will tell thee That by thy taking out and adding to the words of that bock thou hast desperately involved thy self not onely to have thy part taken out of the book of Life but also to have all the plagues fall upon thee Leonard that are written in that book as is in full effect affirmed in Rev. 2.18 19. and not onely God's Law thus fiercely condemns thee and all such false quakers as thou hast proved thy self to be but also thy brother quaker James Naylers condemning Law aforesaid doth adjudge thee Leonard Fell by thy self manifested evil behaviour to be a lyer and so no abider in the truth but art of the Devil and not of Christ and because you quakers do refuse the gracious benefit of the Gospel-imputation that James Naylers censure of thee Leonard is true and just TWELFTHLY My twelfth Discourse is with thee Martha Simmonds and truely Martha thy folly is so apparent that I could almost have seemed to have thrown by my pen and have left thee to have been censured by thine own gross ignorance by thee published in print but yet I shall do thee this favour Martha to help thee to see how the Devil deludes thee if it may be Martha I finde in thy bock which thou callest A Lamentation for the lost Sheep amongst divers quakish errors by thee therein manifested as birds of a feather will flock together that even so thou Martha also hast perverted and wickedly falsified the cleer and plain sense of holy Scripture to serve thy master Satan where thou sayest Now Jesus Christ the second Adam who is God manifested in the flesh condemning sin in the flesh if thou live in him in thee and believe in him in thee thou shalt witness his power to the cutting down of thy will for thy will must come to death that the will of God may be done and so that Scripture comes to be fulfilled in thee which are the words of Christ Lo I come in the volume of thy book it is written of me to do thy will O God which is the book of conscience in thee there the will of God is to be done These be thy words Martha And now know thou and all quakers That Jesus Christ is before now come in his own distinct person of flesh without men but not come personally in yours nor any other mans body of flesh which is largely and firmly proved in my two last Discourses so that a man is not so to live in him in him nor so to believe in him in him as thou falsly saiest for you quakers Christ dwells in no man any other wayes but by Faith which is in plain and full effect proved in Ephes 3.17 neither is Christ abidingly in any man no not in God's sons but by his Spirit which is also proved in Gal. 4.6 and from this ground Christ's Spirit is called the Spirit of Faith 2 Cor. 4 4. and from thence the Saints are said to be the habition of God through to Spirit Eph. 2.22 but not whole Christ God and Man in men but by faith and his Spirit and therefore these Scriptures do confound that thy saying Martha And whereas thou saiest That that Scripture Lo I come in the volume of thy book it is written of me to do thy will O God Heb. 10.7 is to be fulfilled in men It is so evident That that will of God in that same Scripture mentioned is already fulfilled in Christs person onely and never was fulfilled in any other person nor never can be wrought over again in Christs person neither for that will of God was fulfilled by Christs death in his being sacrificed but Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him Rom. 6.9 This again proves cleerly That you quakers are not Christ as you brag you are for Christ now cannot die but it is apparent that you quakers do die as other men do therefore you quakers are not Christ and yet you are so impudent that you dare to say That as Christ is so are you in this world but shame attends upon you But to proceed it is evident That that will of God in that thy cited place mentioned Heb. 10.7 is not to be fulfilled in any mans person whatsoever but as that will of God hath been already perfectly fulfilled in Christ's person by his being personally sacrificed without men whereby he did put a total end to the vertues of all or any typical sacrifices And this is so evident a truth flying even in the very face of that thy false and lying saying Martha that it would be altogether superfluous any further to prove it then to intreat my Reader to peruse Heb. 10. from the 1 vers to the 12. In which space Martha's wickedly abused vers 7. is included And again Nartha whereas thou saiest That by the volume of the book in that place mentioned is meant of the volume of the book of mens consciences it is evident against the Devil speaking in thee Martha that by the volume of the book in that place mentioned is plainly meant to be the volume of the books of the Prophets for the same words written in thy cited vers Heb. 10.7 Lo I come in the volume of thy book it is written of me do appear plainly in the Prophet David's book in his Psalm 40.6 7 8. and in the volume of the Prophet Moses book and Esay 53. and divers other Prophets do in the volume of their books speak so clearly of Christ's death and being to be sacrificed that it would utterly be time lost any further to prove against thy quakish notorious lyes which thou hast learned by-heart by thy accustomed dancing after the Devil's pipe And hereby appears That by your quakers luciferian-like bragging as if you onely were in the light and yet by your falling down so extremely short in the understandings of such cleer and plain places of Scripture and by your delivering such eternally destructive Doctrine from them you deliver up your selves to be one of the most deluded and deluding miracles and monsters of the whole world THIRTEENTHLY My thirteenth Discourse is directed to the four and twentieth quaker the mighty writing quaker James Parnel And now comes his fearful blasphemies tumbling out of his Thraso-like boasting lying book which he calls A Shield of the Truth for observe my Reader and though it be one or more of the self-Christed quakers I care not for as it were passing by James Parnels murthering of himself in Colchester-Goal by his inordinate and by Scripture-condemned fasting as he said luciferian-like to shew himself to be a Prophet of the Lord for people to believe in him which was not to believe his words but to believe in him to whom he promised the eternal joyes of heaven as I finde recorded and said to be licensed according to order And passing by the numerous bulk of his great quakish errors his whole book being nothing else but lyes in
Fountain they will remain under the condemnation of God's Law because though they be sinners yet do desperately refuse the grace of Gospel-imputation and also the condemnation of James Nayler's Law fastneth on them that they abide not in the truth but are of the Devil and not of Christ And I shall prove That the Quakers do desperately refuse all Imputation when I come to discourse with the ten Quakers together But James Nayler a word or two more with thee and that is to shew thee how thy deluding Master to make sure work hath led thee to affirm That thy Quakers Christ is no Christ for thou being asked as in the 25 pag. of Saul's Errand Whether Christ as Man is in thee or no thou thereto didst answer saying Christ is not divided for if he be he is no more Christ but saidst thou I witness that Christ in me who is God and Man in measure These be thy words James and herein is much to be observed That by his affirming that Christ is not divided for if he be he is no more Christ and by his saying in full effect That Christ not onely as he is God but also as he is man is in him but in measure which is That Christ God and Man is but in part in him then the other part of Christ must needs be without him for he by his words denieth that whole Christ God and Man is in him and if he should not deny that then how would all the rest of the Quakers do to have their measure or parts of Christ God and Man also in them for if James Nayler had swallowed up whole Christ God and also Man then he would have left all the rest of his brethren and sister Quakers in a lamentable condition they having no measure or part of Christ God and also Man in them because Iames Nayler had devoured him all up But you see that Iames is more temperate then so for he doth acknowledge that there is but a measure or part of Christ God and Man in him and thereby he leaves out the other part or measure of Christ God and also Man to be without him for the other Quakers to divide amongst them Is not this a great kindeness of Iames â—hink you But thus Iames by thy affirming that Christ is not divided for sayest thou if he be he is no more Christ and by thy dividing of Christ by measure thou hereby affirmest in full effect That thy pretended Christ in thee is no Christ but a Satanical deluding Spirit in thee and truely in this sense I shall believe thee And thus your quaking imagined Christ whom you would fain have stand for a figure or example onely is by thee Iames turned into a naked cypher o signifying nothing or according to thy words no Christ or worse for wickedness is worse then nothing And now dost thou not see Iames how thy Spirit in thee doth over-rule thee to confute thy self in a few words speaking therefore remember this Iames for afterwards That he had need of a good memory that loves to tell lyes For know all ye Quakers That Christ's spiritualized and glorified Person of real flesh and bone cannot be a measure or part thereof in one man and the other parts of his real Person of flesh and bone in other men as you falsly imply though by his spiritual influences he is in all his Saints and you shall finde it so at last if you persist in your quakery THIRDLY Concerning Iames Milner I find upon record in a book written by Iohn Gilpin who was formerly for a time a Quaker during which time he declareth the extraordinary strange powerful and manifold delusions which the devil did act upon him in him but he being by Gods mercy delivered he giveth God thanks in that book for his deliverance from the Devil and the Quakers The book is intituled Quakers shaken printed in anno 1655. In which book he relateth That Iames Milner Quaker told the people that flocked to his house that he had fasted fourteen days and nights and that he must fast two dayes more for the saving of two souls to wit Dorothy Barwick and the Wise of Brian Fell of Ulverstone and he was so extreamly deluded by the Devil that he pretended himself to be a Christ and he said he must suffer as Christ did viz. to save the souls of the two women aforesaid And in a juggling inchanting manner with a knife and a bason he pretended his blood was shed and Milner said he gave up the Ghost as Christ did he said he was Abraham and Adam and his wife was Eve and that George Fox should be Iohn Baptist and he it was to wit Milner the false Christ that should come after whose shooe-latchet Fox was not worthy to unloose Milner also prophecied twelve strange Prophecies and set so short a time for the performance of them all that they were all proved to be false in a short time O monstrous what mad frantick fasting-fits were these But the Quakers fasting need not seem strange for it is evident the Devil did feed a great many of witches being the Quakers neighbors in Lancashire with inchanted dainty food not substantial in an old Barn not far from Bourule Now do not you Quakers perceive how the Devil rides you as Balaam rid his Ass when he would have done those things which God did not allow of Bear with me for I have the example of the great and holy Prophet Elijah which he used to Baal's Prophets in 1 Kings 18.27 And God in mercy hath enabled me to see that you are to be reckoned with them And Iames Milner by thy Luciferian pride to save souls as Christ did and by thy manifold great prophetical lyes thou must come under the lash of thy brother Quaker Iames Nayler's condemning Law aforesaid That thou art of the Devil and not of Christ FOURTHLY I do turn my pen to discourse a little with Christopher Atkinson Iames Lancaster George Whitehead and Thomas Simmonds four principal Quakers because I finde them in a junctual book by them called Ishmael and his Mother cast out more open-heartedly revealing their maliciousness against the Holy Trinity then some other Quakers have done But first Christopher Atkinson a word or two with thee alone Art thou straggled from Kendal in Westmoreland to Norwich in Norfolk I do verily believe that thou art the very same Christopher Atkinson which didst preach thy Quakery at Richard Collisons house at Kendal in May anno 1653. At whose preaching of Quakery the Devil himself did get such fast hold on Iohn Gilpin lately mentioned by his leaning to be instructed in thy deluding Quakery by thee then and there taught as appears in Iohn Gilpins book mentioned in my last or third Discourse But now joyning him to his other three Companions I shall proceed Their words are these directed in their 10th page to their Opposer Mr. Townsend then a Minister in Norwich And
here is say they to him the three Persons thou dreams of which thou wouldst divide out of one like a Conjurer What you foul-mouthed apostate Qâ—â—kers is the affirming that there is three Persons in the Unity of the sacred Godhead like the coâ—juration by the Devil Into what corner of Hell will you flie next for further directions do you not know that God the Father who is and ever was totally spiritual and never took upon him any Person of humanâ— nature as God the Son hath done that notwithstâ—nding God the Father is by his own Spirit in his holy Scripture set forth to be a spiritual Person where it is said in plain and full effect That God the Son is the express image of his Fathers person And if you Qâ—â—kers be not afraid that the holy Spirit doth inspire his holy servants to conjure like the Devil then you may venture upon it to read the 1 2 and 3 verses of Heb. 1. and there you may see that God the Father is affirmed to be a Person God is called Christ's Father often in Scripture And do you not know that the tide Father cannot possibly be rightly applied to a bare denomination or title onely without a Person must not any one be a Person first before he can be a Father methinks you might understand something aright And now concerning the holy Ghost Do not you know that out blessed Saviour doth often call the holy Ghost He where he saith But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom my Father will send in my Name He shall teach you all things John 14.26 He shall testifie of me John 15.26 And if you Quakers dare venture further then you may read John 16.13 14 15. Hah what 's that you Quakers say doth the Father send the bare name or title of the holy Ghost to teach men without a spiritual Person can the expression He be by our Saviour so often given to a bare name or title onely without a Person As for God the Son you do acknowledge that since his incarnation he is a Person but know you further That Christ is called God's Son long before he took upon him a Person of humane flesh which you may see in full effect in Psalm 2. So is proved That there was a Trinity of Spiritual Persons in the Unity of the sacred Godhead even from Eternity before Christ was born of the Virgin Mary and a bare name cannot be a Son though you Quakers blasphemously account the three Persons in blessed Unity of the sacred Godhead to be like the conjuration by the Devil And your hellâ—sh language breaketh out still more largely by your telling of Mr. Townsend in full effect therewith in the same page 10. That he is shut up with the three Persons in perpetual darkness for the lake and pit What is in this your language any less then if you said That the three Persons are shut up with Mr. Townsend in perpetual darkness for the lake and pit it can be no less Oh horrible to what blasphemous height of iniquity against the holy Trinity will you Quakers mount And yet further to avoid conjuration you do pervert the Scripture to uphold your dreamed delusions for whereas God saith Behold I am against the Prophets saith the Lord that steal my word every one from his neighbour Jer. 23.39 this place you produce as if all men that are not taught by enthusiasms without the Scriptures which with you are counted immediate Revelations from God and you cite this place as if all men that are not so taught as you are do steal their Doctrine which they teach from their neighbours onely whereas it is evident in that chap. Jer. 23. even against all contradiction that God therein reproveth the Prophets that say I have dreamed I have dreamed and then to plant in their dreamed delusions into their neighbours hearts they craftily did as you quakers do steal God's true Words from their neighbours but not to teach others therewith but to make room in their neighbours hearts to settle in their dreamed prophetical delusions and this proveth to be your diabolical conjuration And wereas you say in your first page That Moses wrote forth Scripture and not Letter but the Word Herein I have taken you in a notable lye also for could Moses write Scripture without Letters or Characters but Moses five scripture-Scripture-books written with Letters proves all your four quakers lyers Thus every way by James Naylers sentence you abide not in the truth but are of the Devil and not of Christ And as for your frequent maundring to exclude the Scriptures from being the Word of God Because say you they are not that Word which was God and because God spake to his Saints of old immediately or before Moses and the Letter was Are these good Arguments you quakers to prove that the Scriptures are not the Words or Word of God But see your wilful ignorant folly in this also for we are taught that the Scriptures are the Word of Christ who is God and that so they are the Word of God undeniably except you dare deny that Christ is God Construe this place you quakers Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs Col. 3.16 Can you not see that it is not here said Let Christ the Word God and Man dwell in you personally as you quakers falsly say in full effect that Christ doth so dwell in your bodies but contrarily the Scripture-exhortation even by the inspiration of God is this you quakers Let the word of Christ it is not Let Christ the Word dwell in you personally but Let the word of Christ dwell in you and it is in the same place of Scripture shewed what that Word of Christ is viz. psalms and hymns and spiritual songs And those spiritual songs or hymns are Scriptures and they are herein in full effect affirmed to be the Word of Christ and Christ is God therefore the Psalms or Scriptures are hereby proved to be the Word of God though the Spirit of Satan in you quakers will not say Amen to that truth because he feels that that Word of Christ the Psalms or Scriptures will and must destroy his Kingdom of deluding quakery and therefore you his servants in ordinary must though there be three sorts or several dispensation of God's minde to the sons of men in three several ages of the world that is to say First by his immediate words to his Servants until his Scriptures were written during which time his Servants declaring what God spake immediately to them was mediately their preaching of the Word of God Secondly by God's commanding Moses and his other holy Prophets to write what was his minde towards men which is the scope of Rom. 16.25 26. during all which time the Prophets declaring in writings what God spake immediately to them is the mediate Word of God Thirdly by Christ the Son
any others righteousness to their imagined perfect perfection And thus they make themselves to be bran-new coyned glistering Christs without meritorious works also for they new being Christ assume to themselves authority to justifie their own Christhoods without merit or forgiveness from any God or Christ without or besides their own now Christes selves And further to confirm all this they affirm That Christ had no Body but his Church which is shewed in my next Discourse And now to shew that their own actions and words do confirm all this to be true which hath been said of them observe that they the quakers though some of them being not yet ripe quakers are something mealy mouthed yet that there are many bold-faced quakers that speak out and declare openly saying I am the way the truth and the life I am the judge of the world I am equal with God I am God's fellow I am God And as I have shewed That divers quakers have been upon evidence charged that they have thus spoken openly in full effect So I shall passing by James Milner and John Gilpin while he was a quaker though all their sayings are no less then if they did say I am Christ yet now I will for brevity sake onely produce one quaker from amongst the rest that did very lately proclaim openly in divers place in Cambridge-Market upon a Market-day which Town is about 3 miles from me the quaker then and there declared publickly with a loud voice saying I am Christ take my yoke upon you learn of me for I am meek and lowly of heart The quaker taking up Christ's own words by him spoken as in Mat. 11.29 and by that quakers saying directly I am Christ it being suitable to the other quakers affirmations it appears there are many quaker-Christs and how they come to be so in their own estimation is before herein laid open even to publick view Some of them having also undertaken to save souls as Christ did And now it is worthy to be treasured up in the memory of all honest hearts how agreeable all these the quakers publick behaviours and declarations are to our Saviour's loving forewarning by him given and left to the world for men to take heed of such deceivers which he then said should arise in the world where he saith Let no man deceive you for many shall come in my Name saying as it is proved they say I am Christ those being the very same words which these deceivers apply to themselves and shall deceive many Matth. â—4 4 5. And further to prove that the quakers are deceivers note that they say they have no sin in them and they say also by their tenents That a man must be totally perfect from all sin in him or else he cannot be saved But now behold how flat contrary and against the Scriptures these their sayings are where it is said There is no man that sinneth not 1 Kings 8.46 There is no man that sinneth not 2 Chron. 6.26 and that there is not a just man upon the earth that doeth good and sinneth not Eccles 7.20 I could produce many other Testimonies from the Saints words they frequently confessing they were sinners but if we will believe God's own inspired Word before we give credence to such luciferian and as we have before proved dissembling equivocating hypocrites falsifiers of Scripture-words and notorious lying quakers then shall we apparently know That they are the very same deceivers which our Saviour forewarns us to take heed of for he saith they shall deceive many and accordingly it is very evident that they do deceive many And our Saviour goeth on and saith Then if any man say to you Lo here is Christ as they say I am Christ or lo he is there believe it not for false Christs shall arise and false Prophets and shall shew signs and wonders to deceive if it were possible the very elect but take ye heed behold I have shewed you all things before Mar. 13.21 22 23. Now the quakers many Christs being proved by holy Scripture to be false Christs let us apply to that truth the quakers proving themselves to be false Prophets also which is proved in my third Discourse and their striving to be accounted the Prophets of the Lord which appears in my thirteenth Discourse and adding thereto their Scripture-condemning signs and wonders which are shewed at the quakers meetings and preachings which is shewed by complaints made against them related in a printed book called Saul's Errand those tormenting signs and wonders being acted upon the bodies not onely of elder people but also upon and in the bodies of little children which the quakers do not deny And considering their astonishing signs and wonders shewed at their meeting which appears in my fourteenth Discourse These things being viewed together it will appear cleerly That all those three marks by which our Saviour discovers these deceivers he speaks of that is to say False Christs secondly false Prophets thirdly shewing signs and wonders are all firmly fixed by the quakers behaviours upon themselves That they are false Christs and false Prophets shewing deceitful signs and wonders And now if we do take notice in John Gilpin's printed book before named in my third Discourse That he therein affirmeth that the Devil did declare to him John Gilpin when he was a quaker in divers sorts of discoveries confirmed by a voice in him that he the devil was Christ in him and how that when the Devil did finde that John Gilpin did distrust it was he spake in him and not Christ as that voice in him pretended and that thereupon John Gilpin declined from the Devil and the quakers that then the Devil to draw John Gilpin into utter desparation on the other hand did acknowledge plainly that he was the Devil that had taught him and that he had been serving him the Devil and not Christ and that the Devil did tell him in full effect therewith that now it was too late for him to repent there was no mercy for him But John Gilpin in that book giveth God thanks for his great mercy in delivering him from the Devil and quakery And thus we have the Devils own testimony That it was he the Devil and not Christ that so powerfully acted in John Gilpin whilst he was a quaker And so in this discovery we have the Devils own testimony against the quakers Again calling to minde that James Nayler a principal teaching quaker hath so firmly proved by his own behaviour and divers other quakers and thereby hath adjudged himself and them also to be lyers and so not abiders in the truth and so are of the Devil and not of Christ by this we have the quakers own confession condemning themselves also So that now we have first Christ's own testimony pointed forth by three several marks secondly the consent of the Scriptures thirdly the quakers own confession and self-adjudgment and fourthly the testimony of the devil himself enforced as
the drift of it I shall for brevity sake onely discover some few of them to give a taste to all the rest and to this end I finde recorded by him in his 31 pag. he therein affirming That John to wit the holy Apostle Sâ— John though his peramount height would not stoop so low as to call him so but as being his equal if not his superiour he affirmed John said He that hath hope in him purifieth himself even as he is pure but St. John did not say so for he saith Every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself c. But James Parnel hereby not onely falsifieth the very words of Scripture by his taking the most significant word this out of that Text but he also therewith telleth a notorious lye against all denial by his affirming John said so and so he also fathereth his loud lye upon St. John by his affirming John said so He that hath hope in him whereas St. John said not so but said Every man that hath this hope in him But beloved it is worth our search to futer out the cause why James Parnel was so frighted as to take out of that Text that significant word this and we shall finde that if James Parnel had not taken out the word this it would have led his Reader to search further to know what is meant by this hope as distinct from all other hopes and his Reader would finde out in the very next verse going before that verse what St. John meant by his saying Every man that hath this hope for St. John in his very next precedent verse saith Behold now are we the Sons of God and it doth not yet appear what we shall be but we know that when he shall appear we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is 1 John 3.2 but then in the next verse St. John saith And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself c. vers 3. to wit that hope which St. John declareth in his 3 verse But James Parnel was so amazed at those words this hope that he craftily took that word this out of that Text before he could make any quakish Doctrine of it But why so why so say you Why if he had taken in those words this hope they would have discovered First That whereas the quakers say That Christ's appearing the second time without sin unto salvation is manifested and accomplished in them both as Christ is God and Man But even the Sons of God in that Text do cry down that the quakers affirmation as being a delusion of the Devil for they even the Sons of God do affirm the flat contrary and say in full effect That Christ had not appeared by his second personal coming not so much as to them therefore much less in them though the quakers say That Christ is in them God and Man Secondly Those words this hope doth discover that whereas the quakers do affirm That they are so like Christ even in these their dayes of mortality that they do venture audaciously to say As he is so are we in this world even totally without sin in them as Christ is for they affirm That if a man be not totally free from sin in him he cannot be saved But even the sons of God do even in that Text affirm against the quakers That they were not like him in the dayes of their mortality and so were not then free from all sin in them as Christ is nor that they though they were even the Sons of God yet were not then so like Christ nor should be untill his second personal appearing for they there say We know that when we shall appear we shall be like him and it doth not yet appear what we shall be Thus punctually the Sons of God do by those words this hope confound that the quakers luciferian comparing themselves in equality to Christ Thirdly Those words this hope do discover that whereas the quakers tenents do maintain that no man can be a Son of God until Christ's second appearing God and man be manifested and accomplished in him But St. John and other Sons of God do in that Text maintain in plain and full effect that the Saints are the Sons of God even before Christs second personal appearing to them much less in them And whereas the quakers in full effect affirm that they have Christ God and Man in them in possession the Sons of God do affirm by that Text that it is their hope that Christ will appear at his second personal coming to them and not personally in them in possession And thus the holy Gospel-truths comprehended under those words this hope in that Text mentioned do utterly destroy all the three grounds upon which the whole Doctrine of quakery is founded even root and branch Now was it not high time think you my beloved for James Parnel to flie swiftly away from those words this hope This hope quotha it is enough not onely to affright James Parnel out of his light quakish wits but it doth also confound all the quakers not onely these in all England but also all quakers in all the whole world although no other Scriptures which do maintain the same Gospel infallible truths be produced against them for those two verses 1 John 3.2 3 are a key as is shewed to open a door of truth which doth utterly destroy all quakery root stem and twig this hope quotha I wonder James Parnal durst venture to come so â—eer it but you may see beloved That Satan in him and with him did go as waâ—ily to work as they could for they first dragged that directing word this out of that Text and then so falsified they vapouringly howl'd iâ— forth as it were saying See here â—â—e purity of the quakers Behold John saith That the quakers have sâ—me kinde of hope in them And now note James Parnel's direct falsifying the very words of the Scripture again for iâ— his 30 and 31 pag. he saith He that hath sin and saith he hath no sin deceives himself and is a lyer Thus be insers That there are some meâ— that have no sin in them which â—elâ—â—th affirmed of himself in my â—earing of which hereâ—fâ—ere but thâ—se his added words He that hath sin did not in that Text 1 John 1.8 and 〈◊〉 by his taking the word this out of the Scriptures as bâ—â—â—â—e 〈…〉 his adding words unto the Scripture to delude people with 〈◊〉 â—â—volved himself not onely to have his part taken out of the book 〈◊〉 but also to have all those plagues inflicted on him that are written in the book as is in full effect shewed Rev. 22.18 19. and for his lying brother quaker James Nayler's condemning law also adjudgeth him to be of the devil and not of Christ And now to discover James Parnel's notorious lyes and fearful blasphemies mixt together in his quakish Shield of the Truth note That in his 29 pag. he saith