Arts and Sciences but they could not learne of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himselfe did speake 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13 3. In thâ—ir owne judgement the most holy did erre as 1 San 16. 1 and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Austin to Jerome to give this honour onely to the Canonicall bookes firmely to believe that no authour of them erred in writing from all others he expected proofe from Scripture or reason 12. The wonderfull consent singular harmony and agreement of the Scriptures shewes that they came not from men but from God John 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it selfe and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24 27. John 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the old is fulfilled in the new Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of yeeres circumstance of time and place or point of doctrine the fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it selfe and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See Dr. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. These considerations strengthen this argument 1. The length of time in which this writing continued from Moses untill John to whom was shewed the last authenticall revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of books that were written and of writers that were imployed in the service 3. That difference of place in which they were written which hinders the writers conferring together Two other arguments may evince this truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 Kings 7. 24. Christ himselfe and the Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine such as the devill was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sunne the dividing of the Sea and the Rivers the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and believe the workes which I doe if you will not believe me 2. Preservation of the bookes of the Scripture 〈◊〉 the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by divine providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devill and his wicked instruments against the Scripture more then any other booke Antiochus burnt it and made a Law that whosoever had this booke should die the death yet secondly it was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Julian and other evill Tyrants Thirdly the miserable end of Julian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other persecutors of this doctrine The bookes of Salomon which he wrote of naturall philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest bookes that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertaine to godlinesse have been safely kept to posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of naturall things then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetuall forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for 300 yeeres set it selfe to persecute and extirpate this new doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and increased mighily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed JAmes with the sword yet v. 24. the word grew and multiplied The miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himselfe Matth. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14. they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in substance Divine miracles are above and against the force of nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by naturall causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vaine delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvations these to seale up falshood and destroy men confirmed in idolatry and heathenisme 2 Thess. 2. 9. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists behold ye looke for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feele no more paine then if I were in a bed of down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles receved testimony of their most venemous and bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both ancient and Judaicall and the present Christian Church 2. Of the members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jewes professed the doctrine and received the bookes of the old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jewes of these daies who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion doe stiffely maintaine and preserve the Canon of the old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirme the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the old Canon received from the Jewes and now delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine will 2. Of the members of the Church the constant testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their blood have given to the truth Rev. 6.
and Prophets Matth. 5. 17. 7. 12. 11. 13. 20. 40. Acts 13. 15. 24. 14. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 3. 21. or Moses and the Prophets Luke 24. 27. 16. 29. or in the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. or the Prophets alone Luke 1. 70. 24. 25 27. Rom. 1. 2. Heb. 1. 1. the name Prophet being taken as it is given to every holy writer The Jewes and the Ancient reckon 22 Bookes in the old Testament according to the number of the Letters of the Alphabet for memory sake Ruth being joyned with the Booke of Judges and the Lamentations being annexed to Jeremy their Author Hebraeis sunt initiales medianae literae 22 finales quinque Quamobrem V. T. modo in 22. modo in 27. libros partiuntur All the bookes of both Testaments are 66. 39 of the old and 27 of the new Testament Some would have Hugo Cardinall to be the first Authour of that division of the Bible into Chapters which we now follow No man put the verses in the Latine Bibles before Robert Stephen and for the new Testament he performed that first being holpen by no Booke Greeke or Latine Vide Croii observat in novum Testam c. 7. This arithmeticall distinction of Chapters which we have in our Bibles was not from the first authours Of which that is an evident token that in all the quotations which are read in the new Testament out of the old there is not found any mention of the Chapter which would not have been altogether omitted if all the Bibles had then been distinguished by Chapters as ours distinguishing of the Bible into Chapters and Verses much helpes the reader but it sometimes obscures the sense Dr Raynolds gives this counsell to young Students in the study of Divinity that they first take their greatest travell with the helpe of some learned interpreter in understanding St Johns Gospell and the Epistle to the Romans the sum of the new Testament Esay the Prophet and the Psalmes of David the summe of the old and in the rest they shall doe well also if in harder places they use the judgement of some godly writer as Calvin and Peter Martyr who have written best on the most part of the old Testament The Bookes of the old Testament are 1. Legall 2. Historicall 3. Poeticall 4. Propheticall 1. Legall which the Hebrews call from the chiefe part Torah Deut. 31. 9. 33. 4. the Grecians from the number Pentateuch the five Bookes of Moses Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy all written by Moses as it is commonly agreed except the last Chapter in the end of Deuteronomy concerning his death written by Joshua In which five Bookes are described the things done in the Church from the beginning of the world to the death of Moses The Sadduces as some say received no other Scripture but these five Bookes of Moses therefore Christ Matth. 23. 32. proves the resurrection of the dead which they denied out of the second Booke of Moses but Scultetus saith that they rejected not the Prophets l. 1. exercit evang c. 22. Anciently it was not the custome of holy writers to adde Titles to what they had written but either left their workes altogether without Titles or the first words were Titles the Titles now in use as Genesis Exodus were prefixed according to the arbitrement of men and the like is to be thought of those before the historicall bookes of the new Testament as Matthew Marke Luke John With the Hebrews the Titles of bookes are taken sometimes from the subject matter or argument as in the bookes of Judges Ruth Kings Proverbs and others of that kinde sometimes from the Authors or amanuenses rather as in the bookes of Joshua and the Prophets sometimes from the initiall words with which the bookes begin which Jerome followes The Bookes of Moses are denominated from the initiall words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. in principie i. e. Genesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Haec nomina h. e. Exodus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. vocavit h. e. Leviticus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. in deserto i. e. Numeri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. verba sive Deuteronomium These are subdivided againe into 54 Sections that the reading of them may be finished in so many Sabbaths which is signified Acts 15. 12. Junius Ainsworth and Amama with Calvin Cornelius a Lapide and Piscator have done well on the Pentateuch 1. Genesis in Hebrew Bereshith the first word of the book by the Septuagint it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which appellation the Latine Church retained because it sets forth the first generation of things Ch. 2. v. 4. and of Adam or mankind Gen. 5. 1. It consists of 50 Chapters and containes a History of 2368 yeeres from the creation of the world to the death of Joseph The best Expositors of this booke are Mercer River Pareus Caelvin Peter Martyr on 40 Chapters Willet Ainsworth Origen upon the Canticles and Jerome upon Ezekiel say that the Hebrewes forbad those that had not attained to the age of the Priesthood and judgement viz. 30 yeeres to reade in three bookes for their profundity and difficulty that is the beginning of the world which is contained in the three first Chapters of Genesis the beginning and end of Ezekiel since that treats of the Cherubins and the Divine Majesty this of the structure of the third Temple and the Song of Songs in which those things which ought to be understood of the Divine Authour are easily through youthfull affection elsewhere drawne and wrested This booke of Genesis is not onely profitable but very necessary for doctrine as Moses is the Prince and as it were Parent of Divines so Genesis is the foundation and excellent compendium of all Divinity propounding evidently the chiefe parts of it 2 Exodus The second booke of Moses is called in Hebrew Shemoth in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word the Latines have retained It consists of 40 Chapters and containes a History say Junius and Tremelius of 142 yeeres viz. from the death of Joseph even to the building of the Tabernacle The best Expositors of it are Rivet Willet Calvin Ainsworth 3 Leviticus in Hebrew Vaiicra in Greeke and Latine Leviticus from the matter which it handleth because it treats especially of the Leviticall Priesthood and the Leviticall or Ceremoniall Lawes in it It consists of 27 Chapters and containes a History of one Moneth viz. of the first in the second yeere after their going out of Egypt The best Expositors of it are Calvin Ainswarth and Willet 4 Numbers in Hebrew Vaie dabber in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Latine Numeri in English Numbers because it begins with declaring the number of the people and because many numberings are reckoned up in this booke It containes a History of 38 yeeres and consists of 36 Chapters The
best Expositors of it are Calvin Attersoll Ainsworth 5 Deuteronomy in Hebrew Haddebarim from the first words in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latine retaines because it containes a second repetition of many necessary points of the Law It consists of 34 Chapters and containes a history of the two last moneths of the yeere Some say concerning the 34 Ch. 10. that part of it was written by Ezra contemporary with Malachy The best Expositors of it are Calvin Ainsworth Wolphius Cornelius a Lapide 2 Historicall 1. Before the Captivity Joshua Judges Ruth Samuel Kings 2 After the Captivity both the Chronicles Ezra Nehemiah The sixth Booke in the old Testament is called Joshua because it containes a History of things done by Joshua the servant of Moses which he by the will of God put in writing it being all written by him except some of the last Chapter where mention is made of his death and thought to be written by Samuel It consists of 24 Chapters and containes a History of 18 yeeres viz. from the death of Moses even to the death of Joshua The best Expositors of it are Masius and Serarius for Papists Drusius and Lavater of Protestants The seventh booke is called Shophetim Judges because it containes things done under the government of the 12 Judges There is nothing certaine of the authour of this Booke though some would have Samuel but he rather collected and compiled into one Volume what was written by many It describes the state of the government of Israel from the death of Joshua even to the Priesthood of Eli. It consists of 21 â—â—hapters and containes a History of 299 yeeres say some of 300 at least saith Spanhemius The best Expositors of it are Peter Martyr Drusius Lavater Serrarius The eighth is Ruth the authour of which booke is unknowne many thinke it was written by Samuel who added this as a part or conclusion of the booke of Judges It consists of foure Chapters and is an History concerning the marriage and posterity of Ruth The best Expositors of it are Deusius Wolphius Lavater Topsell The ninth in order are the two bookes of Samuel which containe in them an History of 120 yâ—eres The first beginning an History of 80 yeeres of 40 under Eli 1 Sam. 4. 18. and of 40 under Samuel and Saul Acts. 13. 21. and consists of 31 Chapters The second Booke is a History of 40 yeeres even from the death of Saul to the end of Davids Kingdome and consists of 24 Chapters These two Bookes in the Originall have two severall Titles The one is the first and second of Kings the other the first and second of Samuel The former Title it hath received as it stands in relation to the two next Bookes and in opposition to that of Judges for as in that Story the Regiment of Judges was described in one Booke so in this Story of which these two are but one part the Regiment of Kings is described this is the reason of the first Title The other likewise of the first and second of Samuel is given unto it 1. Because there is very frequent mention made of Samuel therein he being a principall subject of the first part thereof 2. Because it continueth the narration so farre till the infallible truth of Samuels principall Prophesie which seemed to remaine in great doubtfulnesse at least when he ended his daies was fully accomplished in establishing the Kingdome upon the person and family of David the sonne of Jesse The best Expositors of both the Samuels are Peter Martyr Drusius Willet also hath expounded them but not so well as he hath other Bookes of Scripture The tenth is the two Bookes of the Kings in Hebrew Melachim is Greeke and Latine the third and fourth of the Kings from the subject matter of them because they relate the Acts of the Kings of Israel and Judah This History was written by divers Prophets but who digested it into one Volume is uncertaine many ascribe it unto Esdras The first Booke consists of 22 Chapters and containes a History of 118 yeeres The second Booke consists of 25 Chapters and containes a History of 320 yeeres The best Expositors of both the Kings are Peter Martyr and Gaspar Sanctius The eleventh Booke is the two Bookes of Chronicles which is called Dibrei Hajamim verba dierum because in them the deeds of the Kings of Israel are particularly described The Greekes and Latines divide it into two with the Greekes it is called liber 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 q. d. praetermissorum because he summarily explaines somethings either omitted or not fully described in the Pentateuch the bookes of Joshua Judges Samuel and the Kings Of the Latines liber Chronicorum q. d. Chronologicum which appellation Luther retaines in the Dutch version of the Bible There is nothing certaine of the authour of these Bookes though Esdras be thought to be the authour The first Booke consists of 29 Chapters and containes a History of 2985 yeeres viz. from the creation of the world even to the Kingdome of Salomon The second consists of 32 Chapters and describes a History from the beginning of the Kingdome of Salomon even to the returne out of the captivity of Babylon The best Expositor on both the Chronicles is Lavater Twelfthly the two Bookes of Ezra they are counted for one Volume with the Hebrewes the Greekes and Latines devide them into two Bookes and assigne the first to Ezra the second to Nehemiah Ezra was so called from the Authour which was a Scribe most skild in the law of God as appeares in the 7 Chap. 1 6 11 verses The best Expositors of it are Junius and Wolphius Nehemiah It is called by the Latines the second Booke of Ezra because the History begun by Ezra is continued in it but usually Nehemiah because it was written by him and also because it containes the re-edifying of the City of Jerusalem caused by Nehemiah It consists of 13 Chapters and containes a Hiâ—tory of 55 yeeres viz. from the 20 yeere of Artaxerxes to the Kingdome of the last Darius The best Expositors of it are Wolphius and Pilkinton The next Booke is Esther called in Hebrew the Volume of Esther Many of the Jewes thinke this Booke was written by Mordechai which those words in the 9 Chap. v. 20. 23. seem to favour Isidore saith Esdras is thought to have written Esther but some say it was composed after by another Moses Camius saith it was written by the men of the great Synagogue Philo Judaeus saith Joachim a Priest of the Hebrewes sonne of the hight Priest was the composer of it and that he did it at the intreaty of Mordecai the Jew It consists of ten Chapters and containes a History of 10 or as others will of 20 yeeres concerning the preservation of the Church of the Jewes in Persia by Hester Drusius Serrarius and Merlin have done well on this Booke 3.
Poeticall Job Psalmes Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles to which some adde the Lamentations Those parts of Scripture wich set forth strongest affections are composed in verse as those holy flames of Spirituall love betweene Christ and his Spouse in the Canticles of Salomon The triumphant joy of Deborah after deliverance from Sisera's Army of Moses and Miriam after the destruction of Pharaoh the afflicting sorrowes of Hezekiah in his sicknesse and the Lamentations of Jeremy for the captivity of the Jewes The Booke of Psalmes is as it were a throng of all affections Love joy sorrow feare hope anger zeale every passion acting a part and wound up in the highest stâ—â—ines by the Spirit of God breathing Poeticall eloquence iâ—to the heavenly Prophet So the Booke of I b whose subjâ—ct is sorrow hath a composure answerable to the matter Paâ—lion hath most scope in Verse and is freest when tied up in numbers Job There is great varieiy of judgement about the Authour and Penman of this Booke some say it was one of the Prophets but they know not who some ascribe it to Salomon some to Elihu many to Moses Hugo Cardinall Suidas and Pineda conceive that Job himselfe was the authour of this book and it is thus proved because when any Booke is inscribed by the name of any person and there appeares no urgent reason wherefor it could not be written by him such a person is to be thought the authour and not the matter of the Booke as is manifest in the Booke of Joshua and those of the greater and lesser Prophets The Arabicall speeches with which it abounds note that it was written by some man living neere Arabia as Job did Neither doth it hinder that Job speakes of himselfe in the third person for Canonicall writers are wont to doe this out of modesty Num. 12. 3. John 21. 24. It is conceived to be the first piece of Scripture that was written if Moses wrote it it is probable that he wrote it before the deliverance of the people of Israel out of Aegypt while he was in Midian The maine and principall subject of this booke is contained in 34 Psal 19. Many are the afflictions of the righteous but the Lord delivereth him out of all We may divide the Booke into three parts and so it sets forth 1. Jobs happy condition both in regard of externals and internals in the first five verses 2. Jobs fall his calamity from that to the seventh verse of the 42 Chapter 3. Jobs restitution or restoring from thence to the end Beza Mercer and Pineda have well expounded it The Psalmes are called in the Hebrew Sepher Tehillim a booke of divine praises in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called from a Muâ—call instrument which name the Latines have retained It containes sacred Songs to be fitted for every condition both of the Church and members It is called in the new Testament the Booke of Psalmes Luke 20. 42. 24 44. Acts 1. 20. No bookes in the old Testament are oftner cited in the new then Esay and the Psalmes that 60 times this 64. They are in all 150 in Greeke 151. Austin and Chrysostome ascribe them all to David as the Authour so doe Theophylact Ludo vicus de Tena Some thinke that after the Captivity Esdras collected these Psalmes dispersed here and there into one Volume There are ten Authors whose names are put in the Titles of the Psalmes viz. David Salomon Moses Asaph Etham Eman Jeduthun and the three sonnes of Corah Odae istae Davidis dicuntur quod is multas veteres collegerit multas ipse Psallendi sciens addiderit aut per homines idoneos addi fecerit Grotius The Hebrewes divide the Psames into five Bookes or parts The first Booke hath the first 41 Psalmes the second 31 from 42 to 73 the third 17 from 73 to 90 the fourth 17 from 90 even to 107 the fifth 43 from the 107 to 150. Vide Genebr in Psal. 1. v. a. 1. Tituli sunt Psalmoeum claves the Titles are Keys as it were of the Psalmes saith Jerome The best Expositors on the Psalmes are Musculus Mollerus Muis Calvin The Scripture is the choicest booke the Psalmes the choycest piece of Scripture and the 119 Psalme the choicest part of the Psalmes Among 176 verses in that Psalme there are scarce foure or five at most wherein there is not some commendation of the word Proverbs The booke of Proverbs is compared to a great heape of Gold rings rich and orient severally and every one shining with a distinst sence by it selfe but other contexts of holy Writ to Gold chaines so enterwoven and linked together that they must be illightned and receive mutuall illustration one from another It consists of 31 Chapters it was written by Saomon saith Austin 17 Ch. of his 20 booke de oivitate Dei and Josephus in the 8th Booke and 2d Chapter of his Jewish Antiquities and it is proved 1 Kings 432. though there indeed it is said onely he spake them yet it is likely also he wrote them Prov. 1. 1. they are called the Proverbs of Salomon It is a Treatise of Christian manners touching piety toward God and justice toward our neighbours The best Expositors on it are Mercer Cartwright Dod Lavater Graece dieitur hic liber 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nimirum Hebraeum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proprie comparationem significat quia ex comparationibus curtatis plerumque fiebaut Proverbia inde coepit sumi in significatione 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grotius Ecclesiastes in Hebrew Coheleth the feminine hath respect either to wisdome or to the soule the nobler part The Authour of this booke was Salomon who either at his Table or in his familiar conference propounded these doctrines to his Courtiers as may be collected out of 1 Kings 10. 8. Many of the Hebrews say that this Booke was written by Salomon to testifie his repentance of his ill led life It consists of twelve Chapters The summe and scope of the whole Booke is explained in the last Chapter viz that all things in the world are vaine therefore that nothing is more profitable and necessary then to feare God and keepe his Commandements The principall parts of it are two The first concerning the vanity of humane matters and studies in the world the latter of the stability and profit of godlinesse and the feare of God The best Expositors on it are Mercer Cartwright Mr Pemble Granger Canticles are called in Hebrew Shirha Shirim by the Latines Cantica Cantieorum The Song of Songs that is a most excellent Song the Hebrews having no Superlatives Salomon was the Authour of it 1 Kings 4. 32. Many of the Ancients refer it to the spiritual marriage betweene Christ and the Church or every faithfull soule It consists of eight Chapters and perpetuall Dialogues The Jewes had this Book in such reverence and account that before thirty yeeres of age none would
study it The best Expositors are Mercer Brightman Ainsworth Dr Gouge This Booke which treats of that Spirituall and Heavenly fellowship the sanctified soule hath with Christ cannot be throughly understood in the true life of it but by those that are Sanctified 4. Propheticall The Greater Prophets 4. Lesser Prophets 12. Esay Jeremy Ezechiel Daniel Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jonah Micah Nahum Habbakuk Zephany Haggai Zachary Malachy Grotius orders them thus Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jona Esay Micha Nahum Habbacuc Zephany Daniel Jeremy Ezechiel Haggai Zachary Malachy They are called Propheticall Bookes because they were written by Prophets by Gods Commandement Prophets were distinguished by the Temples some were Prophetae priores those of the first Temple other Posteriores of the latter Temple Esay Is placed first not because he is more Antient then all the rest for some say that Jonah and Amos were before him in time others that Hosea was before him for Isays beginning was in the dayes of Vzziah Now Hosea was in the dayes of Jerobeam and Jeroboam was before Vzziah This Master Burrouhs saith is one reason why though he intends to goe over the whole propheticall Bookes yet he rather pitcheth upon Hosea first because indeed he was the first Prophet but Isay was rather set first for the Dignity of the Propheticall Oracles which he explaines and because his prophesie is longer then all the rest He is eloquent in his speech being a Noble man therefore the translation can hardly expresse his elegancie He brings so many and such evident Testimonies of the coming incarnation miracles preaching life passion death and resurrection of Christ that he seemes rather to write a History of things past then to prophesie of things to come and one calls him the fifth Evangelist Hence saith Senensis our Lord Jesus Christ made choice of this among all the Prophets first of all to read publikely and expound in the Synagogue of his own Country and in the new Testament he is oftner cited then all the rest of the Prophets He began to Prophesie in the yeare 3160 seven hundred yeares before Christ was borne Vzziah the King of Judah yet reigning and came to the last times of Hezekiah Isay 1. 1. and 39. 3. therefore he was almost contemporary with Hosea Ames and Micha and finished the course of his life under foure Kings of Judath viz. Vzziah Jathan Achaz and Hezehiab The Hebrewes say he was of the Bloud Royall and that he was sawed to death with a woodden Saw by Manasseth an Idolatrous King after he taught 60 yeares His Prophesie consists of 66 Chapters The best Expositors of it are Calvin Scultetus Forerius Mâ—llerus Jeremie This Booke was alwayes esteemed as Canonicall and written by Jeremie He prophesied under Josiah Jehoahaz Joachim and Zedekiah His prophesie consists of 52. Chapters He prophesied partly in the Land of Judea and partly in the Land of Egypt In the Land of Judea he prophesied 41. yeares and afterward 4. yeares in Egypt See Jackson on Jer. 7. 16. p. 4. 5. The best expositors of it are Bullinger Polanus Lamentations It is called in Hebrew Echa 1. quomodo because it begins with this word the Septuagint translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 idest lamentationes vel fletus for the Subject or matter of it It containes sad and mourning complaints of the State of the Common-wealth of Israel into which it fell after the death of Josiah it consists of five Chapters Jeremie is thought to be Author of it The best expositors of it are P. Martyr Vdall Ezechiel signifieth the strength of God or one strengthened hy God He prophesied at the same time with Jeremy Ezechiel in the City of Babylon Jeremy at Jerusalem It consists of 48. Chapters The best expositors of it are Junius Polanus and Villalpandas This Prophesie is full of Majesty obscurity and difficulty Calvin spent his last breath on this Prophet Daniel He wrote his prophesie after the Captivity Chap. 1. 21. and 10. 1. while the visions are generall and not dangerous to the Jewes Daniel writeth in the Syriacke tongue generall over the East from Chap. 1. v. 4. to the 8. Chapter But when the oppressors are named Medes and the Jewes plainly described to be the people whom God defendeth then in the 8. Chapter and all after he writeth in Hebrew and hath a Commandement to keepe close to the plaine exposition in Chapter 12. 4. Some reckon Daniel among the Prophets but the Jewes place it among the Hagiographa It consists of 12. Chapters the six first of which containe matters Historicall the six last Propheticall The best Expositors of it are Polanus Junius Willet Broughton Huit The Latines give the first place to the greater Prophets the Greekes to the lesser because there are many among them very Antient. Gratius The 12. lesser Prophets are so called because their writings are briefer then the foure first greater the Hebrewes have them all in one Booke the later Prophets spake more plainly precisely and distinctly touching the coming of the Messiah then the former Daneus Gualter Ribera Tarnovius and Drusius have done best on all the small Prophets Mercer and Livelie have done well on the five first of them The Hebrewes thus place them Hosea Amos Micha Joel Obadiah Jonah Nahum Habakkuk Zephanie Haggai Zecharie Malachi Hosea Is the first among them whose Prophesie although it consist of more Chapters then Daniel yet the other is more prolixe Hosheang noteth Salvator Saviour he is therefore so called because he published Salvation to the house of Judah and spake of the Saviour of the world and was a Type of Christ our Saviour He Prophesied before the Babylonish Captivity in the time of King Jeroboam under foure Kings of Judah Vzziah Iothan Achaz and Hezekiah and was contemporary as some say with Jonah 2 King 14. 26. Isay Is. 1. 1. Amos 1. 1. and Micha 1. 1. all which prophesied destruction to the Kingdome of Israel It consists of 14 Chapters The best Expositors of it are Zanchius Tremelius Pareus Rivet Livelie Diu vixi Osee Prophetam egit â—ut volunt Hebraei per annos 90 ita multos habuit Prophetas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ut Isaiam Ioelem Amosum Abdiam Iouam Michaeam ut notat Hieronymus Joel he prophesied in the time of Hezeohia it consists of three Chapters which containe partly exhortation to repentance and partly comfort to the penitent Daneus Pareus Drusius and Livelie are the best Expositors of it Amos Of a Shepheard he was made a Prophet 1 Chap. 1. v. and 7. 14. He was contemporary to Isay and Hosea He prophesied to the Kingdome of Israel or the ten Tribes 1. 1. and 3. 1. and 4. 1. and 5. 1. He utters a few things concerning the Kingdome of Judah 2. 4. and 6. 1. It consists of nine Chapters Daneus Pareus Livelie and Drusius are the best Interpreters of it Doctor Benfield hath done well on two
are besprinkled with Jewish Fables and Thalmundique toyes The third Paraphrase hath not expounded all the Hagiographall Bookes For there was never seen any Targum upon Chronicles nor Daniel nor Ezra peradventure because much of the Chronicles was expounded in the Bookes of the Kings and a great part of Daniel and Ezra were written in Chaldee that there was no need of a new Paraphase Onkelos his Paraphrase seldome merits that name being indeed commonly nothing but a rigid version Cudworths discourse concerning the notion of the Lords Supper Chap 3. The third Targum of the Pentateuch is named Jerosolymitanum either from the City whence it came or from the Tongue in which it was written Schickardi Bechinath Happeros Schim The Greeke Translation of the old Testament There is a most ancient rare parchment MS. copy of the Bible in Greeke in our Kings Library at St JAmes sent to His Majesty that now is by Cyrillus then Patriarke of Alexandria The Postscripts of the second Epistle to Timothy and that to Titus in that Manuscript agree in the maine with the Syriacke Testament The second to Timothy written from Laodicea to Titus written from Nicopolis There be divers Greek translations of the old Testament that of all the rest is the most famous and Ancient of which the Seventy-two Interpreters in Egypt obeying King Ptolemeus Philadelphus his Commandement were the Authors It was made not a whole 100 yeares after the death of the Author of Nehemiah and 300 yeares also before Christ. They are said to be 72 Elders chosen out of every Tribe they are commonly called seventy although they were 72 as Bellarmine sheweth where he speakes of their edition as the Centumviri which were 105. Ptolomeus Philadelphus the most learned of all the Ptolomies had made a Library at Alexandria which he stored with many thousands of Books and understanding that the Divine Books of the Prophets full of all good Doctrine were kept amongst the Jewes written in their tongue by the motion of Demetrius Phalerius the best Grammarian of that age whom Ptolomy had appointed the Library-keeper he requested of Eleazar the High Priest of the Jewes those Bookes and Interpreters then 72 Elders of all the Tribes of Israel were sent unto them All the Latine translations of the Bible except that of Jerome were made from it The Evangelists followed the version of the Seventy in many things which was in the hands of many and of great authority amongst the Hellenists when they might doe it without much swerving from the sence of the Prophets both to shew their Liberty and that in things indifferent and of little consequence they would not give occasion of cavill to the wicked nor of scandall to the weake The 70 Interpreters doe manifestly swerve from the Hebrew truth in reckoning of yeares for Gen. 5. they say that Methuselah was more then 167 yeares old when he begat Lamech so that of necessity they make him live 14 yeares after the floud which is false for then were 9 soules saved contrary to Gen. 7. The Syriacke translation of the New Testament comes next to be considered it is Ancient yet it is not certain who was the Author thereof nor in what time it was made though Chamier thinkes a little after Christs time the greate elegancy and purity of speech doth shew that it is Ancient It is probable that it was made about the beginning of the Christian Church because the second of Peter with the second and third of Iâ—hn Jude the Revelation are left out which though they were written by inspiration yet they were questioned by Ecclesiasticall writers because they were omitted by the Syriacke translator It is very profitable for the understanding of the Greeke Testament It wâ—ll interprets those Greek words Matth. 6. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 per panem indigentiae nostrae and that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 16. 22. The Syriack hath 2 words Maran Atha which signifie our Lord cometh The Papists indeavour to establish their administration of the Lords Supper under one kind from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 11. 20. but that word is generally used for the whole action of the Sacrament viz. the distribution of the Bread and Wine The Syriacke so renders it Comendentes vos bibentes Andreas Masius in his Syriacke Grammar saith that the Syrians doe not write sinistrâ—rsum toward the left hand as the Hebrewes nor dextrorsum toward the right hand as the Greekes and Latines but deorsum downward which manner of writing it is probable was then observed by Christ John 8. 6. because at that time the Jewes used the Syriacke tongue The New Testament in Syriacke is in Latine of Trostius his Edition the Revelation was de Dieu's Edition the later Epistle of Peter and two Epistles of John and that of Jude are Pococks Edition The Arabique translation It is uncertain by whom it was made or when sure it is they had the Scriptures in their own tongue and it were to be wished that that tongue were more common and better understood that Religion might be spread amongst the Saracens which for the most part speake that language In the yeare 1592. the New Testament in Arabicke was first divulged at Rome The Arabicke tongue saith Walter is thought to be a branch of the Chaldee and Syriacke proceeding from both but that it exceeds them in 6. letters there being 28. in the Arabicke tongue It was in use Anciently with the Ishmalites and Hagarenes who drew their originall from Abraham and afterward would rather be called Saracens from Sara It is now used through all Asia and Africa Mahumed who descended from the Ishmaelitish Nation wrote his wicked and blasphemous Alâ—oran in this tongue Erpenius who was excellently skil'd in this tongue saith it is more necessary and excellent then either the Syriacke Aethiopicke Persian or Turkish language he extols it for its antiquity largenesse elegancie and profit The Arabians saith he have many more accurate for Geographie then Ptolâ—mie Aviceâ—ma and other famous Physitians have written in this tongue He saith 32 thousand of Arabicke Bookes were to be had in one Library in Maâ—â—itania Joseph Scaliger Raphelengius Isaac Casaâ—bone Emmanuell Tremellius and Franciscus Junius all learned men of speciall note much esteemed this tongue and promoted the study of it as their writings shew Mercer who was most versed in the Hebrew and Chaldee tongues in his old age a little before he died thought to have travelled into the cast only out of a desire learne the Arabicke tongue The Latine translations were so many that Augustine saith they could not be numbred That new version of Tremellius and Junius both is best for the old Test and that of Erasmus and Beâ—a for the New Testament See in Chamiers first tome l. 12. c. 1. his censure of all 3. There is a great use also
intituled in the Canon thereof is easily answered Either they were Civill and common-wealth Stories whether the Reader is referred if it like him to read the stories more at large which the Prophets touched shortly or else they are contained in the Books of the Kings which are manifestly proved to be written by divers Prophets in their severall ages wherein they prophesied Salomons Books which he wrote of generall Philosophy fell away but all the other Books of the Scripture do still remain First they are all of God all whose works remain for ever therefore the holy Scriptures being not onely his handy-work but as it were the chief and Master-work of all other must have a continuall endurance Secondly they all are written generally for our instruction and more particularly for admonition and warning for comfort and consolation unlesse we will say that God may be deceived in his purpose and end wherefore he ordained them it must needs be that it must continue whatsoever hath been written in that respect Thirdly if the Lord have kept unto us the whole Book of Leviticus and in it the ceremonies which are abolished and whereof there is now no practice because they have a necessary and profitable use in the Church of God how much more is it to be esteemed that his providence hath watched over other Books of the Scripture which more properly belong unto our times Fourthly let us heare the Scripture it self witnessing of it own authority and durablenesse to all ages Moses thus writeth of it The secret and hidden things remain to the Lord our God but the things that are revealed to us and our Children for ever David also professeth that he knew long before that the Lord had founded his testimonies for ever-more But our Saviour Christs testimony is of all other most evident That heaven and earth shall passe but that his word cannot passe And yet more vehemently that not one jot or small letter prick or stop of his Law can passe untill all be fulfilled Rom 15. 4. therefore none of those which were written for that end are lost Origen in praefat in Cant. Canticorum Augustine l. 18. de civitate Dei c. 38. thought it could not neither stand with the Divine providence nor with the honour of the Church that any Canonicall Books and given for such to the Church should be lost Of this opinion are many worthy moderne Divines Junius Chamierus Tomo 1. L. 9. c. 5. Polanus Wendelinus Waltherus Spanhemius Cartwright Gerardus in exegesi loci primi de Scriptura sacra c. 6. Joh. Camero Tomo 3. in Praelectionibus de verbo Dei Cap. 15. Rivetus in Isagoge ad S. Script c. 6. in Summa Controversiarum Tom. 1. Tract 1. Quaest. 1. Altingi us But Chrysost. and Whitaker also Bellarmine l. 4. de verbo Dei c. 4. Grâ—ther and Becanus hold that some Canonicall Books are lost I rather subscribe to the judgement of the former Reverend Divines who held the contrary The second question is whether the Scripture of the old Testament was punctata from the beginning or whether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or points from the beginning as now it hath Controversiam de punctorum antiquitate vel novitate inter viros eruditos disceptatam non attingo Sententia utraque suos habet assertores magni quidem nominis Cevalerius Buxtorsius Marinus Junius and other very godly and learned men have defended the antiquity of the pricks which to the Hebrews are in stead of Vowels and say that the Bibles were punctata in our Saviour Christs time and that he approved of the same Matth. 5. 18. others hold that the invention of the pricks and the Massâ—reth is to be ascribed to the Tiberian Massorites who flourished about 500 yeares after Christs birth this opinion divers learned men have defended with most weighty reasons as Martinius in Technologia Luther Mercer Scaliger and Drusius Calvin upon the 11. of Zacharie Zuinglius in his Preface on Esay Raynolds in his censure of the Apocryphall Books But above all Capellus in his Book entitled Arcanum punctationis revelatum hath so strongly confirmed that opinion and hath so solidly confuted the reasons which are commonly brought to the contrary that he hath drawn some learned Divines to his opinion which before did stiffely adhere to the contrary opinion and left others very doubtfull He hath well answered that place Matth. 5. 18. l. 2. c. 14. But as Amana saith if any will not be moved from the other opinion that the puncta were invented by the Prophets which many godly Divines doe out of a good zeale stand for suum Cuique liberum sit judicium Vide Fulleri Miscell Sac. l. 4. c. 4. Mercerum ad Gen. 16. 13. Drusium ad difficuliora loca Genes Buxtor fij dissertationem de Ebraeorum literis Our Saviour saith Matth. 5. 18. that not one jot or prick of the Law shall perish whereby it should appeare that the Law and the Prophets for of both he speaketh immediately before had vowels pricks whereunto also belong all those places of Scripture which testifie of the clearnesse and certainty of the Scripture which could not at all be now if it lacked Vowels Yet this is not B. Vshers judgement as himselfe told me Non est improbabile argumentum ex Matth. 5. v. 18. Luc. 16. 17. ubi per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 puncta accentus commodè intelligi posse docti opinantur inter quos Broughthonius in Daniel p. 45. Polanus Syntagm lib. 1. cap. 37. quamvis argumento illi nolimus insistere Voetius Tomo primo disputat de authoritate Scripturae Sine punctis legere saith Drusius paucis hodie Concessum Serarius de Rabbinis saith Elias Hutter a Lutherane writes thus è mille Praedicantibus ne unum quidem esse qui etiam punctatissina possit Hebraea legere nedum absque punctis CHAP. VII NOw I proceed to shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor the vulgar Latine are anthenticall 1. The Greek translation of the Old Testament which is commonly ascribed to the Seventy Interpreters is not Divinely inspired The chiefe Pillars of the Primitive Church ranne into this errour whence sprung many other errours The Greek Fathers who were generally unskilfull both in Hebrew and Latine some few excepted were the lesse to be blamed here since they made use of no other Editions therefore they more confidently affirmed their own to be Authenticall Augustine Tertullian and many of the Latine Fathers whom divers Divines follow ascribed too much to the Seventy Interpreters Yet there was a controversie between Augustine and Jerome concerning their authority as is evident by both their Epistles Bellarmine is large in commending this version saying that it is most certain that those Interpreters did very well translate the Scripture and had the Holy Ghost peculiarly assisting them least they should erre
descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts 2. Wee shall now lay downe some propositions or Theoremes about the sufficiency of Scripture 1. In every Age of the Church the Lord hath revealed so much supernaturall truth as was for that age necessary unto salvation his wayes he made knowne to Moses Psal. 103. 7. and his statutes to Israel Deut. 4. 6. Psal. 147. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Therefore that is an erroneous opinion that before the Law written men were saved by the Law of nature and in the time of the Law by the Law of Moses and since in the time of the Gospel by the Word of grace 2. The substance of all things necessary to salvation ever since the fall of Adam hath beene and is one and the same as the true Religion hath beene one and unchangeable 1. The knowledge of God and Christ is the summe of all things necâ—ssary to salvation John 17. 3. Col. 2. 2. but this knowledge was ever necessary Jer 9. 23. Acts 4. 12. the Fathers indeed saw Christ more obscurely and aenigmatically we more clearely distinctly and perspicuously but yet they knew him and believed in him unto salvation as well as wee John 8. 56. 2. The Covenant of grace which God made with man is an everlasting Covenant therein the Lord hath revealed himselfe to be one and unchangeable as in nature so in will Heb. 13. 8. Rom 3. 29. shewing that as God is one in nature truth and constancy and that as well toward the Gentiles as toward the Jewes so hee would justifie both the circumcision and uncircumcision the Jew and the Gentile by one way of Religion that is to say through faith and belief in his Son Jesus Christ. 3. Christ and his Apostles professed and taught no new Religion but the same which the Scriptures of the old Testament did before instruct Matâ—hew 5. 17 John 5. 39. Acts 10 43 Luke 24. 25 26 27 44. 45. Acts 18 28. 17. 7. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 6. 26. Therefore the beleeving Jewes and the converted Gentiles are sâ—iled the children of faithfull Abraham being justified by Faith as Abraham was Whence wee may conclude that before under and after the Law since the fall of Adam there was never but one true Catholick Religion or way to Heaven and happinesse The Word of God being uttered in old time sundry ways was at length made knowne by writing the Lord stirring up and by his holy Spirit inspiring his servants to write his Will and Pleasure So long as there was any truth in any Age necessary to bee more fully and clearly knowne then was already revealed in the Bookes of Moses it pleased God to stir up holy men whom he Divinely inspired and sufficiently furnished to make the Truth knowne unto the Church thus after Moses during the time of the Law the Lord raised up Prophets who opened the perfect way of life unto the Church of the old Testament more clearely then it was before manifested in the Bookes of Moses the time and Age of the Church requiring the same The Church of the Jewes in the severall Ages thereof was sufficiently taught and instructed in all things necessary to salvation by the writings of Mâ—ses and the Prophets which appeares 1. In that our Saviour being asked of one what hee should doe that hee might inherite eternall life answered what is written in the Law and Prophets how Readest thou Luke 10. 25 26. and out of the Scripture hee declared himselfe to be the Saviour of the World foretold and promised Matthew 21. 44. 26. 31. Luke 4 21. 24 25 26 27 44 John 3. 14. 2. The answer of Abraham to the Rich man sending his friends to Moses and the Prophets sheweth that they sufficed to instruct the faithfull Jewes in all things necessary to salvation Luke 16. 29 30. by them they might learne how to obtaine Life and escape Death when hee saith Let them heare them he meaneth them onely as that place is meant Mat. 17. 5. 3. The Jewes themselves acknowledged the sufficiency of those writings to leade them unto life and happinesse John 5. 39. 5. The Prophets did expound the Law of God and speake more plainely precisely and distinctly touching the comming of the Messias then Moses did but the last full and cleare Will of God touching the salvation of man was not manifested by them that was together and at once to be published and taught by the Messias who also at his comming did establish that order in the Church of God which was to continue therein for ever For 1. Christ was ordained of the Father to bee the great Doctor of his Church a Prophet more excellent then the rest that were before him both in respect of his Person Office Manner of receiving his Doctrine and the excellency of the Doctrin which he delivered 2. This was well knowne not onely among the Jewes but also among the Samaritanes in so much that the woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messias is come he will tell us all things John 4. 25. 3. The time wherein God spake unto us by his Sonne is called the last dayes or the last time Heb. 1. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 20. to note that we are not hereafter to expect or looke for any fuller or more cleare Revelation of Divine mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a mediator of the New Testament or the new Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdome to reveale the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despaire but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seene of the Father which dispensation was needfull that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made knowne his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of doctriâ—e necessary to salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely Enigmatically and briefely he explained more excellently fully and cleerely the Apostles proved their doctrine out of the Books of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. 6. All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places
of Ales is called Doctor Irrefragabilis Thomas Aquinas after him Doctor Angelicus John Scot the last Doctor Subtilis Yet a learned Doctor of our owne saith of the Schoolmen Scholastici vel hoc nomine non tanti sunt à nobis faciendi quia in Justificationis articulo vix quicquam tradiderunt solidi The Papists themselves note twenty Articles in which their great Master Lombard erred so that that is ascribed to them hic magister non tenetur But now Paul the great Doctor of the Gentiles of whom Chrysostome writes severall Homilies is indeed an Angelicall Subtill Irrefragable Doctor Austin desired three things to have seen Christ in the flesh Rome in its glory and to have heard Paul preach What he speakes is true as Gospell and we can not apply to him what the Papists doe frequently to Peter Lumbard hic magister non tenetur We may exercise our judgement upon the writings of men there being few that write much and contradict not themselves but we must believe the Divinely inspired Writings There is a Booke in the Law called Liber Judiciarius or Doomesday-Booke because as Matthew Paris saith it spared no man but judged all men indifferently as the Lord in that great day will doe The Bible is the true Liber judiciarius or Doomesday Booke The word that I have spoken the same shall judge him in the last day I shall now in a few words discover the usefulnesse of this threefold Treatise Having been in these times of spoile unhappily plundered of my Bookes and Manuscripts which I esteemed as a precious treasure recovering this twice with some others I did resolve for preventing any future dammages in that kind to transcribe it faire for the Presse which was the worke of a whole yeere I know first the subject is very necessary for all Christians to search into and I have perused all the best writers I could find that I might handle it fully common-place wise according to the excellency of the Theme I have made use also of some Manuscrips of three worthy men now with God whose memory I shall ever honour for the compleating of the worke I have gleaned a few observations from some of the worthy Lecturers in Westminster from M. Ley of Budworth in his Lectures in the City and from divers others of the Assembly in their printed Sermons This worke I conceive may be beneficiall for these purposes Chiefly for setling and establishing of Christians in some maine principles of Divinity viz. that there is a God against the Atheists of these times that the Scripture is the Word of God against the Anti-Scripturists that Christ is God against all Arrians Socinians and other Heretickes ejusdem farinae vel potius furfuris that the so 〈◊〉 of man is immortall against such who in these daiâ—â— deny the same 2. For enabling a Christian to all dâ—â—ties prayer meditation holy conference catechizing his family For example suppose a Christian desire to instruct his family in the principles of Religion and would make use of M. Bals Catechisme for that purpose for I know not a better yet extant he may by the helpe of this worke open the heads of Religion from the beginning of that Booke to the Fall of man I would there were the like out on the whole body of Divinity But lest I trangresse the bounds of an Epistle I commend the worke to Gods blessing and desire thy benigne interpretation of my labours still resting Thy faithfull friend and hearty wel-wisher EDWARD LEIGH PROLEGOMENA HEBR. 6. 1. THe Apostle chides the Hebrews in the former Chapter for their ignorance and uncapablenesse of Divine mysteries from v. 11. to the end He tels them they were dull of hearing and that their ignorance was affected they might for their time and means have been teachers and yet now they must be taught and which is strange the very principles of the word of God Here in the beginning of this Chapter he earnestly exhorts them to encrease both in knowledge and obedience Leaving The Apostle alludes to men running a race they leave one place and goe on forward we must leave the principles of Religion that is not sticke there but passe on to a greater perfection The Apostle hath reference to the Schooles of the Jewes where hee was trained up there were two sorts of Schollers 1. Punies or petties 2. Proficients Perfectists Six principles are named as so many heads and common places of the ancient Catechisme not but that there were many other neâ—â—â—â—ary principles yet they might be reduced to 〈◊〉 â— Two maine duties that is 1. the doctrine of repentance from dead workes that every man is dead in sinne by nature and therefore had need to repent 2 The doctrine of faith in God 2 Two meanes 1 The doctrine of Baptismes by which in the plurall number he meanes both the Sacraments and also the inward Baptisme of Christ and that outward baptisme of John that is to say of the Minister though some refer it to the set times of Baptisme 2 The imposition or laying on of hands that is by a trope or borrowed speech the ministery of the Church upon the which hands were laid not the Sacrament of Confirmation as a Lapide expounds it 3 Two benefits Resurrection of the dead that the same numericall body shall rise againe and eternall judgement so called metonymically because in that judgement sentence shall be given concerning their eternall state either in weale or woe Not laying againe the foundation Three things are required in a foundation 1 That it be the first thing in the building 2 That it beare up all the other parts of the building 3 That it be firme and immoveable Simply and absolutely in respect of all times persons and things Christ onely is the foundation upon which the spirituall building of the Church is raised The first principles of heavenly doctrine are named here a foundation because they are the first things which are knowne before which nothing can be known and because upon the knowledge of these things all other parts of heavenly knowledge doe depend The Apostles are also the foundation of the Church Ephes. 2. 20. Rev. 21. 14. in three respects 1 Because they were the first which founded Churches and converted unbelievers to the faith 2 Because their doctrine which they received immediately from God by most undoubted revelation without mixture of errour or danger of being deceived is the rule of faith to all after-commers 3 Because they were Heads Guides and Pastors of the whole universall Church The Proposition or Observation which ariseth from these words thus opened may be this The Principles and Foundations of Christian Religion must be well laid Or thus Catechizing and instructing of the people in the principles of Religion is a necessary duty to be used The Apostle illustrates this by a comparison first from Schooles secondly from building the foundation
must be first laid The excellent definition of catechising which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofes of its necessity 1 It is the doctrine of the beginning of Christ by some rendred not unfitly for the sense which gives beginning in Christ. 2 It is a foundation which beares up all the building without this preaching is to no purpose which though it makes the least shew yet it is of greatest use it establisheth men and keepes them firme from wavering 3 This course is most agreeable 1. To Art all Arts proceed from principles Physitians have their principles Lawyers their maximes Philosophers their chiefe sentences 2 To nature which first formes the vitall parts then the more remote 3. It is sutable to reason Principles are 1. easiest in themselves 2. Facilitate other matters 3. Are the most necessary doctrines of all the rest they beare up all the rest 4. Are of continuall and constant use Prinâ—ipia sunt minima quantitate maxima virtute 4. Gods order and practise hath been still to lay principles things might easily passe from one to another at first they lived so long Cains and Abels sacrificing is an evidence of catechising before the flood there was no word written then therefore it is like their fathers taught them It was practised by Abraham Gen. 18. 19. the fruit of which observe in his sonne Gen 24. 63. and servant Gen. 12. 26. God himselfe writes a Catechisme for the Jewes describing a short compendium of religion in the two authentique tables of the Law Hannah delivered Samuel to Eli his instructor so soon as he was weaned Jehoida taught the young King Jehoash David and Bathsheba practised it 2 Chron. 28. 8 9. Psalm 34. 11. Prov. 4. 4. 31. 1. and Salomon himselfe seeme to give that precept out of the experience of his owne most excellent education Teach a child the trade of his way and when he is old he shall not depart from it though himselfe scarce did so and Eccles. 12. 23. he drawes all which he had said in his whole booke to two heads Feare God and keep his Commandements Catechising was also practised by Christ and his Apostles Luke 2. 46. Acts 22. 3. Heb. 6. 1 2 3. Christ at twelve yeeres old submitted himselfe to be catechised Luke 1. 4. and allowed of Hosanna sung by children He begins with regeneration to Nicodemus and he drew the whole Law into two heads Matth. 22. 37. John and Christ preacht Faith and Repentance and the Apostles after them Theophilus was catechised Luke 1. 4. Apollos Acts 18. 23. Timothy 1 Tim. 3 15. 2 Tim. 2. 2. The Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody a patterne of wholsome doctrine which he cals a form of doctrine Rom. 6. 17. and the analogy of faith Rom. 12. 6. This duty principally belongs to Ministers their Office is set down under the name of catechising Let him which is catechised make him that catechiseth partaker Gal. 6. 6. Ministers must plant and beget as well as increase and build up feed the Lambs as well as the Sheepe they are compared to Nurses wise Stewards skilfull builders it must be performed by housholders also Ephes. 6. 4. God chargeth parents to performe this duty Deut. 6. 6 7. Rehearse them continually whet them upon thy children often goe over the same thing as a knife doth the whetstone They are bound to bring up their children in the nurture and information of the Lord children were to be taught the meaning of the Passover Exod. 12. 16. Masters of Families also must instruct their servants which are ungrounded as children Christ instructed his Apostles he taught them how to pray he being the Master of the family and they his family as appeareth because he did eate the Passeover together with them and the Law appoints that every family should celebrate that feast together The reason why God specifieth not this point in the masters duty is because if it be performed by the father it shall be needlesse seeing it is done to the masters hand but if the father neglect it surely the master which succeeds in the fathers roome and hath his authority must see it done For as a father in Israel was bound to see his owne sonne circumcised so he was bound to see his servant circumcised and if to circumcise him sure he must as well make him as his child to know what circumcision meaned And what Christ did as a master of a family that must every master of family doe seeing we must be followers of Christ every one in his place therefore every one must instruct his ignorant servants in the truths of Religion The Jewes did use catechizing Cyprian saith Optatus exercised it at Carthage and Origen at Alexandria Clemens Alexandrinus had his paedagogus Lactantius and Calvin their Institutions Athanasius his Synopsis Austin his Euchiridion his bookes de doctrina Christiana and de catechizandis rudibus Catechizing is institutio viva voce a kind of familiar conference The Hebrew verbe Chanach signifieth to instruct or traine up even from childhood and to initiate or dedicate from which word holy Henoch had his name importing nurture in the feare of God The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to sound or resound as by an eccho and is applied even by Heathen writers unto that kinde of teaching which is by word of mouth sounding in the eare of him that is taught and especially unto the teaching of the first rudiments of any science whatsoever It signifieth any kind of vocall instruction Acts 21. 21 24. viz. that whereby the principles of Christian doctrine are made known unto the hearers as Luke 1. 4. instructed or catechized Gal 6. 6. taught or catechised See Acts 18. 25. Rom. 2. 18. 1 Cor. 14. 19. Catechizing is a plaine and easie instructing of the ignorant in the grounds of Religion or concerning the fundamentall principles familiarly by questions and answers and a spirituall applying the same for practice What ever the catechizing in the Primitive Church was in private for the publique it seems not to have been Dialogue-wise by question and answer but in a continued speech with much plainnesse and familiarnesse Catechizing differs from preaching preaching is the dilating of one member of Religion into a just Treatise catechizing is a contracting of the whole into a summe preaching is to all sorts catechizing to the young and rude Catechizing is 1. plaine that none might excuse themselves that the most illiterate might not say at the day of judgement O Lord thy waies were too hard for us 2 That the manner of the teaching might be sutable to the hearers 3 That no Governours might pretend the difficulty of it 2 Instructing which implyeth that originall ignorance and blindnesse we were borne with 3 It is such an instructing which is by way of distilling things in a familiar manner our
the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonicall Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Wâ—itaker against Raynolds with his preface wherein he writeth that JAmes his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himselfe I thinke afterwards seeing these words in a latter edition are left out It is nowhere found in Luthers workes that he called the Epistle of JAmes inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Bookes he produced Some in the preface of the German edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawie if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other edition from the yeere 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonicall and Apostolicall and they answer the arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man John Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fert saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinall denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonicall yea which is far worse he affirmeth that the Authour thereof hath erred not onely in words but in the sence and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajetan saith Whitaker rejected JAmes second of Peter and second and third of John and Jude It consists of five Chapters Pareus and Laurentius have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholicall because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon nor to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corintâ—s but to the converted of the Jewes dispersed here and there as appeares by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolicall and was written by Peter 1. Because the Authour of It expresly calleth himselfe Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old age to confirme them in the doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jewes that the former viz. dispersed by the Romane Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shewes an Apostolicall spirit 4. It s stile and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Authour of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a Spectator of the transfiguration in the mount Chap. 1. v. 16. now Peter together with JAmes and John were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his deare brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of John consists of five Chapters Second and third of John They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonicall 1. Their Authour cals himselfe an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiasticall office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that John came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolicall Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Johns and reckon them among the Canonicall bookes Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Jude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolicall first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of JAmes 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it containes as it were a briefe sum and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himselfe an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter JAmes and John quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epstles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himselfe an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well upon it Revelation It is called according to the Greeke Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast John the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyle but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This booke describeth the state of the Church from the time of John the last of the Apostles untill Christs comming againe and especially the proceedings pride and fall of Babylon the great whore with all the Kingdomes of Antichrist The holy Ghost therefore foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impaire the credit and authority of this above all other Bookes wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Booke of Scripture First the Authour of it is set in the forefront or face of it the Revelation of Jesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himselfe to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the severall Epistles to the Churchs in severall stiles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. that holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharpe two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feete like brasse 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven starres 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithfull and true witnesse the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly the instrument or pen-man his servant John the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of