Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	author_n	great_a	write_v	3,726	5	5.3359	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A32344	Envy and folly detected by way of a reply to a scandalous pamphlet, lately published by Robert Bridgeman (a grocer in London) intituled, Folly and envy detected, &c. : being a vindication of the true Christian Quakers : also something to a paper signed by J. Vaughton, J. Field, Ch. Marshall, W. Bingly, and others, being in number 24, and pretended Quakers, lately published in the City mercury, &c. : to which is added, nineteen queries to R.B. and his 24 brethren, &c. / by G.C. and E.N., lovers of all men.	G. C., Lover of all men.; E. N., Lover of all men.	1695 (1695)	Wing C32; ESTC R1507	12,072	24

Errors certainly he that can see with his own Eyes will see the Tendency of what R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren hath said is to cloak and cover gross Errors yea and Doctrine of Devils R. B. in his 6th page whereupon no better Proof than a Perhaps or for ought he knows blames D. S. and then he goes on may I not with the same sort of reason argue against him that perhaps or for ought I know it may be undeniably proved upon him that he is a Thief or a Murderer we perceive this grosser R. B. do not understand Common Sense for what can be undeniably proved upon a Thief or a Murderer is not for ought I know but there is so much Nonsense that we need not take much pains to refute him for undeniably is not a perhaps or for ought I know we would have the Reader well observe that R. B. in his Eighth page where he makes his Complaint against D. S. how distasteful their Errors are and says he the next step would have the Authors burnt least there should be any more such Books ' its evident he would have more erroneous Books writ and have People believe them as Truths and if they will not believe them then they are call'd unruly Spirits Apostates c. Had not R. B. and the Twenty four his Brethren been Cloakers of gross Errors they had no need to have made such a great Out-cry of their being scandalized calling it a malicious Libel and then to cheat the People calls themselves Christian Quakers If they had been such as they have Titled themselves they would not have been offended with D. S. in writing to clear the true Christian Quakers but this have been evident that Sam. Jennings have Preached and prayed in publick Meetings who have been proved Guilty of gross Errors and yet we have not heard of any Paper of Condemnation he have given forth nor Robert Bridgman nor his Twenty four Brethren against him and the rest Guilty of the like Errors and for the sake of the Innocent we have set down some as may be seen more at large in the Plea of the Innocent T. F. said that he owned no Man Christ Jesus as Mediator in Heaven without him but the Grace of God within him page 11th and in the same page He argued against our beloved Friend G. Keith That Christ was only a Spirit in Heaven and had nothing of the Body of man in Heaven and at another Meeting he said he had not learned that Lesson whether it was the Godhead or something else that Christ took of the Virgin that was nailed to the Cross Excluding the Man Christ Jesus his Death Resurrection Ascension and Meditation for us in Heaven J. Wilsford said at a Meeting That Christ was no Mediator for Drunkards nor wicked Persons but for his own own Disciples contrary to the express Testimony Isa 53. 12. Psal 68. and the same Person at a Meeting in West-Jersey said in Prayer Lord that we may not dote on the Body to neglect the Life And in page 12th Some denying God's Presence in all his Creatures another Preaches that Christ cureth mens Souls perfectly at once and maketh them free from all sin and when we are perfect we are Kings and are not to pray to God for our selves and at J. Goodsons S. Jennings accused G. Keith and so did J. Simcock for preaching Faith in Christ without us calling it the Professors Faith and the Faith of all Christendom that did not Profit And Tho. Ducket said he could not determine whether that Body that was Crucified was in Heaven or not What a Preacher here is and Sam. Jennings said to do Gods business we needed Gods Wisdom and Power but to do our own as men we needed it not Page 13th W. Walker said in a publick Meeting That a man might speak unsound words in the Life and at another time he bid wait that the Scepter might depart from Judah and that Shilo might come and stampt it in the name of the Spirit in Page the 14th H. Willis openly declared himself an Vnbeliever of Christ coming without us to Judge the quick and the Dead which is a great Article of the Christian Faith had not R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren been Connivers and Cloakers of these and many more gross Errors that could be charged and proved from their Books in Print they would never been offended with D. S's Christian Testimony and Confession And for a Conclusion let that be a sign between you and the true Christian Quaker as G. White has offered in his Reply to come forth and give a publick Meeting for as the Scripture saith of making Books there is no end and let the Reader know that the Christian Quakers disowns all those Errors that are here mentioned with all the rest that are manifest in Print so shall we conclude and Subscribe our selves as in Truth we are well Wishers to all men G. C. E. N. Berks the 18th of the 10th Month 1694. POSTSCRIPT WE Refer our Reader to a Treatise Titled The Christian Faith of the People of God call'd Quakers in Rode Island in which may be seen what the true Christian Quakers Faith is and that they are not ashamed to Confess it to the whole World Also 19. Queries by way of a further Reply to a Paper published by J. Vaughton J. Feilde Ch. Marshal Will. Bingly and others being in number Twenty four and also to their Brother R. B. which make their number to be Twenty five Seeing thou R. B. and thy Twenty four Brethren have taken upon you the Guilt of those Errors and horrid Blasphemies of your Brethren charged on them by F. Bugg we have here added these following Queries desiring you to answer them or abandon the Name of Christian Quaker that you would seem to take on you which cannot be allowed you by any rational Man while you cover and cloak such vile Errors c. Q. 1. How dared you espouse those gross Errors of Tho Fitzwater R. Young and T. Lloyd viz. O God that died in us and laid down thy Life in us and took it up again and that when Christ ascended he was separated from his Body that Faith in Christ without us as he died for our sins and rose again was not necessary to our Salvation Q. 2. Had it not been better for you rather to have given out a Christian Testimony against them for their said Blasphemous Expressions and against S. Jennings and others Persecutions of G. Keith T. Budd c. Q. 3. Why do you not answer F. Buggs first Charge who saith the Quakers denied him Who was born of the Virgin Mary who suffered Death upon the Cross at Jerusalem who rose again the Third day and ascended into Heaven in the sight of the Galileans to be Christ the Saviour of the World Seeing D. S. clears the true Christian Quakers of this gross Charge it lyeth at your Door to clear your selves thereof

Envy and Folly DETECTED By Way of a REPLY TO A Scandalous Pamphlet lately Published by ROBERT BRIDGEMAN a Grocer in London intituled Folly and Envy Detected c. Being a Vindication of the True Christian Quakers Also something to a Paper Signed by J. Vaughton J. Field Ch. Marshall W. Bingly And Others being in Number 24. And pretended Quakers lately published in the City Mercury c. To which is added Nineteen Queries to R. B. and his 24 Brethren c. By G. C. and E. N. Lovers of all Men. 2 Pet. 2. 1. But there were False Prophets among the People even as there shall be False Teachers among you who privily shall bring in Damnable Heresies even denying the Lord that bought them and bring upon themselves swift destruction Prov. 12. 22. Lying Lips are an Abomination to the Lord but they that deal truly are his delight Prov. 17. 15. He that justifieth the Wicked and he that condemneth the Just even they both are an Abomination to the Lord. LONDON Printed for Sarah Howkins 1695. Advertisement Since the aforegoing was at the Press we have seen a silly Pamphlet published by H. Gouldney an Apostate Quaker who endeavours to cover and cloak Error and Blasphemy with other Antichristian Practises that no Protestant Society will tolerate c. To which Pamphlet for the present let him take the following words for an Answer c. Proverbs 27th Verse 22d Though thou shouldest bray a Fool in a Mortar among wheat with a Pestil yet will not his Foolishness depart from him Christian Reader I Desire thee to lay aside prejudice and observe R. Bridgman is offended at the Christian Confession of D. S. in the Body of his Pamphlet calling it Malapart Pragmatical style Pope like without the Consent of the Church Who this D. S. is may not be easie to judge however I do not find D. S. do joyn with any inraged Enemy or Adversary nor is he malicious against any that have laid down their Lives in defence of the Blessed Truth but for the clearing of all such and that none should be led aside by such who cover and cloak gross Errors And yet R. B. in his fifth Page is offended with D. S. and here he says he villifies some or a part of the same Society and that with denying Him that was born of the Virgin Mary to be the Christ the Saviour of the World it is evident that this R. B. is of the same stamp with his Brethren in Pensilvania or at least-wise a Cloaker of those gross Errors as Samuel Jennings Coock and Loyd and the rest of that Faction and yet this R. B. hath the Confidence in Page the ninth where he cites the Yearly-meeting Paper Mark if there be any gross Errors c. held by any Professing the Truth in America such Parsons ought to be admonished c. And yet I have not heard of any Paper of Condemnation that S. Jennings and the rest of those of that Faction has given forth since their Admonition nor R. B. nor his Twenty four Brethren against them but makes a great out-cry they are wronged and scandalized but they will not let us know in what but it 's the Duty of all true Christians to clear themselves from Errors and not to Cloak such damnable Errors that no Protestant Society in Christendom would tolerate as is made manifest in Print already and there testified against by the Christian Quakers and R. B. seems to be offended with D. S. for desiring any to pray to God to turn them from their Errors how Unchristian this R. B. shews himself is well to be noted it is wonderful to me to see R. B's stock of Confidence in cloaking his Brethrens gross Errors and in charging D. S. upon no better Proof than a perhaps c. when he must if he be ingenuous confess S. Jennings and many more are proved Guilty of such gross Errors that no Protestant Society would tolerate but the main drift of R. B. is to blind the Innocent and cover the guilty p. 7th R. B. makes bold to tell his Reader there is no instance produced wherein G. Whitehead has been either weak or wicked which to cover and cloak many gross Errors must be Either he would make the world believe he had not read G. Whiteheads Writings of Contention or else he justifies all what G. Whitehead has writ or else cloakes and covers it See G. Whitehead's Book Judgment fixed and see what Names he gives to those that testifie against gross Errors not becoming any Christian of Christ's making and also R. B. in his seventh Page is offended with D. S. for saying Light and Darkness are Beings and thus says R. B. which as much bespeaks his Skill in Philosophy as the other does his Titled to Christianity finding R. B. having so little Skill in Philosophy makes me save Paper on that head and whereas R. B. seems to be offended at D. S. for his saying if please God to put it into the Hearts of the Governours to burn all the Contentious Books and then says he no need of Emendation c. I understand D. S. means such Books that contain such damnable Doctrine as tend to the destroying the Christian Faith and instead of R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren writing Emendations they endeavour to cloak all those gross Errors then R. B. goes on and why must they be burnt the Matter it seems is distateful but it is evident gross Errors are not distateful to R. B. if they were he would not hugg them as he does then he goes on and calls all that testifie against gross Errors Apostats and unruly Spirits that like not to have their Fruits made manifest and their Rebellion against the Light rebuked and they that would have Books burnt next step would have the Authors burnt but this is R. B. wanting Charity to condemn gross Errors that doth not follow that they would condemn the Authors to be burnt at his way of arguing all the Protestant Societies that have condemned and testified against the Errors of the Church of Rome would burn their Bodies and should the Christian Quakers tell R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren that those persecuting Quakers in Pensilvania that Fined and Imprisoned our Christian Friends in that Province next step would burn their Bodies our thoughts are that R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren would say we were very uncharitable And now I shall return some of R. B's own words upon him in Page the ninth but this D. S. who in a Malapert Pragmatical stile would be deemed the the Representative of the true Christian Quakers is for Censuring and Excommunicating Pope-like without Consent of the Church c. I appeal to all sober People how R. B. do fret himself with the honest Confession of D. S. But I perceive if D. S. his Book had been Licensed by the Second days meeting or by R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren it would have met with

much more favour than now it has as if nothing but what is tolerated by a certain Faction of some few pretended Quakers whether that be not more like the Pope and his Councel That except we will believe as the Church believes that is receive such gross Errors and damnable Doctrines as no Protestant Society would tolerate we must be called Apostates and unruly Spirits the next thing that makes us admire is how those pretended Quakers as R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren come to assume that Power to themselves as the Title of a Church above the Christian Quaker and nothing must pass currant except it come from some of their Meetings or tolerated by them but we have observed some men will over-value themselves and to have no Charity towards them that deserve it also R. B. seems greatly concerned for D. S. mentioning Josiah Coal J. Audland for their adoring G. Fox it seems R. B. do espouse all the gross Errors and his Twenty four Brethren But the Christian Quaker utterly disowns all Error and cannot ascribe that Honour to a mortal man which is due to our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ the Saviour of the world R. B. would have done well to have told his Reader in what Book or Books those blasphemous Titles given to G. Fox had been vindicated I preceive R. B. and his Twenty four Brethren are Vindicators of those Adorations given to G. Fox and herein is the true Christian Quaker distinguished from the Apostate the one denieth all Error and the Apostate cloak and cover them Then R. B. goes on and says I need say the less to them meaning Books but what Books he tells not his Reader what those Books are and R. B. confesseth there may be some unsound Expressions in G. F. Writings therefore he must grant it wants Emendations and grants they were not well guarded he have made a sort of a blind Confession and by this R. B. have a little Arraigned G. Fox as well as D. S. and F. Bugg and now we will let the Reader understand what Authority the Holy Scriptures have with these men see G. F's Book Eutituled An Encouragement to all the Womens Meetings in the World in pag 42. see Concerning Jeptha's Daughter see p. 43. and was not Micah's Mother a Vertuous Woman read Judg. the 17th and see what she said to her Son the Text tells us the Woman gave Two hundred Shekles of silver to the Founder to make a graven Image and a molten Image pray what Encouragement is this for a Womans Meeting and what use of Scripture these men do make see in pag. 23. pag. 24. now Old Ely was not against the Assemblies of the Women who Assembled by Troops as you may see 1 Sam. 2. 21 22. read the Text and there ye will find Ely's Sons committed whoredom with the Women what may we think after-Ages will say of such Interpreters of Scripture doubtless this Book i. e. G. F's come out by the Authority of the 2d days Meeting or else G. Fox must be as R. B. say Pope-like to impose in pag. the 10th R. B. goes on but I would fain know why it must be deemed by D. S. such weakness in G. Fox to set his Name to the Book called the Battel Door c. Here R. B. covers and cloakes all the Errors that the Christian Quakers deny for there can be no Union between Truth and Error we for our own parts went to the Jews and spoke with the Jew that received Eighty pounds in mill'd Mony paid by G. R. besides the Dozen bottles of Wine given by M. F. as he did affirm for their doing the chief part of it and what a Cheat was this to the Ignorant to make them believe as if it had been revealed to G. Fox away with such deceit in the next place R. B. Envies D. S. as he thinks for favouring Is P. But it was well known that Is P. was ready to retract in his Life-time what he see was an Error in his 13. pag. he thinks D. S. have made a great slip of his Pen if he be a true Believer he was not come to bear the Image of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ but R. B. have shewed but little Skill in Divinity and therefore had need to learn and not to teach in pag. 14. R. B. would make the World believe D. S. was but little acquainted with the Christian Quakers Faith which is attended with Christian Charity and teacheth to exercise a Conscience void of offence both toward God and toward Man pray observe what a flourish R. B. have made it plainly appears that he cannot be of the Faith of the true Christian Quakers because he cloaks and covers all those that have given ill Names for merely dissenting about Circumstantial things that was imposed on us calling us Dogs Devils Incarnate Apostates unruly Spirits with much more Robert Bridgman in his Postscript mentions D. S. Postscript here he desires all those that are living whose former or latter Writings are defective to write Emendations upon them as well as on those that are dead But R. B. is much concerned with D. S. saying he should be glad if God would put it into the hearts of the Governors of the Nation to condemn them to be burnt that is to say all such Books that did contain gross Errors we do not find R. B. nor his Twenty four Brethren are willing to write Explanations and Emendations and have deceitfully Titled themselves Christian Quakers because the Government should take no notice of them and we can testifie these few pretended Quakers have been very forward to appeal to every Government when they thought it would make for their Interest So we have with brevity taken notice of what is material the main end of R. B. is to condemn the Christian Quakers Confession and to cover the Guilty and in his Advertisement he would have People believe his Pamphlet may serve as an Answer to G. W's reply but it must be to such as believe as the Church believes and must take nothing for truth but what such as he and his Twenty four Brethren have stamped but Robert Bridgman and his Twenty four Brethren was not willing to tell their Reader those that had a hand in the yearly Meeting Paper left out part of G. Keith's words in pag. 7th viz. not excluding the Man Christ Jesus his Death Sufferings c. and Intercession c. from being joyntly concerned in our Salvation as also telling you that the Faith of him as he died for us c. is necessary to our Christianity and Salvation Now all this was left out in the 7th page so by this you may see they would Exclude the Man Christ Jesus being joyntly concerned in our Salvation and yet R. B. has the Confidence in his 9th page after the citing about Eight lines out of the yearly Meeting Paper does this look like indeavouring to cover any such gross