the gift of constancie in the faith the end is our glorious resurrectiō euen eternal life I say for this other principal foundation of christian religion what cā be said more plainly more largely thē that which hath bin in the councells of Africa determined out of the scriptures by Meliuitanus Arausicanus others against the Pelagians which were written by Augustine to say nothing of others in manie bookes against the same Pelagians Concerning the holy Catholike Church what is there needfull to bee knowne which hath not beene most plentifully and plainely set downe by Augustine aswell in other places as especially in his bookes against the Donatists euen out of he foundations of the holy scriptures But it is a matter of great moment to knowe what and where the true church of Christ is being out of the church there is no saluation and therefore it is an article of faith not of the least accompt About the points of the sacraments also if a man will cōtent himselfe with the simple truth what is more euident then the doctrine which the auncient fathers Iustine Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and chieflie Augustine haue deliuered out of the scriptures and left vnto vs in their writings One saith Like as Iesus Christ being by the word of God made flesh had flesh and blood so also we haue learned that the foode hallowed by him by the word of prayer and thanks giuing is the flesh and blood of the same incarnate Iesus Christ euen according to those words of Christ This is my bodie But Christ that is the vvorde was made flesh without anie chaunging of it selfe into flesh but onely by a hypostaticall or personall vnion therefore neither is the bread made the body of Christ by any transubstantiation of it selfe into the body but onely by an vnion and that not a physicall or bodily or hypostaticall but onely a sacramētall vnion Also he saith by that foode namely of the blessed bread our blood and our body is nourished by a certaine chaunging of it selfe namely into Christ therefore that chaunge which is made in the supper is not of the bread into Christs body nor of Christ into vs but of vs into Christ by reason of our ingrafting as also wee reade in Augustine that Christ should say speaking of the receiuing of the Eucharist I shal not be chaunged into thee but thou shalt be chaunged into me The same man saith vnto this the foode of the Eucharist none is to bee admitted but they that beleeue that our doctrine is true being washed with the water of regeneration vnto remission of their sinnes so liuing as Christ hath taught them Therfore no infidells and heretikes nor they which haue not receiued the baptisme of Christ not they which liue in such apparent sinne and wickednes that they giue no notice to the church of their amendment are to bee admitted to the supper Another of them saieth the eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly and an heauenly The bread though it be sanctified yet he calleth it an earthly matter why so because it comes from the earth it existeth on earth and is eaten with an earthly mouth the body of Christ he calleth a heauenly matter not because the substāce of it is out of heauen but partly because it is taken into vnitie of the person of the word and partly because it is in heauen endued with heauenly qualities For although in the hypostasie which is the very word it bee euerie where yet in the owne proper essence it is only in heauen and not on earth Whereupon it also followeth that it is not eaten either by earthly men or by the teeth of an earthly body but onely of those men who being borne from aboue do carrie the image of heauenly men eate it in a heauenly manner namely in soule spirite And yet notwithstanding the very bodies also of the faithful while they eate onely an earthly matter they also participate of a heauenlie matter to their glorious resurrection are nourished by it as the same author in that place very learnedly expoundeth I think that by this which I haue spoken out of the creede concerning foure principal partes of christian doctrine your Hon. can well gather such is your piety learning wisedome what is to be concluded concerning the whole body The summe is this that those bee the true churches of Christ and therefore called of vs the truely defensed citties of Christs kingdom which professing generally the sacred scriptures and specially the catechisme in all places receiued doe so reuerence the auncient church and auncient fathers hauing therefore friendshipp and communion with them being now in heauen that neither in their opinions nor yet in their expositions of the holy scriptures they will easily decline from them but onely then whenas they bee forced to dissent both by manifest wordes of the holy scriptures and also by testimonies and consequences beyond all doubt necessary drawne from the principles of faith This surely was counted for a notorious fault in Nestorius and it is written to bee the cause of his vile heresie that contemning the fathers and trusting vpon his owne witt he expounded the holy scriptures after his owne braine What speake I of Nestorius yea that the same contempt of the fathers and some confidence of their owne witts and their owne learning did cause diuers more besides otherwaies verie notable men to fall into sundrie heresies I could easilie shewe out of the Ecclesiasticall histories and councells if the breuitie of an epistle would suffer me For whence I pray was it that after that most holy councell at Nice so many heretikes forth with arose of whome some oppugned the true and euerlasting deity of Christ others his true and perfect humanitie others the true vniting of both the natures in one and the same person others the true distinctiō of their natures their proprieties hence surely that contēning the determinations of the fathers in the Nicene councell and their expositions vpon the holy scriptures and trusting confidently to their owne witts and puffed vp with humane knowledge and eloquence they dared euery one to expound yea indeed to depraue wrest the holy scriptures and foundations of the faith according to their owne fansies Hereunto pertaineth that which Vigilius left written in his first booke of the causes of heresies against Eutyches but they blow forth saieth he these smoakes of vaine accusations chieflie because they are euen sicke of the infirmity of ignorance or disease of contention and whilst they are gogged on with a fond conceite of minde they despise the rules of faith deliuered of old by the fathers onely for this cause to bring in their owne conceited opinions of innouations into the church Thus saith Vigilius This that I say is confirmed by the dispositions imitations and wordes of the sound fathers on the other side who expounding the scriptures and the foundations of christian faith
losse of the graue elders After this being called to Cleue I was pastor in that church about foure yeares with what fruite though not without my crosse your Hon. doth verie well know who such was your singular piety were euer my hearer and no smale helper both with your labour and authoritie in setting forward the kingdome of Christ Afterwards in the raigne of that great incomparable prince Frederike the 3. I professed tenne yeares in the vniuersitie at Heidelberg and at length I came to Neustade the famous most valiant prince Iohn Cassimiers towne where in the schoole newly erected I haue taught seuen yeares and more And where as yet being a withered old man but yet by Gods good fauour in good health I liue by my princes liberalitie And as by little and little I die vnto the world in bodie so I doe my best eudeauour that I may also more and more die vnto it in minde I wish it indeed For the vvorld passeth avvay and the lustes thereof And the little worme in Ionas in a little houres space so gnawed the roote of the gourde vnder the shaddow whereof he laye secure that it being withered away the good prophet had not wherewith to shade himselfe from the exceeding heat of the sunne This very meanes I wish that mine owne children may also follow VVhich is also a principall cause why I was willing now to publish this summe of all the christian doctrin not onely in the name of my selfe but also of my whole familie which indeed I writt long since for another vse purpose but now brought forth into light because that my children besides the doctrine of Christ Iesus which they dayly heare deliuered in our congregatiōs may haue also mine owne forme of the same christian faith left vnto them by me which they may follow For although touching the substance of christian doctrine I teach nothing in this my confession different from that which is preached in our churches yet for that I am not ignorant how much the authoritie and example of parents preuaileth with children therefore I deemed that I should doe a thing not a little beneficiall vnto them if I should leaue behinde me in Christs church some picture or image of my selfe I meane not of my countenance but of my faith which they might often looke vppon and by which they might be more and more encouraged to the studie of the holy scriptures to proceed in the knowledge of the trueth and finally to the constancie and perseuerance in true pietie Neither was it vnknowne vnto me that hereunto belonged that which the Apostle writt to Timothie If there be any man that prouideth not for his owne and namely them of his houshold he denyeth the faith and is vvorse then an infidell To this I ioyne also another cause which pertaineth properly to my self mine own estate That which hitherto I haue in heart beleeued with my mouth cōfessed yea many years publikely taught in the church both by word by bookes published my desire was to comprehend the same wholly in one iust volume that all posteritie might knowe what my faith hath beene and that all the faithfull both now liuing and to come and so all the true catholike church may euidently vnderstand that I neuer consented to such heresies as do now spread all about or euer heretofore did spread specially seing that if I haue beene deceiued in any one thing I submit me to right iudgement therein and I wish that my escape may be examined reformed by the touchstone of the holy scriptures and by the analogie of faith Now to dedicate this my booke vnto your Hon. I was induced by many and those verie honest causes which I trust shall not bee disallowed either of you or any other good man It was meet that a booke not ill containing good doctrin should haue a good patron who both for his pietie would and for his learning could defend the same and that constantly whereunto how much the nobilitie of blood and generosity of minde if they be ioyned with true pietie can help we haue learned by long expetience For it is proper vnto a noble man to be constant in a matter commendable and worthie of honor and not to suffer himselfe to be carried away from any honest purpose either by weale or woe Sinceritie and constancy are such vertues as cannot fall into rusticall and scruile mindes Add hereunto that I iudged it a thing honest and necessarie that there should some monumēt be extant to all men in all ages of my duetiful obseruāce to you of our christian friendship For the friendship which proceedeth of vertue and is therefore sincere and sound is a thing both with God and men most worthie of all praise such as was betweene Dauid and Ionathan Peter and Iohn Paule and Barnabas For as all haue not faith as the Apostle said so al haue not true friendship as faith so also loue is from God saith Iohn and springeth from true pietie and vertue Ours doubtlesse was not setled through flesh and blood but through Christ pietie religion and loue of the same religion whereunto afterwards was added a likenesse of our mindes studies manners and a most sweet conuersing together for many yeares whereby the same was confirmed and so confirmed that it could not by any though very great distance of place no not in many yeares bee diminished or weakened What that it hath not onely cōtinued hitherto firme and constant but also hath euer and stil doth seeme more and more daily to increase the holy ghost more and more kindling this brotherly loue in our hearts I surely for my part do well feele how great a desire is in me both to see you and to speake with you yea and to imbrace you in the Lord as also I well vnderstand both by your letters vnto me and by your kinde dealings in my behalfe what great care you haue of me So true friendship which is wrought by the spirite of God is euer wont continually to be preserued and increased And surely such good things as proceed frō God and may also be for the profite of others those wee ought to shew forth celebrate by al meanes that we can for his glory the edification of our brethren Therefore as it was Gods will that the particular leagues of friendship of some of the Saintes should be commended in the scriptures so this of ours ought not to be buried in perpetuall silence Hereunto also besides that with your singular beneuolence fauour you haue respected not onely my selfe as is said but also my deare kinse-men and all that honest and christian familie of the Limacii such also haue beene your good benefites and offices towards me that vnlesse I would bee vtterly vnthankfull I must needes minde if not a full recompence yet at least an honest declaration of a gratefull heart especially seing true friendship cannot consist among
place next vnto the Canonicall bookes V. The rules of faith can be prooued onely by the canonicall bookes And therefore wee vse only the canonicall bookes for proofe of the rules of faith Hieron in praef in lib. Sal. Cypr. in sym p. 377. Con. Laod. cap. 59. and with the fathers wee teach that they are to be vsed but wee thinke the rest to be of great force to confirme the same rules beeing before sufficiently prooued VI. The canonicall scriptures take not their authoritie from the Church VVherefore this we hold without all controuersie and wee thinke it is to be holden that although the Church beeing taught of the first fathers namely Prophets and Apostles who receiued their doctrine immediatly from god and committed the same to writing and beeing also instructed by the holie ghost hath deliuered to the posteritie by a continueing and perpetuall tradition which are canonicall and which are not canonicall bookes yea and hath giuen and shall alwaies giue testimonie vnto them of the holie and heauenlie truth yet that these writings haue not receiued their authoritie from the same Church but of god onely their onely proper author and therefore that of themselues because they are the word of God they haue power ouer all men and are worthie to bee simplie beleeued and obeyed of all VII Yet that the Churches authoritie doth much auaile to make men beleeue the holie Scriptures Although wee denie not by the waie but that the authoritie of the church hath an especiall force to mooue men to the hearing and reading of the holie Scriptures as the word of god according to that of Augustine I had not beleeued the gospell for so he meant vnlesse the authoritie of the church had mooued me Tom. 6. cont Epi. Fund ca. 5. Yet the same Augustine notwithstanding in all places pronounceth that his beleefe came not from the church but from the bolie spirite whose gift faith is VIII That the church hath nopovver ouer the holie scriptures But to dispute whether the authoritie of the church be greater then that of the holie scriptures yea and much more to set downe the affirmatiue part as though the church ouer and aboue the gift of knowing the spirits and of discerning canonicall scriptures from others and of testifying of them and of interpreting of them should haue also authoritie either of adding too or diminishing anie thing from them and of dispensing with thē we iudge it more then sacriledge Deut. 4.2 5.31 12.32 Apoc. 22.18 19. For God commandeth that no man shall add or diminish nor anie one shall decline to the right hand or to the left but all together shall simplie obeye him speaking vnto them in the holie scriptures in all manner of thinges IX The holie scriptures are so perfect that nothing may be added to or taken from them For the scriptures are so holie and meerlie perfect plentifully containing whatsoeuer is necessarie to saluation that nothing can bee added vnto them written with such perfection and wisedome that nothing may bee taken from them X. And therefore men ought to rest vppon them VVherefore wee euen as all godlie men ought to doe doe rest our selues vppon the doctrine of those holie writinges holding that same spoken by the Apostle 2. Tim. 3.16 all Scripture inspired from aboue is profitable to doctrine c. XI Nothing must be established concerning religion vvithout the vvord af god but all things to be reformed by it VVe hold therefore Dist 9. that nothing must be determined cōcerning religion in the church of god which hath not apparent testimonie in the canonicall bookes or may out of them be conuinced by manifest and necessarie consequence And if at anie time there hath crept into the church anie thing either concerning doctrine or the seruice of god which is not agreeable to the holie scriptures the same ought by some lawfull meanes either quite to be taken away or els to be reformed by the rule of gods word and that all controuersies in religion ought lawfully to be iudged and decided out of the same holie scriptures XII Traditions truely apostolicall and catholicke are to be retained in the church And the traditiōs in meane while which it is manifestlie knowne haue come from the Apostles Aug. tom 7. con Donat. lib. 4. ca. 24. tom 2. 2d Ian. ep 118. D. 11. c. 8. to haue beene euer obserued in all churches as that of hallowing the Lords daie in place of the Sabaoth and such like and allthough there be no expresse commandement in the scriptures for the obseruing of them yet wee iudge that they are to be retained in the church XIII The scripture is verie perspicuous in such things as be necessarie to saluation and therefore ought to bee read of all Yea wee thinke and knowe the whole doctrine of saluation not onely plentifully but plainelie and perspicuouslie to bee deliuered in the holie scriptures and sith God neuer spake vnto his people but in their natural language which might bee vnderstood of all that it is a great iniustice and tirannie to forbidd the reading of them to anie men consequentlie the turning of them into the proper tongue of anie nation which the Lord hath willed and commaunded should be read of all men for their owne saluations sake yea should be continuallie borne about in their hands daie and night XIIII The faithfull interpretations by learned godlie men are not to be contemned Although the holie scriptures in those matters which are necessarie to saluation be plaine and easie yet wee dissolue not the interpretations and expositions of skillful and learned godlie men 1. Thess 5.21 aswell aimcient as later namely such as are grounded vppon the same scriptures and so farre forth as scriptures are expounded by scriptures and that in correspondence to the chiefe principles of faith the summe whereof is contained both in the Apostles Creede and also in the Creedes of the true generall and of the auncient holie councells gathered together against those which were notorious heretikes XV. The onely word of god to be the piller of faith and foundation of religion For our faith nether cā nor ought to groūded vppon anie other thing Rom. 10.17 then the word of god deliuered in the holy scriptures that faith may be allwaies of hearing and hearing by the vvord of god wherunto whatsoeuer in any mens works is repugnāt we reiect it whatsoeuer is agreeable we embrace it but that which standeth in a newtralitie as it shall be expedient or not expedient to the church we allow or disallow it and so we teach that it is to be allowed or disallowed CHAP. II. Of God and of the diuine persons and properties I. That there is one onely god distinct in three persons AS wee are taught therefore by the holie scriptures Deu. 4.6 which are his owne word we beleeue that there is only one god that is one simple indiuisible eternall liuing
which being also in Christ doth so really couple vs with him that we are one body with him and amongst our selues yea al of vs one new man in the same head Christ for in those two respects namely one of the spirit by whome the other of the head Eph. 2.14 to whome wee are ioyned Paule saide all the faithfull vvere one nevve man XVIII By the vnion vvith Christ the participation of the benefits of his death and resurrection is conueied vnto vs. Now of this communion with christ there followeth and dependeth the participation of his benefites and of saluation gotten and remaining for vs in his flesh and blood For as the branches can draw no nourishment from the vine nor the members from the head nor the liuely stones from the foundation vnlesse they be really ioyned with their foundation with their head with the tree with the vine abide in them so neither can we from Christ our head our foundation our tree our vine vnlesse wee bee truely grafted into him by the holy ghost and do abide in him beeing made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone Wherfore they doe vs very great iniurie that say we therefore denie the true participation of his flesh and blood and that we affirme a participation only of his gifts and benefits because wee will not admit which wee cannot admit that the true bodie of Christ doth passe reallie through our mouth into our bodies As though it were not a true and an essentiall communion which is made by the holy ghost and by faith sith nothing can knitt more strictlie diuerse substances and natures into one then the holy ghost As we see in the incarnation of the sonne of God and in the creation of man being compounded of the soule and the bodie Surelye if that communion which is made by the onely spirit and by faith with the flesh and bloode of Christ were not able to saue vnlesse he should also passe through the mouth into our bodies Christ had prouided but slenderly for his church Therefore in receiuing of the gospell and in the profession of Baptisme he would haue the same communion to be made 1. Ioh. 1.3 1. Co. 12.13 as Iohn witnesseth of the first and the Apostle Paule of the second This therfore is our confession of the true communion with Christ in generall and therefore of the dispensation of saluation and life which is in Christ XIX Errors Wherefore we disallow their error which teach that remission of sinnes and saluation is communicated to men Opus operatum by the vvorke wrought as they call it without faith and without the true vniting with Christ Yea we condemne their blasphemie who labour to proue it may be done by works not commaunded of god but deuised by men and full of superstition idolatry and theirs also which setting nought by the ministerie of the worde doe teach that saluation is communicated aswell without as with the hearing of the word and receiuing of the Sacraments and much more those which affirme that al infants in their mothers wōbes aswell of faithfull parents as of infidells are made partakers of the benefite of Christ CHAP. XIII Of the gospell and of the abrogation of the lawe by the gospell SEing first the gospell and then the Sacraments Baptisme and the Lords Supper are the outward instrumentes whereby our redeemer the Lord Iesus Christ vseth to offer and bestowe the grace of redemption remission of sinnes vppon the worlde and to communicate himselfe vnto vs his elect and to incorporate vs likewise into himselfe so to make vs indeed partakers of that saluation and life which we haue in him Therefore wee haue purposed briefly and plainely to declare vnto Gods church what our faith is concerning the same I. The gospell what it is Concerning the gospell therefore according to the signification receiued and vsed in the church we beleeue that it is nothing else but the heauenly doctrine concerning Christ preached by Christ himselfe and the Apostles and contained in the bookes of the newe Testament bringing the best and most gladsome tidings to the world namely that mankinde is redeemed by the death of Iesus Christ the onely begotten sonne of God so that there is prepared for al men Mat. 3.2 if they repent beleeue in Iesus Christ a free remission of al their sinns saluation and eternall life Wherefore it is fitlie called of the Apostle Eph. 1.13 The Gospell of our saluation II. The gospell was promised by the Prophets but published by the Apostles For albeit that this misterie euen from the first beginning of the world was reuealed vnto the fathers and that the Prophetes spake of the same yet that which they preached was rather Euangelical promises and those reserued among the Iewes then the gospell it selfe which was to be published to all nations sith they foretold of a thing which was to come but did not declare the thing present or that was past Rom. 1.2 1. Pet. 1.10 as the Apostle teacheth to the Romaines and Peter in his first epistle III. Aswell the fathers were saued by faith which they had in the promises concerning Christ the redeemer as wee which beleeue in the gospell Meane while we doubt not but aswell the fathers Rom. 4.3 who beleeued in those Euangelicall promises of Christ which was to come and should bruise the serpents head were saued Heb. 1.10 as we also by our faith in the gospell telling vs that Christ is come and that he hath redeemed the world are saued as the Apostle both in other places and in the epistle to the Romaines doth largely teach vs concerning Abraham to the Hebrues concerning all the other so that it is a foule blasphemy to say that only earthly matters were promised to the fathers and that they receiued onely such and not heauēlie as remission of sinnes and eternall life For looke what the gospell is vnto vs properly receiued the same were the Euangelicall promises to them Rom. 1.16 namely the power of God to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer IV. The doctrine of the gospell touching the substance is most auncient and eternall Whereby wee knowe that the doctrine of the gospell touching the substance thereof is not new but most auncient and preached vnto the Fathers euen from the worlds creation so as Iohn not vnfitly called the gospell Apo. 14.6 an euerlasting gospell V. The parts of the gospell how many and what Furthermore there ar three especial points in the gospell which wee are called vppon to performe Repentance towardes God Faith in our Lord Iesus Christ Act. 20.21 Mar. 1.4 Mat. 28.10 and a care to obserue whatsoeuer Iesus Christ hath willed and commaunded VI. A declaration of the former opinion The Gospell therefore which setteth out vnto vs Christ with the whole fauour and mercy of God with the purging forgiuenes of sinnes and with the whole saluation and eternall life
not as euerie art hath it owne proper wordes and names Then if there be any collection or argumētation darke or intricate they explaine the same by Analysis or resolution and set it forth by examples and by generall precepts they teach particular things and declare how largelie the same are ment and taken And this is properlie to teach Now though this bee in faithfull and sound deliuerie of instruction yet a true faithfull teacher not contenting himselfe thus doth also rehearse and often taketh accompt of that which he teacheth and is still at hand among his schollers that of such things as they doubt they may euer require and aske the plainer exposition of himselfe Moreouer the thinges which he hath taught them he also propoundeth to be decided and handled in publike disputations that no whit of doubt may remaine To these thinges also he adioyneth oftentimes exhortations to encourage them forward in the same instructiō and exhortations from such matters as may hinder the same and also generall admonitions reprehensions and childings Lastlie such a maister marketh diligentlie what profite euerie one of his schollers taketh if he finde anie one to loyter in his learning he both priuatelie corrects him and admonisheth him of his duetie if he perceiue anie to goe through his learning lustilie him he encourageth commendeth and whetteth on to follow the studie of it more more From the seuen dueties of teaching were brought into the church 7. orders of ministers All these seuen points of teaching did our Lord Christ also obserue In the Synagoge at Nazareth he read the 61. chapter of Esay and expounded it Luc. 4. He expounded the commaundements of God vpon the mount Math. 5. And he taught in all places and exhorted he reprehended out of the word of God And he made aunswer to al that asked him aswell good as badd and also asked them as Matt. 22. He also catechized his disciples and he himselfe was present at a catechizing Luc. 2. Sith then the ministerie of teaching doth require such manifold labour there haue bin also many sorts or orders of ministers appointed to this ministerie And first of all readers whose office was in some pulpit or high place to rehearse the diuine scriptures Now this rehearsall of the scriptures was instituted to this ende that the language and manner of phrase in the scripture and the scripture it selfe also might so bee made better knowne and more familiar to the people For within one yeare they reade ouer all the bible to the people where as they which shall expound the scriptures are not able to performe more thē some one parte and that not greatnether in one yeares space And meane while by the onely reading of the holie Bible to the people the knowledge of all the principles of our saluation was wōderfullie confirmed for the same are still againe and againe repeated in each of the holie books and are declared by other other words so that the people might often by the following readings learne that which by the former they could not so wel conceiue And by this verie meanes the peoples iudgement was strengthened aswell in religion as also in the expositions of scriptures and in all doctrine which was brought vnto them either by the lawfull curats teachers of the church or by others For this cause this office of onely reading the Scriptures to the people was greatly esteemed in the auncient churches neither were any chosen for this ministerie vnlesse they were commēded for singular piety Which we may knowe aswell by other monuments of the auncient fathers as especially by two epistles of Saint Cyprian as the fiue Epist of Aurelius the reader ordained the 5 3. Epist booke 2. of Saturus and in the 4. booke of Celerinus Celestinus To these readers were afterwardes also added queristers or singing men which ordered and directed the singing of the psalmes and hymnes For the reading of the holie Scriptures it is by Gods grace verie well appointed in the churches of England if so bee that there were meete men ordained which might add a grauitie and a religion worthy the diuine ministerie in the holie readings Let them therefore diligentlie weigh consider whose mouth they make themselues which read the holie books vnto the people in their sacred assemblies euen the mouth of the Lord Almightie as also of what force and of what dignitie the words at which are read which be the words and precepts of eternall life Lastlie vnto what manner of men and for what purpose the readers of the diuine Scriptures ought to serue For they serue to administer the worde euen to the children of God for whose saluation the first begotten sonne of God powred out his precious blood and to whome by them the same saluation is more and more declared made perfect All which things whosoeuer weigheth with himselfe in true faith what grauitie decencie religiousnes can be vsed in any action which such a reader may ouerslipp And this they whosoeuer be appointed for that office ought euermore to haue in the sight of their minde that the things which are read must effectually serue for the edificatiō of faith in the hearers which is then done when the same things are well vnderstood and receiued as the very words of god To both which is requisite a pronunciation verie plaine discreet graue and religious Hereby it is knowne that they are not Christs ministers who do so read the holie Scriptures as if onely this were to bee required that as little tarrying as may be might be made in rehearsing the same Now another duetie is the interpretation of the doctrine which is to be disposed namly a more plaine declaration of the wordes and sentences This office was performed by bishops and Elders and sometime by them of the order of Deacons and subdeacons sometime also they employed vnto this function some of the laitie whom they found by the holie ghost to be made fitt for the profitable executing of the same So Origen also a lay man was called vnto this office in the church at Cęsarea in Palestine by Alexander bishop of Hierusalem by Theoctist bishop of the same church at Caesarea So Euelpis was called by Neonus bishop of Larandi and Paulinus by Celsus bishop of Iconium and Theodorus of Atticus bishop of Sinadi This we read in Eusebius his sixt booke of his ecclesiasticall storie chap. 20 and out of the epistle of those two bishops Alexander of Hierusalem and Theoctist of Caesarea in Palestine vnto Demetrius bishop of Alexandria who had reprehended the deed of these two bishops concerning Origen as a thing neuer heard of that a lay man where bishops were present should speake to the people in the congregation But this the same bishops manifestly affirmed was not true but that godlie bishopps had euer vsed to exhort such as they knewe meet men among the laitie to profite the people by interpreting the Scriptures and
promised by grace to saue vs. WHen therfore the first earthly man by his owne fault had fallen into so miserable an estate through disobedience and together with him all his posteritie which had sinned in him and were in deede to bee conceiued in sinne and to bee borne the children of wrath we beleeue that god of his meere grace and fauour promised vnto Adam and Eue and in them to all mankinde an other man from heauen Gen. 3.15 1. Cor. 15.47.48 Mat. 1.20 Luc. 1.34 Ebr. 4.15 Ios 7.14 that should be the true substance of verie woman but cōceiued without the seede of man so should be born of a virgine without sinne in whome as in another head of mankinde consisting of a diuine and humaine nature beeing the true image of the father and full of the holie spirite that should bee supplied which in Adam the first head by his owne fault was decaied that is that hee the second man in the name of all vs which were to bee ingrafted into him by his spirite Rom. 6.5 11.17 and by a spirituall regeneration should become flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone Io. 5.6 Eph. 5.29 Phil. 2.8 Rom. 5.19 Eph. 2.13.14 should most perfectly bee obedient vnto god and by his obedience and death should take away sinne should appease the wrath of god should redeeme vs iustifie vs sanctifie vs and gouerne vs by his spirite should indue vs with true libertie and with power to do god and lastly should saue vs glorifie vs to eternall life II. The promise of redemption by Christ was verie necessarie For Adam not as a priuate person but as the parent and originall of all mankinde as he was indued with a righteousnesse which he should haue dispersed into all his posteritie as hereditarie for which cause it is vsed also to be called originall righteousnes so by his disobediēce in stead of righteousnes he brought vppon all men great iniquitie and a spring of all sinne and in stead of eternall life eternall death Therefore there was neede of an other head from whome through his obedience that true and heauenlie righteousnesse holinesse and life might bee deriued into all the members This same is Christ III. To what ende that promise was made presently after the transgression And wee beleeue that this promise was made immediatlie after the transgression euē from the beginning of the worlde and afterwards oft times mētioned to the holy fathers declared yea and confirmed and sealed by diuerse and sundrie meanes signes and sacraments that not onely wee which were to bee borne after the comming of the Messias but also all other which from the first creation should beleeue in this promise and in true faith should imbrace the Sauiour which was to come might by that faith bee made partakers of the following redemption might bee iustified and saued IV. As manie as beleeued in Christ that vvas to come from the first beginning were saued Wee beleeue therefore that as manie since the making of the world as beleeued in Christ promised and to come they were ingrafted vnto him by this faith made partakers of his following obedience of his passion death and redemption that they did eate his bodie that was to come and to bee betrayed and dranke his blood that was to bee shedd and finallie that they were all christians and indued with the spirite of Christ and saued vnto eternall life as well as we V. Errors Therefore wee condemne and abhorre all those which saye that none were saued that were before the comming of Christ and that those fathers receiued no promises concerning eternall saluation but onely concerning things temporall CHAP. X. Of the law I. The law of Moses came betweene the promise of redemption by Christ and the accomplishment thereof and to what ende BVt betweene the promise of redemption by Christ made first vnto Adam after more manifestly declared aswell to others as most especially to Abraham sealed with the sacrament of circumcision and confirmed as it were by the death of Isaac his first begotten offered for a sacrifice and established by an euerlasting couenant betweene the accomplishment of the fame promise the lawe was giuen which Moses deliuered the people which came of Abrahams seed beeing gathered together and wonderfully encreased of whome also Christ should be borne and beeing also deliuered out of the bondage of Egypt by a wonderfull meanes that God might haue a church knowne and visible and separate from other nations and gathered together in one certaine place in which church that promise concerning Christ made vnto the fathers might be kept safe and an acceptable seruice of God maintained euen vnto the comming of the true promised redeemer The law I say deliuered by Moses from God vnto his church came betweene containing three kindes of commandements Morall by which the life and pietie of euerie one should bee directed Ceremoniall with the forme whereof the church should bee gouerned in her outward seruice and religion and iudicial pertaining to the gouernement of the whole common wealth in matters politick and oeconomicall that by these meanes the people of God of whome Christ was to come might both bee restrained from the prophane manners idolatries of wicked nations might be kept within their duetie and obedience to Gods will and finallie might be vpholden in the faith and hope of the promise to bee performed concerning the true redemption by Christ and so might bee prepared more and more for the receiuing of Christ and so in that people God might be glorified II. VVhatsoeuer was necessarie to be done for saluation is contained in the law of God To let passe then the two latter parts of the lawe which doe not appertaine to vs and to speake onely of the former wee beleeue that in that law as it is declared in the bookes of Moses the Prophets and Apostles 2. Tim. 3.16 al things which are necessary to saluation are so perfectly set downe and Gods will Deut. 2.4 5.22 12.32 which he will haue vs to do in his word so reuealed as nothing can be added or taken from it III. The law of the Decaloge or ten commandements is a declaration of the law of nature and a picture of the image of God We also beleeue that this law is a declaration of the lawe of nature which was written in the heartes of the first men perfectly of others imperfectly and but in part and therefore by this law is condemned whatsoeuer is not agreeable to that image of God whereunto man was created and is commaunded whatsoeuer is agreeable to the same For God would shew by that law what man was in his first estate and what hee was made in the second estate and what manner one he ought to be and further what he should afterwards be in the third estate in parte and vvhat perfectly in the fourth by Christ so that the lavve is nothing else but a
is truely attributed also to the diuine nature But how can that be sith passion cannot fal into it It is therefore common to it to suffer not in the owne essence for that nether could nor can suffer but in Christ that is in the person of Christ which consisteth of the two natures and therefore which onely according to the flesh suffred so that in the proper essence of the deitie thereis no passion but it is onely in the common person by reason of the flesh and consequently God is also said to haue suffered when notwithstanding the deitie suffred nothing but onely the person of god man that is he which is God and man suffred according to the flesh I will rehearse this againe The proprieties for example of the humaine nature as to suffer to die they are therefore said to be common to the deitie because the deitie also hath them For if in no sort it had thē the same could be said no wayes to be made cōmon to it with the flesh Now then they are truely said to be commō to the deitie with the humanitie not simplie but in Christ because it hath them not in it selfe that is in the owne essence as the flesh hath but onely in the person of Christ which is one and the same person of both the natures seing it subsisteth in both of them The soule also hath the proprieties of the body common vnto it selfe not in it owne essence as the bodie but in the person of man who as he consisteth of them both as being his essentiall partes so also he hath in himselfe really the proprieties of them both so as he may truely be said to be visible and inuisible mortall and immortall This which is said of the proprieties of the humaine nature common with the diuine not in the proper essence of it but in the common person of both the natures that the same also is to be thought and saide of the diuine proprieties with the humaine we are taught by Vigilius bishop and martyr These things being in very deed thus it hereupon is to bee gathered what manner of speaches may be thought agreeable to these matters If a propriety of the flesh as to suffer be in some sort common to the deitie thē it may in some sort be said of the deitie If it bee not in such wise common to the same as to haue it in it selfe as in it owne essence nor as an essentiall parte of it selfe nor as an accident in the subiect then the deitie cannot bee said in it owne essence to bee subiect to passion But if it bee common vnto it onely in person then to suffer cannot be said of the deitie in the abstract but onely in the Concrete this is by such a worde wherein the deitie maye bee so signified as the person may bee signified with it such as bee the Concrete names as God For by this name so farre forth as therein is signified the person of Christ which is also God and not bare man it is truely and really said that God did suffer and died yet not fimplie and according to his deitie also but onely according to the flesh whose propertie it is to suffer and to dye Wherefore as this is most true God suffered so this is most false the deitie suffred or that Christ also according to his diuine nature suffred This is the doctrine of Vigilius and the whole church But seing that which Vigilius hath deliuered of the proprieties and communion of the natures is indifferently said of all the proprieties and their communion in Christ so that by this hypostaticall or personall vnion the diuine proprieties are said to be made commō to the humanitie in the same sense that the humaine are to the diuinitie namely not in the essences of the natures themselues but onely in Christ and in the person of Christ it followeth like as the proposition is impious the deny by reason of the vnion with the flesh in the person of the sonce of god is made partaker of passion in it owne essence so also this is blasphemous the humaine nature by reason of the vnion with the diuine receiueth of it that it is omnipotent really in it ovvne essence c. Now if we add that which the same Vigilius left in writing out of the common consent of the whole church booke 4. chap. 4. this doctrine which we shewed euē now out of him will more plainely appeare For disputing against the Monophysites defenders of one nature he plainely prooueth by the diuers proprieties which were seene in one the same Christ and which the holy Scriptures do speak of that the word and the flesh cannot bee in him all one nature he bringeth a reason because one nature cannot receiue in it selfe any thing that is contrary diuers besides other things he also writeth thus Moreouer if there be but one nature of the word and of the flesh how can it be but that the worde being in all places the flesh must be foūd in al places too For doubtlesse when it was on earth then was it not in heauē now being in heauē it is not likewise on earth yea it is so farre from being on earth as that according to it we looke for Christ to come downe from heauen whome according to the word we beleeue to bee with vs on earth Therefore according to your opinions either the word with his flesh is contained within one place or the flesh with the word is in all places whereas one nature cannot receiue in it selfe any contrarie or diuers things But it is verie contrarie and farre different to be circumscribed or contained in one place and to be euerie where and seing the word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it appeareth that one the same Christ is of both natures and that he is euerie where according to the nature of his diuinitie and is contained in a place according to the nature of his humanitie that he hath beene created and hath no beginning that he hath died and hath not bin able to dye the one he hath by the nature of the word whereby he is God the other by the nature of the flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore this one the sonne of God the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his diuinitie he was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his diuinitie hee is circumscribed by the nature of his flesh and is not contained within place by the nature of his diuinity he is lesse also then the angels by the nature of his flesh and is equall to the father according to the nature of his diuinitie he died by nature of his flesh died not by nature of his diuinitie This is the catholick faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the