Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	age_n	write_v	year_n	1,957	5	4.7409	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43727	Apokalypsis apokalypseos, or, The revelation revealed being a practical exposition on the revelation of St. John : whereunto is annexed a small essay, entituled Quinto-Monarchiæ, cum Quarto Omologia, or, A friendly complyance between Christ's monarchy, and the magistrates / by William Hicks ...	Hicks, William, 1621-1660.	1659 (1659)	Wing H1928; ESTC R20296	349,308	358

the conquering Saints 181 182 In whose power is it to remove false Teachers 196 VVhether the power of the Keys be singly in the Officers and Presbytery or joyntly in the Officers and Brethren together 198 How will it stand with the Justice of God to cut off innocent Infants with their Parents in his wrath and judgements that have never done good or evil 204 How comes Infants dying Infants to be saved that have not faith And whether the Parents faith is the condition of their salvation 205 c. Whether we may merit by our works 208 237. How are the Saints Co-partners with Christ in his Imperial Reign and Kingdom 212 Is it not in the power of Saints to recover themselves out of sin without going to Christ by faith 223 Whether true Saints may finally fall away from grace 223 241. Whether perfection may be had in this life 225 Whether Christ creates war and sends the sword into the world 233 Whether the Saints of God for their iniquities may be blotted out of the Book of Life 241 VVhether it be lawful to pray that God would blot out any name or person out of his Book of Life 242 Whether the Civil Magistrate hath authority over the Church 250 251 Whether Magistrates may not suppress errors being well advised by a Learned Assembly of Divines 851 Whether the Magistrate be not subordinate unto Christ as Mediator to make Laws for him to rule next and immediately under him in his Church 252 VVhen shall the Jews and Gentiles be gloriously united into one Church 261 VVhether Saints may be said to be saved in the hour of Temptation and yet suffer in it 262 VVhether the tryumphant State of the Church shall be here on earth or in the supernal Heavens 276 313 VVhether the Imperial Reigne of the Saints shall be after the general Resurrection or before 277 VVhether Christians may not be over-hot and Zealous in matters of Religion And whether a moderate temper would not be more advantagious therein then an over-furious one 285 VVhether we are to buy of Christ his Graces by way of contract or not 295 How is Christ said to love those whom he bitterly chastiseth 302 VVhether does Christ always use a spiritual force for the reclaiming of his back slidden people 304 VVhether Christs Kingdom and the Fathers be all one 310 Whether the Saints as Saints may justly expect by vertue of promise in the Word the Rule and Dominion under Christ on Earth at this present time 335 Whether the Saints in order to the obtaining of the Rule and Dominion may oppose the Supreme Magistracy they live under 335 337 VVhether Heathenish or Antichristian Magistrates may be opposed 338 339 VVhether the Saints Imperial Reign be far off or near at h●nd 341 342 VVhether it be not lawful for Saints to put to a helping hand in pulling down the Powers of the world that uphold Babylon and the VVhore thereof 346 347 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Or PRAECOGNITA THE REVELATION OF Iohn the Divine CHAP. I. VER I. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto him to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant John THis Book hath for Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Revelation of John the Divine And here in the Entrance I shall take leave to insert some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or preliminary discourses and questions which are necessary to be discussed before I enter upon the Exposition of the Body of this Book Quest 1. Whether this Book of the Revelation of John be of Divine Authority 2. Whether John who in the Title of this Book is named John the Divine the Author thereof be the same with John the Apostle and Evangelist the beloved Disciple of Christ or some other person 3. In the last place I shall give a compendious view and taste of the scope and designe of the whole Book 1. Concerning the Divine Authority of this Book I should say very little or nothing unto it well knowing how dangerous it is to move Foundation stones or to question the Authority of any of the Books of God received reverently in the Churches of Christ from age to age as the Canon and Rule of their Faith and Manners If it were not that the Adversary of old took advantage by this artifice to hinder the growth and cast prejudice on many of the Truths of God and to weaken the comforts of his Saints mainly cherished and supported by the Prophesies in this Book The occasion of the first doubting of the Divine Authority of this Book Hence rose in that it favoured the pretended Heresie of the Chyliasts or Millenaries and their adversaries endeavoured to father it rather on Cerinthus the Heretick then the Apostle John thereby if possibly they might not only enervate its Testimony but quite shut it out for ever out of the number of the Canonical Books of God that it might never do the Chyliasts any service more Vpon this ground Hyrome was the first that did most publiquely call its authority into question about the year of Christ 400. and that in pure opposition unto the Millenaries the followers of Justin Martyr Tertullian Ireneus Lactantius and others of good credit and authority in the Church of Christ in that judgement Secondly it became suspected as Erasmus witnesseth who in this particular and concerning other Divine Books also was very unstable in his own Judgment in that some of the ancient Greek primitive Christians did not receive the Revelations as of Divine Authority and this Hierome himself also testifies But on what slender grounds this came to pass I shall presently consider And though it is granted that some ancient Greek Christians did not receive it yet it was by others of the same age and of the far abler parts judgement and integrity numbred amongst the Books of God and acknowledged to have the publique stamp of his Spirit on it There was one Caius or Gaius as Eusebius witnesseth in the fourth book of his History who saith That this Book was written of one Cerinthus an Heretique who held among many other errors That after the resurrection of Christ his Kingdom should become earthly and sensual wherein the flesh should be satisfied again in all manner of concupiscences for the term of a compleat millenary of years Dionisius of Alexandria takes up this report from this Caius an obscure person and as is thought was one of the heretical Alogi who denied as Epiphanius testifies the Word of God and on the false report of this Caius Dionisius doubts of the Divine Authority of this Book But Hierome takes up the same slender ground from Dionisius and doth object it strongly But I answer it seems Hierome would admit of any slender testimony to the invalidating of the Authority of this Book because this book was the great Fortress of his adversaries the Chiliasts yet however though Hierome

humane actions does rightly distinguish of all the Revolutions and changes both of the civil and ecclesiastick states and though many of them are done and acted together and at the same time by diverse and sundry Persons yet cannot be declared together but severally one after another So these Prophesies though revealed and set down in order of place one preceding the other yet in vain do they go about to interpret them that observe not the peculiar characters and hidden misteries of numbers syncronising and meeting in one and the same time which is indeed the great key of the Revelation which makes all the passages and Revolutions therein though at the first sight they seem abstruse and disturbed yet by collating one to the other they become plain and revealed to us which in the subsequent discourse will manifest it self And these have been some of the reasons that some former interpreters have come off with losse in their studies and expositions of this Book when as they have applied diverse passages in this book to their own times when they had no relation to them and sometimes interpreted as they are in order set down in the Book following one another whereas they should be interpreted as they are Relata and ●orrelata and belonging to one and the same time and period though dispersed here and there thorough the whole book and so the harmony of the whole is kept some and entire For wee see that the order it self is not to be conformed to every aptness of interpretation according to the will and pleasure of the interpreter but according to the minde of the Spirit of God made clear by the Idea of their several and particuliar Characters for explanation thereof affixed thereunto Now because some expositours have herein gone astray must there no farther inquiry be made into this Book This would be a way to cast of all the Books of God for in which of them have not some expositors done amiss There is no promise of infallibility but there is a promise unto the latter dayes that many should run to and fro and knowledge should be encreased Dan. 12.4 do not arts grow in time to their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and perfection And is it any disparagement to those that went before us that we see farther then they did Apigmy upon a ●yants shoulder may see farther then the himself So we being helped by the instructions and experiences of our predecessours upon their shoulders it is no great advancing of our abilities if we soar a little higher I would not be understood as if this my essay were perfect and so exact as nothing can be added thereunto for herein I should balk our proper attribute Humanum est errare since others that come after us will see farther then we of this present age comming neerer to the accomplishment of the events of all Only I leave this consideration and proposal with the judicious and pious Christian that if he can finde out a more commodious method of interpretation upon better reasons and grounds then I have for this Book of the Revelation suiting with the minde of the Spirit and preserving the harmony of the whole Prophesies entire and discovering the several passages and revolutions therein how they do relate one to the other in their several proper characters and syncronismes with more prospicuity and fitter application of History answering the truth of this Prophesy I should most willingly become a learner at his feet in the mean time I shall add that of the Poet. Horat. Si quid novisti rectius istis Candidus imperti si non his utere mecum Object Again others will object and say That this way of interpretation savours too much of curiosity and impertinency And the application of the Prophetical representations and of the Apocaliptique dayes and periods to the several times and changes of the Church and State here on earth is too precise and peremptory 1. To which I answer first I assert no more in this interpretation the text being not at all forced but as it is either literal or figuratively referred to the times and states then in being and that interpretation made clear and undeniable by such necessary and sure arguments characters and notable tokens as will make the true sense and meaning of every notable mistery obvious to every discerning ey And herein I walk not alone having M. Brightman Napeir Piscator Alsteed and learned M. Mede with some others in their several tractates upon the Revelation to be my leaders herein 2. Those figures and representations which makes this interpretation dubious difficult o● misterious being cleared out of the other places of the Revelation and the Prophets of the old Testament which being rightly applied to the civil and ecclesiastick States as the text and time doth require should wipe of the brand of impertinency and curiosity what God hath sanctified no man should call unholy what God hath revealed no man should judge himself too curious and impertinent to search into Unrevealed things pertain unto God but revealed things are for the use and good of man 3. I answer to the perciseness of the time of the Apocaliptique periods though I will not herein be too peremptory well knowing that in matters of History Chronology there is great variety of opinions and imperfection therein as it is manifest in Scaligerde Emendatione temporum and other accounts also treating upon the same subject yet all this doth not hinder but the times and periods are fixed in the predeterminate Counsels of God which are higher then the Laws of the Medes and Persians unalterable and unchangeable And though notwithstanding there is difference and imperfection in most accounts of times yet by a regular judgment drawn from the visible tokens characters image and representation of each time which are either concomitants contemporaries or immediate antecedents or consequents of each great revolution and change we may judge their periods either to be past drawing nigh at hand or yet to come And this is no more then Christ himself hath done in setting down remarkable forerunning as Signes of the destruction of Ierusalem and his least comming in the 24. of Matth. and the 13. of Mark. But I would desire alwayes to be understood when I set down the exact epacts and periods of time it may vary as unto us in preciseness of account in respect of the imperfection of our Chronology but long time it cannot miss every notable revolution and season having their own proper characters and tokens to point them out as it were with a finger which will notably help us peremptorily to conclude in the foresaid limited sense This time is the time of Antichrists birth and rising this of his raign this of his ruine and desolation Consider to this end that of the Angel in the Prophet Daniel Chap. 12.7 Who held up his right hand and left hand unto Heaven and sware by him that liveth for ever that it

and some others of suspected credit and of obscure note as Dorotheus Dionisius Eusebius Caius do oppugne it yet Epiphanius was so passionate friend to it that he reckons them among Heretiques that did reject it and Justin Martyr and Ireneus of sounder judgement and of singular piety did not only approve this book as canonical but wrote commentaries on it 2. Whatsoever that Caius was that fathers the Apocalyps on Cerinthus on whose report all his followers were misled yet the relation it self holds not any resemblance of truth for Ireneus Tertullian and Epiphanius who write very largely of the heresies of Cerinthus and his successors yet never mentions that he held this opinion of Chiliasme or the Kingdom of Christ on earth which they could not be ignorant of therefore this story of Caius concerning him and his Apocalyps is Apocryphal and a meer figment on purpose devised by the adversary to lessen the authority of this book see more at large hereof in D. Homes lib. 3. chap. 3. sect 3. Further if Cerinthus was the Author of this book doubtless he would have besprinkled it with some other of his errors that were peculiar to him as that of the creation of the world by Angels denying of the Divinity of Christ and affirming his generation to be only of the seed of Joseph and Mary as is testified by M. Baxter's book of Infidelity treating of the heresies of Cerinthus Carpocrates and their followers page 129. c. But in this book of the Revelation there is not one word to this purpose but rather the contrary strongly confirmed in many places thereof as the subsequent discourse thereon will manifest And lastly If it were granted that Cerinthus held and expected a riotous and luxuriant Millenary which is now disproved yet this of the Apocalyps hath not the least intimation thereof but of a Millenary of rest and joy in a higher and more spiritual key then ever the Church enjoyed on earth heretofore there is great difference between an earthly sensual reigne and to reigne on earth Saints may be on earth and yet be most spiritual so they may have a Kingdom here on earth and yet a most spiritualized and heavenly one which is fully confirmed in the 21 and 22 chapters of this book And so I have answered the first ground of suspecting the divine authority of this Apocalyps Secondly Hierome the great Antagonist of this book writeth that many learned men spake very sharply against this book and the whole matter thereof as not becoming the gravity of an Apostle being only a common history of things shaddowed under dark figures and hard kind of speeches I answer Rather it becomes and savours the excellency and authority of an Apostle being directed to the then seven famous Churches of lesser Asia carrying in it all along the spirit of Prophesie and the very steps sentences and figures of the old Prophets being full of pregnant testimonies of the Divinity of Christ and of this perfecting of the work of our Redemption and Salvation by his continual Intercession and providential acts of gubernation of his Church to the end of the world I confess the book in the figures and expressions thereof is dark and mysterious but that is not strange in prophetical writings as in Daniel Ezekiel c. It seemed good to God to set us on diligence to enquire into the dealings of God with his Church and people and not to over-slip the judgements of Gods providence which are reserved in God's infinite wisdom unto their appointed times of discovery that from generation to generation his people and Church may be comforted and supported unto the end of all Thirdly Dionisius aforesaid Bishop of Alexandria reasons very slightly against the divine authority of this book when he saith That it doth not suit with the gravity of an Apostle to cast up so oft his own name since in his Gospel he never nameth himself but only pointeth it out by some modest marks as these The Disciple whom Jesus loved But here in this Book in his Visions and Conferences with the Angel he hath never done with these kind of words I John This reason moved Dionisius to think that this book was rather set out by some other in his name then by himself I answer This opposition is but weak for he that writes a History or matters of Doctrine as the Gospel is mixed of both he need not often insert his own name for the truth of that depends on its present verity and other apparent circumstances witnessed unto by the spirit of God in miracles and its operations on the hearts of Believers But it is far otherwise with the Writers of Prophesie for that receives authority by the Author who is known to be a Prophet for in every Prophesie that foretelleth things to come we must enquire first who revealed it and then to whom it was revealed that the person being known to be a Prophet and to have divine Revelations we may give credit to it for otherwise who would give credence or faith to any of the Prophetical predictions or books of the Prophets before they saw them accomplished and fulfilled As to instance in the Prophet Jeremiah who maketh mention of his name at least a hundred times and the Prophet Isaiah how oft doth he repeat these words Isaiah the son of Amos And in Daniel's Prophesie we shall find his name more then threescore times repeated yea ye shall find I Daniel about nine times from the seventh to the tenth chapter and Paul when his Apostleship was called in question by some false Brethren and to shew the excellency of his Ministry how often shall you read I Paul an Apostle not of men nor by men but of Jesus Christ And why should it be accounted strange when John mentions not his name above five times in this whole book and with that modesty that none might doubt of the truth of this Prophesie Having wiped off the objections that have cast jealousies and suspicions on these divine Revelations I shall in the next place endeavour to clear the divine authority thereof and add some testimonies for that end and I doubt not but that being cleared there is no true christians but will receive this Book of Prophesies but as the Oracles of God The testimonies are of two sorts either from without or secondly within the said book Those from without are the general consent of the churches of Christ in all ages excepting in the heat of contest amongst some violent persons to the receiving of them into the Canon The Councels of Laodicea the third Councel of Carthage and the Councel of Toletan 5. cap. 16. decreed it to be received as holy and divine Scriptures Secondly it was so received by most of the ancient Orthodox Fathers as Justin Martyr Tertullian Cyril Epiphanius Lactantius Ireneus Augustine and many others and so this book is often quoted by them as of divine authority in their writings I shall

add the testimony of our late Assembly of Divines in their confession of Faith set forth in the year of Christ 1651. who do number this of the Revelation in the catalogue of the sacred books of God Secondly There are other testimonies very radiant and pregnant within the said Book to prove it of divine inspiration First In that it proceeded from so highly illuminated a person as John the Apostle the beloved Disciple of Christ was which hereafter I shall evince and being directed to the seven famous Asian Churches and being by them left unto all churches unto the end of the world as the last publique Legacy of the spirit of God in this kind must needs be from the special impulse of the spirit of God seeing God would never suffer such a palpable deceit to be put upon the churches and to continue so long without controul and under his own name so often reiterated in those Prophesies if it were not from God himself and by his Spirits direction approbation and providential preservation 2. It is clear and evident that this book is from the spirit of God in that it doth fully harmonize and agree with the other indubitable received books of God that treat about the divinity of Christ and the work of our redemption Thirdly and lastly Seeing those things are evidently come to pass that this book of Prophesies hath predicted and foretold as the destruction of the seven Churches of Asia the dethroning of the Dragon the rise continuance and the fall of the Kingdom of the Beast and of the Whore riding upon the Beast c. with divers other events and contemporaries with the former some whereof are long since evidently accomplished and the rest to be expected in their determined times and periods and to be sure that this is an infallible mark of a Prophesie coming from God when we see it come to pass consult Deut. 18.21 22 verses 2. I proceed to the second Question about the Title of this book having cleared and confirmed the divine authority thereof to wit who is the Author thereof Whether this John the Divine be John the Apostle and Evangelist or some other person First They that oppose the first do offer as their reasons the unlikelyness of the style and speech that there is between this book and the Gospel of John and his Epistles which two latter agree in style and many points of doctrine but this of the Revelation is very dissonant from them both To which I answer It is no marvel in the first two of the Gospel and his Epistles though he writ by the instinct of the spirit of God as unto the substantial Truths contained therein yet he was not so strict tyed up in the history of the Gospel or in the doctrines thereof and the Epistles but was left at large by the Spirit to follow his own expressions which he wrote according to his own genius and temper being high and sublimate but here in this book he must write those things which he had heard and seen and were delivered unto him besides the Spirit in this Prophesie keeps somwhat the like and the same manner of expressions characters and method as it did of old in the Prophets Ezekiel Daniel Isaiah and others that it might appear that the same spirit of Prophesie did joyntly run through them all and were endited by one and the same Spirit so that this objection does not at all hinder but that it may be Johns the Evangelist and Apostle notwithstanding the difference of the style in this of the Apocalyps and others of John's writings Secondly They that oppose give as another reason but unadvisedly that in all the Greek copies the Revelation was entituled not unto John Evangelist or John the Apostle but unto Iohn the Divine This rather proves the contrary for indeed I should desire no better argument to prove it to be Iohn the Evangelist's for all the Learned know that Iohn was by excellency and as it were by a peculiar prerogative called by this name of the Divine because it was as it were his peculiar office and work in his Gospel to write and maintain the Divinity of Christ against those Heretiques that opposed it in his time as the Ebonites Simon Magus Carpocrates Cerinthus and their followers Yet withal I must needs say that this word The Divine in our language is too narrow a word or expression for this Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the Greek is of more copious and extensive signification which makes much that it was the Evangelist that wrote this book for the foresaid reason because he was the great asserter and maintainer of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word to be God and therefore had this denomination either from his work and so was entituled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Divine Or lastly He acquired that peculiar Title to himself from the high Divine Inspirations and most eminent Discoveries he had from God beyond any others of Christs Disciples in those his Visions and so being very frequently and eminently conversant with God he might justly acquire unto himself the Title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of John the Divine but I rather think the former was the more genuine reason and ground of that Title In the next place in the affirmative I shall endeavour to confirm that this John who is the subordinate Author of the Apocalyps is Iohn the Evangelist and Apostle To this purpose consider what is written cap. 1. 9. when Iohn was in the Isle of Patmos under banishment and affliction for the testimony of Jesus and the Word of God that then he received his Revelations which doth agree with all antiquity and ancient Fathers who all testifie with one consent that Iohn the Evangelist and Apostle was there banished And secondly as a testimony from the best Antiquity as Aretas witnesseth Basil Gregory Cyril Epiphanius Ireneus Hippolite and most of the ancient orthodox Councels plainly avouched this of the Revelation to be Iohn the Apostle's This Iohn then the Author of this book was the son of Zebedee the brother of Iames Major or the great and the Kinsman of our Lord's and his beloved Disciple who was alwaies one of the three great witnesses with Christ in his most retired and eminentest actions and miracles of his whole life who after Christ had accomplished the work of our Redemption on the cross and was ascended he followed the work of his Apostleship and as Antiquity and Church history testifieth having with the rest of the Disciples after Christ's ascension received power from on high and the gift of the holy Ghost his Province fell in the lesser Asia for the work of his Ministery where it is very probable that he not only preached converted and founded those several Churches mentioned in the beginning of the Revelation in the Cities of Ephesus Smyrna Pergamus Thyatira Philadelphia Sardis and Laodicea but also it seemeth