also whereof hee hath done much good in Gods Vineyard in labouring to stay that bloody persecution on foot against the poor and Innocent yet he hath much swerved from the Truth of this subject of Witches and Witchcraft in that hee yeildeth at all to the common contagion of Error that hath defiled the World not that Witches are for that were my Error to deny seeing the Scriptures do manifestly condemn them but that Witches in the Scripture sence are such as have made a familier compact with the Devill and receive power from him to kill and the like I wonder but that the hour of darknesse is not yet fully past that so many Ministers should still wander in this darksome imagination what least intimation or description of such a kind of Witch hath God given us in the Scriptures or of Devills in the corporall shape of Imps making a familier compact with any of mankind or any ground for such imaginary whimses of mans brain what consequence is there in Logicall dispute or in Theologicall Principles that hee that denieth these phantasies denieth that there is a Devill and so finally that there is a God the Scripture teacheth us that there is a God and likewise a Devill or Devills but what Scripture speaketh of a familiar Devill or Jmp or that a Witch can kill by Witchcraft or hurt either body or goods by Witchcraft by the Devills help either by Gods permission or without I rather think that this forsaking of the Scriptures and delivering for Doctrin the traditions of Antichristian Popish Writers is a forsaking of God and consequently a denying of God hee saith hee could instance from story how many have had no Faith of Witches being till their bewitched body or goods hath served to unwitch them of their opinions and conceit is this a Theologicall way of Argument to ground a Doctrin upon vain reports and phantasmes without Scriptures yea flat contrary to the Scriptures Deut. 32.39 1 Sam. 2.6 7. dare any man contrary to those and many places of Scripture when hee is afflicted in body or goods ascribe that to a Witch upon vain Phantasie and carnal reason and superstitious imaginations and foolish traditions without Scriptures which by the Scriptures we are taught to ascribe only to God yes men dare do so and Ministers dare teach so And this is the condemnation that light is come into the world and men love darkness rather than light But now to speak to the man himself of whom I have written sparingly Mr. Gaule if this work of mine shall come to your hand as yours hath come to mine be not angry with me for writing Gods Truth I am sure you shall get more estimation among true Beleevers more favour with God and do more good in Christs Vine-yard by acknowledging your error and by embracing Gods Truth than by being carried away with the streams of these flouds of iniquity that have over-flowed the Christian world You say in your second case pag. 24. It is hard to observe any specifique difference of Witches in which you acknowledge the subject to be difficult to write of Sir I have given you full specifical descriptions of them according to the Scriptures then although Sir you be learned in other things disdain not to learn of me the truth of this subject I doubt not but if you had first read my Book your own Book had been more perfect Suffer not a Witch to live Prestigiatricem a Jugling person that worketh false Miracles to seduce the people to Idolatry Exod. 22.18 Jofias destroying of Witches 2 King 23 24. what was it but pulling down the Idols with their Adjuncts Oraclers and South-sayers that were the Idol Priests that seduced the people Examine the places which are your own quotations then Sir I intreat you in Christs name that as you have been fervent for Gods Cause with Apollos Act. 18.25 so learn of me the way of God more perfectly as he did of the Disciples vers 26. fare-well Sir the Spirit of God be your familiar Spirit to guide you in the truth Non quis Sed quid Master Giffard answered THere is yet another Book come to my hand written by Mr. George Giffard an able Minister of Gods Word in Maldon which because the common way of some mans arguing is by questioning what say you to this and what say you to that Author therefore I will give a brief description of his Tenents which are chiefly three the first is That a VVitch can not by a Familiar or by any craft any way hurt or weaken the life health or estate of any man by bewitching with disease or infirmity either Man or Beast or hurting his Goods and this he proveth plainly by Scripture and Reason as I have also done in my Second Book of this Discourse The second Tenent is That VVitches have Imps and Familiars The third Tenent is That these Familiars do nothing really but only do deceive the VVitch by making her beleeve they do that which cometh to pass upon Man or Beast by Divine providence but for these two last Tenents he doth not prove by Scripture as he did the first nor yet affirm for truth but only being overcome by the strength of common report grounded upon the Confession of such as have been executed he only yeeldeth to those strong delusions which have deceived many Hypothetically arguing if Witches have such Imps or Familiars they are only deceived by them but herein is he not confident and therefore these two last Tenents being not confirmed by him do confirm nothing and for the first of the two That VVitches have Imps is sufficiently disproved in my Second Book and that all their Confessions are no argument then for the last Tenent having reference to the first it is in like manner nullified for if they have no Imps nor no Familiar then they are not deceived by them nor do beleeve or confess any such thing wherein they seem to him to be deceived any further than Confession is wrung from them by them who are the deceivers of themselves and others by the Deceiver of the VVorld that dwelleth in them except sometimes by the depth of Melancholly or distempered brain as I have formerly demonstrated in my Second Book and therefore need no further answer So much for this Author who I beleeve had more of the Spirit of truth in him than many of his profession Now for all that have written in that kinde I summon all VVitch-mongers to shew me in the Old or New Testament which are given as a rule of truth the least inference of any such Doctrin as is delivered by them Also I desire any man of right understanding to compare them with the Scriptures and so compare also this my Book with the Scriptures and to see which of them is most consonant with the Scriptures and which is most dissonant from the Scriptures and so to try them by Gods touch-stone of truth The Conclusion TO conclude
or rather by some Scotish man blinded by some Scotish Mist who desired to set forth his own Tenents for the upholding of Popish errours and Popish Writers sufficiently confuted before by Scot in his Discovery of Witchcraft he not being able any whit to answer Scot in his Discourse laboureth to uphold false Tenents and Doctrins by the authority of a King because he could not finde any thing in the Scriptures to uphold them or to answer Scot as wee may read in the Preface that his whole aime is at Scot whom he falsly chargeth with the Tenent and Affirmation That there is no such thing as Witchcraft whereas Scot in all his whole Book saith no such thing but only that Witchcraft is a craft of deceiving and seducing the people and not of killing and making barren and raising Winds and such like Inventions he that readeth that Preface and seeth how Scot is first and chiefly aimed at in the whole Work might presently expect that in the Work he should finde Scot notably confuted or at the least in some way answered but reading over the VVork he shall finde not one thing or other answered at all but only a bare affirmation of such Tenents without any ground or warrant of the Scripture which Tenents were confuted by Scot by the Scriptures so that for any man to answer that Work of the Author at large were only to do that which Scot hath already done in confuting Bodinus and others and whereas this Author pretendeth a refutation of Scot he hath done nothing else but written again the same Tenents that Bodinus and others had before written and were by Scot confuted like an obstinate Disputant that rather than he will not hold his Argument though never so foolish he will deny the Conclusion One Disputant wisely and plainly proveth that a thing is and the other foolishly saith still it is not or one proveth that a thing is not and the other foolishly still saith it is by which way of arguing a childe may hold an Argument against a learned Doctor though never so false Yet for the answering of the Tenents of this Author in that Work First he saith in his first Book as also in the Preface That Witches can by the help of the Devil cause to be brought unto them all kindes of dainty Dishes for their delicious maintenance and yet say I how many poor lean starved people have been executed in several places for Witches and for the truth of this Doctrin he bringeth no place of Scripture to prove it but only affirmeth it to bee true for these reasons First The Devil is a Thief and delighteth to steal Secondly He is a Spirit and therefore can subtilly and suddenly transport the same from whence and whither hee will by which way of argument rejecting the Scriptures a man may affirm for truth any vain imagination be it as absurd as this former as that the Devil is a Thief and therefore hath a Mountain of Gold which he hath taken out of every mans Purse and heaped up in Hell which he being a Spirit hath easily transported from the earth and therefore are so many men hastening to Hell because there is abundance of Gold But if such foolish Arguments as these were of any force what need then any Scripture to teach us the truth But if we examine the truth of this Doctrin by the Scriptures it will prove for want of ground in Scripture very phantastical and in opposition to the truth of the Scriptures very blasphemous for hereby we should yeeld still that what was done by the Angel of God in miraculous manner bringing food to Elijah 1 King 19.6 may be done by the Devil bringing variety of food to them that serve him and whereas God by a Miraculous hand brought his people through a barren Wilderness and fed them in that Wilderness the same thing might as well have been done by the Devil who saith he can bring his servants all manner of dainty dishes This that is already written were enough to disable and make voyd all the three Books of Daemonologie written by this Author but yet for the satisfaction of such as will expect a Methodical answer I will begin with his Works in order as they stand and in brief shew the vanity of them as for example he saith in his Epistle to the Reader Sorcery and VVitchcraft are different from Magick and Necromancy and yet in the first Chapter of the Second Book he saith the Maid spoken of in the sixteenth of the Acts was a VVitch because she had the spirit of Python and yet we finde in the Scripture that they that had the spirit of Python were also Necromancers how then can this distinction hold that VVitchcraft differeth from Necromancy for by that distinction a Pythonist were a VVitch and a Necromancer not a VVitch yet what was the Pythonist of Endor but a Necromancer pretending to consult with the dead and Necromancy was the pretence of all that were said to have the spirit of Python that was that they consulted with the Souls of the dead as in Plutarch and also in holy VVrit as in Isa 8.19 it is manifest in any Tongue but our English which in Tremellius translation is to this sense for when they shall say unto you Ask counsel of those that have the spirit of Python or the imposture of Oracling and of South-sayers should not a people ask counsel of their God Shall they ask counsel of the dead for them that are living so then it is plain this distinction is wholly dissonant from Scripture and that this Author wrote not according to Scripture but by phantasy and imagination And now for his First Book and the whole discourse of it he layeth this foundation he produceth these places of Scripture to prove that there is such a thing as Witchcraft and Witches Exod. 22.18 1 Sam. 15.23 Acts 8. Acts 16. and here he never searcheth the sense and meaning of these Scriptures but proveth that Witches are which thing no man denyeth and yet mark but his proofs Exod. 22.18 which is taken for a Jugler or one that worketh false Miracles to deceive and seduce in the same sense is to be understood Acts 8.9 10. concerning Simon Magus who was a Jugler and Magician Jugling being one main part of Magick in the Scripture discourse such were Pharaohs Magicians which Magicians this Author distinguisheth from Witches and yet would prove by these places that there is such a thing as Witchcraft and Witches so likewise 1 Sam. 15.23 Rebellion is as the sin of Divination from hence hee would prove Witchcraft also and yet his distinction denieth that Necromancers whose main drift was to give Divinations by consulting with the dead are Witches and this is the sum of his first Chapter where any wise man may see how he hath lost himself in proving and not able to prove that which is easily proved and that which no man denieth That there is
Notes saith Terrificum animal id est draco Those were all only such Creatures as do commonly inhabit desolate places The Prophet speaking in the former verse of desolation that should come upon the Land and indeed the Devil hath least to do in desolate places and is most busied where people are most but had Zim and Iim been the proper names of Devils it had not made any thing to the purpose to prove that the Devil walketh up and down in corporal appearance for it is said Revel 2.13 that the Devil dwelt at Pergamus and yet it is not meant that he was there seen at all to appear in any shape but was there in the hearts and works of wicked men but such is the manner of all that are tainted with Popish Tenents that they would have people conceive of the Devil that he is some ugly terrible Creature to look upon some black man with a pair of Horns on his head and a Cloven Foot and a long Tayl or some monstrous Beast that inhabiteth in Woods and walketh about in the night to scare people and this doctrin is maintained by Popish Writers least people should discern that the Devil is in all their Popish Doctrins and actions and in the hearts of all Popish seducers and deceivers of the world Further in this his Third Book he talketh of Incubus and Succubus as if it were an undoubted truth that the Devil lyeth commonly with Witches of both Sexes having copulation with them but for this he hath not the least Scripture nor the least seeming Argument but only constrained extorted belyed nullified Confession of poor condemned people which is the only Argument for all the devillish Tenents of all Writers of this sort and yet they begin with Scripture saying Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live and upon this they raise a long discourse contrary to all Scripture and truth and possibility all which they will father upon the Scriptures and yet when they are pinched by dispute to prove their Tenents by Scripture they fly off to confession this confession I say is in all the discourse of this Author his only Argument which is no Argument and yet he pretendeth his discourse to be grounded on the Scriptures and in that pretence in his last Chapter he concludeth his whole discourse with the Law of God saying Therefore these people ought to be put to death according to the Law of God whereas yet in all his discourse he could not produce the least jot or tittle of the Law against any such kinde of supposed Witches as he talketh of nor the least colour of argument to prove his supposals in all the Law or all the Scriptures without misconstruing the Law of God and the Scriptures So much for this Author Cooper answered THe second English Writer upon this subject is one Thomas Cooper a Minister who himself being infected with the common Popish tenent sent forth by Pope Innocent the Eighth and Pope Julius the Second and affirmed by Bodinus and other bloudy Inquisitors mentioned in my Second Book that Witches are Murtherers and such as can raise Winds and do things impossible by the help of the Devil This Cooper instead of being himself a Minister to instruct and teach the people in Gods Truth grounded in Scriptures he became a bloudy Inquisitor to finde out Witches that is a bloudy Persecutor of the poor and an accuser of them to be Witches who by his blinde zeal in this kinde did cause many to be executed for Witches as he confesseth in his first Book the first Chapter and sixteenth Page and after this he reading Mr. Scots Discovery of Witchcraft which he was no way able to confute by Scripture nor to answer him truly hee being galled in his Conscience and netled in his minde concerning his reputation in the World which he feared he should loose if his wickedness should be convicted and laid open instead of humbling his Soul before God and begging pardon for his sin he wrot a Book in defence of his errours called the mystey of Witchcraft wherein he hath as others have done pretended to confute Scot and to that end hath writ down many Popish inventions adding thereunto many of his own foolish imaginations without one jot of Scripture to prove or ground any of his Tenents and after long discourse of meer lyes and imaginations in a pretence of holy Zeal yet quite contrary to Gods truth yea I may say imaginations resisting Gods holy Spirit of Truth hath thought it a sufficient confutation of Scot to fetch him over with an use of reproof as appeareth in his first Book the eighteenth page just as if a man should preach contrary to the Scriptures that Idols are gods and labour to prove it by experience as this Cooper laboureth to prove his Tenents concerning Witches or to prove it by the example of such as have been slain because they would not fall down before an Idol and worship it as this Cooper laboureth to prove his errours concerning Witches from the example of many that have been executed for Witches and then should fetch them over with an use of reproof that say Idols are no gods and after this groundless use of reproof this Cooper goeth on still in a frivolous discourse without any Scripture to prove his Doctrin and at last laboureth to shew that Juglers are Witches which no man yet did ever deny if they were such as wrought false Miracles to seduce the people as Jannes and Jambres and Simon Magus and Elimas the Sorcerer but he laboureth to prove that common Juglers are Witches that do work their Tricks of Activity saith he by a Familiar which yet saith he are no real Miracles but they hurt the Eye and thicken the Air saith he whereby they make things seem to be really done that are not done which thing for a Jugler to do that is to hurt the eye and touch it not and to thicken the Air were a Miracle it self but to clear these vain Fancies who knoweth not that Juglers do play their Tricks only by the slight of hand called Cleanly Conveyance or Legerdemain and what common Jugler that hath gone about to Fairs or Markets to shew his Tricks of Activity to get Mony will not in private for a shilling shew any Trick that he hath acted openly and shew how it is done to the satisfaction of any man that desireth it and that without a Familiar or the least appearance of any such vain Phantsy as fools imagine But yet if I should take it for granted that these common Juglers are Witches and do work their Feats by a Familiar Devil as he affirmeth yet what doth that make towards the proving of these poor and aged and lame people to be Witches that have so commonly been said to be Witches What Tricks of Activity have they shewed either in Fayers or Markets or in publick or in private surely if they had been Condemned for Witches for any such
A Perfect Discovery OF WITCHES SHEWING The Divine Cause of the Distractions of this Kingdome and also of the Christian WORLD Justitia Thronum firmat PROV 29.14 The King that faithfully judgeth the poor his Throne shall bee established Very profitable to bee read by all sorts of People especially JUDGES of Assizes Sheriffes Justices of the Peace and Grand-Jury-men before they passe sentence on those that are condemned for WITCH-CRAFT By THOMAS ADY M.A. London Printed for R. I. to bee sold by H. Brome at the Gun in Ivy-Lane 1661. The Reason of the Book THe Grand Errour of these latter Ages is ascribing power to Witches and by foolish imagination of mens brains without grounds in the Scriptures wrongfull killing of the innocent under the name of Witches unto which Idolatry and bloud-guiltiness being as bad or worse than the Idolatry of the ancient Heathen men are led as violently by fond imagination as were the Ephesians to the worshipping of Diana and of the Image which as they blindly thought fell down from Jupiter Acts 19.35 It is reported by Travellers that some People in America do worship for a day the first living Creature they see in the morning be it but a Bird or a Worm this Idolatry is like the Idolatry of this part of the World who when they are afflicted in Body or Goods by Gods hand they have an eye to some Mouse or Bugg or Frog or other living Creature saying It is some Witches Impe that is sent to afflict them ascribing the Work of God to a Witch or any mean Creature rather than to God Mr. Scot published a Book called his Discovery of Witchcraft in the beginning of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth for the instruction of all Judges and Justices of those times which Book did for a time take great impression in the Magistracy and also in the Clergy but since that time England hath shamefully fallen from the Truth which they began to receive wherefore here is again a necessary and illustrious discourse for the Magistracy and other People of this Age where I intreat all to take notice that many do falsly report of Mr. Scot that he held an Opinion that Witches are not for it was neither his Tenent neither is it mine but that Witches are not such as are commonly executed for Witches A Candle in the Dark The First Book shewing what Witches are in the Scripture-sence throughout the Old and New Testament The Second Book shewing how grosly the Scriptures have been mis-interpreted by Antichrist concerning Witches by which interpretation he hath made the Nations go astray With a confutation of those Errours The Third Book touching some erroneous English Writers who have upheld the same Errours which Antichrist hath broached to the world Also the Works of a Scotch-man called The VVorks of King James With an addition of fifteen Causes also a reference to Scot and also the opinion of Luther concerning Devils Also an instruction to Lawyers Errata PAge 11. line 3. for Magnus read Magus p. 15. l. 21 for 6 Chron. r. 2 Chro. p. 22. l. 1. for Prophets r. Prophetess p. 28. l. 23. for magis r. magi p. 30. l. 11. for inchantation r. incantation p. 38 l. 15. for little r. liche l. 19. for tax r. tap thrice in the same page in p 48. l. 8. for Charms r. Charmer p. 76. l. 33. for equivocately r. equivocally p. 77. l. 8. for Scopula r. Scapula over p. 79. for Oracle giver r. South sayer so over p. 87. Necromancer should not be The Second Book Pag. 92. l. 5. for drew r. grew p. 96. l. 10 for inquisitions r. inquisitors p. 106 l. 8. tor superstitions r. suspicions p. 122. l. 35 for quem r. quum p. 124. l. 15. for an r. and p 129 l. 15. or preternatural r preternatural p. 136. l. 28. for any sort r. every other sort p. 145. l. 30 for discovered r. discoursed p. 146. l. 36. for and by them cast on can cure r. and by them can cast on or inflict and cure diseases p. 147. l. 4. for send r. teach p. 170. l 17 for endicat r. indicat Reader take notice that most of these faults are mended with Pen and Inke already TO THE Prince of the Kings of the Earth IT is the manner of men O heavenly King to dedicate their Books to some great men thereby to have their Works protected and countenanced among men but thou only art able by thy holy Spirit of Truth to defend thy Truth and to make it take impression in the heart and understanding of men Unto thee alone do I dedicate this Work intreating thy most High Majesty to grant That whoever shall open this Book thy holy Spirit may so possess their understanding as that the spirit of errour may depart from them and that they may read and try thy Truth by the touchstone of thy Truth the holy Scriptures and finding that Truth may embrace it and forsake these darksome inventions of Antichrist that have deluded and defiled the Nations now and in former Ages Enlighten the World thou that art the Light of the World and let Darkness be no more in the World now or in any future Age but make all people to walk as Children of the Light for ever and destroy Antichrist that hath deceived the Nations and save us the residue by thy self alone and let not Satan any more delude us for the Truth is thine for ever To the Reader SIR IF you be a courteous Reader I intreat you that what weaknesse and imperfections you shall think you espie in this Book from the Author thereof you passe them by for the Truths sake whereupon this Book treateth Secondly if you be so discourteous as to carp and censure then I intreat you to carp only at me and not at the Truth lest you resist the truth Thirdly I intreat you to Read my Book thorow before you cast it by for otherwise Sir it may argue weaknesse in your self to slight the Book before you see the Argument It is one of the vanities of the World to write many Books and when a man hath taken pains to write few men will take the pains to read which Solomon intimateth Eccle. 12.12 but Sir if you find no leasure to read and consider then I pray find no leasure to gainsay or to argue against Fourthly for all places of Scripture alledged in this Book if you shall search our English Translations and not find them to carry the sense which I drive at in my discourse I intreat you either to search the Originall or else to look upon the Latin Translations of Junius and Tremellius which carry the true sense of the Originall as it was written by the Spirit of God Your Friend T. A. Non quis sed quid To the more Judicious and Wise and Discreet part of the Clergie of ENGLAND Joshua 7.11 THese words Israel hath sinned are not so to be understood as if Israel had been free from
all other sins but only that of Achan and yet that sinne of Achan was the sinne that kindled the anger of God against Israel so likewise 2 Sam. 21.1 David had been an adulterer Joab was a murderer Shimei a rayler Sheba a wicked man of Belial and many sins were in Israel at that time and yet the sinne that kindled Gods wrath and brought the famine was the blood-guiltiness of Saul as appeareth in the Chapter and verse aforesaid so likewise 1 Kings 16.30 Ahab was more wicked than all that were before him yet the sin that cost him his life and his crown was murthering of Naboth Chapter 21.19 so that it is easily gathered that some one abominable sinne doth sometimes more provoke God to anger against any particular man or against a Nation than all other sinnes that are commonly committed Then you that should be as messengers from God in that you cry against sinne in generall yee do well but in that yee seek not out this cursed Achans wedg that hath defiled England and the Christian world look to it betimes lest it be laid to your charge if the Nations perish for lack of knowledg Your Friend T. A. Non quis sed quid A PREFACE SInce the time that I have tryed to bring truth upon the stage of the world to be censured by all men I being acquainted with but few in comparison of all and some of them knowing my intent to put this discourse in Print I have neerly guessed by common discourse amongst them what the censure of this book will be that is it will be the same among many that it is among few for among few I find some so reasonable in their discourse that when they find by argumentation that there is reason and grounds in the Scripture for what I write they upon second cogitations and deliberate musings have yeelded to this truth and some of them very learned Some again after some serious argumentation being fully convinced that this is the very truth yet doe still suspend their censure till they see how it will be approved of by others by which they shew they are ready at all times to beleeve as the Church beleeves and to pin their opinion upon the sleeve of other mens judgements A third sort there are who at the first on-set of discourse do think themselves so surely grounded and this truth so groundlesse and vain an opinion as that they cannot speak without disdain as great Goliah spake to little David and thus they beginne in fury O grosse what madnesse is this what will you deny the Scriptures what answer you to this Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live but when they are so suddenly answered and suddenly convinced that this place of Scripture maketh nothing for them and that this their great Champion-argument hath so soon received a stone in the forehead they either let their discourse fall to the ground like Goliah and slight this as a new opinion or else they runne away cowardly like the host of the Philistines and forsake the Scriptures which they first pretended should be their only weapon to fight withall and betake themselves to their leggs runing into some vain story taken out of Bodinus or Bat. Spineus or some such popish vain writer and report that it was done in Lancashier or in Westmerland or in some remote place farre off and that they heard it credibly reported from men of worth and quality and so they ingage me to answer to a story which they would compell me to beleeve or else to goe see where it was done but if it happeneth as often it doth that I make it appear by Scripture that it is absurd or impossible not to be reported by a Christian or that I shew them the story in any of the aforesaid Authors who have been the Authors of many vain fables then they presently fly to another story as vain and absurd as the former and that being answered they fly to another saying Sir what do you answer to this in which manner of disputes I have heard sometimes such monstrous impossibilities reported and affirmed to be true for they had it by credible report as would make the Angells in Heaven blush to hear them Therefore setting aside all such unscholar-like way of arguing I desire all to argue by the Scriptures and I will answer or to answer by the Scriptures and I will argue by the Scriptures as followeth in this Dilemma A DILEMMA THAT Cannot bee answered by VVITCH-MONGERS Luke 4.4 8 12. CHrist who is our forerunner Heb. 6.20 by whose holy Spirit the holy Scriptures were written whose words were of equall truth and authority with the Scriptures Yet when he was to conquer the father of lies the Prince of darknesse not for his own sake but for our example although hee was able to have argued by common reason beyond the wisedome of Solomon yet being tempted would not answer any one temptation without Scriptum est it is written because the Scriptures are the only rule of righteousnesse whosoever then will take example by him to try the Truth by Scriptures and to argue by them as he did in this place of Luke and not by strange reports which are the objects of vain credulity let them answer me by Scriptum est 1 Where is it written in all the old and new Testament that a Witch is a murtherer or hath power to kill by Witchcraft or to afflict with any disease or infirmity 2 Where is it written that Witches have Imps sucking of their bodies 3 Where is it written that Witches have biggs for Imps to suck on 4 Where is it written that the Devill setteth privy marks upon Witches whereby they should be known or searched out or that any man or woman hath any mark upon their body any more than natural or by some disease or hurt which is preternatural 5 Where is it written that the tryall of a Witch should be by sinking or swimming in the water or by biggs or privy marks or suspition of people to be signes of a Witch 6 Where is it written that Witches can hurt corn or cattell or transport corn by Witchcraft or can fly in the aire and do many such strange wonders 7 Where is it written that a Witch is such a man or woman that maketh a league with the Devill written with his or her blood and by vertue of that covenant to have the Devill at command 8 Where is it written that any man or woman was called in the Scripture strix or lamia or where is any word of such signification or importance either in the Hebrew text or in the Latin translation where is a Witch said in the Scriptures to be any such kind of person 9 What is a witch in the scripture sense according to Deu. 18.10 11 where all sorts of witches are nominated by nine terms of description 10 Where is it written that there are any other sorts of Witches than such
a week sometimes longer after the day prefixed and after they parted with their money but if it happeneth that some man after he hath laid out his money upon those Impostors hath speedily a VVind for his Journey then he rejoyceth and then the Impostors are credited then he receiveth from the Impostor a bottom of Thread which the Impostor saith he had from such an old VVoman because he will not seem to be the VVitch himself and this Thread is to be carried by the Mariner or by the Merchant into the Ship and he must by degrees continually unwinde the bottom of Thread so long as he would have that VVind blow but if all things happen well then it is concluded surely it is by vertue of the Thread but if VVinds prove by the way cross then it is the fault of him that unwindeth the bottome too fast or too slow or with the wrong hand and thus are poor Idolatrous fools cheated by them that make a rich trade of their Imposture I deny not but this delusion is variously acted in several Countries and some Travellours report some one way and some another way of the manner and carriage of the Imposture but he that beleeveth that it is really done and not a deceiving imposture is an Idolater and as bad as an Infidel and for such Mariners as will buy Winds in that manner the Mariners of Tarshish shall rise up in judgement against them who when they saw the Wind rise and the Sea tempestuous and against their Voyage they fought for whose sin that evil was come upon them Jonah 1.7 those poor Heathen knew that Winds and Tempests came not from a Witch but from the hand of God To conclude stories reported by Travellours prove nothing neither are they lawful Objections and when we hear such a thing reported contrary to the Scriptures and to human capacity it must needs follow that it is a deluding imposture although the story be true from him that reporteth it and some Travellours that report this thing yet are perswaded in themselves that it is but deceit And whereas some would confirm this Objection by Scripture because it is said Job 1.19 after God had said to Satan All that Job hath is in thy power there came a strong Wind from the Wilderness and smote the house that it fell upon the young men that they dyed Hence they argue that the Devil raised that wind but this is a false conclusion for then they may as well argue that the Devil sent the fire from Heaven as in vers 16. which is yet called the fire of God and Job himself ascribed all to God only vers 21. Secondly If the Devil had by Gods peculiar dispensation raised that Wind God permitting him to afflict Job yet it doth not follow that he can do it at the command of a Witch Thirdly Some to prove the power of Witches to afflict men and women and cattel and to bring to pass strange things do alledge Job 2.7 yet there is not a Witch mentioned in all the History of Job but how absurdly they do argue let wise men judge because God sent Satan to afflict Job therefore a Witch can send him to afflict man God permitteth it say they by which Argument they still labour to maintain that God lendeth his Prerogatives to a Witch What though God hath power over Satan to command him to execute his Will to torment and afflict the wicked for punishment to afflict the righteous sometime for trial doth it therefore follow that a Witch can do it because God did it and where do we read in Scripture that God permits it and if God should permit it where do we read that a Witch hath any such power or command over the Devil or any such league or covenant with the Devil or that God permits the Devil to be at the command of a Witch Fourthly Some will allege the Witch of Endor and yet we never read that the Witch of Endor could hurt or send the Devil to hurt any man or woman or childe or cattel or raise Winds or the like neither did Saul go to her to desire her to kill the Philistines but he went for Divinations to know what should become of the Battel the next day And what Objections soever any man shall bring from the Witch of Endor they themselves may answer if they read but the Seventh description of a Witch in the first Book of this Treatise and he that was bewitched by the Witch of Endor was Saul and such as sought to her as Saul did because they were deluded by her Fifthly Some will allege and object That the Serpent tempted Eve and from thence they will argue that the Devil can assume the bodies of Creatures and appear in bodily shape and make a league with a Witch and execute her will to kill and afflict people and cattel but this is a poor consequence that because he can tempt therefore he can kill at the command of a Witch and whereas they would prove from hence that the Devil can assume a bodily shape and appear to a Witch if they bring that Argument from the literal sence of the History they must search narrowly to prove the Devil was in the Serpent for it is said The Serpent was more subtile than any beast of the field inferring that the Serpent did tempt by its own natural subtilty or else why was that expression of the subtilty thereof used by Moses and hence they must conclude that it was the Serpent and not the Devil which tempted Eve which were an absurd conclusion and yet if they run upon the letter of the Story they cannot deny that conclusion to follow for there is not any mention of the Devil in all the History but if they could prove thence that the Devil did assume the body of the Serpent it maketh nothing to the purpose to prove Witches power to kill for the Devil did only beguile Eve and not kill her And although it hath been a common exposition of that place that the Devil did enter into the body of the Serpent and so appeared unto Eve in a bodily shape and talked with her and tempted her to eat the forbidden Fruit yet if this exposition be well and wisely considered it is most gross and erroneous for First here ariseth an absurdily according to their own fond tenents for then they must conclude that Eve was a Witch for say they whosoever hath had any familiar discourse with the Devil is in some degree a Witch and ought not to be trusted although she hath made no compact with the Devil and I have known some hanged in my time for that confession although they did absolutely deny that ever they made compact with him or did any murther by him but yet to speak the truth if it were so that any man or woman could have familiar discourse with the Devil this maketh not a Witch for Christ himself was assaulted by the
Witches which are not Witches for a Witch in the Scriptures is only a seducer of the people to Idolatry and for killing without a stroak of the hand or some material instrument God claimeth it as his own Prerogative proper to himself only Deut. 32.39 1 Sam. 2.6 so that imputing it to any other is against the Scriptures Fourteenthly Some will object and say Although there were no Murthering Witches spoken of in the Scriptures or any such description of a Witch as one that maketh a League with the Devil or that lyeth with Incubus or Succubus or that hath Imps or Biggs or privie Marks by which they are known yet such may be sprung up since the Scriptures were written as new sins increase daily To this I answer If there be new sins it must be in reference to the Law for that maketh sin to be sin because it is a breach of the Law now No man may adde any thing to the Law of God Deut. 12.32 and therefore we may not suppose that there be any sins that are not mentioned in the Law also such sins are not mentioned in the Gospel and Saint Paul saith Whosoever preacheth any other Gospel than that we have received let him be accursed Gal. 1.9 Fifteenthly it hath been objected by some That a Judge or a Jury-man is not to question any truth of opinion concerning the power of Witches or what Witches are but to be guided by the Law of the Nation and to go according to the evidence of Witnesses and if any one will come and witness upon Oath against any man or woman that he or she is a Witch the Jury ought to cast her and the Judge ought to condemn her To this Objection I answer Deut. 17.6 At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall he that is worthy of death be put to death but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death It is taken for granted that a man or woman is sometimes given over to bear false witness therefore God hath made it one of his Commandements Thou shalt not bear false witness and here in Deut. 17.6 God hath given us this rule to avoyd false witness That one Witness shall not pass as a sufficient evidence upon Life and Death and yet many have wrongfully suffered death at the mouth of one Witness contrary to this Law without examination of the condition of the Witness whether Mad or foolishly presumptuous or malicious Secondly I answer Where two or three Witnesses are to pass for true evidence against any Person it is to be understood only in matters prescribed by the Word of God as Murther by an instrument smitten or cast at a person or by the hand or by some apparent infallible way Numb 35.16 c. but not in matters that are no way grounded upon the Word but are flat contrary to the Word of God and are only mens imaginations for we have no warrant to put any person to death upon any imaginary offence if it were likely that two or three should agree together in such a testimony neither ought a Judge or any Magistrate to administer an Oath or take or hear an Oath in any thing Moral that is not prescribed in Gods Word but only imaginary and if two or three would swear point blank against any person to be a Witch they ought not to be suffered to swear against any in that manner except it be to swear against such Witches as the Scripture speaketh of according the whole discourse of this Book and therein also they ought to give a reason of their Oath and the Judge and Jury to consider it Thirdly I answer That Oathes that have been usually taken against many persons in that kinde are not to be regarded though true as that such a one hath been seen to have a Rat or Mouse creep upon her or under her Coats or was heard talking to her Imps these are not material testimonies but are foolish and sensless arguments not grounded in the Word of God Further if the Witnesses can swear that any person keepeth and feedeth Imps it is not a material Oath for it is as lawful to keep a Rat or Mouse or Dormouse or any Creature tame as to keep a tame Rabbit or Bird and one may be an Imp as well as another and so may a Flea or Louse by the same reason and so the Devil need not go far for a bodily shape to appear in or to suck mens or womens flesh in and it these were material Oathes who then may not be proved a Witch and yet there was an honest woman so always formerly reputed executed at Cambridge in the year 1645 for keeping a tame Frogge in a Box for sport and Phantasie which Phantasie of keeping things tame of several species is both lawful and common among very innocent harmless people as Mice Dormice Grashoppers Caterpillers Snakes yea a Gentleman to please his Phantasie in trying conclusions did once keep in a Box a Maggot that came out of a Nut till it grew to an incredible bigness all these are Arguments of no force yea I further say if two or three would swear that they saw such a Creature suck any persons flesh it doth not prove it to be a Devil or that the Devil is in it or therefore the Person a Witch Lastly I answer If a Judge or a Jury be bound by the Law of the Nation to proceed according to that Law yet they are bound more by the Law of God to proceed according to his Law and if there be any Law of any Nation made to put to death people for any supposed imaginary Witchcraft not spoken of in Gods Word that Law ought to be abrogated for we may not adde to Gods Law Deut. 12.32 and in the mean time that Nation that maintaineth such a Law that Judge that Jury which prosecuteth such a Law being not grounded in but contrary to the Law of God they all hazard themselves under the Curse of Gods Law Exod. 22.23 24. Sixteenthly The last and wisest Objection is this It is maniest in the Scriptures that a Witch may kill by Witchcraft for it appeareth Numb 25.9 that after Balaam had tried all ways to Curse the people there dyed of the people twenty four thousand and although he could not hurt them by Inchantment as he affirmeth chap. 23.23 There is no Inchantment against Israel yet it appeareth Revel 23.14 that he taught Balac to lay a stumbling-block before the people in inticing them to commit Idolatry which brought down the anger of God upon them that they dyed Numb 25.9 To this I answer This indeed is the only Witchcraft that can kill or hurt any man according to the whole Discourse of the First Book of this Treatise seducing the people to Idolatry whereby they do cause them to provoke God to anger and to strike them in his displeasure and this is the Doctrin we ought to learn by the History of Balaam
yea this is the only Witchcraft that is summarily included in all the Nine tearms of Description Deut. 18.10 11. being the discourse of my first Book and to shew any proof of any sort of Witches in the Scriptures I challenge all Witchmongers yet some will forsake the Scriptures and confute me strongly with a repetition of some of Bodins lyes or the like Stories telling them for truth But for all such as do still labour by Objections Cavils Inventions and Imaginations to uphold the old Traditions and Errours of that grand Witch the Pope and his Train concerning Witches and their Power and not rather to cleanse the world from these Doctrins of Devils let them take heed that the saying belongeth not to them that Stephen spake to the Jews Acts 7.51 Yee stif-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears yee do always resist the Holy Ghost as your fathers did so do yee As it is written 2 Thes 2.10 11 12. because yee received not the love of the truth that yee might be saved for this cause God hath sent you strong delusions that you should beleeve a lye that they all might be damned who beleeved not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness A Conclusion HE that groundeth his Opinion upon Phansie and Human traditions and reports without light and rule of the Scriptures is like a man groping in the dark who for want of light rusheth his face against the door But if any man will forsake blinde imaginations and be guided by the light and rule of the Scriptures he shall finde by them that Witches are only false Prophets who used several deluding impostures to deceive the people according to the whole Discourse of the first Book of this Treatise and these were not poor men and women such as are commonly executed for that falsly-imputed Crime of Witchcraft but were open practicers of their several Witchcrafts to delude and seduce and those had not their Craft from a Familiar or by making a League with the Devil as hath been commonly imagined but were in a manner learned and used Books written for that purpose to teach them their manifold impostures whereby to gain a maintenance among the people by making them beleeve they were Prophets as wee may read Acts 19.19 many of them being converted by the powerfull preaching of the Gospel brought their Books and burnt them before the people these Books containing such subtile devices as were practised then by the false Prophets or Witches of the time to deceive the people and now adays by the Popish Rout and by our common Wizzards But now for the thousands of people that have been executed for Witches in several parts of the World by the common manner of fond false accusations at whose hands will God require their bloud but at the hands of the Whore of Rome and of those that have joyned with her in her abominations Revel 18.24 In her was found the bloud not only of Saints but of all that were slain upon the earth This doubtless must be understood of those that are unjustly slain and who are they but such as are slain by wrongful accusations which wrongful accusations are occasioned by the devillish Doctrins wherewith she hath defiled the Nations Further I say That this Doctrin of Witches power is the main strength of Antichristian policy for whereas that Romish Whore knoweth that in all Nations the Civil Magistrate will hold his power and not resign it to her to have absolute power to kill for Religion she maintaineth this damnable Doctrin to this end that under the name of Witches she may melt away all whom she feareth or suspecteth will be opposers of her Antichristian pride and herein she ingageth the Civil Magistrate by her subtill Doctrin to cut off whom she pleaseth and how can that be said to be a Government for the defence of peoples Lives and Estates where contrary to all Law these Villains can steal away both life and estate from whom they please except from such as are in places of Dignity or so well esteemed in Common-wealths or have such friendship among the potent of the Land that thereby they are able to withstand their Adversaries and these poor accused people have no redress or help at the hands of the Magistrate but he who ought to be their Defender is bewitched and ingaged against them he is taught indeed not to suffer a Witch to live but never truly taught who and what are Witches and that many times they that ingage him by their lying Doctrin are the very Witches themselves aimed at in the Scriptures that ought not to be suffered to live THE THIRD BOOK SHEWING The vanity of some English VVriters concerning VVitches BOdinus Hyperius Hemingius and other Popish Bloud-suckers mentioned before in the Second Book of this little Treatise having defiled the World with their abominable inventions contrary to the sense and truth of Gods Word their devillish Doctrins being already declared sufficiently to be wholly dissonant to the Word of God yet some of our English Writers who otherwise might seem to have been wise and learned men have defiled their Pens with these groundless Phantastical Doctrins which VVriters are briefly these The first is James Bishop of Winton setting forth three Books called Daemonology in the name and title of the Works of King James and whether the Bishop or the King were the Composer of that Work I stand not to argue which VVorks are collected out of these Popish Writers before mentioned which the Author acknowledgeth in the Preface to his Book where he alledgeth Bodinus Hyperius and Hemingius for confirmation of the truth of the matter contained in his VVorks but not a jot of Scripture is produced in all the VVork if rightly interpreted to prove it to be truth and yet the Author himself confesseth of Bodinus that his Book of Daemonomanie is collected with greater diligence than composed with judgement and truly I wish every wise man that desireth to be resolved in his judgement concerning these Opinions to observe that passage or if he be such a one as can read and search the severall Writers of this subject of Witchcraft let him observe the variety of their Opinions how few of them do agree in one tenent or in their manner of writing by which it is easily concluded that all their traditions are but Phantsies contrary to the sound of Gods Word even as a wise Judge examining several Witnesses of one thing if he findeth not their testimony to agree he concludeth that they compacted together to witness a thing false and truly although wise and learned men have been deluded by these lying inventions yet compare but their Opinions one with another and also with Holy Writ and you shall finde that all their Opinions are but one monstrous Devil striving to get the mastery of the Spirit of truth and whether this Work was either composed by King James or by the Bishop may be very well suspected
equalize the Devils power with the power of God by his Angel And what consequence is here If the Angel did so transport therefore the Devil doth transport and yet this is the whole scope of his fourth Chapter In the fifth Chapter his whole scope is That VVitches can make pictures of VVax or Clay and rost them and so consume the party whom they intend and can receive from the Devil stones and powders and by them cast on can Cure diseases that they can raise Storms and Tempests and do many strange things and that no man is sure to escape their VVitchcraft which as I have shewed in my second Book are not only inventions and fictions of Antichrist without ground in Scripture but flat against Scripture and the faith of Christians to beleeve And whereas he saith further The Devil can send VVitches to poyson people I answer so he may teach any man else that will undertake it for that is not any whit more essential to a VVitch than to any other murthering-minded man or woman no more than stabbing with a Knife or Dagger The scope of the sixth Chapter is That the Devil appears to VVitches and teacheth them to do mischief but yet they have not power to hurt a Magistrate but sure if VVitchcraft consisted any whit in the Art of poysoning why then is the Magistrate free for certainly many Magistrates yea Judges and Kings themselves have been poysoned hath a VVitch then less faculty in poysoning Magistrates then other men have had why then is their Craft counted so dangerous The scope of his seventh and last Chapter is that Spirits did more commonly appear in time of Popery than now and the reason thereof he giveth before he proveth it to be true that is that the Gospel hath dispelled those Spirits that were wont to appear This reason hath a smooth pretence if it were given of a true thing but the thing which he argueth upon is not true for there were no more Spirits seen in time of Popery than now and that is just none at all but there were more lyes reported by papists and in time of Popish ignorance than now and the Gospel indeed hath dispelled those Popish Errours which were wont to deceive the people more than now and who so denyeth that Spirits appear he saith they are Sadduces whereas yet there was never any such dispute among Sadduces whether Spirits did appear visible or not neither were the Pharisees that opposed the Sadduces so silly as to affirm any such thing but if any such thing were as visible apparition of Spirits doubtless at had been no Controversie for the Sadduces might have seen them as well as the Pharisoes this is the scope of his First and Second Book And here I am compelled to go back again to the third Chapter of the First Book to answer one of his Tenents which I think very material to be answered out of order because if I had taken it in order it would have spoyled my method in answering so curtly as I have done his writing being somewhat immethodical Look in his first Book the third Chapter and see how he by the bare signification of a word laboureth to ground an absurdity saying Necromancy is one that Prophesieth by the dead and that is saith he one that consulteth with the Devil assuming the body of the dead party but as I have said what Logician doth not know that it is not a legal manner of arguing but most absurd to draw a Conclusion from the bare signification of words or from what words may signifie but he that argueth truly must argue as the words are taken and not as they may signifie and also search the Original sence of the Hebrew and yet for the word it self it hath not the least signification of the Devil or that the Devil can assume a dead Body or the least signification of Prophecying by the Devil but only by the dead according to the vain Tenent of the Heathen that the Souls of the dead by reason of their perfect estate after this life could inspire men living upon the earth with knowledge of things to come in which pretence these Witches called Necromancers used Divinations or lying Prophecies as manifestly appeareth in Plutarch de defect Orac. and by Scripture as I have shewed more fully in the Ninth description in my first Book and as for that Tenent that the Devil can assume and raise a dead Body it is most absurd and blasphemous for it was by the divine miraculous power of Christ upon the Cross that the bodies of the dead were raised for a time and appeared unto many Matth. 27.52 53. from whence the Centuirion acknowledged Christ to be the Son of God knowing that such things could not be done but by the mighty Power of God yet if this absurdity were true That the Devil could assume the bodies of the dead it makes nothing to prove their common main Tenent that Witches are such people as can kill by Witchcraft for a Necromancer is only one that taketh in hand to Prophesie by the dead or to give divinations and not one that killeth or witcheth people to death neither doth it agree with this Authors distinctions to hold any such Tenent that a Necromancer is one that consulteth with the Devil assuming a dead body for he saith in his Sixth Chapter of his Second Book and also in the third Chapter of the Third Book that the Devil appeareth to Witches and they consult with him having assumed a dead body why then doth he in his former distinctions make a difference betwixt a Necromancer and a Witch And now to proceed to the Third Book as followeth He laboureth to prove in his Third Book That the Devil can appear bodily and doth commonly haunt Houses and Fields in shape of men departed this life and sometimes as Fairies sometime in manner of Browning as he calleth it that is it that by our old Wives Fables is called Robin Good-fellow and that these are true and not false Fables and for that in his first Chapter he allegeth Isa 13.21 where it is said That Zim and Ohim shall dwell in their houses and Jim shall cry in their Palaces which saith he are in the Hebrew the proper names of Devils but how erroneous this exposition is let them that can read the Hebrew text see and for them that cannot read the Hebrew text let them read the Latine translation of Junius and Tremellius which is thus Et recubabunt ferae illic implebunt domos eorum noxia animalia habitabuntque illic ululae scopes saltabunt illic clamitabitque terrificum animal in viduatis palatiis ipsius serpens in templis voluptariis That is Wilde Beasts shall lodge there and hurtful Beasts shall fill their Houses and Owls shall dwell there and Night-birds shall hop there and a Dragon shall cry in their desolate Palaces and the Serpent in their pleasant Temples Tremellius in his Marginal
thing doing they should not need to be found out by an Inquisitor to be tried by Biggs or privie Marks or by sinking or swimming in the water for their actions would declare them openly Also if common Juglers were Witches as he saith yet how doth this prove that a Witch is a Murtherer which is the main drift of his Book and to that end he bringeth many places of Scripture to prove that there are VVitches which thing no man doth deny Afterward he affirmeth that Witches do make a real League with the Devil which hath been a common foolish tradition and for that he alledgeth Psal 58.5 where saith he the Original yeeldeth thus Which heareth not the Charmer or mutterer joyning societies together where saith he the Holy Ghost setteth down the effect of a Charm namely that it is able to stay the Adder from stinging those that shall touch him but mark how this fellow belyeth the Scriptures for which because many understand not the Hebrew I referre them to the Translation of Iunius and Tremellius which is this Quae non auscultat voci mussitantium utentis incantationibus peritissimi which hearkeneth not to the voyce of mutterers or of the most skilful user of Charms so that there is not a word of joyning Societies together not a word of the Devil nor of any league with the Devil yet if it had been so and that he could have proved such a League or Covenant it had made nothing to prove that a Witch is a Murtherer which is his drift for a League might be made for a Deceiver as well as for a Murtherer And whereas he saith the place aforesaid proveth the effect of a Charm that it can stay the Adder from stinging it proveth the clean contrary for if the Prophet had said the Adder hearkneth to or regardeth the voyce of a Charmer it had proved that a Charm is effectual but in that he saith the Adder regardeth not or hearkneth not to the voyce of the Charmer be he never so skilful it proveth that a Charm is of no force and indeed the Prophet doth there allude deridingly to the vanity of that Idolatrous conceit of the Heathen who thought that charms had vertue in them and so were seduced by charms to put confidence in charms and conjurations according to the Sixth term of description in the First Book of this Treatise shewing the common conceit of the Heathen concerning charms appearing in their Poets Frigidus in pratis cantando rumpitur anguis This fellow doth further contradict himself sundry ways one of his most manifest absurd contradictions is in page 85. where he confesseth that God only hath power to send Satan to torment the wicked and afflict the godly and yet he affirmeth in pag. 261. that Witches also can send Satan to possess men and torment them Who so pleaseth to read over this Author shal find that he is bold to affirm not only that the Devil doth at the command of a Witch raise storms poyson the Air blast Corn kill Cattel torment the bodies of men but also cast out Devils as in page 158. also that he sometimes enliveneth a dead childe and bringeth it to a Witch in her travelling to bring forth childe and telleth her that it is the childe born of her body begotten by himself and so saith he she is deceived with her new darling as in pag. 122. so that according to the Devilish doctrin of this Author the Devil can raise the dead as Christ raised Lazarus and Dorcas and cast out Devils as Christ did but to conclude they that shall read his blasphemous and vain imaginations and yet shall see therewithall the pretence of holy zeal in all his Discourse may plainly behold in him the Devil turning himself into an Angel of Light to deceive the World And so I leave this Cooper where I found him namely in a Stationers shop dear of taking up Master Perkins answered THere is yet another Author writing upon this subject of Witchcraft wel known to all and that is M. Perkins who because he was such a chosen instrument of preaching Gods Word in his life I blush to name him least some should think I go about to defame him so long after his death whom I honour in his Grave but yet to take away all suspicions in that kinde let every one know that the Volume of Mr. Perkins his Works in which is contained that Treatise of Witchcraft was not put in print by himself but were certain Writings found in his Study after his death most of which were taught by him in the Pulpit in his Life-time but not all and were put in presse for the benefit of his Wife who had but small means for her maintenance in her widdowhood which thing being well considered it may well bee questioned whether that treatise of Witchcraft was of his own writing or not and it it was yet it may well bee questioned whether hee wrote it with an intent to teach it for Truth openly or only with an intent to confute such Heresies as had formerly been delivered by Bodinus Hiperius and other popish writers if hee had lived for if it be well considered and compared with those Authors it is only a collection of mingled notions out of them put into another Method also it might bee foisted in among his writings by some Ignorant or Popish Heretique who desired to bolster his Errors under the name of so famous an Instrument in the Church as Mr. Perkins was also it might bee added to his works by those that were appointed by his Wife to put his works in print either for the bolstring of their own Errors or for the inlarging of the Volume to make the Book sell the better yea many wayes Mr. Perkins may bee clear from being the Author of that Treatise But yet if some will still beleeve that it is his work let them but compare it with the Scriptures and see how little consonant it is with the Scriptures hee delivereth the common Error that Witches can kill by Witchcraft have made a league with the Devill have the Devill at their call that the Devill is ready at a watch-word given him by the Witch to do mischief and many such strange inventions whereof there is not the least inckling in the Scriptures and therefore need no farther confutation Mr. Gaule answered SInce the finishing of my Book there is come to my hand the works of a fourth English Writer Mr. John Gaule a Minister of Staughton in Huntington shire whom I find in his zeal for God in his Religious hatred to the barbarous cruelty of this age in persecuting the poor and innocent much inclining to the Truth and I cannot say of him but his intentions were godly but yet hath been so swayed by the common tradition of men and the impetuousnesse of the times and the authority of such Writers as hee calleth the learned as that although hee hath writen some Truths in preaching