Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	according_a	dead_a	judge_v	3,895	5	7.1879	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A64611	The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinitie / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latine edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professour of Divinity in Heidelberge ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabeticall table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversie, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theologicall miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errours of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the originall Latine copie by A.R.	Ursinus, Zacharias, 1534-1583.; Parry, Henry, 1561-1616.; Pareus, David, 1548-1622. Theologicall miscellanies.; A. R.	1645 (1645)	Wing U142; ESTC R5982	1,344,322	1,128

Why God would have us certaine of the last judgement 11. Why he would not have us certain of the time 12. Why God deferreth that judgement 13. Whether it is to be wished for 1. Whether there shall be any judgement THis Question is necessary For the Scripture also hath fore-told that there shall come in the later times mockers who shall account this Article for a fable Where is the promise of his coming For since the Fathers dyed 2 Pet. 3.4 all things continue alike from the beginning of the Creation The last judgement cannot indeed be demonstrated out of Philosophy but neither is there any thing in Philosophy against it But the whole certainty thereof is grounded on divine Prophecies The certainty of the last judgement is not to be sought in Philosophy but in Divinity or on the Doctrine of the Church For although the Philosopher perhaps would say somewhat as seeing a little through a mist as That it should goe well with the good and ill with the evill and That it is not likely that man was born to this misery yet by reason that man hath lost the knowledge of the righteousnesse goodnesse and truth of God wee cannot know out of Philosophy that any judgement shall be much lesse with what circumstances it shall be The arguments which Philosophy yieldeth are forcible indeed in themselves but are not made knowne but in Divinity and therefore the arguments themselves are only made forcible and of strength in Divinity Wherefore wee will draw reasons and proofes out of Divinity or the Doctrine of the Gospel by which it may appeare that there is a last judgement Six proofes of the last judgement The first proofe is drawne from expresse and plaine testimonies of sacred Scriptures As out of the Prophecy of Daniel As I beheld in visions by night behold Dan. 7.13 one like the Sonne of Man came in the clouds of heaven and approached unto the Ancient of dayes and they brought him before him And hee gave him dominion and honour and a kingdome that all people nations and languages should serve him his dominion is an everlasting dominion which shall never be taken away and his kingdome shall never be destroyed And againe a little before The Ancient of dayes did sit whose garment was white as snow and the haire of his head like the pure wooll Vers 9 10. his throne was like the fiery flame and his wheeles as burning fire A fiery flame issued and came forth before him thousands ministred unto him and ten thousands stood before him the judgement was set and the books opened The beast was slaine and his body destroyed and given to the burning fire Likewise out of the prophecy of Enoch alledged by the Apostle Jude Jude 14 15. Behold the Lord cometh with thousands of his Saints to give judgement against all men Moreover out of the sermons of Christ especially in Mat. 24.25 Likewise out of the sermons of the Apostles Acts 19 31. 1 Thess 4.16 He hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed whereof he hath given assurance to all men in that hee hath raised him from the dead The Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout and with the voice of the Arch angel and with the trumpet of God It is appointed unto men that they shall once die Heb. 9.27 and after that cometh the judgement And I saw a great white throne Rev. 20.11 12. and one sate on it c. And I saw the dead both great and small stand before God and the books were opened and another book was opened which is the book of life and the dead were judged of those things which were written in the books according to their workes Neither is the certainty of the last Judgement apparent only by these and the like plaine testimonies of Scripture but is deduced also out of other places by good consequence and hence are made those forcible arguments which the Philosophers saw but by a glimpse The second proof is drawn from the end whereunto mankinde was created God necessarily obtaineth his end but to this end did he create mankinde that man should be the image of God and the everlasting temple of God wherein he should be worshipped to whom he would communicate himselfe perfect wisedome righteousnesse and goodnesse and would impart his blessednesse which whereas it is now performed unto us and seeing it cannot be that God should create so most excellent a creature to perpetuall misery wee necessarily inferre that there shall be a change For God will obtaine his end and will not suffer the temple of the holy Ghost to be utterly consumed of rottennesse This blessednesse is a part of Gods image according to which man was made but this the Divel hath destroyed therefore God shall restore it who is mightier than the Divel And although the end for which man was created is hindered divers waies in this life yet God will at some time obtain it Wherefore it is not only as the Philosphers reason likely and probable that man was not made for these miseries but it is also most certain that the most excellent of all creatures was made to a better end Wherefore there must needs be at length a change By this argument is confirmed the happinesse of our bodies according to that of Saint Paul Know you not that your body is the temple of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.19 which is in you The third proof is taken from the justice goodnesse and truth of God which requireth that it may goe full well with the good and with the evill full ill Philosophy knoweth not that God is so just good and true that hee will have the righteous to enjoy full and perfect blessednesse But this cometh not to passe in this life nay rather it goeth well with the wicked and evill in this life Therefore there must remaine another life wherein this shall be The holy Scripture useth this argument as in S. Paul 2 Thess 1.4 6. It is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble you Remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy pleasure and likewise Lazarus paines Luke 16.25 now therefore is he comforted and thou art tormented The fourth is taken from Gods decree whereby he ordained and purposed with himselfe from everlasting to raise the dead Wherefore God being unchangeable will not cancell and revoke this his decree A register and copy thereof we reade in Ezekiel and presidents or examples we have Enoch Chap. 3. ● Elias and Christ The fifth is taken from Gods omnipotency whereby he is able to effectuate and accomplish things contrary to reason This argument Christ useth against the Pharisees Mat. 22.29 Ye erre not knowing the Scripture nor the power of God The sixth is taken from the glory of God sith God created man

as we neither reject nor contemne the testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who do often say that the holy Scriptures have not their authority else-where then from the word of the Church 1 Reason The reproach of God For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say that the authority of Gods Word dependeth of the testimony of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why we beleeve that the Scriptures were delivered from heaven be the witnesse of the Church who seeth not that hereby the authority of a mans voice is made greater then the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimony unto another so that he is the only or the chiefe cause why credence is given unto the other out of all doubt greater credit is given unto him then unto the other who receiveth his testimony Wherefore it is a speech most unworthy the majesty of God that the voice of God speaking in his holy Book is not acknowledged except it be confirmed by the witnesse of men 2 Reason Our comfort Faith is grounded on approved witnesse therefore not on mans Secondarily whereas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge whereof is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflicts of doubtfulnesse in all mens minds are so great what full assurance of our faith can there be what sure consolation against assaults or temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth be no otherwise knowne unto us to be indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom we see so much ignorance errour and vanity to be that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much unto their word except other reason concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and Christian Religion is plainly exposed unto the mocks and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouths doe therefore only desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selves say so For if they be by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it then we affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the Scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion and doth challenge a far higher authority unto it selfe then which hangeth upon mens words For so saith Christ himselfe I receive not the record of man signifying thereby John 5. that his doctrine stood not no not on John Baptists testimony although yet he did alledge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moved to beleeve Therefore he addeth But I say these things that you may beleeve I have a greater witnesse then the witnesse of John And if Christ now being humbled said these things of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his Throne Paul saith 1 Cor. 2. My word and my preaching stood not in entising speech of mans wisdome but in plaine evidence of spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God If so be then our faith must not rest no not upon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shall it depend on the bare word of men Ephes 2. The Church her selfe is said to be built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church stayeth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnesse for so should not the Church be upheld by the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And it is said 1 John 5. If we receive the witnesse of men the witnesse of God is greater If it be greater then the authority of it hangeth not on the record of man but we are to give more credence unto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to be indeed his voice then unto the Church affirming the same 1 Object That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Ans The Minor is false Now that it is said of the contrary That by the Churches record alone it doth appeare unto us that the sacred bookes which wee have were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their fore-head and that even unto us they are come uncorrupt this we grant not For God far more certainly testifieth both in Scripture and in the hearts of his Saints that no feigned or forged thing is in these books then it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand upon the Churches testimony alone in this point shew that themselves have not as yet felt or understood the chiefest testimony 2 Object The discerning of books Ans The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost Furthermore they say That the bookes authenticke or as they terme them Canonicall of both Testaments are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches judgement and therefore that the authority of holy Canon doth depend on the Churches wisdome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the Churches judgement but being imprinted into the bookes themselves by the Spirit of God is onely acknowledged and approved by the Church this is easily to be understood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and majesty of the heavenly Spirit doth lesse evidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of word and matter then in others of which it is cleere that they are the heavenly Oracles 2 The certainty of Authors set down in writing by the divine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these bookes themselves nor out of others which are Canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not opened by those whom God by certain testimonies hath warranted unto us to be endued with a Propheticall spirit or themselves doe not shew any certain Authours of them or by their form of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this evidence of spirit or certainty of the authours we build not our judgement on the testimony of the Church but of the bookes themselves And therefore not for the Churches judgement only do we judge some books to be Canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the Canonicall but rather for the very cause of this difference which we find in the bookes themselves 3 Object The Church is more

unto their little children the whole history of the Law then published And againe in the sixth he willeth that the doctrine touching one God and the perfect love of God be often inculcated in the eares of children And farther in the eleventh he biddeth that the whole Law and Decalogue should be expounded unto them Wherefore in the Old Testament children were taught the chiefe points of the doctrine of the Prophets whethe● touching God or the Law or the promise of the Gospel or the use of the Sacraments and Sacrifices of those times which were types of the Messias to come and of his benefits these and whatsoever other points of doctrine children were taught either at home by their Parents or in publike schooles and congregations by the Prophets 2 Kin. 4.38 and 6.1 For I doubt not but that to this use the houses of the Prophets of Eliseus and others were erected To this purpose God himselfe in briefe delivered the whole doctrine of the Law thus Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart c. and thy neighbour as thy selfe To this purpose likewise delivered God summarily the whole doctrine of the Gospel thus The seed of the woman shall break the head of the Serpent And In thy seed shall all the nations be blessed They had also Sacrifices Praiers and other things which God would that Abraham and his posterity should teach their children and their whole family and therefore this doctrine was framed fit for the capacity of children and the ruder sort In the New Testament wee reade how Christ commanded little children to be brought unto him In the time of the New Testament Mat. 10.14 on whom he laid his hands and blessed them Suffer the little children to come unto mee saith Christ and forbid them not for of such is the Kingdome of God And that catechising of children was in use in the Apostles time witnesse the example of Timothy 1 Tim. 3.15 of whom Paul writeth that he had learned the Scriptures of a childe A farther and more direct proofe hereof we have in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Heb. 6.1 2. which Epistle layeth downe certaine heads of the Apostles Catechisme of repentance from dead workes of faith towards God of the doctrine of Baptism and of Sacraments and the laying on of hands of the resurrection from the dead and of eternall judgement all which he entituleth Milke for children These and such like grounds of doctrine were required at the hands of the Catechumeni at the time of Baptisme and of little children at the time of Confirmation by laying on of hands Therefore the Apostle termeth them The doctrine of Baptisme and laying on of hands Semblably the Fathers also wrote briefe summes of doctrine certaine remnants of which we see as yet in Popery E●seb hist Eccles ●ib 6. cap. 3. Eusebius writeth of Origen that he restored in Alexandria the custome of catechising which in time of persecution was decayed Socrates also reporteth of catechising thus Our forme of catechising saith he is after the manner we received of the Bishops our predecessors going before us according as we were taught when we laid the foundation of faith and were baptised according as we have learned out of the Scripture Pope Gregories Catechisme Pope Gregory erected and set up Idols and Images in Churches that they might be the bookes of Lay-men and children After these times the doctrine of the Church through the negligence of other Bishops and subtlety of the Bishop of Rome was by little and little corrupted catechising decayed and at length was transformed into that ridiculous ceremonie which at this day is by them called Confirmation Thus far of the originall and perpetuall practice of catechising in the Church 3. What are the parts and chiefe points of Catechisme THe especiall parts of the rudiments of Christian Doctrine as it is said in the place afore-named unto the Hebrewes were Repentance and Faith in Christ that is to say The Law and the Gospel Catechisme therefore may primarily and in the largest sense it beareth be divided as the whole doctrine of the Church is into the Law and the Gospel For Catechisme differeth not from the doctrine of the Church in subject and substance of the matter it handleth but in the forme and manner of handling it as solid strong meat prepared for men of yeares which representeth the doctrine of the Church and milke and weak meats chewed for children which shadow and resemble Catechisme vary not in the subject I meane the essence and nature of meat but in these qualities of being strong and weake meats These two parts the vulgar and common sort call by the name of the Decalogue or the Apostles Creed because the Decalogue comprehendeth the summe of the Law the Creed in briefe the substance of the Gospel They term it also the doctrine of faith and works Or the doctrine of things to be beleeved and done Some of the learned divide it into the doctrine concerning God his will and his workes Againe they distinguish Gods workes into workes of Creation Preservation and Redemption But these three members of this division are all handled either in the Law or the Gospel or in both and therefore this division is easily reduced to the former Others make five parts The Decalogue The Apostles Creed Baptisme the Supper of the Lord and Prayer of which parts some were immediately delivered by God himselfe as The Decalogue Others mediately and that either by his Sonne manifested in the flesh as The Lords Prayer Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord or by the Ministery of the Apostles as The Apostles Creed But these parts are also couched within the two before rehearsed For The Decalogue is the summe of the Law The Creed the briefe of the Gospel The Sacraments are as appurtenances of the Gospel and therefore have reference unto the Gospel as farre forth as they are the Seales of grace promised in the Gospel but as they are testimonies of our obedience towards God so they carry the nature of Sacrifices and appertaine to the Law Prayer is a part of the worship of God and therefore referred to the Law The parts of this Catechisme This Catechisme consisteth of three parts which are 1. Mans misery 2. Mans delivery from this misery 3. Mans thankefulnesse for this delivery Which division in effect swerveth not from the rest because the other parts are coupled in these The Decalogue pertaineth to the first part inasmuch as it is the glasse wherein we view and have sight of our sin and misery and to the third part inasmuch as it is the exact rule of true thankefulnesse to God and of Christian conversation The Creed because it describeth the manner of our delivery is contained under the second part Thither also belong the Sacraments which are as the appurtenances and seales of the doctrine of faith Lastly Prayer as the principall part of our spirituall

temporall and miraculous generation of the Virgin and not in respect of any eternall generation of his Father according to his Divinity Ans The Major is true of such a son as hath a generation unlike in the whole kinde that is both in nature and in the manner of the generation But Christ according to his humanity hath a generation divers from us Why Christ according to his man-hood cannot properly be called the onely begotten not as concerning his nature but onely in respect of the manner For according to his humanity he is consubstantiall with us that is hee is true man having a humane nature the same altogether with ours in kinde the difference is onely in the singular and miraculous manner of his conception and nativity of the Virgin Wherefore although in respect of this generation also of his Man-hood hee is onely begotten yet in Scripture and in the Creed hee is properly called the onely begotten Sonne of God according to his divine nature not according to his humanity For ac-according to his humane nature hee hath brethren of the same generation and nature but according to his divine nature hee hath no brethren but alone was from everlasting borne of the essence of the Father Of no other is it said that The Father hath given unto him to have life in himselfe and that John 5.26 Col. 2.9 John 1.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In him dwelleth the fulnesse of the God-head bodily Therefore he is expresly called the onely begotten of the Father not of his Mother And the very word only begotten properly respecteth the nature and essence it selfe not the peculiar manner of his miraculous conception and it signifieth one that is begotten alone and not one begotten after a singular manner alone Object 3. Every son is either naturall or adopted Christ according to his humanity is not the naturall Son of God He is therefore the Son of God by adoption Ans The Major of this reason albeit it may be granted according to civil constitutions yet it is false in divinity because it compriseth not a sufficient enumeration of the sons of God For there are sons of God by grace as the Angels Job 1.6 which yet are not adopted sons Thus is Christ according to his humanity the Son of God even by grace without adoption as appeareth out of that distinction of sons before delivered The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Jesus the only begotten Son Now what is meant when we say I beleeve in Jesus the onely begotten Son of God Ans The meaning is 1. I beleeve that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God that is the naturall and proper Son not having any brethren begotten of the substance of the Father from everlasting very God of very God But this sufficeth not For the Divels also beleeve this and tremble Therefore hereunto is to be added 2. I beleeve that for me that is for my salvation he is the only begotten Son of God or I beleeve that he is therefore the naturall Son that hee may make me a son by adoption and may communicate to me and to all the elect the dignity and right of the sons of God as it is said We have seen his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of the Father John 1.14 12. Mat. 1.17 Ephes 1.6 As many as received him to them he gave power to be the sons of God This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased God with the glory of his grace hath made us accepted in his beloved Of the Deity or God-head of Christ WHereas this doctrine concerning the only begotten Son of God is a foundation of our salvation and we cannot beleeve that Christ is the only begotten Son of God and much lesse can beleeve in this only begotten Son of God unlesse withall we beleeve that Christ is true God even the everlasting Word of the same substance dignity power and nature with the Father it remaineth therefore that herein briefly we deale against the Heretickes who impugne it Foure things are principally controversed touching the God-head of the Son 1. Whether the Sonne of God or the Word be a Subsistent or Hypostasis or person in the flesh and before the taking of flesh That is whether in Christ man there be besides his soule and body a spirituall nature or substance which was also existing before Christ borne of the Virgin and wrought and accomplished the works of God and is the Son of God and is so called in Scripture 2. Whether hee be a person truely distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 3. Whether he be equall unto the Father 4. Whether hee be consubstantiall that is of one and the same substance and essence with the Father We have therefore foure principall conclusions to be proved in their order against severall Heretickes 1. That Christ borne of the Virgin besides his soule body is a subsistent or person 2. That he is a distinct person from the Father and the holy Ghost 3. That he is equall to both 4. That he is of the same essence with both A double way of gathering testimonies of Scripture MOreover there is a double manner of gathering arguments out of the Scriptures whereby the divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost as also other things questioned in divinity are confirmed 1. When the testimonies of Scripture are gathered according to the order of the bookes of the Bible 2. When as certain orders or sorts of arguments or proofes are set unto which the testimonies of Scripture thereto belonging are referred Both waies are good and both very often necessary for a Divine when he privately considereth and examineth or discusseth controversies and disputes of Divinity and searcheth what is true in them The first way is more laborious and repeating of the same things the later is more short and compendious and more fit and appliable both for teaching and also that the grounds of the points and opinions of Christian Religion may the more easily be conceived of the minde and more firmly stick and abide in the memory for whatsoever need or use thereof to come THE FIRST CONCLUSION The Son of God is subsistent in the flesh both of the Virgin and before the flesh THis Conclusion is to be proved and maintained against both ancient and moderne or late up-start Heretickes ancient as Ebion Cerinthus Samosatenus Photinus modern as Servetus and others The orders or sorts of arguments which confirme this Conclusion may be either eight or nine in number To the first Classe belong those testimonies of Scripture 2 Classe which expresly teach and distinguish two natares in Christ and in which the Word is discribed that he was made man that he was manifested in the flesh John 1.14 Heb. 2.16 1 Tim. 3.16 1 John 4.3 John 3.13 18.37 Heb. 2.14 John 5.58 and assumed or took flesh c. The Word was made flesh He tooke the

Old He is minister of God to thee for good Rom. 13.4 IX In that saying of Luke 22.25 Christ doth not debarre such kings from the Church but he onely forbids the Apostles and Ministers of the Church to meddle with riotousnesse preheminence and civill dominion But Paul Gal. 6.15 doth not speak of the externall habit of Christians of whom some were circumcised as the faithfull Jewes and some were uncircumcised as the Christians who had been Gentiles To which saying answereth that Galat. 3.28 There is neither Jew nor Greeke there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female Which words if they understand literally surely they must also be separated from Christ seeing they are either servants or free either males or females The sense then of the Apostle is this That the outward differences of men doe nothing hinder or promote eternall salvation and that onely the new creature in Christ Jesus is necessary to salvation X. Lastly by that saying of Mat. 5.39 Christ doth not take away punishments due to the wicked but only private revenge for otherwise no Christian neither father nor mother nor school-masters nor any minister of the Church could be suffered the dutie of all which is to resist evill and wicked men and to maintain discipline every one in his place without which an horrible ataxie and confusion would ensue too much libertie would be brought in and at length would follow the subversion both of humane societie and of the Church it selfe Surely Christ and his Apostles did very often resist evill Neither doe wee reade any where in the Scripture that they who were appointed for politicall functions did after their conversion to Christianitie desert their province or calling or that ever they were commanded to forsake it So that Ruler in the fourth of John ver 33. beleeved himselfe and all his house Sergius Paulus the Deputie Act. 13.12 beleeved So the Keeper of the prison Act. 16.33 was baptised he and all his houshold XI Concerning the divers formes of Common-wealths which of them is best let Politicians dispute In the Scripture we reade of Cesars Kings Princes Governours Presidents Pretors Consuls Captaines Dukes and in a word both of inferiour and superiour Magistrates Of whom is this generall saying of Paul the Apostle There is no power but of God Rom. 13.1 1 Pet. 2.13 14 17. The powers that be are ordained of God And of S. Peter Submit your selves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreme or unto Governours as being sent by him Also Feare God Honour the King Where we may note that when the Magistrates office by Peter is called an humane ordinance this is not repugnant to Paul who calls it a divine ordinance For God only ordained the Magistrate but as for the forms of Common-weathls and their distinct degrees to wit that in them should be Emperours Kings Princes superiours inferiours this depends from humane ordination and politicall sanction yet all are alike governed by God therefore wee must be subject to humane ordinance for the Lords sake saith S. Peter XII Of the right of Magistrates thus saith Paul For this cause pay you tribute also for they are Gods ministers Rom. 13.6 7. attending continually upon this very thing Render therefore to all their dues tribute to whom tribute is due custome to whom custome feare to whom feare honour to whom honour Againe Give to Cesar what is Cesars Whence we gather that the right of Magistrates consisteth of three things First that hee may be knowne as the minister of God to whom therefore honour and reverence is due because hee is in stead of God for this cause as it said Magistrates are called gods Secondly that for the authoritie of so great a function they should be reverenced honoured and feared by their subjects no lesse then parents are by their children for Magistrates should be to subjects in stead of parents Thirdly that customes and tributes due to Magistrates should be paid them that out of them they may be able to sustaine the heavie burthen of their function preserve their lives and dignitie and exercise their bountie towards others Yet the Magistrate must be as far from riotousnesse as the subjects themselves as it is in Jer. 22.14 15. and every-where else in Scripture XIII God hath furnished the Magistrate with chiefe power that hee may command some and may governe others and use the sword also if need require against the disobedient and maintaine and defend his owne authoritie For so it is written Dan. 4.22 The most High ruleth in the kingdome of men and giveth it to whomsoever hee will Againe The princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them Mat. 20.25 and they that are great exercise authority upon them Againe Rom. 13.4 He beareth not the sword in vaine XIV God also for this cause laid upon the magistrate this carefull and troublesome burthen that he might urge promote and preserve among men the obedience due to Gods Law chiefly among Christians For first hee ought entirely to maintaine the honour and worship of God according to the prescript of the first Table and to propagate pietie with the true worship of God amongst his subjects according to Gods will and word For so God commanded Josuah Jos 1.8 This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth but thou shalt meditate therein day and night that thou mayest observe to doe according to all that is written therein So Paul Rom. 13.4 He is the minister of God to thee for good Now the chiefe happinesse of subjects consisteth in true religion and the true worship of God XV. Againe the office of the Magistrate is to maintaine right and justice and to preserve honestie peace and concord to love the good to afright and punish the wicked to maintaine and defend their subjects and territories even with the sword against domestick and forraigne enemies As it is written Jer. 22.3 Psal 82.3 Thus saith the Lord Execute ye judgement and righteousnesse and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressour and doe no wrong doe no violence to the stranger the fatherlesse nor the widow neither shed innocent bloud in this place Againe Magistrates are not a terrour to good workes but to the evill Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power doe that which is good but if thou doe that which is evill be afraid for he beareth not the sword in vaine for he is the minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evill XVI Both offices of the Magistrate are usually impugned by Pontificians Anabaptists and other fanaticall persons XVII In Popery the Pontificians confesse Bellarm l. 4. de Laicis c. 17 18. that the Magistrate ought not only to have a care of the civill government and to promote the publick peace but also by all meanes to defend Gods worship as it

might seem to sound of any change of the Word into flesh the holy Ghost explaines it by words equivalent saying That God is manifested in the flesh that Jesus Christ came in the flesh that the Son of God was made partaker of flesh and bloud and took the seed of Abraham and that in Christ dwells all fulnesse of the Godhead bodily 1 Tim. 3. 1 John 4. Heb. 2. Col. 2. The Animadversion All this is right if the phrase of Athanasius The assumption of the humanity into God be not wrested against the meaning of Athanasius Thes 15. as if hee had signified either a changing of the humanity into God or an equalling of it with God or a transfusion of the properties of the Godhead into it by which it is made God For whatsoever is created saith the same Athanasius cannot be God therefore let the assumption of the humanity into God De Arian Cathol confess be understood of its hypostaticall union with God or the Word the properties of both being preserved according to the declaration of the Synod of Chalcedon c. And of Austin in his book de fide ad Petrum God then received into his person the forme of a servant that is the nature of a servant c. XVII But the Word was not so made flesh as that any part thereof was associated with the flesh which was assumed For the Word being of a spirituall nature is not cut or divided into parts XVIII But the whole Word in the whole fulnesse of its Deity is united to the flesh All of it as the Orthodox Fathers tell us was clothed with flesh and covered with it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wholly incarnate inhumanated and incorporated The Animadversion And this is also right For neither can there be nor can we imagine how there should be any union of parts between the flesh and the Word which is indivisible The whole Word then assumed the whole flesh and with the whole flesh the whole Word was personally united In what sense the Word is said to be clothed and covered with flesh c. wee have already explained in the ninth Thesis to wit not by way of an externall habit accidentally but by way of an intrinsecall union substantially Hence then it appeares that the Word was not changed into flesh by taking of man no more then our limbs being clothed are changed as Austin speaketh Lib. qu. 38. quaest 73. Neither is it a speech proper enough when they say that the flesh appertaines to the integritie of the person of the Word incarnate that is that it is an integrall part of it as three feet belong to the integrity of the three-footed stoole but rather that the flesh belongs to the person of the Word incarnate as being the nature assumed by the Word into the unitie of the person in which it might manifest it selfe to the world as Austin saith The Word was made flesh that is clothed with flesh that to fleshly men he might appeare in a fleshly way Yet no man will deny or doubt that the Incarnation of the Word which is indivisible was totally made if that be understood without including the immensity of the Word within the dimensions of the flesh as also without an ubiquitary diffusion of the finite flesh with the infinite Word XIX Which union because totall is foolishly compared with examples of partiall unions to wit of the Sun touching some part of his Orbe Of the stone enclosed within some part of the ring Of Antwerp situated neer a part of the sea The Animadversion We must confess that this hidden admirable union of the unmeasurable nature of God with the measured nature of man cannot fully be expressed by any similitude And although both ancient and moderne Divines make use of divers Similies yet we may truly say of them all with Damascen In all smilitudes there are many dissimilitudes And it is impossible to find examples that may expresse the Deitie and Incarnation in every thing Justin Cyril Athanasius made use of these Similies that are taken from the Sun a Ring the Ocean Basil useth the similitude of an hot iron Athanasius of a burned stick or burning iron Cyril of a burning coale Damascen of a fiery sword Justin and Athanasius of the body and light of the Sun But none of all these similitudes will exactly agree with the thing it self This man toucheth our Divines for using examples of partiall unions but with little sinceritie for sometimes they make use of such Similies not to declare exactly the thing it selfe from which we confesse the examples of finite things are far distant but onely to shew the sophistry of Ubiquitaries For example When Jacobus Andreas at Maulbrun did foolishly demonstrate the Ubiquity thus Gods right hand is every-where the humanity of Christ sits at Gods right hand Ergo the humanity is every-where Our men by a Syllogisme altogether like this if you look up on the forme made it appeare that this was a naughty argument and consisted of foure termes The Ocean encompasseth the whole world Antwerp is seated neere the Ocean Ergo Antwerp encompasseth the whole world By this way they did not compare matter with matter but one fault with another for both Syllogismes were alike faulty therefore the shewing of this errour was not foolish Neither doth Doctor Hunnius demonstrate better the illocalitie of the flesh in the Word below in his 36. Thesis It is thus in briefe The Word is illocall the flesh was assumed into the Word Ergo the flesh is illocall Why then doe wee not send this Disputer to the foure termes of Antwerp and the Ocean For as these are different termes To be the Ocean and to be seated neere the Ocean so these are different To be the Word and to be in the Word as in the Vulcanian demonstration these were different speeches To be Gods right hand and To sit at Gods right hand XX. The similitude of the union of the soule and body is more apt to declare this mysterie Smidlin in colloq Maulbrun p. 43. which Athanasius used in his Creed and Cyrillus after him in his Synodicall Epistle saying The Word in the assumed nature hath made such an habitation for it selfe as the soule is beleeved to have in its proper body The Animadversion Of this Similie thus writeth Justin In Exposit Symb. p. 301. Some saith he having conceived in their mind of this union as of the union of soule and body have so delivered it and it 's a convenient example though not in all points yet in some Also the example of man is in some respect to be admitted and in some respect to be avoided And 't is so indeed For they agree thus That as the reasonable soule and body are united into one person and as in one hypostasis subsist two natures distinct in their essences and properties and concurring in these operations that are proper to men and one of