Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	author_n	know_v	write_v	2,987	5	5.2886	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A50542	Jus regium, or, The just, and solid foundations of monarchy in general, and more especially of the monarchy of Scotland : maintain'd against Buchannan, Naphthali, Dolman, Milton, &c. / by Sir George Mackenzie ...	Mackenzie, George, Sir, 1636-1691.; Mackenzie, George, Sir, 1636-1691. That the lawful successor cannot be debarr'd from succeeding to the crown.	1684 (1684)	Wing M162; ESTC R39087	83,008	208

and_o may_v rise_v in_o arm_n against_o they_o if_o the_o monarch_n hinder_v they_o to_o reform_v 4._o that_o the_o people_n or_o their_o representative_n may_v seclude_v the_o lineal_a successor_n and_o raise_v to_o the_o throne_n any_o of_o the_o royal_a family_n who_o do_v best_a deserve_v the_o royal_a dignity_n these_o be_v all_o matter_n of_o right_a the_o plain_a and_o easy_a way_n which_o i_o resolve_v to_o take_v for_o refute_v they_o so_o as_o the_o learned_a and_o unlearned_a may_v be_v equal_o convince_v shall_v be_v first_o by_o give_v a_o true_a account_n of_o what_o be_v our_o present_a positive_a law_n 2._o by_o demonstrate_v that_o as_o our_o present_a positive_a law_n be_v inconsistent_a with_o these_o principle_n so_o these_o our_o positive_a law_n be_v excellent_o well_o found_v upon_o the_o very_a nature_n of_o monarchy_n and_o that_o those_o principle_n be_v inconsistent_a with_o all_o monarchy_n and_o the_o three_o class_n of_o my_o argument_n shall_v be_v from_o the_o principle_n of_o common_a reason_n equity_n and_o government_n abstract_v both_o from_o the_o positiveness_n of_o our_o law_n and_o the_o nature_n of_o our_o monarchy_n and_o in_o the_o last_o place_n i_o shall_v answer_v the_o argument_n of_o those_o author_n as_o to_o the_o first_o i_o conceive_v that_o a_o treatise_n de_fw-fr jure_fw-la regni_fw-la apud_fw-la scotos_fw-gr shall_v have_v clear_v to_o we_o what_o be_v the_o power_n of_o monarch_n by_o law_n and_o particular_o what_o be_v the_o positive_a law_n of_o scotland_n as_o to_o this_o point_n for_o if_o these_o point_n be_v clear_a by_o our_o positive_a law_n there_o be_v no_o further_a place_n for_o debate_n since_o it_o be_v absolute_o necessary_a for_o mankind_n especial_o in_o matter_n of_o government_n that_o they_o at_o last_o acquiesce_v in_o something_o that_o be_v fix_v and_o certain_a and_o therefore_o it_o be_v very_o well_o observe_v by_o lawyer_n and_o statesman_n that_o before_o law_n be_v make_v man_n ought_v to_o reason_n but_o after_o they_o be_v make_v they_o ought_v to_o obey_v which_o make_v i_o admire_v how_o buchannan_n and_o the_o other_o author_n that_o i_o have_v name_v shall_v have_v adventure_v upon_o a_o debate_n in_o law_n not_o be_v themselves_o lawyer_n and_o shall_v have_v write_v book_n upon_o that_o subject_a without_o cite_v one_o law_n civil_a or_o municipal_a pro_fw-la or_o con_v nor_o be_v their_o veracity_n more_o to_o be_v esteem_v than_o their_o learning_n for_o it_o be_v undeniable_a that_o buchannan_n write_v this_o book_n de_fw-fr jure_fw-la regni_fw-la to_o persuade_v scotland_n to_o raise_v his_o patron_n though_o a_o bastard_n to_o the_o crown_n and_o the_o author_n of_o lex_fw-la rex_fw-la ius_n populi_n vindicatum_fw-la and_o other_o be_v know_v to_o have_v write_v those_o libel_n from_o picque_n against_o the_o government_n because_o they_o just_o suffer_v under_o it_o i_o know_v that_o to_o this_o it_o may_v be_v answer_v that_o these_o statute_n be_v but_o late_o and_o be_v not_o extant_a in_o buchanan_n time_n and_o consequent_o buchanan_n can_v be_v redargue_v by_o they_o 2._o that_o these_o statute_n have_v be_v obtain_v from_o parliament_n by_o the_o too_o great_a influence_n of_o their_o monarch_n and_o the_o too_o great_a pusillanimity_n of_o parliament_n who_o can_v not_o resign_v the_o right_n and_o privilege_n of_o the_o people_n since_o they_o have_v no_o warrant_n from_o they_o for_o that_o effect_n to_o the_o first_o of_o which_o i_o answer_v that_o my_o task_n be_v not_o to_o form_v a_o accusation_n against_o buchanan_n but_o against_o his_o principle_n and_o to_o demonstrat_fw-la that_o these_o principle_n be_v not_o our_o law_n but_o be_v inconsistent_a with_o it_o and_o it_o be_v ridiculous_a to_o think_v that_o any_o such_o law_n shall_v have_v be_v make_v before_o these_o treasonable_a principle_n be_v once_o hatch_v and_o maintain_v for_o error_n must_v appear_v before_o they_o be_v condemn_v and_o by_o the_o same_o argument_n it_o may_v be_v as_o well_o urge_v that_o arius_n nestorius_n etc._n etc._n be_v not_o heretic_n because_o those_o act_n of_o general_a council_n which_o condemn_v their_o heresy_n be_v not_o extant_a when_o they_o first_o defend_v those_o opinion_n and_o that_o our_o king_n have_v not_o the_o power_n of_o make_v peace_n and_o war_n till_o the_o year_n 1661._o but_o 2_o dly_a for_o clear_v this_o point_n it_o be_v fit_a to_o know_v that_o our_o parliament_n never_o give_v prerogative_n to_o our_o king_n but_o only_o declare_v what_o have_v be_v their_o prerogative_n and_o particular_o in_o these_o statute_n that_o i_o shall_v cite_v the_o parliament_n do_v not_o confer_v any_o new_a right_n upon_o the_o king_n but_o only_o acknowledge_v what_o be_v original_o his_o right_n and_o prerogative_n from_o the_o beginning_n and_o therefore_o the_o parliament_n be_v the_o only_a judge_n who_o can_v decide_v whether_o buchannan_n principle_n be_v solid_a and_o what_o be_v ius_n regni_fw-la apud_fw-la scctor_n these_o statute_n have_v decide_v those_o point_n controvert_v by_o he_o there_o can_v be_v hereafter_o no_o place_n for_o debate_n and_o particular_o as_o to_o buchannan_n his_o book_n de_fw-fr jure_fw-la regni_fw-la apud_fw-la scotos_fw-gr it_o be_v express_o condemn_v as_o slanderous_a and_o contain_v several_a offensive_a matter_n by_o the_o 134_o act_n parl._n 8._o ja._n 6._o in_o anno_fw-la 1584._o which_o be_v the_o first_o parliament_n that_o ever_o sit_v after_o his_o book_n be_v print_v to_z the_o 2_o d_o i_o answer_v that_o it_o be_v controvert_v what_o be_v the_o king_n power_n there_o can_v be_v no_o strong_a decision_n of_o that_o controversy_n in_o favour_n of_o the_o king_n than_o the_o acknowledgement_n of_o all_o party_n interest_v and_o it_o be_v strange_a and_o unsufferable_a to_o hear_v such_o as_o appeal_v to_o parliament_n cry_v out_o against_o their_o power_n their_o justice_n and_o decision_n and_o why_o shall_v we_o oppress_v our_o king_n and_o raise_v civil_a war_n whereby_o we_o endanger_v so_o much_o ourselves_o to_o procure_v power_n to_o parliament_n if_o parliament_n be_v such_o ridiculous_a thing_n as_o we_o can_v trust_v when_o they_o be_v empower_v by_o we_o and_o if_o there_o be_v any_o force_n in_o this_o answer_n of_o buchannan_n there_o can_v be_v none_o in_o any_o of_o our_o law_n for_o that_o strike_v at_o the_o root_n of_o all_o our_o law_n and_o as_o i_o have_v produce_v a_o tract_n of_o reiterated_a law_n for_o many_o year_n so_o where_o be_v there_o ever_o such_o free_a unlimited_a parliament_n in_o any_o nation_n as_o these_o who_o law_n i_o have_v cite_v 2_o dly_z whatever_o may_v be_v say_v if_o a_o positive_a contract_n betwixt_o the_o king_n and_o people_n be_v produce_v clear_v what_o be_v the_o just_a limit_n of_o the_o monarchy_n and_o bound_v it_o by_o clear_a article_n mutual_o agree_v upon_o yet_o it_o be_v very_o absurd_a and_o extravagant_a to_o think_v that_o when_o the_o debate_n be_v what_o be_v the_o king_n of_o scotland_n just_a power_n and_o right_n and_o from_o who_o he_o derive_v it_o that_o the_o law_n and_o repeat_v acknowledgement_n of_o the_o whole_a representative_n of_o the_o people_n assemble_v in_o the_o supreme_a court_n of_o the_o nation_n have_v no_o open_a force_n upon_o it_o but_o enact_v at_o several_a time_n in_o many_o several_a parliament_n under_o the_o gentle_a peaceabl_a and_o wise_a king_n that_o ever_o they_o have_v shall_v not_o be_v better_o believe_v than_o the_o testimony_n of_o three_o or_o four_o bias_v and_o disoblige_v pedant_n who_o understand_v neither_o our_o law_n nor_o statute_n and_o who_o can_v bring_v no_o clear_a fundamental_a law_n nor_o produce_v no_o contract_n nor_o paction_n restrict_v the_o king_n or_o bound_v his_o government_n 3_o dly_z that_o which_o add_v a_o great_a deal_n of_o authority_n to_o this_o debate_n and_o these_o statute_n be_v that_o as_o this_o be_v clear_a by_o our_o positive_a law_n so_o it_o be_v necessary_o infer_v from_o the_o nature_n of_o our_o monarchy_n and_o be_v very_o advantageous_a for_o the_o subject_n of_o this_o kingdom_n which_o i_o shall_v clear_v in_o the_o second_o and_o three_o argument_n that_o i_o shall_v bring_v against_o these_o treasonable_a principle_n nor_o can_v they_o be_v second_v by_o any_o solid_a reason_n as_o i_o shall_v make_v appear_v in_o answer_v the_o argument_n of_o those_o author_n i_o know_v that_o nephthaly_n the_o author_n of_o ius_n populi_fw-la and_o our_o late_a fanatical_a pamphlet_n allege_v that_o our_o parliament_n since_o 1661._o be_v null_a and_o unlawful_a because_o many_o who_o have_v right_o to_o sit_v as_o member_n or_o to_o elect_a member_n be_v seclude_v by_o the_o declaration_n or_o test_n but_o my_o answer_n be_v first_o that_o these_o be_v exclude_v by_o act_n of_o parliament_n which_o be_v pass_v in_o parliament_n prio_fw-la to_o their_o exclusion_n