for our learning and what good will their being written doe us if we will not reade them but stay and waite till they be inspired into us as so Naylor owneth the Scripture to be profitable to whom they are given by inspiration Implying that else they are not if we have them first by reading see in this his answer page 5. What an absurd doctrine is this and how loath is he to owne that the Scripture in bookes is worth reading This discovers what spirit hee is acted by and how bitterly malicious and full of devices against the Scriptures And againe observe the Apostle Peter and hee are fallen at odds and he hath given him the lye for writing this Scripture it hath so angered him that the Apostle should stand in such direct opposition to his false doctrine For the Apostle calls it a more sure word of prophesie then either visions or voyces which he had in the Mount But this James Naylor denyeth and blameth mee exceedingly for beleeving such a thing as that the letter of the old Prophets should be a surer word then what Peter heard God himselfe speake and were eye witnesses of his Majestie Ans I answer this voyce and vision might seeme a surer word unto Peter and others then the old prophesies it according with them and so was a further confirmation of what the Prophets had spoken But those to whom he writes this Revelation of such things did not heare that voyce nor see his Majestie but had it written unto them as well as the Prophesies and so had it but in the letter from Peter as a testimony unto them And therefore it was that the Apostle called it a more sure word of prophesie for words of prophesie given by inspiration of God if wee know them to be such are more sure words to me then visions and voyces that are heard by others and seene and Related For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophesie And this hee would have them to know that the prophesie in old time came not by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were mooved by the Spirit of God And therefore hee saith wee including himselfe have a more sure word of prophesie the which though the confirmation thereof to Peter testifying of Jesus to be the Christ therein specified was surer to him yet that sure word of prophesie was a more sure word to build their faith upon in regard it foreshewed the coming of Christ and that that Jesus was hee giving notice beforehand of the place of his birth and of his life and death and all such things which came to passe Which clearely demonstrateth that all those prophesies were by inspiration for who else but God could foreshew such things so long before And therefore there cannot be a more sure word then that sure word of prophesie for what can be surer then the words of God and those proved to be his words by the truth and successe in the events thereof that were thereby foreshewed And therefore it is that in case the people desired to know of any Prophet whether the Lord had sent him with such a Message or he had spoken it presumptuously Hee referres them to the successe and events thereof and whether the thing came to passe or no see Deut. 18.21 22. To wit When a Prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to passe that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken it presumptuously thou shalt not be afraid of him But the prophesies of old time are confirmed to us to be a sure word of prophesie and therefore we cannot but beleeve them And that a great deale better then the prophesies of James Naylor though hee telleth us hee hath them by Immediate voyce and visions likewise and that hee hath them from God by Immediate inspiration For till we see them confirmed by the events thereof wee shall rather beleeve that more sure word of prophesie that was spoken in old time and also those sure words of prophesie and Rules and directions given by Christ and his Apostles then those given by James Naylor though hee call himselfe and others account him the Messenger of the living God But though wee doe beleeve in regard wee finde it in Scripture and that in many places and are in expectation dayly to see the downfall and shame and confusion of such who presume to preach in the Name of the Lord and hee hath not sent them see verse 20. Yet wee dare not believe the prophesying of Naylor in that respect nor can we expect or desire either the downfall and shame and confusion of any that is godly and faithfull Nor dare wee condemne all that preach in publike in our publike places which hee whickedly calleth our Idoll Temples to be carnall and hirelings as he blasphemously doth for wee know the contrary and therefore know him to be a lyar and not a true Prophet and so wee feare him not nor regard his prophesies but as false and frothie presumptuous lyes and therefore if it come not so to passe hee will be discovered to those seely people that for the present beleeve him as so he is to us already Againe I produced a Scripture to prove the various and different dispensations of the Lord to his Prophets and to Rebuke the pride and insolencie of James Naylor the which as I suppose because he could not oppose any deductions from it nor evade the charge upon himselfe to wit of despising the Word He maketh as though he understood not my meaning and as though I had brought it for another end the which I never meant And maketh use of it for prooving that they are no Prophets who have no word but the letter The which I shall easily graunt so hee will not deny that the letter of Scripture is the word also nor did I ever deny it but owned Christ as the essentiall word and the Scripture also is the word and therefore he needed not fetch any arguments to proove it But I made another use of it to wit that I finde but little of this meeknesse in James Naylor that was exemplified in Moses But on the contrary that hee counteth himselfe the highest and all below him either dwarfes or nothing like Christians in so much as if they have need of a booke either the Bible or any other they are despised by him as litterall men in his booke against Moore Though Paul advised otherwise as to give attendance to reading and to exhortation and doctrine and not onely to a light within and more to that purpose Which is so quite contrary to his Directorie that having nothing to answer he turneth the dease eare and falleth upon other busines discussed before Againe he saith my second thing is to deny the light of Christ to be sufficient I answer it is most false I told him that wee must confesse that
shew any the least Scripture that so much as tendeth to such a doctrine nor his spirit neither But these evading shifting reviling answers in stead of rationall and proper answers doe clearely hould forth his conviction and obstinance against the light it selfe concerning this maine point so much controverted I shall therefore follow him to some other point to wit hee telleth mee pag. 15. that I aske in what part of Scripture is the Gospell called the letter or the preaching of faith the preaching of the letter I say thou shouldst aske thy selfe this question who would make the letter the Gospell and the preaching of faith litterall which I say are both spirituall and spiritually preached And I aske thee againe where did ever I call the Gospell letter or the preaching of faith letter and so take thy challenge backe againe To which I answer that I tould him that I finde it in a little booke written by Thomas Polard in answer to Richard Farnworth that they call the Scriptures carnall and a dead letter and say it will never bring a man to the knowledge of God but that all that is gotten from the Scripture is but braine knowledge And that I finde in a booke of Naylors against Thomas Moore how hee answereth this to wit being asked by Moore whether the writing of the Prophets and Apostles be a dead letter hee answereth that without the Spirit it is see in my booke pag. 4th And it is cleare in the 12 page of this his answer where hee saith speaking of the Devill that hee would keepe in the letter but from the spirit of which the letter declares And saith also to us and the rest of the world you have long counted the Scriptures to be the word of God but the Devills kingdome is standing still in the heart and so must be till there be account of the word that is nearer then the letter From all which expressions it is cleare that that which wee call the Scriptures hee calleth the letter and a dead letter Now wee call the contents of the Bible both the old and new Testament the holy Scriptures and so hee will not deny but they are Now these Scriptures hee owneth but as carnall and a dead letter wee call them spirituall and the words of God Therefore hee calleth all the Scriptures the letter And the Gospell being contained in the Scriptures which is glad tydings and good newes that shall be to all people the which was therefore called the Gospell And it was written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope the which Gospell was also preached from the beginning yea even to Adam and Eve that they might have hope and comfort thereby to wit that the seede of the woman should breake the Serpents head And wee shall not deny that the Gospell is spirituall and so is the Law also But wee must not deny but both this Law and Gospell are written for our learning And if they be written it must needs be legible to us or it will not serve for our learning if wee want it for the present and have it not written in our hearts for if faith come by hearing and so by reading as so it doth sometimes then it entereth first by the eare to wit by hearing or else by the eye to wit by reading And if wee cannot reade what is written in the hearts of one another not being omnitient but by hearing them speake or seeing them act or reading an expresse of their minds in writing how can wee learne what is the minde and will of the Lord from that which is written if it be not legible and that in letters Suppose us as ignorant for the present not having either Law or Gospell as yet in our hearts how shall wee beleeve in him in whom wee have not heard Implying that it is not a thing to be expected that all should have it by Immediate inspiration but by the hearing of it preached which is the ordinarie meanes whereby the Lord conveyeth it to the soule as hath been shewed before and that from Scripture grounds Now that which hee calls the letter wee call the Scripture and so it is for it was written and is therefore Scripture because written yet wee dare not call it a dead letter but lively Oracles a spirituall word a word in which there is spirit and life to such as beleeve and receive them in love yea wee doe call the Scripture the word of God And doe but aske James Naylor what else that is which is called by the Apostle the sword of the Spirit which is the word of God If it be not the Scripture yea that which is written in the Bible which hee calleth the letter see Eph. 6.17 Aske him I say whether this sword of the spirit which the Apostle calleth the word of God be meant of Christ who is the essentiall word and who is the spirit or it be meant of the Scriptures which are the expresse word of God and so as a sword or weapon in the hand of the spirit both defensive and offensive against our adversaries upon all occations yea Christ himselfe used it against the Devill when hee tempted him and against the Scribes and Pharisees and that as the best and fittest weapon to incounter them with But if this sword of the spirit be not the spirit it selfe but the sword or instrument in the hand of the spirit and yet is called the word of God Then it is not blasphemy but good Scripture language to call the Scripture the word of God but the blasphemy is theires who call it carnall and a dead letter as hath more largely been shewed before in this Treatise Now in these expressions of James Naylor hee denyeth to call any thing Gospell but the spirit or any thing Scripture but the spirit or any thing the word of God but the spirit And so the Scripture with him and the glad tidings of the Gospell contained therein must of necessitie either be called the spirit and so also God or but a dead letter and not the word of God and so not the sword of the spirit wherein how clearely contradicteth himselfe and his owne confessions as hath been shewed before and also the plaine expresse Scripture as any Rationall man may easily perceive that will but reade and consider so that his conviction is cleare from his owne confessions concerning these two maine points of his doctrine which I may well call the maine substance of that Gospell which hee preacheth and of all his bookes which hee writeth namely to teach us to eye that spirit and word and light within and desert the Scriptures and the teachings of men as a dead and vaine and fruitlesse meanes for leading into and guiding in all the wayes of God c. The which Gospell I now leave to the Judgements of all that are truely Judicious whether it be not another Gospell then the Gospell of
spirit Ans I say it is true for that is but done to delude the simple through hypocrisie to make their lyes more feizible as so the Ministers of Sathan are sometimes transformed as if they were Ministers of Righteousnesse as hath been shewed before and so are they 9. That our directing to observe the light in the Conscience is nothing else but to advise them to obey Sathan Ans I say true in such cases wherein I instanced to wit to them in whom hee Ruleth it is no better but so 10. That wee direct people to eye and observe that lying spirit that is in them Ans So they doe by such directions to all those whom they so direct in whom hee raigneth 11. That Naylors doctrine is quite contrarie that any that lacke wisdome should aske it of God Ans I say in my booke Just so and shew my Reasons for it because I finde it not in any of his bookes But onely a direction to seeke it within before they have it And if they have it not already then they want it and ought to aske it of God and not to seeke it where it is wanting and not to be found but it is a grosse directorie so to advise them as so I call it in my booke 12. That Sathan hath got a Commission to be a lying spirit in my mouth Ans Very true and if hee call this a lye hee must father all these lyes himselfe and so be a Devill and the father of lyes for it is not God hee cannot lye 13. That James Naylor is sent with strong delusions to some that they might beleeve a lye Ans True and that to very many of those that beleeved not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousnesse as so I say it againe and shewed reasons for it in my booke 14. That I would needs be accounted some great Prophet and to have some extraordinary revelations that no man else had knowne before and yet teacheth us nothing except lyes c. Ans I say it is true hee that teacheth us nothing except lyes but what wee knew before now this except lyes hee leaveth out and putteth in c. as was usuall in the Bishops times when they were ashamed to declare all 15. That James Nayor utterly denyeth the manhood of Christ Ans So hee doth by cleare consequence from his doctrine as is prooved in the Treatise for that hee blameth us for owning a Christ without and at a distance to wit his body being in heaven as well as hee is present with us in spirit 16. That I blame men for praising and singing of Psalmes in spirit unto God as the Apostles did Ans In spirit and with the mouth and voyce hee doth calling them Devills Rymes most wickedly and prophanely as is shewed but not answered yet 17. That I often produce the non-proficiency of the people as a ground of disparagement to the word it selfe Ans So hee doth as a disparagement to the Scripture it selfe which I call the expresse word of God and as a disparagement to the teachings of men also which hee cannot deny and therefore this is his lye 18. That James Naylor counteth himselfe the highest and all below him either dwarffes or nothing like Christians Ans And this is true for Reasons therein shewed but is his Recitall hee leaveth out those words to wit either like dwarffes and also the reasons which hee cannot answer 19. That I Reproach and disparage those that take heede to the sure word of prophesie Ans True for so hee doth all that take heede to the Scriptures which the Apostle meant when hee so called it 20. That how the word was made flesh James Naylor understandeth not Ans True I said so let him proove the contrary by shewing it if hee can 21. That James Naylors Directorie is quite contradictorie to the directorie of Scripture Ans True and it is so prooved in the booke 22 That I Naylor requireth Scripture grounds for what hee asserteth which hee never yet gave Ans It is I that require Scripture grounds of him for what hee asserteth the which hee hath not yet nor cannot give and that maketh him to put it in the quite contrary sence as I suppose least the simple should discerne him 23. That wee have no faith in God but in a lying spirit within Ans It really appeares that spirit within them is a lying spirit and yet in that they beleeve but the Spirit of God is not a lying spirit therefore their faith is not in God 24. That wee would make the blood of Christ of none effect Ans It is true your doctrine doth so what in your lyeth as it is prooved in the Treatise and not yet answered 25. That our spirit teacheth us not to put off our hatts when wee pray Ans I was so informed by those that have seene you pray that your practise is so and then I suppose your spirit so teacheth you so that if it be not true yet it not my lye because I was so informed Thus his twenty-five lyes that hee would father upon mee I Returne backe to himselfe in this short dresse And shall passe over his language hee giveth mee as grounded hence because it wanteth footing and come to his last maine charge And lastly saith hee thou goes on to plead for a deale more of thy Masters stuffe wherewithall hee houlds up his kingdome of pride and partialitie and such like stuffe as none ever pleaded for but the Devill and his Ministers who is afraid that his kingdowne should goe downe And thou sayes Sathan tells us that it is our dutie to observe the language held forth in Scripture and the example of Christ and his Apostles and upon paine of damnation not to varie from it And this thou brings to plead against speaking the word thou to a particular I answer If it be laid upon us as an injunction and that upon paine of damnation And no such injunction to be found in Scripture it must needs be of Sathan But James Naylor knoweth there is no such Injunction upon that penaltie in all the Scripture as to threaten damnation for using the custome of the Countrie wherein there is no sinne though they varie from the customes in old time As so If James Naylor should tell mee that in Regard Christ wore a coate without seame therefore I may not weare any but such and that upon paine of damnation I should also say that it came from the Devill nor doe I thinke that James will teach the Quakers to follow the example of Christ in this thing But hee saith hast thou been all along crying up Scriptures in thy booke for a Rule and is now the language of it and the examples of Christ and his Apostles therein become a perswasion of Sathan with thee hast thou not heere shewed what broode thou art one who preferres the Devills pride and the worlds fashions before the examples of Christ and his Apostles and would
THE CONVICTION Of JAMES NAYLOR and his black spirit demonstrated from his own confessions lyes evasions and contradictions in the maine points of Doctrine by him held forth against the truth In answer to a Book of his called Wickednesse weighed The which was writt in answer to a little Treatise called The Quakers quaking Principles examined and Refuted written by ELLIS BRADSHAVV This Treatise is therefore directed by way of appeale to all the truly Judicious to be weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary and to see in which end of the scales the wickednes lyeth his end or mine And also some Rules held forth whereby to try the spirits whether they be of God yea or no in case of visions or apparitions yea dreames or voyces whether speaking within or without As also some Scripture Rules for discerning the motions and lustings of the spirit and flesh each from the other that so wee might not be led blind-fold to destruction by any deluding spirits within us or without Written by ELLIS BRADSHAVVE Acts 13.9 10 11. Then Saul who also is called Paul filled with the holy Ghost sett his eyes on him And said Oh full of all subtiltie and all mischiefe thou child of the Devill thou enemy of all goodnesse how long wilt thou not cease to pervert the right wayes of the Lord And now behold the hand of the Lord is upon thee and thou shalt be blind not seeing the Sunne for a season c. LONDON Printed by M. S. for Lodowike Lloyd at the Castle in Cornwall 1656. THE CONVICTION of JAMES NAYLOR and his black spirit demonstrated from his own confessions lyes evasions and contradictions in the maine points of Doctrine by him held forth against the truth READERS James Naylor asserteth in his Title page concerning my booke that it is dedicated as I say unto his Highnesse the Lord Protector c. The which I say is true but what of that he saith nothing and therefore needeth no answer But further he saith that it is much boasted off by the Author but as little worth as the boast is great I answer I did commend it to ingage his Highnes to the reading of it least his multitude of buisinesse should cause him to neglect it And what of all that doth not James Naylor commend his Doctrines and Teachings and Judgements and Censures and tells us it is by the eternall light and Spirit of God that he holdeth them forth as you may see in any of his Bookes wherein we know he lyeth But it will appeare I therein speake the truth and nothing more And as for the worth of that Treatise when it is weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary it will appeare I did not over-value it in my commendations of it but of that let the readers judge Againe he saith also that it was my envie that carried mee with such envie against the innocent till I spake I knew not what concerning the Father and the Sonne the Word the Light and Spirit I answer though he Judge so of me whom in derision he calleth the man yet the truth is I care not to be Judged of James Naylor Nor for ought he knoweth not of mans Judgement But he that Judgeth me is the Lord Nor would I change my condition with James Naylor nor for ought he knoweth not with any man living on the earth And how then can James Naylor know that it was envie that carried me And how can I envie those I account off to be wicked and destinate to destruction for ought I yet see in them that in my apprehension are farre from innocency in the sight of God And how dare I then be envious against them or choose any of their wayes see Psal 37 1. Pro. 23.17 24.1 I shall not envie them till they be more innocent then I yet see them And therefore his censure of mee that I speake I know not what doth not trouble mee at all for I expected no better f om his lying spirit Though he cannot nor doth not in the least prove it so in any of his Answers And why should I beleeve it upon his owne testimony who beginneth with lyes in his Title page Againe hee saith That here is also some markes and maintenance of the true Ministers set downe and also of the false their fruits differing them accoring to Christs Rules in Scripture with diverse other things to keepe the simple from deceite All which when weighed in the ballance let the truth appeare for so I wish of God whether they be or no true or false according to Christs Rule in Scripture yea whether they be in deed to keepe the simple from deceite or clearely and really to deceive the simple and to make them also deceivers of others And againe he telleth us it is by a friend to the worke of God but an enemy to the Devills worke where it is found and pleaded for called of the world James Naylor To this I answer that if this were true what then should be the reason that hee blameth me in his second page for asking Why should not I whiles I am in the world endeavour to destroy the works of the Devill seeing he sayth of himselfe that he is an enemy to the worke of the Devill and if he be so he will labour to destroy it for it is doubtlesse lawfull and a following of Christ as much as in us lyeth to destroy the works of the Devill and none but Devills and their instruments will blame any man for so indeavouring nor call it a setting of himselfe to the stead of Christ for no man can either doe it or indeavour it what in him lyeth but through his grace and assistance and the power of his Spirit as so I never spake otherwise in all my life And he can and will for ought Naylor knoweth enable mee in some measure by his strength to doe it But if I be an exilted wretch and seeke to set my selfe in the stead of Christ as so he calleth mee I know he will not and therefore it is in vaine to indeavour it for hee giveth his grace to the humble And beholdeth the wicked as a farre off and as having no mind to Imploy them in any such service nor any such as are setled in their wickednesse and dare take the office of Christ and attribute it to themselves But the Quakers looke for such amongst themselves they are easily found And it is the Quakers spirit and not the Spirit of God that ever did or shall puffe men up to any such conceits or apprehension of themselves And what James Naylor may conceite of himselfe I well know not For something or other hee would intimate unto us when hee putteth that preamble before his name as in many of his Bookes to wit Called of the world James Naylor Now whether hee would have us thinke that hee is the Christ the sonne of the living God and that Christ that dyed at Jerusalem was
obey such particular Scriptures as he bringeth to their minds and applyeth and wresteth for his owne ends The Devill never bringeth Scriptures but to deceive thereby alwayes wresting them from their genuine sense and proper meanings as James Naylor might see if he were not blinde or had not sould himselfe for the Devills service And againe whereas he saith that one may have the letter of Scripture and not have the word and that the letter without the Spirit is dead page 4. I answer as before that the letter of the Scripture is the word of God though it is not Christ And that the letter of the Scripture is no where in Scripture called a dead letter but it is words of spirit and life to them that beleeve and receive them in love nor is the Spirit of God at any time withdrawne from his owne words nor doe they returne voyde but alwayes accomplish what he pleaseth and doe that for which he sent them And it is not the Resisting of his Word or Spirit nor both joyntly that can disparage the validitie thereof whether it be set home by the finger of his Spirit or that mens hardned hearts still remaine obdurate Nor will James Naylors Directorie to a light within be effectuall to any for the saving of their soules that doe not beleeve the Scriptures and receive them in love but have pleasure in unrighteousnesse but will rather indanger them to be deluded with a lying spirit and acted by it in stead of the Spirit of God and to be carried blind-fold to their greater sinne and condemnation And therefore what is that to the matter though Satan have the Scripture and have no good by it there being no promise therein for him or what if James Naylor hath it and finde no life in it but a meere dead letter in his apprehension in regard hee wresteth it and doth not love it and therefore cannot afford it so much as a good word having an enmitie against it not caring much if it were all burnt as it is very likely because it condemneth him in something or other that he loveth or desireth and will not part with in obedience thereunto but will rather runne the hazzard of loosing all or he will disparage and make voyde the Scripture that hath touched him Nay hee seemeth to mee rather to preferre his owne words and his owne writings above any in Scripture commending his owne as words that proceed immediately from the eternall Spirit full of life and power but the Scriptures carnall and dead and vaine yea vaine hee accounteth them to such who have not the Spirit already Though he cannot but know they are appointed of God as the cheife meanes for ministration of the Spirit and of life and power for what life and power can be communicated or administred to any man by ministration of men but from Scripture-grounds and those pretious promises therein contained through Christ Jesus in whom all the promises are yea and Amen and through whom onely wee have interest in them being all finners and so excluded from life as well as the Devill were it not for him that hath merited our salvation And therefore what a devillish doctrine is this to dehort all men from reading the Scriptures till they first obtaine the Spirit of God What other end can this doctrine aime at but to keepe them still under a spirit of bondage as sure there are none that are set free and have the spirit of life in them through the hearing of faith preached That will owne this doctrine to be of God but a doctrine of Devills And againe hee telleth mee that hee might shew my blindnesse in all other Scriptures that I quote were it needfull as instance that 2 Pet. 1.19 Wee have a more sure word of prophesie to which you doe well to take heed as to a light that shines in a darke place till the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your hearts Now it is true I quoted this Scripture as one amongst the rest against his assertion in his answers to Baxter to wit that the Scripture houlds out but one light and word the which I there denyed and proved it first from Mat. 5.14 16. To wit Yee are the light of the world and John 5.35 that John was a burning and a shining light and Psal 119.130 The entrance of thy words giveth light it giveth understanding unto the simple and then this of Peter Upon which I say that I suppose James Naylor will not acknowledge that he ever received any light from that sure word of prophesie as from a light shining in a darke place but onely some little braine knowledge of the bare letter else hee would not so reproach and disparage those that doe take heed to the sure word of prophesie till they be inlightned thereby in what they were darke and did not understand Now to all that I say in these words hee answereth not at all by way of contradiction but doth as much as confesse that hee was mistaken nor can hee possibly make that his assertion good against these Scriptures But hee heere undertakes to shew my blindnesse in quoting this Scripture to this purpose before-named to wit And this saith he you would have to be the letter of the old Prophets which shines in a darke place And so saith hee by thy doctrine the letter of the old Testament and in a darke place too is a surer word then what Peter heard God himselfe speake and were eye witnesses of his Majestie And this is all thou knowest of the spirit of prophesie the testimony of Jesus or the Scriptures that declare it To which I answer that I appeale to the Judgements and Consciences of all that know any thing of the spirit of prophesie or the testimonie of Jesus or the Scriptures that declare it Whether the Apostle doth not meane it of the old Prophesies of the old Testament when he thus speaketh yea I say the letter hee meant when hee so adviseth them and not the spirit onely of which the letter declares for the letter declares of the spirit and the spirit is the author and opener of the letter and that by the letter as an instrumentall meanes comparing Scripture with Scripture and spirituall things with spirituall things The Prophet Daniel himselfe understood by booke that the time of their captivitie was accomplished And James the Apostle produced the words of the Prophet Amos to Resolve that great doubt and difference amongst them Act. 15.15 To wit And to this agree the words of the Prophet as it is written c. Observe as it is written and so he Recites the very written letter for he knew by the letter what the words of the Prophet were because they were written And how else should wee have knowne the words of the Prophets if they had not been written and wee had seene or heard them read or recited those Prophets themselves being dead long since were they not written