you this Gospel written by St. Mark which I have made choice to go thorough rather than any of the other Gospels because it is more brief than any of the rest are and so will require lesse time St. Austin saies That Mark seems to have followed Matthew Tanquam Breviator Ejus as his Abridger or Epitomiser and he is so for the most part but not alwaies for this Evangelist hath some things which neither Matthew nor any of the other Evangelists have recorded in writing this History Before I come to the Gospel it self and to the words now read it may be fit to speak somewhat though briefly touching the Title of this Book It is called The Gospel according to Mark for so the words are read in the Original Now this Title containes two things 1. The general Name given to the whole Book called the Gospel 2. The Pen-man or Writer of it Mark. Touching the first The word Gospel is a common name to al the Books of the four Evangelists The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signify in general any good or joyful tidings but more properly and peculiarly it is in the New Testament applyed unto that most joyful Tydings of all other concerning Christ Jesus his coming in the Flesh to work our Redemption and concerning our Salvation and the means of it procured and wrought by him And according to this Acception the Word is used three waies 1. To signify the Doctrine of Christ and of Salvation purchased by him Mark 16. 15. Preach the Gospel to every Creature Thus it is commonly taken 2. To signify the preaching or publishing of the foresaid Doctrine of Christ as Rom. 1. 16. I am not ashamed of the Gospel c. i. e. of the preaching of it And thus the word is to be taken in the 1. verse of this present Chapter which I have now read as we shall see by and by 3. This word Gospel doth sometimes signify nothing else but the History or Narration of those things which Christ did and spake on earth when he first brought this glad Tydings of Salvation to us in his own Person Acts 1. 1. And thus the word is used in the Title of this Book and of the other three Evangelists Further It is called The Gospel according to Mark by which phrase is meant that St. Mark was the Writer or Pen-man of it not the Author or Inditer of it for that was the Holy Ghost Vide Paraeum Prooem in Matth. What Mark it was that wrote this Gospel is not certainly known but it is probably thought by Divines it was he that is called John Mark Act. 12. 12. to whose Mother 's House Peter came after his delivery from prison who is also mentioned by the same name Act. 15. 37. It is also thought to be the same Mark of whom both Paul and Peter do make honourable mention Col. 4. 10 11. Paul saith he was one of his work-fellows to the Kingdom of God and Peter 1 Epist 5. 13. calleth him his Son by which honourable testimonies given him it may appear that although he was none of the twelve Apostles whereof two only i. e. Matthew and John were Writers of the Gospel yet he was a man of great account in the Church Some of the ancient as Eusebius and Hierome do write that he was the Disciple and Companion of Peter and that he received his Gospel from the mouth of Peter putting that into writing which he had heard Peter preach and further that this Gospel being written by him was afterward approved and allowed by Peter See Euseb lib. 2. c. 14. Hieronym Catalog in Marcol But this I leave as uncertain Howsoever most certain it is that the Writer of this Gospel was infallibly assisted by the Holy Ghost in the writing of it and so this as well as the other three Gospels is of Canonical authority according as the Chuch hath alwaies from the first writing of it received and approved it so to be we therefore are still to embrace and hold it in like manner to be of Divine authority So much of the Title set before this Book Now to come unto the Book it self The general scope and drift of which as also the other Books of the Evangelists is to shew and prove that Jesus of Nazareth the Son of the Virgin Mary is the true Messiah and Saviour of the World which was promised in the Old Testament and foretold by the Prophets and which was in due time exhibited and sent of God the Father into the World Joh. 20. 31. And this St. Mark doth prove in his Gospel by shewing how those things which were foretold by the Prophets concerning the Messiah were fulfilled in this Jesus the Son of Mary which being so he must needs be the true Messiah Touching the sum of this Gospel it contains the history of Christ In which history four things are recorded by St. Mark concerning our Saviour 1. The course of His life and actions or the history of His sayings and doings till a little before His death This reacheth unto the 14. Chapter of this Gospel 2. The history of His Passion and Sufferings Chap. 14 and 15. 3. The history of His Resurrection Chap. 16. unto the 19. Verse of it 4. and lastly The history of His Ascension briefly set down in the two last Verses of that Chapter Touching this Chapter five things are recorded in it 1. The solemn Baptism of Christ 2. His temptations 3. His preaching in Galilee c. 4. Calling of four Disciples 5. Certain Miracles Vide ver 12. In the Baptism of Christ consider two things in order 1. A description of the person which baptized Him which was John the Baptist unto the 9. Ver. 2. The Baptism it self laid down Ver. 9 10 11. Touching the description of John Baptist he is set forth to us by the Evangelist two waies 1. By his publick Office and Ministery from the 1. Ver. to the 6. Ver. as also Ver. 7 8. 2. By the austerity and strictness of his private life Ver. 6. Touching the history of his publick Ministery the Evangelist layeth down First A Preface to it Ver. 1. Secondly The history it self To begin with the Preface Ver. 1. The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God These words are to be taken not as a general preface to this whole Book but onely as a more particular preamble set before the history of John Baptist his publick ministery The beginning of the Gospel By the Gospel understand here not the history of this Gospel but the preaching or the publishing of the doctrine of the Gospel touching the glad tydings of Salvation by Christ and we must note that these words have relation unto the 4th Ver. following where it is said that John Baptist preached the Baptism of Repentance for the remission of Sins and the meaning is this as if the Evangelist had said The preaching of John Baptist was the first
A Learned Pious and Practical COMMENTARY Upon the GOSPEL According to St. MARK WHEREIN The Sacred Text is Logically Analysed The meaning of the holy Spirit clearly and soundly opened Doctrines naturally raised strongly confirmed vindicated from Exceptions and excellent Inferences deduced from them All seeming Differences in the History between this and the other Evangelists fairly reconciled Many important Cases of Conscience Judiciously Succinctly and Perspicuously solved By that Laborious and Faithful Servant of Christ Mr. George Petter late Minister of the Gospel at Bread in Sussex Luke 24. 32. Did not our heart burn within us c. while he opened to us the Scriptures 2 Tim. 4. 11. Take Mark and bring him with thee For he is profitable to me for the Ministry Non potuit latere Marcum quid scriberet Nec enim inexpers erat lectionis qui ab infantiâ divinis literis imbutus exercitatus erat in lege maximè cum Apostolos sit secutus Augustin Operum Tom. 4. in part 2. Questionum ex Novo Testamento Col. 738. Edit Basil 1569. Habebat Paulus Titum interpretem Sicut Beatus Petrus Marcum Cujus Evangelium Petro narrante illo scribente compositum est Hieronym Hedibiae quaest 11. part 154. Tom. 3. Edit Lugdun 1530. LONDON Printed by J. Streater and are to be sold by George Saw-bridge at the Bible on Ludgate-Hill MDCLXI THE Preface to the Pious Reader THE Four Evangelists are by some compared to four stately white Horses drawing the Triumphant Chariot of the Gospel wherein the Lord Jesus rides gloriously in his Imperial Seat throughout the World Others refer them as Mystical Jerom in praef ad Comment in Math. Anti-Types to the four Cherubims in Solomon's Temple or the four living Creatures in the Visions of Ezekiel supporting the Throne of the Divine Majesty with their Wings lifted up on high Each of which Cherubims had four Heads or Faces That which had the face of a Lion the Ancients say did represent our holy Evangelist St. Mark Because the first thing that we read of in the beginning of his heavenly Gospel is as it were the roaring Voice of a Lion in the Desarts The Voice of one crying in the Mark 1. 3. Wilderness Prepare ye the way of the Lord make his paths streight This blessed Man is reported to have been born in the Land of Judaea possibly at Jerusalem the Head City if that be true which some conceive that the Disciples were met secretly at the House of his Mother Mary when Act. 12. 12. Peter was let out of Prison by the Angel For the Text tells us expresly that he came to the House of Mary the Mother of John whose Sirname was Mark. He was Nephew to Barnabas if that be the same Person of whom the Apostle Paul writes in his Epistle to the Colossians Some have Col. 4. 10 conceited that he was the Son of Peter the Apostle because he styles him 1 Pet. 5. 13. so in his Epistle to the dispersed Jews But I rather understand it according to Oecumenius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That he was his Son begotten in the Faith as Paul calls Timothy other-where I know Carion takes him to be Peter's Carion p. 589. Sister's Son and so pro more Gentis according to the rate of the Hebrews speaking of their Kindred called his Son Others deem him to be so called because of his Youth and his continual Attendance to and Assistance of Peter in the Ministry of the Gospel For by Irenaeus he is called The Iren. haeres lib. 3. c. 1. Disciple and Interpreter of Peter committing those things to writing which he received from the Dictate of Peter Jerom relates concerning him Ib. supra that he was the first Bishop of the Church of God at Alexandria in Aegypt and acquaints us moreover that it was the Tradition in his time That he did not see the Lord our Saviour in the Flesh yet that what he compiled he received from Peter's own Mouth and hath compendiously recited the History of our Lord exactly according with the Divine Truth though not in all Points in precise Order of time The same learned Father in his Catalogue of Ecclesiastical Writers translated into Greek by Sophronius observes further That St. Mark wrote this Evangelical Treatise in Italy even at Rome it self at the request of the Brethren Others say at the desire and by the direction and inditing of Peter if so as most probable then I question whether it were written at Rome For it is greatly controverted and more likely on the Negative that Peter never was at Rome whatsoever the old and bold Lyars of the Popish strain do assert But however it appears from Evidences of great Antiquity that it was approved by Peter and by his Apostolick Authority set forth to be read in the Churches of Christ as Clemens cited by Jerom in the sixth Book of his Hypotyposis hath written Papias also the Bishop of Hierapolis in Syria who lived very anciently and was the Auditor and Disciple of St. John the beloved Disciple doth make a notable mention of this Sacred Author And Philo Judaeus seeing the Order of the Church by him erected in Aegypt what time he went Embassadour to the Emperour in the behalf of his Country-men the Jews highly commended the great Charity Community Holiness and Continency of the lives of St. Mark 's Disciples It is reported by Epiphanius truly in general a grave Author but yet it is to be feared in those Collections of Haeresies and other matters that he over-ruled his Pen too much by common fame that our holy Evangelist was one of those Disciples who not understanding the Mystery of eating the Flesh of Christ fell from him and walked no more with him Joh. 6. 66 but afterwards repenting became a Proselyte to the Gospel This Story is taken up by Baronius and other sequacious Pens whereas there be Casaub in Exerc. 15 in Baron many and those of high Repute and Antiquity who assert that our Holy Man never saw our Lord walking in the Vally of his Incarnation Eutychius in his short recital of the Foundation of the Alexandrian Eutych Edit Seldâ—n Church tells us several Stories of this Person upon what a strange occasion he was instrumental by a miraculous Cure of the Finger of one Ananias a Sutor of that City towards the Conversion of him to the Faith and afterwards he did constitute him the first Patriarch of that Seat The main of which Story being crept into the Fabulous Legends I leave to the Childish Affectors of Jacobus de Voragine and such kind of tremendous Lyars and Impostors to be asserted and proved Out of more serious and grave Relators it appears that this Holy Man dyed in the eighth Hieron Euseb l. 2. c. 24. Hist Eccles Dorotheus Year of Nero and the 63d after our Lord's Birth and was buried at Alexandria Some say he was crowned with
and the three next following he proveth the Crime of which he accused them by an example or instance which he giveth of two particular precepts of the Word of God which they rejected and disannulled by their Tradition Where 1. Our Saviour layeth down or alledgeth the precepts of the Word of God which he chargeth them to abrogate Ver. 10. 2. He layeth down their contrary unwritten Tradition which they opposed against the written Word Ver. 11 12 13. Where he shews how they abrogate God's Word by that Tradition Touching the alledging of the precepts of the written Word of God in which our Saviour instanceth we are to consider two things 1. The manner of alledging them viz. the name of Moses the Pen-man of those Books of Scripture out of which the precepts are cited Moses said c. 2. The matter and substance of the precepts which are two in number The first Being a precept of the Morall Law even the Words of the fifth Commandement recorded Exod. 20. 12. Deut. 5. 16. Honour thy Father and thy Mother The second Being a precept or Ordinance of the Judiciall Law which was the Law of punishments for Breakers of the Morall Law enjoyning the penalty of Death to be inflicted on such Children as did break the fifth Commandement and that in a high degree by cursing or speaking evil of their Patrents in these words Whosoever shall speak evil c. which Judiciall Law is found written Exod. 21. 17. and Levit. 20. 9. First Of the manner of alledging these precepts of the Law of God Quest Quest Where did he say it Answ Answ In his written Books before mentioned Moses said So saith our Evangelist here Yet Matthew 15. 4. it is said God Commanded c. The reason is because Moses was imployed of God as his Instrument and Secretary in writing of the Law and whatsoever he wrote and in writing delivered to the Church in those Books of his before mentioned he wrote it by Authority received from God himself and that immediately St. Mark ascribeth that to Moses which St. Mathew attributeth to God that he might commend to the Church the Divine Authority of the Books of Moses Observ Observ Here take notice of the Divine Authority of the Books of Holy Scripture that though they were written by Men as Instruments imployed of God in that service yet they contain no other but the Divine and Heavenly Doctrine of God himself So that what Moses wrote in his five Books which we have it is the Doctrine and Writing of God Hos 8. 12. I have written to him that is to Ephraim the great things of my Law c. So all that is written in the rest of the sacred Books of the Old and New Testament is no other but the very Word and Doctrine of God himself Acts 1. 16. The Holy Ghost spake by the mouth of David in the Book of Psalms The reason is because all the Pen-men of Scripture wrote those Books of Scripture by immediate extraordinary direction and assistance of the Spirit of God instructing them infallibly both in the matter and manner of Writing 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God c. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Prophecy came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Quest Quest. How to know and be assured that the Scriptures were written by immediate Divine inspiration and consequently that they contain the Doctrine and the Word of God himself Answ Answ The main and principall means to be assured hereof is by the inward infallible testimony of the Holy Ghost in the consciences of Men especially of the Elect of God when they read the Scriptures or hear them read or preached This inward testimony of the Spirit is the onely means abled undoubtedly to perswade the conscience that the Scriptures are the Word of God If no man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12. 3. Then much less can any come undoubtedly to be perswaded that the whole Scripture is the Word of God but by inward testimony of the Spirit sealing it to his heart Now this Testimony is especially found and felt in those that do unfeignedly desire and endeavour to obey the Will of God revealed in his Word Joh. 7. 17. If any man will do his Will he shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God c. But besides this inward testimony of the Spirit there are also sundry other proofs and evidences which may be drawn from the Scriptures themselves which are sufficient to convince the conscience of any not willfully blind that the Doctrine of the Scripture is the Word of God so as they cannot in conscience deny it though otherwise they have not Grace to yield obedience to it as the Word of God I will not speak of all but of some of the principall of those evidences by which our consciences may be settled in the truth of this weighty Point and by which we may be armed against profane Atheists and all that deny or call in question the authority of the Scriptures The proofs are these which I will but briefly touch 1. The Power and Efficacy of the Scriptures in working on the inward Souls and Consciences of men both to humble them in the sight and sense of their sins and to raise them up and comfort them being humbled No Writings or Doctrine of Man hath like Power Hebr. 4. 12. The Word of God is quick and powerfull c. See also 1 Cor. 14. 25. 2. The Antiquity of the Scriptures for the Books of Moses are more antient then any humane Writings setting down the Originall and first History of things done from the beginning of the World which other Writers either knew not at all or borrowed them from Moses and corrupted them with many Fables and untruths 3. The wonderfull Harmony and Consent that is found to be in the Books of Scripture among themselves though they were Written by sundry persons at sundry times and in different Ages of the World And though there be some shew of difference or contrariety in words sometimes yet all such places as seem to differ and to be at jarr are sufficiently reconciled by those of the Church who have laboured therein 4. The fulfilling of the Prophesies found in Scripture in their due and appointed times even unto this very Age in which we live For example The Israelites going into Aegypt and being delivered thence again and coming into Canaan The seventy years Captivity of the Jews and their deliverance by Cyrus who is also named by the Prophet above a hundred years before he was born Isa 45. 1. So also the time and manner of Christ's coming in the Flesh the calling of the Gentiles destruction of Hierusalem revealing of Antichrists c. All these and many other things foretold in Scripture are already fulfilled and other things are daily more
a man said to have the general Warrant of the Word of God for his Calling and Entrance into the Ministry Ans When his entrance is lawful and warrantable by the general prescript and rule of the Word which requires these 4. things 1. That the Person that takes this Function upon him be indued in some measure with such gifts as are fitting for that Calling especially two 1. The gift of Knowledge 2. Aptness in some measure to teach and to deliver that which he know unto others for the edifying of the Church 1 Tim. 3. 2. Indeed there are Degrees of the gifts both of Knowledge and Utterance and all cannot have the same measure God giveth not to every one ten Talents yet 〈◊〉 one that takes this Office on him must have at least one Talent 2. That he which lawfully enters into the Ministry should have a willingness and desire to use the gifts to God's glory and to the edifying of the Church not hiding his Talent in a Napkin 3. That he be one that is for his Life and Conversation unblamable 1 Tim. 3. that is free from notorious Vices He must not be an open wicked liver for then he will bring scandall and disgrace to the Ministery and do more hurt by his wicked life than good by his teaching 4. That he have the outward Ordination of the Church he must be allowed and ordained by the Authority of the Church and withal he must be at least accepted if not desired of that People whom he is to teach These things the Word of God requires in general for the qualifying of such as take upon them the Office of the Ministry and whosoever hath these things and is furnished with them he may be said to have the general warrant of the Word of God for the lawfulness of his Calling to the Ministry otherwise not But I will not insist further on this Obser 2 In that the Evangelist being to set down the History of the Preaching and Baptism of John by which he went before Christ as his Harbinger doth shew that John did this according to the Prophecies that went before of him in the Old Testament and that these Prophecies were now fulfilled in John when he began to preach and baptize Hence we may observe the excellent harmony consent and agreement that is between the Books of the Old Testament and of the New those penned by the Prophets and these by the Evangelists and Apostles those things which were foretold in the Prophets concerning Christ and John Baptist the fore-runner of Christ are recorded by the Evangelists and Apostles to have been actually fulfilled as they were foretold Ver. gra The Prophets foretold that John Baptist should go before Christ by his Ministry preparing the way for Christ that was to come immediately after and the Evangelists in the New Testament do plainly shew how this was accordingly fulfilled by John Baptist as Mark in this place So concerning Christ himself the Prophets foretold many things as the manner and time and place of his Birth his Passion and sufferings his Resurrection Ascension c. And all these things the Writings of the Evangelists and Apostles do plainly shew and testify to have been accordingly fulfilled in and by our Saviour Christ Hence is it that in the New Testament it is often said That such or such things were done by Christ or unto Christ that the Scripture that is the Prophecies of the Old Testament might be fulfilled The truth of this Point might be shewed more at large but I mean not to stand upon it This is enough to shew that there is a sweet harmony and consent between the Books of the Old Testament and of the New and particularly between the Prophecies of John Baptist and of Christ mentioned in the Old Testament and the fulfilling of them as it is expressed in the New Use To confirm our Faith touching the divine Authority of the Books of holy Scripture For this admirable consent that is between them is one special evidence to prove the Scriptures to be the undoubted Word of God himself for there is not the like consent to be found in the Writings of men It is therefore very profitable in reading the Scriptures to observe and take notice of the excellent agreement that is between the writings of the Old and New Testament and to compare the one with the other for this will make much for the strengthening of our Faith in the belief of this point that the Scriptures are the very word of God himself whatsoever may be objected to the contrary by any Atheists in the World Now I come to speak of the Testimonies themselves alledged here for the confirmation of John's Calling and Ministery The first of these Testimonies is taken out of the Prophet Malachy Chap. 3. Ver. 1. The second is taken out of Esay Chap. 40. Ver. 3. In the first is foretold the calling and sending of John Baptist to prepare the way before Christ as it is Ver. 2. In the second is shewed the manner or means how he should prepare the way of Christ Namely by crying in the Wildernesse c. Ver. 3. To begin first with the Testimony of Malachi Behold I send my Messenger c. In the Prophet Malachi the words are read somewhat otherwise then they are cited here by St. Mark for there the Prophet brings in Christ himself speaking of John Baptist and promising to send him before his own face but here St. Mark alleageth the words in the person of God the Father promising to send John Baptist before his Son Christ the Messiah But this comes all to one effect whether it be said that Christ as God sent John before himself or that God the Father sent him before Christ for this Action of sending John is common to the Father and the Son both And it is true both that God the Father sent him as as it is expresly said Joh. 1. 6. and also that Christ as he is God did send him too In the words we may consider more particularly two things 1. The calling of John in these words Behold I send my Messenger 2. The Office or Function unto which he was called 1. To go before the face of Christ 2. To prepare the way before him Behold This word is used often as a note of some weighty matter that is spoken of and so seemeth to stir up our attention unto it Sometimes also it signifies the certainty of the thing spoken of It it may be taken both waies in this place I send my Messenger this is spoken of a thing to come and yet the present tense is used to shew the certainty of the fulfilling of it as if he were already sent And they are the words of God the Father touching John Baptist whom he calleth his Messenger By sending is meant the calling and appointing him c. John 1. 6. Amos 3. 2. Before thy face or presence that is before the presence of
of God to the performance of any great and weighty works the Lord doth alwayes furnish them with sufficient gifts and abilities for the performance of such works Moses being called to perform that great work of delivering the Israelites out of Egypt from under the tyranny of Pharaoh the Lord furnished him with the power of working Miracles before Pharaoh that by them Pharaoh might be moved to let Israel go Exod. 4. Saul being called of God to be King of Israel the Lord gave him another heart that is furnished him with new gifts of wisdom courage and such like as were necessary for him in the Government of the Kingdom 1 Sam. 10. 9. Sampson being called to deliver Israel from the Philistims by performing works of great strength the Lord indued him with extraordinary bodily strength as we read in the Book of Judges The Prophets being called of God to the great Work and Office of Preaching his Word by denouncing Judgments against the wicked and by comforting the true Church and faithfull people of God the Lord furnished them with gifts answerable to the weightiness of that Calling See Jer. 1. 9. So also the Apostles being called to the great work of Preaching the Gospel to all Nations and of planting the first Christian Churches they were furnished of Christ with the gift of Tongues Act. 2. and with an extraordinary gift in teaching and with the power and gift of Miracles to seal their Doctrine Vse 1 Use 1. By this all such as are Called to great places and Offices in Church and Common-wealth and to performance of waighty duties in those places may examine and know whether their Calling to those places be of God or not for if it be there is no doubt but they do find themselves furnished of God with a sufficiency of gifts and Graces fit for discharge of those waighty duties which lye upon them If not let them not think they are Called of God He sends no Minister to be a Preacher in the Church but he gives him one Talent at least neither doth he send or call any to be a Magistrate or Governour in the Common-wealth but he giveth a sufficient measure of Wisdome Experience Courage fit for such a place Use 2 Vse 2. This also may comfort those that find themselves Called of God to performance of great and waighty duties in the Church or Common-wealth for as the Lord hath begun already to qualify them with sufficient gifts for discharge of those duties when they first entred upon them so they may be assured that he will also continue and increase those his gifts in them from time to time if they Conscionably use and employ them to his Glory Mark 6. 8 9 10. And commanded them that they should take nothing c. Mar. 25. 1621. IN the former Verse we heard of our Saviour's sending forth the Twelve Apostles by two and two and of his qualifying them with the gift of Miracles Now in the next place the Evangelist mentioneth the charge given them at the time of sending them which is threefold 1. Touching Preparation for their Journey that they should not make great preparation for it but onely take such things with them as were of present and greatest necessity for them ver 8 9. He commanded that they should take nothing for their Journey save a staff onely c. 2. Touching their lodging in their Journey that they should not change it during the time of their abode in any one place but into whatsoever house they first entred they should there continue till they departed out of that place ver 10. 3. Touching their carriage towards such as should refuse to give entertainment to them and their Doctrine viz. that they should testify against them by shaking off the dust of their Feet at their departure and withall our Saviour ratifieth that Testimony by denouncing the fearfull Judgment of God against such contemners of them and their Doctrine when he saith It shall be easier for Sodome and Gomorrha in the day of Judgment c. ver 11. First to speak of that part of the charge which concerneth their Preparation for the Journey He commanded that they should take nothing for their Journey That is that they should not be sollicitous or very carefull to provide or take with them many necessaries for their Journey or to furnish themselves with great store of Provision for it as of Victualls Money Apparell Weapons of defence and the like Save a staff onely That is a walking-staff to use in the Journey No Scrip That is no Bag or Satchel which the mean and poorer sort used to carry Victuals in for their Journey when they Travelled Bread Bread is put by a Synecdoche for all manner of Victualls as it is often in other places of Scripture No Money in their Purse or Brass in their Girdles as the words are in the Originall for they used then not onely Gold and Silver but Brass money also And the learned do observe that in Antient times they had Girdles made in such sort that they had purses in them in which such as travelled might carry their Money Vide Rittershush in Salvian pag. 213 214. et Henr. Stephan Thesaur Tom. 1. col 1410. But be shod with Sandalls These were a kind of Shooes in use in those times in which they used to travell as may appear Act. 12. 8. where the Angel bids Peter gird himself and bind on his Sandals and follow him Vide Bezam et Drusium in hunc locum Marci And not put on two Coats That is not provide or carry change of Garments with them to put on one after another for he doth not simply forbid them to wear two Coats or two Garments at once but to provide change of Apparell to put on in their Journey Vide Bezam in locum Therefore it is said Matth. 10. 10. Provide not two Coats c. Object Object Matth. 10. 10. Provide not Shooes nor Staves And Luke 9. 3. Take no Staves for your Journey Answ Answ Our Saviour's purpose is not simply to forbid them the use of staves in their Journey for it was ordinary then to Travell with a staff in their hands as appeareth in Jacob Gen. 32. 10. who saith he passed over Jordan with his Staff and by that Ceremony of eating the Passoever with staves in their hands like Travellers Exod. 12. Neither would he have them go bare-foot without any shooes at all as may be gathered by the express words of Mark who saith He commanded them to be shod with Sandals but his meaning is onely to forbid them to take much care and to spend time in providing and furnishing themselves with staves and shooes for their Journey but he would have them presently without delay to go forth taking with them no other shooes than such as were already upon their feet nor any other staves then such as they had already in their hands or near about them Vide Bezam in
to Parents both which they made void or frustrate by their own Tradition which they preferred before them In the words of this 9th Ver. consider two things 1. The manner of our Saviour's charging and accusing them viz. with an Ironicall kind of Speech whereby he speaketh one thing in words and intendeth the contrary for he seemeth to commend them when indeed his purpose and scope is sharply to reprove them Full well ye reject the Command of God c. q. d. ye do grosly offend and sin in so doing and it is a shame for you c. 2. The matter of his reproof or accusation against them That they rejected God's Commandement that they might observe their own tradition Full well ye reject c. Quest Doth not this and the like ironicall Speeches come within the compasse of lying or dissembling Answ Answ Not so for lying and dissembling Speech is when one doth not onely speak otherwise then the truth is but with a purpose to deceive or delude either the party to whom he speaketh or others But in these Ironicall figurative Speeches it is not so for though one thing be spoken and another meant yet there is no purpose of deceiving or deluding others neither is there any danger of their being deceived because the words are so spoken as that the meaning and purpose of the Speaker doth easily appear to all that hear him Observ Observ In that our Saviour here by this sharp Irony or taunting Speech doth deride the grosse superstition of the Scribes and Pharisees We may hence gather That it is lawfull to deride and scoff at the sinnes and unlawfull practises of others especially at the grosse and notorious sins of the Wicked and Ungodly Thus Elijah derided the grosse folly of the Worshippers of Baal 1 King 18. 27. Bidding them cry aloud to him for it may be he was talking or pursuing or in a journey or asleep c. So Isa 44. the Prophet derideth the extream folly of Idolaters in worshipping graven and molten Images See the places Yet some Cautions are to be observed for the lawfull use of such Ironicall reproofs of sin 1. They must proceed from a holy and upright affection in such as use them viz. from zeal of God's glory and hatred of sin and not from private malice or a revengefull mind against the person reproved 2. They must tend to the right end viz. God's glory and the good of the party reproved that by such a sharp and taunting Reproof he may if it be possible be brought to be ashamed of his sin and to be touched with remorse for it as also to grow in dislike and true hatred of it not the disgrace of the person is to be sought but the disgrace of the sin reproved and the reformation of the person 3. Such taunts and Ironies are to be used against sin in due manner that is to say after a grave and serious manner not with shew of lightness or vanity Object Object Ephes 5. 4. Jesting is condemned as a sin c. Answ Answ The Apostle here speaketh of vain foolish and offensive jesting such as tends to no good end or use for edification But on the contrary either to the disgrace of other persons or otherwise to the just offence of good Christians or hardening of the Wicked in their profane mirth But he doth not simply condemn all Jesting As 1. Not that which stands in uttering some witty and pleasant Speeches for lawfull Recreation without hurt or offence to any 2. Neither this kind of grave and serious reproving of sin by ironicall or taunting Speech So much of the manner of our Saviour's reproving them Now follows the matter with which he chargeth them That they rejected c. Ye reject That is ye abrogate or make of no force or authority as is said afterward Ver. 13. Ye take away from it all force and authority by your grosse contempt and disobedience shewed against it The commandement of God That is his written Word by a Synechdoche one part of the Word being named instead of all as in the former Verse That ye may observe c. The sense of these words may appear by that which hath been spoken upon the former c. Observ Observ That it is the property of superstitious Hypocrits to preferr the observation of humane Traditions and Ordinances before the obedience of the Word of God and to choose rather to sin against the precepts of the written Word then to omitt or neglect such humane unwritten Ordinances So it was with the Scribes and Pharisees they were far more carefull to obey the traditions of their Elders then the written Word of God as we have heard before sufficiently See Matth. 23. 23. See also Matth. 5. how they made more accompt of the corrupt glosses and expositions of the Law which they had received by tradition from their Elders then they did of the expresse and plain words of the Law of God So the Papists at this Day are in this also directly the Disciples and followers of the Scribes and Pharises for they make more conscience of obeying the Popes Decrees Canons of the Councills and especially of the late Councill of Trent and other written traditions and Doctrines of men which go for currant in that Church than they do to yield obedience to the written Word of God And they accompt it a greater sin to break those their traditions then to transgresse the manifest precepts of the Word of God for example They accompt it a greater sin for one to eat Flesh in time of Lent or upon Good-Friday forbidden by Popish Canons than to lye swear or commit some other grosse sin against the expresse Word of God So it is a greater sin with them to work upon some Holiday of theirs than to profane the Lord's Sabbath A greater sin also they make it for their Popish Priests to enter into the state of Marriage which by the Word of God is lawfull and honourable among all Men Heb. 13. than to commit the sin of Fornication c. Use Use Take we heed of this grosse Superstition and Hypocrisie in preferring Men's Traditions and Ordinances before the Word of God lest we become like the Scribes and Pharisees and the superstitious Papists And remember what is said Acts 4. 19. Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto Men more than unto God judge ye All humane Ordinances Traditions and Doctrines must bow and stoop to the Authority of the Word of God and we must make more conscience and obedience to one sentence of the Book of God than to all Writings of Men Testimonies of Fathers or Decrees of Councills Mark 7. 10. For Moses said Honour thy Father c. Mar. 10. 1621. IN the former Verse our Saviour charged the Scribes and Pharisees of Jerusalem for preferring their own unwritten Tradition before the written Word rejecting the Commandement of God c. Now in this 10th ver
and more accomplished as they are foretold 5. The unpartiall dealing of the Writers of Scripture not sparing their dearest frineds nor themselves in setting down their faults and frailties Moses recordeth his own sins and the sins of Aaron and Miriam his Brother and Sister So David Paul c. 6. The admirable providence of God seen in the preservation of all the Books of Scripture in all Ages hitherto notwithstanding the means used by Tyrants and Persecuters to abolish them 7. The manner of Style in which the Scriptures are Written which is full of Divine Majesty though expressed in plain words for the most part being such a Style as none could ever or can at this day expresse by imitation And though some of those which wrote the Apocryphall Books as Ecclesiasticus c. did much strive unto it yet they came far short thereof 8. Lastly The constancy and resoluteness of so many Martyrs in all Ages suffering for the Profession of the Doctrine of the Scriptures even to the shedding of their Blood and losse of their Lives yea they suffered most exquisite torments c. Now by these evidences of the Authority of the Scriptures being drawn from the Scriptures themselves we may see the error of Papists teaching that the authority of the Scripture dependeth on the testimony of the Church without which they say we cannot know them to be the Word of God But this is false for although we deny not but that the testimony of the Church approving the severall Books of Scripture and declaring them to be of Divine Authority is of great force to confirm and settle our perswasion of the same Divine Authority of them yet we see it is clear by that which hath been spoken that there is sufficient light of Divine Authority and Majesty shining in the Scriptures themselves to prove and manifest them to be of God even without the testimony of the Church Vse 1 Vse 1. See how great is the sin of such as contemn or set leight by the Scriptures or have not the Doctrine of them in high accompt as Papists and other profane persons c. 1 Thess 4. 8. He that despiseth those things which we write despiseth not Man but God Vse 2 Vse 2. See the truth and certainty of Christian Religion being grounded on the Doctrine of the Scriptures which is from God himself given by immediate inspiration This should stablish us more and more in the constant profession and practice of this onely true Religion in Life and Death Use 3 Use 3. To teach us highly to esteem and reverence the sacred Scriptures above all Books in the World as being most excellent in regard of the Divine and heavenly matter and manner of writing being indited by the Spirit of God and after a sort written as it were with his own finger c. Vse 4 Use 4. To stir up and provoke our diligence in the study of this Book of God by reading and meditation in it Day and Night as it is Psal 1. Joh. 5. 39. Search the Scriptures c. Col. 3. 16. Let the Word of God dwell in you richly c. This Book alone is able to make us wise to Salvation to give wisdom to the simple It is the Letter of the Creator to the Creature as Gregory said of it If we read other Writings of holy and learned men with such delight how much more should we never be weary of reading and studying this Book of God c. And if we be so delighted with reading a Friend's Letter c. So much of our Saviour's manner of alledging the two precepts of the Law of God in that he alledgeth them under the name of Moses the Pen-man of the Law thereby to commend to us the Divine Authority of the Books of Moses Now to speak of the matter of the Precepts And first of the first which is precept of the Morall Law being the very Words of the fifth Commandement Honour thy Father and Mother In the words are two things Contained 1. A Duty enjoyned which is to yield Honour 2. The Persons to whom To Father and Mother The Commandement as it is set down by Moses Exod. 20. and Deut. 5. is of very large extent comprehending the Duties of all Inferiors toward Superiors and by consequence also the Duties of all Superiors towards Inferiors as I have heretofore shewed you when I interpreted the Commandements at large unto you but I will not here take the words in that large sense but speak of them onely so far as they concern the Duties of Children towards their naturall Parents according to the expresse and proper signification of the words and according to the scope of our Saviour's alledging them in this place By Honour understand all Duties which are required of Children toward their Naturall Parents one Principall is named for all and this fitly named because all other Duties ought to come from an honourable respect and reverent affection toward Parents and to be joyned therewith in regard of the Authority given of God unto Parents over their Children By Father and Mother understand naturall Parents And both are named to shew that Honour must be performed to both as well to the Mother as to the Father and that she ought not to be despised or lesse honoured in regard of her Sex being the weaker Vessel Yet the Father is first named to shew his preheminence over the Mother both in regard of Sex and in regard of Authority being the Head of his Wife and so to be honoured and respected in the first place by the Child or Children of them both Object Object Matth. 23 9. Call no man Father upon Earth c. Answ Answ 1. That is to say in that sense and respect as we call God our Father who is so by Creation and by Regeneration and Adoption in Christ and whose Authority over us his Children is absolute as well in respect of our Soul and Conscience as of our Body and outward Man 2. Our Saviour there reproveth the Ambition of Scribes and Pharisees affecting such honourable Titles out of Vain-glory. Therefore our Saviour meaneth that we should call none Father in such sort as the Pharisees desired to be called Fathers c. that is to say in way of flattery or soothing them up and feeding their Ambitious humour So much of the sense of the words Now to the matter to be handled out of them And first of the Duty of Children which is to honour their Parents understanding by Honour as hath bin said all Duties which they owe to Parents which Duties may be referred unto four generall Heads 1. Love 2. Reverence 3. Obedience 4. Thankfullness Of these in order distinctly The first is Love not an ordinary but an entire and speciall kind of Love to Parents as being most near and dear unto them by bond of Nature in that from them Children do receive their Beeing The light of Nature teacheth this as our Saviour Christ seemeth
it or that it is their duty c. They can talk of their Parents Necessities or Infirmities but scarce ever in their lives did they send up one hearty Prayer to God for supply or help of them Well Let all that have been or are guilty take notice of their sin and unfeignedly and speedily repent hereof and for time to come beware of such unnatural Unthankfulness toward their Parents which is commonly the sin of lewd and ungracious Children c. So much of the duties of Children to Parents comprised here under the Word Honour Now a word or two of the Persons to whom it is due viz. Father and Mother Observ Observ Children owe all the duties above-mentioned unto both their Parents to Father and Mother Therefore both are distinctly named not only in these words of the fifth Commandment but also in sundry other places especially in the Proverbs as Chap. 23. 22. Hearken to thy Father that begat thee and despise not thy Mother when she is old Levit. 1. 3. Ye shall fear every one his Mother and his Father where the Mother is first named because she is most subject to contempt usually Gen. 28. 7. Jacob obeyed his Father and his Mother Reasons Reasons 1. Children are most nearly bound by bond of Nature to both Parents for their natural life and beeing whereof they are Instruments under God 2. The care and pains of both Parents in bringing forth and trayning up Children is exceeding great and so great that it seems doubtful which is greatest whether of Father or Mother Therefore Children ought to honour them both Yet so as the Father is to have the pre-eminence in this honour and in all duties as being the chief in regard of Sex and of Authority over the Mother and Children both Vse 1 Use 1. Reproof of such Children as are partial in doing Duties to Parents so honouring one that they despise the other Some respect their Mother only or chiefly because she cockereth and pleaseth them too much in the mean time not caring for their Father c. Others are careful to please their Father and to shew duty to him but none to their Mother and this fault is more common than the former Some Children even when they are young so soon as they are out of the shell learn to despise their Mothers and to cast off their Authority Such must remember the places before mentioned Lev. 19. and Prov. 23. Use 2 Use 2. Admonition to both Parents so to carry themselves toward their Children and to each other that they may preserve their Authority over their Children and that their Children may be moved to honour both as well as one To this End both Parents must be careful to maintain each others Authority and especially Fathers to maintain the Mothers Authority that she be not despised of her Children and she must beware of fond and foolish cockering of Children lest she bring herself into contempt So much of the first Precept here alledged out of the Books of Moses which is a Precept of the moral Law touching the Duty of Children to Parents Now followeth the second Precept which is of the Judiciall Law touching a grievous penalty to be inflicted upon such as break the aforesaid Commandment of the Morall Law in these words Whosoever shall speak evil c. This severe Law of Punishment our Saviour addeth to aggravate the sin of the Pharisees In the words are two things contained 1. The Sin or Breach of the Moral Law appointed to be punished Speaking evill of Parents 2. The Penalty it self Such ought to dy the death Who so shall speak evill Not every kind of evill Speech is here meant but especially two kinds 1. Cursing and banning Speeches uttered against Parents wishing or desiring some evil or mischief to befall them as to wish the Pox or Plague to take them c. And therefore the words are well translated thus Whosoever curseth Father or Mother c. 2. Railing or reviling Speeches uttered against Parents giving them vile or odious Names or Titleâ— in way of Contempt and Disgrace of their Persons Both these kinds of evil Speaking seem to be implyed by the Hebrew Word Killel which is used Exod. 21. and Lev. 20. from whence our Saviour citeth these words Let him dye the Death that is Let him most certainly be put to death for it by the Authority of the Magistrate It is an Hebraism implying the certain performance of the matter spoken of Therefore it is not said Let him dy but Let him dy the Death Quest Quest Was the penalty of death to be inflicted on all such Children as did in any sort curse or rail upon their Parents Answ Answ There are two kinds of cursing and reviling Speech 1. Such as is uttered in sudden passon of Wrath and unadvised Anger for which the party uttering it is perhaps touched with sorrow so soon as that distempered Passion is over Now some think the Law is not to be understood of this 2. Such as is uttered deliberately and advisedly being also joyned with obstinate and wilful Contempt of Parents This I take to be here meant either onely or chiefly See Calvin in Pentateuch and Dr. Willet in Exod. 21. 17. The word Killel used by Moses is derived from Kalal which signifies properly to contemn vilify and set at nought another which argues that the Law speaketh of such cursing and reviling as is joyned with great contempt and vilifying of Parents Deut. 27. 16. Cursed be he that setteth leight by his Father or Mother c. And especially it is to be understood of such contempt as is joyned with Obstinacy and Wilfulness As Deut. 21. 18. not every disobedient Child was to be stoned to Death but such a one as was stubborn and wilful in disobedience persisting therein without Reformation so here I take it that the penalty of Death is denounced not against every reviling word uttered by a Child against Parents but against such as is joyned with some Obstinacy and wilful Contempt Observ 1 Observ 1. It is a most grievous sin in Children to curse or revile their Parents This appears by the grievous Punishment appointed by the Law of God for such viz. The penalty of Death For all sins appointed to be thus punished are very heinous as Murder Adultery Blasphemy c. Prov. 30. 11. Solomon there reckoning up four sorts of gross and notorious Offenders setteth those in the first place who curse their Father and bless not their Mother So Deut. 27. 16. they which set leight by Parents are reckoned among the cursed Crew of heinous Offenders See also Isa 45. 10. Reasons Reasons 1. It is a sin against the light of Nature and therefore condemned by the Heathen 2. It is a high contempt of God and dishonour to his Majesty forasmuch as his Image and Glory shineth in the Authority of Parents over Children Use 1 Vse 1. Terrour unto such cursed and lewd Children as are or have been