Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	age_n	write_v	year_n	1,957	5	4.7409	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A20794	Two sermons preached the one at S. Maries Spittle on Tuesday in Easter weeke. 1570. and the other at the Court at Windsor the Sonday after twelfth day, being the viij. of Ianuary, before in the yeare. 1569. by Thomas Drant Bacheler in Diuinitie.	Drant, Thomas, d. 1578?	1570 (1570)	STC 7171; ESTC S116118	66,054	168

his learning at Sir Iohn Cheekes féete Baldwinus his learning at Caluins féete and Fredericus Staphilus at Melanctons féete Saunders and the Iesuites haue their Grecismes and their Hebraismes by immitation of Musculus Our Erasmus set Latin a flote our Reucli●… hatched Hebrue our Budaeus gage●… Gréeke our Melancton regendred arte●… and sciences Papistes from vs ye hau●… had it or by our examples ye haue spye●… it It is ours it is ours it is all of it our●… Crowes leaue your cackling or geu●… you home agayne your borrowed fether●… But admit we were men of no laudab●… learning and that we could not rightly pleade it yet Quis tulerit Gracchum de seditione loquentem Varrem de furto Who can brooke that Gracchus should speake agaynst sedition Varres against theft or Papistes agaynst ignoraunce The chiefe Rabbie and most frolicke diuine of all their side Hosius how hath he concluded of this saying Obey those that be ouer you therfore Prelates must bée princes Or how can he be learned that thought king Dauid to be vnlearned For geuing his iudgement vpon Dauids psalmes he sayth thus Scribimus indocti doctique poemata passim we write poemes of all handes learned and vnlearned as though Dauids psalter were an vnlearned Poesy What learning is there in rearing vp of this argument Caiphas prophesied once therfore what so euer the bishop of Rome speaketh is true Or this argumēt The gates of hell shall not preuaile against the church therfore the church can neuer be vnder foote Yet S. Paul saith I am sure that no creature can seperate me from the loue of God. And yet though God loued Paul well Paul was vnder foote Or this argument Heretickes haue alwayes appealed to the scripture therefore who so euer appealed to the scripture are heretickes So drunkardes are commonly drunken with wyne therefore all that drinke wyne are drunkardes Or thys argument Christ did sit downe with his twelue disciples onely when he sayd Bibite cx hoc omnes therfore the clergy onely ought to haue the cuppe geuen them And so this prophane bishop wretch might vrge onely to the clergy Edite ex hoc omnes eate ye all of this So onely the clergy should be partakers of the bread too The Councell of Constaunce and the Councell of Basill doo reach the tuppe to the Laitie Or this argument He is blessed that is alwayes fearefull therfore a man ought to haue a fearefull and a trembling fayth Or what learning was it in him to say that Commune and Catholicum were not all one and that vices when they are common cannot be called catholicke ▪ Doctor Saunders hath a trim head and a pure fine wit as they say But let them take a tast how learnedly he hath behaued him selfe in hys reasoning in his booke of Transubstantiation as in this argument Man was forlorne for eating with his mouth therfore man must be saued by eating with his mouth therfore there must be Transubstantiation Agayne the Romane bishops sent the Eucharist to stranger bishops abrode therefore it was an holy thing and therfore it was transubstantiated or ells it could not be holy and worthy the sending Agayne the Apostles were simple men and Idiotes sayth he therefore they could not vnderstand this proposition this is my body if the signe were taken for the thing Agayne Vlpian the Lawyer sayth the names of thinges be vnchangeable therefore the wordes must néedes be as they are spoken and written By this pritie deuise he may banish all figuratiue speach from the scripture Agayne the Gréeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth a figure in English is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of turning but God is not turned sayth he therefore he vseth no trope in this place or figure This argument if it were marked would be laughed at with an whole monthes laughter In his fourth booke he commeth of with argumentes more then a good pase ▪ God is omnipotent Ergo there is transubstantiation Agayne Christ spoke these wordes in the night time therefore the matter was great and it could not be great except there were transubstantiation Agayne there were twelue disciples the number was great therefore the matter was great then it must néedes be transubstantiation Agayne Christ desired to eate it therefore it was a great matter therfore it was transubstantiation Agayne Christ loued them in the end in pertaking it therefore there was transubstantiation Agayne Christ washed feete set downe rise vp girded him selfe washed and dryed therefore the matter was great therefore transubstantiation Agayne their Parlar wherein they supped was néere to the mount Syon therefore a great matter therefore transubstantiation Agayne he blessed it therefore he transubstantiated it Agayne the people say Amen which is it is true or I would it were true therefore the bread was truely transubstantiated Agayne Abell offred a sacrifice and then after was offred therefore Christ was offred in the Masse Agayne he sayth if the bread be but a figure then none can be condemned for eating of a figure Yet as I remember the Propitiatory or Arke of couenant was but a figure yet he smarted that abused that figure Agayne the Apple of the knowledge of good and euill was but a figure of good and euill yet it was not very good for him that abused that figure I tell them it is death to abuse such figures Now good people doo not these Doct. Sanders arguments smell freshly of learning Was not that Pope learned that sayd fiatur for fiat and that Pope that translated Cephas a head Was not Petrus a Soto diuinely learned when he sayd the spirites of generall Councells ought not to be tryed Notwithstanding these wordes be generall Try the spirites whether they be of God or no. What bookes in all christendome haue bene writtē with so sléeke and sleight a diuinitie as those bookes of B. Osorius Sir Tho. More is alwayes wrangling and iangling harping and ●…arping about No and Na yea and yes the word and that word an Elder and an Elder sticke And as Rachell mourned for hir children because she had them not so Sir Thomas More might mourne for more diuinitie because he had it not D. Fisher hath alleged many thinges most vnproperly out of the vulgar translation It is easie to be shewed his doctrine is not learned and therefore ought not to carry credit with mē of learning What groū●…nes is it in that fatte Ecchius to proue a sacrifice out of the hebrue word Gnasha or Sanders out of this cūfaciā vitula profrugibus to proue a sacrifice It must néedes be for lacke of learning that that Lordly préest bishop Gardiner alledged the third booke of S. Augustine de sermone Domim in monte and yet there were but two bookes written that he alledged Theophilus Alexandrinus for Theophilactus there being hundreds of yeares b●…twixt their ages I say it must néedes b●… lacke of learning for his soothing pag●… say that his memory was