Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	body_n	call_v	sacrament_n	1,599	5	7.7295	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16573	The complaynt of veritie, made by Iohn Bradford. An exhortacion of Mathewe Rogers, vnto his children. The complaynt of Raufe Allerton and others, being prisoners in Lolers tower, & wrytten with their bloud, how god was their comforte. A songe of Caine and Abell. The saieng of maister Houper, that he wrote the night before he suffered, vppon a wall with a cole, in the newe In, at Gloceter, and his saiyng at his deathe	Bradford, John, 1510?-1555.; Rogers, Matthew. Instruction of a father to his children.; Allerton, Ralph. A lamentable complaynt of the afflicted, unto god our onely healper.; Allerton, Ralph. A briefe rehersal of parte of the aucthours trouble, entituled God is my comforte.; Allerton, Ralph. Songe of the poore prisoners in Lolers tower.; Hooper, John, d. 1555. Wordes of Maister Houper at his death.; Hooper, John, d. 1555. These are the wordes that Maister John Houper wrote on the wall with a cole, in the newe inne in Gloceter, the night before he suffered.	1559 (1559)	STC 3479; ESTC S112643	64,740	174

into a Serpent But concerning the Sacrament neyther the senses sée any other thing then bread neyther is there any mention made of turning And therefore their cauill is plainly séene to be but a cauill and of no force But to come againe to bring moe reasons against Transsubstantiation Secondly that the substance of bread remayneth still the very text doeth teach For the Euangelists and the Apostle Saint Paul doe witnesse that Christ gaue that to his disciples and called it his body which hee tooke on which hee gaue thanks and which hee brake but he tooke bread gaue thanks on bread and broke bread Ergo he gaue bread and called bread his body as he called the Cuppe the new Testament So that it followeth by this that there is no Transubstantiation And this reason I my selfe haue promised in writing to prooue by the authoritie of the Fathers namely Ireneus Tertullian Origine Ciprian Epiphanius Hieronimus Augustinus Theodorete Cirill Bede if so bee I may haue the vse of my bookes Thirdly that in the Sacrament there is no Transubstantiation of the bread by this reason I doe prooue Like as by our sauiour Christ the Spirit of trueth spake of the bread This is my body So sayth the same spirit of trueth of the same bread That wee many are one body and one bread c. So that as it appeareth the Sacrament not to bee in the Church by Transubstantiation euen so is it not Christs naturall body by Transubstantiation Fourthly I prooue that there is no Transsubstantiation by Luke and Pauls wordes spoken ouer the Cuppe For no lesse are they effectuall to Transsubstantiate the Cup then their words spoken of the bread are operatorious and mighty to Transsubstantiate the bread For as they say of the bread This is my body so say they of the Cup This Cup is the new Testament Which thing is absurde to bee spoken or thought eyther of the Cup or of the thing in the Cup by Transsubstantiation Yea rather in saying these wordes This Cup is the new Testament wee are taught by their coupling this worde Cup to the demonstratiue This how we should in these wordes This is my body knowe that this word This doeth there demonstrate bread Fiftly that the substance of bread remaineth in the Sacrament as the reasons before brought foorth do prooue so doth the definition of a Sacrament For the Fathers doe affirme it to consist of an earthly thing and of an heauenly thing of the word and of the element of sensible things and of things which bee perceiued by the minde But Trāssubstantiation taketh cleane away y e earthly thing the element the sensible thing and so maketh it no Sacrament And therefore the definition of a Sacrament full well teatheth that bread which is the earthly thing the sensible thing and the element remaineth still as saint Augustine saith The worde commeth to the element he sayth not taketh away the element and so it is made a Sacrament Sixtly the nature and propertie of a Sacrament teacheth this also which I haue affirmed For as Cyprian writeth that Sacraments beare the names of the things which they signifie so doeth saint Augustine teach that if Sacraments haue not some signification with the things where of they be Sacramentes then are they no Sacraments Now in the Lordes supper this similitude is first in nourishing y t as bread nourisheth the body so Christs body broken feedeth the soule Secondly in bringing together many into one that as in y e Sacrament many graines of Corne are made one bread many Grapes are made one lyquour and Wine so the multitude which worthily receiue the Sacrament are made one body with Christ and his Church Last of all in one vnlikely likelinesse or similitude that as bread eaten turneth into our nature so we rightly eating the Sacrament by faith turne into the nature of Christ So that it is plaine to them that wil sée that to take the substance of bread away is cleane against the nature and propertie of a Sacrament I will speake nothing how that this their doctrine of Transubstantiation beside the manifold absurdities it hath in it which to rehearse I omit it vtterly ouerthroweth the vse of the Sacrament and is cleane cōtrary to the end wherefore it was instituted so is no longer a Sacrament but an Idoll and is the cause of much Idolatrie conuerting the peoples hearts from an heauenly conuersation to an earthly and turning the Communion into a priuate action and a matter of gazing and piping of adoring and worshipping the worke of mens hands for the liuing God which dwelleth not in Temples made with mens hands much lesse lyeth he in Pixes and Chests whose true worshippe is in spirit and veritie which God graunt vs all to render vnto him continually Amen The Sacrament of Baptisme doth also teach vs that as the substance of the water remaineth there so in the Lords Supper remaineth the substance of bread after consecration For as by Baptisme we are engraffed into Christ so by the Supper we are fedde with Christ These two Sacraments the Apostle gladly coupleth together 1. Cor. 10. and 1. Cor. 12. Wee are baptized into one body sayth hee and haue drunke all of one spirit meaning it by the Cuppe as Chrysostome and other great learned men doe well interprete it As therefore in Baptisme is giuen vnto vs the holy Ghost and pardon of our sinnes which yet lie not lurking in the water so in the Lords Supper is giuen vnto vs the Communion of Christs bodie and bloud that is grace forgiuenesse of sinnes innocencie life immortalitie without any Transubstantiation or including of the same in the bread By Baptisme the old man is put off and the new man put on yea Christ is put on but without Transubstantiating the water And euen so it is in the Lords Supper Wee by fayth spiritually in our soules doe féed on Christs body broken do eate his flesh and drinke his blood doe dwell in him and he in vs but without Transsubstantiation As for the cauill they make that we are baptized into one body meaning thereby the mysticall body not the naturall body of Christ whereby they would enforce that wee are fed with the naturall body of Christ but wée are not ingraffed into it but into the mysticall body and so put away the reason aforesaid As for this cauill I say wee may soone auoyde it if so bee that we will consider how that Christ which is the head of the mysticall body is not separate from the body and therefore to be ingraffed to the mysticall body is to bée ingraffed into the naturall bodie of Christ to bée a member of his flesh and bones of his bones as Pope Leo full wel doeth witnesse in saying that Corpus regenerati fit caro crucifixi The body sayth hée of the regenerate is made the flesh of Christ crucified And

absent to the corporall sences yet this absence is not an absence in déede but to reason and the olde man the nature of Faith beeing a possession of things hoped for Therefore to graunt a presence to Faith is not to make no presence at all but to such as know not Faith And this the Fathers taught affirming Christ to bée present by grace and therefore not onely a signification but also an exhibition and giuing of the Grace of Christes body that is of life and of the séede of immortalitie as Cyprian writeth Wée eate life and drinke life sayth Saint Augustine We féele a presence of the Lord by Grace or in Grace sayth Chrysostome We receiue the celestiall foode that commeth from aboue saith Athanasius We receiue the propertie of the naturall coniunction and knitting together sayth Hillarius Wee receiue the nature of the flesh the blessing that giueth life in bread and Wine sayth Cyrillus And elsewhere hee sayth that with the bread and Wine we eate the vertue of Christs proper flesh life grace the propertie of the body of the onely begotten sonne of God which thing he himselfe expoundeth to be life Basilius sayth that we by the Sacrament receiue the mysticall Aduent of Christ grace and the very vertue of his very nature Ambrose saith that we receiue the Sacrament of the true body Epiphanius sayth we receiue the body or grace And Hierome sayth that wee receiue spirituall flesh which hee calleth other flesh then that which was crucified Chrisostome saith that wee receiue influence of grace and the grace of the holy Ghost Saint Augustine sayth that we receiue grace and veritie the inuisible grace and holinesse of the members of Christes body All the which sayings of the Fathers doe confirme this our faith and doctrine of the Sacrament wee granting in all things héerein vnto them and they in like manner vnto vs. And therefore the lying lyppes which both belye the Doctours as though they graunted a carnall and reall presence of Christes body naturally and corporally after the Papistes declaration and meaning and which belye vs also as though wee denied all presence of Christ and so made it but a bare signe These lying lips the Lord will destroy if they repent not and with vs beléeue and teach the trueth that the Sacrament is the foode of the Soule a matter of faith therefore spiritually and by faith to be talked of and vnderstanded which faith they want therefore they erre so grosely in that they would haue such a presence of Christ as is contrary to all the Scriptures and to our Christian Religion whereby commeth no such commoditie to the receiuer as by the Spirituall presence which wée teach and according to GODS word do affirme For we teach these benefites to bee had by the woorthy receiuing the Sacrament namely that wée abide in Christ and Christ in vs. Againe that wee attaine by it a celestiall life or a life with GOD moreouer that by Faith and in Spirite wée receiue not onely Christes body and blood but also whole Christ GOD and man Besides these wée graunt that by the woorthy receiuing of this Sacrament we receiue remission of our sinnes and confirmation of the new Testament Last of all by woorthy receiuing wée get an increase of incorporation with Christ and amongst our selues which bée his members then which things what more can be desired Alas that men consider nothing at all howe that the coupling of Christes body and blood to the Sacrament is a spirituall thing and therefore there néedes no such carnall presence as the Papistes imagine Who will deny a mans Wife to be with her Husband one body and one flesh although he be at London and shée at Yorke But the Papistes are carnall men guided by carnall reason onely or else would they knowe howe that the holy Ghost because of our infirmitie vseth metaphorically the wordes of abyding dwelling eating and drinking of Christ that the vnspeakeable coniunction of Christ with vs might something be knowen GOD open their eyes to see it And thus much for this Now to that part of the obiectiō which sayth that wee teach Christ to bee none otherwise present in the Sacrament then in his worde I would that the obiectors would well consider what a presence of Christ is in his worde I remember that saint Augustine writeth how that Christs body is receiued sometime visible and sometime inuisible The visible receite hee calleth that which is by the Sacrament the inuisible receite hee calleth that which by the exercise of our faith with our selues wee receiue And saint Herome in the third booke vpon Ecclesiastes affirmeth that wee are fed with the body of Christ and we drinke his blood not onely in mysterie but also in knowledge of holy Scripture Wherein hee plainely sheweth that the same meate is offered in the words of the Scriptures which is offered in the Sacrament so that no lesse is Christes body and blood offered by the Scriptures then by the Sacramentes Vpon the 147. Psalme he writeth also that though these wordes He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood may bee vnderstoode in mysterie yet he sayth it is more true to take Christs body and his blood for the worde of the Scriptures and the doctrine of God Yea vpon the same Psalme hee sayeth plainely that Christes flesh and blood is powred into our eares by hearing the worde and therefore great is the perill if we yeeld to other cogitations whylste wee heare it And therefore I trow Saint Augustine sayth that it is no lesse perill to heare GODS word negligently then so to vse the Sacrament But héere of may no man gather that therefore it néedeth not to receiue the Sacrament or to affirme that a man may as much by himselfe meditating the word in the fielde receiue Christs body as in the Church in the right vse of the Sacrament For Christ ordaineth nothing in vaine or superstitiously hee ordaineth nothing whereof wee haue not néede Although his authoritie is such that without any questioning his ordinances are to be obeyed Againe though in the field a man may receyue Christs body by faith in the meditation of the word yet deny I that a man doth ordinarily receiue Christs bodie by the onely meditation of Christs death or hearing of his word with so much sight and by such sensible assurance whereof GOD knoweth our infirmitie hath no small néed as by the receite of the Sacrament not that Christ is not so much present in his word preached as hee is in or with his Sacrament but because there are in the perception of the Sacrament more windowes open for Christ to enter into vs then by his woord preached or heard For there I meane in the word he hath an entrance into our hearts but onely by the eares through the voice and sound of the words but heere in the Sacrament he hath an entrance by all our senses