Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	article_n	church_n	homily_n	2,467	5	11.7893	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A30399	The Protestant's companion, or, An impartial survey and comparison of the Protestant religion as by law established, with the main doctrines of popery wherein is shewn that popery is contrary to scripture, primitive fathers and councils ... / by a true son of the Protestant Church of England as established by law.	Burnet, Gilbert, 1643-1715.	1685 (1685)	Wing B5845; ESTC R29606	32,970	68

the Church of England in Answer to a Paper written by one of the Church of Rome to prove the Nullity of our Orders By GILBERT BURNET D. D. Octavo An Abridgment of the History of the Reformation of the Church of England By GILB BURNET D. D. Octavo The APOLOGY of the Church of England and an Epistle to one Signior Scipio a Venetian Gentleman concerning the Council of Trent Written both in Latin by the Right Reverend Father in God IOHN IEWEL Lord Bishop of Salisbury Made English by a Person of Quality To which is added The Life of the said Bishop Collected and written by the same Hand Octavo The Life of WILLIAM BEDEL D. D. Bishop of Kilmore in Ireland Together with Certain Letters which passed betwixt him and Iames Waddesworth a late Pensioner of the Holy Inquisition of Sevil in Matter of Religion concerning the General Motives to the Roman Obedience Octavo The Decree made at ROME the Second of March 1679. condemning some Opinions of the Iesuits and other Casuists Quarto A Discourse concerning the Necessity of Reformation with respect to the Errors and Corruptions of the Church of Rome Quarto A Discourse concerning the Celebration of Divine Service in an Unknown Tongue Quarto a For so doth Mons. Militere in his Epistle to His late Majesty confess b Vives de Instrumentis probab 1 Crantzius Metropol 7. 45. 2 Bellarmin de verbo dei l. 4. c. 4. Pighius Eccles. Hierarch l. 3. c. 3. Pool de primatu Romanae Ecclesiae fol. 92. * 2 Tim. 3. 16. 3 Concil de stabilienda Rom. sede p. 6. 4 Concil Trident. Sess. 4. decret 1. 5 Dr Iames his Corruption of the Fathers Part 4. p. 26. 6 Anno 44. Sect. 42. † Bellar. de Tradit cap. 9. 7 Coster Enchirid Controvers cap. 2. Constat manifeste c. Campian rat 3 Seculis omnino quindecim c. rat 10. Testes resomnes 8 Baronius ad 〈◊〉 34. 9 Bellarmin de Concil autorit l. 2 c. 12. Sect. Respondeo 10 How the Papists contemn and condemn the Fathers See Dr. Iames's Corruption of the Fathers part 4. 11 Salmeron in Ep. ad Rom. cap. 5. disp 51. p. 468. 12 Corn. Muss Episc. Bitont in Rom. 14. p. 468. 13 Apolog. adv Rufin l. 2. p. 219. tom 2. 14 Vid. Bin. not ad 2. Concil Constant. tom 1. part 1. p. 541. Item not ad Concil Chalced. tom 2. par 1. p. 410. 15 Lud. Vives in Aug. de civit Dei l. 20. c. 36. 16 See Dr. Iumes's Corruption of the Scriptures Fathers and Councils Printed 1611. Part 4. 17 Joh. 5. 31. 18 Capitul Carol. Mag. c. 88. 19 Anaclet Epist. ap Bin. Tom. 1. Part. 1. p. 43. 20 Gelas. decr de Confec dist 2. cap. 12. 21 Binius in notis Tom. 1. part 1. p. 64. 22 P. Gelas. Ep. 4. 23 Neminem velim sic 〈◊〉 mea omnia ut me sequatur nisi in eis quibus me non ertare perspexerit August de persever Sanct. cap. 21. tom 27. Solis eis Scripturarum libris qui jam Canonic appellantur didici hunc timorem honoremque de erre ut nullum eorum autorem Scribendo aliquid errasse firmissime credam August Epist. 19. 25 Cusan de Concil Cath. 2. 3. 26 Aen. Sylvius de gestis Concil Basil. 27 De Rom. Pont. l. 4 c. 4. 28 Idem de Pontif. l. 2. c. 29. 29 Id. de Rom. Pont. l. 4. c. 2. Sect. Secunda Opinio 30 Idem de Concil l. 2. cap. 13. 31 Barns's Catholico-Romanus Pacificus MS. Sect. 31. 1 Articles of the Church of England published Ann. Dom. 1562. for the avoiding of diversities of opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion Article 6 20. 2d Book of Homilies Hom. 2. 2 2. Tim. 3. 15. 3 Concil Trident. Sess. 4. Decret 1. 4 Pighius Eccles. Hierarch l. 3. c. 3. 5 Bellarmine de verbo Dei l. 4. c. 4. 6 Pool de Primatu Romanae Ecclesiae sol 92. 7 Caranza Controvers 1. And no marvel when another affirmeth that the Scripture hath no more authority than Aesop's Fables V. Bailly Tract 1. 9. 17. 8 Peter Sutor Translat Bibl. c. 22. 9 Consul de Stabilienda Rom. sede p. 6. And though the Papists do cashier the publick use of the Holy Scriptures and fly to as they pretend an Infallible Judge yet are they not agreed among themselves who that should be These Learned Romanists following contend that the priviledge of Infallibility belongs only to the whole Church militant and neither to the Pope nor General Council nor to the Body of the Clergy Occam Dial. p. 1. l. 5. c. 25 29 3. 10 Cusanus Concord Cathol l. 2. c. 3. Antoninus Sum. Summarum p. 3. Tit. 23. c. 2. §. 6. Panormitan Decret p. 1. l. 1. Tit. de Elect. Cap. significasti Mirandula de fide ordine credend Theor. 4. 11 In fine Concil Trident. Reg. 4. 12 Hence comes it to pass that not only the Popish Laity but even the Priests themselves are very ignorant in the Holy Scriptures so that once a Schoolman in the last Age being to preach at Paris where the famous Melancthon was his Auditor took a Text for want I suppose of a better Book out of Aristotle's Ethicks Sixtinus Amama Orat. de Barbarie ex Melancth 13 Artic. 6. 14 Concil Trident. S●ss 4. 15 Witness the two Learned Iews Philo Iudaeus apud Euseb. de Praeparat Evangel l. 8. and Iosephus apud Euseb. Histor. Eccles. l. 3. c. 9. alias 10. and this is fully confessed by Bellarmine de Verbo Dei l. 1. c. 10. 16 Rom. 3. 2. 17 As for the third pretended Council of Carthage alledged by some Papists S. Austin who was one of the chief therein votes in this point for the Doctrine of our Church de Civitate Dei l. 17. c. ult alibi And though they pretend that the Book of Baruch held by us as Apocryphal was declared Canonical in the Council of Florence yet did Driedo afterwards deny it to be so De Dogm Eccles. l. 1. c. 4. which neither would have done if the Church Catholick had declared the Apocrypha Canonical 18 Rycaut's Present State of the Greek Church pag. 372. 19 Catharin Op●sc de Script Canonicis Quod autem Apostoli c. 20 Stapleton de autoritat S. Script l. 2. c. 4. § 14. Sapientiam Ecclesiasticum c. 21 Bellarmin de Verbo Dei c. 10. Itaque fatemur Ecclesiam nullo modo posse 〈…〉 non Canonico nec contra 22 Article 1 -2 Book of Homilies Hom. 2. 23 Artic. 22. 24 Concil Trid. Sess. 25. Bulla Pii 4. 25 1 Cor. 2. 11. compared with Isai. 63. 16. S. Augustin saith That the Souls of the dead are there where they see not all things which are done or happen to people in this life Augustin de cura pro mortuis c. 13. 26 Brev. Rom. Antw. 1663. p. 984. 27 Bellarmin de Indulgentiis c. 4. sub finem

* To win them by the expressions of his kindness and to hold them fast bound to his Service by the testimonies and declarations of his goodness saith Peter Chrysol Serm. 147. 28 Bellarmin alledgeth in particular this Comment upon the Romans to be S. Ambrose's see Crocus in Censura Scriptorum vet p. 133. 29 Dominic Bannes in secunda secundae Qu. 1. Art 10. Orationes ad Sanctos esse faciendas venerandasque esse imagines neque etiam expresse nec involute Scripture docent 30 Spalatensis often err 31 Beatit Sanctorum l. 1. c 8. Sect. ult Other Papists say That there is neither precept nor example for it in Scripture and they give reasons for it for the Old Testament because the Fathers were not yet admitted to the heatifical Vision and for the New Testament because that the Apostles were Men of such piety and humility that they would not admit of it themselves and therefore mentioned it not in their Writings and withal because in the beginning of Christianity there would have been a suspicion that they had only changed the names of the Heathen Deities and retain'd the same kind of Worship Eckius in Enchirid. c. 5. Salmeron in 1 Tim. 2. disp 8. Peres de Tradit p. 3. 32 Sancti l. 1. c. 18. 33 Via Regia de Invocat Sanct. 34 Concil Trident. Sess. 25. Bulla Pii 4. super forma Iuramenti ad calcem Concil Trid. Bellarmin de Imag. l. 2. 35 Azori us l. 9. Instit. mor. c. 6. Art 3. Cajetan in Thom. Part. 3. Qu. 25. Art 3. Gregory de Valentia Tom. 3. disp 6. Qu. 11. punct 6. Coster Enchirid. p. 438. 36 Bellarmin de Imag. l. 2. c. 21. prop. 1. 37 Index Expurgatorius Madri 1612. in indice librorum expurgatorum p. 39. dele Solus Deus adorandus 38 Concil Trident. Sess. 13. 39 Coster Enchirid. Con trov c. 8. de Euch. p. 308. Fisher c. O●colampadium l. 1. c. 2. 40 That the Apparitions which as the Papists pretend have appear'd upon the Altar instead of the Sacrament may and have been the Illusions of the Devil is Confessed by two Learned Schoolmen viz. Alexander de Hales sent 4. Qu. 11. Biel 51. Lect. upon the Canon of the Mass. 41 Naueler ad Ad. 1240. Krantz sex l. 8. c. 10. 42 Jude 3. 43 Articles and Iewel 's Apology 44 Bellar. de Eccles. l. 3. 45 M. Cressie in his Appendix c 7. Sect. 8. saith That the Wits and Judgments of Catholicks he means Papists is to renounce their Judgment and depose their own wit I will make no Application let the Reader do it himself 46 Exercitia Spiritualia Ign. Loyolae Tolosae 1593. p. 173. Reg. 1. 47 Turrecremata summae de Ecclesia l. 2. c. 103. Petrus de Ancorano de Heret n. 2. Augustinus Triumphus de Ancona p. 59. a. 1. art 2. And this knack of making new Creeds is very agreeable to that fancy of Salmeron Non omnibus omnia dedit Deus ut quaelibet aetas suis gaudeat veritatibus quas prior aetas ignoravit Dis. 57. in Ep. ad Rom. 48 Bellar. de Rom. Pontif. l. 4. c. 2. Sect. Secunda opini● 49 Id. de Concil lib. 2. c. 13. 50 Article 25. 51 Mat. 28. 19. Luk. 22. 19 20. 52 Article 30. 53 Mat. 26. 27. 1 Cor. 11. 26 27 28. 54 Concil Constantiense Anno Dom. 1414. Sess. 13. 55 Apud Chytrae de Statu Eccl. Orient Primum Patriar Resp. p. 149 c. The Greek Patriarch Hieremias's Letter to the Tubing Divines bearing date May 15. 1576. 56 Concil Trident. Sess. 7. 57 Concil Constant. Sess. 13. 58 Although some learned Men in our own Church will have Apollinaris who liv'd in the fourth Century to be the Author of that Book See Dr. Stillingfleet's Answer to Cress. Apolog. c. 2. §. 17. p. 133. and Dr. Cave in the Life of Dionysius Areopagita p. 73 74. 59 Consult Sect. 22. 60 In tertiam partem S. Thome tom 3. Quest. 80. Disp. 216. Art 12. cap. 3. nu 38. 61 In Ioh. 6. Lect. 7. 62 In Manuali de communione sub utraque specie 63 Concil Constant. Sess. 13. They in that Council likewise contradicted the Judgments of their ancient Popes Leo Gelasius and Gregory the Great as may be seen in the Quotations of the Fathers 64 Article 28 29. 65 Concil Trident. Sess. 13. c. 4. * Deny'd to be the faith of the Church by Barns in his Romano Catholicus Pacificus MS. Sect. 7. liter Q. 66 Article 22 18. 67 Article 31. Heb. 10. 10. 68 Article 22. 69 1 Cor. 4. 7. 70 Article 12. 71 Article 14. 72 Article 11 13. 73 Concil Trident. Sess. ult Hence doth Bellarmine threaten us saying that whosoever believes not Purgatory shall be tormented iu Hell de Purgat l. 1. c. ult And yet this same Cardinal forgetting what he had before affirm'd for herein he doth not only contradict himself but all Popish pretensions for Purgatory when he grants that Souls in Purgatory do not merit In Purgatorio animae nec mereri nec peccare possint Bellarm. de Purgatorio l. 2. c. 2. To what end then are they sent to Purgatory 74 Spalatensis de Republ. Eccles. l. 5. c. 8. Sect. 73. 75 Bellar. de Indulg l. 1. 76 Taxa Cancel Apost 77 But the poor have not these priviledges whereby mark the great charity of the Romish Priests which will suffer by consequence if their Doctrine were true the poor to go to Hell for want of money Diligenter nota quod hujusmodi gratiae non dantur pauperibus quia non sunt ideo non possunt consolari Taxa Cancellariae Apostolicae Tit. de Matrimoniali 78 Tom. Concil 28. p. 460. 78 Apolog. Graecorum de igne Purgat p. 66 93. Ed. Salmas 79 Unigenitus de poenitentiis remissionibus 80 The Doctrine of Indulgences was oppos'd by two famous Papists not long before the Extravagant of Pope Clement by Franciscus de Mayronis in 4. l. sen. dist 19. Q. 2. and by Durandus in 4. l. sen. d. 20. q. 3. So that it was far from being either Catholick or Ancient 81 Concil Trid. Sess. 6 Can. 9. Sess. 6. cap. 16. can 32. 82 Catechis Rom. de Euchar num 55. 84 1 Cor. 14. 40. 85 Article 24. 86 Harding against Bp. Iewel Article 3. Missal Rom. approbat ex decreto Concil Trident. Bulla Pii 5. Chorabini Bullar Tom. 2. p. 311. 87 Article 36. Book of Ordination Mason of the Consecration of Bishops in the Church of England Archbishop Bramhall's works Tom. 1. Discourse 5. and Tom. 4. Discourse 6. * Which the Roman Church notwithstanding its big pretences to constant succession cannot justly challenge and that both from its five vacancies making up almost Nine years when Rome had no Bishop at all and the many Schisms by some Chronologers reckoned up to be Twenty nine a fair number indeed by Onuphrius to be Thirty and by Bellarmin