Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n author_n know_v write_v 2,987 5 5.2886 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A25572 The Answer to the appeal expounded L'Estrange, Roger, Sir, 1616-1704. Answer to the Appeal from the country to the city. 1680 (1680) Wing A3385; ESTC R16973 34,388 37

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

cautela non nocet o Evil to him that Evil thinks p Was it not an old observation of the Ancients Quos Jupiter vult perdere hos prius dementa● q What a way of Reasoning is this r Here he practises that Popish Doctrine of Merit in Temporals as well as Spirituals when vainly boasting of his own deserts he doth implicitely tax both King Church and State with ingratitude s I think any reasonable man will confess that a Papist at this time is a dangerous companion t This Argument in the Appeal holds only against such Friends or Relations who are suspected to have attempted our Lives u And from ●is Religion if Popery w The gain and expectation which is divided among the populace is not of such power as when united in one single person who has all by the others death Especially at this time they can wish nothing more than the King's Death a Papist being to succeed him for every Englishman ought to desire the King should live as long as the Duke of York or any other person Now if the King does live as long as the Duke then the Duke can never be King therefore every Englishman ought to desire the Duke may never be their King x Here he takes no notice of the Jesuitical K●ng-killing Principles all his design being to render Protestants odious y But he means it and blames nothing in the said Plot but the ill conduct of it calling it only silly but not impious z Witnesses come from St. Omers a 'T is not said were but did prevent their Tryals and that no man can deny b Why because he printed it c How fearful he is left a Pope should be burnt or Papist upon the account of the Plot be affronted d 'T is to be supposed he has a dispensation for that word Detestable e He cannot here quote his Authors because all these Principles were taken out of the Iesuits Morals which he here fixes on the Fanaticks f Here he does the Author of the Appeal no small honour unawares in making his Book so generally approv'd of g Everyman that has but so litte w●t as our Author knew the Papists Interest before so that I conceive this was written only to demonstrate the danger his Majesty is in h Why might not the Author of the Appeal like some of the Popes take a Name upon him contrary to his Nature i You are well acquainted sure with the Author to know his thoughts k I hope he doth not esteem all that are for Magna Charta to be Fanaticks l I think sad experience hath already justified this hint which he calls malicious as if he thought himself concern'd in Firing 't is evident his principles would let him m Here he pleads for Ar●●trary Go●●●nment n The Sword is in the Appeal no where bid to be drawn but against a Popish Successor and that too when the King is murdered So that at the worst it is but Treason by Anticipation which is not mention'd in our Law o Notwithstanding this Authors flattery of his Grace and the City yet their wisdom will certainly unmask him whom if I knew 't is probable I might get a hundred pound for taking a Jesuit p I cannot perceive the Author of the Appeal has any such design against the King but rather the contrary since both by the Title Arguments against the Plot and Prayer for the King at last he seems to aim at nothing more than his Majesties preservation whom I pray God defend from the hands and counsels of all su●h evil men 25 this Author
plenty These are the men who exclaim against our Parliaments Proceedings in relation to the Plot as too Violent calling these times by no other name but that of Forty or Forty-one when to amuse his Sacred Majesty and his good People they again threaten us with another Forty-eight And all this is done under-hand to Vindicate the Catholique Party by throwing a Suspicion on the Fanatiques These are the Episcopal Tantivies who make even the very Scriptures Pimp for the Court who out of Urim and Thummim can extort a Sermon to prove the not paying of Tyths and Taxes to be the Sin against the Holy Ghost And had rather see the Kingdom run down with Blood than part with the least Hem of a Consecrated Frock which they themselves made Holy Here 's a very fair and round distribution of the Cities Enemies into Younger Brothers Dependants upon the King Friends to the Church and into Profest Papists And the whole Kingdom it self is again split into Two Parties the one consisting of Mutiniers and Schismatiques the other of the Loyal Servants and Subjects of the Government which under the three first Heads he brands as the Cities Enemies These Men he Charges with lessening the Plot with resembling the present times to Forty-one and talking of another Forty-eight Now how is it possible but the Positions of Forty-one should put us in mind of the Rebellion of Forty-one and the Regicidal Principles of Seventy-nine mind us of the Regicide it self of Forty-eight For these Principles and Practices are nothing in the World but the Venom of the Old Cause swallow'd and Spew'd up again and all the Treasons of the Consistory are cast upon the Conclave As if the Murther of Charles the First by the Treachery of Mock-Protestants were ever the less Detestable because the Two Harries of France were Assassinated by Profest Papists These are the Puritan Iesuits that turn the Bible into a Nose of Wax that make God the Author of Sin that Depose and Murther Kings by a Text and Intitle their Sacrilege and Treason to the Inspirations of the Holy Ghost These are the Straight-lac'd Christians that make less scruple of Robbing the Altar than of Kneeling at the Communion They can swallow the Blood of Widows and Orphans and yet Puke at a Surplice Let me ask the worthy Gentlemen of the City now which of the two carry'd them the easier the Schismatical and Sacrilegious or the Episcopal Tantivy Or which they take for the more dangerous Enemies our Appellants young Beggarly Officers or their Old Acquaintances Pen Fulks and their Fellows who violently thrust out the gravest and most Substantial of their Citizens as the late King has it and took in Persons of desperate Fortunes and Opinions in their places Let them compare the Appellants Courtiers too with the Old Sequestring Plundring and Decimating Committees with their Court-Marshals and Major-Generals when London was made little better then a Shambles and their Merchants only Cash-keepers to the Tyrants at Westminster and then against his Over-hot Church-men we 'l set the Mechanique Pulpiteers and Tub-Preachers that not only divided the People from their Soveraign but Wives from their Husbands Children from their Parents and Preacht away Apprentices by Droves into Rebellion Carrying the Schism through Church and State into private Families This is the Blessed change that is now propounded and laid before us Lastly says he the chief and most dangerous of your Enemies are Papists who to make sure of their own Game allure all the three forementioned Parties to their side by the Arguments aforesaid Their design is to bring in Popery which they can no ways effect but either by a Popish Successor or by the French Arms. There is no doubt of the danger of the Papists but still while the Government has One Enemy in Front it is good to secure the Flank and Rear from another So that the Cities only safety lies in the mean betwixt the two Extremes of Popery on the One hand and Libertinism on the Other The Former he says can never be effected but by a Popish Successor or the French Arms. See now how this hangs together the same Faction clamour'd against the late King just at this rate and yet there was no prospect at that time of a Popish Successor but yet Popery was charg'd most injuriously as all the World can witness upon the King himself And then for the French Arms so far was his Majesty from calling them in to his assistance that upon the Scottish Rebellion they were Sollicited and Implor'd into a Confederacy against him And yet we remember to our griefs that those very Rumours and Apprehensions of Popery even when there was not any Danger of it cast us all into Confusion And now our Appellant to shew how good an English-man he is as well as a Subject enters his Protestation a little lower in the same Paragraph that he would rather of the Two Live under a French Conqueror then the Duke as Successor I must acknowledge says he in the next clause that there is some Coherence between the Beginning of the Late Civil Wars and this our present Age For as well then as now the Ambitious Papists and French Faction were the chief nay the only Incendiaries which set us all in flame That the French Cardinal did Artificially improve the Turbulent Humour of the English and Scottish Schismaticks to the advancing of the Interest of France and to the Embroyling of these Kingdoms I make no question But to call them the Only Incendiaries is to give the Lye to the constant current of History and the known Certainty of Fact even within our own remembrance How were the Papists and French Factions concern'd in the Scottish Uproar of 1637. and a hundred Sacrilegious Tumults after that in the course of the Rebellion and to set him right now in his Calculation of his Majesties French friends we shall inform him that the King 's Principal supplies of Men Arms Money and Ammunition were furnished from Holland He tells us further that the Catholique Cause like the Chesnut in the Fable hath ever since Q. Marys days been in the Fire and that both then and now the Papists make use of the Episcopal and Court-parties claw to take it out the First of these they allure to their assistance by the Fright of Presbytery the Latter by the apprehension of a Republique tho' nothing is less Designed or more Improbable 'T is a hard case to have to do with an Adversary that has neither Candor in his Reports nor any force of Argument in his Reasonings and yet it is the more tolerable here because it is all that either the Story or the Cause will bear He makes the Episcopal and Court-Party to be the Passive Instruments of the Church of Rome for the advance of Popery ever since the Reign of Queen Mary which is so notorious a mistake that Queen Elizabeth and the