A re-examination of the five articles enacted at Perth anno 1618. To wit Concerning The communicants gesture in the act of receaving The observation of festivall dayes Episcopall confirmation or bishopping The administration of baptisme in privat places And The supper of the Lord in privat places Printed anno 1636. To the Reader YOu know good Reader if a man have a pretious Iewel hee will bee exceeding carefull to keep it from any tash True religion is more pretious then the most pretious jewel it should be the breath of our nosthrils and the â—oy of our hearts Wee finde that in all ages the preservation of religion in puritie hath beene dearer to the godly then their very lives As the preservation of religion in puritie hath been maintained so hath the restauration to puritie beene purchased with the bloud of Martyres and grievous troubles of many confessors The reformation of the Church within this realm was not obtained without the martyrdome of some and the hazard of the lives and estates of many other of our worthie predecessours The temple was throughly built and the head-stone brought foorth with the acclamation of other reformed Churches the Church of England which as Bucerus observed in histime standeth in the midst betwixt the Romane and reformed only excepted crying Grace grace unto it No where was the doctrine sounder the divine worship purer the government fitter for the building of Gods house But of late yeares the doctrine is leavened with Arminianisme and poperie the worship of God defiled with superstition and idolatrie the joint government of Pastors in presbyteries synodall and generall assemblies with subordination of presbyteries to synods and synods to generall assemblies is changed into tyrannicall oligarchie So that it may bee observed in our times to bee true which was noted by Aventinus to have beene done among the Popes in his time that the same deedes are at one time branded with the mark of superstition and at another time set out with the glorious title of pietie at one time attributed to Antichrist at another time to Christ at one time judged tyrannicall and unjust at another time just and righteous That which before we rejected as superstitious or idolatrous is now called truely religious that which before was called Antichristian and tyrannicall is receaved now as ancient and Apostolicall Is it not lamentable to see that government which maintained the kingdome of Antichrist in former times and with much paines thrown foorth to bee reestablished Some idle ministers deserting their owne particular flocks have taken upon them to bee diocesan pastors the principall and only pastors of all the congregations within an whole diocie to plant and transplant Ministers without consent of presbyteries to stay their proceedings against hainous offenders to sit as Princes amongst priests at their diocesan synods to suspend and deprive Ministers by the power of the high Commission without the consent of any lawfull let bee pretended assemblie of the Church to fine confine imprison Ministers or other professours without consent of the estates to sit in the Checker Counsell Session and to bear offices of estate to vote in Parliament in name of the Church without consent of the Church many of the Ministrie repyning and none consenting but upon conditions and cautions which are not regarded to send Commissioners to Court as directed from the Clergie or Church who return with articles in favours of Papists or for advancement of their estate is not the office of Deane and election of bishops by deane and chapter rejected as Popish by our generall assemblies recalled again without consent of the Church or so much as a pretended assemblie Are not the best qualified exspectants debarred from entrie to the Ministrie unlesse they subscrive such articles as the pretended bishops have devised and others obtruded upon congregations to their great grief Ministers are troubled by them with the acts of pretended assemblies whereas themselves transgresse the acts of many laudable assemblie Ministers are become dissolute and erroneus doctrine is taught without controlement We have cause to fear ere it be long that sound and faithfull Ministers shall become as rare as wedges of gold Consider further that soone after the government was changed idolatrous superstitious and ridiculous ceremonies were introduced into the worship of GOD with the five famous articles of which we are now to treat Moe are intended in the cannos lately â—â—blished and yet moe expected with the liturgle not yet printed neither can wee look for an end till the whole worship of God be defiled And yet these ceremonies are either commended as ancient or slighted as matters indifferent It is called in question if not altogether denyed whether the Pope bee the great Antichrist or not the possibilitie of reconciliation with Rome is maintained and to this end erroneous points of doctrine delivered in publick or defended in pâ—ivate or our differences from the Romish church slighted as not fundamentall Bookes of this kinde are printed with priviledge in our neighbour church and in private commended by such amongst us as apprehend the maintainance of this course to bee the easiest way to preferment Doctor Francis White in his treatise of the Sabbath ranketh among the traditions of the church the baptisme of infants religious observation of the Lords day the administration of baptisme and the Lords supper in publick assemblies and congregations the deliverie of the elements of the holy communion in both kindes the service of the church in a known language The Reader may finde more of this stuffe in Cozâ—ns devotions in Montagues Gagg and Appeal and in Shelfords sermons Have wee not need to fâ—ar the burning of our owne house when our neighbours house is in fire Have wee not greater cause to fear and bestirre our selves when the fire hath seased upon the thack of our own house and poysonable errours are vented amongst our selves Do wee then complain without iust cause or for matters of no importance The reconcilers cry peace peace but mean to peace till wee bee at peace with Rome The Prelates charge us with shisme and sedition but they mean to peace without peaceable possession of their places and obedience to their directions They call us shismaticks and yet cannot endure generall assemblies the ordinarie remedie of division and shismes as was acknowledged by the Kings Commissioners and such as were acquainted with his Maiesties minde at Linlithgow anno 1606. To what end was it enacted with their owne consent at Glasgow 1610. that those who were called bishops should be lyable to the triall and censure of the generall assemblie for their office and benefice life and conversation if we have not yearly or set generall assemblies to try them or censure us if we shall be found guiltie of shisme Grievances presented by Ministers to parliamâ—nts which should be the chief sanctuaries of refuge to all distressed subiects are suppressed and not suffered to be read in publick before the Estates
the English Liturgie he opposed stoutly to it And when the contention was like to grow to some hight hee and his Collegue Master Wittingham with some others drew forth of the English booke a plat in Latine and sent it to Master Calvin Howbeit the description of the corruptions was favourably set downe yet kneeling at the receaving of the elements is noted up among the rest in that extract Among his letters which are extant in writ we finde one dated the yeare 1559 at Deep and directed to Mastresse Anna Lock where he calleth the crosse in Baptisme and kneeling at the Lords table Diabolicall inventions After his return to his native country he ministred the Communion according to the order of the English church at Geneva where he had been last Minister This order was observed in all the reformed congregations before the reformed religion was established by authority of Parliament and is yet extant before the Psalmes in meeter with addition of the treatises of fasting and excommunication some prayers the forme and manner of the election and admission of Superintendents In the conâ—ession of faith prefixed and approved by our Church we have these words Neither must wee in the administration of the Sacraments follow mans phantâ—sâ—â—s but as Christ him selfe hath ordained so must they be ministred In the order of celebrating the Lords supper wee have these words The exhortation being ended the Minister commeth downe from the pulpit and sitteth at the table every man and woman likewise taking their place as occasion best serveth And againe The Minister breaketh the bread and delivereth it to the people who distribute and devide the same among themselfes according to our Saviours commandment And likewise giveth the cuppe In the second head of the first bâ—oke of discipline drawne up in the first yeare of publike and universall reformation wee have these words The table of the Lord is then rightly minâ—stred when it approacheth neâ—rest unto Christs owne action But plaine it is that at Supper Christ Jesus sate with his disciples and therefore doe we â—udge that sitting at a table is most convenient to that holy action And againe That the Mâ—nister break the bread and distribute the same to these that be next to him commanding the rest every one with sobrietie and reverence to break 〈◊〉 other we think it nearest to Christs action and to the perfite pracâ—ice Yee see our first Reformers preferred 〈…〉 kneeling but also to standing and 〈…〉 none of them approached so 〈…〉 When they rejected standing 〈…〉 man judge what they thought of kneeling 〈◊〉 ye may perceive that they rested upon 〈◊〉 â—o only for a time because of the abuse of kneeling 〈…〉 because most agreeable to the paterne It was ordained in the generall assembly holden the year 1562 That the order of Geneva be of served 〈…〉 ministration of the Sacraments By the order of Geneva was meant the order which was observed in the English Church at Geneva where Master Knox had beene of late Minister which order is called in the first booke of discipline The order of Geneva and The book of Common order This order as I have already said is set downe before the Psalmes in meeter In the assembly holden anno 1564 Ministers are referred to the order set do 〈◊〉 before the Psalmes which is a renewing of the former act In the Parliament holden the yeare 1567 it was declared that whosoever refused to participate of the Sacraments as they were then publikely administred in this reformed Church were not to be reputed members of this Church An act was likewise made concerning the Kings oath to be given at his coronation to maintain the religion then professed and in speciall the due and right administration of the Sacraments then receaved This act concerning the Kings oath was ratified again by acts of Parliament in the yeare 1581 and againe in the yeare 1592. In the yeare 1572 it was ordained by act of Parliament that such as did not communicate and partake of the Sacraments as they were then truly ministred in the Church of Scotland if they continue obstinate and disobedient shall be reputed infamous and unable to sit or stand in judgement persue bear office c. When in the second confession of faith which is commonly called the Kings confession we professe that we detest the ceremonies of the Roman Antichrist added to the ministration of the Sacraments we professe we detest kneeling in the act of receaving the sacramentall elements of bread and wine The order of celebrating the Lords supper which hath beene receaved and observed since the beginning of reformation and acknowledged both by generall assemblies and Parliaments to be the due and right order was perverted by a number of noble men Barons Ministers and pretended Bishops conveened at Perth in the yeare 1618 either having no lawfull commission or terrified with threats or corrupted one way or other They in their full and pretended assembly to please King James made this act following as it is extant among the acts of Parliament Since we are commanded by God himself that when we come to worship him wee fall downe and kneel before the Lord our Maker and considering withall that there is no part of divine worship more heavenly and spirituall then is the holy receaving of the blessed body and bloud of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ Like as the most humble and reverent gesture of the bâ—dy in our meditation and lifting up of our hearts best becometh so divine and sacred an action therefore notwithstanding that our Church hath used since the reformatioâ— of religion to celebrate the holy Communion to the people sitting by reason of the great abuse of kneeling used in the idolatrous worship of the Sacrament by the Papists yet now seeing all memorie of by-past superstâ—tion is past in revâ—rence of God and in due regard of so divine a mysterie and in remembrance of so mysticall an union as we are made partakers of the assembly thinketh good that that blessed Sacrament be celebrated hereafter meekly and reverently upon their knees This act if the lying parenthesis were culled out which is insert onely to deceave may passe among Papists and Lutherans It is untrue that all memory of by-past superstition is past and untrue that the abuse of kneeling among the papists was the onely occasion that moved our first reformers to make choice of sitting but the paterne of the first supper at the institution was the chiefe cause And therefore they not only rejected kneeling but also standing and taking in passing by as wee have shewed before We shall first defend the communicants sitting and next impugne their kneeling in the act of receiving the sacramentall elements of bread and 〈…〉 we shall prove it first to be warrantable next 〈…〉 downe our reasons whereupon wee 〈…〉 instituted THE FIRST PART CONCERneth the defence of sitting CHAP. I. That the Communicants sitting in the act of receaving eating and drinking is lawfull
also but that statio signifieth only standing in Tertullians phrase when he saith Solennior statio or solvere stationem I have insisted the longer upon this testimonie because Doctour Burges doth so confidently gather out of it which never man did before that the Christians then did and before had used to take the sacrament kneeling This raw but too confident antiquarie his collection may be refuted by other testimonies witnessing that sâ—metimes they saâ—e of which we have alledged some before or at other timâ—s stood Pionysius Alexandrinus writing to Xystus bishop of Rome concerning one that was in sorrow because hee was baptised by hereticks saith he duâ—st not baptise him over againe because he had a long time stood at the table and reached forth his hand to receave the holy food and had beene for a long time partaker of the body and bloud of Christ. Iustinus telleth us That the people rose and the deacons gave to every one to partake of the bread and the wine Is it likely that they kneeled when the deacons gave the elements In the homily which goeth under the name of Chrysostome Stemus trementes timidi demissis ocutis Let us stand trembling with fear aâ—d our eyes casten downe So yee see both before and after Tertullians time testimonies for standing There was an ancient custome in the Church which Bellarmine saith was left off but about 500. yeare before his time to stand upon the Lords day even in time of prayer Zovaras in synod 6. can 90. sâ—ith That no wayes might they kneel betwixt the evening service on satterday and the Lords day at evening Die dominico de geniculis ad orarenesaâ— saith Tertullian And such like betwixt easter and pentecost not only upon the Lords day but no day of the weeke might they kneele Yea by the decree of Alexandâ—r the third they might not kneel upon the Lords day in publike but only at the consecration of Bishops and giving of orders he that did consecrate and he that wâ—s consecrated might kneel and this was decreed about the yeare 1159. at which 〈◊〉 it seemeth this one exception entred in Now will any man affirme That they never communicated upon the Lords day for a thousand yeare or 1159. or imagine as Doctour Burges doth that because they might not kneel that all this time they tooke the sacrament standing in the Church and went home to their houses where they eated kneeling or to their seats in the Church where they might not kneel L. page 52. confesseth That the communicanâ—s in the primitive Church stood at the table when they receaved the sacrament on the Lords day Well say they seeing they prayed standing they used that gesture in the receaving of the eucharist which they thought fittest for prayer I answer they thought not that gesture fittest for prayer The authour of the questions extant in Iustinus saith Genuâ—m inclinatio in precatione magis peccatores Deo commendat quâ—m sistantes orent He preferreth yee see kneeling in prayer before standing But both are indifferent They stood to signifie their joy for Christs resurrection and not because they though it the fittest gesture for prayer It was a conceat they tooke up which entred not in the Apostle Pauls minde for wee finde Acts 20. that he kneeled betweene Easter and Pentecost Alwise by that custome ye may see they communicated standing The testimonies above cited have not relation to any day and the custome observed yet to this day in the orientall Churches to communicate standing notwithstanding that other custome hath ceased declareth that they intended never geniculation in the act of receaving Ephraim Placit in his Christianographie descriving the manner of the administration of the Lords supper in the Greek Church in the Churches of the Mengrellians Circassians Georgians Muscovits Melchits or Syrians Armenian Iacobits the Christians falsly called Nestorians the Cophti or Egyptian Christians the Abyssinos or Ethiopian Christians produceth no instance for kneeling in the act of receaving eating drinking which he would not have pretermined being conforme and dedicating his booke to the bishop of Elie. Cassander in his Liturgicks descriving the order observed in the Churches of the Armâ—nâ—ans Muscovits and in the kingdome of preste Iohn maketh no mention of kneeling but of standing Ilâ—ssie in his 4. boâ—ke of the Masse trusseth up all in few words Quarè orientales ecclesiae adorationem sacramenti admiserunt nusquâ—m non quae patriarchae Consta tinopolitano obsequuntur nâ—n quae Antiocheno Et in Abyssnis etiam ipsis hodie stâ—ntes sacramenta participant nec â—â—minus reverenter The orientall Churches no where admitted edoration of the sacrament not those which are obedient to the patriâ—rch of Constantinople or yet the patriarâ—h of Antioch And the Abyssins themselfes participate of the sacrament standing and yet not without reverence Where by adoration he meaneth kneeling whereunto be opposeth standing If ever kneeling in the act of receaving had beene in use among them it had not beene left off considering mans pronnesse to idolatrie and superstition and delight to stick in the mire when he is wallowing in it It resteth then that kneeling is only found in the Churches subject to the Pope of old or at the present Other Churches howbeit they followed not the paterne using another forme and gesture not was sutable to this first yet they degenerated not so 〈◊〉 as the Roman Church did The Muscovite Graecians 〈◊〉 Lâ—tine Priest chance to say Masse upon one of their altars they forthwith breake them downe as defiled and polluted And they â—old the priests of the Latine Church to be no letter then hereticks and vouchsafe not to salute them Willets out of Sacranus We have not yet heard of any authentick testimonie for kneeling which is adoration in proper and strict sense for the space of a thousand year after Christ which is the date we set downe Nor yet till after the dayes of Pope Honorius the third who lived â—bout the yeare 1220. And he decreed nothing 〈◊〉 â—owing not of the knee but of the head or superiour bulk of the body at the elevation in â—he masse The bowing of the knee at the elevation entred not till afterward yea prevailed not universally even in our dayes For I finde in Bochellus a decree made in a popish synod at Rhems anno 1583. Quoriam apud omnes sere catholicos usus modo obtinuit ut procumbentes adorent divinâ—â— eucharistiam Because the use 〈…〉 prevailed almost among all catholicks that falling 〈◊〉 they aâ—ore the divine eucharist the holy synod exhorteth that if there be any Church useth another custome aâ—d 〈◊〉 the body of Christ in this sacrifice standing that they fâ—ll downe herâ—after while the holy mysteries are set forth to be adored Sancta synodus hortatur ut si quae ecclesia altero more adhuc utatur stando Christi corpus iâ— hoc sacrificio adoreâ— proeumbat 〈…〉 sancta
that purpose which is called the feast of the resurrection Sâ—â—rez having reckoned the many prerogatives of the Lords day as that Christ rose that day the holy Ghost descended upon the Apostles c. hee willeth us to observe that howbeit all these prerogatives might have beene considered in the determination of the day yet the day of it selfe and directly was not instituted for the peculiar commemoration of these â—â—rkes of God but to worship God for himselfe and his owne exellencie Nihilominus per se ac directè non referri vel istitui hunc diem ad peculiaerem commemorationem illorum operum Dei sed ad Deumipsum propter se colendum propter suam excellentiam majestatem It wee had no dayes but festivall for some particular benefits we should have no day for the worship of God in generall The Lords day therefore may justly bee called the schoole-day of Christians as Petrus Ramus calleth it Thirdly as the sabbath of old was distinguished from the yearly feast which were called good that is merrie dayes so is the Lords day from the yearly feasts invented afterwards by men Vpon the anniversarie feasts called good dayes they might not fast as yee have heard before Mirth and mourning could not stand together But upon the sabbath they might lawfully fast Ne quando sanctificaâ—it De is diem septimum quia in illo requievit ab omnibus operibus suis aliquid de jejunio vel prandio expressit nec cum postea populo Hebraâ— de ipsius dici observatione mandavit aliquid de alimentis sumendis vel non sumendis locutus saith Augustâ—ne that is God enjoyned nothing concerning fasting or eating either the first time that he sanctified the seventh day or afterward when he gave the manna The Lords day succeeding in the roome of the old sabbath as it standeth in the decalogue is of the same qualitie Wee may lawfully fast upon the Lords day which were absurd to d ee upon our anniversarie feast dayes It is true that in the ancient Church it was thought a hainous thing to fast upon the Lords day So did they also forbid to pray kneeling that day to signifie their joy for Christs resurrection This use of signification or testification was the fountaine of much superstition and brought in a heap of ceremonies some of which the Papists themselves were â—shamed of long since The same ceremonie of not kneeling in time of prayer upon the Lords day is worne out of use nigh 500 yeares since saiâ—h Bellarmine If the reason of the institution had beene solide it should become us no lesse then them to pray standing upon the Lords day But the ground was naught The like may bee said of not fasting upon the Lords day Some reason they had indeed not to fast upon this day when the Manichees and Priscillianists fasted for the Manichees fasted ordinarily upon the Lords day lest they should seeme to rejoyce for the resurrection of Christ which they beâ—eeved not The Priscillianists fasted likewise ordinarily upon the Lords day and the nativitie day But when there are no knowne Manichees nor Priscillianists there is not the like reason for not fasting But the extremities should be avoided To thinke it unlawfull to fast that day or unlawfull to dine and breake our fast are both without warrant and superstitious But to fast upon occasion or in time of any imminent judgement is lawfull When Paul continued preaching upon the sabbath till midnight at Troas before the tasted any thing or the rest were refreshed with meat this conceat of not fasting upon the Lords day had not entred in the Church Was Paul a Manichaean saith Hierome because hee and those who were with him fasted on the Lords day His words are extant in Gratians decree Atqui utinam omni tempore jejunare possimus quod in Actibus Apostolorum diebus Pentecostes die dominico Apostolum Paictum cum eo credentes fecisse legimus Non tamen Manicheae haereseos accusandit sunt If any had resolved to fast seven dayes or moe he might have fasted upon the Lords day included as ye may see in Balsamo and Zonaras upon the constitutions falsly called apostolicall and Augustine epist. 86. ad Casulanum Whitaker defending the occasionall fasâ—s of our Church telleth Duraeus that the respects the ancients had concerne not us Etsi illîs temporibus die dominica jejunare nefas fuit propter haerelices Judaeos qui Christi resurrectionem impugnabant jam dudum tamen illa offensio nullum in ecclesia locum habet ut planè nugatorum sit quod tu de nostris in Anglia Scotia◠〈◊〉 calumniaris quasi eò spectent ut his cuniculis resurâ—â—ctiâ—â—â— fidem evertamus In a pronounciall synod holden at Dort anno 1574 it was ordained that there bee three sermons on the Lords day when a fast is to be keeped on â— It is to observe a day to say the morne is the Loâ—ds day therefore it is unlawfull to fast saith Chamter Alstedius Jejunandum etiam die dominica si necessitas flagitet What need I multiply testimonies that is sufficient which Augustine saith What dayes wee ought to fast and what not I finde it not defined by any precept given by our Lord or any of the Apostles Quibus diebus non oporteat jejunare quibus oporteat praecepto Domini vel Apostolorum non havenio definitum epist. 86. But if the Lords day were a festivall day it should follow that we should not not fast on it at all Now we proceed in our reasons against festivall dayes THE II. REASON NOne appointed holy festivities under the laws when the times were more ceremonious but God himselfe The dayes of Purim were called simply the dayes of Purim not the holy dayes of Purim They were not called Chaggimâ— No peculiar sacrifice was appointed nor any holy convocation of the people enjoyned The ordinance required but feasting and joy and sending of portions to other The rest mentioned Esther 9. was onely from their enemies So much worke as might stand with a feasting day was not forbidden Suppose they had rested altogether from worke that would only prove an idle day but not an holy day Our Doctour therefore hath no warrant to say that they were made holy dayes by Mordecay Afterward it 〈◊〉 true whâ—n the Jews become more superstitious they read the book of Estheâ— after the reading whereof they spâ—nt the rest of the day in revelling and riotousnesse Next these dayes were instituted by Mordecai and therefore were called Mordecai's dayes 2 Maccahab last chap. vers 37. Sixtus Senensis saith he is thought to be the penman of the booke of Esther he was one of the 120. of which the great synagogue consisted of which number were Zacharie Daniel Ezra and Malachie Whitaker thinketh Mordecai did this God inspiring him or perhaps by the advice or warrant of some Prophet and doubteth not
them and not spoken so generally Chamieraom 3. l. 19. c. 6. embraceth a more generall exposition that the Apostle condemneth both Iewish and Ethnick observation of dayes Non est verisimile Apostol um adeo incautâ— locutum ut generaliter observationem damnare videtetur si aliquam excipiebat saith Chamierus Or is it likely that the dayes appointed by God himselfe being abolâ—shed the Apostles would have brought in other in their roome Is it reason then that others should bring them in Zanchius confesseth That it is more agreeable to the first institution and writings of the Apostles that one day of the weeke onely bee san ctified Magis consentaneum est cum prima institutione cum scriptis Apostolicis ut unus tantum dies in septimana sanctificetur There was but one day observed in the Apostles times and called the Lords day If other dayes had beene dedicated to Christ they should all have beene the Lords dayes Beatus Rhenanus in his annotations upon Tertullian De corona militis observeth that in the primitive times the word Lord was more familiar and frequent in the mouthes of Christians then the name of Christ. So it was as much as to say Christs day The Lords day then was Christs day and Christ had no other dayes of nativitie passion c. Eusebius treading unknowne footsteps as himselfe confesseth in the beginning of his storie filleth up his booke with some old fables Among the rest he maketh mention of an epistle of Polycrates bishop of Ephesus to Victor bishop of Rome wherein he reporteth that hee and his predecessours even upward to John the Evangelise celebrated Easter upon the fourteenth day of the moone That epistle may be marked for a counterfite for it beareth that Iohn was a priest and bare in his forehead the petalum that is the golden plate like that of the high priests The Doctour calleth such gay tales Rhetoricall flowres But saith Scaliger Neutrum concedet qui sciverit nullum Christi Apostol um sacerdotem fuisse nulli praeterquà m summo sacerdoti petalum gestare licuisse Augustine who lived in the fift age after the Apostles could not resolve upon the originall of our five festivall dayes but floated betweene two opinions and not one of them sure For they were neither instituted by the Apostles nor by generall Councel Socrates in his historie commeth nearer to the point I am of opinion saith â—e that as many other things crept in of custome in sundrie places so the feast of Easter to have prevailed among all people of a certaine privat custome and observation in so much that not one of the Apostles hath any where prescrived so much as one rule of it to any man A little after They that keepe Easter the fourteenth day of the moneth bring forth Iohn the Apostle for their Authour Such as inhabite Rome and the west parts of the world alledge Peter and Paul for themselves that they should leave such a tradition yet there is none of them that can shew in writing any testimonie of theirs for confirmation and proofe of that custome It hath beene an old refuge when any countrie or province could not finde the beginning of their customes to father them upon the Apostles A notable exemple whereof wee had in this same I le when there was hote contention about the formes of shaven crownes Hierâ—â—â— himselfe saith Vnaquaeque provincia pracept a majerum leges Apostolicas arbitretur Let every province esteeme the traditions or precepts of their forefathers to bee Apostolicall lawes It will rather follow that the Apostles observed not nor appointed Easter to be observed at all For the Apostle being directed infallibly by the spirit had agreed upon the day as well as upon the thing it selfe and not left occasion of contention to the Christian world Quae aliter atque aliter observabantur non possunt ab Apostolis esse instituta quorum ab eodem spiritu eruditorum non potuit non esse individuus consensus Neque unquam piis fuit persuasum ab Iohanne institutum pascha decima qua ta Luna à I etro autem post eam quomodo jactabant veteres It is well said in the preface to the harmonie of confessions that the old contention about the celebrating of Easter tossed very hotly the space of two hundred yeares or thereabout betwixt the Greekes and the Latines was long since of us thought worthy of laughter Whitaker wondereth at their frivolous contentions and he saith there was no necessitie to observe it any day Chamierus saith Si institutum fuisset ab Apostolus eodem ubique modo fuisset institutum observatum quod falsum esse jam olim observavit Socrates Seeing they have no sooting for the Apostles appointing of the observation of Easter farre lesse will they be able to prove the Christians pentecost and other festivities that came in after as of Christs nativitie ascension c. to have beene instituted by the Apostles Iustinus questions Clemens constitutions some sermons ascrived to Cyprian all suppositious workes are the most ancient proofes they alledge for them THE IIII. REASON IF it had beene the will of God that the severall acts of Christ should have beene celebrated with severall solemnities the holy Ghost would have made knowne the day of his nativitie circumcision presentation to the temple baptisme transfiguration and the like For it is kindly say they to remember opus diei in die suo the notable worke of a day in the owne day Bellarmine saith that Christs acts did consecrat the dayes and times wherein they were wrought Hooker saith that the wonderous workes of God did advance the dayes and times wherein they were wrought There is not a day in the yeare wherein some wonderous worke of God hath not beene wrought All the dayes of the yeare saith Leo are full of Christs miracles If Christs actions advance and consecrate the dayes where on they were wrought they ought to have beene made knowne lest we keep holy such dayes as were never consecrated or advanâ—ed But it is confessed that the day of Christs nativitie and consequently of the rest depending thereupon as of his circumcision presentation baptisme have beene hid from mortall men And therefore the day of Christs nativitie was observed diversly of old by some in one moneth by some in another The 25. of December was grounded upon an erroneous conceat that Zacharie the father of Iohn the Baptist was high priest which errour is yet fostered by observing that day Yee see then as God hid the bodie of Moses for avoiding of idolatrie so hath he the day of Christs nativitie for avoiding superstition And this is sufficient to declare the will of God concerning other notable acts which were knowne to wit that not the act but divine institution maketh a day holy Gods resting upon the seventh day made it not holy but his sanctifying of it and instituting it to