declared their perversnesse as is evident by comparing Acts 16.3 with Gal. 5.2 3. If there were no limitation in this case of giving offence there would never be an Heretick Whom we are to reject after the first and second admonition Titus 3.10 Quest. 8. Whether the Books called Apocrypha be not Scripture These Books commonly called Apocrypha are so called from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abseondo a thing hid because the authority of them is not known to the Church and in testimony of Faith those Books must not at all be produced The Church of Rome owns them as part of the Canon but the Catholick Church did ever exclude their Authority For 1. They were never used by the Jews neither in their Temples nor in their Synagogues the Jews were always Gods Library Keepers To them were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3.2 Now these being never used nor committed to them cannot be Gods Oracles and by consequence their authority is not binding 2. They never received any countenance from the gospel they are never mentioned as a Rule or as Books wherein the will and minde of God was made known to men which Christ would never have neglected to do had they been so yea as he chid the Pharisees for putting false glosses upon the Law surely he would have upbraided them sharply for taking away so great a part of the body of the Law Our Lord Jesus mentions no other parts of the Scriptures then Moses Psalms and the Prophets Luke 24 44 4â— of which the Apocrypha is no part 3. There are many things in those Books false both in History and in Doctrine much non-sense and against both sense reason and Canonical Scripture are there many passages 4. The Author of the second Book of Mac. Mac. 2.2.23 Ingenuously confesses that that Book was only an abridgment or compend of those five Books of the Wars of the Jews writ by one Iason a Cyrenean and great sweat pains and labour it cost hiâ— so to do This was no fit work for the Spirit of God to abridge the long books writ by Iason that men might have more pleasure in the reading of them The same Author concludes this History with a Complement and also desires to have his errours pardoned professing his best in composing that book which also shews it came not professedly from the Spirit of God The same â—each the Reformed Churches of France Art 4. of Belgiae Art 6. of Ireland Art 3. of England Art 6. Yet the Châ—rch does and hath used these books and reads them in their Congregations though not to confirm doctrine but to exhort to manners For these Reasons 1. From that Relation and aspect that it bears toward the Scripture concerning the Jews returning from the Captivity the Passeover kept by King Iosiah the Wisdom so called of Solomon though probably made by Philo the Jew who flourished An. C. 90. the sentences and sayings of the son of Sirach are so much reflecting upon Sacred Writ that they are not to be despised Iohn 10.22 We have some account of a Discourse that was held between Christ and the Jews in the Temple and withall tels us what time this discourse was viz. At the Feast of the Dedication Now of this Feast the Scripture nowhere gives us an account we read of no Laws of it no Sacrifices for it no time set apart for it yet Iesus owns it To know the original and cause of this Feast we must go to Apocrypha 1 Mac. 4. ver 52. to the end In which place we read that when the Iews had defeated the forces of Gorgias and had regained the Temple and rebuilded the Altar they offered Sacrifice thereon and dedicated it for future service and kept the days of Dedication with gladness for joy that God had given them again Liberty to worship in their Temple and ver 59. it is appointed that that feast be kept every year for eight days which in our Saviours time is kept and he graceth it with his presence too blame then are they that are offended at Ministers going down to the Apocrypha citing it for matter of fact for in this and in some other places no Minister under heaven can give his hearers any rational account of this Text without making use of the Apocrypha 2. For those excellent plain Moral Instructions that lie in many places of it so full of variety so plenteous in brevity particularly those books of Ecclisiasticus and Wisdom wherein are excellent documents suited to nay most of them taken from the word of God 3. For those godly and profitable uses beleivers may make in reading and hearing those great deliverances that God was pleased to give his own people Israel in so wonderfull a manner cloathing their enemies with shame when they were at strongest and crowning them with glory and honour when they were at weakest In a word to see how God preserved them in the midst of their enemies keeping to himself still a people when the Heathen about them had said Let them be no more a Nation as is manifest in the history of the Maccabees Yet alwayes care was taken that none of these bookes nor nothing in one of those bookes was ever made use of in matters of Faith or Doctrine but in matters of fact onely as men will make use of Poets Chronicles or moral Authors To this agree the reformed Churches and the Church of England Art 6. the Article it self is this Art 6 of the Church of England Holy Scripture containeth c. And the other books Hierom saith the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners but yet doth not apply it to establish any Doctrine c. Quest. 9. Why would God communicate his will to his Church in writing The meaning of this question is this Seeing God was pleased to let his will and his pleasure or his word be known and communicated to the world from the Creation unto Moses by tradition or by speaking why would he have it to be revealed from Moses untill the dissolution of the world by writing might it not have been delivered to succeeding ages by the present through the Fathers delivering it to the Children and so forward to the end as well as it was for two thousand years at the beginning of the world But God would not have it so he would have it given in writing 1 Because of the darkeness of mans nature the candle of the Lord shined darker and darker as man increased sin increased that lamp of light that he put in man at first grew dimmer and dimmer To prevent a gross darkness from falling upon the deluded sons of men he would not trust his word alwayes to remain upon the tongues or hands of men but would have it set in a candlestick and writ in tables of stone to remain a perpetual light 2 That it might be keept theâ—freer from corruption before man grew more stuborn and as they multiplied
the Spirit as Faith Humility Charity c. with whcih graces whosoever prays by the spirit and the humble or faithfull soul shall by putting in practise the rules before given make known their humble and faithfull petitions with good apt orderly and found words as well as with unseigned lips Quest. 2. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray That none are exempted from this duty but that it is to be performed by all good or bad wicked and prophane by the sound Christian and by the formall Hypocrite ppeares 1. The duty of prayer is as large and as universall as that of reading hearing c. therefore to be practised by all 2. Prayer is a converting ordinance It is a meanes appointed for the obtaining of pardon of sin of the Holy Ghost of drawing nigh unto God and therefore no sinner exempted from it 3. The neglect of prayer is charged upon them as a sin Psal. 14.2 Psal. 10.4 4. The consciences of wicked men accuseth them when they have not prayed 5. God hath sometimes accepted the prayers of very wicked men even of them that have sold themselves to do wickedly 1 King 21.27 Quest. 3. Whether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be Lawfull Before this question be directly answered we shall premise a few things 1. That the book of Common prayer had never been defended in this nature but that the crossnesse and peevishnesse of hot spirited men and passionate writers hath so defamed the the thing it self and also the users of it that it appears to be thought by them a sin unto Death Publickly or privatly to own it in the Church 2. That this defence doth not at all imply its necessity I am perswaded the Church of England might stand without it and may stand in purity by it Unifomity is necessary for the well-being of the Church as was known to the publishers of the Directory and if the Magistrate will have uniformity another way it may be had and if this way it may be used 3. That much of the Common-Prayer is in the Masse may be acknowledged to its honour It is but a furious and blind zeal that makes men inveigh against the Churches practise in this because of its affinity to Rome since we are to preserve the peace of the Church to our utmost we are not to decline too far from any opinion or practise that is lawfull the Jews preists did Sacrifice so did Baals The Papists uses this or that form of prayer if it be lawfull so may I that the breach or quarrel may appear to be one his part not on mine what ever is in the Masse that is lawfull and according to godliness is not to be despised and what ever is otherwise is to be condemned and shunned 4. That the book of Common-prayer might be altered and otherwise framed in some points bettered is not rationally to be denyed what book was ever composed by the wit or art of men but others might alter it and in some measure better it Let the Guisels view their Directory and I doubt not but they will find that somewhat might be left out and something put in part of it expunged and part of it enlarged 5. That by no meanes it ought to jostle out preaching is granted and is easily to be defended Prophecying is that ordinance that cheifly discovers the secrets of the heart that deceitfull part of man Prayer and Sacraments hath done vertuously but this excells them all and therefore for none of them is it to be disesteemed 6. That the Author hath competency of gifts for which he desires to be thankfull to do without Common-prayer as well as others Can they baptise pray bury marry c. without it absit a verbo I. Etantia so can he can they visit or pray sutably over the sick without it so can he can they promptly and readily vary their petitions at any time sutable to the duty in hand so can he In obedience to authority he useth it and so ought others though their gifts were more eminent then they are These things being considered we come now to answer the question And That the Liturgy Service book or Common-prayer of the Church of England is lawfull and with a safe conscience may be used appears by these following reasons 1. From the piety eminency and godlinesse of its composers they were men eminent and famous in their generation opposers of and to death some of them suffered for their not compliance to popish superstition when they were rooting out popery and disclaiming the Pope with all his adherents was that book compiled shall we Imagin the Guisels when they were composing the Directory were establishing Episcopacy if it were found to conjecture that why ought we to conceite the other in collecting the formes of that book of Common-prayer were confirming popery when of any other they most opposed it and suffered most by it It will not be a needlesse digression to spend a little time in shewing the occasion of compiling the book of Common-prayer and see the compilers The occasion of it was breifly this When Edward the sixth was by the Grace of God Crowned King of England c. and it being in his mind to perfect that reformation begun by his Father made many glorious acts for puryfying of the Church from Romish superstition particularly for administring the Sacrament of the supper under both kinds there were some in that time obeyed the King and some that did not so that the Sacraments were given by some one way and by others another way some were for the King some for the Pope and some were neuter to rectify which abuse and to extirpate popery with as little voyce as could be a writ is directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury who afterwards was burned by Queen Mary for his adhering to the Catholick or as the terme now is the protestant faith by the King and his counsell requiring him with others to meet and consult how to prevent for the future and remove that confusion for the present the service of the Church being then various after the use of Sarum Of York of Bangor and of Lincolne and besides them diverse other formes and bookes called Antiphoners Missales Graites Processionals Manuells Legends Pies Portuasses Couchers Iournalls Ordinals In a word every man used what form fashion or manner pleased him best This writ being sent to those persons hereafter to be mentioned they meet and after much debate consulting with the antient liturgyes of the Church expunging from them all what ever was not either in or agreeable to the word of God presented to that Godly King a book entituled The book of the Common-prayer and administration of the sacraments and other rites and Ceremonys of the Church after the use of the Church of England at the reading of which his Majesty being very thankfull both to God and man presented it to both his houses of Parliament assembled
at Westminister November 4.1548 and being by them perused after thanks returned to the King for his care and pains he is petitioned to let it passe unto an act and by Authority it was enacted that in all Churches and Chappels Sacraments and all other ordinances within the compasse of that bock should be performed solely and wholy by it appointing penaltys to the not users or defamers of the same It might very well be Inquired considering the premisses and our practises whether a set for me may not be as necessary in our days as it was in those considering how various men are in their form manner place or gesture in the administration of ordinances not that I would have mens gifts hindered but their spleen rancour and rage stopped unto which well composed for me would be a proper remedy which truly as it is to be suspected is the cause why a forme is by many called down knowing that it would cut be their extravagant notions their abilitye and parts being neither so high nor so great but a liturgy might be used by them but to let them passe The compilers of the Book of Common-prayer were Doct. Cranmer Arch Bishop of Cant. Doct. Goodrick Bishop of Ely Doct. Skip Bishop of Hereford Doct. Thirlby Bishop of Westminster Doct. Day Bishop of Chichester Doct. Holbeck Bishop of Lincolne Doct. Ridley Bishop of Rochester Doct. May Deane of Pauls Doct. Taylour Deane of Lincolne Doct. Heynes Dean of Exeter Doct. Redman Dean of Westminster Doct. Cox King Eâ—wards Almoner Doct. Mr. Robinson Arch-Deacon of Leinest All these being then owned for sound professors of the faith afterward great sufferers by death exile or banishment for their not yeelding to the errors of the Church of Rome Shall their work be thought to be unlawfull which after much deliberation they composed for the edification of the Church were they difstracted or mad or Hypocrites that they should thus put down and erect Popery For all the zeal of the Guisel before Latimer shall be accused as a Papist let him be indicted for an Atheist he that so says fearing neither God nor regarding man had that holy soul no religion when he gave his body to be burned I do now imagine I smell Cranmâ—ns flesh burning through the Cruelty of the Papists and let my right hand forget her cunning if I should not rather kisse the straw he lay upon and bow to thâ— chain he was fastened to the stake by then kick the ashes he was burned to or condemn him for a cheat a dissembler for a Papist which consequentially must be affirmed when that book of Common prayer is reviled and â—corned and as Popish asserred 2. This book of Common-prayer appears to be lawfull from that authoâ—ity by which it hath been established It is strange that that young Iosiah of England viz King Edward studying to root out Popery should so farre befoole himself and his counsel as to be glad at that bookes compiling if it had strengthâ—ned the Papal power was there nor a wise man in all the Parliaments of his time was there no religion in Qâ— Elizabeth was she such a notorious dissembler as under a pretence of throwing the doctrine of Rome aside would hug the Pope the closser in her armes or if she had been such was there never a holy man nor a religious Parliament in her time to rectifie that abuse â— was King Iames and his Parliaments all out of the way and King Charles of glorious memory and his Parliaments all Papists or Ignoramuses that they knew not what they did when they established this book Certainly those glorious Princes and wise Parliaments in establishing successively that book did find in it nothing that was unlawfull or that was contrary to true Godlinesse 3. From its conformity to sacred Scripture Let the Common-prayer be abserved and the matter of it be marked and bring it to the Bible Old or new Testament to Moses the Prophâ—ts or the Psalms and if there be a word sentence petition or prayer that is not agreeable to either of these all of these or a part of these the Author of these lines at this present engages himself to recant publickly what either here or elsewhere he hath written in defence of that book and become a proselyte to the profession of the Guisels In the book of Common prayer there are two things considerable 1. The matter of it 2. The Ceremonies in it 1. The matter or subject of the book of which it is composed to passe over scripture is either 1. Holy songs 2. Pious prayers 3. Godly exhortations 4. Christian confession 5. Scriptural Comminations Which may be again subdevided into 1. The Priests Versicles 2. The Peoples Responses In all which there is nothing but what is agreeable to holy writ and the will of God revealed in his Scriptures The Ceremonies in it which are those particular gestures or acts to be performed in the administration of such and such particular services and they are cheifly these 1. The crosse in Baptisme 2. Kneeling at the Supper 3. The Preists standing at the north side of the table at the communion 4. Marrying with a ring 5. Standing at the Creed In giveing obedience unto which ceremonys there is no more scripture to prove it a sin then there is to maintaine it unjust to be thrice asked in a Church before marriage as the Guisels in their directory enjoyn or to be married by a minister which there by them is also thought to be expedient 4. From the sutablenesse of it to the Common Christians capacity The service of the Church of Rome were it not repugnant in other points to the word of God yet in this it is sinfull that it is performed in a strange tongue which the common sort of Christians understand not In the Church of England there is no ordinance no service but the exhortations thanksgiveings and confessions therein are all of them so plain so easy that the bluntest understanding may reach them and the shallowest capacity may upon a certain knowledge say Amen So be it unto them all 5. From the agreements of it to the set formes of other Churches to those of Geneva Sweden France yea to the Church of Rome so farre as they are agreeable to scripture and to those formes that were of old used and at this present are in the Easterne Church doth the sevice of the Church of England agree and correspond an argument of it self were there no other of its excellency and dignity the wise composers of it having drained the errours from all other formes and thrown away what ever was a misse in other liturgys retaining what was pure and holy agreeable to found doctrine and religion which being methodicall digested and composed was presented to the King and ratified by Parliament as a standing rule to be used in the house of God which is the Church 7. Fâ—om the excellent order and uniformity that is in the
is himself and his Cardinals saies it a poor bolster God knows for a man to place his rest his confidence his assurance the unchangable estate of his eternal soul upon And why must I believe it because they say it Because they cannot erre and why must I believe they cannot erre because they say so thus may they impose upon mens consciences the very doctrine of Devils as they do 1 Tim. 4.12 3 4. and the poor people are taught that they must believe that oâ— herwise they are no members of the Church out of which indeed there is no Salvation or of Christ though no Scripture be brought in the least to confirm it 2. We were not baptized in the name of the Church this argument Paul brings against the divisions of the Corinthians 1 Cor. 11.3 there were some that would stick to the Doctrine of Paul some hold to that of Cephas what sayes he was Paul Crucified for you or were you baptized in the name of Paul that you should suppose to be saved by me we were baptized in the name of the Triun God and we expect only and we believe throughly to be saved by him alone without the aid of men or Angels for if an Angel should come down and perswade us or teach to us a necessity of believing in him without or against the Scripture as frequently Rome doth he were to be accursed I say again he were to be accursed 1 Gal. 9. 3. The Catholick Church calls upon her members not to do that and good reason too the Son of God would not though he might urge his own authority plead for a beliefe but upon a Scripture account Iohn 5.39 and Paul desires to be followed no further than he follows Christ 1 Cor. 11.1 and those Bereans are made noble for searching the Scriptures whether the things that were spoken by Paul were true or no Acts 17 11. And we have a charge given us to hear the Son the same teacheth the reformed Churches as of France Art 2. Belg. Art 7. Art 20. of the Church of England Art 1. of the Church of Bohem In which Article there are two reasons given for this truth 1. because the Scriptures were inspired and taught by the holy Ghost confirmed by heavenly testimonies which spirit discovers to men how it ought to be understood for Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. ult Besides the Lord himself saieth Search the Scriptures And again Ye are deceived not knowing the Scriptures c. 2 Because that is a true and sure testimony and a clear proof of Gods favourable good-will which he hath revealed concerning himself such things as are necessary to doctrine to discipline and government of the holy Church are all fully and absolutely so comprehended then which no Angel can bring any thing more certain and if he should he ought not to be believed For which cause saies that confession in our Churches the Scriptures are rehearsed to the hearers in the vulgar tongue and especially according to the ancient custome of the Church those portions of the Gospel in Scripture which are wont to be read on solemn daies out of the Evangelists and Apostles writings and are usually called the Epistles and Gospels The whole stream of the confessions of reformed Churches runs against Rome in this 4. Our Creed which is the rule of things to be believed as the ten Commandements are of things to be done and the Lords Prayer of things to be asked calls upon him that reads it or hears it to believe only in God the Father and in God the Son and in God the holy Ghost and not to believe in but to believe the Catholick Church i e to be perswaded that there ever was is and shall to the end of the world be a company of men Elected and called unto life by which confession we acknowledge our selves one of them Now to believe in the Church were to set her in as high dignity to rule over the consciences of men as Christ himself or any other person in the Trinity which were a giving his glory to another 5. Men should by this never be assured of their Salvation nor of their good estare it might be necessary for thy Salvation to do that this day which might not be done if I would be saved the next for as the Rulers of the Church uttered their judgments upon the light of reason I must judge my self in a happy or in a forlorn condition which is contrary to that Catholick doctrine Make your calling and Election sure 2 Pet. 1.10 which could never be done did it lye upon the fine flourishes of an Oratour or distinction of a Canonist sitting in counsell And indeed this may be one cause why the Church of Rome denies the possibility of a firm assurance of future glory contrary to the text above named 5. There are but four false religions in the world Heathnism Turcism Judaisme and Papism the Heathen possibly may reason the case for his religion against an Opponent though perhaps as soundly as Cyrus reasoned with Daniel concerning the dignity of Bel Thinkest thou not â—hat Bel is a living God said the King seest thou not how much he eateth and drinketh every day The Jew he will direct thee to the Scriptures see and try if his religion be not according to that most sure word of Prophesie The Turk is stubborn and it is death to dispute or search the truth for the confirming of the faith in the matters of the Alchoran The same it is with the Papist the bell will ring and candle will be put out and the book opened if the authority of the Bishop of Rome be once questioned though in matters of faith Let the Turk and Romanist therefore go together give me that religion that may be tryed and hold out in tryal yet let the Romanist remember that as Mahomet said he found the hand of God seven times colder than ice he may find it seventy times hotter than Purgatory for either adding or taking from the word of God and imposing any thing upon the people as necessary to be done in point of Salvation Illi ergo potius parendum monenti ut omnia exploremus quod bonum est retineamus quoe certe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instituti non potest nisi ad manum sit Lydius ille Scripiucarum lapis cujus ope aurea ab aereis humana á Divines internoscantur Notwithstanding that the restimony of the Church is not to be taken singly in matters of faith yet the testimony of the Church is of great weight and concernmnst in matters of fact For 1 it may prepare our hearts and move them to believe the thing the surer that the Church hath affirmed This made King Charles the first of glorious memory strongly to assert that what could not be proved by the word of God to be unlawfull
our undertaking this subject at this time wherein so many are shaken to and â—ro by every wind of Doctrine desiring to establish you in that Faith once given to the Saints and to confirm you in the doâ—â—rine of the holy Catholick Church to which I presume you were baptized we shall from this Text maintain several grand truths in reference to the Word Sacraments and Prayer which may serve you as Antidotes against that poyson that hath already slain thousands at our right hand and ten thousand at our left but we must first come to the last Section and see some questions resolved SECTION VII Questions Resolved Quest. 1. Whither the Scripture be the word of God Quest. 2. Whither the Scripture ought to be mens onely rule Quest. 3. Whither men may come to a saving knowledg of God without the Scripture Quest. 4. Whither persestion may be attributed to the Scripture Quest. 5. Whither Salvation may be had by the single knowledg of the Scripture Quest. 6. What may perswade one that doubts to beleeve the truth of the Scripture Quest. 7. How far the Saints may be our rule besides the Scripture Quest. 8. Whither the books called Apocrypha be not Scripture Quest. 9. Why would God writ the Scripture Quest. 10. Whether men be bound to beleeve all that is in the Scripture Quest. 1. Whether the Scripture be the word of God By Scripture here is meant the whole word of God contained wholly and onely in the Canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament for though the word Scripture signifies only a writting or a book and may be attributed to any book scrole or writing in the world yet use and custome which is the rule of speaking hath wrought this word Scripture to signifie that writing of the Holy Ghost contained in the Book of God and not any other book 1. From the excellency that it hath above all other it is called the Scripture that is the Book as if there were none deserved that name but it hence the book of Canticles is called the Song of Songs that is the most excellent of Songs so this the Book that is the book of books 2. From that necessity that lies upon men to have this book above all other If all the learning of all the most famous Libraries could be contracted into one book and that one book digested into one mans Head yet he would call for thee Book that book that his life his comforts his salvation stood upon this book was made to mend all other books and the light that all other Learning could afford without this would but make Hell so much the darker when all Books are shown him yet as David said of Goliahs sword there is no Book like that 1 Sam. 21.9 or as Rachel said to Iacob Give me that or else I die Gen. 30.1 The like might be said of the word Bible that signifying also a Book and properly any Book of the world might be called a Bible but customarily it s given only to that Book that contains the word or that Book written by the Spirit of God Now that the Scripture or the Books of the old and new Testament are the words of God and written by none but God that they are from heaven and not of men may appear by these following reasons 1. None but God can be found out to make them let heaven and earth be searched as with a Candle and among all the Inhabitanâ—s therein the Author of this Book is not to be found For 1. If he was not the writer of them either Angels Beasts or men must for Plants and Trees are not to be once suspected for their original But 1. Angels made it not for then it was either made by them altogether or by some part of them But 1. Not by them altogether for then in some place or other this had been discovered the Angels would have told the world before this time that it was composed by them They would have discovered to the soâ—s of men by some means or other that they were beholding to them for these comfortable words 2. Neither can the Scripture be supposed to be made by one part of them for then either they mâ—st be made by the fallen Angels or the confirmed Angels But 1. Not by the fallen Angels the devils are more subtle then to destroy their own Kingdom to give weapons to overcome themselves Satan hath more policy then to reveal how men shall avoid his snares escape his traps overcome his temptations prevent his ambushments frustrate his watchings and disappoint all his purposes every line of the Bible tends to the râ—ine of his Kingdom every verse in it is his neck verse Would he have had himself known by no other name then a lyar a Serpent a Dragon a roaring and devouring Lyon a Deceiver an Accuser an unclean Spirit if he had gone to set himself out into the world it will follow therefore it was not them 2. Neither was it made by the confirmed Angels for they acknowledge themselves our fellow Servants Rev. 19.10 22.9 being therefore professedly our fellow servants they could not make Laws to restrain us of our desires nor enjoyn us from performing any thing that our own hearts lusted after neither would men acknowledge the Angels in this case to be their superiors 2. Beasts did not write it It is to be hoped that the Reader is so much a man as to understand Beasts or Fouls composed not that work their irrationality shews sufficiently their impossibility 3. Men did not do it There is but man to be thought on as the Author of this Book since Angels are known not to do it And yet apparent it is that men had no hand in it for then either it must be done by men altogether or by some men But 1. Not by men altogether where was that meeting and in what Country is that place that mankinde gathered themselves together to make Lâ—ws against themselves to bind their own hands to their own feet nay to crush their own heart yea which is more to doom themselves to the everlasting flames for doing that that above all things is most pleasing to themselves What time of the world was this meeting in What Histories mentions of it What Generation was then living and who called this Assembly together What makes this Age to tye themselves to those Laws made by their Fathers since they are dead and fallen asleep 2. Neither was it done by men apart for then those men that composed it must be either good or bad But 1. Good men would not do it for then they ought to have been speakers of the truth they have kept the world in falshood for they say that the Scripture is of God made by his finger spoken by his Spirit if made by themselves it s nothing so yea the best of men find in themselves disobedience to the Laws therein contained which costs them much sorrow many tears