Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n bishop_n church_n word_n 2,729 5 3.9187 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A66440 The pattern of ecclesiastical ordination, or, Apostolick separation being a discourse upon Acts the 13. 4,5 ... / by Edward Wakeman ... Wakeman, Edward. 1664 (1664) Wing W275; ESTC R5294 23,139 44

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

is an Article not denied by any but such who have so far renounc'd their Understanding that they are resolved to hearken to none but their own Schismatical Fanatick Teachers I conceive it more pertinent and of greater concernment and more advantagious to the Fathers and Sons of the Church to clear the Text from giving Patronage to that opinion so magnified of late that the power of Ordination belongs of right to the Presbytery a Position condemned by the Council of Trent Sess 23. can 7. and is but usurped by the Bishop If I would enter upon a discourse of the Bishops Right in Ordination I might tell them It was a very Ancient Usurpation if it be one even within one year after Christs Ascension into Heaven as Chronologers reckon it For we find at the 6. of this book which treats of things done within the 33. year of Christ the Apostles laying on their hands upon the seaven Deacons without any challenge from the Seventy two of being excluded But to keep to the Text It will suffice to enquire by what Title these Prophets of Antioch exercised this Power and so consequently whether their practice be a sufficient ground for this Opinion That it is not the same Power to Ordain a Priest and to Ordain an Apostle is true But it makes the more for them since it is far more plausible to say that Priests have a power to ordain a Priest than that they have so to consecrate a Bishop Some therefore to avoid this say there were Bishops among these Prophets three at least Others say that the Prophets themselves did not lay their hands on them but sent them to the Apostles at Jerusalem and that it was they that layed their hands on them A learned Divine among us with far greater probability affirms they were more than meer Presbyters in that they were Prophets reckoned at the 4. of S. Pauls Epistle to the Ephes v. the 11 in the next rank to the Apostles before Evangelists they themselves being even Apostles Secundi Ordinis if I mistake not his meaning The two former Opinions have no countenance at all from the Text and so I leave them The Last Interpretation though very probable may admit of some dispute since the Scripture seems to evidence that this Spirit of Prophecy which is thought chiefly to consist in Interpreting the word of God by Immediate Inspiration was at this first breaking forth of the Sun-beams of the Gospel communicated to far greater numbers of men than were likely to have any Precedence or Authority in the Church above Presbyters Read the 14. of the 1 Epistle to the Corinthians and you shall find the Apostle exhorting all his Corinthians to desire especially the Gift of Prophecying and at the 34. v. of the same chapter he commands Women to keep silence in the Church implying that They also sometimes had this Gift of Prophecying as we see Acts 21.9 Phillips Daughters were Prophetesses agreeable to Gods promise repeated out of the Prophet Joel at the second of the Acts verse the 17. your Daughters shall Prophecy The result of which will be that these Prophets were rather Inferiour to Presbyters in Authority than above them though perhaps sometimes Fuller of the Holy Ghost that is better enabled by the Spirit for the performance of that part of the Presbyters charge which consisted in Preaching And therefore since we cannot conclude they had the Power of Ordaining Apostles unless we acknowledge them at least equal to Apostles which this Interpretation doth not make good with submission to the Reverend Author or any other who shall otherwise instruct me I think we need not contend for their Superiority above Presbyters but rather be contented with this that whatever they were they did not this by any Power tranferr'd upon them in ordinary no not even as they were Prophets but by Particular Extraordinary Appointment and Revelation from the Holy Ghost For so much St. Luke tells us expresly in the next verse save one before my Text As they ministred to the Lord and Fasted the Holy Ghost said Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them What then will this advantage them towards the grounding a perpetual practice on it Durst the Jews do you think consecrate an High-Priest without those Ceremonies mentioned in the 8. or 9. chap. of Levit. because God himself did dispense with them in the Consecration of Eleazer upon Mount Hor Num. 20 Or Might the Priests presume to use any other Altar for Burnt Offerings than that in the Tabernacle because God for the Conviction of Baals Prophets approved of Elijahs Sacrifice which he offered upon stones that we do not read where were ever Hallowed 1 Kings 18 Why did not They who had so many Judgements denounc'd against them for letting their children passe through the fire make this reply for their Innocency Lord why dost thou lay thine heavy hand upon us Didst not thou command the Father of the Faithful thy servant Abraham to offer up his Son his only Son Isaac for a burnt Sacrifice If the Prophets at Antioch ordained some upon a special command from the Holy Ghost Let not Presbyters challenge to themselves the same Power till they can shew the same Patent for it But If it were absolutely necessary nay only lawful to follow all Examples recorded in Holy Writ and which too perhaps are not therein condemn'd we should quickly dash the first against the second Table and cast off our Service to God our Obedience to the Church and our Love to one another The Consequences would be such as this there were but twelve that Christ administred the Blessed Sacrament unto before he departed this world and they were all Men and his Disciples yea Apostles and it was after Supper in an upper chamber and in Jerusalem together with many other circumstances the least whereof if any omitted would look but of a bad complection There must be no more nor any other now But to the business in hand Without all question it is not over safe for any Presbyters to venture upon the conferring of Orders upon any where there are no Bishops For though Those Churches beyond Sea not to meddle with our Neighbours urge the Example of the Levites executing the Priests Office when the Priests were too few at the 29 of the 2 book of Chron. yet if they did well consider that this was done but till the other Priests were Sanctified certainly they would long before now have provided themselves of Bishops Indeed the Protestant Churches beyond the Seas had Bishops once and where is the advantage which any of them have received by Rejecting them Alass they are so few that you can scarce name any Indeed if Toleration and promiscuous Indulgence of Heresies which are no where so rife as where there are no Bishops be an advantage then Amsterdam is as happy yea happier now than ever it was or any other place can be I find
John 11. v. 49 50. and 18 14. They would easily confess that it is too possible there may be more employed in the Building of Gods Ark the Church than shall be preserved in it To them who imagine an Infallibility of the Spirit accompanying all true Ordination and dare call them Lay-men which arrive not at the same perfection of knowledge which they dream themselves Masters of when indeed to differ from them in any one fond opinion is enough to fetch us under this Censure the woful experience of their too fruitful Errors is a sufficient answer And Lastly that Holy Orders consist in being qualified in some measure with abilities fit for the Execution of them hath not any Authority so far as I can find from holy Writ For although God do require this Ability in every one in some more in some less yet he hath not pass'd any promise to tye it to the Churches Ordination for the Comforter is no otherwise promised than other Graces of special Favour upon condition of our receiving them And we have too sad experience that we do often Grieve and Quench this Holy Spirit of God in our Understanding as well as in our Conscience Whatsoever therefore it is it must needs be an Accession to the Priesthood and we are to acknowledge God the Author of a double Blessing when he provides Bezaliels and Aboliabs for the work of this his Spiritual Tabernacle Whereas he hath then promised this Power of Orders to all that enter upon his more Immediate service when he directed the Apostles to lay us down that pattern of Ordination It being a Gift of perpetual Necessity in the Church which if at any time it were denyed would open a gap to confusion in the Dispensation or Administration of holy things which can in no wise proceed from the God of Order and Decorum It remains that the Gift of the Holy Ghost in Ordination is nothing else but that Authority and Right the Ordained have in the Administration of Divine Mysteries That Gift whereby the Priest not to speak here of the Bishops Power hath a kind of property in Dispensing Gods holy written word and Sacraments in Offering up the publick prayers of the Congregation for them and in Pronouncing Gods sentence of pardon or condemnation upon them And this is properly our Inward Calling Those other gifts of Grace and Knowledge such as Arts and Languages and Virtues which may precede our Ordination as they are Motives to any man so qualified to offer himself to the Church of Gods service are an Invitation and in that sense an Inward Calling As they do enable any man for the performance of his Duty they are not a warrantable Calling but a Blessing and do not confer any Right upon him to the Priesthood but only strengthen his hands in the Discharge of it Were this rightly considered the world would not be so full of mistakes concerning the Call to the Function But do we not now rather wonder that the Holy Ghost reserves not this so great a Gift in his own hands than that he owns the Donation of it It is a Power over the Consciences over the Souls of men That by which our Saviour differences God himself from the most Potent upon earth at the 10. of St. Mat. Fear not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the soul And can Man confer this Power of his own authority No 'T is the Lord of the Harvest that must send these Labourers into his Vineyard and he never sends them into it by a False Key through a Back Dore over the Wall or in at a Window But hath given Order and Power to his Church to let them in by a solemn Consecration of them to his Service And so I am fallen upon The second particular or second part of their Commission Their External Commission for what they undertake given them by the laying on of hands They on whom the Prophets had layed their hands They were sent forth by the holy Ghost In the days of old there were three sorts of Persons that were Anointed The King The Priest and the Prophet who though they were designed and Appointed by God had yet some External Ceremonious actions performed towards them by Man And thus in the New Testament though the Holy Ghost be the Unction yet there is no way for it to be applied but by the Laying on of hands Which Imposition of hands is here put for all the ceremonies of Ordination as Preaching afterwards for the Apostles Office by a kind of Synechdoche a part being being put for the whole and is much us'd in Holy Scripture The more essential ceremony is the form of words used with it Receive the holy Ghost c. So that that late observation of the use of Imposition of hands upon Lay-men for Election into their Office had better have been spared than published to be layed open as it is to the giddy mis-interpretation of troublesome unsetled times and quarrelsome irreconcileable Spirits For What if the same were there used which was long enough ago confess'd Is therefore a Presbyter and an Elder of the same Sanhedrim all one both equally consecrated and set apart from the People These will be the collections of some readers Whereas if the Author had but mentioned the Forms of our Ordination as he hath done those of the Jews it had been an easie matter for every one to see some difference between Sit tibi facultas Judicandi and Accipe Spiritum Sanctum And those two Ceremonies some of the Church of Rome cited by Franciscus de Sancta Clara upon our 36. Article acknowledge sufficient for Ordination reckoning Unction to be but a mistake of the Greek Fathers expressions by understanding Material where they meant Spiritual All excepting some Sycophants of the Court of Rome that affirm the Pope can make a Priest by a Priest nay though never so far distant by saying only Esto sacerdos count them necessary chiefly in respect of the Apostles practise which in things not depending upon circumstances variable stands for a Law to their Successors but then withall perhaps in as much as it is scarce possible for the Church to express in fewer signs her Commission without which we can have no assurance of the Holy Ghosts Having in the beginning of this discourse shewed that Barnabas and Saul and others were manumi'zd by the Church even in those very times wherein the Holy Ghost was shed forth in an ample measure and that Men have always had to do in giving Commissions to all such as are to execute any office in the Church I might from hence press the necessity of a calling from the Church which Calvine himself urges from this place in the 4. book the 3. ch the 14 Section of his Institutes in these words Sic Paulum quoque Singulari praerogativâ Dominus per seipsum designavit ut Disciplinâ Ecclesiasticae Vocation is interim uteretur But since this