Tenant for life A feofment by two and he in the Remainder or Reversion in Fée joyn in a Feofment by Déed the Livery of the Fréehold shall move from the Lessée and the Inheritance from him in the Reversion or Remainder from each of them according to his estate Co. Inst pars 1 303. b. 2. 5 Every man shall plead such pleas Pleas proper as are pertinent for him Secundum subjectam materiam viz. according to the quality of his case Estate or Interest as Disseisors Tenants Incumbents Ordinaries and the like Co. Inst pars 1 200. b. 3. 6 One Tenant in Common may enfeoffe his Companion Feofment Releases but not release because the Fréehold is several Ioyn-tenants may release but not enfeoffe because the Frée-hold is joynt But Coparceners may both enfeoffe and release because their seisiin to some intents is joynt and to some several Co. l. 3. 50. b. 4. Sir George Browns case 7 The words of the Statute of 11 H. 7. cap. 20. Statute of 11 H. 7. 20. interpreted for discontinuances which prohibits a Feme to alien the lands of her deceased husband are these that she shall not discontinue alien release or confirm them with Warranty where Warranty seems to be referred to any Discontinuance or Alienation as well as to release and confirmation So that if a Feme Tenant in special taile after the decease of her husband make a Lease for three lives not warranted by the Statute of the 32 H. 8. cap. 28. without Warranty he in the Reversion or Remainder by force of the said Statute of 11 H. 7. shall not enter but it was adjudged in Sir Geo. Brownes case in the 3 Report that in that case he might enter and that these words with Warranty shall be onely referred to Releases and Confirmations which indéed do not make a discontinuance without Warranty for the intent of the said Act of 11 H. 7. was not onely to prohibit every barre but also every manner of discontinuance which might put the heire to his real action whereby he might perhaps be disinherited or at least greatly delayed And therefore in regard Releases and Confirmations do not make discontinuance without Warranty these words with Warranty are to be construed Secundum subjectam materiam and shall be referred to them onely to make them equivalent to such an estate which passeth by Livery and which of it selfe without Warranty makes a discontinuance Co. l. 4. 10. b. 4. Bevils case 8 The Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 2. which provides 32 H. 8. 2. interpreted for rents that none shal have any Avowry or Conusance for any rent suit or service unlesse seisin were had within 40 years before the Avowry made extends not to any such Rent or Service which by common possibility cannot happen or become due within 60 yeares as if the Seigniory consists upon Homage and Fealty onely for the Tenant may live 60 yeares after he hath done them So also if the Service be to cover the Hall of the Lord or to go to Warre with him when the King maketh Warre against his enemies such casual Services which by common possibility cannot happen within 60 yeares are not within that Act c. Likewise writs of Escheat Cessavit or Rescous are not within those branches of the same Statute which limit the seisin of land because in those writs the seisin is not traversable but the tenure and in those writs of Escheat and Cessavit albeit they demand the land yet néed they not alleadge any seisin in the same lands c. as the said Statute requires because that Act onely extends to such a writ where the Demandant or his Ancestors may have seisin of the land in demand within the time of limitation prescribed by the Act and the Statute doth not force them to any impossibility c. Scandalum Magnatum 9 The Lord Cromwell brings an Action de scandalo magnatum upon the Statute of 2 R. 2. cap. 5. against Vicar Delmy Co The Lord Cromwels case for speaking these words unto him You like of those that maintaine sedition against the Queens proceedings unto which the Defendant pleades special justification that the Plaintife procured two to prea h in his Church which enveighed in their Sermons against the Book of Common Prayer and because the Defendant did prohibit them the Plaintife said to the Defendant Thou art a false varlet I like not of thee to whom the Defendant said It is no marvel though you like not of me for you like of those inuuendo the two that should have preached that maintaine sedition innuendo seditiosam illam doctrinam against the Queenes proceedings And this was adjudged a good justification For in case of slander for words the sence of the words are to be taken and the sence of them doth best appeare by the cause and occasion of speaking them according to the Rule Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi sunt secundum subjectam materiam And therefore in this case the Council of the Defendant was said to have done well in shewing the special matter whereby the sence of this word sedition might appeare upon the coherence of all the words taken together viz. that the Defendant meant the seditious doctrine against the Quéens proceedings in the Act of 1 Eliz. by which the Book of Common Prayer was established and that he did not intend any such publique or violent Sedition as was alleadged by the Plaintife and as ex vi termini per se the word it selfe would import c. And it was said Quae ad unum finem loquuta sunt non debent ad alium detorqueri c. Common 10 If Common be said to be appertaining to a Mease Land Co. l. 4. 37. a. 4. 38. a. 3. Tirringhams case Meadow and Pasture time out of mind that shall be adjudged Common Appurtenant and not Common Appendant for it is against the nature of Common Appendant to be Appendant to Meadow or Pasture And therefore in that case the subject matter and the circumstance of the case ought to direct the Court to give Iudgement whether the Common be Appendant or Appurtenant 11 In Appeal of Murder against A. as principal Co. l. 4. 43. b. 4. Bibithes case and against B. as accessory before the fact Accessary in manslaughter A. was found guilty of Man-slaughter but not of Murder in this case B. was acquit because there cannot be an Accessary before the fact in Manslaughter which allwayes happens upon a suddaine debate or effray for if it be premeditate it is Murder Joint warranties or words 11 Ioynt words of the parties shall by construction of Law be taken respectively severally according to the several interests of the Grantées as Warranty made to two of certain lands Co. l. 5. 7. b. 4. 16 H. 6. 63 64. shall enure as
of lands of the custome of Burrough English Gavelkind c. Fitz. N. B. 1. 156. b. 48 If Tenant by Receipt upon default of Tenant for life appeare Tenant by â—â—ceipt and to received and pleads and after loseth by action tried c. Yet the Tenant for life may have a Quod ei deforceat upon the Statute of West 2. cap. 4. for the judgement is given against him for his default Dyer 2. 1 2. 6 H. 8. 49 If a Rent-charge be granted out of land pro consilio impendendo Rent chargâ— Prison in 〈◊〉 and the Grantée is afterwards attainted and committed to prison yet he shall not lose the rent for he may give counsel as well in prison as at large Dyer 30. 20â— 28 H. 8. 50 The Feoffées to an use made a lease for life rendring rent Cesty que â—sâ— before the Statute of Vses in this case Cestuy que use who now hath the reversion in possession shall distraine and make Avowry for the rent without attornment So it is if they had granted a rent upon condition the Grantée after the Statute should have holden by the condition in such plight as he did before Law-day Warren 51 There are thrée Coparceners of a Mannor Dyer 30. 203. and the King grants them a Law-day and they afterwards make feoffment of the Mannor yet shall they still retain the Law-day So if a man hath a Mannor and the King grants him frée Warren within his Mannor if he afterwards enfeoff the King of his Mannor without the appurtenances he shall still retain the Warren For a man may have Warren or a Law-day in anothers land per tot Cur. Action upon the case 52 In an action upon the Case the Plaintiff was non sâ—it Dyer 32. 5. 28 29 H. 8. whereupon the Defendant by the Statute of 23 H. 8. 15. had judgement to recover his costs and after the record was removed by Errour in B. R. by the Plaintiff and hanging that suit the Defendant brings an action of Debt in C. B. upon a new original and counts upon the record of an action upon the Case Errour And this matter was pleaded by the Defendant in this action c. And the better opinion of the Court was that the action was maintainable notwithstanding the writ of Errour because it was brought upon a new original Frankalmoign 53 Albeit the Lyturgie or book of Common Prayer was altered by the Statutes of 2 3 Edw. 6. cap. 1. 5 6 Edw. 6. cap. 1. Co. Inst pars 1. 95. b. 2. and 1 Eliz. cap. 2. yet the tenure in Frankalmoign remains the same and such Prayers and Divine Service shall be said and celebrated as in all times shall be authorized by Parliament Câ—mmon Prayer yea although the tenure be as Littleton hath it Sect. 137. A chanter un Messe c. ou a chanter un placebo dirige yet if the Tenant say Prayers in such a form as is lawfully authorized it sufficeth And as Littleton saith Sect. 119. in case of soccage the changing of one kind of temporal services into other temporal services altereth neither the name nor the effect of the tenure so the changing of Spiritual services into other Spiritual services neither altereth the name or effect of the tenure in Frankalmoign For albeit the tenure in Frankalmoigne was reduced by the said Statutes to a certainty contained in the book of Common Prayer and now since to an uncertainty again by extemporary Prayers Yet séeing the original tenure was in Frankalmoigne and the change was and is by general consent in Parliament whereunto as is presumed every man is party the tenure remains as it was at first Tenements devisable 54 Tenements in London divisable by custome come into H. 8. Dyer 155. 21. 4 5 P. M. hands by the dissolution of Abbies and after the King grants them to hold in chiefe by Knights service In this case a Devise of the whole is still good against the heir but quaere whether it be so against the King for wardship or primer seisin by reason of the saving in the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 1. Verdicts returned 55 The Clerk of the Assise may Dyer 163. 54. notwithstanding the death of both the Iustices of Nisi prius deliâ—er in Court the Records of the Verdicts taken before the same Iustices in the Circuit c. Death of a Defendant 56 In a Replegiare or an Assise against two Dyer 175. 24. judgement shall not be arrested by the death of one of the Defendants after the last continuance but shall be entred against the Survivor Partition 57 Ioyntenants and Tenants in Common cannot since the Statute of 31 H. 8. 1. make partition by Parol Co. lib. 6. 12. Morrices case no more than they could before for albeit by that Statute they are compellable to make partition yet it alters not the Common Law in that case Assets 58 In debt upon an obligation against the heire it is no plea to say Dyer 179. 43. Dyer 204. 2. that the Executors have assets Vide Dyer 207. 15. Dyer 217. 61. 4 Eliz. 59 A Veniâ—e facias with Proviso was returned served Venire faciaâ— and puâ— upon the file and two hours after a Pluries venire facias which was afterwards pursued by the Plaintiff was also returned and filed each party also pursue their Habeas Corpora which are likewise returâ—ed Howbeit the Plaintiff failed of his Jurat continuand yet this was adjudged no discontinuance because the continuance by the Defendant sufficed Discontinuance and there is no diversity by the entry of the oâ—e or of the other Dyer 229. 49. 6 Eliz. 60 A Feme dies before Livery sued Tenant by courtesie Partition yet in this case the Baron shall be Tenant by the Courtesie and shall sue livery Dyer 243. 55. 8 Eliz. 61 If there be thrée Coparceners and one of them aliens her part another of them brings a writ of Partition against the Alienée and the third Coparcener upon the Statute per Curiam it shall abate because in this case a writ of Partition lyeth at the Common Law as it did before the Statute Dyer 326. 3. 16 Eliz. 62 The Qu. was seised of Whaddon Chase in Com. Bucks De malefactoribus in paâ—â—â— and the Lord Gray was Lievtenant there in fée and he and his Ancestors and their Kéepers had by prescription used to hunt stray Déere in the Demesnes of the Mannor of Salden adjoyning as in Purlewes the Mannor of S. comes into the Quéens hands who grants it to Fortescue in fée wiâ—h frée Warren within the Demesnes thereof Ita quòd nullus intret in warrennam illam ad fugandum fine licentia F. And it was held that the unity of possession in the Quéen of the Chase and the Mannor of S. did not extinguish the
number neverthelesse any one right is within that Statute c. Pl. Co. 83. 86. Partridges case Vide 40. â—anslaughter 13 By a pardon of murther Man-slaugther is also pardoned Finch 21. Finch ibid. â—taint 14 An attaint supposing a Verdict to have passed before two Iustices whereas it passed before four is good enough â—covery 15 A recovery pleaded of thrée acres where it was of six Finch ibid. is good enough â—ndition 16 A condition that I shall not enfeoff I. S. is broken Finch ibid. if I enfeoff I. S. and I. D. â—pihold 17 A Copy-holder of a Mannor Finch ibid. where the custome giveth liberty to demise in fée may demise for any lesse estate without other prescription Vide 3. â—â—ise 18 Where the custome is 18 E. 3. 8. that a man shall not devise his lands for any higher estate than for terme of life Yet if a devise be made in fée and the Devisée claim but for life the devise is good Finch 21. â—iso 19 By the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 1. 2 3 P. M. Dyer 150. b. that giveth power to devise two parts of ones land a devise of the whole had béen good for two parts although the Stat. of Explanations 34 35 H. 8. cap. 5. had not béen made Finch 21. â—mes â—ure 20 An estate of Fée-simple conveyed to the Feme for her joynture Co. l. 4. 3. b. Vernons case and in satisfaction of her Dower is a joynture within the equity of 27 H. 8. For if an estate for life be a competent livelihood for her much more an estate in Fée-simple c. Sir Morrice Denurs case Dyer 8 El. 248. â—hold wiâ— estate 21 Where the custome of a Copihold Mannor is to grant Copihold lands for one two or thrée lives Co. l. 4. 29. b. 4. there a grant to a Feme Durante viduitate is good for that is a lesse estate and therefore included in the other c. Downes case â—nt inâ— conâ— 22 This word Attaint of murther in the Statute of 3 H. 7. cap. 1. Co. l. 4. 46. a. 4. in Kath. Wroteâ— case shall not be meant onely of a person that hath judgement of life but also extended to a person convicted by confession or verdict for a person attaint is a person convict and more 36. Co. l. 4 106. a. 4. in Adams Lamberts case 23 Albeit by the expresse words of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. Superstitious uses Estates in Fée-simple given to superstitious uses séem onely to be given to the King for the words are To the finding of a Priest to have continuance for ever c. yet that Stat. by construction extends also to every lesse estate as to an estate in taile for life c. Co. l. 5. pars 1. 6. b. 4. The Kings Ecclesiastical law 24 If by the proviso of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. The high Commission may censure depravers of the Common Prayer the Ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Arch-Bishops Bishops and other inferiour Officers is saved so that they may still punish by deprivation and other Ecclesiastical censures all such as shall deprave the book of Common Prayer notwithstanding by the same Act there is other provision made for the punishment of such offenders before temporal Magistrates Much more shall high Commissioners authorised by another Statute of the same year cap. 1. have power to inflict due punishment for the like offence albeit in the said Act of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. there be no such provision made for them as for Bishops c. Because Cui licet quod majus est non debet quod minus est non licere Co. l. 5. 6. b. 1. The Lord Mountjoys case 25 The words of the Statute of 1 Eliz. concerning leases to be made by Bishops c. are these other then for the terme of 21 yeares Leases by tâ—â— Clergy or three lives without saying or under and yet a lease for a lesse term is good There is also the same exposition of the Stat. of the 13 Eliz. cap. 10. whereof the words as to that point are the same 1. Co. l. 5. 29. b. 4. in Princes case 26 In Princes case in the 5 Rep. it was said Administration of boâ—â— Notabilis that it was adjudged in a case between Vere and Jeffres in tempore Reg. Eliz. That where one had goods onely in an inferiour Diocesse yet the Metropolitan of the same Province pretending that he had bona Notabilia in divers Diocesses committed the administration c. This administration was not void but onely voidable by sentence because the Metropolitan hath jurisdiction over all the Diocesses within his Province But if an Ordinary of a Diocesse commit the administration of the goods when the party hath bona Notabilia in divers Diocesses such administration is méerly void as well to the goods within his own Diocesse as elsewhere because he can by no means have jurisdiction of the cause Co. l. 5. 91. a. 1. in Hoes case 27 A man assignes a debt unto Quéen Eliz. by déed enrolled in satisfaction of a debt due to her from him as Collector of the Fifteens Three include 〈◊〉 with proviso that if the Lord Treasurer and the Barons of the Exchequer or any two of them for some reasonable cause should disallow revoke the same that then it should be void In this case revocation by three of the Barons shall be sufficient for if three doth it two doth it at least c. Co. l 5. 115. a. 1. in Wades case 28 If a man tender more money then he ought to pay Tender 〈◊〉 greater fâ—â—â— that is good enough for Omne majus continet in se minus and the other ought to receive so much thereof as is due unto him Quando plus fit quam fieri dâ—bet videtur etiam illud fieri quod faciendum est Et in majore summa continetur minor 29 In the general pardon of the 28 of Eliz. Burglary was excepted Attainder 〈◊〉 Burglary â—doned and thereupon the Iudges were then moved Co. l. 6. 13. a. 4. in the cases of pardon H. 29 Eliz. whether the attainder of Burglary was thereby also excepted And it was resolved that it was For if Burglary it selfe was excepted while it was yet doubtful whether it would be found Burglary or no and before it did appeare to the eye of the Law to be so à fortiori when Burglary appears upon record by judgement of Law it shall be excepted Co. l. 6. 56. a. 1. in the Lord Chandos case 30 By the grant of the Mannor without this word of the reversion By the 〈◊〉 Mannor 〈◊〉 version pâ—seth the reversion shall passe albeit at that time the Grantor had not the Mannor in possession but in revension for this word Mannor includes all estates and degrees of estates of or
the land In this case the Rent and Escuage shall be apportioned but the Homage and Fealty shall still remain intire for the residue of the land still remaining in the Tenants hand because he still holds the residue of the land of him and then he must hold it by some service or other and therefore those services being in their nature unseverable and intire they shall totally remain being indéed the fréest and least chargeable services that the Tenant can hold by c. Co. ib. 150. a. 1. 14 Albeit in some cases a Rent-charge The charge of a stature not apportionable which is in his nature intire may by act in Law be apportioned as when the Grantée of the rent comes to the land by descent or the like Yet in such cases the writ of Annuity faileth because that writ being grounded upon the grant by déed which is intire must be sued for the whole and cannot be sued for part Also a rent in respect of the realty may be apportioned but the personalty is indivisible and shall not be severed no not by act in Law As if execution be sued of body and lands upon a Statute Merchant or Staple and afterwards the inheritance of part of those lands descends to the Conusée In this case all the execution is avoided for the duty being intire and personal cannot be divided c. Annua nec debitum judex non separat ipsum Co. ib. 15â— b. 2. 15 A Rent-service is of its own nature apportionable Rent-service becomes rent-seck Howbeit if it be changed from Rent-service to a Rent-seck by severance thereof from the Seigniory it thereupon becomes intire and unsevâ—â—able according to the nature of a Rent-secke And therefore if there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and certain rent and the Lord by déed grant the rent in fée fée-taile or for life saving the fealty the rent which before was Rent-service is by that severance of it from the Seigniory made a Rent-seck and then if the Grantée purchase part of the land out of which that rent is issuing the whole rent is extinct 16 If a man be seised of two acres of land in two several Counties Co. ib. 153. b. 4. and maketh a lease of both of them reserving two shillings rent In this case albeit several liveries be made at several times yet is it but one intire rent in respect of the necessity of the case and he shall distrain in one County for the whole rent and make one avowry for the whole c. A County intire for livery 17 Every County is as it were an intire body of it selfe Finch 79. Littl. § 418. so that upon a feoffment of lands in many Towns in one County livery of seisin made in one parcel in any one of those Towns in the name of all sufficeth for all the lands in all the other Towns within the same County but upon a feoffment of lands in divers Counties there must be livery of seisin in every County For entry In like manner Littl. § 417. Co. ib. 252 b. 4. if a man have cause to enter into lands lying in divers Towns in the same County if he enter into one parcel thereof lying in one Town in the name of all the lands in the same County by such entry he hath as good possession of all those lands as if he had entred into every parcel but if they lie in several Counties there must be several entries Co. ib. 153. b. 4. So likewise if a man de disseised of a rent issuing out of lands lying in divers Towns within one and the same County he shall néed to bring but one Assise for the recovery of that rent c. But if the lands lie in several Counties he shall have several Assises in confinio Comitatus and in either County shall make his pliant of the whole rent Howbeit there shall be but one Patent to the Iustice And this Assise in confinio Comitatus is given by the Statute of 7 R. 2. Stat. 7. R. 2. 10. For no Assise lay in that case at the Common Law but the party might distrain for the whole rent in either County The like for â—ervices 18 If a man hold divers Mannors or lands in divers several Counties by one tenure and the Lord is deforced of his services Co. ib. 154. a. 2. he shall have several writs of customes and services viz. For every County one writ returnable at one day in the Court of Common Pleas and thereupon Count according to his case by the Common Law But if the Tenant in that case do cease the Lord shall not have several writs of Cessavit ut suprà For the writ of Cessavit is given by Statute of West 2. cap. 21. and the form and manner of that writ is therein prescribed for which cause it is holden in our books that in that case a Cessavit lay not at the Common Law c. â— Villein adâ—owson c. â—ndivisible 19 Of Inheritances some be intire and some several and of intire Co. ib. 164. b. 3. some be divisible and some indivisible c. If a Villein descend to two Coparceners this is an intire inheritance and albeit the Villein himself cannot be divided yet the profit of him may for one Coparcener may have him one day or wéek and the other another day or wéek c. They may likewise have an Advowson in coparcenary and may present by turns because that is also an intire Inheritance which cannot be divided â—stovers â—â—ots and â—ings uncerâ—in not diviâ—ble 20 If a man have reasonable Estovers as House-boot Co. ibid. b. 4. Hay-boot c. appendant to his Frée-hold they are so intire as they shall not be divided betwéen Coparceners So if a Corodie incertain be granted to a man and his heirs and he hath issue divers daughters this Corodie shall not be divided betwéen them It is otherwise of a Corodie certain for thereof partition may be made Likewise Homage Fealty Piscary uncertain Common sans number and the like cannot be divided betwéen Coparceners and the two last not onely because they are intire but also because it would be a charge to the Tenant of the Soile if such hereditaments should be devisible the interest in them being unlimited c. Co. ib. 190. a. 3. 21 If a Corodie be granted to two men and their heirs In this case Grant of a Corodie to two because the Corodie is incertain and cannot be severed it shall amount to a several grant viz. to each of them one Corodie for the persons be several and the Corodie is personal and the grant shall be taken most strongly against the Grantor Littl. § 314. Co. ibid. 197. 22 If two Tenants in Common of lands in fée make a gift in taile or a lease for life to another rendring to them yearly a certain rent Tenants in common
that which is to be done in that particular wherein the said Commissioners have authority to proceed according to their discretion which neverthelesse is to be limited and bounded with the rule of Law and Reason For discretion is a science or understanding to discern betwixt falshood and truth betwixt wrong and right betwixt shadows and substance betwixt equity and colourable glosses and pretences and not to proceed according to a mans own will and private affections because Talis discretio discretionem confundit c. Common of â—iâ—â—nage 50 If the Commons of the Town of A. and of the Town of B. are adjacent Co. l. 7. 5. b. 3. Sir Miles Corbets case and that the one ought to have common with the other because of vicinage and in the Town of A. there are 50 acres of Common and in the Town of B. 100 acres of Common In this case the Inhabitants of the Town of A. cannot put more Cattle in their Common of 50 acres than that will féed without having any respect to the Common within the Town of B. nec è converso for the original cause of this Common for cause of vicinage was not for profit but for the preventing of Suits in a Champian Country by reason of the reciprocal escapes out of the one Town into the other And therefore if the Common of the Town of A. will depasture 50 Cattle and that of the Town of B. 100 Cattle it can be no prejudice to the one or to the other if the Cattle of the one Town do reciprocally escape and depasture out of the one Town into the other For if all their Cattle depasture promiscuously together per my per tout that can be no prejudice to the one or to the other c. â—an slaughter 〈◊〉 the day or â—ght diversiâ— 51 It is a good exposition of a Statute to expound it according to the reason of the Common Law For example at the Common Law Co. l. 7. 6. b. 3. in Milborns case if one had béen slain in a Town in the day-time viz. while there was yet full day-light and the Man-slayer had escaped the Town was therefore amercied and so it is holden in the 21 E. 3. Coronae 238. Dum quis felonicè occisus fuit per diem nisi felo captus fuit tota villata illa oneretur And with this also agrees 3 E. 3. Coronae 293. But if such a murther or homicide had béen committed in the night the Town should not then have béen amercied by the Common Law because then no follie could be imputed to the Inhabitants of the Town for letting him escape c. For the Scripture saith The day is ordained for man to labour in Psal 104. and the night to take his rest And the Poet saith Ut jugulent homines surgunt de nocte latrones And from this resolution of the Common Law the Statutes of Winchester 13 E. 1. and of 27 Eliz. cap. 13. are to be expounded For albeit no time be specified in those Statutes when the robbery should be committed for which damages are to be answered by the Hundred yet it is adjudged in 29 Eliz. in the case between Milborn and the Hundred of Dunmow in Essex that for a Robbery done before day the Hundred shall not answer but onely for that which is committed in the day time betwixt light and light And howbeit at the Common Law as is aforesaid the Inhabitants in great Towns were not to be amercied albeit the Man-slayer escaped when the Murther or Homicide was committed in the night Yet at this day since the said Stat. of Winchester by which it is enacted that in Cities and great Towns that are enclosed the gates shall be shut at Sunne-set until Sun-rising next morning Now the Inhabitants of such Cities and Towns are amerciable if such Man-slayer escape although the Murther or Homicide happen to be committed in the night as well as if it were committed in the day For now that act hath changed the reason of the Law and therefore the Law it selfe is also changed Ratio est anima legis mutata legis ratione mutatur lex For at the Common Law before the Statute if a man were slain in the night as is said before there was no fault to be imputed to the Citie or Town but now if they do not kéep their gates shut according to the Statute by reason whereof the offender escapes then is the fault and negligence in them and this agrées with the book in 3 E. 3. Coronae 299. which see also in Co. pro ut in margine Vide 149. 35. Co. l. 7. 32. The case of a fine per le Roy. 52 Inasmuch as the King is bound by the Stat. De donis conditionalibus as it is adjudged in the Lord Barleys case in Pl. Co. 240. Stat. De dâ— binds the Kâ— and thereâ— he takes bâ—fit of 4 H. 7. â— 32 H. 8. by which Act the King is restrained from alienation for it is provided by the same Act Quod finis ipso jure sit nullus Reason requires that the King shall take benefit of the Acts of 4 H. 7. and 32 H. 8. which enable the Tenant in tail to barre his â—â—â—es For it is agréed in all our Books that the King shall take benefit of any Act although he be not named 12 H. 7. 21. 35 H. 6. 60. Pl. Co. ubi supra And it would be hard if the King being issue in tail of a gift made to the Subject should be in worse condition than if he were not King Co. l. 8. 173. b. Virgil Parkers case 53 The Kings Tenant by Knight-service conveyeth half his land for the joynture of his wife that shall be Equality of the third 〈◊〉 descending and after marriage he demiseth the other halfe for years for the payment of his debts and legacies and deviseth 1000 l. to his younger Children In this case it was resolved that inasmuch as the advancement of his wife is as well within the Statute of 27 H. 8. Co. l. 10. 84. a. 4. Leonard Leveis case as the payment of his debts and the preferment of his children and for that the operation of that Statute doth principally take effect by the death of the Kings Tenant For that cause albeit the estate of the Feme hath the precedency yet the Kings third parâ— shall he taken equally out of both those halfs and not out of the half so demised onely And so it was also resolved M. 41 42 Eliz. betwéen Remington and Savage and the 23 Eliz. in Thynnes case And agrées also with the common experience of the Court of Wards Co. l. 95. a. 4. Connys case 54 In a writ of Mesne the Parol shall not stay for the nonage of the Plaintiff for it is not reason In a writ of Mesne the â—rol shall 〈◊〉 stay for lâ—â—y that the Infant shall be distrained for the services of
is attainted of Felony the bloud on his part being corrupted the sonne as it séems to him hath but halfe the inheritable blood in him without corruption viz. the bloud of the mother and therefore he holds that such a sonne shall not be inheritable no not to his mother And with this agrées Bracton lib. 3. cap. 13. Non valebit felonis generatio nec ad hereditatem paternam vel maternam Si autem ante feloniam generationem fecerit talis generatio succedit in haereditatem patris vel matris a quò non fuerit felonia perpetrata because at the time of his birth he had two lawful blouds commixed in him which could not be corrupted by the attainder subsequent but onely as to him that offended See more of this matter Co. Inst pars 1. 8. a. Co. l. 11. 39. a. 4. in Metcalfs case 2 In an action of Accompt upon the judgement quod Computet No writ â—â—or befoâ— whole â—ment câ—â—pleated before the final judgement given for the arrerages and damages a writ of Error lyeth not for in that writ these words Si judicium inde redditum sit c. are meant not onely de principali judicio but also de integro judicio viz. When all the matter within the original is determined as in 34 H. 6. 18. in Humphrey Bohuns case in a Quare Impedit brought against two the one pleads to issue and the other confesseth the action upon which confession judgement is given and he against whom the judgment was given sues his waie of Error to remove the record into the Kings Bench but Prisot and the whole Court denied it because the writ of Error was to rehearse all those which were parties to the original writ and then the writ saith Et si judicium inde redditum sit tunc Recordarium illud habeatis c. By which it appears that the record shall not be removed by writ of Error before the whole matter be determined 〈◊〉 like 3 A writ of Trespasse is brought against two Co. ibid. b. 1. and the one appears and pleads so that he is attainted of the trespasse and judgement is given against him In this case the Defendant shall not have a writ of Error before the matter be likewise determined against the other c. The Lord Cromwels case against Cawary and others per Prisot tempore H. 6. 〈◊〉 like 4 In trespasse by the Lord of S. against one for his Cattle taken Co. ibib b. 2. 32 H. 6. 5 6. b. as to parcel the Defendant pleads not guilty and as to the rest he pleads another plea whereupon the Plaintiff demurs and after the issue was found for the Plaintiff upon which he had judgement In this case the Defendant shall not have a wait of Error until the whole matter be determined c. 〈◊〉 like 5 A man cast in a writ of Error upon a Iudgement given Co. ibid. b. 3. 39 H. 6. Error 11. where the judgement was given of the Principal and damages but not of the Costs Howbeit the writ was rejected because the writ is conditional Si judicium inde redditum sit c. 〈◊〉 like 6 In Formedon brought by Fitz-williams against Copley Co. ibid. b. 3. 12 Eliz. Dyer 291. the Demandant hath judgement of part c. And after the Tenant brings a general writ of Error before the discussion of the residue earnestly desired that the record might be removed into the Kings Bench but the Court would not grant it before the whole matter in demand should be determined for the Iustices of the Kings Bench should procéed without warrant if they should procéed upon a matter which is not determined and whereupon no judgement is given and the whole record ought to be either in the Common Pleas or in the Kings Bench also the original is intiâ—â— and cannot be here and there too c. 〈◊〉 Impe. 7 The next Advowson is granted to two Dyer 279. 8. 11 Eliâ— who joyn in a Quâ—â—e Impedit the one dies this shall cause the writ to abate 〈◊〉 not inheâ—blâ— 8 Baron and Feme being Donées in special tail Dyer 332. 27. 16 Eliz. the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue the Feme dies the issue shall not have the land for he ought to make his conveyance by both per Curiam â—ard 9 If an award be made for the performance of divers things on one side and nothing to be performed on the other it is a lame award Hob. 49. Nichol's case and void according to the book of 7 H 6. 10 A. brings an action of trespasse against B. C. and D. B. pleads not guilty whereupon issue was joyned C. and D. make a justification â—ob 70. Parkers case and thereupon after a replication a demurrer was joyned Hanging this demurrer the issue was tried against B. and damages given and judgement against him after which judgement the Plaintiff entred a Nolle prosequi against the Defendant C. and D. whereupon Error was brought by all the Defendants against the Plaintiff and the Error assigned was for that the Nolle prosequi had discharged all the Defendants but it was held that the Nolle prosequi against C. and D. had not discharged B. and so no error neither yet should C. and D. have joyned in this writ of Error because there was no judgement against them nor they grieved and the writ of Error is Ad grave daâ—â—um c. 68 Ex tota materia emergat Resolutio Co. l. 3. 59. b. 1. in Lincoln Colledg case 1 It is the office of a good Expositor of an act of Parliament to make construction of all the parts together Discontinâ—ance by the husband of 〈◊〉 wives land and not of one part alone by it selfe Nemo enim aliquam partem rectè intelligere possit antequà m totum iterum atque iterum perlegerit For example albeit the first branch of the Stat. of 11 H. 7. c. 20. makes the discontinuance alienation warranty and recovery made by the wife of the Inheritance of her deceased husband to be utterly void and of none effect Yet the clause following being joyned to the first with this conjunctive And that it shall be lawful for any person c. to whom the said Inheritance c. shall appertain to enter c. doth cléerly expound the generality of the words of the precedent branch And therefore the sense of both together is that they shall be void and of none effect by the entry of him unto whom the interest title or inheritance after the decease of the Feme doth appertain Howbeit they shall not be void but stand in force betwéen the parties themselves and against all others save onely against such as have title c. and they onely have power to make them void and of none effect by their entry as aforesaid For estates of Franktenement or Inheritance
Condition that he shall kill J. S. the bond is void So if a man make a feofment upon Condition that the Feoffée shall kill I. S. the Estate is absolute and the Condition void so as he who intends any unlawful Act is still by the Law crost in the designe or purpose he aimes at Dier 28. a 16. 31 H. 8. 7 Vice is so odious in the eie of the Law Bloud corrupt that it will not suffer any to inherit who derives his title through bloud tainted with any Capital offence As if a man hath issue two Sonnes and the eldest in the life of the Father is attainted for felony and dies living the Father and after the Father dies seised of the land in Fée this land shall discend to the younger Sonne as heire to his Father if the eldest Sonne hath no issue living but if he hath issue in life who by the Law should inherit the Land if it were not for the Attainder and albeit he hath committed no offence yet the land shall not discend to him nor yet to the younger Brother but shall escheate to the Lord of the Fée 140 Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita â—â—feit inâ—â— no good 〈◊〉 1 Where an Indictment is found insufficient Co. l. 4. 45. a. 1 in Vaux his Case the offender may be indicted again for in such Case Autre fois acquite or convict is no good plea because that plea is allowed upon that Maxime of the Common Law viz. that the life of a man shall not be put in jeopardy twice for one and the same offence Howbeit this is intended upon a lawfull acquital or Condition for otherwise his life was never put in jeopardy but when the Indictment or other procéeding against him are insufficient he may be re-indicted For the Law doth abhorre that great offences should passe un-punished according to these ancient Maximes of the Law and State Maleficia non debent remanere impunita impunitus continuum affectum tribuit delinquendo minatur innocentes qui parcit nocentibus Howbeit if upon an insufficient Indictment of felony a man hath had judgment quod suspendatur collum and so is attainted which is the judgment and end that the Law hath appointed for felony in this Case he shall not be again indicted and arraigned until that judgment be reversed by Error 〈◊〉 it goods 〈◊〉 2 The Reason why bona waviata viz. Co l. 5. 109. a. 4 in Fauxleys Case such shelme goods as a felon in flying waives or leaves behind him are forfeit to the King and that the owner shall in such Case lose his property in them is because of the negligence and default in the owner for that he made not fresh suit to apprehend the felon for Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat And therefore the Law hath imposed this penalty upon the owner that if the felon by his industry and fresh suit be not taken by such default he shall lose all his goods which the felon so leaves behind him â—â—â—es taken intendâ—â— 3 In many Cases Penal Statutes shall be taken by intendment Co. l. 11. 44. b. in Alexander Pollers Case and not according to the expresse words thereof especially when it is to remedy a mischiefe in advancement of Iustice and for the suppressim of Crimes and heinous offences of which sée many examples in the book at large quoted in the margent â—ption 4 In a writ of Reception F. N. B. 72. h. where after Replevin the party distraines again for that same thing the Sheriffe is comanded to apprehend the party so offending and so to chastise him by amerciament quod castigatio illa in casu consimili timorem aliis praebeat delinquendi 〈◊〉 breaâ—â— 5 A man was put into the Stockes upon suspition of Felony Dier 99. a. 60. 1 Max. and another comes who lets him go at large this is felony at the Common Law de frangend prison albeit the party that escaped be not indicted for felony â—â—lt â—â—â—der 6 In Banco Reg. in the Case of one Tripcony the Iury to the Nisi prius gave the Plaintiffe but 40 l. damages for the cutting of his right hand Dier 105. a 4. 1 2 P.M. and they were increased by the Iustices to 100 l. because this was matter apparent to the Court and the offence and trespass therein was caried about with the person howbeit in the Case of Sir John Bonham against the Lo. Sturton for slander where the damages were 500 Marks the Iustices said they could not lessen them Dyer 211. 33. 4 Eliz. 7 By the better opinion albeit the Statutes of 27 H. 8. 4. 28. H. 8. 15. Admiral be penal and ordaine that Commissions to heare and determine piracies shall be awarded to the Admiral and others to be named by the Chancellor yet the Lord Keeper being no Chancellor may grant such Commissions and that for the necessity to punish such offences 141 It favoureth Justice and right Co. Inst p. 1. 33. a. 1. 1 In a writ of Dower brought against the heire tout temps prist is a good plea before demand to barre the woman of the meane values and damages because the heire holdeth by title Plea in dowâ— and doth no wrong till a demand be made It is otherwise in a writ of Ayd Cosinage c. where the land and damages are to be recovered for there such a plea is not good because in that Case the Tenant of the land hath no title but holdeth the land by wrong Co. ib. 103. a. 4 b. 1. 2 If there be Lord and Tenant by Homage Ancestrel Homage ancestrel contiâ—nued and the Tenant alien the land in Fée although it be but upon a Condition which is performed at the day yet is the tenure gone for ever because the privity and Estate being once discontinued it is for ever after extinct But if the land be recovered against the Tenant upon a faint title and the Tenant recover the same again in an Action of an higher nature there the Homage Ancestrel remaines for the right which is favoureth in Law was a sufficient meane for the continuance thereof so it is also if he had reversed it in a writ of Error Co. Inst p. 1. 143. a. 4. 3 Before the Statute of quia emptores terrarum if a man had made a feofment in Fée rendring Rent he might have distrained for the Rent arreare of Common Right and in Case he had made no reservation of Rent or service yet the Feoffée should then have held of the Feoffor by such services as the feoffor held over of the Lord paramount So as albeit the Feoffor were negligent and made no provision or reservation of Rent or service yet the Law it selfe so much regarded Equity and Iustice that it created a tenure where the party was
implies a warranty nevertheless because for the most part a warranty is contained in a Charter the writ retains the same form and in such cases the words unde chartam habet c. are not material Escheat 17 If a man be condemned to be hangd for felony and happen to die after such judgement and before execution thereof by the officer F.N.B. 144. b. yet the writ of Escheat shall say pro quo suspensus fuit c. and it is not material whether he be hanged or no but the writ retains that form because for the most part after such judgement the felon is hanged 192 Frequentia Actus multum operatur Fine Non-claim 1 A. possessed of divers lands in D. for years at will Co. l. 3. 79. b. 2. in Fermors case and by Copy and seised of other lands there in fée demises the whole to B. for life and then levies a fine to B. c. of so many acres as amount to the whole land continues possession and payes the rents to the Lord five years pass yet is not the Lord barred by his non-claim because in as much as the lessée had lands in fée simple in the same Town the fine shall be presumed to be levied of such lands there whereof it is lawfull to levy a fine and then as for the quantity albeit the fine contain more acres than his own fee simple lands that can prove nothing to pass the Lease or Copy land because it is the common use and practice almost in all fines to insert more acres therein than the lands intended to be passed by such fines do contain Corporation 2 Albeit a Corporation have a Commencement by Charter Co. l. 4. 77. b. in the case of Corporations and by consequence within memory and it be expressed in their charter that the choice of their Maior Bailifs and other principal officers shall be by the Commonalty yet if by a continual usage they have chosen them by a certain select number of the principal of the Commonalty or of the Burgesses albeit no constitution can be shewed to warrant such election yet such election is adjudged good in Law because it it hath been so often put in execution Vide supra 189. 25. Duâ—chy of Cornwall 3 Ed. 3. gave unto the Black Prince the Dukedom of Cornwall Co. l. 8. 21. b. 1. in the Princes case c. habendum et tenendum eidem duci ipsius haeredum suorum Regum Angliae filiis primogenitis et dicti loci ducibus in regno Angliae haereditarie successuris c. This grant was adjudged fee simple and not at will as some would have had it And one of the reasons was because divers Acts both of E. 3. and the Black Prince himself did confirm the same to be fee simple and not any inferiour estate for E. 3. in the 14. year of his reign when he was to make war against Philip de Valois King of France which was but 3. years after the said Charter grants to the Prince by the name of Edward Duke of Cornwall to be Lieutenant of the Realm so long as the King should be beyond sea Then in 21 E. 3. the Prince for a fine of 1000 marks demiseth the Stanneries to Redman rendring 3000 marks rent per annum And divers other Letters Patents were cited in the Princes case in the 8. Rep. to the like purpose all which did confirm the said estate of the Prince to be fee simple For frequentia actus multum adjuvat Vide supra 71 4. Also another reason to prove the title of the Prince to the Dutchy of Cornwall was that ever since the creation thereof which was in the 11 of Ed. 3. in the succession of divers ages it had béen enjoyed according to the said Charter by the eldest son of the Kings of England c. for which sée the book at large 193 It alwayes construeth things to the Best And therefore Co. Inst part 1. 87. b. 3. 1 If a man be seised of a rent charge rent seck common of pasture Guardian Infant under 14. or such like Inheritances which do not lie in tenure and dieth his heir within the age of 14 years In this case the heir may choose his Guardian but if he be of such tender years as he can make no choice then if the father hath made no disposition of the custody of the child the Law adjudged it most fit that the next of kin to whom the Inheritance cannot descend should have the custody of him and whosoever taketh the rent c. the heir shall charge him in an accompt Co. ibid. 98. a. 3. 2 Where an Abbot holding in Frankalmoigne together with his Covent aliens the land to a Secular man he cannot hold as they held Frankalmoigne Socage viz. in Frankalmoigne yet because of necessity he must hold the land of some person and by some service the Law in this case creates and appoints him the lowest and easiest tenure that is viz. to hold the land of the Lord in socage by fealty only which is incident to every tenure Co. ibid. 99. b. 3. so likewise if the Seigniory be transferred to a stranger by act in Law and thereby the privity is altered In such case also the tenure in Frankalmoigne is changed to a tenure in socage by fealty And therefore if there be Lord Mesn and Tenant and the Tenant is an Abbot who holds of the Mesn in Frankalmoigne Here if the Mesn die without heir so as the Mesnalty escheats to the Lord Paramount the Abbot shall hold immediately of the Lord Paramount by fealty only because he cannot hold of him in Frankalmoigne 148 35. Co. ibid. 146. b. 3 3 If a Villein descend to two Coparceners Intire Inheritances this is an intire inheritance albeit the Villein himself cannot be divided the Law hath ordained that the profit of him shall be divided for one Coparcener may have the service one day one wéek c. and the other another day or wéek c. And for the same reason it is that a woman shall be endowed of a Villein viz. to have him every third day wéek or c. Likewise if an Advowson descend to Coparceners the Law hath so ordered it that they shall present by turns Et sic de similibus In all which cases the Law hath contrived and established the best way and order that may be for the parting of Intire inheritances which are otherwise in their nature indivisible Co. ibid. 214. â— 2. 4 If two joyntenants the one for life and the other in fee Iâ—intenants Tenant for life Reversioner joyn in a Lease for life or a gift in tail reserving a rent In this case the rent shall inure to them both for if the particular estate determine they shall be joyntenants again in possession But if tenant for life and he in the reversion joyn in a