Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	aaron_n	sacrifice_n	sacrifice_v	36	3	10.8057	5	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A12490	A confutation of a certen booke, called a defence of the true, and Catholike doctrine of the sacrame[n]t, &c. sette fourth of late in the name of Thomas Archebysshoppe of Canterburye. By Rycharde Smyth, Docter of diuinite, and some tyme reader of the same in Oxforde	Smith, Richard, 1500-1563.	1550 (1550)	STC 22819; ESTC S105000	121,196	338

Psal 109 priest Saye we not wyth the holy goost speakinge in Dauid and sainct Paul Heb. 7 that he is Ã priest for euer We affirme and teach that he hymselfe offereth his body and bloud daily at masse by the ministerie of the priest as he Ioan. 1. 10. 1. Cor. 3. doth contynually baptize and preache vnto the people by his ministres the priestes My lord ye vnderstande not Sainct paul for he only ment that no other priesthode should euer succede christes priesthode as his priesthod did Aarons but that it shold 1. Cor. 11. endure vntil the worldes ende Wherfore seyinge we say that christ euer continueth Ã priest stil and that we priestes are but his mynisters executinge his office by his owne commission sainge Do ye this in remembraunce Luc. 22. of me my lord reproued vs wythout Ã iuste cause What neadeth any moo The bysshop fo 128. lib. 5 sacrifices yf christes sacrifice be perfect and sufficient Syr the sacrifice The confutation of the holy masse is not an other sacrifice then christes but the very selfe same sacrifice concerninge the thinges offered which are his body and bloud Agayne this sacrifice of the masse is not made for any vnperfectenes or vnsufficiencye of christes death and sacrifice as ye wold make men beleue that we do teach but only to applye it vnto vs for our imperfectenes throughe our synne Maye I not proue by Ã lyke reason grounded vpon the perfectenes and sufficiencye of christes sacrifice that we shal al be saued and that none of al should be damned and that we neade not to beleue hope fear god repent our lyfes synfully speÌ„t fast praye geue almes receaue the sacramentes nor to keepe goddes commaundementes at al For maye I not thus argue Christes sacrifice is sufficient to saue me what neade I then to do any thinge of my partie for to adde any thing vnto that which is of itselfe perfecte and sufficient Thinke ye not my lord that manye of your scholers hath gathered such argumentes and wil gather here after of your doctrine therby cast al vertu aside leade their lyfes in Ã leude liberte and Marke say Christ hath perfectely and sufficiently satisfied for me I neade to do nothinge at al for he wil not lose that he hath so dearly bought Paul sayed I denye not that yf Aarons sacrifices Heb. 8 had bene sufficient to haue put away synne christes sacrifice should not haue bene requyred But what therof Wil ye proue by that that for as much as christes sacrifice is sufficieÌ„t we neade not the sacrifice of the masse Is it not declared sufficiently in my booke of the sacrifice of the masse and also here afore that it is not for any vnperfectnes or insufficiency of christes sacrifice that the masse is Ã sacrifice As it was that christes sacrifice succeded Aarons The bisshop fo 109. li. 5 commaunded of christ as it shal be proued anon but only to applye that sacrifice vnto vs But nowe ye obiecte against oure aunswere to your argumentes which is that we do make no newe sacrifice nor none other than christ made hymselfe at his mandy and vpon the crosse Than The bysshop saye yowe it must neades folowe that ye slaye or kil Christ euery daye for as much as christes oblation was made by his death and effusion of his bloud No sir not so for it is the same The confutation sacrifice touchynge the thinges offered that is to say christes body and bloud but the maner of offerynge is not one one is bloudy the other vnblouddye the one by death and the other by the representation and commemoration of that death Dyd not the fathers of the old lawe offre christ in figures and shadowes which admonyshed Apoc. 13. them of his death and yet they slayed hym not in dede althoughe IhoÌ„ sayeth that he was slayne euen from the begynnynge of the world Why then may we not offre his bodye and bloud in the sacramente in which he Epist 23. is daily offered as Sainct Austen sayeth for the people without killing of hym Why shold we not my lord I be seche yow beleue the holy church which doth thus expounde this matter as wel as we do and neades must in many other thinges that appartayne vnto our fayth Wold ye that we shold beleue yow before al the ancient doctours of christes church both Graekes and latynes of al ages For they are altogether vtterly against your doctrine Why do ye not make aunsweare vnto my bokes of the sacrifice of the blessed masse and of the sacrament of the aulter But now heare S. Chrysostom Homi. 17. in Heb. 9. whiche teacheth vs how this may wel be done sayinge Do we not offre sacrifices daily We do offre but doinge it in remembraunce of christes death And this hoost is one not manye Howe is it one not many And that oblation was ones offered in to heauen but this sacrifice is an example of that we do euer offre the selfe same thinge Whe offre not to daye one lambe christ and twoo morowe an other but euer the selfe same thynge Wherfore this sacrifice is one or els by that reason that it is offered in many places are they many christes Nothinge lesse but there is one christ euery were beynge both here ful and there ful one body For as that which is offered in euery place is one bodie and not many bodies euen so it is also one sacrifice but he is oure bysshop which offered Ã sacrifice makinge vs cleane we do offre the same and that which then was offered can not nowe be consumed Hytherto chrysostom out of whose wordes many notable lessons may be gathered for the confutation of al your raylinge reasonynge my lord false chargynge of al catholike teachers wyth many thinges which they neuer dreamed vpon The first lesson is that notwythstandynge that saint paule affirmeth that christ was neuer but ones offered vpon the crosse that he made al theÌ„ perfect wyth that his one sacrifice which are made holy yet priestes do offre hiÌ„ dayly at masse The seconde is that this oure oblatioÌ„ of christ is not Ã kilynge of hym but Ã remembrynge of his death The third lesson is that we offre dailie and euer one and the selfe same hoost or sacrifice which can not be verified of bread and wyne for they are not one and the same in many places but it is only true of christes body and bloud that are one and the same in al places where they be offered in sacrifice The fourth lesson is that the thynge offered is the lambe christe that is offered in sacrifice dailie in many places and yet he is but one christ which is here vpon this aulter and there vpon that ful one body and not many bodies one sacrifice The fifte lesson is that priestes do dailie offre in sacrifice that same hoost or sacrifice

concel of any one region or Lib. 2. ca. 1. contrae Donatistas de bap countrey Did not also the same thing moue hym to say that he did wel yn folowing the custome establyshed after ward by Ã general counsail yea althoughe the trueth lay yet vnknoweÌ„ hidde S. Cyprian wyth almost lxxx Lib. 7. cap. 27. De bap contra Donatistas bysshops assembled yn Ã councel yn Africa erred and Ã general counsail afterward corrected their errour What follie then were it to beleue the Lib. 1. ca. 18 de bapt contra Donatistas determynation and doctrine of any one region before Ã general councel Wherfore let vs folow such councels as al holie men haue done afore our daies and not streight way denye theÌ„ yf they be against our opinions for so did euer al heretikes Arius sayed that Nicene concile erred Nestorius affirmed that the councel of Ephesus was disceaued Eutiches refused the counsail of Chalcedon and so did euer al other heretikes say that the councels erred which did condemne their opinions but let vs folow rather S. Athanasius Hilary Cyprian Austen Cyril and such blessed fathers and great learned men which both were at general councels and also did euer regarde much their sentences and determynations in matters of our fayth If we thus do we shal not be disceaued yn our beliefe but euer continue yn it that we may say whith S. Hierom I Ad oceanuÌ„ pamma chium wil keepe that fayth in my age yn which I was borne Ã child also wyth saint Paul I haue foughten Ã good battel finyshed my course and kept my fayth There is Ã croune of ryghteousnes layed vp for me which our lord Ã iust iudge shal rendre vnto me at that 2. tim 4. day and to al that loue his commyng Vnto whom be al prayse world wythout ende Amen The confutation of certen sentences whych are in the preface of the Bysshoppes booke But the Romysh Antichrist to deface The bysshop this great benefite of christ hath taught that christes sacrifice made vpon the crosse is not Ã sufficient satisfaction and redemption for synne wythout an other sacrifice deuised by hym and made by Ã priest c. Who sayth my lord that christes The confutation sacrifice made vpon the crosse is not Ã sufficient satisfaction for the remissioÌ„ of the synnes of the whole world Why do ye blame vs in that whych we defend not Haue not I declared in my boke of the holy masse that christes sacrifice is sufficient of it selfe to saue al the whole world and that the sacrifice of the masse is the very selfe same sacrifice touchyng the thinges offered which are christes natural body and bloud and that it is distinct onely from it in the maner of offering and is Ã meane to apply yt vnto vs for the remission of our synnes It is also false that the bysshop of Rome deuised this sacrifice for christ hym selfe did institute it as I wil proue by gods grace in the confutation of the fyft boke Ye say my lord that the bysshop of Rome deuised the sacrifice of the masse and that Ã priest maketh no more Libr. 5. sacrifice for our synnes then the laye man doth and also that your doctrine is approued of the ancient docters which your saynges are very false for the holy martyr Anacletus that was whythin lx yeres after christes passion this wryteth of that sacrifice of Epist 1. omnibus ecclesiis scripta the masse They that do make sacrifice perfectely vnto god ought not to be vexed but to be borne wyth al conforted and worshipped of al men But when they do make sacrifice vnto our lord they ought not to do it alone wythout wytnes that they myght be proued to haue made sacrifice vnto god in places haloued Now wil ye say my lord that this blessed martyr deuised this sacrifice of his oune head against christes sacrifice He affirmeth that priestes do make sacrifice at masse ye deny vtterly that they make any sacrifice more then the laye man doth Whether of you twoo is more worthy to be beleued Heare what S. Clement pauls compaignion in preachyng of the gospel sayeth in this matter these are his wordes vnto S. Iames the apostle Let there be so many hoostes Epistola 2. offered vpon the aulter as may suffice the people What can ye now say my lord vnto this holy martyr Doth he not make playne mention here both of the sacrifice of the masse and also of an aulter for that sacrifice to be made vpon May ye not then my lord be ashamed of your wrytyng that this sacrifice of the masse was deuised by the bisshop of Rome against christes blouddy sacrifice and that priestes make no more sacrifice then the layte doth Why do ye cast doune the aulters which the apostles vsed to say masse and to offer sacrifice vpon Is this to reforme and restore as ye pretende christes religion vnto the state that it was in at the begynnyng of the chuch Do ye not rather destroy that which the primitiue church euer vsed But S. Clement sayeth agayne Epist 3. vnto S. Iames. We must knowe gods wyl whyles we do lyue here where the place is to offre sacrifice for we may The masse is Ã sacrifice not of late deuised not make sacrifice and say masses yn any other places then yn which our oune bysshop hath commaunded or yn that place that is or shal be consecrated by the bysshops debite of that cite For these thynges shal not be other wyse wel done both the old and also the neue testament bearyng ther vnto wytnes The apostles learned these thinges of our lord and taught theÌ„ vs. Who nowe may not see playnly my lord howe far your doctrine disseÌ„teth from the apostles and the ancieÌ„t docters teaching and beliefe S. Clement sayeth that christe taught his apostles to offre sacrifice at masse and yn what place they shold do it that the apostles taught the same vnto him and his feloes ye my lord say that the bysshop of Rome deuysed that sacrifice and that priestes do make no sacrifice more then the laye people do and yet ye affirme in the title of your book that this your doctrine is approued by the coÌ„sent of the most ancient doctours of the church O what meane ye my lord Thinke ye to blere mennes eyes after such sorte Thynke ye that we do not espie what ye goo Epistola ad burdegaleÌ„ses cap. 3. about S. Martial peters scholer thus writeth of the masses sacrifice A sacrifice is offered vpon an aulter vnto god not to man nor angel Nor that is An aulter for masse to be sayed vpon not only done vpon an aulter haloued but Ã cleane sacrifice is offered vnto god yn euery place as he doth testifie whose body and bloud we offre to obteyne euerlasting life Do ye not yet my lord blusse May ye not wel repeÌ„t your labour

Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Text snippets containing the quad