Offices were by the Spirit enabled to make of them So 3 dly If we look to those Accounts which still remain to us of them they will plainly shew us that they were endued and that in a very singular manner with this Power and Gift of the Blessed Spirit 19. OF Barnabas the Holy Scripture it self bears Witness that He was a good Man full of the Holy Ghost and of Faith Acts xi 24 Hermas is another of whom St. Paul himself makes mention Rom. xvi 14 as an early Convert to Christianity And what extraordinary Revelations he had and how he foretold the Troubles that were to come upon the Church his following Visions sufficiently declare 20 CLEMENT is not only spoken of by the same Apostle but with this advantageous Character too that he was the Fellow-Labourer of that great Man and had his Name written in the Book of Life Phil. iv 3 And when we shall consider to how much lesser and worser Men these Gifts were usually communicated at that time we can hardly think that so excellent a Man and the Companion of so great an Apostle employed first in the planting of the Gospel with him and then set to govern one of the most considerable Churches in the World should have been destitute of it 21. AS for St. Ignatius I have before observed that he had this Gift and by the help of it warned the Philadelphians against falling into those Divisions which he fore-saw were about to rise up amonst them 22. POLYCARP not only Prophecy'd of his own Death but spake often times of things that were to come And has this Witness from the whole Church of Smyrna that nothing of all that he foretold ever failed of coming to pass according to his Prediction 23. IT remains then that the Holy Men whose Writings are here subjoyn'd were not only instructed by such as were Inspir'd but were themselves Inspir'd too And therefore we must conclude that they have not only not mistaken the Mind of the Apostles in what they deliver to us as the Gospel of Christ but were not capable of doing of it By consequence that we ought to look upon their Writings tho' not of equal Authority with those which we call in a singular manner The Holy Scriptures because neither were the Authors of them called in so extraordinary a way to the writing of them nor endued with so eminent a Portion of the Gifts of the Blessed Spirit for the doing of it Nor have their Writings been judg'd by the common Consent of the Church in those inspir'd Ages of it when they were so much better qualified than we are now to judge of the Divine Authority of those kind of Writings to be of equal Dignity with those of the Apostles and Evangelists yet worthy of a much greater Respect than any Composures that have been made since however Men may seem to have afterwards written with more Art and to have shewn a much greater Stock of humane Learning than what is to be found not only in the following Pieces but even in the Sacred Books of the New Testament it self 24. I SHALL add but One Consideration more the better to shew the true Deference that ought to be paid to the Treatises here collected and that is Sixthly That they were not only written by such Men as I have said instructed by the Apostles and judg'd worthy by them both for their Knowledg and their Integrity to govern some of the most eminent Churches in the World and lastly endued with the extraordinary Gift of the Holy Ghost and upon all these Accounts to be much respected by us But were moreover received by the Church in those First Ages as Pieces of a very great value which could not be mistaken in its Judgment of them 25. THE Epistle of St. Clement was a long time read publickly with the Other Scriptures in the Congregations of the Faithful made a part of their Bible and was numbred among the Sacred Writings however finally separated from them And not only the Apostolical Canons but our most ancient Alexandrian Manuscript gives the same place to the Second that it do's to the First of them And Epiphanius after both tells us that they were both of them wont to be read in the Church in his Time 26. THE Epistle of St. Polycarp with that of the Church of Smyrna were not only very highly approved of by particular Persons but like those of St. Clement were read publickly too in the Assemblies of the Faithful And for those of Ignatius besides that we find a mighty Value put upon them by the Christians of those Times they are sealed to us by this Character of St. Polycarp That they are such Epistles by which we may be greatly profited For says he They treat of Faith and Patience and of all things that pertain to Edification in the LORD 27. THE Epistle of Barnabas is not only quoted with great Honour by those of the next Age to him but as I have before shewn is expresly called Catholick and Canonical And in the ancient Stichometry of Cotelerius we find it placed the very next to the Epistle of St. Jude and no difference put between the Authority of the One and of the Other 28. AND for the Book of Hermas both Eusebius and St. Jerome tell us that it was also used to be read in the Churches In the same Stichometry I before mentioned it is placed in the very next Rank to the Acts of the Holy Apostles And in some of the most ancient Manuscripts of the New Testament we find it written in the same Volume with the Books of the Apostles and Evangelists as if it had been esteem'd of the same Value and Authority with them 29. SO that now then we must either say that the Church in those days was so little careful of what was taught in it as to allow such Books to be publickly read in its Congregations the Doctrine whereof it did not approve Or we must confess that the following Pieces are deliver'd to us not only by the Learned Men of the First Ages of the Church but by the whole Body of the Faithful as containing the pure Doctrine of Christ and must be look'd upon to have nothing in them but what was then thought worthy of all Acceptation 30. NOW how much this adds to the Authority of these Discourses may easily be concluded from what I have before observed For since it is certain that in those Times the Extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost were bestowed not only upon the Bishops and Pastors of the Church tho' upon them in a more eminent degree but also upon a great many of the common Christians too Since One particular Design of these Gifts was for the Discerning of Prophecies to judg of what was proposed by any to the Church or written for the Use and Benefit of it We cannot doubt but what was universally approved of and allow'd not by a few Learned Men but by
the Greeks for pretending that neither Juno nor Minerva nor Jupiter were what those imagin'd who built Temples and Altars to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nay so far went this last Author in his Allegories as to turn all the Trojan and Graecian Hero's into mere Fictions And to make Hector and Achilles and Agamemnon and even Helena her self nothing less than what one would think they were and what the common People ignorantly imagin'd them to be 33. AND for the Influence which this had upon the Ancient Fathers who from Philosophers became Christians the Writings both of Justin Martyr and Clemens Alexandrinus sufficiently shew And if we may believe Porphery an Enemy in the Case of Origen he tells us in the same place in which he complains of him For turning those things that were clearly deliver'd by Moses into Mystical Significations not only that he did this in Imitation of the Graecians but that it was his frequent Conversation with Numenius and Cronius Moderatus Nichomachus and Others among the Pythagoreans and with Chaeremon and Cornutus among the Stoics that he had learnt his Allegorical way of Expounding the Holy Scriptures and applied that to his Religion which they were wont to do to their Superstition 34. FROM all which it appears that this way of Writing in Matters of Religion was in those days generally used not only among the Jews but among the Wiser and more Philosophical of the Gentiles too And from both came to be almost universally practised among the Primitive Christians Which being so we ought to be far from censuring of St. Barnabas for his mystical Application of what God prescribed to the Jews in the Old Testament to the Spiritual Accomplishment of it in the New Much less should we ever the more call in question either the Truth or Credit of his Epistle upon this account 35. HAVING said thus much either in Vindication of the Allegorical Expositions of this Epistle or at least by way of Apology for them I shall add but little more concerning the Epistle it self I have before observed as to the Time of its Writing that it was somewhat after the Destruction of Jerusalem and as we may conjecture from the Subject of it for Title at present it has none nor do's it appear that ever it had any was address'd to the Jews to draw them off from the Letter of the Law to a Spiritual Understanding of it and by that means dispose them to embrace the Gospel Whether he had besides this a farther Design in it as Dr. Hammond supposes to confute the Errours of the Gnostick Hereticks and to prevent the Jewish Converts from falling into them it is not certain but may from the chief Points insisted upon by him be probably enough supposed If any one shall think it strange that disputing against the Jews for the Truth of the Gospel he should not have urged any of those Passages relating to the Messiah which seem to us the most apposite to such a purpose Such as the Oracle of Jacob concerning the Time that Shiloh was to come the LXX Weeks of Daniel the Prophecies of Haggai and Malachi of his coming while the Second Temple stood and which was now destroyed when he wrote this Epistle and the like Monsieur le Moyne will give him a ready Answer viz. that these Passages relate chiefly to the Time of Christ's appearing and that this was no Controversie in those days the Jews not only confessing it but being ready at every turn through this Persuasion to set up some or other for their Messiah to their Shame and Confusion It was therefore then but little necessary to use those Arguments against them which now appear to be the most proper and convincing since the State of the Question is alter'd and the Jews either deny that their Messiah is come or that it was necessary for him to have come about that time that our Saviour Christ appeared in the Flesh. 36. BUT tho' the chief Design of this Epistle was to convince the Jews of the Truth of our Religion yet are there not wanting in the latter part of it many excellent Rules to render it still very useful to the Pious Reader Indeed some have doubted whether this did originally belong to this Epistle or whether it has not since been added to it But seeing we find this part quoted by the Fathers as belonging to St. Barnabas no less than the other and that the Measure assign'd to it in the ancient Stichometries can hardly be well accounted for without it I do not see but that we ought to conclude that our Author did divide his Epistle into the two Parts in which we now have it and that this latter aswell as the former was written by him 37. AS for the Translation which I have here given of it I have made it up out of what remains of the Original Greek and of the Old Latin Version and of each of which tho' a Part be lost yet it has so fallen out that between them we not only have the whole Epistle but that too free of those Interpolations which Vossius tells us some had endeavour'd to make in this as well as in Ignatius's Epistles In both I have endeavour'd to attain to the Sense of my Author and to make him as plain and easie as I was able If in any thing I shall have chanced to mistake him I have only this to say for my self that he must be better acquainted with the Road than I pretend to be who will undertake to travel so long a Journey in the dark and never to miss his way CHAP. VIII Of the Shepherd of St. Hermas and of the Second Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians That the Hermas mention'd by St. Paul Rom. xvi 14 was the Author of that Book which is here subjoyn'd under his Name There is little remaining of his Life more than what is taken out of his own Book Of his Death Uncertain whether he died a Martyr The Ancient Fathers divided in their Opinions of this Book Nor are our later Criticks less That there are many useful things in it Of the Second Epistle of St. Clement That it is not of equal Reputation with the Former By some deny'd to be St. Clements It is most probable that it was written by St. Clement and has many excellent things and worthy of that Holy Man in it These two Pieces now the first time translated into our own Language 1. THERE is not a greater Difference between the Learned Men of the present Times concerning the Epistle of St. Barnabas than there was among the Ancient Fathers heretofore concerning the Authority of that Book which next follows under the Name of Hermas Who this Hermas was what he did and what he suffer'd for the Faiths sake is in great measure unknown to us That there was one of that Name at Rome when St. Paul wrote his Epistle to the Church there his Remembrance of him Rom.
xvi 14 will not suffer us to doubt Nor is it improbable but that it was the same Hermas who afterwards wrote this Book And who appears not only still to have continued his Relation to the Church of Rome but to have written at such a time as may well agree to one of St. Paul's Acquaintance The former of these may be collected from his Second Vision which he seems to have had at the same time that Clement was Bishop of Rome and to whom therefore he is commanded to carry a Copy of it And for the latter if the Conjectures of two of our Greatest Criticks may be allow'd in applying the Great Affliction of which he speaks in another of his Visions to the Destruction of Jerusalem then at hand it is evident that this Book must have been written within XL. Years after the Death of Christ and by consequence by some Author who lived at the very time that the Hermas of whom St. Paul speaks most certainly did 2. HENCE Origen in his Homily upon that place of St. Paul before mentioned delivers it as his Opinion that it was the Hermas there spoken of who wrote this Book But Eusebius do's more He tells us that it was the received Opinion in those days that it was composed by him And that it continued to be so in the Age after St. Hierome witnesses who speaks yet more positively than Eusebius to that purpose And from all which we may conclude what is to be judg'd of that Mistake which our latter Writers have fallen into by their too credulous following the Author of the Poem against Marcion under the Name of Tertullian viz. that it was written by Hermes Brother to Pope Pius and in which not only the Authors of the Pontifical ascribed to Pope Damascus and of the pretended Decretal Epistles of the ancient Bishops of Rome but the Martyrologists of the Middle Ages Bede Ado c. have generally been involved 3. IT is true Cardinal Baronius has endeavour'd to make up this Difference by supposing that the Hermes spoken of by St. Paul was Brother to Pope Pius and so all Parties may be in the right But besides that this Book was written by Hermas not the Hermes of whom St. Paul there speaks the difference of the Time renders it altogether incredible that a Person of some considerable Age at St. Paul's writing his Epistle should have lived so long as that Pope's Brother is said to have done Whom the Cardinal himself observes to have been living CLXIV Years after Christ that is to say CVII Years after the writing of St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans And this his Epitomator Spondanus was aware of And therefore tho' he seems to have allow'd of the Conjecture yet could not chuse but add this Reflection of his own upon it that according to this reckoning Hermas must have been CXXX Years old when he died and in all probability a great deal more 4. WHAT the Condition of this Hermas was before his Conversion we cannot tell but that he was a Man of some Consideration we may conclude from what we read of him in his Third Vision Where he is said to have been formerly unprofitable to the LORD upon the account of those Riches which after he became a Christian he seems to have dispensed in Works of Charity and Beneficence 5. NOR have we any more knowledg how he was converted than what his Condition was before It is probable from several Passages in his Book that he was brought over to Christianity himself before his Family who continued yet in the practice of many and great Impieties During this while Hermas was not only very kind to them but seems to have been so indulgent towards them as to permit them rather to go on in their Sins than he would take any rough Measures with them to draw them off from them 6. BUT this was not all he not only patiently bore with them but was himself disturb'd with many anxious Cares to supply them in their Extravagances and often times did not behave himself so well as he ought upon that account But however being of an honest and upright Disposition and having a great Sincerity in his Religion it pleased God at last not only to convince him of his Faults in thus neglecting his Family but to give them Grace to hearken to his Admonitions and to embrace at once both the Christian Faith and a Practice also suitable thereunto 7. WHAT he did after this we have no account but that he lived a very strict Life we may reasonably conjecture in that it pleased God to vouchsafe such extraordinary Revelations to him and to employ him in several Messages to his Church both to correct their Manners and to warn them of the Tryals that were about to come upon them 8. THIS was so singular a Grace even in those Times of Miracles that we find some other Christians not so humble as they ought to be became Enemies to him upon the account of them However this did not hinder but that God still continu'd to make use of his Ministry in admonishing Sinners and he as readily and faithfully went on both in warning them of their danger and in exhorting them to repent and save their Souls 9. THIS then was the Business of this Holy Man in which he spent his Life and if we may believe the Roman Martyrologie his Death was not unsuitable to it Where we read that being illustrious for his Miracles he at last offer'd himself a worthy Sacrifice unto God But upon what Grounds this is establish'd Baronius himself could not tell us Insomuch that in his Annals he durst not once mention the manner of his Death but is content to say That having undergone many Labours and Troubles in the time of the Persecution under Aurelius and that too without any Authority he at last rested in the LORD July XXVI and which is therefore observed in Commemoration of him And here is indeed a pleasant Mistake and worthy the Roman Martyrologie For this Author from the Book of which we are now discoursing being sometimes called by the Title of Pastor or Shepherd the Martyrologist has very gravely divided the good Man into two Saints And they observe the Memorial of Hermas May IX th and of Pastor July XXVI th Unless we shall rather say that this was indeed the Cardinal's Blunder and the Martyrologie in the right to make two distinct Persons of St. Hermas rembembred by St. Paul and the Brother of Pope Pius to whom the Passages mention'd July XXVI do manifestly belong And erred only in applying the Character of Pastor to the latter which with the Treatise of which we are now discoursing ought as the Cardinal has truly observed to have been ascribed to the former 10. BUT not to insist any longer on the Author of this Book As for the Work it self we find both the Ancient Fathers and the Learned Men of our own Times not a little divided in
their Judgments concerning it Some there are and those the nearest to the time when this Book was written that treat it almost with the same Respect that they would do the Canonical Scriptures Irenaeus quotes it under the very Name of the Scripture Origen tho' he sometimes moderates his Opinion of it upon the account of some who did not it seems pay the same Respect with himself to it yet speaking of Hermas being the Author of this Book in his Comments on the Epistle to the Romans gives us this Character of it That He thought it to be a most useful Writing and was as he believed Divinely Inspired Eusebius tells us that tho' being doubted of by Some it was not esteem'd Canonical yet was it by Others judged a most necessary Book and as such read publickly in the Churches And St. Hierom having in like manner observed that it was read in some Churches makes this Remark upon it That it was indeed a very profitable Book and whose Testimony was often quoted by the Greek Fathers Athanasius places it in the same rank with the Books of Scripture and calls it a most useful Treatise And in another place tells us That tho' it was not strictly Canonical yet was it reckon'd among those Books which the Fathers appointed to be read to such as were to be instructed in the Faith and desired to be directed in the Way of Piety 11. HENCE we may observe as a farther Evidence of that Respect which was paid to this Book heretofore that it was not only openly read in the Churches but in some of the most ancient Manuscripts of the New Testament is joyned together with the other Books of the Holy Scriptures An Instance of this Cotelerius offers us in that of the Monastry of St. Germans in France in which it is continued on at the End of St. Paul's Epistles And in several of the Old Stichometries it is put in the same Catalogue with the Inspired Writings As may be seen in that which the same Author has published out of a Manuscript in the King's Library in his Observations upon St. Barnabas and in which St. Barnabas's Epistle is placed immediately before the Revelations as the Acts of the Apostles and Hermas's Shepherd are immediately after it 12. AND yet after all this we find this same Book not only doubted of by Others among the Ancient Fathers but slighted even by some of those who upon other Occasions have spoken thus highly in its Favour Thus St. Jerome in his Comments Exposes the Folly of that Apochryphal Book as he calls it which in his Catalogue of Writers he had so highly applauded Tertullian who spake if not honourably yet calmly of it whilst a Catholick being become Montanist rejected it even with Scorn And most of the other Fathers who have spoken the highest of it themselves yet plainly enough insinuate that there were those who did not put the same Value upon it Thus Origen mentions some who not only deny'd but despis'd its Authority And Cassian having made use of it in the Point of Free-Will Prosper without more ado rejected it as a Testimony of no Value And what the Judgment of the Latter Ages was as to this matter especially after Pope Gelasius had ranked it among the Apochryphal Books may be seen at large in the Observations of Antonius Augustinus upon that Decree 13. HOW far this has influenced the Learned Men of our present Times in their Censures upon this Work is evident from what many on all sides have freely spoken concerning it Who not only deny it to have been written by Hermas the Companion of St. Paul but utterly cast it off as a Piece of no Worth but rather full of Error and Folly Thus Baronius himself tho' he delivers not his own Judgment concerning it yet plainly enough shews that he ran in with the severest Censures of the Ancients against it And in effect charges it with favouring the Arrians tho' upon a mistaken Authority of St. Athanasius and which by no means proves any such Errour to be in it But Cardinal Bellarmine is more free He tells us that it has many hurtful things in it and particularly that it favours the Novatian Heresie which yet I think a very little Equity in interpreting of some Passages that look that way by others that are directly contrary thereunto would serve to acquit it of Others are yet more severe They censure it as full of Heresies and Fables Tho' this Labbe would be thought to excuse by telling us that they have been foisted into it by some later Interpolations and ought not to be imputed to Hermas the Author of this Book 14. NOR have many of those of the Reform'd Churches been any whit more favourable in their Censures of the present Treatise But then as the Chiefest of the most Ancient Fathers heretofore tho' they admitted it not into the Canon of Holy Scripture yet otherwise paid a very great Deference to it so the more moderate part of the Learned Men of our present Times esteem it as a Piece worthy of all Respect and clear of those Faults which are too lightly charged by some Persons upon it Thus Petavius none of the most favourable Critics upon the Ancient Fathers yet acknowledges as to the present Book that it was never censured by any of the Ancients as guilty of any false Doctrine or Heresie and especially as to the Point of the Holy Trinity Cotelerius one of the latest Editors of it esteems it as an Ecclesiastical Work of good note and a great Defence of the Catholick Faith against the Errors of Montanism Whose Judgment is not only follow'd by their late Historian Natalis Alexander but is made good too in the Defence of it against those Objections which some have brought to lessen its Reputation And for those of our own Communion I shall mention only two but They such as will serve instead of many to all judicious Persons who have at large justified it against the chief of those Exceptions that have been taken at it the One the most Excellent Bishop Pearson in his Vindication of St. Ignatius the Other the Learned Dr. Bull in his Defence of the Nicene Faith in the Point of our Blessed Saviour's Divinity and which he largely shews our present Author to have been far from doing any Prejudice unto 15. SUCH then have been the different Judgments of Learned Men both heretofore and in our present Times concerning this Book It would be too great a Presumption for me to pretend to determine any thing as to this matter and having subjoyn'd the Work it self in our common Language every one may be able to satisfie himself what Value he ought to put upon it That there are many useful things to be found in it but especially in the Second and I think the best part of it cannot be deny'd And for the other Two it must be considered that tho' such Visions as we there read of being
has multiplied them for his Holy Churches sake is angry with thee because thou hast sinned against me And I answering said unto her Lady If I have sinned against thee tell me where or in what Place or when did I ever speak an unseemly or dishonest Word unto thee Have I not always esteemed thee as a Lady Have I not always reverenced thee as a Sister Why then dost thou imagine these wicked things against me Then she smiling upon me said The desire of Naughtiness has risen up in thy heart Does it not seem to thee to be an ill thing for a Righteous Man to have an evil desire rise up in his heart It is indeed a Sin and that a very great one to such a Man for a righteous Man thinketh what is righteous And whilst he does so and walketh uprightly he shall have the LORD in Heaven favourable unto him in all his Works But as for those who think wickedly in their hearts they take to themselves Death and Captivity and especially those who love this present World and glory in their Riches and regard not the good things that are to come their Souls wander up and down and know not where to fix Now this is the Case of such as are Doubtful who trust not in the LORD and despise and neglect their own life But do thou pray unto the LORD and he will heal thy Sins and the Sins of thy whole House and of all his Saints II. AS soon as she had spoken these Words the Heavens were shut and I remained utterly swallowed up in Sadness and Fear and said within my self If this be laid against me for Sin how can I ever be saved or how shall I ever be able to intreat the LORD for my many and great Sins With what Words shall I beseech him to be merciful unto me As I was thinking over these things and meditating in my self upon them behold a Chair set over against me of the whitest Wool as bright as Snow And there came an old Woman in a bright Garment having a Book in her hand and sate alone and saluted me saying HERMAS hail And I being full of Sorrow and weeping answered Hail Lady and she said unto me Why art thou sad Hermas who wert wont to be patient and modest and always cheerful I answered and said to her Lady a Reproach has been objected to me by an excellent Woman who tells me that I have sinned against her She replied Far be any such thing from the Servant of God But it may be the desire of her has risen up in thy Heart For indeed there is such a Thought even in the Servants of God leading unto Sin Nor ought such a detestable Thought to be in the Servant of God nor should a Spirit that is approved desire that which is evil nor especially HERMAS who contains himself from all wicked Appetites and is full of all Simplicity and of great Innocence III. NEVERTHELESS the LORD is not angry with thee for thine own sake but upon the account of thy House which has committed Wickedness against the LORD and against their Parents And that Act of thy Fondness towards thy Sons in that thou hast not admonished them but hast permitted them to live wickedly and for this Cause the LORD is angry with thee But he will heal all the Evils that are done before thee in thy House For through their Sins and Iniquities thou art wholly consumed in secular Affairs But now the Mercy of God hath taken Compassion upon thee and upon thine House and hath greatly comforted thee only as for thee do not wander but be of an even Mind and comfort thy House As the Workman bringing forth his Work offers it to whomsoever he pleases so shalt thou by teaching every day what is just cut off a great sin Wherefore cease not to admonish thy Sons for the LORD knows that they will repent with all their heart and he will write thee in the Book of Life And when she had said this she added unto me Wilt thou hear me Read I answer'd her Lady I will Hear then said she And opening the Book she read gloriously greatly and wonderfully such things as I could not keep in my Memory For they were terrible Words such as no Man could bear Howbeit I committed her last Words to my Remembrance for they were but few and of great use Behold the mighty LORD who by his invincible Power and with his excellent Wisdom made the World and by his glorious Counsel encompassed the Beauty of his Creature and with the Word of his strength fix'd the Heaven and founded the Earth upon the Waters and by his powerful Vertue establish'd his Holy Church which he hath blessed Behold he will remove the Heavens and the Mountains the Hills and the Seas and all things shall be made Plain for his Elect that he may render unto them the Promise which he has promised with much Honor and Joy if so be that they shall keep the Commandments of God which they have received with great Faith IV. AND when she had made an end of Reading she rose out of the Chair and behold four Young-men came and carried the Chair to the East And she called me unto her and touch'd my Breast and said unto me Did my Reading please thee I answered Lady These last things please me but what went before was severe and hard She said unto me These last things are for the Righteous but the foregoing for the Revolters and Heathen And as she was talking with me Two more appeared and took her up on their shoulders and went to the East where the Chair was And she went chearfully away and as she was going said unto me HERMAS be of good chear VISION II. Again of his Neglect in Correcting his Talkative Wife and of his Lewd Sons and of his Own Manners I. AS I was on the Way to Cumae about the same time that I had been the last Year I began to call to mind the Vision I formerly had And again the Spirit carried me away and brought me into the same Place in which I had been the Year before And when I was come into the Place I fell down upon my Knees and began to Pray unto the LORD and to Honour his Name that he had esteemed me worthy and had manifested unto me my former Sins And when I arose from Prayer behold I saw over against me the Old Woman whom I had seen the last Year walking and reading in a certain Book And she said unto me Can'st thou tell these things to the Elect of God I answered and said unto her Lady I cannot retain such great things in my Memory but give me the Book and I will write them down Take it says she and see that thou restore it again to me As soon as I had receiv'd it I went aside into a certain Place of the Field and transcribed every Letter for I found no
Psal. i. ‖ Vid. Cotel in loc †Vessel * Edit Oxon. aliter 〈◊〉 Vid. Hieron in Hosoam vii 9 * In Glory Edit Oxon. Hath preserved thee in Glory †Edit Oxon. Clem. Alex. Strom. vi ‖ So Coteler Edit Oxon. And she c. ‖ Days that are coming Numb xi 26 27. Origen Philocal cap. 1. ‖ Are abou◠†Edit Oxon. * Clem. Alex. Strom. xii Baptism ‖ Vid. Edit Oxon. ‖ Vas urâ—ale ‖ Observe them Irenaeus lib. 1. c. 3. Origen de Princ. l. 1. c. 3. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. v. c. 8. Athanas de Incarn Verb. c. ‖ Simple * Vid. Antioch Hom. xxix †Daemon ‖ Vid. Antioch Hom. xcviii * Simply †His own ‖ Gloriously to God ‖ Antioch Hom. lxvi * See below Book lii Siâ— x Chap. 32. †If thou shalt keep the Truth ‖ Chastity †Another Mans. ‖ See 1 Cor. vii 15 †Sense ‖ Praepositus See below Chap. iii. †Sense * Great Wisdom †Sense †Sense ‖ In his Vnderstanding * Chastity †Rightly hear◠‖ Those days * Vid. Annot. Coteler in loc pag. 60 61. ‖ Vid. Not. Coteler in loc p. 64. B. C. Rom. vii 3 Comp. 1 Cor. vii †The Vessel ††Disposition to Anger And so in what follows ‖ Place ††Disposition to Anger And so in what follows * Vid. Antioch Hom. â—x ††Disposition to Anger And so in what follows ††Disposition to Anger And so in what follows ‖ To. ††Disposition to Anger And so in what follows * Angel * Angel ††Angriness ‖ Vertue ††Angriness Disposition to Anger See above ††Angriness Disposition to Anger See above ††Angriness Disposition to Anger See above * Vessel * Vid Coteler Annot. in loc pag. 67.68 Comp. Edit Oxon. p. 61. Not. a. †Placed ‖ Vid Antioch Hom. lxi Comp Orig. L. lii De Princip Et in Lâ—c. Hom xxxv * Works ‖ Vid. Antioch Hom. cxxvii * Antioch Hom. lxxix ‖ Of all Iniquities * Vid. Coteler in loc ‖ Vid. Antioch Hom. lxxxiii †Asking the Petition of thy Soul ‖ In every thing ‖ Without Sense thou dost not understand it †Questions * Vid. Edit Oxon. p. 70. b. Comp. 2 Cor. vii 10 †Senses ‖ Antioch Hom. xxv ‖ Of Men. * Vid. Antioch Hom. lxxiv. †Vessels * Angel †Origen in Matth. xxiv 42 ‖ Angel ‖ Vid. Antioch Hom. lxxvii ‖ Antioch Hom. xv ‖ Soule ‖ Vid. Origen in Jos. Hom. x. †Nations ‖ With me * Vid. Not. Coteler in loc pag. 72 73. †Coteler ibid. * Vid. Not. Cotelerli pag. 74. A. B. C. †Vid. Antioch Hom. vii * Vid. Not. Cotelerli pag. 74. A. B. C. * Vid. Not. Cotelerli pag. 74. A. B. C. ‖ Vid. Edit Oxon. Annot. a. p. 105. * Angels * Angels ‖ In them * Vid. Annot. Coteler in loc †Angel * Vid. Origen in Psal. xxxvii Hom. 1. ‖ Angel * Origen in Num. Hom. viii ‖ Angel ‖ Angel ‖ Angel ‖ Vid. Edit Oxon. p. 129 not d. ‖ Sea◠‖ With foreign Nations ‖ With foreign Nations ‖ See above Book I. * Angel ‖ Origen Hom. iii. in Ezech. †So Cotelerius in loc ‖ Vid. MS. Lamb. Edit Oxon p. 15◠‖ Vid. Annot. Edit Oxon. p. 166. d. †Vid. Origen Philocal c. viii ‖ Origen Hom. in Ezek. †Vid. Edit Oxon. p. 171. b. ‖ Vid. Coteler Annot. in loc pag. 77 78. Comp. 1 Pet. iii. 19. * Vid. Clem. Alex. Strom. ii Et vi * Sense ‖ Vid. Orig. Philocal C. viii †Feigned * Vid. Edit Oxon. p. 178. Not. b. ‖ Infancy ‖ Not. ‖ Vid. Antioch Hom. cxxii †Antioch Hom xciv ‖ President * Little things or meanly * Little things or meanly * Little things or meanly †Hear as of little things ‖ Knowing †How great Holy things do we owe unto him Isai. liv 1 †Simply Mat. ix 13 ‖ What is the Knowledge which is towards him Mat. x. 32 Isa. xxix 13 Mat. vii 21 * Wherefore we doing these things Mat. vii 23 Luke xiii 27 Mat. x. 16 Luke xii 4 5. Luke xvi 13 Mat. xvi 26 Ezek. xiv 14 20. ‖ The Combat â—s before us Isa. lxvi 24 †Let us repen◠‖ There Luke xvi 1â— 12. Mat. xii 50 ‖ 〈◊〉 for this cause we cannot find a Man Aliter 〈…〉 q v. See above the 1 st Epistle chap. xxiii pag 37 38.