as of a cake bak't on the hearth on Saturday after three a clocke in the afternoone and how that part of it reserved to the morning and being then broken blood came out of it and another of the like nature and two more I say these are of Roger Hovedens relation not of Eustachius his preaching whom the Monke relates to have been in great esteeme of the Clergie in those dayes and to have prevailed much with many of the people though for the generall he could not bring them off from their marketing on the Lords day Yet what are these to be talkt of in comparison to those which are comprised in two bookes of miracles written by Cluniacensis and albeit those times may be accounted times of darknesse in comparison of ages fore-going yet this Prefacer is ready to make answer that that is but the opinion of some But whereas hee saith That this strange opinion is now revived and published first I desire to know his meaning For as for a preparation to the Sabbath and that to begin from about three a clock in the afternoone the whole Kingdome observes it as for the strict observation thereof here mentioned I have shewed that Eustachius speakes of no such thing If hee did what is that to those who suffer for standing for the strict observation of the Sabbath against those who would have the Lords day at least in part to be a day of sports and pastimes Can he shew this to be their opinion If he can why doth he not And if from three a clock on Saturday in the afternoone people doe prepare for the Lords day and abstaine from such workes dispatching both their baking bread and other works in the morning what danger or detriment is hereby likely to arise either to our faith or manners What danger either to Prince Church or State The third Section BUt to proceed Immediately upon the Reformation of Religion in these Westerne parts the Controversie brake out a fresh though in another manner than before it did For there were some of whom Calvin speakes who would have had all dayes alike all equally to be regarded he means the Anabaptists as I take it and reckoned that the Lords day as the Church continued it was a Jewish ceremony Affirming it to crosse the doctrine of Saint Paul who in the text before remembred and in the fourteenth to the Romans did seeme to them to cry downe all such difference of dayes and times as the Church retained To meet which vaine and peccant humour Calvin was faine to bend his forces declaring how the Church might lawfully retaine set times for Gods service without infringing any of Saint Pauls commandements But on the other side as commonly the excesse is more exorbitant than the defect there wanted not some others who thought they could not honour the Lords day sufficiently unlesse they did affix as great a sanctitie unto it as the Jewes did unto their Sabbath So that the change seemed to be onely of the day the superstition still remaining no lesse Jewish than before it was These taught as now some doe moralem esse unius diei observationem in hebdomada the keeping holy to the Lord one day in seven to bee the morall part of the fourth Commandement which doctrine what else is it so he proceeds as here the Doctor so repeats it in his third section then in contempt of the Jews to change the day and to affix a greater sanctity to the day than those ever did As for himselfe so farre was he from favouring any such wayward fancie that as Iohn Barklay makes report he had a consultation once de transferenda solennitate Dominica in feriam quintam to alter the Lords day from Sunday to Thursday How true this is I cannot say But sure it is that Calvin tooke the Lords day to be an ecclesiasticall and humane constitution only Quem veteres in locum Sabbati subrogarunt appointed by our Ancestors to supply the place of the Jewish Sabbath and as our Doctor tells us from him in his seventh section as alterable by the Church at this present time as first it was when from Saturday they translated it unto the Sunday So that we see that Calvin here resolves upon three Conclusions First that the keeping holy one day in seven is not the morall part of the fourth Commandement Secondly that the day was changed from the last day of the weeke unto the first by this authority of the Church and not by any divine Ordinance And thirdly that the day is yet alterable by the Church as at first it was Exam. Thus at length this Prefacer observes that look upon what Scripture passages some did contend the Jewish Sabbath to be ceremoniall and accordingly to be abrogated by the Death and Resurrection of Christ Upon the very same grounds others contended against the observation of all Holy dayes even of the Lords day also as if that were Jewish This is the course of the Anabaptists unto whom Wallaeus addes the Socinians and Hospinian the Petrobrusians By what authoritie the Lords day was introduced Calvin disputes not He saith Dominicum diem veteres in locum Sabbati substituerunt The Ancients brought the Lords day into the place of the Sabbath and that the day the Apostle prescribed to the Corinthians wherein they should lay apart something for the relieving of the Saints at Ierusalem was the day quo sacros conventus agebant whereon they kept their holy meetings And that which moved the Apostles to change the Sabbath to the Lords day he shewes both in his institutions thus for seeing in the Lords Resurrection is found the end and fulfilling of the true rest which the old Sabbath shadowed by that very day which set an end to those shadowes Christians are admonished not to stick to the shadowing ceremony and upon the Epistle to the Corinthians in these words Electus autem potissimum dies Dominicus quod Resurrectio domini finem legis umbris attulit The Lords Day was chiefely chosen because the Lords Resurrection did set an end to the shadowes of the Law And in the words immediately preceding he expressely professeth that this change was made by the Apostles though not so soone in his opinion as Chrysostome thought who interprets that the first day of the weeke of the Lords Day And Cyrill long agoe upon consideration of our Saviours apparitions on that day and then againe the eighth day after makes bold to conclude that Iure igitur sanctae congregationes die octavo in Ecclesiis fiunt By right therefore holy assemblies on the eighth day are made in the Churches 2 Observe by the way this authors spirit he accompts it more exorbitant to thinke that the observation of the Lords Day is prescribed unto us by Divine authority or the religious observation of one day in seven then to maintaine that none at all is to be set apart to religious
the Flood or a long time after that they kept any Day consecrate to GODS Service will it therefore follow that those holy Patriarchs did set no time at all apart for Gods ervice yet is it generally acknowledged as by the light of nature that some time ought to be set apart for Divine service And formerly I have shewed out of Manasses Ben Israel that whereas the Lord enjoyning to the Israelites the observation of the Sabbath bids them remember that they were servants in Egypt this the antient wise men among the Jewes doe aply in this manner Cogita in Egypto ubi serviebas etiam ipso Sabbato per vim te coactum ad labores thinke with thy selfe how that in Egypt where thou servedst that by force thou wast constrained to worke even on the Sabbath So that the observation of the Sabbath was a duty even in those dayes Observe farther that in the fourth Commandement the Jewes are charged to looke unto it not onely that their children and their servants did observe the Sabbath but also the stranger that was within their gates Now these kinde of strangers commonly called Strangers of the gate and thereby distinguished from Strangers of the Covenant were such as were not circumcised though accompted Proselytes in the first degree And on them was usually imposed no other burthen besides the observation of the seven precepts of Noah as Schindler observes upon the roote 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which seven precepts of Noah are also reckoned up by the same Schindler in the roote 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and albeit the observation of the Sabbath were none of them expresse yet in as much as the Lord gives expresse charge that the strangers within their Gates should observe the Sabbath it seemes it was comprehended under one of them And therefore some thinke it was comprehended under that which was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Benedictio Dei that is the worship of no other God but the Creator of Heaven and Earth and by name my worthy friend Master Joseph Mede as I have seene in a Manuscript of his touching the interpretation of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Acts and hereof he gives this reason namely that the observation of the seventh day was the badge of this namely of worshioping the Creator of Heaven and Earth according to that the Sabbath is a signe between me and you that I Jehovah am your God because in six dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth the Sea and all that in them is and rested the seventh Now if the observation of the Sabbath were comprehended under the seven precepts of Noah undoubtedly it was in force and practise amongest the Patriarchs and that not only after but before the flood for undoubtedly they all worshipped the Lord God Creator of Heaven and Earth 2. We have notable evidence for the observation of the Sabbath Day even among the Gentiles And first the distinction of the whole course of time into weekes for the antiquity thereof is remarkable and now lately justified by Rivetus against Gomarus with great variety of learned observation and that especially by Claudius Salmasius that renowned Scholar and Antiquary one of them who with great instance urged Rivetus not to suffer Gomarus to passe unansweared in this point It is true as Rivetus observes that Causabon writing upon Suetonius l. 3. 52. and upon these words Diogenes the Grammarian was wont to dispute at Rhodâ—s on the Sabbath professeth his opinion that the observation of weekes now a dayes generally receaved was not commonly receaved before the dayes of Theodosius though he confesseth that long before it was in use among the Grecians especially those of Asia Yet Rivet makes it good and that out of Tertullian that long before it was in use among the Latines Ioannes Philoponus in his Commentary upon the History of the Creation a book commended by Photius in his Bibliotheca lib. 7. cap. 14 and lately set forth at Vienna in Austria writes thus All men doe agree in this that there are seven dayes only which by revolution in themselves doe complete whole time whereof what reason can wee give but that which Moses gave to wit that in six dayes the Lord made the World and rested the seventh And Clemens Alexandrinus and Eusebius prove the same out of Homer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The seventh day was that wherein all things were finished and out of Callimachus and out of Linus in diverse passages to the same purse as Rivetus hath shewed in his answer to Gomarus And further that in the French Kings library there is a Chronology of George Syncellus from Adam to Dioclesian wherein Salmasius observes that the computation of times by weekes was before the computation of times by moneths and yeares was found out by Astrologers and that the ancient fathers distinguished the spaces of times only by weekes and that the Caldean Astrologers having observed the course of the Sunne Moone and other planets were the first that bestowed on the seven dayes of the weeke the names of the planets and that by the testimony of an antient author Manuscript Zoroastres and Hystaspis were the authors of these demonstrations But that this circuit of seven dayes was in use before Zoroastres and the first authors of Astrology But the Jewes kept themselves as to the distinction of times by weekes so to call the dayes by their order the first the second and that the Pythagoreans did the like and called the first day of the weeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like as the Hellenists called it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the yeare 1627. There was set forth a book at Venice as the same Doctor Rivet writes intitled Thesaurus praeceptorum Isaaci Atiae Iudaei in the first part whereof and 157. praecept touching the Sabbath he writes to this effect that the holinesse of that sacred day is so well known that it were superfluous to use many words in the explication thereof seeing it is found to have impression in the very hearts of the Heathens themselves becaase there is none that knoweth not that when his highnesse to whom none can approch built this wonderfull frame he rested on the seventh day 2. And thus ere I am aware I am fallen upon the holinesse of the day acknowledged generally by the Heathens themselves as this Jewish writer conceaved Theophilus Antiochenus an antient Father in his second booke written to Autolycus acknowledgeth the celebrity of this day amongst all men though the reason thereof was not so well known to most to wit as drawn from Gods rest on that day after he had created the World Tertullian also acknowledged the Heathens to solemnize the seventh much after the same manner that the Jewes did confirmed by the learned observation of Iacobus Godefridus notwithstanding some exceptions made against it And that this was the practise of the Romans he proves farther out of Tibullus and Ovid namely that they did feriari rest on the
God ordained it should be sanctified but only by way of anticipation for the time to come But this was not the opinion of the Jewes Manasseth Ben Israel a moderne Rabbin in his booke intituled The Reconciler Conciliator according to the argument of that his writing which is to reconcile places of Scripture in shew disagreeing and that upon enquiry into all the Rabbins both ancient and later in his 36. Question upon Exodus writes thus as out of the opinion of the Ancients those words Thou shalt remember that thou wast a servant in Egypt observe how he expounds them Ac si diceret cogita in Aegypto ubi serviebas etiam ipso Sabbato per vim te coactum ad labores as if he should say thinke with thy selfe that in Egypt where thou servedst thou wast by force constrained to labour on the very Sabbath Evidently manifesting not out of his owne particular opinion but as out of the generall opinion of their ancient Rabbins that the Sabbath and the observation thereof was a duty in the very dayes of the Patriarchs And in the end concludes thus Igitur Deus benedictus cupiens Sabbatum cujus sanctimoniam tantis document is approbaverat in aeternum ab omnibus coli decem praeceptis illud inseruit quo scientes praecepta aterna esse etiam hoc inter ea habendum intelligerent Therefore the blessed God it is fit I should translate it for the benefit of the common people desiring that the Sabbath might bee observed for ever of all whose sanctity by so many documents he had commended placed it in the Dialogue that it made it one of the tenne Commandements to the end that knowing those precepts to bee everlasting they should understand that this Commandement also was to be accomplished amongst them And indeed Tertullian himselfe professeth that the Jewes were of this opinion as Rivetus observes out of his booke against the Jewes thus translated God from the beginning did sanctifie the seventh day resting from all the workes that hee had made and that thereupon Moses said unto the people Remember yee the Sabbath day to sanctifie it And therefore when Mercer saith concerning the meaning of these words Genes 2. 3. Hebraei fere referunt in futurum the Jewes for the most part referre it to the time to come he is to be understood of the later Jewes but of this more shall be spoken ere wee part from this section 4 Fourthly not one of the ancient Fathers is alleaged by our adversaries delivering his opinion upon that passage Genes 2. 3. to shew what hee conceives to bee the true meaning thereof which yet is the onely ground whereupon our doctrine is built concerning the originall institution of the Sabbath and seeing it contains a meaning at first sight manifestly contradictious to that which they affirne as wee interpret it of the weekely Sabbath without reference unto the Jewish manner of observing it therefore in this case it stood them upon to take notice of that place and by some faire interpretation vindicate themselves from suspition of contradicting the expresse Word of God 5 Tertullian himselfe justifies our doctrine namely that God from the beginning sanctified the seventh day as Rivetus shewes out of his fourth booke against Marcion cap. 12. where hee sayth Christum ipsum Sabbati diem benedictione Patris à primordio sanctum benefactione sua efficâ—re sanctiorem That Christ himselfe made that day more holy by his well doing on that day which by the benediction of the Father was made holy from the beginning So that Tertullians meaning in the place alleaged to the contrary cannot bee that the ancient Patriarchs simply observed not the weekely Sabbath but onely that they observed it not after that manner the Jewes did and that the like interpretation must bee given of the passages alleaged out of other of the Ancients 6 For further proofe whereof observe that Theodoret albeit on the 20. of Ezekiel hee saith in like manner that God prescribed unto the Jewes the sabbaticall vacations Ut haec civilis administrationis ratio peculiaris à Gentium quidem eos distingueret institutis that this peculiar administration might distinguish them from the customes of the Gentiles yet Wallaeus shewes that the same Theodoret in his questions upon Genesis doth manifestly declare that even from the beginning of the creation God did ordaine this day to rest and sanctification As who having created the creatures in six dayes by the rest of the seventh day manifested the creation to be perfected like as in seven dayes hee concluded the whole circle of dayes And that by blessing the seventh day and sanctifying it he declared Quod non illum diem inutilem putabat ad creandum sed ad quietem accommodatum statuit The meaning whereof in effect is this that hee did not thinke that day unfit to have any thing created therin but onely it was his pleasure to ordaine it for a day of rest The same Author shewes Chrysostome to bee of the same opinion in his 10. Homily on Genesis whose words in Latine he rendreth thus Iam hinc ab initio doctrinam hanc nobis insinuat Deus erudiens in circulo hebdomodae diem unum integrum segregandum reponendum ad spiritualem operationem Now from the beginning God insinuates this instruction teaching that in the circle of the weeke one entire day is to bee sequestred and imployed on spirituall actions These authorities in my judgement should bee of the greater force for as much as they deliver their opinion by way of interpretation of Gods Word and that according to the plaine literall meaning and that such as whereunto every Christians conscience not fore-stalled with prejudice is prone enough to yeeld by reason of the native evidence of the words For they denote an externall action and transient not an internall and immanent in God all of which kinde are eternall which externall action is the dedication of the day to holy uses which cannot bee imagined to bee done any other way as I should thinke then by commanding it to bee sanctified The same Author shewes Austin to have beene of the same judgement writing thus When God sanctified the seventh day because thereon hee rested from all his workes hee did not deliver ought concerning the Fast or Dinner of the Sabbath nor afterwards when to the Hebrew people hee gave commandement for the observation of the day it selfe did hee mention ought as touching the receiving or not receiving of food onely commandement is given concerning mens vacation from their owne or from servile workes which vacation the former people receiving as a shadow of things to come in such manner rested from their workes as now wee behold the Iewes to rest Hee citeth also Theophilus Patriarch of Antioch a most ancient writer in his second booke to Autolychus writing thus Furthermore as touching the seventh which amongst al people is celebrious most men are in great ignorance For this
day which is celebrious amongst all is called the Sabbath if a man interpret in Greeke it is called Septimana by this name all men call this day but the cause of this denomination they know not Now what was the cause hereof in his judgement but the Lords resting thereon as the seventh after hee had finished all his workes in six dayes and thereupon blessing it and sanctifying it whereupon it grew to bee a festivall day generally amongst all Tertullian though alleaged on the other side yet hath beene already shewed to bee of the same minde in this particular with Chrysostome and Austin Adde unto these Epiphanius haer 51. Sabbatum primum est quod ab initio decretum est ac dictum à Domino in mundi creatione quod per circuitum ab eo tempore usque huc juxta septem dies revolvitur The first Sabbath is that which the Lord from the beginning ordained and spake in the creation of the world which by revolution from that time to this according to the circle of seven dayes returneth Athanasius also upon those words of our Saviour All things are given to mee of my Father distinguisheth betweene the Sabbath day and the Lords day affirming the Sabbath day to have been the end of the first creation and the Lords day the beginning of the second creation Beda in his Hexameron professeth that the rest of the seventh day after sixe dayes working semper celebrari solebat was alwayes wont to bee celebrated If alwayes then before the children of Israels comming out of Aegypt before Abraham before the flood even from the beginning of the dayes of Adam the first of men Adde unto this the received and most currant opinion of the Jewes by the testimonies of Philo and Josephus vouched by Wallaeus Philo in his second book of Moses writing thus Quis sacrum illum diem per singulas hebdomadas recurrentem non honorat Who doth not honour that holy day according to the weekely revolution thereof and hee delivers this not of the Jewes onely but of the Greekes and Barbarians of inhabitants of Mayn-land and Ilands those of Europe of Asia and of the whole habitable part of the world to the very ends thereof Iosephus l. 2. against Appion professing that there is no City of Grecians or Barbarians nor any Nation to whom the customary observation of the seventh whereon the Jewes rested had not reached Adde unto this the testimony of two Rabbins mentioned by Broughton in his Consent of Scriptures acknowledging this and another Rabbin alleaged by Peter Martyr upon Genesis both cited by Master Richard Brfield in his answer to Master Breerwood Give me leave to adde my mite also of mine owne observation The 92. Psalme hath this title A Psalme and Song for the Sabbath The Chalde paraphrase hereupon writes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A praise and Song which Adam the first of men spoke on the Sabbath day manifestly evidencing that in the received opinion of the Jewes in those dayes Adam sanctified the Sabbath Rabbi David Kimchi testifies the same in his Commentary upon that Psalme to be the doctrine delivered in their Darash namely that Adam the first conceived this Psalme after hee was created on the Sabbath day and that afterwards he sinned and so prophaned the Sabbath So that notwithstanding all the bluster which this Author makes this fourth Commandement may continue morall neverthelesse And sure I am Irenaeus puts this difference betweene the words of the Decalogue so he speaks and consequently expungeth not but rather includeth the fourth Commandement and the ceremoniall lawes that Decalogi verba the words of the Decalogue spoken by God himselfe unto all doe therefore continue in like manner with us receiving extension and augmentation by the comming of Christ in the flesh but no dissolution But the precept of bondage so he calls the ceremonials by themselves hee commanded unto the people by Moses fit for their instruction and discipline And Doctor Andrewes I am sure so great a Prelate in our Church denies all ceremonialitie thereunto save only so farre as may justifie the change of the day and in reference to the rigorous rest of the Jewes And Azorius confesseth as before hath beene alleaged that after six dayes worke one day should bee consecrate to divine service is a thing most agreeable to reason Yet I know none that accounteth this a Dictate of nature simply as this Author would faine obtrude upon us but rather with Chrysostom that God by creation hath taught us as much and now God hath gone before us herein wee conceive it to bee most agreeable to reason And D. Field did professe as much upon acknowledgement of the Creation as Master Brode confesseth If all talke of observation of the Jewish Sabbath vanished not till the daies of Bede it was 700. years first in the account of Bellarmine And of any resolutions made by Bede or Damascen hereabouts in D. Prideux sect 2. I finde no mention Yet I thinke it likely enough that both they and Procopius might easily contrive as many resolutions hereabouts as either Theodoret upon the twentieth of Ezekiel or Epiphanius against the Ebionites for neither of them in the places mentioned make any resolutions on this point at al. He grants the Lords day to have beene instituted by the Church from the Apostles dayes which latter clause is an ambiguous phrase For it may bee applyed to the dayes after the Apostles If in the Apostles dayes then undoubtedly it was instituted by the Apostles what meant hee then to say it was instituted by the Church and not to bee so ingenuous as to confesse that it was instituted by the Apostles How far off is he from acknowledging it to have beene instituted by the Lord yet Athanasius openly professeth thus much Olim certe priscis hominibus in summo pretio Sabbatum fuit quam quidem solennitatem Dominus transtulit in diem Dominicum Heretofore with men of old time the Sabbath day was in great price which Festivitie truly the Lord hath translated unto the Lords day And Cyrill in his 12. book on Iohn chap. 58. considering the Lords appearance a second time on the eight day Thomas then being present and upon consideration finding it to have beene the first day of the weeke concludes thus Iure igitur sanctae Congregationes die octavo in Ecclesiis fiunt By right therefore holy Congregations in the Churches are made on the eighth day meaning thereby the first day of the week that is the Lords day and as hee concludeth thus so undoubtedly his opinion was the Apostles themselves did conclude in like manner Now albeit much had beene effected for the abrogation as well of all superstitious fancies about that day as of the day it selfe that is of the Jewish sabbath by the labours of the Fathers fore-mentioned and particularly of Damascen and venerable Bede among the rest yet there comes in an exception somewhat of the nature
writing As for Barcley he hath his name ab ursae ungula from the claw of a Beare give we him leave to bee a biter a tearer His father was a man of some note and learning and one that had the opinion to deserve well of Kings by his booke Contrá monarch machos and thereby he endeared himselfe to King Iames being also a Scotchman But King Iames might thinke better of him then there was cause all things considered For he maintaines that in two cases Kings may cease to be Kings and to this acknowledgement he finds himselfe mastered in part by a rule of the civill Law and he was a Civilian which is this Servus habitus proderelicto may choose a new Father At the first reading I wondered at the Doctrine it selfe being of an harsh accent and dangerous consequence and much more in consideration of the reason given which by interpretation and accommodation may draw a very long tayle after it And it may seeme strange that none have taken any paynes either to refute it or cleere it I meane in publique Yet I speake it onely in reference to the compasse of mine owne reading In private it may be some have dealt upon it and my selfe in particular when I dealt in my Sermons upon the thirteenth to the Romans I have been often urged to set forth those Meditations of mine and to make them publike but I have alwayes resisted the motion they being but homely Sermons accommodated to a Countrey auditory neither doe I finde my selfe that way fitted for a better audience I can take some paynes in writing controversies but I cannot take paynes in making a Sermon and when I have taken most I finde I have lesse edified my people though perhaps better pleased my selfe Yet having not long since understood of a Court distinction of Puritans namely that some of them are good men onely they cannot conforme to the ceremonies of the Church but other there are who though they doe conforme yet are antimonarchicall Puritans This consideration hath taken a deepe impression in me and brought me to debate with my selfe whether it were not fit to publish those poore Meditations of mine if for nothing else yet to vindicate our reputation who at the pleasures of too many are oppressed in the World and to represent to publique view Our Countrey faith concerning Monarchies For if we be reputed antimonarchicall no mervaile if some course be taken sooner or later to roote us out And this I might make a Prodromus to a greater worke in answer to a booke entitled Deus Rex a pestilent piece of worke and as it is thought written by one barefoote a Jesuite conteyning a refutation of a certaine book of one of our divines inscribed God and the King written by Doctor Mockest a booke so well pleasing to King James that as we have heard his Majesty thought fit that children should be catechized in it This being afterwards translated into Latine by Doctor Harris now Warden of the Colledge by Winchester hath beene now many yeares agoe answered by a Papist who conceales his name and that in a very unhappy manner And a wonder of wonders it may seeme that so vile a piece hath passed so long unanswered especially considering that heretofore great Bishops chaplens were wont to bee imployed in answering Papists and this was the ordinary way of their preferment I confesse there are certaine mysteries therein which perhaps are as scarre-crowes to deterre men from taking Pen in hand to refute it For the author of this would beare the World in hand that hee who wrote the booke intituled God and the King and was a Puritan and that none but Puritans doe stand for the absolutenesse of Kings in such sort as it is there maintained And that it is merely a plot to ruinate monarches by advancing their absolutenesse so high dealing with them herein as Hercules did with Antaeus for observing that as often as he threw him to the ground he rose up with greater strength for the earth being his mother as often as he fell into her bosome she inspired new vigour and spirit into him therefore he would throw him down no more but lifting him up from the Earth into the Aire there hee held him betweene his armes untill he had crusht his breath out of his body and so made an end of him In like sort it is there said that Puritans finde it their onely meanes to ruine monarches by advancing their absolutnesse in so unreasonable a manner that when the people shall understand it aright they will bee so provoked hereby that they will streyne the uttermost of their power to roote out all Monarchies Neverthelesse all this is but a squib making a great noyse but doing no hurt yet sufficient to scare any man in these times considering how Funestous a condition it is to come under the shadow of the very name of Puritan And the Papists and all that are popishly affected rejoyce in this as in nothing more Forsooth Hoc Ithacus velit magno mercentur Atreidae But see my unfortunate condition after I had resolved to make it my next worke to labour in this argument and after I had dispatched my first worke of pleading for the supreame absolutnesse of God in Heaven in the next place to try my strength what I could say for the secondary absolutenesse of Kings and Monarches here on Earth I am sodenly driven to intermit all other businesses formerly in hand and to travaile in a new argument and to strengthen my selfe against the lightnings and thunders that may breake over our heads we know not how soone for wee see examples before our eyes of sufferings in this kind and how soone our owne turne may come to suffer in the same kinde it is uncertaine unto us Therefore to returne to Iohn Barcley wee have heard that his father before his death commended him to the Patronage of King Iames who accordingly had him attending in his Court somewhile with intent to preserre him untill on a sodaine his minde was changed having receaved intelligence that this Gentleman playd false with him living in his Court but as an espie and intelligencer to discover what he could of his Majesties affayres unto Queene mother of France which mooved King Iames ever after and that most justly to abominate him Now such a one if he could not proove true and loyall unto his naturall Prince can it bee expected hee being of a popish spirit should carry himselfe truely and honestly towards Iohn Calvin But sure it is in this Prefacers judgement that Calvin tooke the Lords Day to be an Ecclesiasticall and humane constitution only appointed by our Ancestors to supply the place of the Iewish Sabbath and as our Doctor tells us alterable by the Church at this present time as first it was when from the Saturday they translated it unto the Sunday For proofe here of this Prefacer alleageth nothing but that out of Calvin where he
likelyhood would have run different wayes And that God hath from the beginning manifested as much Wallaeus hath shewed out of Chrysostome in his 16. Homily upon Genesis Now even from the beginning God insinuates unto us this Doctrine teaching that in the cirole of the neeke one intire day is to be segregated and set apart for spirituall operation and to the same purpose are Clemens Alexandrinus Eusebius Theodoret and Augustine alledged by him Catarinus is in this place brought in quite against the hayre seeing it is not herein that he is so much as pretended to oppose Tostatus but rather as touching the originall institution of the Sabbath Yet why he should say that Catarinus hath herein had ill successe I know no reason neither doth this author once offer to give any especially considering that the very Romists doe acknowledge that the Sabbath was instituted immediately from the Creation Their words are these The Apostles and faithfull abrogated the Sabbath which was the seventh day and made holy-day for it the next day following being the eighth day in compt from the Creation not onely otherwise then was by the Law observed but plainely otherwise then was prescribed by God himselfe in the second Commandement yea and otherwise then he ordained in the first Creation when hee sanctified precisely the Sabbath Day and not the day following Rivetus cites diverse Popish authors affirming the same with Catarinus contrary to the opinion of Tostatus and notwithstanding Pererius his concurrence with Tostatus no lesse then six Papists of note Steuehus Eugubinus in Cosmopaea ad cap. 2. Gen. Gilbert Genebrard in his chronology at the first yeare of the World Jacobus Salianus in his Annalls of the old Testament at the first yeare of the World and the seventh day Who expounds also Tertullian who is pretended to be of the contrary opinion Cornelius a lapide on the 2. cap. of Genesis Emanuel Sa. And lastly Ribera on the Epistle to the Hebrewes cap. 5. Num. 8. So that it seemes Catarinus did on this point oppose Tostatus with very good successe Neither doth the Doctor on whom this Prefacer relies shew any sufficient cause of rejecting Catarinus or bring ought sufficient to justify Tostatus It is true Tostatus brings divers reasons for the confirmation of this opinion and I have no cause to doubt but they were answered by Catarinus who opposeth him herein neither doe I finde any exception taken against his answer either by the Prefacer or by Doctor Prideaux himselfe And therefore I might content my selfe seeing nothing but Tostatus his authority is proposed to answer authority with authority yet I am content also to consider his reasons as they are proposed by Pererius THE FIRST DIGRESSION WHEREIN I. Answer is made to Tostatus his arguments proposed by Pererius to proove that the observation of the Sabbath was ordeyned by God immediately from the Creation II. Herewithall the question is disputed whether Adam fell the first day wherein he was Created THE first agrument of Tostatus proposed by Pererius is to this effect the observation of the Sabbath had been superfluous to Adam and Eve seeing nothing then could have called them away from the service of God to wit they being then in the state of innocency To which I answer first that herein is supposed somewhat wherabout there is much question namely that Adam fell not before the seventh Day Yet Pererius professeth that it was an opinion well knowne and confirmed by the consent of many and those noble and illustrious authors that Adam fell the first day wherein he was oreated This sayth he seemes to have been the opinion of Irenaeus and Cyrillus and Epiphanius are cited as approovers of it He addes that Moses Baroephas in his booke of Paradice both prooves it and avoucheth it as the opinion of many others and especially of Philopenus in his oration which he wrote of the tree of Life and of Ephrem in his Commentaries upon Genesis and of Jacobus Sabugensis in his oration of Christs Passion To whom may bee added saith Pererius Diodorus the Bishop of Tharsis as he is cited in the chaine of interpreters upon Genesis upon those words of the third chapter we do eate of every tree in Paradise Tostatus himselfe as this author writes was sometimes of the same opinion though afterwards he changed his minde and conceaved as more likely that Adam fell on the Sabbath Day which Pererius approves not though that was the opinion of the author of the Darash amongst the Jewes as David Kimchi writes upon that Psalme whose title is A psalme for the Sabbath and that so by sinning he profaned the Sabbath This opinion of Tostatus and the Jewes Pererius doth not approve but the reason he gives for his dissenting from them in my judgement is very weake For that it runnes because the Lord blessed that Sabbath Day and sanctified it resting from all his workes which he had made therefore it was not agreeable that on that day so severe a judgement of the Divine vengeance should be exercised Now I say this reason is very weake For we commonly say the better day the better deed and undoubtedly the Lord is holy as in all his workes so in the execution of condigne vengeance In this he delights as in the execution of mercy And it is usually the Lords course even on the Lords Day to recompence the wayes of the wicked upon their own heads in the profanation of his Sabbaths Secondly it may seeme strange that Pererius should serve himselfe with this reason namely of the Lords blessing the seventh day and sanctifying it seeing he professeth himselfe to be of Tostatus his opinion interpreting these words by way of anticipation and referring them to the giving of the Law upon Mount Sina Others were of opinion that Adam continued is long in Paradise as Christ lived here on Earth But this opinion Pererius thinkes no way probable Others devised a continuance of Adam in Paradise for the space of forty dayes answering to our Saviours fasting forty dayes but this he sayth hath no shew of probability His own conjecture is that Adam fell and was turned out of Paradise that day senight after he was created and the grounds of his conjecture are in my opinion as frivolous as any As first when he saith that eight dayes space was sufficient to have experience of the happinesse of that state For why not as well some dayes more or some dayes lesse nay rather by continuance in the same state we grow lesse and lesse sensible of the happinesse thereof And the happinesse of a state is best known by the contrary according to that rule Carendo magis quà m fruendo quid quidque sit cognoscimus As for the agreement herein which he conceites between Adam and Christ as who is thought of many to have been conceaved in the Virgins wombe on the sixt day of the weeke and on the same day of the weeke was indeed crucified
upon the crosse who seeth not that this conveniency had been found as well on that day fortnight or on that day three weekes and so in Infinitum as on that day senight As ridiculous appeares to be his pretence of complying thus with the antients whose opinion was that Adam fell the same day wherein he was created which he would apply to that day senight after For why not as well to that day three weekes after or that day a month after and so in Infinitum But let us consider Pererius reasons whereby he undertakes to shew the unlikelihood of Adams falling the first day The first is drawn from the forme of Adams temptation thus why doe you not eate of every tree of paradise which supposeth as he saith that they had already eaten of every other Tree in Paradise and Eves answer he saith seems to confirm this in saying we eate of the fruit of the Trees in the Garden But of the fruit of the Tree which is in the mids of the Garden we eate not what is the meaning of we eate but this we are wont to eate quoth Pererius Yet forthwith he himselfe enervates this interpretation confessing that the meaning may be this It is lawfull for us to eate And I willingly confesse that no argument appeares to me so plausible as this namely that they had formerly tasted of every fruit of the Garden besides this for it seems very likly that not till then they were wel prepared for satans temptation And it seemes unlikely they would offer to taste of the fruit forbidden untill they had tasted of all the rest then indeed and not til then the commendation of that as of a more excellent fruit then any of the rest might the better allure them both to touch and taste But as Pererius proposeth it it hath no force for as much as he corrupteth the Text the Divells words being not such as these why doe yee not eate of every tree of paradise but running thus Yea hath God sayd yee shall not eate of every tree in the Garden or as Piscator takes it for a conclusion of a larger discourse yea in as much as God hath said ye shall not eate of the fruit of every tree in the Garden so giving a reason to proove what he objected namely that God envyed their happinesse As for the reasons which before I have given they may be answered thus If the benefit of this fruit had been of the same kinde with the benefit of others and onely in degree of excellency above them then were it no way likely they should begin with this But seeing it was pretended to be of a farre different kinde by Satans suggestion not so much for satisfying the appetite of sense as for satisfying the spirituall desire of the soule in knowing good and evill which the very denomination of the Tree given by God himselfe did fairely intimate and this being cunningly improoved by Satan to be a Divine condition in making them like unto God this consideration might well allure forthwith without all further stay to have experience of other fruit Secondly why might they not have tasted of the fruites of other Trees without any necessity of nature urging them and yet without any luxury at all but only to acquaint themselves with the condition of those good Creatures which God had provided for them Yet again considering that this experience made to no other end should so sensibly have brought home unto them the goodnesse of God in that state of holinesse and integrity that it would have exceedingly confirmed them in their obedience to God and made the motion of the Serpent at first hearing distastfull and to choose to be like unto God in obedience and thereby in conformity to his holy will then in forbidden knowledge And besides the tasting of all so soone can hardly be justified from Luxury or wast therefore I rest in my first answer Pererius his next reason caryeth a great deale of shew but in substance lesse forcible Certainly the making of the beasts of the Earth and of man might be done in as short a time as it pleased God to have it especially considering the opinion of some antients that all things were made together and that in a short space so mans placing in Paradise and the beasts brought unto him by God might be soone dispatched and surely Adams naming of them cost him no study and undoubtedly all this was done before the creating of Eve so that all this might be done before noone and space enough allowed for the Divells conference with Eve and his seducing her and her seducing Adam The making of them aprons to hide their nakednesse caryeth the greatest shew of requiring longer time but he who wanted not wit to name the beasts so congruously to their natures wanted not understanding to cover themselves with fig-leaves As for the Doctors alleaged by him for his opinion I doe not finde that any of them is expresse or by consequent direct for that whereunto they are alleaged but the inferences made from their wordes are meerely conjecturall For when hee writes that Ioseph in the first booke of his antiquities and Basil in his Homily of Paradise and Damaseen in his second booke of orthodox faith and 10. Chapter seeme to be of this opinion his ground is only this because as he saith they write that the Serpent in paradise did often come to our first parents and converse with them very gently and familiarly and that thereupon the Divell tooke hint to inveagle the Woman Now this is but a conjecture of theirs neither doe they say that he was wont to conferre with them yet all that they speake of may very well be fulfilled in a few houres That which to this purpose he alleageth out of Austin de civit dei lib. 11 c. 21. is onely this The Apple on the tree forbidden we are to believe it to be such as the rest of other trees which now they had found to be without hurt hence it seemes Pererius would inferre that before the Divells temptation they had tasted of them all but Austins speech is indefinite and verified in case they had tasted but of some and Eve might have tasted of some Adam of other some If it be further urged that Austin delivers it as a reason to shew how hereby they were made more pliable to yield to Satans temptation I answer that by tasting some yea and without tasting any they might be well assured they might be tasted of without hurt excepting that which God had forbidden them and the tasting of all without hurt was no tolerable reason to perswade that in like manner they might tast of the forbidden fruit without hurt the Lord having professed unto them that In the day they did eate thereof they should die the death Pererius addes that Austin in his twentieth Booke of the City of God and 26. Chapter doth not obscurely give to understand that albeit he
Walaeus hath represented Chrysostome Theophilus Antiochenus Austin Theodor maintaining that the justification of the Sabbath hath beene from the Creation To these Rivetus addes Tertullian as of the same mind howsoever alleged on the adversaries part And he also acknowledgeth the Jewes to be of the same opinion Beda is alleged indeed by Perenius as on the part of Tostatus but no such thing appeares in his Hexameron but rather expressely the contrary his words being these of the Sabbath semper celebrari solebat as I have shewed in my answer to the preface Sect. 1. Where also are represented the testimonies of Athanasius and Epiphanius as maintaining the institution of the Sabbath to have beene from the Creation which also hath beene shewed to have beene the opinion of Philo and Iosephus and divers of the Jewish Rabbins and of the author of the Chaldee-Paraphrase upon the Psalms and of divers others Againe concerning the passages alleged out of some Fathers to the contrary not onely Hospinian answereth that those proceed of the rigorous observation of the Sabbath but Iacobus Salianus a Papist in particular thus interpreteth Tentullian and Tertullian must be in some such sense understood as namely either of observation of other Sabbaths in use among the Jewes or of the rigorous observation of the Jewish Sabbath or of the Jewish manner in observing it by particular sacrifices appointed for that day for as much as he clearely professeth that the Sabbath day was à primordio sanctus as Rivetus sheweth and that the other Fathers which are but foure truly alleged are to be interpreted by some such manner I have endeavoured to evince by divers reasons in my answer to the Preface And though some are willing to admit that of Torniellus that in the accomplishment of the Creation the Angels did observe the Sabbath provided he recompence them in this particular now in question and adde that the observance of it here upon the earth was not till many ages after Yet this naked authority being little worth his reason is so weake in the former that we have cause to suspect it will not prove any thing stronger in the latter though I should have beene content to afford it due consideration had it been proposed As for the Angels singing and shouting for joy this was performed as Torritallus acknowledgeth the day wherein the foundation of the earth was laid which undoubtedly could not be after the first day of the creation For if the foundation of the earth was not laid then when the Lord said that it was without forme and voyd and the waters covered it I cannot devise when it should be It is granted that it may be probably conjectured that the sanctification of the Sabbath was before the Law as concurring herein with Calvin but that Calvin saith that no more is not proved neither is that passage exhibited wherein Calvin should deliver his mind so coldly thereof but Calvin in his harmony upon the foure bookes of Moses and on the fourth Precept is expresse that Diem septimū sibi sumpsit Deus ac consecravit completa mundi creatione that God assumed and consecrated the seventh day unto himselfe upon the finishing of the worlds creation And it is enough for us that then it was instituted and hereupon let every sober reader judge whether it be not more then probable that the holy Patriarches at least observed it Neither doe we affect that any man should rest satisfied with our conjectures but let our reasons be considered and the plaine Text of Scripture professing that because God rested the seventh day therefore hee blessed the seventh day and sanctified it and let them yeeld thereunto no more in this particular then whereof it doth convince a man in conscience Yet who those late Writers be who are so unsatisfied in this point I know not well I verily thinke they are very few Protestants Gomarus as I remember allegeth but two Vatablus and Musculus whereas Walaus and Rivetus between them have alleged no lesse than thirty maintaining the contrary As for the Papists we shall take notice of them in the next Section It is confessed that this proofe is good God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it therefore he commanded it to be kept holy by his people The sanctifying of the day in the true notion thereof being nothing but Gods commanding man to sanctifie it which yet if any man deny I appeale to my former argument delivered in the former Section for the justifying thereof Onely it is said that therence it followeth not that Then or at that time to wit the very day whereon God rested he commanded it to be kept holy by his people Now this exception also I have remooved in the former Section And it is very strange we should be to seeke of the time in reference whereunto this is delivered most of all if spoken onely in reference to 2500 yeares after and not the least intimation of so strange an anticipation beyond all example as Walaeus and Rivetus have proved When Abulensis saith that Moses spake this by anticipation rather to shew the equity of the Commandement then the Originall If the booke of Genesis were written before the Commandement was given on mount Sina this interpretation must suppose that the Lord had already revealed to Moses what hee would doe on Mount Sina and what ground is produced for the building of so much as any conjecture hereof thereupon And what wise man would expect that any man should be satisfied herewith Doth it not concerne them who maintaine this affirmative to make it good by Texts of Scripture If after the Commandements were delivered on Mount Sina what neede of representing the equity thereof seeing the equity and that in this very way is expressed in the Commandement it selfe and that in such manner as to manifest evidently that God did not now begin to command this but that hee commanded it of old even from the Creation as already I have disputed and proved And though Abulensis were of this opinion yet Catarinus was not and though Pererius the Jesuite tooke part with Tostatus yet Rivetus hath shewed that Cornelius de lapide Emmanuel Sa. Ribera all Jesuites do not but with Catarinus rather or that Steuchus Eugubinus Genebrard and Iacobus Salianus concurre with them against the opinion of Tostatus Gomarus acknowledgeth Marius also to be of the same minde all Papists and let mee adde unto these all the Remists as appeares in their notes upon Apoc. 1. 10. Enosh might call upon the Lord and Abraham offer sacrifice without relation to a set and appointed time oftner and seldomer as they had occasion It was in the former Section signified to be Torniellus his reason which here is answered now Torniellus was of a contrary opinion to us in this particular yet hee confesseth that it seemed hardly credible neither doth the Doctor deny it onely hee saith that Enosh might so doe hee doth not say hee did