him commeth Basil Cypr. l. 3. ad Quir. c. 42. Basil Hom. 22. whose wordes are these Ea demum perfecta omnimoda gloriatio est in Deo quandoneque propter suam ipsius iustitiam quis extollitur sed agnoscit se quidem vera destitui iustitia verum sola in Christum fide iustificatum esse That is perfit reioycing and altogether in the Lord when a man is not proud no not of his owne righteousnesse but confesseth himselfe to be destitute thereof and that hee is iustified only by faith in Christ GREG. NAZIAN who for the great opinion of learning that was conceiued of him was called the Diuine as he was in Basils time so was he of his mind too as these his wordes doe shew Nazian Orat. 21. Confiteri Christum credat illum a mortuis suscitatum esse saluaberis Siquidem credere solum iustitia est Confesse Christ and beleeue that he is raised from the dead and thou shalt be saued For to beleeue only is righteousnesse PAVLINVS also is of the same minde that the rest are as wee may see in an Epistle which is among S. Augustines Epistles his wordes are Epist 58. Aug. Salus fide sola quaeritur Saluation is sought for by faith only This is also the iudgement of Ruffine in his exposition of the Creede it is among Cyprians workes Ruffin in Symbolum De remissione peccatorum saith he sufficere deberet sola credulitas Concerning remission of sinnes beleeuing only should suffice And the reason of this his assertion is not to bee omitted Quis enim causas aut rationem requirat vbi indulgentia principalis est For who will inquire after causes or a reason where indulgence or pardon is principall THEODORET also as oft in other his Treatises so also in his bookes against the Idolatrie of the Gentiles and in defence of Christian Religion writeth thus Theodâ—r de curat Grae. Affect l. 7. Non vllis operibus nostris sed per solam fidem mystica bona consecuti sumus Not by any our workes but by faith only we haue gotten vnknowne good things Now vnto these I may adde Leo a Pope in an Epistle that he sent by one called Philo to Leo then Emperour It is not his 70. Epistle as Bellarmine vntruly quoteth the place but 76. But his wordes are these Catholica fides humanum genus sola vinificat Leo Epi. 76. sola sanctificat The Catholike faith doth only quicken only sanctifie mankinde But Bellarmine answereth that Leo in those wordes speaketh De fide dogmatica Of a dogmaticall faith Bellar. de Iustif l. 1. cap. 25. and such as is opposed against Heretikes As if he had said that the Arrian faith or that of the Eutycheans caÌ„not sanctifie but that faith which is true and Catholike Be it so yet he must needes grant that no dogmaticall faith that is no externall profession of Religion how earnest in shew soeuer it is be it also neuer so true can quicken and sanctifie vntil it be as a seed sowne in the heart taking hold of Christ for the remission of sinnes and so it I say it only giueth true life to a Christian I haue also read these very wordes cited out of Alcuine whom some call Albine the booke I confesse Alcuin Praefat. ad Carol. Mag. I haue not seene But if he haue such words he seemeth well to approue that which Leo hath written because hee hath alleaged his very wordes without any change I will cloze vp this ranke with one well esteemed of in the Church of Rome Rich. de S. Victor decisione dubi Apostoli Ecce saith he habes apertè quòd possit homo aliquando iustificari ex sola fide absque legis opere Behold thou seest plainely that a man may sometime be iustified by faith only without any worke of the Law Which seeing hee will grant to be sometime I see no reason why he should doubt but that it is so alwayes For there is but one way of iustifying Iew or Gentile Rom. 3.22 one or other Euen the righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue Christian Poets There are then three ancient Christian Poets who sing the same song with these Fathers and learned Writers Iuuencus is first Hier. Catal. Script eccl Hieron in Mat. 2. Iuueac hist Euang. l. 2. who liued about the 330. yeere of Grace of whom S. Ierome maketh mention and also citeth a Verse out of him in his Commentaries vpon S. Matthewes Gospell This Iuuencus I say hath these wordes Namque vbi certa fides fuerit complexa salutem non erit vlla illic anceps agitatio iuris For when assured faith hath taken hold of saluation there will be no more doubtfull waging of Law Not long after him was Prudentius who in a booke intituled Psychomachia wherein hee sheweth what fights and battels the soule hath Prudent pugna concord discord speaking of faith writeth thus Haec mea sola salus This faith only is my saluation And I finde alleaged by that famous learned man of our time D. Humphrey in his answere to Campians first reason the like out of one Victor Cemensis as I take it but his wordes are these Victor writing of Abrahams faith Credidit nudae fidei consensio sola plenam ad iustitiae meritireputata coronam est ABRAHAM beleeued and this consent only of bare faith was imputed to him for a full crowne of righteousnesse and merit Popish Writers Yet haue I reserued three great Rabbies in the Romish Church for the shutting vp of this question who if they speake as their Fore-man hath done and many other before them I hope we shal be found not guiltie of errour much lesse of heresie The first of this company is Gratian the very store-house of their Canon Law who very plainely affirmeth Dist 2. de Poenit. charitas est a q. that fidei soli vaenia promittitur To faith only is pardon promised And a little after Fide sola peccata relaxantur By faith only sinnes are remitted If any man answere that he there telleth vs but what Augustine saith true but withall he alleageth it not as misliking but as approuing it as sound doctrine After him commeth Peter Lombard though equall in time for it is said that Gratian Danaeus in Com. in Lombard in prolegomenis c. 4. and Lombard and Petrus Comestor were all brethren and the bastard children of a Nunne Lombard I say Bishop of Paris whose authority in the Church of Rome was like that Pythagoras had among his Schollers among whom it was enough to say The Master saith it His writings are in such account with them that they are the very ground of Popish or Schoole diuinitie In so much as since hee wrote his bookes of Sentences very many by their Commentaries haue laboured to explane him studying somtime to make him agree with
answering their principall allegations it will not be hard to iudge of all others also I will beginne with such Scriptures as seeme to ascribe Worthinesse vnto men For out of them doth Bellarmine thus gather Dignum esse praemio De Iustific lib. 5. ca. 2 3 What worthinesse in men Wisd 3.5 mereri praemium idem sunt To bee worthy of a reward and to deserue a reward is all one And to proue this worthinesse in men he alleadgeth foure places The first is taken out of the Booke of Wisedome God tryed them and found them worthie of himselfe The Booke from whence this testimonie is taken is knowne not to be Canonicall Scriptures and therfore of no such credit in Gods Church as that vpon places out of it wee may ground any Article of Religion And this answere might serue verie well to this obiection But yet the words themselues doe not of necessity proue merit or worthinesse of the workes that we doe And that first in respect of the person that trieth thē also in regard of them that are tryed He that tryeth his seruants is I know wise enough to examine and spye faults iust also to punish them But he is also content to couer with the righteousnes of his Sonne our faults and to hide our iniquities not beholding vs as in our selues we are sinners Who are found righteous or worthy Dan. 9.24 but as we are in Christ righteous Then also who are they that being tryed are found righteous Euen they whose debt Christ hath paid for whose sinnes hee hath satisfied and sealed vp as Daniel sayth that they may bee no more remembred Whose iniquitie he hath reconciled to bring in euerlasting righteousnesse Of such we see who bring with them nothing whereby they should be found worthy but haue all from Christ it is said he found them worthy Other two places hee bringeth for which wee are much beholding to him because by them we may learne how to answere such testimonies as seeme to ascribe worthinesse vnto men One is out of the answere that Christ maketh vnto the Sadduces a Sect which thought there is no resurrection who thought to intrappe him in a subtile question The question was of one woman that married seuen husbands who all dying they would know whose wife she should be at the Resurrection To whom Christ answeres thus They who shall be counted worthy to enioy that world Luk. 20.35 and the resurrection from the dead neither marry wiues nor are married The other is much like this 2. Thes 1.5 That yee may be counted worthy of the Kingdome of God for which yee also suffer saith S. Paul to the Thessalonians Now who knoweth not that we may bee counted worthy of that which in due consideration we cannot be worthy of So that they are accounted worthy proueth not that they are worthy indeed as shall God willing by and by plainely appeare The fourth place then must serue the turne or else nothing is said That is the wordes of our Sauiour Christ of some of Sardi They shall walke with me in white for they are worthy Reuel 3.4 As if Christ had said they shall triumph with me or raigne in glory and life euerlasting for they are worthy But what are they worthy in respect of their worke or for the merit thereof For if not it helpeth not our Aduersaries And that neither they nor any other No man worthy of eternall life but Christ that is conceiued as we all are of vncleane seede can be worthy in respect of workes I proue thus No man is worthy of eternall life in respect of works but hee who can fulfill the Law but no man can fulfill the Law therefore by their workes no man can be worthy of eternall life My first Proposition I proue thus God himselfe saith to his people of Israel If thou keepe my Statutes thou shalt liue in them Leuit. 18.5 In which wordes as we see a promise of life so must we obserue the condition of keeping Gods statutes if we will looke to be partakers of the promise And no doubt the Apostle S. Paul out of these and such like words hath learned that which he teacheth vs of the iustification which is of the Law The man that doth these things Rom. 10.5 Gal. 3.12 Deut 27.26 Gal. 3.10 shal liue thereby But if the condition bee not obserued then marke what followeth Cursed is euery man that continueth not in all the wordes of this Law to doe them This continuance in doing the Law and keeping the Statutes of God teacheth vs neither to be idle nor euill occupied and that wee must not swarue either to the right hand or left leauing the right path of Gods Law at any time For S. Iames hath truly out of this place gathered Iam. 2.10 that whosoeuer shall keepe the whole Law and yet faileth in one point is guilty of all Not because whoso breaketh one Commandement breaketh all A thiefe in that he is a thiefe is not a murderer or adulterer but the meaning is he is guilty of transgression and therefore cannot bee saued by the Law If then eternall life be promised to them only that keepe the whole Law as is proued much lesse shall it be merited by any that fulfill not the same My Minor or second Proposition is that no man can fulfill the Law For confirmation whereof I minde rather to point vnto arguments We cannot perfitly fulfill the Law then any way to dilate them First therefore it is a perfection belonging only to Christ to keepe the whole Law He only was without sinne because he neuer did transgresse Hee only could offer the sacrifice of perfect and holy obedience so that in this respect hee only could make the atonement betweene God and vs. As for his Apostles though no doubt good men yet they prayed Luk. 17.5 Mar. 9.24 as they had good cause Increase our faith Helpe our vnbeliefe And our Sauiour himselfe taught them and in them the perfectest that euer was Mat. 6.12 Hebr. 7.26 to pray Forgiue vs our trespasses Our imperfections then being so many and so great Such a high Priest it became vs to haue as is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners made higher then the heauens For but by such a Mediator our sinnes are so great as that wee neuer could haue beene reconciled to God because we are farre from keeping the Law Our conscience teacheth this Secondly our owne consciences will so testifie with me herein and against our selues that I hope I neede not produce much proofe hereof Let vs but examine our selues by that rule which the Author of all truth gaue vnto some who would get as our Papists say they can doe eternall life by doing by which hee meant they should trie and examine themselues Luk. 10.25 Master saith a certaine expounder of the Law what shall I doe to inherit eternall life 26.27 And hee said
that he is simply or altogether righteous But sometime also righteousnesse is ascribed vnto men here vpon earth As among sundry other to Zachary and Elizabeth of whom S. Luke writeth Luk. 1.6 Innocent in comparison of other Both were iust before God and walked in all the Commandements and Ordinances of the Lord without reproofe S. Augustine handling this very history doth truly teach what iustice they had as elsewhere so namely in these wordes Secundum quandam inter homines conuersationem laudabilem probabilem Aug. cont Pelag. Celestin l. 1. cap. 48. quam nullus hominum posset iustè in quaerelam vocare They were iust in regard of their conuersation commendable and allowable such as no man might iustly complaine of And after hee bringeth the example of Paul Phil 3.6 who according to the righteousnesse that was by the Law was without reproofe And yet this righteousnesse he accounted dung and losse In comparison saith AVG. of that which he hoped for And because the Pelagians pressed him with an authority out of Ambrose to proue that a man might in this life be perfit he sheweth what minde S. Ambrose was of for that point alleaging some words of his out of Ambrose his Commentaries vpon Esay which booke is not now extant that I haue seene although here and elsewhere S. Aug. make mention thereof And Ambrose himselfe referreth vs also to that booke Amb. in Luc lib. 2. The wordes alleaged are these Multi sunt perfecti in hoc mundo qui si perfectionem veram respicias perfecti esse non possunt Many are perfit in this world who if you looke to true perfection cannot be perfit Whereupon also S. August doth thus conclude Item immaculati sunt multi quum si minutiùs excutâ—as immaculatus esse nemo possit quiae nemo sine peccato Many also are vndefiled when as if you sift the matter narrowly no man can be vndefiled Notably also for this point writeth S. Ambrose by occasion of those wordes of the Apostle Let vs as many as bee perfit Phil. 3.15 bee thus minded Ambros in Ep. ad Phil. cap. 3. Ad comparationem caeterorum qui res diuinas negligentiùs curant perfecti dicendi sunt qui adhibita solertia perfectionis it er ambulant In comparison saith he of such as are negligent in heauenly matters they may be called perfect who are carefull to walke in the wayes of perfection S. BASIL expounding these wordes of the Prophet DAVID Iudge me O Lord according to my righteousnes Basil in Psal 7. and according to my innocency that is in me taketh innocency to bee simplicity or want of experience whereby men fall into many inconueniences And righteousnesse hee interpreteth to be such iustice as is hominibus comprehensibilis possibilis his qui in carne viuunt Such as men may attaine to and is possible for them to haue who liue in the flesh and thus he frameth that prayer Ad librilem humanae fragilitatis iustitiam meam appendens ita me iudices Waighing my righteousnesse in the wayscales of mans frailty iudge me after that manner By all this it doth appeare that though some are commended in Scriptures as iust men yet perfect righteousnes which only can stand before God none can attaine vnto For Hier. cont Pelag. l. 1. Cunctorum in carne iustorum imperfecta iustitia est The perfection euen of all iust men while they are in the flesh is vnperfit as S. Hierome saith but vnperfect righteousnesse cannot merit eternall life therefore no perfection that man hath here can merit that life This which I haue already said I would haue thought a sufficient answere to those Scriptures wherein some are commended as iust but seeing some contend to establish a greater righteousnesse in vs then we can haue I am forced a little further to looke into this matter Kemnitius a great learned man Popish impious speeches of Merits Kem. exam part 1. pag. 211. who hath most learnedly examined those wicked decrees of the impious Councel of Trent telleth vs that Lindan no small foole in the Romish Church Reuerendiss Episcopus Traiectensis he is called is very angry with some of his fellowes for affirming that God of his clemency and goodnesse rewardeth our good works to which he teacheth a reward to be due for the worthinesse thereof Andradius Paiuas I am sure Andrad Orthod explicat lib 6. pag. 518. dareth and shameth not to write that the ioy of heauen which the Scripture calleth the retribution and reward of the righteous is not so much giuen them of God freely and liberally as it is due to their workes And as the Apostle S. Paul proueth our Iustification by grace Rom. 4.4 because otherwise it should rather bee of debt then of fauour and the reward and grace saith he are quite contrary so dareth this man because eternall life is in Scripture called a reward gather this doctrine most false Pag. 519. Pag. 522. That it ought not to be imputed according to grace but as a debt And not long after he reproueth Kemnitius for finding fault with the Censurers of Colen for writing that God set on sale eternall life And not much vnlike is that Cens Colon. explicat Dialog 5. which they of Colen teach That by grace there is in our works an infinitenesse that they being somewhat holpen by that gift of grace doe worthily merit eternal life So that we see they imagine any little helpe will serue the turne A plaine proofe that their studie was more how to defend their doctrine then in sinceritie to examine themselues how vnable they are to keepe Gods Law so as they may merit eternall life thereby A man may iustly wonder how any that hath any feeling of his owne frailty or any knowledge of Gods word can bee so besotted as to teach that which is so contrary to that euery one of vs doe or iustly may feele in our selues and so directly against most manifest Scriptures Is any of them better then he who said no doubt as well in respect of himselfe Iob 15.14 as of others What is man that he should be cleane and he that is borne of a woman that he should be iust Are they more righteous then Dauid who confesseth that if God enter into iudgement with his seruants Psal 143.2 no flesh liuing shall be iustified or found righteous in his sight Are they holier then he who said Dan. 9.5 We haue sinned and haue committed iniquity and done wickedly yea we haue rebelled and haue departed from thy precepts and from thy iudgements Are they of greater power to resist sinne then Paul who said Rom. 7.19 I doe not the good thing that I would and the euill which I would not that doe I I thinke they dare not for very shame to match themselues with these men that had so great testimonie of their sincerity from God himselfe at the least
himselfe sometime with that the Church Romish hath formerly taught Lambertus Danaeus in the place before alleaged reckoneth at the least 37. or 38. who haue taken such paines and yet as not hauing reckoned all referreth them who are desirous to know of mo vnto Trithemius This great Doctor of the chaire for Schoole-diuinitie in a Preface he writeth before his Commentaries vpon Pauls Epistles in the very latter end thereof gathering a briefe and summe of the former part of Pauls Epistle to the Romanes hath these wordes Pluribus modis ostendit iustitiam salutem Lombard Praefat in Comment in Epi. Paul aequè Iudaeis Gentibus esse non per legem sed per fidem Iesu Christi vt à lege eos tollat in sola fide Christi eos constituat The Apostle many wayes proueth that righteousnesse and saluation is both to Iewes and Gentiles alike not by the Law but by faith of Iesus Christ that he may with-draw them from the Law and settle them in the only faith of Christ. And after in the very beginning of his exposition vpon the third Chapter of the Epistle vnto the Philippians Lombard in Epist ad Philip. c. 3. Contra Pseudo-apostolos eos monuit ne legalia ab eis recipiant sed fidem Christi solam sufficere credant Against false Apostles he hath admonished them that they receiue not of them precepts of the Law but beleeue that the only faith of Christ sufficeth Yet haue we the Doctor of Doctors behinde that Angellical Doctor for so they call him whose wordes at Rome are Oracles and his writings with too many haue more credit then the sacred Scriptures Yet in this I beleeue he will proue a Lutheran or Caluinist I know not whether but sure I am a Paulinist Yee shall heare his owne words that you may know I wrong him not Moralium legitimus vsus est saith he vt homo non attribuat eis Tho. Aquin. 1. Tim. 1. Ier. 3. quam quod in eis continetur Data est lex vt cognoscatur peccatum Rom. 7. Concupiscentiam nesciebam nisi lex diceret Non concupisces quod dicitur in decalogo Notable good counsell it is which in these wordes hee giueth and sound and Christian instruction which I would it were well marked The lawfull vse saith he of the morall precepts is when a man ascribeth not any thing to them but what in them is contayned The Law is giuen that sinne might bee knowne Rom. 7. I knew not lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust as is said in the Decalog Now marke the conclusion which he hereupon inferreth Non est ergo in eis spes iustificationis sed in sola fide Rom. 3. Arbitramur hominem iustificari per fidem absque operibus legis Therefore there is not in them the precepts of the Law any hope of iustification but in faith only Rom. 3. We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Law I haue the more carefully set downe his words because they are so plaine and pregnant for vs. For first he teacheth that the lawfull vse of the morall Law is to let vs see our sinne not to seeke for iustification by it as after he sheweth And why should wee bee taught this if not to driue vs vnto Christ Then also he affirmeth that there is no hope of saluation therein but in faith only And that which doth much contradict our now Romish Catholikes he gathereth this doctrine of Iustification by faith only euen out of these wordes of Paul as we doe How now can we be Heretikes and your Angellical Doctor a Catholike No no hee writeth as plainely for Iustification by faith only as any of vs. It is high time the purgers of mens writings should be set on work to mend their Index Expurgatorius that Thomas may bee taught to speake otherwise then thus or else he will marre all for he speaketh here not Romish For to make it more plaine what hee thinketh elsewhere too concerning iustification by workes when duly and indifferently he considereth of the word it selfe and examineth that he writeth by the true touch-stone one place more out of the said Thomas I trust shall not be thought tedious Expounding the wordes of S. Paul to the Galathians Gal. 3.10 As many as are of the workes of the Law are vnder the curse He sheweth the Apostle speaketh here of all workes Aquin. in Gal. 3. Lect. 4. Ceremoniall or Morall Opera enim non sunt causa quòd aliquis sit iustus apud Deum sed potiùs executiones manifestationes iustitiae Nam nullus per opera iustificatur apud Deum sed per habitum fidei non quidem acquisitum sed infusum Et ideo quicunque ex operibus legis iustificari quaerunt sub maledicto sunt quia per ea peccata non remouentur nec aliquis quo ad Deum iustificatur sed per habitum fidei charitate informatum For saith he workes are not the cause why a man is iust before God but the executions rather or manifestations of iustice For by workes is no man iustified before God but by the habit of faith and that not gotten but giuen Whosoeuer then by the workes of the Law seeke to be iustified are vnder the curse because by works our sinnes are not put away neyther is any iustified before God but by faith beautified with loue These two sentences of Thomas of Aquine being duly weighed doe as plainely auow Iustification by faith only and disproue Iustification by Workes and our owne Merits as any thing we doe say or write insomuch as if he were aliue I make no doubt but he should be forced eyther to recant or would be accounted a Caluinist hee followeth so truly the trace of Saint Pauls Doctrine herein But what if our Countriman Stapleton bee of this minde too I know that if hee were aliue he would not say so for any thing he hath alwayes beene so pestilent and peruerse an enemie to the same calling the Doctrine of Iustification by faith only Stap. Antid in Act. 15.10 Antid in Ro. 3. v. 21. A most wicked and most pestilent Doctrine Yea elsewhere too he is nothing better perswaded thereof but sayth It is impious and full of shame so shamefully doth this impious wretch write of this most comfortable Doctrine But we will not moue him to say it plainly wee will not stand vpon termes so hee teach the substance of the Doctrine we will beare with him And with a little helpe hee will be brought to that We will but lend him a Maior proposition much like that which I vsed in the beginning of this discourse of Iustification by faith only and he will fit himselfe of a Minor and so iumpe with vs in Doctrine If the Apostle exclude from Iustification all workes so as they haue no power to iustifie then faith only doth iustifie but he excludeth all workes from