any liuing man yet it is continued preserued in the memory of men liuing doth farre excell our written lawes namely our Statutes or Actes of Parliament which is manifest in this that when our Parliaments haue altered or changed any fundamentall pointes of the Common lawe those alterations haue beene found by experience to bee so inconuenient for the commonwealth as that the common lawe hath in effect beene restored againe in the same points by other Actes of Parliament in suceedîng ages And as our Custumary vnwritten lawe doth excell our Parliament lawes which are written so for the gouernment of the Common-weale of England which is as well instituted established as any Common-weale in Christendome Our natiue Common lawe is farre more apt agreeable then the Ciuill or Canon lawe or any other written lawe in the worlde besides howsoeuer some of our owne Countrimen who are Ciues in aliena Republica hospites in sua may perâ—â—ppes affirme the contrary But certaine it is That the greate and wise-men of England in the Parliament of Merton did not preferre a Forreine lawe before theire owne when motion being made by the Clergie that Children borne before Marriage might be adiudged legitumate They all made aunswere with one voice Nolumus Leges Angliae mutari And againe in II. R. 2. when a newe course of proceeding in Criminall Causes according to the forme of the Ciuill lawe was propounded in that vnruly Parliament Aunswere was made by all the Estates That the Realme of England neither had bin in former times nor hereafter should bee Ruled and gouerned by the Ciuill law Rot Parliam II. R. 2. in Archiv Turris And heere I may obserue for the Honour of our Nation and of our Auncestors who haue founded this Common-weale wherein wee liue and enioy so many felicities That England hauing had a good and happie Genius from the beginning hath bin enhabited alwaies with a vertuous wise people who euer embraced honest and good Customes full of Reason and conveniencie which being confirmed by common vse practise and continued time out of minde became the common lawe of the Land And though this lawe bee the peculiar inuention of this Nation and deliuered ouer from age to age by Tradition for the common lawe of England is a Tradition learned by Tradition as well as by Bookes yet may wee truly say That no humaine lawe written or vnwritten hath more certainty in the Rules and Maximes more coherence in the parts thereof or more harmony of reason in it nay wee may confidently averr that it doth excell all other lawes in vpholding a free Monarchie which is the most excellent forme of gouernment exalting the prerogatiue Royall and being very tender and watchfull to preserue it and yet maintaining withall the ingenuous liberty of the subiect Breefely it is â—o framed and sitted to the nature disposition of this people as wee may properly say it is connaturall to the Nation so as it cannot possibly bee ruled by any other lawe This lawe therefore doth demonstrate the strength of witt and reason and selfe sufficiencie which hath beene alwayes in the people of this land which haue made theire owne lawes out of their wisdome experience like a silke worme that formeth all her webb out of her selfe onely not begging or borrowing a forme of a common-weale either from Rome or from Greece as all other nations of Europe haue done but hauing sufficient prouision of lawe Iustice within the land haue no neede Iustitiam iudicium aâ— alienigenis emendicare as King Iohn wrote most nobly to Pope Innocent the third Matth Parishistor magn pag 215. En populus sapiens intelligens gens magna As it is said of Gods chosen people 4. Deuter. Neither could any one man euer vaunt that like Minos Solon or Lycurgus he was the first Lawegiuer to our Nation for neither did the King make his owne prerogatiue nor the Iudges make the Rules or Maximes of the lawe nor the common subiect prescribe and limitt the liberties which he enioyeth by the lawe but as it is said of euery Art or Science which is brought to perfection Per varios vsus artem experientia fecit so may it properly bee said of our lawe Per varios vsus legem experientia fecit Long experience many trialles of what was best for the common good did make the Common lawe But vppon what reason then doth Polidor Virgill other writers affirme that King William the Conqueror was our Lawegiuer caused all our lawes to bee written in French Assuredly the Norman Conqueror found the auncient lawes of England so honorable profitable both for the Prince people as that he thought it not fitt to make any alteration in the fundamentall pointes or substance thereof the change that was made was but in formulis iuris he altered some legall formes of proceeding to honor his owne language for a marke of Conquest withall he caused the pleading of diuers Actions to be made entred in French sett forth his publique Ordinances Acts of Counsell in the same tongue which forme of pleading in French continued till 36. Edw. 3. when in regard that the French tongue begann to growe out of vse which for many yeares after the Norman Conquest was as common as the English among the Gentry of England it was ordained by Parliament that all pleas should bee pleaded debated Iudged in the English tongue entred enrolled in Latine And as for our statutes or Acts of Parliament the billes were for the most part exhibited in French passed and enrolled in the same language euen till the time of King H. 7. And so are they printed in Rastalles first Abridgment of statutes published in the yeare 1559. But after the begining of King Henry 7. his raigne wee finde all our Acts of Parliament recorded in English Onely our Reports of the Cases resolutions and Iudgments in the lawe whereof our bookes of the lawe do consist haue euer vntill this day beene penned published in that mixt kinde of speech which wee call the lawe French differing indeede not a litle from the French tongue as it is now refined and spoken in Fraunce as well by reason of the words of Art and forme called the Tearmes of the lawe as for that wee doe still retaine many other old wordes Phrases of speech which were vsed foure hundred yeares since are now become obsolete out of vse among them but are growne by long continuall vse so apt so naturall so proper for the matter subiect of these Reports as no other language is significant enough to expresse the same but onely this lawe french wherein they are written And this is the true onely cause why our Reports other books of the lawe for the most part are not sett forth in English Latine or the moderne french for that the proper peculiar phrase of the common
lawe cannot bee so well exprest nor any case in lawe bee so succinctly sensibly whithall so fully reported as in this speech which is in deede mixte compounded of all these three languages Which reason hath not beene well vnderstood by those who obiect it as a fault to the Professors of our lawe that forsooth they write their Reports and bookes of the lawe in a straunge vnknowne tongue which none can vnderstand but themselues to the end that the people being keept in ignorance of the lawe may the more admire their skill knowledge esteeme value it at a higher price As Cicero in his first booke de Oratore doth testifie that the like conceite was held of the first Professors of the Ciuill lawe Quia veteres illi qui huic scientiae praesuerunt obtinendae atque augendae potentiae suae causa pervulgari artem suam noâ—uerunt And Cesar speaking of the Druides who were Iudges and interpreters of the lawe among the auncient Brittaines doth report of them that though they spent twenty yeares in the study of those lawes Non existimabant fas esse â—a literis mandare But the weaknes of this obiection against the Authors of our lawe bookes will easily appeare if wee consider how easie the Lawe french is to bee learned in somuch that the meanest witt that euer came to the study of the lawe doth come to vnderstand it almost perfectly within ten dayes without a Reader So as wee doe not seale or locke vp the mysteries of our lawe in Hieroglyphickes or in a darke language that cannot bee vnderstood But wee expresse the Cases arguments Iudgements of the lawe in a forme of speech so plaine so significant and in a tongue so soone learned by any man that can speake English and vnderstand Latine as I dare say there is no rationall science in the world hauing so many wordes Tearmes of art and forme that is so clearely deliuered in any language And I may truely say withall that if the bookes of our lawe were all translated into English they would not bee better nay they would not bee so well vnderstood by the students thereof as in this proper peculiar language wherein they are now written And as this obiection touching the speech or language wherein our Reports are penned doth arise out of ignorance of the cause thereof as is before declared so are there other vulgar imputations cast vppon the lawe lawiers which may bee as easily cleared as hauing indeede no other ground but the meere misvnderstanding of such as are strangers to the profession namely 1. that there is much vncerteinty in the reasons Iudgements of the lawe 2. that there are extreame vnnecessary delayes in the proceedings of the lawe 〈◊〉 that many bad and dishonest causes are wittingly defended by the professors of the lawe But Sapientia iustificatur à filijs suis 1 Therefore first touching the incerteinty of the lawe Certeine it is that lawe is nothing but a rule of reason humaine reason is Lesbia regula pliable euery way or like a cupp with two eares as the French proueâ—b is which may bee taken vp on either side as well with the left hand as with the right so as not onely the knowledge of the lawe but all other rationall sciences that are subiect to Argument discourse must needes bee subiect to vncerteinty to error therefore vppon Iudgements giuen in our Ordinary Courts of Iustice the lawe doth admitt allow writts of error to bee brought without any touch or dishonor to the Iudges though there Iudgements bee reuersed for error in point of lawe Howbeit there is no art or science that standeth vppon discourse of reason that hath her Rules Maximes so certeine infallible so little subiect to diuers interpretation as the common lawe of England as it is obserued by the Lord cheefe Iustice Cooke in his Preface to the second part of his Reports that in all his time there haue not beene moued in the Courts of Iustice in England two questâ—ons touching the right of discents or escheats or the like fundamentall points of the common lawe So certaine sure without question are the principles grounds thereof But whence then doe so many debates controuersis arise wherevppon doe wee plead contend so much in the Courts of Iustice it there bee so few doubtes vncerteinties in lawe doubtlesse this question is soone resolued by one plaine common distinction In all the causes that are controuerted there is either Quastio Iuris or quaestio facti But for one cause wherein a question of lawe doth arise that is indeede with the debating there are a thousand causes at least wherein the fact is onely in question wherein if the truth of the fact were knowne the lawe were cleere without question So as the pleading contention in Westminster hall the rest of the Courts of Iustice in both realmes is for the most parte touching matters of fact In the Chauncery whether there bee Trust or no trust Fraud or no fraud In the Starchamber whither a Riotâ— or no riott Forgery or no forgery Perâ—uâ—y or no periuâ—y and the like matters of fact come onely in question in all other Courts which proceed to the hearing determining of causes by examination of witnesses And in the Coâ—â—â—â— of lawe where the triall is by Iurors are there not a thousand issues ioyned vppon matters of fact for one demurrer that is ioyned vppon a point in lawe when all these issues are tried either at the Barre or at the Aâ—sâ—sses how many hundreds of generall verdictes are there giuen which determine matters in fact for one speciall verdict whereuppon doe result questions in lawe And againe of all the questions in lawe which doe arise vppon demurrers or speciall verdicts or which are moued in arrest of Iudgment how many of them are there ouer ruled vppon the first opening or putting of the Case and how few of them are there that are malleable or can endure the hammer so as they come to bee solemnely argued at the Barre and at the Bench As for the Eschequer-chamber cases which are of such difficultie as that they drawe an assembly of all the Iudges of the lawe for the resolution thereof they are so rare as scarce twise in a yeare are those Iudges drawne out of there proper Courtes to deliuer theire opinions vppon those doubtfull pointes So as it is to bee ascribed to the greate learning wisdome grauity constancie of our Iudges to the certeinty excellent harmony of reason in our lawe that there are no more diuersities of opinion among the Iudges or doubtfull questions in the lawe then there are For if the Rules Maximes of the lawe were a thousand times as many as they bee indeede yet would they carry no proportion with the infinite diuersitie of mens actions of other accidents which make the cases
that are to bee decided by the lawe Besides it must bee a worke of singular Iudgement to apply the groundes and rules of the lawe which are fixt certeine to all humaine acts accidents which are in perpetuall motion mutation And therefore wee may truly say for the honor of our lawe notwithstanding that vulgar imputation of incerteinty that the Iudgement reason of it is more certeine then of any other humane lawe in the world As well because the groundes of our common lawe haue from the beginning beene laid with such deepe wisdome policie prouidence as that they doe prouide for meete with almost all cases that can possibly fall out in our common-wealth as also because those groundes are so plaine so cleare as that the professors of our lawe haue not thought it needefull to make so many glosses interpretations therevppon as other lawes are perplexed confounded withall which glosses as one doth well obserue do encrease doubt and ignorance in all Arts and Sciences And therefore the Ciuilians themselues confesse that their lawe is a sea full of waues the Text whereof being digested into so many volumes so many Doctors interpreting the Text twise as many more Commenting vppon their interpretations so glosse vppon glosse booke vppon booke euery Doctors opinion being a good authority fitt to bee cited vouched among them must needes breed distraction of opinions vncerteinty in that lawe The like may bee said of the Canon lawe albeit the Text thereof bee scarce foure hundred yeares old But of the professors of our lawe who euer yet hath made any glosse or interpretation vppon our Master Litleton though into that litle booke of his he hath reduced the principall groundes of the common lawe with exceeding great Iudgement authority with singular Method order yet if hee had beene an author in the Ciuill or Canon lawe I dare say there had beene by this time so many Comments glosses made vppon him as the bookes written vppon this booke onely would haue beene more in number then all the volumes of our lawe at this day But the learned men in our lawe haue euer thought that Littleton being a learned reuerend Iudge wrote with a purpose to bee vnderstoode that therefore an other man specially if he were of lesse learning then hee could hardly expresse him better then he hath expressed himselfe And therefore his booke hath euer beene readâ— of our yongest students without any Commentary or interpretation at all But for all this it is obiected that our later Iudgements doe many times crosse contradict the former directly in one the same pointe of lawe which is a manifest argument of incerteinty in the lawe Assuredly there are very few precedents of such contrary Iudgements scarce two in one age And yet if the reasons of the later Iudgements did appeare of record wee should finde them grounded vppon mischeefes inconueniencies arising since the former Iudgements or vppon other weighty considerations respecting the good of the common-wealth in generall Otherwise there are no Iudges in any State or Kingdome vnder the Sunne that do more reuerence the opinions Iudgements of their predecessors then the Iudges of England haue euer done as your Lordship for their honor hath obserued in that most worthy speech of the Postnati wherein among other thinges your Lordsâ—ip doth noate the memorable saying of Askue 37. Henr. 6 fol. 22. Such a Charter hath beene allowed in the time of our predecessors who were as sage learned as wee bee of Markham 4. Edw. 4. fol. 41. It is good sayeth hee for vs to do as it hath beene vsed in former time not to keepe one way one day for one partie another day the contrary for th' other partie the former precedents are enough for vs to followe But on the other side let vs heare what a learned Canonist Lodoâ—icus Gomez in regula de Triennali possessore cap. 5. is bold to say Non est inconueniens sayeth he iudicium esse vno tempore iustum postea eius contrarium iustius hoc malum videtur imponi mortalibus in pâ—nam vt corum opiniones secundum varietatem temporum senescant intermoriantur aliaeque â—iuersae vel priorihus contrariae renascantur deinde pubescant Talis enim est humani iuris disciplina vt nulla in â—a opinio â—odem statu diú stare possit Dies dâ—â—i â—ructat verbum nox noctâ— indicat scientiam And againe Opiniones hominum â—orum corpora sequuntur quae cum tempore vetaraâ—â—unt pereunt sâ—â—ut rerum omnium ita quoque opinionum est quaedam vicissitudo And in another place Stilus hodiernâ—s propter maâ—orem temporum experientiam videtur magis iure fundatus ideo solet dicâ— quod moderni sunt sicut Culices in capite Elephantis quae vident priora posteriora quanto juniores tanto perspicatiores And thus much may suffice to bee spoken to remoue that scandall of vncerteinty which ignorance doth vnworthily cast vppon the common lawe 2 But if the reason ludgement of our lawe be so litle subiect to vncerteinty how cometh it to passe that the proceedings of our laws are so much subiect to delay for this is another vulgar obiection against our lawe the professors thereof But who are they that make this obiection haue they themselues beene engaged in any suites of importance haue they passed through the Courts of Iustice either in course of lawe or in course of equity if they haue not they speake but by hearesay then their testimony in this behalf is of litle credit If they haue had any long depending suites of their owne then let them examine whither their owne spleene wilfulnesse or the corruption of some needy sollicitors who picke their liuing out of the busines they followe are loath to quench the fur that maketh them warme haue not rather drawne their causes to an extraordinary length then the ordinary proces of lawe or the aduise of learned Counsell For such as are learned Counsellors indeede are like good Pilots who though their skill bee best tried in a long difficult voiage do rather desire faire weather a speedy arriuall with their passengers in the hauen But the troth is it is the stomack or malice of such clients as will not stick to say that they will spend all they are worth to haue their will of their aduersaries therefore will not bee satisfied with any Iudgement or decree that doth produce prolong suites in lawe who when their learned Counsell indeede do refuse to nourish that peccant humor in them doe seeke out discarded impostors or Idolls of whome there is an opinion among light ignorant people of extraordinary cunning sleight in carying of busines with aduantage in curing of foild desperate causes These men giue them counsell according to their owne
hart because they sooth them in their litigious humor howbeit in the end when they haue wearied wasted themselues they finde how weake those wiles craftie courses are learne of Esope that that one onely plaine way which the Cart had to escape from the dogges was better safer then those hundred trickes of euasion whereof the Fox did vaunt before he was taken and they finde withall the saying of Cicero true ignoratio iuris litigiosa est potius quam scientia Besides this malignant vnquiet disposition of many Clients there is another cause why suites are not brought so soone to an end as perhappes they were in former ages namely the multitude of causes now depending in euery Court of â—ustice euery of which causes must haue conuenient time allowed as well to prepare it make it ripe to be heard or tried as for the triall hearing it selfe And the true cause of the multitude of causes doth proceed from this that the comodities of the earth being more improued there is more wealth consequently there are more contracts reall personall then there were in former ages Besides there is more luxury excesse in the world which breedeth vnthryftes banckruptes bad debtors more coueteousnesse more malice which begetteth force fraud oppression extortion breath of the peace breach of trust Out of these fountaînes innumerable suites do spring which make the Courts of Iustice so to swell and hence it is that our statute lawes since Henr. 8. his time do make vp so greate a volume hence it is that the professors of the lawe are growne withall to so greate a number for where there is magna messis there must bee of necessity operarij multi Indeed if wee all liu'd according to the lawe of nature wee should neede fewe lawes fewer lawiers Do as thou wouldest bee done vnto were a rule sufficient to rule vs all euery mans conscience would supplie both the place of an Aduocate a Iudge then wee should suffer no costs of suite nor delay of proces And againe if wee were a poore a naked people as many nations in America bee wee should easily agree to bee iudged by the next man wee meete so make a short end of euerie controuersie When the people of Rome were litle better then Sheepards heardsmen all their lawes were contained in ten or twelue Iuory tables But when they became Lordes of all the world what a world of bookes were there written of the Roman ciuill lawe The like wee see in euery common-wealth when it once beginnes to flourish to growe rich mighty the people growe proud withall their pride makes them contentious litigious so as there is neede of many lawes to bridle them many Officers to execute those lawes many Lawyers to interpret those lawes all litle enough as when a bodie growes full grosse it needes more Physicke then when it was leane And yet though our suites and causes bee very many our Courts of Iustice but a fewe whereby it must needs come to passe that euerie particular busines mouing in his turne must haue the slower motion yet if wee compare our legall proceedings with the proces of other Kingdomes common-weales specially of France wee shall finde that according to the vsuaâ—l clause in diuers writts wee haue indeede plenam celerem iustitiam though the breefest Iustice bee not alwayes best that our causes for the most parte beîng orderly pursued may come to their Period in a yeare with the course of the Sunne when there are many processes in foreine countries that seeme to be gouerned by Saturne which planet doth fearce finnish his course in the space of thirty yeares as Bodin doth testifie of his owne country that their were more suites in lawe depending in France then in all Europe besides that many of those causes were an hundred yeare old as that of the countie of Rais saieth hee which suite hath beene so well entertained in all the Chambers of Iustice as albeit the parties that began it are long since deade yet the suit it selfe is still aliue Besides wee haue not so many Appeales nor so many reuiewes of causes as the Ciuill Canon lawes do admitt neither haue wee at this day so many delaies by Essoines viewes vouchers protections as were in vse in former ages when titles of land were tried onely in actions Reall which are now growne almost out of vse a more speedy course of triall inuented by mâ—xt personall actions Lastly there is no Nation in the world I speake it for the honor of our Nation of our land that hath a course of Iustice so speedy withall so commodious easie for the subiect as our trialles by Assise nisi prius are For what Kingdome is there vnder the Sunne wherein euery halfe yeare the publike Iustice doth make her progresse into euery part thereof as it doth in the kingdomes of England Ireland whereby it commeth to passe that whereas the people of other contries do trauell farr to seeke Iustice in their fixt setled Courts as it were at fountaines or Cesternes the streames of Iustice are deriued vnto our people brought by conduit pipes or quilles euen home as it were to their owne doores And thus much I thought fitt to obserue for the clearing of that vniust imputation of long vnnecessary delaies in our legal proceedings 3 But there is yet another exception against the professors of our lawe namely that wittingly willingly they take vppon them the defence of many bad causes knowing the same to bee vniust when they are first consulted with retained And this is obiected by such as presume to censure our Profession in this manner In euery cause betweene partie partie say they there is a right there is a wrong yet neither the one partie nor the other did euer want a Counsellor to maintaine his cause This may bee true for the most part yet in truth the learned Counsell whose fortune it is to light on the wrong side may be free from imputation of any blame For when doth the right or wrong in euery cause appeare when is that distinguished made manifest can it bee discouered vppon the first Commencement of the suite before it bee knowne what can bee alleaged proued by either partie Assueredly it cannot therefore the Counsellor when he is first retained cannot possibly Iudge of the cause whether it bee iust or vniust because be heares onely one part of the matter and that also he receaues by information from his Client who doth euer put the case with the best aduantage for himselfe But when the parties haue pleaded are at issue when they haue examined witnesses in course of equity or bee descended to a triall in course of lawe after publication hearing in thâ—one cause full euidence deliuered