he maketh little of to the Romans the times and persons differed The Colossians and Galatians had been long in the saith and now put a righteousness and a necessity in those observations The Romans were but weak in the faith and observed those things as religious exercises which yet they might have more conscience of than was requisite but out of weakness onely not out of conceitedness or carnal wisdom So here Effectual course was to be taken to draw off the minds of the people from the opinion they then had of the Bishop of Rome which now being effected we must take heed we go not to the other extreme by continuing of that prayer to alienate more and more those amongst us affected to him from our publick service which the Act against Recusancy not then made doth oblige them to frequent Hence both the precept of King James Act against Recusancy prohibiting bitter invectives and undiscreet railing speeches against the persons of either Papists or Puritans Directions for Preachers anno 1622. Art 5. Dr. Ushâ—r And the practice of those in Ireland related in my hearing by the late Lord Primate not to inveigh against Popery it self but as the Kings words are modestly and gravely when they are occasioned by the Text of Scripture free both the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England from the aspersion of either Except 6 To that Exception they have against three Prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Family Additions of Prayers c. onely because not confirmed by Parliament and therefore not to be used without danger of Law In the Reply to the sixth general Exception hath been answered above To the seventh Exception That whereas the Preface of the common-prayer-Common-prayer-book saith That things uncertain vain and superstitious be cut off and nothing ordained to be read Preface Common-prayer but the very pure Word of God the holy Scripture or that which is evidently grounded on the Except 7 same And that the Collects for Christmas day and Whitsunday say That Christs was born on this day and that the Holy Ghost descended as on the other viz. Whitsunday and these to be read seven days after They say first Pag. 29. n. 7. On what Scripture is it evidently grounded that Christ was born on this very day As also that the Holy Ghost descended on that day seeing it is a moveable Feast and that therefore it is gross lying to Answ 1 God and horrible abusing of God in Prayer First we must distinguish betwixt things and the circumstance of them which are especially Time and Place No thing that is no matter of Doctrine or point of Worship requisite to edification in faith and holiness is appointed to be read but out of the very pure Word of God or that which is evidently grounded on the same But as for circumstances of times or names of places they are not either Doctrine of Faith or Matter of the Worship but Appendixes which vary not the substance of the Book 2. In particular Collect for Christmas day On Christmas day they appoint these words ' O God who hast given thy Son this day to be born c. First they do not say as the Brethren unfaithfully relate it this very day then indeed it might have been doubtfull but this day which admits a latitude and doth not binde the understanding to that very day it is sufficient if it be so commonly conceived and taken Aug. Ep. 23. ad Bonif. Saepe ita loquimur ut pascha propinquante dicamus crastinam vel perendinam Domini passionem cum ille ante tam multos annos passus sit Nempe ipso die dominico dicimus hod è Dominus resurrexit cum ex quo resurrexit tot anni transierunt Cur nemo tam ineptus est ut nos ita loquentes arguat esse mentitos nisi quia istos dies secundum illorum quibus haec gesta sunt similitudinem nuncupamus ut dicatur ipse dies qui non est ipse sed revolutione temporis similis ejus Thus we often speak saith the Father that when Easter is coming we say to morrow or two days off is the passion Good Friday so on the Lords day we say the Lord rose to day whereas so many years are passed since wherefore is no man so foolish as to say we lye the Brethrens words because we call those days so by way of similitude and likeness to those wherein such things were done No lye then if we say this day or as this day in Austins judgement but onely in the opinion of those whose like for folly had not then been Again Aug. Januar. Epist 119. c. 1. they might remember that even Antiquity did not celebrate it as an Article of Faith Noveris diem natalis Domini non in Sacramento celebrari sed tantum in memoriam revocari quòd natus sit Thou shalt know saith S. Austin that the day of Christs birth is not celebrated as a Sacrament but onely as a memorial that he was born And therefore needed not such exactness in the very day Thirdly the Church of England in saying this day followed the steps of Antiquity which did so account Nam ille Joh. Baptista natus est sicut tradit Ecclesia octavo calendas julias cùm jam incipiunt dies minui Dominus autem natus octavo calendas Januarias Aug. in Ps 132. prope fin Vid. ut de Temp. Serm. 12. quando jam dies incipiunt crescere For he John Baptist saith the Father was born according as the Church hath delivered it on the eighth of the Calends of July that is the twenty fourth of June when the days now begin to shorten but our Lord on the eighth of the Calends of January that is Decemb. 25. for the Calends must be reckoned backward beginning at the first day of the following moneth when the days now begin to lengthen Collect for Whitsunday Fourthly Touching that of Whitsunday they do not say this day as on the Nativity but as on this day noting as S. Austin said above not a Sacrament but a commemoration onely As on this day which is as much as if the Church had said The memory of this benefit we celebrate on this day as if it had been done therein Which is evident to be the Churches meaning because it needed not the Brethrens tuition to make them understand that Whitsunday is a moveable Feast falling sometimes sooner sometimes later Repeating the Collect seven days To the last of repeating the Collect for these days seven days after as if this were a gross lying to God and horrible abusing of God in prayer I might answer onely that which was said above to the like exception In answer to their exception against the matter of the Artic. n. 6. of not changing the Qu. name into the Kings it foams out their
of the Old and New Testament The Church of England receiveth the Canon of Scripture according to the antient Church exactly as the Church of England doth Secondly that he saith that is secundum majorum traditionem ex patrum monumentis That it is according to the tradition of the Church and out of the writings of the Fathers Whereby we see the Church of England follows antiquity in reception of the books of holy Scripture more truly than the Church of Rome doth But this obiter and the way Again Bullinger citeth the judgment of Bibliander Bibliander de opt genere interpretandi Hebraica whose words are Ecclesiasticos libros etiam Hagiographa nominant sancta scripta Quae etsi non habent idoneam authoritatem roborandi ea quae in contentionem veniunt ut Canonici Scriptores non tamen rejiciuntur ut Apocrypha qualis fuit prophetia Eldad Medad c. Ecclesiastici autem lâ—bri etiam in Scholam auditoria fidelis populi admâ—ssi sunt tam venerandi multis ut Judith etiam in ordinem canonicae Scripturae à quibusdam reponatur Which having the same sense I forbear to English Onely he saith that the Book of Judith was by some accounted Scripture I suppose he meaneth Origen which I think may as little claim that priviledge as any other Lastly Bullinger goes over every book of them and shews the benefit that the Church may reap by the reading of them And saith We may better learn the form of Houshold-government out of Tobit and Judith and the Ethicks or rules of good living out of Ecclesiasticus and the book of Wisdom than out of Plato Aristotle and Xenophon And the way of a religious Soldier out the Maccabees And of the first book of them he saith Ac tanti omnino hic liber est ut boni illo non possent citra jacturam carere That it is verily of such worth that a good man cannot without loss be without it Which is consonant unto that of King James speaking of the same book Conf. Hamp Court pag. 61. viz. Who shewed the use of the Maccabees to be very good to make up the story of the persecution of the Jews c. And of the History of Bel and the Dragon Bullinger saith Viderint autem qui eam historiam pro fabula damnant quibus nitantur Authoribus Ego video Historiam refertissimam esse multiplici fructu eruditione Let them look to it saith he what Authors they rest upon who condemn it for a fable I observe it to be a History full fraught with fruitful instructions And he names what In a word his whole discourse on these books is worth reading And it is to be noted that this was with the allowance of the rest of the Ministers of Tigur where this book was printed Necessit Reform pag. 20. Basilic Doron But the authority of King James is by some Brethren objected against the Apocrypha viz. As for the Apocrypha books I omit them because I am no Papist and indeed some of them are not like the ditement of the Spirit of God Answ Thus say they the King But it seems time and reading had further ripened the Kings judgment in that point For afterward when he upon great occasion solemnly delivered his judgment Confer Hamp Court second day confer p. 61. è Cathedrâ in reference to the satisfaction of his whole Kingdom this was the result His Majesty in the end said He would take an even order between both Affirming that he would not wish all Canonical books to be read in the Church unless there were one to interpret nor any Apocrypha at all wherein there was * He explains himself presently in allowing the book of Maccabees wherein he acknowledgeth some errors any error But for the other which were clear and correspondent to the Scripture he would have them read for else said he why were they printed and therein shewed the use of the book of Maccabees very good to make up the story of the Persecutions of the Jews but not to teach a man to sacrifice for the dead or to kill himself Thus far the King whâ—ch if the Brethren knew they did not well to cover and if they knew it not and were not vers'd in the most authentical books and writings of this nature as that Conference is a special one they were not fit to deal in such an Argument So also in the same place of the same Conference pag. 61 62. the King opened and defended a passage in Ecclesiasticus one of the Apocryphal books objected against as unsound and closes all with this salt quippe to the opposers What trow ye makes these men so angry with Ecclesiasticus by my saul I think he was a Bishop c. You see with what judgment the Brethren have quoted the King against the Apocrypha and yet as a crowing argument they insist upon it Again Object 2 Hierom. Ep. ad Laetam Tom. 1. St. Hieron is also produced as a witness against these books viz. That he should advise a Lady say they caveat omnia Apocrypha that she should take heed of all the Apocrypha Answ There are several causes of mistaking and mis-representing of an Author as 1 That men rest on Quotations Causes of misunderstanding and mis-representing of an Author and read them not themselves 2 That they understand not the language and Idiom of the writer 3 That they weigh not his scope and drift 4 That they ponder not the context 5 That they compare not one place with another 6 That they consider not the circumstances time place c. 7 That they consult not others that may illustrate him Then for misrepresenting him 1 That they make no bones of it 2 That they conceit they shall not be seen by every eye 3 And that when they be they have a brow to bear it so what they say may serve the turn at present It so fares here For if the Brethren read the place they quote in Jerom it is sure they understood not what he meant by Apocrypha Erasmus therefore on the place shall teach them Inscribuntur Petro Paulo nonnulla ipsi Christo Erasm in Hierom â—p ad Laetam num 79. veluti epistola Jesu ad Abygarum regem They are saith he ascribed to Peter to Paul and some to Christ himself as the Epistle of Jesus unto Agborus Where you see that Jerome did not mean by the Apocrypha onely the Books joyned with the Old Testament but those also yea those especially that were affixed to the New Again They did not weigh Jerom's scope for it was onely to instruct a young Girl in reading in that place not to shew what the Church might do or did Fourthly They did not compare this passage with others where he expresseth himself ex professo As where he speaks of the Books which bear Solomons name but are not his used to be read
to the judgment of these Brethren that the Q. and these Parl. then were in matter of the greatest moment the establishing of the Doctrine and Worship Articles and Liturgy of Almighty God and means of the salvation of men either so ignorant that they understood not what was requisite to the full establishment of their own Acts or so negligent that they minded it not as they should And seeing all the Kings and Parliaments since have swallowed their error As also all the Judges of the Land who do not only sit in Parliam to give advice but also have judged in their several Circuits the violations of those Books And because the present and future Parliaments may be subject to the like miscarriages may it be prevented in a better way then by the Parliam restoring to the Clergy the liberty of being elected Burgesses lost as I take it but in Henry the 8 th his time and so the Brethren may obtain places in the House of Commons and the Parliament enjoy the benefit of their guidance 2. To their instances particular in their printed sheet of alterations in the first printed book of Queen Elizabeth from that of Edward 6. viz. certain Saints days in the Kalender 1 Saints days but in black letters instead of others that were named in that of Edw. 6. Secondly certain Lessons of the Apocrypha appointed to be read instead of some out of the Canonical Scripture which were before appointed in the book of Edw. 6. For answer to both these first in general we have heard above to which I refer the reader Next in particular to that of the Saints days it doth not seem to hazzard the bringing in of new Holy-days both because as the brethren acknowledge they are set down in black letters those to be kept Holy-days in red but especially because the number of Holy-days is stinted they are set down by name in the Liturgy and a prohibition of any other to be kept so that as long as the book remains as now it is there can be no peril of that It may be the change of names was because the days now put in might be days of payment of mony or days of Law or perhaps unworthy persons names put out and better put in their room as Mr. Fox did in that Kalender of his Martyrology But this whatsoever it be makes no alteration in the Service or in the reading Yea but the alteration of the Chapters does 2. Apocryphal chapters To that therefore I say that this alteration was done either casu and by chance or consilio and of purpose And then either by privat hands or by publick authority by the Queen or Commissioners from her according to the clause in this Act authorising her for explanations In all which respects I refer unto the general answer afore-going But more particularly They might be altered upon some such suggestions as was made afterward by the Brethrens Ancestors modestly at the Conference of Hampton-Court of which afterwards To the Second 2. Book of Common-prayer aâ— it now stands established The book of Common-prayer as it now stands as established which the Brethren oppose as differing from that of Queen Elizabeth in alterations detractions and additions For answer first in general We must reflect on what hath been said above viz. That such alterations as have been made by Royal authority by commission under the great Seal being made but for explanations fake and containing nothing contrary to any thing in the book contained doth not derogate from the authority and establishment of the book but such alterations are confirmed such power being yielded to the Kings of this Nation by the Laws K. James Proclamation for uniformity of Com. prayer And for that purpose gave forth Our Commission undes Our Great Seal of England to the Arch-bishop of Canterbury and others according to the form which the LAWS of this Realm in like case prescribed to be used to make the said EXPLANATION c. saith the King upon occasion of the alterations made at the Instance of the Brethrens predecessors at the Conference at Hampton-Court But to come unto particulars first to the Alterations 1. Alterations in the Liturgy That of Holy-days hath beâ—n replyed unto as also that of Apocryphal Chapters To which I add R. Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 20. That it cannot be reasonably thought that we do thereby offer disgrace unto the word of God For in such choice we do not think but that fitness of speech may be more respected than worthiness of matter But this alteration whatsoever it were was made as by the authority of the King By whose means the Apocryphal chapters were altered so it seems by the occasion of Dr. Reynolds anotations For the King said That Dr. Reynolds should note those chapters in the Apocrypha books where those offensive places were and bring them But why do the Brethren appear now so zealous for the reading of the Scripture Conf. Hamp Court p. 63. Matth. 15. which they had almost laid aside in the publick worship for their own traditions i. e. for what they thought better to deliver unto the people 3. As for the alterations made for explanations sake K. James explanation of the present Liturgy by the King at the suit of the Non-conformists at that Conference now made violations of the Statute and essential alterations of the book they were not in any part of the substance of the book it self not in any prayer Not any alteration in the matter of the Liturgy or Exhortation and so in no one point either of Doctrine or Worship let the Reader note against the calumnies insinuated by these Brethren but onely in some two or three words in the old Translation of the Gospels And in a few Rubricks Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 19. which are directions for the service The words altered in the Gospels wherein the steps of the Latine-service-book have been somewhat too nearly followed they are these 1. ' And Jesus said to them Conf. Hamp Court p. 86. to be put twice into the Dominical Gospels instead of Jesus said to his Disciples Though at the Conference it was answered That for ought that could appear by the places Ibid. pag. 63. he might speak as well to his Disciples as to the Pharisees The alterations in the Rubricks are Ibid. pag. 86. 1. Before the general Absolution is put or Remission of sins which before was onely Absolution 2. In private Baptism the lawful Minister present before it was then they minister it 3. In the same Rubrick they procure not their children to be baptised before it was they baptize not children 4. In that before Confirmation Examination with Confirmation of children it was appointed but I do not find it was done So that as the alterations of the words of the old Translation were but two so these in the Rubricks are but three And none of
them in the very Text of the Liturgy it self 2. Detractions from the Liturgy The second variation of the present book from that of Queen Elizabeth are detractions or takings away But God wot they are scarce a number but two and the present Book innocent of them being both made in that of Queen Elizabeth The one is a Rubrick mark nothing of the substance and Text but a Rubrick onely after the Communion containing an explication in what sense kneeling is enjoyned at the Communion Kneeling at the Communion explain'd And the Brethren say 't is an excellent and solid one and so it is but will they then now kneel First negatively it saith That the kneeling is not to the Bread and Wine Reas for Reform Ed. 2. pag. 3. of the inserted sheet for they remain Bread and Wine still Secondly Nor to any real and essential Presence there being of Christs natural flesh and blood for they are in heaven and not here But secondly and positively this gesture of kneeling is for signification of the thankful acknowledgment of the benefits of Christ given unto the worthy Receiver and to avoid prophaneness Now I suppose this Rubrick might be omitted in the Liturgy as being rather a Canon than a Rubrick These serving chiefly for direction how the worship is to be performed Not so properly for explication though some of the Rubricks also do explain But none of them the chief Ceremonies as the Surpliss or the Cross in Baptism and therefore the exposition of these being omitted the other might be thought fit also to be left out which would else have occasioned the addition of the explication of them also and of others to the occasioning of disputes rather than devotion it being not so needful to explain there the Orthodox doctrine in this point being laid down in the Articles and in the Homilies Artic. 28. Homil. of the receiving the Sacrament Can. 30. Can. 18. The explanation of Rites being thought fit for the Canons as in ours the explication of the Cross in Baptism and of bowing at the Name of Jesus But secondly this appears that this Rubrick doth seem not to be appointed by Parliament For if you observe the first Edition of the Common-prayer-book of 5 6 Edw. 6. which is done in very good paper and print the next being in worse as is usual in second Editions of books you shall see room enough vacant in the left page to have received that Rubrick but that is left bare and the Rubrick is printed in a leaf by it self and pasted on Observed as we were viewing by my worthy friend M. Tho. Smith keeper of the publick Library at Cambr. which is further cleared by the Errata in the first edition the second having none In that first edition the Rubrick is printed after all the Rubricks in the other it is in order at n. 3. in another between n and o. which shews that it came after the book was printed off and so not in that passed by the Act. Now then not being established by the Act as it seems the Parliament of 1 Eliz. knew they might omit it and yet not be guilty of detractions from the Book A prayer omitted The next omission is a prayer to be used in times of dearth and famine But seeng it contâ—ins no other matter for doctrine but what is in the prayer yet standing for that occasion 2 King 7. The former draws an argument to prevail with God from the miracle wrought by Elisha in the famine of Samaria And the latter yet standing from the general course of Gods providence and from his goodness which surely are more immediate grounds of faith It is not at all material especially seeing the omission might be from the Press and not from the Prelates Now these two are the onely detractions of the book from that of King Edward but neither of them chargeable upon the present but on the Book of Queen Elizabeth which this follows It appears from the premises that we have all the Liturgy that was established Text Substance and Circumstance as in Queen Elizabeth's time and that Book of hers all that the other had except these immaterial omissions of one Rubrick not establish'd and of one Prayer another more pertinent still remaining two for the same thing in this case and place being not thought so necessary Though all now in the Liturgy be not by that act established which leads me to the last head of Exceptions against the present Book viz. the additions 3. Additions to the Liturgy The Additions For answer in the general I refer unto what was said above Secondly in particular These additions are not annexed as part of the Book that the Act established But either as explanations of it which as we heard above the King hath power to do As are the Questions and Answers added to the Catechism Conf. Hamp Court p. 43. at the suit of the Non-conformists at the Conference at Hampton-Court Or they are certain necessary Prayers for the Kings relations which must be variable according to times and the state of the Royal Family and so not to be established necessarily by Parliament but put into this Common-prayer-book because of daily use with it yet not made parts of it and therefore not altering what was established by the Act. No more then the printing of the Kings Proclamation for uniformity before it is part of the Book or then divers godly prayers at the end devised by some good men But to come to the particulars 1. Prayers The Prayers and the Questions in the Catechism both which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful though with some particular exceptions against a question or two The Prayers added to the Book of King Edward are one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful and necessary They acknowledge also pag. 28. pag. 30. that in the Catechism somewhat of that kind to be useful and necessary though not that model To collect then and conclude It appears that we have the Book now as established in Queen Elizabeths time without alteration 1 Except some odd days set down under other names 2 Also perhaps some few Chapters altered in the Kalender 3 Two words chang'd in the old Translation 4 And three or four Rubricks or directions explained And all these except the first names of days at the request of the Non-conformists the Brethrens Predecessors in these exceptions And no detraction of any Rubrick or Prayer or Exhortation or line or word in the text of the Book or otherwise but of a Rubrick about kneeling that seems not to be established by Parliament and of one Prayer against famine not of any consequence with the addition of some useful prayers and some Questions and Answers necessary for the enlarging and explication of the Catechism but not as part of the Book
Apostle St. Paul implyeth that faith only which works by love to be effectual to obtain forgiveness of sins Jam. 2. And St. James proves as well concerning love as faith that if it have not Alms-giving it is uneffectual as those words If a brother or a sister be naked or destitute of daily food and one say Go be warmed be filled and give him not that which is needful for the body what doth it profit that is what proof of love is here 1 Tim. 6.19 And Paul exhorts rich men by good works to lay up for themselves a good foundation that they may lay hold on eternal life Explained There is a foundation of right whereby we have title to eternal life and that is faith if it be a living one Foundation of salvation double The right of it such also And there is a foundation of assurance and that is by good works Again There is an original right and that 's by faith in the general promise the Covenant of Grace And there is a collateral right and that is by good works whereunto particular promises are made Homil. of Amlsd p. 161. But as our Authour saith I know some men will not be contented with this answer and no marvel for such men can no answer content or suffice I have done with their Exception against the matter Alms-deeds and the efficacy of them I come now to their objection against the proof or the title of it rather Chap. 4.10 Ecclus. 3.30 That the Book of Tobith being cited for proof it is said that the Holy Ghost did teach in sundry places of Scripture and this Book named whence they infer 1. That the Book of Tobith is here taken for holy Scripture 2. That it was indited by the Holy Ghost But for answer When things seem double to the eye that are single it is an argument that either their opticks or their understanding is defective In all other mens eyes for a Book to be holy Scripture and to be indited by the holy Ghost is all one and vice versâ But if they spake that they did not think if their hearts were worse then their head we may here retort upon them their own reproach upon the Hom. excellent sense Secondly I answer with the Learned Whitaker De Sacr. Script Q. 1. cap. 11. Non est idem esse canonicam Scripturam computari in numerum sacrarum Scripturarum It is not the same thing to be Canonical Scripture Apocrypha how Script and to be counted in the number of holy Scripture Computantur enim in numero Scripturarum quae cum sacris Scripturis leguntur ad aedificationem plebis etsi non ad dogmatum confirmationem They are counted saith he in the number of the Books of Scripture which are read with Scripture for the edification of the Church although not for the confirmation of Articles of Faith The Articles therefore having excluded these Books from holy Scripture Artic. 6. as themselves note and every ones Bible having it in the Apocrypha that expression might be born in a popular Sermon though not in a determination in the Schools But Secondly The Homily saith the Holy Ghost saies it and that implies 't is very Scripture As if Apocrypha how from the holy Ghost as he called it Scripture in a large sense so he might not ascribe it to the Holy Ghost in a like sense also yet not as any truth especially in matters of Religion may be so ascribed but because it is so consonant unto those very expressions which the Holy Ghost hath in the undoubted Scripture touching the same matter as we saw above out of the Sermons of our Saviour and writings of the Apostles But Thirdly because I love plainness What if I grant that the Homily being penned very early and in the morning as it were of the Reformation and before the Articles had determined the number of Canonical Books at least in the Synod 1562. or were confirmed by Parl. And whilest it was still in the peoples minds being so formerly taught that those Books Were Scripture what if to avoid offence in a popular Sermon the Homily spake according to the then received opinion as the holy Evangelists and Apostles oftentimes follow the Greek Translation differing from the Hebrew because it was generally received and the errors not such as overthrew the faith Object so here But why was it not amended since Why is it suffered to Answ 1 stand still Forsooth for the same reasons perhaps in part that those of the Church of Rome our brethren of the Nation and others affected that way may see we do not reject wholly those Books out of the number of holy Scriptures in some sense and as inditements of the holy Ghost in such things as they have agreeable to Answ 2 Scripture And it may be these and such like expressions were left as are the Psalms and Epistles and Gospels after the old Translation not only for the cause now named but also to be as a picture of the face of the Church in its infancy here that the growth of it since in knowledge and distinct understanding of things might the better appear Though it must be avowed that if any man Galat. 1. yea or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Doctrine than what is already and then was established in the Articles Homilies and Liturgies let Answ 3 him be accursed Lastly It is very probable that the things not being of any dangerous consequences as they stood Ipsae quippe mutatio consuetudinis etiā quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat Aug. Januar. Ep. 118. c. 5. and the changing of them might be not only very difficult for some things must have been much altered and detruncated but also give occasion of calumny to the adversary and of scandal to the weak it was thought better to let them stand lest it should be said the Doctrine or Worship was altered and not the same as at the Reformation Art 37. The last place they except against is Art 37. where the Queen being named and we enjoyned to read the Articles as they are we may not they say turn the word Queen unto King which Exception because it foameth out their own shame Jud. v. 13. as the Apostle speaketh representing them to be men of a captious and quarrelsome spirit shall receive no other answer But be the Articles true or false 3. Tyranny in the Act requiring subscription to the Articles Pag. 5. they urge the repealing of the Act requiring absolute subscription unto them upon another ground viz. Because say they if we may not subscribe without an addition so far forth as the same Articles are agreeable to Gods Word it must needs be granted that the Composers of them are admitted to be infallible and their Articles of equal authority with the Canonical Scriptures or else that the Statute intended to tyrannize over the consciences of
their usual mistakes For first they are in the Roman and Paris Edition of the Greek and in many antient Eastern Psalters as is noted in those Bibles As also are they in that Edition so magnifi'd by Austin which he followed in his Exposition of the Psalms Aug. in Ps 13. But howsoever they are Scripture and are found altogether in Rom. 3. as themselves acknowledge I might add that they are also in that follow'd by Jerom Hieron in Ps 13. if that Commentary upon the Psalmes be his which Bellarmine saith is obscura quaestio a difficult Problem When they add Insert sheet pag. 6. Object Answ that the Translation of the Epistles and Gospels is as antient as 25 Hen. 8. and taken out of the Mass-book This is added to make this Translation odious but sure they will grant that the Epistles and Gospels in the Mass-book were first taken out of the Scripture it self But of the Mass-book in general we have spoken above and shewen that every thing in it ought not to be rejected Hook eccles pol. 5. § 19. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 45 46. Lastly for the particular places they name some of them have been objected and answered long since And the difference not overthrowing either faith or manners there being also a correct translation for constant use appointed and these but onely in the Epistles and Gospels which are to be used not so frequently these faults moreover not being many nor of any great consequence are venial That of Hezekiah his destroying the brazen Serpent might have here been omitted having been so fully replyed unto and the disproportion shewn by a learned Pen so long ago And afterward briefly by a learned King Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 65. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 73. Of which Books and Answers the Brethren take not the least notice whether out of ignorance or want of ingenuity may be left in medio without danger of the Law I hope Necess Reform pag. 18. 1. The Kalender Next after the man that bore the Armour comes the Champion himself after the inserted sheet the solemn treatise where the first title is of the Kalender And the main quarrel against it for appointing so much of the Apocrypha to be read In the Answer to the fourth general Exception of which above To the particulars if any thing sound toward error or be indeed dross should that deprive the Church of the gold contained in the rest Do we not read of the Midwifes lying of Abrahams twice of Rachels stealing her fathers Idols and many other in Scripture which ought not therefore to be rejected Again if it were requisite to spend time in the particulars there might not want perhaps a probable defence Tob. 3. of what either the daughter of Raguel or Raphael the Angel or Asmodeus the evil Spirit or Judith are there said to have done or spoken Jacob said He obtained the portion of Sichem with his sword and with his bowe much after that sense that Judith there speaks according unto Calvins Exposition Jus victoriae ad se transfert quasi divinitus sibi concessum quia in ejus gratiam homicidis Deut peperceret Calv. in Genes 48.22 Simeon and Levi might have a laudable zeal as Judith speaks and God might use it in his secret counsel and did so to purchase a place for Jacob And Jacob own the Land as his conquest though he detest the action The like may be said touching Judith's prayer as no doubt Jahel had hers before she cut of Sisera's head Judg. 4. whom also she slew by the deceit of her lips as well as Judith did Holofernes Genes 30. Did not Rachel and Leah with great Religion bless God for the children that they had made their husband Jacob beget upon their Handmaids Times and persons must be noted And every thing in Scripture is not to be imitated Else we might say as the Brethren Are not these gallant chapters to be read in the Churches The examples then in Scripture must be interpreted by rule and may not also the Apocrypha The next Regiment assaulted by the Brethren are the Redcoats the Rubricks so called 2. The Rubricks because antiently written in red Letters and are directions how to officiate and read the Common-prayer-book the first whereof is cloathed not with a coat of Male but of a Priest at which they fire They say Priest is the old style and title in the Mass-book This Mass-book is the Gorgons head wherewith they terrifie all assailants But was the Mass book ever in English True indeed Fox Act. Mon. in Edw. 6. King Edward the sixth for the appeasing of a rebellion told the Rebels so but that was not as it was the mass-Mass-book but as it was a prayer-Prayer-book as little as might be at that time different Besides that prayer-prayer-book is not the same with ours now for it hath been reformed more than once since The Mass then never having been in English the word Priest could not be taken thence Yea but it answers to Sacerdos in the mass-Mass-book which signifies Priest Priest That 's the Brethrens translation to avoid Presbyter out of the Mass-book whose evident derivative Priest is with very little alteration If this please not may one more antient and more cheerful be admitted viz. Walter Mapes Arch-deac of Oxf. in King Johns time M. Sâ—r. Sacerdos enim est cùm sacra dederit Tunc verò Presbyter cùm ter praebiberit i. e. When sacred things he gives he is a Priest A Presbyter when thrice before the rest He takes his Cup and so begins the Feast Thirdly Is it equipollent the word Priest to a sacrifice surely not in the etymology for it signifies onely an administration of holy things nor in the use unless we shall say that in the Primitive Church they owned a proper and real sacrifice These Bâ—ethren with the finger point us to take notice That they have seriously consulted Antiquity pag. 47. did they never in all their reading meet amongst a multitude of the like with such a passage as this Cùm haec tanta ac talia multa alia exempla praecedant Cypr. lib. 1. ep 3. quibus Sacerdotalis authoritas potestas divina dignatione formatur quales putas esse eos qui Sacerdotum hostes contra ecclesiam catholicam rebelles nec praemonentis domini comminatione nec futuri judicii ultione terrentur c. Whereas these such so great and so many examples have gone before us of the admonitions and executions of the judgments of God against the despisers of the Priesthood whereby the authority and power of Priesthood is by Gods special providence established what kind of men wouldst thou take them to be who being enemies to Priests and rebels against the Catholick Church are neither terrified with the Lords forewarning nor with the punishment of the judgment to come And what more usual than that title
The Br. iniquity in citing of the Rubricks The Rubrick will apologize for it self if you give it leave to speak out for the Brethren stopt its mouth with the padlock of c. before it had done because they would confute what it never meant to say its words at length are And shall receive the Sacraments and other rites according to the order of this Book appointed injoyning thereby none other either Sacraments or rites Sacraments and Rites but that they that are should be received according to the order of this Book and as they are appointed to be administred therein and none other or otherwise as also the words of the Act for uniformity of Common-prayer runs The sixth Exception is against the last Rubrick before the Catechism in order to Confirmation which is Except 6. That no man shall think that any detriment shall come to children by deferring of their Confirmation he shall know for truth that it is certain by Gods Word that children being baptized have all things necessary for their salvation and be undoubtedly saved The Objection is that after Baptisme they may commit many sins before they come to be confirmed which requires some growth in understanding whereof they cannot be pardoned without true repentance notwithstanding their being baptized c. Answ As the fumes of choler from the stomach ascending into the head do sometimes make dim the eyes and as the God of this world sometimes by covetousness sometimes by ambition Luk. 16.14 Joh. 12. Matth. 27. sometimes by envy and sometimes by other things darkens the mind So it seems to fare with these Brethr. whose eyes charity and duty would have enlightened to have seen that this Rubrick went upon no such supposition that the children should come to years before they were confirmed or else they could not answer the Catechisme but upon this that whereas under Popery soon after which this Book was compiled in part and imposed Confirmation was accounted a Sacrament namely one of the seven the being deprived whereof was counted a damning thing and therefore in case of extremity was no less in their opinion necessary then Bapt. to which end they did oftentimes confirm children in their infancy this practice being by the Church removed it was held necessary to remove the doctrine whereupon it was built viz. the necessity of confirmation unto salvation But this doth no more fix salvation upon the children that sin after Bapt. being come to years if they repent not then the Apostle doth fix it upon men who have received that ordinance 1 Pet. 3.21 when he saith that Baptisme doth now save us Doth this assure all men baptized of salvation if they commit sin afterward without repentance No more doth the other But because the Brethren do seem to teach with their finger Prov. 6.13 as the wise man saith some do as if their fingers itched at that part of the Rubrick that children baptized have all things necessary to salvation and are undoubtedly saved And ask â—he question where that word is that saith so which may indeed have reference unto the former clause or to this either I shall endeavour to shew them where First not to dispute the point here at large * In a Treatise Intituled The Pastor and the Clerk which I have done elsewhere I take it for granted that Bapt. is the seal of the Covenant of Grace by its succession unto and proportion with Circumcision which was so and by the effects of both Col. 2. Rom. 4.11 12 Act. 2.38 Col. 2.11 all which the Scriptures cited in the Margin will evince Secondly That all believers being the children of Abraham unto whom the promise whilest in uncircumcision was made viz. that God would be a Father unto him and his seed after him unto all Generations do inherit the promise of the Covenant of Grace Gal. 3.7 17. Genes 17.7 as fully as he did that is for themselves and their posterity in the faith Thirdly That the profession outward of the Faith and Bapt. constituteth a man in the esse and state of a Believer As it did Simon Ananias and Sapphira till their hypocrisie being discovered they were cut off from the Church Fourthly That a child born in the bosome of the Ch. and under the profession of the Gospel although the immediate parents should be either very wicked or excommunicate Ubicunque non prorsus intercidit vel extincta fuit Christianismi professio fraudantur jure suo infantes si à communi symbolo arcentur Calv. Epist Knoxio Novemb. 1559. is yet the child of the Church and capable of Baptisme upon orderly care for its due education in the faith Fifthly That the children are as capable Subjects of the reception of the Covenant of Grace which is free and of the H. Ghost and the seed of Grace as they are of the seed of reason which all men grant they have as appears in those infants that were sanctified in the womb And by those words of our Saviour where he affirmeth that even of those for he took them up in his arms Matth. 18. put his hands upon them and blessed them doth the Kingdome of God consist Now to these touching the Subject Add but those touching the efficacy of Baptism and according to my Logick the conclusion of the Church of England is most consequent for Baptisme doth save us 1 Pet. 3.2 If we be not born of water and of the H. Ghost we cannot enter into the Kingdome of God In the exposition of which testimony current of Scriptures speaking of the efficacy of Bapt. withholds my assent from the exposition of Calv. Act. 2.38 Rom. 6.3 Gal. 3. 1 Cor. 12. Be baptized saith Peter for the remission of sins We are baptized into his death and by it put on Christ and so are all baptized into one spirit And arise saith Ananias to Paul and be baptized and wash away thy sins Now surely he who makes his Kingdome to consist * Quum longe plures in puerili atate hinc rapiantur significare juxta hic dominum voluisse credo nullam omnio hominum aetatem regno coelorum plures cives dare Bucer in Matth. 19.13 much of these kind of Citizens and that declared so much of his good will unto them having made them capable of that ordinance that furnisheth those that receive it and put no obstacle themselves to the force of it with all things necessary to salvation what fault in the Churches argument viz. This Baptisme affordeth all things necessary to salvation but children are baptized and that of right they are therefore if so dying undoubtedly saved Except 7. Married to receive the Sacrament The seventh Exception is against that Rubrick after matrimony which saith that the married persons must receive the Communion the Brethren ask what necessity A question somewhat too loose for those who pretend to so much piety Why for several reasons it were enough
fell in with Novatus in the former by seeming to deny forgiveness whensoever a man repents from the bottom of his heart so in the latter with Pelagius in concluding Austin Tom. 7. part 2. from a suposition if we do that therefore we may do it Though indeed he went rather upon the command than supposition Object Secondly where they say it occasions men to delay their repentance Have they not read Answ Rom. 2. That the goodness of God and especially that held out in the promise of forgiveness does lead unto repentance Artic. Relig. 17. Is not despair of mercy truly concluded to be a most dangerous downfall whereby the devill doth thrust men either into desperation or into wrethchlesness of most unclean living no lesse perilous than desperation But God may in mercy let these Brethren one day feel in their own consciences the pretious use of this sentence What time soever c. And indeed there is age enough in some of them before and sin enough I fear to make them need it In Psal 31. In te Domine speravi Savanarola to be sure that learned and constant Martyr having acknowledged in the person of sadness and despair objecting to him when he was very near his end Te scientiâ scripturarum ornavit sermonem praedicationis in ore tuo posuit quasi unum de magnis viris in medio populi te constituit That God had endued him with the knowledge of the Scriptures and put the word of preaching also into his mouth and made him as one of the great men of his time as * En Monachus solers rerum scrutator acutus Martyrio ornatus Savanarola pius Chr. Pflug ad Icon. Savanar Ante compend s Philosoph excellentiss he was indeed yet was glad to make use of this sentence even in the words of the Common-prayer though not out of it to refresh his conscience in the sore conflict under the sense of sin wherein he was Annon audivisti Dominum dicentem in quacunque die ingemuerit peccator omnium iniquitatum ejus non recordabor ampliùs Hast thou not heard the Lord saying In what day soever a sinner repenteth I will remember none of his sins any more But these perhaps are but the prefaces may not so much latent evil be within as that their true quarrel with this Scripture should be the same that theirs was in the Gospel with the good-man of the house Matth. 20. for making those that came in at the eleventh hour and had wrought but one equal to them that had undergone the burden and heat of the day And take it ill that a poor sinner at the last repenting from the bottom of his heart should be as the Thief crucified was with Christ in Paradise as well as they who conceive they have done God so so much good service This for the first General the reply to the Brethren SECT IV. A Vindication of the compilers of the Liturgy A Word now of vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy and first in general Script Angl. Censur Liturg. cap. 1. and it shall be in the words of Bucer censuring the whole order of the Service till the Communion In descriptione communionis quotidianarum praecum nihil video in libro esse descriptum quod non sit ex divinis literis desumptum si non ad verbum ut Psalmi Lectiones tamen sensu ut sunt collectae Modus quoque harum lectionum ac precum tempora sunt admodum congruenter cum verbo Dei observatione priscarum Ecclesiarum constituta Religione igitur summa retinenda erit vindicanda haec ceremonia In the description saith he of the Communion he meaneth here communion in prayer for of the Lords Supper he speaketh next and in the description of the daily prayers in the Common-prayer-book I see nothing set down but what is taken out of the holy Scriptures if not verbatim as the Psalms and Lessons yet in sense and meaning as are the Collects And the manner or measure and order of these Lessons and Prayers and the times are very convenient and appointed according to the Word of God and the practise of the most antient Churches Therefore this Service is to be retained and defended in a most religious manner Note How weak were Bucers eyes that could not see that beam which our Brethren stumble upon at the very threshold nay he could see nothing in all that part of the Service amiss even as it was then But in particular touching this sentence The wisdom and piety of the Composers did appear therein forasmuch as they prudently considered that there is nothing more necessary than the publishing of the Gospel The wisdom of the Composers of the Liturgy as being the power of God to salvation And that this is nothing else but the offer of mercy to the penitent through faith in Jesus Christ They considered that there is nothing draws to repentance more effectually than the goodness of God and hope of pardon Therefore being to propound the form of Confession and of Repentance they propose this and other sentences to excite them thereunto And because they would have the people to retain in their minds these special places of Scripture for that purpose and the words of Ezekiel being somewhat long they contracted the substance of them into this sentence Except 2 The second Exception in the body of the Book is against that clause in the general Confession No health in us There is no health in us May we not reply There is no Except 3 soundness in them Let the one help the other A third is TE DEUM Benedicite i. e. We praise thee O God All thy works praise thee Answ the TE DEUM and BENEDICITE which are said to be Apocryphals and interrupt the reading of the Scripture So do also the Prayers and Exhortations in the Liturgy If there must be no interruption of reading of the Scripture it must be all reading and no Liturgy That falshood that they would fix upon the Preface of the Book which they say would bear us in hand Scripture that it is provided against that the continual reading of Scripture shall not be interrupted lies in the falseness of their conception for the Preface takes the word Scripture in the sense that sometimes the Fathers do in a larger one namely and as was in use in the time when the Liturgy was compiled as comprehending those antient Religious writings which when properly distinguished from those that are Canonical as they are by the Articles which are the rule to measure particular expressions by that are found in the Offices of the Church then when they are so distinguished they are called Apocryphals but largely often Scripture and holy Scripture As Austin saith the books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are called Solomons de quadam similitudine Retract l. 2. c. 4. for some
person of Christ and from the continual commemoration of his benefits and from the fervent calling upon his name whereby our faith is nourished there can not be separated an endeavour of perpetual repentance Three chief effects of faith Now these meditation prayers to him and repentance are the three chief effects of faith c. Let the Brethren then cease to quarrel Te Deum as Popish for this doctrine hath been preserved pure in the Popish Church as we saw above out of Zanchy or else confess their own Antichristianism In the answer to the fifth general Exception that is their Arianism and Socinianism Touching their exception in particular against Benedicite or O all ye works of the Lord Benedicite or O all ye works c. bless ye the Lord. It is first to be noted as appears in the Books of King Edw. 6. that this was appointed for Lent onely in the place of Answ 1 Te Deum We praise thee O God but since left indifferent Answ 2 Secondly for the matter of it it contains no other doctrine nor for the order any other method than what is in the 104 and 148 Psalms with something Answ 3 out of the 118 Psalm being a convenient compages of them What the Title is in the Apocrypha needs not to be mention'd here speaking of the Common-prayer-book Answ 4 in which it hath no title As for the reproaches here cast upon it and the holy Martyrs the compilers of the Liturgy who put it in of bungling and Mass-book and belying the Canonical Text because it is said to be the song of the three childr in the furnace Dan. 3. mentioned by Daniel which yet may be well understood to be so as Austin we heard above understood the Book of Wisd and Ecclesiasticus to be called Solomons ob quandam similitudineÌ„ because of a kind of likeness so Ans It is no way probable but that those 3. children did praiâ—e â—od in the midst of the fire which they saw he restrained from hurting of them and might justly take occasion to magnifie God for his Works in the Creatures in giving them such vertues and yet restraining them at his pleasure and so if it were not indeed yet ob quandam similitudinem for some likeness sake it may not be unsitly called so But howsoever who shall compare it will find that it doth in all things follow the pattern of the Psalms above mentioned and so of the Scripture and though Apocryphal yet is a fit form of thanksgiving But as I said the Bunglings and Mass-book and lying we leave them to the father of lies and to those his children that by imitating that Parent in calumny and falshood do merit to be his heirs But yet God in his mercy give them repentance and pardon and according to their Baptism the form whereof they do little less thâ—n blaspheme ' make them the members of Christ the children of God and inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven SECT IV. The Responds of the People THe fourth exception is against the Responds and Answers of the People to the Minister appointed in the prayer-Prayer-Book excepting Amen The Brethren say Fourth Excâ—ption The Respondâ— P. 27 28 n 4. They have no warrant from the Word and are Will-worship nor can be done in Faith That they interrupt the reading contrary to the Preface are taken out of the Mass-Book onely that there are above one hundred of them To which are added the Peoples answering the Confession of sins Creed and every other Verse of the Psalms But they omit the Principal the matter and the use of which anon First for the number Though they may be so many in the whole Number yet are they not all in one service but so divided that they are neither burdensome nor confused To the interrupting of the reading and the Mass-book hath been answered If all were reading where were the Liturgy Nowhere else That they are said to be no where else If they speak of the substance of them argues their want of reading in Antiquity which they would seem to have seriously consulted and of the practice of some in later times Are there not in the ancient Liturgies mentioned by themselves many Responds and Answers of the People Whether those Liturgies be theirs whose names they bear is not the question but ancient they are and the question is whether they had any such answerings of the People which every one by inspection may see they had We will cite but two Witnesses the one Ancient the other Modern The first shall be the Liturgy of Chrysostome How often is repeated besides the Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord have mercy upon us and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To thee O Lord we commend them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord vouchsafe pardon And sometimes longer Responds than any of ours are and the very same in sense as at the Communion The Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let us give thanks unto the Lord Liturg. Chrysost Tom. 6. Then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is meet and right to worship the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost the Trinity of the same and undivided substance And a little after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People for so Chorus is taken also both in the Poets and as we shall see straightway in Neoterick Liturgies Holy holy holy Lord of Sabbath Heaven and Earth are full of thy Glory Hosanna in the highest Blessed be he that cometh in the Name of the Lord Hosanna in the highest And afterward the Priest and the Deacon having uttered their sentences 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People We praise thee we bless thee we give thanks unto thee O Lord and we supplicate unto thee O our God Which are the words much of them of one of the Peoples Responds at the Communion in our Liturgy Lib. Hermaâ—i Archiep. Colon. Reformation The next for I omit other things shall be that notable Liturgy called the Book of the Reformation of Colon compiled by * Vid. Sleidan com lib. 15. Ad Ann. 1543. Against it the Popish party wrote the Antididagma Bucer one of our own Reformers and Melancthon and Pistorius all thorough-Protestants and men of eminency as all know in the Church The Book is so remarkable that it hath ben translated into English the Latine Copy I follow and it is a most usefull piece for all those Ministers that would seriò and in good earnest feed the Flock of God over which the holy Ghost hath made them Overseers In this Common Prayer Book besides the Symphony in Doctrine in some things carped at by the Brethren in our Liturgy of which anon there are several Responds and Answers of the People Not here to insist upon the Answers of the Sureties in Baptism in the name of the child As creditis credimus Answers of the witnesses in Baptism
their general exception The next is against the Ceremonies of this Church and of the Common-prayer Book in particular Of the Ceremonies in partic Against which they except these things First that they are not established by Law Secondly that they are superstitious Thirdly that they are scandalous Fourthly that they have been occasions of persecution Fifthly they are burdensom for their number And lastly even by the consequence of the Article 34. of the 2. Homilie of the time and place of Prayer by the very Preface of the Common-prayer Book it self and also the practice of the Bishops they ought to be removed Touching the first that they are not established they endeavour to prove first generally in that the Common-prayer Book is not established secondly particularly because of the Book of 2. and 5 6 Ed. 6. and the Act of Uniformity of Common-prayer Touching the first that they are not established In the Answ to the sixth gen Except because the Common-prayer Book is not established hath been answered above Touching the particular proof here the Brethren do prevaricate not unpalpably and very undutifully traduce Qu. Eliz. and the Parliament that established the Book of Common Prayer P. 34. For first they say that However the Rubrick before the Book of Common-prayer printed in 1 Eliz. directeth to use such Ornaments as were in use in 2 Edw. 6. Ornaments of service yet that is no part of the Book of Common-prayer which the Parliament of 1 Eliz. established because the Book of 5. 6 Edw. 6. hath no such Rubrick or direction and that Act of 1 Eliz. for Uniformity of Common-prayer injoyns all things to be done according to the Book of 5 6 Edw. 6. and none other nor otherwise therefore nothing according to the Book of 2 Edw. 6. which yet * P. 39. afterward they say is good Law So that they make that Parliament very weak and inconsiderate men Answ and indeed meer C. Combs if that word might be used in reference to so awfull an Assembly that what they appointed in the very entrance of the Book by Rubr. they would establish they did by the Act immediately overthrow They appoint such Ornaments in the Book unto the Minister in Divine Service as was in use by Act of Parliament in the second year of Ed. 6. And in the Act they conform the Prayer-book unto that of 5 6. Ed. 6. and none other or otherwise As if the former were not an Exception and a Provâ—so also in the Act it self Act for Uniformity prope sinem Provided alwayes sayes the Act and be it enacted that such Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers thereof shall be received and be in use as were in the Church of England by the Authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign of King Edw. 6. untill other order shall be therein taken note by the Authority of the Queens Majesty Note with the advice of her Commissioners appointed and authorised under the Great Seal of England for Causes Ecclesiastical or of the Metropolitane of this Realm Which latter clause of the Act yields a farther Answer to the Breth viz. that if those Ornaments were not otherwise established either by the Act or by the Liturgie yet by this Act Other Ceremonies if they be established by the Queen and her Commissioners and so by the following Princes Q. hath power to ordain Ceremon Rites and Orders Ecclesiastical it is sufficient The like may be said for Ceremonies Rites and Orders appointed by the Book That Act immediately after the former words subjoyning And also that if there shall happen any contempt or irreverence to be used in the Ceremonies or Rites of the Church by the misusing of the Orders appointed in this Book the Queens Majesty may by the like advice of the said Commissioners or Metropolitane ordain and publish such further Ceremonies or Rites as may be most for the advancement of Gods glory the edifying of his Church and the due reverence of Christs holy Mysteries and Sacraments So that here is establishment enough Next they would prove that the Ceremonies in the Common-prayer Book for of those they are speaking are not established by Law Pag. 38. because the Common-prayer Book of 2 Edw. 6. is in some things referred to And particularly as to Ornaments and Rites both by the Rubrick before Common-prayer in the present Liturgy and by the Statute of 1 Eliz. 2. So that as to this point vâ—z of Ornaments and Rites which they named and as to Ceremonies for of those they are speaking and instance in them presently so much of that Book is still in force by Law But that Book hath expresly given a liberty in some of the things here desired to be no further imposed where in the last page thereof called Certain Notes for the more plain Explication and decent Ministration of things contained therein it saith As touching kneeling crossing holding up of hands knocking upon the breast and other gestures they may be used or left as every mans devotion serveth without blame This say the Brethren is still good Law c. wherein they do as well falsifie as prevaricate for neither the Rubrick before the Common-prayer nor the Act for Uniformity do name Ornaments and Rites as the Brethren recite the words but Ornaments only Now the word Rites comprehends the Ceremonies also which are not referred to in this Act but bounded in the Book it self and further liberty given to the Queen about them as we saw above out of the Act. Again they prevaricate for they know it was far from the meaning of that Rubrick they quote in 2 Ed. 6. when it names kneeling crossing and other gestures as things indifferent to be done or left according to every mans devotion Far it was from them to intend the Crosse in Baptism or the kneeling at the Communion or other gesturâ—s establisht in that very Book and by Act of Parliament and the latter whereof they explain by Rubrick in the Book of 5 6. Edw. 6. But the Brethren know they meant these words of such other Crossings and Kneelings and gestures which were many in those times not appointed by the Book So much for the â—stablishment The next is they are superstitious Superstitious Thirdly scandalous Both which have been replyed to above to which I referre for brevities sake only because this Tract is growen farre beyond what I intended The fourth is they have been occasions of persecution to manâ— able and godly peaceable Miniâ—teâ—s and sober Christians With reference to what hath been said above I add Pâ—â—â—â—â—ble Ministâ—â—s first Touching the Ministers that peacâ—â—ble they are not if like the Brethren Who first endâ—avour to enflame the people as well as Parliament and then to cast questions of difference between the King and Parliament â—ag â—â—â— â—â—â—r â— about Prerogative â— as they not obscurely do by quarrellâ—ng the validity of the
Repentance and return 1 Pet. 3. I am obliged to render VVithall for the honour of those that went before us and have setled the things that here I plead for it is not amisse to shew 1 Cor. 7. that they had also the Spirit of God Besides it is requisite to Evidence that those that have not hearts to love this Church and Kingdom yet to hate them they have no Cause Add hereunto 'T is not perhaps impossible that some Eye by Gods direction may fall on these Lines who may thereby not only with a more steddy foot walk himself in the good and the old Paths Jer. 6.16 which I point at but may be of Influence also to cause others to do it likewise and not to suffer them to stumble in their ways from the ancient ones Jer. 17.15 to walk in paths in a way not cast up Lastly there is nothing new under the Sun Eccles 1.9 that which hath been may be again to the prevention whereof I have endevoured to contribute somewhat in this Treatise After some Recovery purging is most requisite Nam quae in Morbis relinquuntur post crisin Hipp. l. 2 Aph. 13. recidivas facere consueverunt Dreggs of Diseases if not digested or expelled do cause Relapses Especially in such distempers as are malignant Of which sort if any are Schisme and Sedition Fare thou well Septemb. 27. Anno Dom. 1661. The Contents of this Treatise The Chapters Sections and Pages are referred to as they are here Printed which sometimes but not often are amiss LIB I. Of the Civil Controversie CHAP. I. 1. OF the Right of Retractations allowable unto all men 2. Evidenced from the General Causes of Error 3. and of some great Examples of them Ancient and Modern CHAP. II. How far only the Author declined how he behaved himself therein and what awakened him unto Recovery pag. 15. CHAP. III. What the Author doth Retract both in General and in Particular 1. The War 2. Independency p. 24. CHAP. IV. Causes of the Authors falling and first the Negative p. 28. CHAP. V. The Causes positive And first in General p. 39. to 58. CHAP. VI. Causes particular to each Controversie And first of the VVar. SECT I. Cause general and privative Not obeying the Spirit of God p. 56. SECT II. Particular Motives to the VVar with their Refutation p. 58. to 83. CHAP. VII Reply to certain general Grounds for the VVar being the chief heads of a Book Entituled Scripture and Reason pleaded for Defensive Arms. p. 90. to 106. The Contents of the Second Book Of the Church Controversie CHAP. I. Of Independency SECT I. THe Occasion of the Authors lapse into it p. 109. SECT II. Causes 1. Privative viz. not obeying the particular Word of God p. 112. SECT III. Causes Positive p. 113. SECT IV. The Contents of Independency p. 114. CHAP. II. Of the Grounds of Separation And first in generall p. 119. CHAP. III. Particular Exceptions against the matter of the Premisses 1. Against the Articles or Doctrine p. 174. CHAP. IV. Of Worship and the Directory thereof the Common-Prayer-Book SECT I. Of Worship 1. In it self p. 195. 2. In the Ceremonies p. 196. SECT II. Objections particular against the matter of our Worship p. 204. SECT III. Exceptions against the Body of the Common-Prayer-Book SECT IV. A Vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy in this particular p. 231. SECT VI. Exceptions against the Ceremonies pag. 270. CHAP. VI. Of the Assemblies their matter and mixture SECT I. The means in the Church of England of preserving them from Corruption p. 266. this number and some following are to be looked for in the 6. Chap. of the Second Book p. 269. SECT II. Causes Constitutive of the Church of England p. 270. SECT III. Apostolical Churches vitiated but no separation p. 273. SECT IV. The Primitive Churches also p. 275. SECT V. The Reformed Churches p. 280. CHAP. VII Of Discipline CHAP. VIII Of Government 1. By the Ministery in general and 2. by Episcopacy in particular Sect. 1. The Conditions requisite to the constitution of a Ministery p. 301. Sect. 2. Of Episcopacy It s Right and Title p. 304. Sect. 3. Exceptions against the former Government and Discipline 1. Episcopacy established by Law in Engl. p. 325. Subsect 2. Whether Episcopacy be a different order from Presbytery ibid. Subsect 3. The Question not of order but of Power p. 332. Subsect 4. Whether Ordination in the N. Testament without a Bishop p. 334. Sect. 4. Of the Book of Ordination Subsect 1. Bishops Imposition of hands upon Deacons p. 338. Subsect 2. Apostles choose Deacons ibid. Subsect 3. That phrase Receive the Holy Ghost defended p. 339. Subsect 4. Consecration of Bishops and Archbishops p. 346. Subs 5. Episcopal Jurisdiction p. 349. Sect. 6. The Close of the Church Controversie CHAP. IX The Proof and Trial of these Retractations CHAP. X. The Conclusion 1 A Petition p. 367. The Elder Son ibid. 2. An Admonition of Zanchy p. 368. 3. The Prediction of his late Majesty p. 370. CHAP. XI Additionals The Scope and Protestation of the AUTHOR Containing also an Explication of the FRONTISPIECE MY ayme is to perform by way of Retractation some small service Principi Patriae to the King and to my Country My allegeance to the one and engagement to the other and my lapsing in both so much obliging me Now a] Psal 20. the Kings honour is great in Gods Salvation And b] Psal 144. blessed are the people who have the Lord for their God But c] Amos 3. how can two walk together unless they be aggreed We d] 1 Joh. 3.5 must be like him if we would see him as he is Now God is a righteous God Psal 11. his countenance will behold onely the thing that is JUST This was the end of our Redemption viz. e] Tit. 2. to deliver us from the practise of all iniquity that we might live a godly righteous and sober life Now the the onely rule of this righteousness and justice is the f] Tit. 1. will of God Which will is revealed either generally in the Scripture and in the Law of Nature or particularly in the constitutions of every Nation which contradict not the former Hence g] Dâ— Sibbis Souls conflict cap. 17. what is agreeable to Law is agreeable to Conscience said once the Lawyers Casuist Hence also h] Ro. 13.1 he that resists the Laws of particular Nations resists the Ordinance of God and he be he head or tail branch or rush as the i] Isa 3. Prophet phraseth it shall receive to himself damnation k] Eccles 10. He that brakes this hedge a serpent shall bite him he that removeth these foundation stones they shall fall upon him Laws therefore being the sacred impress of the will of God and the observance of them the obligement and security both of Majestrate and Subjects of Prince and People my onely scope is the
resentment of the premises and which hath wrought this repentance may never be repented of nor that there ever be cause that I retract these retractations Amen Yea there may be those who having lost me may by some artifice effect that I shall lose those whom they think I now intend to win that so being by both deserted I might be ruined But God who sees their plots and my plainness in this affair will I hope disappoint them But if he shall for his glory and my further mortification permit them I hope my suffering shall be like that of Mephibosheth for even David may be abused by a treacherous Ziba for my Loyalty 2 Sam. 19.27 1 King 2. not like that of Shimei for my Apostacy And that I shall never prove either * Qui Sacr. libros tradebancâ— ethnicis Traditor or Proditor false to this Church or faithless to my Country Quia qui in pace militibus suis futuram praenunciat pugnâ—m dabit militantibus in congressione victâ—riam Because he that hath warned his Souldiers of the approaching Battel Cypr. Epist 2. l. 1. will also in the conflict assist to victory And I may give them this taste of my spirit and his grace That whereas upon his Majesties return by prayer I was often importuned to ask and assured to have I wilingâ—y let slip the season that I might evidence I did not follow Christ for the Lâ—eaves nor the King for a Living As also that I might by the publishing this being not onely my retractation but confession also of my faith clearly be known and so no error personae or ignorantia facti be complained of afterward Besides Providence hath so disposed in outward matters that I may in the state I am perhaps not uncomfortably subsist without much addition Sect. 6. Proof that the Author went no further Now for close and confirmation that my lapse was not so exorbitant through the mercy of God as to my principles in either of the former causes I shall subjoyn a passage touching each out of those my actings which were most eminent in these particulars and first for the War Serm. on Judg 5.23 Jun 19 1642. at Trin. Ch. in Camb. Prov. 19. In that Discourse wherein I gave Answer in the University unto Dr. Feams Book at its first appearance there are these words Object 3. But the King forbids this help viz. by the War and commands the contrary Now where the word of a King is there is power and his wrath is as the roaring of a Lion Eccles 8. Ibid. And I counsel thee obey the Kings commandment and that because of the Oath of God vers 4. Rom. 13. And who shall say to the King What dost thou And He that resists resists the Ordinance of God c. Answ We are not to take notice of the Kings commands as they look upon the publick but by his Laws which are his deliberate will and by those whom the Law hath appointed interpreters of it And then indeed when a King comes in his Laws he is more than a man for he is the Minister of God and whosoever resists resists the Ordinance of God and he that resists shall receive to himself damnation Object 4. But the King saith He proceeded according to Law who shall judge Resp The same body rightly gathered that made the Law i. e. the Common-wealth can best judge of its own meaning And seeing Law is not declared by the King but in his Courts and the higher Court being that of Parliament we are to rest in their declaration unless we see manifestly to the contrary By which passage it doth appear that there was this especially that did misguide me viz. The misapplication of some true principles First That the Law of Nature allowing self-preservation to a Nation as well as a Man it might be endeavoured in case of necessity as to particular Laws illegally Which is untrue Rom. 3. for We must not do evil that good may come thereof Secondly That the King being always to be obey'd in his Laws declared in his Courts and the Parliament being the highest Court therefore what the two H. H. did declare to be Law was so wherein there was a doubble mistake 1. That the two Houses were the Parliament in exclusion of and opposition to the King that I say not a lesser part for number of Lords and Commons though enough in formality of Law 2. That it was Law which they declared to be so See the Declaration of 2 H. H. Novemb 2. 1642. in answer to that of the Kings May 26. pag. 22. though no Law was shewed but a sentence out of Bracton who wrote in Hen. 3. in the time of the Barons Wars and who in another place hath the clean contrary as shall appear and it may be a sentence or two out of some other private Lawyer against the constant sentence of Lawyers and the known practice of the Law and Parliaments This for the War that I might shew that Law the Authority of Parliament mistaken and no private headiness did transport me Next for Independency In the Tract I published on that Argument Vindiciae Catholicae cap. 1. p. 3. there is this passage Now the scope of this Treatise is not to unfasten the ground of all Church-combination and to lay a foundation for absolute Independency The conveniency and sometime the necessity of Classes and Synods for direction and determination and that by Divine Authority is freely acknowledged though no with power properly Juridical yea I add that Episcopacy it self was and might be maintained as also Presbytery if confined to a particular Church and not subjected to Superior Ecclesiastical power which was the most antient way of it might both consist together in a particular one Again The violation of Parochial limits oft-times manifestly prejudicial to edification yet am not I for the drawing of any godly able pag. 69. and faithful Ministers people from him who is for the substance of Reformation though with many defects in lesser things Again But this is not their my own and some others opinion pag. 79. that it is essentially requisite to the being of a visible Church that it meet in one place they hold it de benè esse for conveniency not absolutely necessary From which passages it is evident first That not such an Independency as some practised was pleaded for but such as might agree not with Presbytery onely but with Episcopacy and not onely with a Parochial Church or the Church of a City but such as might agree with a Nation also As indeed the Church of England and other National Churches are independent as to right of Jurisdiction from all other Churches There being no such thing in re as an universal Visible governing Church as I have I think evinced in the Treatise above mentioned but every expression in that passage I own not But to conclude I repeat that of Bucer
the Ecclesiastical Concerning the first 1. In the Civil Controversie I closed with the one party in the civil contest for these causes whereof the one is General and Privative the other Positive and Particular The former was the grieving or resisting the Spirit of God from whom I received no small concussion about this matter especially at the coming forth of * The resolving of conscience c. Edit Cambr. 1642. Dr. Fearn's first book in opposition to the Lords and Commons in their taking up Arms against the King The authority of Scripture there urged unto which God had given me ever to bear an awful reverence the Spirit setting it on exercised me more than all his arguments But 1 being in heart enclined unto the good things the other side proposed to be contended for and 2 judging his reasons might all be answered and 3 apprehending it much concerned the cause of God and of his servants and 4 my own reputation also being pre-engaged 5 and lastly my place seeming to call for it I holding then the publick Lecture in Cambridge I took all the former reluctancy of spirit to be onely a temptation and accordingly resolved to reply On Judg. 5.23 on which Mr. St. M. had preached before of whose notions that I know of I made no use Mr. J. B. which I did the next Lords day after the publishing of that Book wherein I answered all that seemed material in that Book and so answered it That some who were of the other judgment were pleased to say that so bad a cause could not be better pleaded Upon this I was sollicited to the publishing of my Answer But coming to London and finding another had done it before but especially my spirit working too and fro betwixt resolution and fear I did suppress it But that of Zachary hath been fulfilled in me since In that day the Prophets shall be ashamed Zach. 13.5 every one of his vision when he hath prophesied And blessed be God who hath verified another also towards me viz. Thou shalt hear a voice behind thee saying Isa 30.21 This is the way walk in it when thou turnest to the right-hand and when thou turnest to the left And blessed be his Name that although I have been a rebellious child as it is in the first verse of that chapter that would not take counsel of him nor cover with the covering of his spirit yet he hath not cast me away from his presence Psal 51.11 nor taken his holy Spirit from me Deliver me from bloods O Lord thou God of my salvation A Prayer and my tongue shall sing aloud of thy righteousness The sacrifice of God is a broken spirit a broken and contrite heart O God thou wilt not despise And Vphold me O Lord with thy spirit then will I teach sinners thy ways and transgressors shall be converted unto thee Lastly Do good in thy good pleasure unto Sion build thou the walls of Jerusalem then shall they offer young bullocks upon thine altar Amen Sed irrideant nos fortes potentes Aug. confess l. 4. c. 1. nos autem infirmi inopes confiteamur tibi But let great and oveâ—-grown spirits laugh at this let us that are infirm and poor in heart confess to thee Tota palea areae ipsius irridet eum Aug. in Ps 21. in Prefat in Expos 2. gemit triticum irrideri dominum All the chaff of Christs own floor laughs at him and the good corn laments its Lords derision Thus of the general and privative cause SECT II. Particular Motives 2. THe particular follow and they were such as these 1. 1. Propounded The excellency and necessity of the things held forth to be contended for the Laws namely and the Liberties of the Nation and that which made them both most precious Religion Protestant by them established and secured 2. Next the credit that I gave unto the persons that did propound them both for their ability and for their faithfulness 3. A third was the awful opinion that I conceived of the power and authority of that place from which they seem'd to issue to wit the Parliament 4. That the exigences being such there was a virtual bond by all Laws to use remedies that were not usual 5. and lastly That examples of the like had been in Scripture among the Jews in the Primitive Church the former against Antiochus by the Maccabees the latter of the Christians against Maximinus Also in the Reformed Churches as the French Holland Scottish and owned by our former Princes and then present King defended also by our own Divines and Bishops as Jewel Abbot Bilson c. 2. Replies unto them But all these and such like as applyed to our case being put into the ballance of the Sanctuary in my eye seem much too light As touching the first my opinion and veneration of the Protestant Religion 1. Religion the Laws and Liberties of the Nation I hope is greater now than it was as I know them somewhat better But touching Religion to be defended by Arms especially of Subjects well spake the Dantzikers A notable speech of the Dantzikeâ—s in their material Letter to the Duke of Croy exhorting them to the like May 27. 1656. Evidently it doth appear say they how much the Roman-Catholicks are incensed through this war and that from thence no small persecutions yea the greatest danger may befall the Reformed Churches Vid. Mercurius Politicus Jul. 3. 1656. if God do not prevent it in his mercy We do confidently believe that no body can think or impute it to us as if God took pleasure in Apostates and Hypocrites and as if he would have Religion promoted in casting off the lawful Magistrate Note and in the slender esteem of a well grounded government Call to mind how at all times by Warrs the spirits of men grow more barbarous and inhumane Note and how the wars for Religion use commonly to extinguish Religion Thus they Note Now I call God to witness upon my soul that the sense of the dishonor done unto the Protestant Religion 2 Cor. 1. working upon my heart hath been one main occasion of further examining the grounds of those transactions and of altering my thoughts Homil. of disobedience part 4. pag. 300. And particularly one passage in the doctrine of this Protestant Church expressed in the Homily of disobedience did much affect me of which anon This for Religion 2. Then for the Laws and Liberties seeing first 2. Laws and Liberties that both Houses of Lords and Commons in all their solemn addresses to the King and that in Parliament and as such a Parliamentary body 1. Style of the H. H. do usually style themselves thus Your Majesties most humble and loyal subjects the Lords and Commons in Parliament assembled In that Remonstrance which the King saith Kings Declaration Aug. 12. 1642. Remonstr of the State of
superbiam quemadmodum digni sunt Dei justo judicio in omnibus supervenienti By whose command saith he men are born by the same command Kings are constituted fit for those who in each time are to be governed by them Some of them are given for the amendment and profit of their subjects and preservation of Justice but some for terrour and punishment and rebuke and some for mockery and contumely and pride according as men deserve the just judgment of God prevailing in all things Thus he by which he implies prayer and patience but no resistance Tertullian likewise Apologet. cap. 30. cap. 33. cap. 37. A quo sunt secundi Reges post quem Deum primi ante omnes super omnes Deos. From whom God they Kings are second after whom they are first before all and above all Gods that is above all inferiour Magistrates In a word we may see the sense of Antiquity in this point in him Instit l. 3. c. 3. § 10. Aug. Contr. Faust lib. 22. cap. 75. from whom Calvin would have us learn it in all viz. S. Austin Ordo naturalis hoc poscit ut suscipiendi belli Anthoritas penes principem sit exequendi autem ministerium milites debeant Natural order saith he requires this that the Authority of undertaking war be in the power of the Prince but that the souldiers owe the service of execution and management And that they wanted not either number or strength one of the former Authours gives us assurance Tertul. Apologet cap. 37. Si enim hostes extraneos non tantum vindices occultos agere vellemus deesset nobis res numerorum copiarum If we would saith he become open enemies and not secret revengers would there be wanting to us the force either of number or Armies And so shews that the Christians filled all places insomuch that should they but have withdrawn themselves only from the rest of men they should have made a desolation in the world And thus of the Primitive Christians * Anticavalierism 7. Reformed Churches So vain is it to say that Tertullian was mistaken in their number 7. In the last place come we to the examples of the Reformed Churches particularly those of France and Holland who are said to have defended themselves by arms as we have done defended by our Writers and owned by our Princes For Answer First we are to note that though perhaps it should be granted that it may be lawful in some cases for oppressed subjects to call for help unto other Foraign and lawful power because these powers are coordinate with their own in respect of degree and dignity and in such case there is no violation of order by the rising up of the inferiour against his Prince But secondly they were neither defended by our Writers Difference of Subject and Rebel part 3. pag. 279. Ed. Lond. 1586. nor patronized by our Princes farther then the Laws and their case as represented by them did allow If the Laws of the Land saith Dr. Bilson speaking of the French the Scottish and the Holland Civil wars do not permit them to guard their lives when they are assaulted with unjust force against law we will never excuse them from rebellion And a little after for my part I must confess saith he that except the Laws of those Realms do permit the people to stand on their right if the Prince would offer that wrong I dare not allow their arms And another treating of the same example saith Quarum injuriarum atrocitates Abbot de Antichrist cap. 7. n. 5 6. occasionem fortè dederunt bello civili dum vim vi propulsant tantummodo qui contra jus fasque indignissimè habiti id sibi per patrias LEGES licere judicarunt The horribleness of which injuries saith he peradventure gave occasion to the Civil war whilst they do only repell force by force and who contrary to all right and equity were treated most unworthily and did judge that they might do so by the Laws of their Country And again Hîc verò politica res agitur quid principi juris in subditos per leges cujusque Reip. fundatrices permissum sit The question here saith he is matter of Civil policy viz. What power the Prince hath over his subjects by the fundamental Laws of each Common-wealth So that we see they defended these actions of the Protestants abroad so far only as they were legal This for their cause But as to ours the former Authour shews it to be different The German Emperour saith he is elected and his power abated by the liberties of the Princes Bils of Subj and Rebel part 3. p. 277. But the Queen of England hath one and the same right over all her subjects be they NOBLES or others You see he makes our cause and case Kings of Engl laws and allegiance to differ from the former CHAP. VII Reply to certain general Reasons for the War Scripture and Reason for defence of Arms a Book so called AND now to draw towards an end of this first point the War The defences made in the justification of the War they are of three sorts from Scripture from Law and from Reason Those from Scripture and Law have been replyed to before SECT I. Law TO those from Reason laid down in the Book quoted in the Margin a seven fold errour more especially hath miscarried the Authours though men otherwise of Learning and Piety first in mistaking the word Law They seem to take the word Law to signifie only the agreements pactions and rules established by mutual consent betwixt Prince and people and make this only to be the ground of subjection and of commanding So that what is beyond it is no way obligatory either to be performed or suffered under farther then necessity and the want of power to resist doth enforce But they forget that there is another and superiour Law viz. that of God's Soveraignty oftentimes appointing an Invader or an Usurper or a Tyrant to rule for the punishment of a people Whose will only is the Law and whom God will have obeyed by all subjects in things lawful and not resisted in things unlawful So he appointed Nebuchadnezzar Jer. 25.15 not onely to rule over the Jews but over all the Nations there mentioned and they are enjoyned to obedience unto him So Hos 13.11 Hos 13.11 Jeroboam and the following Kings over the ten Tribes in his wrath as himself saith or even over all Israel as Saul who is understood to be pointed at in that Text. And of their Kings 't is expresly said they should onely be able to cry out in that day which by their practise 1 Sam. 8.18 may be understood that they should be allowed to do no other For else why joyned they not with David or why did not David himself resist him but always fled from him And the punishment of all those subjects that rebelled in the
and for some of our selves likewise if whilst we had such principles we had been silenc'd and asleep also To the last vâ—z That conscientious men are 3. Conscientientious men troubled for their unconformity unto these things molested and troubled I answer And well they may both for their own good and others whom by their example or perswasion they might mislead For if God may justly plague his people for neglecting his good and wholsome Law Act for the uniformity of Common-prayer in these cases provided as the Queen and Parliament imply he will It is as good service done to men by penalties to compel them to their duty in theâ—e particulars as to scourge a child to keep him from the fire St. Austin being once of the mind that Schismaticks and Hereticks should not be punished on better advice acquaintance with the Scripture and by experience Epist 48. and 50. was brought to be of another mind and wrote two large and elaborate Epistles to defend the lawfulness of the use of Laws to that purpose SECT III. Humane Inventions THe third general Exception is against the things we treat of that they are inventions humane and from man onely Answ several of them First The light of natural understanding wit and reason is from God he it is which thereby doth illuminate every man entring into the world Rich. Hook Eccles pol. lib. 3. sect 9. If there proceed from us any thing afterward corrupt and naught the mother therof is our own darkness neither doth it proceed from any such cause whereof God is the Author He is the Author of all that we think or do by vertue of that light which himself hath given And therefore the Laws which the very Heathens did gather to direct their actions by so far forth as they proceeded from the light of nature God himself doth acknowledge to have proceeded even from himself and that he was the writer of them in the table of their hearts In the second place How much more then is he the Author of those Laws which have been made by his Saints c. saith that praise worthy Author When the Disciples would have had our Saviour to put the man to silence who cast out devils in his name Mar. 9.38 and followed him not with them our Saviour rebuking of them gives us this useful Maxim in religious matters viz. That he that is not against us is on our part Things not opposing of the Scripture and intended for and tending to the furtherance of Religion they are not humane notions but the inventions of men directed by Scripture in the general touching such things viz. 1 Cor. 14. That all things be done to decency and edification and guided by the Spirit of God in such particulars Observance whereof rather then opposition thereto would represent a Christs Disciple The Feast of Dedication of the Temple was no injunction from the Lord 1 Maccab. 4.59 Joh. 10.22 But so useful an invention of man that our Lord himself observed it Remarkable also to this purpose is the profession of the Learned Zanchy touching things of this nature viz. Zanch. Observ in confess suam cap. 25. Aph. 10 11. ab initio Credo ea quae â piis patribus in nomine domini Congregatis communi omnium consensu citra ullam sacrarum literarum contradictionem definita recepta fuerunt ea etium quanquam haud ejusdem cum sacris literis authoritatis A SPIRITV SANCTO ESSE Those things saith he which have been concluded and received by the holy Fathers gathered together in the name of God Canons of the Church of what authority agreed on by common consent and without any contradiction to the Scripture although they are not of the same authority with the holy Scriptures yet I believe even those things to be from the HOLY GHOST Thus he Joh. 14. cap. 15. cap. 16. And it is not in vain that Christ hath promised his Spirit to his people to guide them into all truth SECT IV. Of the Apocrypha TO the fourth that many things in the premises are but Apocryphal and so not Scriptural nor obliging Now Touching the Apocrypha and its injunction to be read in some parts in the Church although all the Scripture be not read First which Books in case my self did think as some others do safer and better to be left publickly unread R. Hook Eccles pol. l. 5. sect 20. nevertheless as in other things of like nature even so in this my private judgment I should be loth to oppose against the force of their reverend authority who rather considering the divine excellency of some things in all and of all things in certain of those Apocrypha which we publickly read have thought it better to let them stand as a list or marginal border unto the Old Testament And though with divine yet as humane compositions to grant at the least unto certain of them publick audience in the Church of God And if in them there happen any speech that soundeth towards error should the mixture of a little dross constrain the Church to deprive her self of so much gold rather than learn how by art and judgment to make separation To this effect very fitly from the counsel that St. Jerom giveth unto Laeta of taking heed how she read the Apocrypha as also by the help of other learned mens judgment we may take direction And let me add that without such directions Confer Hamp Court pag. 61. King James said well he would not have all the Canonical Scripture read But because some there are who seem better to relish forreign judgments than those of their own Church Expositio de sacr libr. dignitate praefix ante Biblia Tigurin sive Leon Judae I shall recite first Bullingers opinion of those Books and the publick reading of them one of the Professors of the Church of Tigur his words are Ego verò arbitror salvo aliorum judicio istos libros Apocryphos rectissimè Hagiographa dici posse nimirum a sanctis viris de rebus Scriptos sacris quos quanquam non fint in Canone Hebraeo Ecclesia tamen quia sancta tradunt Canonicis non contradicunt recipit ac in sanctorum coetibus legit I do think saith he saving other mens judgments that these Apocryphal Books may very justly be called holy writings as being written by holy men touching holy things which though they are not in the Hebrew Canon yet because they treat of religious matters and do not contradict the holy Scriptures the Church doth receive them and reads them in the Assemblies of the Saints Then he produceth the judgment and relation of Cyprian Cyprian expos symb or Russinus for the work is ascribed to both in his Exposition of the Creed to the same purpose Where it is by the way to be noted out of the Text of Cyprian or Ruffinus first that he reckons the Books
truly defined by St. Paul to be a departing from the faith it shall be evident that these are no Popery It is prudently uttered by King James Conf. Hamp Court pag. 75. Answ when the like was before him objected of some of these matters That no Church ought further to separate it self from the Church of Rome I may add or from any other Church either in Doctrine or Ceremony than she had departed from her self and from Christ her Lord and head And indeed it is a Popish and superstitious principle to take nothing of those Churches that are opposite to them which is an issue of their pride and arrogance R. Hook Eccles pol. l. 5. §. 68. p. 368. Calv. Epist ad Socinum 1549. vid. Et Instiâ— lib. 4. cap. 2. § 11. which some now imitate on the other side Now it must be noted ' Thot those that hold the head the confession of faith do all joyn in the root though they separate above and in the branches Hence Ecclesiam aliquam manere in Papatu There is some Church remaining in the Papacy saith Calvin Others I might name but take Zanchy's notable word for all Nescio quo singulari beneficio Dei hoc adhuc boni in Romanâ Ecclesia servari nemo non vidit nisi qui videre non vult Quod nimirum sicut semper sic nunc etiam constans firma in verâ de Deo deque personâ Domini nostri Jesu Christi doctrinâ persistit Et Baptizat in nomine Patris Filii Spiritus sancti Christumque agnoscit praedicat pro unico mundi Redemptore futuroque vivorum mortuorum judice qui veros fideles secum in aeternum vitam recepturus incredulos autem impios in aeternum ignem cum diabolo Angelis ejus ejecturus sit Quae causa est cur Ecclesiam HANC pro Ecclesia CHRISTI etiamum agnoscam sed quali Qualis ab Osea aliisque prophetis Ecclesia Israelis sub Jeroboamo deinceps fuisse describitur nunquam enim resipuit à suis fornicationibus That is I know not by what kind of special mercy of God Zanch. ep dedic ante confess suam Tom. 8. but so it is that thus much good remains in the Church of Rome which every man sees but they that will see nothing Namely that as always The Roman Church what remains found in it so now it persists firm and constant in the true doctrine concerning God and concerning the Person of our Lord Jesus Christ And Baptizeth in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Ghost And doth acknowledge and preach Christ for the onely Redeemer of the world and he that shall be the Judge of the quick and the dead Who also shall receive unto himself all true believers unto eternal life and who shall reject unto everlasting fire with the devil and his angels all unbelievers and wicked men For which reason I do in some sort acknowledge THIS for a Church of CHRIST But what kind of one namely such as the Church of Israel is described to be under Jeroboam and afterwards by Hosea and other Prophets for she never repented of her fornications Thus he Some kind of Church of Christ then it being Hence it follows first that all things in Popery are not superstitious for if a Church there must be somewhat of the Spirit of God and of Christ in them Joh. 1. Joh. 16. to guide and keep it in these truths Else why do these Brethren read the Popish writers the Jesuites and Schoolmen as some of them have the best spoak in their cart from thence and preach much of their matter and notions to their people The superstition may be either in the opinion that they had of them or the abuse they made of them which being removed the thing may be lawful even in individuo As the flesh that had been consecrated to an Idol 1 Cor. 8. even that very flesh might have been bought or eaten by the strong and those that knew the truth As God be praised our people do in the things excepted against no man putting any confidence in them but in Christ alone observing them onely for order edification and decency Secondly Some kind of respect must have been given to that Church as a Church of Christ in some sense by the Reformers both for preventing offence in respect of them abroad and for the regaining of the brethren of this Nation amongst us misled that way as the Apostle saith I become all things to all men 1 Cor. 9. ad fin that I might by all means win some If therefore what could not be thâ—n or cannot be now without danger in those respects left off be retained still the doctrine of the Church in the mean time being fully opened and professed it is charity not Popery and wisdom godly not superstition ' for we must have respect unto the weak 1 Cor. 14. Object Before we leave this If it be objected that the Church of * Homily on Whitsunday part 3. Homily of Rebellion in several places and in other Homilies England doth seem to hold the Church of Rome the seat of Anti-Christ and the Pope to be his very peson It is answered suppose it do so Answ yet doth it not therefore follow but that the Church of Rome hath something in it of a true Church 2 Thess 2. else how should Antichrist sit in the Temple of God which is his Church if the seat of Antichrist were not in some respects a Church And that the Church of England doth acknowledge that Rome hath something of a Church in it it s retaining the Baptism and Ministery of that Church it s not re-baptizing or new-ordaining those that come to it from that 2. The Mass-book doth plainly shew This for Popery and the Church of Rome in general Secondly for the Mass-book in particular Cic. Joh. 1. De Justific lib. 5. cap. 7. sit tertia propositio Missale Rom. edit Paris 1787. The Mass-book against merits Let us see whether any gold be in Ennius dung whether any good thing can come out of Nazareth and whether any truth and piety out of the Mass-book Bellarmine who knew its meaning well and in a cause wherein if any where he should have pass'd it by proves out of the mass-Mass-book that we can have no trust nor confidence in our own work and merits for salvation but onely in the mercy of God In which as in the Master-vein doth run the life-blood of all Religion The words are a] Collectâ in sexagessimâ Deus qui conspicis quia ex nulla nostrâ actione confidimus Item b] Collect. secreta dom Adventus 2. ubi nulla suppetunt suffragia meritorum tuis nobis succurre praesidiis Item c] In canone post consecration in orat prox post comemorat pro defunct de multiâ—udine miserationum tuarum sperantib c.
certain words there is offered up a real sacrifice expiatory for the sins of the living and the dead Non solum pro sidelium vivorum peccatis poenis satisfactionibus aliis necessitatibus sed pro defunctis in Christo nondum ad plenum purgatis ritè offertur And again Can. 1. Si quis dixerit in Missa non offerri Deo verum proprium sacrificum Anathema sit That is In the Mass is offered rightly not only for the sins punishments satisfactions and other necessities of the living but for the dead in Christ also And if any man shall say that in the Mass there is not a true and proper sacrifice let him be accursed Contrary to this idolatry blasphemy and superstition In the publick form of Administring the Sacrament in the Prayer Consecratory in our Liturgy whereby the Bread and Wine is set apart for that holy use Prayer before the distribution of the Sacrament The entrance is this Almighty God our Heavenly Father which of thy tender mercy didst give thine only Son Jesus Christ to suffer death upon the Cross for our Redemption who made THERE BY HIS ONE OBLATION OF HIMSELF ONCE FOR ALL a full perfect and sufficient sacrifice oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world and did institute and in his holy Gospel command us to continue a perpetual MEMORY of that his precious death until his coming again Transsubstantiation Artolatria Communion in one kind Concil Constant Sess 13. What should I speak of Transsubstantiation and of the worshipping of the Host whereas the Prayer-Book teacheth us to believe it is Bread and Wine still and to lift up our hearts to worship Christ in the Heavens The defrauding of the people of one half of the Sacrament the Cup licèt Christus post coenam instituerit suis discipulis administraverit sub utraque specie panis vini hoc venerabile sacramentum tamen hoc non obstante c. that is though Christ instituted this after Supper and administred it unto his Disciples under both kinds of Bread and Wine yet this notwithstanding They forbid the Priest to give it so under the penalty of Excommunication 7. Sacram. Corruption of Bapt. c. 5. Prayer for the dead Concil Trid. Sess 9. sub p. 4. Decret 1. The multiplying of the Sacraments the vitiating of Baptisme by superstitious ceremonies of exorcising with Cream Spittle c. All which foul Spirits are cast out by the Liturgy from our worship with multitude of others I shall but name one more that you may tell them on your fingers And that is prayer for the dead Whereas the Church of Rome it self doth teach that there is no use of Prayer for the damned because Purgatorium pro eis tantum esse qui cum venialibus culpis moriuntur Bell. de purgat lib. 2. cap. 1. ad fin A wise distinctâ—on rursum pro illis qui discedunt cum reatu poenae culpis jam remissis Purgatory is for those only that dye in smaller sins or in guilt of punishment the offence being pardoned Now our Church excludeth the use of Prayer for any deceased For those who dye excommunicate they have no solemn Burial And for others who dye in the Faith and Fellowship of the Church it prayeth not Form of Burial whilst the earth is cast upon the body but first professeth its Faith of their happy Resurrection Forasmuch as it hath pleased Almighty God to take unto himself the soul of our dear Brother here departed we therefore commit his body to the ground in sure and certain hope of resurrection to eternal life c. Then professing against Purgatory it saith Almighty God The Thanksgiving before the last Collect at Burial with whom do live the spirits of them that depart hence in the Lord and in whom the souls of them that be elected after they be delivered from the burden of the flesh be in joy and felicity Lastly it giveth therefore thanks We give thee hearty thanks for that it hath pleased thee to deliver this our Brother out of the miseries of this sinful world c. Where by the way let it not offend that this form is applyed to all Why the same form is applyed to all that are buried For first it useth the word hope not knowledge Secondly it is applyed only to those who dye visible members of the Church and not excommunicated So that charity doth not interpose its private judgment where the Church hath not pronounced hers To conclude the Br. must consider that the Liturgy was directed on purpose to oppose Popery as was noted above His Majesty remembring with what doctrine the Church of England in her first and most happy reformation did drive out the one and keep out the other namely Popery and Separation saith his Grace of Cant. And thus much in answer to the fifth general Exception viz. Popery Superstition and the Mass-Book SECT VI. Of the Non-establishment of the premises by law COme we to the sixt viz. That the doctrine the worship the discipline and government are not established by law in this Church and Nation This I shall reply unto in reference unto them all in general first and then descend unto the severals 1. The Authors of the Book intituled Reasons shewing the necessity of Reformation c. And here before I come to the matter it self I must take leave to speak a word unto these objectors And it shall be in their own Language namely that they are like to give a sad account unto God or in a more Authentick one that they must look unto it for this their writing As they will answer before God for such evils and plagues wherewith Almighty God may justly punish his people for neglecting this good and wholesome Law Act for uniformity of Common-Prayer vîz the Act 1 Eliz. 1. establishing the form of Gods worship The obedience unto which and other tending to the setling of Religion among us hath been so much shaken by the form and appearance of truth and godliness which their Treatise hath without the power thereof seemed to have This to their persons 2. Their scope Next for their scope they express it not to be a reformation of the things they except at but a plain abolition of them Zâ—nch Epist ad Cardin. Letharing ib. 2. whereas our Lord Christ saith the Cardinal approved by a chief man of our own did not destroy the Temple but only purge it Christus non destruxit Templum sed repurgavit ita ecclesiae in quas irrepserunt aliquot errores abusus superstitiones non sunt convellendae sed repurgandae So the Churches saith he into which some errors abuses and superstitions are crept are not to be plucked up but purged But it seems ubi dolor ibi digitus the Kitchin of the chief supposed Author of that Treatise is like to be cooler for the late restitution having
jurisdiction belonging to Soveraign Princes is expresly forbidden Ministers to meddle with further then they are presidented in the Homily of Obedience and in the rest of the Homilies and Articles of Religion And besides that the declaring of Law in general is proper to the Judges for to you saith our * Kings Speech at the Dissolution of the Parl. after his assents unto the Petition of Rights late Soveraign speaking to the Judges in Parliament only under me belongs the interpretation of Law But Thirdly should we grant that according to the punctilio's and formalities of Law they should not be established by that of the Land yet the Church hath its Law also that whatsoever is imposed by the Governors thereof for edification Note agreeable or not repugnant to the Scriptures especially if God and experience have set their seal thereunto as the premises have had and that custome and tract of time have given them prescription which the Apostle after all reasoning flies unto if such things should be excepted against by others 1 Cor. 11.16 yet doubtless very improperly by those 1 Cor. 9.1 2. whose seed of generation and milk of infancy and strong meat of riper age they have been in the Lord. Yea I add and who by their profession and subscripsion have been particularly obliged to them But oftentimes it cometh to pass that the watchmen themselves who were appointed for the Safeguarding of the Church Serm. before the Hâ— Com. Feb. 18. 1620. prove in this kind to be the smiters and wounders of her saith the Primate of Ireland And no marvel for veteres scrutans historias invenire non possum scidisse ecclesiam de domo Dei populos seduxisse praeter eos qui Sacerdotes à Deo positi fuerant prophetae id est speculatores Searching the antient Records Hier. in Hos 9.8 Tom. 6. I cannot find that any other have rent the Church and have seduced the people from the house of God but they who have been appointed Priests by God and Prophets thar is Watchmen saith St. Jerome I have done with the first Exception against the premises viz. their non-establishment in general Subsect 1. Articles not established COme we now to the particular proofs of their non-establishment with replies unto them And first 2. Partic. Except against the establishment of the premises the Doctrine or the Articles of Religion they are not say the Brethren established because neither doth the Act 13 Eliz. name them in particular nor so much as their number but only the title page nor is it known where the original is enrolled Answ Omitting what several others may have more pertinently answered in their replies to the Brethren none of which I have read my conceptions are First Necessity of Reform p. 1 2 That this reflects gross negligence upon the then Parliament if they laid that foundation weak upon which the whole fabrick of Religion in this Church was to be raised But Secondly Do the Brethren imagine that the Parliament intended to establish titulum sine re the title and leave the matter uncertain Surely not only that Parliament but all since The Princes also and Judges ever since have taken the Articles as now they are to be confirmed then K. Declarat bâ—fore the Articles 4 Car. 3.1 and to contain the true Doctrine of the Church of England who surely had good assurance that they did accord with the original Thirdly Again if all Acts of State be void whereof the originals are not extant although confirmed by Act of Parliament what the inference may be I leave to the Learned in the Laws to judge for my self I take it to be a suggestion of a very dangerous consequence This for the Articles Subsect II. Common-Prayer-Book NExt for the Liturgy or Common-Prayer-Book That they say is not established First because it is not the same that was established by the Parliament 1 Eliz. 2. And secondly because if it were yet it is not established by Law because that of 1 Eliz. 2. it self doth not appear to be established neither because it is not agreeable to the Act nor annexed to it nor the original to be found 1. Com. Prayer Book of Q. Eliz. To begin with the Book of Queen Elizabeth and then to come to that now in use Touching the former the Act of 1 Eliz. 2. touching uniformity of Common-Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments enjoyneth the use of that Book with the allowance of one alteration or addition of certain Lessons to be used every Sunday in the year Except And the form of the Letany altered and corrected and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacraments to the Communicants and none other or otherwise from the Common-Prayer Book confirmed by Parliament in the fifth and sixth years of Edw. 6. Now because the Book of Q. Elizabeth referreth to that and that the alterations mentioned in that of Q. Eliz. from that of Edw. 6. are not particularly named in the Act for conformity of Common-Prayer And because the original Book of Edw. 6. is lost and this of Q. Eliz. printed differs from that of Edw. 6. the Brethren infer that the Book of Q. Eliz. is not established or not evident that Answ 1 it is established by the Act. I might answer That these being niceties of Law and the alterations insisted on either in Q. Eliz. Book or in the present one from that Answ 2 not being many or much material And being generally Answ 3 received as established the matter being godly Answ 4 and presence of God in the comfort and edification of Answ 5 his people thereby evidently approving of it I might as I said answer viderint alii let men of skill in Law look to that point But seeing I take their objections from Law to be easily answerable go to let us try their strength The Parliament of the 1 Eliz. 2. Q. Eliz. Liturgy established did know that the former Book of 5 6 Edw. 6. was abolished by an Act 1 Mar. 2. and mention it in the Act. And that the Original was taken off the Parliament Roll and so lost They did not think it necessary notwithstanding this either to name particularly the alterations made or to annex the Book unto their Act. Now the Q. and Parl. did judge that they had done enough to establish the Book the Brethren affirm not Wherein if they were right in their matter yet not in their modesty But they are amiss there also For the Parl. knowing the Book of Edw. 6. to have been in all Churches and in every mans hand and themselves allowing not the original which was lost but the printed ones with the alterations they mention it was most easie for any man to find by comparing the Books printed by this Act with those of Edw. 6. which were the alterations the Parl. having named where they were and concerning what But because by this it appears according
of the other Ubi videbat cruentum facinus Idem ibid. cap. 1. ibi rursum timebat reatum perjurii Ne Deum offenderet peâ—erando Deum offendit saeviendo Where he saw a bloody villany there he feared the guilt of perjury and lest he should offend God by forswearing there he offended God by cruel murdering saith the same Author Subsect 2. What the Covenant obligeth to THus far hath been shewen that the Covenant in reference to the performance of the contents of it bindeth not Yet doth it bind and oblige very strongly For Ecce sanctus David non quidem juratus sanguinem hominis fudit sed eum falsum jurasse negare quis poterit de duobus peccatis elegit miâ—us sed minus fuit illud in conparatione majoris Nam per seipsum appensum magnum malum est falsa juratio Behold holy David Aug. ubi supra cap. 3. he would not shed a mans blood though he had sworn it But who can deny but that he was forsworn of two evils he chose the least It was indeed the least in comparison of the greater but else of it self false swearing is a great sin Saith the same St. Austin Now great sins do bind and oblige unto deep repentance As Paul in another case 2 Cor. x2 ult I must bewail saith he those that committed these lasciviousnesses and have not repented Job 42. We must as Job did after he had spoken words that he understood not to God even abhor our selves and repent in dust and ashes And with the blessed Apostle we must be humbled as oft as we reflect upon it and think the worse of of our selves as long as we live as he did for his sin though not committed in light as ours was 1 Cor. 15. I am not worthy saith he to be called an Apostle because I persecuted the Church of God So every one of us I am not worthy to be called a Christian a subject of the Kings or a son of the Church because I entred into this Covenant But yet with his comfort and some kind of recompence where he had cone the wrong viz. Yet by the grace of God I am what I am that is a penitent and a convert and as a token of it I laboured more abundantly then they all that had not so offended As 't is also prophesied in this cause some should do Eicon Basilic Medit. 27. Prov. 24.21 22. And let us for the future fear God and the King and not meddle with them that are given to change the government of Church and State for their destruction hath come suddenly and who foreknew the ruine of them both i. e. those that have both deserted God in his Church and the King in the State and Common-wealth Prov. 1.10 And if hereafter sinners in that kind entice thee consent thou not no though they should say Come we will have all one purse For they lay wait for their own blood as we have seen And let us not deceive our selves one horn of this dilemma will wound us Either the Covenant is to be literally kept or else repented of Remember palliations expositions and evasions here will do no good Prov. 28.13 Psal 32. Numb 32.23 For he that covereth this sin shall not prosper And whilst we hold our peace our bones will consume through Gods heavy hand upon us And our sin will find us out For there is no darkness nor shadow of death Job 34.22 where the workers of iniquity may hide themselves saith Elihu And thus far of the general exceptions against the Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government of the Church of England viz. That they are unnecessary inconvenient humane inventions Apocryphal Popish not established by Law And an Engagement and Covenant for the removing or reforming of them CHAP. III. Grounds of Separation and Exceptions particular against the Matter of the Premises SECT I. Against the Articles or Doctrine 2. Exceptions particular against the matter of the premises Independents excepts not Apologet. narrat pag. 29. PRoceed we now unto the Exceptions particular namely against the matter of the Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government And first of those against the Articles or Doctrine The Independent or dissenting Brethren acknowledge That in the review and examination of the Articles of our Church so are their words our judgments say they have still concurred with the greatest part of our Brethren neither do we know wherein we have dissented Some Presbyters now do But certain of the Presbyterian Brethren do dissent and object against them first doubtfulness secondly error thirdly tyranny in the act requiring subscription Necessity of Reform pag. 1. c. 1. Doubtfulness and fourthly defectiveness and imperfection First doubtfulness because in the book of Articles now printed and ever since 10 Carol. 1. there is a declaration of his late Majesty to the Articles to this effect 1. That those Articles contain the true Doctrine of the Church of England agreeable to Gods Word 2. That the Clergy upon just occasion may have liberty from the King Kings deelar before the Articles under the Broad Seal to deliberate on such things as make for the establishment of the same doctrine yet so that no varying in the least degree should be endured 3. That no man should put his own sense upon them but take the Articles in the literal and grammatical sense pag. 2. whence the Brethren infer that by this Declaration no Minister shall have liberty to interpret any one of these Articles And therefore they will remain doubtful But first Answ 1 this doubtfulness is not per se and in the Articles themselves but per accidens and in reference to this declaration Again though they are prohâ—bited to put any Answ 2 new sense as the King speaks or their own sense as the Judge in Smiths case Necessity of Reform p. 5. yet are they not forbidden to explain the literal and grammatical sense The Scripture in the fundamentals of salvation also the Laws and Acts of Parliament are so to be taken and yet Divines there and Judges here have ever been allowed to open those senses or else the one must not preach nor the other declare Law Thirdly when unto that liberty Answ 3 granted to the Clergy there is this restraint expresly put upon it viz. That from the Doctrine established the least varying shall not be endured and that nothing shall be concluded contrary to the Laws and Customs of the Land is there not a fair assurance that the present doctrine shall remain fixed and that if any heterodox sense shall be put upon them it shall be lawful to oppose the literal and grammatical sense whether in the Article or Explication Fourthly when the Declaration Answ 4 saith We will that all further curious search be laid aside and these disputes shut up in Gods promises as they be generally set forth unto us in the holy
men The Br. object Tyranny to Q. Eliz. and the Parl. which is not to be imagined To this first in general If this Reason be admitted it doth not only overthrow all constitutions that concern Religion whether made by Church or State whensoever any turbulent spirit shall fancy them not to be according to the Word And to all States and Churches But it condemns also all the Reformed Churches yea all the Churches and Christian States that are or ever have been I think in the world And particularly majorem in modum and in a special manner the Church of Geneva Ch. of Geneva requires conformity by Oath Revel 13.11 and Calvins Discipline where they are obliged thereunto by oath But to the dilemma in particular neither of the two Horns of this Lamb that speaks like a Dragon have any strength Have they forgotten or never learned that boyes are taught in the very rudiments of Logick and reasoning Kek. Log l. 3. c. 12. can 7. Quod per bonam consequentiam ex testimonio aliquo divino elicitur id EANDEM cum eo vim habet That what by good consequence is drawn from Scripture hath the same force that Scripture hath Did not our Saviour and all the Apostles prove their Doctrine so unto those that received nothing from them but what they proved Do not the Brethren think their Sermons and this their Book ought to be obeyed absolutely and in all the points they have excepted And indeed a good consequence is nothing but a natural effect Consequences And an effect is of the same nature with its cause yea as one saith nothing else but the cause in act or at least the cause is in the effect R. Hook l. 5. so is Scripture in the true consequénces of it And yet subscription to such conclusions do not argue the Authors to be infallible but only to be eyes unto the weaker-sighted to see the light by Tert. Advers Haeret. Omnia quidem dicta Domini omnibus posita sunt quae per aures judaeorum ad nos pervenerunt Gods Word is propounded unto all but it comes to us by the ears and so by the eyes of others And because men are called to subscribe and not children who should have their eyes their subscription only acknowledgeth that the Church and State have taken a true sample from the original leaving this still as the standard as prior tempore ordine naturâ dignitate Such are all the true determinations of Judges in reference to the Law as Deut. 17. They shall expound the Law to thee And the disobedient there was punished with death for contempt of the sentence of the Church and State and yet their determinations were not of equal authority but of equal force with the Law it self So here Secondly To the other horn of this Lamb or dilemma That else the statute did intend to tyrannize over the conscience which they say is not to be imagined Oportuit esse memorem Answ Did not the Brethren in the very lines immediately going before acknowledge yea urge it as an argument out of Sir Edw. Coke who saith He heard Wray Chief Justice of the K. Bench Pasch 23 Eliz. quoting Dier 23 Eliz. 377. lib. 6. fol. 69. Greens case Smiths case report that where one Smith subscribed to the 39 Articles of Religion with this addition so far forth as the same were agreeable to the Word of God that it was resolved by him and all the Judges of England that this subscription was not according to the Statute of Eliz 13. Because the Statute required an absolute subscription and this subscription made it conditional And that this Act was made for avoiding diversity of opinions c. And by this additâ—on the party might by his own private opinion take some of them to be against the Word of God and by this means diversity of opinions should not be avoided which was the scope of the Statute and the very Act it self made touching subscription hereby by of none effect Thus far their own quotation So then it is evident by the words themselves quoted just before and by the sentence of all the Judges of England that the Statute requireth absolute subscription which if it do they say it did intend to tyrannize over the consciences of men So then Q. Eliz. and that Parl. with all the Kings and Parliaments since that have confirmed that Act were Tyrants It concerns the present Parl. to vindicate their predecessors in this point also To what they add concerning mens subscribing when they are young Subscription of young men and before their judgments be mature It is answered first Those admitted to the Ministry though they may be as Timothy was but young in age yet they are not to be Novices in knowledge And Subscription is a good bond upon them Use of subscription both for the peoples good and their own to preserve them from novelties and apostacy But so that no man is engaged against the Word of God I hope then they will not urge the obligation of the Covenant upon those who have not had time or solidity throughly to ponder and weigh all the Articles thereof in the ballance of the Sanctuary and in the scale of the Law as they phrase it To the last of this head The liberty given to tender consciences Liberty to tender consciences is to be in things of lesser not of fundamentall consequence and in the Articles of the Faith for then how should the Magistrate be custos utriusque tabulae How should the Prince perform his trust of the souls as well as the bodies estates and names of his people How should there be one God one Faith one Baptisme in a particular Church and we all with one mouth glorifie God This is also against the practice of all Churches we have no such custome 1 Cor. 11. nor the Churches of God Thus much in reply to their three general first object against the Articles 1. Their doubtfulnesse 2. Their erroniousness and 3. The exacting of subscription to them I come now to the fourth viz. Their defectiveness and imperfection Defectiveness of the Artic. Where the first Exception is that Art 6. it is said that In the name of the holy Scripture we understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority there was never any doubt in the Church The Brethren oppose that some Books and passages of the New Testament have been doubted of as the Epistle of James the second Epistle of Peter The Article they say is defective in not enumerating all the Books of the New Testament as it had done those of the Old and of the Apocrypha comprehending them only under this expression All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received These words of the Article being the former contains no matter of doctrine namely those of which there was never any doubt in the
as few as may be and that we leave mens judgments free in many things by reason that the obscurity in a number of them is exceeding great I have done with the first general head the Doctrine and Articles wherein as being the foundation the more time hath been expended CHAP. IV. Of Worship and of the Directory there of the Liturgy SECT I. Of Worship THE next is Worship 2. VVorship 1. In it self wherein the thing especially to be observed is Purity as in Doctrine Truth Now the purity of worship I take it Purity of it wherein consisting is defin'd by the matter whereof it is composed the object whereunto and medium or mean by which it is directed if these be right the Worship it self is pure For the evidencing that ours is such consider we it first in it self and then in the Appendixes of it the Ceremonies 1. In it self That of the Church of England such and so our Worship in the Church of England is directed onely to the onely true God in the Unity of Essence and Trinity of Persons the Maker and Governor of all things And the Worship which we tender unto him is for matter according to his will as shall be proved Lastly it is by the onely and alone medium and mediation of God manifested in the flesh the Man Christ Jesus but of the Creatures whether the blessed Virgin although 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Mother of God or Saint or Angel we joyn none with him as is to be seen in the frequent closure of our prayers in the publick Liturgy The second Collect in the Letany Through our ONELY Mediator and Advocate Jesus Christ our Lord. Which is also proved negatively because there is in the Liturgy no prayer neither directly nor indirectly to any but God himself nor by any other but Jesus Christ 2. In the Ceremonies which destroy not the substance of worship 2. In respect of Ceremonies which are annexed to it Now Ceremonies being but the appendixes and circumstances of Worship either as ornaments or advantages to it unless they be such as at least imply either another object or person to be worshipped than God or another Mediator than Christ and so a contradiction to the worship whereon they hang How should they destroy the purity of worship Perturb and trouble it they may by their multitude or unusefulness but vitiate it they cannot Now all our Ceremonies are so few in number and so explained eâ—ther by Doctrine or Canon or other publick writings for their * Dr. Burgess of the three innocent Ceremonies See the form of private Baptism and Can. 30. with the Rubricks Mr. Ph. N. innocency and use that they seem not capable of the former evills though they had been all urged But for the matter of our worship the most weighty men of the other ways do not much except against it I am sure I have heard one of the best of them acknowledge lately That there was nothing in the common-prayer-Common-prayer-book for the matter of it against the word of God Now all separation is a division all division tends to dissipation But to commit this against a Church whose worship is for the matter sound and the Ceremonies not opposite thereunto because some of them have been abused formerly to superstition savours of worse then their weakness 1 Cor. 10.25 28. who refused the meat though in the shambles because it had been once consecrated unto an Idol But rather take we his advice misericorditer igitur corripiat homo quod potest Aug. contr epist Parmen lib. 3. cap. 2. quod autem non potest patienter ferat cum dilectione gemat atque lugeat donec ille desuper emendet corrigat aut usque ad messem differat erradicare zizania paleam ventilare Let a man therefore gently amend what he may and and what he cannot let him bear with patience and lament with love until God from above do reform it or correct it or defer until the harvest the rooting out of the tares and the winnowing of the chaff But in particular the Ceremonies are but four especially Bowing at the naming Jesus The Cross in Bapt. Keeling at the Communion And the Surpliss in reading Service Omitting what hath been satisfactorily discoursed on these by others as [a] Conser Hampt Court King James [b] Can. 30. The Canons of 1603. Can. 30. [c] Eccles Polit. Mr. Hooker [d] The three Innocent ceremonies Hieron in Isa 45.23 Mr. Burgess and divers more I shall for the first recite the Judgment of Antiquity represented by St. Jerome on those words of Isaiah By my self have I sworn that every knee shall bow to me c. Hoc jurat quòd Idolis derelictis omne genu ei flectat coelestium terrestrium infernorum omnis per illum juret lingua mortalium In quo perspicuè significatur populus Christianus Moris est enim ecclesiastici Christo Genu flectere Bowing at the name of Jesus Quod Judaei mentis superbiam demonstrantes omnino non faciunt This he swears That forsaking Idols every knee should bow to him of things in Heaven in the Earth and under the Earth and every tongue of mortal men swear by him in which is clearly signified the Christian people for it is the custome of the Church to BOW the KNEE to Christ Which the Jews declaring the pride of their hearts will by no means do Wherein Explained we may note two causes of refusing to bow at the naming of the Lord Jesus First Jewish unbelief and secondly The like haughtiness and pride of spirit To which we may add in respect of some I hope a needless fear of superstition Touching the next the Cross in Baptisme Although I cannot hope to satisfie those whom the Canon of the Church hath not satisfied Against which Canon Cross in Bapt. Can. 30. the late Authors of the Treatise of the necessity of Reformation have this Exception that it hath not with its reasons Pag. 60. Ed. 2. added either Scripture or Fathers Whereas it mentions both though naming none By this reason they may decline all the Articles yea and most Confessions in Europe which generally omit both as being too paedantical for a confession or the Canons of a Church Wherein also their iniquity as well as unskilfulness appeareth Who say of the Rubrick explaining the use of the ceremony of kneeling at the communion Pag. of the inserted sheet the third that the Compilers had solidly and excellently declared in what sense they intended kneeling at the Communion omitted in the Book of Q. Eliz. and yet that hath neither Scripture nor Father alledged But this pleased because it ministred quarrel against the present Common-prayer-book I might refer for more ample satisfaction to the exact diligence in this point also of that hyperaspistes of our Church in these matters Mr. Hooker Eccles Polit. li. 5. §
likeness-sake So are these also called Scripture and holy Scripture yea and sometimes Canonical some of them De doctr Christ lib. 2. cap. 8. by St. Austin But so that aliter Hieronymus accipit vocabulum hoc Canonicus aliter eam vocem Augustinus Innocentius Patres Carthaginuenses interpretanter Otherwise doth Jerom take the word Canonical and otherwise Austin Innocent and the Fathers at the Councel of Carthage saith our Whitaker Contr. 1. Q. 1. c. 4. And so I say otherwise do the Articles of our Church take the word Canonical and otherwise sometimes the Prayer-book and the Homilies But of this more largely above In the answer to the fourth general Exception Secondly These are brought in here not as an interrupting of the reading any more than the singing of a Psalm which though not express Scripture might be sung betwixt the Lessons or reading an Exhortation or Prayer for they are brought in by way of Hymn onely and are sung also in some Churches But in particular they except first against Te Deum Te Deum We praise thee O God c. that it is a piece taken out of the Mass-book and in Popish Churches usually sung Thence brought in by Bishops into Protestant Churches but no where enjoyned or warranted by any Law in force That it shews the Bishops are not able to give thanks themselves for extraordinary mercies That it is a superstitious formal dress c. Answ To the antiquity of Te Deum beyond the Mass-book its reference unto St. Ambrose might be testimony But it s being used there or taken thence doth no more derogate from the matter of it than it doth from the Psalmes Epistles and Gospels or then it doth from the Doctrine of Free-mercy against Merits which is yet there and in the very office of the Mass as we saw above In answer to the fifth general exception It is recorded as a reputation to the old Romans that they disdained not nec ab hoste doceri To learn even of an enemy for we In what is good all friends and fellows be That the Bishops brought it in does not argue want of ability to give thanks themselves but their want of self-conceit and singularity They prudently and modestly choosing to receive and close with what is good and of general reception That they might declare their communion with all Christians in what they might and fulfilling the Apostles prayer Rom. 15. With one mind and one mouth glorifie God with the rest of his Church That it is no where enjoyned and warranted by any Law in force Not established is more than they have charged the Book hitherto with Answ having not nor indeed being not able to do it alledged any one thing added to the body of the Liturgy established by Law pag. 28. n. 6. but an Appendix as themselves reckon of three prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny 2. Act uniform com pr. Besides it is also untrue for themselves acknowledge as it is in the Act for the Uniformity of Common-prayer that the Books of 5 6 Edw. 6. shall be established without alteration except one sentence in the Letany and the addition of two in the Lords Supper c. Now it is evident that TE DEUM is in King Edwards Books and in the Book of Queen Elizabeth established by Parliament as we now receive it with all the Kings Parliaments and Judges since and comprehended by Bucer in that Elogy of his before named viz. That all generally till the Communion was agreeable to Gods Word and the use of the primitive Church Which form of Communion then hath been since reformed in part as he directed So that Te Deum is as well established by Law as any other part of the Book This gross reeling of the Brethren doth not it argue now they were etcaetera To the last which touches the matter of it viz. That it is a superstitious formal dress Seeing this is a high charge not on it but on the Common-prayer-book also yea and on the Church of England it should have in particular been shewed by the Brethren wherein it is so for dolosus versatur in universalibus This is the fruit perhaps of their Law-studies they have learned the course of Chancery to charge heavy crimes and prove nothing But shall I open this mystery of iniquity to be suspected in the breasts of these Brethren they seem to be Socinians and enemies to the Godhead of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the Doctrine of the Trinity both which are there splendidly acknowledged and professed in the Hymn of Te Deum Mr. Cartwright as it seems before Dr Reynolds and the rest at Hampton-Court were ashamed to except against it though they spared not where they thought exception might with any modesty be taken But as I said here is not onely a profession of the doctrine of the Trinity and a kind of repetition of the common Creed by way of Hymn The special use of the hymn TE DEUM but a particular application of prayer unto our Lord Jesus Christ which is done in no other part of the Book so expresly except the Letany Communion This is the superstition it may be feared that the Brethren aim at for other there is none We may now understand them when they call it and other parts of the Book Popish superstitious and Antichristian namely in his sense who writing against the doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of the Lord Jesus entituled his book Antithesis doctrinae Christi Antichristi de uno vero Deo An opposition of the doctrine of Christ and of Antichrist concerning the one true God To which the learned Zanchy making answer shews that for strengthning our faith in the doctrine of the Godhead of Christ Zanch. epistol dedic ad Sturm ante Resp suam ad Arrianum Tom. 8. p. 6. Ad hanc fidem in cordibus nostris servandam fovendam augendam quà m necessaria est crebra ad Christum in coelo residentem pro nobis interpellantem mentis elevatio EJUSQUE ac patris invocatio à verâ porrò seriâ contemplatione personae Christi ab assiâ—ua beneficiorum ejus commemoratione denique ab ardenti nominis ejus invocatione quibus fovetur fidos nostra separari non potest studium perpetuum resipiscentiae c. sunt autem haec meditatio invocatio resipiscentia tria praecipua verae fidei effecta c. For the nourishing this our faith saith he in the Godhead of Christ namely in our hearts and for the encreasing and preserving of it Prayer to Christ necessary for the strengthning of faith in him how necessary is the often lifting up our minds to Christ sitting in heaven and interceding for us and as necessary is prayer to him and to the Father Now from the true and serious consideration of the
but like beasts made a noise without any expressions They had no doubt taken example by the people Exod. 15.20 and Miriam with the women which is another I think unanswerable evidence who joyned with Moses in the song of victory over the Aegyptians And had the burden of that hymn for 't is said expresly that Miriam and so the women answered them namely the men Sing ye to the Lord for he hath triumphed gloriously the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the Sea which are the words wherein Moses and the people had begun unto them verse 1. So that not onely men but women and children Object who are forbidden to usurp authority so as to speak by way of teaching in the Church 1 Tim. 2. yet are in solemn worship admitted to bear their parts Answ Else how tedious would it have been to the whole body of the people to stand like stocks and have neither part in the worship nor means to excite their devotion Hence also is it that not the Priests onely but Israel is said to sing this song Spring up O well Num. 21.17 sing ye or as it is in the Original and also in the Margin of the Bible answer ye unto it namely by way of respond as the custom it seems was What appearance else hath that Psalm wherein For his mercy endureth for ever is repeated twenty six times Psal 136. even every verse of the Psalm which by the way may check those who except against the repetitions in the Common-prayer-book but that it was the part born by the people though it is not denyed but that the Levites might go before the people and perhaps the Priests before them as we saw above out of the Liturgy of Chrysostom the Priest the Deacon who was in stead of the Levite and the people followed one another in the publick worship Antistites clarâ voce precantur Aug. ep 119. Janu. cap. 18. As with us the Minister the Clerk and the People communis oratio voce Diaconi indicitur I have done with their exceptions to this point But as I said they omit the principal which is the matter and use of these answers of the people They should have shewn that it was different from the word else what is agreeable thereunto may be made use of in publick by those who are no where forbidden to do it 2. Use of Answering especially when we have an implicite command for so doing For if all things in Gods worship be to be done that may further edification then surely such Answers ought not to be excepted against which are so useful to that end 1 They help the intention of the people 2 they allay the peril of tedium and wearisomness 3 they engage to duty as proceeding out of their own mouthes 4 and they excite and stir up their devotion Whereupon the antient Church was so enamoured with them Socrates lib. 6. c. 8. reports Socr. l. 6. c. 8. that this custom was delivered to the Church by Ignatius Antiochiae tertius ab Apostolo Petro Episcopus qui cum Apostolis ipsis multum versatus est Not to ascribe much to his vision this shews both the antiquity and the veneration the primitive Church had of it And the latter times being taught by experience have so carefully improved them Both which we saw above and more fully represented by * R. Hook Eccles pol. l. 5. § 39. Austin ad Januar â—p 119. cap. 18. another I conclude this with that excellent and useful in this and other like cases sentence of S. Austin Vna in his saluberrima regula retinenda Vt quae non sunt contra fidem neque contra bonos more 's habet aliquid ad exhortationem Vitae melioris ubicunque institui videmus vel instituta cognoscimus non solum non improbemus sed etiam laudando imitando sectemur In these things there is one wholsome rule to be observed viz. That those things that are not against the doctrine of faith or piety of life and have any advantage to stir up to amendment of life wheresoever we see them appointed or know that they have been so let us not onely forbear to blame them but also by praising and imitating let us follow them But what if some be offended at it he answers Si aliquorum infirmitas non ita impedit ut ampliùs detrimentum sit Si enim eo modo impediat ut majora studiorum lucra speranda sint quà m calumniatorum detrimenta metuenda sine dubitatione faciendum VVhen the scandalizing of some need not hinder us If saith he the infirmity of some do not hinder so that it be rather a greater hindrance For if it so hinder that there is hope of greater benefit to the endeavours of the people then harm feared by those that speak ill of it without doubt it is to be done Repetit Psalms Which I hope is our case Lastly to the repetition of the Psalms by course it is not commanded but a custome not observed by all Except 5 The next Exception is against the Letany whose faults so far as is common with the other Against the Letany have been cleared above To that of compiling it into one prayer argues the ignorance both of the nature of vehement and fervent prayer such as the Letany is and of the infirmity of the people of whom especially respect is to be had in Gods service Violent things cannot be held out long Matth. 11.12 and 't is the violent prayer that takes heaven by foâ—ce as our Saviour speaks Now such prayers are like strong pulls that require a breathing betwixt or a fresh whetting of the affections Again the people are lost in long and continued prayers Convenit in sacris actionibus eam adhiberi moderationem quae conducit religioni populi excitandae non praebeat prolixitate occasionem aliquam negligentiae vel pio animi ardori minuendo Liturg. Colon. de Baptism The repeating of some things in the Letany by the people doth not take away that the Minister should be the mouth of the people or make themselves his mouth but his mouth going before theirs following after is as a thorn to the breast of the Nightingale to keep up their attention and devotion To that of leaving out of the Letany From the tyranny of the Bishop of Rome Tyran Bishop of Rome and all his debitable enormities Though this quarrel is against Queen Elizabeth and her Reformation Answ and the Parliament then yet it is answered that the clause is sufficiently known by comparing the Book of Edw. 6. with this which the Parliament judged to be sufficient for the thing it self Times and persons may so differ that Paul writing to the Colossians saith Chrysostom I might add Chrysost prolog ad Pauli epist Coloss 2. Gâ—l 4. Rom. 14. and to the Galatians inveigheth severely against observation of Jewish times and ceremonies which yet
the sap and spirit of the body and Vine unto us First one recent Calvine namely who defining Baptism Instit l. 4. c. 15. § 1. saith Baptismus signum est initiationis quo in ecclesiae cooptamur societatem ut Christo insiti inter filios Dei censeamur Baptism is the sign of our entrance vvhereby vve are received into the society of the Church that being grafted into Christ we might be accounted among the children of God And elsevvhere Salutis symbolum ac pignus dedit Deus in Baptismo In Tit. 3.5 nos in suam Ecclesiam cooptans inferens in corpus filii sui Quare Baptismus congruenter verè savacrum regenerationis dicitur And that therefore Bapt. is properly and truly called the laver of Regeneration Thus he Now although he make the first particular benefit in Baptism to be remission of sins and afterward the grace of the holy Ghost Jnst l. 4. c. 15. §. 5. Yet seeing he makes our new birth to be effected in Baptism and that it is properly therefore truly called the Laver of Regeneration and that therein we are first ingraffed into Christs Body and made the children of God it follows thence that we receive remission of sins by spiritual regeneration Aug. contra Jnlion l. 2. c. 3. The other is Antient to wit Austin who doth in terminis express the same which the Church hath done in that Prayer Lex quippe ista peccati quae in membris est corporis mortis hujus remissa est regeneratione spiritali manet in carne mortali Remissa scilicet quia reatus solutus est in Sacramento quo renascuntur sideles For this law of sin saith he which is in the members of this body of death both is remitted by spiritual regeneration and also remains in the flesh that is mortal It is remitted because the guilt of it is discharged in the Sacrament whereby the faithfull are regenerated And afterward Cap. 8. Justificatio porro in hac vitâ nobis secundum tria ista confertur Priùs lavacro regenerationis quo remittuntur cuncta peccata deinde congressione cum vitiis à quorum reatis absoluti sumus tertio dum nostra exauditur oratio qua dicimus dimitte nobis debita nostrae Justification how conferr'd Our justification in this life saith he is conferred upon us by these three things First by the laver of Regeneration whereby are all our sins forgiven Next by our conflicting with sins he takes the word Justification here largely as comprehending the work of Grace also from the guilt of which we are absolved Thirdly When our Prayer is heard wherein we ask ' Forgive us our debts c. The Church therefore in that Prayer hath spoken both according unto truth and to Antiquity I dismiss that point Come we to the next which is their Exception against the Catechism touching the Sacraments Except 11 which was contrary say they to the Statute of 1 Eliz. 2. added in King James time Page 30. Touching Additions hath been answered above But further that act did not prohibite the King from adding any thing for explanation which another Act as we saw gives power to do so it be not contrary to any thing in the Book established But this might perhaps be a caution to his present Majesty The Brethren caution the King lest his indulgence in remitting of that Law by his late Gracious Declaration be as well interpreted a violation of it for there is no act for that whereas for his Grandfathers explaining there was one Next in this Paragraph is an Exception against the Answer to the Question in the Catechism Except touching the Sacrament How many Sacraments hath Christ ordained in his Church Answ Two onely as generally necessary to salvation For it may say they without racking be interpreted as a tacite admission of more as Marriage holy Orders Answ c. The Apostle giving rules of speech unto Titus Tit. 2.8 warns him that it be sound and such as cannot be condemned by the contrary part This rule therefore was here observed by the Composers of this Answer For they knew that the word Sacrament in a large sense was applicable to many sacred things not onely instituted in Scripture but also in the practice of the Church Accordingly Austin in one of the places above cited saith Noveris diem natalem domini Januar. Epist 119 cap 1. non in Sacramento celebrari Agimus pascha ad Sacramenti significationem Thou must know that the day of Christs birth is not celebrated as a Sacrament But we celebrate Easter under a sacramental signification Where he takes the word Sacrament to signifie the mystical things wrought and pointed at in Christs resurrection Therefore to avoid contention with froward spirits the expression in the Catechism is so uttered that there is no occasion given and yet the Doctrine secured forasmuch as all Sacraments properly so called are generally necessary to salvation Their next Exception is That whereas in the same Catechism it is demanded why children are baptized when by reason of their tender age they cannot perform the Conditions required in Baptism viz. Repentance and Faith It is answered Yes they do perform them by their Sureties who promise and vow them both in their names which when they come to age themselves are bound to perform This the Brethren say is a meer tale Except 2 We must not be offended Jer. 13. if the Leopard cannot change his spots nor the Brethren their Black-more language They add for proof That it was never read nor heard of in Scripture that one man either repented or believed in the room and name of another whereby that other did receive all or any of the spiritual benefits exhibited and sealed in either of the Sacraments And 't is not a vowing by one that another shall repent and believe when he is not at present able to do either that can truly be said to be a performing of them Thus the Brethren Wherein there is a double mistake first of the meaning of the Answer in the Catechism and then in Answ 1 the matter of their Reply Touching the first The distinction in the Catechism viz. that there is an outward and visible sign which comprehends both the Element and the Form and Action of baptizing and an inward and spiritual Grace Or there is Sacramentum as the Schools speak the outward and visible part and there is res Sacrâ—menti that which is inward and spiritual this helps us to an Answer for accordingly it may be said of Repentance and Faith required to this Sacrament There is the inward Repentance and Faith or the res ipsa and there is the outward repentance and Faith that is the profession of them Now as to the partaking of the inward grace viz. Christ and his benefits there is required the inward graces of repentance and faith so for the outward part of it the visible
Act as not extending to Queen Elizabeths Successors in Ecclesiastical Affairs and the Kings Proclamation till confirmed by Act and reproaching the Doctrine Pag. 62. quer 4 Worship Discipline and Government of the Church publickly These are not sons of peace but of those who as Solomon speaks separate very friends Pro. 16.28 or as others read it Separate the Captain or the Princes For Sunt qui intelligant principem a suo populo ut hic in illum rebellet aut ille in hunc alienore sit animo Mercer in loc vid. et R. Kavenak ibid. There are saith mine Author that by these words understand the separation betwixt the Prince and the People that they should rebell against him and he be disaffected toward them This for the Ministers Next for the godly and sober people Sober Christians Their calamity lyes in following rather those that delight to goe over Hedge and Ditch Answ then to keep the Kings High way But for their suffering though the Father and Mother and Children cannot but be much grieved to afflict or see afflicted a Childe or Brother yet we know some Members must suffer to preserve the whole And sometime the Parents are commanded to bring the sonne forth to justice not only for his vitiousness but for his disobedience Deut. 21.20 And the Magistrate is sometime forced to punish those that have much good worth in them only for some disorder unto Government And let no man reply that these are for vitiousness Inst but remember Answ that heresie and schisme are reckoned among the fruits of the flesh as well as drunkenness and whoredom Gal. 5. And that those whom Paul wished were cut off were not vitious persons for ought appears but schismaticks Ibid. And that our Saviour was much more facile to the Publicans and sinners then to the religious but hypocritical Pharisees Which is not written to discountenance Religion but to make it appear that if we look not well to it strictness may be mixed with much hidden evil as theirs was Col. 2. 1 Tim. 4. who yet were guilty some of Will-worship others of Doctrines of Devils Howsoever no mans piety must patronize his irregularity and disorder Jam. 3.17 for the Wisdom from above is pure peaceable c. The fifth exception against the Ceremonies is That they are burdensome for number insinuated by the citing a place of the Preface of the Common-prayer Book which quoteth * Ep. 119. Januar. cap. 19. The number of Ceremonies in the Com-prayer Book Austin complaining of this evil in his time and saying it was worse then the Jewish Paedagogy But this no way comports with ours which as they are innocent and simple and well explained so are they few in number as kneeling in Prayer and at receiving the Sacrament standing at the Creed for that at the Epistle and Gospel is not in the Common-prayer Book though not against it the Crosse in Baptism the Ring in Marriage the Imposition of hands upon Children to be confirmed and in ordination of Ministers in the Book of Ordination Besides which five I remember no other I am sure there is none material else appointed And but two of these in the ordinary service kneeling and standing and but one in any of the other Some few others there are in Vestiments and Bowing at the Name of Jesus established by Canon and others by custome as the reading the Epistle Gospel standing and at the Communion-Table with some the Vaylings of the Women to be Churched out of use Psal 64.6 which all amount to no considerable number So that after they have searched out or searched for iniquity if they could finde any in this particular and accomplished a diligent search as the Psalmist complains yet all these men whose hands are mighty in these kinde of catchings have found upon the matter nothing Ps 76.5 they have not found their hands able to fasten upon any number to make good the proof of this accusation Their last Exception is that they ought to be removed by the consequence of the 34 Article of the Church Except ult P. 32 33 35 39. Ought to be removed and of the Preface to the Common-prayer-book it self also of the second Homily of the time and place of prayer yea and by the practise of the Bishops themselves Wherein as before they prevaricate and play false For because the Article saith That it is not necessary that Ceremonies be in all places one and that they may be changed 1. By Artic. 34. therefore the Brethren infer they must be changed Answ But they should remember a posse ad esse nedum à posse ad necesse non valet consequentia That from what may be to what is much leâ—s to what must be is no good consequence Again for the Preface to the Common-prayer-book 2. By the Preface of the Com. prayer because it saith That many Ceremonies were removed because some were abused Answ so as that they could not be reformed without the removing of them That others were superstitious others unprofitable others obscured the glory of God others by their multitude were burdensome Hence the Brethren infer That therefore those Ceremonies which the Compilers of the Prayer-book left and were in their judgments profitable innocent clear few in number must be removed also To make the Composers of the Book so simple as they did the Parliament that established the Book as to confute themselves And to the third the second part of the Homily of the time and place of prayer they handled this word also deceitfully 3. By the Homily Answ as no doubt but their conscience might have told them For the Homily having complained first of those who having prophaned and defiled their Churches with Heathenish and Jewish abuses with Images and Idols with numbers of Altars with gross abusing and filthily corrupting of the Lords Supper with an infinite number of toys and trifles of their own devices to make a goodly outward shew and to deface the plain simple and sincere Religion of Christ Jesus Then the Homily saith ' Gods vengeance as for the former so hath been and is provoked because people pass not to come to the Church either through blindness or else for that they see the Church altogether scoured of such gay gazing sights as their gross phantasie was greatly delighted with because they see the false Religion abandoned and the true restored which seems an unsavoury thing to their unsavoury taste As may appear by that a woman said to her neighbour Alas Gossip what shall we do now at Church since all the Saints are taken away since all the goodly sights we were wont to have are gone since we cannot hear the like piping singing chanting and playing upon the Organs that we could before But dearly Beloved we ought greatly to rejoyce and give God thanks that our Churches are delivered out of all those things which
repetition of this Testimony Non Crambe bis cocta haec bis repetita placebunt In Musick streins often repeatâ—d are In mental harmony why is' t a jarr nemo post divinum judicium post populi suffragium post Coepiscoporum consensum judicem se non jam Episcopi sed Dei faceret Nemo dissidio unitatis Christi Ecclesiam scinderet c. For from no other root saith hee either Heresies spring or Schisms do arise than from this That Obedience is not given to the Priest or Minister of God so hee calls the Bishop by way of eminency as the words following declare And that it is not considered that there is for the time but One Priest and but ONE JUDGE in Christs stead To whom if the WHOLE Church according as the Scripture hath appointed were obedient no man would move any thing against the Colledge of Ministers no man after Gods sentence the peoples suffrage election or approbation after the consent of the other Bishops would make himself Judge not now of the Bishop but of God himself In which Testimony onely by the way noting that populi suffragium must be according to Calvins observation not properly an Election though in a large sense it may be called so according to that of the former Author elsewhere Quum ipsa plebs maxime habeat potestatem L. 1. Ep. 4. vel eligendi dignos Sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi That the people have chief right either to chuse good Ministers or of refusing those that are bad But either a signification of their desire whom they would have or else an approbation of the Election made by the Bishops and confirmed by the Magistrate So Calvin Instit lib. 4. cap. 4. s 12. Cap. 13. Laodic Concil Est quidem illud fateor optimâ ratione sancitum in Laodicensi concilio ne turbis electio permitteretur primum soli Clerici eligebant offerebant Magistratui tum ad multitudinem res deferebatur Aut si à multitudine incipiebatur tantum id fiebat ut sciretur quem potissimum expeteret It is saith hee I confess excellently decreed in the Councel of Laodicea that the election of Ministers should not be permitted to the people But first the Clergy did chuse then they presented him to the Magistrate and lastly hee was propounded to the people c. But this occasionally onely to prevent mistaking As to the former Testimony of Cyprian out of it wee learne First That the eminency of one Minister above the rest in Government is of Divine Institution Post Judicum divinum Secondly That hee being chosen hath a sole superiour power of judgement in the Church to whom all must be obedient I say not hee hath a sole power absolutely but a sole superiour power over all within his Diocess and Jurisdiction by this Testimony whatsoever is to be said of the thing it self according to the Word of God And indeed the liberty or advantage that Civil Laws give of exercising Episcopal Authority doth not imply they have no other The Church hath taught us they may concur Will you such as be unquiet disobedient and criminous within your Diocess Book of Consecrat Q. At the consecrat of a Bishop correct and punish according to such Authority as yee have by Gods Word and as to you shall be committed by the Ordinance of this Realm 〈…〉 Ecclesiastical whether in order or degree which at present wee dispute not be according to Scripture as before hath been shewn Government and Jurisdiction cannot bee separated from it although the Laws should not confer any yea forbid it seeing the Church cannot subsist without Government which cannot be exercised regularly without Bishops Cypr. lib. 8. Ep. 3 The same Cyprian and in the same Epistle now cited shewing it to be the design of Satan in setting men to oppose godly Bishops that so hee may destroy Discipline and by that the Church it self saith Apparet quis impugnet non scilicet Christus qui Sacerdotes aut constituit aut protegit sed ille qui Christi adversarius Ecclesiae ejus inimicus Ob hoc Ecclesiae praepositum sua infestatione persequitur ut Gubernatore sublato atrocius atque violentius circa Ecclesiae naufragia grassetur Who it is and upon what design that opposeth Episcopacy It appears saith hee who opposeth the Bishop to be sure not Christ who either appointeth or protecteth Bishops But hee who is Christs adversary and his Churches enemy for this end persecutes and infests the Church Ruler that the Pylot being taken off hee might with greater cruelty and violence make spoil and shipwrack of the Church Thus far Cyprian And this here for the Right of this office in humane and divine SUBSECT II. THe next is whether it bee a distinct Order from or a superiour Degree above the Presbytery or ordinary Ministry Whether Episcopacy be a different order Necess Ref. p. 42. Touching the judgement of the Church of England in which point there need not be any great controversie if men that have little else to defend themselves were not too captious of words Of which sort of controversies the Apostle giveth warning viz. 2 Tim. 2.14 That wee should not strive about words without profit Answ 1 The Preface to the Book of Ordination of Ministers saith Preface to the Book of Ordination It is evident to all men diligently reading holy Scripture and Ancient Authors that from the Apostles time there have been THESE ORDERS of Ministers in Christs Church Bishops Priests and Deacons which offices were evermore had in such reverent estimation that no man by his own private authority might presume to execute any of them Where it is plain that saying these Orders and then naming three it is as much as if it had said These three Orders which is the Exception the Brethren have against it And because it calleth them presently Offices But that altereth not what it said before for every order is an office and every office is in some order Again they evidently prevaricate for whereas they say that the passage Almighty God which hast appointed divers orders of Ministers in the Church or in thy Church is in one prayer at the consecration namely of a Bishop It must be noted that it is three times in the book viz. At the ordering of a Deacen of a Priest and consecrating of a Bishop Now applying this word in prayer divers orders of Ministers to every one of those offices Can any man in his conscience doubt but that they took them for several orders who compiled the book and which being confirmed by Parliament and Convocation 8. Eliz. cap. 1. is the judgement of the Church of England in this point although it doth not every time it mentions the Bishop name order but sometime Office and Ministry That the book calls the inauguration of a Bishop Consecration of Bishops not an ordering but a Consecration doth not overthrow what
they said in the Preface and in the Prayer in both which the book speaks of them as of several orders as wee saw but now for that word of Consecration is used for honours sake onely as being the separation of a person to a more eminent order If the Brethren could make advantage of it they might by the same Logomachy prove that Bishops Priests and Deacons are consecrated also for the Title of the Book saies The form and manner of consecrating Bishops Priests and Deacons Ergo Priests and Deacons are consecrated as well it may bee said as that Bishops are consecrated therefore not ordered This for the judgement of the Church of England and of the Articles whereof the book of Ordination is a branch unto which the Brethren as it seems have also subscribed Artic. 36. For revolting from which Can. 38. they have merited the censures of the Church but that they say those Canons have now no powder but there may bee some in making If Linwood and Anshelme say Linwood constitut Anshelm in Phâ—l 1. that Episcopacy is not an order distinct from Presbyters wee are to note that these and many streams like have but one head which when it issued out this was a little troubled it is St. Hierom whom in this they follow and whose words they use Who being provoaked by John Bishop of Hierusalem Ad Evagr. Tom 2. in Ep. ad Tit. 1. took occasion warmly to make that a general note which hee had but from a few particular instances and the latitude of the word Bishop in Scripture That because there was not at that time any one so constituted at Ephesus Act. 22. when Paul left that Church therefore there was not one afterward when John wrote his Revelation and Christ sent the message to the Angel especially of that Church To say that Angel was the company of the Ministers Apoc 2. is to beg the question not to answer the proof Also because there was none one while more specially designed by Paul at Philippi or at least spoken to therefore there was none at Colosse when as the Apostle directs his speech to bee delivered to Archippus To say there was no other Minister there is to avoid what can not by such evasion be escaped Ephesus had a Bishop or call him what you will a superiour Governour to all the Ministers 1 Tim. 1. when Timothy was there and so had the Isle of Crete when Titus governed it Tit. 1. When the Apostle admonisheth the Hebrews to obey them that have the Rule over them Heb. 13. Act. 15. Gal. 2. 1 Cor. 3 5. 2 Cor. 3.6 Eph. 6.21 Rom. 13.4 cap. 15.8 doth it exclude the government of James or of Peter to whom Paul applyed himself as the pillars and rectors of that Church A speech uttered to many doth not shut out the precedency of some one among them The word Deacon is sometime applyed to the Apostles themselves and to the Evangelists And to the Magistrate Luk. 19.44 1 Pet. 2.12 and to â—hr st himself So the word Episcopacy sometimes signiâ—ies viâ—itation in general in the Scripture sometimes the offiâ—e of A ostleship Act. 1.20 And his Bishoprick let ano her take â—nâ— sometimes the office of a Bishop or Pastor or Presbyter 1 Tim. 3. Hee that desireth the office of a Bishop But this latitude of the Word in Scripture impedeth not but that the thing now understood thereby may be in Scripâ—ure distinct from that of Presbyter and is in all those plaâ—es and persons where and who had jurisdiction over other Ministers as the Apostles the Evangelists and others such as Timothy and Titus were But that Hieron even when hee disputes upon the Word was not so clear against the thing Ep. ad Evagr. in ipso fine appeâ—rs in that hee saith Presbyter Episcopus aliud aetatis aliud dignitatis est nomen Unde ad â—imotheum de ordinatione Episcopi Diaconi dicitur de Presbyteris omnino reticetur quia in Episcopo Presbyter continetur Et ut sciamus traditiones Apâ—stolicas sumptas de Veteri Testamento Qâ—od Aaron silii ejus atque Levitae in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Episcopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicent in Ecclesia The name saith hee of Presbyter and Bishops the one is a title of years the other of dignity Whence it is that in the Epistle to Timothy there is mention made of the ordination of a Bishop and a Deacon by the way note Consecration an Ordination that Antiquity doth name the consecration of a Bishop ordination which the Brethren deny but there is no mention there of the ordination of a Presbyter because that in a Bishop a Presbyter is also contained And that wee may understand the postolical traditions taken out of the Old Testament Hieron judgement of Epâ—scopacy whilst he dâ—sputes against it look what Aaron and his Sons and the Levites were in the Temple Let the Bishops and he Presbyters and the Deacons challenge unto themselves in the Church where first we have as much distinction yeelded as was betwixt Aaron and his Sons and the Levites between the Bishops and Presbyters and Deacons Secondly That this distinction is Apostolical and grounded on the equity of the orders of the Ministery in the Old Testament so that it is agreeable unto Scripture both in the Old and New Testament Thirdly That the word Bishop is used for Presbyter sometimes because it comprehends it But hee doth not say it is comprehended also of it SUBSECT II. Answ 2 BUt wee may quit this controversie about the distinction of the orders of Episcopacy and Presbytery for the question is of the power which of men in the same degree is not alwaies the same When the same Father saith in the same Epistle Quid enim facit exceptâ ordinatione Ep. ad Evagr. Episcopus quod non facit Presbyter What doth a Bishop excepting Ordination which a Presbyter doth not and where elsewhere hee saith That imposition of hands or confirmation of the Baptized was proper to the Bishops though hee qualifie it by saying that it was done ad honorem potius Sacerdotis quam ad legis necessitatem ' for the honour of the Priesthood for so by way of excellency hee often as also other of that time call Episcopacy as we saw above out of Cyprian rather than by necessity of the institution ' And when in the former Epistle and elsewhere hee saith Ad Evagr. in Tâ—t cap. 1. In toto orbe decretum est ut unus de Presbyteris electus superponeretur caeteris ad quem omnis Ecclesiae cura pertineret Schismatum semina tollâ—rentur That it was decreed through the whole world that one should be elected out of the Presbyters and set over the rest unto whom the whole care of the Church should belong and the seeds of Schism taken away Also Ecclesiae
follows that no Minister can be made but hee must have the Authority of the Holy Ghost Secondly It is necessary also that hee receive the Holy Ghost it self in the gifts and abilities of it for the discharge of this calling For no man can say that is effectually teach that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 12. And every spirit that confesseth that is soundly preacheth that Jesus is the Christ is of God 1 John 4.1 2. John 16. For it is the Holy Ghost onely that leadeth into all Truth concerning Christ Thirdly The conveyance of the Holy Ghost in all publick Ordinances is by some Ministerial hand as in Baptism and the Lords Supper wherein at least unto the faithful the Holy Ghost is conveyed So as in respect of the thing it self the Holy Ghost is necessary to bee conveyed to every Minister that is to bee ordained Sense of the words 2. Next for the meaning of the phrase First wee must observe That the word Holy Ghost here may be either taken for his person and gifts or for his Authority or both by a Metonymy It is taken for his gifts where it is said John 7. that the Holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified It is taken for his Authority when the Apostle saith that the Holy Ghost had made the Ministers of Ephesus the overseers of the flock Act. 20. Secondly wee may expound the words by way of declaration and solemn pronouncing as well as imparative or communicative bidding And the other words may bee so expounded also according as in absolution it is in one place in the Common prayer-Prayer-Book pronounced authoritatively yet it is expounded to bee onely a declaring and pronouncing Now to apply the former The word Holy Ghost here seems to bee taken for the Authority especially of the Holy Ghost to the exercise of the Ministerial function As if it were said Take thou the Authority of the Holy Ghost which hee hath appointed his Church to communicate and dispense to persons worthy for the Ministry of the Word in binding and loosing and of the Sacraments 3. To their exceptions First To the exception general it self that this form hath no warrant No warrant It is answered Answ That in other things they urge the Letter of the Scripture And surely where there is no incongruity in the thing nor impediment from some other cause from using the very words of Institution there cannot bee desired a better warrant Now that there is no such incongruity nor impediment shall bee shewn in answering unto the Reasons of the former exception whereof the first is that Proof none but God himself hath power to give the Holy Ghost But it hindreth not but that what none but a superiour Authority can have power to give originally may yet bee given ministerially Answ and by delegation from that superiour power Neither Moses had power to consecrate Aaron nor Samuel to confer the Kingdome unto David nor the Apostles themselves to give the Holy Ghost but by delegation and commission Which power if as to that right of the conferring the power and authority of the Holy Ghost to the ordaining of a Minister the Church ministerially hath not for without that power it cannot bee done then must every Minister receive his authority and outward call immediately from Heaven Neither is repugnant hereunto Lib. 1. dist 14. cap. 1. Hic quaeritur Aug. de Trin. l. 15. c. 26. either that of the Master of the sentences nor of Austin himself whence hee hath it viz. Neque enim aliquis discipulorum ejus dedit spiritum sanctum Orabant quippe ut veniret in eos quibus manum imponebant non eum ipsi dabant Quem morem in suis propositis etiam nunc servat Ecclesia Object For neither saith hee any of the Disc ples gave the Holy Ghost but they prayed that hee might come on those upon whom they laid their hands but gave him not themselves which custome the Church even now retaineth in her Bishops For our Church doth pray in laying on of hands and with and under the words Answ 1 of Institution asketh also before and after What form of words the Apostles used in laying on of hands and conferring the Holy Ghost is not expressed but unlikely it is that they used none Now those they used whether they were those used by our Saviour or others in form of praying cannot be determined nor therefore their example urged in that which our Church pretendeth not unto But the former will bee more evident in other ministrations also In Absolution the form is in the Liturgy in the visitation of the sick Imperative and authoritative as I may so speak and in a good sense so it is by his authority committed unto mee I absolve thee from all thy sin c. yet in the general absolution after the general confession at morning-prayer by which the former must bee expounded it is expressed to bee but declaratory by way of solemn and authoritative pronouncing and with the concurrence of prayer for efficacy of such declaration Almighty God who hast given power and commandment to declare and pronounce to his people being penitent the absolution and remission of their sins c. In Baptism the Holy Ghost and remission of sins is given and that by the ministration and the words spoken by the Minister So also in the Lords Supper the body and blood of Christ sacramentally is conferred by the words and action of the Minister none of which is in the power of any to bestow but God onely Shall wee therefore except against the fruits of those Ordinances or against the Minister for pronouncing such words and doing such actions Again as in the Absolution there goeth with the Pronounciation prayer also and so likewise in Baptism and the Lords Supper what hindereth but that the words may be taken under a precatory sense also and as including prayer which more expresly goeth both before and after The words therefore take thou the Holy Ghost do not argue an original or an inherent power but Ministerial onely and so as not excluding a precatory vertue also This to the first Reason The second is because they were the words of Christ himself to his Apostles what Proof 2 then were all Christs words to his Apostles peculiar to them Answ It was to his Apostles that hee gave the command of baptizing and teaching and of giving his last Supper Have none therefore power since to administer these Ordinances Again if no Minister can be made but by the Holy Ghost and his Authority and this Authority were proper onely to the Apostles because the words were spoken to them then is the Church deprived of the Holy Ghost ever since the Apostles nor hath power to ordain a Ministry The third reason is taken from the parallel of other administrations Proof wherein the words of institution in
that power into executâ—on Now in the former sense neither the Scripture so far as I understand nor the Church of England hath asserted such power in any Ecclesiastical persons since the Apostles who onely under Christ had a power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and autocratical Or thirdly For an eminent degree of power in Government so as that some acts thereof do solely belong unto him to perform regularly and in common order Now in this sense omitting the name as Zanchy said above and keeping our eye upon the thing it self seeing both the Scripture and the Church of England as also the practice of the whole Church through the world formerly and the most learned men of the reformed Churches of late all which have been evidenced above have constituted an order or degree of persons who of right had and ought to have the Regiment and Government over other Ministers as is plain not onely by the Apostles but also by the Evangelists Timothy and Titus as also by the perpetual necessity of the Church I must needs refer unto that fore-quoted sentence of Cyprian to this purpose and add here another of like effect out of him Haec sunt enim initia haereticorum ortus atque conatus Schismaticorum malè cogitantium Cypr. l. 3. Ep. 1. ut sibi placeant ut praepositum superbo tumore contemnant Sic de Ecclesiâ receditur sic altare prophanum foris collocatur sic contra pacem Christi ordinationem atque unitatem Dei rebellatur These are saith hee the beginnings of Hereticks the rise and struglings of ill minded Schismaticks to please themselves and with proud stomach to despise the Bishop for so this word must here be meant thence men depart from the Church thence the prophane altar of separation is placed elsewhere thence against the peace of Christ and against the Ordinance and unity appointed by God rebellion is raised Fourthly Sole Jurisdiction may be taken for exercising those Acts that of right belong to him to do wholly of his own head without ingagement to consult and advise with any or else for the sole power of acting but upon ingagement of taking with him the Judgement and opinion though not the governing power of others also Hence the Apostle in the former sense admonisheth that the Bishop as well as any other Minister and Elder Tit. 1.7 must not be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that in the Government of the Church goeth upon his own head And in the latter sense is it that Cyprian than whom no man was more for the priviledge Episcopal and for entire obedience thereunto yet saith Cypr. l. 3. Ep. 10 Ad id vero quod scripserunt mihi compresbyteri nostri solus rescribere nil potui cum a primordio Episcopatus mei statuerim nihil sine consilio vestro sine consensu plebis mea privatim sententia gerere Unto that saith hee that my fellow Presbyters wrote unto mee I can alone return no answer for I determined from my first entrance into my office privately and of my own head without your counsel that are the Ministers and without the consent of the people to do nothing For the true understanding of which sentence and other like as also for a resolution of the question it self a few things must be severally and distinctly noted First That hee doth not in this overthrow what several times hee said before L. 1. Ep. 3. l. 3. Ep. 1. touching the obedience due from the whole Church to the Bishop but onely signifies that hee thinks it his duty to advise with them as theirs to be obedient unto him Secondly That this course of use then is not so necessary now when as all the motions and actings of the Bishop are laid forth and determined and hee obliged to operate and govern onely by them by the Laws and Canons which was not so fully done in that Fathers time Thirdly That this order is not observed therefore by those who are most Antiepiscopal not by the Brethren or Presbyters neither here nor beyond the Seas who do not call the people to all consultations but onely Presbyters either sacred or civil Lastly That this practice of Cyprian is ad amussim and exactly performed by the Bishops of England For The Bishops in the Church of England do nothing but by the advise of their Brethren and of the people First seeing they arrogate no power but what the Scripture the Canons of the Church and the Laws of the Land do allow and secondly that by these all whatsoever materially they do is already prescribed to them And in the third place those powers in Scripture Canons of the Church and Laws of the Nation are approved and confirmed both by their Brethren the Ministery in Convocation and by the people in the Parliament by their delegates it follows truly and really that the Bishops in England act nothing but in effect according to that Fathers example by the counsel of the Ministry and consent of the people Thus much for their assertion Brethrens proof As to their proof It is from Antiquity from the book of Ordination from the Common-prayer-book and from the Law First For Antiquity P. 47. they say in Cyprians time there were in Rome a number of the Clergy Answ who acted with the Bishop By this argument wee may infer strange consequences For the Parliament acts with the King So Acts run the Kings most excellent Majesty with the advice of the Lords and Commons c. And the Counsel acts with the King for that is common in proclamations The King by the advice of the Privy Counsel The question is not with whom the Bishops act as who hath the primary Power The Justices on the Bench act with the Judge but can they declare Law give the charge and pronounce sentence Wee heard above what Cyprians judgement was of the power of the Bishop what also out of tenderness and indulgence and to avoid offence and for better light not for more jurisdiction hee condescended unto also Next Proof 2 for that out of the book of Ordination that because it is asked the Minister to bee ordained whether hee will obey his Ordinary and other chief Ministers c. therefore there are other Ministers that have the power of jurisdiction As if this did not refer unto the Archbishop Answ or other officers of the Bishops To which because they cannot answer they object a place out of the Liturgy which shall bee spoken to in its time P. 48. The other place in the book of Ordination That because it is asked the Priest to be ordained if hee will administer the Doctrine Object and Sacraments and Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same therefore they say it was the intention of the Church to admit all Presbyters to have a share in Ecclesiastical jurisdiction That is It was the intention of the Church Answ to
King James's Proclamation for Uniformity of Common-prayer prefixed to some Editions of the Liturgy which by Law was established in the daies of the late Queen of famous memory blessed with a peace and prosperity both EXTRAORDINARY and of many years continuance A STRONG evidence that God was therewith well pleased The importunity of the complainers was great their affirmations vehement and the zeal wherewith the same did seem to bee accompanied very specious And they began such proceedings as did rather raise a scandal in the Church than take offence away and did other things carrying a very apparent shew of Sedition Upon this double experience when such motions of change were made to him hee * In his Proclamation for unity of Common-Prayer and confer H. Court crushed the chicken here in the shell lest it being hatched by indulgence might pick out his eyes as it did afterward some others and did well King Charls His Majesties Father yeelded in these things to Scotland but doth not obscurely bewail it If any saith hee speaking of Episcopacy shall impute my yeelding to them my failing and sin Icon. Basilic medit 17. p. m. 156. I can easily acknowledge it On the issue whereof no man can without horrour reflect Now Faelix quem faciunt aliena pericula cautum O happy hee whom others failings make Wise to become and by them warning take But it may be times are different and am I made of the Kings Counsel I conclude all 2 Chron. 25.16 Erasm in Epist Hieron ad Heliodor Tom. 1. Ep. 1. in Antidot advers calumniam first with that of Erasmus Ad haec video esse non-nullos hujuscemodiingenio ut cùm apicula ad omnem flosculum ad omnem advolans fruticem tantum id excerpat quod ad mellificium sit conducibile ipsi solum hoc venentur si quid sit quod aliquo pacto Calumniari possint His mos est è toto libro quatuor aut quinque verba decerpere atque in eis calumniandis ostendere quantum ingenio polleant Non animadvertunt quibus temporibus cui Causes of calumniating of an Author qua occasione quo animo scripserit ille Neque conferunt quid praecesserit quid sequatur quid alio loco eadem de rescripserit Tantum urgent ac premunt quatuor illa verba ad ea machinas omnes admovent Syllogismorum detorquent depravant aliquoties non intellecta calumniantur That is I perceive saith Erasmus that some men are of that disposition that whereas the little Bee flyes to every flower and to every green thing onely that it may gather that whereof it would make honey these men only hunt after that which they may rail at The custome of such men is out of a whole book to cull out four or five words and in reviling of them to shew what abilities they have They consider not in what times the Author wrote nor to what persons nor upon what occasion nor with what intention Nor do they compare what went before with what follows after what hee said of the same matter in another place Onely they urge those four words they wrest they deprave and sometimes reproach what they understand not Thus far hee Next with that elegant and prudent observation absit invidia verbo of our late Soveraign upon this same Argument Icon. Basilic Medit. 27. To His Majesty that now is Not but that saith hee the draught being excellent as to the main both for Doctrine and Government in the Church of England some liues as in very good figures may happily need some sweetening or polishing Which might have easily been done by a safe and gentle hand if some mens praecipitancy had not violently demanded such rude alterations as would have quite destroyed all the beauty and proportion of the whole Thus the King The close of all Dr. Usher L. Primate of Armagh Serm. before the H. of Com. Febr. 18. 1620. pag. 6 7. Rom. 16.17 I seal up all with the grave admonition of a Primate Bishop and the Authentique Decision of this case by a Prince of Kings Let not every wanton wit saith the former to one of the Houses of Parliament bee permitted to bring what fancies hee list into the pulpit and to disturb things that have been well ordered I beseech you Brethen saith the Apostle mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which yee have learned and avoid them Howsoever wee may see cause why wee should dissent from others in matter of opinion yet let us remember that that is no cause why wee should break the Kings Peace and make a rent in the Church of God A thing deeply to bee thought of by the Ismaels Ismaels of our time whose hand is against every man Gen. 16.12 and every mans hand against them who bite and devour one another until they bee consumed one of another Gal. 5.15 who forsake the fellowship of the Saints and by sacrilegious separation break this bond of peace Little do these men consider how precious the Peace of the Church ought to be in our eyes to bee redeemed with a thousand of our lives and of what dangerous consequence the matter of Schism is unto their own souls For howsoever the Schismatick secundum affectum as the Schoolmen speak in his intention and wicked purpose taketh away unity from the Church even as hee that hateth God taketh away goodness from him as much as in him lyeth yet secundum effectum in truth and in very deed hee taketh away the unity of the Church onely from himself that is hee cutteth himself off from being united with the rest of the body and being dissevered from the body how is it possible that hee should retain communion with the head Thus that most learned Primate Note for whom the Brethren seem to have a special reverence in recommending of his Model of Episcopacy Necessit Reform p. 53. Wherein yet hee did propound but not prescribe his â—udgement according to that Seneca Illi qui in his rebus nobis praecesserunt non Domini sed Duces nostri sunt or as the Apostle as a helper 2 Cor. 1.24 not as a Lord over the Faith of the Church in this particular but especially as respecting the time when more could not well bee hoped for The last word as 't is meet shall bee the Kings and 't was his deciding one in these controversies after hearing of all debates about them at the conference at Hampt Court Proclamat for authorizing the book of Com. prayer at the close And last of all saith hee wee do admonish all men that herereafter they shall not expect nor attempt any further alteration in the common and publick form of Gods service from this which is now ESTABLISHED For that neither will wee give way to any to presume that our own judgement having determined in a matter of this weight shall bee sweighed to
1 Cor. 4.5 until the Lord come who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts and then shall every man have praise of God who shall defer his judgement till then for that his modesty and charity Neither let others be difficult in forgiving Concilium Alexandr apud Ruffin Hist lib. 1. cap. 28. remembring that ille Evangellicus junior filius paternae depopulatur substantiae sed in semetipsum reversus non solum suscipi meruit sed dignus paternis complexibus deputatur annulum fidei recipit stola circumdatur per quam quid aliud quam Sacerdotii declarantur insignia Nec probabilis extitit apud patrem senior filius quod invidit recepto nec tantum meriti habuit non delinquendo quantum noxae contraxit non indulgendo Germano I. E. Luke 15. That younger Son mentioned in the Gospel the waster of his Fathers substance but returning unto himself did not onely obtain to be received but was also counted worthy of his Fathers embracements and received the Ring of Faith and was cloathed with a Robe by which what other thing is signified than the Ornaments of Priesthood Neither was the elder Son approved of his Father in that hee envyed the reception of his Brother Neither deserved hee so well by not offending as hee contracted guilt by not indulging Let no man therefore bee high minded but fear Rom. 11. Gal. 6. and let him that standeth take heed least hee fall And let him whom God hath recalled Psal 8. Prov. 14.14 1 King 2. see that hee return not again to folly For the backslider in heart shall bee satisfied with his own way as wee see in Shimei who was not hearty to his submission And I remember that Watson the Priest having well * Watsons Quodlibets defended allegeance was afterward executed for * At Winchester treason I crave therefore the benefit and exercise of that Article of our Faith which every one of us professeth the communion of Saints And particularly in the conjunction of their prayers with mine that God who hath begun this good work in mee Phil. 1.6 would strengthen stablish confirm and perfect it until the day of Christ Amen SECT II. The heads of this Treatise ANd now having rendred the grounds of these Retractations and given a reason of mine and the Church of Englands Faith in these particulars And represented the consent thereof with the holy Scripture with primitive Antiquity and with the judgement of the best of the late writers of the Reformed Churches and made reply also to such Objections as did seem material let mee adjure all men and conclude in the Church affair with the prayer obtestation and admonition of the learned Zanchy Zanch. in clausulâ observationum in confess suam Tom. 8. Precor omnes Christianos per Dominum Jesum ut positis vanis privatorum hominum somniis positis etiam propriae carnis affectibus odiis inimicitiis amplexi vero certam ac salutarem veteris Ecclesiae doctrinam Christianamque dilectionem coeamus omnes in unam fidem sanctamque amicitiam sicut nobis quoque omnibus unus est Deus unus Mediator unum Baptisma una spes vocationis nostrae Ad gloriam nominis Dei Ecclesiae aedificationem salutemque animorum nostrorum Citius enim quam putamus sistemur ante tribunal Christi ut referat unusquisque prout se gesserat in corpore in hac vita Quando post hanc vitam nulla spes veniae nullus resipiscentiae locus I beseech all Christians saith hee by the Lord Jesus that laying aside the dreams and vanities of private men and laying aside also the corrupt affections of their own flesh as hatred and enmities and embracing the sure and soveraign Doctrine of the Antient Church with Christian love wee may all grow into one Faith and Christian friendship As there is to us also all but one God one Mediator one Baptism one hope of our Calling This do wee to the glory of the Name of God the edification of the Church and the salvation of our own souls For sooner than wee are aware of Note wee shall bee set before the judgement seat of Christ that every one may receive according as hee hath carried himself in the body and in this life when after this life there will bee no hope of pardon no place for repentance Thus far hee And in the matter of the Civil State I cannot end better than with that most true and charitable both judgement and prediction of the Kingly Prophet our late slaughtered Soveraign Icon. Basilic Medit. 27. speaking to His Majesty that now is and whom God long preserve Be confident saith hee as I am that the most of all sides who have done amiss have done so not out of malice but mis-information or mis-apprehension of things And none will bee more loyal and faithful to mee and you than those subjects who sensible of their errours and our injuries will feel in their own souls most vehement motives to repentance and earnest desires to make some reparations for their former defects Psalm 32.3 5. Whilst I kept silence thy hand was heavy on mee I said I will confess and thou forgavest mee O ter beatum cui bonus arbiter Non imputavit lubrica devia Errata vitae nec reperit dolum Caeco in recessu pectoris Erasm in vita Hieron de ipso Hieron verba faciens Fit nescio quo pacto ut efficacius nos eorum exempla permoveant quibus ex vitiosa vita contigit ad pietatem resipiscere * Reg. juris in Tit. digest Reg. 108. Fere in omnibus paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 CHAP. XI Fuga Vacui or Some Additionals Phys lib. 4. cap. 8. Seqq. NOn dari Vacuum that there is no emptiness in Nature and the works of God was the assertion of the Philosopher And ne detur Vacuum that there may be none in Morals and in our works must be the contention of every Writer For which purpose partly to fill the Vacant pages and specially the Readers mind with satisfaction I shall subjoyn first certain notes in reference unto the chief Arguments in this Treatise Next some other Examples of Retractations and lastly an undoubted evidence of the sincerity of my own Concerning the Notes 1. Touching the common-prayer-Common-Prayer-Book the notable * Suggested to my search by my Reverend friend Mr. Tim. Thriscrosse Testimony of John Careless Confessor and Martyr who died in the Marshalsey 1556. The words * Fox Act. Mon. Edit the first for none since have it in his Examination are Dr. Martin But I pray thee how sayest thou now thy second Book the Liturgy reformed in 5 6. Edw. 6. is also condemned in divers points of Heresie at Frankford among the Brethren which Book will you allow Careless I am
sure that it is not there in any point condemned of Heresie unless it be of the ANABAPTISTS as it is here And I do not think but there be some as well there as in England and it is like enough that SUCH do finde fault with it Who are offended with the Liturgy Dr. Martin Nay even of Mr. Cox himself and other that were Preachers in King Edwards time they have disproved your * This Book established 5 6. Edw. 6. was re-established 1. Eliz. with two or three alterations and is that we now use as was proved above The Alterations are in the Act prefixed before the service-Service-Book second Book in divers points and have now made a third Book how say you which of these three Books will you allow now Careless Forsooth I say still as I have written that the second Book is good and godly and IN ALL POINTS agreeing to the Word of God and I am sure that neither Master Cox nor any other of our godly Preachers that be fled unto Frankford have condemned that Book IN ANY POINT as repugnant to the Word of God though perchance they have altered something therein according to the usage of that Country where now they are And I have not denied in my Articles but the Church of Christ hath power and authority to enlarge or diminish any thing in the same GOOD BOOK so far forth as it is agreeable to the Scriptures D. Martin But what authority have you or how durst you bee so bold to make an Article of the Faith concerning that Book to be beleeved of all men under pain of damnation Carelesse Ah Master Doctor have I bound any man to beleeve that Article under pain of damnation as you do charge mee I am sure there is no such word in all my Articles I have there written what I hold and beleeve my self as I am bound to do in conscience And now I will add thus much more That the same Book which is so consonant and agreeable to the Word of God ☞ Nore in the fear of God and consider being set forth by Common Authority both of the Kings Majesty that is dead and the whole Parliament House ought not to be despised by mee or any other private man under pain of Gods high displeasure and DAMNATION except they repent 2. Concerning Monarchy and that of this Nation * The Testimony of Mr. Sam. Ward sometime the famous Preacher of Ipswitch the Author of several elegant and useful pieces Hoc enim mihi ratum indubitatum semper fuit hoc semper cum Politicis Theologis gravissimis sensi palum apud omnes professus sum Monarchiam haereditariam sub qua mihi vitales auras feliciter haurine bonis omnimodis frui piè tranquillè degere contigit esse omnium quotquot extant aut excogitari possunt regiminum formae longè multumque praestantissimam utilissimam laudatissimam Cui me ex animo favere ille novit qui perscrutatur renes meos c. i. e. This hath alwaies been with mee a certain and undoubted maxime In his Preface to King Charls the first prefixed before his Treatise in Latine of the Load-stone dedicated unto him intituled Magnetis Reductorium this alwaies with the best States-men and Divines I have ever concluded and openly among all men professed viz. That a Monarchical Government hereditary under which providence hath so ordered that I have drawn my vital breath enjoyed many comforts have had the opportunity to live godly and quietly is of all Governments which are or can be divised by many degrees the best the most beneficial and most commendable to which that I am from my heart a well-wisher hee knows that searches my reins and my heart said that Author Dr. Sanderson the now Right Reverend Bishop of Lincoln in his late treatise intituled Episcopacy not prejudicial to Regal Power as established by Law in the Postscript Lastly Concerning the Divine Right of Episcopacy Though from one in that function yet because it derives it higher and founds it somewhat deeper more solidly and also briefer than is usually done deserves more special notice His words are My opinion is that Episcopal Government is not to bee derived meerly from Apostolical practice or Institution But that it is originally founded in the person and office of the Messias our Blessed Lord JESUS CHRIST who being sent by his heavenly Father to bee the great Apostle Heb. 3.1 Bishop and Pastor 1 Pet. 2.25 of his Church and annointed to that office immediately after his Baptism by JOHN with power and the Holy Ghost Act. 10.37 8. descending then upon him in a bodily shape Luke 3.22 did afterward before his ascension into Heaven send and impower his holy Apostles giving them the Holy Ghost likewise as his Father had given him John 20.21 to execute the same Apostolical Episcopal and Pastoral office for the ordering and governing of his Church until his coming again and so the same office to continue in them and their Successors unto the end of the world Mat. 28.18 20. This I take to be so clear from these and other like Texts of Scripture that if they shall bee diligently compared together both between themselves and with the following practice of all the Churches of Christ as well in the Apostles times as in the purest and Primitive times nearest thereunto there will bee left little cause why any man should doubt thereof Thus that Reverend Author II. Certain other Examples of Retractations In the next place other Instances of Retractations and repentings Beda prefat in Retract suas in Actor Apostol Tom. 6. Cujus Augustini industriam nobis quoque pro modulo nostro placuit imitari Nunc in idem volumen Actor Apostolic brevem Retractationis libellum condamus studio maximè vel addendi quae minus dicta vel emendandi quae socus quam placuit dicta videbantur The ingenuity and industry of St. Austin in his Retractations it is my purpose in my small measure to imitate also Now therefore let us compile a brief Treatise of Retractations with this intent especially either of adding those things which were not sufficiently expressed or of amending those that were expressed otherwise than did seem convenient saith venerable Bede Again For my part saith another though a late Author yet one of good note Good Reader Mr. Whately in his Bride-Bush in his advertisement to the Reader I account it no shame to confess and revoke an errour and will therefore do it plainly and without circumstance Then hee closes with this honest and Austin-like expression viz. From him that had rather confess his own error than make thee erre for company The like whereunto wee heard above out of that Father And Dr. Bishop Brownriggs sentence concerning Retractations Related by Dr. Gauden the now very Rev. Bishop of Excester his successon Brownrigge the late most worthy Bishop of Excester would say that Hee