Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n aaron_n prince_n tribe_n 22 3 9.7838 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A56632 A commentary upon the fourth Book of Moses, called Numbers by ... Symon, Lord Bishop of Ely. Patrick, Simon, 1626-1707. 1699 (1699) Wing P774; ESTC R2078 399,193 690

There are 12 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

right of Marriage So shall their Inheritance be taken away from the Inheritance of the Tribe of our Fathers So will their Estate go out of our Tribe without remedy because the Jubilee it self will give us no Relief Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses commanded the Children of Israel according to the Word of the LORD Whom I suppose he consulted about this matter as he did when the first doubt was moved about the Inheritance of these Women XXVII 5. and received the answer by which he here commanded the Israelites to govern themselves The Tribe of Joseph In whose name the chief Fathers of their several Families made this representation to Moses as became Men who took care of the concerns of the whole Tribe Hath said well In desiring the Inheritance of these Women might not go out of their Tribe which was prevented by the following Law Ver. 6. This is the thing which the LORD doth Verse 6 command concerning the Daughters of Zelophehad saying Let them marry to whom they think best They were not confined to any particular Persons but might have their choice among those who were descended from the same Stock as it immediately follows Only to the Family of the Tribe of their Father shall they marry Only with these two limitations that they might not marry a Man of another Tribe nor a Man of another Family in their own Tribe For it is very manifest that they are tied to marry into the Family of their Father and accordingly they did actually marry their Cosin-Germans as we now speak v. 11. For this Law was made for the preservation of Families as well as of Tribes as the Law for the Redemption of Lands was And therefore these words the Family of the Tribe of their Father is well translated by Grotius upon I St. Matthew 16. familia stirpis paternae the Family of the Sto●k of their Father which was that they desired might not perish XXVII 4. and was the ground of the Law which commanded a Man to marry the Wife of his Brother who left no Issue XXV Deut. 16. Therefore there being several Families in the Tribe of Manasseh XXVI 29 30 31 32. these Women could marry only into the Family of the Hepherites Verse 7 Ver. 7. So shall not the Inheritance of the Children of Israel remove from Tribe to Tribe For by preserving it in the Family to which it was given it was necessarily preserved in the Tribe For every one of the Children of Israel shall keep himself to the Inheritance of the Tribe of his Fathers And not endeavour to get any part of the Inheritance of another Tribe by marrying an Heiress in it Plato himself took care of this that when a Man left only a Daughter his Estate should not be carried by her to a Stranger but she should be bound to marry 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that was nearest of kin to her And if there was a want of near Kindred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. it should descend to the Children of her Father's Brother or the Children of the Grandfather some of which he ordains should marry her Lib. XI de Legibus p. 924 925. Edit Serrani Verse 8 Ver. 8. And every Daughter that possesseth an Inheritance in any Tribe of the Children of Israel Here this Law is made general that all Women who were Heiresses as the Daughters of Zelophehad were should do as they are here commanded And this was one of the Attick Laws which as Grotius observes were plainly borrowed from the Law of Moses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. That an Heiress should not marry out of her Kindred but dispose of her self and Estate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to one nearest of kin to her which was one of the Laws of Solon as Sam. Petitus observes out of Isaeus Pollux and others in his Comment in Leges Atticas Lib. VI. Tit. 1. p. 441. Shall be Wife to one of the Family of the Tribe of her Father Here she is confined to her Family and not merely to her Tribe But this concerned only such as were Heiresses all other Women might marry into what Tribe they pleased as appears by these very Books wherein we read that Aaron himself married the Sister of the Prince of Judah VI Exod. 22. And if any object that this was before the giving of the Law it is evident that Jehoiada a Priest and consequently of the Tribe of Levi married King Jehoram's Sister who was of the Tribe of Judah 2 Chron. XXII 11. And long before this all the Tribes of Israel being in great solicitude how to find Wives for their Brethren of Benjamin did not scruple their having them out of any Tribe if it had not been for their Oath XXI Judg. 18. And to add no more David himself of the Tribe of Judah married Michael the Daughter of Saul who was of the Tribe of Benjamin The Talmudists add that even these Heiresses might marry into what Tribe they pleased after the first Division of the Land by Joshua to which they imagine this Law was restrained it being a common saying among them That it did not belong to any Age but that in which it was made In the following Ages they pretend a Man might purchase Land in any Tribe and possess it alway or have the Inheritance of it by Marriage though he were of another Tribe as Selden shows their Opinion to be Lib. de Successionibus ad Leges Hebr. cap. 18. and Lib. III. de Synedr c. 4. n. 1. and Buxtorf de Sponsal Divortiis sect 44. But this is well confuted by Grotius in his Annotations upon I St. Matthew v. 16. Ver. 9. Neither shall the Inheritance remove from one Tribe to another Tribe This establishes in general what he had said before v. 7. with particular respect Verse 9 to the Daughters of Zelophehad But Moses ben Nachman upon these very words asserts the Talmudick Opinion before-mentioned that this concerns only the present Time not future Ages And puts this Case which is the strongest that can be thought of if a Woman were married into another Tribe after which Marriage her Father and all her Brethren dying without Children the Inheritance fell to her and consequently saith he the Possession must devolve from one Tribe to another into which she had married But according to the Letter of these words the Inheritance was rather to descend to the next of her Kindred than by her be carried out of the Tribe to which it belonged But every one of the Tribes of the Children of Israel shall keep himself to his own Inheritance Shall cleave or stick close to his own Inheritance as the Hebrew word signifies and as the Greek and Latin expresses it The reason of the Command was as Procopius Gazaeus observes to prevent the Confusion of Tribes How the Vulgar Latin came to deviate so much from the Hebrew Text and from the Intention of this Law as it hath done in this and the
A COMMENTARY UPON THE Fourth Book of MOSES CALLED NUMBERS BY The Right Reverend Father in GOD SYMON Lord Bishop of ELY LONDON Printed for Ri. Chiswell at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul's Church-yard MDCXCIX A COMMENTARY UPON NUMBERS A COMMENTARY UPON THE Fourth Book of MOSES CALLED NUMBERS CHAP. I. Chapter I THIS Book is called by the Name of NVMBERS in our Language because it begins with an Account of the Numbering of the People in the beginning of the second Year after they came out of Egypt though it contain a great many things besides that particularly another Numbering of them Chapter XXVI towards the conclusion of their Travels in the Wilderness For this Book comprehends an History of about thirty eight Years though the most of the things related in it fell out in the first and in the last of these Years and it doth not appear when those things were done which we read of about the middle of the Book from the XVth to the XXth Chapter Verse 1 Verse 1. And the LORD spake unto Moses Who undertook nothing without order from God In the Wilderness of Sinai Where they had continued near a full Year as appears by comparing XIX Exod. 1. with this place and shortly after this removed from it X. 11. In the Tabernacle of the Congregation From whence the LORD delivered those Laws which we read in the foregoing Book See on I Lev. 1. and now seems to have admitted him into the Tabernacle whereas before he only spake to him out of it On the first day of the second Month in the second year after they were come out of the Land of Egypt All that is related in the foregoing Book seems to have passed in the first Month of the second Year after their coming out of Egypt In the beginning of which the Tabernacle was set up XL Exod. 2 17. and in the middle of it the Passover was kept as appears by this Book IX 1 2 c. Verse 2 Ver. 2. Take ye the sum There had been a Muster as we may call it of the People before the Tabernacle was erected XXX Exod. 12. and consequently some Months before this for it was in order to a Contribution which every one was to make towards that holy work XXXVIII Exod. 26. Whereas this was for the better disposing of their Camps about the Tabernacle now that it was set up and for their more regular march when they removed from Mount Sinai which they were to do shortly Of all the Congregation of the Children of Israel Who alone were numbred all except the Levites but none of the mixt Multitude that came with them out of Egypt XII Exod. 38. After their Families It appears by VII Joshua 16 17 c. that the several Tribes of Israel were divided into Families and those Families into Housholds and those Housholds had every one of them an Head or Chief who is called the Father of it There were LXX of these Families in all but some Tribes had more others fewer according to the number of Souls as they are called that is Persons who were in each when they went down into Egypt XLVI Gen. 27. By the House of their Fathers Every Family as I said being distributed into Houses which we now call Families these Houses were denominated from their Chief whom they called their Father For no Houses were denominated from the Mother as the Jews say With the number of their Names The Names of every Person in the several Houses were set down and registred that they might be the better known Every Male by their pole But no Women for the reason which follows Ver. 3. From twenty years old and upward Which Verse 3 was ever after this the Age when Men were thought fit for War All that are able to go forth to war in Israel One would think by this they were not to number very aged and decrepit People because they were no more able to go to war than Women and Children and those under twenty years old And if we may believe Josephus L. II. Antiq. cap. 9. after fifty Years old Men were not bound to pay the half Shekel which was due in such Musters and therefore we may reasonably think were excused from going to war unless they had a mind themselves Thou and Aaron Who had the highest Authority in the Nation Shall number them by their Armies This seems to import that in taking the account of them they distributed them into certain Troops or Companies out of which were formed Regiments as we now speak and greater regular Bodies which composed several Armies We do not read this was required in the former numbering XXX Exod. that being for another end as I now observed not for their more orderly march in their remove from Mount Sinai And here I cannot but take notice what a vast difference there was between this method and that rude way which Cecrops the first King of Attica after the Ogygian Flood which hapned about the time of Moses took to know the number of his People which the Greek Writers say was by requiring every one of them to bring a Stone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and throw it down before them which he counting found them Twenty thousand So the Scholiast upon Pindar Od. IX and others in Meursius de Regibus Atheniens L. I. cap. 7. Verse 4 Ver. 4. And there shall be with you a Man of every Tribe Whom they were to take for their Assistants Every one Head of the House of his Fathers The LXX and the Vulgar understand this to signifie the principal Persons in each Tribe who were best acquainted with every Family and Houshold in that Tribe And so it is expounded v. 6. And many think these were the First-born in their Tribe But there is this Objection against it That Nahshan who is named for the Tribe of Judah v. 7. was not descended from the First-born of that Tribe For Pharez was not Judah's eldest Son Selah being before him who had Children as we find XXVI of this Book v. 20. Besides when the Princes of the Tribes rre reckoned again XXXIV of this Book in the last Year of their abode in the Wilderness none of them are derived from these Men here mentioned but from others And therefore these were the most eminent Men in the several Tribes upon a different account either for Wisdom or Valour or some other excellent quality Ver. 5. And these are the Names of the Men that shall Verse 5 stand Be Assistants With you i. e. With Moses and Aaron Of the Tribe of Reuben Elizur the Son of Shedeur There is little to be observed concerning these Tribes but that they are here placed not in the order of their Birth but of their Mothers who bare them First the Children of Leah who are all reckoned in the same order wherein they were born of her ver 6 7 8 9. Then the Children of Rachel v. 10 11. And after them the
1 Deut. II. The LORD God of your Fathers make you a thousand times so many mo as you are and bless you as he hath promised you CHAP. VII Chapter VII Ver. 1. AND it came to pass on the day that Moses Verse 1 had fully set up the Tabernacle Which he did upon the first Day of the first Month of the second Year after they came out of Egypt XL Exod. 17 18. And had anointed it and sanctified it c. See VIII Levit. 10 11. where it is said he anointed also as it here likewise follows all belonging to it Which being seven days in doing as appears from v. 35. of that Chapter it is evident that the word Day doth not here precisely denote the very Day on which the Tabernacle was erected but more largely at or about that time as it must necessarily signifie v. 84. of this Chapter after he had set up the Tabernacle and not only sanctified and anointed it but received Orders about Sacrifices and anointed the Priests with the rest mentioned in the Book of Leviticus and also had numbred the People ordered their Encampment and the Encampment of the Levites and given them their Charge about the Tabernacle In short when Moses had done all the things mentioned hitherto in this Book then followed this Dedication of the Altar And whosoever will compare this Chapter with the second may easily be convinced that this Offering of the Princes was not made till the Camp was formed and the Tribes ranged under their several Standards For the Princes Offer held in the same Order and Method that they are disposed there Ver. 2. That the Princes of Israel heads of the House of their Fathers Mentioned Chap. I. 5 16. And were over them that were numbred This evidently Verse 2 shows that this Offering of the Princes was after the numbring of the People Offered In the Order that is set down in this Chapter Verse 3 Ver. 3. And they brought their Offering The LXX translate the Hebrew word Korbanam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their Gift or their Present which they made to God Which consisted of several things for divers uses Before the LORD i. e. At the Door of the Tabernacle as it is explained in the end of the Verse Six covered Wagons and twelve Oxen. In the first place they made a Present for the Service of the Tabernacle it self That such parts of it as were most cumbersome might be more conveniently carried and that they might be free from Dust Rain or Hail The Wagons were covered being not ordinary Carriages but such as were used by great Persons So the LXX understood it who translate the Hebrew word Tzabbim by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the LXVI Isa 20. and here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now as Pollux reckons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among the Wagons and Chariots then used So Hesychius tells us as Learned Men have observed it signifies such Wagons as illustrious Men and Women used and that they were covered above A Wagon for two of the Princes This shows plainly enough that they were sumptuous and had perhaps rich Coverings in that two of the great Men joyned in the Present of one Wagon And for each one an Ox. That there might be a Pair of Oxen to draw each Wagon And it is probable those Oxen were yoked together which were offered by those two Princes who joined in offering one Wagon And they brought them before the Tabernacle Set them before the entrance of it Ver. 4. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Verse 4 It seems Moses did not accept these Presents till he had Orders from the LORD in the next words Ver. 5. Take it of them Receive their Present as Verse 5 acceptable to me That they may be to do the service of the Tabernacle of the Congregation He directs their use which was to carry the Tabernacle when they removed from one place to another And thou shalt give them to the Levites In order to which he directs him to bestow them upon the Levites who had the charge of that Carriage To every Man according to his Service In such Proportions as the things they had to carry required Ver. 6. And Moses took the Wagons and Oxen and Verse 6 gave them to the Levites In such Proportions as follow in the next two Verses Ver. 7. Two Wagons and four Oxen to the Sons of Verse 7 Gershon according to their Service As they were fewest in number that could do Service so they had less burdensome things to carry than the Sons of Merari IV. 25 40. and therefore had fewer Carriages allowed them Ver. 8. And four Wagons and eight Oxen he gave unto the Sons of Merari according to their Service They were the most numerous but had the greatest Verse 8 burden and therefore had allowance of more Carriages and Oxen IV. 31 32 48. Vnder the hand of Ithamar the Son of Aaron the Priest Who had the Inspection and Care both of the Gershonites and Merarites IV. 28 33. Verse 9 Ver. 9. But unto the Sons of Kohath he gave none For the reason that follows Because the Service of the Sanctuary belonging unto them was that they should bear upon their Shoulders The LXX translate it more exactly because they had the Service of the holy thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Ark is called IV. 4. they shall carry it on their Shoulders Which was for the greater Honour and Dignity of the Ark and of the Law contained in it as Maimonides R. Levi ben Gersem and others observe And that the Form and Structure of the Ark might not be discomposed as Maimonides adds More Nevochim P. III. Cap. XLV nor the Ephod and the Breast-plate rufled as they might have been by the shaking of a Wagon Yet they all observe this was not so peculiar to the Sons of Kohath but that the Priests the Sons of Aaron upon some special occasion carried the Ark particularly when they went over Jordan III Josh 3. and at the Siege of Jericho at both which times a great Miracle was to be wrought And when Zadok and Abiathar carried it back to Jerusalem 2 Sam. XV. 29. though that I observed before may be otherways interpreted and there seems no reason why they should carry it back when the Levites brought it ver 24. and when Solomon's Temple was built 1 Kings VIII 6. for the Levites might not go into the Holy Place and therefore it was then carried by the Priests Ver. 10. And the Princes offered They brought the Offerings which they desired might be presented Verse 10 unto God For the dedicating of the Altar The Hebrew word Chanac which in one place of the Pentateuch signifies simply to begin to use or enjoy an House XX Deut. 6. here and several other places signifies the first Application and Addiction of any thing to Sacred Uses or to the Divine Service to which it had been designed and consecrated And this was done with some certain solemn
him in the fifth Month called Ab as St. Hierom notes from the Jews of the second Year after they came out of Egypt It is not certain upon what day but it is likely in the beginning of the Month which answers to the nineteenth of our July sent them from the Wilderness of Paran From Radesh-Barnea XXXII 8. I Deut. 19 20. IX 23. XIV Josh 7. All those Men were heads of the Children of Israel So the Rulers of Thousands and Hundreds are called XVIII Exod. 25. as well as the Princes I Numb 16. But these were a lower sort of Heads or great Men in the several Tribes of Israel Ver. 4. And these are their Names Of the Tribe of Verse 4 Reuben Shammua the Son of Zaccur There is little to be observed concerning this Verse and those that follow to the XVIth but that it is evident these were not the same Men who in the first Chapter of this Book are called the Heads and Princes of the Tribes being inferiour Persons who ruled over some part not over a whole Tribe The three first Tribes also that are here mentioned sprang from the three eldest Sons for Levi did not make a Tribe in Israel of Jacob But in the Enumeration of the rest there is not any Order observed of which I can give an account Perhaps they being to disperse themselves when they entred the Country they were to search see verse 22. and thinking it not prudent to go above two at the most in company cast Lots who should be associated And the first Lot fell to those of the Tribe of Reuben and Simeon the next to those of Judah and Issachar and so to the rest Verse 11 Ver. 11. Of the Tribe of Joseph i. e. Of the other Branch of Joseph's Family viz. of the Tribe of Manasseh as it here follows Verse 16 Ver. 16. These are the Names of the Men that Moses sent to spy out the Land He would have their Names remembred which is the reason of this Remark for the sake of those two worthy Men Caleb and Joshua whose Vertue was very illustrious in the midst of a crooked and perverse Generation And Moses called Oshea the Son of Nun. So he is called v. 8. being named for the Tribe of Ephraim Jehoshua He was called by this name presently after they came out of Egypt XVII Exod. 9. when he went to fight with Amalek Whom he having overcome Moses lookt upon it as a Token that he should save and deliver the People of Israel and then called him by this Name Which imports some thing more than Oshea for that denotes only a Prayer for Salvation as Menochius observes but this carries in it a Promise of it And some think the addition of the first Letter in the name Jehoshua was from the name of JEHOVAH Implying that the LORD would imploy him in leading and conducting his People into the Land of Promise Wherein he was a Type of the Saviour of the World the LORD JESUS whose Name is the same with this who conducts those that believe on him to an Heavenly Inheritance If I could find the like comfortable Signification in the rest of the Names of these Men I should think there might be some ground for their Opinion who fancy Moses chose Joshua because there was a good Omen in his very Name For all Nations took great care that no Man should be imployed in Affairs of moment whose Names carry any unlucky Signification in them So Cicero observes in his first Book of Divination that the Generals of Armies and the Censors took care that none should so much as lead the Sacrifices to the Altar but who were bonis Nominibus of Names that signified Good Of which the Consuls also were very observant ut primus miles fiat bono nomine that the first Souldier whom they listed should be of a good Name such as Valerius Salvius Statorius or the like On the contrary the Name of Naevius was deemed so bad that in his Oration pro Quinct Sext. he saith having named the Man methinks I have said enough Ver. 17. And Moses sent them to spy out the Land and Verse 17 said unto them That is when he sent them to spy out the Land as was said in the foregoing Verse he gave them the following Directions Get ye up this way Southward This South-part of Canaan fell afterward to be part of the Lot of the Tribe of Judah XV Josh 1 2 3. and was very dry and consequently barren I Judg. 15. and therefore fittest for their entrance to spy out the Land unobserved being less inhabited than the better parts of the Country Besides it was nearest to the place where they now were encamped And go up into the Mountain Where the Amorites dwelt I Deut. 19. together with some Amalekites and other People XIV 43 45. From whence they were to go down into the Valleys Verse 18 Ver. 18. And see the Land what it is and the People that dwell therein These are the general Directions which he gave them to inform themselves both of the Country and of its Inhabitants Whether they be strong or weak few or many In particular with respect to the latter he directs them to inform themselves whether the Inhabitants were strong bodied or feeble and whether their number was great or small Verse 19 Ver. 19. And what the Land is that they dwell in whether it be good or bad And with respect to the former he would have them bring an account first what sort of Country it was whether healthful and delightful or unwholesome and unpleasant And what Cities there be that they dwell in And then how large their Cities were and of what strength Whether in Tents or in strong Holds Whether they lived in Tents as the Arabians did and the Israelites while they were in the Wilderness or in Houses and whether they were fortified Or rather as we would say in our Language whether in open Villages or in walled Cities For so the word Mahanaim signifies not Tents as we here translate it but Hosts or Camps XXXII Gen. 1. and here Towns without Walls as the LXX interprets it And the Vulgar Verse 20 also only inverting the order of the words whether in walled Towns or without walls Ver. 20. And what the Land is c. And last of all what is the Soil of the Country whether rich and fertile or poor and barren and also whether it be a woody Country or otherwise And be ye of good courage and bring of the fruit of the Land In which Discoveries there being some hazard he bids them be confident God would preserve them so that they might venture to bring away with them some of the Fruit which the Country produced Now the time was the time of the first ripe Grapes Towards the Vintage Ver. 21. So they went up and searched the Land Verse 21 from the Wilderness of Zin Which was on the South of the Land of Canaan XXXIV
the whole number of Males descended from Kohath compare this with III. 28. there was a fourth part and better that were fit for Service Ver. 37. These were they that were numbred of the Families of the Kohathites all that might do Service in the Tabernacle Such Service as is particularly mentioned from v. 4. to v. 16. Verse 37 Ver. 38. And these are they that were numbred of the Verse 38 Sons of Gershon c. He proceeds in the same order to number them which he observed in giving them their Charge beginning with the Children of the second Son of Levi and then going back to the eldest Ver. 39. From thirty years old and upward c. Verse 39 This Verse is the very same with 35. Ver. 40. Two thousand and six hundred and thirty Verse 40 A third part and little more of their Males were fit for Service Compare this with III. 22. Ver. 41. These are they that were numbred of the Families Verse 41 of the Sons of Gershon of all that might do Service in the Tabernacle c. Such Service as is described from v. 24. to v. 29. Ver. 42 43. These two Verses are the same with Verse 42. 43. v. 38 39. Ver. 44. Even those that were numbred of them after Verse 44 their Families were three thousand and two hundred It is very remarkable the Descendants from the youngest Son of Levi III. 17. which had the fewest Males in it of a Month old and upward had the most robust Men fit for Service For here are above half compare this with III. 34. of the whole number of Males grown up to Thirty Years of Age. Which was a singular Providence the heaviest Burden lying upon them who were to carry the Boards c. of the Tabernacle Not indeed upon their shoulders but in Waggons which they were to load after they had taken them down and unload when they were to set them up again and for that reason had more Waggons allowed them than their Brethren the Gershonites VII 7 8. Verse 45 Ver. 45. These are those c. whom Moses and Aaron numbred Who were principally employed in this business According to the Word of the LORD by the hand of Moses To whom the Command is expresly directed v. 21. Verse 46 Ver. 46. All those that were numbred of the Levites whom Moses and Aaron and the Chief of Israel numbred For they took in others to their assistance v. 34. which is here repeated to show that there was no fraud in the business there being Witnesses of every Tribe that they proceeded impartially and did not favour the Levites who were their Brethren Verse 47 Ver. 47. Every one that came to do the Service of the Ministry and the Service of the Burden in the Tabernacle c. The first of these the Service of the Ministry one would think related to their serving the Priest when the Tabernacle was standing and the later the Service of the Burden to their carrying the Tabernacle when it was taken down and removed and so I expounded those words v. 24. But he mentioning here only those that were numbred from Thirty Years old I think upon further consideration that there is no regard in these Expressions to the Service they did to the Priests in the Tabernacle unto which they were admitted at Twenty five Years old See v. 3. but only to the Service mentioned here in this Chapter which relates altogether to the taking down and carrying the Tabernacle And therefore these must be lookt upon as two Phrases for the same thing the former of which is not exactly translated for there is nothing of Ministry in the Hebrew but the words are Every one that cometh to serve the Service of the Service and the Service of the Burden or Carriage For it is the same word which being joyned with work we translate servile XXIII Lev. 7. and other places Ver. 48. Eight thousand and five hundred and fourscore Verse 48 If the three Sums mentioned v. 36 40 44. be put together they amount exactly to this Sum in the whole Ver. 49. According to the Commandment of the Verse 49 LORD they were numbred by the hand of Moses By the assistance of Aaron and others v. I 34 46. Every one according to his Service and according to his Burden I observed before v. 47. that Service and Burden are two Expressions of the same thing For though the Sons of Kohath had the noblest part of the Work yet their Employment is called both a Service and a Burden v. 19. as that of the Gershonites is v. 24. For which Service all the Tithes of the Country of Canaan were given to them and continued to be theirs when this kind of Service ceased as it did when the Temple was built For then there were no Burdens to be carried on their shoulders as Josiah speaks 2 Chron. XXXV 3. but their Duty was changed even by David before the Building of the Temple who made them Singers and Keepers of the Treasury as well as Porters at the Gates of God's House and likewise Judges and other Officers in the Country as we read in 1 Chron. XXVI But the alteration in their Service made no alteration in the Wages allotted to them for they still enjoyed all the Tithes Thus were they numbred of him as the LORD commanded Moses This is so often repeated v. 37 41 45. that all Posterity might reverence these Ordinances as Divine Institutions and not merely Humane Appointments And so we are to look upon all these Laws as wise Orders made by the Soveraign of the World for the better Government of that People whom he had taken for his own peculiar And it argues a very profane Spirit in those as Conr. Pellicanus here observes who can admire and praise Ovid de Fastis and such like Books and have no regard at all if they do not ridicule them to these Sacred Writings which are of such venerable Antiquity CHAP. V. Chapter V Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses saying It is not said when this was spoken which here follows but it 's likely immediately after the foregoing Commandments upon which it hath some dependance Verse 2 Ver. 2. Command the Children of Israel that they put out of the Camp every Leper and every one that hath an Issue and whosoever is defiled by the dead There were three Camps as Maimonides and a great many other mentioned by Mr. Selden observes L. II. de Synedr cap. I. n. 5. the Camp of the SCHECHINAH or of the LORD viz. the Sanctuary with its Courts which are called the Tents of the LORD 1 Chron. XXXI 2. And next the Camp of the Levites who with Aaron and his Sons made a Camp about the Tabernacle Chapter III. of this Book and then the Camp of Israel Chapter II. which incompassed them all Answerable to these when the Temple was built they reckoned the Temple it self from the East-Gate to be the Camp of
the Head of the House of their Fathers should bring these Rods. Their Names we have in the first Chapter of this Book v. 5 6. and VII 2 12 c. Twelve Rods. Besides Aaron's for so many Tribes there were besides that of Levi. And too great a number of every Tribe in all likelyhood had joyned with Korah in their discontended Murmurings at the confinement of the Priesthood unto Aaron's Family alone to which they all fansied they had as much right as he Which is the reason of taking a Rod from every Tribe that they might all be convinced that none of them but he and his Family alone were owned by God for his Priests See XVI 3. Write thou every Man's name upon his Rod. Either by an Incision into the very Wood or with such Ink as they wrote withal in those days V. 22. This he did in the Presence of the Princes that they might not afterward suspect any Fraud when they came to take their Rods again but be satisfied they were the very same which they saw noted with their Names Ver. 3. And thou shalt write Aaron's name upon the Verse 3 Rod of Levi. Because God had made him the Prince of that Tribe by giving him the High-Priesthood And he would have them see that as no other Person in any of the Twelve Tribes so no other Levite ought to pretend unto that high Office which he had invested him withal and him alone For one Rod shall be for the Head of the House of their Fathers One Rod was sufficient because the Head of the Tribe comprehended the whole Tribe Who were all excluded from the Priesthood by the Exclusion of him who represented them Verse 4 Ver. 4. And thou shalt lay them up in the Tabernacle In the most Holy Place Before the Testimony i. e. Before the Ark called in many Places the Ark of the Testimony XL Exod. 3. because therein Moses put the Testimony or two Tables of Stone and the Mercy Seat above it v. 20 21. where the Divine Glory resided Therefore to lay the Rods before the Testimony was to lay them before the Divine Majesty who intended by them finally to determine the present Controversie Where I will meet with you There he promised to meet with Moses XXV Exod. 22. by whom he communicated his Mind unto the People For he neither met with them nor with Aaron there any other way but by Moses And therefore the Vulgar Latin here translates it minding the sence rather than the words Where I will speak to them And so the LXX By which I will be made known to thee there And indeed meeting with them here is nothing but declaring or making known his Mind to them all by what was done there upon Aaron's Rod. So it follows in the next verse And for this reason the Tabernacle of the LORD is called OHEL MOED the Tabernacle of Meeting not of Mens meeting there as is commonly supposed by our translating it The Tabernacle of the Congregation but of God's meeting there with Men. For so the LORD himself gives the reason of the Name both here and in XXIX Exod. 42. XXX 36. where I have noted the same out of Mr. Mede Ver. 5. And it shall come to pass that the Man's Rod whom I shall choose shall blossom The Rods being laid before me I will tell you whom I have chosen to minister to me in the Priesthood by making the Verse 5 Rod upon which his Name is written to blossom when all the rest remain as they were before without any Alteration This was a kind of new choice as the words import whereby God confirmed the choice he had formerly made of Aaron to be High-Priest And I will make to cease from me the Murmurings of the Children of Israel whereby they murmur against you And hereby stop all their Mouths from murmuring any more about this matter unless they will oppose me directly who declare before-hand how I intend to give Judgment in this Case and put an end to this Dispute Ver. 6. And Moses spake unto the Children of Israel Verse 6 Told them what God had said that they might be all consenting to this way of Decision And every one of their Princes gave him a Rod apiece For they could not refuse such a fair Proposal For each Prince one according to their Fathers Houses even twelve Rods. Observing herein the Commands of Moses who wrote no doubt every Man's Name upon his Rod as he was also commanded v. 2. And the Rod of Aaron was among their Rods. Not one of the twelve as the Jews fancy but besides the twelve Rods for the twelve Tribes as was directed v. 2. and obeyed by them as the foregoing words tell us his Rod was put among them with his Name upon it as their Names were upon their Rods. And therefore the Vulgar translates it having regard to the sence only There were twelve Rods besides the Rod of Aaron Which the LXX intended in their Translation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Rod of Aaron in the midst of their Rods. And if it were cut from the very same Tree with theirs the Miracle became the more remarkable Verse 7 Ver. 7. And Moses laid up the Rods before the LORD Who was by them to declare his choice v. 5. In the Tabernacle of Witness In that part of the Tabernacle where the Ark was which had in it the Witness or Testimony which God gave Moses XXV Exod. 21. who alone could go into that place Verse 8 Ver. 8. And it came to pass that on the morrow It is likely God told him he would ●orthwith show whom he had chosen Moses went into the Tabernacle of Witness The most Holy Place where the Rods were laid up by God's order And behold the Rod of Aaron Which had his Name written on it For the House of Levi. Or To the House of Levi i. e. whom God had made Head of the Levites Was budded and brought forth Buds and blossomed Blossoms and yielded Almonds In some places of the Rod I suppose there was an appearance of Buds coming forth in others the Buds were fully thrust out and in others they were opened and shot forth into Blossoms and those Blossoms in other parts knotted and grown into Almonds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as Gregory Nyssen speaks in the Life of Moses p. 185. The greatest Miracle even in the judgment of Unbelievers who now acknowledged that which before they opposed v. 12 13. For that in one Night a dry Stick as some suppose them all to have been should produce Buds and Flowers and Fruit when all the rest which perhaps were cut from the same Tree were as dry as they were before could not but be very amazing and unless they would shut their eyes make them see the distinction which the LORD made between Aaron whose Name that Rod bare and all the rest of the Children of Israel whom the other Rods represented The Heathen did
thou redeem See XIII Exod. 13. XXXIV 20. Verse 16 Ver. 16. And those that are to be redeemed Viz. Of the First-born of Men mentioned before not of unclean Creatures which were to be redeemed by a Lamb XIII Exod. 13. and that after they were eight Days old XXII Exod. 30. From a Month old shalt thou redeem Then the Money was due but they commonly staid till the fortieth Day when the Woman was purified According to thy estimation Some think this relates not to what follows that the Priest should set a value upon them for that was a set rate five Shekels for every one but to what goes before that after a Child was a Month old the Priest should appoint a day for the payment of the Redemption-money either immediately after the Women had lain in a Month or on the fortieth Day that she might be Purified and the Child redeemed both together But it rather refers to what follows for though the price be determined yet so it is in another case XXVII Lev. 3 4. and notwithstanding is said to be by the estimation of the Priest because he was to take this Money not according to the quality of the Person but as much of a poor Man as of a rich and not more of a rich Man than of a poor For the Money of five Shekels c. Which was the price set upon the First-born when they were exchanged for the Levites III. 46 47. This Redemption of every First-born was a matter of great Importance and therefore so often mentioned as a very learned Friend of mine Dr. Alix observes in his Reflections on the four last Books of Moses Chap. 3. For as the Separation of the Tribe of Levi to God's Service instead of the First-born whom God spared and preserved in Egypt of which we read in the third Chapter of this Book made every Levite become a living Memorial of that great Miracle wrought at the Israelites going out of Egypt so this Law concerning the Redemption of the First-born made a further impression upon their Minds of that mighty Hand of God which compelled Pharaoh to let the Isaelites depart out of his Country Ver. 17. But the firstling of a Cow or of a Sheep or Verse 17 a Goat thou shalt not redeem For they were clean Creatures and only unclean Beasts were to be Redeemed v. 15. They are holy Separated by my appointment for an holy use viz. to be offered in Sacrifice not redeemed or put to any other use Thou shalt sprinkle their Blood upon the Altar and burn their fat c. Just as they did with their Peace-offerings VII Lev. 31 33. Ver. 18. And the flesh of them shall be thine The Verse 18 whole Body of the Beasts not merely some part of them after the Fat was burnt became the Priests intirely As the Wave-breast and the Heave-right-shoulder are thine As these parts of the Peace-offerings were the Priests See v. 11. so that all their Family who were clean might eat of the Flesh of these Firstlings as they did of those parts of the Peace-offerings Verse 19 Ver. 19. All the Heave-offerings of the holy things which the Children of Israel offer unto the LORD He repeats what he had said in the beginning of this Discourse v. 8. that he had given him all the Heave-offerings which comprehend those mentioned VI. 19 20. Have I given thee and thy Sons and thy Daughters with thee by a Statute for ever Settled upon the Priests and their whole Family for their Support by an unalterable Law See v. 11. It is a Covenant of Salt for ever before the LORD unto thee c. i. e. An everlasting Covenant never to be revoked See upon II Lev. 13. And these things being to be eaten before the LORD there was a place in the Court of the Women where they feasted upon them as L'Empereur observes upon Middoth cap. 2. sect 6. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And the LORD spake unto Aaron saying See v. 1. Thou shalt have no Inheritance in their Land i. e. In the Land of the Children of Israel whom he speaks of in the foregoing verse Where having told him what reward he and his Family should have for his Service he bids them be satisfied therewith and not expect any more And indeed it was so very liberal a Provision that their desires could not reasonably extend any further For as they had two sorts of First-fruits as I observed v. 12. so after a Tythe of that which was given to the Levites there was another Tythe of what remained to be spent in sacrificing at Jerusalem that is for the most part upon the Priests and Levites unto whom and unto the Poor it wholly belonged every third Year XIV Deut. 22 28. XXIII Exod. 19. XXXIV 20. Add hereunto the First-born all the Sin-offerings and their share in the Peace-offerings and the Skins of the Sacrifices which alone as Philo observes was a great Revenue and it will appear it could not be so little as a fifth part of the Fruit of the Country that came to the Priests for their Maintenance as Mr. Thorndike observes in the Rights of the Church in a Christian State p. 211. Neither shalt thou have any part among them When the Land was divided no fields or Vine-yards c. were to be given to the Priests or to any of the Tribe of Levi. And as the Jewish Doctors say they were to have no part among their Brethren in the Spoil So Jarchi upon this place and Maimonides and others who indeavour to answer the Objection which may be raised against this from the XXXIst Chapter of this very Book v. 28 29. Where a Tribute was taken of the Prey they got from the Midianites and given to Eleazar and the Levites This Tribute say they was offered because the Spoil came by executing God's Vengeance upon a Land that was not theirs XXV 17. But of the Land of Sihon and Og which God bestowed upon them as he did the Land of Canaan nothing was given to the Priests and Levites for they were admonished to the contrary as they understand them by these words Neither shalt thou have any part among them no not of the Spoil Certain it is that of the Land of the Country they were to have no part God having otherwise provided for them that they might attend wholly to his Service and not spend their time in Tilling the Ground or feeding Cattle which would have taken up their Thoughts very much from their Sacred Employment Yet the Levites had certain Cities and their Suburbs assigned to them XXXV 2 c. which was executed by Joshua as God commanded XXI Josh 2 3. whereby they were dispersed among the Tribes of Israel that they might the better instruct the People in the Divine Law XXXIII Deut. 10. 2. Chron. XXX 22. II Malachi 4 5 c. By accident also the Priests came to have some Land See XXVII Lev. 20 c. and my Notes there I
am thy part and thine inheritance among the Children of Israel For they were maintained in his House and lived upon his Altar and fed from his Table as it is explained in XIII Josh 14. The Sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance as he said unto them Which is given as the reason why Joshua gave them no Inheritance And see v. 33. of that Chapter where the LORD God of Israel is said to be their Inheritance Who it appears by the foregoing part of this Chapter and other places made such an ample Provision for them that if he had given them any part of the Land of Canaan together with it there had been too great an inequality between them and the rest of the Tribes of Israel For without any share in the Land their Portion was far richer than that of any other Persons whatsoever I have said enough to prove this already but it may not be amiss to set it before the Reader again a little more distinstly As they had yearly the First-fruits of the whole Country which was at least the sixtieth part of the Fruits it produced and the tenth part of the Tithe given to the Levites as it follows below v. 26. and all Free-will-offerings together with the Money which arose out of Persons and Things devoted unto God and all the Firstlings of Cows Sheep and Goats and the Redemption-Money for the Firstlings of such Creatures as were unclean So they had all the Meat-offerings Offerings for Sin and Trespass-offerings together with the Breast and Shoulder of all Peace-offerings and the Skins of all Burnt-offerings and the Loaves made of the first Dough and the Shew-bread and as Josephus and others expound XVIII Deut. 3. a considerable part of every beast that was killed for private use besides the Cities and Land about them which were assigned to the Levites Which if well weighed there will appear a vast difference between the Priests and the rest of the People For the First-fruits alone if they were not less than the sixtieth part of the product of the Country might seem sufficient especially if the Firstlings be added the Priests not being the sixtieth part of the People no nor the hundred part as learned Men have computed See Bonfrerius Ver. 21. And behold Now he gives the Levites Verse 21 notice of the Recompence he would make them for their Service as he had told the Priests what they should have for theirs And Aaron hath the delivery of this Grant made to them from God that they might see he did not mind himself and the Interest of his own Family only I have given the Children of Levi all the tenth in Israel See XXVII Lev. 30. and 2 Chron. XXXI 5 6. where they are distinctly mentioned Aben-Ezra thinks the tenth rather than any other part was assigned because it was a perfect Number Ten being in simple Numbers the highest to which we can arise without repeating the Numbers under it For it is as he speaks the beginning of the second Combination and the end of the first whereupon all Numbers do depend Which our Mr. Mede hath expressed in my judgment far better who looks upon it as God's favourable dealing with men in requiring but the Tenth which is in truth the least part of their Goods according to the first Division For when we proceed beyond Ten we begin to make a new Division as Eleven is ten and one c. But we need not have recourse to such Niceties See upon Genesis XXVIII 22. For an Inheritance Instead of a share in the Land of Canaan which other Tribes had divided among them And a larger Inheritance this was than any other Tribe possessed for this was the smallest Tribe of all as appears by comparing the account which is given of them in the beginning of this Book For all the Males of this Tribe from a Month old and upward were but Two and twenty thousand III. 29. Whereas in the Tribe of Judah alone there were above Threescore and fourteen thousand Men of War I. 26 27. And yet the Levites had a tenth part of the product of the whole Country and the twelve Tribes had only the other nine parts among them Such a care had God of those who were peculiarly devoted to his Service For the Service which they serve c. As a Reward of their Service of which see Chapter IV. Verse 22 Ver. 22. Neither must the Children of Israel henceforth come nigh the Tabernacle of the Congregation Or rather Therefore the Children of Israel must not come nigh so as to perform any of the Offices belonging to the Priests and Levites who were appointed to do every thing belonging to the Service of God there and had their Reward for it also appointed Lest they bear sin and die Be punished with Death which is often threatned to such Presumption Ver. 23. But the Levites shall do the Service of the Verse 23 Tabernacle of the Congregation It was their work and no Bodies else and therefore no other Persons were to meddle with it That is they alone guarded the Tabernacle and afterwards the Temple opened the Gates of it kept out all Strangers i. e. all but Priests and Levites carried the Tabernacle and its Vessels when they were to be removed c. And they shall bear their Iniquity They shall die for it if they permit any one else to come there and do their work See v. 1. It shall be a Statute for ever throughout their Generations that among the Children of Israel they have no Inheritance As all other Persons were excluded from serving in the Tabernacle so they who served there were shut out from having any Inheritance among their Brethren This was made an unalterable Law which provided another separate Maintenance for them by the Tythes of all the Land as here it again follows Ver. 24. But the Tythes of the Children of Israel which Verse 24 they offer as an Heave-offering unto the LORD That the People might not grudge to pay them the Tythes for their Service he represents them as an Heave-offering which they offered to God in Gratitude to him of whom as the Supreme Landlord they held that Land Not that they were heaved up or waved before the LORD but they were of the same Nature with those things that were so offered to him i. e. Holy Things separate to his uses all which are called by this Name of Terumah v. 8. And particularly all the Offerings which God required to be freely brought for the building him a Sanctuary are called by this Name of Terumah or Heave-offering XXV Exod 2. See there I have given to the Levites to inherit The Israelites gave them to God and he gave them to the Levites for their Inheritance who had as much right to them as the other Tribes had to their Land Which was the reason he ordered they should have no Portion of the Land of Canaan with the other
Rabbah-Ammon i. e. the great City of the Ammonites For so we find in Stephanus de Vrbibus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Bochartus hath truly corrected it in his Preface to his Phaleg which he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For Ar as I said was the old Name of it II Deut. 29. XVI Isa 1. from whence came the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which it retained in later Ages And the Lords of the High-places of Arnon The Masters or Owners as the word Baale may be translated of the High-places c. i. e. those that dwell in the strongest Forts of the Country Or as some fancy the Priests of the Places are here meant or rather their Temple where Baal was worshipped For we find a place in this Country called Bamoth-Baal XIII Josh 17. The High-places of Baal And it is evident this Poet triumphs in this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over their Gods and their Religion as well as over them Verse 29 Ver. 29. Wo unto thee Moab He goes on to foretell the Calamity of the whole Country Thou art undone O People of Chemosh So he calls the Moabites who served as the Chaldee translates it or worshipped Chemosh as their God For so we read he was XLVIII Jerem. 7 13. 1 Kings XI 7. XI Judges 24. which St. Hierom thinks differs from Baal-Peor only in Name See Vossius de Orig. Progr Idolol Lib. II. cap. 8. Some take Chemosh to be Saturn particularly Scharastanius the manner of whose Worship see in Dr. Pocock's excellent Annotations in Specim Hist. Arab. p. 316. I shall only add That as the Moabites are called the People of Chemosh because they worshipped him as their God so the Israelites are called the People of the LORD and the People of God because they worshipped the LORD alone V Judges 11. 2 Sam XIV 13. For in the Days of Paganism as Mr. Mede observes every Country nay every City had their proper and peculiar Gods which were deemed as their Guardians and Protectors From whence the Nations themselves are expressed by the Name of their Gods That is evident from this place but it is not so plain that when God threatens to deliver up Israel to serve other Gods he means giving them up into the Hands of the People of strange Countries which he takes to be intended in IV Deut. 28. XXVIII 64. XVI Jerem. 16 c. See Book IV. p. 977. And so he thinks the words of David may be expounded 1 Sam. XXVI 19. They have driven me out this day from abiding in the Inheritance of the LORD saying Go serve other Gods i. e. banished me into the Country of Idolaters See Book III. p. 823. where this is more largely explained He hath given his Sons that escaped and his Daughters into Captivity unto Sihon King of the Amorites This is a manifest triumph over their god Chemosh who was not able to save his Worshippers whom he calls his Sons and his Daughters i. e. his Children who were under his Protection No he could not so much as preserve those that escaped the fury of the Sword but they were afterward taken Captive to make up part of the Triumph of Sihon King of the Amorites Ver. 30. We have shot at them Heshbon is perished Verse 30 even unto Dibon The Hebrew words vanniram abad Heshbon at h Dibon may as well if not better be translated their Light is perished or taken away from Heshbon unto Dibon So Forsterus in his Lexicon and the Tigurin Version and others That is their Glory is gone from one end of the Country to the other For Heshbon and Dibon were two famous places in this Territory XIII Josh 17. And some think this is the place called Dibon-Gad XXXIII 45. Which was the more noted because there Nebo one of their Gods was worshipped For in XV Isai 2. Dibon is mentioned as one of their High-places and there Nebo is lamented i. e. their God which was there worshipped When Hesychius saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which no doubt is this Dibon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Place where the Moabites had a Temple See Selden de diis Syris Syntagm 2. cap. 12. We have laid them waste even unto Nophah Another place in that Country as appears by the words following Which reacheth unto Medeba That is the Territories of Nophah extended as far as Medeba which was certainly a place in the Country of Moab XV Isai 2. But the word reacheth is not in the Hebrew and the words without it may be thus truly translated and as far as Medeba For so the Hebrew Particle ascher is sometimes used to signifie simply and as VI Eccles 12. ascher mi and who can tell c. So here ascher ad and unto c. And here I think fit to note That it is likely these Verses were some part of the History of those Countries For a Poetical way of writing was in use before Prose as Strabo tells us Lib. I. Geograph p. 18. where he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. All set or artificial Speech whether Historical or Rhetorical was but an imitation of Poetical Compositions the Ancients knowing no other Cadmus and Pherecydes and Hecataeus being the first who brought in this form of writing now in use See Salmasius in Solinum p. 841. and Cuperus in his Apotheosis Homeri p. 55. However this is certain that they who would instruct the People put their Lessons into Verse as Strabo there shows where he says p. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Ancients call Poetry the first Philosophy forming our Lives from tender years teaching good manners governing the passions and actions with pleasure For which cause the Greeks instituted their Children in their Cities by Poety 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not merely for the sake of bare delectation but to form them to sobriety Ver. 31. Thus Israel dwelt in the Land of the Amorites Verse 31 This he mentions again to make it the more observed that this was the Country of the Amorites into which the Children of Israel entred not of the Moabites who had been expelled out of it as was notoriously known there being a Song in every Bodies mouth which continued the memory of it Ver. 32. And Moses sent to spy out Jaazer Another Verse 32 City formerly belonging to Moab but now in the possession of the Amorites Which the Israelites did not take at the first but after they had conquered all the Country before-mentioned they sent some Men to bring them Intelligence which way it was best to attack that City also and the Country about it It was not far from Mount Gilead 2 Sam. XXIV 5 6. 1 Chron. XXVI 31. and both of them were famous for good Pasture and therefore given to the Tribe of Reuben and Gad who had much Cattle XXXII of this Book 1 3 4 35 36. After the ten Tribes were carried Captive from their own Land
by above thirty seven thousand than they were at the last numbring See I. 23. Many of them it is probable being in the same Crime with Zimri and the Plague falling most heavily upon this Tribe whom Moses in the XXXIII Deuteronomy doth not bless Verse 15 16 17. Ver. 15 16 17. And the Children of Gad after their Families They are reckoned here next to the Simeonites because they lay encamped next to them under the Standard of Reuben II Numb 10 11 c. Of Zephon the Family of the Zephonites c. They are reckoned up in the same manner XLVI Gen. 16. only he that is here called Zephon is there called Ziphion and Osni is there called Ezbon and Arod called Arodi Verse 18 Ver. 18. These are the Families of the Children of Gad according to those that were numbred of them forty thousand and five hundred This Tribe also was less by above five thousand than before I. 25. Verse 19 Ver. 19. The Sons of Judah Er and Onan These were his eldest Sons but died without Issue before the Children of Israel went down into Egypt as it here follows See XXXVIII Gen. 1 2 c. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And the Sons of Judah after their Families were c. Now he reckons those of his Sons who made Families which were three as we read also XLVI Gen. 12. Ver. 21. And the Sons of Pharez were Hezron c. Here he numbers two of Judah's Grand-children as he did one of Reuben's v. 6. only with this difference that these two made Families in Israel which Verse 21 his Grand-son did not they being substituted instead of Er and Onan who died without Children Or rather the Family of Pharez growing very great there was a sub-division made of it into the other Families who were all still Pharezites for Pharez had no other Children but there two to make a Family of that Name but called by these two Names of Hesronites and Hamulites because the Pharezites were grown too big to be but one Family and therefore parted into two Ver. 22. These are the Families of Judah according Verse 22 to those that were numbred of them threescore and sixteen thousand and five hundred This Tribe was very numerous before above all the rest And now this new Generation which sprung up instead of the old who were all destroyed except Caleb exceeded them two thousand So faithful was God to his Promise that this should be a most powerful Tribe See I Numb 27. Ver. 23. The Sons of Issachar after their Families Verse 23 He and Zebulon are mentioned next because they lay encamped together under the Standard of Judah See II Numb 5 6 7. Of Tola the Family of the Tolaites A wonderful fruitful Family and very valiant there being of this one Family Twenty two thousand and six hundred Men in the days of David 1 Chron. VII 2. Of Pua the Family of the Punites He is called Phuvah XLVI Gen. 13. Ver. 24. Of Jashub Who is called Job in the same place Ver. 25. Threescore and four thousand and three hundred Verse 24 This Tribe also was exceedingly increased Verse 25 being near Ten thousand more now than they were at their first numbring I. 29. II. 6. Verse 26 Ver. 26. Of the Sons of Zebulun after their Families There is no change in their Names which are the same without any alteration as when they went into Egypt XLVI Gen. 14. Verse 27 Ver. 27. Those that were numbred of them threescore thousand and five hundred This Tribe likewise was increased above Three thousand since the former numbring See I. 31. And so the whole Camp of Judah was mightily augmented as that of Reuben was diminished Verse 28 Ver. 28. The Sons of Joseph after their Families See XLVI Gen. 20. Verse 29 Ver. 29. Of the Sons of Manasseh of Machir c. This was his only Son but those descended from him by an usual manner of speaking are called Manasseh's Sons also being his Grand-sons Some think indeed that Manasseh had other Sons which they gather from L Gen. 22. but if he had their Families were extinct for none but Machir and his Posterity had any Inheritance in the Land of Canaan XVII Josh 1 2. where the Grand-children are called his Children Machir begat Gilead and of Gilead came the Family of the Gileadites They were not a distinct Family from the Machirites but the very same Machir having no other Son but Gilead Therefore that Family which at first was called Machirites were afterwards called Gileadites or they were indifferently called either by the one or the other Ver. 30. These are the Sons of Gilead of Jeezer Called Abiezer XVII Josh 2. The Family of the Jeezreites c. The Posterity of Gilead grew so numerous that his Sons made Families Verse 30 and not only Housholds So that the name of Gileadites being too general to distinguish them all they were called at length by the name of his Sons Ver. 31 32. Of Asriel the Family of the Asrielites Verse 31 32. c. This and all the rest that follow are mentioned as the Son 's of Gilead for each of whose Children there was a Lot in the Land of Canaan XVII Josh 2. Ver. 33. And Zelophead the Son of Hepher had no Verse 33 Sons but Daughters c. Whose Case is considered in the next and in the last Chapter of this Book where they are ordered to have an Inheritance among their Father's Brethren but to marry into their own Tribe And their Posterity I suppose were called after their Grand-father's name Hepherites for such a Family there was as Moses tells us in the foregoing verse Ver. 34. Numbred of them fifty two thousand and Verse 34 seven hundred If this be compared with I. 35. it will appear that this Tribe was increased above Twenty thousand Which is the greatest Increase of any other and made good the Prophecy of Jacob concerning the Children of Joseph XLIX Gen. 22. Ver. 35. These are the Sons of Ephraim after their Verse 35 Families He is mentioned after Manesseh because he was his younger Brother yet in their Encampment this Tribe had the Standard under which Manasseh marched II Numb 18 c. Of Shuthelah the Family of the Shuthalites c. He is mentioned first also in 1 Chron. VII 20. Where the next Son Becher is called Bered and Tahan called Tahath For time is wont to make great Alterations in the names of Persons and Places Verse 36 Ver. 36. These are the Sons of Shuthelah of Eran the Family of the Eranites He had it seems but one Son whose Children after the usual manner of speaking before noted were called the Sons of Shuthelah though they made a distinct Family under the name of Eranites Verse 37 Ver. 37. Those that were numbred of them thirty two thousand and five hundred Though this proved a very numerous Tribe in future times yet for the present they were fewer by eight thousand than they were in the
in Egypt See this there explained And she bare unto Amram Aaron and Moses and Miriam their Sister Who seems to have been born before Moses if not before Aaron II Exod. 4. Ver. 60. And unto Aaron was born Nadab and Abihu Eleazar and Ithamar VI Exod. 23. where he tells the name of their Mother Ver. 61. And Nadab and Abihu died when they offered Verse 60 strange Fire before the LORD See X Lev. 2. Verse 61 and the third Chapter of this Book v. 4. But Eleazar who was the eldest next to them was now alive and made High-Priest and it is likely Ithamar also being under Twenty years old when the People murmured upon the Report of the Spies and so not cut off with that wicked Generation XVI 29. All this is here recounted to show that the Tribe of Levi was preserved by the blessing of God as well as the rest of the Israelites though they were to have no Inheritance in the Land of Canaan Ver. 62. And those that were numbred of them were Verse 62 twenty and three thousand c. So they were a thousand more than at the last numbring III. 39. For they were not numbred among the Children of Israel But by themselves for the reason following Because there was no Inheritance given them among the Children of Israel For God was their Inheritance as he told them XVIII 20 c. And therefore they were ordered not to be numbred Thirty eight years ago no more than now I Numb 49 c. The Jews are something curious in their Observations upon these words among or in the midst of the Children of Israel from whence they conclude that the Levites might have Lands out of the Bounds of the Land of Canaan though not within it among their Brethren Ver. 63. These are they that were numbred by Mose● Verse 63 and Eleazar the Priest who numbred the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab c. By a special command of God v. 1 2 c. Ver. 64. But among these there was not a Man of them whom Moses and Aaron the Priest numbred when they numbred the Children of Israel in the Wilderness of Verse 64 Sinai See the first Chapter of this Book v. 1 2 c. so exactly were God's Threatnings fulfilled as well as his Promises Chapter XXVII Verse 65 Ver. 65. For the LORD had said of them they shall surely die in the Wilderness He had pronounced this irreversible Sentence upon the whole Congregation XIV 23 28 29. where he swears they should not enter into the Land of Canaan because they had brought or entertained an evil report of it See also II Deut. 14 15. And there was not left a Man of them save Caleb the Son of Jephunneh and Joshua the Son of Nun. Whom God promised to spare because they were of another Spirit XV. 24 30 38. And their survival was as remarkable an instance of the truth of God's word as the Death of all the rest CHAP. XXVII Verse 1 Ver. 1. THEN came the Daughters of Zelophehad the Son of Hepher c. Who are mentioned before XXVI 33. just as they are here only their Genealogy is here more fully set out that their Father was the Grandson of Manasseh the Son of Joseph from whom he was lineally descended but left no Sons behind him Now these young Women hearing Moses say as he doth in the foregoing Chapter that the LORD commanded the Land of Canaan should be divided among those that were now numbred and observing that only Males from Twenty years old were numbred v. 2. presently apprehended that they being Females were excluded from having any Inheritance among the Israelites and so the Family of the Hepherites XXVI 32. would be extinguished This was the ground of what follows Whereby it appears that every body was immediately acquainted with the Laws which Moses received from God and that there was a faithful Register kept of every one that was born in every Family and Tribe to prevent all Disputes about the true Heirs to Mens Estates Ver. 2. And they stood before Moses c. To represent Verse 2 before him and the rest of the Judges who were now assembled the Case which I have mentioned Before Moses and Eleazar the Priest and before the Princes and all the Congregation These made up the greatest Court of Judicature that at any time sate For by Princes are meant either the Heads of the Tribes or the highest of the Judges appointed XVIII Exod. called the Heads of the People v. 25. And by all the Congregation is meant the LXX Elders mentioned in this Book XI 24. For they are called col ha edah the whole Congregation and sometimes only Edah the Congregation as R. Solomon observes See Bertram de Republ. Jud. p. 72. Now at the Head of all these sat Moses and next to him Eleazar the Priest By the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation Near to which this august Assembly it is likely was wont to sit when they met together that Moses might presently if there were occasion go and consult with God himself in any difficult matter that came before them And thus Mr. Selden observes out of Maimonides that in future times the great Sanhedrim followed the Tabernacle sitting sometimes in one place sometimes in another according as that was settled As after they came to Canaan it was first at Shiloh then at Mizpeh and afterwards at Gilgal Nob Gibeon the House of Obed-Edom till at last it was fixed in Jerusalem Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 15. n. 4. As concerning that which the Talmudists say concerning the proceedings in this case of Zelophehad's Daughters nothing certain can be determined But they give this account of it That they first brought this Cause into the Courts appointed by the advice of Jethro XVIII Exod. 21. and began with the Rulers of ten who knowing not what to say to them they went to those of fifty and from thence to the Centurions and at last to the Chiliarchs None of which durst adventure to give Judgment but referred the Cause by reason of its difficulty to Moses who brought it to the SCHECHINAH as they speak i. e. to the Divine Majesty Seld. ib. cap. 16. n. 1. Verse 3 Ver. 3. Saying Our Father died in the Wilderness Among the rest mentioned v. 64 65. of the foregoing Chapter They seem to have drawn up their Cause in the form of a Petition or as Mr. Selden speaks in the Legal Phrase presented a Libel to the Court containing the intire matter of their Petition and that artificially enough And he was not one of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the Company of Korah They use the very words of Moses concerning that rebellious Company XVI 11. And instance in this Sin rather than any other either to show that their Father had a due regard to the Authority of Moses who they hoped therefore would be the more favourable to his Posterity or
two preceding verses I shall not here examine It is sufficient to note that Onkelos hath expressed the Hebrew Text word for word and the LXX do not depart from the sence of it Verse 10 Ver. 10. Even as the LORD commanded Moses so did the Daughters of Zelophehad Accordingly they followed this direction when they came into the Land of Canaan and had received their Portion there Now there being no such words added here as there are in other Cases this shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. much less a Statute of Judgment throughout your Generations XXXV 29. it led I conjecture the Talmudick Doctors into the fore-mentioned Opinion that this Law concerned only the present Generation Ver. 11. For Mahlah Tizzah and Hoglah and Verse 11 Milkah and Noah the Daughters of Zelophehad Thus they are called both in XXVI 33. XXVII 1. though they are not there mentioned in the same order for Tirzah is there named last who here is named in the second place Perhaps they are set down here in the order wherein they were disposed in Marriage and Tirzah who was the younger was married in the second place Were married unto their Fathers Brothers Sons For Hepher no doubt had other Sons besides Zelophehad who had Issue-male though Zelophehad had not What their Names were or how many of them we do not know but some suppose them to have been six one of which died in the Wilderness without Issue See Selden de Successionibus cap. 23. where he discourses at large of the Portion which fell to them in the Land of Canaan Ver. 12. And they were married into the Families Verse 12 c. In the Margin more exactly out of the Hebrew to some that were of the Families i. e. to one of the Families of Manasseh from whom several Families descended XXVI 29 c. And their Inheritance remained in the Tribe of the Family of their Father The word for Tribe signifies sometimes merely a Family in a Tribe And so the LXX as Grotius observes in the place before-named in this very business uses sometimes the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former of which signifies a part of a whole Tribe And thus Josephus also uses the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie a Family Mr. Selden hath the same Observation in his Book de Successionibus cap. 18. that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then it signifies not a Tribe but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 familiam cognationem seu genus sanguine proximum a Family a Kindred or those that are next in Blood But there is no need of these Observations if the words be translated as they may rightly and their Inheritance remained in the Tribe and the Family of their Father See v. 6. Verse 13 Ver. 13. These are the Commandments and the Judgments which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses to the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho He began to deliver the Precepts here intended at the XXVIth Chapter See v. 3. and continues them to this place By Commandments seem to be meant the Precepts about the Worship of God Chapt. XXVIII XXIX XXX and by Judgments the Civil Laws about dividing their Inheritances and regulating their Descent to their Posterity and establishing Cities of Refuge for Man-slayers which are expresly called a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. XXXV 29. Some other things are interspersed as God's Commandment to number the People which was in order to the assigning them their Inheritances proportionable to their Families to execute Judgment on the Midianites and to set down in Writing their Travels in the Wilderness of which I have given an account in their proper places FINIS By reason of the Distance of the Author these ERRATA have hapned which the Reader is desired to Correct Page 5. Line 7. read are reckoned Page 73. Line 29. r. See Levit. II. 15. Page 74. Line 22. r. were signs Page 82. Line 12. r. Rabboth Page 96. Line 4. r. aquatiles Line ult r. so that they might not Page 107. Line 13. r. other shoulder Page 110. Line 2. r. Chaskuni Page 123. Line 31. r. XL. Exod. Page 140. Line 30. r. may teach Page 152. Line 5. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 158. Line 31. r. Acropolis Page 163. Line 10. r. Choten Page 166. Line 31. r. the following story Page 167. Line 3. r. Rise up Page 171. Line 22. r. it is likely Page 190. Line 12. r. Setting forth the Praises Line 20. r. such credit Page 191. Line penult r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 195. Line 21. r. whose Presence Page 198. Line 1. r. kadim Page 201. Line 11. r. but besides that there is Line 12. r. and it is Page 210. Line 28. r. as were never bred Page 216. Line 18. r. not deigning to stay Page 221. Line 21. after July begin a new line Page 227. Line 2. r. Torquatus Page 228. Line 3 4. r. a stony place Page 241. Line 1. dele and that Page 251. Line 7. r. Bitter Line 31. r. Spirit with him Page 282. Line 1. r. The Man shall be Page 284. Line 31. r. And the Garment the Jews say in the Selvedge c. Page 284. Line 33. r. Talith Page 316. Line 19. r. it being broke out Page 332. Line 3. r. where as Page 333. Line 21. r. within the veil Page 335. Line 11. r. Zeback Page 358. Line 7. r. more fit to treat Page 367. Line 7. r. as we may call it Page 387. Line 26. r. Successors of Esau Page 402. Line 19. r. by way of apposition Page 404. Line 24. r. the words are Page 406. Line 30. r. Bootius Page 420. Line 6. r. from Arnon Page 426. Line 1. r. whence Hesychius Line 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 433. Line 18. r. Kosem Page 446. Line 9. r. proffer'd him Page 468. Line 9. r. per juga Page 469. Line 7. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 470. Line 15. r. Sepher Cosri Page 482. Line 2. r. Dei nutu Page 501. Line 4. r. Baal-Peor Line 26. r. were called Baalim Page 519. Line 30. r. are reckoned Page 523. Line 14. r. Zelophehad Page 532. Line penult r. who was born Page 539. Line 21. r. being but reason Page 555. Line ult r. pouring out upon Page 556. Line 4. r. Heliogabalus Page 564. Line 18. r. and so doth Page 598. Line 19. r. and what I have Page 618. Line 22. r. Jogbehah Page 634. Line 22. r. to have been places Page 635. Line 9. r. anciently called Abel-shittim Page 673. Line 14. r. XXXI XXXII 2. Books written by Symon Patrick D. D. now Lord Bishop of Ely and Printed for Richard Chiswell THe Parable of the Pilgrim written to a Friend The Sixth Edit 4 to 1681. Mensa Mystica Or a Discourse concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper In which