Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n add_v life_n write_v 2,999 5 5.9232 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A50698 Self-conviction, or, An enumeration of the absurdities, railings against the college, and physicians in general (but more especially, the writers against the apothecaries), non-sence, irrational conclusions, falsities in matters of fact, and in quotations, concessions, &c. of a nameless person and also, an answer to the rest of Lex talionis / collected and made by Christopher Merrett ... Merret, Christopher, 1614-1695. 1670 (1670) Wing M1841; ESTC R1984 16,813 34

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

man may be a Divine Lawyer Chirurgeon Apothecary c. I doubt his Company will not thank him for it nay any man may set up any Trade in London he saith somewhere I may do so by this Logic if he can but get Customers He goes on and replies to what I allege that the Apothecaries practise against Law A. Answers Any one may apply outward applications and inward Medicines by the Statute I 'le tell him 't is that of 34 H. 8. and withal several Pleas made by Mountebanks who were all overthrown upon it Besides some of the Judges were of opinion that this was repealed by 1 Mar. vid. Butlers Case in Crokes Report part 1. you conclude this with your good Latin somewhat better then your Magna in parvâ and call it a Maxim in Law Quod quisque norit in eodem exerceat This Maxime is against all reason and therefore Law in your sence I never heard of it surely you mistake stake it for that common Maxime of theirs Quisque in sua Arte credendus or in sua Arte peritus The former is a practical consequence from the later and that is a supposition needful in our Law To the rest of the Book and Postscript he saith nothing but only of the relation I had from a Clergy Man who names no person but A. hath made his name out of the letter thus the silly Apothecary knows no more then to write to a whole-sale Apothecary in your City out of which he hath Christned Wright the Apothecary I say of my Friend he is well known in Physic whence he infers he is a practiser too and then quotes against his practice the decrees of the Church and Dr. Primrose and then tells you this story might have been better concealed for the honour of the Divines profession just as much as it was against Physiology before for me to do the like it being contrary to the rule of Charity and his great Master to divulge his Brethrens faults how then shall a Divine preach you would like him well enough if he had spoke though untruths against the Physicians and though you in many places revile me for detecting your Cheats and proving them yet you must be prais'd for your Lex Talionis a meer Libel A. And in truth there is as much reason for Apothecaries to change professions and preach as they to practise Physic though I am for neither M. but by his Logic if they will practise Physic he will preach A. This observe You shall seldom read or hear of any mischiefs or abuses such as these are put in print by the Doctors but the Parson must have a finger in the Pye witness in late times In Nomine Domini c. And thus Reader you have seen how he hath abused the Physicians and Divines and this makes it probable that if a Lawyer should tell him how grosly he mistakes in page 21. the application of the Maxim how he would deal with him And now to confirm what I have said throughout I desire the Reader to peruse the 2d part of the usefulness of Natural Philosophy Written by the Honourable Mr. Boyl a Person who spends both time and purse for the advancement of all publick good without interest or passion and you will find him there not only affirm but prove a good part of what I have said with some quick and sharp glances against Physicians that do not improve Medicines I shall mention but two page 142. he saith of the inventors of Mithridate and Treacle A wise Man might use a remedy which scarce any but a Fool would have invented Add hereto what the Learned Zwelfer the first Physician that ever went about to reform Dispensatories too hard a task for Apothecaries All others being either transcribers only or a little alterers of the Shop Medicines saith of Treacle and Mithridate p. 428. What was said before and premised of Theriaca Andromachi may be deservedly said of Mithridate both as well to the Composition its self as to the rule of preparing it and a little after I may rather laugh at then examine some of the ingredients and no less worthy of laughter then examination are there many other ingredients in this pompous Composition Which passage is much more severe then what I said of them in my View p. 38. where I say briefly that they consist of confused and contrary ingredients and that they are unintelligible and unreasonable Compositions By this passage out of a person whose Book all Physicians highly honour besides what I allege in the same place how falsly this ignorant A. speaks for you are to believe saith he this infallible Doctors ipse dixit and that 't is but one Doctors opinion and is as true as he twice affirms these Compositions were commended by me to the Nation because my name was to the Dispensatory I confess my name is fixed to it but as Candidate only not as Fellow and therefore I had no hand in that Book and had I been then Fellow of the College I should have given my suffrage and approbation to it notwithstanding any thing I say in my View 20 years after the publication of that Pharmacopaea And again Mr. Boyl in p. 138. ' T is certain saith he that the Bills of Apothecaries especially in Chronical Cases do often prove so chargable that even when the remedies succeed by that time a poor Patient is recovered he is undone and pays for the prolongation of his life that which should have been his livelyhood Now Sir if you please to add this or any other of his Books to your Library you may find more reason in a few pages of his then in the whole Library you have commended and Certe in your own word you will not judg this Noble Person to have written as you say of us out of malice or design nor railingly though more sharply then our selves Add hereunto the opinion and practice of that Pious and Learned Divine Mr. Baxter well known for his life and works who not long since told me in the presence of one of my Collegues and an Apothecary and several other persons of quality that when he practised Physic in Kiderminster wherein he is rationally skilled he durst never trust an Apothecary but practised all his own Medicines and when he gave over he introduced another into his practice on this condition only that he should dispense his own remedies And so having spent a few idle hours in reading and animadverting on your frivolous papers I hope you and such as you will leave your railing and follow your practice which I did neither in my former Book nor in this Pamphlet restrain you from or set any Conditions Articles or Limitations upon you according to all your desires as your other Antagonists do and therefore have reason to expect you will without murmuring and tricks let the Closet Doctors peaceably enjoy their practice and then let 's try whether you or such as you are