precious Gifts to Sects divided from the Church of which scarce any pretend to them and those that doe so do evidently shew by their contempt of all authority renunciation of all Christian Charity furious and restles attempts of new Reformations and Seditious Combinations to the ruine of all Peace that it is a black Spirit which was a Murderer from the beginning by which they are agitated Whereas those humble devout and retired soules among Catholicks stiled by the Doctour Fanaticks are so far from any intention of disturbing Peace and so entirely submitted to Lawfull Authority the Spirit of Prophets being so indispensably Subiect to the Prophets that they are in a continuall readines to renounce all Reuelations Apparitions impulses and whatsoever extraordinary Visitations if they seem any wayes to occasion in them Doubts of the Churches Faith or to prejudice Obedience to her Ordonnances 63. The Doctour I am sure considering his supposed Universall reading cannot be ignorant that such Fanaticks as these though invisible to the busy World were yet esteemd Chariots of Israël and the horsemen thereof That pious wise and Potent Christian Emperours have consulted them in their greatest affairs and have acknowledged themselves obliged to them for miraculous Victories over Tyrants resolving upon warre by their encouragement beginning them with their benediction and conquering by the assistance of their Prayers By their Prayers and not their Disputations the Church has triumphed over Heresies and the world been freed from Plagues and Mortalities At their Names Devills have trembled and by their command though absent those proud Spirits have with a mixture of feare and rage quitted their habitation in the Bodies of unhappy men Yet these the Doctour dares deride and because they are patient will not perhaps repent till it be too lare but will justify still his impious boldnes and petulancy 64. It is truly a sad thing to consider with what disposition of mind persons qualifyed as it seems the Doctour is do apply themselves to the reading of Books of Piety written by Catholicks It is as daggers piercing their hearts when they find no advantage to expresse their malignity If in a great volume full of most heavenly Instructions for the exercise of all vertues and dutyes to God and man they can find but a line or two into which they think they can make their Venenious teeth to enter by that line or two they become edified that is comfortable nourrishment to their minds the whole Book besides being nauseous to them Would not damned soules in Hell if Spirituall Books were sent them thus read and thus descant upon them 65. Now whether the Doctour and some other of his freinds has not shewed himself such a Reader of Catholick Books truly innocent devout and in which the breathing of Gods Spirit may as it were be perceived let any indifferent Reader of his Book be judge How many of such Books from S. Gregory to S. Ignatius his time does the Doctour shew that he has read how many Lives of Saints how many Treatises of Devotion and among them he will give me leave to name Sancta Sophia and poor Mother Iuliana And what account does he give to his Readers of the Spirituall Benefit reaped by him from his laborious reading He it seems is not able out of them all to suggest any point of Instruction in Christian Doctrin not one good affection to God not the least encouragement to a vertuous holy life All these things are vanished out of his memory and evaporated out of his brain having never affected his heart What then does he yeild for his Readers edification He teaches him in reading such Books to pronounce mimically and Scornfully what he finds there concerning Miracles how wel soever attested and concerning Divine Favours communicated by God to his Speciall Servants and this being done to call them Fanaticks and so doeing to esteem such relations sufficiently confuted and such Spirituall Books sufficiently disparaged He teaches him to snatch out of a great Book three or four passages lamely and imperfectly cited to give what construction to them he pleases and whether he does not understand or over-understand them to pronounce them still Fanaticall and there is an end of those Books By the Doctours good will no Protestant hereafter must receiue the least good from them vnless pride malice and contempt of godlines be good things 66. Now having named in the last place poor Mother Iuliana a devout Anchoret about three hundred years since living in Norwich I must needs Signify my wonder what could move his Spleen and choler against her litle Book It is true her language to the ears of this age seems exotick But it is such as was spoken in her time therefore she may be excused Her expressions touching Gods favours to her are homely but that surely is no sin For affections to God are set down with great simplicity indeed but they are withall cordiall and fervent and apt to imprint themselves in the heart of an unpreiudiced Reader The sense and tast she shews to have had of Gods Speciall love to his servants of the omnipotent efficacy of his Grace and his impregnable defence and watchfullnes over his Elect to secure them finally from all dangers of Tentations is indeed admirable Yet the Doctour has no eyes to see any of these things But through what glasses he looked when he spied out blasphemy in her Writing I am not able to say Blasphemy which never hitherto could be observed by so many learned and Religious persons as have perused them But it is no wonder that Spiders should suck and digest into poyson the most wholesom nourishment 67. What hath been hitherto said of Contemplative Prayer is but even too much to such an Adversary it being a Subiect too Sacred and Divine to be treated of in a Polemicall Discourse against an Opponent of the Doctours temper Who I think is the first Protestant Writer that ever made that an argument of Controversy against the Catholick Church The only Excuse that I can devise for so unreasonable a quarrel begun by him is his indulgence to a froward passion conceived by him without any provocation against M. Cressy who severall years since published a Book on that Subiect called Sancta Sophia in which Book notwithstanding he challenges nothing to himself but the Labour of making Collections and the Method of it In that regard therefore it may be permitted him to commend the Directions for the Exercise of Internall Spirituall Prayer and the Practise of all Christian Vertues in Perfection contained in it And this in despight of the Doctours unmerited malice he does with such confidence that he dares promise to himself that if any sober well affected Reader though a Protestant and though at present one of the Doctours admirers shall seriously and with an humble heart peruse it he will either apply himself to the practise of the excellent Instructions contained in it or bewayle his want
scorns or calumnies when merited only for recommending to devout Christians instructions for the practise of Christian Vertues and Piety in the greatest perfection that this life is capable of His Motiues therefore of writing and publishing this Discourse were first his Obedience to certain freinds whose commands he ought in no wise to resist And then a just Indignation in seeing the most Sacred things and Persons in the Catholick Church selected on purpose by him to be contaminated with his inck full of gall and poyson thereby imprudently ministring new aims to Atheists against whom as a considerable and growing Sect among them he and others begin to preach and write by shewing to his utmost ability that all the Religion professed in the world and that thing that bare the name of a Catholick Church for so many Ages before the times of Luther and Calvin was nothing for their Worship but Idolatry for their Devotions but Fanaticism and for their Doctrine and Disciplin nothing but Faction Ambition and Avarice 2. The task therefore here imposed being to answer in the Doctours last Book not the Points of Controversy between the Catholick Church and Protestants reserved for a more learned pen of his worthy Antagonist but those discourses in his Book and principally touching Fanaticism in which the Doctour seems not to have intended to employ his Talent of Reasoning but to discharge his excess of Spleen and choler and to give free scope to all Vnchristian and even in human Passions the Authour hopes he shall not deserve justly a Censure from the Reader if he endeavour here to defend the Truth with as much zeal and confidence as his Adversary hath assaulted it So long as nothing passeth from him that any way woundeth Christian Charity nor any sharpness is used but such as may through Gods Grace prove beneficiall to him and his applauding Readers 3. Now in the Doctours Book there are three Heads of Accusation selected by him with intention to disgrace and fright his Readers from the Communion of the Catholick Church by imputing to her 1. That she is guilty of Severall Opinions and Practises which hinder Devotion and a good life 2. That Fanaticism is not only countenanced by her but made a ground of believing some Doctrins of making some Ecclesiasticall Ordonnanes of erecting Religious Orders and â—kewise of resisting lawfull Authority 3. That there are among her Subiects Divisions about Doctrins of great moment and no possibility of reducing dissenting Parties to Vnity or Obedience 4. These Accusations my purpose is to refute and for his Proofs of them to shew the invalidity of those which are pretended by him to regard the Church her self But as for such as regard the Opinions or Actions of particular persons and which fill up the far greatest number of his leaves some thing shall be said to those among them which seem of any considerable moment and the rest shall be neglected as needing no Answer though never so truly alledged by him And having done this I will as I am perswaded with much greater confidence retort the same Heads of his Accusations upon himself demonstrating that his Protestant Churches as principled by him 1. doe evidently undermine the foundations of Piety and a Good life 2. That the Essence of his Religion is meer Fanaticism in his own sence of the Word and that it iustifies Rebellion against the Civill Magistrate 3. That by the Grounds of his Religion all manner of Divisions and Schims are not only excusable but lawfull and withall incurable 5. He will perhaps when he sees his large Book pretended to be sufficiently answered in a few sheets of paper renew the scornfull complaint made by him in his Preface That those who in some small measure have attempted to answer him have performed it in a way that Ratts answer Books by gnawing some of the leaves of them the Body and Design of them remaining wholly untouched by them Now who those persons are whom he is pleased to resemble to Ratts I can only iudge by guess and if I guess aright particularly of one Authour I could make it appear to the Doctour that the very bowells and most Vitall parts of his great Volume have been eaten through and consumed by that his Adversary 6. However I conceive he wil not have iust reason to apply this Metaphor to the Authour of this present Treatise since it was his own fault by heaping together a great Masse of rubbage and stuff altogether impertinent to make a short Answer sufficient Does he think his Adversaries in case they were allowed the liberty and commodity of publishing large Volumes so much at leasure as to follow him step by step in examining Quotations and answering Obiections which are of no moment whether they be true or false He may by such a way of writing beget in the minds of the vulgar sort of Readers a high Opinion of the Vastnes of his unnecessary reading and his well-furnished Library but his Adversaries will be much to blame if they trouble themsselves with defending every Old Story or personall imputations or indeed if hereafter they engage themselves in any Controversy with him except in Points pretended by him of such consequence as to iustify a necessity in Protestants of separating from the Catholick Church And few such Points are to be found in his Books 7. But moreover as short an Answer as this is he wil have less reason to say That the Body and Design of his Book will remain wholly untouched in it He may indeed perhaps have some ill Design in publishing as it were by conspiracy with others a Book so voyd of Christian Charity and moderation Which Design may remain untouched by mee because I am unwilling to declare the grounds of my coniectures moving me to look upon it as an Ominous ill-boading Book fore-running some expected mischeif But for the Body of his Book that is whatsoever appears to me in it of consequence it is truly a very slender dwarfish Body being almost entirely contained in a few sheets at the beginning and in the last single sheet which enwraps his Protestant Principles The publishing of which Principles was truly an act of commendable ingenuity and confidence also For I think he is the first Protestant-Controvertist who upou such a tender Subiect has appeared bare-faced out of the Clouds And moreover I may take leave to tell him that from a heedfull consideration of those his Principles I do collect that He and myself are of the same iudgment in one matter of great importance viz. That no shew of Reason or conscience can be pretended to escape from the Authority of the Catholick Church but by renouncing entirely as he has done in his Principles all Ecclesiasticall or even Civill Authority and by consequence that no Churches proceed Logically in asserting the grounds of their Religion but only Catholicks or Single-Independents The reason hereof is Because for any Ecclesiasticall Superiours to acknowledge any
not haue refused to make use of it being one of the seauenty Patrons to whom he has written most pittifully begging Epistles addressed to all degrees sects and Professions except Bishops And in requitall he cannot but warrant him now a sufficient Minister in case he can get Ordination from a Iustice of Peace or some other qualified Ciuil Magistrate Poor England art thou so unprovided of factious spirits that French Calvinists must be calld in and hired to plant among us the poysonnous roots of malicious Huguenotterie 86 But to return to the Doctour Himself J am far from being of his opinion That the most dangerous Sect among us is of those who under pretence of setting up the Kingdom of Christ think it lawfull to overturn the Kingdoms of the world Such were Venner and his company who saith he acted to the height of Fanaticism among our Sectaries Thus far indeed J agree with him That these Frantick Fifth Monarchists do more professedly teach Rebellion then any other Sect but I should renounce common Reason if I should affirm that such à handfull of mad-men as Venner and Riscrew are a Sect more dangerous to the Kingdom then those numerous Armies of sober Fanaticks Presbyterians Independents Anabaptists c. who all conspired to the raising and prosecuting the late Rebellion Yet all these will say as much for themselves as the Doctour has here done viz. We condemn any opposition to Government under any pretence whatsoeuer For it was in Obedience to a Government such as it was that the Rebellion was upheld a Government divided from the Kings and usurped on purpose to destroy him To conclude this point as zeale for the Kings safety and the Publick Peace is commendable in all English Subjects and in such Strangers salso whom English Preferments have made his Subiects yet certainly in the Doctour and his worthy Huguenot Authour it seems a preposterous and suspicious zeale which has been shewn only against a Party of which not one can be accused of want of fidelity to his Maiesty whilst they speak not a word nor so much as intimate any apprehension of danger from those who unanimously conspired to his Destruction and who for any thing to the contrary appears cannot yet find one word in the Scripture or the Lawes of the Kingdom which condemns their former Rebellion But enough if not too much of this argument which the Doctour would needs discourse upon §. 6. Fanaticism returneed upon the Doctour and his vvhole Religion 87. THe Doctour now for the recreation of his Readers hauing represented Catholicks not only such as now liue but many in glory with God in heaven travestis in a disguise of Ffanaticks acting a Ffarce or Enterlude composed by him the glory of which invention he may lawfully challenge to himself alone for I do not find that any pattern has been giuen him by any other Adversaries of Gods Church He cannot iustly take it ill if in some degree of requitall we endeavour to shew not only himself but the whole Church I mean all the Churches of Protestants as they are Principled by him in his Book to be really without any vizard or disguise very Fanaticks 88. Jn pursuing this subiect we cannot hinder the Doctour from challenging some by him esteemed great advantages in which he much glories and for which he giues God humble thanks For 1. we can find no Religious Orders among them upon the Institutours and Subjects of which we might fasten this Title and whom we might Stigmatize with this brand An attempt indeed has once been made of beginning such an Order of young men and women liuing promiscuously together But by reason of two defects it presently expired For neither would they be persuaded to vow continency in such circumstances truly vnreasonable Neither could a Superiour he or she be found to whom they could be obliged in conscience to profess Obedience and no wonder since it seems their own Church cannot exact it from them 2 We cannot heare of so much as one single person whom we might call a Fanatick for leauing the flesh and the world to the end he or she might entirely consecrate themselues to God in Solitude and Exercises of Spirituall Prayer and Mortification 3. Jn case God should call any one to such a state of life there is an vtter want among them of Instructours and Instructions proper for it vnles The crumms of comfort The Practise of Piety truly for the Substance good innocent Books with store of pious affections or else one a more late one yet better then those called The whole duty of man could serue their turns But these hauing neuer been intended for such an vse it cannot reasonably be expected from them 4. They all of them except the Quakers and Fifth Monarchists with few besides disclaiming all Gratuite Graces Visions Illuminations Inspirations Passiue Vnions c. Jf vpon this account we should call any of them besides these Fanaticks they would and very iustly call us impudent Slanderers 5. Not one Miracle hauing been pretended to since the first Reformation not so much as the curing a Tertian Ague to testify that Reformation was pleasing to God we cannot reasonably accuse them of forging any Miracles 6. The Doctour might haue done well even in revenge against his enemy M. Cressy and his Church History or as he scornfully stiles it Great Legend to have given to the world at least a pretty little Legend of his Reformed Saints But alas his Records will not furnish him with matter of that argument to fill a nutshell So that he has deprived us of the means of requiting him with finding Fanaticks among his Rubricated Saints Yet if he will consult more Ancient and some even Primitive Records as S. Ireneus Tertullian and after them S. Epiphanius S. Augustin and Philastrius together with other Modern writers as Alphonsus a Castro Prateolus c. who have compiled Books expressly touching the Lives and Doctrins of many of his Predecessours it will goe hard if he be not able to discover some among them whom he may call Saints as well as Cranmer and we in requitall Fanaticks But he is too wise to loose his advantage 89. And all these manifold advantages wee yield up to him to our shame and to the Doctours great contentment and to the glory of his Protestant Churches Yet all this will not discourage vs from endeavouring at least to iustify that the Doctour and his Churches are meer Fanaticks This we confidently pronounce and to make this good we will not as he has done exemplify in the Writings or actions of a few persons culld out with an intention to baffle affront and reuile them but we will demonstrates vpon his own grounds and Principles that the very nature and Essence of his Churches and Religion is pure putid Fanaticism 90. Now a demonstrable proof of this the Doctour himself affords vs in the 13. and 15. Principles at the end of his Book
His words are these Such a particular way of Reuelation being made choice of by God for the means of making known his Will in order to the happines of Mankind as Writing we may iustly say that it is repugnant to the nature of the Design and the Wisdom and Goodnes of God to giue infallible assurance to persons in Writing his Will for the benefit of Mankind if those Writings may not be vnderstood by all Persons who sincerely endeauour to know the meaning of them in all such things as are necessary for their Saluation And consequently there can be no necessity supposed of any infallible Society of men either to attest or explain those Writings among Christians 91. What is this now but Fanaticism in the heighth of the Notion signified by the word to make euery Christian Soberly enquiring into Scripture to be his own Teacher in all necessary Points of Faith and it is no matter what becoms of vnnecessary Points and to be a competent Iudge of the true sence of Scripture in them all this without any regard to all Externall Authority infallible or fallible either for an infallible one being vnnecessary what necessity can there be of a fallible Authority which none is or can be bound to Belieue If it be Fanaticism to attend to and belieue certain pretended Illuminations Inspirations and Reuelations concerning particular matters perhaps of no great importance with a refusall to submitt them to any Externall Authority what is it to ground his whole Religion vpon his own fancy enquiring into the true sense of Diuine Reuelation 92. But perhaps the Doctour thinks himself and his Churches secure notwithstanding any thing here said because neither himself nor they pretend to any New Reuelations Illuminations or Inspirations in this matter Notwithstanding he will not find an euasion by this For besides that J am sure Presbyterians at least if not the other Sects and likewise the Huguenots of France in their Confession of Faith haue always professed that they haue not only the true sense of Scripture by Inspiration of the Holy Ghost but that thereby they are enabled to distinguish true Scripture from Apocriphall Writings I will take the boldnes to tell him That he himself does the same and if he denyes it it is because he is ignorant of what passes in his own mind 93. To shew this I will here propose a few Questions to him and he not being present to doe it himself I will suppose he gives me leaue to make Answers to them such as J conceiue he will not disavow The. 1. Question Does he after a sober Enquiry vnderstand and assent to the true sense of Scripture in all necessary Points Answer Yes 2. Question Is his Assent to such Points an Act of meer naturall Reason or is it a Diuine Faith Answer A Diuine Faith surely as he hopes and is fully perswaded For he would be sorry if he belieued not better then Devills 3. Question Is a Diuine Faith a Supernaturall Gift of Gods Holy Spirit Answ. Yes the Scripture saying so expresly 4. Quest. Is this Gift of God communicated to his servants any other way then by Illumination Inspiration or the like Diuine operation Equivalent Answ. J must answer in the Doctours place till he better informs me that no other way is known Jn the last place 5 Q. Does he think himself fobliged to acknowledge that he receies this Faith from or to Submitt this his perswasion of a Diuine operation in him to the Teaching of any Church Answ. He will not though J thank God J doe acknowledge any Church fallible or infallible which can iustly require thus much from him Now therefore a primo ad vltimum does the Doctour want any necessary qualification to make him passe for a perfect Fanatick and Enthusiast a Fanatick by duty imposed on him from the Essence of his Religion and moreouer a Teacher of Fanaticism Jf I could absolue him from this I would very willingly but sincerely I cannot since he himself has giuen me a distinct notion of Fanaticism by which he and his party vnderstands an Enthusiastick way of Religion or resisting Authority Civill or Ecclesiasticall vnder a pretence of Religion by which Notion in it self true and proper he is to be iudged without Appeale 94. Now though the Doctour takes vpon him and is generally conceiued by others to be a Champion of the Church of England yet perhaps it would be rashnes in me from his warrant alone to affirme that the Church of England that Church J mean which is established by publick Authority does now at last ground her Faith on such a Fanatick Principle as the Doctour in her name has layd For then it might indeed be truly sayd that the New Faith of the Church of England is the very Faith of New England The Doctour how learned soeuer otherwise he is but a Neophit in this Church and therefore all he says not to be swallowed presently without examining if he wrong the Church of England J am vnwilling to wrong her with him 95. And one particular thing which I have observed from his Book makes me suspect that my Lords the Bishops will not avow this Principle imposed by him on them which is that his Book wants an Imprimatur Now if an Approbation was either not demanded by him or being demanded was refused him it seems strange that against order and Publick command it should be permitted to be so dispersed without any Controll But the truth is there is a great Mistery of late in that Formality of Approbations for some Books want an Imprimatur for the Reader which was not wanting to the Printer Perhaps the Doctours virulence against poore Catholicks was so highly approved by the grave Censor Librorum that rather then it should be hindred from doing mischief to them he was content the Principles also should passe which utterly destroy the foundations of his own Church This may seeme more probable because in like manner a Licence is given to the Printer for a Book of Sermons in one of which composed entirely of Lying Invectives against Catholicks and by a most horrible calumny imputing the Pouder Treason to the Preaching of Catholick Religion there is this passage becoming a Preacher of the Gospell I wish that the Lawes against these Foxes the Papists might be put in execution as they were anciently against Wolues Nothing but an vtter extermination of Catholicks it seems will content the charitable Preacher who seems to intimate also that in his Judgment it is fitt a price should be sett on every Catholicks head as formerly on Wolues to be payed to his murderer Such a Sermon as this the Printer is licenced to print but he who gave it being ashamed that his Approbation of so barbarous a piece should appeare to the world has given order that his Licence should be concealed 96. What judgment therefore in this regard to make of the Doctours
Martyr whose Relicks lay there so to be helped with our Lord by his Intercession where it may be observed that S. Augustin both allows Praying to the Martyr in the behalf of such Deceased and supposes the Martyrs hearing such Prayers But withall the Father tells them that should some Deceased not have the happines to be buried in such a Holyplace others are not therefore to neglect their Supplications for such because not so minded of them as of others when they goe to the Memoriall of the Martyr And then comes to our very case that howeuer such soules may want Kindred or freinds to remember them as the other hath yet the Common prayers of the Church pro defunctis are without naming any particular persons offred vp for them His words are Adsupplicationes faciendas pro omnibus in Christianâ Catholica Societate defunctis etiam tacitis nominibus quorumcumque sub generali commemoratione suscepit Ecclesia Vt quibus ad ista desunt Parentes aut Filij aut quicunque cognati velamici ab vna eis exhibeantur pia matre Communi §. 10. Of Indulgences 141. BUt toward the latter end of his Book treating of Indulgences the Doctour alledges a practise in the Church which these Catholicks who pretend to iustify it will J belieue find very great difficulty in answering the Doctours proofs that it is really a hindrance of the care of a good life If any therefore do find harm by relying vpon such a Practise they may thank themselues they voluntarily and without any obligation procure such harm to themselues The Councill of Trent in its decision of this Point of Indulgences expressly Condemns a too frequent vse of them as enervating Ecclesiasticall Discipline and desirous to correct all scandalous abuses crept in them ordains an vtter abolishment of all vnlawfull gain for the obtaining of them enioyning likewise all Bishops in their Provinciall Synods to take care that the Benefit of Indulgences may be dispensed piously holily and without corruption to the people 142. Now if after such solicitude shewed by the Councill all abuses doe not yet cease this must be imputed to humane frailty and corruption and to the erroneous Doctrin of some Schoolmen or rather some passages of them singled out from the context and stript from the necessary circumstances and so misapplied whereby the power of the Donour of them is extended without its certain limitts and a vertue attributed to them far exceeding that which the present Church acknowledges in them 143. This seems plainly to appeare by the words of the Councill declaring That since a Power of conferring Indulgences hath been giuen by Christ to his Church which from the most ancient times hath exercised this Power diuinely granted to her Therefore the Holy Synod doth teach and command the vse of Indulgences to be retained in the Church as very healthfull to Christian people and approved by the authority of Holy Councills 144. From this Declaration of the Councill the Doctour truly says that some Catholick Writers do make this Deduction That Indulgences are only a relaxation of the ancient Severity of Church Disciplin according to the old Penitentiall Canons Which Deduction seems the lesse irrationall since the Indulgences inserted by the Councill are the same which from the most ancient times have been exercised by the Church And such an vse of Indulgences if the Doctour refuse to the Catholick Church he dares not to his own Since he cannot deny but that in the Spirituall Courts the Iudges assume a power either to qualify Corporall punishments imposed by the Laws and Canons on Speciall sins or commuting them into Pecuniary But I must add one thing that euen these Indulgences may be said to extend their vertue till after death Since it is certain that being duly administred and taking away the obligation to the Seuerity of the Penitential Canons they doe consequently abate the Suffrings after death which otherwise the Penitent was to vndergoe having neglected to make Satisfaction in this life In a word Catholicks are taught that Indulgences are beneficiall to none but those that are already in the state of Grace And that Remission of Penalty only and not sin is conceded by them Likewise that they relate to Purgatory only not to Hell And lastly by the form of them it appears that the vertue of them after death is only per modum Suffragij 145. As touching the Doctours Questions concerning Indulgences if he expect an Answer to them he must goe into some of our Catholick Schooles where he will not faile to receiue Solutions to them all if they were twice as many but I dare not assure him that these Solutions will give him Satisfaction For my part I have nothing to say about them nor I am sure any other Catholicks as a Catholick Neither doe I belieue that euer any Protestant Controvertist wrote a Volume against the Catholick Church of which not near a tenth part did in any sort concern her and such a Book the Doctour certainly knows his to be and by consequence every ingenious prudent Reader will easily discouer from how poysonous a heart it issued and to how vnchristian an end it was directed §. 11. Of the Churches Liturgy in a tongue not generally understood 146. ANother Practise in the Catholick Church there is which the Doctour esteems a notable hindrance to Piety which is the Publick Ecclesiasticall Office being in a Tongue vnder stood by few This he will not allow to be a matter of Discipline only and consequently in the Churches power to alter Because the Churches power is only to edification for a power beyond that the Apostles themselues never challenged Now it is manifest saith he that S. Paul judges Praying or Preaching in an vnknown tongue not to be of edification 147. Notwithstanding with the Doctours favour his allegations doe not proue the mater not to be of Discipline meerly For the Case stands thus It was far from being the Churches Primary intention that the publick Office should be in a tongue not vnderstood by the people for it was at first composed in the language generally Spoken and vnderstood through Europe But that Language being changed by a mixture of the Dialects of seuerall barbarous nations she thought it not prudent that the publick Service of God composed with great care and exactnes should be exposed in euery Nation to vnsskillfull Translatours and every age to be varied as Dialects did alter it not being in her power to examine all Translations after every new Edition And the same judgmēt the most ancient most extended Churches in the East had all which in a manner do to this day retain their ancient Liturgies now not vnderstood by the Common ignorant people 148. Notwithstanding to repair as much as may be this incommodity the Roman Church at least has taken great care in her Councills that the people in all Nations should be furnished with
at the best a few Sensuall incestuous Fryars abroad and Popular Preachers at home yea as we have lately seen even Mechanicks Souldiers or any other ignorant persons actuated by the Spirit of Pride and Licentiousness to begin a Sect fitt for the palats and complexions of Seekers after Novelties 162. Matters therefore standing thus in these later times can any rationall man be perswaded that if any of those Holy Fathers cited by the Doctour had lived among us or if such Heresies had been spred among their Disciples and pretended to have been evidently deduced from Gods Word they would have been so zealous in their Exhortations to a promiscuous reading of Scriptures But how much think we would such their zeale have been cooled in case such an Architect of Principles as the Doctour is had been in Vogue in their times For Principles they are which evidently contain the most pernicious Soule-destroying Heresy that ever assaulted Gods Church Principles which banish Peace Charity Humility and Obedience vtterly from the Church and State Principles which if through Gods judgment they should generally prevaile what think you would become of our Saviours Promise for there would not be left in the world one Church at all true or false Since where every one is acknowledged the only inventer and Iudge of his own Faith there may meet a Multitude but it is no Church none having right over another errour and truth vertue and vice being equally Iustifiable Lastly these are Principles the admirable vanity of which I think was never paralleld by any Heresiarch but a certain Rhetorius mentioned by Philastrius who taught That all Heresies were in their precepts of life innocent and in their Doctrins true Omnes Hereses rectê ambulare vera docere 163. Non sum ambitiosus in malis I may with a good conscience protest that it is only Truth and a Charitable compassion to soules miserably seduced by so Comprehensive a Heresy as is contained in the Dostours Principles which hath moved mee to fix such a brand upon them Not that I suspect that he would approve such consequences but I am confident with all his skill he cannot avoyd them 164. Now I must acquaint the Doctour that my iust indignation against these Principles is heightned from my own unhappines if not guilt in being the first who gave occasion that they should be known and received into the Church of England This I am sure neither he nor perhaps any one now alive does know and therefore I will acquaint him with the true Story concerning them 165. As I remember it was in the year 1638. that I had occasion to accompany a Noble freind in a iourney from Dublin to London When we were ready to return I went to a Booksellers shop to search out some bâ—oks to be carried back into Ireland and among others I bought Daillé du vray usage des Peres a Book at that time not at all taken notice of That Book the same night I shewd to my Noble dear Lord Lucius Lord Falkland who perusing and liking the Contents of it desired me to give it him which I willingly did About a month after my return into Ireland he sent me a most civill letter full of thanks both in his own but especially in M. Chillingworths name for that small present telling me that that litle Book had saved him a most tedious labour of reading almost twenty great Volumes 166. This Mysterious speech I easily understood For M. Chillingworth a litle before was returned out of Flanders where he had professed himself a Catholick and being sent for by Archbishop Laud was strictly examined by him touching his Religion And whether he went to Masse or Common Prayer to whom he gaue this account That he had entertained such scruples touching Catholick Religion and withall was as yet so vnsatisfyed with the grounds of the English Protestant Religion that at the present his conscience would not permitt him to goe either to Masse or to Common Prayer And therefore with his Graces leaue he was resolued to spend a year or two in a solitude and the Study of Greek and Latin Fathers fully purposing to embrace that Religion which appeared to him most consonant to what the Fathers generally taught The Archbishop much commended his design and dismissed him with his blessing and a promise also that he should enioy entire liberty to prosecute so laudable a Study Very busy in this Study I found and left him in England But it was presently after interrupted by that vnlucky Book of Daillé which perswaded him to a light esteem of the Holy Fathers vpon whose authority he would no longer rely But yet this did not bring him into the Church of England so as to think himself obliged to belieue her Doctrins and whose authority he saw was much inferiour to the other and from all subordinate but diuided English Sects he had a horrible aversion and contempt Therefore without any long demurr he fixed his mind vpon Socinian grounds which he afterwards shewed in a litle Book of one of them which was an Answer to certaine Theses Posnanienses which Theses as J remember asserted the Authority of the Catholick Church in opposition whereto the Socinian reiecting all Externall Authority layd these very grounds of his Religion That in all necessary Doctrins the Scripture was clear Therefore euery sober Enquirer might with ease find them in it without any help of a Teacher or at least any obligation to believe him Vpon these grounds M. Chillingworth dilated his Discourses with much art and gracefullness of Stile in his Book against a learned Catholick writer And the same grounds so discoursed on Doctour Stillingfleet has contracted Methodically into his Principles And both these Books though manifestly destroying all Authority in the English or any other Church haue been patiently and quietly suffred yea commended by Superiours here to their infinit dammage as is seene at this day which dammage is J belieue more sensible to them since they see no considerable prejudice to Catholicks by them for J doe not remember to haue heard of any one Established Catholick Shaken in his Faith by such grounds Though I confess they obctructed a good while my entrance into the Catholick Church 167. Now it being certain that these Princi ples came originally into England from the Socinians a Sect maintaining a Fundamentall Heresy it is of small edification and less glory to the English Church in case as the Doctour pretends his Faith and hers are built on the same Principles that she should consequently acknowledge herself forced to desert the grounds vpon which she proceeded since the Reformation as being grounds by M. Chillingworths discovery found to be Sandy and ruinous and consequently acknowledge all her Articles of belief all her Laws Constitutions Canons c. misgrounded The consideration of this besides disreputation cannot but raise great Scruples in the minds of her Disciples and Subiects till she not only disavow
this her Champion but likewise assert her Authority by Answering all the Discourses of M. Chillingworth my Lord Falkland M. Digges M. Whitby Doctour Stillingfleet and severall other Doctours and Professours in the Vniversities who all exalt their Single judgments above her Authority 168. And as for Doctour Stillingfleet there is another task to be undertaken by him which I believe will give him excercise enough For he knowing that the Socinians as well as himself do make the plain evidence of Scripture in all necessaries to all Sober enquirers a Principle of their Religion and upon this Principle building their Heresy his Study must be to beat them from this Principle which can be done no other way but either by confessing that the Doctrin of Christs Divinity is not necessary to be believed or by demonstrating to them that they do not understand the plainest Texts of Scripture not having been sober enquirers into it This will be a task becoming such an Hectorean Controvertist as the Doctour is esteemed to be considering how even among his freinds the Socinâ—ans among all Protestant Sects are acknowledged to have been very Laborious and far most exact in interpreting the most difficult Books of Scripture and this not without good Success except where their iudgment has been perverted by a resolution to defend their peculiar Hereticall Doctrins Now by this time I believe the Doctour sees what a world of work his Principles have cut out for him which he is obliged to justify not only against Catholicks who abhorr them but Socinians also who invented them as necessary for maintaining their Heresy lastly against my Lords the Bishops his Superiours as I verily believe His Principles therefore being of so very main importance being the only considerable Subiect treated of in his Book my Readers must not wonder that in so short a Treatise I have so oft put him in mind of them since a horrour of the consequences of them forced me to look on them as mihi saepe vocandum ad partes monstrum nullâ virtute redemptum a vitijs §. 13. The Conclusion vvith Advices to the Doctour 169. THus much I judged sufficient to make up an Answer to those parts of the Doctours Book which do not purposely treat of a Doctrinall Controversy for no more was required from mee indeed not quite so much it being only the Section of Fanaticism in which J was particularly concerned But the others intruded themselves J know not well how and by that means forced me also to neglect observing the order in which they lye in his Book Which being no very great fault J hope a pardon from the Doctour will without much difficulty be obtained 170. J shall also stand in need of another pardon for a fault such as it is willingly committed and not yet repented of because J beleive except himself none will esteem it a fault It is this Observing in the Doctours Book a world of Quotations out of Authours which J never saw nor intend to see containing many dismall Stories and many ridiculous passages of things done or said by severall Catholicks in former and some latter times if J had had a mind to examine and say something as in Answer to them an impossibility of finding out those Authours must have been my excuse But J have a better Excuse then that For if the Doctour would have lent mee those Books out of his Library I should have thanked him for his Civility but withall I should have refused to make use of his Offer For to what purpose would it have been to turn over a heap of Books to find out Quotations in which neither the Church nor myself were any way concerned Not concerned J say though they had been Opinions or Actions even of Popes themselves being assured that at least never any Pope how wicked soever ha's brought any Heresy into the Church It is to me all one whether all his Allegations be true or false as to any advantage he can make of them against the Catholick Church unless the Doctour will undertake to demonstrate That it is unlawfull or but considerably dangerous to be a Member of a Church where any persons doe or have lived who have been obnoxious to Errours or guilty of ill Actions 171. Yet J must acknowledge that in one regard a Book written in such a Stile as the Doctour's is may have an influence on the Whole Church and against his intention produce a good effect in it For it may be hoped that Catholicks of the present Age will seriously consider the horrible consequences of seditious licentious and otherwayes unwarrantable Doctrins and Practises of a few Catholicks in former times which have not only been pernicious to the Authours themselves but by the Scandalousness of them have exposed the Church her self how innocent soever to the detestation of such who are without For Sins when Scandalous are an Vniversall and never ceasing Plague which moved our Saviour to say Vae mundo a Scandalis Woe to the whole world because of Scandalls 172. Hoping therefore that by occasion of the Doctours Book such a Benefit may accrew to his Catholick Readers as to render them more watchfull over themselves to prevent hereafter the like Scandals J think my self obliged in requitall seriously to advise him touching the dangerous State he is now in as to his Soule in regard likewise of Scandall He would laugh at me if I should tell him that this danger proceeded from his not being a Member of the Catholick Church It is not that therefore that I now mean though Woe unto him if in the day of Iudgment he be found separated from our Lords Mysticall Body 173. Not to hold him in suspence J take leave to admonish him that since the world sees that he manifestly professes himself a Member of the English-Protestant Church established by Law his Mind must either answer to his Profession or he must be a shamefull Hyppocrit Now in case he be not an Hypocrit he is desired as a genuine English-Protestant to cast his eyes on and to examine severall of the first Constitutions of his Church there he will find an Excommunication denounced ipso facto against all such as shall in the manner there expressed openly oppose any thing contained in the Nine and-thirty Articles in the Books of Common Prayer and of Ordinations of Bishops and Priests c. Which Excommunication is there declared to remain in force till the Offender repent not of his boldness and disrespect but of his Wicked Errour which he ought to revoke 174. After he has considered this he may please to reflect on his Book called Irenicum not to mention his Sermons during the late Rebellion and so comparing together the said Constitutions ratifyed with an Excommunication and his own Book let him ask his conscience whether he has not incurred this Excommunication of the Legality and Validity whereof he being now supposed a declared Protestant cannot nor ought to
For though his Book proves in effect exceeding harmless to the common Cause of Catholicks and though all the Weapons made use of by him against the Catholick Faith really want both edges and points of Sufficient sharpnes and strength to make an entrance into the Rock on which our Saviour has built his Church yet they pierce into the very bowells of the Persons fortunes and condition of English Catholicks whose destruction he seems to design And on the other side though the same weapons do draw out the very heart-blood of the English Church yet he pretends all the way and seems to be acknowledged by them a Champion of its cause and not to intend the least harm to the Prelats and Subiects of it Cicero was wont to say that he thought any one Roman Augur could not without Smiling look upon another Augur considering what large preferments and honours they enioyed by befooling the whole Roman Common-weale with their ridiculous fopperies The like smile of secret intelligence passes between the Doctor and his ancient Brethren For a great pleasure it must needs be to them to see him in his new dress in his Surplice and Scarlet-Hood so Canonically defending out of the Pulpitt the Church of England or brandishing his Sword against her Adversaries in printed Volumes but so defending it as not to do the least harm to the old cause Not one word falls from his tongue or pen to give his now Prelats warning of their danger from Presbyterians Independents Latitudinarians and other Sects though all these conspiring against them had held their Necks so many years of late under their feet But nothing can be more ridiculous to those Sectaries nor truly more deserving detestation from all loyall Subiects then to see the same Sectaries quondam friend Doctour Stillingfleet zealously pretending a care of the Safety of his Majesty and the State against the seditious writings and practises of ill-principled Subiects and at the same time as if he thought the world by vertue of the Act of Oblivion had quite forgott the last twenty years troubles naming none but Catholicks as such ill-principled Subiects who yet alone among all Dissenters from the English Church had all of them unanimously adhered to his Majesty and for his Majesties sake had defended also the said Church against the Doctor and his Brethren in evill the Sectaries The plain truth is the Doctors collusion and prevarication in his Book seems to me so visible and so insupportable that it is a shame that hitherto not one true Prelaticall Protestant has appeared as a Defender of the English Church and State against him but on the contrary even some English Prelats themselves have congratulated and boasted of his supposed succesfull endeavours against the Catholick Church though ruinous only to themselves Indeed it was the Doctors Master-piece by his Drollery to putt Protestants into a fitt of laughing that being in so good an humour they might drink down the Poyson he presented them This Poyson it seems does not yet sensibly work with them and therefore they neglect to provide Antidots Well all J can say is Viderint ipsi But they may also do well to consider that to this hour they have not from this Defender of the Church of England seen one line which was not more to the advantage of their Enemies the Sectaries then of their own Church So that abating severall hundred pounds of yearly preferments he still is what he was before his Majesties return He was pleased to stile some late Catholick Writers by the name of Ratts for not answering line by line his great Volume He must give me leave to make use of his Metaphor another way applying it to himself It is a common Observation among Mariners that when they see a Ship suddenly freed from Ratts formerly abounding there they conclude that there are some leaks in it unobserved by any but the Ratts themselves which threaten its sudden sinking Now let any one judge wherther the Doctour by publishing his Principles has not stolln out of the Church of England yet with a Latitudinarian conscience holding fast his Preferments and does not this argue that the Ratt foresees or shrewdly suspects some danger to the Ship and therefore provides for his own safety by returning to the same Sects which uncessantly plott against it and it is to be feared against the Civill State too It is a sad thing therefore that not one Protestant will open his eyes and give warning of the dangerous proceedings of their Champion Now whether that task and duty deserted by them has not been efficaciously enough undertaken and performed by the Authour of the following Treatise J leave to all indifferent Iudges to determine They are also hereby entreated to impute the delay of this Answer to the true cause above mentioned or indeed to any thing rather then to the least guilty apprehension which Catholicks may have of encountring such an Adversary as the Doctour is supposed to be by persons who are perswaded that an insolent confidence must needs be accompanied with Reason and Truth And for such persons so qualified no doubt it was that the Doctor wrote his Book not to instruct them but to imprint his own enormous passions in their minds Whereas Readers of but ordinary capacity and prudence will easily perceive that it was a consciousness of his own inability to cast any prejudice on the received Doctrins and Discipline of the Catholick Church her-self that forced him to indulge to his fancy and invention to expose to contempt and hatred of unwary Readers the Opinions and Practises of a few particular persons among Catholicks not alwayes faithfully related by him and most of them already censured by Superiours But that which has gained to him the most of his applauding Readers is his acting the Theologicall Zani after a fashion altogether new and unexpected whilst he most ridiculously imputes Fanaticism to the Catholick Church of which never any Heretick before him suspected her capable My last request to the Reader is that seeing this Treatise written in a stile so unpractised hitherto by mee and indeed so contrary to mine own inclination he will interpret it aright and believe that J judged my self obliged to neglect complements of Civility to such an Adversary If he had written like one that sought out Truth J should have condemned my self if any phrases of bitterness had escaped my pen. But in answering such a mass of Buffonry mixed with rancour and malice the Wise man has taught me my Duty Proverb xxv 5. OF FANATICISM §. 1. The Authours Motive of Writing this Treatise Doctour Stillingfleets three Heads of Accusation against the Catholick Church c. 1. THe Authour of this following Treatise may with confidence profess that it was not from a resentment of severall contemptuous Aspersions cast on him by Doctour Stillingfleet in his lately published Book that he was induced to write this Answer For who would not glory in suffring any