might appear to all That he might shew himself approved unto God A workman that needeth not to be ashamed 1 Tim. 4.13 14 15. with 2 Tim. 2.15 But give me leave to speak without offence You seem to me in this point to take too much liberty in a serious cause to play upon equivocation It is true in studying a Sermon the Preacher useth his Invention and Judgement and in that sence his Sermon may be called mans Invention But you are not ignorant we speak in this cause of such inventions of men as God hath given neither Commandement nor direction for in his Word In which sence a studied Sermon is no more a mans Invention than a studied answer which Solomon commendeth as a path of the Righteous Prov 15.28 The like may be said of the next instance which is Interpretation of Scriptures as also a conceived Prayer Interpretation of Scripture is from a spiritual gift which God hath given and commanded to be used for the edification of his Church 1 Cor. 14.26 Nehem. 8.8 So is Prayer conceived from a spirit and gift of prayer which is to be used also and attended to as a principall part of the Ministeriall office 1 Cor. 14.15 Acts 6.4 Obj If it be said but I may take an Interpretation or Translation of Scripture from others and therefore a form of Prayers from others also Answ 1. There is a broad difference betwixt an Interpretation of Scripture as it is put for translation of Scripture and read Prayer for reading of Scripture in the Church is an ordinance of God so is the reading of it in a tongue which the people understandeth and therefore it is an ordinance of God that the Word be read in some translation But the reading of a prayer for the prayers of the Church is no ordinance of God therefore there is not the like ground from the Word to make use of prayer-Prayer-Books to read prayers as to make use of a printed Bible for the reading of the Word 2. Every Minister that hath understanding of the originall languages wherein the Scripture was written ought to make use of his own gift in examining the truth of the translation which he readeth unto the Church which will not be allowed in prescript Lyturgies As for the division of Scriptures into Sections and Chapters and the reading of one part this Week and the other next It is certain division of Scripture is antient even from the times of the Prophets And evident it is the whole Scripture cannot be read over in one day And therefore it is from God that some divisions of Scriptures be observed according to the variety of matter therein contained and distinctly devideth it selfe and consequently it is from God that one part of it be read at this Assembly another at the next because all cannot be read at once And yet we know no warrant that one Church should prescribe another what division to make of the Scriptures or what part of it should be read this day and what the next what God hath lest free let no man limit Disc Preaching is commanded of God so is interpretation of Scripture but phrase and method of Interpretation is of men The matter of the Scripture is the immediate Word of God but the Word and phrase which are Vessels to convey this truth to us I speak of Translations not of the Originall Text are humane and not of God by immediate inspiration God commandeth us to call upon him both in publique and private but the words in which we expresse our desires are our own both in conceived and stinted Prayer Answ It is true preaching of the Word and the Interpretation of the Word are of God but the phrase and Method is of men yet so of men as they have commandement and warrant from God to preach and interpret the Word and not in what phrase and Method please themselves nor in such words as mans wisdome teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth 1 Cor. 2.13 Nor so from men as that the men of one Church may devise a set form thereof and binde all men as well of other Churches as their own to this or that manner of phrase or Method the like is to be said of prayer also But when your Discourse saith that the words wherein we expresse our desires are our own in conceived and stinted prayer you might as well have said that the words wherein we deliver our Sermons are our own both in conceived Sermons and in stinted Homilies Disc These two kinds of Prayer conceived and stinted agree in their Author Matter Form Object end and common nature the one is no more an Invention of man than the other so then devised Worship is unlawfull but not a worship in a form of words devised Answ And so might we say of prayer to God before an Image and prayer without an Image they are two kinds of prayer that agree in their Author matter form object end and common nature yet we cannot say the one is more an invention of men than the other As devised Worship is unlawfull so are devised forms and means of worship unlawfull also of which sort such set forms of words be as are devised and composed by the officers of one Congregation and imposed upon the brethren of another Congregation for the forms of their prayers Answ 2. We cannot say as you do that such conceived and stinted forms agree in their Authors for I am not the Author of the matter of that prayer which another man composed and was the Author of and is now stinted and prescribed to me no more then I can be said to be the Author of that Sermon which another man indited Battyllus was not the Authour of Virgil's Verses Though he resiteth them as his own Virgil justly challengeth his own out of his hand Hos ego versiculas feci c. Nor can we say that such conceived or stinted forms agree in their form if by form be meant externall form it is not the same form of walking to walk with Crutches and to walk upright It is not the same form of prayer to pray with help of mens inventions and with such helps only as the Holy Ghost supplyeth which also hindereth that they cannot be said to agree in their common nature The one being a lawfull form of prayer the other unlawfull And therefore when your Discourse saith that conceived and stinted prayer the one is no more the invention of man than the other we cannot understand the truth of that for in conceived prayer the Spirit of God within us teacheth us what to pray And for that the Ordinance and Word of God is plain Rom. 8.26 But in stinted prayer the matter is not suggested or indited to us by the Spirit of God within us but prescribed and imposed upon us by the will wisdome and authority of men whom the Holy Ghost hath not called to such a work as therefore a devised worship is unlawfull
the Crutch from the lame and bread from the hungry Answ In case a distressed soul do meet with a prayer penned by a godly and well experienced Christian and do find his own case pithily and amply deciphered and anatomized therein we deny not but his heart and affections may go along with it and say Amen to it And thus far may find it a lawfull help to him but if you set a part such a prayer to support him as a crutch in his prayers as without which he cannot walk straight and upright in that duty or if he that penned that prayer or others that have read it do injoyn it upon him and forbid him to pray especially with others unlesse he use that form this instead of a crutch will prove a cudgell to break the bones of the Spirit in prayer and force him to halt in worshipping God after the precepts of men as it hath been said before so it may be again remembred here a man may help his spirit in meditation of his mortallity by beholding a dead mans scalp cast in his way by Gods providence but if he should set a part a deaths head or take it up as injoyned to him by others never to meditate or conserre with others about his mortality and estate of another life but in the sight and use of the deaths head such a soul shall find but a dead heart and a dead devotion from such a means of mortification if some forms of Prayer especially such as gave occasion to this Dispute do now seem to be as bread to the hungry we say no more but this then hungry souls will never be starved that never want store of such like bread as this is Disc The ample and particular laying out of our necessities doth ease the heart and move affections and when this may be better done by the help of a Book in prayer then of our selves it is senselesse to accuse the use hereof as a lip-labour and a quenching of the spirit he stinteth not the Spirit that labours to blow the coals of grace c. Answ It is true he stinteth not the Spirit nor quencheth him that useth any means sanctified by the Spirit to blow the coals of grace but this we deny that a stinted form of prayer upon a book devised by men and enjoyned to be used as the prayers of a Christian soul is a means sanctified by the Spirit to blow the coals of his grace or that the repeating of such a set form of Prayer though ample and particular in laying out his necessities will ease his heart or move his affections according to God God doth not delight ordinarily to breath in the Masterly injunctions of brethren upon brethren or of one Congregation upon another especially in such things whereof we have neither precept nor president in the Word Disc He doth not substitute his Christian friend in the place of the word and Spirit who not able to lift up his soul to God by reason of straightnesse of heart and grievous pressure doth crave his help and assistance in prayer and may not a godly Book supply the want of a Christian companion Answ It is an ordinance of God to crave the help of the Prayers of our brethren and to joyn with them shew the like warrant for Prayer upon a book prescribed to us and then we will grant a godly book may supply even in this case the lacke of a Christian companion If a Minister be not able to preach by reason of the straightnesse of his heart and grievous pressure he may get his Christian friend to preach for him but he may not make use of a godly homily enjoyned to him by others to supply the lack of a Christian friend Disc Why should it be a sin to read or pronounce a godly form of Prayer is it for that it is read and pronounced or because a man cannot lift up his heart in faith unto God when he uttereth his requests in a stinted form of words to assigne the former is superstition To say the latter is to offend against common experience Answ We do not say it is a sin to read or pronounce a godly form of Prayer but to read a form of Prayer devised by others and to set it a part to read being devised by others enjoyned to me as my Prayer This is sin not because it is pronounced for all publique Prayer is pronounced nor alwayes in private because it is read for as hath been said a man may go along in his spirit and be affected with some Prayer which occasionally he readeth and may lift up his own heart in it to the Lord but a sin it is as it is set apart by himselfe for his Prayer or as it is so enjoyned to him by others and in publique it is of sin both because it is read as the Prayer of the Church and so another book brought into the Church besides Gods Book And because it is devised not by the gift of Gods Spirit in themselves but in others and also because by other it is prescribed or enjoyned to be read as the service and worship of God in another Church For we do not find that ever God gave warrant either for the offering up of read Prayers to God as the ordinary prayers of the Church and least of all for Prayers prescribed and enjoyned by one Church unto another It is so far off from superstition to affirm this that we look at it as a superstition to deny it for to speak of superstition according to the true nature of it and not according to the old Etymologie If superstition be cultus supra statutum there is none of all these kinds whether as read upon a book in the Congregation for their ordinary Prayers or devised by men of other Congregations for that end or as imposed upon us by them but they are all of them and each one of them cultus supra statutum worships and helps and forms of worship which never came into Gods heart to allow for his statute and worship Disc Will any man object that read prayer is not Gods Ordinance It hath been answered already that prayer is the ordinance of God but whether our prayers be onely conceived in heart or uttered by words whether in our own or other words whether by pronouncing or reading that is not appointed when spake he one word of prayer within Book or without in this or that form of words Answ Reply hath been made hereto before as Prayer is an Ordinance of God so are all the lawfull helps and means and forms of Prayer God hath plainly expressed his allowance of Prayer conceived in the heart and of prayer uttered and pronounced by words both in our own words and in the words of others whom God calleth to be our mouths in the present assembly but of set forms of read prayer devised by men of another Congregation and prescribed and imposed upon others it may
the devises of men as with Salt Cream Spittle Crosse and the like so is the case here aprescript form of prayer may consist of lawfull fit petitions and be delivered with a faithfull holy humble spirit and so be truly and properly prayer and yet fall short of some rule requisite to be attended to make it a lawfull worship of God to wit if it be offered to God in a strange Tongue or before an Image or by the help of an Image such as we conceive a prescript form of words to be injoyned and imposed to be read upon a book for the Prayers of the Church Answ 2. If by Matter and Form be meant not only Internall and Essential forme but externall also Then we deny that a prescript form of prayer injoyned to be read upon a Book is a lawfull externall form of prayer no more than a prescript form of Homilies is a lawfull externall form of preaching These Answers seem to us sufficient and unavoidable and we rest in them but the other Answers which are alledged by you in your Discourse and much and often beaten upon you though it was delivered by one whose works praise him in the gates throughout all the Churches of the Saints yet we do not insist upon it as not willing to turn aside to unnecessary disputes stinted set forms we do not look at as lawfull to them that need them but unlawfull to them that need them not For though there be a good use of the distinction in this case as we shall see anon yet not in this case where the necessity ariseth not from Gods Commandement but from the sinfull defect of the Creature for supply whereof God hath ordained sufficient help other wayes But yet in reply which you make to the Answer you give a distinction liable to the same exception which your self take against that Answer For that Answer consisting of a distinction of arbitrary and necessary help Your Discourse rejecteth it as a distinction not grounded upon the Word of God which in Divinity is as you say an unwritten tradition and is this distinction of your own any better Helps say you and surtherances in Gods Service are of two sorts some in nature and use the same with the true worship of God instituted by his highnesse and these are unlawfull because they are devised and others concern the Method Phrase of Speech outward manner of celebration onely as meer circumstances and these are not forbidden A distinction ungrounded upon the Word so no better that an unwritten tradition and withall both the parts imply a fals-hood for a prayer which a Minister deviseth for his own and his peoples use before the Sermon is in nature and use the same with the true worship of God instituted by his highnesse yet it is not unlawfull because it is devised for it is devised by him who is called of God to devise and indite it as David did Psal 45. v. 1. and all the rest and that by help of the Spirit of prayer again on the other part a prescribed Homilie doth conserve the method phrase of speech outward manner of celebration only as a meer circumstance yet no Word of God ever allowed it to be read for the publick preaching of the Word unto the people It is true which the Discourse speaketh of the Method of Sermons devised or studied by such as Preach them there may be some liberty whether to preach by doctrine reason and use or some other way the like may be said of forms of Chatechismes Blessings and Baptismes But the reason of this liberty is because we find in Scripture severall forms of all these and therefore we limit or prescribe no set forms to any Pauls Epistle to the Romans is carried along by Doctrine reasons and uses and so are sundry more of his Epistles But Christs Sermon on the Mount is carried in another Method The Apostles Catechise is of one form Heb. 6.1 2. Davids of another Psal 34.11 12 13 14. The Priests Blessings were of one form Numb 6.23 to 26. The Apostles Blessings of another 2 Cor. 12.13.2 Thes 3.17 18. Heb. 13.20 21. Jude 24.25 The forms of baptizing did also sometimes vary some using the words of our Saviour Math. 28.19 Others another form of words Acts 19.5 The thing is this where God hath used variety of forms he leaveth us at liberty to use that one form or the other But to gather a liberty to prescribe and limit a set form of any of these where God hath not limited is to pervert and abuse the power of the keyes of Christs Kingdome to wit to bind where Christ looseth but your Objection is as you say answered by others and that more safely Disc That mens inventions in the service of God are forbidden in the second Commandement But Book Prayer is an Invention of men To this your Discourse replyeth by retorting upon a former Answer which we said afore we did not make use of in this case You reply again the Objection it self is of no weight for by this reason all set forms of Catechismes studied Sermons Interpretations of Scripture divisions of it into Sections and Chapters reading one part this week and another the next conceived prayer it self may be disallowed Answ Touching set forms of Catechisme we do willingly approve diligent attendance to the Catechising of youth and Novices in any form tending to Edification but to devise and prescribe a set form of words wherein all the Questions and Answers shall run and no other we know no warrant for that from Scripture if God would have his people limited to a set form of words in catechizing he would himself have prescribed some set form of his own inspiration which might be defective in no principles nor incommodious in any expression 2. What though there might be some colour to put a set form of words of catechisme into the mouths of Children and Novices the better to help their memory and capacities will it therefore argue it to be a reasonable service of God to put a set form of words and prayers into the mouths of Ministers to help their memories and capacities in powring out their own and the Churches Petitions unto God Studied Sermons are of another nature it is an Ordinance of God that Sermons should be studied before preached Jude made it his whole study 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to write his Epistle Jude 3. How much more ought we to make it our whole study to preach who are not so immediately inspired Solomon gave good heed and sought out to find and set in order fit words and matter for the edification of the people Eccles 12.9 10. and behold lesse than Solomon are Ministers here though in respect of the cleer discerning the Mysteries of Christ The least in the Kingdom of God is greater than he Timonthy is exhorted to give attendance to reading Meditation Doctrine to meditate thereon to give himself wholly to them that his profiting