habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia This is as much as can be demanded when we heare that nothing was done in the Church to wit by the Bishop without the advice of his Presbyters The same is affirmed by S. Hierome upon Titus i. 5. Antequam Diaboli instinctu studia in religione fierent diceretur in populis Ego sum Pauli ego Apollo ego Cephae communi consilio Ecclesiae gubernabantur In that S. Hierome thinketh there were no Bishops till Churches were forced to that course to avoid schismes it hath been shewed he is not in the right But in that he affirmeth that at first Churches were governed by common advise we may well heare him speak in so good company of witnesses Last of all S. Cyprian having said once for all Epist 6. Quando à primordio Episcopatûs mei nihil statuerim sine consilio vestro Presbyterorum Diaconorum sine consensu plebis meae privatá sententiâ gerere how well he observed it is yet to be seen in the passage of divers businesses related in his Epistles Out of which the like is to be conceived of the Presbyters of Rome by those things that are touched there And this is the true reason why many times especially among the most ancient Church-writers Bishop and Presbyters both are comprised in the same styles and names not because there were then no Bishops as some men imagine but because both States concurred in the same office Clemens in the Epistle aforesaid pag. 54. speaking of the Ministeries instituted by the Apostles saith thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is They made the first-fruits of believers Overseers and Ministers that is Bishops and Deacons of those that should believe It seemeth indeed that Clemens calleth the Presbyters Bishops because as yet there was no other Bishop there as was proved afore for so the word is used in S. Pauls Epistles and the Acts of the Apostles for the same reasons as hath been said But in Ignatius his Epistle to Hero his Deacon at Antiochia you have these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do nothing without the Bishops that is without the Presbyters who were indeed Bishops in Ignatius his absence when this is pretended to be written And be he who he will be that writ it I believe it will not often be found that Presbyters are called Bishops in any monument of Church-writers after this time unlesse it be in these words of Tertullian De praescript c. 3. Quid ergò si Episcopus si Diaconus si vidua c where putting the Deacon next to the Bishop he seemeth to comprise the Presbyter with him in the same style For afterwards the name of Bishops became appropriate to the heads of Presbyteries as we heard S. Hierome say of the Presbyters at Alexandria that the head whom they chose themselves out of their own number they named BISHOP of Alexandria Otherwise as it is well known that the name of SACERDOS is common to both estates in regard of the offices of Divine service which were performed by both so in regard of the government of the Church common to both are they many times comprised together in the common style of PRESBYTERS the name of their age or ANTISTITES 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 PRAEPOSITI and the like the names of their charge For as the Apostle maketh himself an Elder when he writeth to them in this style 1. Pet. i. 5. The Elders I exhort who am also an Elder so is the like to be observed in that well-known passage of Clemens Alexandrinus related by Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 23. concerning the youth which S. John the Apostle commended to the Bishop of a certain place Clemens proceeding in the relation addeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the Elder saith he taking the youth home to his house c. calling him a Presbyter whom he had named a Bishop but just afore So Tertullian Apologet. c. 39. describing what was wont to be done in the Assemblies of Christians addeth Praesident probati quique Seniores honorem non pretio sed testimonio adepti not meaning to tell us that there was no Bishop to be seen at these meetings for in his book De praescript where he nameth Polycarpus whom we alledged afore cap. 32. Bishop of Smyrna he speaketh as much of Bishops that succeded the Apostles in the rest of the Churches of their planting but comprising both ranks and estates in one name of ELDERS And that upon the reason specified in the Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. iii. 8. where he giveth the reason why the Apostle passeth straight from Bishops to Deacons Because saith he every Bishop is a Presbyter though every Presbyter is not a Bishop who is the chief of Presbyters And the true S. Ambrose Offic. i. 20. Viduarum virginum domos nisi visitandi gratiâ juniores adire non est opus hoc cum Senioribus hoc est cum Episcopo vel si opus est cum Presbyteris With the Elders saith he that is with the Bishop or Presbyters Justine Martyr in his second Apology relating the orders of Christians in their Assemblies having spoken of reading the Scriptures Then saith he the Reader having done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler maketh a speech of instruction to the people exhorting them to imitate what was read And again of the Eucharist Then saith he bread and wine is offered to the Ruler 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Was it the Bishop alone or the Presbyters alone that preached and celebrated the Eucharist Sure both did it and the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was chosen on purpose by Justine to comprise both The same is to be observed in the words of S. Augustine Hom. ult ex quinquaginta cap. 11. Veniat peccator ad Antistites per quos illi in Ecclesia claves ministrantur à Praepositis sacrorum accipiat satisfactionis suae modum ANTISTITES in Ecclesia is not the Bishop alone but the Bishop and the Presbyters Hegesippus in Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 20. relateth how some of our Lords kindred were brought afore Domitian upon suspicion of danger to the State in regard of their title to the Kingdome but dismissed by him upon notice of their profession of life in tilling their grounds with their own hands tried by the hardnesse of them which it had wrought These saith Hegesippus were hereupon chosen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be leaders of Churches as both Cousins of our Lord and his witnesses comprehending both Bishop and Presbyters in one title As in Ignatius ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put in one word to expresse Bishops and Presbyters both as the circumstance of the place will evidence To this we must adde the words of Ireneus iv 43. Wherefore saith he it behoveth us to obey the Elders that are in the Church which have received according to the Fathers pleasure the certain grace of truth with
preaching in the assemblies of Christians at that time so farre as we understand by the Apostle went more by mens gifts then by their places in the Church Reade the fourteenth chapter of the first to the Corinthians throughout and consider what great use there was of the gifts of prophecying and speaking strange languages in their assemblies which the Apostle there regulateth sure you will never imagine for there is not a syllable to intimate it that these were all Presbyters ordinary Ministers in the Church The like must be said of the gifts reckoned vers 8. The word of Wisdome the word of Knowledge Discerning spirits and the like of the gifts of Teaching and Exhorting Rom. xii 7 8. of Pastours and Doctours mentioned by the Apostle Ephes iv 14. The Office of the Presbyters at Thessalonica the Apostle recommendeth to the brethren there in these terms 1. Thess 5. 12. We beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you And to esteem them very highly in love for their works sake But we are not bound to think them all the same persons whose graces he recommendeth when he addeth vers 19. 20. Quench not the Spirit Despise not prophesying Acts xiii 1. There were in the Church of Antiochia Prophets and Teachers and of them they were that gave Paul and Barnabas imposition of hands And 1. Tim. iv 14. these are those that prophesied of him and Presbyters they were I suppose that gave him imposition of hands with the Apostle And so it was argued from hence afore that the Spirit of Prophesie rested upon those Presbyteries But that all such Prophets were Presbyters or all Presbyters such Prophets neither is it written in Gods book nor of it self credible in such varietie of graces specified which all being given for edification and used in the assemblies to that purpose must either rest in the rank of ordinary Ministers or be counted personall graces whether miraculous or otherwise used for the edification of the Church in supplement of their indeavours which have served the turn in after ages He that writ the Commentaries upon S. Pauls Epistles under S. Ambrose his name upon Ephes iv 10. having laboured to accommodate the gifts there specified to the Ministeries then in use in the Church is at length driven to this point Tamen postquam omnibus lociâ— Ecclesiae sunt constitutae officia ordinata aliter composita res est quà m coeperat Primùm enim omnes docebant omnes baptizabant quibuscunqâ—â—diebus vel temporibus fuisset occasuâ— And after a while Vt ergò crescere plebs multiplicaretur omnibus intâ— initia concessum est evangelizare baptizare Scripturas in Ecclesia explanare That which he saith of aâ—â— persons publishing the Gospel is justified by that which we reade Act viii 4. Therefore they that were scatered abroad went everywhere preaching the word And again Acts xi 19 Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as farre as Phoenice and Cyprus and Antiochia preaching the Word to none but unto the Jews onely That which he saith of expounding the Scriptures that is speaking in the Church will be justified no lesse if it be referred to that variety of gifts specified out of the Apostle most an end miraculous and concerning that time the use whereof was for edification in the assemblies And the reason that is to be given for this must needs appear very considerable Because that among men chosen out of those that were newly converted to the faith in their elder years for which they are called PRESEYTERS and that in respect of other kind of abilities tending to other parts of their office there should be found men fit to speak in publick assemblies upon humane parts and indeavours so as to preserve the decorum and reverence of so great a work is beyond the compasse of common discretion to imagine these qualities being not often found but in those that are habituated to them from their youth Do but look on those of our Lords kindred that confessed him before Domitian and therefore were made leaders of Churches as was related before from Hegesippus and think whether men whose hands were hardned with the plough already struck in years were fit to make Preachers when they were made Rulers of Churches So farre is it from us to think that in the cradle of the Church no Presbyter was made but for his abilities in preaching Let us now look back a little upon the platform pretended and ask what commission men have to turn temporary indowments into perpetuall places or according to personall gifts and graces to distinguish oecumenicall offices And yet it will not appear that ever Pastours were distinguished from Doctours by the Apostle For he never said that Christ hath given some Pastours some Doctours but his words are Ephes iv 11. that he gave some Pastours and Doctours having said afore that he gave some Apostles some Evangelists some Prophets distinguishing those but comprising these If Teaching and Preaching must make two offices as then they were two graces why shall not Exhorting come in for a share and demand that there may be an office instituted for the purpose of it as well as for Teaching which it standeth in equipage with Rom xii 7 8 why should not the word of Wisdome and the word of Knowledge do the like for these mentioned 1. Cor. xii 8. are of perpetuall use although Prophesies and strange languages were but for the time There is one good reason to be given and no more Because perpetuall Ministeries are one thing temporary Gifts are another thing Those we know by the institution of them in Scripture by the office of them specified in the Acts and in the Epistles by the practice of them in all ages of the Church those we know were in time of the Apostle but not instituted for Ministeries because not continued The Office of Presbyters we know was both for Government and Teaching Both are found in S. Peters exhortation to the Presbyters of his charge 1. Pet. v. 2. feeding the flock and overseeing it both in S. Pauls charge to the Presbyters of Ephesus Acts xx 28. and afterwards both in the qualities of Bishops that is as is acknowledged of Presbyters wherein Timothy is instructed by the Apostle 1. Tim. iii. 2 5. both conteined in that very passage that is alledged to bring in a difference of Presbyters 1. Tim. v. 17. For those Elders that rule well are such as labour in the word and doctrine Why might not the Apostle then difference Presbyters by the execution of their functions as well as by the functions themselves Why might not some Presbyters shew more diligence in the most eminent point of the office taking speciall pains in the Word and Doctrine which speciall pains the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth and yet others be counted worthy of double
not yet made therefore he did not intend there should be any such in the Church Rather let me argue that because S. Paul left two of his principall Disciples in two principall places with charge to plant Presbyteries as there was means to propagate Churches therefore he gave a pattern of that which these Disciples and all the Church was to do afterwards in settling the government of those Churches in the Presbyteries of them and in their heads which themselves were for the time And this we shall find was done in good time in the Churches of Timothies charge if we take but a short consideration of the beloved Disciple John the Apostle and Evangelist what we find concerning him in Scriptures or otherwise received and credible in this nature He lived longest of all the Disciples as is said and he will easily shew us Bishops over the Churches of Timothies charge for such without doubt were the seven Churches of Asia unto whom the Apostle sending from our Lord seven Epistles ii and iii. chapt of his Revelation directeth them to the Angels of those Churches a style not competible to a person of common rank and the act of directing Epistles to one in the name and behalf of the whole Church arguing the eminence of the head fit to answer for the body he representeth Herewith agree the words of Clemens Alexandrinus in Eusebius iii. 23. concerning this Apostle that being returned from Patmus to Ephesus he used upon request to go among the neighbour-nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is in some places to constitute Bishops to wit where there were Presbyteries afore that yet had none in some to found whole Churches in others to ordain a Clergie out of such as were signified by the Spirit as we reade of S. Paul and Timotheus For will you have these to be Bishops according to the use of the word in S. Paul where it is all one with Presbyters Sure we must needs think of such as his own writings make Angels of Churches Ignatius that was his Disciple according to some in all his Epistles specifieth and sometimes by name the Bishops of some the same Churches and some of others together with their Presbyteries and in particular Onesimus Timothie's successour at Ephesus Tertullian and Ireneus the most ancient we can alledge have named Polycarpus in particular made Bishop of Smyrna by this Apostle It is not possible to say more in this case So often as we find mention of government in particular Churches in Scripture so often we meet with Presbyteries or the heads of Presbyteries Apostles themselves or deriving their charge from the Apostles Nay it is very much not pretending that Bishops came on otherwise then to be in stead of the Apostles over particular Churches that there is so much to be said for their office out of Scriptures all written during their time CHAP. V. The Presbyterie at Antiochia S. Peter and S. Paul heads of the Church there Likewise of that at Rome The difference about their next Successours Epiphanius his conjecture upon it Another Clemens succeeded S. Peter and Linus S. Paul The succession of the Apostles there is unquestionable THe Church of Antiochia is remembred next to that of Jerusalem in the Acts of the Apostles but of the government thereof we have nothing so distinct or expresse in Scripture Yet this we reade Acts xiii 2. Now there were in the Church at Antiochia certain prophets and teachers And as they ministred unto the Lord and fasted the holy Ghost said Seperate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away That these Prophets and Teachers were all of them Presbyters of that Church is more then can be affirmed because it is nowhere set down But when we reade that they ministred unto the Lord which must be understood of the service of God in their assemblies especially in celebrating the Eucharist and gave imposition of hands we find among the number of them the works of ordinary Ministers when there was no higher rank then that of Presbyters able to do the like For as concerning the Heads of this Church we must have recourse to Ignatius his Epistle ad Magn. where he useth these words For at Antiochia the Disciples were first called Christians Paul and Peter founding the Church And in the Epistle ad Antioch if it be his as the other unquestionably is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Ye are Pauls and Peters Disciples Remember Euodius that first had the rule of you put into his hands by the Apostles Be he what he will be that writ this let me be bold to say it agreeth marvellous well with what hath been said and with the Scripture In which it is plain there were at the beginning two congregations of Christians at Antiochia one of the Circumcision the other converted from the Gentiles because S. Peter Gal. ii 12. fearing those of the Circumcision withdrew himself and ate no more with the Gentiles In regard of the care of which two congregations performed by S. Peter and S. Paul according to the division agreed upon Gal. ii 9. the words of Ignatius are to be verified where he maketh both Apostles founders of the Church at Antiochia Who finding themselves imployed in other parts of the world took the same course with this Church which S. Paul did with those he commended to Timothy and Titus and put both congregations by that time united and concorporate in one under the charge of Euodius predecessour to Ignatius These two Apostles are usually counted founders of the Church at Rome as well as of that of Antiochia Ireneus iii. 3. Fundantes itaque instituentes beati Apostoli Ecclesiam Lino Episcopatum Ecclesiae administrandae tradiderunt Hujus Lini Paulus in iis quae sunt ad Timotheum Epistolis meminit Succedit autem ei Anacletus Post eum tertio loco ab Apostolis Episcopatum sortitur Clemens Where you see he referreth the foundation of that Church to both the Apostles as doth Dionysius also of Corinth some hundred and twentie years after their death in Eusebius Eccles hist. iii. 26. and others of later stamp sans number Whereupon Epiphanius Haer. 27. reckoning the succession of the Bishops of Rome putteth Peter and Paul in the first place But yet observe further the difference between the words of Ireneus which put Linus after the Apostles and the Latine Church which according to S. Hierome Catal. Script in CLEM. reckoneth Clemens in that place which Tertullian the most ancient of that language lib. De Praescript averreth To which difference we may ascribe the confusion that Baronius hath observed in the Pontificall book under the name of Pope Damasus an ancient piece but pieced indeed out of severall writings and crosse to one another divers times As for the purpose when it
but under two or three witnesses Them that sinne rebuke before all that others also may have fear But having hitherto shewed that our Lord in the Gospel hath appointed matters of particular offense to come before the Consistory of Bishop and Presbyters That the Apostles themselves in divers matters belonging to the Government of the Church used their assistance That in the Primitive times of the Church even under the Apostles matters of Censure and Ordination both were wont to passe by the Presbyters but in the Assemblies of Christian people Let me referre this to al indifferent persons to judge whether the same course of proceeding were in likelyhood observed in the censure of Presbyters The Apostles direction regulating what information to admit is directed to Timothie alone for the meaning is not that two or three should be present when it is put in but that it should not be admitted but as the Syriack translateth it upon the mouth that is the word of two or three witnesses But the censure of reproof is prescribed to passe in the congregation when he saith them that sinne that is them that are found in fault rebuke before all that others may have fear no otherwise then the censure of the Apostle did and was prescribed to do 1. Cor. v. 4. 2. Cor. ii 6. and therefore we are to think that the examination of such causes must passe as others of like nature by him with the Presbyters to whom the Apostle had assigned a charge of governing the Church there Acts xx 28 35. So the keyes of the Church given to S. Peter and to the Apostles were neverthelesse intended to be exercised by the Church as hath been said So the charge of excommunicating Hereticks is directed to Titus alone Titus iii. 10. But we have no reason therefore to imagine that Titus is directed to proceed otherwise in it then we know the Church was wont to proceed in Censures of that nature according to that which hath been said And so it is in the case that followeth a little after verse 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man neither be partaker of other mens sinnes where the rule of Ordinations is directed to Timothy alone yet have we no cause to believe that it was practiced by him otherwise then according to the form aforesaid joyning with him the Ptesbyters in imposition of hands as was practiced by the Apostle The eminence of their place is to be acknowledged because the Apostles instructions for managing these matters are directed to them alone But their course of proceeding must be measured by that which we know otherwise CHAP. XIV Retaining the primitive form Bishops cannot be abolished How Aerius is counted an Heretick All displeasure against Bishops occasioned by defect of Presbyteries To what purpose they might be restored THat which hath been said being intended to represent the form delivered in Scripture by the agreement of Historicall truth and primitive practice concerneth no more as every man sees then the government of Mother-churches contained in Mother-cities Because that is all the Scripture hath expressed But what influence and effect this ought to have in the present state of the Church now that Dioceses are divided Churches built and congregations assigned is not for a private person to particularize unlesse he meant to build Churches as some men do Castles in the air Let it be enough to say thus much in generall which every man must think that believeth what hath been said to be true that he that aimeth at the Primitive form and that which cometh nearest the institution of our Lord and his Apostles must not think of destroying Bishops but of restoring their Presbyteries Were it but an humane Ordinance of yesterday established by due course of right let me be bold to say that if Aerius withdraw his submission to it he must come within Epiphanius his list of Hereticks not understanding an Heretick in S. Augustines sense wherein Tertullian in his book de praescript went afore him to be none but he that will not believe some point of doctrine necessary as the means of salvation to be believed but according to the latitude of the word taking all to be Hereticks that make Sects and assemble themselves apart besides the Church of God lawfully settled This sense is used in Can. 6. Conc. 1. Constantinop where they are counted Hereticks that hold the sound faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this latitude it seemeth Epiphanius comprised because he reckoneth the Quartadecimani in the roll of Hereticks These when the position whereupon the separation is grounded is not of weight setting their separation aside to separate them from the invisible Church are since according to the Authors named afore by a proper term called Schismaticks though Hereticks in the proper sense separate no lesse then they do And of this crime my earnest desire is that those which have separated themselves from this Church of England upon this quarrel of government by Bishops or the like unjust or unsufficient causes may stand acquitted though how they will acquit themselves of it I cannot yet perceive But if the rank of Bishops over their Presbyters be not onely a just humane Ordinance but estated in possession of sixteen hundred years without deceit or violence at the beginning let me have leave to think it will be hard to shew a better title of humane right for any estate upon the earth How much more when the possession is avouched to have been delivered from the hands and time of the Apostles must it needs seem strange that the successours of their place should be destroyed by the sons of their faith Be it pardonable for our neighbours and Brethren of the reformed Churches abroad to have overseen the succession of the Apostles because they could not discern it as they found it blended with such abundance of accessories especially in the persons of men that hated to be reformed But among us there hath been time to plead the right to the quick and though not without eagernesse of debate which interesse breedeth yet alwayes with advantage to the true tenure And among the multitude of speech that this time hath bred we have heard little or nothing as yet of new reasons to quell the cause with So that before advancing new plea the old right descending from such hands standeth now in as good terms as ever heretofore As for the point of peace within our selves and correspondence with our neighbours be it considered how large S. Hierom of all Church writers least favourable to the Order as he that found himself pinched with the Bishop of Jerusalem hath been neverthelesse in acknowledging that the peace of particular Churches could not be preserved without it To which we must adde the remembrance of so many happy dayes as this Church since the Reformation hath seen without such ruptures as have fallen out in other parts by the benefit of it among a people alwayes observed to be of all