose or against me Were they all exact and true which yet no Man will be able to make good is every thing to be set forth for the Faith of a Church which can be found in one Author as it is by him when he prefixes to them a He that is the Papist must believe Can the Church of England stand this Test Would it not be Misrepresenting her to Preface every extravagant Saying of her Members with She believes and She teaches What signifie therefore the mentioning those Authors when the Question is not What some Private Authors say but what the Church believes When the Archbishop therefore brings in the Papist professing his Faith with this solemn Protestation We must believe and then supports the Paradox with a single Authority or two as this was in him a piece of Artifice not justifiable amongst Friends so the omission of such Testimonies was beyond the possibility of being a Design unless it were of Consulting the Credit of the Prelate And tho' the Books mention'd were publish'd by Authority of Superiors yet from such Books cannot be fairly Represented the Faith of the Church and whosoever pretends to do it is nothing less than a Misrepresenter Nor will a Church of England-Man I fancy much question this Truth who I believe upon consideration will allow that his Church may be easily Misrepresented if every idle Opinion to be pick'd out of Books which come forth with an Imprimatur were to be inserted into the Character of her Faith And I cannot but wonder the Answerer should urge this Dispute now at this time when we have seen a Book Publish'd by Authority of Pope Cardinals and other Dignitaries and in a particular manner approv'd by them and yet question'd by some as not Representing the Faith of the Church aright Methinks when a Book of this Authority comes to be disputed as not truly Representing I cannot understand how every other Author with a petty Licence is a sufficient ground for a Representer But it must be so to drive the Business on When a Protestant shews forth the Church of Rome every thing that can be rak'd out of Books is authentick enough for him to put into the Character but when a Catholick Prelate Expounds the Doctrine of his Church all the Authority of Pope