Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n according_a common_a prayer_n 2,718 5 6.1677 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A30189 An answer to two treatises of Mr. Iohn Can, the leader of the English Brownists in Amsterdam the former called, A necessitie of separation from the Church of England, proved by the Nonconformists principles : the other, A stay against straying : wherein in opposition to M. Iohn Robinson, he undertakes to prove the unlawfulnesse of hearing the ministers of the Church of England ... / by the late learned, laborious and faithfull servant of Jesus Christ, John Ball. Ball, John, 1585-1640.; Ashe, Simeon, d. 1662. 1642 (1642) Wing B558; ESTC R3127 281,779 264

There are 16 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

against Martiall Preface to the reader Bellarm. lib. 3. de justifi c. 8. Non potest aliquid certū esse certitudine fidei nisi aut immediate contineatur in verbo Dei aut ex verbo Dei per evidentem consequentiā deducatur Park de pol. Eccl. l. 1. c. 1.4 Separabant se sacerdotes et Levitae qui Deum timebant 2 Chro. 11.14 Atqui haec separa●●o ab Israelitis idolatris erar qu● legemcult umque Dei per idola Ieroboam fundamentaliter sustulerunt Aug. de unit eccl c. 16. Let the Donatists if they can shew their Church not in rumors and speeches of the men of Africa nor in the coūcels of their Bishops nor in the discourses of any writer whatsoever nor in the signes and miracles that may be forged but in the prescript of the Law in the predictions of the Prophets in the verses of the Psalmes in the voyces of the Shepheard himselfe c. that all devised false and idolatrous worship is to be abhorred is confessed and professed by Conformists and Nonconformists It is a constant received position That nothing ought to be tolerated in the Church as necessary unto salvation or as an article of faith except it be expresly contained in the word of God or manifestly to be gathered therefrom and that all ceremonies are to be rejected wherein there is placed opinion of merit worship or necessitie to salvation But that the worship tendred to God in the English Congregations is devised false idolatrous that the Nonconformists never said nor thought and whosoever shall rashly affirme it he shall never be able to make proofe thereof by the word of God If any rite prescribed in the book of common-Common-prayer be worship in the use thereof the word being taken in a large signification that is not so in the intention and profession of the Church nor apprehended to be so in them that conforme unto it neither doth it defile the worship of God to them that joyne in the ordinances of grace notwithstanding the corruption which in their judgement is annexed to it and practised by some For notwithstanding such corruption or abuse the worship it selfe is that which God hath prescribed approved blessed to them that seeke his face aright and serve him unfeignedly whereat he requireth our presence and wherein he hath promised to sup with us and we with him That the Non-conformists should affirme the worship of God or ministery in the English Assemblies to be as false idolatrous and unlawfull as was the worship of Jeroboam at Dan and Bethel is a most lewd and impudent slander which the sworne shaveling● of Antichrist whose profession is to lye and slander for the catholique cause would blush to vent You know it is contrary to their judgement practice prosession and protestations many times renewed Whether the phrase be tolerable or no if you will be prodigall to pawne your head in this case take heed lest you loose it not in Gods cause but in your owne And if you shall be desperate herein your forwardnesse will move no wise man for Religion is to be learned from the truth of God and not from the high adventures of inconsiderate men The Non-conformists can prove the Religion and worship of the Church of England to be of God not by petty reasons and colourable shewes which they leave to them that maintaine a bad cause but by pregnant evidence from the word of truth not by similitudes allegories and forced interpretations of Scripture as you dispute against it but by plaine texts of Scripture and sound reason deduced therefrom against which the gates of hell shall never prevaile The Author of that Booke Bilson Christ subject part 4. p. 349. This is the doubt betwixt us whether we should cōtent our selves with such meanes as he hath devised for us and cōmended unto us thereby daily to renew the memory of our Redemption or else invēt others of our own heads fit perhaps to provoke us to a naturall and humane affection but not fit to instruct ourfaith c. He knowing that images though they did intertaine the eyes with some delight yet might they snare the souls of many simple silly persons and preferring the least seed of sound faith beholding adoring him in spirit truth before all the dumbe shewes and Imagerie that mās wit could furnish to win the eye Can. Neces of Separat c. 2. p. 78 79. 254. according to a prescript form culled out of the blasphemous mass-Mass-book 238. That which was takē out of the vile Masse-booke c. Sold. ●a●w T. C. repl 1. pag. 130. Abridg. p. 89. Adm. 1. p. 9. 2. Adm. p. 41. Fall of Babyl ●9 Altar Damasc pag. 612 613. Syons plea. 29. Perth Assemb 64. Syons plea. 30. pag. 40. 〈…〉 intituled The course of Conformitie sheweth that the Israelites might in generall pretend for Jeroboams calves the same excuses that were made in defence of some corruptions thrust upon the Church of Scotland but the corruptions he doth not make to be like nor the pretences to be of equall validitie nor the state of the Church where such corruptions are tollerated to be the same with the state of the Israelites who worshipped the Calves Abuses that agree in the generall nature of abuse may be coloured with the same pretences when they be not of the same weight qualitie or degree the one may be small the other hainous The same distinction may be brought to countenance the vilest heresie and a petty errour if I may so speake Heresie and Idolatry are both talkative and who doubts but corrupt wits can say much in defence of both shall we thence conclude that errour or heresie are both one every abuse is grosse idolatry The Author you quote was not so unadvised His drift was onely to shew the vanitie of such excuses and not to match the things pleaded for with Jeroboams Idolatry as hath been shewed before But let us see whether you can alledge any colourable shew or petty reason to prove our worship to be false and idolatrous The whole forme of the Church-service is borrowed from the Papists peiced and patched together without reason or order of edification yea not onely is the forme of it taken from the Church of Antichrist but surely the matter also For none can deny but it was culled and picked out of that popish dunghill the portius and vile mass-Masse-booke full of all abhominations From three Romish Channels I say was it raked together namely the Breviarie out of which the common prayers are taken out of the Rituall or booke of Rites the administration of the Sacraments Buriall Matrimony Visitation of the sick are taken and out of the Masse-booke are the Consecration of the Lords Supper Collects Gospels and Epistles And for this cause it is that the Papists like so well of the English Masse for so King James used to call it and makes them say Surely the Romish is the true and
Dispute upon communicating at confused Communions affirming that the sitter is accessary to the sinne of the kneeler But he was no English-Nonconformist nor doth intreat of English conformitie And if there be any speciall reasons why presence should be accounted approbation with them in that particular it is no equitie his private opinion should be brought to the prejudice of them that maintaine another cause But as yet we cannot see either from Scripture grounds or Nonconformists principles that it is utterly unlawfull to be present at the worship of God in the administration whereof some superstitious rite is used or some fault committed Your long labour in setting downe the faults to be found in our Liturgie is to small purpose The Nonconformists doe except against many things appointed in the Booke as inconvenient at least and such as should be taken away or reformed as The reading of Apocryphall books under the title of holy Scripture specially such parts as be corrupt for matter The Crosse and Surplice as Idolothites by participation and signes of mysticall signification The corruptions in the translations and some things in the formes of Buriall Matrimony Thanksgiving for Women after child-bed c. But these they condemne not as Idolatry nor as that which maketh the worship it selfe m Magdeburg centu 2. ca. 2. col 109. A true Church as it containes the pure doctrine so also it keepes simplieitie of ceremonies but an hypocriticall Church as it departs from pure doctrine so for the most part it changeth augmenteth the ceremonies instituted of God and multiplieth its owne traditions c. Can. Stay pa. 123. false and idolatrous It is one thing to say such a rite is inconvenient superstitious scandalous borrowed from the Papists not warranted by the word of God in the use will-worship if the word be taken largely another that the worship it selfe is false and idolatrous Therefore I will not stand to examine the particulars therein but proceed to examine what you bring further to shew the necessitie of Separation SECT IV. HEre is a fit place to propound a Question or two First whether to hold teach and practise the errours and lyes contained in their Canons Service-booke Booke of Articles and the ordering of Bishops Priests and Deacons doe mak● a false Prophet Secondly Whether to hide from the people the knowledge of all the maine truths which concerne the outward regiment of Christs visible Church make a false Prophet Thirdly Whether it be lawfull to heare any false Prophet knowne so to be Qu In what ranke of Prophets unlawfull Ministers be and under what Scripture they are comprehended I would have a private Christian aske this Question of some learned Divine whom he knowes doth hold it lawfull to heare false Ministers And it is very likely he will answer him with deep silence There is one Question more viz. whether the Lords lawfull Priests which served at the Altar in Jerusalem might not as well urge their people to heare Jeroboams Priests at Dan and Bethel as the Ministers now under the Gospell to perswade men to heare in false Churches If is be not all one shew the difference ANSVVER TO your two last Questions answer hath been made divers times in sundry Treatises and in the first chapter of this present answer and you know the Scriptures plainly alledged to confirme what is said which you should have confuted if you had been able and not againe and againe to come over with the same thing If any learned Divine shall answer the demand with deep silence it may be because the partie demanding is uncapable of an answer not because there is any great difficultie in the matter It is a received Rule That the Accuser Plaintiffe and Affirmer should make proofe of what they say and if you erre your Questionist will affirme it is all one for the people of the Jewes to heare Jeroboams Priests at Dan and Bethel and the people in England to heare the word of God in our assemblies you must either bring good evidence for what you say or beare the brand of Slaunderers or false n Beza Epist 2. An enim obsecro aliter est de Sacramētis i. de doctrinae appendicibus quàm de ipsa doctrina judicandum At qui si nullam esse ecclesiā dicamus ubi nullus est prorsus in cunctis doctrinae Christianae dogmatibus naevus refellent nos Pauli Epistolae Corinthiacis et Galaticis Ecclesiis inscriptae c. Itaque ubi non satis pura est Ecclesiâ Ecclesia tamen est in qua salvum manet fundamentum ac multo magis ubi ritus Caenae Domini mutilus est Caena tamen est c. Accusers Is it sufficient thinke you to say If it be not so let them shew the contrary Your second Question will come to be handled in the next Chapter and there it shall be answered Your first Question onely which I scarce thinke another man would have asked pertaineth to this place wherunto I answer directly and plainly That a Minister of the Gospell may hold teach and practise according to the Book of Common Prayer Articles and Ordination and be a true Minister of Jesus Christ Nay he cannot truely hold and practice according to them but of necessitie he must be a true Minister in respect of his office and administration For the worship for substance there prescribed is of God the doctrine professed in respect of faith and Sacraments sound and true No errour either in speech hereticall or which doth tend to overthrow the foundation which is taught in them Suppose the seventie errours which o Can. Neces of Separat pag. 243 244 245. you reckon up were all true and justly taken against the Books and as many more to them might be named as it is not the number but the qualities of the errours which make a false Prophet false Church or false worship One fundamentall errour as the word is commonly used overthroweth the faith and twenty errours of inferiour alloy doe not much hurt the truth and soundnesse of faith The maine truths which concerne the very life and soule of Religion be p Vsher de success Eccl. cap. 1. few and the failings which may stand with the substance of Religion many Let it aske a better wit and head then ever Mr Dar. or your q Can. Neces of Separat pag. 185. selfe had to prove that there are halfe so many corruptions in the Religion professed by the English-Anabaptists adde if you please the Separatists Pelagians Arrians as are to be found in the English-Liturgie It will not be hard to prove that errours must be r The communion of the Catholique Church is not broken by the varietie of rites customes laws and fashions which many places and countries have different each from other except they be repugnant to faith or good manners August Epist 118. ad Ianuar. Euseb hist lib. 5. cap. 26. lib. 5. c. 23. Socrat. lib.
AN ANSWER TO TWO TREATISES Of Mr. IOHN CAN THE Leader of the English Brownists in Amsterdam The former called A Necessitie of Separation from the Church of ENGLAND proved by the Nonconformists Principles The other A Stay against Straying Wherein in opposition to M. Iohn Robinson he undertakes to prove the unlawfulnesse of hearing the Ministers of the Church of England Very seasonable for the present times By the late learned laborious and faithfull servant of Jesus Christ JOHN BALL He that is first in his owne cause seemeth just but his neighbour commeth and searcheth him Prov. 18.17 Prove all things hold fast that which is good 1 Thes 5.21 LONDON Printed by R. B. and are to be sold by John Burroughes at his Shop at the signe of the Golden Dragon neere the Inner Temple gate in Fleetstreet 1642. TO The Christian READER Sound Knowledge and love of the Truth together with inward peace and Spirituall joy through Communion with Christ in the Ordinances of the Gospell Christian READER THis ensuing discourse was prepared for the Presse by the Reverend Author and committed to one of us that it might be made publike of which we will say nothing but shall freely venture it to stand or fall by the award of an impartiall judgement Neither shall wee present thee with the Authors deserved praises seeing his rare pietie and great learning were sufficiently knowne to very many of various rankes who were well acquainted with him and his workes already Printed have given a competent proofe hereof unto all others who have 〈◊〉 them without prejudice and partialitie Only by occasion of publishing this piece wee ●●we leave to cleare him from such aspersions as by 〈◊〉 have causlesly beene cast upon him and by others too much and too easily believed against him a thing incident to men most eminent and innocent as instances in all Ages will evince not only to the blemishing of his just estimation but also as we conceive to the prejudice of the truth it selfe and in favour of many spreading errours and exorbitances Those aspersions which wee shall endeavour to take off are two which though they openly contradict each other yet they unhappily agree to defame our worthy friend whose credit wee judge our selves many wayes bound to vindicate and preserve The one intimating some degree of declining from his former inconformitie in deserting the Nonconformists cause and grounds being too much inclined to favour the times in our Ceremonies and Service book The other expressing his advancing beyond the wonted limets of a Nonconformist towards the cause and course of separation Two things are pretended to confirme the former 1. A passage in the Preface of his Book called A friendly tryall of the grounds tending to separation c. pag. 3. his words are these Many are the objections which are made against set formes of Prayer and particularly against our booke of Common Prayer All which I have endeavoured to answer severally not because they are of so great weight but because I desired fully to satisfie every doubt c. Secondly that in the whole frame of the same booke he speakes more covertly and coldly against the corruptions of our Church than became a man who continued stedfast in the wayes of Nonconformity For Answer whereunto we affirme in the Generall That upon our knowledge he lived and dyed a strict forbearer and firme opposer of all such corruptions as the Nonconformists heretofore so usually called had commonly by their publike writings disallowed Nor have wee knowne any man in that kinde more precise uniforme and constant to his opinion in discourse prayers and practices yet alwayes carried on with Christian moderation and meekenesse which graces are of singular use in controversies of this nature yea some of us can witnesse his purpose if God had lent him longer life by a set Treatise to have shewed himselfe a plaintiffe for the Nonconformists against the corruptions in our Church as in this hee appeares their defendant against the Calumnies of Master Can. These testimonies may satisfie the sober minded that he continued cordial to their cause whereunto more might be added but wee desire not to revive the remembrance of these differences among deare brethren Because wee pray and hope that through Gods mercy by meanes of our Gracious Sovereigne and of the present Parliament they will in such sort be buried that they shall arise no more to our disturbance and discomfort More particularly to the passage objected out of the forecited Preface we Answer That the words themselvs doe not necessarily imply any such sense but they may admit yea they will carry a better construction if the Reader will be candid and well advised For he saith not that he hath answered the objections as suggesting little or nothing blameworthy in our Liturgie but because they are not of so great weight as to inforce the unlawfulnesse of those set formes or warrant a separation from our Churches and publike worship in regard thereof All which both the title of the Booke and the tenour of the whole discourse therein together with this Treatise exhibited will sufficiently cleare unto the indifferent and attentive Reader And that this was his meaning some of us can testifie from his owne mouth which also he would have manifested to the world if God had lengthened his life either in an Epistle annexed to this worke now brought into the open light or some other way as might have been judged most convenient But you will say Object The other ground of this imputation is more pregnant for why did he not speake out against the corruptions of the times as others did Nay why did he seek to clea● the book of Common Prayer of some things charged upon it Two things we conceive may fully take off the strength of this objection Answ 1. Because it was impertinent here to aggravate or multiply corruptions objected but rather to shew that as in some things the booke by them was overcharged so notwithstanding all that could be alledged against it yet separation from our worship could not be lawfull much lesse necessarie 2 The state of those times wherein this piece was penned would not brooke more plainnesse in that and such like points this we could if it were expedient aboundantly evidence by declaring with what difficultie it passed the Presse what exceptions were taken at some harmelesse expressions and what amendments were exacted in some phrases which seemed somewhat openly to hint the Authors heart-workings towards that Reformation which in these times is much desired and endeavoured The second imputation remaines to be removed viz. that though our Reverend Author had both reasoned and written against the opinions and practice of separation in the time of his health yet on his death bed he did retract and with griefe repent what in that kinde he had done This is commonly reported confidently believed and gladly embraced not only here at home but also in forreigne parts even in
America as by divers letters and other wayes some of us have beene informed It is high time therefore to give open check unto these groundles rumours lest the cause here maintained should thereby suffer prejudice either in the mindes of them who are friends or of those who be adversaries thereunto And for this end we intreat the Reader first to consider that this imputation being directly contrary to the former either they must confute each other or else argue the man strangely light in wheeling from one extreame unto another or guilty of a fowler fault in writing one thing and thinking another from both which charges we assure our selves his great soliditie in judgement and pietie in practice will fully absolve him in the consciences of all such who were acquainted with him And as for others we hope they may bee aboundantly satisfied by the ensuing evidence First in that foure or five dayes before his death he expressed to some of us his willingnesse to have this Treatise presented to publike view which hee had composed since the former Secondly so soone as he had finished this book he undertooke a large Treatise of the Church wherein he intended to discover the nature of Schisme and to deale in the main controversies touching the essence and government of the visible Church Concerning these matters we have almost fifty sheets of Paper written with his owne hand wherein many passages expresle his continued dislike of the separations both then and now in practice And these writings together with his other papers he on his death bed committed to the care of some of us to be disposed of for private or publike use as we should judge expedient Had there beene any griefe upon his Spirit or alteration in his judgement in reference to what he had spoken or printed against the separation we know none so likely to have beene acquainted therewith as our selves For one of us dwelling neare unto him was for many years his bosome companion and in his last sicknesse seldome from him Another being requested during his weaknesse to supply his place so journing in the same towne was daily with him The other three of us being his familiar friends did all visit him within one two or three dayes before his end We are all of us as we hope though most unworthy the Ministers of Iesus Christ who desire to be faithful And we doe each for our selves seriously protest in the presence of Almighty God that we never heard any syllable from him sounding that way Yea there is one thing more to be added which may for ever silence all gainesayers viz. That one of us through Gods good providence suspecting what hath since fallen out and being desirous to prevent such false rumours within lesse than two dayes before his death and not many houres before he was speechlesse asked him to this effect Whether he had any remorse or disquiet in his minde for any thing hee had written in opposition to the way of Separation whereto he thus answered I thanke God I have not any but I rather take comfort in what I have done and could have desired if it had beene the will of God to have lived a while longer to have given further assistance in that worke And this question was propounded to him and the Answer returned by him not only in the audience of some other of us but also of sundry other godly friends who can attest the truth of this relation Lastly We boldly challenge any person to come forth and to make proofe either by word or writing that this our Reverend Brother either repented his paines or changed his judgement against the way of separation which if he shall accordingly doe then will we be content to undergoe the severest censures that are due unto unjust suppressors of the truth But if any failing herein shall hereafter persist to promote either by scattering or crediting the forenamed reports wee leave them to the judgement of all indifferent men whether they deserve not to be accounted defamers of the dead and lyars against the truth if not subtile promoters of their owne cause and course by pretending falsly the Patronage of their Adversary when they could not stand before his Arguments But in probabilitie some will thus reply to our Apologie That if your friend did not retract the more was his sin and the lesse his honour Unto whom we returne this answer That this censure strongly presumes his former discourse in the maine matter to be erroneous and unjustifiable whereas that is the thing still in question and as we verily believe cannot be solidly proved And though our Reverend Brother be dead whom God had extraordinarily fitted for disputes of this nature yet we doubt not but the living Lord wil raise up for himself some other instruments to maintain the truth which he had undertaken There is one thing more Christian Reader which we desire thee to take notice of viz. That whereas it is often reported that this Authors former booke was fully answered before it passed the Presse and that therefore further answer there●o cannot bee expected wee shall relate the truth for thy satisfaction in that particular Our worthy Brother having by Conference as some of us and others know with unshaken strength defended the lawfulnes of set formes of Prayer he was afterwards by a Le●ter sent from a worthy Gentleman M. Richard Knightly requested to state that question then much in agitation and to give in some arguments for his personall setling Hereupon in the space of one day the Messenger staying for an answer to the letter he did set down his judgment with some grounds thereof and sent them unto his much honoured friend from whom a copie being procured and conveyed into New England it seems an Answer was undertaken by a reverend brother there In the meane time the number of them increasing who withdrew themselves from our Church Assemblies because of the Liturgie there used he was importuned both by Ministers and others from divers parts of this Kingdome to take some further paines in that Controversie This occasioned the perusall of his former papers and the examining of those Arguments which he met withall either in Printed bookes Manuscrip s or the Rela ion on of friends against the use of set forms of prayer in generall and of our Common prayer booke particularly And thus the Embrio biggened and being ready to be brought forth into the light an answer unto the first conceptions came to the Authors hand wherein was nothing materiall as he conceived but what was answered in the book● then about to be licenced yet by reason of some exceptions in another frame suggested he judged it sufcient to annex a few marginall notes unto his booke as thou mayest observe page 13.15.24.33 c. being unwilling in a more open way to reply upon the private answer of him whom he highly prized and intending if God had spared life to have returned more
concerning the Worship of God only Israel might not adde either to the Statutes or Judgements of the Lord and if by Statutes be meant Decrees for Religion or the Worship of God only which cannot be proved by the use of the Word by judgements they cannot be understood likewise By this saith Master Ainsworth God forbiddeth all inventions of men Eccl 7.29 the workes of their owne hands Jer. 25.6 and the Statutes of the Kings of Israel which they after made without the Commandement of the Lord. But the inventions of men respect the Commandments of God in generall and not the Ceremoniall Ordinances only nor yet the immediate worship of God alone He shall doe good service to the Papists that shall limit the Texts in that manner for by such like distinctions they seek to elude them when they are produced to prove the perfection of the written Word of God in all things necessary to salvation Ye shall take heed saith the Lord to all the things that I have said unto you But this cannot be restrained to the ceremoniall precepts concerning Gods Worship but must be referred to all things that God gave them in charge David prayeth Psal 119.133 Direct my steps in thy Word and let none iniquitie have dominion over me But what can be more plaine than that David doth not speake of the worship of God alone but desires that all his counsells thoughts manners actions might be directed according to Gods Word because the Word of God is the rule of all our actions In which sense also it may be affirmed That Negative conclusions in matters of faith and duties Hen. Ai●sw 2. Ans p. 55. The 〈◊〉 cited sc Deut. 5.32 12.32 Speak of Gods Commandements in generall you take one in particular and because one is not all therefore all must not be all A D●spute part 1. cap. 4. p. 8. The lavves of the Church declare unto us what is fittest in such things as are in their own nature indifferent and neither enforced by the law of God nor nature Id. p. 21. As when the Church ordaineth that in great Townes there shall be a Sermon on such a day of the week and publike Prayers every day at such an hourt c. First book of Scotish Discip In great Townes we thinke expedient that every day there be either Sermon or Common Prayer c. Zanc. in quartum praeceptum in tract de discip Eccles in fine Calv. Instit l. 4. c. 10. §. 30 31. E●fi fateamur non ●nviti ex insitâ naturali Dei ●ognitione ersi corrupta sequietiam in genere Deum esse colendum Item non solum interno affectu cultum illum fieridebere sed etiam externo actu Negamus tamen naturali leg determinatam esse speriem il am externi cultus Rivet in Gen. exercit 42. Sec Scul●et Ethic. lib. 1. Neither Angels nor men can make a Sacrament Ca●seh art 4. p. 104. follow well from Scriptures silence If the way or manner of Worship be put for immediate Worship then it extends as large as the Commandements of the first Table and the sense of the proposition must be That no Worship publike or private must be performed to God for substance manner or time other than that which God hath prescribed in his Word which holdeth not true unlesse it be added That no worship must be performed as necessary and holy for substance manner and time which God hath not prescribed For what shall we say of the time of rivate Prayer in the familie or closet the forme of catechizing and translations of the Scripture the times for publike Lectures and exercises of Religion upon the week day and ordering and government of Schooles and Universities for these things are not for time words and manner prescribed or determined of God If the word Worship be taken more strictly for substantiall Worship commanded in or referred to the first and second Commandements usually known by the titles of inward and outward worship Naturall and positive instituted Worship though perhaps the termes be not so fit if better were found out then the meaning is that no Worship of God inward or outward naturall or positive is lawfull but what is prescribed and determined of God in his Word But then there want not difficulties for how should Worship be naturall if it must be instituted and prescribed If the light of nature or reason teach it which is planted in the heart by the singer of God how can it be unlawfull unlesse it be prescribed by an externall word of institution What shall wee say of outward gestures made in and upon the body to declare the hidden affection of the soule must these be prescribed and determined or fall under this censure When the Word informeth me to call upon God in the Mediation of Jesus Christ doth not reason it selfe without any further institution teach me to kneele lift up my hands c. At least if worship be naturall or positive must there be a distinction of the institution or prescription of this worship also Doth not positive Worship require one manner of institution naturall another If the way or manner of Worship be restrained to positive or instituted only it is most true No worship is lawfull which is not in speciall commanded or appointed of God in his Word But then the Texts of Scripture quoted by you for proofe will not speak unto it Ye shall not doe saith Moses after all things Deut. 12.8 which wee doe here this day every man all that is right in his owne eyes Some Greek copies have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is according to the Hebrew Ainsw annot in Deut. 12.8 And the speech of Moses seems to mean the true Service of God which was not yet perfected neither could be in their travells Iun. annot in Deut. 12.8 Analy in loc P. Martyr in 1 Reg. 8. Vetabl Nefeceritis id est Non facietis omnino ut nos c. hodiè ante ingressā viz. terrae sanctae hic facimus i. extra terram sanctam Deodar Italic Deut. 12.8 i. concerning sacrifice the law of which they did not observe exactly by occasion of the continuall wandring of the people Ainsw annot in Rev 10.19 De●dat Ital. in Lev. 10 ●9 The Lord hath shewed great wrath against me by the death of my sons how then can I cate of this sacrifice to beare the si●s of the people according to the ordinary law the Lord not being pleased with me myselfe Others would have it That he could not eate because he was in heavinelle it b●ing ●cet he should eate those things with joy and thanksgiving Vatabl annos in Loc. as it was after in Canaan v. 10.11 Not that they sacrificed after their fancie saith the Geneva notes but that God would be served more purely in the land of Canaan Jun. upon this place noteth Etsi oblationū lex unasemper fuit ab
of Separation by complaining of the abuses in our Church p. 20 21. From whence the outward calling of a Minister is derived p. 24 25. Herein a distinction is considerable betwixt an errour in admission into an office and a flat nullitie of the office it selfe p. 29. Who are not and who are Antichristian teachers p. 41. The true nature of worship and what it is to worship God in a right manner p. 43. Of an Idoll Church and Ministerie p. 45. Places of publike worship allowed and prohibited unto Isr●ell● p. 59. Of worshipping God in a true Church p. 61. Our Churches are not to be reputed spirituall Babylon p. 69. Concerning Churches true and false p. 71 Corrupt mixtures in true Churches p. 81. The nature of superstition p. 89. Of Ordination received from Bishops p. 93. Concerning presence at Gods true worship where something is faultie in the Ministers calling and the ●ann●r of administration p. 105. Some things may staine which yet overthrow not the Ministerie p. 119. From whence the Ministers of the Gospell derive their office p. 126. The Ministers ignorance and scandalous life doth not nullifie his Ministerie p. 128. Some touch given of Master Cannes grosse abuse of philosophicall Canons and of some Authors by him cited p. 132 133 134 c. When Ministers may be said to runne though not sent p. 139. Forreigne reformed Churches acknowledg us the true Churches of Christ p. 141. The Ministers calling is not to bee judged by the titles of Parson Vicar c. p. 143. In the second Part. THe lawfulnesse of set formes of prayer p. 3. Nonconformists never utterly condemned any use of our Common Prayer Booke p. 7 15 16. Nor allowed separation because of some abuses p. 20 22. The discussing and discovering of that argument used against the Common prayer booke viz. that it was taken out of the Masse Book 9 10 11 12. The pressing of subscription in the tenth yeare of Queene Elizabeth caused separation and other troubles in our Church p. 13. The antiquitie of set Liturgies p. 17. Concerning idols and separation from them p. 23 24 25. Of discipline how far necessarie in a Church and how wanting amongst us p. 33 35 37. c. Concerning the matter and manner of gathering Churches 50 unto 64 c. The office of Lecturers justified p. 84. FINIS Errata in Part 1. Page 2 line 1 put out shall p. 7 Marg. l. last adde lib. 1. p. 8. marg at end ad●e et Repl. 1. p. 33. p. 9. marg adde hoc autem p. 11. marg adde Ier. 23.11.34 Esa 28.7.9 Ier. 23.16.17 p. 44. l. 4. add in p. 54. l. 14. add the most of p. 53 l. 11. for neither read either p. 57. l. 12. for rom r. say l. 17. our ministerie is insert true though p. 62. l. 25. put out not p. 64. l. 7. adde sani p. 80. l. 32. adde in marg 3. p. 90. l. 12. read shaft p. 100. l. last for answered r. censured p. 105. l. 4. unto generall adde rules p. 108. l. 1. for it is r. is it p. 139. l. 37. put out nor p. 140. l. 30. adde it In part 2. P. 7. l. 18. put out have p. 11. l. 34. for made r. makes p. 13. l. 24. for former matter r. forme or matter p. 16. l. 4. adde into p. 26. l. 31. for when r. then p. 38. l. 7. for constitution r. institution p. 50. l. 25. for dare r. doe p. 52. l. 6. for promised r. purchased p. 55. l. 6. for more r. most p. 72. l. 23. for more r. were p. 73. l. 11. for dissevered r discovered p. 74 last line r. Anabaptistae p 84 l 12 adde in
right Religion Else the Heretiques in England would never have received so much of it For some have avouched it to my face saith the Author of the Curtaine of Church-power that the service there is nothing to the Masse in the English others that it wants nothing but the Popes consecration These things thus retrived it was also thought that popish Kings and Princes would be the lesse offended what marvaile seeing the Jesuites themselves are so well pleased with the ceremonies and service that I heard one of them God is my witnesse herein make it his hope that the maintenance of them against the Puritans would make England the sooner returne to Rome in the rest Qu●vadis sec 4. Mine eyes and eares saith Bishop Hall can witnesse with what approofe and applause divers of the catholique royall as they are termed entertained the new translated Liturgies of our Church Which is the lesse wonder seeing Pope Pius the fourth sending Vicentio Parpatia Cambd. An. 1560. Abbot of Saint Saviours to Queene Elizabeth offered to confirme the English Liturgie by his Authoritie if shee would yeeld to him in some other things Indeed it pleased them so well Fresh suit l. 1 203. that for the first eleven yeares of Queene Elizabeth Papists came to the English Church and service as the Lord Cooke sheweth L. Cooke de jure Regis Eccles f. 34. Syons plea. 49.91 Others of them affirme the same namely their Church-service pleaseth marveilous well the Romish Beast and his ungodly followers Witnesse the Pacification of the Devonshire-Papists in the time of King Edward the sixth when as they understood it was no other but the very Masse-booke put into English Witnesse also the assertion of Dr Carrier a dangerous seducing Papist The common-prayer-booke saith he and the Catechisme conteined in it hold no point of doctrine expresly contrary to Antiquitie that is Consider pag. 45. sect 8 9. as he explaineth himselfe the Romish-service onely hath not enough in it And for the doctrine of predestination Sacraments grace free-will and sin c. The new Catechismes and Sermons of the Puritan-preachers run wholly against the common-prayer and Catechisme therein conteined c. Motiv Preface to the Answ And thereupon he comforteth himselfe upon the hope of the supply of the rest To this effect speaketh Bristow and Harding If these things be right why not the rest It shall not be amisse to marke one occurrence in Queene Elizabeths time who being interdicted by the Popes Bull Secretary Walsingham tryed a tricke of State-policy to reverse the same He caused two of the Popes Intelligencers at the Popes appointment to be brought as it were in secret into England to whom he appointed a guide being a State Intelligencer who should shew them in Canterbury and London service solemnly sung and said with all their pomp and procession Which order the popish Intelligencers seeing and so much admiring they wondred that their Master would be so unadvised as to interdict a Prince or State whose service and ceremonies so symbolized with his owne So returning it the Pope they shewed him his oversight affirming that they saw no service ceremonies or Church-order's in England but they might have very well beene performed in Rome whereupon the Bull was presently called in That which you alledge against the English-Service-booke in particular Answer you intend against all set-formes of prayer or stinted Liturgies whatsoever For the use of them is a false devised idolatrous antichristian worship in your account Thus you know your Brethren of the Separation have disallowed all set and stinted formes Johnson Ainsworth Robinson Greenewood c. as humane inventions forbidden in the second Commandement Images Will-worship Idol-prayers False-worship Lip-labour c. And you your selfe insist upon this principle of the Nonconformists as the cause of Separation from the Church of England that all formes of worship not prescribed of God are will-worship which if it maketh against one holdeth against all prescribed Liturgies Can. Neces of Separat pag. 114. Id. pag. 115. Againe you confesse that every Church is not to be forsaken or left which hath something in it by participation idolatrous And therefore our Service is not devised worship because it is taken out of the Masse-booke as you alledge but simply because it is devised whencesoever it had its originall if it be devised worship First therefore we must consider the matter in generall Oyls●hil speaking of Images brought into the Church saith Wee might justly condemn the whole faithlesse fond invention For it was but a will-worship a naughtie service having no ground of the Word of God and onely spring of errour Calf Preface to the Reader testifieth Bilson Christ subject part 2. p. 297. That Princes may prescribe what faith they list what service of God they please what forme of administration of the Sacraments they thinke best is no part of our thought or point of our doctrine yet that Princes may by their lawes prescribe the right faith to bee preached the right service of God in spirit and truth to be used c. T. C. repl 1. pag. 8. Park of the Crosse par 1. ca. 4. sect 7. pag. 177. A. W. ans to late popish Artic. p. 73. and then try what is alledged against our booke of common-Common-prayer These words Formes of worship may be taken two wayes First to note the substantiall parts or meanes of worship and in this sense it is most true That all formes of worship not prescribed of God are unlawfull and false worship because devised by men Secondly To note a bare order methode or phrase wherein divine Service is performed And in this sense the Nonconformists never said That all formes of worship not prescribed are false or devised worship For they know that no forme is determined and prescribed of God precisely in all parts of his worship and where none is set apart by his Majestie it is a breach of his Commandement and devised worship to place an opinion of worship in the simple order or phrase of speech used in prayer or administration of holy things The Nonconformists condemne not a Liturgie or stinted forme of prayer but desire that all things therein might be ordered as doth tend most to edification Whatsoever exceptions they have taken against our Booke of common-Common-prayer they never disliked the use of it so far as they judged it sound and good They doe not condemne it wholly but finde fault with it as in some points disagreeing with the word of God What hath beene their seeking from time to time a razing of the Communion Booke No but a purging and filing of it after the patterne of that care which former examples set us The Booke of common-Common-prayer they condemne not as a wicked and ungodly Booke much lesse the Service as false devised and idolatrous but they have and doe use the booke and professe their readinesse so to doe onely they desire to
the word and elements Bilson Christ subject part 4. p. 356. To the Papists objecting that as Magistrates Parents have part of Gods externall honour because they present his person in judging and blessing so many Images have part of his externall though not of his internall honour Answer is truly returned It is not in your hands to make allowance of Gods honour to whom you list and againe God himselfe hath made a plaine prohibition in this case that Images shall have no part of his externall honour The words are as cleare as day light Thou shalt no bow downe to them Tho Beacon Catech in his workes in fol. printed at London Ann. 1562. f. 484. Fox in Osor lib. 3. pag. 27. The Booke of common-Common-prayer before the Communion Cypr. Ep. 63. ad Caecisi●m Justin Martyr in Apol. 2 Iren. lib. 4. cap. 34 lib. 5. cap. 4. Gratian. Decret part 3. de Conse●r dist 2. cap. 10.12 18.36 Durand rational divin offic lib. 4. cap. 5● how comes it to have those things which are so directly contrary to the Masse that both cannot possibly stand together In our booke of common-Common-prayer we pray to God onely in the mediation of Jesus Christ and in a knowne language We professe that Christ by one oblation of himselfe once for all hath made a full perfect and sufficient satisfaction for the sinnes of the whole world that he hath commanded a perpetuall remembrance of his death and passion in that his ordinance of the Supper and that the Sacrament is to be administred in both kinds the Minister and the people communicating together were these things taken out of the Masse-booke The Church of Rome joyneth the two first Commandements in one or taketh away the second thereby to cloake their Idolatry in the worshipping of Images But the common-prayer-booke of the Church of England divideth them into two therein following two of the Fathers at most excepted all Antiquitie and fetteth downe the words of the second Commandement at large The Church of Rome teacheth that in the Sacrament of the Eucharist the body and bloud of Christ is received and eaten carnally that as much is received in one kinde as in both and that in the Masse Christ is offered 〈…〉 a propitiatory unblouddy Sacrifice for the sinnes of 〈◊〉 and dead But the common-prayer-booke of the Church of England in the forme of administring that Sacrament teacheth expresly That spiritually by faith wee feed on him in our hearts eating and drinking in remembrance that Christ dyed and shed his bloud for us In the Masse the Priest receiveth alone the people standing by gazing on but the Minister and people are appointed with us to communicate together according to the institution of Christ and practice of the primitive Church We make the communion of the Eucharist properly a Sacrament They a Sacrament and a Sacrifice propitiatory They celebrate at an Altar wee at a Table according to the example of our Saviour Christ his Apostles and the primitive Church in the purest times Wee pray for the living They for the living and dead And if these be not points directly and expresly contrary to the Romane service Rome is much departed from her selfe Carriers pretence in that particular is a meere jugling trick that he might insinuate a change of Religion might be made among us without any great alteration which is as likely as the light should be turned into darknesse and not espied If many points of Popery be not condemned expresly in the Catechisme or Service-booke which are for the instruction of the simple in the grounds of Religion and the administration of the holy things of God and not to shew what is condemned in Religion yet so many points are there taught directly cōtrary to the foundation of Popery that it is not possible Popery should stand if they take place And whereas Antichristianisme standeth in ungodly superstructions and additions to the truth and worship of God both matter and object if the Catechisme and Service-booke have not enough in them in his sense of necessitie they contradict the whole bulke of Popery which confisteth in abhominable superfluities or impious inventions of their owne It is mone proper to say the Masse was added to our common-prayer than that our common-prayer was taken out of the mass-Masse-booke For most things in our common-common-prayer were to be found in the Liturgies of the Church long before the Masse whereof wee speake was heard of in the world And the Masse was patched up by degrees and added to the Liturgie of the Church now one peice then another so that the ancient truths and holy Liturgies were at last stained with the Idoll of the Masse Bishop Jewel Ser. on Josh 6.1 2 3. The things that may bee reserved viz. in the destruction of Hiericho must not bee dust or chasse or hay or stubble But gold silver iron and brasse I meane they may not be things meet to furnish maintaine superstition but such things as be strong and may serve either directly to serve God or els for comelinesse and good order which was sacrilegiously thrust into them But the prayers and truths of God taught in that Booke pertained to the Church as her prerogative the Masse and the abhominations thereof belonged into the man of sinne And if a true man may challenge his goods which the theese hath drawne into his denne the Church of God may lawfully make claime unto those holy things which Antichrist hath unjustly usurped That answer which is returned to the accusation makes against them that sue for discipline viz. That a great part of their discipline is borrowed from the Anabaptists will serve as a buckler in this case And it is this which I doubt not you will approve Whatsoever is proper either to the heresie of Papists and Anabaptists Donatists or Puritanes that wee utterly condemne to the pit of hell But if amongst the filth of their heresies there may be found any good thing as it were a graine of good corne in a great deale of Darnell that we willingly receive not as theirs but as the Jewes did the holy Arke from the Philistins T. C. repl 2. par 1. Epistle to the Chh of England whereof they were unjust owners For herein that is true that is said The sheepe must not lay downe her fell because shee seeth the Wolfe sometimes cloathed with it August lib. 2. Serm. de Monte yea it may come to passe that the Synagogue of Satan may have some one thing at one time with more convenience than the true and catholique Church of Christ Bishop Jewel Ser. in Iosh 6.1.2.3 In religion no part is to be called little A haire is but little yet it hath a shadow If our Booke please the Papists it is but in some things wherein in reverence to Antiquitie we come too nigh them in some rites and ceremonies but with the substance of the ministration it selfe they cannot be pleased unlesse they be
displeased with their owne service and will renounce their owne Religion If Pope Pius the fourth promised to Queene Elizabeth that if shee would reconcile her selfe to the Church of Rome Pius the fourth in his Bull sent forth against Queene Elizabeth saith Impiorū numerus tantum potentiâ invaluit nullus jam in orbe locus relictus fit quem illi pessimis doctrinis corrūpere non tentarint And then speaking of Q. Elizabeth Missae sacrificium preces jejunia cihorum delectum caelibatū abolevit and acknowledge the supremacy of that Sea he for his part would binde himselfe to declare the sentence pronounced against her Mothers marriage to be unjust to confirme by his authoritie the English Liturgie and to permit the administration of the Sacrament here in England under both kindes It is no new thing for the Pope to permit and confirme both for his owne sinister end what he doth not like or approve It is no strange matter that the Pope should preferre his supremacy before the purity of Religion And by the words of the offer the promise of the Pope seemeth not to be extended to the whole Liturgie and service of the Church as it is established by Law but to some part alone perhaps as it was practised before the sacrifice of the Masse was abolished For why should it be added that he would permit the administration of the Sacraments in both kindes if he would confirme the whole English Liturgie as it is now set forth After Queene Elizabeth was proclaimed a Proclamation came forth that the Letany the Epistles and Gospels the Decalogue the Creede and the Lords-prayer should be read in all Churches in the English tongue but it was the fourteenth of May after being Whitsunday before the sacrifice of the Masse was abolished and the booke of the uniformitie of common-common-prayer and the administration of the Sacraments publiquely received but whether the whole Service be meant or no it is not much materiall for he could not confirme it but he must condemne himselfe If the Papists for the first ten yeares The seditious Bull of Pius Quintus was set up published by Felton a rebellious traytor in the twelfth yeer of Q. Elizabeth which bare date the fifth of the Calends of March Anno 1569. An. 13. The statute for subscription to the Doctrine of faith Sacramēts An. 17. of Q. Elizabeth there was great stirre about Ceremonies and Discipline Scripsit haec ille saith Mr. Parker speaking of Dr. Whiteg ante natam separationē nostram quae utinam O utinam●nata nunquā fuisset Park de polit Eccl. l. 1. ca. 14. sect 1. Ann. 20. Began a flourishing time An. 26. Universall subscription offered to the Ministers After which followed grievous troubles and then separation and falling from the Chh. August lib. 1. contr ep Parm. c. 7. Nec quae dicebant probare potuerunt et adhuc in sanctae Ecclesiae praecisione Sacrilego furore ferebantur Acts and Mon. vol. 3. title The Cannon of the Masse resorted to our publique Congregations and service what can we thinke but that the hand of the Lord was with us for good whiles we sought him unfaignedly who caused our enemies at least lyingly to submit themselves For in the first ten yeares of Queen Elizabeth there was sweet consent amongst brethren The Pope durst not curse the Gospell flourished and was glorifyed the Papists durst not oppose themselves and I thinke there was not a man that thought of separation The pressing of subscription and conformitie in the tenth yeare of Queen Elizabeths Reigne was that which brought in all the troubles and contentions following For after that Brethren wrote one against another the Papists they fell backe to their vomit and in processe of time and not long after some of fiery spirits advanced the Controversies to such an height as they forsooke their brethren renounced their Mother and drew themselves into voluntary separation or schisme Which rents have beene encreased unto this day by the violent urging of subscription and conformitie on the one fide and the maintenance of that rash and sinfull departure on the other But these things convince not our service to be idolatrous In few words if our publique worship be false and devised it must be either because it is a stinted or set Liturgie devised by man or for some speciall reason in respect of the former matter If because it is a stinted or set Liturgie devised by man then it is in vaine to say it is picked out of the Masse-booke or it pleaseth the Papists or the Pope would have confirmed it For this doth not make it devised worship but it is devised worship because it is a set or stinted forme And then the same sentence must passe against all set formes of Psalmes Blessings Confessions and Catechismes Then the publique worship of all the Churches of God throughout the whole world for the space of this fourteene hundred yeares if not more was false devised and idolatrous If in respect of the peculiar matter or forme then either the bare forme of words order and methode must be a part of worship or the matter and substance of prayers and administration of the Sacraments be forged and devised worship neither of which was ever said by any Nonconformists nor can be avouched with colour of truth The forme may be too like the mass-Masse-booke in some things and the matter in every point not so pure as is to be desired but the forme is not worship nor prayers and substance of administration devised worship Such is the unholinesse of this Idol-booke Sect. 2. Neces Can. of Separat p. 81 82. 2 Admon pag. 56. Def. Admo pag. 4. 1 Admonit pag. 3. Syons plea. 342. 318 314. Mr. Gilby pag. 29. 2 Admon 57. 1 Admon 3. as the Nonconformists generally have refused to subscribe unto it affirming it to be such a peice of worke at it is strange any will use it there being in it most vile and unallowable things And for this cause they have besought the Peeres of the Read●ie that it might be utterly removed and many reasons they have given in severall Treatises to prove their condemnation of it just and lawfull First because it is an infections Liturgie Romish-stuffe a divised service and in it are many Religions ●ixed together of Christ and Antichrist of God and the Devill besides a booke full of fansies and a great many things contrary to Gods Word and prayers which are false foolish superstitious and starke naught Secondly They cannot account it praying as they use it commonly but onely reading or saying of prayers 2 Admon 56. even as a childe that learneth to reads if his lesson be a prayer he readeth a prayer and doth not pray even so it is commonly a saying and reading prayers and not praying Thirdly In all the order there is no edification but confusion Fourthly Wee reade not of any such Liturgie in the Christian Church
in the dayes of the Apostles 1 Admon pag. 14. Altar Dam. 178. nor in many ages following till blindnesse ignorance and lazinesse occasioned a prescript forme to be made for idle and dumbe Priests Fifthly If this were not many would make more profession of Love to preaching and hearing Gods Word but by this meanes it is neglected and despised for worldlings usurers drunkards whore-mongers and other earthly and prophane people away with nothing so well as English Masse Against Br. 43. Curt. Ch. power 42.45 and why but because it doth not sharply reprove them of their sinnes nor disclose the secret of their hearts but that they may continue in all kinde of voluptuousnesse and all other kinde of wickednesse Learn Discour of Eccl. Govern 68. Mart. Senior p. 2. Pract. of Prin. addi and therefore rightly it is called their sterve-us-booke Sixthly God hath no where appointed that the Church should be tyed to reade the Booke of common-Common-prayer for his worship and therefore to doe it is an high transgression before him as great as the sinne of Nadab and Abihu and such are liable unto the like or greater punishment Seventhly If this were praying and there were never an ill word nor sentence in all the prayers yet to appoint it to be used or to use it as Papists did their Mattens and Evening-song for a se●-service to God though the words be good the use is naught The words of the first Chapter in John be good but to be put into a Tablet of gold 2 Admon pag. 55. for a soveraigne thing to be worne the use is superstitious and naught and so is the use of this Service The Nonconformists never passed any condemnatorie sentence against the Booke of common-Common-prayer Answer as if it was false or devised worship or against the use of a stinted forme as if to reade it was an high transgression before the Lord. Enough hath beene said of their opinion in the former section whereunto adde this testimony of a man of another Nation whom you are pleased to stile a chiefe Nonconformist Course of Confor pag. 58. The famous confession of faith well known and commended at home and abroad the formes of prayer publiquely used in the Congregations and families of Scotland must be cast in a new mould It is true Beza Epist 2. Gravissimè nimirum in semetipsos in fratres reliquos peccare qui naevis istis aut etiam si mavis corrupt●lis et suas ex aliorum cos●entias non leviter perturbant perinde ac si de Christianismo semel ablato ageretur c. Sed vitia a vitiis quae condonanda sunt Christianae chari●ati ab iis quae prorsus sunt execranda pradenter distinguenda esset censeo idque tamen non ex carnis sed spiritus prudenti●● the Nonconformists judge it unlawfull to subscribe to that Booke that every thing conteined therein is agreeable to the Scripture but they condemne not the Booke as an Idol or prophane nor the use of the Booke in those things which are consonant to the truth And of this their judgement there is evident ground for we must not approve the least error though in it selfe never so harmlesse for truth because that were to lie against the truth and the God of truth needeth not my lie But many things must be tolerated when it is not in our power to amend them which we cannot approve otherwise we must hold communion with no Church or societie in the world And of this marke are the corruptions noted in the Communion-Booke as hath been shewed and is evident by the particulars mentioned in passages which you alledge It is true likewise they judge the Booke in the forme thereof to come too nigh the Papists and so have others as well as they and therefore have petitioned that it might be reformed that we might depart further from them and come neerer to the reformed Churches But herein they shew what they judge most convenient not condemning the Booke for the substance thereof as a forged worship How much more convenient were it saith T. C. T.C. repl 2. p. 109. that according to the manner of the reformed Churches first the Minister with an humble and generall confession of faults should desire the assistance of the Lord for the fruitfull handling and receiving of the Word of God and then after we have heard the Lord speake unto us in his Word by his Minister the Church should likewise speake unto the Lord and present petitions and suits at once c. But how carefull he was to prevent such wayes and speeches as some professors of the Gospel being private men might be emboldned to breake forth upon such like exceptions T.C. repl 1. p. 106. is evident by that solemn request he makes unto them that professe the Gospell in the name of God that they abuse not his labour to other ends than he bestowed it and that they keep themselves in their callings commit the matter by prayer unto the Lord leaving to the Ministers of the word of God and to the Magistrate that which pertaineth to them The Protestants in France for substance of matter agree with the Nonconformists herein The use of the whole Booke for matter and manner in every thing without addition or alteration they doe not approve because they conceive some things faulty others inconvenient and some things defective and strictly to be tyed to words and syllables is more than the Lord hath bound us unto in the administration of his holy Sacraments But the substance of prayers in the Booke they never disallowed nor the use of the booke 2 Admonit pag. 56. ● Admonit pag. 3. as of a vile and filthy thing Thus the Authors of the Admonition must be understood when they say The Booke is such a peice of worke as it is strange we will use it And now they are bound of necessitie to a prescript order of service and booke of common-common-prayer in which a great number of things contrary to Gods Word are conteined c. For they professe they have tolerated what they could not amend 1 Admonit pag. 9. Park of the Crosse part 2. ca. 9. sect 4. Wee receive the Communion-book in what wee may and in omitting of the ceremonies we doe in equitie keep the Law because of the end which is to edifie and used the Booke in their Ministery so farre as they might even where they object as great corruptions against it as in any other place To reade or repeate a prayer by heart as if the bare rehearsall thereof in so many words and syllables and none other was a part of Gods worship is a transgression of his commandement whether it be prescribed by others or devised of our selves or set downe in Scripture And the same may be said of the preaching of the Word to place opinion of worship in the meere act done in such words or methode is will-worship
or superstition And we may say of both these exercises so used 2 Admonit pag. 56. as the Admonition doth wee cannot account them praying or preaching but onely reading or rehearsing or saying of a Sermon or prayer even as a childe that learneth a prayer or Sermon without booke if he rehearse what he hath learned he rehearseth a prayer or Sermon but he doth not pray or preach But this is onely the sinne of him that useth not these prayers as he ought it argueth not the prayers themselves to be evill nor the use of a stinted forme publique or private in them that use it or them that joyne to be disallowed If it be not praying as it is used ignorantly for custome without affection it is praying when used aright with understanding faith feeling and such like affections required in holy prayer We reade not of any such Liturgie in the Church of Christ in the dayes of the a Bilson Christ subsect part 4. p. 407 408. You may well perceive by the Apostles words that they had neither Sermons nor Service prefixed nor limited in his time but when the chh came together the Elders and Ministers instructed the people and made their prayers by miraculous instinct or inspiratiō This was all the church-service they had to which they added the celebration of the Lords Supper but without any setled or prefixed order of prayer except it were the LORDS prayer which they observed in all places c. Apostles and therefore no such Liturgie is any part of Gods worship or substantiall meanes thereof to be used without addition or alteratiō of all or any Church with opinion of necessitie holinesse or merit But a set Liturgie might be in use in their times though we reade not of it for the Apostles set not downe a Catalogue of all and every particular order that was in the Church but give us a perfect rule or canon of faith and manners in all things necessary to salvation and all things unchangeably concerning the government of the Church unto the end of the world And if there was no stinted Liturgie in their dayes yet for order a set forme of prayer to be used in publique meeting is not unlawfull because it is of the number of things which God hath not determined in his Word and b In the additions to the Admonitiō it is read thus Remove Homilies Articles Injunctions and that prescript order wherein they declare that their meaning is not to disallow of prescript service of prayer but of this forme that we have T. C. repl 1. pag. 105. Dr. Whiteg answer to the Admonition pag. 143. where God hath not prescribed any forme there no forme must be esteemed any part of worship or condemned as simply unlawfull For as to call that holy which God hath not sanctified is superstition so it is erroneous to condemne that as unholy or prophane which God alloweth or is consonant to his Word though it be not precisely commanded But that there was no such c Bilson ibid. pag. 409. Had they set an order for the service of the church durst any man after have broken it or any church refused it Liturgie in many ages following till blindnesse ignorance and lazinesse occasioned a prescript forme to be made for idle and dumbe Priests is your addition to the Nonconformists reasons and not their saying and more then can be proved by good Authoritie Of the precise antiquitie of stinted Liturgies it is hard to determine but that they have beene in use in the Christian Church for the space of this fourteene hundred yeares if not above no man can denie It is more than probable that stinted formes were in use in the Greeke Churches before they came to the d The Bishops of Rome were 600. yeares and upward patching peicing the Masse before they brought it to any setled forme Polydor. De Invent. rer l. 5. c. 10. Latine at least many things were translated out of the Greeke Liturgies into the Latine But in the Latine Church we finde a stinted forme was in use in Cyprians time in the administration of the Supper not to insist upon that which some mention of the Lords prayer used in the celebration from the very times of the Apostles And some the chiefe promoters of a stinted Liturgie are renowned for their constant and unwearied paines in preaching every day in the weeke and sometimes twice So that there is no probabilitie that the first occasion of a stinted e Rome had one forme of service Millain another France a third Greg. respon ad 3. interrogat Aug. Liturgie was to helpe the ignorant idle or dumbe Priest as you are pleased to phrase it Where you borrowed this clause I know not but I cannot finde that ever the f See T. C. repl 1. pag. 106. Nonconformists have thus written In all the order there is you say no edification but confusion but the g 2 Admon pag. 14. Author of the Admonition saith In all their order of service there is no edification according to the Rule of the Apostle but confusion which seemeth to be referred rather to the h In the Church of Corinth some of their Elders strangers or inhabitāts to venditate themselves and the gifts they had of God might sometimes blesse or make their prayers at the Lords Table in a tongue not understood of the whole multitude But this abuse doth not condemne the exercise it selfe abuse in too many places than to the order it selfe prescribed in the booke as the instances following of tossing the Psalmes like tennise-balls in many places and the peoples standing walking talking reading by themselves doe evidence But the Booke is not to be burdened with the faults of men though too ordinary and common The Nonconformists dislike that nothing els should be required of Ministers but barely to reade service and the ordaining of ignorant Ministers they condemne as contrary to the Word of God and the meanes to nuzzle people in ignorance securitie lukewarmnesse and sinne But the use of a stinted Liturgie or the reading of prayers in the publique assembly they never gainesaid as unlawfull or inexpedient We agree saith i T C. repl 1. p. 106. T. C. of a prescript forme of prayer to be used in the Church And in the other no question many Conformists doe consent with them A prescript service therefore and an k Rutges Metaph. institut lib. 1. ca. de Bono Effectus per accidens secutus ex actione vel omissione alicujus non imputatur ei nisi intercedat obligatio cavendi unum ne aliud sequatur Hoc pacto unus bomo nonpotest juste recte intendere permissionem lapsus alterius ignorant or carelesse Ministery have no necessary coherence the one is lawfull the other unlawfull the one may be retained the other ought to be taken away It is no consequence to reason thus The Nonconformists disallow a Ministery that can
doe nothing but reade as that which makes men neglect the preaching of the Word therefore a prescript Liturgie is disliked To appoint or use a prayer conceived or stinted as the Papists doe their Mattens and Evensong for a set service to God howsoever it be uttered ignorantly for custome with lips onely alone or with others in publique or private as if the rehearsall of such words though neither understood nonheard were an acceptable service from l Bils Christ subject part 4. p. 416. Your maine foundation is a dreame of your owne that the Church of Corinth had a prescribed nūber of prayers pronounced by some one Chapsaine that said his lessō within book and might not goe one line besides his Missale for any good This you imagine was their Church-Service all other prayers Psalmes blessings thankesgivings though they were used openly in the Congregation and the whole people bound to say Amen you will not have to be called Church-service which he must not depart one word for any good is a superstition justly to be condemned Thus to repeate the words of a prayer though never so good and holy is not to pray But this makes nothing against the lawfull holy religions use of a stinted forme of prayer publique or private which is that we plead for And this is all that can be gathered from the Author of the Admonition There needs no great skill to discerne the inconsequence of this manner of arguing which here you use To use a stinted forme as the Papists doe for a set-service is naught though the words be good therefore a stinted or prescribed forme is altogether unlawfull And put case some private or singular person hath spoken roughly in heate and passion of the Booke of common-Common-prayer or seemed to disallow the stinted use of a publike found of prayer or Liturgie his speech or position delivered as his private conceite and perhaps not rightly apprehended must not be interpreted the principle of the Nonconformists contrary to the tenour of their writing profession and practice much lesse must his words be racked contrary to his meaning as if he condemned all stinted Liturgies as falso de●ised and idolatrous worship or did leane unto favour or uphold the practice of separation from the assemblies because such Liturgies are in use among them Howsoever by the grounds of the Nonconformists laid downe in the second section Sect. 3 Can. Neces of Separat pag. 92 93 94 c. to 98. separation must necessarily follow from all communion with them in the worship of their Church-service-booke yet to have the point more fully proved I will here shew that every particular thereof is affirmed of themselves to be idolatrous false Antichristian Touching the Booke we may consider two things First The distinct services thereof Secondly The Ceremonies used in and about the same Wee will speake first of their Ceremonies that is of the Crosse Surplice and Kneeling in the act of receiving the Lords Supper Against these many Treatises have beene purposely written I will here onely observe some of their speeches referring the Reader to their Bookes if he desire more satisfaction c. Voluntary separation from the ordinances of Religion in our assemblies Answer is neither commanded by God nor taught by the Prophets or Apostles It is not approved by the practice of the Saints nor grounded upon the principles of the Nonconformists as hath beene shewed That there be m A disputation against the English-popish c. Epistle to the Reformed Churches In England Ireland every noysom weed which Gods hand never had planted was not pulled up c. Sprint repl to the answ pag. 269. acknowledgeth the reformatiō of England to have been defective abuses and corruptions in the Booke the Nonconformists doe not deny and therefore in all humilitie they have sought to have them reformed but that they affirme the whole service thereof to be idolatrous false Antichristian that is your impudent slander That many Treatises have been written against the Ceremonies imposed upon the Ministers and people is very true But in the relation which you make out of them these few things must be observed First what is spoken of one Ceremony you apply to all when there is not the same reason of all in the judgement of them that wrote Secondly what they write of the Ceremonies as they are used amongst the Papists that you report as if they understood it of the use of the Ceremonies as they are imposed and injoyned amongst us Thirdly The private opinion of one you alledge as if it was the common principle of the Nonconformists though you doe or might know that generally they are of another mind Fourthly Amongst your chiefest Nonconformists you alledge such as be not English-Nonconformists nor speake of English-Conformitie but that which was lately brought in among themselves whose case doth much differ from ours in their judgement But the further examination of these things is needlesse let us heare how from these principles of the Nonconformists you can conclude the necessitie of Separation From all which Can. Neces of Sep●rat pag. 98. this argument may be framed That worship in which a man cannot possibly communicate without sinne he is bound necessarily to separate from But that worship in which these Idolls are made and used viz. the Crosse Surplice and Kneeling a man cannot possibly communicate without sinne Therefore from that worship wherein these Idols are made and used a man is bound necessarily to separate The proposition is certaine and by Doctor Ames in his cases of Conscience acknowledged Although saith n Lib. 4. cap. 24. he we may joyne to that Church in which many defects are to be tolerated yet not to that in which we cannot but necessarily partake in sinne The Assumption is assented unto by as o Parker Crosse lib. 1. pag. 20. 21. judicious and zealous Nonconformists as ever held that cause and they have brought good proofes for it First because men must flie from Idols and Idolothites But when they come to worship God after the order of the Congregation where these things are practised they doe not flie from them but draw neere unto them Secondly Their bare presence argues their approbation and yeelding in shew to Ceremonies Thirdly p Mr. Bates p. 258. Though the personall sinnes of the Minister doe not hurt the people yet his ministeriall and publique sinnes doe hurt which he performes for the people to God and so their joyning with him is unlawfull Fourthly What example can be brought where the holy men of God have communicated with such things The Author of the dispute upon communicating at thier confused Communions affirmes confidently that the sitter is accessary to the sinne of the keeler and he gives many reasons for it whereof wee shall have a fit occasion hereafter to speake Can any man beleeve Answer that the Nonconformists say both parts of your reason are true viz. That a man
heart men pretend to detest Idolatry vaine needlesse presence where Idolothites are used as to eate of things sacrificed to Idols in the place of their Idoll-banquet or to sit downe though he doe not eate is scandalous and offensive but presence at Gods worship which God hath commanded where Christ is present to meete welcome and blesse his servants though some things by participation Idolatrous be retained or used therein is neither sinfull nor offensive it carrieth no evill appearance of approbation or consent This distinction of personall and ministeriall sinnes as it is here applied I never found in the writings of Nonconformist and in it selfe it is a meere invention and device which hath no ground from Scripture and must have no place in Divinitie For if the Minister be ignorant proud carelesse prophane corrupt in judgement superstitious in some observations be these sinnes personall or publique and Ministeriall If personall then should not they hurt the people if this be true which here you affirme But when you are directly crosse to your selfe throughout your whole booke If publique and ministeriall then the people are guilty of the Ministers ignorance carelesnesse pride passion indiscretion c. And if these be publique and ministeriall I desire to know what is a personall and what a ministeriall fault If a Minister in preaching or prayer put up a rash petition or deliver a rash sentence give a weake reason an unsound tryall use vaine repetitions a confused methode if he mis-interpret the Scripture or doe not soundly deduce his doctrines out of the Text he taketh upon him to expound if he divide it not aright or some way misapply it are these publique and ministeriall or personall and private faults if personall I desire to know what makes a fault ministeriall and publique and see it proved If that which is done by a Minister in preaching and prayer blessing and administration of the Sacraments be not ministeriall I know not what is to be called ministeriall If they be publique and ministeriall then whosoever communicates with a Minister in the worship of God he is guilty of all the sins publiquely committed by him in this kind if that distinction be of any worth Which if it be granted If I may judge of your preaching by your writing it is high time for all your hearers to hast from you for you mis-alleadge Scripture slander the godly speake evill of the wayes of God teach many falshoods and whiles they joyne with you in the worship of God they are partakers of your transgression The exposition which is made of publique and ministeriall faults to wit such as he performeth for the people to God is as strange if not more strange then the distinction it selfe as it is applyed For in preaching the Word and reading the Scripture a ministeriall fault may be committed which is not performed for the people to God In prayer the faults of the Minister are not ever ministeriall if we may beleeve the forenamed distinction and yet prayer is an action performed for the people to God And let that description stand and the use of our ceremonies are no ministeriall faults for they are neither performed for the people unto God nor from God unto the people as the Church professeth But I have stood too long about these things because in the first Chapter the contrary hath been shewed at large And if Mr Bates be truely alledged in this particular that bare presence in his conceit was approbation yet this is a peece of cunning in you not very commendable that you bring the private judgement of one man as if it was the common principle of the chiefest Inconformists For so you doe in this place and so a little h Can. Neces of Separat pag. 96. before you say the strictest Inconformists affirme that it is utterly unlawfull for Parents to bring their children to be crossed for which you cite onely the testimony of the forenamed Author And yet within a few leaves you are not ashamed to say in the names of many at least i Can. Neces of Separat pag. 118. Note here how greatly they contradict one another They said even now that their ceremonies are such Idolls as a man cannot lawfully joyne with that worship where they are used yet here they say that they are not worse than were the superstitions in the Jewes worship unto which Christ and his Apostles joyned The chiefe thing here to be noted is your unconscionable dealing First you pretend to set downe the principles of the Nonconformists and to inferre upon their grounds the necessitie of separation when you relate nothing lesse than that which they affirme Secondly The k Beza Epist 2. Verum inquient ut nō inquinemur eorum peccato attamen favere eorum errorem sic videbitur Imò ne hoe quidem satis recte dicitur Quid enim absurdius est quàm cum accusare tanquam alieni vitiis fautorem qui ut fratrem lucratur ejus infirmitatem rolerat Tibi non frangitur panis sed integer datur laudari sane id nō potest nec debet at tu certe id peccatum non committis quod in te potius committitur opinion of one man walking alone you charge upon all or the chiefest of the Nonconformists who dissent as much from him therein as he doth from the most rigid Separatist Thirdly He saith not That our Ceremonies are Idolls but speaks of the Crosse onely and if he say of the use thereof as it is amongst us that it is Idolatry it is that which he can never prove nor Inconformist will take upon him to justifie And if bare presence be approbation and consent all worship must be forsaken which hath any thing annexed unto it erroneous irreverent superstitious in the manner of performance by the Minister for wee must not doe the least evill for the greatest good Fourthly Whatsoever you can make of our Ceremonies or other abuses and corruptions in the worship of God I doe not thinke you can bring forth any one Nonconformist that ever said the use of the Ceremonies amongst us are worse than the superstitions and corruptions in the Jewes worship in the dayes of our Saviour Christ and his Apostles unto which worship our Saviour and his Apostles joyned themselves Thirdly You alledge the l A dispute against the English-popish Epist to all reform Though some of the cōtroverted ceremonies have bin kept and reserved in many not all the reformed churches yet they are not therefore to be the better liked of For the reason of the reservation was because some reverend Divines c. is scarcely expected to effectuate so much as the purging of the Church from fundamentall errors and grosse Idolatry which wrought them to be content that lesser abuses in Discipline and Church-government should then be tolerated c. All which since they were once purged away from the Church of Scotland c. Author of the
5. ca. 21. weighed and not numbred and that the errours of all these sorts are in specie much more dangerous and pernicious though not so many If you can prove any one errour in specie hereticall to be taught in those Bookes according to the true meaning and intent of the Bookes then I will consent unto you that he which administers in all things according unto them is not a true Minister of Jesus Christ But if that cannot be done and I presume you will hardly be drawne to attempt it in all your raging termes and reproachfull taunts cast upon our worship Church and Ministery you doe but foame out your owne shame The true Ministers of Christ may erre in many things else it will hardly be found that there is any true Minister and therefore to prove a Minister to be a false Prophet it sufficeth not to say he s Cypr. li. 2. Ep. 3. If any of our predecessors either ignotantly or simply did not observe keepe that which the Lord by his example and authoritie willed his simplicitie may be pardoned by the goodnesse of God Aug. Ep. 48. This blemish in his most beautifull breast hee covered with the teares of charitie August de Baptis l. 4. cap. 5. Ignosci potest simpliciter erranti erreth in many things but wee must shew the errours for qualitie to be such as cannot be in a true or lawfull Prophet of the Lord And here I would aske you this one Question Whether there was any true Ministery in the Christian Churches within the space of the fourth fift or fixt ages after Christ If not what is then become of the promises of God made to the Churches of the New Testament If yes whether was not their course of administration polluted with as many or more dangerous errours than can truely be named in all the Bookes forementioned And so expecting your resolution of this one demand I proceed to your third ground of Separation drawne as you say from the Nonconformists Principles CHAP. III. SECT I. IF the publique Assemblies of England have not the power of the censures Can. Neces of Separat p. 149 150. and excommunication but stand under a government which came wholly and every part from the Devill and Antichrist then is their condition naught then are they false and Antichristian Churches The reason is because this power is of absolute necessitie for the Churches of Christ an essentiall propertie thereof and serve not onely for their well-being but the being it selfe for without this there can be no coupling of the parts and members together And so much t De consc lib. 4. cap. 24. pag. 214. Dr Ames testifieth Now the Assemblies of England were not gathered by any such power but in their first constitution wanted the same and had this false power which is exercised at this day as the Nonconformists doe acknowledge Our arguments which we have used in this point have been to this effect Every true visible Church hath a power immediately under Christ to execute Church-government But the publique Congregations of England have not any such power under Christ to execute Church-government Therefore they are not true visible Churches What they will say to this I know not but hitherto they have been silent or answered to no purpose in the world For it is usually their manner to tell us how the Churches in Corinth Pergamus Thyatira c. neglected to execute discipline as though there were no difference betwixt omitting to administer the ordinance and the want wholly of it yea and to have an Antichristian and devilish in the roome of it ANSVVER YOu undertooke to prove the necessitie of Separation from the Nonconformists Principles But here you reject their Principles with disdaine and build your responsive conclusions as you call them upon your own foundation which you know doth not accord with their Principles The Nonconformists hold discipline necessary to the well-being of a Church the safety of Religion the preservation of Gods ordinances from contempt They compare it to the u Bilson perpet ch gov ca. 1. Since the Church of Christ is the house of God the Citie of the living GOD and the kingdome of his welbeloved Sonne Shall we thinke that God is carefull for others carelesse for his own or that confusion ought to be lesse doubted and feared in heavenly than in earthly things wall of a Citie hedge of a Vineyard fence of a Garden and bounds of an Orchard but never said it to be of absolute w Jewel Serm. on Iosh 6.1 2 3. Discipline is so needfull that neither without it shall ye be able thoroughly to discomfort those that seeke to build up Jericho c. necessitie that there could be no Citie Vineyard Garden or Orchard without it But this in your judgement is broken-stuffe not worthy any answer For where doe they read say x Can. Neces of Separat pag. 151. you in Scripture that this power which Christ hath given to his Church is compared to a wall or hedge c. But rather it may be likened to the power of the body which receiveth food and thereby excrements are purged and avoided the want whereof were in nature prodigious neither could the body possibly subsist and live In the same page you take up Dr Laiton roundly after your manner for saying that the y Cypr. lib. 1. ep 10. Concil Carthag 3. ca. 35. Gratian. decr p. 3. dist 2. cap. 95 96. Bils Christ subject part 2. pa. 335. I do not mislike that malefactors of all kinds not only drūkards railers perjurers adulterers usurers and such like but also theeves robbers ravishers murderers plagiaries incendiaries traytors and all other hainous offenders when their lives be spared by Princes should be driven to earnest and open repentance before they be received into the Church or admitted to the divine mysteries yea rather I thinke it very needfull in a Christian Common-wealth that God be pleased and the Church preserved from all communion with these monstrous impieties c. want of an integrall part of the whole is no sufficient ground of Separation He speakes you say as a man most ignorant of the nature of Church-power for were he able truly to define it he should see that it is of such necessitie as a people cannot constitute themselves in the right order of the Gospell without it as we have before expressed Expressed it may be but not proved by Scripture or reason drawne from Scripture How palpably you abuse Dr Ames testimony is shewed before and it makes as plainly against your reason as a thing can be spoken But that is broken-stuffe which pleaseth you not and he is ignorant that applauds not your dictates To be taunted and reviled is answer sufficient to be given to us simple poore ignorants who know not truely to define what Church-power is But whether this stuffe be broken or the Nonconformists ignorant what Church-power is or
what if you doe not reade that Diotrephes was an unlawfull and Antichristian Minister you reade that he usurped over the faithfull hindred the due execution of Church-censures abused excommunication prated against the Brethren and practised a false government And if the want of discipline or neglect of due execution prove a Church to be no Church the faithfull in that societie were bound to separate If the Church had not the power of government at this time if we may beleeve you or receive your position they were no church if they had power in their hands and suffered it to be abused their sinne was the greater And if you take a view of your dealings in this or other particulars vilifying what you are not able to confute and wresting mens words contrary to their plaine meaning if your paper blush not I can hardly thinke but your conscience will smite SECT II. IF the Church of England hath not Christs keyes Can. Neces of Separat pag. 154. shee is not his saith Mr D. But the Church of England hath not Christs keyes saith Mr Brightman and y Syons plea. 111. others Therefore shee is not his house and consequently to be separated from ANSVVER YOur former reasons out of Mr D. I passe over because they have been answered already and are here thrust in to no purpose but onely to cover the insufficiency of your reply His answer was the want of discipline though an integrall part is no sufficient ground of separation This z Can. Neces of Separat p. 152 153. you offer not to disprove by any substantiall reason but with railing and reproach to disgrace wherein whether you more wound your own conscience or hurt your adversary be judge your selfe a Can. Neces of Separat pag. 212. 1 Pet. 3.9 Rom. 13.21 You say truely It is a Christian part not to render rebuke for rebuke and a thousand times better were it to sustaine even a legion of reproaches than for a man by turning though but one to give cause of suspition that evill hath got some part of conquest over him But if you looke into your own writings you shall finde them stuffed with insolent boasting scornfull taunts and reproaches unbeseeming your place person and a good cause I dare say all the Nonconformists that ever wrote in the cause of discipline never went in practise so much against their Principles as you in this one particular goe against your profession in the foresaid passage and a good conscience The matter in hand betwixt you and Mr D. is the absolute necessitie of Church-discipline to the being of a Church To what end then doe you bring That the Book of common-common-prayer used in the Assemblies of England is an infectious Liturgie Romish-stuffe a devised service raked out of three Romish Channells That the Ministery of the Church of England is unlawfull and Antichristian That the Ministery worship and government of of England are corruptions Doth this make ought to confirme your position or weaken the answer which was truely given But some thing must be said whether to or besides the purpose it matters not Another stratageme b Can. Neces of Separat pag. 153. you put in practice in the same place not very commendable You would seeme to confute the D. out of himselfe What say you if it appeare that Mr D. arguments doe lead rather to separation and that he speaketh one thing and practiseth another would not this be a strange sight especially to himselfe Now whether this be so we will here try by some reasons in his owne moode and figure But though the moode and figure be his the reasons be your owne and not his and the conclusions unjustly drawne from the Premises as the D. answered and we have shewed before Perhaps in warre stratagems may be of use but in the cause of God such cunning devices are dangerous symptoms This I note to entreat your serious reexamination of what you have done and now I come to the argument here propounded whereunto I make answer as you relate it for I have not the D. Booke to search out what he hath written The power of the keyes is twofold Concioualis Judicialis as it is usually called The first consists in the preaching of the Gospell wherein the kingdome of heaven is opened to the penitent sinnes remitted life promised and heaven shut to the obstinate which is the sword and the scepter of Christ whereby he saveth his people 2 Cor. 1.21 2 Cor. 10.4 Isa 11.4 Rom. 1.16 and conquereth his enemies beateth downe every strong hold p●ireeth to the division of foule and spirit and of the joynts and marrow and judgeth the very cogitations and thoughts of the heart These effects Christ executeth by his Word even when it is not assisted by the c To excommunicate is to remove the wicked irrepentant from participation of the Lords Supper least by sacrilegious presuming to violate that Table the ungodly should condemne themselves and defile others Bilson perpet gov cap. 9. discipline spoken of Now if it be rightly understood the Church of God cannot be without this key For the Church is gathered by the Word and is a company or societie which hath received the Word in profession at least and doth possesse it and amongst whom it dwelleth The Judiciall power of the d Excommunication is a meere spirituall punishment reacheth no further by Gods word than to take from offenders the remission of their sinnes by wanting the Word and Sacraments untill they repent Bilson Christian. part 3. pag. 52. keyes is the power of government which consisteth principally in the right ordering and dispensation of Church censures and so of the manners and necessities of all men which agreeth not to any one member nor to the communitie of the faithfull nor to any one singular governour but to the Ecclesiasticall Senate yet with due respect had to the communitie of the faithfull In the first sense the Church of England hath the power of the keyes e Cyp. lib. 1. epist 3. I hardly perswade the people yea I am forced to wrest it from them before they will suffer such to be admitted Bilson perpet gov c. 9. Great reason had those godly Fathers to see the whole Church satisfied before they released the sentence of excommunication c. and so doing they shewed not what right the multitude had to sit Iudges with the Bishop but what ●●e themselves had to remove from the people all occasions of stumbling Id. pag. 113. If you take Excommunication for removing the unruly from the civill societie of the faithfull untill they conforme themselves unto a more Christian course of life I am not altogether averse that the whole Church should concurre in that action c. See August contr Par Ep. 1 l. 2. ca. 1. Can. Stay Sect. 12. pag. 123. not so much as is to be desired but in an eminent sort and that with Gods
this sincerely in truth and measure But they never thought nor taught that every member in a sort of the visible Churches were holy and sincere the true sheepe of Christ faithfull and effectually called much lesse that it was no Church of Christ wherein abuses were to be found or ungodly prophane men were tolerated The q Bils The difference between christium subject par 1. pag. 92. These se the Church militant triumphāt be not two but one Church Jerusalem which is above is the mother of us all Gal. 4. Yee be now saith Paul no more strangers and forreiners but Citizens with the Saints and of the houshold of God Eph. 2. For you be come to the Citie of the living God and Heb. 12. where you see the Saints in heaven be not removed from the Church of God but be received to their fellowship Id. part 2. p. 230. The Church in heaven is it another Church from this on earth or the same Certainly Christ hath but one body which it his Church and of that body seeing the Saints sc in heaven be the greater and worthier part they must be counted the same church with us Church militant and triumphant are not two Kingdomes but two degrees of one Kingdome The Church visible and invisible are not two Churches but distinct considerations of the same Church If then we speake of true sound living chiefe principle members of the militant Church such as partake in all the royalties and priviledges of members every member of the Church militant is a true branch in the Vine knit firmely unto Christ quickned by the Spirit and shall be an inheriter of eternall glory But if we speake of members in a sort of visible societies so hypocrites may be members and ungodly men as they are tolerated in the societie when the better part cannot reforme or amend them But to the Arguments in order First The Church may be true though the Ministery be deficient in the order of calling qualification of persons and execution of their office But that Church is false whose Ministery is altogether false for substance of their office that is the doctrine which they teach Sacraments which they administer and functions whereunto they are set apart Thus the Conformists and Inconformists both Now if we speake of the Ministery of the Church of England indefinitly both Conformists and Inconformists will confesse some things to be faulty both in the entrance and execution of their callings as that some are ignorant proud covetous carelesse corrupt not watching over the flocke But absolutely that their Ministery is false in respect of the substance of their office that was never said by either of them as you doe or might well know The knot to be unloosed now remaineth in your conscience in that either you aequivocate in your Major or against knowledge charge the Nonconformists in your Minor with that which they never said Secondly The true Church of Christ that is the true and lively members of the militant church and militant members of the catholique church is a company of r The true Church is an universall cōgregation or fellowship of Gods faithfull and elect people built upon the foundations of the Prophets and Apostles Christ Iesus himselfe being the head corner stone And it hath alwayes three notes or markes whereby it is knowne pure and sound doctrine the Sacraments ministred according to Christs holy institution and the right use of Ecclesiasticall discipline Hom. 2. booke hom for Whites 2. part The Church consisteth not of men but of faithfull men and they be the Church not in respect of flesh and bloud which came from earth but of truth and grace which came from Heaven Bilson Christ Subject part 2. pag. 231. faithfull people a communion of Saints the true flock of Christ which heare know acknowledge beleeve and obey the voyce of Christ the kings daughter which is all glorious within knit to Christ and married unto him But in this societie there are mixed not onely secret hypocrites but fierce Lyons Tigres Wolves Beares wicked Teachers and ungodly livers Thus the Conformists and Inconformists And in this sense the Church of England is a societie of faithfull and beleeving people the flocke of Christ the Kings daughter quickned by the Spirit enriched with grace decked with Gods ordinances walking in sincere constant conscionable obedience though in outward societie and profession mixed with many ignorant vaine prophane persons who have received the presse-money of Christ but indeed fight under the Devils banner as doe all hypocrites and ungodly wretches that is in the Church of England there be some truely of the Church which heare the voyce of Christ mixed with those which in words professe Christ but in their deeds deny him Thus the Conformists and Nonconformists The knot here lyeth onely in an aequivocation or grosse abuse of the word Church which sometimes notes the whole visible societie linked in an externall profession and sometimes the true and living members of Jesus Christ against which the gates of hell shall not prevaile Thirdly The s Deo dat Ital. Ioh. 10.1 The sheepe are the true faithfull endued with spirituall light and discretion sheepe of Christ doe heare his voyce but what sheepe not all that be sheepe in profession but all that be sheepe indeed and truth effectually called and gathered into Christ● sheep-fold They heare that is acknowledge beleeve and obey Christs voyce sincerely but not perfectly fully and compleatly for the faithfull may erre of frailtie and infirmitie both in faith and manners sometimes they are mislead through ignorance drawne aside by passions foiled by temptations Christs sheepe doe obey his voyce but t Bils Christ. subject part 2. pa. 233. The Church is not simply a number of men for Infidels heretickes and hypocrites are not the Church but men regenerate by the Word Sacraments truely serving God according to the Gospell of his Sonne and sealed by the Spirit of grace against the day of Redemption all that are linked with them in outward societie doe not sincerely obey not yet in conversation fashion themselves to the direction and commandement of Jesus Christ And thus the Church of England that is the true and faithfull people in those societies doe heare and obey the voyce of Christ in truth others mixed with them doe heare and professe but not obey If the Church doe erre it is of ignorance nor of wilfulnesse or stubbornnesse In matters of lesse importance not fundamentall or bordering thereupon It is the errour of some onely add not of the whole Church which errours u Gratian. decret par 2. ca. 24. qu. 1. cap. 9. A rectae in Gloss Novitatibus Ipsa congregatio fidelium hic dicitur Ecclesia 〈◊〉 Ecclesia non potest nonesse cannot make that shee is not the flocke of Christ The knot here to be unloosed is your sinne in charging that upon the Nonconformists the contrary whereto they have ever