Vulgar who most faithfully and honestly believe it and never speak or write undervaluingly of it But because we press and exalt his Spiritual Appâ—arance or Christ as come in Spirit to the Soul for its particular Redemption the Work of our Day the other being granted on all hands therefore men of his Leaven inser That we make void the ourward Coming Sufferings of Christ and utterly deny and reject him as he is the Man Christ Jesus I wish for their sakes that thus traduce us they were as far from drawing such Consequences as our Faith is from countenancing them Of this I have spoak so largely both in my Answer and Rejoynder disingenuously overlookt by this Adversary But he faults me for saying That W. Smith 's Catechism is scripturally written c. but never takes notice of his unworthy Assertion nor my Answer as he ought to have done The Matter was this J. Faldo making use of this Instance to prove we preferr'd our own Writings before the Scriptures viz. That we call'd our own Sayings Books The Voice of the Son of God was uttered forth by him c. Truths Principles Shield of Truth c. I answer'd that those Titles were given with respect to that Divine Truth they declar'd of and testified unto not in Comparison with the Scriptures That not one of those Books were destitute of Scripture but it either generally writ in a Scriptural Styl or particularly defended by express Scripture cited therefore of necessity the Scripture must also partake with them in common of those famous Titles And thus far have they the Preference that they are quoted on purpose to give the Truth we write of greater Credit What is that greater Credit then to be exactly agreeable with them This and more I gave for Answer He replieth thu I leave it to my Reader to give a Name to this Passage the like to which for a daring Vntruth the World hath scarcely been acquainted with yet the Man pretends besides all other Graces to * Infallibility It is frequent with him and that Sort of Adversaries to fling Infallibility in our Teeth and here he doth it with manifest Derision as if it was a greater Evil to be Infallible then to Err but let the Reader know that we do not so much as pretend to any such Thing as meer Men for as such Humanum est crrare but in our Judgment of the Things of God so far as we receive it from the Grace of God And if this be a Piece of Quakerism in Opposition to Christianity in J Faldo's Account the Scripture must answer for it only I cannot but take Notice how he beats the Air who either defends or opposeth any Religion upon Fallible Grounds In many a large Libel I could produce where there is not one Quotation of Scripture W. Smith in his Directory for Religious Principles consisting of above 200. Pages hath not one Scripture quoted not one Exhortation to read the Scriptures but as his main Scope denyes and throws Dirt upon them This was J. Faldo's Reply I shall now contract the Substance of my Rejoynder to it First I did not say that there was not one Book without plenty of express Scripture but that those Books whose Titles he quoted were either generally in a Scripture Style or particularly defended by plenty of express Scriptures Secondly To confute me he produceth one of those Books wherein he saith one Scripture was not quoted as if that was sufficient to prove it was not written generally in a Scripture Style one half of the â—uestion Upon which I made him this Challenge to give me one Book out of a Scripture style that is not Controversial or any Controversial Book without express Scripture cited If he could not his vain Insulte should fall upon his own Head In this particular though he has ove lookt all the rest of my Discourse in Defence of our Faith Writings and Principles he undertakes me in his pretended Curb to my Confidence in these words To accept W. P 's Challenge is no bold thing and to shew his unparallel'd Falsehood and Confidence I shall need to give you but a few Instances out of W. Smith's Catechism and Primer But J. Faldo Three instances few enough to be sure prove 200 Pages generally unscriptural the Terms of the Question Methinks this shews more Confidence then a Man that undertakes to Curb another Man's Confidence ought to have but all J. Faldo's sayings are to be construed cum grano salis But to the first Instance Child I would know Father how it is concerning those things call ' Ordinances as Baptism Bread and Wine which are much used in their Worship Father Why Child as to those things they rose from the Pope's Invention And then the Priest gives it to the People and tells them that it is the Blood of Christ shed for them when it is Wine and not Blood Smith's Catechism pag. 39. I see nothing unscriptural in either Question or Answer unless J. Faldo quibbles upon the Pope 'T is true he rose not till several hundred years after the Scriptures were written but if there be a use of those things call'd Sacraments invented by the Pope after another manner then they were ever practised by the ancient Christians which is undeniable with J. Faldo and that scuh an unscriptural use may be called an Invention and that the Pope be a Man â—ea the Man of Sin as also J. Faldo I suppose and many more do conceive and all this Scripturally then I hope it cannot with any sober Pretence be deny'd but that W. S's Answer is very Scriptuâ—â—l But what makes this great Pretender to Truth and Modesty decline taking any notice of that Charge I publisht against him upon occasion of his most gross Abuse of W. Smith upon these words who would needs have it that W. Smith calls the Lord's Supper the Pope's Invention when I expresly proved out of the same place that W. Smith intended it of the present Practice of them and not of any primitive Institution W. Smith's words are these The whole Practice of those things as THEY USE them had their Institution by the Pope and were never SO ordained of Christ for he did not ordain Sprinkling of Water in a Child's face or to make a Sign of a Cross in his forehead nor God-fathers and God-mothers to undertake for it neither did he ordain Bread and VVine to be SO or after that Manner used and received If this be to make Baptism and the Supper Popish what becomes of his Antipaedobaptists and all Protestants that maintain the same respectively But most evident it is VV. Smith intended not that Baptism and Supper used by the Ancient Christians but most true it is that J. Faldo made VV. Smith to intend so I leave the Reader to give a Name to this Carriage the like to which for a Daring Perversion I yet know nobody guilty of J. Faldo and T. Hicks excepted Now for
enough in the one nor Room enough in the other for more of the Labours of the Author of Quakerism No Christianity But he thanks me that I have put one Argument into his Mouth viz. Wherefore hath W. P. made such a Bussie against Mr. Hicks and me seeing he hath not toucht or much less answer'd the far greater part of my first Book Oh that J. Faldo would but learn to write Truth and not cover great Weakness and Baleness with so much Vntruth Have I not answered to every Charge in the first Book Examin'd 2 3 4 or 5. of his Witnesses at a time to each Charge that is Testimonies out of our Friends Books he brought to justifie it It seems then that my not fully Answering of his first Book is one Reason why he hath hitherto declin'd Publishing something against my second but had the Man been of this Mind before doubtless he would never have writ a Second But what saith J. F. to my second Book wherein I charge him in Point of Fact with so many horrid Abuses or our Principles and Writings Not one word unless that it is a considerable Book for Railing Confidence abusing Authors Impertinences Falshoods and unfaithful Giâ—â—ng what I pretend to confute What sence can be had against such a Flail Is this through the aboundings of the Man's Mâ—desty Am I not like to be cur'd of my Confidence by a Curb made up of such Links Certainly unless J. Faldo hath as little Brains as this Character of my Book shows him to have of Honesty he cannot think tkis Entertainment should prevail with me to step over the Kennel to meet such A If ever Man was wrong'd I am in that Expression though his Saying and Not Proving helps it a little I will at present overlook all but the last Ill Quality he fastens upon my Rejoynder and that is Not fairly citing his Reply I think I may say I have quoted the better half of his Reply into my Rejoynder and that with such Distinction as any Capacity may discern his Matter from mine And where he hath quoted One Line of mine I have quoted Three of his But I cannot think this the Way to Carb my Confidence or to Act the Modest Man To Charge and Not Prove Nay to Overlook so much Charg'd and Proved against him in my Rejoynder That is Vnfairly Citing us grosly Perverting what is cited Adding or Diminishing as best answer'd his Ends overlooking my Matter Arguments and evading the Strength of most of what he cited Charging Consequences unfairly drawn upon us for our Principles and abusing our Writings to maintain that Abuse which is not only prov'd in the Body of the Discourse but summ'd up at the End of my Rejoynder to help the Readers Memory And so far hath the Man been from Defending himself Doâ—trinally that he suffers himself to remain without all Defence against my Charges But he hath told us very seasonably His farther Writing is not deem'd Convenient or Satisfactory A great deal of Wiâ—dom believe me in the Dâ—emers and a great â—hare of Submission in tâ—is Adversary I confess it is no Argument to do Indiscretly a third time because a Man hath done so twice before Had I return'd him a Seurrilousc Frothy Evasive Pamphlet like his Reply to his great Book I should have blam'd my self not him but I did conscientiously consider it and bestow'd a large grave Discourse upon it faithfully citing and I hope as fully enervating it But to this he objects that seems the Strength of his Sheet if there be any in it that is That he made 12 Citations out of our own Books and brought 13 Texts of â—cripture to prove one Point of many that I took buâ— 2 of each which granted makes nothing against me but proves himself Weak to say no worse For either each of them he brought was pertinent or not If not then his urging them calls him Impertinent If pertinent I answer'd the Law that saith In the Mouth of two Witnesses c. for I examin'd Two I thought of his Considerablâ—st and sound them nothing to his Purpose but that he had aggravated his Evil by grosly Abusing our Books to prove his Infamous Charge Now I would fain know if it became not J. Faldo rather to have shown how weakly I invalidated his Evidence and prov'd him as Abuser of our Words then to tell the World I took but Two into Consideration for if he be gone upon them he is gone upon all for they are not a Jot more to his Purpose if so much as those examin'd And I did not holy my self oblieged to answer every impertinent Line in his Book If I skipt the Strength of his Evidence or that those I left had something not exprest or implyed in the other it had been proper for him to have particularly and expresly excepted against me all which he not doing his Objection is frivolous and amounts to no more then a mean Shuffle But he tells the World That also a whole Chapter of Apostolical Inspirations lye at my Door untoucht and that they may judge at what rate I have answer'd his Book Poor Man Is this all he can do after he hath thought fit to give us a second Book Must his first be his Asylum still Why did he not tell T. H. and W K. so to excuse his coming to Barbican Is he for Disputing notwithstanding and yet not for Writing It seems then that it is not deem'd Inconvenient to Dispute but Write Well! But why will J. Faldo drop things against himself and as he terms it put Instances in my Mouth to prove him a most Disingenuous and Impudent Person for did I not tell him That what concern'd us upon the Point of Inspiration I had treated at large else where and there was no need of a Repetition Now hath he shown or attempted an Enervation of that Nothing less Or that we were concern'd in that more then in his 4th Chapter No such Matter Or hath he given us one Reason why I ought to have consider'd it Or dare he say the other contain'd not the Matter of it What more can we say to a Man of this Fore-head I told him of Scores of Passages given by him under our Name he had not so much as cited Person or Book for as well as abundance willfully abused by him that he did cite To all which he is as mute as if I had never accused him or he had nothing to say in his own Vindication Is his Recrimination suppose a Reason for it in its place a valid Answer Would he have thought this enough to his two Books How easily could we have told J. F. Thou hast abused our Religion Books and Persons but would he have accepted this as a sufficient Answer or Rejoynder He tells the World of our Denying the Man's Nature or Man Chirst Jesus and brings a Company of wrested and misapplyed Sentences to vail his Abuse from the
William Penn's RETURN To John Faldo's REPLY CALLED A Curb for William Penn's Confidence c. Writ in Defence of his Answer to John Faldo's Printed Challenge MY Answer to J. Faldo's Challenge was in terms so Modest that no man not bent to be Abusive and resolv'd against all Candor and Moderation could have taken such Pains as he hath done to bedirt it Would I so ill bestow my Time I could well nigh fill as great a Compass with the Hard Names he flings upon it The Refuge and Practice of Petulant and Empty Adverâ—aries His Title charges it with False Inf 〈…〉 a 〈…〉 s and Juglings I seriously proâ—ess I never intended any thing with more Trâ—th Plainness and Softness then that short Answer And truly that which renders this Usage at any time â—neasie is the fastening unjustly that Character upon me my Friends which is most deservedly their own thereby concealing and securing the Offender and substituting the Innocent in his room to the Deceiving of the Simple and exposing us to the Bate of the rude and ignorant Multitude But it is our Lot and mine at this time more particularly I was treated at another rate whilst I could cry Hosanna to his Order But let us hear what he sayes to prove that my Answer contains fâ—lse Insinuations and Juglings I told him That it was unfairly done of him to chuse the Barbican-Meeting to divulge his Challenge to me which I had receiv'd no notice of To this he replies That the Meeting was occasion'd by the Quakers Appeal Which beside that it is nothing to the Purpose is a great Untruth Did we occasion any Meeting wherein we were concerned to be present without our Notice and Consent either as to Matter or Manner Time or Place taking the word Occasion in the common Acceptation of it No-body surely but J. Faldo and such Prejudgers can think so For Shame be Just But he believes such a Critical Season seldom happens wherein both G. W. and I before so long a Season out of the Reach of so publick a Concern What then Therefore were we not then out of Reach What would he be at Lamentable Weakness Is this to justifie his Cowardly Brags I will call them so now since softer Terms fair'd so ill at his hands But let J. F know that for that Glorious Gospel of Jesus Christ our Lord he with as much Envy as Untruth sâ—ggests us to deny we are frequently engaged in remote Places and that for Weeks and sometimes Moneths where no Letters can be sent to us with any previous Knowledge where to find us insomuch as that our nearest and dearest Relations may have taken their Leave of this World and exchanged their House for Grave before our Return or Knowledge of their Condition which might have better beeâ— considered by this Stipendiary Resident who though he gets more Money by it is not exposed to that and many other Hardships But to palliate the Injust Procedure of the Baptists against us at their first Barbican-Meeting he tells us a Tail of G. Whitehead's surprizing him with a Dispute upon three dayes Notice which he saith was not according to the Agreement made betwixt him and some of our Friends to wit Mutual Consent which granted to him neither helps the Baptists nor hurts us for first G. Whitehead went principally to a Meeting of our Friends and if he might have Opportunity to allay the Heat of this Vapouring Adversary 2dly It was so far left with J. Faldo either to accept or reject as that it was most remote from the Thoughts of G. W. upon his Refusal to assemble the Inhabitants of the Place and in his Absence exclaim both against his Faith and Praâ—tice our manifest Suffering from T. Hicks and his Confederates 3dly There can be nothing well falser then his insinuating the Issue of that Mâ—eting to have been his Qâ—iet from the Quakers if by Quiet he understands any Fear upon them from his Force of Argument to encounter him since he could neither recover our half Proselyte as he is pleased to call that Person once a Hearer of him nor did he reâ—t one Moneth without a fair offer of another Meeting from some of our Friends near the Place of his Residence which as I am informed he declined I blame him not for doing so But suppose G. W. was as culpable as he represents him who so little deserved his Reflection how doth this excuse T. Hicks or extenuate his own Injustice who without any Notice given to G. W. or my self did so publickly at Barbican in our Absence abuse the one and challenge forth the other in Defence of himself and Friends from a Charge then exhibited by him against our Faith and Principles suggesting to the Auditory as if what were in Reality but his own crooked Consequences detested of us had been the express Articles of our Creed If yet he can presume to believe himself Modest Just or Christian his Case is desperate and I heartily pitty his Mistake But he faults me for saying He could not but know of my being at a great Distance telling me That I either make him an Extraordinary Gnostick or my self such an Over-Lasher as needs to have my words well measured after me Truly if J. Faldo hath the Doing of it I am sure to be wronged unless he hath changed his Wont How near a kin he is to the Gnosticks in other Respects I will not undertake to determine only if what Epiphamus writes of their Self Conceit be true J. F. has printed himself one of the Extraordinariest Gnosticks of this Age But I will stand to my words that he must needs know of my Absence for they that gave him notice of the Meeting being some of the Persons concern'd might also inform him that I was at a great distance they receiving that Answer But left he should deny all this as probaâ—le as it is the Prolocutor's Gloss upon the Word EAST doth the Business to an Hairs breadth for unless J. Faldo's Ears happen like J. Ives's to be all of a sudden thick of Hearing or to have as great an Impediment as T. Hick's Tongue that is in Cases unpleasant to them he could not but observe that W. K. insinuated as if I had Voyag'd to the East-Land or the East-Indies too far for the Noise of J. Faldo's Charge to be heard as Empty as it was But I must not forget and yet take no Delight to remember that Grave Person purposely left out England joyn'd to East in the Letter that he might better break his Jest But be it as it will I cannot but return J. Faldo an Allusion in his first Book it may be not in the very Words yet the same Sense viz. That he doth with me in this as nicely and unjustly as some Physitians who strictly prohibit that to their Patients they eat themselves with great Gusto I further told him as he observes that I had twice Defended our Faith in Print against him
86. My Answer pag. 250. 6. That the Quakers mean by the Vail that is over People their Belief of the Man Christ Jesus born of the Virgin Mary to be now existing in Heaven Ibid. p. 87. Vind. p. 93. My Answer pag. 251 252. Rejoynd pag. 395 396. 7. I take occasion to censure mens adding their Comments and Glosses fram'd from Study TO any part of the Scripture and J. Faldo cites me as complaining of such as frame them from the Study OF the Scriptures as if Studying OF the Scriptures and mens Adding their own Glosses TO the Scriptures were one and the some thing Vind. pag. 42 43. My Rejoynd p. 159. 8. From E. Burrough's making the Light of Christ within to be one in Nature with the Spirit of Christ J. Faldo infers That the Quakers hold the Soul to be God as if that had been said of the Soul which was said to the Light of Christ shining in the Soul or that they were Synonymous Vind. from p. 75. to 87. Rejoyndr p. 348 349 350. 9. Because E. B. rejected that Carnal Notion that confines the Infinite Omnipresent God to a Residence only above the Stars he makes no Difficulty of inferring that we deny the Manhood of Christ Jesus As most absurd as base Q. no C. p. 9 10. My Answer p. 14. Vind p. 9. Rejoynd p. 420. 10. From our affirming that such a kind of Reading of Scripture as the Pharisees used and to those Ends makes men harder to be wrought upon to true Conversion then the Heathen J. Faldo infers that reading the Scriptures and getting Knowledge thence puts Men into a worse Condition then the Heathen and that there 's scarcely anything more Dangerous then reading the Scriptures Yea he accuseth us of Charging the Miscarriages of Mens Souls on the Knowledge the Scripture by God's Blessing both convey Vind. p. 21 37. Rejoynd p. 126 127 425. Thus much and I wish here had been no occasion for this to evidence the false and unworthy Practice of J. Faldo against the Writings and Sayings of our Friends in order to compass his Designes I shall now give some touch upon his Confidence since he hath intituled me to an unparallel'd share and counts himself the fit Person to Curb me for it J. Faldo began with us in a great Book called Quakerism No Christianity I answered him in a Book intitled Quakerism a New Nickname for Old Christianity against this he put forth his Vindication unto which I made my Rejoynder consisting of TWENTY THREE CHAPTERS in which I vindicated our Principles striping them of those frightful Vizards and hateful Disguises he put upon them confirm'd them by many Scriptures and Reasons and to compleat our Defence produc'd iin favor of the whole above TWO HUNDRED TESTIMONIES out of both ancient and modern Authors Besides all this I faulted his Conduct and Behaviour in this Controversie in above FOUR HUNDRED PARTICULARS and that under distinct Sections most of which were not less unworthy of a good Christian yea an honest Heathen I will say of any fair Controvertist then the Ten I just now mention'd Notwithstanding this great Obligation upon him either to answer my Book or ente Muter to any farther Proceed in this Debate in my Absence at the first Barbican Meeting beâ—ore a great Concurse of People after T. Hicks had won the Goal by running Alone the Man as one in Love with such Romance-Trophys starts up like some Herald at Arms bids Defiance to the Quakers and their Religion gives forth his Challenge to W. Penn to dispute him I that he would and instead of his Glove flung a Paper to bind it which when all came to all was but some of the Contents of his first Book twice largely answered and because no farther Notice was taken of this Giant partly by not receiving his Paper so soon as might expect and partly by reason of these other Contests that claim Precedency That he might not be thought NoBody when so many strove to be Some-Body against us he prints it without all consideration had to my Rejoynder or so much as an Apology for his Silence to it which at least had become a Modest Person to give After all this can any man think J. Faldo Bashful or one that is so out of Love with Confidence in himself as that he is fit to Curb it in others Me thinks he should not believe that repetitious Farthing or Half-penny Paper feat enough toi excuse him or so sufficient to acquit him of old Debts as that without any Breach of Modesty or common Honesty he might encrease his former Score by fresh Charges It is but reasonable that he should make good what he hath done first and not that we should gratifie every importinent tautological Humor of J. F. But what saith John Faldo to this part of my Answer to his Challenge viz. But that I may acquit my self of that Duty incumbent on me for the Truth I do hereby signifie That in as much as the Controversie depending between T. Hicks c. and us takes in the most of the particulars of his Charge we freely consent that he should come in with them for a Share as Confederate in the same work and use his utmost Abilities to maintain his Accusations And if in any thing his Charge is singular we shall be ready to hear and fairly debate it at the same Meeting or Meetings to avoid fresh and unnessary Contests as much as justly may be To this he thus Replieth 1. I must fall into a Confederacy which the Antipaedo-baptists in the same Work Hold a little Mr. Penn If I have my Option I must deal with you singly More confuse rather then assist But it seems I must be wholely at your Appointment for although you had consented that in your Contest about Mr. Hicks's Dialogues there should four of each Party have Liberty to speak yet I no sooner began to oppose you being desired to be one of the four but you told me you were not to dispute with me but Mr. Hicks and call'd to T. Hicks and were follow'd by the Quakers Clamours of Hicks Hicks which answer'd your End and forc'd my Silence Contradiction and Falshood make up this Paragraph Was he not of the Confederacy when he tells us himself that he was not only a Party with them but One of the four pitcht upon to mannage their Cause But if he have his Option he must deal with me singly It is time for him indeed who hath been a double-dealing so long But certainly if the man were not more then ordinarily fond of hearing himself talk or extravagantly ambitious of a single Crown he would be contented with a Partner but this Option holds no Concord with his Adoption into the Confederacy He hath begun already as one of the four what hinders that he should not continue so But he thinks that more then one confounds rather then assists If so what made T. Hicks have three to help